----

----

| California                      | 33-0230641                           |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| incorporation or organization)  |                                 |

| 1200 N. Van Buren St., Suite A, Anaheim, CA | 92807      |
|---------------------------------------------|------------|
| (Address of principal executive offices)    | (Zip Code) |

----

| Large accelerated filer   ̈                                                                          | Accelerated filer   ̈         |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                         |                                             |
| Non-accelerated filer  ̈ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company  x |

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o  No  xThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $7,984,507.The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock as of June 30, 2009 was 79,845,077.DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None.        TABLE OF CONTENTS   PAGE      Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information  1       PART I          ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS 2       ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 4       ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 5       ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 5       PART II          ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASE OF SECURITIES 5       ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 7       ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 7       ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 12       ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE). 12       ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. 12       ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION   13       PART III          ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT 13       ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 17       ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS 18       ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 18       ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. 19       ITEM 15. EXHIBITS 20    i    CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION All statements contained in this Form 10-K, other than statements of historical facts, that address future activities, events or developments are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements containing the words "believe", "anticipate", "expect" and words of similar import. These statementsare based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our assessment of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results will conform to the expectations and predictions of management is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in thisForm 10-K are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by management will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on our business operations. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are unavailable to issuers of penny stock. Our shares may be considered penny stock and such safe harbors set forth under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 may not be available to us. As used in this Form 10-K, unless the context requires otherwise, "we", "us" or the "Company" means RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. and its divisions and subsidiaries.   1    PART I ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Company HistoryRG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the “Company”), was originally incorporated in California on July 12, 1985 as International Beauty Supply Ltd. The name of the corporation was changed on May 28, 1993 to L.L. Knickerbocker Co., Inc., and thereafter on January 9, 2003 to the present name, RG Global Lifestyles,Inc. The common stock of the Company trades on the over-the counter Bulletin Board (“OTC Bulletin Board”), under the symbol “RGBL.”Company BusinessRG Global is a full service water and wastewater treatment engineering and construction company headquartered in Southern California. Services include innovative technologies; water and wastewater engineering; construction and construction management; start-up, operation and maintenance services; and equipment manufacturingfor industrial and municipal sectors. Areas of expertise include water treatment and distribution; wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal/reclamation associated with coal-bed mining (CBM) and other energy producing industries, including petroleum. RG Global has several proprietary technologies in this space, and currently its primary technology is branded DynIXTM, which is an ion based processes that can be paired with best in class technology to provide significant economic savings, through thereduction of waste.Past Company History and BusinessesPrior to its current business in wastewater treatment in the energy arena, the and since its inception, the Company, under prior management teams, was involved in several businesses and engaged in various consumer, retail and commercial ventures, which ultimately proved unsuccessful. The Company underwent Chapter11 bankruptcy commencing on August 15, 2002, and was discharged from the bankruptcy on September 6, 2002. The Company had ceased filing reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2001 and became delinquent in its filing obligations after its September 30, 2001 quarterly report.  Subsequent to its discharge from bankruptcy,  in July of 2004, the Company began the business of nutraceutical production and sales, whereby it entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, (the“Plan of Reorganization”) with among Amerikal International Holding, Inc. (“AIH”) and its shareholders.   The Company continued as the surviving entity in the reverse merger, and held AIH as a wholly owned subsidiary (“Amerikal”).  On October 1, 2005, the Company abandoned the business of nutraceuticals and distributed its wholly-owned subsidiary Amerikal to a group of founding AIH shareholders in exchange for approximately 7,500,000 million sharesof Common Stock of the Company.Prior to the distribution of Amerikal, in October 2004, the Company formed Aquair as a wholly-owned subsidiary and California corporation. At the time, the Company formed Aquair to change expand the company’s businesses and engage in the distribution of environmentally friendly water generating equipment thatcreates purified drinking water from air for residential and commercial uses, distribute anti-microbial and anti-scaling technology worldwide, and to pursue other water-related technologies and opportunities. The Company has suspended the operations of Aquair and is no longer actively in this business.In late 2006, the Company commenced operations in the bottled energy drink and oxygenated water industry as OC Energy Drinks, as a division of the Company (“OC Energy”), and later transferred operations to a majority owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Company has discontinued investing in its energy drink line in order to focusits resources on the development and licensing its DynIXTM Technology. Thus, the OC Energy operations are reflected as discontinued operations.RG Global, a division of RGBLIn February 2007, with the technology it purchased from Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc., the Company commenced operations in the water reclamation industry specifically associated with coal-bed mining as Catalyx Fluid Solutions, a division of RGBL. In May 2008, the company began to market its services beyond that ofCBM gas into other areas of Waste Water Treatment. In April 2009, the Company returned focus to its primary image “RG Global” and stopped using the division Catalyx Fluid Solutions.  As a result of the numerous advances and changes to its Wyoming Facility, RG Global ceased marketing under the trade name CFS and choose DynIXTM to more clearly represent this advanced proprietary process. DynIXTM is an ion based processes that can be paired with best in class technology to providesignificant economic savings, through the reduction of waste.  2  Business of IssuerOVERVIEWDynIXTM TECHNOLOGYThe Company, under the name RG Global, manufactures plants that utilize its proprietary (DynIXTM)  wastewater treatment technology, based on an ion-exchange process for the treatment and reclamation of wastewater. The DynIXTM Technology removes sodium and other pollutants from wastewater allowing itto be returned to the environment within local, state and federal environmental compliance regulations. The successful removal of the treated wastewater in turn allows energy companies to harvest and sell methane, gas and oil associated with such fields. The Company receives a royalty from the customer for every barrel of water treated and purified.In April of 2008, RG Global constructed and successfully tested its first plant in Wyoming in connection with an agreement with Yates Petroleum, Inc. This agreement is structured on a “build, own and operate” economic model whereby RG Global provides a “turnkey” plant to Yates Petroleum and chargesa royalty per barrel of cleaned wastewater. The Company receives a fixed royalty for every barrel of waste water treated and purified and maintains ownership of the equipment under a five year contract.  After unsuccessfully attempting to negotiate a higher royalty rate, the Company decided to shut the plant down until a buyer could be found.  Subsequent to this, Yates Petroleum, Inc. cancelled its agreement with the Company.Recently, the Company has changed its strategy from solely a build to sell manufacturing environment to include a royalty based model whereby the Company would license its DynIXTM Technology to achieve royalty income.  During the third quarter the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”)for the sale of its only wastewater plant to a third party.  The Company was unable to complete the sale and the MOU was cancelled in April 2009.OC ENERGY DRINKSThe Company is discontinuing investing in its energy drink in order to focus its resources on the development and licensing its DynIXTM Technology. Thus, the operations are reflected as discontinued operations.Principal Products and Services, and Distribution MethodsRG Global RG Global is a full service water and wastewater treatment engineering and construction company headquartered in Southern California. Services include innovative technologies; water and wastewater engineering; construction and construction management; start-up, operation and maintenance services; and equipment manufacturingfor industrial and municipal sectors. Areas of expertise include water treatment and distribution; wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal/reclamation. Its multi-disciplinary team includes professional and licensed engineers and scientists with extensive experience in current engineering, environmental, and construction technologies.Status of Publicly Announced New Products and ServicesNone.CompetitionRG GlobalDynIXTMTechnology currently has direct competition from AMF Cuno, Ionics, GE Water, Water Factory, Harmon Systems International, EMIT Water Discharge Technology, and Universal Systems.   3  Many of these competitors have established histories of operation and greater financial resources than the Company, enabling them to finance acquisitions and development opportunities, to pay higher prices for the same opportunities, and to develop and support their own operations. In addition, many of these companies have greater name recognition. These companies mightbe willing to sacrifice profitability to capture a greater portion of the market for products similar to those manufactured or distributed by the Company or pay higher prices than the Company would for the same expansion and development opportunities. Consequently, the Company may encounter significant competition in its efforts to achieve its growth objectives.Principal SuppliersRG GlobalRG Global contracts with a third parties to supply the appropriate resins for use in its DynIXTM Technology systems as well as it Best in Class technologies.Dependence on One or a Few Major CustomersFor the fiscal year ended March 31. 2009, 100% of water treatment revenues were generated from one customer. The loss of this customer would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements. Intellectual PropertyAs part of the Technology Transfer Agreement effective January 2007 between the Company and Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc., the Company purchased the wastewater technology protected by US patent 6776913 and proprietary know how which is expected to form the basis for further patents filings based on the fundamentalsin the issued patent. Government ApprovalRG GlobalThe plant in Wyoming using DynIXTM Technology (currently the only location contracted for) requires a permit issued by the Wyoming Department of Environment Services (WYPDES permits) that regulate and allow the clean water discharge into the environment.Cost and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws and RegulationsRG GlobalThe DynIXTM Technology for plants in Wyoming (currently the only location contracted for) requires permits issued by the Wyoming Department of Environment Services (WYPDES permits) that regulate and allow the clean water discharge into the environment. The effect of this compliance is that Wyoming issues onlya certain number of the WYPDES permits until a technology is proven by their standards, which may limit our initial sales. Additionally, if Wyoming increases its thresholds for effluent limits, the DynIXTM Technology may become more expensive and therefore, less cost effective for methane production.EmployeesAs of March 31, 2009, the Company employed five full time employees and no part time employees. The Company retains consultants on an as needed basis, including its principal accounting officer. ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Company rents office space of approximately 1,100 square feet of office space in Upland, California for $2,063 per month. In 2008, the Company constructed and is operating a water treatment facility in Gillette, Wyoming.  4   ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On June 11, 2008, the Company and Grant King was served a lawsuit from one of its note holders claiming that the Company defaulted on repayment on a note payable in the amount of $350,000 plus interest at 8%.  The complaint asks for payment of these amounts plus damages.  On August 12, 2008, the partiesagreed to stipulated order whereby Grant King was dismissed from the lawsuit and the Company was granted a 90-day extension to respond to the complaint (until November 10, 2008) in exchange the Company paid $49,530 which represents the interest due on the note through July 18, 2008. On January 30, 2009, the Company paid $8,016 of additional interest on the note making it then current, and entered into a stipulation whereby the Company had until February 19, 2009 to satisfy this entire note obligation.  TheCompany failed to do so and on April 1, 2009 a judgment was entered against it.  No amounts for damages have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statement other than the note payable and accrued interest.On July 11, 2008, the Company received notice that one of the Company’s vendors filed a lien against the Company’s water treatment plant for past due amounts due to the vendor. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the vendor was due $140,310, which is included in accounts payable.  The company hasdisputed this lien and lawsuit has been filed by the vendor.  The lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase with a trial date set for early in 2010.  No amounts for damages have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statement other than the accounts payable as the lawsuit is currently in the discovery stage.On July 17, 2009, the Company received notice that one of the Company’s vendors filed a lien against the Company’s water treatment plant for past due amounts due to the vendor for hauling waste water.  The disputed amount totaled approximately $145,000, which is included in accounts payable.  Noadditional amounts for damages have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statement as the Company cannot reasonably estimate the damages, if any, due to the recentness of the issue.Other than the foregoing lawsuits, the Company is not aware of any litigation, either pending or threatened. ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS On March 27, 2009, the Company held its annual shareholder meeting.  As disclosed on Schedule 14C, a majority of the Company’s shareholders acted by written consent to elect four directors to the board and ratified the appointment of its independent auditors for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.Additionally, at the annual shareholder meeting a proposal was voted on and passed by a majority of shareholders to increase the Company’s authorized common stock to 200,000,000 shares.PART II ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Market InformationThe Company's Common Stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “RGBL.” The following tables set forth the high and low bid information for the Common Stock for each quarter within the last two fiscal years: QUARTERLY COMMON STOCK PRICE RANGES Quarter Ended High  Low         June 30, 2007 $1.68  $0.60 September 30, 2007 $1.32  $0.39 December 31, 2007 $0.70  $0.38 March 31, 2008 $0.85  $0.36 June 30, 2008 $0.50  $0.16 September 30, 2008 $0.21  $0.08 December 31, 2008 $0.19  $0.06 March 31, 2009 $0.12  $0.05    5  These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.Holders There were approximately 201 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock as of June 30, 2009. Dividends The Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.  There are no restrictions on the Company’s present ability to pay dividends to shareholders of its Common Stock, other than those prescribed by California law. Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans In order to compensate our officers, directors, employees and/or consultants, our Board and stockholders adopted the 2006 Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the "2006 Plan") and the 2007 Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”).The 2006 Plan has a total of 10,000,000 shares reserved for issuance, and the 2007 Plan has a total of 6,000,000 shares reserved for issuance.As of the end of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, we have issued the following stock options under the Plans:Equity Compensation Plan InformationPlan category  Number of securitiesremaining to be issuedupon exercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights  Weighted averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights  Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance      (a)  (b)  (c)                       Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2006 Plan    3,990,955   $0.15     2,429,973                        Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2007 Plan    3,527,300   $0.13     2,372,700                        Equity compensation not pursuant to a plan    100,000   $0.20     -                        Total    7,618,255   $0.14     4,802,673    Recent Sales of Unregistered SecuritiesDuring the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company raised investor money through a private sale of unregistered common stock and common stock warrants (“Offering”). The terms of this Offering are a sale of common stock for $0.30 per share with the investor additionally receiving a warrant to purchaseone share of common stock at $0.40 for every dollar invested. As of March 31, 2009, the Company raised an aggregate of $1,026,840 in this Offering from 24 accredited investors, and, therefore, issued 3,258,333 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 977,500 shares of common stock. The shares sold and the shares underlying the warrants have standard piggyback registration rights. The securities were offered and sold to the accredited investors in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involvinga public offering, as set forth in Sections 4(2) and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D adopted thereunder.During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company raised investor money through a private sale of unregistered Series A preferred stock (“Series A Offering”). The terms of this Series A Offering are a sale of Series A preferred stock for $0.15 per share, each convertible into six shares of common stock.  As of March 31,2009, the Company raised an aggregate of $569,000 for 3,637,493 shares of preferred stock in this Series A Offering from 36 accredited investors.  These investors immediately converted their Series A preferred shares into 21,824,958 of common stock.  The securities were offered and sold to the accredited investors in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Sections 4(2) and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/orRule 506 of Regulation D adopted thereunder.   6   ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATANot applicable.ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.The following discussion compares results of continuing operations of the Company only during the periods described.   2009  2008 Income Statement Data      Revenue $391,905  $737,576 Gross loss  (254,412)  (129,379)Loss from continuing operations  (9,829,555)  (6,465,321)Loss from discontinued operations  (732,843)  (918,610 )Net loss  (11,004,321)  (3,844,562)Net loss per weighted average common shares – continuing operations  (0.22)  (0.10)Net loss per weighted average common shares – discontinued operations  (0.02)  (0.03)Balance Sheet Data        Total assets  1,238,925   7,758,187 Total liabilities  4,081,501   2,958,937 Stockholders' equity (deficit) $(2,842,576) $4,799,250 Revenues        Increase/(decrease)For the fiscal year ended March 31  2009  2008  $ %              Revenues $391,905  $737,576  $(345,671)  (47%)Revenue decreased by $345,671 primarily due to a decrease in water treatment revenue as compared to the prior year. 100% of the Company’s sales are from water treatment revenues from a construction contract signed in fiscal year 2007 for which most of the work was done in fiscal 2008. Of this revenue, 100%was earned from on single customer. In addition, the Company shut down the Yates plant after its first initial operation to make adjustments and modifications deemed necessary to reduce unexpected amounts of residual waste produced in the outflow pond during the filtration of the waste water.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company made the decision to stop production at the Wyoming plant. The original cost calculationswere based on percentage of byproducts and their associated disposal charges. Renegotiations to get our pricing in line with current market prices have been ineffective and thus the contract has been terminated. Currently we are exploring options to relocate the plant to an area where higher processing fees and lower disposal fees are available, or sell it to another operator.  RGBL is pursuing  both of these options.Gross Profit (Loss)        Increase/(decrease)For the fiscal year ended March 31  2009  2008  $ %              Gross Loss $(254,412) $(129,379) $125,033 97%  The resulting loss during the year ended March 31, 2009, was due primarily to higher than expected byproducts and their associated disposal charges, compared to those figures originally relied upon.  Included in its cost of sales was depreciation expense of approximately $603,252.     7   Total Operating Expenses         Increase/(decrease)For the fiscal year ended March 31  2009  2008  $ %              Total Operating Expenses $(9,575,143) $(6,335,942) $(3,239,201)(51%)Total operating expenses include management and administrative personnel costs (including non-cash stock-based compensation), corporate office costs, accounting fees, legal expense, information systems expense, and product marketing and sales expense.  The decrease in total operating expenses in the year ended March 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of a decrease in stock-basedcompensation. In addition, expenses of $5,082,120 were recorded as loss on impairment of Assets held for sales and intangibles.  This is due to the Company’s unsuccessful attempts to market its water treatment technology or to sell its existing treatment plant. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company made the decision to stop production at the Wyoming plant. The original cost calculations were basedon percentage of byproducts and their associated disposal charges. Renegotiations to get our pricing in line with current market prices have been ineffective and thus the contract has been terminated. Currently we are exploring options to relocate the plant to an area where higher processing fees and lower disposal fees are available, or sell it to another operator.  RGBL is pursuing  both of these options.Other Income (Expense)         Increase/(decrease)For the fiscal year ended March 31  2009  2008  $ %              Other Income (Expense) $(441,923) $3,539,369  $(3,981,292)(112%)The decrease in other income during the year ended March 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2008 resulted primarily from reduced interest expense for notes converted to stock in 2008, a reduction in the change in the fair value of common stock issued in connection with convertible notes in 2008, a reduction in the change in fair value of derivative liabilities in 2007 and proceeds of an insurance policy on the founderslife that was collected after his death.Loss from discontinued operations         Increase/(decrease)For the fiscal year ended March 31  2009  2008  $ %              Loss from discontinued operations $(732,843) $(918,610) $(185,767)(20%) The decrease in loss from discontinued operations was attributed to Company changing its focus to its water treatment segment due to the decrease in energy drink revenues at OC Energy resulting from its inability to market the product or obtain any contracts to place its products with retailers. The Company also soldits OC Energy Drink products at cost before it would need to be destroyed due to it being past its shelf life.LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCESThe accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business. The report of our independent auditors contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantialdoubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses and negative cash flows. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.The Company’s principal sources of liquidity consist of cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from product sales and construction contracts, and the issuance of equity and/or debt securities. In addition to funding operations, the Company’s principal short-term and long-term liquidity needs have been,and are expected to be, the debt service requirements of its notes payable, capital expenditures and general corporate expense expenses. In addition, as its sales and operations continue to increase, the Company anticipates significant increases in purchases of equipment for the construction of plants utilizing the DynIXTM Technology. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3,007, and liabilities outstanding of $4,081,501.  8  The Company believes that its existing sources of liquidity, along with cash expected to be generated from product sales and construction contracts and cash generated from the issuance of debt and equity securities, will be sufficient to fund its operations, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and otherfinancing requirements through Q2 of fiscal 2010. The Company will need to continue a focused program of capital expenditures to effectuate its DynIXTM Technology project constructions. In order to fund capital expenditures or increase working capital above the current plan, or complete any acquisitions, the Company may seek to obtain additional debt or equity financing. It may also need to obtain additional debt or equity financing if it experiences downturns or cyclical fluctuations in its businessthat are more severe or longer than anticipated, or if the Company fails to achieve anticipated revenue, experiences significant increases in the costs associated with products sales, or if it engages in additional strategic transactions. However, the Company cannot provide assurance that such financing will be available to it on favorable terms, or at all. If, after utilizing the existing sources of capital available to the Company, further capital needs are identified and the Company is not successful in obtainingthe financing, it may be forced to curtail its existing or planned future operations.For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company funded operations primarily through proceeds from sales of its Series A preferred and common stock to investors in the amount of $795,072 and note proceeds of $215,697.OPERATING ACTIVITIESOperating cash flows used during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, amounted to $938,007. This resulted from the Company’s net loss of $11,004,321 offset by non-cash and non-operating items (depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair value of common stock issued in excessof subscription price, non-cash interest expense including the amortization of debt discounts, proceeds from a key man life insurance payment, loss on impairment of assets held for sales and intangibles and the change in the fair value of derivative instruments) totaling $8,134,500.FINANCING ACTIVITIESFinancing cash flows during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, amounted to $929,103, and consisted primarily of sales of its common and preferred stock to investors in the amount of $795,072, loans of $215,697, offset by note payments of $81,666CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESWe prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingentassets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.The methods, estimates, and judgment we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The SEC has defined "critical accounting policies" as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial conditionand results, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based upon this definition, our most critical estimates are described below under the heading "Revenue Recognition." We also have other key accounting estimates and policies, but we believe that these other policies either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are as difficult or as subjective, or it is less likelythat they would have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available, and actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED AND INTANGIBLE ASSETSThe Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144 ("SFAS 144"). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount ofan asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting fromthe use and ultimate disposition of the asset. SFAS No. 144 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.  9  REVENUE RECOGNITIONProduct sales - For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition ("SAB104"), which superseded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements ("SAB101"). SAB 101 requires that four basic criteria mustbe met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments areprovided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.Construction contracts - In accordance with Statement of Position 81-1"Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts", the Company uses the percentage completion method for the recognition of revenue received in connection with its engineering, equipment sale and installation contracts.In making the estimate of the percentage of revenue to recognize, the Company compares costs to the total projected cost of the contract. Accordingly, the Company recognizes that portion of the revenue and record the balance of the cash received as deferred revenues, which is included within accrued liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATIONOn December 16, 2004, the FASB published Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R"). SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Share-based payment transactions within thescope of SFAS 123R include stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The provisions of SFAS 123R were effective as of the first interim period that begins after December 15, 2005.The Company has adopted SFAS 123R, which requires disclosure of the fair value and other characteristics of stock options, and SFAS 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure," which requires more prominent disclosure about the effects of an entity's accounting policy decisionswith respect to stock-based compensation on reported net loss. The Company has reflected the expense of such stock based compensation based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. There were no options issued to employees as of March 31, 2006, all other options and warrants had been accounted for at fair value using the Black Scholes valuation model. Thus, the impact of adopting SFAS 123R was immaterial to the Company's financial statements.In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R, we estimate the fair value of our share-based compensation utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of the options granted is amortized as compensation expense on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally thevesting period. The fair value calculations involve significant judgments, assumptions, estimates and complexities that impact the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in current and future periods. The factors include: (1) The time period our stock-based compensation awards are expected to remain outstanding based upon the average of the original award period and the remaining vesting period in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 simplified method. Our Company's stock trading history hasbeen relatively short (since January 2005). Our expected term assumption for awards issued during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was five years. As additional evidence develops from our stock's trading history, the expected term assumption will be refined to capture the relevant trends. (2) The future volatility of our stock has been estimated based upon our entire trading history from inception to the reporting date. (3) A dividend yield of zero has been assumed for awards issued during the years endedMarch 31, 2009 and 2008 based upon our actual past experience and the fact that we do not anticipate paying a dividend on our shares in the near future. (4) We have based our risk-free interest rate assumption for awards issued during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 based upon the weighted-average yield of 1.57% and 5.25%, respectively, available on US Treasury debt instruments with an equivalent expected term. (5) Forfeiture rates for awards issued during these periods have not yet been estimated asthe Company has only recently issued share based awards and no forfeiture data has been available to the Company as a result.  10  The Company's accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goodsor Services." The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTSIn September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("FAS 157"). The provisions of FAS 157 define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value in generally acceptedaccounting principles, and expand disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2 which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). This FSP partially deferred the effective date of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginningafter November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The adoption of the remaining provisions of FAS 157 previously deferred by FSP FAS 157-2 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”), which replaces FAS 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assetsacquired, the liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years  beginning after 15 December  2008.  Theadoption of SFAS No. 141(R) is not expected to have an impact on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.In April 2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 07-05, "Determining  whether  an  Instrument (or  Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock". EITF 07-5 applies to any freestanding financial instrumentsor embedded features that have the  characteristics of a derivative, as defined by SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity's own common stock.  EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of EITF07-5 will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.In April 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB") issued FASB Staff  Position (“FSP") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" ("FSPSFAS 142-3").  FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS  142").  The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flowsused to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations", and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").  FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangibleassets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date.  Early adoption is prohibited.  The Company is currently reviewing the effect,  if any, the proposed  guidance will have on its financial statements.In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement  No. 162,  "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles"  ("SFAS 162"). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accountingprinciples to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for nongovernmental entities. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants("AICPA") Statement on Auditing Standards ("SAS") No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SAS 69 has been  criticized  becauseit is  directed to the auditor rather than the entity. SFAS 162 addresses these issues by establishing that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting  accounting  principles for financial statements  that are  presented in conformity with GAAP.  SFAS 162 is effective November 15, 2008 and is only effective for nongovernmental entities; therefore, the GAAP  hierarchy  will  remainin SAS 69 for state and local governmental entities and federal governmental entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 11  In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, "Subsequent Events", ("SFAS 165"), which establishes general  standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statement are issued or available to be issued. In particular, SFAS165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial  statements' and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or  transactions that occurred afterthe balance sheet  date.  It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently reviewing the effect,  if any; the proposed guidance will have on its financial statements.OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTSThe Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material toinvestors. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item 8 begin on page F-1 of this report. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None.ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure Controls and Procedures As required by SEC Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, our Chief Executive and Principal Accounting Officers carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this report. Based on the foregoing evaluation, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of March 31, 2008 and that they do not allow for information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designedto ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its Chief Executive and Principal Accounting Officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company in accordance with as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe (i) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (ii) reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our internal controls framework is based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  12   Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting is as of the year ended March 31, 2009. We believe that internal control over financial reporting is not effective. We have identified the following current material weaknesses consideringthe nature and extent of our current operations and any risks or errors in financial reporting under current operations: ·Inadequate staffing and supervision;            ·Inadequate approval and substantiation of cash disbursements;        ·Substantiation and evaluation of certain general ledger account balances including the lack of reconciliations and improper cut-offs;    ·Lack of procedures and/or expertise needed to prepare all required financial disclosures; and evidence that employees lack the qualifications and training to fulfill their assigned functions. We are currently in process of remediating these material weaknesses; however, our current financial condition has limited the amount of resources available to us. We plan to implement additional policies, procedures, and controls to address these issues.Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  Our most recent assessment resulted in reaffirming the material weaknessesnoted above. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of theSecurities and Exchange Commission that permits us to provide only management’s report in this annual report. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATIONOn March 27, 2009, a majority of the Company’s shareholders voted to increase the Company’s authorized common stock to 200,000,000 shares at its annual shareholder meeting.  On July 27, 2009, the Company filed an amended and restated articles of incorporation reflecting this increase with theSecretary of State of California.  The amended and restated articles of incorporation also increases the authorized number of Series A preferred shares to 10 million pursuant to resolution of the Company’s board of directors. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT Board of DirectorsThe Company's Board of Directors currently consists of three (3) authorized directors. The following sets forth certain information about each of the directors:GRANT KING, 56, DIRECTOR SINCE 2004, AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Mr. King has served as General Manager and Managing Director of two major manufacturing and export companies in Bangkok, Thailand since 1990. From September 1996 to September 2000, Mr. King served as President of various wholly-owned subsidiariesof the Company's predecessor, L.L. Knickerbocker Co., Inc. and between October 2000 and June 2004, Mr. King was managing his own business interests overseas. From 1997 to July 2003, he also served as president and CEO of L.L. Knickerbocker (Thai) Co. Ltd. in Thailand.   13   STEVE RITCHIE, 66, retired Brig. Gen. USA, DIRECTOR SINCE 2005. Gen. Ritchie became an advisory board member to the Company in August 2005 and subsequently became a Director in October 2005. Prior to joining the Company in these positions, Mr. Ritchie had a career in the US Air Force, culminating with the rank ofBrigadier General.DAVID KOONTZ, 65, DIRECTOR SINCE 2005. Mr. Koontz has been Chief Financial Officer for WLG Inc. since August, 2005. From July 15, 2003 to August 6, 2005, he was the Chief Financial Officer of the O2Diesel, Corp, a publicly traded company on the American Stock Exchange. Mr. Koontz has served as a Director of O2DieselCorp. from July 15, 2003, to July 14, 2008, . From the period January 2000 to September 2002 to Mr. Koontz worked as an independent business consultant, mostly for businesses located in Asia. Mr. Koontz began his business career as a CPA and became a partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. He practiced in the firm's offices in Los Angeles, Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo.Executive Officers and Significant Employees and ConsultantsIn addition to Mr. King, whose biographical information is set forth above, the following are the Company’s significant officers, employees and consultants:RICHARD LAMBRIGHT, 49, CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER, holds a Bachelor of Science from California State Fullerton and is a Certified Public Accountant.  Since 2004, Mr. Lambright has been president of 180 Business Solutions, Inc., an accounting and consulting firm. Prior to 2004, Mr. Lambrightwas Chief Financial Officer of Auto and Truck Glass LLC. Mr. Lambright serves as a consultant and not as an employee of the Company.BOB GLASER, 55, VP OPERATIONS SINCE 2008.  Mr. Glaser has over 35 years of manufacturing expertise including electrical and mechanical design, engineering, and building machinery from inception to completion. His skills include, machinery design, managing large workforces, detail oriented planning, forecasting,and creating short and long term company goals. Dealing with difficult issues is one of his best assets and he is known for being a problem solver. His ability to utilize Lean, Supply Stream Manufacturing and Six Sigma Processes in the evaluation of projects is essential to minimizing costs and instrumental in vendor negotiations. He has received many awards from major manufacturers for consistent quality in manufacturing and his relentless pursuit of excellence. KEITH  MORLOCK, 35 VP BUSINESS DEVELPOEMENT SINCE 2008 AND CORPORATE SECRETARY. Mr. Morlock has extensive history in GMP, writing SOP’s and over 14 years of dealing withregulatory agencies including the EPA and the FDA. Much of this background was achieved while he managed several large Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical manufacturing companies. This included overseeing water treatment plants as they are critical in pharmaceutical manufacturing. In addition his expertise includes researching, analyzing, and monitoring financial, technological, and demographic factors to capitalize on market opportunities and minimize competitive activity. He has developed and executed comprehensivemarketing plans, both short and long range, to support the sales and revenue objectives of organizations.In addition, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, Juzer Jangbarwala served as Director and Chief Technology Officer for the Company.  Mr. Jangbarwala resigned both positions as of April 17, 2009.Family RelationshipsThere are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by the Company to become directors or executive officers.Involvement in Certain Legal ProceedingsTo the best of our knowledge, for the past five years, no director or officer of the Company has been involved in any of the following: (1) Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two yearsprior to that time; (2) Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) Being found by a court of competentjurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.  14  Adverse ProceedingsThere exists no material proceeding to which any director or officer is a party adverse to the Company small business issuer or has a material interest adverse to the Company.Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Exchange ActSection 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executiveofficers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).Based solely on our review of certain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the following reports required to be filed with respect to transactions in our Common Stock during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 wereuntimely:·  Juzer Jangbarwala Form 4 for the acquisition of a stock option grant on February 23, 2009, was not filed.·  Steve Ritchie Form 4 for the acquisition of a stock option grant on February 23, 2009, was filed late.·  David Koontz Form 4 for the acquisition of a stock option grant on February 23, 2009, was not filed.·  Joe Murray Form 4 for the acquisition of a stock option grant on February 23, 2009, was not filed.·  Grant King Form 4 for the acquisition of a stock option grant on February 23, 2009, was filed late.·  Grant King Form 4 for the exercise of 1,328,000 stock options on March 10, 2009 was filed late.·  Grant King Form 4 for the exercise of 996,000 stock options on April 21, 2009 was filed late. Code of EthicsThe Company has adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to our directors and officers. Our code of ethics is posted on our website and can be accessed at WWW.RGGLIFE.COM.Nominating and Compensation CommitteesThe Board of Directors does not have a standing nominating committee, compensation committee or any committees performing similar functions. As there are only three Directors serving on the Board, it is the view of the Board that all Directors should participate in the process for the nomination and review of potentialDirector candidates and for the review of the Company's executive pay practices. It is the view of the Board that the participation of all Directors in the duties of nominating and compensation committees ensures not only as comprehensive as possible a review of Director candidates and executive compensation, but also that the views of independent, employee, and shareholder Directors are considered.The Board does not have any formal policy regarding the consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders; any recommendation would be considered on an individual basis. The Board believes this is appropriate due to the lack of such recommendations made in the past, and its ability to consider theestablishment of such a policy in the event of an increase of such recommendations. The Board welcomes properly submitted recommendations from shareholders and would evaluate shareholder nominees in the same manner that it evaluates a candidate recommended by other means. Shareholders may submit candidate recommendations by mail to RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC. 2345 W Foothill, Suite 7, Upland, CA 92807. With respect to the evaluation of director nominee candidates, the Board has no formal requirements or minimumstandards for the individuals that it nominates. Rather, the Board considers each candidate on his or her own merits. However, in evaluating candidates, there are a number of factors that the Board generally views as relevant and is likely to consider, including the candidate’s professional experience, his or her understanding of the business issues affecting the Company, his or her experience in facing issues generally of the level of sophistication that the Company faces, and his or her integrity andreputation. With respect to the identification of nominee candidates, the Board has not developed a formalized process. Instead, its members and the Company’s senior management have recommended candidates whom they are aware of personally or by reputation.  15   Board Meetings and Annual Meeting AttendanceThe Board of Directors met two times the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.  Additionally, the Board acted two times by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting during this period.The Board of Directors encourages attendance by our directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, two of our four directors attended the 2008 annual meeting; Mr. Koontz and Mr. Ritchie did not attend.Audit CommitteeThe Company's Board of Directors currently has one member - independent Director David Koontz - serving on its Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. Koontz qualifies as its audit committee financial expert for purposes of the SEC rules.The Company’s Audit Committee held one meeting during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. The function of the Audit Committee, as detailed in the Audit Committee Charter, is to provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to the shareholders, potential shareholders, and investment communityrelating to corporate accounting, management practices, reporting practices, and the quality and integrity of the financial reports of the Company. In so doing, it is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to maintain free and open means of communication between the directors, the independent auditors and Company management.Among the policies and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee is the requirement that the Audit Committee is charged with the responsibility for investigation, contact, and negotiation with the independent auditor regarding audit and related fees incurred during the fiscal year.  In accordance with therequirements of paragraph (c) (7) (i) of Rule 2-01 of Reg S-X, the Committee made all necessary contact, inquiry, and recommendations, in order to to approve all (100%) of the independent auditing fees, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees , in advance, for the conduct of the audit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.  None of the hours related to the Company's independent auditor's work for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 was attributable to work performed by persons other thanthe auditor's full-time, permanent employees.  No part of the pre-approval policies and procedures for the foregoing specified services has been delegated to management.Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company's Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which established operating guidelines for the Audit Committee.  A copy of the charter is attached as Appendix A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement filed September20, 2005.Report of the Audit CommitteeThe Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal years ended March  31, 2009 and 2008 with the Company’s management.The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), 2 as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board in Rule 3600T, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. Based on the such review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the SEC.Respectfully submitted,David KoontzThe preceding Report of the Audit Committee will be filed with the records of the Company.   16  ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth the compensation of our Executive Officers for the fiscal years ending on March 31, 2009 and 2008. Name and Principal PositionYear  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)Stock Awards ($)Option Awards ($)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings($)All Other Compensation ($) Total ($)                            Grant King2008/09  $        $ 12,000       $12,000CEO and Director RGBL2007/08  $          $ 6,000       $  6,000                            Richard Lambright2008/09  $  58,228      $ 7,904       $7,904Principal Financial Officer2007/08  $  20,315      $        $                             Juzer Jangbarwala2008/09  $220,000      $ 12,000       $12,000CTO and Director (1)2007/08 $258,076   $ 6,000    $6,000(1)           Juzer Jangbarwala served as Director and Chief Technology Officer for the Company.  Mr. Jangbarwala resigned both positions as of April 17, 2009.DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONThe following table sets forth the compensation of our directors for the fiscal years ending on March 31, 2009 and 2008 (if not addressed in the Executive Officer Compensation table above). Name  Fees Earned orPaid in Cash ($)    Stock Awards ($)    Option Awards ($)    Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)    Change in PensionValue and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings($)    All Other Compensation($)    Total($)  Steve Ritchie                  $  12,000                            $  12,000  David Koontz                  $12,000                             $  12,000     17  OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END     Option Awards                  Stock Awards              Name  Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Exercisable    Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Unexercisable    Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options(#)    Option Exercise Price($)  Option Expiration Date  Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(#)    Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested($)    Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(#)    Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested($)  Grant King    3,288,000                      $0.06  Various dates thru 2013                                                                                                    Richard Lambright    300,000                      $0.06  2014    168,000       $16,800                                                                                       Juzer Jangbarwala    1,012,500                      $0.06  2009    200,000       $20,000                  ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS The following table sets forth the current common stock ownership of (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of the Company's common based upon approximately 79,845,077 shares outstanding as of March 31,  2009, (ii) each officer and director of the Companyindividually, and (iii) all officers and directors of the Company as a group. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options and/or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable, as appropriate, or will become exercisable within sixty (60) days of the reporting date are deemed outstanding, even if they have not actually been exercised. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding forthe purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock shown, and all ownership is of record and beneficial. The address of each owner who is an officer or director is in care of the Company at 2345 W Foothill, Suite 7, Upland, CA 92807.TITLE OF  NUMBER OF      PERCENT OF    CLASS  SHARES  NOTE  CLASS  NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNERCommon                  Common  6,454,272  (1)    8.1%  Knickerbocker EstateCommon  2,707,105  (2)    3.39%  Grant King, CEO and DirectorCommon  354,446  (2)    *  Steve Ritchie, DirectorCommon  131,737  (2)    *  Richard Lambright, ControllerCommon  254,167  (2)    *  David Koontz, Director  All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)     (1)This figure includes 2,154,274 shares issuable to the estate of Mr. Knickerbocker pursuant to options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.  (2)Shares issuable pursuant to options to purchase shares of our common stock vested as of June 30, 2009. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had the following related party transactions.During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with a company wholly owned by the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company for the subleasing of office space and administrative support services. The agreement was month to month and cancelled during fiscal 2008. During theyear ended March 31, 2008, payments to this former related party for these services were $9,175.   18  On February 11, 2008, Grant King, Chief Executive Officer, made a payment of $100,000 towards a note from a vendor and recorded it as a loan payable to a related party. During the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company received additional proceeds of $20,697 and $32,700 from Grant King for operating purposes,respectively. The loan accrues interest at 11% and is due upon demand.  During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid $48,965 and $30,000 toward the note payable, respectively. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2009 the principal balance of the note was reduced by $36,500 through the issuance of 243,333 shares of Series A. Upon issuance, the Company determined that the fair value of the Series A based on the fair value of the common stock equivalent was $116,800. In addition,the Series A was converted into 1,460,000 share of common stock on the date of issuance. The excess of $80,300 between the liability satisfied and the fair value was expense to general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement of operations. The total loan outstanding from Grant King as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $5,233 and $102,700During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 333,333 shares of Series A to Grant and Mark King in satisfaction of $50,000 in accrued salaries. Upon issuance, the Company determined that the fair value of the Series A based on the fair value of the common stock equivalent was $160,000. In addition, theSeries A was converted into 2,000,000 shares of common stock on the date of issuance. The excess of $110,000 between the liability satisfied and the fair value was expense to general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement of operations. In addition, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the individuals applied $79,680 of the liability toward the exercise price of 1,328,000 options at $0.06 per share.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts payable to the individuals includedin accrued liabilities were $176,320 and $65,340 respectively. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the individuals exercised 1,276,000 options and reduced the amounts payable to them by an additional $73,560 through applying the required exercise price of $0.06 to the liability.During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued a purchase order to Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc. (“Catalyx”), for the purchase of resin, at the approximate cost of $756,000, needed for the operation of the Company’s wastewater treatment plant in Wyoming. Catalyx is partially owned byJuzer Jangbarwala, a Company Director and its Chief Technology Officer. In addition, from time to time Catalyx has paid for various costs related to the wastewater treatment plant on behalf of the Company, for which the Company has reimbursed Catalyx.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to Catalyx included in accounts payable were $280,000.In July 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Catalyx Engineering, Inc. (“CEI”), a company that is owned in part by Juzer Jangbarwala, a Company Director and its Chief Technology Officer, to sub-lease approximately 7,000 square feet to serve as its new corporate office in Anaheim, California.The term of the lease is 18 months at a base monthly rent of $7,200.  During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 payments to CEI for rent were $79,200 and $64,800, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has included $7,200 in accounts payable for rental payments due to CEI. In February 2009, the Company vacated the premises at the end of the lease term.The Company utilized CEI for engineering services related to the design and construction of its water treatment plant in Wyoming. The agreement is verbal and provides engineering services at $75 per hour, which represents a 37.5% discount off of normal CEI rates. Total expenses incurred by the Company with CEI duringthe year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $2,944 and $118,157, respectively.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to CEI included in accounts payable were $23,803 and $24,354, respectively.In previous periods, the Company utilized Fusion Solutions (“Fusion”) for manufacturing of product and promotional items for it OC Energy drink products. Fusion is partially owned by Mariano Fusco, a former owner and former CEO of the Company’s subsidiary, OC Energy and Albert Guerra, a partial ownerof OC Energy.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to Fusion included in accounts payable were $99,807.ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICESDetail of fees paid to dbbmckennon:a.Audit Fees:  Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2009, were approximately $35,000.b.Audit-Related Fees:  Fees billed for audit-related services were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.c.Tax Fees.  Fees billed for tax services were $0 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.   19   Detail of fees paid to McKennon Wilson & Morgan LLP:a.Audit Fees:  Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, were approximately $2,500 and $45,000, respectively.b.Audit-Related Fees:  Fees billed for audit-related services were approximately $36,000 and $35,000 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These fees were primarily for reviews of quarterly un-audited financial statements.c.Tax Fees.  Fees billed for tax services were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial  Statement SchedulesSee Exhibit Index below. In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized.   R G GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.        Dated: July 31, 2009/s/ Grant King    By: Grant King,    Chief Executive Officer,        Dated: July 31, 2009/s/ Richard Lambright    By: Richard Lambright    Principal Accounting Officer     20  In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature  Title  Date              /s/ Grant King   Director  July 31, 2009  Grant King                      /s/ David Koontz   Director  July 31, 2009  David Koontz                      /s/ Steve Ritchie   Director  July 31, 2009  Steve Ritchie            21  EXHIBIT INDEXExhibitNumber  Description      3.1  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.   21.1  Subsidiaries   31.1  Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Grant King   31.2  Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Richard Lambright   32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Chief Executive Officer   32.2  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Chief Accounting Officer   22    Index to Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  F-1      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  F-2      Consolidated Balance Sheets  F-3      Consolidated Statements of Operations  F-4      Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  F-5      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  F-6      Notes to Financial Statements  F-8   23  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMThe Shareholders and Board of DirectorsRG Global Lifestyles, Inc.We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibilityof the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company wasnot required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses, has used cash in operating activities and has a significant working-capital deficit. Thesefactors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with respect to these matters are also discussed in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty./s/ dbbmckennon Newport Beach, CaliforniaJuly 31, 2009  F-1  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMThe Shareholders and Board of DirectorsRG Global Lifestyles, Inc.We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibilityof the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company wasnot required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses, has used cash in operating activities and has a significant accumulated deficit. These factorsraise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with respect to these matters are also discussed in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty./s/ McKennon Wilson & Morgan LLP Irvine, CaliforniaJuly 15, 2008   F-2   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSAs of March 31,    2009    2008              Assets          Current assets:          Cash and cash equivalents  $3,007    $11,230  Accounts receivable    673      673  Inventory - finished goods    -      -  Federal income tax refund receivable    -      143,775  Prepaids and other current assets    -      -  Current assets of discontinued operations    2,565      93,367  Total current assets    6,245      249,045                    Property and equipment, net    30,515      35,055  Assets held for sale    424,351      3,016,261  Intangible assets, net    576,042      3,985,012  Other assets    198,678      228,962  Assets of discontinued operations    3,094      243,852                    Total Assets  $1,238,925    $7,758,187                    Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)                Current liabilities:                Accounts payable  $1,038,100    $803,902  Accrued salaries and wages and consulting fees    1,082,488      120,751  Accrued liabilities    694,360      215,662  State income taxes payable    95,732      97,890  Convertible notes payable    500,000      864,074  Notes payable - related party    5,233      102,700  Notes payable    455,500      410,500  Current liabilities of discontinued operations    210,088      273,458  Total current liabilities    4,081,501      2,888,937                    Accrued liabilities – Long  Term    -      70,000  Total liabilities    4,081,501      2,958,937                    Commitments and Contingencies                                  Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):                Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding; as of March 31, 2009 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock have been designated with none issued and outstanding    -      -  Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 79,845,076 and 36,400,410 issued; 76,368,211 and 34,500,410 outstanding, respectively    76,369      34,501  Common stock to be issued    -      2,113,904  Additional paid-in capital    37,593,763      32,159,232  Accumulated deficit    (40,512,708)    (29,508,387)Total stockholders' equity (deficit)    (2,842,576)     4,799,250                    Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)  $1,238,925    $7,758,187  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.  F-3  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS   For the Year Ended    March 31    2009  2008 Revenue:      Water treatment related $391,905  $737,576 Total revenues  391,905   737,576           Cost of revenues:        Water treatment related  646,317   866,955 Total cost of revenue  646,317   866,955           Gross loss  (254,412 )  (129,379 )          General and administrative, including stock-based compensation of $1,323,239 and $2,713,753 in 2009 and 2008, respectively  3,308,636   5,739,874 Selling and marketing  1,720   35,875 Loss on impairment of held for sale assets and intangibles  5,082,120   - Project costs  1,182,667   560,193 Total expenses  9,575,143   6,335,942           Operating loss  (9,829,555 )  (6,465,321 )          Other income (expense):        Interest income  142   77,494 Interest expense - related party  (8,340 )  (25,643 )Interest expense  (323,104 )  (559,849 )Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  -   3,403,673 Proceeds from Key Man life insurance policy  -   3,000,000          Fair value of common stock issued in excess of notesnotes payable satisfied  (109,265 )  (1,675,852 )Loss on settlement on notes payable  -   (672,589 )Other income (expense)  (1,356 )  (7,865 )Total other income (expense)  (441,923 )   3,539,369           Net loss from continuing operations  (10,271,478 )  (2,925,952 )          Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $0  (732,843 )  (918,610 )          Net loss $(11,004,321) $(3,844,562)          Weighted average number of common shares:        Basic and diluted  47,282,237   28,994,987           Net loss per share:        Basic and diluted – continuing operations $(0.22) $(0.10)Basic and diluted – discontinued operations $(0.02) $(0.03)The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.  F-4   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008    Series A Preferred Stock  Common Stock  AdditionalPaid-in  Common stock to be  RetainedEarnings  TotalStockholders’    Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Issued  (Deficit)  (Deficit) Balance, March 31, 2007 $-  $-   26,022,592  $26,023  $16,470,286  $-  $(25,663,825) $(9,167,516)                                  Common stock to be issued for cash  -   -   -   -   -   2,113,904   -   2,113,904 Common stock issued for cash  -   -   3,258,333   3,259   914,241   -   -   917,500 Common stock issued for payment of NIR note payable  -   -   100,000   100   55,900   -   -   56,000 Common stock issued for services  -   -   953,667   954   605,021   -   -   605,975 Conversions of notes payable into common stock  -   -   2,373,241   2,373   2,271,313   -   -   2,273,686 Exercises of stock options and warrants  -   -   1,137,642   1,137   154,180   -   -   155,317 Fair value of stock issued to acquire OC Energy intangible assets  -   -   654,935   655   474,173   -   -   474,828 Derivitive liabilities reclassed to equity  -   -   -   -   8,500,365   -   -   8,500,365 Fair value of warrants issued to consultants for services  -   -   -   -   155,666   -   -   155,666 Stock based compensation  -   -   -   -   2,558,087   -   -   2,558,087 Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,844,562)  (3,844,562)Balance, March 31, 2008  -   -   34,500,410   34,501   32,159,232   2,113,904   (29,508,387)  4,799,250                                   Series A preferred stock issued for cash  576,667   577   -   -   276,223   -   -   276,800 Series A preferred stock issued for services  4,006,160   4,006   -   -   564,994   -   -   569,000 Common stock issued for cash  -   -   6,209,676   6,210   1,851,695   (1,631,833)  -   226,072 Conversion of Series A preferred stock into common stock  (4,582,827)  (4,583)  27,496,962   27,497   (22,914)  -   -   - Common stock issued for payment of NIR note payable  -   -   4,041,268   4,041   655,224   -   -   659,265 Exercises of stock options and warrants  -   -   3,492,228   3,492   636,698   (482,071)  -   158,119 Fair value of beneficial conversion feature issued in connection with notes payable  -   -   -   -   150,000   -   -   150,000 Common stock issued for services  -   -   627,667   628   141,364   -   -   141,992 Stock based compensation  -   -   -   -   1,181,247   -   -   1,181,247 Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (11,004,321)  (11,004,321)Balance, March 31, 2009  -  $-   76,368,211  $76,369  $37,593,763  $-  $(40,512,708) $(2,842,576)  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.   F-5    RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS    For the Year Ended    March 31,    2009  2008 Cash flows from operating activities:      Net loss $(11,004,321) $(3,844,562)          Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        Amortization of debt discounts related to beneficial conversion features and warrants  185,926   468,655 Proceeds from ex-officer's life insurance policy  -   (3,000,000 )Loss on settlement on notes payable  -   672,589 Impairment of intangible assets  3,093,462   206,819 Write down of assets held for sale  1,988,658   - Stock issued for services  141,992   605,975 Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  -   (3,403,673 )Excess of fair value of common stock issued for satisfaction of related party liabilities  190,300     Fair value of common stock in excess of notes payable forgiven  112,324   1,675,852 Depreciation and amortization  1,240,441   352,751 Stock-based compensation  1,181,247   2,713,753 Minority interest in subsidiary  -   (43,903 )Change in operating assets and liabilities:        Accounts receivable  5,414   (6,024 )Inventory  86,864   166,990 Federal income taxes refund receivable  143,775   11,225 Prepaid expenses  (2,157 )  25,975 Other assets  50,841   - Accounts payable  349,383   1,198,681 Accrued liabilities  1,300,002   257,664 Deferred revenues  -   (115,963 )Income taxes payable  (2,158 )  2,890 Net cash used in operating activities  (938,007 )  (2,054,306 )          Cash flows from investing activities:        Purchase of fixed assets  -   (5,825 )Construction in progress  -   (2,486,560 )Proceeds from key man life insurance policy      3,000,000 Other assets  -   24,561 Net cash used in investing activities  -   532,176    F-6  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)   For the Year Ended    March 31,    2009  2008 Cash flows from financing activities:      Proceeds from issuance of notes payable  195,000   - Proceeds from notes payable - related party  20,697   102,700 Proceeds from sale of common stock  226,072   917,500 Cash received for common stock to be issued  -   2,113,904 Proceeds received from sale of Series A preferred stock  569,000   -     -     Proceeds from exercise of stock options      138,500 Payments on notes payable  -   (2,240,433 )Payments on notes payable – related party  (81,666 )  - Net cash provided by financing activities  929,103   1,032,171 Net increase (decrease) in cash  (8,904 )  (489,959 )Cash of discontinued operations  681   (39 )Cash - beginning of year  11,230   501,228 Cash - ending of year $3,007  $11,230           SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION        Cash paid during the year for:        Interest $8,016  $112,533 Income taxes $-  $-           Non-cash investing and financing activities:        Issuance of common stock in settlement of notes payable and accrued interest $550,000  $603,835 Conversion of accounts payable into note payable $-  $710,500 Conversion of stock options with accounts payable and accrued liabilities $158,119  $11,417 Issuance of preferred stock in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities $86,500  $- Issuance of note payable in settlement $-  $600,000 Issuance of common stock for tangible and intangible assets $-  $474,828 Issuance of OC Energy, Inc.'s interests for tangible and intangible assets $-  $43,903 Recognition of asset retirement obligation $-  $70,000 Construction in progress recorded in accounts payable $-  $459,701  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.   F-7  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNote 1 – Organization, History and Significant Accounting Policies and ProceduresOrganization and HistoryR.G. Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in California on July 12, 1985 as International Beauty Supply Ltd.  The name of the corporation was changed on May 28, 1993 to L.L. Knickerbocker Co., Inc., and thereafter on January 9, 2003 to the present name, R.G. Global Lifestyles, Inc.The Company currently operates as RG Global Lifestyles, Inc.In September 2006, the Company developed and introduced a line of energy drinks and oxygenated bottled water products under the name of OC Energy Drinks (TM), through its wholly-owned subsidiary On Line Surgery, Inc. On June 16, 2007, the Company changed the name of this subsidiary to OC Energy Drinks, Inc. (“OCEnergy”).On December 24, 2006, the Company entered into a series of agreements with Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc. (“Catalyx”) to acquire technology for the use in removing excessive sodium and other pollutants from the water associated with wet-bed methane mining in exchange for the issuance of warrants to purchaseeight (8) million shares of the Company’s common stock.  See Notes 4 and 13 for additional information. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company entered into a long-term contract with a company that will use this technology in its wet-bed mining business.Additionally, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Aquair, Inc., (“Aquair”) was organized to distribute, market and sell atmospheric water generators, a business which Aquair entered into in October of 2004. On July 26, 2006, the Company formed two wholly-owned subsidiaries in Hong Kong and TaiwanLimited. The purpose of the subsidiaries are to develop markets in Asian and South Pacific countries. The foreign subsidiaries commenced operations during the year ended March 31, 2007 and have had limited operations since inception. The Company is currently not actively pursuing this business in any market.Recently, the Company has changed its strategy from solely a build to sell manufacturing environment to include a royalty based model whereby the Company would license its DynIXTM Technology. During the third quarter the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for the sale of its only wastewater plantto a third party. The Company was unable to complete the sale due to the inability in getting the current customer to modify the per barrel royalty rates and build additional plants, and thus, the MOU was cancelled in April 2009. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company made the decision to stop production at the Wyoming plant. The original cost calculations were based on percentage of byproducts and their associated disposal charges. Renegotiations to get our pricing in line with current marketprices have been ineffective and thus the contract has been terminated. Currently we are exploring options to relocate the plant to an area where higher processing fees and lower disposal fees are available, or sell it to another operator.  RGBL is pursuing  both of these options. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has presented the  Wyoming plant as held for sale as until the cancellation of the contract in April 2009 anticipated they would have a continued interest in the plant as thus hadreflected the operations in the accompanying financial statements. Management is currently assessing whether the current agreements being negotiated would require the Company to maintain a continuing interest in the plant other than an expected royalty based on future revenues under the patent rights for use of the technology. Accordingly, the Company will make the determination of whether to continually report the operations of the plant as continuing or discontinued operations during the first quarter of fiscal2010.In addition, the Company is discontinuing investing in its energy drink and focus its resources on licensing its DynIXTM Technology. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has decided to discontinue its energy drink operations and focus completely on marketing its water treatment technology.  As a result, the Company has classified balances related to its energy drink business as discontinued operations in its financialstatements as of March 31, 2009 and 2008.Note 2 – Accounting Policies and Basis of PresentationGoing Concern ConsiderationsThe accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, during the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company incurred an operating loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $10,271,478, and used cash fromoperations of $938,007. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of $4,075,256. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  F-8  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain equity and/or debt financing and ultimately achieving profitable operations from the development of its business segments. During the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company funded operations through debt and equity offerings. Subsequent to the year end,the Company raised an additional $257,450 through the sales of Series A Preferred stock. Currently, the Company does not have any commitments or assurances for additional capital. In fiscal 2009, the Company commenced production under the water treatment contract with a customer but subsequently shut down the plant in April 2009 due to its inability to negotiate a higher royalty rate. In addition, the Company’s only customer has declined to move forward with constructing additional water treatment facilities.  Therecan be no assurance that the revenue from these contracts will be sufficient for the Company to achieve profitability in its operations, and it is possible that additional equity or debt financing may be required to for the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company estimates it has current cash reserves sufficient to fund operations through Q2 of fiscal 2010.The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities, which might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.ConsolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Aquair, and Catalyx, after elimination of all material inter-company accounts and transactions. OC Energy is classified as discontinued operations.EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reportedamounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the valuation of derivatives, equity instruments such as options and warrants, and the percentage of completion related to construction contracts, impairment of assets held for sale and intangible assets related to its water treatment technology. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsEffective April 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, except as it applies to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP SFAS 157-2. SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderlytransaction between market participants.  As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:   Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.   Level 2 - Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.   Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Cash (Level 1), accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, due to related party, notes payable and convertible notespayable (Level 2) are reflected in the balance sheet at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.Fair-value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2009 and 2008. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaids,accounts payable, accrued liabilities, notes payable, and convertible notes payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.   F-9   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ConcentrationsCredit RiskAt times, the Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. In addition, at we extend credit to customers in the normal course of business, after we evaluate the credit worthiness. We do not expect to take any unnecessary credit risks causing significant causing write-offsof potentially uncollectible accounts. However, during the year ended March 31, 2008, one of its customers, Black Diamond Energy, Inc., suspended payments on its existing contract with the Company, which resulted in a significant write-off, see Note 11. CustomerDuring the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, 100% of water treatment revenues were generated from one customer. The loss of this customer would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results, see Note 11.VendorDuring the year ended March 31, 2008, 50%, respectively of the equipment used to generate water treatment revenues was manufactured and supplied by one vendor. The loss of this vendor would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results, see Note 8 for discussion of note payable to this vendor. Cash EquivalentsAll highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three (3) months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The estimated lives of property and equipment are as follows:Office equipmentfive yearsComputer softwarethree yearsFurniture and fixturesseven yearsSFAS No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” requires that a liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period which it is incurred, with the offsetting associated asset retirement cost capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.Retirement obligations related to the Company's leased land are the requirements to demolish improvements and return the land to its original state.Impairment of Long-Lived and Purchased Intangible AssetsThe Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 (“SFAS 144”). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate thatthe carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discountedcash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. SFAS 144 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.  F-10  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Conversion Features and Warrants Issued with Convertible DebtThe Company's derivative financial instruments consist of embedded derivatives related to the senior convertible secured notes. These embedded derivatives include the conversion feature and the detachable warrants. As of the inception date of the agreement the debt was not considered conventional as defined in EITF 05-2,“The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible Debt Instruments" in issue No. 00-19”. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the conversion feature and related warrants at their fair values and record them at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is to be recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheetdate, the Company will record a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives is lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record non-operating, non-cash income.EITF 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios,” and EITF 00-27, “Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments” governs the calculation of an embedded beneficial conversion, which is treated as anadditional discount to the to the instruments where derivative accounting (explained above) does not apply. The amount of the value of warrants and beneficial conversion feature may reduce the carrying value of the instrument to zero, but no further. The discounts relating to the initial recording of the derivatives or beneficial conversion features are accreted over the term of the debt.Derivative Financial InstrumentsDerivative financial instruments, as defined in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 133”), consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable),require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has issued financial instruments including senior convertible notes payable and freestanding stock purchase warrants with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification,(ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. As required by FAS 133, in certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements.The Company estimates the fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with the objectively measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique, consideration is give to, among other factors, the nature of the instrument,the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. For less complex derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, estimated terms and risk free rates) necessary to fair value these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may,and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, the Company's operating results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.  F-11  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Revenue RecognitionProduct Sales and Water Treatment Royalties - For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB104”), which superseded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, RevenueRecognition in Financial Statements (“SAB101”). SAB 101 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisionsfor discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.Construction Contracts - In accordance with Statement of Position 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts”, the Company uses the percentage completion method for the recognition of revenue receivedin connection with it’s engineering, equipment sale and installation contracts. In making the estimate of the percentage of revenue to recognize, the Company compares costs to the total projected cost of the contract. Accordingly, the Company recognizes that portion of the revenue and record the balance of the cash received as deferred revenues. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not have any deferred revenues.Net Loss Per ShareNet loss per share is provided in accordance with SFAS No. 128 “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”). Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, after giving effect to dilutive commonstock equivalents, such as stock options, warrants and convertible debt. The following is a summary of outstanding securities which have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for the years ending March 31, 2009 and 2008:   2009  2008         Common stock options  7,618,255   7,903,579 Common stock warrants  15,555,440   17,163,344 Secured convertible notes  9,532,700   - Totals  32,706,395   25,066,923 Proceeds from Key-Man Life InsuranceIn January of 2008, the Company received $3,000,000 in connection with a claim it had on a key man life insurance policy related to the death of one of its officers. On January 24, 2008, the Company used $2,100,000 of the proceeds to settle litigation with one of its previous investors, the NIR Group. See Notes 8 and11 for additional information. Advertising CostsThe Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. The Company expensed $1,721 and $13,580 of advertising costs during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  F-12  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Stock-Based CompensationOn December 16, 2004, the FASB published Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Share-based paymenttransactions within the scope of SFAS 123R include stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The provisions of SFAS 123R were effective as of the first interim period that begins after December 15, 2005.The Company adopted SFAS 123R, which requires disclosure of the fair value and other characteristics of stock options, and SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” which requires more prominent disclosure about the effects of an entity’s accounting policydecisions with respect to stock-based compensation on reported net loss. The Company has reflected the expense of such stock based compensation based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the fair value of our share-based compensation has been determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of the options granted is amortized as compensation expense on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generallythe vesting period. The fair value calculations involve significant judgments, assumptions, estimates and complexities that impact the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in current and future periods.The following variables were used in the Black Scholes model for all option issuances valued during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:YearendingMarch 31,  Stock Price at Grant Date  DividendYield  Range ofExercisePrice Risk FreeInterest Rate  Volatility  AverageLife2009  $0.10  -% $0.06 - $0.40 0.57% 355% 5.02008  $0.56  -% $0.49 - $0.56 2.64% 297% 5.0The Company's accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunctionwith Selling, Goods or Services”.  The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete.  In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.Segment ReportingThe Company reports its segments under SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”) which establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segmentsto be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. As of March 31, 2009, due to the discontinuance of OCEnergy’s operations the Company only has one segment.  F-13  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Income TaxesThe Company follows SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”) for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enactedmarginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowanceare included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxesarising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("FAS 157"). The provisions of FAS 157 define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value in generally acceptedaccounting principles, and expand disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2 which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for all  nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). This FSP partially deferred the effective date of Statement 157 to fiscalyears beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those  fiscal  years for items within the scope of this FSP. The adoption of the remaining provisions of FAS 157 previously deferred by FSP FAS 157-2 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”), which replaces FAS 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired,the liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years  beginning after 15 December  2008.  The adoptionof SFAS No. 141(R) is not expected to have an impact on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.In April 2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 07-05, "Determining whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock". EITF 07-5 applies to any freestanding financial instruments or embedded featuresthat have the characteristics of a derivative, as defined by SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity's own common  stock.  EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of EITF 07-5 will have on itsfinancial  position, results of operations or cash flows.In April 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB") issued FASB Staff  Position (“FSP") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" ("FSP SFAS142-3").  FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS  142").  The  intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized  intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cashflows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations", and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").  FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangibleassets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date.  Early adoption is prohibited.  The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any, the proposed guidance will have on its financial statements.  F-14   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles tobe used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for nongovernmental entities. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement on Auditing Standards ("SAS") No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.  SAS 69 has been criticized because it is directedto the auditor rather than the entity. SFAS 162 addresses these issues by establishing that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP.  SFAS 162 is effective November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will havea material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, "Subsequent Events", ("SFAS 165"), which establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statement are issued or available to be issued. In particular,  SFAS165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements' and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred afterthe balance sheet date.  It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any; the proposed guidance will have on its financial statements.Note 3 – Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:   2009  2008 Office equipment, computer software, and furniture and fixtures $47,254  $47,254 Accumulated depreciation  (16,739 )  (12,199 )Total $30,515  $35,055 During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $4,540 and $13,740, respectively.Asset Retirement ObligationsThe Company recognizes asset retirement costs under SFAS 143 in the period in which they are incurred. Under a water treatment contract with a customer, the Company’s owns the building and equipment but does not own the land. At the termination of the contract, the Company is required to return the land to its originalcondition. At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation of approximately $70,000. Due to the plant shut down subsequent to year end, the liability has been reclassified as a current liability included in accrued liabilities.  F-15  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Capitalized InterestThe Company capitalized interest costs related to the construction of its water treatment facilities of $0 and $39,000 during the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.Note 4 – DynIXTM TechnologyDuring fiscal 2007, the Company entered into a series of agreements with Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc. (“Catalyx”) pursuant to which the Company acquired certain technology, know-how, and patent rights related to water treatment for use in the oil and gas industry. This patent for this technology has a remaininglegal life of 13 years at the time of acquisition. The Company acquired the technology to exploit its water purification operations in the oil and gas industry. In accordance with these agreements, the Company issued warrants to purchase eight million shares of the Company’s common stock at various exercise prices ranging from $0.21 to $0.40. The Company valued these warrants using the Black Scholes option valuation model using a term of five years for the warrants, a risk free interest rate of 5.25% andvolatility for the Company’s stock as of the date of issuance of 243%, and determined that the value of the warrants issued was $4,381,113. This amount was recorded as an intangible asset on the consolidated balance sheet, and is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 14 years. In addition, per the terms of the acquisition agreement the initial $200,000 paid to acquire this technology will be offset against future royalties of $0.01 per barrel of water treated and 5% of equipmentsold based on the Catalyx technology due to Catalyx. Royalties earned by Catalyx during the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $19,669 and $0, respectively, and were offset against the prepaid royalties.As of March 31, 2009, the Company has reflected the remaining royalties to be earned by Catalytics as an asset as amounts due to Catalytics for other services are in excess of this amount. The Company intends to negotiate the amounts and ultimately offset the liability with the asset. As of March 31, 2009,the right of offset does not exist and thus the amounts have not been netted.  During the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded amortization expense of $315,509 and $314,652, respectively. Due to the cancellation of the MOU  in April 2009 and the Companies  subsequent decision to stop production at the Wyoming plant. The renegotiations to get our pricing in line with current market prices have been ineffective and thus the contract has been terminated. The Company determinedthat these events strongly indicated that impairment to the technology could be present. Other factors which indicated impairment as of March 31, 2009, included the Company’s inability to market the existing technology or generate any additionally revenues from the construction or sale of additional plants. Additionally, in April 2009 the Company shut down its only existing operational plant and lost the customer in which had plans to open additional plants. Thus, as of March 31, 2009 the Company projectedthe future estimated cash flows directly related to the technology. The cash flows were estimated using estimated cash flow from current negotiations ongoing with potential customers and the probability of those events happening. As a result, the Company determined the carrying value of this asset has been impaired as the future estimated cash flows did not support the current carrying value and thus recorded a loss on impairment of $3,093,462. This adjustment reduced the carrying value of the asset to $576,042of March 31, 2009. The Company still intends to amortize the life of the asset over its estimated life of 10 years. Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows: 2010 $57,604; 2011 $57,604; 2012 $57,604; 2013 $57,604; 2014 $57,604; thereafter $288,022.Note 5 – Discontinued OperationsThe Company has recently changed its focus to its water treatment segment due to the decrease in energy drink revenues at OC Energy resulting from its inability to market the product or obtain any contracts to place its products with retailers. Thus, during the 4th quarterof fiscal 2009, management decided to formally discontinue the operations of OC Energy. The Company is currently attempting to sell the assets, including intangible, but to date have been unsuccessful in finding a buyer. In accordance with SFAS 144, OC Energy’s financial results, including those discussed above have been classified as a discontinued operation in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.The financial results of OC Energy included in discontinued operation are as follows for the years ended March 31:   2009   2008   Sales $63,723   $243,642   Income taxes  -    -   Loss from discontinued operations after income taxes $(732,843) $(918,610)    F-16  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe following is the condensed balance sheets of OC Energy as of March 31:   2009  2008 Assets      Current assets:      Cash and cash equivalents $408  $1,089 Accounts receivable, net  -   5,414 Inventory  -   86,864 Other current assets  2,157   - Total current assets  2,565   93,367 Property and equipment, net  -   9,569 Intangible assets, net  -   210,633 Other assets  3,094   23,650 Total assets $5,659  $337,219           Liabilities        Current liabilities:        Accounts payable $187,341  $150,598 Accrued expenses  22,747   122,860 Total liabilities $210,088  $273,458 Management believes there are no contingent liabilities related to discontinued operations. Note 6 – Assets Held for Sale – Impairment of AssetOn December 8, 2008, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to sell its only existing water treatment plant to a third party. As a result, the Company had classified the plant as Assets Held for Sale under SFAS 144. In April 2009, the MOU was terminated because the Company was unable to close the transaction largely due to the inabilityto obtain a higher royalty under the Yates contact and the unwillingness of Yates to add additional plants. In connection with the cancellation of the MOU, the Company has shut the plant down due to the inability to currently run the plant at a profit and ultimately the contract was cancelled. The Company is currently in negotiations with other potential customers to purchase the plant. However, to do so the plant will have to be moved to an alternative location. Thus, the costs to sell the plant increased substantiallyand the fair market value of the plant decreased upon cancellation of the MOU as some of the costs cannot be recaptured upon sale. The Company determined the fair value of the plant through estimating the fair market value of the assets based on the original purchase price and the residual value. The Company only included assets in which could be transported to a new location. As a result, the Company determined that the carrying value of the plant had been impaired and recorded a loss on impairment on assetsheld for sale of $1,988,658. This reduced the net book value of the assets held for sale to $424,351 as of March 31, 2009.The Company determined that the operations of the assets should not be reflected as discontinued operations at March 31, 2009 as at the time the Company expected to have a continued interest in the assets of approximately 12.5% based on the MOU. On April 8, 2009, the MOU was cancelled and management determined that inorder for the assets to be sold, they would have to move the plant to an alternative location. On such date, management determined that the Company would likely not retain a continuing interest in the plant other than an expected royalty based on future revenues under the patent rights for use of the technology.  Accordingly, the Company will report the former operations of the plant as discontinued operations starting the first quarter of fiscal 2010.   F-17  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNote 7 – Certain Balance Sheet ElementsOther AssetsAt March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had deposits with various vendors comprised of the following:   2009  2008 Rental deposits $-  $12,000 Deposit against future Catalyx royalty  180,331   200,000 Other  18,347   16,962 Total $198,678  $228,962 Accrued LiabilitiesAt March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had accrued expenses as follows:    2009    2008  Amounts due to YPC (see Note 12)  $230,972    $ -  Accrued interest    120,327      44,663  Accrued consulting fees    128,235        -  Other    214,826      170,999  Totals:  $694,360    $215,662  Note 8 – Notes Payable Fiscal 2007 Note PayableOn December 26, 2006 and January 12, 2007, the Company entered into three new note agreements (the "2007 Notes") with accredited investors for total proceeds of $600,000. The 2007 Notes had a term of one year and bear interest at 8% per annum. For each dollar loaned, the holders were granted a warrant to purchase oneshare of the Company's common stock at $0.20 per share (a total of 600,000 warrants). The warrants vest at maturity and expire in five years from the date of issuance. The 2007 Notes and accrued interest are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock upon maturity, at the lowest price traded of the Company's common stock for the prior year, but not less than $0.10 per share.  The Company determined the value of these warrants to be $778,953 using the Black Scholes method with the followingweighted average estimates: 5.25% risk free interest rate, 248% volatility, and a five-year life. The Company allocated $320,346 to the warrants based on their relative fair value to the 2007 Notes, resulting in a discount. In addition, since the lowest conversion price of $0.10 per share was lower than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the dates of issuance of $0.63 and $1.75, respectively, management used $0.10 per share in its computation of the value of the beneficial conversion feature.The Company valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of issuance in the amount of $279,654, and recorded a discount against the 2007 Notes. The total discount between the warrants and the conversion feature applicable to the notes was $600,000. The discount is being amortized over the one year term of the notes. During the year ended March 31, 2008 the Company amortized $460,137, of the discount to interest expense,Two of these notes, with a principal balance totaling $250,000, matured on December 26, 2007. Subsequent to that date, the two note holders elected to convert the principal amounts due, plus accrued interest totaling $22,740, into 717,766 shares of the Company’s common stock, at a purchase price per share of $0.38,all in accordance with the terms of the associated notes. At the time of issuance, the Company recorded the excess in fair value of the common stock over the liabilities satisfied of $13,700 as additional interest expense.  F-18   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The third note was entered into on January 12, 2007 with an accredited investor for proceeds totaling $350,000.  This note matured on January 12, 2008 and is currently in default as the holder had demanded payment. The note and accrued interest are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock upon maturity,at the lowest price traded of the Company's common stock for the prior year, but not less than $0.10 per share. In connection with the default, the interest rate increased from 8% to 11% per annum. As of March 31, 2009, accrued interest recorded in accrued liabilities related to this note was $5,548.  See Note 12 for discussion of a lawsuit filed by holder of the note against the Company and the payment of accrued interest by Company.$600,000 Promissory NoteIn connection with the settlement of the $2,000,000 secured convertible notes in fiscal 2008, the Company issued a $600,000 promissory note with an interest rate of 10%, with payments due in 12 equal $50,000 monthly payments commencing on March 3, 2008. Initially, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock toan escrow account in which secures the promissory note, during the nine months ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued an additional 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the escrow account. The promissory note can be paid in cash or the Company’s common stock at the election of the Company. If paid in common stock, the common stock will be issued at a equal to $55,000 divided by the lesser of the weighted average price (“VWAP”) over the five days preceding the due date of payment or the dayon which the note is transmitted to the escrow agent.  If the VWAP is lower than $0.10 or the there are insufficient shares in escrow the Company cannot settle the monthly obligation in common shares.Since the $600,000 promissory note does not incur interest the Company recorded a discount of $44,444 to the promissory notes. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company amortized $35,926 and $8,518 of the discount to interest expense, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the entire discount has been amortizedand note has been satisfied.During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company issued 4,041,268 and 100,000 of common stock, respectively, from the escrow account to satisfy payments for the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 totaling $659,265 and $50,000 respectively.  As of March 31, 2009, there are no shares of common stockare held in escrow and the note has been satisfied.Note Payable to VendorOn January 29, 2008, the Company the issued a promissory note to a vendor in settlement of $780,500 in accounts payable. The vendor manufactured and installed the Company’s water treatment facility.  The note bears interest at 10% per annum with a one time default penalty of 10% of the principal balance,and is secured by the Company’s contract with Yates Petroleum Corporation and the equipment that was manufactured by the vendor.  The note calls for an initial payment of $270,000 due on February 1, 2008 with monthly principal payments of $100,000 due each month until paid off.  The Company did not make its April 2008 payment and any payments there after and is currently in default on this note.  As a result of this default, the Company accrued an additional $41,000 penaltyto interest expense during the year ended March 31, 2009.  The balance due on this note at March 31, 2009, was $410,500 with accrued interest and penalties of $86,661.MOU Note PayableOn December 17, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note in connection with the MOU to purchase its water treatment plant.  The funds were used for operations.  The note bears interest at 10% with a default rate of 18% and is to be drawn on in two advances, one for $45,000 and the other for $30,000.  Thesale was never completed and the note matured on March 8, 2009.  See Note 6 for more disclosure regarding the MOU.  As of March 31, 2009, the note is in default and interest is being accrued at the default rate. As of March 31, 2009, the Company elected not to draw the additional $30,000.Convertible Notes PayableIn April and September 2008, the Company entered into note agreements with an accredited investor and shareholder for proceeds totaling $150,000.  The notes are due on demand, incur interest at 11% and are convertible into 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. As of March 31, 2009, the notes were outstandingand accrued interest recorded in accrued liabilities related to this note was $14,000.  On the date of issuance, the Company determined that the since the conversion price given to the holder, effective conversion rate of $0.025, was significantly less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock per the closing market price, a beneficial conversion feature was present. The Company valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of issuance in the amount of $390,000, and recordedthe maximum discount allowed of $150,000 against the notes. The discount was immediately amortized to interest expense as the note was convertible upon issuance.   F-19   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 9 – Income taxes The following table presents the current and deferred income tax provision for federal and state income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:    2009  2008 Current tax provision:      Federal $-  $- State  -   - Total   -   - Deferred tax provision (benefit)        Federal   (4,418,760 )  (1,628,374 )State  (665,011 )  (210,383 )Increase in valuation allowance  5,083,771   1,838,757 Total  -   - Total provision (benefit) for income taxes $-  $- Current taxes only consist of minimum taxes to the State of California which are insignificant and have not been presented.Reconciliations of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the actual tax rate for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:   2009  2008 US federal statutory income tax rate  34%    34%  State tax – net of benefit  5.8 %   5.8 %     39.8 %   39.8 %           Permanent differences  1.1 %   20.5 % Intangibles  5.3 %   - % Property, plant and equipment  3.3 %   - % Others  (3.3 %)  (12.8 %)Increase in valuation allowance  (46.2 %)  (47.5 %)Effective tax rate  0.0 %   0.0 %   F-20   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and (liabilities) for federal and state income taxes as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:   2009  2008 Current deferred tax assets (liabilities):       Accrued expenses $659,005  $102,456 Total current deferred tax assets  659,005   102,456 Non-current deferred tax assets        State taxes  (962,569 )  (536,196 )Stock options  3,628,054   3,159,135 Intangibles  1,357,761   - Property, plant and equipment  851,146   - Net operating losses  4,062,143   1,786,373 Total non-current deferred tax assets  8,936,535   4,409,312 Valuation allowance (9,595,540)  (4,511,768 )Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $-  $- At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had approximately $11,947,478 and $5,254,039, respectively, of federal and state net operating losses allocated to continuing operations available. The net operating loss carry forward, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2025 for federal purposes and 2009 for state purposes.For financial reporting purposes based upon continuing operations, the Company has incurred a loss in each period since its inception. Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at March 31,2009 and 2008, will not be fully realizable. Due to the uncertainty surrounding realization of the deferred tax asset, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2009 and 2008. Based upon current law, the Company believes that for California income tax purposes, the net operating loss from the current year will not be allowed to be carried back to reduce or eliminate the state income tax liability for the year ended March 31, 2005. Accordingly, the Statetax liability of $93,887 for the year ended March 31, 2005, remains in existence and will not be subject to refund. As of March 31, 2009, the State tax liability is $95,732, which included the accrual of interest and penalties and a $5,000 payment which was taken by the State through a lien on one of the Company’s bank accounts.During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company accrued $89,725 in income tax liabilities related to the exercise of non-qualified stock options in which the required withholding for income tax was not made. The amount is included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 31,2009 and 2008.Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) Authorized SharesOn July 15, 2009, the Company amended their articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized common shares to 200 million and to increase the designation of Series A preferred stock to 10 million shares.   F-21   Common StockDuring the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 3,258,333 shares of common stock to accredited investors at a price of $0.30 per share for total net cash proceeds of $917,500. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has not issued 7,046,347 shares of common stock related to subscriptions of $1,631,833 and warrantexercises resulting in $482,071. Thus, the proceeds received are recorded as “common stock to be issued” on the accompanying balance sheet at March 31, 2008 as they were immediately issued in fiscal 2009. In addition, for each dollar invested the investor received a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The warrants vest immediately and expire in five years. The warrants were valued at $1,209,505 based upon the Black Scholes valuationmodel using the following weighted average estimates: 3.45% risk free rate, 297% volatility, an expected life of five years and no dividends. In addition, the Company paid $60,000 in finder’s fees in which was recorded as an offset to the cash proceeds.During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 953,667 shares of common stock for services rendered by consultants and employees. The services related to general corporate duties, marketing and production. The Company valued the shares on the date of issuance as there were no future performance conditions.The shares were valued at $605,975 based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. During the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 769,996 shares of common stock at approximately $0.30 per share for net proceeds totaling $226,072.  In addition, for each dollar invested the investor received a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of$0.40 per share. The warrants vest immediately and expire in five years. The warrants were valued at $164,628 based upon the Black Scholes valuation model using the following weighted average estimates: 3.34% risk free rate, 303% volatility, an expected life of five years and no dividends.During the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 627,667 shares of common stock for services rendered by consultants and employees. The services related to general corporate duties.  The Company valued the shares on the date of issuance as there were no future performance conditions. The shareswere valued at $141,992 based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance.During year ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 4,041,268 shares of common stock for payment on notes payable due to the NIR Group.  The shares were valued at $659,265 based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance which resulted in additional interestexpense of $109,265.See Note 8 for discussion of common stock issuances and other items impacting stockholders’ deficit during the year ended March 31, 2009.  F-22   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Series A Preferred StockDuring the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company received gross proceeds of $569,000 for the purchase of 3,637,493 shares of Series A preferred stock (“Series A”) at $0.15 per share.  In addition, the Company issued 368,667 shares of Series A to a placement agent for 10% of the proceeds raised. The shareswere recorded as an offset to the proceeds received. In addition, the Company issued 576,667 shares of Series A to related parties to satisfy liabilities of $86,500, see Note 13 for additional information. As of March 31, 2009, all shareholders had converted their preferred shares into common stock. In addition, as of March 31, 2009, the Company received proceeds of $141,112 related to sales of Series A. The proceeds have been recorded as accrued liabilities as to date the required Series A has not been issued.On January 27, 2009, the Company filed an Amended Certificate of Determination with the Secretary of State of the State of California increasing the number of shares of Series A authorized from 300,000 to 5,000,000, no par value. Each Series A share is convertible into six shares of the Company’s common stock oneyear after issuance. On February 23, 2009, the Board of Directors amended this provision to allow immediate conversion of each preferred share.  In additions, the Series A has preference over the common stock related to dividends and liquidation. Upon the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Series A, the Company shall not, either directly or indirectly by amendment, merger, consolidation or otherwise, do any of the following without (in addition to any other vote required by law or the Articles of Incorporation)the written consent or affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the then outstanding shares of Series A, given in writing or by vote at a meeting, consenting or voting (as the case may be) separately as a class.In the event the Company shall at any time after the Series A original issue date and prior to three years from such date, issue additional shares of common stock, without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the applicable Series A conversion price ($0.025/share) in effect immediately prior to suchissue, then the Series A conversion price shall be reduced, concurrently with such issue, to the consideration per share received by the Company for such issue or deemed issue of the additional shares of common stock; provided that if such issuance or deemed issuance was without consideration, then the Company shall be deemed to have received an aggregate of $0.001 of consideration for all such additional shares of common stock issued or deemed to be issued, and the conversion ratio will be changed accordingly.Note 11 – Options and WarrantsOptionsOn May 3, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Incentive and Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (“2006 Plan”) for issuance of stock options to employees and others. Under the 2006 Plan, the Company reserved ten million shares for issuance. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, 2,429,973 and 2,229,973options were available for issuance under the 2006 Plan, respectively.On December 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of up to 6,000,000 options under its 2007 Incentive and Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”) for issuance of stock options to employees and others. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, 2,372,700 and 3,872,700, respectively, options wereavailable for issuance under the 2007 Plan.On February 23, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a resolution which modified the stock option exercise prices of 5,885,000 options outstanding to $0.06 per option exercised. The modification of the options did not have a significant impact on the financial statements as the fair value of the optionsimmediately prior to and subsequent to the modification was immaterial.Although management believes its estimate regarding the fair value of the services to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that all of the subjective assumptions will remain constant, and therefore the valuation of the services may not be a reliable measure of the fair value of stock compensation or stock based paymentsfor consulting services.  F-23  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options:   Number ofShares  WeightedAverageExercise Price AverageRemainingContractual Term (Years)  AggregateIntrinsicValue  Outstanding at March 31, 200713,851,230   $ 0.35              Options granted1,100,000     0.56              Options exercised(632,578)   0.20              Options cancelled(6,415,073)   0.40              Outstanding at March 31, 20087,903,579     0.33              Options granted1,800,000     0.10              Options exercised(1,585,324)   0.06              Options cancelled(500,000)   0.49              Outstanding at March 31, 20097,618,255   $0.14  3.05   $211,567   Exercisable at March 31, 20097,176,668   $0.13  3.00   $193,904       Exercisable  Unexercisable  Total Stock OptionsNumber of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number of Shares  WeightedAverageExercise Price Less than $0.104,847,589  $0.06  441,587  $0.06  5,289,176  $0.06  Above $0.102,329,079    0.33    -      -  2,329,079    0.33  Total Outstanding7,176,668  $0.13  441,587  $0.06  7,618,255  $0.14  The Company will record estimated future compensation expense related to options of approximately $152,719 during the years ended March 31, 2010.WarrantsDuring fiscal 2009 and 2008, in connection with the common stock offering for every dollar received from an investor for the purchase of its common stock, the Company granted the investor a warrant to purchase an additional share of the Company’s common stock.  The warrants, have an exercise price of $0.40per share, vest immediately and expire five years after the date of issuance.     F-24  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe following is a summary of activity of outstanding common stock warrants for the years ended March 31:      Weighted       Average    Number  Exercise    of Shares  Price Balance, March 31, 2007  15,403,940  $0.53 Warrants granted  2,609,404   0.39 Warrants exercised  (850,000 )  0.20 Balance, March 31, 2008  17,163,344  $0.52 Warrants granted  299,000   0.40 Warrants exercised  (1,906,904 )  0.36 Balance, March 31, 2009  15,555,440   0.54 Exercisable, March 31, 2009  15,555,440  $0.54 Note 12 – Commitments and ContingenciesOperating LeasesIn July 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with a company that is owned in part by Juzer Jangbarwala, a Company Director and its Chief Technology Officer, to sub-lease approximately 7,000 square feet to serve as its corporate office in Anaheim, California. The lease term is for 18 months commencingAugust 1, 2007, at a rental rate of $7,200 per month and includes office services. The lease agreement required a security deposit of $7,200 and does not provide for any renewal options. Payments to the related entity were $79,200 and $64,800 during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, included in accounts payable was $7,200 payable to the lessor for accrued rent. In December 2008, the Company vacated the premises  and consolidated it operations with the OC Energyfacility discussed below.In November 2007, the Company’s OC Energy Drink, Inc. subsidiary entered into a lease agreement with a third-party company for approximately 1,100 square feet for a commercial office suite to serve as its new corporate office in Upland, California. The lease term is for 25 months commencing November 1, 2007, ata rental rate of $1,031 per month for the period November 1, 2007, through January 31, 2008, $2,063 for the period February 1, 2008, through October 31, 2008, and $2,146 for the period November 1, 2008, through November 30, 2009. It is also responsible for approximately 2.0% of the overall buildings common area maintenance costs. The lease agreement required a security deposit of $3,004 and does not provide for any renewal options. Additionally, performance under the lease is guaranteed by the President and formerCEO of OC Energy.  Future minimum lease payments for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 are $17,168.  F-25  RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Legal ProceedingsOn August 30, 2005, the Company was served with a lawsuit filed as Case No. 05CC09548 in Orange County, California Superior Court. In the complaint, Universal Communications Systems, Inc. and its subsidiary Atmospheric Water Technologies, Inc. alleged defamation, interference with prospective economic advantage, and falseadvertising, and sought compensatory and punitive damages, and costs against the Company. As of June 21, 2007, the parties to this litigation have entered into an agreement that provides for dismissal of the case and exchange of mutual releases. The formal dismissal of this lawsuit was filed July 16, 2007, with no amounts due.On January 24, 2008, the Company settled and dismissed its prior litigation with certain of its previous investors, the NIR Group. The settlement was funded by proceeds the Company received in connection with a claim it had on a key man life insurance policy, taken out in connection with the financing with the NIR Group.Other than the foregoing, the Company is not aware of any litigation, either pending or threatened; see Note 8 for additional information.On June 11, 2008, the Company and Grant King was served a lawsuit from one of its note holders claiming that the Company defaulted on repayment on a note payable in the amount of $350,000 plus interest at 8%.  The complaint asks for payment of these amounts plus damages.  On August 12, 2008, the partiesagreed to stipulated order whereby Grant King was dismissed from the lawsuit and the Company was granted a 90-day extension to respond to the complaint (until November 10, 2008) in exchange the Company paid $49,530 which represents the interest due on the note through July 18, 2008. On January 30, 2009, the Company paid $8,016 of additional interest on the note making it then current, and entered into a stipulation whereby the Company had until February 19, 2009 to satisfy this entire note obligation.  TheCompany failed to do so and on April 1, 2009, a judgment was entered against it. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has the principal of $350,000 and accrued interest of $5,548 recorded in the financial statements.On July 11, 2008, the Company received notice that one of the Company’s vendors filed a lien against the Company’s water treatment plant for past due amounts due to the vendor. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the vendor was due approximately $140,310, which is included in accounts payable.  The companyhas disputed this lien and lawsuit has been filed by the vendor.  The lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase with a trial date set for early in 2010.  No amounts for damages have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statement other than the accounts payable as the lawsuit is currently in the discovery stage.On July 17, 2009, the Company received notice that one of the Company’s vendors filed a lien against the Company’s water treatment plant for past due amounts due to the vendor for hauling waste water.  The disputed amount totaled approximately $145,000, which is included in accounts payable.  Noadditional amounts for damages have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statement as the Company cannot reasonably estimate the damages, if any, due to the recentness of the issue.Water Treatment ContractsIn January 2007, the Company entered into a contract with a customer to construct and install a water treatment facility for the customer using the Catalyx technology. The total proceeds expected from the sale were $2.3 million. In accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy, the Company recorded therevenue on the basis of a percentage completion of the pending contract. During the year ended March 31, 2008 the Company recorded $737,576 of revenue under this contract. During 2008, the Company’s customer requested that the project be halted until such time as the customer could secure funds to continue with the project. Previous progress payments had been made by the customer, however, a receivable had been accrued for additional costs incurred. As a result, the Company determined that the collectabilityof the receivable of $171,613 was potentially in doubt and elected to reserve the entire amount.On June 25, 2007, the Company entered into contract with Yates Petroleum Corporation (“YPC”) to engineer, design, and install a water treatment system (“System”) of Coal Bed Methane (“CBM”) produced water provided by YPC. The Company will own and operate the System and regenerationwaste pond. The Company will receive a base rate under the contract of $0.125 (12.50 cents) per barrel (42 US gallons) of water discharged by the System. The term of the contract is for 60 months from the start of the first billing cycle.YPC is responsible for constructing the inflow pond and will receive a credit from the Company of $50,000 each month for the first three months of operation. In addition, YPC will receive reimbursements on current billings for future repairs and maintenance to the inflow pond. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has accrued$230,972 related to reimbursement of costs due to YPC for the construction of the inflow pond and repair and maintenance incurred on behalf of the Company which is included in accrued expenses on the accompanying balance sheet. The Company expensed these costs as the future cash flows of the facility did not support the carrying value of the plant at the time the expenditures were incurred. In April 2009, due to the customers unwillingness to change the royalty rate under the contract the Company shut down theplant and subsequently cancelled the contract. The Company is currently exploring other options including the sale of the plant to other potential customers, see Note 5 for additional information.  F-26   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 13 – Related Party TransactionsDuring the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with a company wholly owned by the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company for the subleasing of office space and administrative support services. The agreement was month to month and cancelled during fiscal 2008. During the yearended March 31, 2008, payments to this former related party for these services were $9,175.On February 11, 2008, Grant King, Chief Executive Officer, made a payment of $100,000 towards a note from a vendor and recorded it as a loan payable to a related party. During the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company received additional proceeds of $20,697 and $32,700 from Grant King for operating purposes,respectively. The loan accrues interest at 11% and is due upon demand.  During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid $48,965 and $30,000 toward the note payable, respectively. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2009 the principal balance of the note was reduced by $36,500 through the issuance of 243,333 shares of Series A. Upon issuance, the Company determined that the fair value of the Series A based on the fair value of the common stock equivalent was $116,800. In addition,the Series A was converted into 1,460,000 share of common stock on the date of issuance. The excess of $80,300 between the liability satisfied and the fair value was expense to general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement of operations. The total loan outstanding from Grant King as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $5,233 and $102,700During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 333,333 shares of Series A to Mark King in satisfaction of $50,000 in accrued salaries. Upon issuance, the Company determined that the fair value of the Series A based on the fair value of the common stock equivalent was $160,000. In addition, the SeriesA was converted into 2,000,000 shares of common stock on the date of issuance. The excess of $110,000 between the liability satisfied and the fair value was expense to general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement of operations. In addition, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the individuals applied $79,680 of the liability toward the exercise price of 1,328,000 options at $0.06 per share.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts payable to the individuals included in accruedliabilities were $176,320 and $65,300, respectively. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the individuals exercised 1,276,000 options and reduced the amounts payable to them by an additional $73,560 through applying the required exercise price of $0.06 to the liability.During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued a purchase order to Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc. (“Catalyx”), for the purchase of resin, at the approximate cost of $756,000, needed for the operation of the Company’s wastewater treatment plant in Wyoming. Catalyx is partially owned byJuzer Jangbarwala, a Company Director and its Chief Technology Officer. In addition, from time to time Catalyx has paid for various costs related to the wastewater treatment plant on behalf of the Company, for which the Company has reimbursed Catalyx.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to Catalyx included in accounts payable were $280,000.In July 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Catalyx Engineering, Inc. (“CEI”), a company that is owned in part by Juzer Jangbarwala, a Company Director and its Chief Technology Officer, to sub-lease approximately 7,000 square feet to serve as its new corporate office in Anaheim, California.The term of the lease is 18 months at a base monthly rent of $7,200.  During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 payments to CEI for rent were $79,200 and $64,800, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has included $7,200 in accounts payable for rental payments due to CEI. In February 2009, the Company vacated the premises at the end of the lease term.The Company utilized CEI for engineering services related to the design and construction of its water treatment plant in Wyoming. The agreement is verbal and provides engineering services at $75 per hour, which represents a 37.5% discount off of normal CEI rates. Total expenses incurred by the Company with CEI duringthe year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $2,944 and $118,157, respectively.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to CEI included in accounts payable were $23,803 and $24,354, respectively.In previous periods, the Company utilized Fusion Solutions (“Fusion”) for manufacturing of product and promotional items for it OC Energy drink products. Fusion is partially owned by Mariano Fusco, a former owner and former CEO of the Company’s subsidiary, OC Energy and Albert Guerra, a partial ownerof OC Energy.  As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, amounts due to Fusion included in accounts payable were $99,807.  F-27   RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 14 – Subsequent EventsSubsequent to March 31, 2009, the Company received $257,450 from 18 accredited investors for the purchase of 1,716,334 shares of Series A preferred stock.See Note 10 for discussion regarding increase in authorized shares.See Note 12 for discussion regarding the cease of operations of the Yates plant and the cancellation of the contract.See Note 12 for discussion regarding subsequent legal proceedings.See Note 13 for discussion of exercise of stock options in satisfaction of amounts payable to a related party.  F-28