alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.38.3


                     EXTENSION NO.3 OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT


August 31, 1999

Ms. Gale Kaufman
Kaufman Campaign Consultants
1510 J Street, Suite 210
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Gale:

Kaufman Campaign Consultants has been providing Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.
("Norcal") with consulting services in the areas of political affairs, public
affairs, and media and public relations. The services have been provided
pursuant to an agreement, originally signed May 16, 1996 and extended per a
letter agreements dated December 11, 1997 and October 20, 1998. I would like to
formalize the extension of the agreement under the same terms and conditions as
contained in the original document through September 30, 2000.

As stated in the original agreement, the relationship between you and Norcal
will be that of an independent contractor relationship and that the agreement
will not be construed to constitute you an employee of Norcal or the formation
of a partnership or joint venture between you and Norcal.

Consistent with the original agreement, you will receive aggregate fees covering
all services rendered pursuant to this consulting agreement of $9,500 per month
on or before the 5th day of each and every month.

This letter, along with the original agreement letter dated May 15, 1996 and the
extension letters dated December 11, 1997 and October 20, 1998, constitute the
understanding under which you provide services to Norcal. Please acknowledge by
signing this letter and returning it to me at your earliest convenience.

                                     Very truly yours,

                                     /s/ Michael J. Sangiacomo
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Michael J. Sangiacomo

                                     President & Chief Executive Officer

Kaufman Campaign Consultants

By:     /s/ Gale R. Kaufman
    ---------------------------
      Gale R. Kaufman


                                      -1-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor A. DePonceau, Also Known as John Doe, Appellant.

Submitted January 19, 2010;

decided April 1, 2010

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal action *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal action *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602; CPL 450.90). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
32.1
            
            Certification
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002




CERTIFICATION






PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Ronald
A. Davis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bella Viaggio,
Inc. (the "Company") certify that:






1. I have
reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bella Viaggio, Inc.;






2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and






3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.






Date: May
06, 2009






/s/ Ronald A.
Davis


Ronald A.
Davis,


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer









1
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2022-01-10 19:28:02","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2022"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["38"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["17"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["36"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2022","quarter":"Q1"}
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 63913]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no98-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

"FEDERAL REGISTER" CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 63 FR 59549.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:30 a.m., Thursday,
November 19, 1998.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has
cancelled the meeting to discuss Enforcement Objectives.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-30830 Filed 11-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

K. PENATE, Correctional Officer at Lancaster State Prison, in his/her individual capacity,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 56886

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 02268

- JFW

- SP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Gregory C. Bontemps, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the

filing fee after revoking his in forma pauperis s tatus (“IFP”) on the ground that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. S ee Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 56886

Bontemps has “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Washington v. L .A. Cty. Sheriff’s

Dep’t , 833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The distri ct court properly revoked Bontemps’ IFP status because at least

three of Bontemps’ prior cases qualified as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and

Bontemps did not allege facts demonstrating that he faced imminent danger at the

time he filed his complaint. See Knapp v. Hogan , 738 F.3d 1106, 1109 (9th Cir.

2013) (defining when a case is frivolous or malicious, or fails to state a claim

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and can be considered a strike); Andrews v. Cervantes

,

493 F.3d 1047, 1055

- 57 (9th Cir. 2007) ( discu ssing imminent danger exception ) ;

see also Harris v. Mangum , 863 F.3d 1133, 114 3 (9th Cir. 2017) ( “[W]hen (1) a

district court dismisses a complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim, (2)

the court grants leave to amend, and (3) the plaintiff th en fails to file an amended

complaint, the dismissal counts as a strike under § 1915(g)

. ” )

.

Bontemps’ motion seeking appointment of counsel, attached to his opening

brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-208-000]

# DATE:

January 11, 2001.

Take notice that on January 5, 2001, Amoco Production Company, BP Exploration & Oil Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., ExxonMobil Gas Marketing Company, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Shell Offshore Inc. (Producers) tendered for filing an emergency petition requesting the Commission to issue an immediate temporary restraining order, prior to January 9, 2001, to prevent Southern Natural Gas Company from shutting in natural gas supply upstream of the Toca processing plants, located in Louisiana. In addition, the Producers request the Commission to schedule an emergency technical conference to explore all of the issues as soon as possible.

Producers states that copies of the filing have been served upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

                        Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before January 16, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                         *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1424 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1142 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1142

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 9, 2010.
Whereas Silver Lake College was founded in the late 1800s by the Franciscan 
        Sisters of Christian Charity as an academy and normal school;
Whereas the State of Wisconsin issued the charter designating Silver Lake 
        College, then named Holy Family College, as an undergraduate institution 
        of higher education in 1935;
Whereas Silver Lake College is a four-year Catholic liberal arts college, 
        located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin;
Whereas Silver Lake College currently serves 1,253 students and offers a 7 to 1 
        student to teacher ratio;
Whereas students at Silver Lake College can earn degrees in 11 different 
        programs and 24 different areas of study; and
Whereas Silver Lake College emphasizes a professional education with a liberal 
        arts experience and encourages life-long learning and moral and 
        community leadership: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Silver Lake College for 75 years of service as an 
        undergraduate institution of higher education; and
            (2) commends Silver Lake College for providing education and 
        training to the people of Wisconsin for over 75 years.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1292 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1292

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 19, 2010.
Whereas the Emporia State University (ESU) Lady Hornet basketball team defeated 
        the Fort Lewis Skyhawks by a score of 65 to 53 to win the 2010 NCAA 
        Women's Division II National Championship in St. Joseph, Missouri, on 
        March 26, 2010;
Whereas this is ESU's first ever women's national basketball championship and 
        the first national championship in any sport since being crowned the 
        1984 NCAA NAIA Women's Softball National Champions;
Whereas the ESU coaching staff of head coach Brandon Schneider and assistant 
        coaches Jory Collins and Kiel Unruh guided the Lady Hornets to a final 
        record of 30 wins and only 5 losses;
Whereas the 2010 National Champions consisted of seniors Cassondra Boston, Jamie 
        Augustyn, Lacy Corker, and Sophia Lenard, juniors Ashley Ferrell, 
        Negesti Taylor, Kayla Krueger, Dava Logsdon, and Alli Volkens, sophomore 
        Brittney Miller, and freshmen Rachel Hanf, Jocelyn Cummings, and Kelsey 
        Newman;
Whereas ESU was led by the overall Most Outstanding Player of the tournament, 
        Alli Volkens, who recorded 16 points, 15 rebounds, and five blocks in 
        the championship game; and
Whereas the students, staff, alumni, and friends of Emporia State University 
        along with the city of Emporia, Kansas, deserve much credit for their 
        support of the Lady Hornet basketball team: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Emporia State University Lady Hornet 
        basketball team for winning the 2010 NCAA Division II National 
        Championship; and
            (2) recognizes the achievements of all the team's players, coaches, 
        and support staff.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 66919]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no06-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 22, 2006.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9287 Filed 11-15-06; 3:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of China Quest Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report'),
I, Chin Yung Kong, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





October
7, 2008





/s/
      Chin Yung KongName:
      Chin Yung KongTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
No. 502.

#### Simon *v.*City Cab Co., Inc.

November 11, 1935.

*Messrs. George D. Horning, Jr.,*and *Louis Ottenberg*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Alvin L. Newmyer*and *David G. Bress*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 23, 2011
    By:
    /s/ William McDonaldWilliam McDonald,CFO
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
  By:
    /s/ CHARLES C. UNGUREANCharles C. UngureanPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Oxford 
Resources GP, LLC (the general partner
of Oxford Resource Partners, LP)
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford Resource Partners, LP;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q is being prepared;
 b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q based on such evaluation; and
 c.
    
    Disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 ,
 By:
    /s/ CHARLES C. UNGUREANCharles C. UngureanPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
Oxford Resources GP, LLC (the general partner
of Oxford Resource Partners, LP)