alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31630-31631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-436-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
become effective June 1, 2001:

Thirty Sixth Revised Sheet No. 9

    National states that under Article II, Section 2, of the 
settlement, it is required to recalculate the maximum Interruptible 
Gathering (IG) rate monthly and to charge that rate on the first day of 
the following month if the result is an IG rate more than 2 cents above 
or below the IG rate as calculated under Section 1 of Article II. The 
recalculation produced an IG rate of $0.60 per dth. In addition, 
Article III, Section 1 states that any overruns of the Firm Gathering 
service provided by National shall be priced at the maximum IG rate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will

[[Page 31631]]

be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us.online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and 
interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at htt://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14694 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>
       
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the year ended August 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                  1,591
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,714
<PP&E>                                    197
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,045
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  500
<OTHER-SE>                                259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,935
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       13,201
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          12,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           433
<INCOME-TAX>                              173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       260
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.05
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Jose
Ramon Basterra, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Spantel Communications, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated:
      April 29, 2005
    
    /s/
      Jose Ramon BasterraJose
      Ramon Basterra, President(Chief
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surf Resorts, Inc. a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Eduardo Biancardi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Surf Resorts, Inc., and will be retained by International Surf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
  /s/
      Eduardo BiancardiEduardo
      Biancardi
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                    May
      13, 2008
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 66613]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no99-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m.-1 p.m., December 2, 1999.

STATUS: Open.

SUMMARY: This is to give notice that the Commission will hold a public
roundtable meeting to discuss regulation of exchange-traded
derivatives.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, Lobby Level Hearing Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: De'Ana H. Dow, Legal Counsel to
Chairman Rainer, at 202-418-5030. Written comments should be submitted
to Jean A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on November 24, 1999.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-31067 Filed 11-24-99; 11:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### In re La’Shan Deneice JOHNSON, Petitioner.

No. 13-2020.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 8, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 10, 2013.

La’Shan Deneice Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

La’Shan Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a ruling on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) motion and petition for mandamus. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
DEVIN DEJUAN MIDDLETON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3241

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Michael G. Allen, Judge.

Devin Dejuan Middleton, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney 

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Kaps-All Packaging Systems, Inc., Respondent, v Joshua R. Cohen, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[875 NYS2d 159]—

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of the duty of loyalty, the defendant Joshua R. Cohen appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated April 2, 2008, as denied, as untimely, his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In this action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of the duty of loyalty, the plaintiff filed a note of issue on August 14, 2007. By order dated December 6, 2007, the Supreme Court denied the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him “without prejudice to the making of a new motion for the same relief made within 30 days of the entry of this order.” The order was entered on December 11, 2007. The appellant did not make a new motion for summary judgment until January 16, 2008. Consequently, the Supreme Court denied the motion as untimely. The appellant argues that this was error because he was not served with the December 6, 2007, order with notice of entry until on or about January 16, 2008, and his new motion for summary judgment was made within 30 days of such service. However, the Supreme Court did not err or improvidently exercise its discretion in enforcing the December 6, 2007, order as written *(cf. Matter of County of Sullivan [Spring Lake Retreat Ctr., Inc.],*39 AD3d 1095 [2007]; *Pi Ju Tang v St. Francis Hosp.,*37 AD3d 690, 691 [2007]; *Matter of County of Clinton [Bouchard],*29 AD3d 79 [2006]; *Lyons v Butler,*134 AD2d 576 [1987]; *Matter of Oak Is. Beach Assn. v Flacke,*96 AD2d 841 [1983]; *see also Thewet v Clarke,*38 AD3d 447 [2007]; *Gallo v Ventimiglia,*283 AD2d 331 [2001]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Miller, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1204 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 179
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1204

                          [Report No. 111-454]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4899) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for disaster relief and summer jobs for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2010

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4899) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for disaster relief and summer jobs for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4899) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for disaster relief and summer jobs for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except 
those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 
of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 179

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1204

                          [Report No. 111-454]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4899) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for disaster relief and summer jobs for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 22, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         375,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  605,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,546
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,240,980
<PP&E>                                         443,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,301,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,811,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    330,072
<COMMON>                                     6,791,612
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,301,205
<SALES>                                      1,239,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,239,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,056,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,778,608)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,778,608)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JAMES H. HENSON, JR.

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 398 , 2017

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID 89004837D I ( N )

§

§

Submitted: March 9, 2018

Decided: May 7 , 201 8

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VA UGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

Th e Court has considered carefully the parties’ briefs and the record on

appeal. We conclude that the judgme nt below should be affirmed on the basis of

the Superior Court ’s decision adopting the Commissioner’s well

- reasoned report

dated August 7, 2017

. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Henson’s

motion for postconviction relief was untimely and o therwise procedurally barred

and that he had failed to overcome th e procedural hurdle s

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### American International Group, Inc., Respondent, v Maurice R. Greenberg et al., Appellants.

[875 NYS2d 39]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), all seven of which were entered November 14, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motions for a stay of proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly declined to grant a stay of proceedings pending resolution of a related action in federal court (see CPLR 2201; *952 Assoc., LLC v Palmer,*52 AD3d 236, 236-237 *484[2008]; *Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v Corning Inc.,*33 AD3d 51, 58-59 [2006]). Defendants are former executives and/or directors of plaintiff American International Group, Inc. (AIG), the defendant in the federal action; they are current and/or former directors and/or voting shareholders of the plaintiff in the federal action, Starr International Co., Inc. (SICO). In the federal action, AIG asserted counterclaims against SICO arising out of SICO’s alleged obligations to AIG in connection with certain stock. AIG’s allegations herein arise out of defendants’ alleged independent fiduciary duties to AIG by virtue of their express pledges to preserve the value of said stock. A finding as to SICO’s duty to AIG would not affect defendants’ potential liability as independent fiduciaries of AIG and would not dispose of or significantly limit the issues involved in this action or pose a risk of inconsistent rulings *(see Belopolsky v Renew Data Corp.,*41 AD3d 322 [2007]; *Asher v Abbott Labs.,*307 AD2d 211 [2003]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta and Renwick, JJ. [See 2008 NY Slip Op 33102(U).]
```

[Federal Register: September 24, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 185)]
[Notices]
[Page 48861]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24se01-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, October 19, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-23904 Filed 9-20-01; 12:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

June 7, 2024 SC-2024-0289 Ex parte Jennifer Glass James PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Jennifer Glass James v. State of Alabama) (Chilton Circuit Court: CC-22-132; Criminal Appeals: CR-2022-1235).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on June 7, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama