alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of We Save Homes, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date: November 26, 2010





By:
/s/ David R. WellsDavid R. Wells,Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)








A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00467-CV

In re Madeleine Connor

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion are denied. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Filed: September 25, 2020
```

[Federal Register: January 22, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 14)]
[Notices]
[Page 3017]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ja03-42]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION



Sunshine Act Meeting


Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 28, 2003.


Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.


Status: Closed.


Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Meeting.


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.


Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-1424 Filed 1-16-03; 4:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Ave. Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. FRANKLIN BRADLEY, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 14th day of April, 2011.








/s/ J. FRANKLIN BRADLEY


Principal Accounting Officer
#### Ronald ANDERSON, Appellant v. Ann MEISTER, Register of Wills and Chris Sinks, Deputy Register of Wills, Appellees.

No. 09-7038.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 23, 2010.

Ronald Anderson, Warden (McCreary), United States Penitentiary, Pine Knot, KY, for Appellant.

BEFORE: ROGERS, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court *5for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders entered February 20, 2009 and March 17, 2009 be affirmed. Under the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine, “a United States District Court has no authority to review final judgments of a state court in judicial proceedings.” *District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). The decision of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus bars his claim in this case as stated in either his original complaint or amended complaint. Therefore, dismissal of appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was proper, *see*Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3), and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant’s motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment because amendment of his complaint would have been futile. *See Firestone v. Firestone,*76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                    
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                             

The undersigned, John Dahle, the Chief Executive Officer of
Bear River Resources, Inc., and Robert Donald M. Prest, the Chief Financial
Officer of Bear River Resources, Inc, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Bear
River Resources, Inc., for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Bear River Resources, Inc.

Date: February 11, 2008

|John Dahle                                  
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|John Dahle                                    
|President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal 
|Executive Officer and a director              
|                                              
|Donald M. Prest                             
|                                              
|Donald M. Prest                               
|Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
|Principal Accounting Officer and a director   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bear River
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Bear River Resources, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7350

PHOENIX ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALAN MOATS, Judge; LEONARD LUCAS, Magistrate;

HOWARD FERRIS, Attorney; JIM SHACKELFORD,

(Shackelford Bonding); ROGER HICKMAN,

(Shackelford Bonding); CAROL S. BIRDSELL,

Court Reporter; ELAINE BENNETT, Clerk of the

Circuit Court of Taylor County; JOHN L. BORD,

Prosecutor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-152-1)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phoenix Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Phoenix Anderson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v.

Moats, No. CA-03-152-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 3, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") by
CapSource Financial, Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Steven J. Kutcher, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


    DATE:  July 25, 2007                By: /s/ Steven J. Kutcher
                                            --------------------------
                                        Name: Steven J. Kutcher
                                        Chief Financial and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Ernest Ray Koonce, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-15-00440-CV & 01-15-00228-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-64752

Trial court: 127th Judicial District Court of Harris County

On June 11, 2015, this Court’s Order directed relator, Ernest Ray Koonce, to pay

the $145 filing fee for his petition for a writ of mandamus, and requested a response to 

the petition by the real party in interest, which was filed on July 13, 2015, by Wells Fargo 

Bank, N.A., as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of April 1, 

2005, Asset Back Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-WHQ2 (“Wells Fargo”). Also 

on July 13, 2015, Wells Fargo filed its Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases, seeking 

to consolidate the interlocutory appeal with this mandamus petition because these cases 

involve the exact same issues and parties. Thus, Wells Fargo requests that, for simplicity 

purposes, any portions of the records filed and fees paid in the interlocutory appellate 

cause number 01-15-00228-CV should be carried over to the mandamus appellate cause 

number 01-15-00440-CV.

On July 21, 2015, relator filed a letter, dated July 3, 2015, in 01-15-00440-CV, 

stating that he had enclosed a $145 check for the filing fee for that case, and attaching a 

letter, dated June 26, 2015, he sent to the trial clerk enclosing the $65 fee for preparing

the clerk’s record to be filed in 01-15-00228-CV. On July 21, 2015, the Clerk of this 

Court sent relator a letter confirming receipt of the $145 filing fee for 01-15-00440-CV.

Accordingly, for purposes of the record and fees, Wells Fargo’s motion to 

consolidate is DISMISSED as moot because relator has already paid the fee for both 

cases, the mandamus record has been filed in 01-15-00440-CV, the clerk’s record has 

been paid for and requested to be filed in 01-15-00228-CV, and Wells Fargo has already 

submitted briefing in both cases.
2

In addition, the reply by the relator, if any, to Wells Fargo’s response to his 

mandamus petition in 01-15-00440-CV, which may be combined in one brief in response 

to Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss in 01-15-00228-CV, if any, must be filed within 30

days of the date of this Order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(c), 52.5. To the extent 

necessary, relator’s reply/response may refer to the reporter’s record filed in 01-15-

00228-CV or to documents in the mandamus record filed in 01-15-00440-CV. If relator 

fails to timely file a reply/response, this Court may consider and decide his mandamus 

petition together with his interlocutory appeal without his reply/response.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 28, 2015
Amendment No. 3 to Consulting Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 3 to Consulting Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of April 26, 2006
(the “Effective Date”), by and between Newmont Capital Limited (“Newmont”) and Seymour Schulich (“Contractor”). 
  
 Recitals 
  
 A. Newmont and Contractor have entered into that certain Consulting Agreement having an effective date of April 1, 2002 (the “Agreement”).

  
 B. Newmont and Contractor desire to amend certain terms and
conditions contained in the Agreement. 
  
 Agreement

  
 The Agreement is amended as follows: 
  
 Recital A is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

  
 A. Contractor currently serves on the Board of Directors of
Newmont, in the position as Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”). In consideration of such service, Newmont will pay Contractor US$75,000 per year, paid quarterly, for each year that he serves as Chairman. 
  
 This Amendment is executed as of this 31st day of October, 2005, intended to
be effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	 NEWMONT CAPITAL LIMITED
	 	 	 	 
					
	 By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Name:
	 	 Sharon Dowdall
	 	 	 	 	 	 Seymour Schulich

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of UniCapital Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

UniCapital Acquisition Corp.


/s/ William Tay
--------------------------------
By: William Tay
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: August 8, 2008
# C_2010311EN.01001601.xml

| 16.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/16

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 311/07

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Steel ropes and cables | India | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 283/2009 (OJ L 94, 8.4.2009, p. 5) | 17.11.2010 |

Product

Country of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Steel ropes and cables

India

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 283/2009 (OJ L 94, 8.4.2009, p. 5)

17.11.2010

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 12.5.2010, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

---
II 

Calendar No. 444 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 908 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 

Act of 1994 to reauthorize the Missing Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Alert Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Missing Alzheimer’s 

5 Disease Patient Alert Program Reauthorization of 2009’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 908 RS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MISSING ALZHEIMER’S 

2 DISEASE PATIENT ALERT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 240001 of the Violent Crime Control and 

4 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14181) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol7 lows: 

8 ‘‘(a) GRANT.—Subject to the availability of appro9 priations to carry out this section, the Attorney General, 

10 through the Bureau of Justice Assistance and in consulta11 tion with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

12 shall award competitive grants to nonprofit organizations 

13 to assist such organizations in paying for the costs of plan14 ning, designing, establishing, and operating locally based, 

15 proactive programs to protect and locate missing patients 

16 with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and other 

17 missing elderly individuals.’’; 

18 (2) in subsection (b)— 

19 (A) by inserting ‘‘competitive’’ after ‘‘to re20 ceive a’’; and 

21 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

22 sentence: ‘‘The Attorney General shall periodi23 cally solicit applications for grants under this 

24 section by publishing a request for applications 

25 in the Federal Register and by posting such a 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 908 RS

1 request on the website of the Department of 

2 Justice.’’; 

3 (3) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol4 lows: 

5 ‘‘(c) PREFERENCE.—In awarding grants under sub6 section (a), the Attorney General shall give preference to 

7 national nonprofit organizations that have a direct link to 

8 patients, and families of patients, with Alzheimer’s disease 

9 and related dementias.’’; and 

10 (4) by amending subsection (d) to read as fol11 lows: 

12 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

13 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

14 $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 

15 2016.’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 444 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 908 

AN ACT 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law EnAlzheimer’s Disease Patient Alert Program. forcement Act of 1994 to reauthorize the Missing 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended May 31, 2011 of Castmor Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer.


Date: July 14, 2011

By /s/ Alfonso Quijada
Alfonso Quijada
Chief Executive Officer, President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
#### Elsa Solveig BILLINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-35781.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 6, 2010.

Elsa Solveig Billingham, Anchorage, AK, pro se.

*201Brenda Page, Attorney General’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elsa Solveig Billingham appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her employment action alleging sex and age discrimination and retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Leong v. Potter,*347 F.3d 1117, 1123 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Billingham’s discrimination and retaliation claims because she failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether similarly situated employees were treated more favorably, *see id.*at 1124 (finding that the plaintiffs “proposed comparators [we]re not similarly situated because they were not subject to [a Last Chance Agreement]”), and as to whether defendant’s reason for terminating her and classifying her as ineligible for rehire was pretextual, *see id.*at 1124-25 (affirming summary judgment where the plaintiff did not raise any genuine issues of material fact as to whether the employer’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the challenged employment action was pre-textual); *Manatt v. Bank of Am., NA,*339 F.3d 792, 801 (9th Cir.2003) (affirming summary judgment on retaliation claim). Moreover, Billingham failed to show a causal connection between her administra-five complaints and her termination and ineligibility for rehire. *See Manatt,*339 F.3d at 802.

We do not address issues that Billingham has not raised or argued on appeal. *See Cook v. Schriro,*538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n. 5 (9th Cir.2008).

Billingham’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.