alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14199]



[[Page 30445]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-427-000]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

May 31, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 24, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1-A, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 90, with an 
effective date of July 1, 2001.
    GTN states that the filing is being made in order to reformat 
references to capacity release options consistent with GTN's 
implementation of a new web-based customer interface and capacity 
release module.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell/htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14199 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1111 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1111

       Designating March 2, 2010, as ``Read Across America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2010

   Ms. Markey of Colorado (for herself and Mr. Ehlers) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating March 2, 2010, as ``Read Across America Day''.

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success, and is a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading intervention that has been 
        proven effective through scientifically valid research and providing 
        additional resources for reading assistance; and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association to use 
        March 2 to celebrate reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known 
        as Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, for his 
        success in encouraging children to discover the joy of reading;
            (2) honors the 13th anniversary of Read Across America Day;
            (3) encourages parents to read with their children for at 
        least 30 minutes on Read Across America Day in honor of the 
        commitment of the House of Representatives to building a Nation 
        of readers; and
            (4) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
exv4w8



 





Exhibit 4.8




CONSENT OF LAWRENCE B. COCHRANE





     The undersigned hereby consents to the reference in any registration statement, as such
registration statement may be amended or supplemented, to be filed by Inco Limited in connection
with its announced offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge Limited,
including, but not limited to, a registration statement on Form F-8, to him as having
responsibility for the statements as to the ore reserves as of December 31, 2003 with respect to
Inco Limited’s operations in Ontario and Manitoba, the Voisey’s Bay project and PT International
Nickel Indonesia Tbk (“PT Inco”) and (2) as of December 31, 2004 with respect to Inco Limited’s
operations in Ontario and Manitoba, the Voisey’s Bay project, the Goro project and PT Inco in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inco Limited for the year ended December 31, 2004 under the headings
“Ore Reserves and Mining Rights”, “Goro Nickel S.A.”, “Voisey’s Bay Nickel Company Limited”, “PT
International Nickel Indonesia Tbk” and “Exploration and Project Development”.



     Dated the 24th day of October 2005.



 




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	  	                                                  /s/ Lawrence B. Cochrane
 	 
	 	 	Lawrence B. Cochrane
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damione BROCK, also known as Pete Rock, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30889

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Allison Duncan Bushnell, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Betty Lee Marak, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Damione Brock has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Brock has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Brock’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Brock’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Torres, Appellant.

[877 NYS2d 243]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered April 26, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (11 counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 21/2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant’s eve-of-trial request for an adjournment to obtain new retained counsel, since defendant did not establish compelling circumstances, or any legitimate basis for the substitution *(.see People v Arroyave,*49 NY2d 264, 271 [1980]). There is nothing to indicate that his attorney’s difficulties in collecting her full fee from defendant created an adversarial relationship or affected her representation of defendant *(see People v*Husbands, 303 AD2d 227 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 562 [2003]). Furthermore, although the proposed substitute attorney had contacted the court shortly before trial and had been advised by the court to appear on the trial date ready to proceed, he never appeared.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.
##### 



RESTRICTED UNIT GRANT LETTER
 
 RECITALS
   Grant of Restricted Units
 Performance Goals




---



##### 



APLP's TSR Rank(Percentile)
    
    Percentage of Target Award EarnedHighest
    
    
    200
    %90th
    
    
    175
    %75th
    
    
    150
    %60th
    
    
    125
    %50th
    
    
    100
    %40th
    
    
    50
    %less than 40th
    
    
    0
    %
     Termination of Employment or Service
    2




---



##### 



Coordination with Severance Plan
 Payment with Respect to Restricted Units
 Restricted Unit Distribution Equivalents with Respect to Restricted Units
     3




---



##### 



Withholding
 Change of Control
 Grant Subject to Plan Provisions
 No Employment or Other Rights
 No Unit Holder Rights
  4




---



##### 



Assignment and Transfers
 Applicable Law
 Notice
  AmeriGas Propane, Inc.AttestBy:Assistant Secretary
    
    
    
    
    
    Robert H. KnaussVice President and General Counsel
  Participant
  5




---



##### 



Comparison Group
 MLP Peer Group
AmeriGas Plus 20 Peers
 Propane MLPs:
    
    TickerAmeriGas Partners, L.P.
    
    APUFerrellgas Partners, L.P.
    
    FGPStar Gas Partners, L.P.
    
    SGUSuburban Propane Partners, L.P.
    
    SPHInergy, L.P.
    
    NRGY
 Pipelines / Transportation MLPs:Buckeye Partners, L.P.
    
    BPLEnbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
    
    EEPEnergy Transfer Partners, L.P.
    
    ETPEnterprise Products Partners, L.P.
    
    EPDKinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
    
    KMPONEOK Partners, L.P.
    
    OKSPacific Energy Partners, L.P.
    
    PPXPlains All American Pipeline, L.P.
    
    PAASunoco Logistics Partners, L.P.
    
    SXLTC Pipelines, L.P.
    
    TCLPTEPPCO Partners, L.P.
    
    TPPValero, L.P.
    
    VLIMagellan Midstream Partners
    
    MMP
 Coal MLPs:Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
    
    ARLPPenn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.
    
    PVRNatural Resources Partners, L.P.
    
    NRP
  6
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-89382, 333-02340,333-06303, 333-16963, 333-20853, 333-52603, 333-80861, 333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550, 333-97101,333-107027, 333-117762, and 333-126092 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2007, relatingto the consolidated financial statements of Applix, Inc., (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment) and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applix,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPBoston, Massachusetts
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q for RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane Fund Management Corporation, the general partner of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP, that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP, for the period in question.
| Date:  May 15, 2009 |   | By:   /s/   Robert L.                        Lerner                                                       

President, Principal Executive Officer and                        Principal Financial Officer

Ruvane Fund Management Corporationthe general partner of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Scott Longval, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)of IntriCon Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1)
        the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 9, 2007

/s/
        Scott LongvalScott LongvalChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





---
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Covenant Group of China Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Justin D. Csik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May 17, 2010
By:   /s/ Justin D. CsikJustin D. CsikChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### S. David STEINMETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-55446.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*679Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2012.

S. David Steinmetz, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Daniel J. O’Rielly, Esquire, O’Rielly & Roche LLP, San Francisco, CA, Marcos D. Sasso, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

S. David Steinmetz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging, among other claims, violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts (“FDCPA”), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), and California law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, *Knievel v. ESPN,*393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005), and summary judgment, *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for ExxonMobil Oil Corporation on the FCRA claim because, contrary to Steinmetz’s contention otherwise, whether a defendant is a “furnisher of credit information” is not a moot point. Only “furnishers” can be held liable under 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b), *see Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP,*584 F.3d 1147, 1153-54 (9th Cir.2009), and Steinmetz failed to dispute ExxonMobil’s evidence that it was not a furnisher of credit information.

The district court properly dismissed Steinmetz’s FCRA claims as to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and GE Money Bank, F.S.B. because Steinmetz failed sufficiently to allege in his third amended complaint that Citibank and GE were fur-nishers who had received notice of the dispute from a credit reporting agency. *See id.*at 1154 (furnisher’s duties under the FCRA “arise only after the furnisher receives notice of dispute from a [credit reporting agency]; notice of a dispute received directly from the consumer does not trigger furnishers’ duties under subsection (b)”).

The district court properly dismissed Steinmetz’s FDCPA claim because Steinmetz failed sufficiently to allege that defendants were “debt collectors.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6) (defining debt collector as one who “regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another”).

Steinmetz’s remaining contentions, including those concerning discovery and his defamation claims, are unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: April 11, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 17674]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11ap02-33]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Times and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, May 3, 2002.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-8921 Filed 4-9-02; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Hecker, Appellant.

Submitted March 29, 2010;

decided April 29, 2010

*835Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 17A 0027. M E A C H U M v. R E G E N C Y H I LLS C OMMUN I T Y A S S O C IA T IO N , I NC.

On Au g u s t 2 5, 2 0 1 6

, ap pel l an t was o rd ered t o fi le a bri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f

erro rs n o l at er t h an Sep t em b er 6

, 2 0 1 6

. To d at e, ap p el l an t h as n o t fi l ed a b ri ef an d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs , an d n o ex ten s i on o f ti m e f o r f i l i n g h as b een g ran t ed

. Acco rd in g ly

, Cas e N u m

ber A 1 7A 0027 i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r Ap p el l an t ’ s fai l u re

t o fi l e a b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f erro rs i n s u p p o rt o f h i s ap p eal

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/10/2016 November 10, 2016
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte Silverman.

Submitted January 11, 1932-,

Decided January 18, 1932.

*Mr. William H. Lewis*for petitioner.