alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOCK-UP AND RESALE RESTRICTION AGREEMENT

January 5, 2005

Gentlemen:

     In consideration of agreeing to register the Common Shares that you own,
and by signing this agreement the undersigned hereby agrees to the terms of this
Lock-Up Agreement. The undersigned represents and warrants to the Company that
the undersigned is (a) the record or beneficial holder of 300,000 shares
("Shares") of Wimax EU, Ltd common stock (the "Common Stock").

     The undersigned agrees that during the period from the date hereof until a
date 1 year after (the "Lock-Up Period"), the undersigned shall not (except as
permitted below), without the prior written consent of the Company, directly or
indirectly, offer, issue, sell, contract to sell (including, without limitation,
any short sale), grant any option for the sale of, pledge, or otherwise dispose
of or transfer any Shares or Underlying Shares in excess often percent (10%) of
the balanced direct or beneficial holdings of shares of the Company's Common
Stock in any one-month period; provided, however, that the foregoing agreement
and representation shall not apply to (i) dispositions by gift, will or by the
laws of descent and distribution, or otherwise to the undersigned's parents,
siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren, (ii) a trust for the benefit of
the undersigned's parents, siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren, (iii) a
partnership, the general partner of which is the undersigned or the
undersigned's parents, siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren, or a
corporation or limited liability company, a majority of whose outstanding equity
securities is owned of record or beneficially by the undersigned or by any of
the foregoing, (iv) an Insider to the Company; provided that, in each case, such
transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms hereof.

     The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the Company shall place
appropriate stop transfer instructions with the transfer agent of the Common
Stock to ensure compliance with this Agreement.

     The undersigned represents that he, she or it is duly authorized to enter
into this Agreement and that this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of
the undersigned and the undersigned's respective successors, heirs, personal
representatives and assigns and is enforceable in accordance with the terms.

January 5, 2005

                                                 Very truly yours,

35216 Yukon Inc.                                 Wimax EU, Ltd.

/s/  Abbie Zands                                 /s/  Christopher Miles
--------------------------------                -----------------------------
     Abbie Zands                                      Christopher Miles
     President                                        President
October 30, 2014

By Email: submissions@cftc.gov

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: tpSEF Inc. – Regulation 40.2 Certification of CDS Index Contract – North 

America Investment Grade Swaps and Swaptions (#14-21P)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

tpSEF Inc. (“tpSEF”) herby notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) of its intent to list CDS Index Contract – North America Investment Grade 

Swaps and Swaptions (the “Contract”) on tpSEF’s swap execution facility. tpSEF intends to list 

these Contracts on November 3, 2014.

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.2, this submission includes:

i. A copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in 

Appendix D to Part 40 of the Commission’s regulations;

ii. The intended listing date – November 3, 2014;

iii. A certification by tpSEF that: (a) the Contract complies with the Commodity 

Exchange Act, as amended, and the Commission regulations thereunder; and (b) 

concurrent with this submission, tpSEF posted on its website: (i) a notice of 

pending certification of the Contract, and (ii) a copy of this submission, attached 

as Exhibit A;

iv. The Contract’s terms and conditions, attached as Exhibit B; and

v. An explanation and analysis of the Contract’s compliance with applicable core 

principles and Commission regulations, attached as Exhibit C.

tpSEF is listing the Contract by virtue of updating the terms and conditions of CDS Index 

Contract – North America Investment Grade submitted to the Commission for self-certification 

pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.2 on September 29, 2013. A copy of the terms and 

conditions marked to show changes from the version submitted on September 29, 2013 is 

attached as Exhibit D.
```

[Federal Register: October 30, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 210)]
[Notices]
[Page 64687-64688]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30oc00-54]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Meeting Act

``Federal Register'' Citation of Previous Announcement: 65 FR 65843.

Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 1 p.m., Monday, October
30, 2000.

Changes in the Meeting: The open meeting previously scheduled for 1
p.m., Monday, October 30, 2000 has

[[Page 64688]]

been postponed until 1 p.m., Wednesday, November 1, 2000.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-27965 Filed 10-26-00; 3:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 JERRY SANDEL,

8 Petitioner-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,590

10 JEFFREY SANDEL,

11 Respondent-Appellant,

12 consolidated with

13 JASON SANDEL,

14 Petitioner-Appellee,

15 v.

16 JEFFREY SANDEL,

17 Respondent-Appellant.

18 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

19 Robert A. Aragon, District Judge

20 Gurley Law Firm

21 Curtis R. Gurley

22 Farmington, NM

23 for Appellees
2

1 Jeffrey Sandel

2 San Ysidro, Ca

3 Pro se Appellant

4 MEMORANDUM OPINION

5 CASTILLO, Judge.

6 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

7 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

8 and the time for doing so has expired.

9 AFFIRMED.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 ___________________________________

12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

13 WE CONCUR:

14 __________________________________

15 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

16 __________________________________
3

1 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Blue Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Franklin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joel Franklin By: Joel Franklin Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 16, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Non-Employee Director Option Grant Notice



 Exhibit 10.84 
  
 CONSOL Energy Inc. 
 300 Delaware Avenue 
 Suite 567 
 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-1622 
  
                             , 200     
  
 [Name of Non-Employee Director] 
 [Address] 
  
 Dear [Name]: 
  
 We are pleased to grant you, as an Eligible Director (as defined in CONSOL Energy Inc.’s Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)), an initial
Nonqualified Stock Option award of [            ] shares effective [            ],
200    , at the price of [$            ] per share, under the Plan (the “Option Award”). 
  
 The Option Award is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Plan, a copy of which may be obtained upon request. Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan), the unvested portion of the Option Award shall vest and, unless otherwise provided by separate agreement between the Company and you, remain
exercisable for the lesser of a one year period or until the expiration date of the Option Award. 
  
 It is CONSOL Energy Inc.’s philosophy that an enhanced sense of ownership by Directors of CONSOL Energy Inc. is an important element in our long-term
success. We would like you to have an opportunity to share in the continued success of CONSOL Energy Inc. through this Option Award. 
  

	
	  

 J. Brett Harvey

	 President & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the
Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director
of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2010



/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Derrick Tommy ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50295

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Derrick Tommy Robinson, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Derrick Tommy Robinson, federal prisoner # 03339-180, was convicted in 2002 of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Robinson was sentenced at the bottom of the guidelines imprisonment range to a 324-month term of imprisonment. Subsequently, the district court granted the Government’s motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 and reduced Robinson’s term of imprisonment to 300 months. Robinson then filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) seeking a reduction of his sentence pursuant to recent amendments to the sentencing guidelines applicable to crack cocaine offenses. Robinson requested that his sentence of imprisonment be reduced to 262 months.

The district court granted the motion, reduced Robinson’s offense level by two levels to level 38, and sentenced Robinson at the bottom of the resulting imprisonment range to a 262-month term of imprisonment. Robinson moved for reconsideration of the district court’s order, arguing that he did not receive the benefit of the Rule 35 reduction. The district *869court denied the motion for reconsideration. Robinson gave notice of his appeal and has applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).

Robinson contends that the amended sentence did not give him the benefit of the Government’s Rule 35 motion. Robinson has not shown that there is a nonfrivo-lous issue with respect to whether the district court abused its discretion in refusing to order a further sentence reduction in light of its prior order granting a Rule 35 reduction. Although the district court arguably could have granted such a reduction, it was not compelled to do so. *See United States v. Cooley,*590 F.3d 293, 297 (5th Cir.2009); *United States v. Doublin,*572 F.3d 235, 237 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 517, 175 L.Ed.2d 366 (2009). The request for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 
  
 October 17, 2005 
  
  
  
  
 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 
  
  
 Roy C. Levitt, M.D. 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Genaera Corporation 
 5110 Campus Drive 
 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 
  
  
 Dear Roy: 
  
 The Board of Directors of Genaera Corporation met today and accepted your resignation as
Chief Executive Officer of Genaera Corporation effective December 31, 2005. The Board agreed to treat your resignation under your employment agreement with Genaera, entered into May 12, 2004, as if the Board of Directors did not extend
your employment for the period starting January 1, 2006, and for the purposes of your employment agreement as a “Notice of Non-Renewal” from Genaera. Accordingly, your last day as Chief Executive Officer of Genaera will be
December 31, 2005. 
  
  
 Sincerely, 
  
  
 /s/ R. Frank Ecock 

 R. Frank Ecock 
 Chair, Compensation Committee of the 
     Board of Directors 
  
  
 via REGULAR CERTIFIED MAIL, 
 RETURN
RECEIPT REQUESTED 
  
  
 AGREED TO: 
  
  
  
  
 /s/ Roy C. Levitt, M.D. 

 Roy C. Levitt, M.D.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JERMAINE D. LOGAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3692

[ February 22, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 01

- 233CF10A and 02

- 7487CF10A

.
Jermaine D. Logan, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

M AY , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATIONS  I, John Schoenauer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity Aviation Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 13, 2008 /s/ John SchoenauerJohn Schoenauer, Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2555 

To amend the Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952 to require that former members 

of the uniformed services who were captured or entered a missingin-action status during the Korean War while serving as a member 

of a combat unit in Korea receive combat pay for each month spent 

in a captured or missing-in-action status, rather than just a total of 

four months. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, 

Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mrs. LEE of Nevada) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952 to require 

that former members of the uniformed services who were 

captured or entered a missing-in-action status during 

the Korean War while serving as a member of a combat 

unit in Korea receive combat pay for each month spent 

in a captured or missing-in-action status, rather than 

just a total of four months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2555 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Never Forgotten Ko3 rean War POW Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF ENTIRE PERIOD SPENT IN A CAP5 TURED OR MISSING-IN-ACTION STATUS DUR6 ING THE KOREAN WAR FOR RECEIPT OF 

7 COMBAT PAY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704(b) of the Combat 

9 Duty Pay Act of 1952 (title VII of Department of Defense 

10 Appropriation Act, 1953; 66 Stat. 539) is amended by 

11 striking ‘‘for not more than three months thereafter’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘for each month thereafter’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.— 

14 (1) COVERED PERSONS.—Section 704(b) of the 

15 Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952, as amended by sub16 section (a), applies only with respect to a former 

17 member of the uniformed services who received com18 bat pay under such section and who is alive as of 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (2) COMBAT PAY AMOUNT.—In determining the 

21 actual amount to be paid to a former member of the 

22 uniformed services covered by paragraph (1), the 

23 Secretary of Defense shall increase the amount de24 termined under section 704(b) of the Combat Duty 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2555 IH

1 Pay Act of 1952, as amended by subsection (a), 

2 using an appropriate inflation adjustment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 888 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage and Rental 

5 Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The mortgage and rental assistance pro9 gram was authorized under the Robert T. Stafford 

10 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 888 IH

1 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) to provide assistance to individ2 uals who have lost a portion of their income and are 

3 having difficulties paying their rents or mortgages. 

4 (2) The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Pub5 lic Law 106–390) amended the Stafford Act to end 

6 the program in May 2002. 

7 (3) Following the major disaster declaration re8 sulting from the terrorist attacks in New York on 

9 September 11, 2001, the Federal Emergency Man10 agement Agency allowed the use of funds under the 

11 program to aid residents who were having difficulties 

12 paying their rents or mortgages. 

13 (4) The program should be reauthorized to 

14 allow the Federal Government to provide direct 

15 housing assistance to those who have been displaced 

16 by Hurricane Katrina. 

17 SEC. 3. TEMPORARY MORTGAGE RENTAL ASSISTANCE. 

18 Section 408(c)(1) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

19 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 5174(c)(1)) is amended— 

21 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub22 paragraph (C); and 

23 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol24 lowing: 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 888 IH

1 ‘‘(B) TEMPORARY MORTGAGE AND RENTAL

2 PAYMENTS.— 

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The President is 

4 authorized to provide assistance on a tem5 porary basis in the form of mortgage or 

6 rental payments to or on behalf of individ7 uals and families who, as a result of finan8 cial hardship caused by a major disaster, 

9 certify that they face dispossession or evic10 tion from a residence by reason of a fore11 closure of any mortgage or lien, cancella12 tion of any contract of sale, or termination 

13 of any lease, entered into prior to such dis14 aster. 

15 ‘‘(ii) DURATION OF ASSISTANCE.— 

16 The assistance under this subparagraph 

17 shall be provided for the duration of the 

18 period of financial hardship but not to ex19 ceed 18 months.’’. 

20 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY. 

21 The amendments made by section 3 shall apply with 

22 respect to a major disaster occurring on or after August 

23 24, 2005. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS