alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: April 8, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 17024]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08ap03-49]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee; Tenth Renewal

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew
again for a period of two years its advisory committee designated at
the ``Agricultural Advisory Committee.'' The Commission certifies that
the renewal of the advisory committee is in the public interest in
connection with duties imposed on the Commission by the Commodity
Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq., as amended.
    The objectives and scope of activities of the Agricultural Advisory
Committee are to conduct public meetings and submit reports and
recommendations on issues affecting agricultural producers, processors,
lenders and others interested in or affected by agricultural
commodities markets, and to facilitate communications between the
Commission and the diverse agricultural and agriculture-related
organizations represented on the Committee.
    Chairman James E. Newsome serves as Chairman and Designated Federal
Official of the Agricultural Advisory Committee. Commissioner Walter
Lukken serves as Vice-Chairman of the Committee. The Committee's
membership represents a cross-section of interested and affected groups
including representatives of producers, processors, lenders and other
interested agricultural groups.
    Interested persons may obtain information or make comments by
writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 1, 2003, by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-8428 Filed 4-7-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Designation of Senior Agency Official Under Executive Order 12958

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION:  Notice of designation of ``Senior Agency Official'' for 
certain purposes under section 5.6 of Executive Order 12958 entitled 
``Classified National Security Information.''

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Counsel of the Office of the U.S. Trade 
Representative has been designated as the senior agency official for 
purposes of section 1.8(d) of Executive Order 12958 and has the 
authority, along with the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and 
the Deputy USTRs, to classify or re-classify information that has not 
previously been disclosed to the public after a request for it has been 
received under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Privacy Act 
of 1974.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FOIA Office, Office of the U.S. 
Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508. The 
telephone number is (202) 395-3419.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12958 (``the Order'') 
provides that heads of agencies that originate or handle classified 
information shall designate one or more senior agency officials to 
carry out certain duties and responsibilities under the Order. On May 
10, 2001, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick designated the 
position of General Counsel as a ``Senior Agency Official'' pursuant to 
the provisions of section 5.6 of the Order. The General Counsel shall 
have the authority to classify or re-classify information after a 
request has been received under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, so long as that 
information has not previously disclosed to the public. Such 
classification or re-classification shall be done in a manner that meet 
the requirements of the Order and on a document-by-document basis.

Sybia Harrison,
Agency FOIA Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14147 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 52894]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc01-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 23, 2001.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-26414 Filed 10-16-01; 1:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,178
<SECURITIES>                                   125,058
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                       710
<INVENTORY>                                      7,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,499
<PP&E>                                          43,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           415
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,855
<SALES>                                        171,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,334
<CGS>                                           40,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,472 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES REFERS TO EXPENSES OF $2,600 INCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF INTRUSION DETECTION INC. AND OTHER EXPENSES
OF $1,872 INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH A THREATENED LITIGATION SETTLEMENT.
<FN>
        


</TABLE>
<Page>


        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 14 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-20343)
(the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 31, 2005, relating
to the financial statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company (as of
September 6, 2005, known as Union Security Life Insurance Company of New
York), which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 7, 2005
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 116)]
[Notices]
[Page 35229]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn05-28]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, July 22, 2005.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-12053 Filed 6-15-05; 11:12 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jimiyu VERNON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30136

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2010.

Maurice Edwin Landrieu, Esq, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Stephen Andrew Higginson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jimiyu Vernon, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jimiyu Vernon, federal prisoner # 30572-034, pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more *881of cocaine base and cocaine hydrochloride and with possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. He currently appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to compel specific performance of the plea agreement by ordering the Government to file a motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Rule 35(b) does not provide a jurisdictional basis upon which to entertain Vernon’s motion. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir.1994). Vernon has made nothing more than a “generalized allegation[] of improper motive,” which does not warrant relief or an eviden-tiary hearing. *See Wade v. United States,*504 U.S. 181, 186, 112 S.Ct. 1840, 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992). Additionally, the language of the plea agreement reflects that the Government did not surrender its discretion to file a motion for a reduction of sentence. *See United States v. Price,*95 F.3d 364, 368 (5th Cir.1996).

Vernon contends that agents of the Government assured him prior to the entry of the guilty plea that he had in fact provided substantial assistance warranting a motion for a reduced sentence, and that the Government’s failure to do so thus rendered his guilty plea involuntary. This contention is more properly raised in the context of a direct appeal or in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See United States v. Amaya,*111 F.3d 386, 388-89 (5th Cir.1997); *United States v. Nuckols,*606 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir.1979). Even if this court considered Vernon’s motion for specific performance as a request for leave to amend the § 2255 motion pending at the time it was filed, Vernon has not established that he was entitled to relief because the amendment would be futile. *See Lowrey v. Texas A & M University System,*117 F.3d 242, 245 (5th Cir.1997); *United States v. Smith,*915 F.2d 959, 963 (5th Cir.1990); *United States v. Fuller,*769 F.2d 1095, 1099 (5th Cir. 1985). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Tan Duc USA v. Jimmy Tran

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00539

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 48243

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Tan Duc U SA has filed a Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Brief. That motion is GRANTED to the following extent: Tan Duc USA is ORDERED to file its amended brief within 30 days of the date of this order

. Due to the previous delays in this appeal, no further

e xtensions will be granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( d). If Tan Duc USA intends to file a responsive brief to the brief of Appellant Hoang

- Yen Thi Dang filed on July 13, 2015, that responsive brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order

. Appellee /Conditional Cross

- Appellant Tran has filed a Motion to Adjust Briefing Deadlines. That motion is GRANTED to the following extent: Tran’s brief as appellant and

response to Dang’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order . Tran’s response to Tan Duc USA’s amended brief will be due within 30 days of the date that brief is filed.

All relief not expressly granted herein is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting f or the Court

Date: _ August 25, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1222 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1222

       Supporting the goals and ideals of National Library Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2010

   Mr. Ehlers (for himself and Mr. Grijalva) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Supporting the goals and ideals of National Library Week.

Whereas the Nation's school, academic, public, and special libraries make a 
        difference in the lives of millions of people in the United States, 
        today, more than ever;
Whereas librarians are trained professionals, helping people of all ages and 
        backgrounds find and interpret the information they need to live, learn, 
        and work in a challenging economy;
Whereas libraries are part of the American Dream, places for opportunity, 
        education, self-help, and lifelong learning;
Whereas according to a December 2008 National Center for Education Statistics 
        (NCES) report, public library use increased to 1,400,000,000 visits 
        nationwide during fiscal year 2006, among all types of library users, 
        continuing a long term trend of increased library usage;
Whereas libraries play a vital role in supporting the quality of life in their 
        communities;
Whereas libraries help people of all ages discover a world of knowledge, both in 
        person and online, as well as provide personal service and assistance in 
        finding needed information;
Whereas libraries are a key player in the national discourse on intellectual 
        freedom and equity of access;
Whereas libraries are narrowing the ``digital divide'', by providing no-fee 
        public computer and Internet access to accommodate the growing need for 
        access to digital and online information, including e-government, 
        continuing education, and employment opportunities;
Whereas in 71 percent of communities, libraries have the only no-fee public 
        computers; and
Whereas libraries, librarians, library workers, and supporters across the United 
        States will celebrate National Library Week, April 11-17, 2010: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Library Week;
            (2) encourages all residents to visit a library to take 
        advantage of the wonderful library resources available, and to 
        thank their librarians and library workers for making 
        information accessible to all who walk through the library's 
        doors; and
            (3) supports librarians' efforts to ensure that all 
        Americans can continue to access 21st century library services 
        in school, public, academic, and special libraries.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: January 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 10)]
[Notices]
[Page 2529]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17ja06-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 17, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-420 Filed 1-12-06; 11:56 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

IntriCon Corporation:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-33712) and Form S-8 (No. 333-16377, 333-66433, 333-59694, 333-129104 and 333-134256) of IntriCon Corporation (formerly Selas Corporation of America) of our report dated March 12, 2007 which appears on page 22 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Virchow Krause & Company, LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 14, 2007





---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Eric SCHEIDT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-10003.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 4, 2012.

David L. Gappa, Assistant U.S., USF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Katherine L. Hart, Law Offices of Katherine L. Hart, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

James Eric Scheidt, pro se.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

James Eric Scheidt appeals from the 324-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for receipt or distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Scheidt contends that the district court plainly erred by including, in its calculation of his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, four points related to distribution of child pornography under U.S.S.G. §§ 2G2.2(b)(1) and 2G2.2(b)(3)(F). We have not yet resolved the issue of whether the use of a file-sharing program, without more, can support the award of distribution points under section 2G2.2(b). Accordingly, any error on the district court’s part cannot be deemed to have been plain. *See United States v. Olano, 507*U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (no plain error unless error is clear under “current law”); *United States v. Thompson,*82 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir.1996) (“Because of the circuit split, the lack of controlling authority, and the fact that there is at least some room for doubt about the outcome of this issue, we cannot brand the court’s failure to exclude the evidence ‘plain error.’ ”). Nonetheless, the government concedes that there was error and that it would have conceded the distribution issue had counsel objected at sentencing. Accordingly, the better course is for us to remand for consideration of this issue in the first instance.

Scheidt also contends that the district court’s restitution order should be vacated, as there was no evidence that his crime proximately caused quantifiable losses, or indeed any losses, to the named victims. After the entry of judgment below, we decided *United States v. Kennedy,*643 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir.2011), which set forth a framework for analyzing mandatory restitution orders under 18 U.S.C. § 2259. On remand, the district court shall revisit its restitution order in light of the framework set forth in *Kennedy.*

*610In view of the remand, it is unnecessary to reach Scheidt’s remaining contentions.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1; 7:05-cv-00235-SGW) Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: July 13, 2007 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Perez-Fulgencio has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 300.

#### New England Newspaper Publishing Co. *v.*Bonner.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Francis P. Garland*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Richard W. Hale*and *John W. Guider*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register: August 18, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 51270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18au04-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, September 24, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-19041 Filed 8-16-04; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```