alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

### FORM 8-K

---

# CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 23, 2008

---

CyberOptics Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Minnesota                                | (0-16577)             | 41-1472057         
|---------------------------------------- | --------------------- | -------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of          | (Commission File No.) | (I.R.S. Employer   
|incorporation or organization)           |                       | Identification No.)
|                                        
|5900 Golden Hills Drive                  |                       |                    
|Minneapolis, Minnesota                   |                       | 55416              
|(Address of principal executive offices) |                       | (Zip Code)         

(763) 542-5000(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

____________________________________________________________
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.
below):

|o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

Item 2.02.   Results of Operations and Financial Condition



On July 23, 2008, CyberOptics Corporation published a press release
providing information regarding its results of operations and financial
condition for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.



Item 9.01.   Financial Statements and Exhibits



Exhibit 99   Press Release Dated July 23, 2008.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



CYBEROPTICS CORPORATIONBy
        /s/   Jeffrey A. BertelsenJeffrey A. Bertelsen, Chief Financial Officer




Dated:   July 23, 2008







---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1448 

 CEIVA LOGIC, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

FRAME MEDIA, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

 

and 

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

 DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

 

 Defendant. 

Gary A. Hecker, The Hecker Law Group, of Los Angeles, California, argued for 

plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James M. Slominski. 

Allen S. Rugg, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued 

for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Frame Media, Inc., were 

James J. Foster and Hunter D. Keeton. On the brief for Digital Spectrum Solutions, 

Inc., were Robert D. Fish and Andrew Mar, Fish & Associates, P.C., of Irvine, California. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California 

Judge James V. Selna 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1448 

CEIVA LOGIC, INC., 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

FRAME MEDIA, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California 

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-636. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 

Per Curiam (MAYER, GAJARSA, and MOORE, Circuit Judges ) 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nexam Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 15, 2010

                                         By:  /s/ G.J. de Klerk
                                              -------------------------------
                                              G.J. de Klerk
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
Prepared and filed by St Ives Financial



Exhibit 10.2

OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT

     This OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), dated October ____, 2005, is made by and between MIVA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [Optionee] (the “Optionee”).

     The Company previously granted to the Optionee stock options to purchase shares of Company common stock, $0.01 par value, as follows (the “Options”):

	Grant Date	Grant Type	Options Granted	Plan Governing Grant	Option Price
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 


     1.      Cancellation of Options.  The Options are hereby canceled and extinguished without further action by any of the parties to this Agreement.  The Optionee shall execute such documents and other papers and take such further actions as may be reasonably required or desirable to evidence cancellation of the Options.

     2.      Consideration.  In consideration for the cancellation of the Options, the Company agrees to grant the Optionee restricted stock units under the FindWhat.com, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the terms of which shall be evidenced in a separate restricted stock unit agreement attached hereto.

     3.      Release.  Effective as of the date hereof, the Optionee does hereby, on behalf of the Optionee and his heirs, successors and assignees, if any, release and absolutely forever discharge the Company and its managers, officers, directors, shareholders, affiliates, employees and agents, from and against all claims, demands, damages, debts, liabilities, obligations, costs, expenses, actions and causes of action of any nature whatsoever, that the Optionee has, or at any time previously had, or shall or may have in the future, arising with respect to the Options.

     4.      Entire Agreement.  This Agreement contains the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, with respect thereto.

     5.      Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely within such State without regard to conflict of law principles thereof.






     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

	 	                              MIVA,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	                              By:________________________________
	 	                              Its:________________________________
	 	 
	 	                              OPTIONEE
	 	 
	 	                              ________________________________

                              [Optionee]


 

- 2 -
# C_2011079EN.01002201.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/22

---

Corrigendum to authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 269 of 5 October 2010
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 269 of 5 October 2010

2011/C 79/11

On page 1, State aid N 339/09:

for:

| ‘Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2010’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2010’

read:

| ‘Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2012’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2012’

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1073

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Dom South - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Dom South

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lucious Muldrow, Appellant, v James T. Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of an individual Justice of the Appellate Division (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code

I,
Dawn M. Jaffray, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of
Westaff, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to the best of my knowledge:



Date:
February 1, 2008

|By:                                                               |  | /s/DAWN M. JAFFRAY |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|Dawn M. Jaffray Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. and will be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Nicholas Lahanas, the Chief Executive Officer of Meridian Acquisition Corporation, hereby certify that:  1. I have reviewed Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Meridian Acquisition Corporation (theregistrant);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Nicholas LahanasNicholas Lahanas, Chief Executive Officer  Date:  February 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of China Quest Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

CHINA QUEST ACQUISITION CORP.


/s/ William Tay
--------------------------------
By: William Tay
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: April 14, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

VICTOR CHAVEZ-GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30370

D.C. No. 1:11-cr-00041-EJL-6

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2014** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, Senior District

Judge.

*** 

FILED

APR 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
Because the facts and circumstances of this case are well known to the

parties, we repeat them only as necessary to illuminate our decision.

I

The government candidly acknowledges its error in inadvertently failing to

timely disclose a late-discovered local agency’s exculpatory fingerprint report. As

soon as the government became aware of the report, it was turned over to ChavezGarcia’s attorney. At the same time the government alerted the court to its lapse,

the government suggested that the defendant be given more time before trial to

prepare. Defense counsel did not request a continuance, and the court barred the

government -- but not Chavez-Garcia -- from referring to or making any use of the

report during trial.

During the trial, defense counsel introduced the report and effectively used it

to cross-examine a key government witness, establishing that his client’s

fingerprints were not on a bag of methamphetamine found in his mother’s house

where he lived. Accordingly, reviewing this issue de novo, we conclude beyond

any doubt that the government’s failure to timely disclose the report was harmless.

II

In connection with his sentence, Chavez-Garcia argues that the court erred in

calculating the amount of methamphetamine attributed to him, i.e., 422.7 grams of

2
actual methamphetamine, the amount found in his residence. He says the amount

should be only 28 grams, an amount he referred to in a telephone call as a

“worker,” meaning one ounce, or 28 grams. We review this issue for clear error.

A conspirator is accountable for “reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions

of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity, that occurred

during the commission of the offense of conviction, in preparation for that offense,

or in the course of attempting to avoid detection or responsibility for that offense.”

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (2013).

Chavez-Garcia was actively involved in the methamphetamine conspiracy,

originally said he knew the methamphetamine was in the house, and was caught on

a recording using code words in the transaction. The court did not clearly err in

attributing 422.7 grams of methamphetamine to Chavez-Garcia. 

AFFIRMED.

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**JUDGE DIANA ANHALT AND COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 133 EM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of December, 2015, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is** DENIED **, and the**

**Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-066)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council. 

# DATES:

Thursday, June 28, 2001, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.; and Friday, June 29, 2001, 8:15 a.m. to 2 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 9H40, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Kathy Dakon, Code Z, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0732. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be closed to the public on Thursday, June 28, 2001, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)9(B), to hear briefings on the FY 2003 Performance Plan. Friday, June 29, 2001, will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:
    - OMB Perspectives on Budget
    - Space Launch Initiative Update
    - Space Station Update
    - Committee/TaskForce/Working Group Reports
    - Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: June 1, 2001.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-14283 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P