alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                         CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                           1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
                                   SUITE 2902
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036

                                  CERTIFICATION

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2009 to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, A. Alexandra Denahan, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                        /s/ A. Alexandra Denahan
                                        A. Alexandra Denahan
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 7, 2009


                                       56
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Holdings Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul K. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 14, 2009By:

/s/ Paul K. KellyPaul K. KellyChairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.6 AMENDING AGREEMENT  THIS AGREEMENTmade as of the 1st day of January, 2004.   AMONG:  STELLAR INTERNATIONAL INC.  (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation")   - and   LMT FINANCIAL INC.  (hereinafter referred to as the "Advisor")    RECITALS   WHEREAS:  A. The parties to this agreement entered into a fiscal advisory and consulting agreement dated January 1, 2003 (the "Agreement").  B. The parties are desirous of entering into this agreement to amend the consideration provisions of the Agreement.  NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this agreement and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged), the parties hereto agree as follows:   1. Section 5(ii) of the Agreement will be deleted and restated as follows:  (ii) pay to the Advisor, for the second year of the agreement an annual fee of $120,000 (plus GST thereon), which shall be satisfied in full by the issuance by the Corporation to the Advisor of 200,000 common shares of the Corporation at a deemed issue price of $0.60 per share and the payment in cash of $8,400 on account of GST;  2. Section 5(iv) will be added to the agreement and will state as follows:  (iv) grant to the Advisor, in respect of the second year of the agreement an option to acquire up to 200,000 common shares of the Corporation , at an exercise price to be determined prior to the beginning of the second year of the agreement, in the context of the market and in accordance with the terms of the Corporations stock option plan and the rules of the TSX Venture Exchange, with such option to be exercisable at any time and from time to time until the second year anniversary of the date of such grant.  3. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended and in full force and effect.   4. This agreement may be signed in counterparts and each such counterpart shall constitute an original document and such counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.  5. This agreement shall ensure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their representative successors and assigns.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement.   STELLAR INTERNATIONAL INC.   By: /s/ Peter RiehlAuthorized Signing Officer  LMT FINANCIAL INC.   By: /s/ Arnold TenneyAuthorized Signing Officer
No. 112.

#### Burwell, Executrix, et al. *v.*Powell et al.

Argued December 8, 1931.

Decided December 14, 1931.

Mr. *James E. Heath-*for appellants.

Mr. *Stewart K. Powell,*with whom Mr. *Wm. M. Williams*was on' the brief, for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Ennis Water Works*v. *Ennis,*233 U. S. 652, 657, 658; *Banning Co.*v. *California,*240 U. S. 142, 153, 154, 155; *Board of Liquidation*v. *Louisiana,*179 U. S. 622, 638.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               JURISDICTION OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                              INCORPORATION                    BUSINESS NAME
------------------                              -------------                    -------------
<S>                                               <C>                              <C>
BTG Technology Systems, Inc. *                     Virginia                         Tech Systems

Concept Automation, Inc. of America *              Virginia                         CAI

Delta Research Corporation                         Virginia                         Delta

BTG Technology Resources, Inc.                     Florida                          BTR

Nations, Inc.                                      New Jersey                       Nations

STAC, Inc.                                         Virginia                         STAC

BTG Systems Engineering, Inc.                      Virginia                         Systems Engineering
</TABLE>



-----------------

* A wholly-owned subsidiary of BTG Technology Resources, Inc.





                                       47
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titanium Asset Management Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Hoenecke, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: May 18, 2011
/s/ Jonathan HoeneckeJonathan HoeneckeChief Financial Officer
#### STEPHENSON v. PITT COUNTY MEM’L HOSP.

No. 496P98

Case below: 131 N.C.App. 155

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 December 1998.
```

[Federal Register: March 26, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 58)]
[Notices]
[Page 16447]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26mr01-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 27, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-7538 Filed 3-22-01; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                                RSA SECURITY INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                          (AS EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2000)





      WHEREAS, RSA Security Inc. ("RSA Security") maintains the RSA Security
Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, Effective March 1, 2000; and

      WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.01 of the Plan, RSA Security has reserved
the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so;

      NOW THEREFORE, Sections 4.04 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:

      Section 4.04 MODIFICATION OR REVOCATION OF ELECTION BY PARTICIPANT. A
Participant may not change the amount of his Base Salary Deferrals during a Plan
Year. However, a Participant may discontinue a Base Salary Deferral election at
any time by filing, on such forms and subject to such limitations and
restrictions as the Administrative Committee may prescribe in its discretion, a
revised Participation Agreement with the Administrative Committee. If approved
by the Administrative Committee, revocation shall take effect as of the first
payroll period next following its filing. If a Participant discontinues a Base
Salary Deferral election during a Plan Year, he will not be permitted to elect
to make Base Salary Deferrals again until the later of the next Plan Year or six
months from the date of discontinuance. In addition, the Deferral Period may be
extended if an amended Participation Agreement is filed with the Administrative
Committee at least six months before the Deferral Period (as in effect before
such amendment) ends; provided, that only one such amendment may be filed with
respect to each Participation Agreement. Under no circumstances may a
Participant's Participation Agreement be made, modified or revoked
retroactively, nor may a deferral period be shortened or reduced.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 (AUDITED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDJET INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         343,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,666
<PP&E>                                         471,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 266,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,320,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,915
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,021,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,025,295
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,879,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,324,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (594,009)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,730,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,915,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yogesh SHAH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-1281.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 24, 2010.

Decided Sept. 10, 2010.

Michelle L. Jacobs, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel T. Hansmeier, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Springfield, IL, Richard H. Parsons, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge and JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge.

*113ORDER

After we reversed the judgment with instructions to resentence, 559 F.3d 643 (7th Cir.2009), the defendant was resen-tenced, and again appealed. His lawyer has filed an *Anders*brief and moved to dismiss the appeal as frivolous; he has responded

On remand the judge had imposed a below-guidelines sentence of 108 months, the practical equivalent of time served. The defendant has been released from custody and removed to India. His convictions, which are not at issue, render him inadmissible to the United States; he has served his prison sentence; and the amount he has been ordered to pay in restitution is uncollectable. Even if the appeal is not moot, it is entirely frivolous, as explained in great and lucid detail in the *Anders*brief filed by the federal defender.

The motion is granted and the appeal Dismissed.
#### James Joseph OWENS, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Erick STEIGER, Mr., Chief of Security; Kim Anthony, Ms., Case Manager; Mary Jo Williams, Regional Analyst; Edward G. Perry, Chairman, Defendants — Appellees.

No. 08-6438.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 2, 2008.

*228James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Joseph Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). To the extent that Owens seeks to state a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claim based on alleged civil rights violations occurring in Maryland, this court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Carp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Owens seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

To the extent that Owens seeks to state a § 1983 claim based on alleged civil rights violations occurring in Ohio, or seeks to raise a habeas corpus claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), we have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Owens v. Steiger,*No. l:08-cv-00121-JFM (D. Md. filed Feb. 21, 2008; entered Feb. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification
of President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the
      Report.





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:           November
9, 2009











/s/
            Kevin
      T. BottomleyKevin
      T. BottomleyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |   |                             |   |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 24, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Roger Zolg              |   |
|               |   | Roger Zolg, CFO                  |   |
|               |   | (as Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|               |   |                             |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
e.spire Communications, Inc.:

Under date of March 24, 2000, except as to notes 2, 8, and 19, which are as of
April 13, 2000, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of e.spire
Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of
the aforementioned financial statements, we also audited the related financial
statement schedule. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

                                                               /s/ KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
April 14, 2000
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

March 19, 2019

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2016-2746

XITRONIX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, DBA KLA-TENCOR, 

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

Decided: March 14, 2019

Non-Precedential Order

______________________

Please make the following change:

Page 2, line 29, change “cannon” to “canon.”
Exhibit 12**AIRGAS, INC.****COMPUTATION OF FINANCIAL RATIOS**(in thousands, except ratios)                     **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges** **2002**  **2003**  **2004**  **2005**  **2006**    **EARNINGS COMPUTATION:**                    Add:                    Pretax income from continuing operations beforeequity earnings and minority interest $79,304  $108,768  $124,395  $147,627  $208,037 Fixed charges  67,849   68,767   66,848   83,139   92,553 Distributed income of unconsolidated Affiliate  901   943   724   —   —                   $148,054  $178,478  $191,967  $230,766  $300,590                                      Subtract:                    Preferred dividend requirements of consolidatedaffiliate  —   —   (1,151)  (4,626)  (4,589)                Earnings for purposes of computation $148,054  $178,478  $190,816  $226,140  $296,001                                      **FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION:**                    Interest expense (1) $52,783  $50,639  $46,340  $57,547  $65,110 Estimate of the interest component of rent expense  15,066   18,128   19,357   20,966   22,854                      Preferred dividend requirements of consolidatedaffiliate  —   —   1,151   4,626   4,589                 Fixed charges for purposes of computation $67,849  $68,767  $66,848  $83,139  $92,553                                      **RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**  **2.18X**   **2.60X**   **2.85X**   **2.72X**   **3.20X**  **(1)** includes amortization of capitalized financing costs and discount on trade receivablesecuritization.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janice Clarke, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:  January 12, 2011


/s/  Janice ClarkeJanice ClarkeChief Financial Officer