alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Perez, Appellant, v M. Hourihane, Respondent.

Submitted April 26, 2010;

decided June 17, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43924

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

LUCOUS L. INMAN

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 655

Filed: August 24, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Bonner County. Hon. Richard S. Christensen , District Judge.

Appeal from order revoking probation, dismissed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respond ent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Lucous L. Inman pled guilty to burglary , Idaho Code § 18

- 1401 . The district court

imposed a unified sentence of four years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year

, suspended the sentence and placed Inman on supervised probation. Subsequently, Inman

admitted to violating several terms of his probation

, and the district court revoked probation,

ordered execution of the underlying sentence, and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of

retained jurisdiction, the district court suspended the sentence and placed Inman on probation.

On appeal, “mindful of the fact that he has been subsequently returned to probation, ” Inman

continues to assert that the district court erred in revoking probation and retaining jurisdiction.2

A case becomes moot when the issues presented are no longer live or the defendant lacks

a legally cognizable interest in the outcome. Murphy v. Hunt

, 45 5 U.S. 478, 481 (1982);

Bradshaw v. State , 120 Idaho 429, 432, 816 P.2d 986, 989 (1991). Even where a question is

moot, there are three exceptions to the mootness doctrine: (1) when there is the possibility of

collateral legal consequences imposed on the person raising the issue; (2) when the challenged

conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition; and (3) when an

otherwise moot issue raises concerns of substantial public interest. State v. Barclay , 149 Idaho 6,

8, 232 P.3 d 327, 329 (2010). The only relief Inman has requested on appeal cannot be granted

because Inman has been placed back on probation. Therefore, any judicial relief from this Court

would have no effect on either party. See id.

Accordingly, Inman ’s a ppeal from the order revoking probation is dismissed.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                                 
|Mark R. Bachmann Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

April 9, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.6


                              GULF WEST BANKS, INC.
                         EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS PROGRAM


TERM:
Continuous with annual review by Board. The Board may revoke the bonus program
by making the revocation effective for the year immediately after the second
calendar year-end following the revocation.

ELIGIBILITY:
Only Executive officers are eligible, however, to receive any bonus the officer
must be employed by the Bank at the time the bonus is paid.



BONUS CALCULATION:
Bonus payment will be made upon achieving minimal target levels of return on
average equity. The return on average equity shall be computed by dividing the
net income for the calendar year, after subtracting the after tax provision for
any Stakeholder bonuses and Executive Bonuses, by the average equity (net
worth). Any bonus payouts per the schedule below shall be reduced as needed to
be able to pay Stakeholder bonuses and still maintain the scheduled return on
average assets. The average equity shall be computed by adding the equity at
January 1 of each year to the equity at month end during the year and dividing
by 13.The following schedule shall apply:

                                                                BONUS PAYMENT
                                                                    AS A
             RETURN ON                                              % OF
          AVERAGE EQUITY                                        ANNUAL SALARY
          --------------                                        -------------
                10%                                                  10%
                11%                                                  15%
                12%                                                  20%
                13%                                                  25%
                14%                                                  30%
                15%                                                  35%
                16%                                                  40%
                17%                                                  45%
            18% and over                                             50%
Exhibit 12.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Gérard Lamarche, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUEZ; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Reserved]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control of internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 28, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Wardle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Protosource Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer , including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small
business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting..

April 13, 2009

/s/ PETER WARDLE
----------------
Peter Wardle
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: December 20, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 244)]
[Notices]
[Page 76279]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20de06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, January 5, 2007.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9801 Filed 12-18-06; 11:32 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Garcia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 14, 2011














/s/ Armando Garcia


Armando Garcia,


President, Secretary & Treasurer


(principal executive and financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the amended quarterly report
of Castmor Resources Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfonso Quijada, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: January 19, 2012 | By /s/ John Allen                 
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                       | John Allen                        
|                       | President, Chief Executive Officer
|                       | Chief Financial Officer, and      
|                       | Principal Accounting Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of Baby Girl P. )

________________________________ )

)

N.P., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D20-1096

)

AMERICANKIDZ ADOPTION )

SERVICES, INC., )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 30, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Kimberly Todd, Judge.

Scott L. Robbins, Tampa, for Appellant.

Patrick B. Calcutt of Calcutt & Calcutt,

P.A., Americus, Georgia, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The NSF management officials having responsibility for the four advisory committees listed below have determined that renewing these groups for another two years is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C. 1861*et seq.*                     The committees will be renamed (the current name is in parenthesis). The committee number is to stay the same. This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.                

1. #1756—Proposal Review Panel for Earth Sciences (Earth Sciences Proposal Review Panel)

2. #1569—Proposal Review for Geosciences (Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences)

3. #1766—Proposal Review Panel for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences)

4. #1373—Advisory Panel for Integrative Activities (Special Emphasis Panel in Integrative Activities)

                    Authority for these Committees will expire on June 30, 2003, unless they are                           ( print page 30956)                        renewed. For more information, please contact Susanne Bolton, NSF, at (703) 292-7488.                

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-14502  Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Baxter Healthcare SA, and Baxter International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Deka Products Limited Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care North America, and Fresenius USA, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2011-1268.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 13, 2012.

David K. Callahan, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants Baxter Healthcare Corporation *956et al. With him on the brief were Jessica C. Kaiser, Michael I. Cohen and Rachel N. Farrington. Maureen K. Toohey, Toohey Law Group LLC, of Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellant Deka Products Limited Partnership.

Juanita R. Brooks, Fish & Richardson P.C. of San Diego, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief was Michael E. Florey, of Minneapolis, MN.

PROST, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE NETWORK 
CONNECTION, INC. FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>      
<S>                             		<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   		YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,000,000
<SECURITIES>                                   495,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,026,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                   220,792
<INVENTORY>                                  1,108,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,541,303
<PP&E>                                       2,786,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                 627,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,792,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,777,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,037
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,753,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,792,599
<SALES>                                      4,092,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,092,023
<CGS>                                        3,050,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,016,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,252,899) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,252,899) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.14) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.14) 
        

        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: January 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 13)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3340]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ja99-118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Voting by Interested Members of Self-Regulatory Organization
Governing Boards and Committees

Correction

    In rule document 98-34516, beginning on page 16, in the issue of
Monday, January 4, 1999, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 16, in the first column, under the heading I.
Introduction, in the second line, ``5a(1)(17)'' should read
``5a(a)(17)''.


Sec. 1.69  [Corrected]

    2. On page 23, in the second column, in Sec. 1.69(a)(8), in the
first line, ``8 (Significant action)'' should read ``(8) Significant
action''.
[FR Doc. C8-34516 Filed 1-20-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX ========**

----