alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,046
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,903
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,183
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        124,119
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,848
<DEPOSITS>                                     169,101
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,237
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                969
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,343
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 204,848
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,934
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,661
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   444
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,039
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,026
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,013
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      437
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 237
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,909
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,909
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.8
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,184
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       96
<RECOVERIES>                                        39
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,564
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,564
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Gary Null, Appellant, v Pacifica Foundation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[873 NYS2d 489]

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered October 24, 2007, which granted the motion of defendants WBAI and Pacifica Foundation to dismiss the complaint against them as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly found that plaintiff had reason to know that the union would not be pursuing his grievance; consequently, the complaint, filed more than six months after his last unanswered communication with the union, was untimely *(see White v White Rose Food, a Div. of DiGiorgio Corp.,*128 F3d 110, 114 [1997]). There was no basis for tolling *425the limitations period or barring its assertion, in the absence of any claim of fraudulent concealment *(see Cohen v Flushing Hosp. & Med. Ctr.,*68 F3d 64, 69 [1995]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our report dated March
23, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial statements (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an
explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment) included
in the Image Sensing Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is
incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement. We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of the aforementioned report.





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

April 30, 2007

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**BISON INSTRUMENTS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned, Edward G. Lampman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bison Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB-A for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date:  August 4, 2006

 

|   | /s/ Edward G. Lampman |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Title:                | Edward G. Lampman

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HUGHES Telematics, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Leddy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ JEFFREY A. LEDDYName:

Jeffrey A. LeddyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:

August 14, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 11.1

                      ENERGY SEARCH, INCORPORATED
                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   YEAR ENDED
                                                DECEMBER 31, 1998
                                                -----------------
<S>                                                <C>                                             
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER 
     SHARE
Net income (loss)                                    (394,428)
Payment of dividends on preferred stock                17,601      
Shares                      
   Weighted average shares outstanding              3,868,752  
Basic earnings (loss) per share                          (.11)      

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER
     SHARE
Net income (loss)                                    (394,428) 
Payment of dividends on preferred stock                17,601
Shares
   Weighted average shares outstanding              3,868,752
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                        (.11)

</TABLE>
#### Gary Wayne DANNER, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Detainee Center, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 08-6955.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 8, 2008.

Gary Wayne Danner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Wayne Danner appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil rights action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b) based on Danner’s failure to keep the court apprised of any change of address. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Danner v. Piedmont Regional Jail,*No. 3:08-cv-00013-REP (E.D.Va. Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Federal Register: October 25, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 63843-63844]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25oc00-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 3, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 63844]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-27598 Filed 10-23-00; 4:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
# C_2010070EN.01002801.xml

| 19.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/28

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 70/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bicycles and certain bicycle parts | People's Republic of China
  Vietnam | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 (OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1) and extended to bicycles parts by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55) | 15.7.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Bicycles and certain bicycle parts

People's Republic of China

Vietnam

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 (OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1) and extended to bicycles parts by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55)

15.7.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
```

[Federal Register: July 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 133)]
[Notices]
[Page 42677]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11jy00-33]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 14, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-17584 Filed 7-7-00; 11:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4432-4433]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-48]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, February 20, 1998.





[[Page 4433]]





PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



.STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2345 Filed 1-27-98; 12:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
[967 NE2d 700, 944 NYS2d 475]

#### Air Stream Corp., Appellant, v 3300 Lawson Corp., Respondent.

Decided April 3, 2012

*973APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Dollinger, Gonski & Grossman,*Carle Place *(Floyd G. Grossman*of counsel), for appellant.

*Jaspan Schlesinger LLP,*Garden City *(Linda S. Agnew*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals *(22*NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, *974Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the principles of law expressed in *Estate of Becker v Murtagh*(19 NY3d 75 [2012] [decided today]). Because the legal standards Supreme Court employed were consonant with our decision in *Becker,*we remit to the Appellate Division rather than Supreme Court. Thus, the Appellate Division, in reviewing Supreme Court’s judgment, should now apply the facts of this case to the law as expressed in *Becker.*

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON**

**5001****SPRING VALLEY ROAD**

**SUITE 800 EAST**

**DALLAS, TEXAS 75244**

 

February 23, 2012

 

Encana Corporation

1800-855-2nd Street SW

Calgary, Alberta T2P 2S5

Canada

 

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton and reference to our name and our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2011 on Certain Properties owned by Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. Mid-Continent Business Unit SEC Case”, and our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2011 on Certain Properties owned by Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Mid-Continent Business Unit (United States Dollars)” (our Reports) evaluating a portion of Encana Corporation’s petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December 31, 2011, and the information contained in our Reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Encana Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453), (iii) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-124218, 333-85598, and 333-140856), and (iv) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-165626), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Very truly yours,

 

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

 

----
#### In Re: Randy L. THOMAS, Petitioner.

No. 10-1768.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 30, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 7, 2010.

*777Randy L. Thomas, Petitioner pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thomas petitions for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition seeking an order vacating the district court’s June 19, 2007, order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We conclude that Thomas is not entitled to the relief he seeks.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought, *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,*503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir.2007).

A writ of prohibition should not issue “unless it clearly appears that the inferior court is about to exceed its jurisdiction.” *Smith v. Whitney,*116 U.S. 168, 176, 6 S.Ct. 570, 29 L.Ed. 601 (1886). Like mandamus relief, a writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy, available only when the petitioner’s right to the relief sought is “clear and undisputable.” *In re Vargas,*723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir.1983). Additionally, the writ is “not to be used as a substitute for appeal.” *Id.; see In re Missouri,*664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir.1981).

The relief sought by Thomas is not available by way of mandamus or prohibition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petitions for writ of mandamus and prohibition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITIONS DENIED.*
```

[Federal Register: June 5, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 30843]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05jn97-43]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, June 30, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-14789 Filed 6-3-97; 10:17 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Exhibit 31-2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:September 24, 2010
    By:

/s/ William McDonaldWilliam McDonald, CFO
```

[Federal Register: March 28, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 60)]
[Notices]
[Page 16379]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28mr00-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, April 7, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-7720 Filed 3-24-00; 1:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----