alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
     Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-87916, 33-88506, 33-88508, 33-88510, 333-08939, 333-31793, 333-52255 and 
333-71075 of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-49949 of the Company of Form S-3 of our
reports dated January 27, 1999 (which report on consolidated financial
statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs
referring to the restatement of the consolidated financial statements for
pooling of interests in 1998 and a change in the Company's method of accounting
for option grants requiring stockholder approval in 1996), appearing in and
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 1998.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
#### Nella Manko, Appellant, v Lenox Hill Hospital, Respondent.

Decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 2011 NY Slip Op 77315(U).

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00172-CV

CHRISTOPHER TIMOTHY SHERMAN,

Appellant

V.

MOLLIE MARIE SHERMAN, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 30th District 

Court

of Wichita County (189,894-B(A))

July 14, 2022

Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete all awards 

of spousal maintenance. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed 

as modified.

It is further ordered that appellee Mollie Marie Sherman shall pay all costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Riehl, Chief Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date:  March 31, 2008



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Peter Riehl                      
| | Peter Riehl                          
| | President and Chief Executive Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Shanahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ---- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2010 |  |      |  | /s/ Michael S. Shanahan
|                      |  | By:  |  | Michael S. Shanahan    
|                      |  | Its: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc. and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

| 1) |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2) |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                    |                                                                                                     |   |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:      May 20, 2009 | /s/ Newall Daughtrey                                                                                     |   |   |
|                    | Newall      DaughtreyChief      Financial Officer,Corporate      Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |   |   |
|                    | (Principal      Financial Officer)                                                                       |   |   |

----

----
**Exhibit 3.6**

 
| ** ** | 1345069                                      | ** **                               |
|------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **A477651**                                  |
| ** ** | ** **                                   | /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                          |
| ** ** | ** **                                   | FILED                                    |
| ** ** | ** **                                   | In the office of  the Secretary of State |
| ** ** | **CERTIFICATE****OF THE****AMENDMENT****OF** | of the State of  California              |
| ** ** | **THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF**         |                                     |
| ** ** | **THE L. L. KNICKERBOCKER CO.,****INC,**     | JUN - 19 1996                            |
| ** ** | ** **                                   |                                     |
| ** ** | ** **                                   | /s/ Bill Jones                           |
| ** ** | ** **                                   | BILL JONES,  Secretary of State          |

 

LOUIS L. KNICKERBOCKER and PEGGY VICIOSO certify that:

 

1.                                       They are the Chairman of the Board andSecretary, respectively, of THE L. L. KNICKERBOCKER CO., INC, a CaliforniaCorporation.

 

2.                                       That the Board of Directors of THE L. L.KNICKERBOCKER CO., INC. has approved the following Amendment to the Articles ofIncorporation of said corporation:

 

Article IV is amended to read as follows:

 

“This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of stock; andthe total number of shares which this corporation is authorized to issue is OneHundred Million (100,000,000).”

 

3.                                       The amendments nave been approved by therequired vote of the shareholders in accordance with Section 902 of theCalifornia Corporations Code. The corporation has only one class of shares andthe number of**outstanding sharesis Fourteen Million Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Six Hundred Eighty Five(14,325,685). The number of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled orexceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more than 50%.

 

Each of the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under thelaws of the State of California that the matters set forth in this certificateare true and correct of his or her own knowledge.

 

Dated: May 7,**1996

 

 
| /s/  Louis L. Knickerbocker        |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Louis  L. Knickerbocker, President |   |
|                               |   |
|                               |   |
| /s/  Peggy Vicioso                 |   |   |
| Peggy  Vicioso, Secretary          |   |

 

----
December 22, 2022

VIA Portal

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(d) Notification: Nodal Exchange Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) Regulation 

40.6(d), Nodal Exchange submits this weekly notification of non-substantive revisions made, during 

the week of December 12, 2022, to the Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix C (Contract Reporting 

Levels, Position Accountability Levels and Position Limits). For Nodal environmental contract 

Oregon Clean Fuels Program Future, the short name in Appendix C has been amended from Oregon 

LCFS Future to Oregon CPF Future. This revision has no effect on the economic characteristics of 

this contract in accordance with CFTC Regulation 40.6(d)(i).

If you have any question or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact 

me at 703-962-9853 or markotic@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Max Markotic

Senior Director Compliance
No. 89.

#### Augusta Power Co. et al. *v.*Savannah River Electric Co.

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.

Decided October 19, 1931.

*Mr. Edgar Watkins*for appellants.

*Mr. M. G. McDonald*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed. *Louisiana Navigation Co., Ltd.,*v. *Oyster Commission,*226 U. S. 99, 101; *Reddall*v. *Bryan,*24 How. 420; *Bruce*v. *Tobin,*245 U. S. 18, 19; *Verden*v. *Coleman,*18 How. 86; *Moses*v. *The Mayor,*15 Wall. 387.
FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT Of APPEALS:

NOW COMES, NICHOLAS “NICO” LAHOOD, Criminal District Attorney

of Bexar County, Texas, and Counsel for the State of Texas, and files this first

motion asking the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief in the above

cause.

I. Statement of the Case

1. This is a Chapter 59 seizure case.

2. The style and number of the case in the trial court is 2011-CT14755. frank Hemandez v. The State of Texas.3. The State is appealing the Courts ruling on its Plea to the

Jurisdiction which the State filed on September 29, 2014.

4. That Plea was denied by the Honorable Judge Salinas on the 166th

Judicial Court Of Bexar County on December 30, 2014.

5. The deadline for the State’s Appeal is January 30, 2015.

6. This is the State’s first request for an 30-day extension.

1
of 300 + cases while pursuing this appeal.

2. Counsel for the State has recently had to physically move his office location

due to the recent election of a new Criminal District Attorney.

3. This is only the second Appeal for the Counsel for the State.

The State is asking the Court for a 30 day extension in order to complete its brief.The State has not requested nor have any other extensions already been granted.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel for the State prays the

Court grant an extension of time for an additional thirty days for filing the State’s

brief.

2
Is! Troy Meinke

Troy Meinke

Assistant Criminal District AttorneyBexar County, Texas

State Bar No. 2406875

300 Dolorosa, 5th Floor

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Voice: (210) 335-2556Fax: (210) 335-0784Email: trneinke@bexar.org

Attorneysfor the State ofTexas

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1 (5)(b), the State

attempted to communicate with Kelly Green, Attorney for Frank Hernandez. The

State sent a telephonic fax on January 27, 2015. The State attempted to leave a

verbal message for Ms. Green on January 29, 2015. I have not been able to makecontact with Ms. Green.

3
I, Troy L. Meinke, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Bexar County,

Texas, hereby certifSr a true copy ofthe above and foregoing Motion for Extension

of Time to File State’s Brief was mailed to Kelly Green on Friday, January 30,2015.

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Kelly Green

Attorney for Frank Hemandez

455 S. Main Ave.

San Antonio, TX. 78204

4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                JURISDICTION OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                               INCORPORATION                   BUSINESS NAME
------------------                              ---------------                  -------------
<S>                                               <C>                               <C>
BTG Technology Systems, Inc. *                     Virginia                         Tech Systems

Concept Automation, Inc. of America *              Virginia                         CAI

Delta Research Corporation                         Virginia                         Delta

BTG Technology Resources, Inc.                     Florida                          BTR

Nations, Inc.                                      New Jersey                       Nations

STAC, Inc.                                         Virginia                         STAC
</TABLE>

----------

*   A wholly-owned subsidiary of BTG Technology Resources, Inc.
# C_2010158EN.01000601.xml

| 18.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/6

---

Draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 — Council position

2010/C 158/05

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic and Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 (2), and in particular Article 37 thereof,

1

2

Whereas:

| — | the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2010 was definitively adopted on 17 December 2009 (3), |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2010 was definitively adopted on 17 December 2009 (3),

3

| — | on 16 April 2010, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2010, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 16 April 2010, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2010,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 was adopted on 11 June 2010.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, 11 June 2010.

For the Council

The President

E. SALGADO

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43 and in OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 64, 12.3.2010, p. 1.

3

---
# C_2010036EN.01000401.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 11 December 2009 at 15.00 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.350 — Microsoft

Rapporteur: France

2010/C 36/04

| 1. | The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s concerns as to the compatibility with Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement of Microsoft’s behaviour as expressed in the draft decision communicated to the Advisory Committee. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s concerns as to the compatibility with Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement of Microsoft’s behaviour as expressed in the draft decision communicated to the Advisory Committee.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Microsoft are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to meet the concerns expressed by the Commission in its draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Microsoft are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to meet the concerns expressed by the Commission in its draft decision.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that in the light of the commitments offered by Microsoft and the observations submitted by interested third parties, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that in the light of the commitments offered by Microsoft and the observations submitted by interested third parties, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theron Resource
Group. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: April 14, 2010

/s/      
Jerry R. Satchwell

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Theron Resource
Group. and will be retained by Theron Resource Group. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
# C_2010016EN.01004001.xml

| 22.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/40

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 16/14

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2), at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Furfuraldehyde | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2005 (OJ L 107, 28.4.2005, p. 1) | 29.4.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Furfuraldehyde

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2005 (OJ L 107, 28.4.2005, p. 1)

29.4.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---