alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Diane L. BEATREZ, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 2010-3145.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

*582Robert Walter Bruce Jr., U.S. Coast Guard, Arlington, VA, for Petitioner.

Before LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PROST, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Diane Beatrez moves for a stay, pending review in this court, of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s May 14, 2010 order requiring the United States Coast Guard to suspend Beatrez without pay for ten days. The Merit Systems Protection Board moves for leave to intervene for purposes of moving to reform the official caption to designate the Board as the respondent and opposes Beatrez’s motion to stay. Beatrez replies. Separately, Counsel for Beatrez moves without opposition for leave to withdraw as counsel and moves to stay the briefing schedule until Beatrez obtains new counsel. We treat the motion to stay the briefing schedule as a motion for an extension of time.

The Administrative Judge dismissed the Office of Special Counsel’s complaint against Beatrez alleging that she violated 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(6) by granting a preference or advantage to a Coast Guard employee to improve his chances of obtaining a promotion. On review, the Board reversed the initial decision, determined that Beatrez violated § 2302(b)(6) by aiding or abetting another employee who violated the statute, and ordered the Coast Guard to suspend her for ten days without pay.

In her motion, Beatrez asserts that she is suffering extreme and undue hardship because of her suspension. Specifically, Beatrez states that her suspension will cause her shame and will damage her professional reputation. However, in *Sampson v. Murray,*415 U.S. 61, 89-92, 94 S.Ct. 937, 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974), the Supreme Court held that loss of federal employment and earnings, humiliation, or damage to one’s reputation are not irreparable harms warranting interim relief in a case involving discipline of a federal employee.

Accordingly,

It Is ORDERED That:

(1) The Board’s motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) The motion for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted.

(4) The motion for an extension of time is granted in part. Beatrez’s brief is due within 90 days of the date of filing of this order.

(2) Beatrez’s motion to stay her suspension, pending review, is denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10834 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Eduardo Nieblas,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:21

- CR

- 4

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

.
**Per Curiam :**  *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Nieblas
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nieblas has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 4, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10834 Document: 00516225324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2022No. 21

- 10834

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-10834 Document: 00516225324 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 935 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 935

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the number of 
     persons appointed to the military service academies from the 
 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa from 
nominations made by the Delegates in Congress from the Commonwealth of 
            the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mr. Faleomavaega) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the number of 
     persons appointed to the military service academies from the 
 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa from 
nominations made by the Delegates in Congress from the Commonwealth of 
            the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMIES FROM NOMINATIONS 
              MADE BY DELEGATES FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN 
              MARIANA ISLANDS AND AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) United States Military Academy.--Section 4342(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9), by striking ``Two'' and inserting 
        ``Three''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``One'' and inserting 
        ``Three''.
    (b) United States Naval Academy.--Section 6954(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9), by striking ``Two'' and inserting 
        ``Three''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``One'' and inserting 
        ``Three''.
    (c) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9342(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) In paragraph (9), by striking ``Two'' and inserting 
        ``Three''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``One'' and inserting 
        ``Three''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to the nomination of candidates for appointment to 
the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, 
and the United States Air Force Academy for classes entering these 
military service academies after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 29714]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn97-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11: a.m., Friday, June 6, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-14460 Filed 5-29-97; 1:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Exhibit 23.1
                         Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-22813, 333-27625, and
333-49485) of our report, which contains an explanatory paragraph about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated December 22, 1998,
except for Note 5 as to which the date is January 6, 1999, on the consolidated
balance sheets of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 1998 and September
30, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of loss, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 1997 and 1998
and the four months ended September 30, 1998, which report appears in the Form
10-KSB/A-1 of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. for the transition period ended
September 30, 1998.


                                                            Wolf & Company, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts
January 22, 1999
#### Mary E. Leonard, Esq., as Bankruptcy Trustee, in Regard to the Estate of Samuel VanHorn, Deceased, and Another, Bankruptcy Case No. *04-65584,*United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York, Respondent, v Thompson & Johnson Equipment Co., Inc., et al., Appellants

(Appeal No. 1.)

[874 NYS2d 833] —

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Kar alunas, J.), entered July 30, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them.

It is hereby ordered that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988 [1988]; *Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts,*63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Martoche, J.P., Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
              32.1**
 
 SECTION
              906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.
 
 In
              connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot
              VN, Inc.
              for the quarter ended July 31, 2008, the undersigned, Thomas Johnson,
              Chief
              Executive Officer of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to
              18 U.S.C.
              Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
              Act of
              2002, that:
 
 (1)
              such
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 fully
              complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act
              of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
              the
              information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
              quarter
              ended July 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial
              condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.
  Date:
                      September
                      12, 2008/s/ Thomas
                      JohnsonThomas
                      JohnsonChief
                        Executive Officer and principal executive
                        officer
**Exhibit 12.1**I, James Murdoch, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (“theCompany”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: 31July 2006
```

[Federal Register: October 14, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 198)]
[Notices]
[Page 59164]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14oc03-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Tuesday, October 21, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st. St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

Status: Closed.

Matters To be Considered: Enforcement matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-25971 Filed 10-8-03; 4:10 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Energy and Environmental Markets A

Energy and Environmental MaTalking past each other

Rafa

Division of Marke

Market 

Wednesday, M
0.00

0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

Power Generation Fuel Costs(performancesinc

Coal Natural Gas Residual Fuel Oil (c) 

Source: Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration.
57.0058.0059.0060.0061.0062.0063.0064.0065.0066.0067.00

Prices and ConsumptionExpectations

Forecasted 12mo. Consumption (bcf/d) NaturalGas Price 

12 mo. AverageBcf‐day

Source: Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration.
What caused the “roll

•Tire

• Design•Condition•Use

•Driver

• Speed•Habits

SYST

A better q

How d

catastr
Markets are in constant rein

• Markets are human constructs of 

complexity.

• Energy markets operate within a 

system.

• Propensity to periodic bursts migh

unavoidable

• However, we need to keep trying 

weaknesses, review practices, impdiscovery and information flows.
The best way to avoid rep

• Policies around the world are bein

based on misperceptions of what 

• Interventions risk making things w

we cannot continue from boom to 

• We need to engage more product

industry and academia to underst

happened

• Need to keep in mind we operate 

public license. Engage the public.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1251 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1251

Recognizing and honoring the United States troops who gave their lives 
                  on D-Day at the Battle of Normandy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2010

    Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. Thornberry) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and honoring the United States troops who gave their lives 
                  on D-Day at the Battle of Normandy.

Whereas June 6 marks the 66th anniversary of the D-Day landings at Normandy, 
        France;
Whereas more than 150,000 troops of the Allied forces participated in the 
        Normandy landings;
Whereas 31,000 United States soldiers stormed the beaches of Normandy on D-Day 
        and more than 6,000 of them gave their lives fighting for the cause of 
        freedom;
Whereas, on June 6, 1944, close to 31,000 Allied airmen flew 7,500 raids between 
        midnight and 8 a.m.;
Whereas 5,000 ships carrying soldiers and supplies crossed the English Channel;
Whereas the United States shipped 7,000,000 tons of supplies, of which 448,000 
        tons was ammunition;
Whereas 800 Allied planes dropped over 13,000 men in parachutes;
Whereas 300 Allied planes dropped bombs on German troops defending the beaches;
Whereas Allied troops came ashore on a 60-mile front in the largest seaborne 
        invasion in history;
Whereas more than 100,000 Allied soldiers made it ashore while 9,000 of their 
        comrades were wounded or died;
Whereas there are 9,386 graves in Colleville-sur-Mer, the largest United States 
        cemetery in Northern France where all graves face west, toward the 
        United States;
Whereas there are 307 graves containing the remains of unknown soldiers;
Whereas within the Garden of the Missing there are 1,557 names of soldiers who 
        were never found;
Whereas the average age of United States soldiers fighting in the Battle of 
        Normandy was 20 years old;
Whereas captured Germans were sent to United States prisoner of war (POW) camps 
        at the rate of 30,000 POWs per month from D-Day until Christmas 1944; 
        and
Whereas the Allied landings on D-Day led to the liberation of France and 
        culminated in the ultimate annihilation of the Nazi empire: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the United States troops who gave their lives in 
        the Battle of Normandy;
            (2) recognizes the 66th anniversary of the D-Day landings 
        at Normandy, France; and
            (3) expresses gratitude to the ``greatest generation'' of 
        United States soldiers who fearlessly fought for freedom.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of EmoCapital Corp. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending April 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Juanming Fang                                   

Juanming Fang, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 27, 2008
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Jerry Collazo, certify that: 

1.        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 ofOrange 21 Inc.; 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)    Designed internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.