alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Herman SCOTT, also known as Herman Condo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20097

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Herman Scott raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Lopez-Ortiz,*313 F.3d 225, 229-31 (5th Cir.2002), which held that an immigration judge’s failure to inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary waiver of removal at his removal proceeding did not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair. *See Romero-Rodriguez v. Gonzales,*488 F.3d 672, 677 n. 5 (5th Cir.2007). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**ORANGE 21 INC.**

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of**

**2002 for the Period Ended December 31, 2006**

I, Jerry Collazo, certify that: 

1.        I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of Orange 21 Inc.; 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.        The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)    disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5.        The Registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Maine State Office.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the Maine State NRCS 
Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) located at www.me.nrcs.usda.gov 
under ``Draft Standards for Comments'' for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS to issue revised conservation 
practice standards in its National Handbook of Conservation Practices. 
These revised standards are the following: 327 Conservation Cover; 330 
Contour Farming; 340 Cover & Green Manure Crop; 324 Deep Tillage; 380 
Farmstead & Feedlot Windbreak; 394 Firebreak; 511 Forage Harvest 
Management; 666 Forest Stand Improvement; 655 Forest Harvest Trails and 
Landings; 412 Grassed Waterway or Outlet; 561 Heavy Use Area 
Protection; 441 Irrigation System, Microirrigation; 590 Nutrient 
Management; 595 Pest Management; 516 Pipeline; 521A Pond Sealing or 
Lining Flexible Membrance Lining; 338 Prescribed Burning; 391 Riparian 
Forest Buffer; 490 Site for Woody Plant Establishment; 580 Streambank & 
Shoreline Protection; 395 Stream Habitat Improvement and Management; 
585 Stripcropping, Contour; 612 Tree and Shrub Establishment; 660 Tree 
and Shrub Pruning; 620 Underground Outlet; 472 Use Exclusion; 313 Waste 
Storage Facility; 359 Waste Treatment Lagoon; 642 Water Well; 351 Well 
Decommissioning; 657 Wetland Restoration; 644 Wildlife Upland Habitat 
Management.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before July 9, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Christopher R. 
Jones, Assistant State Conservationist for Technology/Planning, Natural 
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 967 Illinois Avenue, Suite #3; 
Bangor, Maine 04401.
    A copy of this standard is available from the above individual.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

    Dated: May 4, 2001.
Christopher R. Jones,
Assistant State Conservationist for Technology/Planning.
[FR Doc. 01-14314 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel DeFreitas, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 806]—

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, an opinion and order of this Court dated August 14, 1995 *(People u DeFreitas,*213 AD2d 96 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 9, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### R&R Capital LLC et al., Appellants, v Linda Merritt, Respondent.

[875 NYS2d 65]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered August 12, 2008, which granted defendant’s motion for disbursement of proceeds of the sale of certain property located in Pennsylvania, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion denied.

The motion court did not have jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim for a final accounting of the proceeds of the sale of the Pennsylvania property at issue, which was the sole asset of a limited liability corporation in which plaintiffs and defendant were equal members. Although plaintiffs initially commenced this action in New York relating to defendant’s alleged mismanagement of several limited liability corporations, the claims were heard and dismissed after a nonjury trial.

Defendant subsequently sold the property at issue and plaintiff commenced an action in Pennsylvania for, inter alia, a final accounting based on the sale of the property and defendant’s alleged mishandling of the proceeds. The Pennsylvania court placed the proceeds of the sale in escrow pending a determination by Supreme Court, New York County regarding how *529the funds should be disbursed and defendant moved the court for disbursement of the funds pursuant to a schedule submitted with the motion.

The motion court, in granting the motion and permitting the disbursements sought by defendant with limited exceptions, lacked jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims, since the relief sought did not relate to a cause of action raised in the initial complaint, nor was the issue involved previously litigated in this action *(see P.A. Bldg. Co. v City of New York,*236 AD2d 275 [1997]; *Ward-Carpenter Engrs. v Sassower,*193 AD2d 730 [1993]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: August 6, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 151)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41982]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06au98-12]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Chapter I


Concept Release Concerning Performance Data and Disclosure for
Commodity Trading Advisors and Commodity Pools

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Extension of comment period on Concept Release.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
issued a Concept Release concerning performance data and disclosure for
commodity trading advisors and commodity pools on June 18, 1998 (63 FR
33297) with comments due by August 17, 1998. In response to a request
from the Managed Funds Association, the Commission has determined to
extend the comment period for an additional 30 days, until September
16, 1998. As indicated in the release, comments should be submitted by
the specified date to Jean A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20581. In addition, comments may be sent by facsimile
transmission to facsimile number (202) 418-5521, or by electronic mail
to [email protected].
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 16, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul H. Bjarnason, Jr., Chief Accountant, (202) 418-5459, electronic
mail: "[email protected];" or Robert B. Wasserman, Special Counsel,
(202) 418-5092, electronic mail: "[email protected]," Division of
Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on this 30th day of July, 1998, by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-20928 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
  
 Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $140,000, consisting of a cash and a restricted stock component,
plus certain other fees as described below: 
  

	 	•	 	Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $60,000. 

  

	 	•	 	The chair of each Board committee (other than the Audit Committee) receives an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000. The chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional
annual cash retainer of $15,000. 

  

	 	•	 	Non-employee directors also receive a fee of $1,500 for attendance at each meeting of the Board and each committee meeting, other than telephonic meetings, for which the fee is
$500. Pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, directors may defer receipt of their annual retainer and/or meeting fees until retirement from the Board. 

  

	 	•	 	Non-employee directors also receive an annual grant of $80,000 of Raytheon common stock. Grants are made under the 1997 Nonemployee Directors Restricted Stock Plan. All grants
consist of restricted stock and are held in the custody of the Company until restrictions lapse, generally on the date of the annual meeting one year after the award. The directors receive dividends on these shares and are entitled to vote these
shares. 

  

	 	•	 	The Company reimburses directors for actual expenses incurred in the performance of their service as directors, including attendance at director education programs sponsored by
educational and other institutions. The Company also reimburses directors for the costs of their spouses to travel with them to Company-sponsored business events. The Company also maintains a general insurance policy which provides non-employee
directors with up to $100,000 per incident in travel accident insurance when on Company business. 

  
 The lead director receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000, payable as follows: $24,000 in cash and an annual grant of $36,000 of restricted
shares of Raytheon common stock. 
  
 October 26, 2005
Exhibit 23.1









CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the use in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.
333-105828, 333-111944 and 333-123208) pertaining to the Amended and Restated
1997 Equity Incentive Plan and  the Amended and Restated 1998 Non-Employee
Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Urigen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report
(which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to Urigen
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern as
described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements) dated
October 13, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Urigen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 2008.








/s/ Burr,
Pilger & Mayer LLP





Palo
Alto, California


October
13, 2008
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Jacob Rhodes v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00810

- CR

Trial court case number: 1979692

Trial court: Co Crim Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County

A jury convicted appellant of the misdemeanor offense of unlawfully carrying a weapon and appellant timely appealed. The clerk’s record has been filed. The reporter’s record was originally due on No v ember 2 , 201 5 . We were advised by the court reporter on December 18

, 2015, that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. Appellant was

notified on December 18, 2015 of nonpayment for the reporter’s record, and that, unless

a ppellant responded by January 19 , 201 6 , we would consider the appeal on the briefs without the benefit of a reporter’s record. No response was filed.

T he clerk’s record reflects that the trial court determined appellant wa s not indigent

. In addition, the record re flects that appellant retained counsel to represent him in the trial court . We may consider an appeal withou t a reporter’s record if a reporter’s record is not filed because an appellant

, who is not indigent , fails to request and pay the fee for preparation of a reporter’s

record

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

Accord ingly, this appeal will be considered without a reporter’s record unless the reporter’s record is filed within 14 days of the date of this order , or unless by that date appellant provides this Court with proof that he has paid, or made arrangements to pay, t he court reporter for preparation of the record. No further extensions of time to file the reporter’s record will be granted. If no reporter’s record or proof of payment arran gements is filed within 14 days of the date of this order, appellant’s brief will be due 30 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually

Date: February 2, 2016
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **3** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Neubauer,     Nickolas** |
|--|-----------------------------|

| DATE: | 07/20/2006 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 6 | PDF SIZE: | 50 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/c |
|-------|------------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|---------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **American Cotton     Shippers Association (ACSA)** |
|--|------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 07/27/2006 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 3 | PDF SIZE: | 39 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/c |
|-------|------------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|---------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Bell, Barry     L.** |
|--|-------------------------|

| DATE: | 07/09/2006 | FR PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF SIZE: | 20 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/c |
|-------|------------|----------|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|---------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

FirstPreviousNextLast
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 200)]
[Notices]
[Page 60494]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc05-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 18, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20879 Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
First Amendment to The PMI Group, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
  
 THE PMI GROUP, INC. 
  
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 THE PMI GROUP, INC., having adopted The PMI Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as of May 27, 2004, hereby
amends the Plan as follows effective as of October 1, 2005: 
  
 Section 8.1, “Grant of Stock Units,” is revised in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 8.1 Grant of Stock Units. On the first business day on or after April 15, July 15, October 15 and
January 15 of each year, each individual then serving as a Non-employee Director automatically shall be granted Stock Units with an initial value of $25,000. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The PMI Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan
on the date indicated below. 
  

			
	THE PMI GROUP, INC.
		
	By	 	/s/ Charles Broom
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 69746]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no05-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 30, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Surveillance matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22883 Filed 11-15-05; 12:20 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```