alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40072 Conference Calendar

__________________ DALE HYDE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES T. HICKEY, Sheriff of Nueces County, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 92-CV-181

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995
Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dale Hyde, a former inmate of the Nueces County Jail, appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint. On appeal, Hyde alleges that he is unable to properly brief his appeal because he has "no knowledge as to what is required of him in litigating this cause of action." He further alleges that he "has no choice but to not respond, cancelling the action through no fault of his own."95-40072 -2- Insofar as Hyde's brief could be construed as a motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal, Hyde's motion is DENIED.
See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). Because Hyde has indicated that, without counsel, he is unable to proceed, Hyde's brief is construed as a motion to withdraw his appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Hyde's appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
Exhibit
32.1

OFFICER
CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Lenox Group Inc (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                    |                                                      
|----- | ------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 9,
  2006 | /s/ Susan E.
  Engel                                 
|      |                    |                                                      
|      |                    | Susan E.
  Engel                                     
|      |                    | Chairwoman
  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|      |                    |                                                      
|Date: | November 9,
  2006 | /s/ Timothy
  J. Schugel                             
|      |                    |                                                      
|      |                    | Timothy J.
  Schugel                                 
|      |                    | Chief
  Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer

---
#### In the Matter of Edward Murphy et al., Respondents-Appellants, v United States Dredging Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 3, 2012;

decided March 29, 2012

Reported below, 74 AD3d 815.

Motion by appellant-respondent for leave to appeal denied. Motion by respondents-appellants for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals *(see Parker v Rogerson,*35 NY2d 751, 753 [1974]).
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NETWORK APPAREL GROUP, LP, CLARUS DATA, 

INC., DBA KORCETT HOLDINGS, INC., KHI-TW, 

LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

AIRWAVE NETWORKS INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee

PAVLOV MEDIA, INC., APOGEE TELECOM, INC., 

ELAUWIT, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE INC., TIME 

WARNER CABLE TEXAS LLC, 

Defendants

______________________ 

2016-1943, 2016-2036

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Texas in Nos. 6:15-cv-00134-WSS, 

6:15-cv-00135-WSS, 6:15-cv-00136-WSS, 6:15-cv-00138-

WSS, 6:15-cv-00139-WSS, Judge Walter S. Smith Jr..

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID G. HENRY, SR., Gray Reed & McGraw, PC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented 
 

by MICHAEL D. ELLIS, JAMES LAWTON REED, JR., Houston, 

TX.

TRACY J. WILLI, Willi Law Firm, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JAMES 

NORMAN WILLI. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### Margarita Walter, Appellant, v John Walter, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 2010;

decided June 8, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theron Resource
Group. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine month period ended
February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2011

|/s/ | Jerry R. Satchwell
|--- | --------------------

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Theron Resource
Group. and will be retained by Theron Resource Group. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Clermont York Assoc., Respondent, v Leslie Feher, Appellant.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided April 3, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602).
Order entered September 28 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01151

- CR

SAMUEL FRANCO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Cour t Cause No. F15

- 41032

- M



### O RDER

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to issue the

mandate in this appeal INSTANTER

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John Dahle, certify that;

(1)        I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of Bear River Resources, Inc.;

(2)        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:    December 20, 2007
# CE2013165EN.01010501.xml

| 11.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 165/105 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 165/105

---

Thursday 1 December 2011Amendment of Decision 2007/659/EC as regards its period of application and the annual quota benefiting from a reduced rate of excise duty *

P7_TA(2011)0529

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 December 2011 on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2007/659/EC as regards its period of application and the annual quota benefiting from a reduced rate of excise duty (COM(2011)0577 – C7-0311/2011 – 2011/0248(CNS))

2013/C 165 E/20

(Special legislative procedure – consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2011)0577), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2011)0577),

| — | having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0311/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0311/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0382/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0382/2011),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
IV 

House Calendar No. 158 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1065 

[Report No. 111–411] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 45) increasing the statutory limit on the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

joint resolution (H.J. Res. 45) increasing the statutory 

limit on the public debt. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the joint 

3 resolution (H.J. Res. 45) increasing the statutory limit on 

4 the public debt, with the Senate amendment thereto, and 

5 to consider in the House, without intervention of any point 

6 of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 

7 a motion offered by the Majority Leader or his designee 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1065 RH 

1 that the House concur in the Senate amendment. The 

2 Senate amendment shall be considered as read. The mo3 tion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

4 controlled by the Majority Leader and Minority Leader 

5 or their designees. The previous question shall be consid6 ered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without in7 tervening motion. The question of adoption of the motion 

8 shall be divided between concurring in the matter pre9 ceding title I of the Senate amendment and concurring 

10 in the matter comprising titles I and II of the Senate 

11 amendment. The first portion of the divided question shall 

12 be considered as adopted. If the second portion of the di13 vided question fails of adoption, then the House shall be 

14 considered to have made no disposition of the Senate 

15 amendment. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 158 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1065 

[Report No. 111–411] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendcreasing the statutory limit on the public debt. ment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 45) inFEBRUARY 3, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Margaret Regan Smith, on Behalf of Hunter L, an Infant, Respondent, v Dawn F.B., Appellant. Richard L, Nonparty Respondent.

Submitted November 14, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 88 AD3d 729.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



I, Mark S. Gorder, Chief Executive Officer of IntriCon Corporation certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntriCon Corporation;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        [Intentionally Omitted];




(c)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: November 9, 2007

/s/
        Mark S. GorderMark S. GorderChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)






---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario RAMIREZ-BELMARES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40282

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 29, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ramirez-Belmares (Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has ñled a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medjet Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eugene I. Gordon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Eugene I. Gordon, Ph.D

Eugene I. Gordon, Ph.D
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003



















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Medjet Inc. and will be retained by Medjet Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1321

Crude Oil Option - Argus WTI Houston - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled Argus WTI Houston put and call options on the Argus Media Argus WTI Houston price specified 

in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media Argus WTI Houston

price for each business day that it is determined during the contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the arithmetic average of the Argus 

Media Argus WTI Houston (as described in Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is 

greater. On expiration of a Put Option, the value will be the difference between the strike price and the

arithmetic average of the Argus Media Argus WTI Houston (as described in Floating Price A), or zero 

whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style Average Price option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity multiplied by the 

settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per barrel and prices shall be in multiples of $0.01 per barrel. The minimum 

price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.