alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald M Prest, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Omnicity Corp. (formerly Bear River Resources, Inc.) hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Omnicity Corp. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Omnicity Corp.

Date:  November 13, 2008

|"Donald M Prest"                                                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Donald M Prest 
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director 
 (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer  and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Omnicity Corp. and will be retained by Omnicity Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
<PAGE>
                                IMAX CORPORATION

                                  Exhibit 10.20

                       SUMMARY OF DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION

1.   In respect of each year during which an Eligible Director serves as a
     Director of the Corporation, he shall receive:

     a.   $20,000 (Cdn.) per year payable quarterly in arrears provided that an
          Eligible Director may elect, at the commencement of each year of
          office, or as soon as practicable thereafter, to receive such number
          of options to purchase an equivalent number of Common Shares of the
          Corporation under the terms of the IMAX Stock Option Plan (the
          "Plan"). The options will be granted annually and will vest in equal
          amounts quarterly, in arrears;

     b.   $1,500 (Cdn.) for every Board meeting attended in which an Eligible
          Director participates whether in person or by telephone;

     c.   $1,200 (Cdn.) for any Committee of the Board meetings in which the
          Eligible Director participates, whether in person or by telephone;

     d.   at the commencement of each year of office or upon joining the Board,
          or as soon as practicable thereafter, a grant of options to purchase
          8,000 Common Shares of the Corporation under the terms of the IMAX
          Stock Option Plan at an exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value
          of the shares, as defined in the Plan; and

     e.   reimbursement of any expenses incurred by the Eligible Director in
          connection with participation in Board or Committee meetings.

2.   The Chair of the Audit Committee shall receive $8,000 (Cdn.) per year
     payable quarterly, in arrears.

3.   The annual compensation for Directors, as set out above, shall remain in
     effect until it is amended or revoked by further resolution.

August 11, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the Report.








This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be
deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:                      August 7, 2009





/s/
James J. McCarthyJames J. McCarthyExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 10.20
 Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.(SQUIRE SANDERS LOGO)
    
    Suite 5001201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20004Office:     +1.202.626.6600Fax:          +1.202.626.6780
 Direct Dial:   +1.202.626.6793
jmurphy@ssd.com




---



##### 



Sincerely yours,s/ James P. MurphyJames P. MurphyPartner and General Counsel  cc:
    
    Daniel M. MaherAlex Shumate
  -2-




---



##### 



OXFORD RESOURCES GP, LLCDate: August 1, 2010
    By:
    s/ Charles C. UngureanCharles C. UngureanPresident and Chief Executive Officer  -3-




---



##### 



Standard Terms and Conditions of Engagement
 1
  Who Will Provide the Legal Services?
    
    
    1Our Services to You
    
    
    1Who Is Our Client?
    
    
    2Conflicts of Interest
    
    
    3Termination of Representation
    
    
    3How We Set Our Fees
    
    
    4Other Charges
    
    
    5Billing Arrangements and Payment Terms
    
    
    6Revenue and Expense Sharing in Networks and Other Relationships with
Independent Law Firms
    
    
    7Taxes
    
    
    7Client and Firm Documents
    
    
    7Disclosure of Your Name
    
    
    8Firm Attorney Client Privilege
    
    
    8Severability
    
    
    8Primacy
    
    
    8Entire Agreement
    
    
    8Governing Law
    
    
    8In Conclusion
    
    
    8
 WHO WILL PROVIDE THE LEGAL SERVICES?
  OUR SERVICES TO YOU
  
 1
    
    Squire, Sanders & Dempsey practices in a
number of different nations. Due to local laws on regulation of the legal
profession, the formal legal name may differ in some nations. Please refer to
the formal legal name on the cover letter accompanying these Standard Terms of
Engagement for the name of the legal entity that is contracting with you. SSD
attorneys worldwide are available to meet your needs.




---



##### 



WHO IS OUR CLIENT?
     2




---



##### 



CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
   TERMINATION OF REPRESENTATION
    3




---



##### 



HOW WE SET OUR FEES
   4




---



##### 



OTHER CHARGES
    5




---



##### 



Letter Type
    
    Description
    
    RateClean
    
    No litigation reported
    
    US $
    550Normal
    
    1-3 cases
    
    US $
    850Extraordinary
    
    >3 cases
    
    US $
    1,350Update
    
    Update of prior response
    
    US $
    400No-Services
    
    Verifying no work for client during fiscal
year
    
    US $
    75
  BILLING ARRANGEMENTS AND PAYMENT TERMS
       6




---



##### 



REVENUE
AND EXPENSE SHARING IN NETWORKS AND OTHER RELATIONSHIPSWITH INDEPENDENT LAW FIRMS
 not
 TAXES
  CLIENT AND FIRM DOCUMENTS
   7




---



##### 



DISCLOSURE OF YOUR NAME
  FIRM ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE
  SEVERABILITY
  PRIMACY
  ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  GOVERNING LAW
  IN CONCLUSION
   8
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60316 Summary Calendar

EZEQUIEL PEDROZA

- GOMEZ , Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A087 623 326

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ezequiel Pedroza

- Gomez , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. His brief consists almost entirely of legal boilerplate and generalized, conclusory assertions that he meets the
relevant standards

. He does not explain how he satisfies th ose standards or

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60316 Document: 00512530485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2014N o. 13

- 60316

include citations to the administrative record. M uch of his brief rests on the
incorrect assertion that that the immigration judge made an adv ers e credibility determination which the BIA refused to reconsider

. Because Pedroza

- Gomez does not dispute the BIA’s dispositive f inding
that he failed to show persecution on account of membership in a “particular social group , ” see Orellana

- Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 518, 521

- 22 (5th Cir. 2012), or the determination that he failed to establish a likelihood of
tort ure upon his return to Mexico, s ee Zhang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 345 (5th Cir. 2005) , we “treat the issues concerning the merits of his immigration appeal as abandoned.” Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003) (per curiam); see also F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 28(a ) (8) ( A ) (requiring the appellant to include his “contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies”); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (declining to raise and address legal issues the appellant failed to assert and holding that his “recitation of familiar rules governing our review . . ., without even the slightest identification of any error in [the district court’s] legal analysis or its application to [his] suit” was “the same as if he had not appealed that judgment”). The petition for review is DENIED

.

2 Case: 13-60316 Document: 00512530485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2014
No. 243.

#### Puerto Rico *v.*Velazquez.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. William Cattron Rigby, Benjamin J. Horton,*and *Nathan R. Mar-gold*for petitioner.

*Mr. Luis F. Velazquez, pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40323 and 333-57521) and
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-73333, 333-86825 and 333-55554) of CenterSpan Communications Corporation and subsidiaries (fka
Thrustmaster, Inc.) of our report dated January 25, 1999 relating to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 which appear in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 30, 2001

---
```

[Federal Register: November 19, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 223)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 58007]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19no01-116]



[[Page 58007]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 41

RIN 3038-AB71

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 242

[Release No. 34-44853; File No. S7-16-01]
RIN 3235-A122


Customer Margin Rules Relating to Security Futures

Correction

    In the issue of Tuesday, November 13, 2001, on page 56902, in the
first column, in the correction of proposed rule document 01-24574, in
the first paragraph, in the third line, ``October 24, 2001'' should
read ``October 4, 2001''.
    In the same correction, in the first column, in paragraph 3., in
the first line, ``the same page'' should read ``page 50728''.
    In the same correction, in the first column, in paragraph 4(b), in
the second line, ``amount'' should read ``amount,''.

[FR Doc. C1-24574 Filed 11-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
```

[Federal Register: September 7, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07se00-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, September 15, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-23109 Filed 9-5-00; 2:42 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K/A

                                 CURRENT REPORT
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  February 12, 2007


                             THE VALSPAR CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         DELAWARE                     1-3011                  36-2443580
(State or other jurisdiction        (Commission            (I.R.S. Employer
     of incorporation)              File Number)          Identification No.)


   1101 THIRD STREET SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA              55415
      (Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (612) 332-7371


                                 NOT APPLICABLE
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[_]      Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act
         (17 CFR 230.425)

[_]      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17
         CFR 240.14a-12)

[_]      Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
         Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[_]      Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
         Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
<PAGE>

ITEM 2.02. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

         On March 7, 2007, the Company issued the press release attached as
Exhibit 99.1. This press release supplements and modifies the information on the
Company's results of operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 that was
included in the press release dated February 12, 2007 and filed with the Form
8-K report on the same date.

ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

         (d)      Exhibits

                  99.1     Press Release dated March 7, 2007



                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                                 THE VALSPAR CORPORATION



Dated:  March 7, 2007                            /s/ Rolf Engh
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 Name:  Rolf Engh
                                                 Title: Secretary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COUNTRY JOE STEVENS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DAVID A. MAR,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-16834

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00010-RCJWGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Country Joe Stevens appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

FILED

JUL 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Stevens

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant Dr. Mar

provided treatment that was medically unacceptable and was in conscious

disregard to an excessive risk to Stevens’s health. See id. at 1058 (prison officials

are deliberately indifferent only if they know of and disregard an excessive risk of

serious harm to an inmate’s health, and a prisoner’s disagreement with medical

opinion is not sufficient to constitute deliberate indifference); Hallett v. Morgan,

296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (when a prisoner alleges that delay of medical

treatment evinces deliberate indifference, he or she must show that the delay led to

further injury).

We do not consider issues raised by Stevens in his opening brief that are not

supported by argument. See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir.

1992).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-16834
```

[Federal Register: September 19, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 54902]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19se05-34]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 70 FR 173.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 11 a.m., Wednesday,
September 21, 2005.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The closed meeting to discuss a Derivatives
Clearing Organization Review has been changed to Monday, October 3,
2005 at 11 a.m.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18677 Filed 9-15-05; 11:27 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Lambright, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
July 31, 2009





/s/
      Richard LambrightChief
      Accounting Officer
#### Tasha M. Vlahos, Respondent, v 422 East 14th Street Associates, LLC, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 629]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered October 17, 2008, which struck defendant’s answer and awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 22, 2008, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*403The court providently exercised its discretion in finding defendant’s noncompliance with multiple discovery orders willful and contumacious, warranting the striking of its pleadings *(see e.g. Brewster v FTM Servo, Corp.,*44 AD3d 351 [2007]). Defendant’s proffered reason for staying of discovery in conjunction with its motion for summary judgment, filed with the court the day before the sanction conference, does not adequately explain its failure to comply for the 11 months preceding its motion. Given this disposition, the court correctly denied defendant’s subsequent motion for summary judgment as moot.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Gonzalez, Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Alberto SOTELO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40396

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Guillermo Ruben Garcia, Garcia & Garcia, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Sotelo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sotelo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and *360the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.