alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (518)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,238
<PP&E>                                          10,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,401)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,514
<SALES>                                         51,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,237
<CGS>                                            7,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
FOR RELEASE: Immediate



FROM: New Ulm Telecom, Inc.

27 North Minnesota

New Ulm, Minnesota 56073

Phone 507-354-4111



New Ulm Telecom, Inc.

Contact:  Bill Otis, President and CEO

507-354-4111

E-mail: billotis@nu-telcom.net





New Ulm Telecom, Inc. Receipt of Midwest Wireless



January 16, 2008



New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (New Ulm) announced today that it has received the final payment of funds from the November 2006 Midwest Wireless Holding (MWH) transaction.



New Ulm announced that it received from escrow $5,331,000 in principal plus accrued interest and that its newly-acquired subsidiary, Hutchinson Telephone Company also received a payment of $1,128,000 in principal plus accrued interest.  The aggregate amount received by both companies, including accrued interest, is approximately $6,459,000.



New Ulm intends to use the money for general working capital purposes and repayment of debt.



As previously announced, on January 4, 2008, New Ulm acquired Hutchinson Telephone Company for approximately $78 million and borrowed approximately $60 million from Co-Bank to finance the acquisition.  The price that New Ulm paid for Hutchinson Telephone Company reflected the anticipated receipt of the MWH funds by Hutchinson Telephone Company.



In addition, Hector Communication Corporation, of which New Ulm is a one-third owner, also received a final payment of approximately $4,323,000 in principal plus accrued interest from the escrow account.





---

Background on the MWH Transaction

In connection with the acquisition of MWH by Alltel in October 2006, New Ulm received approximately 90% of the sale proceeds attributable to its interest, or approximately $74 million, on October 6, 2006.  Alltel delivered the other 10% to the escrow agent.  The escrow account was established for use in any trueing-up adjustments, indemnifications, and other specified costs under the acquisition.  Funds not used for these purposes were to be released to the former shareholders of MWH.  New Ulm had received a payment of approximately $3 million plus accrued interest in April 2007.  Due to the contingencies for release of the escrow funds, the Company had not recorded a receivable for any part of the funds prior to their receipt.



Forward-Looking Statements



Statements about New Ulms future prospects are forward-looking and, therefore, involve certain risks and uncertainties.  These and other risk factors are discussed in New Ulms Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and from time to time in its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In addition to these factors, forward-looking statements in this press release are subject to the ability of New Ulm to operate the combined company in a profitable manner after the merger.







---
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 2, 2010
    /s/ Michael D. DevlinMichael D. DevlinPresident and Chief Executive Officer Date: November 2, 2010
    /s/ Guy HackneyGuy HackneySenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.07


 


CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST


 


OF


 


LEHMAN
BROTHERS HOLDINGS E-CAPITAL TRUST I


 


This
Certificate of Trust of Lehman Brothers Holdings E-Capital Trust I is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory
trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.  C. §§ 3801
et seq.) (the “Act”):


 


(a)                                  The
name of the statutory trust being formed hereby (the “Trust”) is Lehman
Brothers Holdings E-Capital Trust I.


 


(b)                                 The
name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has its principal
place of business in the State of Delaware are as follows:


 


Chase
Bank USA, National Association

500 Stanton Christiana Road

3/OPS 4

Newark, Delaware  19713

Attention: Worldwide Securities Services


 


(c)                                  This
Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of
the Act.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
    /s/
  Barrett S. DiPaolo

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Barrett S. DiPaolo,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Regular
  Trustee

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
    /s/
  James J. Killerlane III

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:James
  J. Killerlane III,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Regular
  Trustee

  	
   

  



 





















 


	
   

  	
   

  	
    /s/
  Karen B. Corrigan

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:Karen
  B. Corrigan,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Regular
  Trustee

  	
   

  



 





















 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chase Bank USA, National Association,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Delaware Trustee

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
       /s/ Diane P.
  Ledger

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Diane P. Ledger

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Assistant Vice President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Property Trustee

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
       /s/ Enrico D. Reyes

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Enrico D. Reyes

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President
No. 324.

#### United Drug Co. *v.*Washburn, Commissioner of Agriculture.

Argued January 13, 1932.

Decided January 18, 1932.

*Mr. Brenton K. Fisk*for appellant. *Messrs. Clement F. Robinson,*Attorney General of Maine, and *Nathan W. Thompson*were on the brief for appellee.

*Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr.,*Attorney General of New York, and *Henry S. Manley,*by leave of Court, filed a brief on behalf of the State of New York et al., as *amici curiae.*

*Per Curiam:*

The order denying an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. *Alabama*v. *United States,*279 U. S. 229, 231; *United Fuel Gas Co.*v. *Public Service Commission,*278 U. S. 322, 326; *National Fire Ins. Co.*v. *Thompson,*281 U. S. 331, 338.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

November 14, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – Exhibit B - AEGIS SEF Self Certification

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit B (“Exhibit”), which 

were submitted to the Commission as 40.2 Listing products for trading by certification on this 

date. This request pertains to all material in the Exhibit. The Exhibit bears the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8, as 

Exhibit contains information that would reveal the trade secrets or confidential commercial or 

financial information of AEGIS SEF and its affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-sef.com with any questions 

regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ***





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Bonanza One, Inc., (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”) pursuant to
      the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350),
      John Holcomb, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial
      officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




1. The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for
      the period covered by the Periodic Report.





Date:
                November 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/John
                HolcombJohn
                HolcombPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer)




*  This
      certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of Bonanza One, Inc. under the Securities Act
      of
      1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
      made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 12.1
 Oncothyreon Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
 Computation of Deficiency in the Coverage of Fixed Charges by Earnings Before Fixed Charges
 For the ThreeMonthsEndedMarch 31, 2009Earnings before fixed charges:Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and income/(loss) from equity investees
    
    $
    (2,472
    )Add fixed charges
    
    
    8Add amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    Add distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    Subtract capitalized interest
    
    
    Loss before fixed charges
    
    $
    (2,464
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    Estimate of interest expense within rental expense
    
    
    8Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    Total fixed charges
    
    $
    8Deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    (2,472
    )
```

[Federal Register: June 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 107)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 32866]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06jn05-71]



[[Page 32866]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1

RIN 3038-AC15


Investment of Customer Funds and Record of Investments

Correction

    In rule document 05-9794 beginning on page 28190 in the issue of
Tuesday, May 17, 2005, make the following correction:


Sec.  1.25  [Corrected]

    On page 28201, 1.25(b)(3)(i)(B) is corrected to read as follows:
    ``(B) An instrument that meets the requirements of paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) of this section may provide for a cap, floor, or collar on
the interest paid;
    provided, however, that the terms of such instrument obligate the
issuer to repay the principal amount of the instrument at not less than
par value upon maturity.''

[FR Doc. C5-9794 Filed 6-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.Adam D. Singer, M.D. Chief
Executive Officer


Date: April 27, 2011
Independent Director Compensation Program



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 The Pantry, Inc 
 Board of Directors Compensation 
 First Amendment October 2004 
  
 Compensation program for designated independent members of the Board of Directors: 
  

			
	 Quarterly Retainer:
	  	$5,000 paid in cash on a calendar quarterly basis, prorated as applicable.
		
	 Board Meeting Fees:
	  	$2,500 per meeting attended in person or by approved video conference. Paid in cash plus reimbursement of travel and lodging expenses. If attendance is telephonic, the fee will be
$1,250
		
	 Committee Meeting Fee:
	  	$1,000 per meeting attended in person or by approved video conference. Paid in cash plus reimbursement of travel and lodging expenses. If attendance is telephonic, the fee will be
$500
		
	 Committee Chair Fee:
	  	Additional $1,000 per committee meeting attended in person or by approved video conference. If attendance is telephonic, the fee will be $500
		
	Ad-hoc/Special Committees:	  	 Compensation to be determined, as applicable.

		
	 Initial Stock Option Grant:
	  	Grant of 10,000 options on election to the Board to vest over a three year period, conditioned upon continued service as a participating member of the Board. Strike price to be at market
price on date of grant.
		
	 Annual Stock Option Grant:
	  	Annual stock option grant upon annual re-election of 5,000 options, to vest over a three year period, conditioned upon continued service as a participating member of the Board (attend at
least 3 meeting per year) . Strike price to be at market price on date of grant.
		
	 Effective Date:
	  	Initially adopted by Board of Directors approval at the January 15, 2003 meeting to be in effect with the March 25, 2003 Annual Meeting and election of Directors and
Officers.
		
	 	  	First Amendment approved at the October 26, 2004 meeting with retroactive effective date of October 1, 2004.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6776
BERNARD BAGLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ROBERT WARD, Warden of the Evans Correctional Institution; WILLIAM GUNN, Director of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-487-2-8AJ) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate j udge and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bagley v. South Carolina , No. CA-96-487-2-8AJ (D.S.C. May 9, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register: February 1, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 21)]
[Notices]
[Page 4807]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01fe00-37]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  11:00 a.m., Friday, February 18, 2000.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW, Washington DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-2219 Filed 1-28-00; 1:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1448

CEIVA LOGIC, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FRAME MEDIA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant.

Gary A. Hecker , The Hecker Law Group, of Los A ngeles, California, argued for

plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James M. Slominski

.

Allen S. Rugg , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued

for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Frame Media, Inc., were

James J. Foster and Hunter D. Keeton . On the brief for Digit al Spectrum Solutions,

Inc., were Robert D. Fish and Andrew Mar , Fish & Associates, P.C., of Irvine, California.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Central Dis trict of California

Judge James V. SelnaNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1448

CEIVA LOGIC, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FRAME MEDIA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United St ates District Court for the

Central District of California

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-636.

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, GAJARSA, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
H. Res. 1112 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 2, 2010. 

Whereas the Penn State IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon, 

known as THON, is the largest student-run philanthropy 

in the world, with 700 dancers, more than 300 supporting organizations, and more than 15,000 volunteers 

involved in the annual event; 

Whereas student volunteers at the Pennsylvania State University annually collect money and dance for 46 hours 

straight at the Bryce Jordan Center for THON, bringing 

energy and excitement to campus for a mission to conquer cancer, and bringing awareness to countless thousands more; 

Whereas all THON activities support the mission of the Four 

Diamonds Fund at Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital, which provides financial and emotional support to 

pediatric cancer patients and their families and also 

funds cancer research; 

Whereas each year, THON is the single largest donor to the 

Four Diamonds Fund at Penn State Hershey Children’s 

Hospital, having raised nearly $68.9 million since 1977, 

when the two organizations first became affiliated; 
2 

•HRES 1112 EH 

Whereas in 2010, THON set a new fundraising record of 

over $7.83 million, even after the previous record of $7.5 

million was set in 2009; 

Whereas THON support has helped more than 2,000 families 

through the Four Diamonds Fund, is currently helping 

to build a new Pediatric Cancer Pavilion at Penn State 

Hershey Children’s Hospital, and has helped suppport 

pediatric cancer research that has caused some pediatric 

cancer survival rates to increase to nearly 90 percent; 

and 

Whereas THON has inspired similar events and organizations across the Nation, ranging from high schools to colleges and beyond, and continues to encourage students 

across the country to volunteer and stay involved in great 

charitable causes in their community: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Pennsylvania State University 

IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon (THON) on its continued success in support of the Four Diamonds Fund at 

Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital; and 

(2) commends the Pennsylvania State University 

students, volunteers and supporting organizations for 
3 

•HRES 1112 EH 

their hard work putting together another recordbreaking 

THON. 

Attest: 

Clerk.