alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CorMedix Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Brian Lenz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May 11, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Brian LenzName:
            Brian
      LenzTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,175
<SECURITIES>                                    95,320
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                      2,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,805
<PP&E>                                          14,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           372
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,975
<SALES>                                         83,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,817
<CGS>                                           18,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<FN>
OTHER EXPENSES REFERS TO MERGER EXPENSES INCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MERGER
WITH RSA DATA SECURITY, INC. IN JULY 1996.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-2076-000]


New York Independent System Operator; Notice of Filing

May 22, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 17, 2001, the New York Independent System 
Operator, Inc. (NYISO), at the Direction of its independent Board of 
Directors, made an exigent circumstances filing to propose changes to 
its Market Administration and Control Area Services Tariff (Services 
Tariff) designed to implement automated mitigation procedures. The 
NYISO has requested that the Commission act on this filing in a 
expedited manner and that it shorten the usual period for comments. The 
NYISO has also requested that the Commission waive its usual 60-day 
notice requirement and make the filing effective no later than June 15, 
2001.
    The NYISO has served a copy of this filing on all parties that have 
executed Service Agreements under the NYISO's Open-Access Transmission 
Tariff or Services Tariff, on the New York State Public Service 
Commission, on the electric utility regulatory agencies in New Jersey 
and Pennsylvania and on all parties in Docket Nos. EL01-55-000 and 
ER01-181-000. The NYISO has also emailed a copy of this filing to all 
subscribers to the NYISO's Technical Information Exchange list.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 31, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(l)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13357 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
exv10w2



 




Exhibit 10.2



TERMINATION AGREEMENT



     THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT, effective September 30, 2005, is made and entered into by and
between Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Medicis”), and Michael A.
Pietrangelo.



RECITALS:



     WHEREAS, the parties entered into a letter agreement, dated November 5, 1997 (the “Consulting
Agreement”), regarding the provision of certain consulting services by Mr. Pietrangelo to the
Company; and



     WHEREAS, the parties wish to terminate the Consulting Agreement and their respective rights
and obligations thereunder effective September 30, 2005.



     NOW, THEREFORE, each of the Company and Mr. Pietrangelo agree that the Consulting Agreement
and their respective rights and obligations thereunder shall be terminated effective September 30,
2005.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the parties on
October 19, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION


	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jonah Shacknai	 
	 	Name:  	Jonah Shacknai 	 
	 	Title:  	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	 
	 	MICHAEL A. PIETRANGELO


	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael A. Pietrangelo	 
	 	Name:  	Michael A. Pietrangelo
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Deniz Hassan, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HL Ventures Inc..;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of December, 2007.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Etowah County, Alabama

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared for a proposed highway 
project in Etowah County, Alabama.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joe D. Wilkerson, Division 
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 500 Eastern Boulevard, 
Suite 200, Montgomery, Alabama 36117, Telephone: (334) 223-7370.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the State of 
Alabama Department of Transportation, will prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for Alabama Project NHF-PE 94 (2). The proposal 
is to extend Interstate Highway 759 (I-759) from George Wallace Drive 
to an interchange with U.S. Highway 431 and US-Highway 278 in the city 
of Gadsden, Alabama. The project will be a multi-land freeway on new 
location.
    The proposal will allow traffic from I-759 to flow through the City 
of Gadsden without merging with local street traffic.
    Alternatives under consideration include (1) alternate route 
locations, (2) a no action alternative, and (3) postponing the action.
    A Public Involvement Meeting will be held in Gadsden to acquire 
local input on the proposed project. Written comments will be solicited 
from Federal, State and local agencies, officials and individuals who 
may have an interest in the proposal. A formal Scoping Meeting will not 
be held.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action is addressed and all significant issues identified, comments and 
suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research Planning and Construction. The provisions of OMB 
Circular No. A-95 regarding state and local clearinghouse review of 
Federal and federally assisted programs and projects apply to this 
program.)

Joe D. Wilkerson,
Division Administrator, Montgomery, Alabama.
[FR Doc. 01-13324 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14386]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

[USCG-2001-9763]


Towing Safety Advisory Committee; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Transportation has renewed the charter for 
the Towing Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC) for a period of two years 
from May 19, 2001, until May 19, 2003. TSAC is a federal advisory 
committee constituted under 5 U.S.C. App. 2. It advises the Secretary 
of Transportation on matters relating to shallow-draft inland and 
coastal waterway navigation and towing safety.
    This notice and the charter are available on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. The charter is also available on TSAC's Internet web page 
at http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/advisory/index.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gerald P. Miante, Assistant 
Executive Director, Commandant (G-MSO-1), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 Second 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001, telephone 202-267-0229, fax 202-
267-4570.

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
Howard L. Hime,
Acting Director of Standards, Marine Safety and Environmental 
Protection.
[FR Doc. 01-14386 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE

#### Commonwealth of Virginia v. Ramanda Carr

May *2,*2003

By Judge Edward l. Hogshire

This letter addresses Defendant’s Motion to Suppress, in particular, whether the warrant to search the duplex at 1506 6th Street SE described the appropriate unit to be searched with sufficient particularity. It is clear that the address contained throughout the warrant, unit 1506A, was incorrect. This fact alone, as discussed in *Robinson*v. *Commonwealth,*219 Va. 520 (1978), is insufficient to j ustify suppression. However, a closer inspection of the warrant reveals clearly conflicting descriptions of the proper unit to be searched that could not reasonably be distinguished given the evidence available to the executing officers.

The warrant and affidavit mention that “Apartment A is the western most unit, that unit closest to 6th St. SE.” It is not in dispute that this is the proper description of unit B. The next sentence, standing alone, notes that “the letter “A” is clearly displayed next to the door.” In fact, the letter “B” is next to the western most unit. This description, on its face, provides directly conflicting evidence as to the location of the correct unit. This Court holds that the letter “A” is employed in the warrant as a descriptive physical characteristic, not merely as part of an incorrect address as suggested by the Commonwealth. That fact distinguishes this case from *Robinson.*There are no other descriptive sentences in the warrant to differentiate the two units.

Given that the executing officers did not have sufficient evidence from the face of the warrant to reasonably conclude which was the proper unit to be searched, this Court grants Defendant’s Motion to Suppress.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2548 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To modify eligibility requirements for certain hazard 

mitigation assistance programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2548 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazard Eligibility and 

3 Local Projects Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO BEGIN IMPLEMENTATION OF AC5 QUISITION OR RELOCATION PROJECTS. 

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE FOR INITIATED

7 PROJECTS.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of law, an entity seeking assistance under 

10 a hazard mitigation assistance program shall be eli11 gible to receive such assistance for a covered project 

12 if the entity— 

13 (A) complies with all other eligibility re14 quirements of the hazard mitigation assistance 

15 program for acquisition or relocation projects, 

16 including extinguishing all incompatible encum17 brances; and 

18 (B) complies with all Federal requirements 

19 for the project. 

20 (2) COSTS INCURRED.—An entity seeking as21 sistance under a hazard mitigation assistance pro22 gram shall be responsible for any project costs in23 curred by the entity for a covered project if the cov24 ered project is not awarded, or is determined to be 

25 ineligible for, assistance. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2548 RFS

1 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi2 nitions apply: 

3 (1) COVERED PROJECT.—The term ‘‘covered 

4 project’’ means— 

5 (A) an acquisition or relocation project for 

6 which an entity began implementation prior to 

7 grant award under a hazard mitigation assist8 ance program; and 

9 (B) a project for which an entity initiated 

10 planning or construction before or after re11 questing assistance for the project under a haz12 ard mitigation assistance program qualifying 

13 for a categorical exemption under the National 

14 Environmental Policy Act. 

15 (2) HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PRO16 GRAM.—The term ‘‘hazard mitigation assistance 

17 program’’ means— 

18 (A) the predisaster hazard mitigation 

19 grant program authorized under section 203 of 

20 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

21 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133); 

22 (B) the hazard mitigation grant program 

23 authorized under section 404 of the Robert T. 

24 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist25 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 2548 RFS

1 (C) the flood mitigation assistance pro2 gram authorized under section 1366 of the Na3 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

4 4104c). 

5 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to 

6 funds appropriated on or after the date of enactment of 

7 this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

                      

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Capital Resource Alliance Inc.. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2008, each of the undersigned Joseph Forzani, the Chief Executive Officer, and Frederick Fitzgerald**,** the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Derian Douglas HICKMAN, Appellant v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL Texas Child Support, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-5229.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Derian Douglas Hickman, Saint Elizabeth Hospital, Washington, DC, pro se.

Craig R. Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 15, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint as frivolous. *See, e.g., Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Garcia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 15, 2010














______________________________________


Armando Garcia,


President, Secretary & Treasurer


(principal executive and financial officer)
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

IntriCon Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 33-33712 on Form S-3, and in the registration statements (No. 333-16377, 333-66433, 333-59694, 333-129104 and 333-134256) on Form S-8 of IntriCon Corporation (formerly Selas Corporation of America) and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 18, 2005, except as to notes 3, 4, 8 and 18, which is as of March 31, 2005 and note 2 which is as of June 24, 2005, relating to the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows and related financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2004, which reports are included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of IntriCon Corporation.



Our reports refer to the Companys restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 15, 2007





---