alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2765-16T1

IN THE MATTER OF PRINCETON

CHARTER SCHOOL'S REQUEST

TO AMEND ITS CHARTER.

___________________________________

Submitted October 4, 2018 – Decided

Before Judges O'Connor, Whipple and DeAlmeida.

On appeal from the New Jersey Department of 

Education.

Fogarty & Hara, attorneys for appellant Board of 

Education of the Princeton Public Schools (Vittorio S. 

LaPira, of counsel and on the brief; Robert D. Lorfink, 

on the brief).

Johnston Law Firm, LLC, attorneys for respondent 

Princeton Charter School (Thomas O. Johnston, of 

counsel and on the brief; Rula Alzadon Moor, on the 

brief).

Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for 

respondent Commissioner of Education (Melissa 

Dutton Schaffer, Assistant Attorney General, of 

counsel; Lori B. Prapas, Deputy Attorney General, on 

the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

October 17, 2018
2

A-2765-16T1

PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument this matter has been amicably 

adjusted, and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7430

JAIME A. DAVIDSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-01-2685-2-20-AJ)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime A. Davidson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jaime A. Davidson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in Davidson’s action seeking a criminal investigation of

officials involved in his criminal prosecution. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Davidson v. United States, No. CA-01-2685-2-20-AJ (D.S.C.

filed July 25, 2001 & entered July 26, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion of the Procurador de la Administracion of the Republic of Panama


 Exhibit 4.4 
  
 [Letterhead of Procuraduría de la Administración] 
  
 November 2, 2005 
  
 Dr. Ricaurte Vásquez Morales 
 Minister of Economy and Finance 
     of the Republic of Panama 
 P.O. Box 2694, Zona 3 
 Panama, Republic of Panama 
  
 Dear Minister Vásquez: 
  
 I am the Procurador de la Administración of the Republic of Panama (the “Republic”) and have served
as counsel to the Republic in connection with the Republic’s Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”), and the forms of the Underwriting Agreement and the Fiscal Agency Agreement incorporated as Exhibits 4(1) and 4(2)
thereto (the “Agreements”), pursuant to which the Republic is registering certain securities (the “Securities”) to be offered and sold from time to time as set forth in the Registration Statement. 
  
 The filing of this Registration Statement has been authorized pursuant to
Cabinet Decree No. 25, dated September 14, 2005, as amended by Cabinet Decree No. 32 dated November 2, 2005 (the “Cabinet Decree”). 
  
 It is my opinion that when the Securities have been (i) duly authorized, issued, executed and delivered by the Republic and authenticated pursuant to
the Cabinet Decree, and (ii) delivered and paid for as contemplated by the Agreements and the Prospectus (including, without limitation, the applicable Prospectus Supplement and any amendment and supplement thereto), the Securities will
constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Republic under the laws of the Republic. 
  
 I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the heading “Validity of
the Securities” in the Registration Statement. In giving the foregoing consent, I do not thereby admit that I am in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/    OSCAR CEVILLE        
	Oscar Ceville
	 Procurador General de la Administración
 of the Republic of Panama
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ECOBLUPRODUCTSS,INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVECONBOY, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Steve Conboy
|------------

Steve Conboy President

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

|November 22, 2009
|-----------------

---
```

[Federal Register: February 18, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 32)]
[Notices]
[Page 7776]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18fe03-32]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION



Sunshine Act; Meeting


Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.


Time and Date: 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, March 5, 2003.


Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.


Status: Closed.


Matters to Be Considered: Personnel Matters.


Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.


Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-3928 Filed 2-13-03; 11:18 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: December 23, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 67054]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23de97-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, January 21, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33636 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
# C_2010029EN.01000801.xml

| 5.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/8

---

Planned closure of complaint No 2009/2002

2010/C 29/06

The European Commission has received a large number of complaints concerning a car pollution tax levied in Romania in accordance with the relevant national legislation, as amended by the Government Emergency Ordinance 218/2008. These complaints were treated under the lead file with reference number 2009/2002.

By publishing this notice the Commission informs the public on its intentions to close this file.

First, it must be recalled that regrettably there is no harmonisation of the passenger car related taxes at the EU level and therefore Member States are not precluded from levying such taxes and are free to decide on their levels and methods of calculation. However, such discretion is restricted by the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular Article 110 (ex Article 90 ECT), which requires equal tax treatment of domestic products and products coming from other Member States.

The responsible Commission's department, after having analysed the Government Emergency Ordinance 218/2008, concluded that it was not in line with Article 110 TFEU given that certain used cars appeared to be overtaxed in comparison with similar motor vehicles registered on the domestic market as new. The exemption granted under the terms of Government Emergency Ordinance 218/2008 did not appear to be based on objective criteria and seemed to favour domestic car manufacturers. This was considered to be incompatible with Article 110 of the TFEU and, consequently, on 26 June 2009, the Commission issued a letter of formal notice urging the Republic of Romania to amend the contested provisions (IP/09/1012).

The Romanian authorities replied with a letter of 28 September 2009 expressing their position on the matter and on 12 of January 2010 informed the Commission of the Government Emergency Ordinance 117/2009, which abolished the exemption granted under Emergency Ordinance 218/2008 with the effect from 1 January 2010.

In the light of the above information, the responsible department of the Commission considers that the Romanian authorities have taken the appropriate steps to ensure compliance with the EU law and at present it would appear that the Romanian legislation on car pollution tax has been brought in to line with Article 110 TFEU.

For this reason, the responsible department will propose to the Commission that the case in question be closed.

---
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Chicago Mercantile          Exchange (CME)** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 8/20/01 | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: |  | 3 | PDF SIZE: | 131 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/ |
|-------|--|---------|----------|--|-----|--------|--|---|-----------|--------|-----------|--------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Chicago Board Options          Exchange (CBOE)** |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 8/20/01 | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: |  | 5 | PDF SIZE: | 209 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/ |
|-------|--|---------|----------|--|-----|--------|--|---|-----------|--------|-----------|--------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Hugh J. Gallagher,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of AmeriGas Partners, L.P.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 18, 2015



/s/ Hugh J. GallagherHugh J. GallagherVice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of AmeriGas Propane, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6528

JOSEPH F. CLAUDIO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE JOHNSON, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-1874-AM) Submitted: September 22, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph F. Claudio, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Joseph F. Claudio seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Claudio has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00165

- CR

THEODORE RICHARD WREN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24703

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Theodore Richard Wren has attempted to appeal from his convict ions on five separate

counts of possession of child pornography. We have examined the trial court’s certification of

right of appeal, which certified this to be a plea bargain case in which Wren has no right of

appeal. By letter da ted July 30, we informed appellant of this potential jurisdictional defect and

afforded him ten days in which to respond and to show this Court how it has jurisdiction over the

appeal. We have received no response.

Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appell ate Procedures provides,

In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal o nly: (A) Those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a ) (2). Further, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case,

the trial court’s certification indicates that there is no right of appeal. See id

.

Because the trial court certified that Wren has no right of appeal and because the record

before us contains nothing to suggest that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State , 154

S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

25.2(d).3 We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction

.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: August 26 , 2013

Date Decided: August 27 , 2013

Do Not Publish
H. Res. 1142 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 9, 2010. 

Whereas Silver Lake College was founded in the late 1800s 

by the Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity as an 

academy and normal school; 

Whereas the State of Wisconsin issued the charter designating Silver Lake College, then named Holy Family College, as an undergraduate institution of higher education 

in 1935; 

Whereas Silver Lake College is a four-year Catholic liberal 

arts college, located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin; 

Whereas Silver Lake College currently serves 1,253 students 

and offers a 7 to 1 student to teacher ratio; 

Whereas students at Silver Lake College can earn degrees in 

11 different programs and 24 different areas of study; 

and 

Whereas Silver Lake College emphasizes a professional education with a liberal arts experience and encourages lifelong learning and moral and community leadership: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 1142 EH 

(1) congratulates Silver Lake College for 75 years 

of service as an undergraduate institution of higher education; and 

(2) commends Silver Lake College for providing 

education and training to the people of Wisconsin for 

over 75 years. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Ave. Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEPHEN MOLINARI, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 21st day of January, 2011.








/s/ STEPHEN MOLINARI


Principal Accounting Officer
* Judge Murnaghan was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1182
DIMITRA TANGIRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4181-H) Submitted: July 31, 2000 Decided: September 20, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN* and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dimitra Tangires, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Serotte, Elizabeth Gross Jacobs, SEROTTE, ROCKMAN & WESCOTT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dimitra Tangires appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Johns Hopkins Hospital on her complaint filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 2000) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp. , No. CA-98-4181-H (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Found Shrimp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Cupp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  NEW FOUND SHRIMP, INC.  /s/:David R. Cupp DAVID R. CUPP, Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer   November 14, 2011