alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofEverest Resources Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Gary Sidhu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 13thday of February, 2008.

GARY SIDHUGary SidhuChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
































---
#### Joseph JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Special Agent Josh FLORELL; Officer Steve Parshall; Officer Mark Sletta; Officer Andy Stender; City of Minneapolis; David Steinkamp, Appellees.

No. 07-1459.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 5, 2008.

Filed: Sept. 15, 2008.

Joseph Johnson, Memphis, TN, pro se. Warden-WI, Oxford, WI, for Appellant.

P. Kenneth Kohnstamm, Attorney General’s Office, St. Paul, MN, Cheryl Lynne Fundingsland, Patricia R. Cangemi, City Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal and grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Johnson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. *See Federer v. Gephardt,*363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir.2004) (de novo standard of review for Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); *Anderson v. Larson,*327 F.3d 762, 767 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo standard of review for grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the reports and recommenda-lions of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the report of Emo Capital Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending
April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang, Chief Executive
Officer,Director, Principal Financial Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350),
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Juanming Fang

Juanming Fang,

Chief Executive Officer
Director
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: August 8, 2011
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Pacific Blue Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Franklin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Joel Franklin By: Joel Franklin Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 17, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wentworth VII, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kevin R. Keating
              Kevin
      R. Keating
              Principal
      Executive Officer
              Principal
      Financial Officer
              May
      11, 2009
**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**






In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kraig
      Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., for the Quarter ending September 30, 2007 I, Kim
      Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
      that:






1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended September 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,
      Inc.






Date:
        November 14, 2007
  */s/ Kim
        Thompson*
 Kim
        Thompson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
#### Florindo PABLO-BAUTISTA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-70256.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008 *.

Filed Sept. 5, 2008.

Douglas D. Nelson, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

CAS-District Direct, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Minick, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., David J. Stander, U.S. Dept, of Justice-Criminal Division, Organized Crime & Racketeering Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*560Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Florindo Pablo-Bautista, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Where, as here, the BIA adopts and affirms the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions. *See Nuru v. Gonzales,*404 F.3d 1207, 1215 (9th Cir.2005). We review for substantial evidence, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the petition.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Pablo-Bautista has shown extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5); *see also Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 657 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Pablo-Bautista’s asylum claim.1

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal because Pablo-Bautista failed to establish either past persecution or a clear probability of persecution on account of a protected ground. *See Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002). Pablo-Bautista’s experiences do not compel the conclusion that he has established a pattern of persecution based on his family membership. *See Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS,*937 F.2d 411, 414 (9th Cir.1991). Moreover, Pablo-Bautista failed to establish a nexus to an imputed political opinion, because he did not show his alleged persecutors knew or assumed he held a particular political belief. *See Molina-Estrada,*293 F.3d at 1094-95; *Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*232 F.3d 1024, 1030 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Because Pablo-Bautista is ineligible for asylum, we do not review his contention that he is entitled to humanitarian asylum.
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4433]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-49]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, February 13, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2346 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: September 8, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 173)]
[Notices]
[Page 53349]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08se05-36]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Wednesday, September 21, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Derivatives Clearing Organization Review.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-17901 Filed 9-6-05; 11:08 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1877. HAMMONS et al. v. GEORGIA TITLE SOURCE, LLC et al.

The appellees sued the appellants for misappropriation of confidential and

proprietary information. The appellants answered the complaint and filed

counterclaims. The trial court conducted a bench trial and entered an order that

resolved the case except for the issue of attorney fees under OCGA § 13-6-11. On

that issue, the court directed the appellees to present an application for fees and costs

within 10 days, which they did. The appellate record contains no ruling on the fee

application. The appellants filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s bench-trial

order, and the appeal was docketed here. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Because the trial court had not resolved the issue of OCGA § 13-6-11 attorney

fees, the case was pending below when the appellants filed the notice of appeal.

Sotter v. Stephens, 291 Ga. 79, 83-84 (727 SE2d 484) (2012) (“[I]f the judgment

reservesthe issue of attorney fees under OCGA § 13-6-11, then one cannot claim that

the case is no longer pending in the court below as required by OCGA § 5-6-34 (a)

(1).”) (punctuation omitted). The appellants were required to follow the interlocutory

appeal procedures to appeal the trial court’s order. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b);

CitiFinancial Svcs. v. Holland, 310 Ga. App. 480, 481 (713 SE2d 678) (2011). 

The fact that the trial court granted the appellees injunctive relief, ordering the

appellantsto return all property of the appellees, does not alter thisresult because the

appellants do not challenge the grant of that relief. Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 46-

47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017) (applying issue-raised-on-appealrule to find that appellant

should have filed an application for discretionary review instead of a notice of direct

appeal). See also Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Assn., 271 Ga. 745, 747 (2) (524 SE2d

February 06, 2019
464) (1999) (determining whether an action is an equity case for purposes of

appellate jurisdiction “depends upon the issue raised on appeal, not upon how the

case is styled nor upon the kinds of relief which may be sought by the complaint”)

(punctuation omitted).

The appellants’ failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives

us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/06/2019
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan
K. Bedford, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of,
and for the period covered by, the Report.







By:
            /s/ Bryan
      K. BedfordPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardMarch
      16, 2010







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **4** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Schulte        Roth & Zabel** |
|--|--------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 2/9/94 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 |
|-------|--------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **5** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **American        Bar Association, Section of Business Law** |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 3/28/94 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 4 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
```

[Federal Register: March 3, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr98-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, March 6, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-5619 Filed 2-27-98; 3:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DEVRA G. SHAPIRODevra G. ShapiroChief Financial Officer


Date: July 26, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raja M. Parvez, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William F. Weissman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Raja M. Parvez                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Raja M. Parvez President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |    
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ William F. Weissman                             
|                     |  |     |  | William F. Weissman Chief Financial
Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1110

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Tenn 500L - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Tenn 500L

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.