alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.B






CERTIFICATION
 
 I, John
R. Sult, certify that:
 
 1.           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of El Paso Pipeline Partners,
L.P.;
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
    Date: 
      May 9, 2008
                
                /s/ John
      R. SultJohn
      R. SultSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)El
      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., theGeneral Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, the undersigned certifies that this annual report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RSA
Security Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

                                             /s/ ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, JR.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                               ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, JR.
                                          PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                          AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Dated: March 13, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David Corre, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vringo, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: August 16, 2010
NUMBER 13-08-00671-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________ 

RICHARD ALLEN KREST, Appellant,

v.

MILDRED RENEE KREST, Appellee.

________________________________________________________ 

On appeal from the 94th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Richard Allen Krest, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-6611-C. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached a mediated

settlement agreement. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of

the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 5th day of March, 2009.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):December 24, 2008



---

SCANNER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





New Mexico(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)000-08149

        

        85-0169650(Commission File Number)

        

        (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)14505 21st Avenue North, Suite 220Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447(Address of Principal Executive Offices)  (Zip Code)(763) 476-8271(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)Not Applicable(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report




---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



o

        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)




o

        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item 5.02

        Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




(b)



On December 24, 2008, Elwin M. Beaty resigned his positions as chairman and director of the Company.



- 2 -

---

SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Dated:  December 31, 2008



SCANNER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONBy

        /s/ DAVID P. MORKDavid P. Mork President






- 3 -

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6351

ROBERT ARTIS, 

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE WILLIAMSON,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BRYAN P. 

STIRLING; GREGORY KNOWLIN, individually and in their official capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-01238-RMG)

Submitted: August 30, 2018 Decided: September 11, 2018

Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Robert Artis, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON 

HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Robert Artis appeals the jury verdict entered in favor of Michelle Williamson on 

Artis’ excessive force claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). On appeal, Artis contends 

that the jury’s verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence, and he disputes the 

admission of various testimony and evidence admitted at trial. For the reasons that 

follow, we affirm.

Artis neglected to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of 

law after entry of the jury’s verdict. “Absent such a motion, . . . [we are] powerless to 

review the sufficiency of the evidence after trial.” Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180, 189

(2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). Consequently, Artis has forfeited his 

challenge to the jury’s verdict. See Belk, Inc. v. Meyer Corp., 679 F.3d 146, 154-60 (4th 

Cir. 2012) (explaining that postverdict motion challenging sufficiency of evidence

supporting jury’s verdict is necessary to preserve issue for appeal).

Artis likewise failed to preserve all but one of his arguments concerning the 

admission of certain evidence at trial. See Padilla v. Troxell, 850 F.3d 168, 178 (4th Cir. 

2017) (providing appellate review of evidentiary issue is forfeited if issue not raised 

before trial court). With respect to Artis’ preserved claim that the district court erred in 

permitting prior act evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b)(2), we discern no abuse of 

discretion. Smith v. Balt. City Police Dep’t, 840 F.3d 193, 200 (4th Cir. 2016) (stating 

standard of review).
4

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

August 30, 2022

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – AEGIS Product Listing – Exhibit B

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibits B (“Exhibit”), which 

was submitted to the Commission as Self Certification on Product Listing(s) on this date. This 

request pertains to all material in the Exhibits. The Exhibits bear the designation “Confidential 

Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission

Regulations 40.8, as Exhibit contains information that would reveal the

trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information of AEGIS SEF and its

affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-hedging.com with any 

questions regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the Report.





This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be
deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:                      August 7, 2009








/s/
Kevin T. BottomleyKevin T. BottomleyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|   |   |                                           /s/ John R. Sult |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |  John      R. Sult                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|   |   |  Senior      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|   |   |  (Principal      Accounting and Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|   |   |  El      Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., the                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   |           General Partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   |   |  May      11, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., (the Company), in connection with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                                              
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ H. Michael Schwartz                                                      
|                         |  |     |  | H. Michael Schwartz President, CEO and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
Executive Order 13215

# President's Information Technology Advisory Committee, 

Executive Order 13035

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-194), as amended by the Next Generation Internet Research Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-305), and in order to extend the life of the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee so that it may continue to carry out its responsibilities, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 13035 of February 11, 1997, as amended by Executive Orders 13092, 13113, and 13200 (Executive Order 13035, as amended), is further amended as follows:

**Section 1.**                         Section 1 of Executive Order 13035, as amended, is further amended by deleting the last sentence and inserting in lieu thereof: “Members appointed prior to June 1, 2001, shall serve until December 1, 2001, unless reappointed by the President. Members appointed or reappointed on or after June 1, 2001, shall serve for no more than 2 years from the date of their appointment, unless their period of service is extended by the President. The President shall designate two co-chairs from among the members of the Committee. A co-chair may serve for a term of 2 years or until the end of his or her service as a member of the Committee, whichever is the shorter period.”                    

**Sec. 2.**                         Section 4(b) of Executive Order 13035, as amended, is further amended by deleting “June 1, 2001,” and inserting in lieu thereof: “June 1, 2003.”                    

[FR Doc. 01-14319

Billing code 3195-01-P
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1502

Aluminum Fixed Swap - LME Aluminum CMA Swap - LME

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the price published by LME for the location specified in 

Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the LME Official Cash 

Settlement Price for Primary Aluminum for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be metric tons. Each contract based shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in metric tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars per metric ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall be 

$0.01 per metric ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last calendar day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### In the Matter of Lastanzea L. and Others, Infants. Oneida County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Lakesha L., Appellant.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 87 AD3d 1356.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s denial of the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.