alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                           BTG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                       ------------------------------------------------
                                                         1998                1997               1996
                                                       ----------         ----------          ---------



    <S>                                               <C>                 <C>                 <C>
    Net income (loss)                                 $  (35,223)         $    4,271          $   2,954
                                                      ===========         ==========          =========


    Weighted average common stock
      shares outstanding during the
      period (used in the calculation of
      basic per share results)                              8,540              6,887              6,042

    Dilutive effect of common stock
      options and warrants                                     --                254                191
                                                       ----------         ----------          ---------

    Weighted average common stock
      and potentially dilutive securities
      outstanding during the period (used in
      the calculation of diluted per share
      results)                                              8,540              7,141              6,233
                                                       ==========         ==========          =========



    Basic earnings (loss) per share                   $    (4.12)         $     0.62          $    0.49
                                                      ===========         ==========          =========


    Diluted earnings (loss) per share                 $    (4.12)         $     0.60          $    0.47
                                                      ===========         ==========          =========
</TABLE>





20
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 955 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, 

Washington, as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 955 EH

1 SECTION 1. JOHN ‘‘BUD’’ HAWK POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in 

4 Rollingbay, Washington, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 955 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Post-

‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ‘‘John al Service located at 10355 Northeast Valley
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.22    
    


            ,
2005 


Cold
Spring Capital Inc.

51 Locust Avenue, Suite 302

New Canaan CT 06840 


Re:
Initial Public Offering 


Gentlemen:



        The
undersigned stockholder of Cold Spring Capital Inc. ("Company"), in consideration of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
("DBSI") entering into a letter of intent ("Letter of Intent") to underwrite an initial public offering
of the securities of the Company ("IPO") and embarking on the IPO process, hereby agrees as follows (certain capitalized terms used herein are defined
in paragraph 5 hereof): 


        1.     If
the Company solicits approval of its stockholders of an Initial Transaction, the undersigned will vote all Insider Shares owned by it in accordance with the majority
of the votes cast by the holders of the IPO Shares. 


        2.     The
undersigned will escrow its Insider Shares until six months after the consummation of an Initial Transaction subject to the terms of a Stock Escrow Agreement which
the Company will enter into with the undersigned and an escrow agent acceptable to the Company. 



        3.     The
undersigned hereby waives any and all right, title, interest or claim of any kind ("Claim") in or to any distribution
of the Trust Fund (as defined in the Letter of Intent) with respect to its Insider Shares and waives any Claim the undersigned may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any contracts
or agreements with the Company to or against the Trust Fund and will not seek recourse against the Trust Fund for any reason whatsoever. 


        4.     The
undersigned has full right and power, without violating any agreement by which it is bound, to enter into this letter agreement. 



        5.     As
used herein, (i) an "Initial Transaction" shall mean an acquisition by merger, capital stock exchange, asset or stock acquisition or other similar business
combination of one or more operating business, one or more portfolios of financial assets (including consumer and/or mortgage loans) or one or more real estate assets, or a series of such
transactions, that has a fair market value of at least 80% of the Company's net worth at the time of such transaction (excluding the amount held in the trust account representing a portion of the fees
of the underwriters, as more fully discussed in the Underwriting Agreement, dated as of            , 2005 between the Company and DBSI); (ii) "Insiders" shall mean all officers,
directors
and stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the IPO; (iii) "Insider Shares" shall mean all of the shares of Common Stock of the Company owned by an Insider prior to the IPO; and
(iv) "IPO Shares" shall mean the shares of Common Stock issued in the Company's IPO. 


        [Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 








        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Letter Agreement as of the date first written above. 



	 	 	MAXWELL A. STRATTON TRUST
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 Name: John M. Cornish

Title: Trustee















QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.22
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed August 17, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00673-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.G.S. AND T.W.S., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-01569

A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

In the underlying suit to modify the parent-child relationship, the Texas 

Department of Family and Protective Services intervened for protection of the children, 

and the Department was named temporary managing conservator of the children by order 

signed June 25, 2012. The Mother of the children counterclaimed against the Department, 

and the trial court granted the Department’s plea to the jurisdiction. The Mother then 

brought this interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §51.014(a)(8). Under 

this subsection of the statute, all proceedings in the trial court are stayed pending 

resolution of the interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §51.014(b).

The stay provision in Section 51.014(b) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code 

conflicts with the Family Code statutes governing cases brought by the Department for 
child protection. See Tex. Fam. Code §§263.201, 263.304, 263.305, 263.401.

Accordingly, on August 16, 2012, the Department filed a motion asking this court to 

abate the interlocutory appeal so that the trial court may conduct a statutorily required 

status hearing no later than August 24, 2012. See Tex. Fam. Code § 263.201. We have 

authority to make an “appropriate order that the law and the nature of the case 

require[s].” See Tex. R. App. P. 43.6. We GRANT the motion and issue the following 

order:

We order the appeal ABATED for the trial court to conduct a status hearing 

pursuant to Tex. Fam. Code § 263.201. During the abatement period, the trial court may 

consider an appropriate motion to sever the child protection action from the Mother’s 

counterclaims. A supplemental clerk’s record containing any new order(s) signed by the 

trial court shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before September 7, 2012.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate

the appeal on its own motion. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 17, 2010 

jam 

Order 

 

February 17, 2010 

139966 

CREAMUS PAXTON HOWARD, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139966 

 CoA: 293630 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of December 4, 2009, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
# C_2019383EN.01003501.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/35

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH v Hauptzollamt Lörrach

(Case C-559/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheading 85044030 - Static converters - Classification criteria - Main intended use)

(2019/C 383/38)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Lörrach

Operative part of the judgment

Subheading 85 044 030 of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, must be interpreted as meaning that static converters such as those at issue in the main proceedings may fall within that subheading only if the main use for which they are intended is with ‘telecommunication apparatus or automatic data processing machines and the units thereof’, within the meaning of that subheading, which is a matter for verification by the referring court.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 10, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 20
- 00715
- CV TRI PHAM , Appellant

V. MITRA MAHMOUDI , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20
- 01961
- E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Schenck, and Browning

Opinion by Justice Schenck The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated August 3 , 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 3 , 2020, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated November 2 , 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not– 2

–

been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, (1) verification of payment or arrangements to pay fo r the clerk’s record, or (2) written documentation that appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date,
appe llant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

200715 F

. P 05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT TRI PHAM, Appellant
No. 05

- 20

- 00715

- CV V. MITRA MAHMOUDI, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 01961

- E. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Whitehill and Browning participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee MITRA MAHMOUDI recover her costs of this appeal from appellant TRI PHAM.
Judgment entered this 10th day of December , 2020

.
Exhibit 32.1




Quarterly Certification Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Robert F.X. SillermanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: May 17, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00766-CV

Style: Keith Porter v. Patricia Porter

Date motion filed*: November 12, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Records & Pay Fees

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Evidence of Indigence or Payment of Reporter’s Record & Filing Fees

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 10/6/14 (Filing Fee) & 10/13/14 (Reporter’s Record)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Dates: 11/6/14 (Filing) & 11/13/14 (R.R.)

Date Requested: 45-Day Extension

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted in part; if document is to be filed, document due: December 29, 2014.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record is dismissed as 

moot because it was filed on October 31, 2014, and his request to file the reporter’s

record is dismissed as the reporter is responsible for filing it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.3(b). To the extent appellant seeks an extension to file evidence of indigence or

payment of the reporter’s record and filing fees, his motion is granted because his

counsel claims her medical issues delayed the trial court’s indigence contest hearing, 

but no further extensions will be granted. Thus, if appellant fails to file evidence of 

indigence or the filing fee by December 29, 2014, the Court may dismiss this appeal 

without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting

Date: November 18, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN THE INTEREST OF: C.O.

PETITION OF: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : No. 203 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 13th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED .
Exhibit 4.1


 


SEE RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS ON REVERSE
SIDE OF CERTIFICATE


 


 


	
  C-__

  	
  Incorporated
  Under

  the Laws of the State of Delaware

  on December 8, 2004

  	
  **______**

  



 


 


NEW ATHLETICS, INC.


 


 


Common Stock


 


                                THIS CERTIFIES THAT ______________ is the record holder of _______________ (______) shares of the
Common Stock of New Athletics, Inc. (the “Corporation”)
transferable only on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof, in
person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate
properly endorsed or assigned.


 


                                This
Certificate and the shares represented hereby shall be held subject to all of
the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of said
Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at
the office of the Corporation and made a part hereof as fully as though the
provisions of said Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws were imprinted in
full on this Certificate, to all of which the holder of this Certificate, by
acceptance hereof, assents and agrees to be bound.


 


 


 


                                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this _____ day of __________,
200__.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  President

  	
   

  



 


 





















 


                FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________________
HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN, AND TRANSFER UNTO _______ SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OF NEW
ATHLETICS, INC. REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND DO HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER SUCH STOCK ON
THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF
SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.


 


	
  DATED

  	
   

  	
  , 200__

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  IN PRESENCE OF

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (Witness)

  	
   

  	
  (Stockholder)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Stockholder)

  
						



 


NOTICE: THE
SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.


 


 


THE SECURITIES
REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933,
AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”).  SUCH SECURITIES
MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (A) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT, OR (B) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
REGULATION S PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE ACT AND, IF REASONABLY REQUIRED
BY THE COMPANY, SUCH COMPLIANCE IS CONFIRMED BY AN OPINION OF COUNSEL.  HEDGING TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE SECURITIES
REPRESENTED HEREBY MAY NOT BE CONDUCTED EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACT.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 23, 2009

/s/ Scott Mitchell RosenbergScott Mitchell RosenbergChief Executive Officer andChairman

---
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Development Partners,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jack Jie Qin, the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


May 14, 2010                        By: /s/ Jack Jie Qin
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Jack Jie Qin, Principal Executive and
                                        Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: April 2, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 63)]
[Notices]
[Page 15551]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ap02-55]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 5, 2002.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-7980 Filed 3-28-02; 4:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

�