alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30976-30977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14492]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for renewal and comment. The ICR 
describes the nature of the information collection and its expected 
cost and burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment 
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information 
was published on March 23, 2001 [66 FR 16309]. No comments were 
received.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before (insert: date 30 days 
after publishing in the Federal Register) to: Attention DOT/OST Desk 
Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Schmidt, Competition and Policy 
Analysis Division, Office of Aviation Analysis; Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW., 
Washington DC 20590-0002. Telephone (202) 366-5420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Office of the Secretary (OST).
    Title: Passenger Manifest Information.
    OMB Control Number: 2105-0534.
    Affected Public: US and foreign direct air carriers
    Annual Estimated Burden: 1.05 million hours.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.


[[Page 30977]]


    Issued in Washington, DC on June 5, 2001.
Michael Robinson,
Information Resource Management, United States Department of 
Transportation.
[FR Doc. 01-14492 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Federal Register: March 25, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 57)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13680]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25mr02-137]



[[Page 13680]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 15

RIN 3038-AB88


Reporting Levels for Large Trader Reports; Security Futures
Products

Correction

    In rule document 02-6288 beginning on page 11569 in the issue of
Friday, March 15, 2002, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 11569, in the first column, under the heading SUMMARY:,
in the fourth line, ``features'' should read, ``futures''.


Sec. 15.03  [Corrected]

    2. On page 11571, in Sec. 15.03, in the table, under the column
``Number of contracts'', in the second line from the bottom, ``100''
should read, ``200''.

[FR Doc. C2-6288 Filed 3-22-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit (d)(208)

**Form Of**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0519 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS JEFF RICHARDSON ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2022

03/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0519
#### Raman KUMAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-72349.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 29, 2013.

Filed Oct. 4, 2013.

Robert Bradford Jobe, Esquire, Law Offices Of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

*779Robert Michael Stalzer, Trial, DOJ— U.S. Department Of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department Of Homeland Security San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and HUCK, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Raman Kumar, a native of Punjab, India, made his way to Blaine, Washington on February 12, 2010, after being denied asylum by Canadian immigration authorities. Shortly after his arrival, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) took him into custody. DHS issued a notice to appear, and charged Kumar as removable for being present within the United States without admission or parole. Kumar conceded the charges and applied for asylum. He also sought withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The basis for Kumar’s asylum application and his other requests for relief was that the Punjab police repeatedly harassed him on account of his association with two political activist organizations. The immigration judge (“IJ”) denied his claims, finding him to be not credible. The IJ’s adverse-credibility determination was based almost entirely upon Kumar’s admission that he advanced perjured testimony before the Canadian immigration officials. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed.

We may grant the petition only if the record compels a contrary result. Here, it does not. The stories Kumar gave to Canadian and U.S. immigration officials were entirely different. Kumar asserts that he advanced perjured testimony out of fear of being sent back to India and is now telling the truth. However, Kumar did not mention his prior perjured testimony during his direct testimony before the IJ. It was only during cross-examination that he admitted that he had previously sought asylum in Canada, which was denied, and had told a different story there. Moreover, in his asylum application here, Kumar denied having previously sought asylum. Whatever Kumar’s reason for advancing perjured testimony, nothing in the record required the IJ and BIA to believe Kumar. Given the totality of the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the negative credibility determination made by the IJ and sustained by the BIA was supported by substantial evidence, *see Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir.2010), as the record does not compel the conclusion that Kumar was credible, *see Zi Lin Chen v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 611 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX-10.93






Exhibit 10.93



Fiscal 2006 Senior Management Incentive Plan



A pool of cash and stock options equivalent to 2% of the trailing 12 months revenue of each
acquired Company and reserved in a pool for the management team on a quarterly basis, to be divided
evenly between cash and stock options. Each quarter in which a bonus is earned, the Compensation
Committee will determine an allocation of the bonus based on the assessment of the contribution by
the members of the Halo family of companies. Earned bonuses will be paid as soon as practicable
following the close of the quarter.



Bonuses will only be paid out only on deals where the Halo successfully acquired companies in
accordance with its goal of executing transactions between 2-5X target Company’s cash flow. In the
event that the management recommends and the board approves an acquisition where these metrics are
not applicable (e.g. in the case where a Company with zero or negative cash flow is acquired, or
where a higher multiple of cash flow is paid for a rapidly growing Company), the Committee retains
the right to issue discretionary bonuses as special situations arise.



Near the end of the 2006 fiscal year the Committee will revisit this plan and make appropriate
adjustments based on Halo’s then current activities in the market as well as other relevant
circumstances.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than January 31, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Northwest Suburban Bancorp, Inc., Mount Prospect, Illinois; to 
engage de novo in purchasing loan participations from its subsidiary 
banks, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 11, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-1436 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1367-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1367-DR), dated May 2, 2001, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 29, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective May 29, 2001.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 01-14639 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
H. Res. 1128 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 16, 2010. 

Whereas the people of Canada opened their hearts and their 

home to the athletes of the world; 

Whereas the Olympics foster healthy competition and interaction among nations; 

Whereas these games were not without moments of tribulation and tragedy, but the courage and resolve of the 

athletes to continue was inspirational; 

Whereas the United States won a record 37 medals, 9 gold, 

15 silver, and 13 bronze; 

Whereas the United States won the overall medal count for 

the first time since 1932, the highest medal total by any 

one nation in the history of the Winter Olympics; 

Whereas the United States men’s and women’s silver medal 

hockey teams excited and inspired the games with their 

world class play; 

Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno won his seventh and eighth medals to become the most decorated United States Winter 

Olympian of all time; 

Whereas the United States earned medals in Nordic Combined events for the first time in history, took the gold 
2 

•HRES 1128 EH 

in men’s figure skating, and won a gold medal in bobsledding for the first time since 1948; 

Whereas United States teams and individual athletes should 

be honored for their contributions to these monumental 

achievements; 

Whereas some athletes must overcome great personal adversity to realize their Olympic dreams; 

Whereas the strong performances by United States Olympic 

athletes inspire children across the Nation to engage in 

physical fitness, work hard, and set high personal goals; 

Whereas the dedication and sacrifice of the families, coaches, 

and communities associated with Olympic athletes should 

also be recognized; and 

Whereas the Olympic torch has been extinguished in Vancouver, but the flame of camaraderie burns on in the 

hearts and minds of the world community: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the City of Vancouver, Team 

USA, and the athletes of the world for an outstanding 

and inspiring 2010 Winter Olympics; and 

(2) wishes participants in the 2010 Paralympic 

Winter Games success in their athletic endeavors. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 116)]
[Notices]
[Page 35228]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn05-25]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, July 1, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-12050 Filed 6-15-05; 11:12 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre i
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile; (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Mr. Martin Oakley

Chief Compliance Officer
360T Trading Networks Inc.
521 Fifth Avenue, 38th Floor
New York, NY 10175

Re: Application of 360T Trading Networks Inc. for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Oakley:

By submissions dated August 28, 2013 through December 23, 2015, 360T Trading
Networks Inc, (“360T”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §
76-3, and Commission Regulation 37,3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap
execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed 360T’s application and has determined to grant 360T
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,
Betcle | Deb-th-

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1252 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1252

Commending the political leadership of Northern Ireland on reaching the 
            Hillsborough Agreement on policing and justice.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2010

 Mr. Rooney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending the political leadership of Northern Ireland on reaching the 
            Hillsborough Agreement on policing and justice.

Whereas, on April 10, 1998, the Good Friday Agreement set forth a roadmap for 
        lasting peace in Northern Ireland;
Whereas, on October 13, 2006, the St. Andrews Agreement was adopted to 
        strengthen power sharing between the political parties of Northern 
        Ireland;
Whereas, on May 8, 2007, leaders from the major political parties in Northern 
        Ireland took office as part of an agreement to share power in accordance 
        with the democratic mandate of the Good Friday Agreement;
Whereas, on February 5, 2010, the political leadership of Northern Ireland 
        concluded the Hillsborough Agreement on the devolution of policing and 
        justice in Northern Ireland;
Whereas, on March 9, 2010, the Northern Ireland Assembly voted to affirm the 
        Hillsborough Agreement and endorse the devolution of policing and 
        justice, creating a Department of Justice for Northern Ireland;
Whereas the approval of the Hillsborough Agreement marks a major landmark in 
        realizing the objectives of the Good Friday Agreement and the St. 
        Andrews Agreement;
Whereas the Hillsborough Agreement commands widespread public support among the 
        people of Northern Ireland; and
Whereas, on March 9, 2010, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton 
        applauded ``Northern Ireland's political leadership for tackling the 
        complex and difficult work that will come with these additional 
        responsibilities'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the--
            (1) Hillsborough Agreement marks a significant step forward 
        in the peace process for Northern Ireland;
            (2) political leadership of Northern Ireland should be 
        commended for taking the difficult steps to reach and implement 
        this agreement;
            (3) political parties of Northern Ireland should continue 
        to work together toward the goal of achieving a lasting peace 
        for the people of Northern Ireland; and
            (4) United States supports the Hillsborough Agreement and 
        will continue to stand by the people of Northern Ireland in 
        their effort for a true and enduring peace.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      Subsidiaries of RSA Security Inc.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                         -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
3-G International, Inc. .........................  Delaware
ASR Securities Corp. ............................  Massachusetts
Dynasoft Holdings AB ............................  Sweden
RSA Investments Inc. ............................  Massachusetts
RSA Partners I, L.P. ............................  Delaware
RSA Security AB .................................  Sweden
RSA Security do Brasil Ltda. ....................  Brazil
RSA Security Business Trust .....................  Massachusetts
RSA Security (Canada) Inc. ......................  New York
RSA Security Holding Limited ....................  Ireland
RSA Security Holdings Inc. ......................  Delaware
RSA Security Massachusetts Corp..................  Massachusetts
RSA Security Australia Pty Ltd. .................  Australia
RSA Security B.V. ...............................  Netherlands
RSA Security France SARL ........................  France
RSA Security GmbH ...............................  Germany
RSA Security Ireland Limited ....................  Ireland
RSA Security Japan Ltd. .........................  Japan
RSA Security (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ...............  Malaysia
RSA Security Nordic AS ..........................  Norway
RSA Security Products Limited ...................  Cyprus
RSA Security (S) PTE Ltd. .......................  Singapore
RSA Security UK Limited..........................  United Kingdom
RSA Ventures, Inc. ..............................  Delaware
RSA Ventures I, L.P. ............................  Delaware
Securant Technologies, Inc. .....................  California
Securant Technologies Pty Ltd. ..................  Australia
Security Dynamics Foreign Sales Corp. ...........  Delaware
Sichuan An Cheng Security Technology Company ....  People's Republic of China
Xcert International, Inc. .......................  Delaware
Xcert Limited ...................................  United Kingdom
Xcert Software Inc. .............................  British Columbia, Canada
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATIONS





This
Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350
of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.





The
undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certify as
follows:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies
this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Dated
this 7th day of
May 2010




/s/ Nicholas S. SchorschNicholas
      S. SchorschChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/ Brian S. BlockBrian
      S. BlockChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Accounting Officer)