alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

xtuqrsxy
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

#### Mary L. Mason v. George Melvin Bray

March 20, 1991

Case No. LS-681-1

By JUDGE MELVIN R. HUGHES, JR.

In this case, plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle which was hit in the rear by a dump truck operated by defendant. Plaintiff has moved for partial summary judgment as a sanction on the ground that defendant allowed a throttle plate from his truck to become lost when he knew there were claims arising from the automobile accident. Having done so, plaintiff contends, defendant should be foreclosed from showing his accelerator stuck in support of his defenses of sudden emergency and unavoidable accident.

The parties agree that five days after the accident, defendant was advised of claims arising from it. The parties also agree that the plate was not preserved when it was removed in a repair the day after the accident and that the mechanic who did the repair is expected to be called by defendant to describe that the part was in a defective condition and caused an unwanted acceleration.

The Court decides to overrule the motion because there is no showing that the failure to keep the part was deliberate, willful, or designed to thwart the discovery process. In the sequence of events following the accident, defendant’s vehicle underwent repair, there was notice of claims given defendant, and this lawsuit and others were filed some seven months after the accident. Considering *289especially defendant’s getting the truck repaired the day after the accident, there is nothing to show any misconduct to secure an advantage by not preserving the plate. Plaintiff’s witness, though an expert, is also a fact witness and has no special advantage by the absence of the original part he removed other than that any such witness may bring to a trial. Both sides can have their experts testify about how a throttle plate works and how a worn one can or cannot make an accelerator stick because of wear, using any throttle plate as demonstrative evidence.
### NUMBER 13 - 12 - 00601 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOSE LUIS DAVILA , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 430 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER
Before Justices Garza, Benavides , and Perkes

Order Per Curiam
O n February 12, 2014 , th is Court abated and remanded the matter to the trial court because of the appellant ’ s counsel’s failure to file the brief. The trial court conducted a hearing on March 10, 2014, and determined that appellant desires to appeal this case, appellant has not abandoned this appeal, appellant remains indigent and is entitled to2

court
- appointed counsel, counsel should not be removed, and counsel has failed to file a brief because the reporter has not transcribed the record. The trial court ordered the reporter to promptly prepare the record and file it no later than April 10, 2014 before 5:00 p.m. and recommended that thi s Court allow counsel thirty days thereafter to file appellant’s brief. Accordingly, we REINSTATE the case. The Court is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, an order should be
entered. Reporter, Adelaido “Al” Flores Jr. , is hereby ORDERED to file the reporter’s record in this Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 1 0 , 2014

. T he Honorable Johnathan T. Ball , counsel for appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court within thirty days after the filing of the reporter’s record

. The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on Adelaido “Al”
Flores by certified mail, return receipt requested. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed t h e 25th day of March , 2014

.
S06Y0829.

#### IN THE MATTER OF FEMI GBAJA.

(641 SE2d 532)

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent Femi Gbaja’s Petition for Voluntary Discipline, which was filed under Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) before a formal complaint was issued. In his petition, Gbaja admits violating Rule 1.15 (I) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Although a violation of this rule is punishable by disbarment, Gbaja requests the imposition of a 24-month suspension. He agrees, however to accept a suspension of up to 36 months. The State Bar has no objection to the acceptance of Gbaja’s petition so long as the suspension is no less than 36 months in duration.

Gbaja, who has only been a member of the Bar since 2001, admits that he accepted payment of $25,000 as settlement of a client’s personal injury claims, deposited those funds in his attorney trust account in January 2003, failed to promptly disburse those funds to his client, withdrew those funds for his own use, closed his practice and moved out of the country. Although Gbaja ultimately paid the $25,000 to his client in 2006, he admits his conduct violated Rule 1.15 (I) and that, as a result, he is subject to disbarment. In mitigation of his actions Gbaja asserts that he has cooperated fully with disciplinary authorities, repaid his client, and is extremely remorseful for the consequences of his conduct. Under these circumstances, we conclude that a 36-month suspension is an appropriate sanction. Accordingly, Gbaja hereby is suspended for a period of 36 months. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Thirty-six-month suspension.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*660Decided February 26, 2007.

*William P. Smith HI, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Warren R. Hinds,*for Gbaja.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>
                      EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Statement Data

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  677,319
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           137,450
<ALLOWANCES>                            39,698
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        818,522
<PP&E>                                  1,133,608
<DEPRECIATION>                          846,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,685,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   263,854
<BONDS>                                 21,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                11,428,924
<OTHER-SE>                              (8,028,516)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,685,181
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,125,225
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,566,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        32,198
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      16,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,293,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,293,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.72)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File No. 333-105828, 333-111944 and 333-123208)pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amendedand Restated 1998 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the Amended andRestated 2001 Non-Statutory Plan and the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ofValentis, Inc., and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(File Nos. 333-38092, 333-54066, 333-104022, 333-112821,333-117523 and 333-126678) and related prospectus of Valentis, Inc.,of our report dated September 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Valentis, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended June 30, 2006.
|                              | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Palo Alto, California        |                            |   |
| September 27, 2006 |                            |   |

 

----
```

[Federal Register: April 16, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 73)]
[Notices]
[Page 19429]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16ap01-35]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Technology Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(a), that the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Technology Advisory Committee
will conduct a public meeting on May 2, 2001, in the first floor
hearing room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, DC
headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581. The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. and last
until 5:00 p.m. The agenda will consist of the following:

I. Introduction
II. Implementation of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000:
Electronic Trading Facilities
III. Electronic Order Routing
IV. Real Issues in a Virtual World: Technology and Its Challenges
V. Going Forward: Issues, Priorities, and Process

    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory
Committee, Commissioner Thomas J. Erickson, is empowered to conduct the
meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate the orderly
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a
written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the
statement to the attention of: The Technology Advisory Committee, c/o
Commissioner Thomas J. Erickson, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581,
before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral
statements should inform Commissioner Erickson in writing at the
foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting.
Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral
presentation of no more than five minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC, on April 10, 2001.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-9324 Filed 4-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
SCWC-16-0000435
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., dba AMERICAS SERVICING COMPANY,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MARIANNE S. FONG, Individually and as Trustee of the M arianne S. Fong Revocable Trust Dated October 16, 2003,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and ONOMEA BAY RANCH OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS ( CAAP-16-0000435; CIV. NO. 10-1-0097)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J
. )

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on February 18, 2020, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 14, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000435 14-APR-2020 08:12 AM
No. 516.

#### Union Building Corp. *v.*Conway.

Jurisdictional statement distributed November 21, 1936.

Decided December 7, 1936.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Southwestern Oil Co.*v. *Texas,*217 U. S. 114, 121-124; *Singer Sewing Machine Co.*v. *Brickell,*233 U. S. 304, 315; *Tax Commissioners*v. *Jackson,*283 U. S. 527, 537-542; *First National Bank*v. *Tax Commission,*289 U. S. 60, 63-64; *Puget Sound Co.*v. *Seattle,*291 U. S. *516619, 626.

*Anna Judge Veters*for appellant.

*Messrs. Charles J. Rivet*and *P. H. Stern*for appellee.
Exhibit 10.1(b)


         Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (new financing) Issued by
             NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on October 31, 2005


                                                                     Conversion
        Issue Date           Due Date           Principal              Price
      -------------      --------------      ---------------       -------------
        10/31/05            04/30/06          $  325,000             $ 0.0041
```

[Federal Register: April 7, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 66)]
[Notices]
[Page 16988]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07ap98-60]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, April 23, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-9144 Filed 4-2-98; 4:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN    TO INDEX ========**

----
Actions Taken by the Nominating, Compensation and Governance Committee of the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors on October 19, 2005


Exhibit 10.2



 

Actions Taken by the Nominating, Compensation and Governance
Committee of the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors on October 19,
2005



               On
October 19, 2005, the Nominating, Compensation and Governance Committee of the
PG&E Corporation Board of Directors (Committee) approved portions of the
2006 Officer Compensation Program, including (i) an annual salary increase
budget of 3.5 percent for base pay adjustments, mid-year discretionary
increases, and lump-sum payments, and (ii) target participation rates for cash
awards under the PG&E Corporation Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) ranging
from 30% to 100% of base salary depending on officer level, with a maximum
payout of 200% of base salary. Actual STIP awards are determined by the
Committee based on the extent to which certain pre-established performance
criteria are met. The Committee deferred taking final action on the long-term
incentive portion of the 2006 Officer Compensation Program until its meeting in
December 2005.
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |   |                                                                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:    August      19, 2009  |   | /s/      Cheng Yu Wang                                                                       |   |
|                                                    |   | Cheng      Yu Wang                                                                           |   |
|                                                    |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                 |   |
|                                                    |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officerand      Acting Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this
annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RSA
Security Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

                                           /s/ ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, JR.
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                            ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, JR.
                                     PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Dated: March 4, 2004

                                            /s/ JEFFREY D. GLIDDEN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                               JEFFREY D. GLIDDEN
                                 SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND OPERATIONS,
                                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER

Dated: March 4, 2004
H. Res. 1030 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 26, 2010. 

Whereas Messiah College men’s and women’s soccer teams 

won the 2009 NCAA Division III championships on December 5, 2009, against Calvin College and Washington 

University-St. Louis; 

Whereas the 2009 championship was the seventh national 

championship for Messiah College men’s soccer team 

since 2000 and the third national championship for the 

women’s team since 2000; 

Whereas Messiah College is the only college in the NCAA to 

win both the men’s and women’s soccer national championship in the same year; 

Whereas Messiah College is a Christian liberal arts college 

that was founded in 1909 and is located in Grantham, 

Pennsylvania; 

Whereas Messiah College has 22 intercollegiate athletic teams 

that have won 11 NCAA national championships; and 

Whereas Messiah College encourages athletes to develop their 

athletic excellence and to develop character: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 1030 EH 

(1) congratulates Messiah College men’s and women’s soccer teams on winning the 2009 NCAA Division 

III national championships; and 

(2) recognizes Messiah College for excellence in academics, athletics, and character. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 223.

#### Kieldsen *v.*Barrett, State Treasurer.

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.

Decided October 26, 1931.

*Mr. Oliver O. Haga*for appellant.

*Messrs. Fred J. Babcock*and *Leon M. Fisk*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substaiitial federal question. *Wabash R. Co.*v. *Flannigan,*192 U. S. 29; *Erie R. Co.*v. *Solomon,*237 U. S. 427; *C. A. King & Co.*v. *Horton,*276 U. S. 600; *Bank of Indianola*v. *Miller,*276 U. S. 605; *Roe*v. *Kansas,*278 U. S. 191.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Maguire, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14h day of December, 2009


/s/ Michael Maguire
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer