alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00009-CV

WILLIAM R. AND SUSAN M. KNODERER, Appellants

V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, PENNI PERKINS, AND TOM ROBERTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 74,037

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Julie Vrooman recorded the trial proceedings in appellate cause number 06-

16-00009-CV, styled William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins, and 

Tom Roberts, trial court cause number 74,037, on appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in this matter on February 1, 2016. 

That deadline was extended three times on Vrooman’s requests, resulting in the most recent due 

date of April 22, 2016. Vrooman has now filed a fourth request seeking an additional fifteen-day 

extension of the filing deadline.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The 

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, 

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of 

time.

Therefore, we overrule Vrooman’s fourth request for an extension of the filing deadline 

and order her to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-16-00009-CV, styled William R. and 

Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins, and Tom Roberts, trial court cause 

number 74,037, on appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas, to be 

received by this Court no later than the close of business on Monday, May 9, 2016.
3

If the reporter’s record is not received by May 9, we warn Vrooman that we may begin 

contempt proceedings and order her to demonstrate why she should not be held in contempt of this 

Court for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: May 3, 2016
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digitiliti, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Larry D. Ingwersen, President, and William McDonald, CFO/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 18, 2008By:/s/ Larry D. IngwersenLarry D. Ingwersen, President, CEO and Director  Date:August 18, 2008By:/s/William McDonaldWilliam McDonald, CFO/ Treasurer    1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Rhodes, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 504]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered September 11, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts) and unlawful possession of marijuana, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Aloise, J.), of the defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion, made during trial, to reopen the pretrial suppression hearing inasmuch as the defendant failed to show that he had discovered additional pertinent facts which he could not have discovered with reasonable diligence before the determination of the motion and which would have materially affected that determination *(see*CPL 710.40 [4]; *People v Clark,*88 NY2d 552, 555 [1996]; *People v Fuentes,*53 NY2d 892 [1981]; *cf. People v Velez,*39 AD3d 38 [2007]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.1

# INSIGNIA SYSTEMS, INC.
2007 CEO BONUS PLAN

1.       Purpose.   The
purpose of this Plan is to assist the corporation in retaining and motivating the CEO of the corporation, for the benefit of the
corporation and its shareholders.

2.       Eligibility.   The
sole employee eligible to participate in this Plan is the CEO of the corporation. The CEO must be employed on December 31, 2007 to
earn any bonus.

3.       Duration
of Plan.   This Plan shall be effective for the corporations fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

4.       Bonus
Formula.   The CEO may earn a bonus for 2007 equal to the sum of the following:

(a)     1%
of total POPS revenue for 2007 between $19 million and $24 million, for a maximum bonus under this paragraph of $50,000; plus

(b)     3.75%
of the corporations gross margin for POPS sales in 2007 which exceed $24 million.

5.       Calculation
of Bonus.   POPS revenue, POPS gross margin and earned bonus shall be calculated by the corporations
CFO based on the accounting methods and procedures used in preparing the corporations audited financial statements for 2007.

6.       Payment
of Bonus.   Earned bonus shall be calculated and paid as soon as administratively feasible after December 31, 2007.

7.       Non-Assignability.   The
CEO may not assign or transfer his right to payment under this Plan, and his right to payment may not be attached by creditors.

8.       No
Continued Employment.   Nothing contained in this Plan shall be construed as guaranteeing continued
employment to the CEO.

---
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 887 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 131 

East 4th Street in Davenport, Iowa, as the ‘‘James 

A. Leach United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 887 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 131 East 

3 4th Street in Davenport, Iowa, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘James A. Leach United States Court5 house’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘James A. Leach United States 

11 Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 887 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

house’’. the ‘‘James A. Leach United States Courtat 131 East 4th Street in Davenport, Iowa, as
# Determination Under Subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974, as Amended_Continuation of Waiver Authority for Vietnam

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-618, 88 Stat. 1978 (hereinafter the “Act”), I determine, pursuant to section 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1), that the further extension of the waiver authority granted by section 402 of the Act will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act. I further determine that continuation of the waiver applicable to Vietnam will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 01-14520

Billing code 4710-10-M
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





I,
Allison Carroll, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pretoria Resources Two, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Pretoria Resources Two, Inc.





Date:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Allison CarrollAllison
      CarrollPresident,
      Principal Executive Officer and
                Principal
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2009



/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Excaliber Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Y. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Matthew L. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stephanie Y. Jones


Stephanie Y. Jones


Chief Executive Officer


April 26, 2011








/s/ Matthew L. Jones


Matthew L. Jones


Chief Financial Officer


April 26, 2011
MARZUQ AL-HAKIM,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2423

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Marzuq Al-Hakim, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
© ICE Swap Trade, LLC 2013. All Rights Reserved.

ICE Swap Trade LLC

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

March 6, 2015

Submitted via the CFTC Portal Submission 15-05

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: ICE Swap Trade, LLC – Rule Amendment – Revised Error Trade Policy

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), ICE Swap Trade, LLC (“IST” or the “SEF”) hereby 

notifies the Commission that it has amended its Error Trade Policy as described herein. The Error Trade Policy has 

been amended in order to clarify the process by which IST intends to implement and enforce certain sections of its 

rules. The amended Error Trade Policy will become effective on March 20, 2015 (based on an acknowledged filing 

date of March 6, 2015).

A concise explanation of the amendments to the Error Trade Policy, marked to show changes is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A, and a clean copy of the Error Trade Policy is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 

IST certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and 

regulations promulgated thereunder. IST is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to 

this filing and certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the IST’s website 

and may be accessed at: https://www.theice.com/notices/RegulatoryFilings.shtml

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 323-8512 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Catherine O’Connor

Chief Compliance Officer

Enclosures
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the No. 50558-4-II

Personal Restraint Petition of

SCOTT ALLEN BOWLER

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

BJORGEN, C.J. — Scott Bowler seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his 2016 

plea of guilty to second degree burglary. We grant the petition in part and deny the remainder.

In Bowler’s judgment and sentence, the trial court found that Bowler “is indigent and disabled 

and is not anticipated to be able to pay financial obligations in the future.” Resp. to Personal Restraint 

Pet., App. A, at 4. The trial court then imposed the following legal financial obligations (LFOs): 

$500 victim assessment, $100 domestic violence assessment, $200 criminal filing fee, and $100 

deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee. 

Bowler argues that the trial court erred in imposing any LFOs because of his physical 

disabilities and his lack of vocation. But the victim assessment, criminal filing fee, and DNA 

collection fee are mandatory LFOs that the trial court must impose. State v. Clark, 191 Wn. App. 

369, 373, 362 P.3d 309 (2015). As to domestic violence assessment, the State concedes that it is 

a discretionary LFO and that the trial court erred in imposing it. We accept the State’s concession.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

December 12, 2017
No. 50558-4-II

2

We grant Bowler’s petition in part and remand to the trial court for correction by striking 

the $100 domestic violence assessment from Bowler’s judgment and sentence. As to the 

mandatory LFOs, we deny the petition.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

BJORGEN, C.J.

We concur:

JOHANSON, J.

SUTTON, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,942
<SECURITIES>                                    96,043
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,556
<ALLOWANCES>                                       577
<INVENTORY>                                      2,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,883
<PP&E>                                          12,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           367
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,285
<SALES>                                         57,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,254
<CGS>                                           12,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<FN>
OTHER COSTS REFER TO MERGER EXPENSE INCURRED DURING MERGER WITH RSA DATA
SECURITY, INC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ubiquitech Software Corporation (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Brian Sobnosky, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,


that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the
Company.




Ubiquitech
      Software CorporationDate: 
      April 14, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Brian
      SobnoskyBrian
      Sobnosky
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: January 9, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 5)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 1463]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ja06-86]



[[Page 1463]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 4

RIN 3038-AC25


Commodity Pool Operator Electronic Filing of Annual Reports

Correction

    In proposed rule document 05-23965 beginning on page 74240 in the
issue of Thursday, December 15, 2005, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 74241, in the first column, in the first paragraph, in
the ninth line, "report; (iii) to" should read "report; and (iii)
to".
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the second paragraph,
in the seventh line, "would: explicitly" should read "would: (i)
Explicitly".
    3. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in
the 13th line, "principles; clarify that" should read "principles;
(ii) clarify that".
    4. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in
the same line, "COPs" should read "CPOs".
    5. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in
the 16th line, "NFA; clarify" should read "NFA; (iii) clarify".
    6. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in
the 22nd line, "person; and require" should read "person; and (iv)
require".
    7. On the same page, in the same column, under the heading DATES,
in the second line, "January 17, 2005" should read "January 17,
2006".
    8. On the same page, in the second column, in the first full
paragraph, in the seventh line, "to" should read "or".
    9. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in
the ninth line, "COP" should read "CPO".
    10. On the same page, in the same column, in the second full
paragraph, in the eighth line, "compete" should read "complete".
    11. On the same page, in the third column, in the first full
paragraph, in the fourth line from the bottom, "COPs" should read
"CPOs".
    12. On page 74242, in the second column, in the second full
paragraph, in the second line, "field" should read "filed".
    13. On page 74243, in the first column, in the second full
paragraph, in the first line, "proposed" should read "proposes".
    14. On the same page, in the second column, in the second full
paragraph, in the 15th line, "preform" should read "perform".


Sec. 4.7  [Corrected]

    15. On page 74245, in the first column, in Sec. 4.7 (b)(3), in the
second line, "in" should read "of".


Sec. 4.22  [Corrected]

    16. On the same page, in the second column, in Sec. 4.22 (c), in
the first paragraph, in the 11th line, "an" should read "any".
    17. On the same page, in the same column, in Sec. 4.22 (d), in the
first line, "statement" should read "statements".

[FR Doc. C5-23965 Filed 1-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Fidelity Aviation Corporation for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in his capacity
as an officer of the company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the company.
  Date:
      January 14, 2009
              
              /s/ Rong
    YangRong
  YangPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer(principal executive
      officer)Date:
      January 14, 2009
              
              /s/ Rong
    YangRongYangChief Financial
      Officer(principal financial and
      accounting officer)
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000616

27-JUN-2014

08:47 AM