alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.B






CERTIFICATION
 
 I, John
R. Sult, certify that:
 
 1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of El Paso Pipeline Partners,
L.P.;
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
    Date:  August
      8, 2008
                
                /s/ John R.
      SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)El
      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., theGeneral Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyprium Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jeffrey A. Collins, the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


April 30, 2009                   By:   /s/ Jeffrey A. Collins
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Jeffrey A. Collins, Principal Executive
                                       and Financial Officer
exv10w8



 






EXHIBIT 10.8




Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation




     Non-employee director compensation currently consists of an annual cash retainer of $18,000
and an option grant for 6,000 shares. Audit committee members receive an additional $6,000 per
year ($8,000 for the chairman) and compensation committee members an additional $2,500. Any
director who fails to attend in a fiscal year at least 75% of the combined number of the meetings
of the Board and committees on which such director served, and fails to attend in person at least
75% of the in person Board meetings, may forfeit some or all of the compensation, as the Board may
in its discretion determine.
*District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-30529

DHANPAT MOHNOT; SURENDRA PUROHIT; SUNIL PUROHIT,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

VERSUS

RAJEEV BHANSALI; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CHRISTOPHER E. KALMUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

#99-CV-2332

March 5, 2003

Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge and ROSENTHAL*, District Judge.

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:**

The defendant Christopher Kalmus challenges the district court’s order summarily rejecting
2

his claim for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and F.R.C.P. 11.

After rejecting all of plaintiffs’ claims as meritless, the district court denied sanctions in the

following language: 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ respective claims for sanctions are

DISMISSED and shall not be considered by this Court. Almost every claim made

herein was derivative and dismissed for failure to make the required pre-suit demand

on the Board of Directors of the corporations (i.e., ICL or ITIL). Plaintiffs should

not take heart in this pronouncement, as they were the instigators, the prime movers

and shakers, responsible for breathing life into this war of attrition. 

Unfortunately this summary treatment of the defendant’s claim for sanctions gives us no

insight into the district court’s reasoning. As we stated in Schwartz v. Folloder, 767 F.2d 125 (5th

Circ. 1985) “where a district court failsto explain its decision to deny attorney’sfees we do not know

whether the decision was within the bounds of its discretion or was based on an erroneous legal

theory.”

Our review of the record reveals that Kalmus made a colorable claim for sanctions under §

1927 and F.R.C.P. 11, but because the district court did not explain itsreasonsfor rejecting Kalmus’

sanction claim, we must remand this case to the district court to give it an opportunity to explain why

it denied this claim. See Schwartz v. Folloder and Copeland v. Wassersten, Perella & Co., Inc., 278

F.3d 472, 484 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the district court’s order dismissing defendant Kalmus’

sanctions claim is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
```

[Federal Register: December 27, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 77233]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27de04-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 28, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-28414 Filed 12-22-04; 3:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Customs Service 

          - [T.D. 01-42] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Accreditation of Robinson International (USA) Inc. of Houston, Texas, as a Commercial Laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

Robinson International (USA) Inc. of Houston, Texas, has applied to U.S. Customs under Part 151.12 of the Customs Regulations for accreditation as a commercial laboratory to analyze petroleum product under Chapter 27 and Chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Customs has determined that this company meets all of the requirements for accreditation as a commercial laboratory. Specifically, Robinson International (USA) Inc. has been granted accreditation to perform the following tests methods only: (1) API Gravity by Hydrometer, ASTM D287; (2) Percent by Weight of Sulfur by X-Ray Fluorescence, ASTM D4294; (3) Sediment in Crude Oils and Fuel Oils by Extraction, ASTM D473; (4) Water in Crude Oil by Distillation, ASTM D4006. Therefore, in accordance with Part 151.12 of the Customs Regulations, Robinson International (USA) Inc. of Houston, Texas, is hereby accredited to analyze the products named above. 

*Location:*                         Robinson International (USA) Inc. accredited site is located at: 4500 South Wayside Drive, #101, Houston, Texas, 77207.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 1, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Parker, National Quality Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500 North, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 927-1060. 

Dated: May 30, 2001. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services. 

[FR Doc. 01-14060 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00256-CV

In re Lonestar Soccer Club of Austin, Inc.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Lonestar Soccer Club of Austin, Inc. and Real Party in Interest Sean Bubb

have filed a joint motion requesting that this original proceeding be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Filed: May 31, 2012
<PAGE>



Exhibit 10.7



         Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997 between Medjet Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Employer") and Eugene I. Gordon ("Employee").

                                 W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, Employer and Employee are parties to an Employment
Agreement dated as of March 15, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement") and
Employer and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement to increase
the Employee's Base Salary thereunder;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

         1.   Effective January 1, 1997 the Base Salary under the Employment
Agreement is hereby increased to $160,000 per year.

         2.   The following bonuses (aggregating $75,000) shall be paid to
the Employee upon and if the conditions set forth below for such bonus are
met:

     Bonus                                      Condition
     -----                                      ---------

     $25,000                  An Investigational Device Exemption ("IDE") is
                              issued to the Employer for any of the Employer's
                              keratomes on or before June 30, 1997

     $25,000                  An IDE is issued to the Employer for any of the
                              Employer's other keratomes on or before
                              December 31, 1997

     $25,000                  The Employer has received an FDA 510(k)
                              clearance on or before December 31, 1997 for
                              any of its keratomes

         3.   Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of
the date first above written.

                              MEDJET INC.


                              By:   /s/ Thomas M. Handschiegel
                                    -----------------------------------------


                              /s/ Eugene I. Gordon
                              -----------------------------------------------
                              Eugene I. Gordon


                                       2
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




I, Yu Xinbo, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of BTHC XV, Inc.;




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           [Intentionally omitted]




5.           [Intentionally omitted]









Dated:  August 19, 2011




By:/s/ Yu Xinbo


Yu Xinbo


Chief Financial Officer and


Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-105828) pertaining to
the Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 2001 Non-Statutory Plan
and the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Valentis, Inc., and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38092, 333-54066 and
333-104022) and related prospectus of Valentis, Inc., of our report dated August 20, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Valentis, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo
Alto, California
September 26, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.3.20

[WESTAFF
LOGO]

August 28,
2008

Sean
Wong
spwongcpa@hotmail.com

Dear
Sean:

This
letter is to confirm our verbal offer of employment to you as VP, Controller in Westaff's Corporate office in Walnut Creek California, reporting to me Christa Leonard, SVP and CFO.
Your official start date will be Monday, September 22, 2008, with a starting salary of $175,000 per year with a sign on bonus of $17,500 on your start date and $17,500 in 90 days. You
are also eligible for participation in the Company's annual bonus plan program commensurate to your position level and no less then 25% of your base salary. You will be eligible for three weeks of
vacation per year based upon the standard vacation accrual of the company's vacation policy.

In
addition to the above, upon successful completion of the following you will be eligible for a $17,500 dollar bonus:



Pending
Board approval, you will also be eligible to participate in the Company Stock Incentive Plan. It is anticipated that you will be awarded 75,000 Stock Options.

Should
you be terminated from the company within your first 12 months of employment due to the company relocating its headquarters further than a 35 mile radius of 298 N. Wiget
Lane, Walnut Creek, CA or following a company change your job is eliminated, you will receive 6 months of base pay as severance pay.

This
offer is contingent upon a satisfactory pre-employment evaluation which includes reference verification and a background investigation.

Westaff
engages in fair competition. We have no interest in any confidential information or trade secrets that belong to your former employers. We ask that you not share such information
and secrets with us.

Sean,
we look forward to your formal acceptance of this offer by signing and returning a copy of this letter to me. We believe that you will enjoy your association with Westaff and that
you will be a significant contributor to our team. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, please contact Debra Banks, Human Resource Representative at (925) 952-2540.

Sincerely,

/s/
Christa C. Leonard
Christa C. Leonard
SVP & Chief Financial Officer

ACCEPTED

Sean Wong Sean WongDATE

9/4/08


---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register: October 4, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 62234]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04oc02-31]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity,
Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability of report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or agency) in
accordance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Pub. L. 106-554; H.R. 5658) as
implemented by the final guidelines published by the Office of
Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President on September
28, 2001 (66 FR 49718) and on January 3, 2002 (67 FR 369) (and
reprinted in their entirety on February 22, 2002, 67 FR 8452),
"Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity,
Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal
Agencies,'' has posted its report on the CFTC website, http://www.cftc.gov. This report provides the agency's information quality
guidelines and explains how such guidelines will ensure and maximize
the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information,
including statistical information, disseminated by the CFTC. The report
also details the administrative mechanism that will allow affected
persons to seek and obtain appropriate correction of information
maintained and disseminated by the CFTC that does not comply with the
OMB or agency guidelines.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hilary E. Schultz, Chief Information
Officer, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581, email: [email protected], telephone: (202) 418-
5200.

    Dated: September 25, 2002.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-25241 Filed 10-3-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6827
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. NORD; C. S. MASSEY; WILLIAM JENNETT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHERROD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COTTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-343-5-BR) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint seeking equitable relief. While it is unclear whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-124, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), was properly applied to Appellant's complaint, we conclude that the order may be affirmedbecause Appellant has subsequently been released from incarceration, rendering his claims moot because he is no longer subjected to the conditions of which he complained. Magee v. Waters , 810 F.2d 451, 452 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Seventh Report of the Seneca County Special Grand Jury of January 2007. First Named Public Official, Appellant; R. Michael Tantillo, Special District Attorney of Seneca County, Respondent.

[874 NYS2d 834]—

Appeal from an order of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), dated February 15, 2008. The order accepted Report Number 7 of the January 2007 Seneca County Special Grand Jury and directed the filing of the report as a public record.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law and the report is sealed.

Memorandum: We agree with appellant, a public official of Seneca County, that County Court erred in directing that a grand jury report be filed as a public record for the same reasons as those set forth in our decision in *Matter of Second Report of Seneca County Special Grand Jury of Jan. 2007*(59 AD3d 1079 [2009]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.