31574 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2001 / Proposed Rules

Local Regulation Chapter 7, Open

Burning. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’

section of this Federal Register, EPA is

approving the State’s SIP revision as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial SIP revision and

anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set

forth in the preamble to the direct final

rule. If EPA receives no adverse

comments, EPA will not take further

action on this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, EPA will

withdraw the direct final rule and it will

not take effect. EPA will address all

public comments in a subsequent final

rule based on this proposed rule. EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting must do so at

this time. Please note that if EPA

receives adverse comment on an

amendment, paragraph, or section of

this rule and if that provision may be

severed from the remainder of the rule,

EPA may adopt as final those provisions

of the rule that are not the subject of an

adverse comment.

DATES: Comments must be received in

writing on or before July 12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be

mailed to Richard R. Long, Director, Air

and Radiation Program, Mailcode 8P–

AR, Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite

300, Denver, Colorado, 80202. Copies of

the documents relevant to this action

are available for public inspection

during normal business hours at the Air

and Radiation Program, Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th

Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado,

80202. Copies of the State documents

relevant to this action are available for

public inspection at the Montana

Department of Environmental Quality,

Air and Waste Management Bureau,

1520 E. 6th Avenue, Helena, Montana

59620.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laurie Ostrand, EPA, Region 8, (303)

312–6437.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the Direct Final

action of the same title which is located

in the Rules and Regulations Section of

this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: May 22, 2001.

Patricia D. Hull,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.

[FR Doc. 01–14613 Filed 6–11–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IN133–1b; FRL–6990–2]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; IN

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to

approve revisions to particulate matter

(PM) regulations for Rolls-Royce Allison

(Rolls-Royce), formerly Allison Engine

Company. This facility is located in

Marion County, Indiana. The Indiana

Department of Environmental

Management (IDEM) submitted the

revised regulations on August 31, 2000

as a requested amendment to its State

Implementation Plan (SIP). The

revisions consist of a name change for

the company and the addition of a

provision that allows the facility to use

landfill gas as an alternate fuel. These

requested SIP revisions do not change

Rolls-Royce’s emissions limits.

DATES: The EPA must receive written

comments on this proposed rule by July

12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: You should mail written

comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

You may inspect copies of Indiana’s

submittal at: Regulation Development

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt

Rau, Environmental Engineer,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone

Number: (312) 886–6524, E-Mail

Address: rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document wherever

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean

the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What actions are EPA taking today?

II. Where can I find more information about

this proposal and the corresponding

direct final rule?

I. What Actions Are EPA Taking Today?

The EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the particulate matter

regulations for Rolls-Royce Allison in

Marion County, Indiana. IDEM

submitted the revised regulation on

August 31, 2000 as amendments to its

SIP.

The revisions are a name change for

the company and the addition of landfill

gas as an alternate fuel. These SIP

revisions result in no increase of

particulate matter emissions.

II. Where Can I Find More Information

About This Proposal and the

Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

For additional information see the

direct final rule published in the rules

section of this Federal Register.

Dated: May 9, 2001.

Norman Neidergang,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 01–14611 Filed 6–11–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH140–1b; FRL–6992–1]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; OH

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to

approve revisions to sulfur dioxide

(SO2) emissions regulations for the

Lubrizol Corporation (Lubrizol) in Lake

County, Ohio. The Ohio Environmental

Protection Agency (Ohio EPA)

submitted Director’s Final Findings and

Orders (Orders) for the Lubrizol facility

on November 9, 2000. These Orders are

revisions to the Ohio State

Implementation Plan (SIP). The

revisions are the adjustment of six shortterm emissions limits, the addition of an

annual emissions limit, and the addition

of a continuous emission rate

monitoring system (CERMS)

requirement for the facility. Three shortterm emissions limits are relaxed and

three short-term are tightened. There is

no increase in the total potential shortterm SO2 emissions.

DATES: The EPA must receive written

comments on this proposed rule by July

12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: You should mail written

comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2001 / Proposed Rules 31575

You may inspect copies of Ohio’s

submittal at: Regulation Development

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt

Rau, Environmental Engineer,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone

Number: (312) 886–6524, E-Mail

Address: rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document wherever

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean

the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What actions are EPA taking today?

II. Where can I find more information about

this proposal and the corresponding

direct final rule?

I. What Actions Are EPA Taking

Today?

The EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to sulfur dioxide emissions

limits for the Lubrizol Corporation

facility in Lake County, Ohio. Ohio EPA

submitted the revised regulations on

November 9, 2000 as an amendment to

its SIP. These revisions are the

adjustment of six short-term limits

(three relaxed and three tightened), the

addition of an annual limit, and the

requirement of a continuous emission

rate monitoring system (CERMS).

II. Where Can I Find More Information

About This Proposal and the

Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

For additional information see the

direct final rule published in the rules

section of this Federal Register.

Dated: May 18, 2001.

David A. Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 01–14609 Filed 6–11–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 242–0280b; FRL–6991–5]

Revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan, Monterey Bay

Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

a revision to the Monterey Bay Unified

Air Pollution Control District

(MBUAPCD) portion of the California

State Implementation Plan (SIP). This

revision concerns the control of

emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen (Nox)

and sulfur compounds. We are

proposing to approve a local rule to

regulate these emissions under the

Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA

or the Act).

DATE: Any comments on this proposal

must arrive by July 12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy

Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR–

4), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

You can inspect copies of the

submitted SIP revision and EPA’s

technical support document (TSD) at

our Region IX office during normal

business hours. You may also see copies

of the submitted SIP revision at the

following locations:

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 1001 ‘‘I’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95814.

Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution

Control District, Rule Development,

24580 Silver Cloud Ct., Monterey, CA

93940–6536.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Vineyard, Rulemaking Office

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, (415) 744–1197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

proposal addresses the following local

rule: MBUAPCD 404, Sulfur

Compounds and Nitrogen Oxides. In the

Rules and Regulations section of this

Federal Register, we are approving this

local rule in a direct final action without

prior proposal because we believe this

SIP revision is not controversial. If we

receive adverse comments, however, we

will publish a timely withdrawal of the

direct final rule and address the

comments in subsequent action based

on this proposed rule. We do not plan

to open a second comment period, so

anyone interested in commenting

should do so at this time. If we do not

receive adverse comments, no further

activity is planned. For further

information, please see the direct final

action.

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Jane Diamond,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 01–14607 Filed 6–11–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[NC–T5–2001–01; FRL–6996–1]

Clean Air Act Proposed Full Approval

of Operating Permit Programs; North

Carolina, Mecklenburg County, and

Western North Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed full approval.

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to fully

approve the operating permit programs

of the North Carolina Department of

Environment and Natural Resources, the

Mecklenburg County Department of

Environmental Protection, and the

Western North Carolina Regional Air

Quality Agency. These programs were

submitted in response to the directive in

the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA)

Amendments that permitting authorities

develop, and submit to EPA, programs

for issuing operating permits to all

major stationary sources and to certain

other sources within the permitting

authorities’ jurisdiction. On November

15, 1995, EPA granted interim approval

to the North Carolina, Mecklenburg

County, and Western North Carolina

operating permit programs (60 FR

57357). These agencies have revised

their programs to satisfy the conditions

of the interim approval and this action

proposes approval of those revisions

and other program changes made since

the interim approval was granted.

DATES: Comments on the program

revisions discussed in this proposed

action must be received in writing by

July 12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the

program revisions discussed in this

action should be addressed to Ms. Kim

Pierce, Regional Title V Program

Manager, Air & Radiation Technology

Branch, EPA, 61 Forsyth Street, SW,

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8909. Copies of

the North Carolina, Mecklenburg

County, and Western North Carolina

submittals and other supporting

documentation used in developing the

proposed full approval are available for

inspection during normal business

hours at EPA, Air & Radiation

Technology Branch, 61 Forsyth Street,

SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8909.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim

Pierce, EPA Region 4, at (404) 562–9124

or pierce.kim@epa.gov/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

section provides additional information

by addressing the following questions:

What is the operating permit program?