alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145558

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145558

COA: 309621

Muskegon CC: 09-058127-FC

MARK WAYNE BARNHARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of N8CONCEPTS,INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVECONBOY, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\ Steve ConboySteve ConboyPresidentPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 14, 2009

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**** 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Altounian, President, Chief Operating Officer& Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

 of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

August 18, 2010                                  /s/ Brian Altounian 

                                                               Brian Altounian 

                                                President, Chief Operating Officer

& Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

 

                                                                        

----
**Eurex Clearing AG**

**Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments**

**No. 085-23**

**December 8, 2023**

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of December 4, 2023: 

· Eurex Clearing Circular No. 085-23 (December 4, 2023): Equity Index Futures and Options, Total Return Equity Index Futures: Changes to transaction fees, post-trade fees and volume rebates, amendments to the Price List of Eurex Clearing AG. This circular provides for certain adjustments to transaction and post-trade fees, volume rebate thresholds, and rebate levels for certain equity index futures and options as well as total return equity index futures. For avoidance of doubt, Eurex Clearing clears listed futures and options outside the scope of its DCO license, which only applies to swaps. 

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars.  If you require any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By:	Eric Seinsheimer	

Title:	US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated:	December 8, 2023

Internal
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10097

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO GONZALEZ-MOLINA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-132-1

Before BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Gonzalez-Molina appeals his sentence for illegal reentry after

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Gonzalez-Molina contends that

the district court committed plain error by applying a 16-level increase to his

offense level based on its finding that his 2000 Pennsylvania conviction for

aggravated assault was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii).

The Government concedes that neither the law nor the record establishes that

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-10097

2

Gonzalez-Molina’s prior conviction was a crime of violence for purposes of the

enhancement and that it was plain error to increase Gonzalez-Molina’s sentence

based on that conviction.

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we agree that the

district court committed plain error by using Gonzalez-Molina’s Pennsylvania

aggravated-assault conviction to increase his sentence. See United States v.

Fierro-Reyna, 466 F.3d 324, 327-29 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Alfaro, 408

F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we vacate Gonzalez-Molina’s

sentence and remand for resentencing. See Alfaro, 408 F.3d at 211.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED
1

 

August 4, 2023

(Submitted via the CFTC Portal)

Assistant Secretary of the Commission

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Act Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20851

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) has submitted to the Commission a Rule Certification 

Submission pursuant to CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) for modifications to the SPIKES Market Maker Program 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Confidential Submission” or “Program”). This Confidential Submission 

included as Exhibit A contains confidential commercial or financial information. MGEX respectfully requests 

that the Commission not release the Confidential Submission. 

MGEX specifically requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Submission pursuant to Commission 

Regulations 145.9 and 145.5. Under Commission Regulation 145.9, a submitter making this request “shall 

specify the grounds on which confidential treatment is being requested.” Confidential treatment is being 

sought on the basis that the Confidential Submission contains confidential commercial or financial 

information under Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii). In addition, MGEX represents that the 

Confidential Submission is a nonpublic record pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.5. 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), MGEX asks the Commission to afford confidential 

treatment to the Confidential Submission in perpetuity.

Should the Commission receive a Freedom of Information Request for the Confidential Submission, MGEX 

acknowledges that it will be notified of the request and then instructed to provide a detailed written 

justification for confidential treatment, per Commission Regulation 145.9(e)(1). 

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (612) 321-7128 or 

psparby@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Peter D. Sparby

Vice President, Counsel

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
    Time and Date:

June 27, 2001--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
June 28, 2001--10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

    Place: Renaissance Hotel, 999 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
(202) 898-9000.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: At this meeting the Committee will hear presentations 
and hold discussions on several health data policy topics. On the 
first day an update from HHS has been scheduled on the 
implementation of the administrative simplification provisions of 
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA). The Committee also will be briefed by HHS staff on a number 
of additional data policy activities including quality of care for 
racial and ethnic minorities and the implementation of OMB federal 
data standards on race and ethnicity. The Committee will review 
reports in progress including the report from the Subcommittee on 
Populations on functional status data, and Subcommittees will hold 
working sessions in the afternoon. There will also be Subcommittee 
sessions early in the morning of the second day. Day two of the full 
Committee meeting will feature a briefing on the HHS Patient Safety 
Task Force, the National Quality Forum and the National Quality 
Report from the Institute of Medicine. The afternoon agenda begins 
with a briefing on the status of the Centers for Disease Control's 
National Electronic Data Surveillance System (NEDSS). The remainder 
of the afternoon's agenda will be devoted to Committee business 
including reports from the Subcommittees and planning future 
agendas.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of 
committee members may be obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Room 1100, Presidential 
Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 
(301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page 
of the HHS website: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further 
information including an agenda will be posted when available.

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 01-14057 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 ofChapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Dirk A. Sodestrom, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity asan officer of Westaff, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)                   The Annual Report of the Company onForm 10-K for the period ended October 29, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(ii)                The information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: January 27, 2006                             |
|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |
| By:/s/ Dirk A. Sodestrom                           |   |
| Dirk A. Sodestrom                                  |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. and will be retainedby Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP98-44-000 and GP98-38-000]


EL Paso Natural Gas Company, Vastar Gas Marketing, Inc. and 
Atlantic Richfield Company; Notice of Settlement Agreement

May 24, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 16, 2001, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso), Vastar Gas Marketing, Inc. (Vastar) and Atlantic Richfield 
Company (ARCO) (collectively referred to as the Signatory Parties) 
filed, for the Commission's approval a Settlement Agreement 
(Settlement) under Rule 602 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure in the captioned dockets. A copy of the Settlement is 
available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Reference 
Room and may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Signatory Parties state that the Settlement resolves the Kansas ad 
valorem refund claims raised by El Paso against Vastar and ARCO. El 
Paso originally sought refunds of approximately $6.6 million from 
Vastar and/or ARCO. The Settlement resolves these claims, and the 
related defense of Vastar and ARCO, in exchange for Vastar's and ARCO's 
lump sum payment of $4.1 million. In addition, the Settlement will 
result in the full and complete release of Vastar's and ARCO's claims 
against its royalty owners with respect to Kansas ad valorem tax 
refunds on El Paso's system, and the termination of all related 
proceedings pending before the Commission as they relate to EL Paso's 
claims.
    Initial comments are due June 5, 2001; relay comments are due June 
15, 2001.

Davis P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13593 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Development Partners,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jack Jie Qin, the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


August 3, 2010                     By: /s/ Jack Jie Qin
                                     --------------------------------
                                     Jack Jie Qin, Principal
                                     Executive and Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

131614 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,
Justices v SC: 131614 COA: 269525 Ingham CC: 04-001475-FC JOHNNY LEE HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 of International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.   Very truly yours,   /s/ David RogersDavid RogersChief Executive Officer/s/ David RogersDavid RogersChief Financial OfficerDated: April 13, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to David Rogers, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: May 16, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 31150]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16my00-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 30, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-12362 Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATIONS
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Viper Powersports Inc., a Nevada corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2006,
the undersigned certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Viper Powersports Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Viper Powersports Inc.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   April 13, 2007

| | /s/   John Lai                                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | John Lai, Principal Executive Officer of Viper Powersports Inc.

Date:   April 13, 2007

| | /s/   Jerome Posey                                                 
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Jerome Posey, Principal Financial Officer of Viper Powersports Inc.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Lamar SELF, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-7325.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Rodney Lamar Self, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Lamar Self seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Self has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the *256appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*