alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: June 5, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 108)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30675]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05jn98-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 10


Rules of Practice; Proposed Amendments

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 3, 1998, the Commission published in the Federal
Register a notice requesting comments on proposed amendments to its
Rules of Practice, which govern most adjudicatory proceedings brought
under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, except for reparations
actions. The original comment period expires on June 2, 1998. 63 FR
16453 (April 3, 1998). In a letter dated May 28, 1998, the Committee on
Commodities and Futures Law of the New York State Bar Association
requested an extension of the comment period. To assure that an
adequate opportunity is provided for the submission of meaningful
comments, the Commission has determined to extend the comment period by
an additional thirty (30) days.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 2, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed amendments should be sent to Jean
A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. Comments
may be sent by electronic mail to [email protected]. Reference should
be made to "Proposed Amendments to the Rules of Practice."

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Mihans, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Enforcement, at
(202) 418-5399 or David Merrill, Office of Chief Counsel, at (202)
5120, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on this 1st day of June, 1998, by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14961 Filed 6-2-98; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-490

Lower Tribunal No. 17-CA-003695

_____________________________

LAWRENCE DUFRAINE and SHARON DUFRAINE,

Appellants, 

v.

GEORGE STEPHEN and SUSAN STEPHEN,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Joseph C. Fuller, Judge.

February 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Marc B. Hernandez and Matthew E. Haynes, of Lytal, Reiter, Smith, Ivey & 

Fronrath, West Palm Beach, for Appellants.

Michael R. D’Lugo, of Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for 

Appellees.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Marion HIS LAW, also known as Charlie Boy His Law, Appellant.

No. 95-4228.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 1996.

Decided June 5, 1996.

Cheryl F. Laurenz-Bogue, Dupree, SD, for appellant.

Thomas J. Wright, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pierre, SD, for appellee.

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Marion His Law challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to distributing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The government argues the appeal should be dismissed because His Law agreed in the plea agreement to waive his right to appeal, or challenge via post-conviction writs of habeas corpus or co-ram nobis, the district court’s entry of judgment and imposition of sentence. We construe this as a promise on His Law’s part not to appeal his sentence. We have held that a promise made in a plea agreement is binding on the government and may be specifically enforced by a defendant. *United States v. Kelly,*18 F.3d 612, 615-16 (8th Cir.1994). We conclude that this principle applies with equal force against defendants and therefore against His Law in this case.

We therefore specifically enforce His Law’s promise against him by dismissing his appeal.

1

. The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
#### Cheneise E. Carey, Appellant, v Empire Paratransit Corp. et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 27, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 85 AD3d 520.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *901the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 10.1
 DIGITILITI, INC.
2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 OPTIONEE:
    
    []GRANT DATE:
    
    []NUMBER OF OPTION SHARES:
    
    []EXERCISE PRICE PER SHARE:
    
    $ [] per ShareEXPIRATION DATE:
    
    []
 THIS AGREEMENT
  NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Grant of Option. not
 2. Purchase Price.
 3. Term and Exercise of Option.




---



##### 



Exhibit A
  4. Limitations on Exercise of Option.
   5. Nontransferability of Option.
 6. Termination of Optionee as an Employee, Consultant, Independent Contractor or other Service
Provider.
  2




---



##### 



7. Termination of Optionee as an Employee, Consultant, Independent Contractor or other Service
Provider due to Disability of Optionee.
 8. Termination of Optionee as an Employee, Consultant, Independent Contractor or other Service
Provider due to Death of Optionee.
 9. No Right to Continued Employment or Engagement of Services.
 10. Adjustments.
 11. Effect of Certain Transactions.
   3




---



##### 



12. Limitation on Payments and Benefits.
 13. Interpretation.
  4




---



##### 



14. Definitions; Option Plan Governs.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMPANY:
Digitiliti, Inc.By[Name of Officer of the Company]Its: [Title]  5




---



##### 



$___________ $_______ ).
 Check one:
 o
    
    Enclosed is cash, or a cashiers or certified check payable to Digitiliti, Inc. for the total exercise price of the shares
being purchased.o
    
    Attached is a certificate(s) for _______  shares of common stock duly endorsed in blank
and surrendered for the exercise price of the shares being purchased.*
 *
    
    The use of this alternative is subject to the approval of Digitiliti, Inc.   (Signature)(Print or Type Name)
```

[Federal Register: August 20, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 161)]
[Notices]
[Page 44260]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20au97-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, September 8, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-22153 Filed 8-18-97; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
H. Res. 1098 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 24, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

4626) to restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws 

to the business of health insurance to protect competition and 

consumers. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

(2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1235 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1235

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require chairs 
    and ranking minority members of committees and subcommittees to 
 indicate whether they have any financial interest in the employer of 
any witness at a hearing, any person retaining a witness, or any person 
                       represented by a witness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

 Mr. Teague submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require chairs 
    and ranking minority members of committees and subcommittees to 
 indicate whether they have any financial interest in the employer of 
any witness at a hearing, any person retaining a witness, or any person 
                       represented by a witness.

    Resolved, That clause 2(k)(1) of rule XI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives is amended by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(1)'' and by 
adding at the end the following new subdivision:
    ``(B) Immediately after the announcement under subdivision (A), the 
chair of the committee or subcommittee, as applicable, shall state 
whether he has, had, or intends to have any financial interest in the 
employer of any witness at the hearing, any person retaining any such 
witness, or any person represented by any such witness. The chair shall 
then recognize the ranking minority member solely for the purpose of 
making the same statement.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: April 20, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 77)]
[Notices]
[Page 20272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap01-42]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Tuesday, May 1, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-10007 Filed 4-18-01; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 32



Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished but not filed)



In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Joseph S. Micallef, President of the Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:



1. This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date
        October 25, 2007
        
        By
        /s/  Joseph S. MicallefJoseph S. Micallef, President of the Trustees andChief Executive Officer








In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Thomas A. Janochoski, Vice President & Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:



1. This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date
        October 25, 2007
        
        By
        /s/  Thomas A. JanochoskiThomas A. Janochoski, Vice President &Secretary and Chief Financial Officer






---
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549-1004



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report:

December 31, 2008



---

INSIGNIA SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its chapter)



Minnesota

        1-13471

        41-1656308(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)

        (CommissionFile Number)

        (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)




8799 Brooklyn Blvd., Minneapolis, Minnesota

        55445(Address of principal executive offices)

        (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code(763) 392-6200



(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



o

        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o

        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item 1.02.Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.



Effective December 31, 2008, the Companys retailer agreement with Safeway Inc. expired, which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition in 2009 and later years if the Company is unable to re-establish a relationship with Safeway. The Company is making efforts to do so.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Insignia Systems, Inc.(Registrant)Date:   January 6, 2009

        

        By

        /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. Drill, President and Chief Executive Officer








---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1135] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act (the Act) of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

WHEREAS, the Greater Cincinnati Foreign Trade Zone, Inc. (GCFTZ), grantee of FTZ 46, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 46—Site 3 (Clermont County Industrial Park) to include three additional parcels (FTZ Doc. 44-2000, filed 7-27-00); 

                    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (64 FR 47712, 8-3-00) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                 

WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby authorizes the grantee to expand its zone as requested in the application, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of December 2000. 

Richard W. Moreland, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Pierre V. Duy, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-1383 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 13, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00528-CR

CHAD PROVORSE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1443270

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance. In 

accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial 

court sentenced appellant to confinement for four years in the Institutional Division 

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in 

which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no 
2

right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is 

included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports 

the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

[CO 04/166]
CHESS-APPROVED FOREIGN SECURITIES -- AMENDMENT

Issued 26/2/2002

Class Order [CO 04/166] amends [CO 02/284] by replacing in the Schedule the term
`SCH business rules' with the term `ASTC operating rules'.

                Australian Securities and Investments Commission
            Corporations Act 2001 -- Subsection 1075A(1) -- Variation


Under subsection 1075A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission varies Class Order [CO 02/284] by, in the Schedule,
omitting "SCH business rules" and substituting "ASTC operating rules".

Dated this 26th day of February 2004



Signed by Brendan Byrne
as a delegate of the Australian Securities and Investments
```

[Federal Register: March 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 52)]
[Notices]
[Page 13178]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr05-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, April 8, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-5486 Filed 3-16-05; 11:47 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Robby Truman SHERRILL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6401.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 2006.

Decided: June 1, 2006.

Robby Truman Sherrill, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*303Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Robby Truman Sherrill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as time-barred. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sherrill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September
30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Lyle Jensen, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: December 31, 2007

/s/ Lyle Jensen
---------------
Lyle Jensen
President and Chief Executive Officer