alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13766]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Determination of Quarterly Rate of Excise Tax for Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Annuity Program

    In accordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad 
Retirement Board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such 
Section 3221(c) on every employer, with respect to having individuals 
in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is paid by 
such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter beginning 
July 1, 2001, shall be at the rate of 26 cents.
    In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined 
that for the quarter beginning July 1, 2001, 38.6 percent of the taxes 
collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad Retirement 
Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account and 61.4 
percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) 
plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) of the 
Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Account.

    Dated: May 24, 2001.
    By Authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13766 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Maguire,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of March, 2009.


/s/ Michael Maguire
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Jennifer L. Pharris,, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Bonfire Productions, Inc. Inc. certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bonfire Productions, Inc.




2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of May 10, 2010 (the "Evaluation Date");




c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  May 11, 2010



/s/ Jennifer L. Pharris

--------------------------

Jennifer L. Pharris

President, Chief Executive

Officer, and Director
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK CHIN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

RICK HILL, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-18011

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-03258-GEBDAD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2013** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TROTT, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Mark Chin appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a

writ of habeas corpus, which the district court determined was time-barred under

FILED

DEC 10 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d). We affirm.

For the first time on appeal, Chin asserts that the state corrections

department’s denial of his administrative appeal, which formed the basis of his

habeas petition, was a “judgment” subject to direct review by the U.S. Supreme

Court, § 2244(d)(1)(A), rather than “the factual predicate of [his] claim,” §

2244(d)(1)(D). He argues that, because his petition is governed by §

2244(d)(1)(A), he was entitled to take advantage of that sub-section’s provision

that AEDPA’s one-year limitation period does not begin to run until “the

expiration of the time for seeking [direct] review.” Consequently, Chin asserts, the

limitation period only began to run 90 days after his administrative appeal was

denied – once the deadline to petition for a writ of certiorari had passed.

Chin had conceded before the district court that the limitations period began

to run when the denial of his administrative appeal was issued, and he was right. 

“[W]hen a habeas petitioner challenges an administrative decision affecting the

‘fact or duration of his confinement,’ AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations runs

from when the ‘factual predicate’ of the habeas claims ‘could have been discovered

through the exercise of due diligence.’ As a general rule, the state agency’s denial

of an administrative appeal is the ‘factual predicate’ for such habeas claims.”

2
Mardesich v. Cate, 668 F.3d 1164, 1172 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal citations omitted)

(quoting § 2244(d)(1)(D)).

AFFIRMED.

3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4808-4809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-3661-001]


Central Hudson Gas & Electric; Notice of Filing

January 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 11, 2000, Central Hudson Gas and 
Electric Corporation (Central Hudson), tendered for filing its FERC 
Rate Schedule No. 201 which sets forth the terms and charges for 
transmission facilities provided by the Company to Consolidated Edison 
company of New York, Inc., and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation for the 
transmission of output from the Roseton Generating Station.
    Rate Schedule FERC No. 201 is issued in compliance with the October 
10, 2000 order issued in Docket No. ER00-3661-000, which required the 
Company to file rate schedule designations as required in Order No. 
614. Accordingly, Rate Schedule FERC No. 201 supersede Rate Schedule 
FERC No. 42.
    Central Hudson states that a copy of its filing was served on Con 
Edison, Niagara Mohawk and the State of New York Public Service 
Commission.

[[Page 4809]]

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before January 22, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1417 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40609 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL LYNN BRADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus AUREL L. ADAMS; MURRY A. FUNDERBURG, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CV-462

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Lynn Bradden, Texas inmate No. 1171646, has appealed the dismissal of his in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Section 1915A directs the district court to dismiss sua sponte any frivolous complaint filed by a prisoner against a “governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). A complaint is frivolous if it lacks an arguableNo. 05-40609 -2-

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). basis in fact or if it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory. Berry v. Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999). Bradden alleged that he was denied prescription medication in deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The magistrate judge ** held that the complaint was frivolous because Bradden’s claims lacked an arguable legal basis. Bradden has failed to demonstrate that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need or that the magistrate judge erred by dismissing the complaint as frivolous. Velasquez v. Woods , 329 F.3d 420, 421 (5th Cir. 2003); Domino v. Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice , 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint. The dismissal of the complaint and this court’s affirmance of the dismissal count as one strike against Bradden for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Bradden is warned that, should he accumulate three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
[LOGO] ACI                     ARMANDO C. IBARRA
                          Certified Public Accountants
                           A Professional Corporation


Armando C. Ibarra, C.P.A.                   Members of the California Society
                                            of Certified Public Accountants

Armando Ibarra, Jr., C.P.A., JD             Members of the American Institute of
                                            Certified Public Accountants

                                            Registered with the Public Company
                                            Accounting Oversight Board

September 29, 2005

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Armando C. Ibarra, Certified Public Accountants, apc consents to the
inclusion of our report dated August 9, 2005, on the audited financial
statements of Addison-Davis, Inc., as of June 30, 2005, in any filings that are
necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Very truly yours,


----------------------------
ARMANDO C. IBARRA, C.P.A.


                      371 E. Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
    Tel: (619) 422-1348                                  Fax: (619) 422-1465
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 2000 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      179
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,073
<PP&E>                                           1,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,545
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,605
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    211
<INCOME-TAX>                                       475
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (264)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1042 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1042

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 13, 2010.
Whereas the Boise State University Broncos football team won the 2010 Tostitos 
        Fiesta Bowl, defeating the Texas Christian University Horned Frogs by a 
        score of 17-10 at the University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, 
        Arizona, on January 4, 2010;
Whereas the Broncos finished their 2009 season with a flawless 14-0 record and 
        have gone undefeated 3 of their last 4 regular seasons;
Whereas the Broncos' only loss in 2008 was against Texas Christian University in 
        a 1-point nail-biter, making the 2010 Fiesta Bowl victory all the more 
        gratifying for the team;
Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen called for a courageous fake punt play 
        with less than 10 minutes remaining in the game that led to the game-
        winning touchdown;
Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen received the Paul ``Bear'' Bryant 
        Award for the second time in just 4 years, which recognizes the best 
        college football coach in the Nation;
Whereas sophomore quarterback Kellen Moore threw 39 touchdown passes this 
        season, the most for a single season in school history;
Whereas the 2010 Fiesta Bowl victory comes just 3 years after the Broncos' 
        historic Fiesta Bowl victory in 2007;
Whereas the entire Broncos team should be commended for its steadfast resolve, 
        tireless work ethic, and solid sportsmanship;
Whereas the Broncos should be considered serious National Championship 
        contenders next year with 21 of its 22 starters returning to the field, 
        ready to pick up from where they left off; and
Whereas the Broncos have brought great honor to themselves, their university, 
        the city of Boise, and the State of Idaho: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Boise State University Broncos football team for 
        winning the 2010 Fiesta Bowl; and
            (2) congratulates the team for completing an undefeated, 14-0 
        season.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Jonathan Medved, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vringo, Inc.:




2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):




a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b) [Omitted pursuant to the transition period exemption for newly public companies]




c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and




d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: August 15, 2011







/s/    Jonathan MedvedChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Great Spirits, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dana
Hyde , Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 12, 2009
              /s/ Dana HydeDana HydeChief Executive Officer
                Chief Financial Officer