alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kaiyo Nedd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date: June 2, 2008By:/s/ Kaiyo NeddKaiyo Nedd
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Joseph A. Markey, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Valentis, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
September 15, 2004

| |  | /s/JOSEPH A. MARKEYJoseph A. Markey Senior Director of Finance and
Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10
 Williams Pipeline GP LLC
Director Compensation Policy
Adopted August 19, 2008
 Compensation of Directors
  I. Annual Compensation Package
  1.
    
    $50,000 cash;2.
    
    $25,000 in Restricted Units valued as of the grant date designated below; and3.
    
    $5,000 cash each for service on the conflicts and audit committees of the Board.
  II. Conflicts Committee Fees
   III. Other Compensation
  1.
    
    for a person first elected as a Non-Employee Director, a one-time grant of Restricted
Units valued at $25,000 on the date of election to the Board; and2.
    
    reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with
attending Board and committee meetings and attending education programs relevant to their
duties as members of the Board.
 IV. Restricted Period
  29




---



##### 



V. Interim Payment and Grant Dates and Proration
 1.
    
    Interim Payment and Grant Dates.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director after January 24 and prior to May 1 shall
receive the full Annual Compensation Package for such Annual Compensation Period paid as of
May 15, in the case of annual cash compensation amounts, and granted as of May 15, in the
case of annual compensation in the form of Restricted Units.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director on or after May 1 and on or before July 31
shall receive a prorated Annual Compensation Package for such first Annual Compensation
Period paid as of August 15, in the case of annual cash compensation amounts, and granted as
of August 15, in the case of annual compensation in the form of Restricted Units.A person who first becomes a Non-Employee Director on or after August 1 and prior to January
24 shall receive a prorated Annual Compensation Package for such first Annual Compensation
Period paid as of January 24, in the case of annual cash compensation amounts, and granted as
of January 24, in the case of annual compensation in the form of Restricted Units.2.
    
    Proration.The number of Restricted Units for a prorated Annual Compensation Package shall be the
product of $25,000 in Restricted Units valued as of the grant date multiplied by a fraction,
the numerator of which is the number of full and fractional calendar months elapsing between
the date such person first becomes a Non-Employee Director and the following January 23 and
the denominator of which is 12.The amount of cash compensation for a prorated Annual Compensation Package shall be the
product of the aggregate annual cash compensation amount applicable to such Non-Employee
Director as set forth in Section I above multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is
the number of full and fractional calendar months elapsing between the date such person first
becomes a Non-Employee Director and the following January 23 and the denominator of which is
12.
 VI. Other Provisions
    30
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eligia Junior MARTIN, a/k/a Shorty Boy, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6713.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

Eligia Junior Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eligia Junior Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION OF

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(effective January 1, 2006 or thereafter(1))


 


 


Annual Retainer:


 


•                  Non-employee
members of the Board will receive a retainer in cash and restricted stock.


 


•                  The cash
component will be $55,000.


 


•                  The restricted
stock award will have a value of $82,500(2).


 


•                  The retainer
will be payable annually, upon election, re-election or appointment to the
Board(3).


 


Committee Chair Retainers:


 


Each non-employee Committee Chair will receive:


 


•                  Audit -
$20,000, payable one-half in cash and one-half in restricted stock.


 


•                  All other
Committees (except Executive Committee) - $15,000, payable one-half in cash and
one-half in restricted stock.


 


Meeting Fees:


 


•                  No fees for
attending Board meetings.


 


•                  Committee
meetings - $1,000 per meeting attended(4).


 


Lead Director Compensation:


 


The non-employee Director designated as Lead Director
will receive an additional retainer of $25,000 annually, payable one-half in
cash and one-half in restricted stock(3).


 


Vesting of Restricted Stock


 


All restricted stock compensation received by
non-employee Directors will vest one year after the award.


 










(1)                        All
stock-based elements are subject to approval of amendments to the 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


(2)                        Grants
of restricted stock will be valued at the value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant and will vest in full one year from the date of grant.


(3)                        Pro-rated
for partial years of service.


(4)                        The
fee will be paid for attendance in person, by telephone or by video conference.


 





















 


 


Director Ownership Guidelines:


 


•                  Under the
Company’s Governance Principles, Directors must own 3,000 shares or more of
Company common stock within one year after their initial election or
appointment and 5,000 shares or more two years from such date.


 


•                  Restricted
stock will qualify for this purpose only after full vesting.


 


Deferred Compensation:


 


•                  All restricted
stock issued to non-employee Directors as retainers will be placed in the
Company’s Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors.  Dividends paid on the
restricted stock in this account must be reinvested in Company common stock.


 


•                  Amounts in a
Deferred Compensation Plan will not be released until a Director retires
and resigns from the Board or is not re-elected.


 


Expense Reimbursement and Travel:


 


The Company pays or reimburses expenses for Directors’
travel on Board business.  In most cases,
and based on the Director’s preference, the Company will handle any travel
arrangements, book airline and hotel reservations and cover billings.
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 116)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41166]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn02-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 3

RIN 3038-AB89


Registration of Intermediaries

AGENCY:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rules; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The  Commodity   Futures   Trading   Commission  (the `` Commission ''
or ``CFTC'') published in the Federal Register of June 6, 2002, a
document concerning final rules relating to the registration of
intermediaries. Inadvertently, the  Commission  cited to an incorrect
paragraph designation. This document corrects that error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on June 17, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence B. Patent, Associate Chief
Counsel, or Michael A. Piracci, Attorney-Advisor, Division of  Trading
and Markets,  Commodity Futures Trading Commission , Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. Telephone: (202)
418-5430.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The  Commission  published in the Federal
Register of June 6, 2002, a document concerning final rules relating to
the registration of intermediaries.\1\ In that document, the  Commission
indicated that it was revising paragraph (a)(2)(i) of Rule 3.10. This
revision was actually of paragraph (a)(2), because the  Commission  had
previously redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(i) as paragraph (a)(2).\2\
This correction makes that change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 67 FR 38869 (June 6, 2002).
    \2\ See, 66 FR 53510, 53518 (Oct. 23, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the final rule document appearing on page 38874 in the issue of
Thursday, June 6, 2002, make the following corrections: in Sec. 3.10,
in the first column, in the amendatory instruction Number 3, second
line, ``paragraph (a)(2)(i)'' should read ``paragraph (a)(2)''; and in
Sec. 3.10, in the second column, sixth line, ``(2)(i)'' should read
``(2)''.

    Dated: June 11, 2002.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-15178 Filed 6-14-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: March 26, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 58)]
[Notices]
[Page 14707]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26mr99-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, April 12, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-7587 Filed 2-24-99; 12:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0585 

TIMOTHY J. WHALEN, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

and ELIZABETH BRIDGES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEARTOOTH ELECTRIC CO-OP, INC., 

Defendant and Appellee. 

FILED 

JAN 2 7 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Pursuant to Appellant Timothy J. Whalen's motion for extension of time to file his opening 

brief and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until March 1, 2023, to file his 

opening brief. `11--

DATED this -C7 day of January, 2023. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

01/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0585
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2017-05-01 14:45:53","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["47"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["49"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["12"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q2"}
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Simon Au, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Here Enterprises,
      Inc. for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Here Enterprises, Inc.                                                                     

Dated: April 14, 2009

| | /s/
      Simon Au                                     
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Simon Au                                               
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director          
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Here
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Here Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Azael Dythian PERALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5145.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Azael Dythian Perales, Fullerton, CA, pro se.

Jeanne E. Davidson, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendantr-Ap-pellee.

Before LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The United States moves for summary affirmance of the July 20, 2010 order of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing Azael Dythian Perales’ petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. Perales responds and separately moves for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris.

Perales filed a document titled “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed Perales’ petition, determining that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This appeal followed.

Summary affirmance of a case is appropriate “when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists.” *Joshua v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed.Cir.1994). Here, the Court of Federal Claims correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over Perales’ petition. *See Ledford v. United States,*297 F.3d 1378, 1381 (Fed.Cir.2002) (“[T]he habeas statute does not list the Court of Federal Claims among those courts empowered to grant a writ of habeas corpus, and the trial court therefore is without power to entertain [a] petition.”)

Because the Court of Federal Claims correctly held that the petition was not within its jurisdiction, we conclude that no substantial question regarding the outcome of this appeal exists; therefore, summary affirmance is appropriate.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The United States’ motion for summary affirmance is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) Perales’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF STILLWATER MINING COMPANY
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the accompanying
Amendment No. 1 to Annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2005 that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis R. McAllister, Chief
Executive Officer of Stillwater Mining Company (the "Company") hereby certify
that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

January 10, 2007,

                                               /s/ Francis R. McAllister
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                 Francis R. McAllister
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The above certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure statement.
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4432]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-44]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 17, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2341 Filed 1-27-98; 12:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----