alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
amalgapixsb2a2ex101



  

  Exhibit 10.1 



AVERY PACK

  2132 Mears Parkway

  Margate, Florida 33063

                                                                                                                  October 14, 2005

Amalgamated Pictures Corp.

  2132 Mears Parkway

  Margate, Florida 33063

  

  To the Board of Directors:

            In order to pursue our business plan, if we are unable to raise sufficient funds from our public offering or other financing to satisfy our minimum cash requirements to initiate operations and produce our first film property,   I agree to lend such funds to Amalgamated Pictures Corp. up to $75,000.

            I will be willing to lend those funds for a minimum period of 12 months at an interest rate equal to the prime rate of Citibank N.A.

            Please accept this letter as my formal personal commitment, as an individual and not as an officer and director of Amalgamated Pictures Corp.

                                                                                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                                                                                  /s/ Avery Pack

                                                                                                                  Avery Pack
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1136 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1136

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the McKay-Dee 
                       Hospital in northern Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2010

   Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself, Mr. Chaffetz, and Mr. Matheson) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the McKay-Dee 
                       Hospital in northern Utah.

Whereas McKay-Dee Hospital and its predecessors have offered 100 years of 
        continuous health care service to the residents of northern Utah from 
        1910 to 2010;
Whereas tens of thousands of hardworking individuals have devoted their lives to 
        the care, concern, and healing of patients at the three hospitals that 
        have become Intermountain McKay-Dee Hospital and Medical Center;
Whereas hundreds of thousands of Utah residents have received medical care 
        during McKay-Dee's 100 years of service;
Whereas McKay-Dee Hospital represents the fulfillment of Annie Taylor Dee's 
        dream to provide access to high quality health care for the residents of 
        northern Utah;
Whereas McKay-Dee Hospital's contributions to the community at-large come in 
        many more ways than simply providing traditional hospital-based health 
        care services;
Whereas every Dee, McKay, and McKay-Dee facility has offered innovative medical 
        technology; and
Whereas Intermountain Healthcare was recently recognized as a national model for 
        providing quality and affordable healthcare: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the establishment 
        of the McKay-Dee Hospital in northern Utah; and
            (2) commends McKay-Dee Hospital and its employees for 
        providing quality care to hundreds of thousands of patients 
        over the last century.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL R. WESLING,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 535 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the report of Emo Capital Corp. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-Q/A3 for the quarter ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to
my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Juanming Fang

Juanming Fang,

Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer

Dated: April 11, 2012
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 07-2806

07-2821

EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v.

CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as an indirect successor to

Insurance Company of North America,

Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

HOME INSURANCE COMPANY; NORTH RIVER INSURANCE CO.;

ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY; US FIRE INSURANCE CO.,

Defendants, Cross-Appellees,

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 13, 2009, is amended

as follows:

On p. 47, lines 5-8: Replace "State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) (striking down $145

million punitive damages award against insurance carrier,

where jury held that plaintiff was entitled to only $1

million in compensatory damages)." with "BMW of N. Am.,

Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 580 (1996) (noting that one

"indicium of an unreasonable or excessive punitive

damages award [under the Due Process Clause] is its ratio

to the actual harm inflicted on the plaintiff," citing

cases)."
Exhibit 21.1

              Subsidiary Companies of Life Sciences Research, Inc.



Name                                                    Jurisdiction

Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd.                           England & Wales

Huntingdon Life Sciences Inc.                           Delaware, USA

HIH Capital Ltd.                                        Jersey

HIH Ltd.                                                England & Wales

HRC Ltd.                                                England & Wales

Huntingdon Research Centre Ltd.                         England & Wales

Huntingdon Consulting Engineers Ltd.                    England & Wales

Huntingdon LSR Ltd.                                     England & Wales

Paragon Global Services Ltd.                            England & Wales

Pathfinder Clinical Development Ltd.                    England & Wales

Pathfinder Nominees Ltd.                                England & Wales

Life Sciences Research Ltd.                             England & Wales

Aquatox Ltd.                                            England & Wales

Huntingdon Life Sciences Co., Ltd.                      Japan
H. Res. 1156 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 10, 2010. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Moore of Kansas. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 31, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1.  Northwest Suburban Bancorp, Inc.*, Mount Prospect, Illinois; to engage                     *de novo*                     in purchasing loan participations from its subsidiary banks, pursuant to §  225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 11, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-1436 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Federal Register: May 16, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 31150]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16my00-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 33, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-12361 Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
OTHER EXPENSES REFERS TO EXPENSES OF $11,350 INCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH
CERTAIN RESTRUCTURING COSTS INCURRED IN 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         122,170
<SECURITIES>                                 1,261,111
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,032
<INVENTORY>                                      7,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,454,407
<PP&E>                                          57,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,512,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          901,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           440
<OTHER-SE>                                     610,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,512,124
<SALES>                                        218,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,124
<CGS>                                           45,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                302,728
<INCOME-TAX>                                   118,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,762
<EPS-BASIC>                                     4.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.38


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.1



Computation of Earnings Per Share



The following summarizes the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:



2007
        
        2006Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:Historical common equivalent
        
        $
        20,433,321
        
        $
        12,378,657Weighted average common shares issues during period
        
        
        
        
        
        4,988,940Weighted average common shares outstanding  basic and diluted
        
        
        20,433,321
        
        
        17,367,597Net Loss
        
        $
        (1,765,795
        )
        $
        (1,829,202
        )Net loss per basic and diluted share
        
        $
        (0.09
        )
        $
        (0.11
        )




Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased for potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of equity instruments is calculated using the treasury stock method.



Warrants to purchase 8,967,164 and 9,276,998 common shares as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were excluded from the treasury stock calculation because they were anti-dilutive due to the Companys net losses.



---
Patent Security Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT 
  
 Silicon Graphics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Silicon Graphics Federal, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Silicon Graphics
World Trade Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, “Grantor”), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, grant to Wells Fargo Foothill Capital, Inc., a
California corporation, as agent for and representative of (in such capacity herein called “Secured Party”) the Bank Product Provider and the financial institutions (“Lenders”) party to that certain Third Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into by and among the Grantor, Agent, and Lenders, dated as of October 24, 2005 ( the “Credit Agreement”), a continuing security interest in the following property: 
  
 (i) Each patent presently owned and listed on Schedule A hereto; and

  
 (ii) All proceeds of the foregoing, including without
limitation any claim by Grantor against third parties for damages (to the extent not effectively prohibited by an applicable and legally enforceable license agreement) by reason of past, present or future infringement of any patent now owned or
hereafter owned by Grantor, in each case together with the right to sue for and collect said damages: 
  
 to secure performance of all Obligations of Grantor under the Creditor Agreement and as set out in that certain Intellectual Property Security Agreement
dated as of October 24, 2005, by and among Grantor and Secured Party (the “Agreement”). 
  
 Grantor does hereby further acknowledge and affirm that the rights and remedies of Secured Party with respect to the security interest in the works of
authorship, patents, patent registrations and recordings made and granted hereby are more fully set forth in the Agreement, the terms and provisions of which are incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. 
  
 All terms defined in the Agreement, whether by reference or otherwise, when
used herein, shall have their respective meanings set forth therein, unless the context requires otherwise. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Patent Security Agreement to be duly executed as of
October 24, 2005. 
  

			
	GRANTOR:
	
	SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jean Furter


	Name:	 	Jean Furter
	Title:	 	Vice President, Treasurer
	
	 SILICON GRAPHICS FEDERAL, INC., a
 Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeff Zellmer


	Name:	 	Jeff Zellmer
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	SILICON GRAPHICS WORLD TRADE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Warren Pratt


	Name:	 	Warren Pratt
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President
	
	ACCEPTED BY SECURED PARTY:
	
	 WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC., a California
 corporation, as Agent

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mara Vaisz


	Name:	 	Mara Vaisz
	Title:	 	Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, John Dahle, the Chief Executive Officer of Bear River Resources, Inc., and Robert Donald M. Prest, the Chief Financial Officer of Bear River Resources, Inc, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Bear River Resources, Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Bear River Resources, Inc.

Date:   December 20, 2007.

|"John Dahle"                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|John Dahle 
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director                
|"Donald M. Prest"                                                                                         
|Donald M. Prest
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and a director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bear River Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Bear River Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
#### Richard Jerome HAMMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARK SHELLNUT, LLC, John G. Cogner, personally and in his professional capacity, Robert B. Brickerstaff, personally and in his official capacity, Edwin Albright, Esq., the Metro Narcotics Task Force, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-14963

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 12, 2010.

Richard Jerome Hammonds, Atlanta, GA, pro se.

Before EDMONDSON, BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Jerome Hammonds, a federal prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his *pro se*42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. On appeal, Hammonds alleges that the defendants violated his Fourth Amendment and due process rights by improperly confiscating and retaining his personal property following a forfeiture hearing in state court.

Federal courts look to state law to determine the applicable statute of limitations for actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *Rozar v. Mullis,*85 F.3d 556, 561 (11th Cir.1996). In Georgia, the applicable statute of limitations for personal injury actions is two years. O.C.G.A, § 9-3-33. To determine when the cause of action accrues, we look to when the plaintiff knew or should have known of his injury and its cause. *Rozar,*85 F.3d at 561-62.

Upon careful review of the record and consideration of Hammonds’s brief, we affirm, finding no error in the district court’s conclusion that Hammonds’s claims were barred by the 2-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions. Thus, Ham-monds’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, a district court must dismiss the complaint of a prisoner if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed Hammond’s complaint.

AFFIRMED.