alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (3)
THE EXHIBITS FILED AS A PART OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10k IS THE
FOLLOWING:
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,639
<SECURITIES>                                    13,729
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (531)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,010
<PP&E>                                          11,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,268)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,365
<SALES>                                         48,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,498
<CGS>                                            9,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (229)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (404)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
32.1
            CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.




I, Chet
Gutowsky, the Chief Executive Officer of Southfield Energy Corporation, hereby
certify that to my knowledge, Southfield Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Southfield
Energy Corporation.




Date:
November 15, 2010




/s/
      Chet GutowskyChet
      Gutowsky
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark K. Ryun, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Here Enterprises,
      Inc. for the period ended February 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Here Enterprises, Inc.                                                                    

|Dated: April 12, 2010 |                                                        
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                        
|                      |                                                        
|                      | /s/ Mark K.
Ryun                                       
|                      | Mark K. Ryun                                           
|                      | President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director          
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
|                      | Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)             

---
**Fidelity**®

U.S. Bond Index
**Exhibit 23.1**







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
      PUBLIC
      ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the use in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.
333-105828, 333-111944 and
      333-123208) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive
      Plan, the Amended and Restated 1998 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan
      and Amended and Restated 2001 Non-Statutory Plan and the 2003 employee stock
      purchase plan of Urigen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the Registration Statements
      on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38092, 333-54066, 333-104022, 333-112821,
      333-117523, 333-126678 and 33-133413) and related prospectus of Urigen
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report (which contains an explanatory
      paragraph relating to Urigen Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.’s ability to continue
      as a going concern as described in Note 1 to the financial statements) dated
      October 2, 2007, relating to the financial statements of Urigen Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30,
      2007.










October
                2, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Burr,
              Pilger & Mayer LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1186 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1186

  Expressing support for designation of April as National Distracted 
                        Driving Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2010

 Ms. Markey of Colorado submitted the following resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of April as National Distracted 
                        Driving Awareness Month.

Whereas 9-year-old Erica Forney of Fort Collins, Colorado, was struck and killed 
        by a distracted driver in 2008;
Whereas there were more than 276,000,000 wireless cell phone subscribers in the 
        United States as of June 2009, an increase of 42 percent from 
        194,000,000 in June 2005, and nearly 3 times more than the 97,000,000 
        wireless subscribers in June 2000;
Whereas over 600,000,000,000 text messages were sent in 2008, nearly 4 times the 
        number sent in 2006;
Whereas according to the recent National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey, 
        80 percent of all traffic incidents and 65 percent of all near-crashes 
        involve some type of distraction;
Whereas according to data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), 
        driver distraction was reported to have been involved in 16 percent of 
        all fatal crashes in 2008, which is an increase from 12 percent in 2004;
Whereas the Secretary of Transportation held a Distracted Driving Summit in 
        September 2009; and
Whereas April would be an appropriate month to designate as National Distracted 
        Driving Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of Distracted Driving 
        Awareness Month;
            (2) encourages all people in the United States to consider 
        the lives of others on the road and avoid distracted driving; 
        and
            (3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House to 
        transmit a copy of this resolution to FocusDriven, an advocacy 
        group for victims of motor vehicle crashes involving drivers 
        using cell phones.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: July 21, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 39075]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21jy98-45]


[[Page 39075]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, August 31, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19534 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2014-10-10 11:25:03","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["45"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["70"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["27"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q4"}
No. 116.

#### Drackett Company *v.*Chamberlain Company.

*504Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Messrs. Walter F. Murray, Jonathan S. Green,*and *Edgar W. McCallister*for appellant.

*Messrs. W. H. Parmelee, Bruce G. Mackey,*and *Leslie C. Strickland*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 240 (b) and (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 939). The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied for the reason that application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, § 8 (a) 43 Stat. 936, 940).

*

Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of any of the cases reported in this volume in which judgments or orders were announced on November 9th or days subsequent.

For decisions on applications for certiorari, see *post,*pp. 523, 539; for rehearing, *post,*p. 618.
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**Telecom Argentina S.A. Subsidiaries**

 
| **Name**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|----------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Telecom Personal S.A.            |       | Argentina                                   |
|                             |       |                                        |
| Núcleo S.A. (1)             |       | Paraguay                                    |
|                             |       |                                        |
| Personal Envíos S.A. (2)    |       | Paraguay                                    |
|                             |       |                                        |
| Micro Sistemas S.A. (3)          |       | Argentina                                   |
|                             |       |                                        |
| Telecom Argentina USA, Inc. |       | Delaware, United States                     |

 

----

(1)         Interest held indirectly through Telecom Personal S.A.

(2)         Interest held indirectly through Núcleo S.A.

(3)         Dormant subsidiary as of December 31, 2015.

 

----
```

[Federal Register: March 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 59)]
[Notices]
[Page 15842]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29mr05-52]


[[Page 15842]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Pool Industry Issues;
Meeting

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (``Commission'') will hold a public roundtable meeting at
which invited participants will discuss issues concerning commodity
pool operators and the commodity pool industry. An agenda and list of
participants will be available on the Commission's Web site,  href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.cftc.gov" shape="rect">http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.cftc.gov
.


DATES: Wednesday, April 6, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.

PLACE: Commission Headquarters, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC.
Lobby Level Hearing Room.

STATUS: Open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

    Issued in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March, 2005.

    By the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-6084 Filed 3-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
No. 25.

#### Chicago *v.*Chicago Rapid Transit Co.

Argued October 21, 1931.

Decided October 26, 1931.

*Per Curiam:*

This suit was brought to restrain the Illinois Commerce Commission and the Attorney General of the State of Illinois from enforcing an order of the commission prescribing rates of fare upon the appellee’s railroads upon the ground that the order was confiscatory and in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The City of Chicago was permitted to intervene as defendant. The District Court, composed of three judges (U. S. C., Title 28, § 380), granted an interlocutory *578injunction, and on final hearing entered its decree, adjudging, upon findings, that the rates prescribed by the state commission were confiscatory and permanently restraining the enforcement of its order. The Illinois Commerce Commission and the Attorney General of the State have not appealed from the decree, which is thus a final adjudication of the invalidity of the rate order. The present appeal is taken by the City of Chicago.

*Mr. Joseph F. Grossman,*with whom *Messrs. Wm. H. Sexton, Albert H. Veeder, Samuel A. Ettelson,*and *Edward C. Higgins*were on the brief,.for appellant.

*Messrs. Addison L. Gardner, Harry J. Dunbaugh,*and *Gilbert E. Porter*were on the brief for appellee.' \

The Court is of the opinion that the City of. Chicago has no separate standing which entitles it to appeal from the decree, and its appeal is dismissed. *Pawhuska*v. *Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.,*250 U. S. 394; *Chicago*v. *Dempcy,*250 U. S. 651; *Denney*v. *Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.,*276 U. S. 97, 102; *Railroad Commission of California*v. *Los Angeles Ry. Corp.,*280 U. S. 145, 156; *Public Utilities Commission*v. *Quincy,*290 Ill. 360, 369, 370; 125 N. E. 374; *Chicago Railways Co.*v.. *Chicago,*292 Ill. 190 , 195; 126 N. E. 585; 257 U. S. 617; *Hoyne*v. *Chicago & Oak Park Elevated Ry. Co.,*294 Ill. 413, 420-422; 128 N. E. 587. See also *New York City*v. *New York Telephone Co.,*261 U. S. 312, 316.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1178 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1178

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 9, 2010.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. INTERNET POSTING OF CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATES.

    (a) Internet Posting.--The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 
ensure that cost estimates prepared by the Congressional Budget Office are 
available to the public by including a link to the official web site of the 
Congressional Budget Office on the official public Internet site of the Office 
of the Clerk.
    (b) Regulations.--The Clerk shall carry out this resolution in accordance 
with regulations promulgated by the Committee on House Administration.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register: June 4, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 107)]
[Notices]
[Page 30479]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04jn98-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Friday, June 30, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor, Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14963 Filed 6-2-98; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          406,733
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   469,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (43,237)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,101,582
<PP&E>                                           401,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (112,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,653,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,924,737
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                          39
<COMMON>                                          3,930
<OTHER-SE>                                      724,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,653,903
<SALES>                                       2,981,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,981,260
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 7,147,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 83,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              262,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,195,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,195,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (151,449)
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,347,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (2.11)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason J. Alejandro, Appellant.

[876 NYS2d 281] —

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered September 4, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and unlawful possession of marihuana.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a nonjury trial of criminal possession of a controlled *1382substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03) and unlawful possession of marihuana (§ 221.05). Defendant made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal, and thus failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, defendant’s challenge lacks merit *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), and we therefore reject the further contention of defendant that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve that challenge for our review *(see People v Caban,*5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277, 287 [2004], *rearg denied*3 NY3d 702 [2004]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes in this nonjury trial *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally Bleakley,*69 NY2d at 495). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, Garni and Green, JJ.