alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sukit N. KUMVACHIRAPITAG, Appellant v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and Seventy-nine or more Corporations, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-7048.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 23, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 2010.

. Sukit N. Kumvachirapitag, Newton Grove, NC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and TATEL and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 7, 2010, be affirmed. The district court correctly dismissed the action without prejudice on the ground that appellant had not provided proof the defendants were served with a summons and a copy of the complaint or responded to the court’s order with an explanation for his failure to do so. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 — Summons. Because the complaint had not been served, the district court properly denied appellant’s motions for preliminary relief, including the motions for appointment of counsel and motions to appear in person for mediation.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT
31.2





SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





I, Dr.
Lee Johnson, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and,





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and,





6. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:
      September 14, 2009
              /s/ Dr. Lee JohnsonDr.
      Lee JohnsonPresident
      and Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Federal Register: December 23, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 67054]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23de97-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 9, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33631 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                  42,367    
<SECURITIES>                            18,472
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,372,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0 
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     4,465,008
<PP&E>                               6,337,119
<DEPRECIATION>                        (161,477)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      10,640,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  355,674
<BONDS>                              9,475,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                             1,010,000
<OTHER-SE>                            (200,129)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        10,640,650
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,206,821
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,109,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     714,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (617,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (617,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                          (617,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        

</TABLE>
BUTTE CREEK BREWING CO.

945 W. 2nd St.

Chico, CA  95928

(530) 894-7906          FAX 
(530) 894-1505

 

As of September 1, Butte Creek Brewing Company authorized Bay Area
Distributing to add Organic Pilsner to the existing Territorial Agreement between
Butte Creek Brewing Company and Bay Area Distributing.

 

/s/ Tom
Atmore                           


Tom Atmore

Butte Creek Brewing Company

      9/1/05         

Date

 

 

 

organicale.com
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Claudio OTERO, Jr., a/k/a Bill, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Claudio Otero, Jr., a/k/a Bill, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 08-8362, 09-7417.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 27, 2010.

Decided: June 15, 2010.

*281Claudio Otero, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claudio Otero, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Otero,*No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-6 (W.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2008 *&*July 15, 2009). We deny Ote-ro’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
No. 282.

#### Dederick *v.*Smith.

Jurisdictional state*507ment distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Florence M. Dederick, pro se. Mr. Fred C. Demond*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Railroad Co.*v. *Husen,*95 U. S. 465, 472; *Jacobson*v. *Massachusetts,*197 U. S. 11, 28, 29; *Zucht*v. *King,*260 U. S. 174, 176, 177.
Exhibit 32.1

 

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the filing of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 (the “Report”) by Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                         |                                                     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: January 14, 2020      | /s/ Michael Macaluso                                |
|                         | Michael Macaluso                                    |
|                         | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |                                                     |
| Dated: January 14, 2020 | /s/ Daniel G. Stokely                                    |
|                         | Daniel G. Stokely                                        |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary     |
```

[Federal Register: June 24, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 121)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24jn98-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, July 6, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16859 Filed 6-19-98; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Office of the 

Inspector General 

Mr. Timothy Massad 

Chairman 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 41 8-5521 

www.cftc.gov 

November 17, 2014 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Washington, D.C. 2058 1 

Dear Chairman Massad: 

The Office of the Inspector General has conducted a limited review to determine whether the 

evaluation of the system of internal accounting and administrative control, as described in Office 

of Management and Budget Circular No. A-1 23, Management's Responsibility for Internal 

Control, has been carried out in a reasonable and prudent manner at the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission for the year ended September 30, 2014. 

The Circular requires each agency to assess and report on the adequacy of internal 

controls over its programs and operations (Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 

19821 (FMFIA) Section 2), and to assess, document, and report on controls over financial 

management systems to assure conformance with government-wide requirements 

(FMFIA Section 4). 

As part of the OIG's annual audit of the CFTC's financial statements the audit team included a 

statement in the audit opinion that CFTC is reporting to the appropriate government officials an 

Anti-deficiency Act (ADA) violation. Tllis ADA violation is related to the fiscal year 2013 

transfer of funds from the Information Teclmology fund to the Salaries and Expense fund 

without having the authority under the fiscal year 2013 Appropriations Act. Except for this 

matter, nothing else came to our attention that would indicate that the CFTC is not complying 

with the above-mentioned circular. 

I P.L. 97-255 

Sincerely, 

A. Roy Lavik 

Inspector General
CERTIFICATION

I, Stanley B. Baron, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lantis Laser Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2009

/s/ Stanley B. BaronCEO and CFO
**            Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

            As independent publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports  included in this Form 10-K, into theCompany’s previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos.  333-4802, 333-44143, 333- 41850, and333-73748.

 

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | ARTHUR ANDERSEN  LLP    |

 

 

Seattle,Washington

March 27, 2002
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of iTrackr
Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, I, John Rizzo, Chief
Executive Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. 
         Such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. 
         The information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31,
2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of iTrackr Systems, Inc.




Dated:
      May 20, 2010/s/John
      RizzoJohn
      Rizzo, Chief Executive Officer ofiTrackr
      Systems, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-81-008]


Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of 
Negotiated Rate

June 5, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas 
Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A, Second Revised Sheet No. 4G and 
Original Sheet No. 4J, to be effective June 1, 2001.
    KMIGT states that the above-referenced tariff sheets reflect a new 
negotiated rate contract effective June 1, 2001. The tariff sheets are 
being filed pursuant to Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A, Section 36 of 
KMIGT's FERC Gas Tariff, and the procedures prescribed by the 
Commission in its December 31, 1006 ``Order Accepting Tariff Filing 
Subject to Conditions'', in Docket No. RP97-81 (77 FERC para.61,350) 
and the Commission's Letter Orders dated March 28, 1997 and November 
30, 2000 in Docket Nos. RP97-81-001, and RP01-70-000, respectively.
    KMIGT states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
parties to this proceeding, KMIGT's customers and affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protest, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14553 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.38

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2

THIS AMENDMENT is made September 20, 2004 among:

     MARCH NETWORKS CORPORATION, a Canadian business corporation having
     its offices at Tower B, 555 Legget Drive, Ottawa, ON K2K 2X3 ("MARCH
     NETWORKS")

-and-

     MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, a Canadian business corporation having its
     offices at 350 Legget Drive, Ottawa, ON K2K 2W7 ("MITEL NETWORKS")

-and-

     MITEL NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, a Barbadian business corporation
     having its offices at Charnic Business Centre, Spring Garden Highway, St.
     Michael, Barbados ("MNIL")

-and-

     MITEL NETWORKS LIMITED, a UK business corporation having its offices at
     Mitel Business Park, Portskewett, Caldicott, UK NPZ6 5YR ("MNL")

WHEREAS:

     A.   March Networks, Mitel Networks, MNIL and MNL entered into an alliance
          agreement effective as of September 21, 2001, as amended on September
          20, 2003 (the "Alliance Agreement").

     B.   Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Alliance Agreement, the parties wish to
          renew the Alliance Agreement on the same terms and conditions for an
          additional six month term expiring on March 31, 2005.

NOW THEREFORE for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Amendment hereby agree as
follows:

1.   The term of the Alliance Agreement is hereby extended for an additional six
     month term, expiring March 31, 2005.
<PAGE>
2.   All terms and conditions of the Alliance Agreement to remain the same.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be signed by
their duly authorized representatives as of the date written above.

MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION              MARCH NETWORKS CORPORATION


BY: /s/ DON SMITH                       BY: /s/ Peter Strom
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
NAME: DON SMITH                         NAME: Peter Strom
TITLE: CEO                              TITLE: President & CEO


MITEL NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED    MITEL NETWORKS LIMITED


BY: /s/ PAUL BUTCHER                    BY: /s/ PAUL BUTCHER
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
NAME: PAUL BUTCHER                      NAME: PAUL BUTCHER
TITLE: PRESIDENT                        TITLE: PRESIDENT


                                       2
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Maiden Holdings, Ltd (the “Company”), hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated:November 16,
      2009
                By:
                /s/ARTURO M. RASCHBAUMName:  Arturo
      M. RaschbaumTitle:
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report.