alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOE SMALL, III, DOC #309160, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4142

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Carol J. Y. Wilson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Pamela Cordova 

Papasov, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, C.J., and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1219 

Expressing support for designation of September as National Child Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself and Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of September as National 

Child Awareness Month. 

Whereas millions of American children and youth represent 

the hopes and future of the United States; 

Whereas numerous individuals, children’s organizations, and 

youth-serving organizations that work with children and 

youth collaborate to provide invaluable services to enrich 

and better the lives of the young; 

Whereas heightening awareness of, and increasing support 

for, organizations that provide access to healthcare, social 

services, education, the arts, sports, and other services 

will assist in the development of character and the future 

success of youth in the United States; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1219 IH 

Whereas September is a time when parents, families, teachers, school administrators, and communities in general 

increase their focus on children and youth nationwide as 

the school year begins; 

Whereas September is a time for the people of the United 

States as a whole to highlight and be mindful of the 

needs of children and youth; 

Whereas the House of Representatives unanimously passed 

H. Res. 1296 in 2008 and H. Res. 438 in 2009 to support the designation of September as ‘‘National Child 

Awareness Month’’; 

Whereas private corporations and businesses have joined with 

hundreds of national and local charitable organizations 

throughout the United States in support of a month-long 

focus on children and youth; and 

Whereas designating September as National Child Awareness 

Month would recognize that a long-term commitment to 

children and youth is in the public interest, and will encourage widespread support for the charities and organizations that seek to provide a better future for the children and youth of the United States: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a National Child 

3 Awareness Month to promote awareness of children’s 

4 charities and youth-serving organizations across the 

5 United States; 

6 (2) recognizes the efforts of children’s charities 

7 and youth-serving organizations on behalf of chilVerDate Nov 24 2008 18:04 Mar 26, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1219.IH HR1219

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1219 IH 

1 dren and youth as a critical contribution to the fu2 ture of the United States; and 

3 (3) encourages the President to issue a procla4 mation to emphasize the importance of National 

5 Child Awareness Month. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 986 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

28 Washington Street in Mount Holly, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Jim Saxton 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Mr. ADLER of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. SIRES, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. LANCE, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. 

ANDREWS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. GARRETT of 

New Jersey, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 28 Washington Street in Mount Holly, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Jim Saxton Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JIM SAXTON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 28 Washington Street in Mount 

6 Holly, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Jim Saxton Post Office Building’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 986 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jim Saxton Post Of5 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEMPSEY JOHN FRANCOIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3396

[March 12, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CF002771A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. 

Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 200)]
[Notices]
[Page 60494]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc05-36]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Thursday, November 10, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20877 Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Leonard STAFFORD, Defendant.

Cr. No. 89-55-MAC (WDO).

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division.

Sept. 27, 1993.

Michael T. Solis, Macon, GA, for U.S.

*881David A. Goldenberg, Southfield, MI, for Leonard Stafford.

*ORDER*

OWENS, Chief Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. In 1989, defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. This court awarded defendant a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility and sentenced plaintiff to 97 months. In 1992, the United States Sentencing Guidelines were amended to allow a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility for defendants with an offense level of 16 or above. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Defendant contends that the amended guidelines should be applied retroactively to allow an additional one-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 a court may modify an imposed term of imprisonment if “a defendant ... has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered....” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1993). The court, however, may reduce the term only “if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” *Id.*Section 1B1.10 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines sets forth the applicable policy statement of the Commission regarding retroactivity. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. Section 1B1.10(a) specifically states that if an amended section is not included within section lB1.10(d), then the retroactive application of the amended section would be inconsistent with the policy statement. *Id.*1B1.10(a). Amended section 3E1.1 is not included within section lB1.10(d). Therefore, amended section 3E1.1 is not entitled to retroactive application. Although the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to rule on this issue, the First, Second, Eighth and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have all held that section 3E1.1 is not entitled to retroactive application. *United States v. Avila,*997 F.2d 767 (10th Cir.1993); *United States v. Dowty,*996 F.2d 937 (8th Cir.1993); *Desouza v. United States,*995 F.2d 323 (1st Cir.1993); *United States v. Caceda,*990 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1993). Accordingly, defendant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration

          - [Docket No. FRA-2001-9270]

                    On April 6, 2001, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (66 FR 18351) notice of the petition of Wabtec Railway Electronics (Wabtec) in which Wabtec seeks a permanent waiver of compliance from a provision of the “Railroad Power Brake and Drawbars” regulations regarding two-way end-of-train devices (49 CFR 232.23(f)(2)).                

FRA invited interested parties to participate in this proceeding by submitting comments to the DOT Central Docket Management Facility by May 11, 2001. It has come to our attention that due to an administrative error on the part of the agency, an incomplete copy of Wabtec's petition was filed in the public docket (Docket No. FRA-2001-9270). That error has been corrected and a complete copy of Wabtec's submission is now filed in the docket as Document No. 5.

                    Inasmuch as interested parties may have had incomplete information on which to base comments in this proceeding, FRA is extending the comment period to July 11, 2001. Comments and other communications concerning this proceeding should be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Comments received by that date will be considered by FRA before final action is taken in this proceeding. All written communications concerning this proceeding are available for examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. All documents in the public docket are also available for inspection and copying at the docket facility's web site at                     *http://dms.dot.gov.*

Issued in Washington, DC on June 6, 2001.

Michael T. Haley,

Acting Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-14604 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 15 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00507- CV

MERCEDES WEISHALLA, Appellant

V. JENJA APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1071282

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from a proposed post-judgment order that was never signed by the trial court. Appellant is trying to recover funds held in the registry of the court.
Appellant filed a motion to withdraw those funds and submitted a proposed order to the trial court. For reasons unknown to this court, the County Civil Court
at Law N o. 1 did not rule on appellant’s motion.2

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). However, some post-judgment orders are appealable, but we have no signed order in this case. Appellant must obtain a ruling on her post-judgment motion to withdraw funds before she can file an appeal. Any possible remedy for a refusal to sign an order is by a petition for a writ of mandamus, not by appeal.

On July 3, 2019 notification was transmitted to the parties, of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before August 2,
2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Ave. Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JAMES LINDSEY, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 15th day of July, 2011.








/s/ JAMES LINDSEY


Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 113

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
           Intelligence in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

Mr. Reyes submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
           Intelligence in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $10,850,000 for the One 
Hundred Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,387,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $5,462,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
| **Material Released     Pursuant to FOIA Requests Which** |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

| **has Been, or is Likely     to Be, the Subject of Future** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

| **FOIA     Requests** |
|------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| Documents which do not have     PDF links are availabe on request to [email protected] by using the |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| electronic request form.     Electronic distribution of the documents is possible, depending on the     requester's |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ability to receive them.     Paper copies of documents are available within the Washington, D.C., area     through |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| the Commission's Public     Reading Room and outside the area through use of the electronic request form. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Fees of 15 cents per page     apply to paper copies |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| **Request Form** | **If you are unfamiliar with PDF files, click here for     help** |
|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| FILE NUMBER: | **RF05-006** | PLACED ON THE PUBLIC     RECORD: | 11/02/2005 | CATEGORY: | **C** |
|--------------|--------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------|

| **REFCO, LLC, CFTC FORM     1-FR-FCM FOR THE PERIOD 09/01/2005 -** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT NUMBER: | 1 |
|------------------|---|

|  | Refco, LLC, Form 1-FR-FCM     fo the perion 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 09/30/2005 | PAGES: | 19 | PDF SIZE: | 78 KB | PDF LINK: |
|-------|------------|--------|----|-----------|-------|-----------|

| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidWest One Financial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary J. Ortale, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MidWest One Financial Group, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.








/s/ Gary J. OrtaleGary J. OrtaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:May 5, 2011





This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 76 6

- C V

Style: Keith Porter v. Patricia Porter

Date motion filed * : November 1 2, 201 4

Type of motion: Motion f o r E xten sion of T ime to File Records & Pay Fees

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Evidence of Indigence or Payment of Reporter’s Record & Filing Fees

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 10/6/14 (Filing Fee) & 10/13/ 14 (Reporter’s Record)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current D ate s : 11/6/14 (Filing) & 11/13/14 (R

. R

. )

Date Requested: 45

- Day Extension

Ordered that motion s are :

 Granted in part ; if document is to be filed, document due: December 29, 2014.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record is dismissed as

moot because it was filed on October 31, 2014, and his request t o fil e the reporter’s

record is dismissed as the reporter is responsible for filing it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

35.3( b )

. To the extent appellant seeks an extension to file evidence of indigence or

payment of the reporter’s record and filing fees, his motion is granted because his

c ounsel claims her medical issues delayed the trial court’s indigence contest hearing

, but no further extensions will be granted. Thus, if appellant fails to file evidence of

indigence or the filing fee by December 29, 2014, the Court may dismiss this appeal

without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting

Date: November 18, 2014
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission 

September 1, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-49

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of August 21, 2023:

• August 24, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. CT 

Wednesday, August 30, 2023 deadline to report offsets of September 2023 SPIKES Volatility Index 

futures, and Hard Red Spring Wheat Index, Hard Red Winter Wheat Index, Soft Red Winter Wheat 

Index, National Corn Index and National Soybean Index futures and options, effective for the 

Tuesday, August 29, 2023 trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at http://www.mgex.com under the “Announcements” 

tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7188 or 

randerson@mgex.com. 

Sincerely,

Ryan Anderson

Associate Counsel