alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: February 22, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 8683-8684]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22fe00-31]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Global Markets Advisory Committee, Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, Sec. 10(a), that the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission's Global Markets Advisory Committee
(``GMAC'') will conduct a public meeting on March 9, 2000, in the first
floor hearing room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, DC,
headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and last
until 4:00 p.m. The Agenda will consist of the following:

Agenda

    1. Introductory Remarks by Commissioner Barbara Pedersen Holum,
Chairman, GMAC.

[[Page 8684]]

    2. Presentation and discussion of recommended initiatives to
harmonize international financial regulation governing segregation
of customer funds.
    3. Presentation and discussion of recommended amendments for
rules governing secured amount balances.
    4. Consideration and discussion of rule amendments and related
initiatives to harmonize international regulatory treatment of
institutional customers.
    5. New business.

    The GMAC was created by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations on the many
complex and novel issues raised be the ever-increasing globalization of
futures markets. The purposes and objectives of the GMAC are more fully
set forth in its charter.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the GMAC,
Commissioner Barbara Pedersen Holum, is empowered to conduct the
meeting in a fashion that will, in her judgment, facilitate the orderly
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a
statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the
statement to the attention of: Global Markets Advisory Committee,  c/o
Commissioner Barbara Pedersen Holum, Commodity Futures Trading
Commission. Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington
D.C. 20581, before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make
oral statements should also inform Commissioner Holum in writing at the
foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting.
Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral
presentation of no more than five minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on February 16, 2000.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-4098 Filed 2-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patricia Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Asia Atlantic Resources on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Atlantic Resources.    /s/ Patricia Cooke Patricia Cook President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  March 13, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form 
S-8 No. 333-39795) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee 
Stock Purchase Plan and Non-Plan Option Grants of Megabios Corp., of our 
report dated July 31, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of 
Megabios Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended 
June 30, 1998.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
October 1, 1998
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 4, 2011
    
    /s/ Michael D. Devlin

Michael D. DevlinPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 4, 2011
    
    /s/ Guy Hackney

Guy HackneyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier LINARES-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50175

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public *22Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Linares-Lopez (Linares) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to illegal reentry of a previously deported alien, arguing that his sentence is greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and therefore unreasonable. Specifically, he contends that U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not empirically based and his sentence is greater than necessary because the Sentencing Guidelines account for a prior conviction both to increase his offense level and to calculate his criminal history score. He also argues that the guidelines range did not properly account for his personal history and characteristics, including his motive for reentering.

Linares’s empirical data argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 378, 175 L.Ed.2d 231 (2009); *see also United States v. Mondragour-Santiago,*564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 192, 175 L.Ed.2d 120 (2009). We have also previously rejected the argument that the double counting of a defendant’s criminal history necessarily renders a sentence unreasonable. *See Duarte,*569 F.3d at 529-31; *see also*U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment.(n.6).

Linares’s disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the § 3553(a) factors does not suffice to show error in connection with his sentence. *See United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir.2008). Linares has not shown that his sentence was unreasonable, and he has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to his within-guidelines sentence. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554-55 (5th Cir.2006). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Alonzo KEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of; Aiken City Police Department; Badge 450 Phillip S. Miano; Badge 545 Mathew Barnwell; Badge 520 Cpl Spann; Badge 159 Cpl Smith; Cpl Eagerton, Officers of Aiken Department of Public Safety, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-7295.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Key seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendants State of South Carolina and Aiken Police Department without prejudice from Key’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. *252§ 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Key seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Key’s motion for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
H. Res. 1015 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 19, 2010. 

Whereas the Penn State Nittany Lions continued a 102 

match winning streak, the longest Division I women’s 

streak, to win the 2009 NCAA Division I women’s 

volleyball championship; 

Whereas head coach Russ Rose has 1,001 wins to his name, 

all of which have come at the helm of the Penn State 

program; 

Whereas the Penn State women’s volleyball team has won 65 

consecutive Big Ten matches and owns the top 3 winning 

streaks in league history; 

Whereas Megan Hodge, Alisha Glass, and juniors Blair 

Brown and Arielle Wilson were named AVCA First Team 

All-Americans and Megan Hodge was the 2009 ESPN 

the Magazine Academic All-American of the Year; 

Whereas the Nittany Lions women’s volleyball team has won 

74 straight home matches and the program also owns the 

NCAA’s longest road winning streak at 50 straight 

matches; 

Whereas the Nittany Lions women’s volleyball team has 

amassed at least 20 wins 33 times; and 

Whereas the athletic excellence demonstrated by the Penn 

State women’s volleyball team is one example of the ath-
2 

•HRES 1015 EH 

letic, academic, and collegiate excellence of Penn State’s 

students, faculty, administration, and alumni: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Penn State women’s volleyball 

team and the university’s athletes, coaches, faculty, students, and alumni on the winning of the 2009 NCAA 

Division I women’s volleyball championship; and 

(2) recognizes Penn State for its recognized excellence as an institution of higher education. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: September 24, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 185)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51124]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24se98-145]



[[Page 51124]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Orders Eligible for Post-execution Allocation

Correction

    In rule document 98-22933 beginning on page 45699, in the issue of
Thursday, August 27, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 45699, in the first column, under the heading FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, in the fourth line, "Anderson" should
read Andresen".
    2. On page 45699, in the first column, under the heading Table of
Contents, in the ninth line, "1.35(a-1)" should read "1.35(a-
1)(5)(i)".
    3. On page 45699, in the second column, in the 16th line, "1.35(a-
1)(5)(iii)" should read "1.35(a-1)(5)(ii)".
    4. On page 45700, in the second column, under the heading
II.Amendments to Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1), in the third line,
"Orders eligible for post-execution allocation," should read "Orders
eligible for post-execution allocation".
    5. On page 45700, in the second column, under the heading  II.
Amendments to Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1), in the 19th line, "as"
should read "a".
    6. On page 45700, in the third column, in the second full
paragraph, in the tenth line, "ere" should read "were".
    7. On page 45702, in the second column, in the first full
paragraph, in the 11th line from the bottom, "section" should read
"Section".
    8. On page 45702, in the second column, in paragraph (b)(i),
"manager," should read "manager;".
    9. On page 45702, in the third column, in paragraph (b)(v), in the
sixth line, "order," should read "order;".
    10. On page 45702, in the third column, in paragraph (b)(vi) , in
the second line, "person." should read "persons.".
    11. On page 45702, in the third column, in the fourth paragraph, in
the eighth line, "bounded" should read "bunched".
    12. On page 45703, in the third column, under heading  D.
Disclosure Final Regulation 1.35(a-1)(5)(iii), in the third line,
"writing" should read "writing,".
    13. On page 45703, in the third column, in the 7th line from the
bottom, "MFA" should read "MFA,".
    14. On page 45704, in the second column, in the second paragraph,
in the first line, "In" should read "The".
    15. On page 45704, in the second column, under the heading, 2.
Comments Received, in the ninth line, "provided" should read
"provide".
    16. On page 45704, in the second column, in the footnotes, in the
eighth line from the bottom, "Goldman," should read "Goldman.".
    17. On page 45706, in the third column, in the footnotes, in the
tenth line from the bottom, "and or" should read "and of".
    18. On page 45709, in the second column, in the second full
paragraph, in the first line, "1.35(a-" should read "1.35 (a-1)(5)
generally applies to large users of the market. It".
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

----

**======== RETURN    TO INDEX ========**

----
### NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00 204

- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

RAUL LONGORIA , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 319 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garz a

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Raul Longoria , attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated
robbery. The trial court has certified that this A is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant
has NO right of appeal. @ See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On Ma rch 28 , 2012 , this Court notified appellant = s counsel of the trial court = s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

ap pellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel = s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.

On April 18, 2012, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel = s response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that
appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an a ppeal must be

dismissed if the trial court = s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are d ismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed 26th day of April , 20 12

.
# C_2010343EN.01001201.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/12

---

Special report to the European Parliament made in accordance with Article 3(7) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman (1)

1

2010/C 343/06

The European Ombudsman addressed one special report to the European Parliament in 2010:

Special report of 24 February 2010 following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 676/2008/RT.

The text of the special report is available on the European Ombudsman's website at: http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| CS 30403 |
| 67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 388172313 |
| Fax +33 388179062 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403

67001 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Tel. +33 388172313

Fax +33 388179062

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---

(1)  Decision 94/262 of 9 March 1994 of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman's Duties, OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, in connection with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure                                                                
|Date                |  |  |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
10.56




EXTENSION
AGREEMENT





This
EXTENSION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made as
of the 3rd day of
December, 2009, is entered into by and between Thomas Johnson, an individual
(“Lender”) and
Dot VN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Borrower").





Recitals




A.
            Borrower made, executed and
      delivered to the order of Lender one certain Corporate Promissory Note
      (“Note”) dated September 12, 2009, in
      the principal sum of $18,000.00 with interest payable at the rate of 10%
      per annum, which Note is due and payable onDecember 12, 2009 (the
      “Due Date”).




B.
            Borrower and Lender desire to
      further modify the terms of the
Note.




NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:





Agreement




1.           The
Due Date of the Note is extended to February 28, 2010, at which time the entire
amount of principal plus interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum
from September 12, 2009, shall be due and payable in full.




2.           Except
as provided herein, the terms and provisions of the Note shall remain unchanged
and shall remain in full force and effect.  The Note as modified and
amended hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects.




3.           This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts.  All such
counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument,
but in making proof hereof it shall only be necessary to produce one such
counterpart.




4.           The
terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and
assigns.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the respective dates of
acknowledgment but is effective as of the date first above written.





“BORROWER”
            
            “LENDER”DOT
      VN, INC.
            
            THOMAS
      JOHNSON/s/  Lee
      Johnson
            
            /s/  Thomas
      JohnsonBy:
            Lee
      Johnson
            
            By:
            Thomas
      JohnsonIts:
            CEO
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

~xqqrsqrsr|{
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Managed        Funds Associations (MFA)** |
|--|----------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 6/14/00 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF        SIZE: | 39        KB | PDF        LINK: | foicf0015 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|-----------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Paloma        Partners Company L.L.C.** |
|--|--------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 6/12/00 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF        SIZE: | 56        KB | PDF        LINK: | foicf0015 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|-----------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
    Previous
Next
Last