alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010330EN.01000701.xml

| 8.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 330/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 27.6.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 27.6.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | USK/567EI. |
| Species | Tusk (Brosme brosme) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

27.6.2010

Duration

27.6.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

USK/567EI.

Species

Tusk (Brosme brosme)

Brosme brosme

Zone

EU and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2544 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify that, during a lapse 

in appropriations beginning on or after October 1, 2020, positions relating to providing services for paying or reimbursing Federal employees 

for official travel are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify that, 

during a lapse in appropriations beginning on or after 

October 1, 2020, positions relating to providing services 

for paying or reimbursing Federal employees for official 

travel are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2544 IH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATING TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT SERV2 ICES AS EXCEPTED SERVICES UNDER THE 

3 ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1342 of title 31, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘An officer’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

7 An officer’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) Any services by an officer or employee relating 

10 to paying or reimbursing Federal employees for official 

11 travel expenses shall be deemed, for purposes of paragraph 

12 (1), services for emergencies involving the safety of human 

13 life or the protection of property.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub15 section (a) shall apply to any lapse in appropriations be16 ginning on or after October 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HL Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deniz Hassan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of March, 2008.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of EcoBlu Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Conboy, President, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/Steve Conboy


Steve Conboy


President


Principal Executive Officer





November 22, 2010
#### In the Matter of Susan D. Settenbrino, P.C., Appellant, v Florentina Barroga-Hayes, Respondent.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided March 29, 2012

Reported below, 89 AD3d 1094.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to correct the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

p~uqrsxy|xrsv
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 11173

- AA

________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ALEXANDER VUGLER, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 26, 2017) Before: HULL, WILSON, JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: The Government = s mot ion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant = s plea agreement is GRANTED. United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); see U nited States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 17-11173 Date Filed: 09/26/2017 Page: 1 of 1
#### Rickey L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10-1047.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 7, 2010.

Filed: Oct. 29, 2010.

Rickey L. Jackson, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Michael A. Price, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellee.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 order, entered after a bench trial, granting in part and denying in part his motion for return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), which authorizes a person whose property was seized by the government to petition the district court for its return. Following careful review, we conclude that the district court, after resolving conflicting testimony and assessing witness credibility, did not err returning one CD that had been seized by the government to Jackson, in finding that the remaining CDs and certain paperwork had been lawfully returned to the grandmother of the lessee of the vehicle, and in finding insufficient evidence that the government seized a particular duffle bag. See *Jackson v. United States,*526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir.2008) (on appeal from Rule 41(g) proceeding after bench trial, appellate court reviews district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error); *Richardson v. Sugg,*448 F.3d 1046, 1052 (8th Cir.2006) (due regard is given to district *143court’s judgment of witness credibility, and choice between two permissible views of evidence is not clearly erroneous). Finding no merit to Jackson’s other arguments, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
EXHIBIT
32.1













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan
K. Bedford, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:






(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of,
and for the period covered by, the Report.











By:
              /s/ Bryan
      K. BedfordPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardFebruary
      20, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 105

  Referring the bill (H.R. 798), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
 Rodriguez'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2009

 Mr. Filner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Referring the bill (H.R. 798), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
 Rodriguez'', to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    The bill (H.R. 798), entitled ``For the relief of Adrian 
Rodriguez'' and now pending in the House of Representatives, is 
referred to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
        United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the 
        earliest practicable date, providing--
                    (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that 
                are sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in the bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Adrian Rodriguez.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010343EN.01002301.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/23

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 343/17

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 2.11.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 2.11.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | MAC/8C3411 |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 834235 |

Date and time of closure

2.11.2010

Duration

2.11.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

MAC/8C3411

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Scomber scombrus

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

834235

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Hylas Deangelo Polk, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00161

- CR v. The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 203rd District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F

- 11

- 51317

- P ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that Polk pled not guilty to the offense of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, to reflect that Polk was convicted by a jury, and to reflect Polk’s plea of true and the trial court’s finding of true to the State’s enhancement allegation

. As mo dified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Hylas Deangelo Polk, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.3


Certification
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the
      Report.





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2202, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signal
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








­/s/   L. Mark
Panella________________


L. Mark Panella


Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 to 
 NCI Information Systems, Inc. 
 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement 
  
 This Amendment is entered into as of October 13, 2005 by and between NCI, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NCI-DE”), and the undersigned holder (“Optionee”) of a Non-Qualified Stock Option (the
“Stock Option”) originally granted by NCI Information Systems, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“NCI-VA”), pursuant to a Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated June 30, 2004 (the “Stock Option Agreement”).

  
 Whereas, NCI-DE assumed the Stock Option and the Stock
Option Agreement pursuant to an Option Assumption Agreement dated September 1, 2005; 
  
 Whereas, Section 5 of the Stock Option Agreement provides that the Stock Option vests in full on the occurrence of an initial public offering of NCI-DE’s stock; 
  
 Whereas, Section 6(a) of the Stock Option Agreement provides that
the vested portion of the option shall only become exercisable upon the occurrence of certain events, including, among others, an underwritten public offering of shares; and 
  
 Whereas, NCI-DE and Optionee desire to amend the Stock Option Agreement to allow Optionee to exercise the Stock
Option in full at any time after NCI-DE executes and delivers a definitive Underwriting Agreement for the purpose of effecting an initial public offering of any shares of its capital stock, all on the terms and conditions provided herein.

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 5 is hereby amended to add the following sentence at the end thereof: 

  
 “For purposes of this Section 5, an IPO shall be deemed to occur when the Company has entered into a definitive Underwriting
Agreement for the purpose of effecting an IPO.” 
  

	2.	Section 6(a) is hereby amended by deleting clause (b) and replacing it with the following: 

  
 “(b) the Company has entered into a definitive Underwriting Agreement for the purpose of effecting an IPO,” 
  

	3.	Except as amended above, the Stock Option Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

  

	4.	This Amendment may be signed in counterparts. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date above written. 
  

					
	NCI, INC.	 	 	 	OPTIONEE
			
	 /S/ CHARLES K. NARANG
	 	 	 	 /S/ MICHAEL W. SOLLEY

	 By: Charles K. Narang
	 	 	 	 Michael W. Solley

	 Its: Chief Executive Officer
#### Josefa GOMEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-31162.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 9, 2006.

*437Agustín R. Guitart, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Eneid A. Francis, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Josefa Gomez filed applications for supplemental social security benefits in 1984 and 1985; both applications were denied. In 1999, Gomez sought to reopen the 1984 and 1985 applications. The Commissioner denied Gomez’s request. Gomez filed an action in district court seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s adverse decision. The district court dismissed her case for lack of jurisdiction. Gomez appeals. We affirm.

Absent a colorable constitutional claim, we lack jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 205 over the Commissioner’s refusal to reopen a prior decision.1 Gomez argues that her mental impairment prevented her from understanding and pursuing her right to appeal the denial of her 1984 and 1985 applications. Her evidence of a mental impairment falls short. First, Gomez submitted an “earnings statement” indicating that she did not work between 1984 and 1990. While it could be that Gomez did not work because of her mental impairment, the earnings statement alone does not prove this proposition. Second, Gomez submitted a 1998 letter from her current doctor who stated that a different doctor diagnosed Gomez with borderline personality disorder and dissociative disorder in 1994. That Gomez was mentally impaired in 1994 hardly suggests that she was mentally impaired in 1984 or 1985. Third, Gomez submitted a 1999 letter from her current doctor stating that when Gomez first visited a hospital in 1984, she had been unable to work for a year. *438Again, this evidence is insufficient to establish that Gomez was mentally impaired, as there are many reasons why she was not working prior to 1984. Finally, the 1999 letter referred to an April 1984 psychological examination, which found that Gomez’s “highest level of adaptive functioning [was] level 5,” which results in “a moderate amount of impairment in both social relations and occupational functioning.” This too is insufficient to establish a constitutional claim, as there is no explanation of what “level 5” means or whether that condition would prevent Gomez from understanding that she needed to timely appeal the denial of her benefits applications.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. See, *e.g., Califano v. Sanders,*430 U.S. 99, 108-09, 97 S.Ct. 980, 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977); *Thibodeaux by Thibodeaux v. Bowen,*819 F.2d 76, 80 (5th Cir.1987) ("[A] federal court does not have jurisdiction to review the non-constitutional bases of the Secretary's decision on a petition to reopen.”).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To The Board of Directors and Shareholders
BTG, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-97302) on Form S-8 of BTG, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated May
24, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BTG, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, cash flows, and comprehensive
income for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 1999, and
the related schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of BTG, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
June 27, 2000