alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1119 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 21, 2010. 

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the 

Nation’s forefathers that the United States first gained 

freedom and became a sovereign nation; 

Whereas there are more than 1,471,000 active component 

and more than 1,111,200 reserve component members of 

the Armed Forces serving the Nation in support and defense of the freedom that all Americans cherish; 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and admiration of their fellow Americans 

for putting their lives in danger for the sake of the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans; 

Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces make 

sacrifices commensurate with the men and women of the 

Armed Forces; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around the globe and are playing a 

vital role in protecting the safety and security of all 

Americans; 

Whereas the Nation officially celebrates and honors the accomplishments and sacrifices of veterans, patriots, and 

leaders who fought for freedom, this resolution pays tribute to those who currently serve in the Armed Forces; 
2 

•HRES 1119 EH 

Whereas all Americans should participate in a moment of silence to support our troops and their families; and 

Whereas March 26, 2010, is designated as ‘‘National Support 

Our Troops Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that all Americans should participate in a moment of 

silence to reflect upon the service and sacrifice of members 

of the United States Armed Forces both at home and abroad, 

and their families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period
ending February 28, 2010 of Fresh Start Private Holdings, Inc. (formerly River
Exploration, Inc.); a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
I, Andrew Aird, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





/s/
      ANDREW AIRD
              ________________________________________
              Andrew
      Aird
              President,
      Secretary Treasurer,
              Principal
      Executive Officer,
              Principal
      Financial Officer and Director
              
              
              Date:
      May 11, 2010
S e ria l: 190399 I N T H E SUPR EM E C O UR T O F M I SS I SS I PPI No . 2 0 1 3 - I A- 0 0 0 4 0 - S CT
S AF EC HOI CE , I NC. A ppe l l ant
v. TH E C I TY O F M CC O M B, M I SS I SS I PPI A ppel l ee
OR DER B ef or e the en banc C ourti s Sa f e c ho i c e , I nc . ’ s i nt er l ocut ory appea l f r om the D ece m ber 18, 2012, or derof

the C ounty C ourtof

Pi ke C ounty, M i s s i s s i ppi , denyi ng i t s “M ot i on f or S u mm a ry J u d g me n t . ” I n i t s p e t i t i o n f o ri n t e r l o c u t o ry ap p e a l , S a f e c h o i c e p r e s e n t e dtwo i ssues: ( I ) W hetherSaf eC hoi ce, a f

or ei gn corpor at i on, i s abl e t o de f end thi s acti on fi l ed by M cC om b and t o pur s ue compul s ory count er cl ai m s agai nst M cC om b, de s pi t e nothavi ng obt ai ned a Cert i f i cat e of A uthor i ty f

r om th e S e c re tary o f S tate to c o n du c t b u sin e ss inth e S tate o f M iss iss ip p i? (II ) W h ethe r the C o u rt ’s o v erru li n g o f S afe C h o ice’s M o ti o n for S u m m ary Ju d g m en t and failu re to c o n sid er R eq u est for A d m issi o n N u m b er 4 ad m itted w as p rop er? A fte r fu rth e r re v iew , the re c o rdrev e a ls th a t th e co u n ty co u rt’s D e c e m b e r 1 8 o rd e r d id notdi s m i s s Saf

echoi ce’ s count er cl ai m s . A s ther e i s no or derdi s m i s s i ng thos e cl ai m s , i s s ue I is n o t p ro p e rly b e fo re th e C o u rt. Iss u e II a sk s th is C o u rt t o ad d re ss a m a tter o f d isc o v e ry o n inte rlo c u to ry ap p e a l. “T h is C o u rt h a s a h isto ry o f ap p ly in g s trict sta n d a rd s fo r in ter lo c u to ry ap p e a ls” su c h th a t “[r]a re ly2

w i l l w e ent ert ai n an i nt er l ocut ory appea l r egar di ng a di s covery m att er . ” B los s om v. B los s om , 66 So. 3d 124, 126- 27 ( M i s s . 2011) ( quot i ng Mis s. Sta teBa rv. Atto rne yL. , 511 So. 2d 119, 121 ( M i s s . 1987) )
. A f

t err evi ew i ng the r ecor d and br i ef s pr es ent ed by the part i es , and i n the abs ence of

a ddr es s i ng i s s ue I , w e f i nd thatthi s i nt er l ocut ory appealdoe s no tw arr ant
c o n sid e ra tio n o f iss u e II. A c c o rd in g ly , the in ter lo c u to ry ap p e a l is d ism iss e d , w ith c o sts
a s s e s s e dto S a fe c h o ic e , In c . SO O R D E R E D , thi s the 1 day of M ay, 2014. st
/ s /M i chae l K
. R andolph

M IC H A E L K . R A N D O L P H , P RES I DING J UST I CE F OR THE C OURT
TO A GR EE: ALL J USTI CES
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Urban Barns Foods Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Meikleham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 15thday of June, 2011.





/s/ Daniel Meikleham


Daniel Meikleham


Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.19


                                 [CENSTOR LOGO]





                             COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


This compensation agreement between Censtor Corp. ("Censtor"), employer, and
Sabine Austin, employee, is entered into this 29th day of July, 1997. Under
this agreement, Sabine Austin, who will serve as Corporate Secretary, Finance
Director, and a director of the Company if elected at the September 3, 1997
Annual Shareholders Meeting, will receive, as incentive compensation (if
elected), a bonus of 1.5% of all net licensing revenue received by the Company
as long as she serves in those positions (including any proposed agreements
under negotiations as of the date of this agreement.)

As compensation for fulfilling the requirements of her positions as Finance
Director and Corporate Secretary, Ms. Austin will also receive compensation in
the gross amount of $4,000/month to be paid monthly on the 15th of every month,
commencing on September 1, 1997, as long as she serves in those positions. In
the event that the number of hours worked in a given three (3) month period
exceeds 180, she will be paid at the rate of $75/hour for the excess hours. She
will also be entitled to two (2) months severance pay in the event her
employment is terminated by Censtor without cause or if Censtor becomes
insolvent.






Agreed to by:   /s/ Russell M. Krapf
                ------------------------------
                Russell M. Krapf

Agreed to by:   /s/ Sabine Austin
                ------------------------------
                Sabine Austin
Exhibit
No. 32.2


Form
10-Q


First
Quantum Ventures, Inc.


File
No. 000-52759




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Andrew
Godfrey,  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
First Quantum Ventures, Inc., (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter  ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Andrew Godfrey
 Andrew
Godfrey
 Chief Executive
Officer
 
 
 Date:
November 12, 2009
 
 
 
 -------------------
 This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be
deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A
signed  original of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
this written  statement required by Section 906,  has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.7
  FIRST
    AMENDMENT TO INVESTMENT AGREEMENT
  Amendment Company Investor
  RECITALS
  WHEREAS, Investment Agreement
  WHEREAS,
  NOW, THEREFORE,
  Amendment to Section 1.2(b) of the
    Investment Agreement. $15 Million Tranche Number Initial Tranche Number
  Amendment to Section 8 of the
    Investment Agreement. Huff Investment Agreement $15 Million Tranche Number
  Huff Investment Agreement
  Initial Tranche Number
  Effect of Amendment. Form 10-K
  Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue;
    Process. New York
    Court




---



##### 



Execution in
    Counterparts.
  Headings.
  [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank;
    Signature Page Follows]
 2




---



##### 



By:
    /s/  Mitchell
    J. Nelson   Title:
    Executive Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-287-055]

      ( print page 30725)    
Take notice that on May 24, 2001, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 2001:

Thirty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 30

Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 31

El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to implement two new negotiated rate contracts and update a company name change pursuant to the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14342  Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered December 20, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00508

- CR

BRANDON DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Jud icial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 80734

- 2018



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 19, 2019 third motion for extension of time to

file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before December

31 , 2019.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW ALAN SMITH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEVRY UNIVERSITY, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-1447

(D.C. No. 1:13-CV-01840-LTB) 

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, McKAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges. 

 

Matthew Smith filed a pro se complaint in the district court against DeVry 

University (“DeVry”) for violation of his rights related to his enrollment in a master’s 

degree program. The district court dismissed this complaint without prejudice, ordering 

Mr. Smith to file a complaint complying with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8. 

Mr. Smith then filed three amended complaints in three consecutive days. The district 

court dismissed these complaints without prejudice for failure to satisfy Rule 8. The 

 

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously 

that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. 

P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

 

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of 

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value 

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

February 12, 2014

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
-2- 

district court also denied Mr. Smith’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“ifp”) in this 

appeal. Mr. Smith appeals and renews his request to proceed ifp. Exercising jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the district court’s dismissal and deny Mr. Smith’s 

request to proceed ifp. 

We review the district court’s dismissal of a complaint without prejudice under 

Rule 8(a) for abuse of discretion. See Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents, 492 

F.3d 1158, 1162 n.3 (10th Cir. 2007). Under Rule 8(a)(2), a complaint “must 

contain . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the [plaintiff] is entitled 

to relief.” We construe pro se pleadings liberally. See Diversey v. Schmidly, 738 F.3d 

1196, 1199 (10th Cir. 2013). But we do not assume the role of advocate and craft 

arguments for the pro se litigant. See United States v. Pinson, 584 F.3d 972, 975 (10th 

Cir. 2009). 

Mr. Smith’s amended complaints fail to allege facts to support his claims. In his 

attempt to state discrimination claims regarding alleged unfair grading procedures and 

failure to accommodate his mental disability in the classroom, Mr. Smith cites federal 

statutes without linking them to factual allegations. Having reviewed the amended 

complaints and the district court’s dismissal order, we conclude the court did not abuse 

its discretion in finding noncompliance with Rule 8. 
-3- 

We affirm the district court and deny ifp. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. 

Circuit Judge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

184 

CA 10-01281 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

DOMINIC R. PARTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ONONDAGA COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

 

GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (MARY J. FAHEY OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (AMY M. VANDERLYKE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John

C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered January 6, 2010. The order granted the

application of plaintiff for leave to file and serve a late notice of

claim. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in

granting plaintiff’s application seeking leave to serve a late notice

of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). Plaintiff

offered a reasonable excuse for failing to serve the notice of claim

within the statutory 90-day period (see § 50-e [1] [a]; see generally

Matter of LaMay v County of Oswego, 49 AD3d 1351, 1352, lv denied 10

NY3d 715). Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff “made a

persuasive showing that [Onondaga County (defendant)] ‘acquired actual

knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim’ . . .[, and

defendant has] made no particularized or persuasive showing that the

delay caused [it] substantial prejudice” (Wetzel Servs. Corp. v Town

of Amherst, 207 AD2d 965; see Matter of Rodriguez v Western Regional

Off-Track Betting Corp., 74 AD3d 1811).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 965 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 965

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amended by striking subsection (c) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 965

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.
```
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
Richard A. Baker , certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NRDC Acquisition
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Omission in accordance with SEC Release
No. 33-8760] for the registrant and have:




(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)
[Omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760];




(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      November 12, 2008
                            By:
                            /s/ RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)