alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### A.F., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[874 NYS2d 397]-

Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Fitzpatrick, J.), entered January 31, 2008, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.

Claimant served a notice of intention to file a claim alleging that, on November 2, 2006, employees of defendant had improperly disclosed his confidential medical information *(see*Public Health Law § 2782). The notice of intention was received *1223by the Attorney General on February 14, 2007. Defendant moved to dismiss the subsequently filed claim on the ground that the notice of intention had been untimely served. The Court of Claims granted the motion, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Claimant does not dispute that the notice of intention was untimely if his claim accrued on November 2, 2006 *(see*Court of Claims Act § 10 [3]). Claimant argues that his claim actually accrued after that date because of later alleged disclosures of the confidential information at issue. Each disclosure gives rise to a separate claim *(see*Public Health Law § 2783 [1] [b]), however, and we agree with the Court of Claims that any subsequent disclosures were not “so interrelated [with the original disclosure] that they could not be separated for purposes of applying time limitations” *(Mahoney v Temporary Commn. of Investigation of State of N.Y.,*165 AD2d 233, 240 [1991]; *see Augat v State of New York,*244 AD2d 835, 837 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 814 [1998]). As such, the Court of Claims lacked jurisdiction over the claim and it correctly granted defendant’s motion to dismiss *(see Matter of Magee v State of New York,*54 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2008]).

Claimant also argues that he should have been granted permission to file a late claim *(see*Court of Claims Act § 10 [6]), yet he failed to move for that relief before the Court of Claims *(see Calderazzo v State of New York,*74 AD2d 954, 954-955 [1980]; *Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd. v State of New York,*70 AD2d 742, 744 [1979], *appeals dismissed*48 NY2d 629, 653 [1979], *lv denied*48 NY2d 612 [1980]).

Her cure, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### STATE v. FOUST

No. 333P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 152

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 October 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

Form 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED):  July 23, 2008



---

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





MINNESOTA
        0-2382
        41-0908057(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)
        (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)
        (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)




14000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)   (ZIP CODE)



(952) 937-4000

(REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)



N/A

(FORMER NAME OR FORMER ADDRESS, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4c))







---

Item 2.02.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition



On July 23, 2008, the registrant issued a press release regarding the registrants results of operations for the third quarter ended June 28, 2008. The full text of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.



Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits



(d)  Exhibits



Exhibit 99.1  Press Release issued on July 23, 2008 regarding the registrants results of operations for the third quarter ended June 28, 2008 furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 of this Form 8-K.



2

---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION(Registrant)Date: July 23, 2008
        By:
        /s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHTSusan E. KnightVice President and Chief Financial Officer




3

---

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

FORM 8-K REPORT



INDEX TO EXHIBITS



Exhibit No.
        
        Description  99.1
        
        Press Release issued on July 23, 2008 regarding the registrants results of operations for the third quarter ended June 28, 2008 furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 of this Form 8-K.




4

---
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-4 No.33-91006) of PriCellular Corporation and in the related Prospectus
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-10735) pertaining to the
PriCellular Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 22,
1998 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
PriCellular Corporation, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997


                                                    Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 20, 1998
Exhibit
      32




Section
      1350 Certification








In
connection with the quarterly report of China Armco Metals, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kexuan Yao, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Fengtao Wen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August
      14, 2008
            /s/Kexuan YaoKexuan
      Yao
              CEO
      and Chairman
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer







August14,
      2008
            /s/Fengtao WenFengtao
      Wen
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (principal
      accounting officer)






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
20-F










EXHIBIT 10.2  



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



        We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-116429), pertaining to On Track Innovations Ltd.‘s 2001 Share Option Plan,
2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and 1995 Share Option Plan, Forms F-3 (File Nos.
333-111770, 333-115953 and 333-121316) of On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries
of our report dated March 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of On
Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the year then ended included in the Amendment No.1 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F /A for the year ended December 31, 2004. 



Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

A member of KPMG International



Tel Aviv, Israel

October 26, 2005







81
```

[Federal Register: April 25, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 80)]
[Notices]
[Page 24187]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25ap00-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 26, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-10349 Filed 4-21-00; 11:35 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

June 29, 2010

 

Securitiesand Exchange Commission100 F Street, N.E.Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladiesand Gentlemen:

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

FrancoBertone, the Chief Executive Officer and Adrián Calaza, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Telecom Argentina S.A. (“Telecom”) each certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:

 

1.              this AnnualReport on Form 20-F (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Telecom.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Franco Bertone     |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                  | Franco  Bertone |
|   |   | Title:                 | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Adrián Calaza |
|   |   | Name:                  | Adrián  Calaza |
|   |   | Title:                 | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centaurus Resources Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Weaver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of June, 2008.


/s/ Robert C. Weaver
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
DIONTE STALLWORTH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0843

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 25, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

Dionte Stallworth, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
```


[Federal Register: January 19, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 12)]
[Notices]
[Page 3000]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19ja05-34]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, February 25, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-1114 Filed 1-14-05; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: June 18, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 117)]
[Notices]
[Page 34141-34142]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18jn04-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, July 30, 2004.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

[[Page 34142]]


Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-14004 Filed 6-16-04; 2:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**Exhibit      21.1**

|   | 1. | Aquair,                Inc., a California corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the                Company |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | OC                Energy Drink, Inc., a California corporation, a majority-owned subsidiary                of the Company |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Aquair                Hong Kong Ltd, a company organized under the laws of Hong Kong, a                wholly-owned subsidiary of the                Company |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | Aquair                Asia Company Limited, a company organized under the laws of Thailand,                a                wholly-owned subsidiary of the                Company |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1123 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the 

use of Yucca Mountain as the Nation’s primary permanent nuclear 

waste storage site. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, 

Mr. INGLIS, and Mr. BROWN of South Carolina) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with 

respect to the use of Yucca Mountain as the Nation’s 

primary permanent nuclear waste storage site. 

Whereas Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act in 

1982, setting the stage for a safe and permanent nuclear 

waste repository; 

Whereas in 1987 Congress designated Yucca Mountain as the 

only option for a long-term storage site; 

Whereas Congress reaffirmed Yucca Mountain’s designation 

of the only option for a long-term storage site in 2002; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1123 IH 

Whereas since 1982, the nuclear power industry, through 

ratepayers, has paid over $16,000,000,000 into the Nuclear Waste Fund; 

Whereas South Carolinians alone have contributed more than 

$1,200,000,000 into the Nuclear Waste Fund; 

Whereas the total spent for the preparation and construction 

of a permanent storage site at Yucca Mountain has exceeded $10,000,000,000; 

Whereas taxpayers will receive nothing for their substantial 

investment as a result of the decision to abandon the 

Yucca Mountain project; 

Whereas nuclear waste is stored at over 120 locations across 

the country, with 160,000,000 Americans living within 

75 miles of one of these sites; and 

Whereas the presence of so many storage facilities throughout the United States presents a potential national security threat because each storage site could be a target for 

terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) strongly believes that the decision to aban3 don the 23-year bipartisan project establishing 

4 Yucca Mountain as the Nation’s primary permanent 

5 nuclear waste storage site— 

6 (A) is misguided and breaks a promise 

7 made to certain States nearly 3 decades ago; 

8 and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1123 IH 

1 (B) violates the letter of the law by extend2 ing the length of time South Carolina and other 

3 States will be forced to store nuclear waste; and 

4 (2) calls upon the President to honor the bipar5 tisan commitment made to taxpayers to establish 

6 Yucca Mountain as the Nation’s primary permanent 

7 nuclear waste storage site. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS



To the Board of Directors

eAutoclaims., Inc.



We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 of our report dated September 22, 2006 on the
financial statements of eautoclaims, Inc. as of July 31, 2006 and our report dated September 22, 2006 on the financial statement
schedule for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2006, which appear in such Prospectus. We also consent to the
reference to our Firm under the captions Experts in such Prospectus.



GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

New York, New York



November 24, 2006





---
#### Keith Clayton BROOKS, Jr., and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angel MEDINA, Warden; Travis Tranni, Warden; Francis Massengill, Associate Warden; Paul Auet, Lieutenant; Ken Sokol, Lieutenant; Fox, Lieutenant; Bryan Milburn, Lieutenant; Jackson, Lieutenant; Anthony Decesaro, Step 3 Grievance Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-1549.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 24, 2012.

Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr., Limón, CO, pro se.

Before MURPHY, ANDERSON, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Keith Brooks, a Colorado prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing as frivolous his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

Mr. Brooks’s amended complaint focused on the difference in treatment accorded prisoners at Colorado’s Limón Correctional Facility depending on whether they were in the Incentive Unit (IU) program. He alleged that as a prisoner not in the IU program he was denied due process and equal protection and was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment because of his reduced access to various amenities and exercise opportunities. The district court fully explained why there is no merit to the amended complaint, and we need not repeat its analysis. On appeal Mr. Brooks further asserts that the district court erred in not permitting him to amend the complaint. But he fails to explain what he would have added that would constitute a proper cause of action.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below and assess a strike against Mr. Brooks. We DENY Mr. Brooks’s motion to proceed without prepayment of costs or fees and order him to remit the full amount of the filing fee immediately. We remind him of his obligation to pay the filing fee even on an appeal that has been dismissed.

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00067-CR

Juan Gabriel GARZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-06-03428-ZCR

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on June 22, 2015. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
|  | **FR** |
|--|--------|

|  | **;        correction** |
|--|--------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **NC** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **CFTC        News Release #4084-97, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Requests        Public** |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Comment        on Draft Proposed Revisions by the CBT To Corn and Soybean Futures        Contracts** |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 11/26/97 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 |
|-------|----------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **NC** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **CBT        Draft Proposed Revisions, Corn Futures** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 10 |
|-------|------------------|-----|--------|----|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last