alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
foreclosed on both of the notes and allegedly acquired title to the subject

property. Upon discovering that the $210,000 had been paid to a thirdparty instead of being reinvested in the new loan, Mortgage Mart commenced foreclosure proceedings on the subject property and sold its note to respondents V.I.P. Trust Deed Company and Nevada Trust-Deed Services, Inc. (collectively, VIP Trust), who later purchased the subject property at a foreclosure sale.

Smeath filed a complaint to quiet title in the district court and a lis pendens on the subject property on the theory that Mortgage Mart's note had been paid in full and that Mortgage Mart had directed that the $210,000 be paid to the third-party entity after Mortgage Mart had received the funds in satisfaction of its note. VIP Trust sought to have the lis pendens expunged and moved for summary judgment on Smeath's quiet title complaint. The district court granted both of VIP Trust's motions. This appeal follows.

Because there is no evidence in the record showing that Mortgage Mart was paid the $210,000 on its note, we perceive no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the mortgage note was paid in full. See 

### Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 112 Nev. 663, 669, 918 P.2d 314, 318 (1996) ("In a quiet title action, the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to prove good title in himself'); 

### Sparks v. Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, 127 Nev. , 255 P.3d 238, 242-43 (2011) (we review a district court order granting summary judgment de novo, and summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law). Thus, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of VIP Trust. Further, we conclude that the district

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2);4.> court did not abuse its discretion by expunging the us pendens because

Smeath cannot succeed on his quiet title claim since the mortgage note was never fully satisfied. 

### See Zhang v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 1037, 1043, 103 P.3d 20, 24 (2004), 

### abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228 n.6, 181 P.3d 670, 672 n.6 (2008); NRS 14.015(3)(a). 1

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty



### C L Q 17 Cherry

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Thomas J. Tanksley, Settlement Judge Fidelity National Law Group Law Office of Edgar C. Smith Eighth District Court Clerk

'We further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to grant Smeath's request for a continuance of the motion for summary judgment under NRCP 56(f) to allow him to conduct discovery. Smeath did not make his request for a continuance in a separate affidavit as required by NRCP 56(f). 

### See Choy v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 127 Nev. „ 265 P.3d 698, 700 (2011) (holding that no continuance of summary judgment will issue pursuant to NRCP 56(f) where the party fails to make the request in a separate affidavit). J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 3
|   |   |                                           /s/ John R. Sult |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |  John      R. Sult                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|   |   |  Senior      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|   |   |  (Principal      Accounting and Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|   |   |  El      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., the                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   |           General Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |  November      7, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2011, the undersigned, Dr. Lee Johnson, President of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.





Date: March 17, 2011
/s/ Dr. Lee JohnsonDr. Lee JohnsonPresident and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: July 18, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 138)]
[Notices]
[Page 42691]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18jy03-74]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding The Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commision.

Time And Date: 11 a.m., Friday, August 22, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-18455 Filed 7-16-03; 1:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30884-30885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14444]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

[Docket No.: 010323078-1141-02]
RIN 0693-ZA44


Critical Infrastructure Protection Grants Program

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Friday, April 13, 2001, the National institute of Standards 
and Technology (NIST) announced in the Federal Register the 
availability of fiscal year 2001 funds for the Critical Infrastructure 
Protection Grants Program (CIPGP). The purpose of this notice is to 
inform the public that if additional funding is received by NIST for 
this program in fiscal year 2002, NIST may make additional awards to 
proposals evaluated under the fiscal year 2001 competition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald G. Marks; National Institute of 
Standards and Technology; 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8901; NIST North, Room 
622; Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8901; Tel: (301) 975-3660; E-Mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cb88829b8ba5a2b8bfe5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eba8a2bbab8582989fc58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additional information will be available on the website, http://csrc.nist.gov/grants. Questions regarding administrative matters such 
as payments or required forms should be directed to the NIST Grants 
Office at (301) 975-5718.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 13, 2001, NIST published a document 
in the Federal Register announcing the availability of fiscal year 2001 
funds for the Critical Infrastructure Protection Grants Program (CIPGP) 
(66 FR 19139). Should NIST receive additional funding for the CIPGP in 
fiscal year 2002, NIST may use that funding for making additional 
awards to proposals evaluated under the fiscal year 2001 competition. 
All information and requirements as published in the April 13, 2001 
Notice will remain in effect.


[[Page 30885]]


    Dated: June 1, 2001.
Karen H. Brown,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 01-14444 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Shigenobu Nagamori, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nidec Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2005

/s/   Shigenobu NagamoriShigenobu Nagamori
President, Chief Executive Officer and Representative Director
| November      13, 2009 |   |   /s/ John      Wang                                                                 |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Name:  John      Wang                                                                     |
|                   |   | Title: Chief      Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive      Officer) |

| November      13, 2009 | By:  |   /s/ Hao      Wu                                                                                  |
|------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |      | Name:  Hao      Wu                                                                                      |
|                   |      | Title: Chief      Financial Officer, Secretary and Director(Principal Financial and      Accounting Officer) |

----
Amendment to 2004 Restatement of Unfunded Retirement Income Guaranty Plan



 Exhibit 10 (f)(2) 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 to the 
 2004 RESTATEMENT 
 of the 
 XEROX CORPORATION UNFUNDED RETIREMENT INCOME GUARANTEE PLAN 
  
  
 W I T N E S S E T H : 
  
 WHEREAS, Xerox Corporation (the
“Company”) has adopted the Unfunded Retirement Income Guarantee Plan, which is presently set forth in the “2004 Restatement of Xerox Corporation Unfunded Retirement Income Guarantee Plan”, 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, 

 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

  

	1.	Section 3.1 shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

  
 “Section 3.1. Eligibility. All Employees and beneficiaries of Employees eligible to receive benefits from the Funded Plan shall be
eligible to receive benefits under this Plan in accordance with Section 4.1 regardless of when the Employees may have retired. Notwithstanding the above, if a Participant who is an Employee or former Employee of the Company is deemed by the
Plan Administrator, in his sole reasonable discretion, to have engaged in detrimental activity against the Company, such Employee or former Employee shall not be eligible to receive benefits under the Plan.” 
  

	2.	A new Section 6.6 shall be added to read in its entirety as follows: 

  
 “Section 6.6. Restriction of Venue. Any action in connection with the Plan by an Employee or beneficiary may only be brought in
Federal District Court in Monroe County, New York.” 
  

	3.	In the third sentence of Section 7.1, “(iii)” shall be amended to read as follows: 

  
 “(iii) the Vice President of the Company responsible for Human Resources or a representative
thereof.” 
  

	4.	The second paragraph of Section 7.1 shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

  
 “Any amendment, alteration, modification or suspension under subsection (iii) of the preceding paragraph shall be
set forth in a written instrument executed by the Vice President of the Company responsible for human resources.” 
  
 The effective date of this amendment is as of the date hereof. In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed and its corporate
seal duly affixed this 21st day of October, 2005. 
  
  

			
	 XEROX CORPORATION

		
	 By    
	 	/s/ Patricia M. Nazemetz
	 	 	 Vice President



  
  
  
  

	
	 ATTEST:

	
	/s/ J. Michael Farren
	Secretary
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued pu blished opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. James Wesley Amonett, Jr.
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1613-17-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on February 19, 2019

2. Joaquin Shadow Ra ms, Sr., a/k/a, etc.
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1453-17-4 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on February 26, 2019

3. Kathryn Johnson, s/k/a Kathryn Eileen Johnson
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1478-17-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on March 5, 2019

4. Clinard Gary Lambert
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1762-17-3 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on March 12, 2019The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued p ublished opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Roland Baldwin
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0740-17-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on July 17, 2018 Refused (181065)

2. Franklin Lee Thomason, Jr.
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1290-17-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on July 17, 2018 Refused (181054)

3. Eric Hamilton
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0814-17-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on August 7, 2018 Refused (181157)On May 2, 2019 the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the f ollowing case, w hich had been appealed from this Court

1. Tamara Felicia Brown
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0269-17-1 Memorandum opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien o n March 27, 20 18 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed (180537)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Holdings Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul K. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 14, 2008By:

/s/ Paul K. KellyPaul K. KellyChairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register: June 7, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 110)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 39473]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07jn02-154]



[[Page 39473]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 11


Delegation of Authority to the Director of the Division of
Enforcement To Institute Subpoena Enforcement Proceedings

Correction

    In rule document 02-13300 beginning on page 37322 in the issue of
Wednesday, May 29, 2002, make the following correction:
    On page 37322, in the first column, under ``EFFECTIVE DATE'' ``June
28, 2002'' should read ``May 29, 2002''.

[FR Doc. C2-13300 Filed 6-6-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

�
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 9, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Brian Lenz                                       |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Name:  | Brian Lenz                                           |
|              | Title: | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of China Yuchai International Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Hoh Weng MingName: Hoh Weng MingTitle: President and Director


Date: April 17, 2017

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.