alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 8 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108 

[Report No. 111–11] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 352) to postpone the DTV transition 

date. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 352) to postpone 

the DTV transition date. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 

3 352) to postpone the DTV transition date. All points of 

4 order against consideration of the bill are waived except 

5 those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall 

6 be considered as read. All points of order against the bill 

7 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

8 ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 108 RH 

1 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

2 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

3 the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one mo4 tion to commit. 

5 SEC. 2. Section 2 of House Resolution 92 is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘February 4’’ and inserting ‘‘February 26’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 8 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108 

[Report No. 111–11] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 352) to 

postpone the DTV transition date. 

FEBRUARY 3, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London E1 6PW

United Kingdom

September 17, 2019

Via Email

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts

Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(the “Commission”) a rule certification amendment in NEX SEF-2019-R-9 pursuant to CFTC 

Reg. 40.6 in order to certify its revised Fee Program (the “Certification”). Attached as Exhibit 

A to the Certification is the Fee Program, and attached as Exhibit B to the Certification is a copy 

of the Fee Program marked to show changes to the version last submitted to the Commission. 

NEX SEF hereby requests that Exhibit A and Exhibit B to the Certification (“Confidential 

Information”) be treated as confidential in order to prevent disclosure of NEX SEF’s trade 

secrets and confidential commercial and financial information upon a request under the 

Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). We request the Confidential Information be provided 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, London Fruit and 

Wool Exchange, 1 Duval Square, London E1 6PW, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY NEX 

SEF LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying number and code: NEX SEF-2019-R-9-Exhibit A and NEX SEF-2019-R-9-Exhibit B.
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London E1 6PW

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 248901607v.1
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 03/10/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

 PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 96-4577

______________________________

D.C. Docket No. 95-8285-CIV-KLR

SHARI L. LYES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA,

CINTHIA BECTON, et al.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida

______________________________

(March 10, 1999)

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, KRAVITCH and WOOD*, Senior Circuit

Judges.

_______________

*Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh

Circuit, sitting by designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with the opinion of the en banc court, dated February 11, 1999,

reversing in part and affirming in part, we remand this case to the district court for

disposition consistent with that opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 31.2(a)

I, Martha B. Lindsay, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on
     Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 (as amended, the
     "annual report") of AmeriGas Partners, L.P., AmeriGas Finance Corp.,
     AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp. and AP Eagle Finance Corp.; and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report.


Date: December 22, 2004      Martha B. Lindsay
                             -----------------
                             Martha B. Lindsay
                             Vice President--Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                             AmeriGas Propane, Inc.
                             AmeriGas Finance Corp.
                             AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp.
                             AP Eagle Finance Corp.
The H ONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the 1 Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1440

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Rodney J. Long, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 27, 1997 Filed: July 9, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
While investigating information about possible criminal activity, authoritie s knocked on the door of a motel room in which Rodney J. Long and three other persons
wer e present. Long invited the authorities inside the room, where they observe d metha mphetamine, a loaded revolver, and items used in the manufacture o f methamphetamine. Long later pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture more than 100 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. After calcu lating a Guidelines sentencing range of 121 to 151 months imprisonment, th e district court granted the government’s motion to depart downward from the

1-2-

Guidelines and the statutory minimum sentence, and sentenced Long to 60 month s imprisonment and five years supervised release. Long appeals, and we affirm.
Long argues the district court erred in assessing a two-level firea rm enhancement unde r U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1995) (add two levels i f dangerous weapon, including firearm, was possessed). He also challenges the district court’s a ssessment of one criminal history point based on a prior misdemeano r conviction for which he received a suspended jail sentence , probation, and a fine; Long claims, as he did below, that the conviction was uncounseled.
Because the departure sentence Long received is below the applicabl e Gu idelines range, with or without the challenged enhancement and criminal history point, we conclude his sentence is not reviewable. See United States v. Baker , 64 F.3d 439, 44 1 (8th Cir. 1995). In any event, his arguments lack merit. First, we find n o clear error in the distr

ict court’s finding that it was not clearly improbable the weapon in the motel room was connected with the offense. See U.S. Sentencing Guideline s Manual § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3) (1995); United States v. McCracken , 110 F.3d 535, 541 (8th Cir. 1 997). Second, even assuming that Long sufficiently carried his burden of p roving the prior conviction was uncounseled, and that the suspended-jail-tim e portion of the sentence was thus invalid, see Scott v. Illinois , 440 U.S. 367, 373 (1979); U n ited States v. White , 529 F.2d 1390, 1394 & n.4 (8th Cir. 1976), the probationary sentence and monetary fine provided a basis for assessing the criminal history point , see Nichols v. United States , 511 U.S. 738, 748-49 (1994) ; United States v. Ortega , 94 F.3d 764, 769 (2d Cir. 1996); White , 529 F.2d at 1394.
Accordingly, we affirm.-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2010266EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/4

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in Malaysia: change of the name of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate

2010/C 266/04

Imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Malaysia are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (1) (‘Regulation (EC) No 192/2007’).

1

Hualon Corporation (M) Sdn. Bhd. (‘Hualon’), a company located in Malaysia, whose exports to the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty of EUR 36,0 per tonne imposed by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007, has informed the Commission that after being put into receivership, on 23 July 2008 all its Malaysian assets and liabilities were taken over by Recron (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (‘Recron’), who became the legal successor.

Hualon has argued that the take over and the change of name does not affect the activities of the company with regard to the product concerned and therefore the right of Recron to benefit from the individual anti-dumping duty rate applied to Hualon by Regulation (EC) No 192/2007.

The Commission has examined the information provided and, considering that the company requesting a name change has been taken over by a company which did not produce the product concerned before, has concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007. Therefore, the reference in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 to:

Hualon Corp. (M) Sdn. Bhd.

should be read as:

Recron (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

The TARIC additional code A186 previously attributed to Hualon Corp. (M) Sdn. Bhd. shall apply to Recron (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

---

(1)  OJ L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                                                    CONFIDENTIAL

                                JOB OFFER SUMMARY
                                       FOR
                                 JOHN R. TREACE

Job Title:           Executive Vice President, U.S. Sales

Reports To:          F. Barry Bays, President and Chief Executive Officer

Department:          Sales

Status               Full-time, exempt with applicable benefits

Compensation:        $9,583.33 semi-monthly, gross pay

Executive            Eligible for up to 200% of your base compensation based on
Incentive Plan       the performance criteria of the 2005 Executive Incentive
                     Compensation (Bonus) Plan.

Stock Options:       Subject to approval by the Compensation Committee, you will
                     be granted options to purchase 60,000 shares of Wright
                     Medical Group, Inc. common stock under the Company's 1999
                     Equity Incentive Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"). These
                     options will be granted when the Compensation Committee or
                     Board officially takes action to approve the grant and the
                     option price exercise price will be the average of the high
                     and the low price of the Company's stock on the trading day
                     immediately preceding the date of grant. Subject to
                     approval by the Compensation Committee, the vesting
                     schedule defined under the Stock Option Agreement will be
                     100% of the total option grant at the conclusion of twelve
                     (12) months of employment. This grant will be subject to
                     the terms and conditions of the Stock Option Plan and a
                     Stock Option Agreement.

Starting Date:       Monday, October 17, 2005

Required to Sign:    WMT Confidentiality and Inventions Agreement

I-9 Information:     Provide a state-issued driver's license; and original
                     social security card or birth certificate; or other
                     approved document.

Temporary Living:    WMT will provide appropriate housing in the form of a
                     corporate apartment or long term hotel accommodations
                     while residing in Memphis during this full time period.



IF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS WE HAVE SPECIFIED ARE ACCEPTABLE TO YOU, PLEASE
COUNTERSIGN THIS AGREEMENT AND RETURN A COPY TO ME.

AGREED: /s/ John R. Treace                                     DATE: 10/17/05
        ------------------------
#### Melvin KIROJAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76278.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

*598Kaaren L. Barr, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Joan E. Smiley, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. Petr. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Melvin Kirojan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We *599review factual findings for substantial evidence, *Zhang v. Gonzales,*408 F.3d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.2005), and deny the petition for review.

The agency determined that Kirojan’s asylum application was untimely, and that he did not provide a viable excuse for his late filed asylum application. Kirojan does not dispute this finding. Therefore, Kirojan is ineligible for asylum.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal because nothing happened to Kirojan or his family in the past, *see Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 817 (9th Cir.2001), and the record does not contain objective evidence of a clear probability of future persecution. *See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). Even assuming the disfavored group analysis applies in the context of withholding of removal and applies to Christian Indonesians, Kirojan has not demonstrated a clear probability of future persecution. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2003); *cf. Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir. 2004). Lastly, the record does not establish that Kirojan demonstrated a pattern or practice of persecution against Christian Indonesians. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1180-81 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, Kirojan’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Kirojan has not established it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia. *See Singh v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir.2006).

Kirojan’s request for a remand to allow the agency to consider new evidence of the December 26, 2004 earthquake and tsunami is unavailing. The proper recourse is to file a motion to reopen. *See 8*C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(a), (c)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMES D. SAFFORE, DOC #488495, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1717 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 22, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theron Resource
Group (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine month periods ended
February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Dated: April 15, 2009

/s/ Jerry R. Satchwell

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief
Executive Officer

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1007

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Dawn - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Dawn

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Exhibit 4.1

[FACE OF CERTIFICATE]
NUMBER
P
COMMON STOCK

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

[LOGO] PASSAVE, INC.
SHARES

CUSIP 70285E 10 8

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFIES that

is the owner of

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.0001 PER
SHARE, OF PASSAVE, INC. (hereinafter called the "Corporation") transferable on
the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly
authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and
the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

/s/
PRESIDENT
[SEAL]

/s/
SECRETARY

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (NEW YORK)
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

[REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

PASSAVE, INC.

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests
a full statement of the designations, preferences, limitations and relative
rights of each class of stock or series thereof of the Corporation and the
variations in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of any
series of preferred stock, so far as the same have been fixed and determined,
and the authority of the board of directors to fix and determine the relative
rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock. Such requests may be
made to the Corporation or to the transfer agent.

ABBREVIATIONS

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM -- as tenants in common

TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties

JT TEN  --  as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
           common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -- .....(Cust)..... Custodian..... (Minor)..... under Uniform
Gifts to Minors Act..... (State).....

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises.

Dated

Signature(s):
X________________
X________________

NOTICE:
THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

Signature(s) Guaranteed

By

THE SIGNATURE(S)

MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.