alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NO. WR

- 92, 622

- 01

EX PARTE DONNIE RAY MEISMER , Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 59720

- A IN THE 461 ST DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZORIA COUNTY

Y EARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which S LAUGHTER , J., joined

. DISSENTING OPI NION Applicant was convicted of online solicitation of a minor and sentenced to forty

two months’ imprisonment in violation of former Section 33.021(b) of the Penal Code

.
T EX

. P ENAL C ODE § 33.021(b). Applicant filed his post

- conviction application for writ of habeas corpus contending that the statute under which he was convicted was found

unconstitutional. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 11.07. Today, the Court grants post

- conviction relief based on Ex parte Lo , in which the

Court held Subsection (b) of the former online solicitation of a minor statute to be

unconstitutional. See Ex parte Lo , 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). But Applicant has not demonstrated that his conduct constituted protected speech such that the statute

### Meismer

— 2
may be said to have o perated unconstitutionally as applied to him. I therefore dissent from the Court’s order granting summary post

- conviction habeas corpus relief for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in Ex parte Fournier , 473 S.W.3d 789, 800

– 8 05 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (Y eary, J., dissenting), and Ex parte Chavez , 542 S.W.3d 583, 584

– 85 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018) (Yeary, J., dissenting).

FILED : June 23, 2021 DO NOT PUBLISH
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

## **CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

## **PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 333-55831 on Form S-4 and inRegistration Statement Nos 333-10429 and 333-48143 on Form S-8 of our reportdated January 25, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accountingfor goodwill and other intangible assets), appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Westaff, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended October 29, 2005.

 
|   | /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Oakland,  California           |
|   | January 25,  2006              |

 

----
**Exhibit 3.3**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**NEW ABRAXIS, INC.**

It is hereby certified that:

1. The name of the corporation is New Abraxis, Inc. (the “Corporation”). 

2. The amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation effected by this Certificate of Amendment is as follows: 

Article 1 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby deleted in its entirety with the following substituted therefor: 

“The name of the corporation is Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the “Corporation”).” 

The aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WEREOF, NEW ABRAXIS, INC. has caused this Certificate to be signed byLisa Gopala, its Assistant Secretary, this 13th day of November, 2007.
**Exhibit 15**

 

Tothe General Partner and Unitholders

OSGAmerica L.P.

 

Weare aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-147290) of OSG America L.P. of our report dated November 4,2008 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financialstatements of OSG America L.P. that are included in its Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2008. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of theSecurities Act of 1933, our report is not part of a registration statement preparedor certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of theSecurities Act of 1933.

 

 

**ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

** **

Tampa,Florida

November 4,2008

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HUGHES Telematics, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig J. Kaufmann, Vice President Finance and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ CRAIG J. KAUFMANNName:

Craig J. KaufmannTitle:

Vice President Finance and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:

May 10, 2010
#### 2470 Cadillac Resources, Inc., et al., Appellants, v DHL Express (USA), Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Submitted January 9, 2012;

decided February 21, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 697.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-957-1430-BJ] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The plats of the following described lands were officially filed in the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, effective 9 a.m., on the dates specified: 

The plat representing the entire survey record of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivisional lines, T. 5 N., R. 1 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group Number 1092, was accepted October 2, 2000. The plat was prepared to meet certain administrative needs of the Bureau of Land Management. 

The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the east boundary and of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of section 36, T. 2 S., R. 36 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, and the plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the east and north boundaries, and the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of sections 13, 14, and 24, T. 3 S., R. 36 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group Number 999, were accepted November 6, 2000. The plats were prepared to meet certain administrative needs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Fort Hall Agency. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Duane Olsen, Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709-1657, 208-373-3980. 

Dated: January 3, 2001. 

Harry K. Smith, 

Acting Chief, Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho. 

[FR Doc. 01-1395 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
H. Res. 1061 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 10, 2010. 

Whereas, on January 4, 2010, during an assault at the entrance of the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse in Las 

Vegas, Nevada, Court Security Officer Stanley Cooper 

was fatally wounded and died heroically in the line of 

duty while protecting the employees, occupants, and visitors of the courthouse; 

Whereas Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ 

Gardner was wounded in the line of duty while protecting 

the employees, occupants, and visitors of the courthouse; 

Whereas the Court Security Officers and members of the 

United States Marshals Service and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department acted swiftly and bravely to 

subdue the gunman and minimize risk and injury to the 

public; and 

Whereas the heroic actions of Court Security Officer Stanley 

Cooper, Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ 

Gardner, and the law enforcement officers who responded 

to the attack prevented additional harm to innocent bystanders: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) commends the brave actions and quick thinking 

exhibited by Court Security Officer Stanley Cooper dur-
2 

•HRES 1061 EH 

ing the assault at the entrance of the Lloyd D. George 

Federal Courthouse; 

(2) offers its deepest condolences to the family and 

friends of Court Security Officer Stanley Cooper, who 

valiantly gave his life in the line of duty; 

(3) commends Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ Gardner for his actions and bravery in responding to the assault; 

(4) wishes Deputy United States Marshal Richard 

J. ‘‘Joe’’ Gardner a speedy recovery from the wounds he 

sustained in the line of duty; and 

(5) applauds the Court Security Officers and members of the United States Marshals Service and Las 

Vegas Metropolitan Police Department for their brave 

and courageous actions in responding to the assault at 

the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN RE DISSOLUTION OF 

DOEHLER DRY INGREDIENT 

SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware 

limited liability company.

§

§ No. 350, 2022

§

§ Court Below–Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. 2022-0354

§ 

Submitted: March 8, 2023

Decided: March 14, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

This 14th day of March 2023, after consideration of the parties’ briefs, the 

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of its September 

15, 2022 Memorandum Opinion.

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice

1

In re Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLC, 2022 WL 4281841 (Del. Ch. Sept. 15, 2022).
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Medjet Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Eugene I.  Gordon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.


/S/ EUGENE I. GORDON
---------------------
Eugene I. Gordon, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
April 13, 2004


















A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Medjet Inc. and will be retained by Medjet Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Summary of Director Compensation.



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 ENTRUST, INC. 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 (effective October 20, 2005) 
  
 Directors receive compensation for their board service. That compensation is comprised of:

  

			
	 Retainer:
	  	$5,000 per quarter.
		
	 Attendance Fees:
	  	 $3,000 per regular meeting; plus
 $1,000 per special
meeting; plus
 reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.

		
	 Audit Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$4,000 per year.
		
	 Audit Committee Member Retainer:
	  	$2,000 per year.
		
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$4,000 per year.
		
	 Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$2,000 per year.
		
	 Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grant:
	  	15,000 stock appreciation rights per annum.
		
	 Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grant:
	  	2000 restricted stock units per annum.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFERY FULTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 364 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 971 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 971

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide commuter flexible 
                         spending arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

    Mr. Weiner (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, and Ms. Shea-Porter) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide commuter flexible 
                         spending arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Flexible Savings 
Accounts Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to cafeteria plans) is amended by redesignating subsections 
(i) and (j) as subsections (j) and (k), respectively, and by inserting 
after subsection (h) the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Transportation Flexible Spending Arrangement.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (f), 
        qualified transportation fringe shall be treated as a qualified 
        benefit for purposes of this section to the extent provided 
        under a flexible spending arrangement (as defined in section 
        106(c)).
            ``(2) Qualified transportation fringe.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, the term `qualified transportation fringe' has 
        the meaning given such term by section 132(f), except that 
        paragraph (2)(B) thereof shall be applied by substituting 
        `$100' for `$175'.''.
    (b) Modification of Regulations.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall make such modifications to Treasury Regulations under section 125 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as may be necessary to allow 
qualified transportation fringe (as defined in section 125(h) of such 
Code) to be offered through a flexible spending arrangement in a 
cafeteria plan.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|   | Date:  August 14, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Laura Lee Stewart           |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |   | Laura Lee Stewart                          |
|   |                             |   | President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |                             |   |                                       |
|   |                             |   |                                       |
|   |                             |   |                                       |
|   |                             |   |                                       |
|   | Date:  August 14, 2009 | By:    |  /s/  Matthew P. Deines     |
|   |                             |   | Matthew P. Deines                          |
|   |                             |   | Executive Vice President                   |
|   |                             |   | Chief Financial Officer                    |
|   |                             |   | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|   |  (1) |   |  The      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008      (the “Form 10-Q”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   |  (2) |   |  The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                            |                                                                      |                         |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                            |  BISCAYNE ACQUISITION GROUP,      INC.(Registrant)                   |
|                            |                                                                      |                         |
| Date: August      11, 2008 |  By:                                                                 |  /s/      Luz M. Weigel |
|                            | Luz      M. Weigel                                                        |
|                            | President,      Secretary and Treasurer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
```

[Federal Register: September 7, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 54240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07se00-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Wednesday, September 27, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-23112 Filed 9-5-00; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
# C_2010312EN.01001201.xml

| 17.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 312/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.8.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.8.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | LIN/03. |
| Species | Ling (Molva molva) |
| Zone | IIIa; EU waters of IIIb, IIIc and IIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 552777 |

Date and time of closure

21.8.2010

Duration

21.8.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

LIN/03.

Species

Ling (Molva molva)

Molva molva

Zone

IIIa; EU waters of IIIb, IIIc and IIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

552777

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Tisdale, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 565]—

*978Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), rendered August 6, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the People adduced legally insufficient evidence at trial regarding the knowledge element of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]; *People v Robles,*34 AD3d 849 [2006]). In any event, the People’s evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt (see *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]; *People v Chapman,*255 AD2d 218, 219 [1998]). The defendant was identified as the man who stole the complainant’s handbag, was found in possession of the complainant’s wallet containing credit cards shortly after the wallet was stolen, and ran from police officers when they observed him near the location where the complainant’s wallet was stolen.

Additionally, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

The defendant’s repugnancy argument is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Alfaro,*66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]; *People v Ferguson,*55 AD3d 926, 928 [2008]) and, in any event, is without merit (see *People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 4 [1981]).

The defendant’s argument regarding the ineffectiveness of counsel is without merit (see *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; *People v Carter,*44 AD3d 677, 679 [2007]). Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.