alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:    May      19, 2010  | /s/ William      Elder                                 |
|                                                 | William      Elder                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                                 | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                           |

----
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 200)]
[Notices]
[Page 60494-60495]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc05-39]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 25, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 60495]]


Contact Person For More Information: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20880 Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 52894]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc01-25]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 9, 2001.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-26412 Filed 10-16-01; 1:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30828-30829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

United States Patent and Trademark Office

37 CFR Parts 1 and 2

[Docket No. 991105297-1125-03]
RIN 0651-AB01


Revision of Patent and Trademark Fees for Fiscal Year 2002; 
Correction

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office published a 
proposed rule in the Federal Register of May 9, 2001, revising certain 
patent fee amounts and a trademark fee amount for fiscal year 2002, 
changing the maintenance fee correspondence address, and amending a fee 
to reflect current business practice. This document corrects one error 
in that proposed rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Lee by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e984889d9d818c9ec7858c8ca99c9a999d86c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34595540405c51431a58515174414744405b1a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>, by telephone at (703) 305-8051, or by fax at 
(703) 305-8007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Patent and Trademark 
Office published a proposed rule entitled ``Revision of Patent and 
Trademark Fees for Fiscal Year 2002'' in the Federal Register of May 9, 
2001 (66 FR 23642). The proposed rule contains an error in the Other 
Considerations section. The paragraph that references

[[Page 30829]]

an appendix comparing existing and proposed fee amounts should have 
been omitted. The appendix was referenced for informational purposes 
only. This document corrects the error in the Other Considerations 
section.
    In rule FR Doc. 01-11591, published on May 9, 2001 (66 FR 23642), 
make the following correction. On page 23643, in the third column, 
remove the third paragraph from the Other Considerations section.

    Dated: May 31, 2001.
Nicholas P. Godici,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting 
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 01-14510 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **27** |
|-----------|--------|--------|

|  | **Adams        County Co-op** |
|--|--------------------------------|

| DATE: | 2/27/97 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **28** |
|-----------|--------|--------|

|  | **Heartland Co-op, Inc.** |
|--|---------------------------|

| DATE: | 2/27/97 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
    Previous
Next
Last
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgemont Mining Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 11, 2007





/s/ Dean Rogers

Dean Rogers, Principal Financial Officer
NICK PANEBIANCO, ESQ./ 

APPELLANT, THE FORMER 

ATTORNEY FOR THE 

EMPLOYEE/CLAIMANT/ELIZ

ABETH VASQUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM 

AND CANNON COCHRAN 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, 

INC., AND ELIZABETH 

VASQUEZ,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5501

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 25, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Stephen L. Rosen, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 3, 2007.

Nick J Panebianco of the Law Offices of Nick J. Panebianco, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Richard S. Powers of Richard S. Powers, LLC, Coral Gables, and R.A. Cuevas, Jr., 

County Attorney, Miami, and Marlene P. Klein, Assistant County Attorney, Miami, 

for Appellees.
2

PER CURIAM.

Because Mr. Panebianco was not afforded meaningful due process below, we 

vacate the order entered on November 3, 2014, and remand for a new evidentiary 

hearing at which he shall be heard and shall have the right to cross-examine 

witnesses. See Giddins v. Giddins, 151 So. 3d 54, 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (reversing 

for hearing to satisfy due process requirements that party have opportunity to be 

heard and call witnesses). See also § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014) (no attorneyclient privilege exists as to communications relevant to “an issue of breach of duty 

by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer, arising from the lawyerclient relationship”); R. Reg. Fla. Bar 4-1.6(c)(2) (lawyer may reveal confidential 

information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary “to establish a 

claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and 

client”). This disposition renders moot the other issues raised on appeal, on which

we therefore express no opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
3

ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.1


    Exhibit
      10.1

     

    FOURTH
      AMENDMENT

    TO
      THE

    M/I
      HOMES, INC. 401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

    


    (As
      Restated Effective as of January 1, 1997)

    


    


    WHEREAS,
      M/I
      Homes, Inc. (the “Sponsor”) sponsors the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing
      Plan (the “Plan”); and

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Plan provides that the Sponsor may amend the Plan; and 

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Plan has been amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1997, and further
      amended by the First, Second and Third Amendments, and by an unnumbered
      amendment to conform the Plan to the final regulations under Section 401(a)(9)
      of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and 

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Sponsor desires to amend the Plan in order to adopt certain administrative
      provisions;

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, effective
      on July 1, 2005, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

    


    1. The
      following new Section 1.01(c) shall be added to Section 1.01 at the end
      thereof:

    


    (c) For
      the
      purpose of satisfying the service requirements set forth in this Section 1.01,
      the Plan may credit an Employee with his or her service with an employer
      (“Predecessor Employer”) where such service occurred prior to the date that (i)
      the Predecessor Employer became an Affiliate; or (ii) some or all of assets
      of
      the Predecessor Employer were acquired by the Sponsor or an Affiliate. Such
      grants of prior service will be specified in either an action of the Board
      of
      Directors of the Sponsor, a document approved by an officer of the Sponsor,
      an
      action of the Plan Administrator, or by an amendment to the Plan.

    


    2. The
      following new Section 2.01(d) shall be added to Section 2.01 at the end
      thereof:

    


    (d) For
      Plan
      Years commencing on and after 2005, at the discretion of the Plan Sponsor,
      a
      special allocation of a specified dollar amount may be made for one or more
      Predecessor Employer Participants during such year, and shall be allocated
      to
      the Participant’s Employer Contribution Account. For the purpose of this
      subsection (d), a “Predecessor Employer Participant” is a Participant who
      previously worked for an employer which was acquired by, or some or all of
      the
      assets were acquired by, the Sponsor or an Affiliate. Any such special
      allocation shall be specified in writing by an action of the Board of Directors
      of the Sponsor, a document approved by an officer of the Sponsor, an action
      of
      the Plan Administrator, or by an amendment to the Plan.

    
 

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      Sponsor has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
      officer.

    
 

    M/I
      HOMES, INC.

     

    Date:           


                           By:               

     

     Name:       

    
                                 Title:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6030** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. EMILIO BAUTISTA

- TERAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00177

- CMC

- 6; 3:09

- cv - 70068

- CMC )

Submitted : May 22, 2013 Decided: June 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Emilio Bautista

- Teran, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Mark C. Moore, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Emilio Bautista

- Teran seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) **.** We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisd iction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bo wles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on November 12, 2009 **.** The notice of appeal was filed on December 20 , 2012 **.** See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
Because Bautista

- Teran failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. To the extent Bautista

- Teran moves for authorization pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2006) to file a successive § 2255 motion, such motion is denied
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is C ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2010283EN.01001401.xml

| 20.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/14

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 283/06

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Lisbon–Ponta Delgada–Lisbon
  Lisbon–Terceira–Lisbon
  Lisbon–Horta–Lisbon
  Funchal–Ponta Delgada–Funchal
  Oporto–Ponta Delgada–Oporto
  Lisbon–Santa Maria–Lisbon
  Lisbon–Pico–Lisbon
  Oporto–Terceira–Oporto |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 60 days after the date of publication of this communication |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P. |
| Rua B, Edifícios 4, 5 e 6 — Aeroporto de Lisboa |
| 1749-034 Lisboa |
| PORTUGAL |
| Tel. +351 218423500 |
| Fax +351 218423582 |
| Internet: http://www.inac.pt |
| E-mail: dre.am@inac.pt |

Member State

Portugal

Concerned routes

Lisbon–Ponta Delgada–Lisbon

Lisbon–Terceira–Lisbon

Lisbon–Horta–Lisbon

Funchal–Ponta Delgada–Funchal

Oporto–Ponta Delgada–Oporto

Lisbon–Santa Maria–Lisbon

Lisbon–Pico–Lisbon

Oporto–Terceira–Oporto

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

60 days after the date of publication of this communication

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P.

Rua B, Edifícios 4, 5 e 6 — Aeroporto de Lisboa

1749-034 Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Tel. +351 218423500

Fax +351 218423582

Internet: http://www.inac.pt

E-mail: dre.am@inac.pt

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guy Christopher BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-56637.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 5, 2010.

Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Douglas F. McCormick, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Guy Christopher Brooks, Lompoc, CA, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Guy Christopher Brooks appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 2002 jury-trial conviction for bank robbery and his sentence of 210 months imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), and we affirm.

Brooks contends that his trial and appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance when they failed to challenge the district court’s reliance on the Presentence Report (“PSR”) to substantiate a 1990 state burglary conviction used as part of the basis for Brooks’s “career offender” enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) sections 4B1.1 and 4B1.2. Brooks does not challenge the PSR’s factual accuracy but argues that the PSR was not a judicially noticeable document that the trial court could rely on in imposing a career offender enhancement.

Brooks’s contention that the undisputed PSR was insufficient to establish the predicate burglary conviction is foreclosed. *See United States v. Romero-Rendon,*220 F.3d 1159, 1160, 1161, 1163 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise this argument in the district court or on appeal. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

We construe Brooks’s remaining arguments as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability, and we deny the motion, as Brooks has made no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); *Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir.1999); 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: August 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 160)]
[Notices]
[Page 47780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18au06-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, September 8, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7045 Filed 8-16-06; 11:50 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14315]



[[Page 30688]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia Field 
Office Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS 
Field Office Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS Field Office Technical 
Guide specifically in practice standards: #360, Closure of Waste 
Impoundments; #338, Prescribed Burning; #642, Water Well and #390, 
Riparian Herbaceous Cover to account for improved technology. These 
practices will be used to plan and install conservation practices on 
cropland, pastureland, woodland, and wildlife land.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before July 9, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to M. Denise 
Doetzer, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS), 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; 
Telephone number (804) 287-1665; Fax number (804) 287-1736. Copies of 
the practice standards will be made available upon written request to 
the address shown above or on the Virginia NRCS web site: http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/DataTechRefs/Standards&Specs/EDITStds/EditStandards.htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: May 31, 2001.
L. Willis Miller,
Assistant State Conservationist/Programs, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. 01-14315 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P