alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Quincy Lamont SALLIEY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 11-4413.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.

*288Gerald C. Ruter, The Law Office of Gerald C. Ruter, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Benjamin M. Block, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quincy Lamont Salliey pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). The parties further agreed, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(C), to a sentence of 204 months’ imprisonment, which Salliey ultimately received. On appeal, Salliey argues that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary. We affirm.

Salliey did not move to withdraw his guilty plea below; we therefore review the adequacy of the plea for plain error. *United States v. Massenburg,*564 F.3d 337, 342 (4th Cir.2009). To establish plain error, Salliey “must show: (1) an error was made; (2) the error is plain; and (3) the error affects substantial rights.” *Id.*at 342-43. Even if such error is found, it is within this court’s discretion to notice the error, and we do so “only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *Id.*at 343 (internal quotation marks omitted).

We evaluate a guilty plea based on “the totality of the circumstances” surrounding the guilty plea. *United States v. Moussaoui,*591 F.3d 263, 278 (4th Cir.2010). A properly conducted Rule 11 colloquy creates a “strong presumption” that a plea of guilty was taken appropriately and is “final and binding.” *United States v. Lambey,*974 F.2d 1389, 1394 (4th Cir.1992) (en banc). “Solemn declarations in open court carry a strong presumption of verity. The subsequent presentation of conclusory allegations unsupported by specifics is subject to summary dismissal, as are contentions that in the face of the record are wholly incredible.” *Blackledge v. Allison,*431 U.S. 63, 74, 97 S.Ct. 1621, 52 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977).

Here, the totality of the circumstances establishes that Sallie/s guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Amendment to Lease of Facilities



 Studio Tarchini 
 6928 Manno

  

			
	 	 	 NAIE
 Centro Galleria
 6928 Manno


  
 Manno, September 15, 2005 
  
 Lease of space nr. 10 – 1st floor Centro Galleria 1 
  
 Dear Mr. Petrini, 
  
 As agreed with Mr. Silvio Tarchini during the meeting on Sept. 02, 2005 we take good note of your request to anticipate to Oct. 1, 2005 in place of January 1, 2006 the lease of space nr. 10 –
1st floor Galleria 1 (highlighted in yellow in the attached map). 
  
 As per your request, the surface will be enlarged with additional 39.34 sqm (highlighted in
green on the attached map). 
  
 Therefore, the new yearly lease of space 10 of
globally 564.19 sqm. is CHF 70’500,- / VAT excluded, with a first payment on October 1, 2005. 
  
 All the other clauses are as per the lease contract dated May 9, 2005. 
  
 Best regards, 
  

	
	Silvio Tarchini


  

	
	For acceptance
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janice Clarke, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Date:  March 31, 2011


/s/  Janice ClarkeJanice ClarkeChief Financial Officer
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **3** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Chicago Board of Trade          (CBT)** |
|--|--------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 4/12/01 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF SIZE: | 71 KB | PDF LINK: | foicf0104 |
|-------|--|---------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|-----------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **National Futures          Association (NFA)** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 4/11/01 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 4 | PDF SIZE: | 138 KB | PDF LINK: | foicf0104 |
|-------|--|---------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|--------|-----------|-----------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Futures Industry          Association (FIA)** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 4/9/01 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 9 | PDF SIZE: | 366 KB | PDF LINK: | foicf0104 |
|-------|--|--------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|--------|-----------|-----------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last

�
```

[Federal Register: August 16, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 42998]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16au01-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, September 28, 2001.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-20733 Filed 8-14-01; 11:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
exv10w11



 






Exhibit 10.11




Carl B. Webb Compensation Arrangement




     On October 24, 2005, the Compensation Committee of Triad Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) agreed to compensate Mr. Carl B. Webb for his work as interim President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Webb assumed this role in August 2005 and will be paid
a monthly salary of approximately $41,666. Mr. Webb will be employed on an “at will” basis and
there is no written employment agreement.
#### VICTOR TALKING MACH. CO. v. STRAUSS et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

June 28, 1909.)

Patents (§ 328*) — Infringement—Gramophones.

An injunction granted against infringement of the Berliner patent, No. 534,543, for improvements in talking machines.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Dee. Dig. § 328.*]

In Equity.

Horace Petit, for complainant.

Edmond E. Wise, for defendants.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Manifestly complainant is entitled to the ordinary injunction against infringement of claims 5 and 35 of the Berliner patent. What defendants may do with the infringing discs they now own is a question to be dealt with when it arises. If they ship them abroad, and sell them after they get there, it would be difficult to see how they would infringe. If they find some one who owns and uses a mechanical feed device, they would run the risk, upon selling to him, of his putting them to an infringing use to which they would have contributed. If they wish to test their right to sell a licensee of the complainant, they might do so by selling a single disc to him, notifying complainant promptly of such sale. Then the text of the license would be before the court, and the question could be disposed of understandingly. In the event of adverse decision under such circumstances, the court would surely not impose more than a nominal fine.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Damien Warren, Respondent.

Submitted February 21, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 36.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Michael L. D’Amico, Esq., 484 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
```

[Federal Register: February 20, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 34)]
[Notices]
[Page 7910]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20fe04-22]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, March 5, 2004.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-3785 Filed 2-18-04; 9:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135521 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

ROBERT S. BECK,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 135521 Justices 

 COA: 277384 

WCAC: 05-000279 

TGM BROADBAND CABLE SERVICES and 

ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

TGM BROADBAND CABLE SERVICES and 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND (PERMANENT & 

TOTAL DISABILITY PROVISIONS), 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1204 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1204

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 24, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4899) making emergency supplemental 
appropriations for disaster relief and summer jobs for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
23.1





Chang
G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.


t 2667
CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH SUITE B t SAN
DIEGO t
CALIFORNIA 92108 t


t
TELEPHONE (858)722-5953 t FAX
(858) 761-0341  t FAX
(858) 764-5480


t
E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com t







March
17, 2009




To
Whom It May Concern:





The firm
of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of our report of March 17, 2009
on the reviewed condensed consolidated financial statements of Dot VN, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009, in any filings that are necessary now or in
the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.





Very
truly yours,





/s/Chang
      G. Park


Chang G.
Park, CPA





Member
of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants


Registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
```

[Federal Register: March 3, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr98-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, March 26, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-5616 Filed 2-27-98; 3:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7697

ROMAN R. BRYANT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-930-5-3F)

Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 7, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roman R. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roman R. Bryant appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bryant v. North Carolina, No. CA98-930-5-3F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 539. No. 540.

#### Callaghan et al. *v.*Reconstruction Finance Corp.; and Stitt *v.*Same.

December 9, 1935.

*Mr. Percival E. Jackson*for petitioner in No. 539.

*Mr. Theodore Stitt, pro se.*

*Solicitor General Reed*for respondent.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
No. 76-5924.

#### Bressler *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Frank Cecil CANNON, Appellant v. Mary SABOL, Warden of York County Prison.

No. 10-1592.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 May 26, 2010.

Opinion filed June 7, 2010.

Frank Cecil Cannon, York, PA, pro se.

Melissa A. Swauger, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellee.

Before: SLOVITER, AMBRO and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Frank Cannon appeals the District Court’s order denying his petition for ha-beas corpus. For the reasons below, we will affirm.

The procedural history of this case and the details of Cannon’s claims are well known to the parties and need not be discussed at length. Briefly, Cannon filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argued that when he was admitted into the county prison, an intake counselor wrote down that Cannon was a pagan and not a Hebrew Israelite. He contended that he was not allowed to participate in Hebrew activities, which denied his rights under the First Amendment. He requested that the District Court grant the writ and enjoin respondents from violating his rights. The District Court denied the petition without prejudice to Cannon presenting his claims in a properly filed civil rights complaint. Cannon filed a timely notice of appeal, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We agree with the District Court that Cannon’s claims concerning his participation in religious activities at the prison do not lie at the “core of habeas” and, therefore, are not cognizable in a § 2241 petition. *See Leamer v. Fauver,*288 F.3d 532, 542-44 (3d Cir.2002). None of his claims challenges the fact or length of his sentence or confinement. *See Preiser v. Rodriguez,*411 U.S. 475, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973).

Summary action is appropriate if there is no substantial question presented in the appeal. *See*Third Circuit LAR 27.4. For the above reasons, as well as those set forth by the District Court, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s order. *See*Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6.
Ex-10.2



 






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT, made the 17th day of August, 2005, by CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the
“Company”), a North Carolina corporation with its principal office at Concord, North
Carolina, and Michael R. Coltrane (“Employee”), an employee of the Company.



WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have previously entered into a Change in Control
Agreement dated October 1, 1997 (the “Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide that any Compensation
payable to the Employee under the terms of the Agreement shall be paid in the form of a
single lump sum.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms contained herein, the Employee’s
employment with the Company, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee agree that the
Agreement shall be and hereby is amended by deleting Section IA and substituting therefor
the following:



“A. If a Change in Control (as defined in Section IA(iii) hereof) occurs and if, within
two years following the Change in Control, the employment of the Employee is terminated (A)
by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in Section IA(i) hereof), or (B) by the
Employee for Good Reason (as defined in Section IA(ii) hereof), an amount equal to the
Employee’s Compensation (as defined in Section IA(iv) hereof), less applicable withholdings,
for a period of thirty-five months, shall be paid by the Company to the Employee in a single
lump sum within 30 days of termination of the Employee’s employment under circumstances
entitling the Employee to Compensation hereunder.”



Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto effective as
of the day and year first above stated.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ RICHARD L. GARNER, JR.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Richard L. Garner, Jr.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ MICHAEL R. COLTRANE
	 	(Seal)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Michael R. Coltrane
	 	 






38
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Urban Barns Foods Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacob Benne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 21st day of June, 2010.





/s/  Jacob Benne


Jacob Benne


Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: November 6, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 215)]
[Notices]
[Page 62776]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06no03-36]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Technology Advisory Committee Second Renewal

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew
for a period of two years its Technology Advisory Committee. The
Commission has determined that the renewal of the advisory committee is
in the public interest in connection with duties imposed on the
Commission by the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq., as
amended.
    The purpose of the Technology Advisory Committee is to advise the
Commission on the impact and implications of technological innovation
in the financial services and commodity markets. Meetings of the
Technology Advisory Committee are public.
    Interested presons may obtain information or make comments by
writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 31, 2003, by the Commission.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-27910 Filed 11-5-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```