alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary Applicants

Quick Freight Group, Inc. d/b/a Accufreight Group, 147-35 Farmers 
Blvd., #201, Jamaica, NY 11434, Officers: Han Goo Choi, President 
(Qualifying Individual)
Sunfreight Cargo International, Inc., 3541 Taffrail Lane, Oxnard, CA 
93035, Officers: Paulino J. Gerardo, CFO (Qualifying Individual), 
Rolando P. Gipulan, President
Extrans International U.S.A., 758 Glasgow Avenue, 2nd Floor, Inglewood, 
CA 90301, Officers: Andy Song, Treasurer/Managing Director (Qualifying 
Individual), Kyu Seung Shin, CEO
Scorpion Express Line Corp., 4995 NW 72 Avenue, Suite 406, Miami, FL 
33166, Officers: Ricardo Amable, President (Qualifying Individual), 
Raul Campos, Vice President
Hemisphere International Shipping, Inc., P.O. Box 13401, Santvrie, 
Puerto Rico 00908, Officers: Wayne M. Siegel, Vice President 
(Qualifying Individual)

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicant

STS North America Inc., 12727 NE 20th Street, Suite 23, Bellevue, WA 
98005, Officers: Nickolay Nickolaychuk, Director (Qualifying 
Individual), Rustam Yuldashev, Director

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicant

Shoreline Exprss, Inc., 13231 Eastern Avenue, Suite No. 3 Palmetto, FL 
34221, Officers: Mildred Reba Hunt, Secretary (Qualifying Individual), 
Timmy S. Adams, President

    Dated: June 1, 2001.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14297 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 20, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-01067-CV
PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, LL C AND JAMES C. LANKFORD, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. THE LAW COMPANY, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove Before the Court is appellants’ motio n to dismiss the appeal based on
settlement. We grant the moti on and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1(a)(1).

221067F.P05 /Maricela Breedlove / MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, LLC AND JAMES C. LANKFORD, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants

No. 05-22-01067-CV V.

THE LAW COMPANY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762. Opinion delivered by Justice Breedlove, Justices Nowell and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
As agreed by the parties, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 20, 2023.
# C_2010327EN.01002001.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/20

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 327/11

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 24.2.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 24.2.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | DGS/2AC4-C |
| Species | Spurdog/dogfish (Squalus acanthias) |
| Zone | EU waters of IIa and IV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 605704 |

Date and time of closure

24.2.2010

Duration

24.2.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

DGS/2AC4-C

Species

Spurdog/dogfish (Squalus acanthias)

Squalus acanthias

Zone

EU waters of IIa and IV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

605704

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
                                    MILESTONE
                                   SCIENTIFIC


September 30, 2005

Design Center, Inc.
218 Dew Drop Road
York, PA 17402
Attn:  Gary De Bruin


                   Re: MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC. ("MILESTONE")


Dear Mr. De Bruin,

         This will confirm that Milestone has agreed to issue to Design Center,
Inc. and that Design Center, Inc. has agreed to accept from Milestone 13,181
shares of common stock in payment of $25,176 as consideration for services
rendered to Milestone.

         By signing this letter, you confirm that (i) you are an "accredited
investor" within the meaning of Rule 215 of the Rules and Regulations under the
Securities Act, and (ii) you have acquired the shares for investment and
acknowledge that the shares cannot be resold or otherwise disposed of until they
are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws
or an exemption from registration is available.

         Since the shares will not be registered at the time of issuance, the
certificates representing the shares delivered to you will bear the following
legend:


         THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), AND MAY NOT BE SOLD,
TRANSFERRED, HYPOTHECATED OR ASSIGNED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR IN A TRANSACTION WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION UNDER THE ACT.



         Please acknowledge your agreement and understanding of the above
provisions by signing and dating a copy of this letter and returning it to us by
facsimile and mail. The shares will be delivered to you promptly after receipt
of your acknowledgement.





                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC.


                                                     By: /s/ Rosaline Shau
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Rosaline Shau
                                                        Chief Financial Officer



ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
THIS 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005


Design Centre, Inc.



/s/ Gary De Bruin
---------------------
By:  Gary De Bruin
Its: Senior Vice President


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          220 South Orange Avenue, Livingston, NJ  07039 o Tel: 973.535.2717 o
                                Fax: 973.535.2829
                                 www.MileSci.com
NO. 07-02-0498-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY 27, 2004

	____________________________

		IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

	RICHARD BALLENGER AND REBECCA BALLENGER

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2001-515,864; HONORABLE MACKEY K. HANCOCK, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Richard Ballenger filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss on January 21, 2004. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  All costs herein having been paid, no order pertaining to costs is made.  

							James T. Campbell

						    	        Justice
Exhibit 32.2

                         CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                           1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
                                   SUITE 2902
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036

                                  CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008 to be filed, I,
A. Alexandra Denahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   1  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the Report.
It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                            /s/ A. Alexandra Denahan
                            ------------------------
                            A. Alexandra Denahan
                            Chief Financial Officer
                            August 8, 2008


                                       49
#### Sislyn Benjamin, Appellant, v New York City Department of Health, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 2010;

decided May 11, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anastacio GARCIA-CARAVEO, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 12-10452, 12-10455.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Filed Oct. 3, 2013.

Sean Kevin Lokey, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeanette Elizabeth Alvarado, Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*769MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Anastacio Garcia-Caraveo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 46-month sentence and 36-month term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals the 11-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Garcia-Caraveo contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider his mitigating arguments or adequately explain the sentence. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The district court heard the mitigating arguments and sufficiently explained the sentence, including the supervised release term. *See Rita v. United States, 551*U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

Garcia-Caraveo also contends that the total 57-month sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the age of his prior robbery conviction, which triggered a 12-level enhancement. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Garcia-Caraveo’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the need for deterrence. *See id.*

Garcia-Caraveo finally contends that the three-year term of supervised release is substantively unreasonable in light of U.S.S.G. § 5Dl.l(c). The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a term of supervised release. *See United States v. Valdavinos-Torres,*704 F.3d 679, 692-93 (9th Cir.2012). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances, including the need for additional deterrence. *See id.;*U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1 cmt. n.5 (the district court should consider imposing supervised release on a deportable alien “if the court determines it would provide an added measure of deterrence and protection”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1414]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 18, 2001

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428

STATUS: Open.

MATTTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Request from a Federal Credit Union to Convert to a Community 
Charter.
    2. Washington Member Business Loan Rule.
    3. Request from a Corporate Credit Union for a Waiver under Part 
704, NCUA's Rules and Regulations.
    4. Final Rule: Amendments to Part 748, NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Guidelines for Safeguarding Member Information.

RECESS:  11:15 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, January 18, 2001

PLACE:  Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and 
(6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone 703-518-6304.

Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-1414 Filed 1-11-01; 4:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 6, 2008



---

MAKO Surgical Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware

        001-33966

        20-1901148(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)

        (Commission File Number)

        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)




2555 Davie Road

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33317

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)



Registrants telephone number, including area code:(954)927-2044



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



o

        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.



On November 6, 2008, MAKO Surgical Corp. (the Company) issued a press release, furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Form 8-K by reference, announcing its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2008.



The information in this Form 8-K and the exhibit attached hereto pertaining to the Companys financial results shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d) Exhibits.



Exhibit No.

        

        Description of Exhibit99.1

        

        Press Release issued by MAKO Surgical Corp. on November 6, 2008






SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MAKO Surgical Corp.Date: November 6, 2008

        

        By:

        /s/Fritz L. LaPorte,Fritz L. LaPorte,Senior Vice President of Finance andAdministration, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer






2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6662

ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KIM WHITE, Regional Director,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:06-cv-00652-DKC)

Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andre Sylvester Watts, a District of Columbia inmate

incarcerated in Virginia, appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and motion

to reconsider. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watts has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-89382, 333-02340, 333-06303, 333-16963, 333-20853, 333-52603, 333-80861,
333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550, 333-97101, 333-107027, 333-117762 and
333-126092 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2006, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Applix, Inc., appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Applix, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 2006
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WiTel Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November
      10, 2008
            /s/ James E.
      Renton
              James
      E. Renton
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 28, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00356

- CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE , JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment o f conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ a rguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM JUAN TAYLOR

No. 71PA98

(Filed 9 October 1998)

On review of substantial constitutional questions, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(1), of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 394, 496 S.E.2d 811 (1998), finding no error in a judgment entered by Gardner, J., on 19 April 1996, in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 1 October 1998.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by T. Brooks Skinner, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Janine Crawley Fodor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to both constitutional questions raised, the issue of the juvenile transfer statute, N.C.G.S. § 7A-610(a), being based on the authority of *State v. Green,*348 N.C. 588, 502 S.E.2d 819 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.