alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 06--002 | **Boards of Trade Located     Outside of the United States and the Requirement To** |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Become a Designated     Contract Market or Derivatives Transaction Execution Facility** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| FR CITE: | 71 FR 34070 (June 13,     2006) |
|----------|----------------------------------|

| CLOSES: | 7/12/2006 | 8/1/2006 |
|---------|-----------|----------|

| EXTENDED: | 7/14/2006 |  | LINK TO FILE: | /foia/com |
|-----------|-----------|--|---------------|-----------|

|  | **-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 06--001 | **Commodity Futures     Trading Commission 17 CFR Part 41 Securities and Exchange** |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Commission 17 CFR Part     240 Joint Proposed Rules: Application of the Definition of** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Narrow-Based Securities     Index to Debt Securities Indexes and Security Futures on** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Debt     Securities** |
|--|--------------------------|

| FR CITE: | 71 FR 18030 (April 4,     2006) |
|----------|----------------------------------|

| CLOSES: | 5/10/2006 |
|---------|-----------|

| EXTENDED: | LINK TO FILE: | /foia/com |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|

|  | **-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

FirstPreviousNextLast
H. Res. 1022 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 4, 2010. 

Whereas Medgar Evers was born on July 2, 1925, in Decatur, Mississippi; 

Whereas Mr. Evers was hired by Dr. Theodore Roosevelt 

Mason Howard to sell insurance for the Magnolia Mutual 

Life Insurance Company; 

Whereas Mr. Evers was inducted into United States Army in 

1943 and fought in the Battle of Normandy; 

Whereas Dr. Howard, as President of the Regional Council 

of Negro Leadership, helped to introduce Mr. Evers to 

civil rights activism; 

Whereas Mr. Evers applied to the then-segregated University 

of Mississippi School of Law in February 1954; 

Whereas Mr. Evers’ application was rejected resulting in a 

National Association for the Advancement of Colored 

People (NAACP) campaign to desegregate the school; 

Whereas Mr. Evers was hired as a field secretary for the 

NAACP; 

Whereas Mr. Evers was the target of a number of death 

threats as a result of his activism; 

Whereas, on May 28, 1963, a Molotov cocktail was thrown 

into the carport of Mr. Evers’s home and 5 days before 
2 

•HRES 1022 EH 

his death Mr. Evers was assaulted by a car outside of an 

NAACP office; 

Whereas Mr. Evers was assassinated in the driveway of his 

home in Jackson after returning from a meeting with 

NAACP lawyers on June 12, 1963; 

Whereas this assassination occurred just hours after President John F. Kennedy’s speech on national television in 

support of civil rights; 

Whereas the death of Mr. Evers helped to prompt President 

John F. Kennedy to ask Congress for a comprehensive 

civil rights bill; 

Whereas that bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, was signed 

into law by President Lyndon Johnson; 

Whereas Mr. Evers’ assassination has been memorialized in 

numerous popular songs, movies, and written pieces; 

Whereas in 1969, Medgar Evers College was established in 

Brooklyn, New York, as part of the City University of 

New York; 

Whereas, on June 28, 1992, the city of Jackson, Mississippi 

erected a statue in honor of Mr. Evers; 

Whereas in December 2004, the Jackson City Council 

changed the name of the city’s airport to Jackson-Evers 

International Airport; and 

Whereas, on October 9, 2009, Secretary of the Navy Ray 

Mabus announced that the United States Naval Ship 

(USNS) Medgar Evers (T–AKE–13), a Lewis and Clarkclass dry cargo ship, will be named after Mr. Evers: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the life and sacrifice of Medgar Evers; 
3 

•HRES 1022 EH 

(2) recognizes the important role Mr. Evers played 

in securing civil rights for all people in the United 

States; and 

(3) congratulates the United States Navy for honoring Medgar Evers by naming the United States Naval 

Ship Medgar Evers after him. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: August 26, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 165)]
[Notices]
[Page 51251]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26au03-56]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 10:30 a.m., Friday September 5, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 9012.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-21912 Filed 8-22-03; 1:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1135 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1135

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
     Members take the same annual ethics training as senior staff.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2010

  Mr. Broun of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
     Members take the same annual ethics training as senior staff.

    Resolved, That clause 3(a)(6)(B) of rule XI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives is amended--
            (1) in item (i), strike ``new officer or employee'' and 
        insert ``Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or 
        employee'';
            (2) in item (ii), strike ``officer and employee'' and 
        insert ``Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, and 
        employee'' and strike ``officer or employee'' and insert 
        ``Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or 
        employee''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The 
        training that is required of Members, Delegates, and the 
        Resident Commissioner under this paragraph is the same that is 
        required of senior staff by the committee.''.
                                 <all>
```
Appendix CC

to

Cleartrade Exchange Form FBOT Application

MAS APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS ON CLEARTRADE EXCHANGE
EXHIBIT
32.2
  **CERTIFICATIONS**
  **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**
  **(subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title
18,**
  **United
States Code)**
  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Spantel Communications Inc., a Florida corporation (“The
Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual report of the Company
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Form 10-KSB”)that:
  3)
    
    The
      Form 10 KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and4)
    
    the
      information contained in the Form 10 -KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
  Dated: April 29, 2005
    
    /s/ Cesar MartinezCesar
      Martinez(Chief
      Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1195 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1195

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
  fifths majority to designate spending as emergency spending, except 
                spending for the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2010

Mr. Marshall submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
  fifths majority to designate spending as emergency spending, except 
                spending for the Department of Defense.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
``Votes to designate spending as emergency spending
    ``11. (a) Any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or conference 
report designating any direct spending or appropriation as an emergency 
requirement may not be considered as passed or agreed to unless so 
determined by a vote of not less than three-fifths of the Members 
voting, a quorum being present.
    ``(b) Paragraph (a) shall not apply to spending for the Department 
of Defense or any spending from a designated emergency fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Bernardo PANIAGUA-PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30265.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 14, 2010.

Monte J. Stiles, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

J.D. Merris, Boise, ID, for Defendant Appellant.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Bernardo Paniagua-Pacheco appeals from'his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Paniagua-Pacheco’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maiden Holdings, Ltd.
      (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Max Caviet, President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)        
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)       
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






By:    
        /s/ Max Caviet




Max Caviet




President
      and Chief Executive Officer




(Principal
      Executive Officer)








August
      13 2008
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Stevenson Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Richard Newlon Assocs.

July 30, 1991

Case No. (Law) 74400

By JUDGE THOMAS S. KENNEY

This cause is before the Court upon the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff’s Petition for Confirmation of an Arbitration Award. At oral argument, the defendant’s counsel urged this Court to find that proper jurisdiction of this cause lies in Washington, D.C. I agree.

The litigants in this case were parties to a contract which provided for binding arbitration "before a single disinterested member of the Bar of the District of Columbia." Arbitration was in fact entered into in Washington, D.C., with an award of $9,920 being made to the plaintiff, Stevenson Engineering. An *ex parte*motion to confirm the award under Virginia Arbitration Act, Virginia Code Section 8.01-581.01 *et seq.,*was filed with this Court and dismissed by the Court’s Order of April 15, 1991.  On May 6, 1991, that order was vacated in order to give the plaintiff an opportunity to bring the defendant before the court. Upon being served, the defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The specific dilemma this Court must confront is whether the Virginia Arbitration Act can be construed to encompass the confirmation of arbitration awards entered *139into outside of this state. 1 do not believe that it can. Several courts, whose states have adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act, have considered precisely this issue, including the Kentucky Court of Appeals in *Tru Green Corp.*v. *Sampson,*802 S.W.2d 951 (Ky. App. 1991). There, the prevailing litigant in an Ohio arbitration hearing sought confirmation of the award in Kentucky. In rejecting the confirmation, the Court concedes that KRS 417.200 says H[t]he term ‘court’ means any court of competent jurisdiction of this state,"2 but concludes that a predicate to subject matter jurisdiction is that the hearing actually occur in the state in which arbitration occurs. *Tru Green*at 953.

I am satisfied that this approach best effectuates the purposes of our statute. Clearly, in adopting a uniform act the General Assembly has chosen to join other adopting jurisdictions in the promotion of consistency in the application of certain laws. Allowing Stevenson Engineering to confirm the award here produces the opposite result. The potential for chaos is especially great if one considers a situation wherein a Virginia resident successfully prevails against Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C., defendants after a hearing in Washington, D.C. If, as plaintiff's counsel argued, it is the defendant’s residence which allows a particular court to take action, there could be three simultaneous and inconsistent proceedings. I cannot construe the statute to permit such a result.

The motion to dismiss is granted with each party to bear its own costs.

2

 The language mirrors Va. Code Section 8.01-681.014 which also purports to establish the courts’ jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act.
```

[Federal Register: May 16, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 31150]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16my00-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 2, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-12358 Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of China Yuchai International Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: July 15, 2005  By:
    /s/  Teo Tong KooiName:
    Teo Tong KooiTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer and Director  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.




---



##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of China Yuchai International Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: July 15, 2005  By:
    /s/  Philip Ting Sii TienName:
    Philip Ting Sii TienTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and
Director  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit
32.2










CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgemont Mining Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March
10, 2009








/s/
Guy Federspiel


Guy
Federspiel, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-1146 of The L.L. Knickerbocker Co. Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration
Statements No. 333-15185, No. 333-37101 and No. 333-59169 on Form S-3 of our
report, which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated April 12,
2000, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The L.L. Knickerbocker Co.,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
April 12, 2000
```

[Federal Register: September 27, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 188)]
[Notices]
[Page 58052]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27se00-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, October 27, 2000.

Place: 1155 21st, NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for more Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Sectretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-24874 Filed 9-22-00; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
----

EXHIBIT 32.3

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/  | L. Mark Panella                                      |   |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|      | L. Mark Panella                                      |   |
|      | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |