alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 15, 2016 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01247-CV 

ROGER AND EDNA PAYNE, Appellants 

V. 

GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04830-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellants’ brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated May 17, 2016, we notified 

appellants the time for filing their brief had expired. We directed appellants to file both their 

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellants that failure to file their 

brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

To date, appellants have not filed their brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded 

with the Court regarding the status of their brief. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

151247F.P05 

 

/ Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ROGER AND EDNA PAYNE, Appellants 

No. 05-15-01247-CV V. 

GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04830-E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS recover its costs of 

this appeal from appellants ROGER AND EDNA PAYNE. 

Judgment entered August 15, 2016.
# CE2012188EN.01006901.xml

| 28.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 188/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 188/69

---

Tuesday 15 February 2011Agreement between the European Union and Brazil on certain aspects of air services ***

P7_TA(2011)0045

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 February 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on certain aspects of air services (13988/2010 – C7-0335/2010 – 2009/0115(NLE))

2012/C 188 E/18

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13988/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13988/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on certain aspects of air services (12922/2009), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on certain aspects of air services (12922/2009),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(8), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0335/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(8), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0335/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0004/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0004/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

---
Eurex Clearing AG

ECAG Rule Certification 066-23

October 17, 2023

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Clearing Conditions (“Clearing Conditions”) of Eurex 

Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) is appended as Attachment A. Any additions are underlined and any 

deletions are struck through.

2. The date of intended implementation is November 13, 2023.

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange 

Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this 

submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ecen/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

4. A concise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears 

below.

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

6. Confidential treatment is not requested.

___________________________________________________________________________________

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF 

THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, 

INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

Eurex Clearing is amending the Clearing Conditions to reflect the launch of DAX® Index End-of-Day 

Options Contracts on Eurex Deutschland, as outlined in Eurex Clearing Circular 066/23, which is appended 

as Attachment A. Eurex Clearing will provide clearing services for this contract. For avoidance of doubt, 

Eurex Clearing will clear these contracts outside the scope of its derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”)

license, which applies only to swaps.

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed 

in Attachment A.

Eurex Clearing has identified the following DCO Core Principle as potentially being relevant to the above 

amendments:

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will 

comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendments list a new contract, which Eurex 

Clearing clears outside the scope of its DCO license, and all products cleared by Eurex Clearing

under its DCO license will continue to be subject to appropriate standards in compliance with this 

Core Principle.
2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7 

U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that:

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder; and

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing 

to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: October 17, 2023
#### Israel K. Garth RICHARDSON, Appellant v. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE(S) (Years: 1985-2010) Of The United States District Court For The Northern District Of Illinois Eastern Division, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-5141.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 5, 2010.

Israel K. Garth Richardson, Chicago, IL, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 21, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint as frivolous. *See, e.g., Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                           3,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,975
<INVENTORY>                                    168,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,227
<PP&E>                                         122,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 705,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,499
<BONDS>                                        401,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   705,234
<SALES>                                        705,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               705,353
<CGS>                                          346,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               296,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                       315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,456
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of No Show,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate
in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
October 31, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Doreen E. Zimmerman
-----------------------
    Doreen E. Zimmerman
    President/CFO


Date  December 2, 2009
      ----------------

<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Alexis C.R. and Others. Onondaga County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Victor C., Appellant.

Submitted May 10, 2010;

decided June 15, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Federal Register: April 10, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18977]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10ap00-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  10:30 a.m., Wednesday, April 26, 2000.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-8845 Filed 4-5-00; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2202, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/KEVIN T. BOTTOMLEYKevin T. Bottomley
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 13.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT 

TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of China Yuchai International Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: April 15, 2015 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT 

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Yuchai International Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for theyear ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

By:
 
/s/ Leong Kok Ho
 
Name: Leong Kok Ho
 
Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 15, 2015 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation.
# C_2010122EN.01001101.xml

| 11.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/11

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 122/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) | People's Republic of China
  Russia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1987/2005 (OJ L 320, 8.12.2005, p. 1) | 9.12.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

People's Republic of China

Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1987/2005 (OJ L 320, 8.12.2005, p. 1)

9.12.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
1

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

03-20660

___________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

VERSUS

JUAN A. TREVINO, 

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

No. H-02-CR-36-4

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Juan A. Trevino challenges his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to

possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Specifically, he challenges the district

court’s findings as to the drug quantity that was used to enhance his sentence. He argues

that the key witness the government used to establish drug quantity was unreliable. The

district court judge did not hear testimony from the informant after the government

opposed the drug quantity and argued that the informant was not credible. 

In an unpublished opinion, this court has dealt with this issue in the appeal of three
2

 Although Trevino signed a plea agreement containing a waiver of this right to appeal, we

need not enforce a waiver of appeal when the government does not ask us to do so. United States

v. Rhodes, 253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir. 2001). Trevino also argues that his plea agreement should

be vacated on the basis of Rule 11 violations by the district court and ineffective assistance of

counsel. Given our disposition of this case, we need not address those issues.

2

of Trevino’s co-defendants. See United States v. Jesus Lorenzo Ayala, Manuel Lorenzo

Garcia and Armando Perez, No. 03-20562 (5th Cir. August 13, 2004). In that case, three

of Trevino’s co-defendants objected to the district court’s finding of drug quantity on the

identical ground raised by Trevino. The panel made it clear that the district court was not

bound by the United States’ concession regarding drug quantity. However, it concluded

that the district court committed clear error by basing its findings on drug quantity on

statements of an informant identified by the government as unreliable without hearing the

informant’s testimony. As the government concedes, there is no principled basis to reach

a different result in this identical case.2

We therefore vacate Trevino’s sentence and remand his case for resentencing and

to give the district court an opportunity to determine the credibility of the government

informant after hearing his testimony. The district court may sentence Trevino either on

the quantity of drugs seized or hear the informant’s testimony and sentence Trevino based

on the court’s evaluation of his credibility with respect to drug quantities in addition to

the drugs seized.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  International Industrial Enterprises for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Industrial Enterprises for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International Industrial Enterprises.  By:/s/ David RogersName:David RogersTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:August 11, 2008By:/s/ David RogersName:David RogersTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:August 11, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HL Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deniz Hassan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of December, 2008.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer