alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,447
<PP&E>                                           1,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                     943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                         438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,895
<SALES>                                         19,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,923
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    393
<INCOME-TAX>                                       273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       120
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 3
- 7170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 8:07

- cr - 00331

- JKB

- 1 )

Submitted : February 22, 2024 Decided: February 27, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Scott Lewis Rendelman , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7170 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Scott Lewis Rendelman appeals the district court’s order denying his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rendelman’s motion, particularly in light of the previous opportunities afforded Rend el man to supplement the reco rd with evidence supporting his motion

. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 188

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Rendelman , No. 8:07

- cr - 00331

- JKB

- 1 ( D. Md. May 18 , 2023)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7170 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), PaulGoddard, Chief Executive Officer of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”),and John Varian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

2.             The information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th day of November, 2009.

 

 
| By:    |  /s/  Paul Goddard                                        |   | By:                                                              |   /s/  John Varian |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|   |   Paul  Goddard, Ph.D.                               |   |   John  Varian                                         |
|   |   Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive Officer |   |   Chief Operating Officer and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Meridian Interstate Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian
 Interstate Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|                       |                                       
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------
|Date:
 January 4, 2008 | /s/ Richard
 J. Gavegnano             
|                       |                                       
|                       | Richard J.
 Gavegnano                 
|                       | Chairman and
 Chief Executive Officer 
|                       |                                       
|Date:
 January 4, 2008 | /s/ Leonard
 V. Siuda                 
|                       |                                       
|                       | Leonard V.
 Siuda                     
|                       | Chief
 Financial Officer and Treasurer

---
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Roger Williams, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Here Enterprises,
  Inc. for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Here
Enterprises, Inc.

Dated: December 3, 2007.

*/s/ Roger Williams*

_____________________Roger WilliamsPresident,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Here
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Here Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30251

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HANNIBAL X. BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:02-CR-111-ALL-B 

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Hannibal X. Brown has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has filed a response

and requested the appointment of substitute counsel.

Our independent review of the brief, Brown’s response, and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal
No. 04-30251

-2-

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Brown’s motion to appoint

substitute counsel is DENIED.
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 29714]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn97-57]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 27, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-14461 Filed 5-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: March 25, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 57)]
[Notices]
[Page 14428]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25mr98-57]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

"FEDERAL REGISTER" CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 63 F.R. 10364.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 2:00 p.m., Thursday,
March 26, 1998.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
changed the meeting to discuss a rule enforcement review to April 2,
1998 at 2:00 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-7922 Filed 3-23-98; 11:26 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.               | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             |                                                                                                                                                  |
|             |                                                                                                                                                  |
|             |                                                                                                                                                  |
|             |                                                                                                                                                  |
| November 2, 2010 |                                                                                                                                                  | /s/Wallace Boyack |
|             |                                                                                                                                                  | Wallace Boyack, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Haitham AWWAD, also known as Tanman4youngerf Haitham Awwad, Appellant.

No. 05-2241.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 19, 2006.

Filed June 12, 2006.

Anthony J. Wzorek, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Robert Epstein, Defender Association of Philadelphia Federal Court Division, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Before: McKEE and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and McCLURE,* District Judge.

*

 Hon. James F. McClure, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

*OPINION OF THE COURT*

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Haitham Awwad appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) for attempting to use a means of interstate commerce (the Internet) to persuade, induce, and entice a minor to engage in sexual activity and his *202conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2428(b) for traveling in interstate commerce for the purposes of engaging in sexual conduct with a minor. He argues on appeal that he cannot be convicted under either statute because his intended victim was, in fact, not a minor but an undercover FBI agent posing as a minor online. While his appeal was pending we rejected the precise arguments made by Awwad under both of these statutory provisions in *United States v. Tykarsky,*446 F.3d 458 (3d Cir.2006). Accordingly, we will affirm the order of the District Court.
#### In re ALBERT O. BROWN *&*CO. Ex parte OLMSTEAD.

(District Court, S. D. New York.

June 14, 1909.)

Bankruptcy (§ 348*) —Claims —Priority —Wages—“Workman, Clerk, or Servant.”

The manager of a branch office of a broker in another city is not a “workman, clerk, or servant.” within the meaning of Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 64b (4), 30 Slat. 563 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3447), and his claim for wages is not entitled to priority on the bankruptcy of his employer.

I Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 536; Dec. Dig. § 318.*]

. Iii Bankruptcy. On petition to review referee’s denial of priority to claim for wages.

Thorndike Saunders, for petitioner.

Ralph Wolf, for receiver.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

HAND, District Judge.

Act March 2, 3867, c. 176, § 27, 14 Stat. 517, provided that priority should not be given, “except that wages due from him [the bankrupt] to any operative or clerk or house servant” shall be preferred. In the present act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 511, § 64b (4), 30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3447]) the words are “workman, clerk, or servant.” “Workman” is possibly a wider phrase than “operative,” and “servant” is undoubtedly wider than “house servant”; but the section is obviously copied after the law of 1867.

It is quite clear that Olmsted is not a “workman” for the bankrupt. Nor is he a “servant,” because the term does not include all instances of the formal relation of master and servant. In so far as In re Caldwell (D. C.) 164 Fed. 515, decides to the contrary, I cannot agree with it. This seems to me to follow from the previous form of the section which I have cited, and it has been decided. In re Grubbs-Wiley Grocery Co. (D. C.) 96 Fed. 183; In re Smith, 11 Am. Bankr. Rep. 646. In the more limited sense, it is quite clear that Olmsted is not a “servant.”

The only thing left that he could be, therefore, is a “clerk.” No one would think of calling the manager in charge of the Chicago branch of a broker’s office a “clerk” — he himself least of all. Whether or not he is employed for “wages,” he is much distinguished from a clerk.

The petition will be denied, and the order of the referee affirmed, with costs of the proceeding to complainant.
# C_2010073EN.01003901.xml

| 23.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/39

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 73/10

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain compressors | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2008 (OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 1) | 21.3.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Certain compressors

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2008 (OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 1)

21.3.2010

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 22.10.2009, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

---
```

[Federal Register: June 24, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 121)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34335]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24jn98-31]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 34 and 35


Concept Release Concerning Over-the-Counter Derivatives

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Extension of comment period on Concept Release.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued a Concept
Release concerning over-the-counter derivatives on May 12, 1998 (63 FR
26114) with comments due by July 13, 1998. In response to requests from
the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Futures Industry Association, and
the Managed Funds Association, the Commission has determined to extend
the comment period for an additional 60 days. The extended deadline for
comments on the Concept Release is September 11, 1998.
    Any person interested in submitting comments on the Concept Release
should submit them by the specified date to Jean A. Webb, Secretary,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st
Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581. In addition, comments may be sent
by facsimile transmission to facsimile number (202) 418-5521, or by
electronic mail to [email protected].

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John C. Lawton, Associate Director, Division of Trading and Markets,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581. Telephone: (202) 418-5490.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on this 18th day of June, 1998, by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16767 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### Gerardo Camargo MEDINA; Carolina Camargo, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70929.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*622Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 10, 2010.

Todd Becraft, Law Office of Todd Be-craft, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Gregory Michael Keleh, Lindsay Elizabeth Williams, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Camargo Medina and Carolina Camargo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001), and we grant the petition for review.

The Camargos contend the IJ violated procedural due process by conducting a merits hearing on July 18, 2005, when the immigration court had given the Camargos notice of a master hearing on that date. Because the Camargos were thus prevented from presenting the testimony of their hardship witnesses, the proceedings were rendered “so fundamentally unfair that [they were] prevented from reasonably presenting [their] case.” *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted). Moreover, the Camargos demonstrated that additional testimony potentially may have affected the outcome of the proceedings. *See Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 965 (9th Cir.2002) (prejudice is shown where violation potentially affected outcome of the proceedings).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.