alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1
I, James Murdoch, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of British Sky BroadcastingGroup plc;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.     The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: 26 October 2004
JAMES MURDOCH
Chief Executive Officer
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      16, 2010 |        | /s/ Michael J.      Mauceli                                                                                                                                             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   | Michael      J. Mauceli                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                  |   | Manager      and Member of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC, the manager of Reef      Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the Managing General Partner of the      Partnership |   |
|                                  |   | (Principal Executive      Officer)                                                                                                                                           |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6079

GARY WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-448-7) Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: July 8, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gary Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court dismissed Williams’ petition in an order entered on November 12, 2003. Williams’ notice of appeal, dated December 22, 2003, was received in the district court on December 29, 2003. In his notice of appeal, Williams stated that he “only received [the district court’s order] from Prison Staff on December 11.” Williams’ notice of appeal was made within the period of time applicable for a determination of excusable neglect or good cause under Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and expressed his desire to preserve his appeal. See Myers v. Stephenson , 781 F.2d 1036, 1038-39 (4th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Williams has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, then will be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED
```

[Federal Register: December 28, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 72650]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28de99-77]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, January 21, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-33755 Filed 12-23-99; 11:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.Adam D. Singer, M.D.Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 26, 2010
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc., for the period ending April 30, 2009, I, Thomas J.
Irvine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc.
   Date:
June 19, 2009
  /s/
Thomas J. Irvine
 Thomas J.
Irvine
 Chief
Executive Officer,
Amended & Restated Promissory Note



 







EXHIBIT 10.2




Amended and Restated Line of Credit Promissory Note




	 	 	 
	$3,250,000.00

	 	Date: As of October 6, 2005






     1. FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned (“Borrower”) unconditionally promises to pay to the order of
BERJAYA GROUP (CAYMAN) LIMITED, a Cayman Islands corporation (“Lender”), without setoff and in
immediately available funds, the principal amount of THREE MILLION TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND and
NO/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S. $3,250,000.00) or, if less, the total unpaid principal amount advanced by
Lender from time to time to or for the benefit of or at the request of Borrower, together with
interest thereon according to the terms and conditions as set forth in that certain Amended and
Restated Loan Agreement of even date herewith between Lender and Borrower, together with all
amendments, modifications and extensions thereof (the “Loan Agreement”). This Note is subject to
the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement; provided, however, that the Loan Agreement is
expressly NOT incorporated herein pursuant to Section 201.08(6), Florida Statutes and Rules
12B-4.052(6)(b) and (12)(h) , Florida Administrative Code. This Note amends and restates, but does
not satisfy or repay, or constitute a novation of, the Line of Credit Promissory Note dated as of
August 10, 2005 made by the Borrower and payable to the Lender (the “Original Note”) or of any
Loans evidenced by the Original Note. The Original Note is completely superseded by and replaced
with this Note but is attached hereto to evidence the payment of Florida documentary stamp taxes on
this Note.



     2. Upon default under this Note or the Loan Agreement, Lender shall have the right to pursue all
rights and remedies available to Lender at law or in equity including, but not limited to, those
set forth in this Note, the Loan Agreement and each security agreement executed by the Borrower in
connection therewith.



     3. Borrower agrees to promptly pay, indemnify and hold harmless Lender from all state and federal
taxes of any kind and other liabilities with respect to or resulting from the execution or delivery
of this Note or advances made pursuant to this Note and/or the Loan Agreement.



     4. This Note shall be governed by, and construed under, the laws of the State of Florida.



 









 





     5. Notwithstanding any other provision contained in this Note, Lender does not intend to charge and
Borrower shall not be required to pay any amount of interest or other fees or charges that is in
excess of the maximum permitted by applicable law. Any payment in excess of such maximum shall be
refunded to Borrower or credited against principal, at the option of Lender. It is the express
intent hereof that Borrower not pay and Lender not receive, directly or indirectly, interest in
excess of that which may be lawfully paid under applicable law including the usury laws in force in
the State of Florida.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ROADHOUSE GRILL, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Ayman
Sabi 	 
	 	Name:  	Ayman
Sabi 	 
	 	Title:  	President
and CEO 	 
	 




2
```

[Federal Register: May 20, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 27519]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20my99-33]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 4, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-12864 Filed 5-18-99; 1:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
**Exhibit 15****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-08246 on Form F-3,and No. 333-106837 on Form F-3/S-3 of our report dated 27 July 2006, (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the nature and effect ofdifferences between International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Unionand the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 20-F of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc for the year ended 30 June 2006.Deloitte & Touche LLP
20-F










EXHIBIT 10.1  



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS



        We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-116429), pertaining to On Track Innovations Ltd.‘s 2001 Share Option Plan,
2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and 1995 Share Option Plan, Forms F-3 (File Nos.
333-111770, 333-115953 and 333-121316) and related Prospectus of On Track Innovations Ltd.
and its subsidiaries of
our report dated March 28, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002
included in this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004. 




	 October 27 , 2005 	Luboshitz Kasierer 
	  	  
	Tel-Aviv, Israel 	An affiliate member of Ernst & Young International 






80
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Mark S. Gorder, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of IntriCon Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1)
        the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 13, 2008

/s/ Mark S. GorderMark S. GorderPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)






The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

H.D. VEST, INC. AND STEPHANIE

CHARITONENKO,

RELATORS.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-10-00337-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relators seek a writ of mandamus to overturn an order denying their motion to compel

arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). A writ of mandamus will issue only if

the trial court clearly abused its discretion and if the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004). A party may appeal

an interlocutory order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the FAA. See

TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 51.016 (Vernon Supp. 2010); In re Merrill Lynch & Co.,

Inc., 315 S.W.3d 888, 891 n.3 (Tex. 2010); Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP v. J.A. Green

Dev. Corp., ___ S.W.3d ___, 2010 WL 4457467, at *1 (Tex.App.--Dallas Nov. 9, 2010, no

pet.h.). Because Relators thus have an adequate remedy by appeal, the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

November 29, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
#### James TRENDLE, Appellant, v. Alyson CAMPBELL, in her individual capacity; Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Division, Appellees.

No. 11-2730.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 7, 2012.

Filed: March 14, 2012.

James Schottel, Jr., Schottel & Associates, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Karin A. Schute, Attorney General’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appel-lee.

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James Trendle appeals the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he claimed, inter alia, that his due process rights were violated as a result of the temporary garnishment of his wages for child support, even though his wages were *585garnished in accordance with statutes authorizing such action, an administrative hearing was set at his request, and he availed himself of a state-court modification proceeding to stop the garnishment. The sole issue Trendle raises on appeal is whether the district court appropriately dismissed his due process claim against Alyson Campbell in her individual capacity, upon applying an abstention doctrine.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Campbell was entitled to qualified immunity. See *Schmidt v. Des Moines Pub. Sch.,*655 F.3d 811, 817-18 (8th Cir.2011) (fundamental requirement of due process is opportunity to be heard at meaningful time and in meaningful manner); *Akins v. Epperly,*588 F.3d 1178, 1183 (8th Cir.2009) (qualified immunity requires two-part inquiry: (1) whether facts shown by plaintiff make out violation of right in question, and (2) whether right was clearly established at time of defendant’s alleged misconduct). Accordingly, we modify the judgment to reflect that the dismissal of Trendle’s claim against Campbell is with prejudice, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2106 (appellate court may modify any judgment brought before it for review); *cf. Moore ex rel. Moore v. Briggs,*381 F.3d 771, 775 (8th Cir.2004) (upon concluding that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity, remanding case with directions to dismiss claims against them with prejudice), and we affirm the judgment as modified.
No. 355.

#### E. Griffiths Hughes, Inc., *v.*Federal Trade Commission.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Albert Edward Maves*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Dickinson,*and *Messrs. Charles H. Weston, Carl McFarland,*and *W. T. Kelley*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Chicago Mercantile          Exchange** |
|--|-------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 6/12/01 | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: |  | 3 | PDF SIZE: | 144 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia |
|-------|--|---------|----------|--|-----|--------|--|---|-----------|--------|-----------|-------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
H. Res. 1251 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 14, 2010. 

Whereas June 6, 2010, marks the 66th anniversary of the 

D–Day landings at Normandy, France; 

Whereas more than 150,000 Allied troops participated in the 

Normandy landings; 

Whereas approximately 70,500 Americans stormed the beaches of Normandy on D–Day and more than 1,400 of them 

gave their lives fighting for the cause of freedom; 

Whereas the U.S. Army Air Forces alone flew 8,000 planes 

on more than 14,000 sorties during D–Day; 

Whereas more than 4,000 ships carrying soldiers and supplies crossed the English Channel; 

Whereas 800 Allied planes dropped more than 13,000 men in 

parachutes; 

Whereas more than 100,000 Allied soldiers made it ashore 

while 9,000 of their comrades were wounded or killed; 

Whereas there are 9,387 graves in Colleville-sur-Mer, America’s cemetery in Northern France where all graves face 

west, toward America; 

Whereas there are 307 graves containing the remains of unknown soldiers; 
2 

•HRES 1251 EH 

Whereas within the Garden of the Missing there are 1,557 

names of soldiers who were never found; 

Whereas captured Germans were sent to American prisonerof-war camps at the rate of 30,000 POWs per month 

from D–Day until Christmas, 1944; and 

Whereas the Allied landings on D–Day led to the liberation 

of France and culminated in the ultimate annihilation of 

the Nazi empire: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the American troops who gave their lives 

in the Battle of Normandy; 

(2) recognizes the 66th anniversary of the D–Day 

landings at Normandy, France; and 

(3) expresses gratitude to the ‘‘greatest generation’’ 

of Americans who fearlessly fought for freedom. 

Attest: 

Clerk.