alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler** |
|--|------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 3/9/00 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF        SIZE: | 63        KB | PDF        LINK: | cf0010c001.p |
|-------|--------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|--------------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
    Previous
Next
Last
# C_2010076EN.01002501.xml

| 25.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/25

---

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2010/C 76/12

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2008) 62R | | 14.2.2008 | Interim report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on progress in Romania under the cooperation and verification mechanism |
| COM(2008) 63R | | 14.2.2008 | Interim report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on progress in Bulgaria under the cooperation and verification mechanism |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2008) 62R

14.2.2008

Interim report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on progress in Romania under the cooperation and verification mechanism

COM(2008) 63R

14.2.2008

Interim report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on progress in Bulgaria under the cooperation and verification mechanism

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10834

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eduardo Nieblas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:21-CR-4-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Nieblas

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nieblas has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10834 Document: 00516225324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2022
No. 21-10834

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10834 Document: 00516225324 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2022
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20260
DOUGLAS FREULER, derivatively on behalf of Parker Drilling Company, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ROBERT L. PARKER, JR.; ROBERT L. PARKER; JOHN W. GIBSON; ROGER B. PLANK; R. RUDOLPH REINFRANK; ROBERT E. MCKEE, III; GEORGE J. DONNELLY; ROBERT W. GOLDMAN; GARY R. KING; DAVID C. MANNON; JAMES W. WHALEN; W. KIRK BRASSFIELD; LYNN G. CULLOM; PARKER DRILLING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants - Appellees

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-cv-03148
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See 5th CIR. R. 47.6. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D March 11, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5, the court has determ ined that this op inion s hould not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-20260 Document: 00512170015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2013
Exhibit 11



National Presto Industries, Inc.



(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



First Quarter2008
        
        2007Net Earnings (1)
        
        $
        6,250
        
        $
        5,021Weighted average common shares outstanding  (2)
        
        
        6,840
        
        
        6,832Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive
        
        
        
        
        
        Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation  (3)
        
        
        6,840
        
        
        6,832Net earnings per share:Basic  (1 divided by 2)
        
        $
        0.91
        
        $
        0.73Diluted  (1 divided by 3)
        
        $
        0.91
        
        $
        0.73




---
No. 391.

#### Binford et al. *v.*J. H. McLeaish & Co. et al.

Argued January 21, 22, 1932.

Decided January 25, 1932.

*Messrs. Albert L. Reed*and *Elbert Hooper,*Assistant Attorney General of Texas; with whom *Messrs. James V. Allred,*Attorney General; *T. S. Christopher,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Mr'. W. L. Cook*were on the brief, for appellants.

*Messrs. Lon E. Blankenbecker*and *John H. Croaker,*with whom *Mr. R. C. Fulbright*was on the brief, for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The order granting an interlocutory injuction is affirmed. *Alabama v. United States,*279 U. S. 229; *United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission,*278 U. S. 322, 326; *National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson,*281 U. S. 331, 338.
EXHIBIT
31.2





SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








I, James
W. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of PuraMed Bioscience Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of PuraMed Bioscience Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:









a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and





5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:  May
15,
2009                                                               /s/ James W.
Higgins


James W. Higgins


Chief Financial and Operating
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.2

                                 BEHRE DOLBEAR
                      BEHRE DOLBEAR & COMPANY (USA), INC.
                   founded 1911 MINERALS INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS

                                 March 16, 2006

Stillwater Mining Company
1321 Discovery Drive
Billings, MT 59102

Re:  Consent for Reference in Form 10-K Filing

Gentlemen:

Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), Inc. herein provides its consent for reference
to our company in regards to work performed for Stillwater Mining Company in
Stillwater Mining Company's filing of its Form 10K with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. Please contract us if you require further assistance.

Sincerely,
BEHRE DOLBEAR & COMPANY (USA), INC.

/s/ Donald K. Cooper

Donald K. Cooper
President











100 Park Avenue - Suite 1600, New York, NY 10017   212-684-4150 fax 212-684-4438
  BEIJING DENVER GUADALAJARA HONG KONG LONDON NEW YORK SANTIAGO SYDNEY TORONTO
                                   VANCOUVER
                                www.dolbear.com
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1322

Crude Oil Option - ICE Brent Crude North Sea - ICE

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled ICE Brent Crude put and call options on the ICE Brent Crude North Sea futures contract specified 

in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the ICE Brent Crude North Sea futures 

first nearby contract settlement price for each business day that it is determined during the contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the average daily settlement price 

during the calendar month of the first nearby ICE Brent Crude North Sea futures contract (as described in 

Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On expiration of a Put Option, the value 

will be the difference between the strike price and the average daily settlement price during the calendar 

month of the first nearby ICE Brent Crude North Sea futures contract (as described in Floating Price A), or 

zero whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style Average Price option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity multiplied by the 

settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per barrel and prices shall be in multiples of $0.01 per barrel. The minimum 

price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

November 29, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00728

- CV

IN THE INTEREST A.N.J.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02188 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent

- child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant prematurely filed a notice of appeal , which was deemed filed October 23, 2018. Accordingly, the reporter’s record
was due November 2, 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b). The record was not filed.

On November 8, 2018, the clerk of this court notified the court reporter, David Zarate, by letter that he is the reporter responsible for the record and that the record was late. Our letter required the record be filed by November 19, 2018. The record has not been file d and Mr. Zarate has not otherwise responded to the clerk’s letter.

We therefore order the court reporter, David Zarate, to file the reporter’s records by December 5, 2018

. The court will not grant any further extension of time to file the record in
th e absence of a showing of extraordinary circumstances that prevent the timely filing of the record and reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested
extended deadline.

Because this is an appeal from the termination of pare ntal rights, “the trial court must direct the official or deputy reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record. The trial court must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(b)(1). We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial

court. See T EX .R. A PP

. P. 35.3 (c) (“[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed”).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 29th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### Maria Elsy CALLES-ORELLANA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72653.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*618MEMORANDUM **

María Elsy Calles-Orellana, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Calles-Orellana’s experience in El Salvador did not constitute past persecution because the only harm she suffered was one unfulfilled threat. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Calles-Orellana did not establish that she would be singled out for persecution if she were to return to El Salvador. *See Quintanilla-Ticas v. INS,*783 F.2d 955, 957 (9th Cir.1986). Accordingly, Calles-Orellana is not eligible for asylum.

Because Calles-Orellana did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cm. 2003).

Substantial evidence supports the denial of protection under CAT because Calles-Orellana did not show that it is more likely than not that she would be tortured if returned to El Salvador. *See id.*

Calles-Orellana’s due process contention that the IJ failed to consider the State Department Country Report is not supported by the record because the IJ cited to the Report in his decision. Further, Calles-Orellana’s contention that the BIA’s summary affirmance violated her due process rights is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 848 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 10(a)




Exhibit 10(a)   




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Amendment No. 16 to Registration Statement (Investment Company Act File
No. 811-21162) of Merrill Lynch Basic Value Principal Protected Fund (the
“Fund”) of Merrill Lynch Principal Protected Trust on Form

N-1A of our report
dated August 15, 2005, appearing in the June 30, 2005 Annual Report of the Fund, which is
incorporated by reference in Part B of this Registration Statement. 



/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP 



Princeton, New Jersey
October 25, 2005
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00317

- CR

CHAZ ANTHONY PHILLIP JONES , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F50789

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones pled guilty to one count of Aggravated Sexual Assault

of a Child and one count of Online Solicitati on of a Minor

. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§
22.021(a)(2)(B); 33.021(c) (West 2011 & 2016 ). He was sentenced to 45 years and 20 years
in prison , respectively

. 1 The trial court’s judgment s are affirmed.

In one issue, Jones contends that his sentence s are grossly disproportionate to the

1 Jones was also found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. The appeal of th is offense w as severed from this appeal and disposed of in another appellate case number, 10

- 1 9

- 00 0 74

- CR.Jones v. State Page 2

respective offenses under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and

Article I, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution. See U.S. C ONST . amend. VIII; see also T EX

.

C ONST . art. I, § 13. A disproportionate

- sente nce claim must be preserved for appellate

review. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 33.1(a)(1); Rhoades v. State , 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1996); Noland v. State , 264 S.W.3d 144, 151 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet.
ref'd). At trial, Jones did not object to the imposed sentence s

. Further , Jones did not raise
a disproportionate

- sentence claim in his motion for new trial or otherwise present a post

trial objection to the imposed sentence s

. Thus , Jones’s complaint is not preserved, and

his sole issue is overruled.
Having overruled Jones’s sole issue on appeal, we affirm the trial court’s
judgments.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggi ns 2 Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed February 2 7 , 2019 Do not publish [CRPM]

2 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C O DE A NN . §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
##### 



Exhibit 12.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
China Yuchai International Limited:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
F-3 (No. 333-5478) of China Yuchai International Limited (the Company) of our
report dated March 31, 2003, except for Note 30, as to which the date is July
15, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income, cash flows, and changes in stockholders equity for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002.



/s/  KPMG

Hong Kong, July 15, 2003
North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc., 200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60606

US Toll-Free +1 (877) 77 NADEX info@nadex.com www.nadex.com 20220805(1)

August 5, 2022

Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments: Nadex Amends Strike Widths - Submission Pursuant to 

Commission Reg. §40.6(d)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”), and Section 40.6(d) of 

the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) under the Act 

(the “Regulations”), North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. (“Nadex”, the “Exchange”) hereby provides notice 

that it amended the strike widths of various contracts during the week of August 1, 2022 due to increased or 

decreased volatility, as the case may be, in the underlying markets upon which the Nadex contracts are based. 

Amended strike widths are reflected in Exhibit A.

Nadex hereby certifies that the additions and amendments contained herein comply with the Act, as 

amended, and the Commission Regulations adopted thereunder. No substantive opposing views were expressed to 

Nadex with respect to these additions. Nadex hereby certifies that notice of these events was posted on its website 

at the time of this filing.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 

(312) 884-0927 or by email at jaime.walsh@nadex.com.

 Sincerely, 

Jaime M. Walsh

Head of Legal
North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc., 200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60606

US Toll-Free +1 (877) 77 NADEX info@nadex.com www.nadex.com 20220805(1)

EXHIBIT A

Week of August 1, 2022

Contract Trade Date of Change Strike Width Adjusted 

From

Strike Width Adjusted To

20-Minute Wall Street 30 (Wide) 

Binary

August 1, 2022 8 16

20-Minute Wall Street 30 (Narrow) 

Binary

August 1, 2022 6 12

2-Hour Wall Street 30 Binary August 1, 2022 24 48

20-Minute US 500 (Wide) Binary August 1, 2022 1.5 3

20-Minute US 500 (Narrow) Binary August 1, 2022 1 2

2-Hour US 500 (Wide) Binary August 1, 2022 3 6

20-Minute US Tech 100 (Wide) Binary August 1, 2022 4 8

20-Minute US Tech 100 (Narrow) 

Binary

August 1, 2022 3 6

2-Hour US Tech 100 (Wide) Binary August 1, 2022 12 24

20-Minute US SmallCap 2000 (Wide) 

Binary

August 1, 2022 1.4 2.8

20-Minute US SmallCap 2000 

(Narrow) Binary

August 1, 2022 1.2 2.4

2-Hour US SmallCap 2000 (Wide) 

Binary

August 1, 2022 2.8 5.6

Daily Wall Street 30 Binary August 1, 2022 40 80

Daily US 500 Binary August 1, 2022 6 12

Daily US Tech 100 Binary August 1, 2022 24 48

Daily US SmallCap 2000 Binary August 1, 2022 4 8

Daily Crude Oil Binary August 1, 2022 0.4 0.8

Daily Germany 40 Binary August 1, 2022 20 40

Daily Gold Binary August 1, 2022 3 6
mm^m.oDi^

tiiofA mil

ia sots

P.O. b* S^>)C0^S&ton

rs

iM»r t>r

I am 1,/itiy czpestiftx to toad -fhe, status

of^ (RAQfe-^

fepfeftfef, liidiM not f€ceia^a
tv h£ar-from q0(4 &n&rn'>ng -ttife )<npor-faof waxier of/wfual &>fc3rcijT.

ceaw>o

(k? a\u)aupj

Ocbo V). ^noOTt;WO- foe?

®pPin. 309J

Ctfik/M?