alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.20549



---

FORM8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section13 OR 15(d)of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):February 10, 2009



---

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Minnesota

        0-2382

        41-0908057(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

        (CommissionFile Number)

        (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)14000 Technology DriveEden Prairie, Minnesota

        

        55344(Address of principal executive offices)

        

        (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code:(952) 937-4000



N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 2.05.

        Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.




On February 10, 2009, MTS Systems Corporation (the Company) announced a workforce reduction as part of its efforts to align the business with current market and economic conditions while maintaining the ability to successfully execute its strategy.



The Company-wide workforce reduction will affect approximately 150 positions, about six percent of the Companys employee base, through a combination of attrition, cancellation of open positions, and layoffs of current staff.  As a result, the Company expects to take a pretax charge of $2.5 million to $3.5 million related to severance and facilities in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, ending March 28, 2009.  A majority of this charge will result in future cash expenditures.



A copy of the press release announcing this action is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.



Item 9.01.

        Exhibits.




(d)Exhibits.



ExhibitNo.

        

        Description of Exhibit99.1

        

        Press Release dated February 10, 2009.






---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION(Registrant)Date: February 10, 2009

        By:

        /s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHTSusan E. KnightVice President and Chief Financial Officer






---



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

FORM8-K CURRENT REPORT



INDEX TO EXHIBITS





ExhibitNo.

        

        Description of Exhibit99.1

        


        Press Release dated February 10, 2009.










---
```

[Federal Register: August 31, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 168)]
[Notices]
[Page 46220]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31au98-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, September 25, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-23437 Filed 8-27-98; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN    TO INDEX ========**

----
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)   October 24, 2007



---

INTRICON CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Pennsylvania
        1-5005
        23-1069060(State or other jurisdiction
        (Commission
        (IRS Employerof incorporation)
        File Number)
        Identification No.)




1260 Red Fox Road, Arden Hills, MN 55112

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



Registrants telephone number, including area code (651) 636-9770



____________________________________________________

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 2.02.Results of Operations and Financial Condition



The following information is being provided pursuant to Item 2.02. Such information, including the exhibit attached hereto, should not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



On October 24, 2007, IntriCon Corporation announced earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and discussed recent developments. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 7.01.Regulation FD Disclosure



The following information is being provided pursuant to Item 7.01. Such information, including the exhibit attached hereto, should not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



The information contained
under Item 2.02 is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 9.01.Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d) Exhibits



99.1
        Press Release dated October 24, 2007


---



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



IntriCon CorporationBy:
        /s/Scott LongvalDate:   October 24, 2007
        
        
        Scott LongvalChief Financial Officer








---

EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1 Press Release dated October 24, 2007



---
ex10.1


    


    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    Fiscal
      Year 2006 Annual Incentive Plan Criteria

    


    


    The
      named
      executive officers are assigned the following Target Award Percentage of their
      base salary for the 2006 Annual Incentive Awards. These percentages are the
      same
      as those designated under the company's fiscal year 2005 annual incentive
      plan:

    


    
      	
              Level

            	
              Target
                Award Percentage

            
	 	 
	
              CEO

            	
              110%

            
	
              13

            	
               95%

            
	
              12

            	
               75%

            
	
              11

            	
               65%

            


    

    


    


    Awards
      are based upon the consolidated results of the company and/or the individual’s
      business unit performance. The current weight of corporate and business unit
      performance for named executive officers is as follows:

    


    
      	
              Level

            	
              Corporate
                / Business Unit Weight

            
	 	 
	
              CEO
                and Level 13

            	
              100%
                / 0%

            
	
              11-12

            	
              80%
                / 20%

            


    

    


    


    The
      payout multiple of a participant’s Target Award Percentage, depending upon
      whether threshold, target, distinguished or super-distinguished performance
      is
      achieved is as follows:

    


    


    
      	
              Payout
                Multiple of Target Award Percentage

            
	 	 
	
              Threshold

            	
               
                25%

            
	
              Target

            	
              100%

            
	
              Distinguished

            	
              150%

            
	
              Super-Distinguished

            	
              200%

            


    

    


    


    The
      consolidated results of the company shall be measured upon a return on equity
      (“ROE”) basis. ROE shall be calculated as net income divided by equity. Business
      unit results shall be measured based primarily on income needed to support
      the
      corporate ROE goal.

    


    


    


    


    E-1
```

[Federal Register: April 20, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 75)]
[Notices]
[Page 20534]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap05-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, May 20, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-8042 Filed 4-18-05; 2:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE LEE McGEE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4167

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Manatee County; Brian A. Iten, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON,JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of UniCapital Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

UNICAPITAL ACQUISITION CORP.


/s/ William Tay
--------------------------------
By: William Tay
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: May 7, 2008
```

[Federal Register: December 15, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 69059]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15de98-37]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to Office of
Management and Budget for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted
information collection 3038-0048, Exemptions from Speculative Limits to
OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
Pub. L. 96-511. The information collected pursuant to this rule is in
the public interest and is necessary for market surveillance.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection
should contact Desk Officer, CFTC, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 3228, NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20502, (202) 395-7340. Copies of the
submission are available from the CFTC Clearance Officer, (202) 418-
5160.
    Title: Off-Exchange Agricultural Trade Options.
    Control Number: 3038-0048.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Businesses (excluding small business).
    Estimated Annual Burden: 32,060 total hours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Est. avg.
            Respondents                  Regulation (17 CFR)      Estimated # of      Annual         hours per
                                                                    respondents      responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses.........................  Part 3 and Part 32.........           3,610           5,915           80.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 9, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-33174 Filed 12-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: February 21, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 8008]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21fe02-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, March 29, 2002.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-4240 Filed 2-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONNIE DEVONE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-96-157-HO) Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Devone Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Ronnie Devone Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Reach Final Disposition on Magistrate Judge Order filed October 30, 2000.” We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Johnson’s motion to adopt appendix and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. CR96-157-HO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Susan DeLuca, Appellant, v Joey F. Cerda et al., Defendants, and Emil F. Onolfi, Respondent.

[875 NYS2d 520]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated December 31, 2007, as granted the motion of the defendant Emil F. Onolfi for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was a passenger on a motorcycle driven by the defendant Emil F. Onolfi on Long Beach Road in Nassau County. The defendant Joey F. Cerda was operating a tow truck owned by the defendant No Limit Towing & Recovery, Inc., when he exited a parking lot, entered Long Beach Road, and collided with the motorcycle, causing the plaintiff to sustain serious injuries.

*722At his deposition, Cerda admitted that he only came to a “rolling stop,” and did not see the motorcycle before entering Long Beach Road. An independent witness confirmed that the tow truck driver did not stop as he exited the parking lot. Onolfi testified at his deposition that he noticed the tow truck while it was in the parking lot and next saw it seconds before it collided with his motorcycle.

Onolfi made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Rieman v Smith,*302 AD2d 510 [2003]; *Lupowitz v Fogarty,*295 AD2d 576 [2002]; *McKeaveney v Reiffert,*268 AD2d 411 [2000]). As the driver who had the right-of-way, he was entitled to anticipate that Cerda would obey the traffic laws by coming to a complete stop before entering the roadway *(see Rak v Kossakowski,*24 AD3d 1191 [2005]). In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether Onolfi, who had only seconds in which to react to the situation, was negligent in failing to avoid the collision *(see Batts v Page,*51 AD3d 833 [2008]; *Lupowitz v Fogarty,*295 AD2d 576 [2002]; *Le Claire v Pratt,*270 AD2d 612 [2000]; *McKeaveney v Reiffert,*268 AD2d 411 [2000]). Although the plaintiff suffers from amnesia as a result of the accident, and thus is not held to as high a degree of proof, she is not relieved of the obligation to provide some proof from which negligence can reasonably be inferred, which she failed to do *(see Noseworthy v City of New York,*298 NY 76 [1948]; *Blanco v Oliveri,*304 AD2d 599 [2003]; *Albinowski v Hoffman,*56 AD3d 401 [2008]; *Jose v Richards,*307 AD2d 279, 280 [2003]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Onolfi’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1047 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1047

  Commending The Ohio State University Buckeyes football team for its 
                     victory in the 2010 Rose Bowl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

 Ms. Kilroy (for herself, Mr. Driehaus, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Turner, Mr. 
Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. Wilson of Ohio, Mr. Austria, Ms. Kaptur, 
 Mr. Kucinich, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Tiberi, Ms. Sutton, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
 Boccieri, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Space, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Courtney, Mr. 
Klein of Florida, Mr. Massa, Mr. Murphy of Connecticut, Mr. Perriello, 
     Mr. Snyder, Ms. Titus, and Mr. Tonko) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commending The Ohio State University Buckeyes football team for its 
                     victory in the 2010 Rose Bowl.

Whereas The Ohio State University (Ohio State) Buckeyes football team achieved 
        many historic accomplishments during the 2009 regular season;
Whereas Ohio State defeated favored Oregon 26-17 in the Rose Bowl on January 1, 
        2010;
Whereas Ohio State won its seventh Rose Bowl all-time;
Whereas Ohio State won its fifth consecutive Big Ten title and played in its 
        fifth consecutive BCS bowl;
Whereas Ohio State finished the season at 11-2, ranked fifth nationally;
Whereas Ohio State led the Big Ten for the eighth consecutive season in academic 
        all-conference honorees;
Whereas Ohio State Coach Jim Tressel became only the second coach in Ohio State 
        history to win both a NCAA National Championship and a Rose Bowl (Woody 
        Hayes);
Whereas the Ohio State defense ranked in the Top 5 nationally in 4 different 
        categories;
Whereas Quarterback Terrelle Pryor threw for 266 yards, ran for 72 yards, and 
        scored two touchdowns, leading all players for both teams in these 
        categories; and
Whereas Quarterback Terrelle Pryor was the Rose Bowl MVP: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends The Ohio State University (Ohio State) Buckeye 
        football team for its victory in the 2010 Rose Bowl;
            (2) congratulates Coach Jim Tressel, winner of five Big Ten 
        titles; and
            (3) recognizes the accomplishments of the Ohio State 
        Buckeye football team, which has played in more BCS Bowl Games 
        than any other team in college football.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC. 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN




     AMENDMENT to the Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, dated as of this 8th day of
June, 2005.



     WHEREAS, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to encourage and enable all eligible employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through ownership of the
Company’s common stock;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 9 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of Monro Muffler Brake,
Inc. (the “Board”) may amend the Plan provided that any amendment that would (i) materially
increase the aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) materially
increase the benefits accruing to employees under the Plan, or (iii) materially modify the
requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, shall be subject to the approval of
the Company’s stockholders; and



     WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan from 1,425,000 to 1,785,000.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority retained by the Board under
Article 9 of the Plan, subject to ratification by the stockholders of the Company, the Plan is
hereby amended, effective June 8, 2005, to provide as follows:




	 	1.	 	The first sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by
deleting “1,425,000” and inserting “1,785,000” in its place.
	 
	 	2.	 	The Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain in
full force and effects in all other respects.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment to be executed, to be effective as of
the day and year first written above.



22