alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

qxss|xrsv
# C_2010330EN.01000601.xml

| 8.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 330/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.5.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.5.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | United Kingdom/GBR |
| Stock or Group of stocks | USK/567EI. |
| Species | Tusk (Brosme brosme) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

21.5.2010

Duration

21.5.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

United Kingdom/GBR

Stock or Group of stocks

USK/567EI.

Species

Tusk (Brosme brosme)

Brosme brosme

Zone

EU and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Federal Register: April 2, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 63)]
[Notices]
[Page 15552]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ap02-57]


[[Page 15552]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 19, 2002.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-7982 Filed 3-28-02; 4:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

�
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0522

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CODY JOSEPH VERNON FLESCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 16, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 9 2023

05/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0522
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30949-30950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4287]


ABB/Westinghouse, Hematite Plant, Festus, Missouri; Notice of 
Negative Determination on Reconsideration

    By application dated March 3, 2001, a petitioner requests 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility to apply for North American Free 
Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance (NAFTA-TAA), 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
denial notice applicable to workers of the subject firm was issued on 
February 7, 2001, and was published in the Federal Register on March 2, 
2001 (66 FR 13087).
    The petitioner presented new evidence regarding company imports of 
pellets from Canada.
    The Department denied NAFTA-TAA to workers of ABB/Westinghouse, 
Hematite Plant, Festus, Missouri, producing nuclear fuel rods and 
pellets because criteria (3) and (4) of the group eligibility 
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of section 250 of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended, were not met. There were no company imports of 
articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the 
workers. The production at the Festus, Missouri plant was shifted to a 
country other than Mexico or Canada.
    On February 7, all workers of the subject firm were certified 
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TA-W-38, 300). That 
investigation revealed that production at the Festus, Missouri, plant 
was being transferred to a foreign source outside of the United States, 
Mexico and Canada. The investigative findings also revealed that 
company imports, from countries other than Mexico and Canada, of 
articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the 
workers in Festus, Missouri, increased significantly.
    On reconsideration, the Department has carefully reviewed the 
materials

[[Page 30950]]

submitted by the petitioner with respect to the pellet imports shipped 
from Canada. This review finds that the company imports from countries 
other than Mexico or Canada contributed more importantly to declines in 
sales or production and to worker separations at ABB/Westinghouse, 
Hematite Plant, Festus, Missouri, than the Canadian imports identified 
by the petitioner.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA for workers and 
former workers of ABB/Westinghouse, Hematite Plant, Festus, Missouri.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of May 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-14419 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




Amendment No. 1 to

Appendix A to Employment Agreement

Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

and

G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.




Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits





	1.	 	Effective July 14, 2005, Employee’s title(s) shall be Executive Vice President and President
 — Western Division. Effective August 1, 2005, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $325,000.
Effective August 1, 2006, Employee shall be eligible for a Base Salary increase of $25,000 per
year, based upon the achievement of performance criteria to be established by the Compensation
Committee. Employee’s principal work location shall be the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area.
	 
	2.	 	Paragraph 2 of Appendix A is unaffected by this amendment and remains in full force and
effect.
	 
	3.	 	For Fiscal Year 2006, the Employee shall be eligible to receive a maximum Bonus of up to 130%
of his Base Salary (or up to $422,500) based on such performance criteria as the Compensation
Committee shall deem appropriate in its discretion.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Agreed to and accepted:





STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.

 	 
	Date: October 11, 2005 	By:  	/s/JAMES W. MCFARLAND
 	 
	 	 	      James W. McFarland 	 
	 	Compensation Committee Chairman 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYEE

 	 
	Date: October 11, 2005 	/s/G. KENNETH STEPHENS, JR.
 	 
	 	     G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), PaulGoddard, Chief Executive Officer of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. (the“Company”), and John Varian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.             The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th day of August, 2008.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Paul Goddard                                         |   | By:    | /s/  John Varian                                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   Paul Goddard, Ph.D.                                |   |   |   John Varian                                          |
|   |   Chairman  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   Chief  Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **3** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **The        Mennel Milling Company** |
|--|----------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 9/8/98 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 3 | PDF        SIZE: | 94        KB | PDF        LINK: | cf9832c003.p |
|-------|--------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|--------------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Knappen        Milling Company** |
|--|-------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 8/31/98 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 | PDF        SIZE: | 25        KB | PDF        LINK: | cf9832c002.p |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|--------------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Pioneer        Flour Mills** |
|--|---------------------------------|

| DATE: | 8/28/98 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 | PDF        SIZE: | 44        KB | PDF        LINK: | cf9832c001.p |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|--------------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14333]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Clearance of a Revised 
Information Collection: RI 25-14 and RI 25-14A

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for clearance of a revised 
information collection. RI 25-14, Self-Certification of Full-Time 
School Attendance, is used to survey survivor annuitants who are 
between the ages of 18 and 22 to determine if they meet the 
requirements of Section 8341(a)(C), and Section 8441, title 5, U.S. 
Code, to receive benefits as a student. RI 25-14A, Information and 
Instructions for Completing the Self-Certification of Full-Time School 
Attendance, provides instructions for completing the Self-Certification 
of Full-Time School Attendance survey form.
    Comments are particularly invited on:
    <bullet> Whether this collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of functions of OPM, and whether it will have 
practical utility;
    <bullet> Whether our estimate of the public burden of this 
collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; 
and
    <bullet> Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection 
of information on those who are to respond, through use of the 
appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Approximately 14,000 RI 12-14 forms are completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 12 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 2,800 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f4fbedf6f6f4fce0d9f6e9f4b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8858a9c8787858d91a8879885c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before August 
6, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Ronald W. Melton, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349A, 
Washington, DC 20415-3540.
    For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact: 
Donna G. Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, Budget and 
Administrative Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Steven R. Cohen,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 01-14333 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 62.

#### American Hide & Leather Co. *v.*United States.

January 25, 1932.

The opinion in this cause *{ante,*p. 343) is hereby amended by adding at the conclusion thereof the following paragraph:

*599“ The amounts of the tax computed by the commissioner and the amount of the overpayment as stated in this opinion are those shown by the findings of the Court of Claims, but the mandate of this Court will be without prejudice to any restatement of the amount of overpayment based on a recomputation of the tax.”
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of RGGlobal Lifestyles, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB forthe period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and William C. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectivelycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker |   |                    | /s/ William C. Hitchcock |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Louis L. Knickerbocker     |   | William C. Hitchcock    |
| Chief Executive Officer    |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| June 24, 2005         |   | June 24, 2005      |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50010 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN JOSE MENDOZA-GALLARDO, also known as Juan Jose MendozaCastillo Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1342-ALL
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Jose Mendoza-Gallardo (Mendoza) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Mendoza argues on appeal that the district court erred in increasing his guidelines offense level by eight levels under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) based on its characterization of the more recent of his two prior state drug possession United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 21, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-50010

2 convictions as an aggravated felony. Citing Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), he contends that the more recent state drug possession conviction could not constitute an aggravated felony because the State did not plead and prove that hewas a recidivist when it obtained the conviction, as is required under 21 U.S.C. §§ 844(a) and 851. Lopez has not altered our holding in United Statesv. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572 (5th Cir.2005), that a second stateconviction for simple possession qualifies as an aggravated felony sufficient to support the imposition of the eight-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). U nited Statesv. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 335 (5th Cir. 2008). The State’s failure to comply with the procedural requirements of §§ 844(a) and 851(a) in obtaining the second drug possession conviction does not prohibit the district court from enhancing a sentence on this basis. Id. at 336 n.11. AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              61,357
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       19,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,686
<INVENTORY>                                          2,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    84,851
<PP&E>                                             134,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                      29,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                               349<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                         133,830          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       747,656   
<SALES>                                              5,364   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   181,000   
<CGS>                                               12,841   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      143,776   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,250<F2>   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67,392   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (13,631)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (13,631)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                       (13,631)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.55)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0   

<FN>
<F1> Total number of shares of Class A is 218 and Class B is 121
<F2> Additional Gain 8,423
</FN>
                                                   


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Parminder Kaur et al., Respondents, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Appellant. In the Matter of Tuck-It-Away, Inc., et al., Respondents, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

*870Motion by Senator Bill Perkins for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.