alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
OF STILLWATER MINING COMPANY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 that is being filed concurrently with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory A. Wing, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Stillwater Mining Company (the Company) hereby certify
that, to my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 31, 2005, /s/ Gregory A. WingGregory A. WingVice President and Chief Financial Officer
 The above certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q/A or as
a separate disclosure statement. 91
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date: September 28, 2006 | MRU HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                             |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     | /s/ Edwin J. McGuinn, Jr.                                                                      |
|                     | By: Edwin J. McGuinn, Jr.                                                                      |
|                     | Its: Chief Executive Officer                                                                   |
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     |                                                                                           |
| Date: September 28, 2006 | MRU HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                             |
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     | /s/ Vishal              Garg            |
|                     | By: Vishal Garg                                                                                |
|                     | Its: Chief Financial              Officer                                                      |

----
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1121

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Transco Z6 (non-NY) - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily Transco Z6 (non-NY) published price for each calendar day of the corresponding 

contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                           BTG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         FISCAL YEARS ENDED
                                                                             MARCH 31,
                                                            --------------------------------------------
                                                               2000               1999            1998
                                                            ---------           --------        --------
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>             <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations                    $   4,555           $  2,761        $ (29,081)
                                                            =========           ========        ==========
Weighted average common stock shares
     outstanding during the period (used in the
     calculation of basic per share results)                    8,853              8,774             8,540

Dilutive effect of common stock options and
     common stock purchase warrants                               182                 53              --
                                                            ---------           --------        ----------
Weighted average common stock and potentially
     dilutive securities outstanding during the period
     (used in the calculation of diluted per share
     results)                                                   9,035              8,827             8,540
                                                            =========           ========        ==========

Basic earnings (loss) per share
     from continuing operations                             $    0.51           $   0.32        $   (3.40)
                                                            =========           ========        ==========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
     from continuing operations                             $    0.50           $   0.32        $   (3.40)
                                                            =========           ========        ==========
</TABLE>
#### The Union Gold Gravel Company *vs.*Chambers *et al.*

It requires a strong case to authorize a chancellor to enjoin a judgment at law. Where no such case was made, and the affidavits were conflicting, the discretion of the chancellor in refusing the injunction will not be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

February 17, 1886.

Blandford, Justice
#### June T. Ly, Respondent, v Angela Holloway et al., Appellants.

[876 NYS2d 482]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Osman A. Mohamedtamim and Tangiz Hacking Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order *1007of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated March 28, 2008, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) insofar as asserted against them, and the defendant Angela Holloway separately appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as denied her separate motion, in effect, for the same relief.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendants Osman A. Mohamedtamim and Tangiz Hacking Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the separate motion of the defendant Angela Holloway, in effect, for the same relief, are granted.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating, on the basis of the same submissions, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiff relied on, inter alia, an affirmed report of an examining physician, who, based on a recent examination of the plaintiff, indicated that she had limited ranges of motion in her cervical and lumbar spines. It is evident that in arriving at his conclusions, the plaintiff’s examining physician relied on records of the plaintiff’s treating chiropractor, who performed contemporaneous examinations of the plaintiff, and indicated that he found limited ranges of motion in her cervical and lumbar spines. However, those records were not in proper evidentiary form *(see Casas v Montero,*48 AD3d 728, 728-729 [2008] ). Moreover, the plaintiffs treating chiropractor failed to adequately quantify the restrictions he claimed to have found *(see Sirma v Beach,*59 AD3d 611 [2009]; *Friscia v Mak Auto, Inc.,*59 AD3d 492 [2009]; *Gochnour v Quaremba,*58 AD3d 680 [2009] ; *Duke v Saurelis,*41 AD3d 770, 771 [2007]).

The plaintiff also failed to set forth any competent medical evidence to establish that she sustained a medically-determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her ususal and customary daily activities for 90 of the 180 days following the subject accident *(see Leeber v Ward,*55 AD3d 563, 564 [2008]; *Furrs v Griffith,*43 AD3d 389, 390 [2007]). The plaintiff’s own deposition testimony *1008established that she missed, at most, several hours of work as a result of the subject accident. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Belen, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                          OF STILLWATER MINING COMPANY
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the accompanying
report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 that is being filed
concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gregory A. Wing, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Stillwater Mining Company (the "Company") hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

March 16, 2006,

                                                 /s/ Gregory A. Wing
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                   Gregory A. Wing
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The above certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TitanMachinery Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,David J. Meyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: September 9, 2009 |                                 |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                         |                                 |
|                         |                                 |
|                         | /s/ David J. Meyer                   |
|                         | David J. Meyer                       |
|                         | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. PL01-5-000 and RM99-2-000]

                    On December 15, 2000, the Electric Power Supply Association,                     *et al.*, filed a motion requesting the Commission to convene a technical conference to provide guidance on implementation of Function 8 of Order No. 2000—Interregional Coordination, as it applies to Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). By notice issued March 28, 2001, in Docket No. RM99-2-000, comments were sought on this motion.                

Take notice that a technical conference will be held on June 19, 2001, at 10 a.m., in a room to be designated, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. All future actions with respect to this conference will be taken under Docket No. PL01-5-000.

The purpose of the conference will be to discuss interregional coordination between RTOs. All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend. Anyone interested in making a statement at this conference should file a request to speak in Docket No. PL01-5-000 no later than June 8, 2001. Further details about the conference will be provided in a subsequent notice.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14216  Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

June 9, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – Exhibit B - AEGIS SEF Self Certification

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit B (“Exhibit”), which 

were submitted to the Commission as 40.2 Listing products for trading by certification on this 

date. This request pertains to all material in the Exhibit. The Exhibit bears the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8, as 

Exhibit contains information that would reveal the trade secrets or confidential commercial or 

financial information of AEGIS SEF and its affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-sef.com with any questions 

regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Deborah Davis, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*14 NY3d 703 (2010)].
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
       Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-87916, 33-88506, 33-88508, 33-88510, 333-08939, 333-31793 of Security
Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-34241 of the Company on Form S-3 of our reports dated March
20, 1998 (which report on consolidated financial statements expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the
restatement of the consolidated financial statements for a pooling of interests
in 1997 and a change in the Company's method of accounting for option grants
requiring stockholder approval in 1996), appearing in and incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Security Dynamics Technologies,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Digital  Development  Partners,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Isaac Roberts,
the  Principal  Executive  and  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


November 10, 2009                   By:   /s/ Isaac Roberts
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Isaac Roberts, Principal Executive and
                                          Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1001 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1001

Congratulating North Central College on winning the 2009 NCAA Division 
                 III men's cross country championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2010

Mrs. Biggert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating North Central College on winning the 2009 NCAA Division 
                 III men's cross country championship.

Whereas the North Central College Cardinals' men's cross country team won the 
        NCAA Division III National Championship on November 21, 2009;
Whereas all seven North Central College team members that competed in the 
        championship earned All-American status;
Whereas the 2009 championship Cardinals team is comprised of Neal Klein, Michael 
        Spain, Ryan Carrigan, Nathaniel Hird, Kyle Brady, Nathan Rutz, Sean 
        Carlson, and head Coach Al Carius;
Whereas the North Central College Cardinals compete in 22 intercollegiate sports 
        and study more than 55 different majors;
Whereas North Central College, located in Naperville, Illinois, is a four-year 
        liberal arts college with students from 31 States and 23 countries; and
Whereas the North Central College men's cross country team national title is one 
        example of the excellence students have demonstrated in athletics, as 
        well as academics and all areas of collegiate life: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates North Central College and its athletes, 
        coaches, faculty students, and alumni on the winning of the 
        2009 NCAA Division III men's cross country championship; and
            (2) recognizes North Central College for excellence in 
        academics, athletics, and collegiate life.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dante Marcellous BROADWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6612.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 13, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 2, 2013.

*261Dante Marcellous Broadway, Appellant pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dante Marcellous Broadway seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for failure to either pay the filing fee or return an in forma pauperis application. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Broadway has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Broadway’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*