alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MORTON TRUST CO. et al. v. STANDARD STEEL CAR CO.

(Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

July 24, 1909.)

No. 16.

Patents (§ 328*) — Invention—Bending Machine.

The Fliim patent, No. 736,S34, for a bending machine adapted specially for bending pipes or tubes for car and locomotive builders, is void for lack of patentable novelty and invention.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Patents, Dec. Dig. § 328.*]

In Equity. On final hearing.

Cyrus N. Anderson and Bakewell & Byrnes, for complainants.

Kay & Totten, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this suit complainants charge respondent with infringement of all three claims of patent No. 736,-834, granted August 18, 1903, to Christopher Flinn for a bending machine. To our mind the case falls within narrow limits and turns on the validity of the patent. The device in question is adapted especially for bending pipes or tubes for car and locomotive builders.

After hearing full arguments of counsel and on due consideration, we are of opinion this binder is a mere mechanical construction and is lacking in patentable novelty. The bending of pipes and bolts was old. The individual elements in Flinn’s device are not new, and it produces no novel result or new product. The use of a bending former at the head of its piston was known. Moreover, take, for example, the best machine. The cylinder was adjustable longitudinally of the table by removing one of its pins and swinging it on the other, which connected it to the table. The cylinder could be radially adjusted “at any position on the table to suit the location of the bend in the pipe.” In so operating the cylinder was held against rebound by putting a bolt through the table and the front cylinder bed plate. To us it is clear that mounting and holding the cylinder by a single pivot adjusted to engage in an undercut T-slot was a mechanical expedient that would naturally occur to a skilled man who sought to impart greater adaptable flexibility to a bending mechanism. Pivoting or swinging" cylinders were in use. Undercut slots and clamps to hold *673tools in adjustable thrust positions were in common use in machine tool construction, and while the Flinn machine may be, and we doubt not is, a clever, commercial, and effective means of adapting a cylinder to impart a bending thrust in any direction, yet when all its features are summed up, we are satisfied they are mechanical and not inventive in character.

A decree may therefore he submitted dismissing this bill.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.Adam D. Singer, M.D. Chief Executive
Officer


May 4, 2009
H. Res. 1161 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 27, 2010. 

Whereas Marquette University was founded in Milwaukee, 

Wisconsin, in 1881 as a Catholic, Jesuit educational institution; 

Whereas Marquette University was created to educate firstgeneration and low-income students under the premise 

that all people should be able to pursue higher education; 

Whereas Marquette University was the first Catholic university in the world to admit women to be educated alongside men in its regular undergraduate programs in 1909; 

Whereas because of the courageous vision of its then-president, the Rev. James McCabe, S.J. Marquette University 

pioneered the inclusion of women; 

Whereas today, 53 percent of Marquette University students, 

7 of the 33 members of the board of trustees, and 12 of 

the 27 members of the university leadership council are 

women; 

Whereas Marquette University is celebrating the 100th anniversary of the admission of women during the 2009–2010 

academic year through an alumnae memory project, 

guest speakers and lectures, commemorative publications, 

and faculty, staff, student, and alumni events; 
2 

•HRES 1161 EH 

Whereas Marquette University continued to expand access to 

education in 1969 by creation of the Educational Opportunity Program, which enables low-income and first-generation students to enter and succeed in higher education; 

Whereas Marquette University is celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Educational Opportunity Program, which 

now serves more than 500 high school and college students annually through 4 Federally funded TRIO programs; 

Whereas the Educational Opportunity Program continues 

Marquette University’s tradition of serving as a model of 

success for more than 1,200 colleges and universities 

with Federally funded TRIO programs; 

Whereas Marquette University’s continued focus on its 4 core 

values of excellence, faith, leadership, and service challenges students to integrate knowledge, faith, and reallife choices in ways that will shape their lives and those 

of others in order to better society; 

Whereas Marquette University recognizes and cherishes the 

dignity of each individual regardless of age, culture, faith, 

ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, language, disability, or social class; and 

Whereas Marquette University continues to adhere to its 

tenet of asking who has yet to gain access to higher education and who needs support in succeeding once through 

the door: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

Centennial Celebration of Women at Marquette University 

and commends the largest independent institution in Wis-
3 

•HRES 1161 EH 

consin for continuing to fulfill its Catholic, Jesuit mission of 

offering premier higher educational opportunities to all students who have a desire to learn. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63  of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Christa C. Leonard, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to the best of my knowledge:



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 11, 2009                                                   
|By:  
Christa C. Leonard Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. and will be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Henri THOKA; Therese Djunkeu; I.C.P.T., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-2163.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 14, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 5, 2008.

Ronald D. Richey, Law Office of Ronald D. Richey, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioners. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henri Thoka, Therese Djunkeu, and daughter, I.C.P.T., all natives and citizens of Cameroon, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying them motion for the Board to exercise its discretion to sua sponte reconsider the denial of them motion to reopen. It is undisputed that Petitioners did not file a timely motion to reconsider. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2). However, under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), the Board has authority sua sponte to reconsider a case in which it issued a final decision, and Petitioners moved for the Board to exercise this discretionary authority. We have reviewed the record and conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review Petitioners’ claim that the Board should have exercised its discretionary authority to reconsider sua sponte. *See Tamenut v. Mukasey,*521 F.3d 1000, 1004 (8th Cir. 2008) (en banc); *Zhao Quan Chen v. Gonzales,*492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir.2007); *Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004); *Harchenko v. INS,*379 F.3d 405, 410-11 (6th Cir.2004); *Enri-quez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 246, 249-50 (5th Cir.2004); *Belay-Gebrn v. INS,*327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003); *Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d Cir.2003); *Luis v. INS,*196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir.1999).

We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*
#### In the Matter of Thomas Williams, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 395] —

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of disobeying a direct order and being out of place. The Attorney General has advised this Court, by a memorandum from the Department of Correctional Services, that the administrative determination has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this matter is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Decker v Selsky,*53 AD3d 996 [2008]; *Matter of Correnti v Leclaire,*52 AD3d 1153 [2008]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JERMAINE D. LOGAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3692

[February 22, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 01-233CF10A and 02-7487CF10A.

Jermaine D. Logan, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

August 18, 2010                                   /s/ Scott Mitchell Rosenberg

                                                                 Scott Mitchell Rosenberg

                                                                Chief Executive Officer and 

                                                                Chairman

 

 

 

                                                                        

----
Agreement

 Whereas: Ultradata Systems, Inc. (hereinafter, "UDS"), desires to expand and 
improve the routing capability of its line of travel-related hardware products,
but has no desire to market software as a stand-alone product, and -

Whereas: TravRoute Software (a division of ALK Associates, hereinafter "TRS"),
wishes to improve and expand the utilization of its routing software and 
navigation database, but has no desire to market electronic hardware, and -

Whereas: Both UDS and TRS wish to expand their respective market shares, by 
expanding distribution channels, improving their respective products, and 
through the introduction of new and innovative products, and -

Whereas: Both UDS and TRS believe that by working together, expanded market 
opportunities and profitability can accrue to both parties,

Now Therefore: UDS and TRS affirm that is their intent to jointly explore the 
benefits of collaboration and cooperation in the following areas:

     * Joint product development
     * Interconnected data base(s)
     * Technology exchange
     * Joint and cross marketing

Agreement:

Both parties hereto agree to proceed in good faith to explore the opportunities
set forth above. UDS and TRS agree, during the period of exploration, not to 
employ the services of, nor engage in active business discussions with any 
individual or business entity whom the other party would consider to be a direct
competitor, and therefore, inimical to their business interests. This obligation
will end upon entering into a superseding formal business arrangement between
the parties hereto, or 30 days after wri
 forth below, whichever shall occur first. Obligations to protect the 
confidential and proprietary business information of each party are the subject
of a separate Confidentiality Agreement, and will survive this agreement, in 
accordance with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement.

For UDS:________________________   For TRS:_________________________
	       Monte Ross	      	(date)	         	Dan Titus	       		(date)
	       President		                     			President
H. Res. 1145 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 15, 2010. 

Whereas the University of Arizona was authorized by Arizona’s 13th Territorial Assembly on March 12, 1885; 

Whereas the University of Arizona is the flagship university 

of the State of Arizona and, true to its land-grant heritage, is dedicated to building a better Arizona through access, quality, and discovery; 

Whereas classes at the University of Arizona first met in 

1891 with 32 students in Old Main, the first building 

constructed on campus; 

Whereas the University of Arizona is Arizona’s only member 

of the prestigious 62-member Association of American 

Universities; 

Whereas the University of Arizona is committed to an accessible, quality education for all, maintaining the third lowest tuition rate of any public university among the Association of American Universities; 

Whereas the University of Arizona is ranked No. 15 among 

public universities by the National Science Foundation 

for research and development; 

Whereas the University of Arizona offers 122 undergraduate 

degrees, 217 graduate programs, and 3 professional 

schools including pharmacy, medicine, and law; 
2 

•HRES 1145 EH 

Whereas the University of Arizona has over 225,000 alumni 

in all 50 States and across the world, including a former 

U.S. Secretary of the Interior and a former U.S. Surgeon 

General; 

Whereas the University of Arizona is recognized as an international leader in research and innovation in many fields 

including optics, water research, and astronomy; 

Whereas the University of Arizona has achieved remarkable 

success in athletics, winning 20 national championships, 

including 8 softball titles and the 1997 men’s basketball 

title; 

Whereas University of Arizona students have consistently answered the call to service as memorialized by the clock 

tower of the Student Union Memorial Center, home to a 

bell rescued from the USS Arizona after the attack on 

Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941; 

Whereas the University of Arizona played a leading role in 

NASA’s Phoenix Mars Mission, leading to the discovery 

of water on Mars and furthering the understanding of 

the Martian condition using advanced robotics; and 

Whereas the University of Arizona is dedicated to a more 

sustainable energy future as reflected in its selection to 

and achievement in the U.S. Department of Energy’s distinguished Solar Decathlon: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the University of Arizona for 125 

years of dedication to excellence in higher education; 

(2) congratulates the University of Arizona on the 

occasion of its 125th anniversary, and 
3 

•HRES 1145 EH 

(3) expresses thanks to the University of Arizona 

for its contribution to the betterment of the United 

States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1165 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1165

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 11, 2010.
    Resolved, That Mr. Schiff, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. Johnson of 
Georgia, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. Sensenbrenner are appointed managers on the part 
of the House to conduct the trial of the impeachment of G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., 
a Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
Louisiana, that a message be sent to the Senate to inform the Senate of these 
appointments, and that the managers on the part of the House may exhibit the 
articles of impeachment to the Senate and take all other actions necessary in 
connection with preparation for, and conduct of, the trial, which may include 
the following:
            (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary assistants and 
        incurring such other expenses as may be necessary, to be paid from 
        amounts available to the Committee on the Judiciary under House 
        Resolution 15, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, agreed to January 13, 
        2009, or any other applicable expense resolution on vouchers approved by 
        the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary.
            (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with the Secretary of 
        the Senate, on the part of the House of Representatives, any subsequent 
        pleadings which they consider necessary.

                                        Speaker of the House of Representatives.

            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register: November 13, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 219)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 56902]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13no01-155]



[[Page 56902]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 41

RIN 3038-AB71

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 242

[Release No. 34-44853; File No. S7-16-01]
RIN 3235-A122


Customer Margin Rules Relating to Security Futures

Correction

    In proposed rule document 01-24574 beginning on page 50720 in the
issue of Thursday, October 24, 2001, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 50727, in the table, under the heading ``Maintenance
margin requirement'', in the second entry, in the third line, ``of the
plus put plus'' should read, ``of the put plus''.
    2. On the same page, in the table, under the heading, ``Initial
margin requirement'', in the third entry, in the fourth line, delete
``aggregate''.
    3. On the same page, under the heading ``Initial margin
requirement'', in the sixth entry, in the second line, ``based'' should
read, ``basket''.
    4. On page 50728, under the heading, ``Maintenance margin
requirement'',
      (a) In the fifth entry, in the first line, ``(1) of'' should
read, ``(1) 10%''.
      (b) In the last entry, in the fifth line, after ``amount''insert
``if''.
    5. On page 50729, in the table, under the heading ``Description of
offset'', in the second entry, in the first line, delete ``(or stock''.

[FR Doc. C1-24574 Filed 11-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
BTG, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BTG, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, cash flows and
comprehensive income for the years then ended. Our audit also included the
financial statement schedule (Schedule II) for the years ended March 31, 2001
and 2000. These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement
schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of BTG, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


McLean, Virginia
May 21, 2001










                                       50