alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs (Management), Department of the Interior, through his delegated 
authority, has approved the Off-Track Wagering Compact between the 
Choctaw Nation and the State of Oklahoma, which was executed on March 
28, 2001.

DATES: This action is effective June 7, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 25, 2001.
James H. McDivitt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs (Management).
[FR Doc. 01-14308 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
#### Ronald Rose et al., Respondents, v Hassan Ibn Aziz et al., Defendants, and Long Island College Hospital, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 816]-

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical mal*926practice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendant Long Island College Hospital appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated February 14, 2008, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to prosecute.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that CPLR 3216 permits a court to dismiss an action for want of prosecution only after the court or the defendant has served the plaintiff with a written notice demanding that the plaintiff resume prosecution of the action and serve and file a note of issue within 90 days after receipt of the demand, and also stating that the failure to comply with the demand will serve as the basis for a motion to dismiss the action. Since CPLR 3216 is a legislative creation and not part of a court’s inherent power *(see Airmont Homes v Town of Ramapo,*69 NY2d 901, 902 [1987]; *Cohn v Borchard Affiliations,*25 NY2d 237, 248 [1969]), the failure to serve a written notice that conforms to the provisions of CPLR 3216 is the failure of a condition precedent to dismissal of the action *(see Airmont Homes v Town of Ramapo,*69 NY2d at 902; *Harrison v Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*43 AD3d 996 [2007]; *Schuering v Stella,*243 AD2d 623 [1997]; *Ameropan Realty Corp. v Rangeley Lakes Corp.,*222 AD2d 631, 632 [1995]).

The appellant’s notice, dated July 31, 2007, demanding that the plaintiffs serve and file a note of issue cannot be deemed a notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 because it failed to notify the plaintiffs that they were “to resume prosecution of the action and to serve and file a note of issue within ninety days after receipt of such demand” (CPLR 3216 [b] [3]). Since a proper notice was not received by the plaintiffs prior to the appellant’s motion, the Supreme Court was not authorized to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant pursuant to CPLR 3216 *(see Harrison v Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*43 AD3d 996 [2007]; *Schuering v Stella,*243 AD2d 623 [1997]; *Ameropan Realty Corp. v Rangeley Lakes Corp.,*222 AD2d at 632). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Miller, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
        4.2

      


      


      


      


      


      October
        26, 2005

      


      Smithfield
        Fiduciary LLC

      c/o
        Highbridge Capital Management, LLC

      9
        West
        57th
        Street

      27th
        Floor

      New
        York,
        New York

      USA
        10019

      Attention: Ari
        J. Storch / Adam J. Chill

      


      Dear
        Sirs:

      
        
           

          
            	Re:	
                    Generex Biotechnology
                      Corporation

                    - Amendment to Jun 17 05
                      Warrant

                  


          

        

      

      


      We
        make
        reference to the common stock purchase warrant issued by Generex Biotechnology
        Corporation (the “Company”)
        to
        Smithfield Fiduciary LLC (“Smithfield”)
        on
        June 17, 2005 pursuant to which the Company granted to Smithfield the
        entitlement to purchase up to 609,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at
        $0.82 per share (the “Warrant”).

      


      The
        Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in the Warrant) of the Warrant
        is
        expressed therein as the 181st
        day
        after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
        of
        the exercise by Smithfield of not less than 100% of the Warrant and the delivery
        to the Company of a Notice of Exercise in respect thereof on or before the
        close
        of business on October 27, 2005, the Company has agreed to abridge the Initial
        Exercise Date and to honor the aforementioned Notice of Exercise.

      


      Yours
        truly,

      


      Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      


      


      /s/
        Mark A. Fletcher

      


      Mark
        A.
        Fletcher

      Executive
        Vice-President, General Counsel

      maf:hs
```

[Federal Register: July 21, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 39074]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21jy98-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, August 24, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19532 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Genaro Marchan MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50111

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Gale Ferguson, Esq., Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Genaro Marchan Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Mendoza has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**BG** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 608 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including May 7 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2022

03/31/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0608
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 2765

- 16T1

IN THE MATTER OF PRINCETON

CHARTER SCHOOL'S REQUEST

TO AMEND ITS CHARTER.

___________________________________

Submitted October 4, 2018

– Decided

Before Judges O'Connor, Whipple and DeAlmeida.

On appeal from the New Jersey Department of

Education.

Fogarty & Hara, attorneys for appellant Board of

Education of the Princeton Public Schools (Vittorio S.

LaPira, of counsel and on the brief; Robert D. Lorfink,

on the brief).

Johnston Law Firm, LLC, attorneys for respondent

Princeton Charter School (Thomas O. Johnston, of

counsel and on the brief; Rula Alzadon Moor, on the

brief).

Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for

respondent Commissioner of Education (Melissa

Dutton Schaffer, Assistant Attorney General, of

counsel; Lori B. Prapas, Deputy Attorney General, on

the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

October 17, 20182 A

- 2765

- 16T1

PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument this matter has been amicably

adjusted, and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and wi thout costs.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1154 

Expressing support for designation of September 13, 2010, as ‘‘National 

Childhood Cancer Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Mr. SESTAK (for himself, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

DOGGETT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. COLE, and Ms. SPEIER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of September 13, 2010, 

as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death by 

disease for children in the United States; 

Whereas an estimated 12,500 children in this Nation are diagnosed with cancer each year; 

Whereas an estimated 2,300 children in this Nation lose their 

lives to cancer each year; 

Whereas the results of peer-reviewed clinical trials have 

raised the standard of care and improved the 5-year cancer survival rate in children to greater than 80 percent 

overall; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1154 IH 

Whereas more than 40,000 children and adolescents in the 

United States currently are being treated for childhood 

cancers; 

Whereas up to 2⁄3 of childhood cancer survivors are likely to 

experience at least one life-altering or life-threatening 

late effect from treatment; 

Whereas childhood cancer occurs regularly and randomly and 

spares no racial or ethnic group, socioeconomic class, or 

geographic region; and 

Whereas September 13, 2010, would be an appropriate date 

to designate as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Childhood Cancer Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) requests that the Federal Government, 

5 States, localities, and nonprofit organizations ob6 serve the day with appropriate programs and activi7 ties, with the goal of increasing public knowledge of 

8 the risks of cancer; 

9 (3) recognizes the profound toll a diagnosis of 

10 cancer has on children, families, and communities 

11 and pledges to make its prevention and cure a public 

12 health priority; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1154 IH 

1 (4) urges public and private sector efforts to 

2 promote awareness, invest in research, and improve 

3 treatments for childhood cancer. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Jackie KRIENKE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 07-70244.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Jackie Krienke, Citrus Heights, CA, pro se.

Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, John Schumann Fax, Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq. Fax, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jackie Krienke appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying her motion to *609vacate the Tax Court’s decision dismissing her petition for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion, *Thomas v. Lewis,*945 F.2d 1119, 1123 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm.

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by denying Krienke’s motion to vacate because Krienke did not challenge the grounds for dismissal or show any other ground for relief from judgment. *See id.*at 1123-24. Further, the record does not support Krienke’s contention that the Tax Court conducted a de novo trial.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: September 7, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07se00-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 11 a.m., Friday, September 22, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-23111 Filed 9-5-00; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: July 22, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 140)]
[Notices]
[Page 43817]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jy04-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, August 20, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-16801 Filed 7-20-04; 11:22 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

y0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140616 & (16) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140616 

 COA: 295586 

Oakland CC: 2008-223910-FH 

YAKOV VYACHESLAV RAKHAMIMOV, 2008-224095-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

stay is DENIED.
```

[Federal Register: May 17, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 27897]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17my04-47]


[[Page 27897]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, June 25, 2004.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:
    Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-11188 Filed 5-13-04; 10:39 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 23, 2020

NO. 03-18-00229-CV

Field G. Harrison, D.D.S., Appellant

v.

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 19, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment that affirms the 

Board’s sanctions against Harrison, affirms the remainder of the district court’s judgment, and

remands the case to the trial court with instructions to remand the case to the Board for further

reconsideration of sanctions against Harrison. On remand, the Board is limited to exercising its 

discretion on the assessment of sanctions against Harrison consistent with this opinion. Appellee

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit
32.1






Certification






The
undersigned certifies for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, in his capacity as the chief executive officer of NORTH
HORIZON, INC. (“NORTH HORIZON”) that to his knowledge, the Form 10-Q of NORTH
HORIZON with financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,
fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operation of NORTH HORIZON.




Date: October
      9, 2008/s/
      Wallace BoyackWallace
      BoyackChief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-87916, 33-88506, 33-88508, 33-88510, and 333-08939 of Security Dynamics
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8 of our report dated January 22,
1997 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph referring to a change in the Company's method of accounting for option
grants requiring stockholder approval in 1996), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 1996.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in the
aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. listed in ITEM 14.(a)2. This
consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based upon our audits.
The consolidated financial statement schedule gives retroactive effect to the
merger of the Company and RSA Data Security, Inc., which has been accounted for
as a pooling of interests as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements. We did not audit the consolidated financial statement schedule of
RSA Data Security, Inc. for 1995 and 1994. That financial statement schedule of
RSA was audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our
opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for RSA Data Security,
Inc. for 1995 and 1994, is based solely on the report of such other auditors.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, such
consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1997



                                       41
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1997 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,756
<PP&E>                                          38,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,155
<BONDS>                                         21,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,814
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        88
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.49
        

</TABLE>