alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 11, 2009



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RONALD E. TERRY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2626

[ November 21, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 501990CF013336AXXXMB

.

Ronald E. Terry, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-Q of China Infrastructure Construction Corporation
for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
his capacity as an officer of the company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the company.




Date:
      January 14, 2010/s/
      Rong YangRong
      YangPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)/s/ Yiru
      ShiYiru
      ShiChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial and accounting
officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.2



 






Exhibit 10.2




Seventh Extension Agreement




This Seventh Extension Agreement is dated as of September 29, 2005 between Tollgrade
Communications, Inc., having an address at 493 Nixon Road, Cheswick, PA 15024 (“Tollgrade”) and
Dictaphone Corporation, acting through its Electronic Manufacturing Services Division, with an
address at 3900 W. Sarno Rd., Melbourne, FL 32934 (“Dictaphone”).



WHEREAS, Tollgrade (as successor in interest to Acterna Corporation) and Dictaphone are
parties to a Supply Agreement dated July 25, 2002, which sets forth the terms pursuant to which
Dictaphone manufactures and supplies to Tollgrade, and Tollgrade purchases from Dictaphone, certain
products (the “Supply Agreement”);



WHEREAS, the Supply Agreement was initially scheduled to expire on July 24, 2004, and has been
successively extended through September 30, 2005;



WHEREAS, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to replace the Supply Agreement with a new supply
agreement, but have not yet completed negotiations with respect to such new supply agreement; and



WHEREAS, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to further extend the term of the Supply Agreement
through December 31, 2005 or until a new supply agreement is executed, if sooner;



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and for other good and
valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:



1. Extension of Supply Agreement. The parties hereby agree that the Supply Agreement
is hereby extended through December 31, 2005 or until such time as the parties execute a new supply
agreement, if sooner.



2. Miscellaneous. Except as extended hereby, the provisions of the Supply Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect. This Seventh Extension Agreement will be governed in all
respects by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without reference to any choice of law
provisions. This Seventh Extension Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by
the different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be
deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	 	 	 	DICTAPHONE CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer M. Reinke
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ James Davis	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Jennifer M. Reinke
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	James Davis	 	 
	Title:

	 	Assistant Secretary
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Sr. V.P., Operations	 	 






46
EXHIBIT 10.1

                               ENZO BIOCHEM, INC.

                  SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

CASH COMPENSATION
<TABLE>
<S>      <C>                                                             <C>
         Annual Fee:
                  Lead Independent Director                              $50,000 per year
                  All Other Non-Employee Directors                       $20,000 per year

         Meetings of the Board of Directors (telephonic or in person):

                  Lead Independent Director                              $2,000 per meeting
                  All Other Non-Employee Directors                       $2,000 per meeting

         Meetings of Board Committees (telephonic or in person):

                  Lead Independent Director                              $1,500 per meeting
                  Audit Committee Chair                                  $2,000 per meeting
                  Other Audit Committee Members                          $1,000 per meeting
                  Compensation Committee Chair                           $1,500 per meeting
                  Other Compensation Committee Members                   $1,000 per meeting
                  Nominating/Governance Committee Chair                  $1,500 per meeting
                  Other Nominating/Governance Committee Members          $1,000 per meeting
</TABLE>
EQUITY COMPENSATION

         Subject to limits in the Company's 2005 Equity  Compensation  Incentive
Plan,  the  Compensation  Committee  has the  discretion  to determine the form,
amount  and  terms of equity  incentive  awards  under the plan to  non-employee
directors.  The Lead Independent  Director will receive 10,000  restricted stock
units immediately following the date of the next annual meeting of the Company's
shareholders,  provided  such  person is a director of the Company at such time.
All other  non-employee  directors  will receive  5,000  restricted  stock units
immediately  following  the date of the next  annual  meeting  of the  Company's
shareholders,  provided  such  person is a director of the Company at such time.
Each of the  restricted  stock  units  referred  to above  shall be subject to a
two-year  vesting period;  provided that at the time any  non-employee  director
ceases to be a director of the Company, such non-employee  director's restricted
stock units shall become fully vested at such time. Such  restricted  stock unit
grants will be made in lieu of the  automatic  annual  stock  option  grants the
non-employee  directors  would have received at such time under the terms of the
Company's 2005 Equity Compensation Incentive Plan.

OTHER INFORMATION

         Non-employee directors' compensation is paid based on an August to July
annual  period.  The Company  reimburses  directors for their travel and related
expenses in  connection  with  attending  meetings of the Board of Directors and
Board-related activities.
S07Y0644.

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT N. WILSON, JR.

(642 SE2d 806)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board which recommends that Respondent Robert N. Wilson, Jr.’s license be suspended pursuant to Rule 9.4 (b) (1) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). This disciplinary action arises out of Wilson’s having assented to the April 20, 2006 suspension of his law license in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a disciplinary sanction for unspecified misconduct.

Because Wilson acknowledged service of the Notice of Reciprocal Discipline but did not object in any way, this Court hereby accepts the recommendation of the Review Panel and orders that Wilson be suspended until he notifies and provides appropriate proof to the Review Panel that he has been reinstated to the practice of law in Massachusetts. Wilson is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Suspended.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*783Decided March 26, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1060 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1060

Congratulating Frank Buckles, America's last surviving WWI veteran, on 
                his 109th birthday on February 1, 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2010

  Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Faleomavaega, and Mr. Barrett of 
South Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Frank Buckles, America's last surviving WWI veteran, on 
                his 109th birthday on February 1, 2010.

Whereas Frank Buckles was born on a family farm in Harrison County, Missouri, in 
        1901;
Whereas after several rejections, Buckles eluded a recruiter about his young age 
        and enlisted in the Army when he was 16 years old;
Whereas Buckles deployed with his fellow doughboys to the tune of America's 
        best-known WWI song, ``Over There'', on the Carpathia, the ship that 
        rescued the only survivors of the Titanic;
Whereas Buckles served as a motorcycle driver for dignitaries, an ambulance 
        driver, and a prison guard while serving for the American Expeditionary 
        Forces;
Whereas Buckles returned to the United States in 1920 as a corporal;
Whereas, while working as an assistant purser of the Western World steamship for 
        the American President Lines, Buckles was captured by the Japanese as a 
        civilian and became a prisoner of war during World War II;
Whereas for 39 months Buckles survived on meager rations consisting of beans, 
        rice, and worm-filled mush until his rescue by the 11th Airborne 
        Division of the Army on February 23, 1945, the same day he was scheduled 
        to be executed;
Whereas after fighting in two world wars, Buckles settled in West Virginia as a 
        farmer where his family ancestry dates back to the 1700s and where he 
        worked the farm until the age of 102;
Whereas Buckles dedicated his life so that other WWI veterans will be 
        remembered; and
Whereas his story embodies the self-sacrifice and patriotism that is at the very 
        core of what it means to be an American: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Frank 
Buckles, America's last surviving WWI veteran, on his 109th birthday on 
February 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Wardle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Protosource Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer , including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small
business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting..

March 31, 2008

/s/ PETER WARDLE
Peter Wardle
Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 1190 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 18, 2010. 

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time through 

the calendar day of March 21, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
            4.3

          


          


          


          


          


          October
            26, 2005

          


          Cranshire
            Capital, L.P.

          666
            Dundee Road

          Suite
            1901

          Northbrook,
            Illinois

          USA
            60062

          Attention: Mitchell
            P. Kopin

          


          


          Dear
            Sirs:

          
             

            
              	Re:	
                      Generex Biotechnology
                        Corporation

                      - Amendment to Jun 17 05
                        Warrant

                    


            



          
            We
              make
              reference to the common stock purchase warrant issued by Generex Biotechnology
              Corporation (the “Company”)
              to
              Cranshire Capital, L.P. (“Cranshire”)
              on
              June 17, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Cranshire the
              entitlement
              to purchase up to 609,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.82 per
              share (the “Warrant”).

          

          


          The
            Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in the Warrant) of the
            Warrant is
            expressed therein as the 181st
            day
            after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
            of
            the exercise by Cranshire of not less than 100% of the Warrant and the
            delivery
            to the Company of a Notice of Exercise in respect thereof on or before
            the close
            of business on October 27, 2005, the Company has agreed to abridge the
            Initial
            Exercise Date and to honor the aforementioned Notice of Exercise.

          


          Yours
            truly,

          


          Generex
            Biotechnology Corporation

          


          


          /s/
            Mark A. Fletcher

          


          Mark
            A.
            Fletcher

          Executive
            Vice-President, General Counsel

          maf:hs
#### Joan ELIZABETH, aka Joan Aarestad, aka Joan Elizabeth Aarestad, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, individually and as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-55640.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*697Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2012.

Joan Elizabeth, Pasadena, CA, pro se.

Scott H. Christensen, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, Washington, DC, Rita M. Haeusler, Esquire, Alex Edwin Spjute, Esquire, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michelle Ognibene, Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Arlington, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joan Elizabeth appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in her action challenging the FDIC’s deposit insurance determination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Elizabeth has been refunded the entire uninsured deposit amount that her action sought to recover, in accordance with a change in federal law after the district court issued its judgment. Because there is no longer a live issue or controversy and no effective relief can be granted, we must dismiss the appeal as moot. *See Church of Scientology v. United States,*506 U.S. 9, 12, 118 S.Ct. 447, 121 L.Ed.2d 813 (1992) (“[I]f an event occurs while a case is pending on appeal that makes it impossible for the court to grant any effectual relief whatever to a prevailing party, the appeal must be dismissed.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); *see also Far W. Fed. Bank, S.B. v. Office of Thrift Supervision-Director,*119 F.3d 1358, 1366-67 (9th Cir.1997) (FDIC is not subject to a prejudgment interest award because it operates as a regulatory entity, and Congress has not explicitly waived its immunity against interest).

We do not consider Elizabeth’s contentions concerning the FDIC’s alleged negligence because Elizabeth did not adequately raise the issue before the district court. *698*See Crawford v. Lungren,*96 F.3d 380, 389 n. 6 (9th Cir.1996).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2398 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 14, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 and title 

38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for the 

HUD–VASH program, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit annual reports to the Committees 

on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding homeless veterans, and for other 

purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2398 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Housing Op5 portunities and Unemployment Support Extension Act of 

6 2020’’ or the ‘‘Veteran HOUSE Act of 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR HUD–VASH. 

8 (a) HUD PROVISIONS.—Section 8(o)(19) of the 

9 United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 

10 1437f(o)(19)) is amended by adding at the end the fol11 lowing new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(D) VETERAN DEFINED.—In this para13 graph, the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

14 that term in section 2002(b) of title 38, United 

15 States Code.’’. 

16 (b) VHA CASE MANAGERS.—Subsection (b) of sec17 tion 2003 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 

18 adding at the end the following: ‘‘In the case of vouchers 

19 provided under the HUD–VASH program under section 

20 8(o)(19) of such Act, for purposes of the preceding sen21 tence, the term ‘veteran’ shall have the meaning given 

22 such term in section 2002(b) of this title.’’. 

23 SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORTS. 

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than once 

25 each year, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2398 RFS

1 to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 

2 the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Rep3 resentatives a report on the homelessness services provided 

4 under programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 

5 including services under HUD–VASH program under sec6 tion 8(o)(1) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 

7 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19)). 

8 (b) INCLUDED INFORMATION.—Each such annual re9 port shall include, with respect to the year preceding the 

10 submittal of the report, a statement of the number of eligi11 ble individuals who were furnished such homelessness 

12 services and the number of individuals furnished such 

13 services under each such program, disaggregated by the 

14 number of men who received such services and the number 

15 of women who received such services, and such other infor16 mation as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS