T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. PA RI S CH ERER, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 15607 D . C. N o s . 2 : 0 5 - c r - 0 0 3 2 5 - J CM 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 6 4 4 - J CM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da J a m e s C . M a han, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r15, 2013 ** B efo re: F IS H E R , G O U L D , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F eder alpri soner P ar i s C here r app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s order d e n y in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 5 m o tio n to v a c a te , s e t a s id e , o rc o rr e c t h is s e n te n c e . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 3. W e r evi ew a di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al 

# FI LED OC T 23 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 15607 2 o f as e c tio n 2 2 5 5 m o tio n d e n o v o , see U n i ted Sta tes v. M

a n zo , 675 F . 3d 1204, 1 2 0 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 2 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. C h e r e rc o n te n d s th a t h e w a s d e n ie ddu e p r o c e s s b e c au s e h e w a s f o r c e dto s t a nd tr i a l w he n he w a s i nc om pe t e nt . W e di s a gr e e . T he r e c or d s upport s the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t, a t th e tim e o f tr ia l, C h e r e rh a d“ar a tio n a l a s w e ll a s f a c tu a l u n d e r s tan d in g o f th e p r o c e e d in g s a g a in s t h im ” a n dth e “ab ilityto c o n s u lt w i th h i s l aw ye r w i th a re as on abl e degree of ra t i on alun ders t andi ng . ” Indi an a v. E dw ards , 55 4 U . S . 16 4, 17 0 (20 08 ) ( em ph as i s and qu ot at i on s om i tt ed). C h e r e ra ls o a r g u e s th a t h is tr ia l c o u n s e l w a s in e f f e c tiv e f o rf a ilin g to in v e s tig a te C h e r e r ’s m e n ta l c o m p e te n c y , f a ilin g to in v e s tig a te r e c o r d s th a t c o u ld h a v e p r o v id e de x c u lp a to rye v id e n c e , an df a ilin g to p r e p ar e a n a d e q u a te d e f e n s e . C h e r e rf u rth e rc o n te n d s th a t h is ap p e lla te c o u n s e l w a s in e f f e c tiv e f o rf a ilin g to rai se th ese cl ai m s o n ap p eal . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d en i edrel i ef as t o th ese c l a i m s be c aus e C he r e rha s notde m ons tr a t e d e i the rde f i c i e ntpe r f

orm anc e by c o u n s e l o rp r e

ju d ic e . Se e Str i c kland v . W as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8, 68 7 (19 84 ). C ontr a ryt o C he r e r ’ s c ont e nt i on, the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on b yd e n y in g h is s e c tio n 2 2 5 5 m o tio n w ith o u t an e v id e n tiaryh e ar in g . See R ob er t s v . M a rs h a ll , 62 7 F . 3d 76 8, 77 3 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). AF F I RME D.