alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 23, 2013 of Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry Ulrich, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Jerry Ulrich                                        
| |  | Jerry Ulrich                                            
| |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                           
| |  | Date: May 14, 2013                                      

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, and Lemons, JJ., and Carrico and Stephenson, S.JJ.
MERRY CHRISTINE PEASE PER CURIAM v. Record No. 030081 October 31, 2003 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the trial court did not err in (1) failing to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds, (2) failing to disqualify the special prosecutor and to dismiss and quash the indictment, and (3) failing to set aside the jury verdict because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law. We have considered the questions, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 39 Va. App. 342, 573 S.E.2d 272 (2002), we will affirm its judgment. Affirmed

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  amended quarterly report of Castmor Resources Ltd. on
Form  10-Q  for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the Report), I, Fidel Thomas,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and Principal
Accounting  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.




Date: January 14, 2010                     By /s/ Fidel Thomas
                                              Fidel Thomas
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer, and
                                              Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit
        4.1

      


      


      


      


      


      October
        26, 2005

      


      Omicron
        Master Trust

      650
        Fifth
        Avenue

      24th
        Floor

      New
        York,
        New York

      USA
        10019

      Attention: Brian
        Daly

      


      


      Dear
        Sirs:

       

      
        	Re:	
                Generex Biotechnology
                  Corporation

                - Amendment to Jun 17 05
                  Warrant

              


      

       

      We
        make
        reference to the common stock purchase warrant issued by Generex Biotechnology
        Corporation (the “Company”)
        to
        Omicron Master Trust (“Omicron”)
        on
        June 17, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Omicron the entitlement
        to purchase up to 609,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.82 per
        share (the “Warrant”).

      


      The
        Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in the Warrant) of the Warrant
        is
        expressed therein as the 181st
        day
        after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
        of
        the exercise by Omicron of not less than 100% of the Warrant and the delivery
        to
        the Company of a Notice of Exercise in respect thereof on or before the close
        of
        business on October 27, 2005, the Company has agreed to abridge the Initial
        Exercise Date and to honor the aforementioned Notice of Exercise.

      


      Yours
        truly,

      


      Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      


      


      /s/
        Mark A. Fletcher

      


      Mark
        A.
        Fletcher

      Executive
        Vice-President, General Counsel

      maf:hs
Exhibit
31.2




Certification


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act




I, Robert
J. Eu, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Hambrecht Asia Acquisition Corp.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      August 12, 2009/s/ Robert J. EuName:    Robert
      J. EuTitle:      Chairman
      of the Board, Chief Financial Officer,
                Secretary
      and Director(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-506-006]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 25, 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) submitted supplemental information related to its proposed 
policy on partial capacity turnbacks.
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order on Compliance Filing dated April 25, 2001 in 
Docket Nos. RP00-506-003 and RP00-506-004.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14343 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register: July 2, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 127)]
[Notices]
[Page 40359]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jy04-41]


[[Page 40359]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee, Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(a), that the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committee
will conduct a public meeting on Wednesday July 21, 2004. The meeting
will take place in the first floor hearing room of the Commission's
Washington, DC, headquarters, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20581 from 2 to 5 p.m.
    The agenda will consist of the following:
    (1) Call to order and introductions
    (2) Review of trends in futures industry and oversight
    (3) Discussion of Federal speculative position limits for certain
agricultural commodities
    (4) Developments regarding various risk-management products for
producers
    (5) Other business
    (6) Discussion of future meetings and topics
    (7) Adjourn
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory
Committee, Commission Chairman James E. Newsome, is empowered to
conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate
the orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to
file a written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy
of the statement to the attention of: Agricultural Advisory Committee,
c/o Chairman James E. Newsome, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581,
before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral
statements should inform Chairman Newsome in writing at the foregoing
address at least three business days before the meeting. Reasonable
provision will be made, if time permits, for oral presentations of no
more than five minutes each in duration.
    For further information concerning this meeting, please contact
Marcia Blase at 202-418-5050.

    Dated: Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC, on June 28,
2004.
Jean A. Webb.
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-15092 Filed 7-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto de Luna, Appellant.

Submitted December 19, 2011;

decided January 5, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 433.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Patricia M. Newman, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annualreport on Form 10-K for the year ended October 29, 2005 of Westaff, Inc.

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 
| Date: March 7, 2006                   |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ Patricia M. Newman                |   |
| Patricia M. Newman                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Westaff, Inc.                         |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Calder, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 460]

— Judgment, *442Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered July 10, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

The imposition of mandatory surcharges and fees by way of court documents, but without mention in the court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, was lawful *(People v Guerrero,*12 NY3d 45 [2009]). Defendant’s argument that his plea was rendered involuntary by the court’s failure to mention the assessments during the plea allocution is without merit *(People v Hoti,*12 NY3d 742 [2009]).

Regardless of whether the written waiver of defendant’s right to appeal is valid, we perceive no basis to reduce the sentence. Concur—Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
**Chang
        G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.**
 **t** **2667 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH SUITE B** **t** **SAN DIEGO** **t** **CALIFORNIA 92108** **t**
 **t** **TELEPHONE (858)722-5953** **t** **FAX (858) 761-0341** **t** **FAX (858) 764-5480**
 **t** **E-MAIL** **changgpark@gmail.com** **** **t**


September
      11, 2008










*To
      Whom It May Concern:*







The
      firm
      of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of our report of September
      10,
      2008 on the reviewed condensed consolidated financial statements of Dot VN,
      Inc.
      and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2008, in any filings that are necessary now
      or
      in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.











Very
      truly yours,





/s/
      Chang
      G. Park


____________________________


Chang
      G.
      Park, CPA










**Member
      of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants**


**Registered
      with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board**
H. Res. 1083 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 23, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2314) to express the policy of the United States regarding 

the United States relationship with Native Hawaiians and to 

provide a process for the recognition by the United States of 

the Native Hawaiian governing entity. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 

bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; 

(2) the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in 

part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Abercrombie of Hawaii or his designee, which shall be in order 
2 

•HRES 1083 EH 

without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as 

read, and shall be separately debatable for 30 minutes equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; (3) 

the amendments to the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part B of the report of the Committee on 

Rules, each of which may be offered only by a Member designed in the report, shall be in order without intervention of 

any point of order except those arising under clause 10 of 

rule XXI, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 

debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent; and (4) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of an amendment printed 

in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, the Chair may postpone the question 

of adoption as though under clause 8 of rule XX. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

E.O.,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 233

- CV

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCM1157 )

MEMORAND U M OPINION

On September 12, 2019, G.O. filed a notice of appeal from a trial court judgment

terminating his parental rights issued on July 29, 2019. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Rule 26.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure sets out the timelines for perfecting

appeals in civil cases. Rule 26.1(b) specifies that the notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal

must be filed within 20 days after the judgment or order is signed. T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.1(b). Parental

termination order appeals are accelerated app eals. In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 925 (Tex. 2005).

The Court may grant an extension of time to file a late appeal if an appellant moves for

extra time within 15 days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.3.

However, the Court lacks jurisdiction to review trial court judgments or orders in accelerated cases

if a notice of appeal and motion for extension of time have not been filed by the 35th day. Cf

.2

Verbu r gt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)(appell ate court lacked jurisdiction where

appeal was filed outside the grace period provided for in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).

The 35th day following the trial court’s July 29, 2019 judgment was September 2, 2019.

Although Appellant filed a motio n for extension of time to file the notice of appeal, the notice of

appeal and motion were filed on September 12, after the grace period provided by Rule 26.3

expired. As such, we lack jurisdiction over this attempted appeal. Accord ingly, the appeal is

dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

September 25, 2019

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior J udge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raja M. Parvez, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William F. Weissman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Raja M. Parvez                                  
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Raja M. Parvez President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William F. Weissman                             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | William F. Weissman Chief Financial
Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                    |
|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date:    November 15, 2010  | /s/ William Elder       |
|                                                 | William Elder           |
|                                                 | Chief Executive Officer |

----