alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.13





Exhibit 4.13




Transfer Certificate




To: Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. as Agent



From:
Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch (the Existing Lender) and VLCC
A Investment L.L.C. (the New
Lender)



Dated:
15 July 2010



$57,500,000
Facility Agreement dated 5 July 2010 (the “Agreement”) to Alpha Elephant Inc





	1	 	We refer to the Agreement. This is a Transfer Certificate. Terms defined in the Agreement
have the same meaning in this Transfer Certificate unless given a different meaning in this
Transfer Certificate.







	2	 	We refer to clause 28.5 (Procedure for transfer):







	 	(a)	 	The Existing Lender and the New Lender agree to the Existing Lender assigning to
the New Lender all of the Existing Lender’s Commitment rights and assuming the Existing
Lender’s obligations referred to in the Schedule in accordance with clause 28.5
(Procedure for transfer) and the Existing Lender assigns and agrees to assign such
rights to the New Lender with effect from the Transfer Date.







	 	(b)	 	The proposed Transfer Date
is 15 July 2010.







	 	(c)	 	The Facility Office and address, fax number and attention details for notices of
the New Lender for the purposes of clause 35.2 (Addresses) are set out in the Schedule.







	3	 	The New Lender expressly acknowledges the limitations on the Existing Lender’s obligations
set out in clause 28.4.3 (Limitation of responsibility of Existing Lenders).







	4	 	This Transfer Certificate may be executed in any number of counterparts and this has the same
effect as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this Transfer
Certificate.







This Transfer Certificate and any non-contractual obligations connected with it are governed
by English law.



 


 









 







The Schedule




The New Lender




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name
 	 	VLCC A Investment L.L.C.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Commitment $
 	 	57,500,000
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Commitment to be
assigned $

	 	57,500,000
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Facility office,
address, fax number
and attention details
for notices	 	c/o Teekay Shipping (Canada) Ltd.
 Suite 2000,
Bentall 5
 550 Burrard Street

Vancouver, British Columbia
 Canada V6C 2K2


 Fax: +1 604-681-3011

Attention: Vice President, Finance
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Account Details

	 	Bank:
	 	Citibank NA — New York Branch

	 

	 	Address:
	 	New York, NY

	 

	 	ABA:
	 	21000089
	 

	 	SWIFT:
	 	CITIUS33

	 

	 	Beneficiary Name:
	 	Teekay Tankers Ltd.

	 

	 	Bank Account #:
	 	[XXX]
	 

	 	Currency:
	 	USD

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL	 	57,500,000






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch	 	VLCC A Investment L.L.C.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 






This Transfer Certificate is accepted by the Agent and the Transfer Date is confirmed to be as
stated above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

rsrsqyrqqqx|xrsv
No. 68.

#### Baxter, Administrator, *v.*Continental Casualty Co.

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.

Decided October 26, 1931.

*Per*Cu-. *riam:*

This action was originally brought in. the Circuit *579Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri, and was removed to the District Court of the United States upon the ground of diversity of citizenship. The action was upon a policy of automobile insurance issued by the defendant, and recovery depended upon judgment having been obtained and execution thereon having been returned unsatisfied in an action against the assured. It was shown that action had been brought in the state court against the assured, the Southwest Motor Sales Co., a Missouri con poration, and also against one Harry Shields, its executive officer. Process had been served upon Shields personally, and jurisdiction of the Southwest Motor.Sales Co. had been sought by constructive service under the Missouri law. Judgment by default had been entered against both defendants and execution had been returned unsatisfied.

*Messrs. P. Taylor Bryan*and *Douglass H. Jones*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

In the present action the Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming judgment for the defendant, held that the insurance policy which the defendant had issued did not cover Shields and that the service in the action against the Southwest Motor Sales Co. was invalid under the decisions of the state court. *Priest*v. *Capitain,*236 Mo. 446, 457; 139 S. W. 204; *Moss*v. *Fitch,*212 Mo. 484, 497; 111 S. W. 475. As the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals merely applied the law of the State, no question is presented which gives this Court jurisdiction of the appeal. *Public Service Commission*v. *Batesville Telephone Co., ante,*p. 6. Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 955 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 955

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ``John 
                       `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN ``BUD'' HAWK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, shall 
be known and designated as the ``John `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John `Bud' 
Hawk Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1850

HUGO ALBERTO DE LA O and J.E.D.R.,

Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Argued: March 10, 2023 Decided: June 6, 2023

Before KING, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Ronald Darwin Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, 

Maryland, for Petitioners. Kathryn McKinney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Suzanne L. Capriotti, LAW 

OFFICES OF SUZANNE L. CAPRIOTTI, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Petitioners. Brian 

Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anna Juarez, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1850 Doc: 36 Filed: 06/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Hugo Alberto De La O and his son, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) dismissing the 

appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We review the agency’s factual findings for substantial evidence. Diaz de Gomez v. 

Wilkinson, 987 F.3d 359, 362 (4th Cir. 2021). Under that standard, the agency’s factual 

findings are “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude 

to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). Legal issues are reviewed de novo. Diaz de 

Gomez, 987 F.3d at 363. From our review of the record, the Board did not commit any 

legal error. And the Board’s factual findings were supported by substantial evidence. Stated 

differently, no reasonable factfinder “would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); see also Essohou v. Gonzales, 471 F.3d 518, 520 (4th Cir. 2006). 

So, we deny the petition to review the Board’s decision concerning the asylum, withholding 

of removal and CAT claims.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1850 Doc: 36 Filed: 06/06/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Louis Gries, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of James Hardie
Industries N.V.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the company, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companys internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control
over financial reporting. /s/ Louis GriesLouis GriesDate: November 22, 2004
    
    
    
    Interim Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT
32.B




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2008, of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James C. Yardley, President and Chief Executive Officer of El Paso
Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., the general partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners,
L.P, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
    /s/ John
      R. SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)El
      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., theGeneral Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.May
      9, 2008
 
   
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. and will be retained by El Paso Pipeline
Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 6, 2001, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (“CableLabs”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, General Communications, Inc., Anchorage, AK; Cedar Communications, Arlington, WA; CWA Cable, Bracey, VA; FamilyView Cablevision, Seneca, SC; and Classic Communications Inc., Tyler, TX have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 11, 2000. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2000 (65 FR 57842).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-13856  Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# CE2012188EN.01006701.xml

| 28.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 188/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 188/67

---

Tuesday 15 February 2011Agreement between the EC and South Africa on trade, development and cooperation ***

P7_TA(2011)0043

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 February 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, amending the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation (10297/2010 – C7-0190/2010 – 2010/0119(NLE))

2012/C 188 E/16

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (10297/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (10297/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, amending the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation (07437/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, amending the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation (07437/2008),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0190/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0190/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0018/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0018/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of South Africa. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of South Africa.

---
# C_2010138EN.01002901.xml

| 28.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/29

---

Extract from the decision on the opening of winding-up proceedings concerning the Banco Privado Português, S.A. under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions

(Publication provided for in Article 13 of that Directive and in Article 21 of Decree-Law No 199/2006 of 25 October 2006)

(Publication provided for in Article 13 of that Directive and in Article 21 of Decree-Law No 199/2006 of 25 October 2006)

2010/C 138/07

The Banco de Portugal, the administrative authority competent for the winding up of credit institutions within the meaning of the sixth indent of Article 2 of Directive 2001/24/EC, on 15 April 2010 decided, pursuant to Article 23 of the General Rules on Credit Institutions and Finance Companies (Regime Geral das Instituições de Crédito e Sociedades Financeiras), approved by Decree-Law No 298/92 of 31 December 1992, and taking into account the provisions of Article 152 and Article 22(1)(f) of the same Decree-Law, to withdraw the authorisation to pursue activity of the Banco Privado Português, S.A., having ascertained the unviability of the recapitalisation and recovery efforts of that institution pursued within the context of the extraordinary reorganisation measures adopted by the Banco de Portugal. By law the decision reached entails the dissolution and winding up of the Banco Privado Português, S.A.

Regime Geral das Instituições de Crédito e Sociedades Financeiras

It was also decided that the withdrawal of the authorisation of the Banco Privado Português, S.A., shall have effect from 12.00 on 16 April 2010 for the purposes, in particular, of Article 5(3) of Decree-Law No 199/2006 of 25 October 2006.

An appeal may be lodged against the above decision by initiating proceedings before the Lisbon Administrative Court, Rua Filipe Folque, n.o 12-A, 1.o, Lisbon, PORTUGAL, within 90 days of notification or publication thereof.

o

o

The Secretary of the Boards

Paulo Ernesto CARVALHO AMORIM

---