alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  May 23, 2011

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       President and Chief Executive Officer

     Acting Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

FILED 

NOV - 8 20ta 

Clerk, U.S. DiStrict & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

Stephen P. Wallace, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tom Coburn et aI., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

IV 1920 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is 

required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 

Plaintiff, a Tulsa, Oklahoma, resident and self-described "Private Attorney General," has 

submitted a "Complaint for Convening a Special Grand Jury & Forensic Audit Under Freedom 

ofInformation Act." Title 18 of the United States Code requires a "grand jury impaneled 

[pursuant to 18 U.S.c. § 3331] within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the 

criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district." 18 

U.S.c. § 3332(a). "Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the 

court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of 

evidence." Jd. 

3 
Plaintiff accuses Senators Tom Coburn and James Inhofe, Congressman Henry C. 

Johnson, United States District Judge Gregory Frizzell of the Northern District of Oklahoma, and 

Robert L. Walker, former Staff Counsel and Chief Counsel of the Senate and House ethics 

committees, of committing "ultra vires civil/criminal acts" in Washington, D.C. Compl. at 2; see 

case caption (listing defendants' addresses) & attachments. He also invokes the Racketeer 

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.c. §§ 1961 et seq. As a remedy, plaintiff 

seeks an order "enjoining any Party from arresting, harassing, intimidating or attempting to 

murder PRIV A TE ATTORNEY GENERAL during the pendency of the current on-going Grand 

Jury Investigation of Ensign,Coburn, et al., .... " Id. at 3 (capitalization in original). 

A complaint may be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous when "there is 

indisputably absent any factual and legal basis for the asserted wrong," Brandon v. District of 

Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984), or when it describes fantastic or 

delusional scenarios or contains "fanciful factual allegation[s]." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319,325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). This complaint 

qualifies for such treatment. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum 

Opinion. 

- / 

Date: November ~, 2010 

2
SCWC

- 19

- 0000668

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

ROWENA AKANA, Petitioner/ Respondent

- Appellant

- Appellant,

v s

.

HAWAI  I STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent/ Complainant

- Appellee

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
( CAAP

- 19

- 0000668 ; CIV. NO. 1CC191000379 )

ORDE R ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J. , McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ. )

Petitioner Rowena Akana’s Application for Writ of

Certiorari, filed on April 16, 2024, is hereby accepted and will

be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by

the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, June 10

, 2024

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens Electronically Filed Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000668

10-JUN-2024

10:38 AM

Dkt. 37 OGAC
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14218]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 270 and 275

[Release Nos. IC-24991 and IA-1945; File No. S7-06-01]
RIN 3235-AI05


Electronic Recordkeeping by Investment Companies and Investment 
Advisers; Correction

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule, which 
was published on Wednesday, May 30, 2001 (66 FR 29224). This rule 
relates to electronic recordkeeping by investment companies and 
investment advisers. In FR Document No. 01-13526 beginning on page 
29224 for Wednesday, May 30, 2001, the docket line contains an error. 
The docket line is correct as set forth above.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Sienkiewicz at (202) 942-7072.

    Dated: May 31, 2001.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14218 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 10.1





FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of October 28, 2010 by and between COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Maker"), and WALSTON DUPONT GLOBAL ADVISORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Payee" and, collectively with Maker, the “Parties”).




BACKGROUND




A.           On June 10, 2010, Maker and Payee executed a Promissory Note, whereby Maker promised to repay the principal sum of $130,000 in connection with a Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by the Parties of even date (the "Original Note").




B.           Maker and Payee now desire to amend the Original Note as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




1.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original Note.




2.  The second paragraph of the Original Note reading, “The entire principal balance will be payable in full three (3) months from the date of this Note[,]” is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“The entire principal balance will be payable in full four (4) months from October 28, 2010.”





3.  Except as expressly modified in this Amendment, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Original Note shall continue in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.




[signature page follows]
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the date first written above.







COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC.





By:         /s/ Justin D. Csik


Justin D. Csik, CFO and General Counsel








WALSTON DUPONT GLOBAL ADVISORS LLC





By:         /s/ James Wilent


James Wilent, President
II 

Calendar No. 66 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 20, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAN LUNDINE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in James6 town, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 918 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 66 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Jamestown, New York, as the ‘‘Stan Lundine al Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in 

MAY 20, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

January 30, 2023

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC - Rule Changes – Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby 

submits amendments to its Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies) (“Fee

Schedule”), which have been amended to reflect updates to certain terms. The amendments will become 

effective on February 13, 2023, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. Pursuant to 

Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A is the update to the Access Fees and 

Payment Terms, with the additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this 

submission, TW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain information 

confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial 

information and has posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a redacted 

copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rule complies with the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder, 

including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Fee Schedule is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rule were expressed to TW SEF by its 

governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market participants.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (646) 767-4923 or by email at 

Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

Chief Compliance Officer

TW SEF
APPENDIX A

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies)

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-2106-000]

Take notice that on May 22, 2001, Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., tendered for filing an Interconnection and Operating Agreement with GenPower Keo, LLC (GenPower), and a Generator Imbalance Agreement with GenPower.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the                           ( print page 30444)                        Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14206  Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Annual Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
      Lambright, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      July 15, 2008





/s/
                Richard LambrightChief
                Accounting Officer
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00165-CR

THEODORE RICHARD WREN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24703

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Theodore Richard Wren has attempted to appeal from his convictions on five separate 

counts of possession of child pornography. We have examined the trial court’s certification of 

right of appeal, which certified this to be a plea bargain case in which Wren has no right of 

appeal. By letter dated July 30, we informed appellant of this potential jurisdictional defect and 

afforded him ten days in which to respond and to show this Court how it has jurisdiction over the 

appeal. We have received no response. 

Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedures provides,

In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or 

nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended 

by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:

(A) Those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on 

before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Further, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, 

the trial court’s certification indicates that there is no right of appeal. See id.

Because the trial court certified that Wren has no right of appeal and because the record 

before us contains nothing to suggest that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 

S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d).
3

We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: August 26, 2013

Date Decided: August 27, 2013

Do Not Publish
exv10w2



 




Exhibit 10.2


Amendment No. 1 to

Appendix A to Employment Agreement

Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

and

Brent F. Heffron




Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits





	1.	 	Effective July 14, 2005, Employee’s title(s) shall be Executive Vice President and President
 — Eastern Division. Effective August 1, 2005, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $325,000.
Effective August 1, 2006, Employee shall be eligible for a Base Salary increase of $25,000 per
year, based upon the achievement of performance criteria to be established by the Compensation
Committee. Employee’s principal location shall be Greenville, South Carolina metropolitan
area.
	 
	2.	 	Paragraph 2 of Appendix A is unaffected by this amendment and remains in full force and
effect.
	 
	3.	 	For Fiscal Year 2006, the Employee shall be eligible to receive a maximum Bonus of up to 130%
of his Base Salary (or up to $422,500) based on such performance criteria as the Compensation
Committee shall deem appropriate in its discretion.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Agreed to and accepted:





STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.

 	 
	Date: October 11, 2005 	By:  	/s/JAMES W. MCFARLAND
 	 
	 	 	     James W. McFarland 	 
	 	Compensation Committee Chairman 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYEE

 	 
	Date: October 11, 2005 	/s/ BRENT F. HEFFRON
 	 
	 	     Brent F. Heffron
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                       
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the year ended August 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                  2,185
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              77
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,529
<PP&E>                                    261
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,613
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  700
<OTHER-SE>                                361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,797
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       17,285
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          16,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           603
<INCOME-TAX>                              241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       362
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.05
        

</TABLE>
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1108

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - TCO - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC TCO published 

price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.