alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Simo, the Chief Executive Officer of Orange 21 Inc. (the Company),
certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report
of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 8, 2008

By:

/s/ Jerry CollazoJerry CollazoChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of China Armco Metals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kexuan Yao, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Fengtao Wen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





May 16, 2011

/s/ Kexuan YaoKexuan Yao

CEO and Chairman

(Principal executive officer)





May 16, 2011

/s/ Fengtao WenFengtao Wen

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, David C. Mahoney, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Applix, Inc.;
            and

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this report.

Dated: April 7, 2004                                   /s/ David C. Mahoney
                                                       --------------------
                                                         David C. Mahoney
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marvin E. Dee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Marvin E. DeeMarvin E. DeeChief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2006


---
Amendment to Employment Agreement


     

     

    AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    
      


      


      AMENDMENT
        (the “Amendment”) dated October 19, 2005 to the Employment Agreement dated as of
        September 23, 2003, as amended April 6, 2004 (the “Picker Employment Agreement”)
        by and between Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
        “Company”), and Donald H. Picker, an individual (the “Executive”).

      


      WHEREAS,
        the parties desire to amend the Picker Employment Agreement to increase the
        amount of compensation to be paid upon termination;

      


      NOW
        THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts and mutual agreements
        set
        forth below, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as
        follows:

      


      1.        
        Amendment
        to Picker Employment Agreement. 
        The Picker Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

      


      1.1        
        Section
        4.3 is hereby amended by changing thirty (30) days to ninety (90) days in
        the
        third sentence of Section 4.3. 

      


      2.        
        Ratification. 
        The Picker Employment Agreement is ratified and confirmed and shall continue
        in
        full force and effect as amended hereby. 

      


      3.        
        Headings
        and Captions. 
        The
        headings and captions of the various subdivisions of this Amendment are for
        convenience of reference only and shall in no way modify or affect the meaning
        or construction of any of the terms or provisions hereof.

      


      4.        
        Counterparts. 
        This
        Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, and by different parties
        hereto on separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
        but
        all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This
        Agreement may be executed by facsimile with original signatures to
        follow.

      


      
        
           

        

        
           

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      

       

      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment or caused
        this
        Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the
        date
        first above written. 

    

     

    
      
        	 	 	 
	 	
                CALLISTO
                  PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

              
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/
                Gary S. Jacob
	 	
                

              
	 	
                Gary
                  S. Jacob

                Chief
                  Executive Officer

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Donald H. Picker
	 	
                

              
	 	Donald H. Picker, Ph.D.
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 19)]
[Notices]
[Page 8100]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29ja01-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, February 23, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-2592 Filed 1-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX ========**

----
#### Kareemah BELL-BOSTON, Appellant v. CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION PROGRAM, Appellee.

No. 10-7028.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 12, 2010.

Kareemah Bell-Boston, Alexandria, VA, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. *See Fed.*R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 24, 2010, dismissing appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, be affirmed. The district courts of the United States are “courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.” *Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America,*511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994). The district courts have jurisdiction in “federal question” cases, i.e., civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The district courts also have jurisdiction in “diversity” cases, i.e., civil actions between citizens of different U.S. states or between U.S. citizens and foreign citizens or foreign states, provided the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In this case, because appellant established neither federal-question jurisdiction nor diversity jurisdiction (no amount in controversy was pleaded), the district court lacked jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
II 

Calendar No. 8 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 251 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Received; read the first time 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 

Standards Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chemical Facility Anti5 Terrorism Standards Program Extension Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 251 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TER2 RORISM STANDARDS PROGRAM OF THE DE3 PARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 

4 Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing Chemical 

5 Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 

6 113–254; 6 U.S.C. 621 note) is amended by striking ‘‘4 

7 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 

2019. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 8 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 251 

AN ACT 

To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Antiposes. ment of Homeland Security, and for other pur- Terrorism Standards Program of the DepartJANUARY 10, 2019 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Kathryn Toland et al., Respondents, v Jim Young et al., Appellants.

[873 NYS2d 916]

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etcetera, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated January 3, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendants on *755the issue of liability upon their default in appearing or answering the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 19, 2007, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate the order dated January 3, 2007.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 3, 2007, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 19, 2007, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.

A defendant seeking to vacate its default in appearing or answering the complaint must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co.,*67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; *Canty v Gregory,*37 AD3d 508 [2007]; *Mjahdi v Maguire,*21 AD3d 1067 [2005]). The defendants’ excuse that their insurance carrier failed to provide a defense was insufficient to excuse their default in serving a timely answer *(see Lemberger v Congregation Yetev Lev D’Satmar, Inc.,*33 AD3d 671, 672 [2006]; *Krieger v Cohan,*18 AD3d 823, 824 [2005]; *Juseinoski v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*15 AD3d 353, 356 [2005]). In view of the lack of a reasonable excuse, it is unnecessary to consider whether the defendants sufficiently demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense *(see Levi v Levi,*46 AD3d 519, 520 [2007]; *Segovia v Delcon Constr. Corp.,*43 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2007]; *Mjahdi v Maguire,*21 AD3d at 1068). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to vacate their default was properly denied. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-87916, 33-88506, 33-88508, 33-88510, 333-08939, 333-31793, 333-52255,
333-71075, 333-75569, 333-78703, 333-78705, 333-82597, 333-84597, 333-85475,
333-90299 and 333-92487 of RSA Security Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-49949 of the Company on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 20, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending May 31, 2010 of Fresh Start Private Holdings, Inc. (formerly River Exploration, Inc.); a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Andrew Aird, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




By:
/s/ ANDREW AIRDAndrew AirdPresident, Secretary Treasurer,

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and DirectorDated: July 20, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HL Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deniz Hassan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of June, 2008.


/s/ Deniz Hassan
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**Subsidiaries**

 

Vascular Solutions, GmbH (Germany)
# C_2010002EN.01000301.xml

| 6.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 28 September 2009 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.416 — Ship classification

Rapporteur: Slovakia

2010/C 2/03

| 1. | The Advisory Committee shares the Commission's concerns as to the compatibility with Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement of IACS' decisions as expressed in the draft decision communicated to the Advisory Committee on 11 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee shares the Commission's concerns as to the compatibility with Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement of IACS' decisions as expressed in the draft decision communicated to the Advisory Committee on 11 September 2009.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by IACS are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to meet the concerns expressed by the Commission in its draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by IACS are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to meet the concerns expressed by the Commission in its draft decision.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's view that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's view that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by IACS, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by IACS, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

ACTIVE DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

Westaff (USA), Inc.
Western Medical Services, Inc.
Western Medical Services (NY), Inc.
MediaWorld International
Westaff Support, Inc.
Westaff (GP), Inc.
Westaff (LP), Inc.
Westaff (CA), Inc.

INACTIVE DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

Western Permanent Services Agency, Inc.

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

Australia:
Westaff (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Western Personnel Services Pty. Ltd.
Western Temporary Services Pty. Limited

Denmark:
Westaff A/S

New Zealand:
Westaff NZ Limited

Norway:
Westaff AS
Kontorservice A/S

Singapore:
Westaff (Singapore) Pte Ltd

United Kingdom:
Westaff (U.K.) Limited

Mexico:
Westaff de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BROADBAND ITV, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC., OCEANIC TIME 

WARNER CABLE, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE, 

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2016-1082, 2016-1083

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Hawaii in Nos. 1:14-cv-00169-ACK-RLP, 1:15-

cv-00131-ACK-RLP, Judge Alan C. Kay.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

FREDERICK A. TECCE, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & 

Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for plaintiffappellant. Also represented by KEITH AARON JONES, JOHN 

DAVID SIMMONS; PAUL ALSTON, JOHN S. RHEE, Alston, 

Hunt, Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI.

 SASHA G. RAO, Maynard Cooper & Gale LLP, San 

Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee Hawaiian 
 

Telcom, Inc. Also represented by ALEXANDRA DRURY,

BRANDON H. STROY; WILFORD EDWARD BAILEY, JOHN 

COWLES NEIMAN, JR., Birmingham, AL.

 CHARLES KRAMER VERHOEVEN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for 

defendants-appellees Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC, 

Time Warner Cable, Inc. Also represented by CARL G.

ANDERSON, DAVID EISEMAN, IV; DEEPA ACHARYA, PHILIP 

CHARLES STERNHELL, Washington, DC; JOSEPH MILOWIC, 

III, New York, NY; DAVID BENYACAR, DANIEL REISNER, 

Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY.

 ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, 

Chicago, IL, for amicus curiae United Inventors Association of the United States of America.

 ARTHUR STEVEN BEEMAN, Arent Fox LLP, San Francisco, CA, for amicus curiae Tranxition, Inc. Also represented by JOEL MUCHMORE. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 September 26, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Carmen J. Carbona, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 11  th  day of August 2020 .

 

/S/Carmen J. Carbona

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.