alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: December 20, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 244)]
[Notices]
[Page 76279]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20de06-53]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, January 26, 2007.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9798 Filed 12-18-06; 11:32 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-063)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Thermosurgery Technology, Inc., 
of Phoenix, Arizona, has applied for an exclusive license to practice 
the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 6,083,158, 
entitled ``Real-Time Visualization of Tissue Ischemia,'' which is 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent 
to NASA Management Office-JPL.

DATE(S): Responses to this notice must be received by July 30, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patent Counsel, NASA Management 
Office-JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Station 180-801, Pasadena, CA 
91109-8099.

    Dated: May 22, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-13619 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:      August 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ William M. McDonaldWilliam M. McDonald,CFO
```

[Federal Register: July 20, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 138)]
[Notices]
[Page 41689]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20jy05-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, August 12, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-14367 Filed 7-18-05; 11:42 am]

BILLING CODE 6451-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: May 16, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 31150]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16my00-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 9, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-12359 Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terrele V. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30145

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Catherine M. Maraist, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert William Piedrahita, Esq., *11Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Rebecca Louise Hudsmith, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Terrele V. Jackson, federal prisoner #04484-095, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the recent amendments to the crack cocaine guidelines provision. The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits. Although Jackson argues that he was eligible for such a reduction, when a defendant such as Jackson is “subject to a statutory minimum sentence above the upper end of his guideline range, ... 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) provides no authority to the district court to later modify the sentence based on amendments to the guideline range.” *United States v. Carter,*595 F.3d 575, 581 (5th Cir.2010).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *12the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register: September 24, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 185)]
[Notices]
[Page 55289]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24se03-11]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 24, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-24318 Filed 9-22-03; 3:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-3  (No.  333-114529)  and the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (No.
333-112934 and No. 333-30829) of Global Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated November 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements
and related  schedule of Global  Payment  Technologies,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries
included in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  September  30,
2004.



Eisner LLP

New York, New York
November 29, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Spantel Communications, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 10-KSB) that:



| | 3) |  | the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Cesar Martinez
Cesar Martinez, Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 52894]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc01-26]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 16, 2001.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-26413 Filed 10-16-01; 1:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
##### 



Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF CARLO BOZOTTI, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND CARLO FERRO, EXECUTIVE VICE
PRESIDENT


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


20-F




| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                        
|
| | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/ Carlo Bozotti

| |                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------
| |                                                   
| | Name: Carlo Bozotti                               
| | Title:   President and Chief Executive
    Officer



| |     |                
| | --- | ---------------
| | By: | /s/ Carlo Ferro

| |                  
| | -----------------
| |                  
| | Name: Carlo Ferro

| |        |                                                           
| | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Executive Vice President 
     and Chief Financial Officer
#### Felix Cruz MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L.E. SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-16438.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

*264Felix Cruz Martinez, Coalinga, CA, pro se.

Jesse Noel Witt, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Ap-pellee.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Felix Cruz Martinez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

We agree with the district court that the California courts’ resolution of Martinez’s claim that coerced statements were improperly admitted at trial was not “contrary to, or [ ] an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” and did not “result in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), (2).

Specifically, the California Court of Appeal’s determination that admission of the first statement was harmless under *Chapman v. California,*386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), because the jury could not have given any weight to the first statement, was reasonable in light of the jury’s factual findings and the substance of first statement. *See Medina v. Hornung,*386 F.3d 872, 878-79 (9th Cir.2004).

Also, the California Court of Appeals reasonably determined that the second statement was not tainted by the first interview, in light of the time that elapsed between the interviews of the witness, the less confrontational manner in which the second interview was conducted, and the substance of the second statement. *See Garvin v. Farmon,*258 F.3d 951 (9th Cir.2001).

Accordingly, admission of the first statement did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the jury’s verdict. *See Fry v. Pliler,*551 U.S. 112, 121-22, 127 S.Ct. 2321, 168 L.Ed.2d 16 (2007) (“[I]n § 2254 proceedings a court must assess the prejudicial impact of constitutional error in a state-court criminal trial under the ‘substantial and injurious effect’ standard set forth in *Brecht [v. Abrahamson],*507 U.S. 619 [113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) ], whether or not the state appellate court recognized the error and reviewed it for harmlessness.... ”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: November 19, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 223)]
[Notices]
[Page 64248]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19no98-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, December 21, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-31051 Filed 11-17-98; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1216 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1216

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 21, 2010.
Whereas Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin has served honorably and faithfully as 
        Chaplain of the House of Representatives since being sworn in as the 
        59th Chaplain on March 23, 2000;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was born on November 8, 1934, in Chicago, Illinois;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin graduated from St. Mary of the Lake University in 
        Mundelein, Illinois, becoming a Licentiate of Sacred Theology in 1960, 
        and from Loyola University in Chicago, Illinois, with a degree in 
        Pastoral Studies in 1968;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was ordained for the Archdiocese of Chicago on May 3, 
        1960;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was appointed the first Director of the Office for 
        Divine Worship for the Archdiocese of Chicago;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin spent a year-long sabbatical in residence with the 
        Trappist monks of the Abbey of Gethsemani in Kentucky, and served the 
        poor through the Missionaries of Charity in Calcutta, India, in 1984;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin served as scholar-in-residence at North American 
        College in Vatican City;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was pastor at St. Francis Xavier Parish in La Grange, 
        Illinois, from 1985 through 1990;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin worked as Vicar for Priests of the Archdiocese of 
        Chicago under both Joseph Cardinal Bernardin and Francis Cardinal George 
        from 1995 through 2000;
Whereas the Office of the Chaplain of the House of Representatives has served 
        the House since May 1, 1789;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin is the first person of Roman Catholic faith to hold 
        the Office of Chaplain of the House of Representatives; and
Whereas Reverend Coughlin opens proceedings in the House of Representatives with 
        prayer, and additionally provides pastoral counseling and arranges 
        memorial services for the House and its staff: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Reverend Daniel P. 
Coughlin on his 10th year of faithful service as Chaplain of the House of 
Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register: September 7, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07se00-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Friday, September 15, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-23110 Filed 9-5-00; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Brylane Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33899) of our report dated March 27, 1998
except for Note 16, as to which the date is April 3, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Brylane Inc. as of February 1, 1997 and
January 31, 1998, and for the years ended February 3, 1996, February 1, 1997,
and January 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 
10-K.



                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Indianapolis, Indiana
April 28, 1998
#### Roderick WILLIAMS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Appellees.

No. 09-5367.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 24, 2010.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 26, 2010.

Warden (SEATAC), Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Roderick Williams, Seattle, WA, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for appellees.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and motion to “save evidence and investigate” filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders issued September 2, 2009, and October 9, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the appellant’s complaint for damages and in-junctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *28§ 1915A(b)(l). The claims of prosecutorial misconduct in the appellant’s complaint, if successful, would have a probabilistic effect of invalidating his conviction; therefore, he must first demonstrate that his conviction has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, or called in question by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. *See Razzoli v. Federal Bureau of Prisons,*230 F.3d 371, 373-76 (D.C.Cir.2000); *see also Edwards v. Balisok,*520 U.S. 641, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997) (applying *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), to bar a state prisoner’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief in addition to money damages). To the extent that the appellant seeks injunctive relief to compel the Attorney General to investigate his claims of prosecutorial misconduct, the appellant failed to state a claim for such relief because the Attorney General has prosecuto-rial discretion to determine whether to investigate any alleged misconduct by federal prosecutors. *See*28 U.S.C. § 526(a)(1) (“The Attorney General *may*investigate ... the United States attorneys ... ”) (emphasis added); *see also United States v. Nixon,*418 U.S. 683, 693, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974) (“[T]he Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case.”). The district court did not err in denying the appellant’s motion for leave to amend the complaint because he “cannot possibly win relief’ on his claims of prosecutorial misconduct. *See Davis v. District of Columbia,*158 F.3d 1342, 1349 (D.C.Cir.1998). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to “save evidence and investigate” be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.