alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                       
|--------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure                                                                
|Date            |  |  |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                     

        <S> <C>                            

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>                     

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
                                 
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1                       

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997 
<CASH>                              4,609 
<SECURITIES>                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                            0 
<INVENTORY>                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    4,609 
<PP&E>                                  0 
<DEPRECIATION>                          0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      4,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             180,468 
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0 
<COMMON>                            5,003 
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        4,609 
<SALES>                                 0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (126,608)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (7,744) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (134,352) 
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                     (134,352)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.03) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.03)



         

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



June 29, 2005



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Exchange Act and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Report) accompanying this letter.



Carlos Felices, the Chief Executive Officer and Valerio Cavallo, the Chief
Financial Officer of Telecom Argentina S.A. (Telecom) each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Carlos FelicesName:

Carlos FelicesChief Executive Officer/s/ Valerio CavalloName:

Valerio CavalloChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Telecom and will be retained by Telecom and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010353EN.01001001.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 353/07

| Date of adoption of the decision | 8.4.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 628/08 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide à la protection sociale complémentaire des militaires |
| Legal basis | Article 40 de la loi no 2007-148 du 2 février 2007 de la modernisation de la fonction publique.
  Projet de décret relatif à la participation de l'État et de ses établissements publics au financement de la protection de militaires. |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Social support to individual consumers |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 91 million
  Overall budget: EUR 13 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2010-31.12.2016 |
| Economic sectors | Service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de la défense |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

8.4.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 628/08

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide à la protection sociale complémentaire des militaires

Legal basis

Article 40 de la loi no 2007-148 du 2 février 2007 de la modernisation de la fonction publique.

o

Projet de décret relatif à la participation de l'État et de ses établissements publics au financement de la protection de militaires.

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Social support to individual consumers

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 91 million

Overall budget: EUR 13 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.1.2010-31.12.2016

Economic sectors

Service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de la défense

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 10

- 01089

- CR

Jackie Johnson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appealed from the Co unty Crim inal
C our t at Law No

. 11 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1686082). Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. J ustices Boyce and McCally also participating.

TO THE CO UNTY CRIM INAL C OUR T AT LAW NO

. 11 OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on August 21, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its
order in these words:

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further o rder appellant to pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, February 13, 2015.
EXHIBIT 99.2


I,  Steven Reder, Principal Financial Officer of QT 5, Inc., certify that:

         1. This annual report on Form 10-KSB of QT 5, Inc.  fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934; and

         2. The information  contained in this annual report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of QT
5, Inc.


Dated: April 15, 2003

                           /s/ Steven Reder

                           -------------------------------------
                           Steve Reder, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),
Maurice R. Ferré, M.D., in his capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of MAKO Surgical Corp., hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | the
 Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September
 30, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
 Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the
 information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MAKO
 Surgical Corp.                                                                                              

|                  |                                                              | 
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|November 4,
 2009 | /s/ Maurice
 R. Ferré, M.D.                                  | 
|                  | Maurice R.
 Ferré, M.D.                                     
|                  | President,
 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theBoard
|                  | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                              

This
certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAKO Surgical Corp.
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

32

---
`
 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Excaliber Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Y. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Matthew L. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Stephanie Y. Jones 

     Stephanie Y. Jones

     Chief Executive Officer

     May7, 2008

 

 

/s/ Matthew L. Jones

     Matthew L. Jones

     Chief Financial Officer

     May7, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
`
**Fund**/Ticker

**Strategic Advisers**®**Short Duration Fund**/FAUDX

*Offered exclusively to certain clients of Strategic Advisers, Inc. - not available for sale to the general public*

**Summary Prospectus**

**July 30, 2012**

**As Revised December 28, 2012**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P. SUBSIDIARIES

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             STATE
                                                              OF
                     SUBSIDIARY                          ORGANIZATION/              OWNERSHIP
                                                         INCORPORATION

=================================================================================================
  <S>                                                       <C>                       <C>
  AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.                                     DE

            AmeriGas Finance Corp.                            DE                      100%

       AmeriGas Propane, L.P.                                 DE                        *

            AmeriGas Propane Parts &                          PA                      100%
              Service, Inc.

            Northwest LPG Supply Ltd.                       Canada                    100%

            Petrolane Offshore Limited                      Bermuda                   100%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


*   AmeriGas Partners, L.P. owns 98.9899% of the limited partnership interest 
    in AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
#### Weltin ASSA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73764.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*637Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Gihan L. Thomas, Law Offices of Gihan L. Thomas, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Weltin Assa, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 *638U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

We do not consider Assa’s asylum claim because he does not challenge the agency’s time-bar finding, which is dispositive. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm Assa suffered did not rise to the level of past persecution. *See Nagoulko,*333 F.3d at 1016-18. Assuming, without deciding, that the disfavored group analysis set forth in *Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004), applies to Indonesian Christians and applies in the context of withholding of removal, substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Assa failed to demonstrate that it was more likely than not he will be persecuted on account of his religion if he returned to Indonesia. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2003). Additionally, the record does not compel the conclusion that the religious strife in Indonesia amounts to a pattern or practice of persecution against Christian Indonesians. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1181 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Assa is not entitled to CAT relief because he has not demonstrated that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed SIDDIQUEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50332.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 14, 2010.

Ronald Loh-Chi Cheng, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Adam Axelrad, Esquire, Law Offices of Adam Axelrad, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Mohammed Siddiquee, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mohammed Siddiquee appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted trafficking in counterfeit goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Siddiquee contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by failing to consider and properly weigh the relevant factors and circumstances under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The record reflects that the district court considered all of the statutory sentencing factors and did not procedurally err. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Siddiquee also contends that the sentence imposed is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence, which was at the bottom of the Guidelines range, is substan*662tively reasonable. *See id.*at 993; *see also United States v. Rivera,*527 F.3d 891, 912 (9th Cir.2008) (concluding that the circumstances did not compel a lower sentence because the district court had properly weighed and considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant sentencing factors, including the fact that the appellant would likely deported after serving his sentence).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### FRONTLINE PROCESSING CORP., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. FIRST STATE BANK OF ELDORADO, Eldorado, Illinois, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, v. LMA Underwriting Agency, Inc.; Christopher L. Kittler, Third-party-defendants-Appellees. *186Frontline Processing Corp., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. First State Bank of Eldorado, Eldorado, Illinois, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee, v. LMA Underwriting Agency, Inc.; Christopher L. Kittler, Third-party-defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 08-35879, 09-35166.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 2010.

Before: REINHARDT, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENTING PETITION FOR REHEARING

Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. The reply tendered September 15, 2010, is ordered filed.

The memorandum disposition filed July 30, 2010, is amended as follows:

On page 4, replace the first full paragraph with:

> We review for clear error a district court’s factual findings. *Bertelsen v. Harris,*537 F.3d 1047, 1056 (9th Cir.2008). Defendant argues that $160,000 of the Count IIA award is duplicative of the Count IV award requiring payment of “the Wade Cook reserve money, plus interest.” The district court’s findings of fact show that Defendant twice deducted from Plaintiffs income “$80,000 going to reserve.” The district court specified neither which funds comprised the Wade Cook Reserve nor which reserve account received the two $80,000 deductions. Because the district court’s award and findings of fact are ambiguous, we remand to the district court to determine whether the $160,000 was awarded under either Count IIA or Count IV, or both.

On page 13, replace the last paragraph with:

> AFFIRMED in part, and REMANDED in part with instructions to dismiss Defendant’s indemnification counterclaims without prejudice and to clarify the award under Count IIA and Count IV.

With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/ ARTURO
      M. RASCHBAUMName: Arturo
      M. RaschbaumTitle: President
      and Chief Executive Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report.