alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.3


Certification
of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby
certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the
      Report.





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2202, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signal
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:                      May
8, 2009








/s/
                          L.
      Mark PanellaL.
      Mark PanellaExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 
                            EXHIBIT 23.1(c)


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANT


          We hereby consent to our reserves estimates contained in the
Annual Report of  Form 10-KSB of Energy Search Incorporated (the "Company")
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (the "1998 10-KSB").  Our
estimates of the oil and gas reserves of the Company are contained in our
report dated March 2, 1999 on the oil and gas reserves of the Company as of
January 1, 1999 (the "1999 Report"), as well as our report dated March 4,
1998 on the oil and gas reserves of the Company as of January 1, 1998 (the
"1998 Report").  We also hereby consent to the reference in the 1998 10-KSB
to Wright & Company, Inc. as experts in oil and gas analysis.  We further
consent to the incorporation by reference of our 1999 Report and 1998
Report and our oil and gas reserves estimates contained in the 1998 10-KSB
into the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-58407).



                                   Wright & Company, Inc.

                                   By: /S/ D. RANDALL WRIGHT          
                                       D. Randall Wright
                                       President


March 30, 1999
Brentwood, TN
1

 Hicks directed his appeal to the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter

here.

Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A2207. RAKEEN RAYNEIL HICKS v. THE STATE.

In 2012, Rakeen Rayneil Hicks was convicted of armed robbery and other

crimes. We affirmed his convictions on appeal. Hicks v. State, 326 Ga. App. 46 (755

SE2d 855) (2014). Hicks then filed another notice of appeal, again seeking review

of his judgment of conviction.1 

Because Hicks has already had a direct appeal, he is not entitled to another

appeal from his judgment. See Jackson v. State, 273 Ga. 320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001)

(defendant “not entitled to another bite at the apple by way of a second appeal.”).

This appeal is therefore DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/04/2014

September 04, 2014
#### STATE v. GOINS

No. 224P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 431

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US $

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,512
<SECURITIES>                                    95,320
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                      2,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,935
<PP&E>                                          13,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           344
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,942
<SALES>                                         76,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,148
<CGS>                                           17,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,100<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<FN>
<F1>OTHER COSTS REFER TO MERGER EXPENSES INCURRED UPON ACQUISITION OF RSA DATA
SECURITY, INC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

~xqqrsqrsrt~
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1042

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Tenn Z4 200L - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Tenn Z4 200L

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Otis, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934 as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                |  |                                        
|----- | -------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: | March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Bill Otis                          
|      |                |  |                                        
|      |                |  | Bill Otis                              
|      |                |  | President and Chief
  Executive Officer

89

---
#### Wempi Freds LOING, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76277.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

*601Kaaren L. Barr, Esquire, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

John Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, OIL, Janice Kay Red-fern, Esquire, David M. McConnell, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Esquire, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. Petr. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Wempi Freds Loing, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Zhang v. Gonzales,*408 F.3d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir. 2005), and deny the petition for review.

The BIA determined that Loing’s asylum application was untimely and that he failed to show that extraordinary circumstances excused the late filed asylum application. Loing does not dispute this finding. Therefore, Loing is ineligible for asylum.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal because, as Loing concedes in his opening brief, he and his family experienced no problems on account of them religion in the past. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 817 (9th Cir.2001). Furthermore, even assuming the disfavored group analysis applies in the context of withholding of removal and applies to Christian Indonesians, Loing has not demonstrated a clear probability of future persecution. *See*
      *602
      *Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2003); *cf. Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004). Lastly, the record does not establish that Loing demonstrated a pattern or practice of persecution against Christian Indonesians. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1180-81 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, Lo-ing’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because he has not established it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia. *See Singh v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit
32




Certifications
of




Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,




As
Adopted Pursuant to




Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond D. Zinn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           That
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      April 29, 2008
            
            /S/ Raymond D.
      Zinn
              Raymond
      D. Zinn
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)












In
connection with the Annual Report of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard D.
Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           That
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date:
      April 29, 2008
            
            /S/ Richard D.
      Crowley
              Richard
      D. Crowley
              Vice
      President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.2 

Amendment No. 3

  to the

  
  IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL INC.

  Employee Stock Purchase Plan


     In connection with the transactions contemplated by, and pursuant to the provisions of, Section 5.7(b) of Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September
15, 2005, by and among Imagistics International Inc., Océ N.V. and Orange Merger Corp., the Imagistics International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:



     1.    Section
16 of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting therein the following definitions:

          “Current Period” means the Purchase Period commencing on July 1, 2005. 


          “Effective Time” has the meaning set forth in the Merger Agreement. 


          “Authorized Officer” means each member of the Employee Benefits Committee and such other officers of the Company as any of the foregoing may designate in writing. 


          “Special Purchase Date” means the earlier of (x) the Purchase Date, determined without regard to Section 17(a) and (y) on a date determined by the Authorized Officer which date shall
be at least five (5) business days prior to the Effective Time. 


          “Merger Agreement” means that Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September
15, 2005, by and among Imagistics International Inc., Océ N.V. and Orange Merger Corp. 


     2.    Article
17. Special Merger Provisions. 


          (a) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, each Purchase Right in respect of the Current Period that is outstanding immediately prior to the Special Purchase Date shall be exercised
upon the Special Purchase Date.


          (b) The Plan shall be suspended effective immediately following the Special Purchase Date and no Purchase Rights shall thereafter be granted or exercised under the Plan. 


  	
    Dated:
      	
    October 14, 2005
      	
    Approved and Adopted:
      
			 
			 
			 
	

		

		/s/ Mark S. Flynn
			

	

		

		
    /s/ Timothy E. Coyne
			

	

		

		
    /s/ Tina Allen
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1110 

Commending the members of the 45th Agri-Business Development Team 

of the Oklahoma National Guard, for their efforts to modernize agriculture and sustainable farming practices in Afghanistan and their dedication and service to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Ms. FALLIN (for herself, Mr. BOREN, Mr. COLE, Mr. LUCAS, and Mr. SULLIVAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the members of the 45th Agri-Business Development Team of the Oklahoma National Guard, for their 

efforts to modernize agriculture and sustainable farming 

practices in Afghanistan and their dedication and service 

to the United States. 

Whereas members of the 1–45th Agri-Business Development 

Team (ADT) took control of the ADT mission in the 

Paktya and Paktika provinces of eastern Afghanistan 

from the 1–16th ADT from the Tennessee National 

Guard on December 21, 2009, and members of the 2– 

45th ADT are planned to take over their mission in the 

summer of 2010; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1110 IH 

Whereas the members of the Oklahoma National Guard’s 

ADT are experts in civilian agriculture practices and will 

provide important resources to the Afghan population in 

fostering sustainable agriculture practices, improving 

food production and processing, providing secure storage 

facilities and controlled temperature facilities, and ensuring secure and legal economic growth; 

Whereas the International Agricultural Program at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Oklahoma, has provided valuable training for the 45th ADT pre-deployment 

and has provided a valuable educational research tool for 

Guardsmen and women deployed to Afghanistan; 

Whereas agriculture accounts for 45 percent of Afghanistan’s 

gross domestic product and over 80 percent of the Afghan population is engaged in farming and agriculture; 

Whereas the 45th ADT works closely with the Provincial Director of Agriculture in Afghanistan to ensure Afghan 

farmers and ranchers are receiving valuable assistance in 

rebuilding and restoring the Afghan agricultural economy; and 

Whereas ADTs partner with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to provide interagency support to Afghan 

farmers and are critical to the overall success to the Afghan mission: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the members of the 45th Agri-Business Develop3 ment Team of the Oklahoma National Guard, for their 

4 efforts to modernize agriculture and sustainable farming 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1110 IH 

1 practices in Afghanistan and their dedication and service 

2 to the United States . 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32**

 

OSG AMERICA L.P.

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F2002

 

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the ChiefFinancial Officer of OSG America LLC (the “Company”), the general partner ofOSG America L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certifies, to the best of hisknowledge and belief, that the Form 10-Q of the Partnership for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”) accompanyingthis certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andthat the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.  This certification isprovided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.

 

 
| Date:  | May 5,  2008        |   | /s/  Jonathan P. Whitworth |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Jonathan  P. Whitworth   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
| Date:  | May 5,  2008        |   | /s/  Myles R. Itkin        |
|   | Myles  R. Itkin          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nevwest Explorations Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Abah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of June, 2008.


/s/ Albert Abah
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer