alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3693

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Johnny L. Cornelious, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 6, 2007 

 Filed: November 13, 2007

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Johnny L. Cornelious (Cornelious) pled guilty to distributing more than

5 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), the district court1

sentenced Cornelious to 87 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On

appeal, Cornelious’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), and moved to withdraw. Cornelious filed a pro se supplemental brief. For the

reasons discussed below, we reject all of the arguments raised on appeal, and we grant

counsel’s withdrawal motion.
-2-

First, the sentencing transcript shows Cornelious was held responsible for only

5-20 grams of cocaine base, consistent with the amounts in the indictment and plea

agreement. Second, Cornelious’s claim he was never provided with a copy of the

presentence report is not supported by the record. Third, a direct criminal appeal is

not a vehicle to remedy an alleged information leak by the government that has caused

a defendant past hardship in prison. Fourth, matters to which defense counsel made

and withdrew objections below--the application of an aggravating-role enhancement

and the calculation of the criminal history score--are deemed intentionally

relinquished or abandoned and need not be reviewed on appeal. See United States v.

Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993); United States v. Tulk, 171 F.3d 596, 600 (8th Cir.

1999). Fifth, Cornelious’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must be raised,

if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449

F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir. 2006).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We affirm the

judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 29, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. ABC Bancorp, Inc., Moultrie, Georgia; to merge with Golden Isles 
Financial Holdings, Inc., St. Simons Island, Georgia, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of First Bank of Brunswick, Brunswick, 
Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 31, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-14139 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-203

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 05/02/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of April 24, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

May 2, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-203

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of April 24, 2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-134 (April 27, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy Margin -

Effective April 28, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-135 (April 27, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture, 

Energy, Equity, and FX Margins - Effective April 28, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
Exhibit 10.1

LOGO

June 27, 2011

Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329

Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos,

Torre Ejecutiva, Piso 41

11311 Mexico, D.F. México

Dear Dr. Suarez Coppel:

We hereby consent to the references to Ryder Scott Company L.P. as set forth under the heading Exploration and Production
(Reserves) in the annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 20-F) and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F our report describing our review of the estimates
of proved oil, condensate, natural gas and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico) as of January 1, 2011, for 276 fields located onshore in and offshore from Mexico in the Northern Region. These estimates
were prepared in accordance with the applicable reserves definitions of Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580




|                                 |  |                             |  |                    |  |                   
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------
|1015 4TH STREET, S.W., SUITE 600 |  | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4    |  | TEL (403) 262-2799 |  | FAX (403) 262-2790
|621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550      |  | DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 |  | TEL (303) 623-9147 |  | FAX (303) 623-4258
# C_2010343EN.01001301.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/13

---

Annual Report 2009

2010/C 343/07

The European Ombudsman has presented his Annual Report for the year 2009 to the European Parliament.

The Annual Report as well as a shorter version are available on the European Ombudsman's website in all 23 official languages at:

http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies of these publications can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| CS 30403 |
| 67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 388172313 |
| Fax +33 388179062 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403

67001 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Tel. +33 388172313

Fax +33 388179062

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1146 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1146

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 10, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 248) directing the President, pursuant to 
section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed 
Forces from Afghanistan, if called up by Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his 
designee. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. The concurrent 
resolution shall be debatable for three hours, with 90 minutes controlled by 
Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his designee and 90 minutes equally divided 
and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2319

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. NINA HELWIG, Esq.; JOHN MONAHAN, Esq.; MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE NGOLE, Esq. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv
- 02652

- TDC )

Submitted : April 27, 2018 Decided: May 16, 2018

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
civ il complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torkornoo v. Helwig , No . 8:15

- cv
02652

- TDC (D. Md., Oct. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), PaulGoddard, Chief Executive Officer of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”),and John Varian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.             The information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as ofthe 15th day of November, 2010.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Paul Goddard                                 |   | By:    | /s/  John Varian                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul  Goddard, Ph.D.                              |   |   | John  Varian                                         |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-63564) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-87882,
33-87776, 33-89382, 333-02340, 333-06303, 333-16963, 333-20853, 333-52603,
333-80861, 333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550 and 333-97101) of Applix, Inc. of our
report dated January 24, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 30, 2003
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patricia Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Asia Atlantic Resources on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Atlantic Resources.    __/s/  Patricia Cooke____________________________ Patricia Cooke President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  March 18, 2010
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of Allied First Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-87836)
of our report  dated July 19,  2004,  except for Note 17 as to which the date is
September 3, 2004,  on the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Allied First
Bancorp,  Inc.,  which  report is  incorporated  by reference in the 2004 Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Allied First Bancorp, Inc.




                                                    Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Oak Brook, Illinois
September 27, 2004
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re Corey Dewayne Wilbert

No. 06

- 23

- 00002

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

, Justice van Cleef and

Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JANUARY 24, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
No. 69772 

FILED 

MAR 1 8 2016 

TR CIE K. LMIDEMAN 

CLERK4JFAUPREME COURT 

BY -yo 

DEPUTY CLERK I 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

GABRIEL GARCIA, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

ELISSA F. CADISH, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY; AND JOYCE 

KING, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a 

district court order dismissing, for failure to state a viable claim, the 

portion of a complaint seeking to renew a judgment against real party in 

interest Joyce King. Having considered the petition, we conclude that 

petitioner has failed to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is 

warranted. 

A writ of mandamus is available to compel legally-required 

action by an inferior state tribunal, but the writ generally will not issue 

when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. 

NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; Mineral Cty. v. State, Dep't of Conservation & 

Nat. Res., 117 Nev. 235, 242-43, 20 P.3d 800, 805 (2001). Here, petitioner 

has indicated that, after King was dismissed, the underlying case was 

removed to the federal district court. As a result, the respondent district 

court lacks jurisdiction, and petitioner's remedy properly lies with the 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) '947A 

- 08&35 
taaal 

federal court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(d) and 1450 (2012); Ackerman v. 

ExxonMobil Corp., 734 F.3d 237, 249 (4th Cir. 2013); Laguna Viii., Inc. v. 

Laborers' Intl Union of N. Am., 672 P.2d 882, 885 (Cal. 1983). 

Accordingly, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not 

warranted or appropriate, Mineral Cty., 117 Nev. 235, 20 P.3d 800 

(denying a writ petition out of deference to the proper, federal court 

forum), and we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Ao_A 

Hardesty 

J. 

Saitta 

Pieith AI) , J. 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Christensen Law Offices, LLC 

Harper Law Group 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 0
Filed 11/3/15 P. v. Lars CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MARCUS D. LA RS

,

Defendant and Appellant

. B 26 2153

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. NA081578 )

A PPEAL from a judgment of the Superior C ourt of Los Angeles County

, James

Otto

, Judge . Affirmed.

Janet Uson

, under appointment by the Court of Appe al, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________________2

In 2009

, Marcus Lars, who has a significant criminal record, was convicted of two

counts of transport and sale of a controlled substance in vi olation of Health and Safety

Code section 11352 , his second “strike” under Penal Code section 1170.12, subd ivision

(c)(1). 1 He was sentenced to a determinate prison term of 11 years.

In 20 14, Lars petitioned for resentencing pursuant to Proposition 36, the Three

Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (§ 1170.126)

, and Proposition 47, the Saf e Neighborhoods

and Schools Act (§ 1170.18). T he trial court denied the petition , and Lars appealed.

We appointed counsel to represent Lars on appeal , but a fter examination of the

record counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to review the

record independently pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. On Ju ne 4,

2015, we informed Lars he had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues he wished us

to consider. We also directed his appointed counsel to send the record and opening brief

to him immediately. We received no response.

Resentencing under Proposition 36 is unavailable to any “ person who is presently

serving a term of imprisonme nt for a ‘ second strike ’ conviction imposed pursuant to

. . .

paragraph (1) of sub division (c) of Section 1170.12. ” (§ 1170.126, subd. (c).)

Resentencing under Proposition 47 is unavailable to a person convicted of violating

Health and Safety Code sectio n 11352. (See § 1170.18, subd. (a).) Lars is serving a

determinate sentence for a second strike conviction pursuant to section 1170.12,

subdivision (c)(1), for violating Health and Safety Code section 11352. He is therefore

ineligible for resentencing u nder either proposition.

We have otherwise examined the entire record and conclude Lars ’ s counsel

complied with the responsibilities set forth in People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106 and

People v. Wende

, supra , 25 Cal.3d at p age 441 . No arguable issues e xist

.

1 Undesignated statutory references will be to the Penal Code.3 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed

.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

CHANEY

, Acting P. J.

We concur:

JOHNSON, J.

LUI, J.
```

[Federal Register: May 3, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 86)]
[Notices]
[Page 22217]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03my01-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 30, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-11229 Filed 5-1-01; 10:59 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```