alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.3**

June 22, 2006 

Petróleos Mexicanos 

Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329 

Torre Ejecutiva, Piso 41 

Colonia Huasteca 

México, D.F. 11311 

México 

Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton as set froth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2005, under the heading“Exploration and Production (Reserves)”. We reviewed estimates, as of January 1, 2005, of the proved crude oil, condensate, and natural gas reserves and the oil equivalent of 51 fields with interests owned by the United Mexican States(“Mexico”). These estimates were prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(13) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The fields are located offshore from Mexico inthe Southwest Marine Region, and are those referenced in our audit letter dated September 10, 2005.
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 66919]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no06-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday, December 8, 2006.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9285 Filed 11-15-06; 3:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
No. 27.

#### Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *v.*Illinois Life Insurance Co.

December 7, 1936.

It is ordered that the sentence in the second paragraph of the opinion delivered in this cause on November 9, 1936, which is as follows: “That provision is a reenactment of § 245 (a) (2), Revenue Act of 1921, which in *Helvering*v. *Insurance Co.*we held not to apply to assets reserved by a life insurance company against unmatured, unsurrendered, and unpaid coupons attached to its policies,” be amended by striking therefrom the word “unmatured” and inserting in its place the word “matured.” The petition for rehearing is denied. [Opinion reported as amended, *ante,*p. 88.]
Exhibit 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------



Board of Directors
Creative Host Services, Inc.
San Diego, California

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-
102869 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement 333-90630 on Form S-8 of Creative
Host Services, Inc. of our Independent Auditors Report dated March 15, 2002,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Creative Host Services, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003.




/s/  Stonefield Josephson,  Inc.

Santa Monica, California
March 30, 2004
```

[Federal Register: March 17, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 12604]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17mr97-61]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Renew Information Collection #3038-0031:
Procurement Contracts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is planning to renew
information collection 3038-0031, Procurement Contracts, which is due
to expire on June 30, 1997. The information collected consists of
procurement activities relating to solicitations, amendments to
solicitations, requests for quotations, construction contracts, award
of contracts, performance bonds and payment information for individuals
(vendors) or contractors engaged in providing supplies or services. In
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission
solicits comments to:

    (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) evaluate
the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of
the collection of the information on those who are to respond,
including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection
should contact the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW,
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5160.
    Title: Procurement Contracts.
    Control Number: 3038-0031.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Businesses.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 604 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 11, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-6592 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
No. 245.

#### Navigazione Generale Italiana *v.*Elting, Collector of Customs.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Delbert M. Tibbetts*and *Gaspare M. Cusumano*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Sweeney,*and *Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney*and *W. Marvin Smith*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1223 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 25, 2010. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Latta. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Maria GOMEZ-DIAZ, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-60920

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Teresa Salazar-Cosmos, Esq., Immigration Practice Group, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, Martin Avila Robles, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Sunah Lee, Trial Attorney, Tangerlia Cox, Kerry Ann Monaco, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KING, BENAVIDES and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Maria Gomez-Diaz, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen her in absentia removal proceeding. Her central argument is that an in absentia order was improper because she did not receive notice of the hearing and she did not have an address required by § 239(a)(1)(F)® of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(F)®, to provide to authorities.

The BIA’s finding that Gomez-Diaz failed to provide authorities with a current mailing address is supported by substantial evidence in the record. *See Chen v. Gonzales,*470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006). The Board’s determination that her failure to provide a current address precluded her from receiving notice of her removal hearing is correct. *See*§ 1229(a); *Gomez-Palados,*560 F.3d 354, 359 (5th Cir.2009). Likewise, her failure to provide an address precludes her from obtaining rescission of the in absentia order of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii); *Gomez-Palacios,*560 F.3d at 360-61.

Gomez-Diaz’s remaining arguments, creative though unsupported by controlling authority, do not overcome the highly deferential abuse of discretion standard of review. *See Maknojiya v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 588, 588-89 (5th Cir.2005). The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register: March 3, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr98-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, March 13, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-5621 Filed 2-27-98; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: September 18, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 181)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49955]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18se98-116]



[[Page 49955]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Orders Eligible for Post-execution Allocation

Correction

    In rule document 98-22933 beginning on page 45699, in the issue of
Thursday, August 27, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec.  1.35  [Corrected]

    1. On page 45710, in the second column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(i)(D), in the 13th line, "provided" should read "provided".
    2. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(H), in the first line, "government" should read
"governmental".
    3. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(H), in the fifth line, "suparnational" should read
"supranational".
    4. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(I), in the 7th line, "behalf:" should read "behalf;".
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Unassociated Document


    

      Exhibit
        4.29

      


      FORM
        OF CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

      


      Houston,
        Texas

      


      For
        value received, ATSI,
        Inc., a Nevada Corporation (Maker), promises to pay to Recap
        Marketing & Consulting LLP
        (Holder)
        the principal sum of [amount] with interest from date at the rate of twelve
        percent (12%), per year, until applied to warrants converted under a separate
        agreement. Holder or Maker has the right to convert the Principal at the
        price
        per share (rate) identified in Exhibit 4.1 of the Consulting Agreement
        ("Conversion"). Such Conversion shall occur only after approval of a reverse
        split, and authorization by the SEC of the Maker, and approval by the Board
        of
        Directors, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.

      


      Principal
        is payable in lawful money, or stock if converted, of the United States of
        America at 12000 Westheimer, Suite 340, Houston, Texas 77077, or at such
        place
        as may later be designated by written notice from the Holder to the Maker
        hereof, on the date and in the manner following:

      


      All
        principal and accrued interest is due on or before twelve (12) months from
        the
        date the principal amount is received.  

      


      This
        Note
        is not secured, other than by conversion of warrants to common
        stock.

      


      Both
        parties understand that the amount or value above does not exceed the maximum
        interest allowed by law, under the statutes of the state of Texas, and
        acknowledge that the terms are reasonable given the nature of the
        loan.

      


      ATSI,
        Inc.

      a
        Nevada
        Corporation

      By:
        /s/
        Arthur L. Smith 

      Arthur
        L.
        Smith 

      Its
        President and Chief Executive Officer

      


      Amount:
        $75,000 Received
        on: May
        10, 2005 

      Amount:
        $25,000 Received
        on: July
        14, 2005
#### Robert Alan BERKOWITZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, The; Wachovia Bank, N.A.; Bank of Anderson, NA; Carecredit, Incorporated-Ge Money Company; City of Anderson; Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina; Delta Dental Plan of Missouri; Cigna Healthcare Benefits, Incorporated; Cigna Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; National Technology Leasing Corporation; Barton R. Bright, III, a/k/a Chip; National Processing Company; Global Payments, Incorporated; Elavon, Incorporated; Chase Paymentech; Bank of America; Fifth Third Bank Operations; Legal Entry MD IMOC2Q; First Data Merchant Services Corporation; HPSC, Incorporated-GE Healthcare Financial Services; Great American Leasing Corporation; DF Services, LLC, Respondents-Appellees, and Patterson Dental Supply, Incorporated, Respondent.

No. 09-2328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.

Robert Alan Berkowitz, Appellant Pro Se. George John Conits, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina; Laurie Allyn Snyder, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Alan Berkowitz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part the United States’ motion to dismiss some, but not all, of the respondents in his petition to quash summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service upon third-party record-keepers. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Berkowitz seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Federal Register: September 14, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 177)]
[Notices]
[Page 49094]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14se98-39]


[[Page 49094]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Petition of the London Clearing House Limited for Exemption
Pursuant to Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Extension of comment period on petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(Commission) published for comment on July 7, 1998 (63 FR 36657), a
petition submitted by the London Clearing House Limited (LCH)
requesting an exemption, pursuant to Section 4(c) of the Commodity
Exchange Act, in connection with LCH's proposed provision of clearing
services for certain swap agreements. Comments on LCH's petition were
due by September 8, 1998. In response to a request by the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc., the Commission has determined
to extend the comment period for an additional 15 days. The extended
deadline for comments on the LCH petition is September 23, 1998. The
Commission believes that this extension should give all parties
sufficient time to consider and comment upon the LCH petition and will
look with disfavor upon any further requests for an extension of the
comment period.
    Any person interested in submitting comments on the LCH petition
should submit them by the specified date to Jean A. Webb, Secretary,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st
Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581. In addition, comments may be sent
by facsimile transmission to facsimile number (202) 418-5521, or by
electronic mail to [email protected].
    Copies of the LCH petition are available for inspection at the
Office of the Secretariat at the above address. Copies also may be
obtained through the Office of the Secretariat at the above address or
by telephone at (202) 418-5100 or on the Commission's Internet web site
(http://www.cftc.gov).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 23, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Thomas E. Joseph, Attorney Adviser, Division
of Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.
Telephone (202) 418-5430.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 8, 1998 by the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission.
Jean Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-24574 Filed 9-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
exv10w31



 






Exhibit 10.31









Steven Boss

Chief Executive Officer

Commerce Energy Group

600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 2000

Costa Mesa, California 92626




October 28, 2005



Re: Understanding regarding Employment Offer Letters.



Dear Mr. Boss:




     This letter will serve to confirm my understanding that my Employment Offer Letter dated May
31, 2005 supersedes and makes the previous Employment Offer Letter dated February 28, 2005 null and
void.



Sincerely,




/s/ THOMAS ULRY




Thomas Ulry

Senior Vice President Operations

Commerce Energy Group
Exhibit 21
----------


           Principal Subsidiaries of Global Payment Technologies, Inc.
           -----------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Jurisdiction         Percentage Ownership
       Name of Subsidiary                                       Incorporation           by the Registrant
--------------------------------------------------------     ------------------     ------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>                         <C>
Global Payment Technology Holdings (Proprietary) Limited        South Africa               4.99%

Global Payment Technologies Australia Pty. Ltd.                   Australia                  50%

Ecash Management Pty. Ltd.                                        Australia                  35%

Global Payment Technologies (Europe) Limited                    United Kingdom              100%

Abacus Financial Management Systems Limited                     United Kingdom               25%

Abacus Financial Management Systems Ltd., USA                    United States               80%
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Kerrisdale Mining Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Huoqi Chen , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Huoqi Chen Huoqi Chen, Chief Executive Officer June 11, 2009
**Exhibit 14(a)**

----

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-90616, No. 33-80797, No. 333-6390, No. 333-6862, No. 333-7226, No. 333-12732 and No. 333-109572) of STMicroelectronics N.V. of our reports dated February 16, 2005 relatingto the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 20-F.

| PricewaterhouseCoopers SA |
|---------------------------|

|    |      |
|---------|-----------|
|    |      |
| M Foley | H-J Hofer |

Geneva, March 22, 2005

PricewaterhouseCoopers is represented    in more than 140 countries worldwide and in Switzerland in Aarau, Basle,    Berne, Chur, Geneva, Lausanne, Lucerne, Lugano, Neuchâtel, Sion, St.    Gall, Thun, Winterthur, Zug and Zurich and offers Assurance, Tax & Legal    and Advisory services.

----
```

[Federal Register: April 9, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 68)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17439]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap99-124]



[[Page 17439]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Access to Automated Boards of Trade

Correction

    In proposed rule document 99-6829, beginning on page 14159, in the
issue of Wednesday, March 24, 1999, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 14160, in the first column, in the second full
paragraph, in the 12th line, before ``countries'' add ``country or
within''.
    2. On the same page, in the third column, in the first full
paragraph, in the 21st line from the bottom, ``regulatory'' should read
``regulator''.
    3. On page 14161, in the third column, under the heading A.
Definitions, in the first paragraph, in the 15th line, ``FMC'' should
read ``FCM'', and in the 16th line, ``rule'' should read ``Rule''.
    4. On page 14163, in the first column, in the first full paragraph,
in the eighth line, ``creates'' should read ``create''.
    5. On the same page, in the second column, in the third paragraph,
in the 10th line, ``A a'' should read ``As a'', and in the 11th line,
``alter-native'' should read ``alternative''.
    6. On page 14164, in the second column, in the first full
paragraph, in the fourth line from the bottom, ``aboard'' should read
``abroad''.
    7. On page 14165, in the third column, in the first full paragraph,
in the seventh line, ``petitioners'' should read ``petitioner'', and in
the fourth line from the bottom, ``regulatory'' should read
``regulator''.
    8. On page 14166, in the first column, in the first full paragraph,
in the 16th line, ``30.30'' should read ``30.10''.
    9. On page 14169, in the third column, in the sixth line from the
bottom, ``memebers'' should read ``members''.
    10. On page 14170, in the second full paragraph, in the 11th line,
``(or its affiliate'' should read ``(or its affiliate)''.
    11. On page 14171, in the second column, in the 13th line, ``and''
should read ``any''.
    12. On page 14174, in the second column, in the second line,
``2(a)91)(A)'' should read ``2(a)(1)(A)''.


Sec. 1.71  [Corrected]

    13. On page 14175, in the first column, in Sec. 1.71(c)(1), in the
first line, the paragraph designation ``((c)(1)'' should read
``(c)(1)''.
    14. On the same page, in the same column, in Sec. 1.71(c)(2), in
the second line, delete ``Medicare'' and add ``commission merchant''.
[FR Doc. C9-6829 Filed 4-8-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----