alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 962 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 962

           To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUTETIUM OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.75       Lutetium oxide      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 12032-20-                                                 31/2012.......
                          1) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2846.90.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.A







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2008, of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James C. Yardley, President and Chief Executive Officer of El Paso
Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., the general partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners,
L.P, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ James
      C. YardleyJames
      C. YardleyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)El
      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., theGeneral Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.May
      9, 2008













A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. and will be retained by El Paso Pipeline
Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit B 

Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 35-3 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 9 of 9
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00438

- CV

SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP,

Appellant

v.

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO., At rium Circle, GP, Atrium Winn, LLC, Atrium Kavoian,

LLC Copperfield Square, Copperfield Winn, LLC, Copperfield Kavoian, LLC, Imperial Airport,

Imperial Winn, LLC, Imperial Kavoian, LLC, Crystal Springs Partners, LLC, Commerce Office

Park

– One LP, and Unive rsal Square, LP,

Appellee s

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 00676

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting : Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On July 25, 2019

, appellant filed a motion for rehearing

. The Court requests that

appellees file a response on or before S e ptember 16, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2.

I t is so ORDERED on this 16th day of August, 2019

.

PER CURAIM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________

KE ITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Timothy Neher, the
Chief Financial Officer of MIKOJO INCORPORATED (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of November,
2009.





/s/
      Timothy NeherTimothy
      NeherChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MIKOJO INCORPORATED and will be retained by MIKOJO INCORPORATED and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,321
<SECURITIES>                                    15,155
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (598)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,343
<PP&E>                                          14,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,948)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,681
<SALES>                                         55,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,841
<CGS>                                           15,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,397
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,380
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
# CE2012380EN.01015801.xml

| 11.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 380/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 380/158

---

Tuesday 7 June 2011European environmental economic accounts ***I

P7_TA(2011)0253

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts (COM(2010)0132 – C7-0092/2010 – 2010/0073(COD))

2012/C 380 E/28

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM (2010)0132), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM (2010)0132),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0092/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0092/2010),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0330/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0330/2010),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

Tuesday 7 June 2011P7_TC1-COD(2010)0073

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 7 June 2011 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No .../2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 691/2011.)

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Brandon Christopher JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10002

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Susan Cowger, Hector Miguel Valle, Esq., Assistants U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Kimberly S. Keller, Keller Law Firm, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Brandon Christopher Johnson has moved *16for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Johnson has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Johnson’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *16the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Page 12 of 23Exhibit 99(d) KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2001-A
OFFICERS CERTIFICATE JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., ELT
    
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., IT4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
    
    4 New York Plaza, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10004
    
    New York, NY 10004Attn: ITS-Global Debt.
    
    ATTN: ABS AdministrationPhone: (212) 623-5427
    
    Phone: (212) 623-5437Fax: (212) 623-5933
    
    Fax: (212) 623-5933
 KeyBank National Association
    
    MBIA Insurance Corporation800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
    
    113 King StreetCleveland, OH 44114
    
    Armonk, NY 10504ATTN: President, KER
    
    ATTN: Data AdministrationPhone: (216) 828-4293
    
    Phone: (914) 765-3772Fax: (216) 828-9301
    
    Fax: (914) 765-3660
 Key Consumer Receivables LLC
c/o KeyBank National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
ATTN: President, KER
Phone: (216) 828-4293
Fax: (216) 828-9301 Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Consumer Receivables LLC, as
Depositor, KeyBank National Association, successor in interest to Key Bank USA, National
Association, as Master Servicer and Administrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2001-A, as Issuer,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor in interest to Bank One, National Association, not in its
individual capacity but solely as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of September 1, 2001 (the
Agreement), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Administrator from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of our knowledge, based on our review, the
Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement and the related Administration
Agreement respectively throughout such period. KeyBank National Association, successor in interest to Key Bank USA, National Association, as Administratorby:/S/ DANIEL G. SMITHDate: February 18, 2005
    
    Name: Daniel G. SmithTitle: Senior Vice Presidentby:/S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVSName: Darlene H. DimitrijevsTitle: Senior Vice President
```

[Federal Register: April 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 19878]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18ap06-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

time and date: 11 a.m., Friday, May 26, 2006.

place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

status: Closed.

matters to be considered: Surveillance Matters.

contact person for more information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-3730 Filed 4-14-06; 10:35 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6776

BERNARD BAGLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ROBERT WARD, Warden

of the Evans Correctional Institution; WILLIAM

GUNN, Director of South Carolina Department of

Probation, Parole and Pardon Services,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-487-2-8AJ)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Bagley v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-487-2-8AJ (D.S.C. May 9, 1997).

See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23,

1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### Shama RAHMAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75023.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2006.*

Filed June 8, 2006.

Salim Sheikh, Esq., New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Jenny L. Smith, Esq., U.S. Attorney Office Northern Dist. of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The panel referred this case for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Since mediation failed, the clerk is now ordered to file this disposition.

MEMORANDUM **

Shama Rahman, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her second motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. *611Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Bhasin v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir. 2005), we deny the petition for review.

“A motion to reopen proceedings for the purpose of submitting an application for relief must be accompanied by the appropriate application for relief and all supporting documentation.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). Rahman did not provide any supporting documentation with her second motion to reopen. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying reopening because Rahman failed to establish her prima facie eligibility for adjustment of status. *See Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 785 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that prima facie eligibility is demonstrated by a showing that there is a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rah-man’s arguments regarding the BIA’s order denying her first motion to reopen because Rahman did not file a timely petition for review of that order. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1257-58 (9th Cir.1996).

Rahman’s remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: April 20, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 21091]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap04-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, May 21, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-9008 Filed 4-16-04; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit (m)(32)

DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE PLAN

FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST: FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 5, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00423

- CR

EX PARTE Carlos Antonio CORDOVA JUAREZ

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10594CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Carlos Antonio Cordova Juarez’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. We further consider Cordova Juarez’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and

DENY his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 5, 2024

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
IV 

House Calendar No. 171 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1146 

[Report No. 111–428] 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 248) 

directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 

Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. 

Con. Res. 248) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the 

United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the concurrent resolution 

4 (H. Con. Res. 248) directing the President, pursuant to 

5 section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the 

6 United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan, if called 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1146 RH 

1 up by Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his designee. 

2 The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. The 

3 concurrent resolution shall be debatable for three hours, 

4 with 90 minutes controlled by Representative Kucinich of 

5 Ohio or his designee and 90 minutes equally divided and 

6 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

7 the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The previous question 

8 shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution 

9 to final adoption without intervening motion. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 171 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1146 

[Report No. 111–428] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resoForces from Afghanistan. Resolution, to remove the United States Armed dent, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers lution (H. Con. Res. 248) directing the PresiMARCH 9, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: July 18, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 138)]
[Notices]
[Page 42691]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18jy03-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding The Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, August 29, 2003.

 Place: 1155 21st St., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

For Further Information Contact: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-18456 Filed 7-16-03; 1:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```