alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gérard Mestrallet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUEZ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2005



/s/

Gérard Mestrallet

Gérard Mestrallet
Chief Executive Officer
%a bo a fraaohim the right mwt bo 

OS rush 8 nature that, wlbhout oxpeas lo&rlatfvo authority, it oannot be ereroi~m4. 

. Yho legislative department OS the 

L 

886 i 

k ham been unable to fin4 my rrtadutary or oonstitutlonal dutgdty, either sxpmrr w limlfs4, whiob would aumJf"0 th* o~nslonelr8' come to grtuit a pmy bus tran- 

. 

Opinion So. O-1805 of this 4eyertment holds that the 

Oommimloner~* aourt of Brewster &n&y, Poxar, has no authorltty 

toarant afrenohlse to the GuitralPowrrtLi&t Com9nny to 

oover Plmnmhbr Dbm%y, Tsxa8. 

Opinion So. O-2517 or thi8 4qmtumnt hol4r that the 

aomals~lormrr* aourt or Yontgmmry Qountt he* no authority 

to grant a rranohiao to a telephone ocmpuy.
FY06 Base Salaries and Target Annual Incentive Awards



 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 Fiscal Year 2006 
 Base Salaries and Target Annual Incentive Awards 
 for Sun Microsystems, Inc.’s 
 Named Executive Officers 
  
 On July 28, 2005, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of Sun Microsystems, Inc. (“Sun”) approved base salaries and target annual
incentive awards for its named executive officers for fiscal 2006. Jonathan I. Schwartz will receive a base salary of $900,000 and his target annual incentive award will be 200% of his base salary; Scott G. McNealy’s base salary and target
annual incentive award were not changed from those for fiscal 2005; Crawford W. Beveridge’s and Stephen T. McGowan’s base salaries were not changed from those for fiscal 2005, but each received a customary annual increase of his target
annual incentive award; and Gregory M. Papadopoulos received customary annual increases in his base salary and target annual incentive award.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31226-31227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-83-000]


CE Generation, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

June 4, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 25, 2001, CE Generation, L.L.C. tendered 
for filing a Petition for Enforcement Action and/or Declaratory Order 
and Motion to Consolidate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 25, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically

[[Page 31227]]

via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14560 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Casita, LP, Respondent, v MapleWood Equity Partners (Offshore) Ltd., Appellant. (And Another Action.)

[874 NYS2d 123]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered January 4, 2008, which granted plaintiffs cross motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant from declaring or holding plaintiff in default under the parties’ articles of association and subscription agreement, or acting upon any default by plaintiff, as a consequence of plaintiff’s refusal to fund certain capital calls, and order, same court and Justice, entered July 3, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff’s cross motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims based on two of the capital calls, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs application for preliminary injunctive relief upon its clear showing of a likelihood of success on the merits of its claim that defendant’s calls for capital contributions (capital calls) were not authorized under the controlling articles of association and subscription agreement, that plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury unless the relief sought was granted, and that the balancing of the equities lies in favor of plaintiff *(see W.T. Grant Co. v Srogi,*52 NY2d 496, 517 [1981]). The record evidence establishes that defendant’s capital calls for litigation expenses and for “Follow-on Investments” were untimely, causing the potential for plaintiffs default and the loss of plaintiffs voting power and decision-making rights appurtenant to its shares.

Since the documentary evidence conclusively establishes that the capital calls issued for Follow-on Investments were untimely, the court properly granted plaintiffs cross motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims for breach of contract and for a declaratory judgment that it was entitled to issue those capital calls. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta and Renwick, JJ. *[See*17 Misc 3d 1137(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 52322(U).]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1146 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 171
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1146

                          [Report No. 111-428]

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   248) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                              Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2010

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   248) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                              Afghanistan.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 248) directing the 
President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to 
remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan, if called up by 
Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his designee. The concurrent 
resolution shall be considered as read. The concurrent resolution shall 
be debatable for three hours, with 90 minutes controlled by 
Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his designee and 90 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without 
intervening motion.
                                                 House Calendar No. 171

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1146

                          [Report No. 111-428]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   248) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                              Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 9, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surf Resorts, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Eduardo Biancardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Surf Resorts, Inc., and will be retained by International Surf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Eduardo
      BiancardiEduardo
      Biancardi
                  Chief Financial
      Officer
                  August
      14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1185 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1185

Congratulating Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin on his tenth year of service 
              as Chaplain of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2010

Mr. Lipinski (for himself and Mr. Fortenberry) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin on his tenth year of service 
              as Chaplain of the House of Representatives.

Whereas Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin has served honorably and faithfully as 
        Chaplain of the House of Representatives since being sworn in as the 
        fifty-ninth Chaplain on March 23, 2000;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was born on November 8, 1934, in Chicago, Illinois;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin graduated from St. Mary of the Lake University in 
        Mundelein, Illinois, becoming a Licentiate of Sacred Theology in 1960, 
        and from Loyola University in Chicago, Illinois, with a degree in 
        Pastoral Studies in 1968;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was ordained for the Archdiocese of Chicago on May 3, 
        1960;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was appointed the first Director of the Office for 
        Divine Worship for the Archdiocese of Chicago;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin spent a year-long sabbatical in residence with the 
        Trappist monks of the Abbey of Gethsemani in Kentucky, and served the 
        poor through the Missionaries of Charity in Calcutta, India, in 1984;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin served as scholar-in-residence at North American 
        College in the Vatican City in Rome, Italy;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin was pastor at St. Francis Xavier Parish in La Grange, 
        Illinois, from 1985 through 1990;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin worked as Vicar for Priests of the Archdiocese of 
        Chicago under both Joseph Cardinal Bernardin and Francis Cardinal George 
        from 1995 through 2000;
Whereas the Office of the Chaplain of the House of Representatives has continued 
        unbroken since May 1, 1789;
Whereas Reverend Coughlin is the first person of Roman Catholic faith to hold 
        the Office of Chaplain of the House of Representatives; and
Whereas Reverend Coughlin opens proceedings in the House of Representatives with 
        prayer, and additionally provides pastoral counseling and arranges 
        memorial services for the House and its staff: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Reverend 
Daniel P. Coughlin on his tenth year of faithful service as Chaplain of 
the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: March 17, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 12605]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17mr97-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of intent to renew information collection # 3038-0017:
Market Surveys.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is planning to renew
information collection 3038-0017, Market Surveys, which is due to
expire on June 30, 1997. Section 8(a) (i) and (ii) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (``Act'') provide that for the efficient execution of the
provisions of the Act and in order to inform Congress, the Commission
may make investigations concerning futures markets and may publish
general statistical information from such investigations. In certain
instances in response to abrupt and substantial changes in market
prices, Congressional inquiry or other reasons, the Commission may
conduct full market investigation requiring that all persons holding
futures positions on the date in question in a specific market be
identified. In such cases the Commission issues its call for survey
information pursuant to rule 21.02. In compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission solicits comments to:

    (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) evaluate
the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of
the collection of the information on those who are to respond,
including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection
should contact the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW,
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5160.
    Title: Market Surveys.
    Control Number: 33038-0017.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Businesses.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 700 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 11, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-6601 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kum Soon YOO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10284.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Karon Virginia Johnson, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Hagatna, GU, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Rawlen M.T. Mantanona, Esquire, Partner, Cabot Mantanona LLP, Tamuning, GU, for Defendant-Appellant.

*289Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kum Soon Yoo appeals from the 97-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams net weight of methamphetamine hydrochloride (“ice”), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

Yoo contends that the district court erred when determining her base offense level because it improperly attributed at least 1.5 kilograms of “ice” to her and failed to require the government to prove the quantity and purity of the drugs beyond a reasonable doubt. However, her intentional withdrawal of her objection regarding this issue constitutes a waiver for purposes of appeal. *See United States v. Streich,*560 F.3d 926, 930 n. 1 (9th Cir.2009); *see also United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 733, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (“Whereas forfeiture is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right, waiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maiden Holdings, Ltd.
      (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Max Caviet, President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/Art
                RaschbaumArt
                RaschbaumChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)November
                13, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eleanar PIMENTEL-MENDIOLA, also known as Elias Moraila-Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-40513

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eleanar Pimentel-Mendiola (Pimentel) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pimen-tel has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1003

Natural Gas Basis Swap - CG Mainline - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC CG Mainline

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.