alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

No. 20221214(1)

December 14, 2022

Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification: Nadex Announces its 2023 Exchange Holidays – Submission 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation §40.6(a) 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), and 

§40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) under the Act, North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. (“Nadex”) d/b/a 

crypto.com | Derivatives North America hereby submits to the Commission the 2023 holidays for 

which Nadex may adjust listing hours for, or not list, all or some of its contracts. Unless otherwise 

indicated on the Notices page of the Nadex website, Exchange holidays will follow the listing 

schedule set forth in the Holiday Product Schedule Guidelines.

The Exchange will be closed on the following dates:

New Year’s Day (Observed) – Monday, January 2, 2023

Martin Luther King Jr. Day – Monday, January 16, 2023

President’s Day – Monday, February 20, 2023

Good Friday – Friday, April 7, 2023

Memorial Day – Monday, May 29, 2023

Juneteenth – Monday, June 19, 2023

Independence Day – Tuesday, July 4, 2022

Labor Day – Monday, September 4, 2023

Thanksgiving Day – Thursday, November 23, 2023

Christmas Day – Monday, December 25, 2023

New Year’s Day – Monday, January 1, 2024
crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

Nadex has not identified any DCO or DCM Core Principles that would be negatively 

affected by the 2023 holidays. Pursuant to the 10-day filing period under Regulation 40.6(a)(3), 

the amendments will become effective December 30, 2022. No substantive opposing views were 

expressed to Nadex with respect to these holidays. Nadex hereby certifies that the amendments 

contained herein comply with the Act, as amended, and the Commission Regulations adopted 

thereunder. Nadex certifies that a copy of these amendments was posted on its website at the time 

of this filing.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me 

by telephone at (312) 884-0927 or by email at Jaime.walsh@nadex.com.

Sincerely,

Jaime Walsh

Head of Legal
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30473-30474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning

[[Page 30474]]

individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: July 19-20, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS, Building 101 Conference Room, South Campus, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Nat'l Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-24, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 
541-1307.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS 
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS 
Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic Research and Education; 
93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental 
Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14166 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

| 1.   | I have reviewed the Report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------|

| 2.   | based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Exhibit 32**

 

OSG AMERICA L.P.

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F2002

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the ChiefFinancial Officer of OSG America LLC, the general partner of OSG America L.P.(the “Partnership”), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief,that the Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the quarterly period ended September 30,2007 (the “Periodic Report”) accompanying this certification fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.  This certification isprovided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.

 

 

 
| Date:  | December 19,  2007  |   | /s/  Jonathan P. Whitworth |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Jonathan  P. Whitworth   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 
| Date:  | December 19,  2007  |   | /s/  Myles R. Itkin |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|   | Myles  R. Itkin          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

 

 

----
#### In the Matter of David Burr, Appellant, v Timothy B. Howard, Sheriff of Erie County, Respondent.

Submitted March 5, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 2012 NY Slip Op 60911(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the January 2012 Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Robert ASPRY, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2011-7137.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 23, 2012.

Sandra W. Wischow, Goodman, Allen & Filetti, of Richmond, Virginia, argued for claimant-appellant.

Michael P. Goodman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Brian M. Simkin, Assistant Director, and Scott D. Austin, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Rachael T. Shenkman, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Before PROST, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Aspry, Jr., appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”), denying his claim based on hearing loss. Although Mr. Aspry frames the issue on appeal as whether the Veterans Court applied the correct legal standard, in effect he disagrees with the application of the “clear and unmistakable evidence” standard of 38 U.S.C. § 1111 to the facts of his case. We do not have jurisdiction to review the Veterans Court’s application of the law to the facts unless it presents a constitutional issue. *Jackson v. Shinseki,*587 F.3d 1106, 1109 (Fed.Cir.2009); 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2); *cf. Livingston v. Derwinski,*959 F.2d 224, 225 (Fed.Cir.1992) (“[T]he mere recitation of a basis for jurisdiction by either party or a court[ ] is not controlling; we must look to the true nature of the action.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss Mr. Aspry’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Costs

Each party shall bear its own costs.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Balram Singh, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 553]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Quinn, J.), rendered May 25, 2006, convicting him of murder in the second degree, arson in the first degree (two counts), arson in the third degree, assault in the first degree, stalking in the third degree, and menacing in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it *876was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Casey,*37 AD3d 1113, 1114-1115 [2007] ; *People v Brown,*281 AD2d 700, 700-701 [2001]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo, 2*NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to sever the stalking and menacing counts from the remaining counts. The motion was untimely *(see*CPL 255.20), and the defendant failed to demonstrate good cause for the untimeliness *(see People v Vernon,*304 AD2d 679 [2003]; *People v Garcia,*259 AD2d 630 [1999]). In any event, the separate offenses were properly joinable in a single indictment pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (b), as the nature of the proof of the stalking and menacing counts was material and admissible as evidence upon the trial of the remaining counts *(see People v Laverpool, 52*AD3d 622 [2008] ).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento, 91*NY2d 708, 712 [1998]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Balkin, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Lafayette D. Young, Jr., a Justice of the Macomb Town Court, St. Lawrence County, Petitioner. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Submitted December 27, 2011;

decided January 5, 2012

Motion to waive strict compliance with certain requirements concerning the record on review herein granted to the extent that consideration of the determination of the Commission on Judicial Conduct may be prosecuted upon 10 copies of the record on review.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John J. Sutherland, certify that:				1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Cyprium Resources Inc.;				2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;				3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;				4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

> 
(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;					(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and					(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> 
(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and				(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2008			/s/ John J. Sutherland				John J. Sutherland				President, Secretary and Treasurer				(Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

----
Exhibit 32.1


                         CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                           1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
                                   SUITE 2902
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036

                                  CERTIFICATION

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2009 to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew Lambiase, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:


    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                        /s/ Matthew Lambiase
                                        Matthew Lambiase
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
                                        May 7, 2009


                                       55
#### Yan Ping Xu, Appellant, v City of New York, Sued Herein as New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Respondent.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 82 AD3d 559.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### John M. Summers, Appellant, v City of Rochester et al. Defendants, and Export Finance Insurance Corporation, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[874 NYS2d 830] —

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stephen K. Lindley, J.), entered February 27, 2008 in an action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction. The order granted summary judgment to defendant Export Finance Insurance Corporation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by dismissing the second amended complaint against defendant Export Finance Insurance Corporation and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Summers v City of Rochester*(60 AD3d 1271 [2009]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

{ss
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                    ----------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Hitchcock, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 13, 2007

                                         /s/ William Hitchcock
                                         ------------------------
                                         Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronne L. Steinocher,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
21st of June 2010.


/s/ Ronne L. Steinocher
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010135EN.01002201.xml

| 26.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/22

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 135/09

The Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

1

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Magnesium oxide | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 778/2005 (OJ L 131, 25.5.2005, p. 1) | 26.5.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Magnesium oxide

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 778/2005 (OJ L 131, 25.5.2005, p. 1)

26.5.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

---