alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.0**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December                21, 2007 | /s/                Kenneth A. Wilman, Jr.Kenneth                A. Wilman, Jr.President                and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                                                                               |
| December                21, 2007 | /s/                Kevin D. MillerKevin                D. MillerExecutive                Vice President and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
1

Filed 5/19/14 P. v. C ervantes CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANDREW CERVANTES,

Defendant and Appellant. C074845

(Super. Ct. No. 13F03051)

On May 8, 2013, defendant Andrew Cervantes and the victim, his girlfriend,

argued over a prank she had played on defendant. He threatened to beat her and hit her in

the arm and face, u sing an open hand six to ten times and a closed fi st three times . As a

result, she suffer ed a bloody nose , a swollen eye, and an extreme headache for two days.

Defendant ple d no contest to assault by means of force likely to produce great

bodily injury , reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to Penal Code section 17,

subdivision (b), in exchange for dismissal of other counts : criminal threats and battery2

upon a person with whom defendant had a dating relationship, a misdemeanor, with a

waiver pursuant to Pe ople v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754 as to battery

.

The court granted probation subject to certain terms and conditions including 90

days in jail and participation in a batterer’s treatment pro gram.

Defendant appeals.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 .) Defendant was a dvised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed,

and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination

of the entire record, we f

ind no arguable error that would result in a disposition more

favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

ROBIE , J.

We concur:

HULL , Acting P. J.

BUTZ , J.
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Prospectuses and Statements ofAdditional Information in Post-Effective Amendment No. 93 to the Registration Statement onForm N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Canada Fund, Fidelity China Region Fund,Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Europe Fund, Fidelity Global Balanced Fund,Fidelity Japan Fund, Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund, Fidelity Latin America Fund,Fidelity Nordic Fund, Fidelity Overseas Fund, Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund, and FidelitySoutheast Asia Fund of our reports dated December 20, 2005, and Fidelity InternationalDiscovery Fund of our report dated December 13, 2005, on the financial statements and financialhighlights included in the October 31, 2005 Annual Reports to Shareholders of the abovereferenced funds.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in theProspectuses and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statements ofAdditional Information.
#### Olubukola ADEWUMI, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General,* Respondent.

No. 03-4157.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 5, 2006.

Alan Michael Strauss (Stanley H. Wallenstein, on the brief), Law Office of Stanley H. Wallenstein, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS and Hon. B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges, and Hon. DAVID G. TRAGER,** District Judge.

*

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as the respondent in this case.

**

**The Honorable David G. Trager, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Olubukola Adewumi petitions for review of a Board of Immigration (“BIA”) decision affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ’s decision denied Adewumi’s applications for asylum, witholding of removal, and suspension of deportation, and granted her application for voluntary departure. The BIA also denied Adewumi’s motion to remand the case to consider additional medical evidence. We assume familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

Where the BIA issues a short decision that affirms the IJ’s opinion without significant analysis, this Court reviews the IJ’s decision directly. *See Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003).

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination to deny suspension of deportation based on Adewumi’s failure to show extreme hardship. *See Kalkouli v. Ashcroft,*282 F.3d 202, 204 (2d Cir.2002). However, we retain jurisdiction to evaluate Adewumi’s claim that the IJ violated her due process rights by warning her that he would view with suspicion a report from any Nigerian physician regarding the availability of treatment for sickle-cell anemia in Nigeria. *See Xiao Ji Chen v. DOJ,*434 F.3d 144, 155 (2d Cir. 2006). To succeed on a due process challenge, an alien must show both that she was denied a full and fair opportunity to present her claims and that she was prejudiced by this error. *See id.*Even assuming that the IJ made the statement, Adewumi’s argument does not succeed because the IJ never indicated that he would not consider a report from a Nigerian physician, and was merely warning Adewumi of potential evidentiary problems with such a report.

*104We have considered Adewumi’s remaining argument and find it to be meritless.

For the reasons set forth above, Adewumi’s petition for review is DENIED.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1237 

CAF 14-02252 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF CHARITY M. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 ORDER

WARREN M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND CHRISTINA M., RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------ 

IN THE MATTER OF KORDELL S. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

WARREN M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND CHRISTINA M., RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------ 

IN THE MATTER OF TEMPERANCE M. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

WARREN M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND CHRISTINA M., RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------ 

IN THE MATTER OF KYRA T. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

WARREN M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND CHRISTINA M., RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

KIMBERLY S. CONIDI, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL). 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret

O. Szczur, J.), entered November 17, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to

Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged

that Kordell S. is an abused child and Charity M., Temperance M., and
-2- 1237 

CAF 14-02252 

Kyra T. are derivatively abused children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Matter of Lisa E. [appeal No. 1], 207 AD2d 983,

983).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification*




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pretoria Resources Two, Inc., (the
      “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to
      the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),
      Gail Davis, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and principal
      financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
      covered by the Periodic Report.




Date: August
              12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Gail
              DavisGail Davis
              President, Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                Financial Officer)





*  This
      certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of Pretoria Resources Two, Inc. under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
      (whether made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective
      of
      any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
NUMBER 13-14-00230-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

REY ORTIZ, Appellant,

v.

LUIS MANUEL SINGLETERRY, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court regarding the briefing schedule for this accelerated 

appeal under the Texas Election Code. The reporter’s record in this case was filed on 

April 22, 2014. That same day, appellant Rey Ortiz filed a motion for extension of time 

to file his brief until May 5, 2014. According to the motion for extension of time, the 
Honorable J. Manuel Banales ordered the reporter's record and the clerk's record to be 

filed with this Court by April 18, 2014 and that appellant's brief was to be filed with this 

Court by April 25, 2014. See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.014(d) (West, Westlaw 

through 2013 3d C.S.). The election code also provides that this Court may review these 

deadlines on motion of a party. See id. Appellant's counsel was able to secure a copy 

of the reporter's record on April 18, 2014 but has not yet received the clerk's record and 

has been informed that the clerk's record will be filed by April 28, 2014. Appellant thus 

requests an extension of time for ten days, until May 5, 2014, to file his brief in this cause 

provided that the clerk's record is secured no later than April 28, 2014. 

The clerk notified this Court on April 23, 2014 that the record will be filed in this 

Court no later than April 24, 2014. 

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant’s motion for extension 

of time to file the brief in this cause and the nature of the case, is of the opinion that, in 

the interest of justice, the motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted 

in part and denied in part with order. The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion for 

extension of time but ORDERS appellant’s brief to be filed in this cause on or before May 

2, 2014. The Court further ORDERS appellee’s brief to be filed in this cause seven days 

thereafter, or on or before May 9, 2014. Absent truly exigent circumstances, the Court 

will not favorably entertain further motions for extension of time in this case. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of April, 2014.
---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report: December 22, 2006

(Date of earliest event reported)



LENOX GROUP INC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Commission File Number: 1-11908



Delaware
        13-3684956(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
        (IRS Employer Identification No.)




One Village Place, 6436 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, MN 55344

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)



(952) 944-5600

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---

---

Item 7.01Regulation FD Disclosure



On October 3, 2006, Lenox,
Incorporated (the Company), a wholly owned subsidiary of Lenox Group Inc, entered into an Agreement of Sale (the
Sale Agreement) with BTR Capital Fund II, LLC for the sale of the Companys factory in Pomona, New Jersey for
$7.0 million. (The Company filed an 8-K on October 3, 2006 regarding the Sale Agreement.) On December 22, 2006, the Company closed
this transaction and received net proceeds of $6,680,244.04 which have been applied to pay down outstanding debt under the
Companys Term Loan Credit Agreement.



The Company has leased back four spaces at this Pomona, New Jersey property to continue various operations. The retail lease consists of 31,500 square feet at a rent of $3.8175 per square foot plus a pro rata share of real estate taxes and maintenance. The initial term of the retail lease expires on December 31, 2011. The Company has also leased back on a six month basis, with two six month renewal terms, 55,000 square feet for the manufacturing of sterling silver products, 19,700 square feet for its technical center and 14,000 square feet for customer service offices. The rent for these three spaces is $3.50 per square foot plus a pro rata share of real estate taxes and maintenance.

---

SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



LENOX GROUP INC/s/ Timothy J. SchugelTimothy J. SchugelChief Financial and Operating Officer




Dated: December 28, 2006

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SUSANNE HELBIG, a/k/a Susanne D. Helbig,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:14-cr-00008-NKM-RSB-1; 6:16-

cv-80885-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susanne Helbig, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Lynn Carlton, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Susanne Helbig seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Helbig’s informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Helbig has forfeited appellate review 

of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (noting 

court’s review is limited to issues preserved in informal brief); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 

370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (deeming abandoned issue not raised in brief). 

Accordingly, we deny Helbig’s motions for a transcript at government expense and to 

supplement her informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-55831 on Form S-4 and in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-10429 and 333-48143 on Form S-8 of Westaff, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated January 27, 2004 (February 13,
2004 as to the matters discussed in paragraphs two through seven in Note 1), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern, the November 2, 2002 balance sheet reclassification of long-term debt as a current liability, and a change in method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets, on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of November 1, 2003 and November 2, 2002 and for the years then ended appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Westaff, Inc. for the year ended November 1, 2003.

Our
audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the schedules of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Schedule II) of
Westaff, Inc as of November 1, 2003 and November 2, 2002 and for the years then ended appearing on page IV-1. These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. The financial statement schedules for the year ended November 3, 2001 were audited by
other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed, in their report dated December 19, 2001 (February 11, 2002 with respect to a subsequent event), that such 2001
financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the 2001 basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oakland,
California
February 13, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT PURSUANT
TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I,
Patricia Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Asia Atlantic Resources on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Asia Atlantic Resources.    /s/ Patricia
Cooke Patricia Cook President, Chief
Executive Officer and Director  December 12, 2008
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian Interstate Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November 13, 2009 | /s/ Richard J. Gavegnano                     |   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Richard J. Gavegnano                         |   |
|                                | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer         |   |
|                                |                                         |   |
|                                |                                         |   |
| Dated:  November 13, 2009 | /s/ Gregory Derderian                        |   |
|                                | Gregory Derderian                            |   |
|                                | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|                                | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----