alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2011004EN.01006701.xml

| 7.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 4/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 4/67

---

Thursday 25 March 2010Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors – Mr Igors Ludboržs

P7_TA(2010)0077

European Parliament decision of 25 March 2010 on the nomination of Igors Ludboržs as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0017/2010 – 2010/0805(NLE))

2011/C 4 E/16

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0017/2010),

having regard to the fact that, at its meeting of 16 March 2010, the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0040/2010),

| A. | whereas Igors Ludboržs fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Igors Ludboržs fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the nomination of Igors Ludboržs as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the nomination of Igors Ludboržs as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
#### Sandra FRILEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL PLAYTEX, INC., Defendant.

No. 82-4103-CV-C-5.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D.

Aug. 13, 1984.

Roger C. Brown, Jefferson City, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Thomas O. Baker, Thomas N. Sterchi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

ORDER

SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

Before entering judgment in this strict products liability/negligence case, the Court must consider whether the jury’s punitive damage award must be reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault. Missouri law, which has only recently adopted a system of comparative fault, has not addressed this issue. Nevertheless, Missouri law is quite clear that punitive damage awards are intended not to compensate the plaintiff, but to punish the defendant and to deter the defendant and others from similar conduct. *See*MAI 10.02 (1983 Revision), 10.04 (1983 Revision). Consequently, the Court is of the opinion that the punitive damage award in this case should not be reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault because punitive damages are designed to benefit and protect society as a whole. The extent of the particular plaintiff’s fault is simply irrelevant. This view is in accord with the overwhelming weight of authority. *See, e.g., Campbell v. Van Roekel,*347 N.W.2d 406 (Iowa 1984); *Shahrokhfar v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*634 P.2d 653 (Mont.1981); *Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery,*487 F.Supp. 1268 (W.D.Okla.1980).

Of course, the jury’s award of $6,500.00 in compensatory damages must be reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault. *Gustafson v. Benda,*661 S.W.2d 11 (Mo.1983) (en banc). The jury found that the plaintiff was 49% at fault. Consequently, the plaintiff will be entitled to recover 51% of her compensatory damages. ’

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the punitive damage award of $50,000.00 shall *not*be reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault. It is further

ORDERED that the compensatory damage award shall be reduced to $3,315.00.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1071 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1071

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
 fifths vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on 
                            the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2010

Mr. Akin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
 fifths vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on 
                            the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the public debt) is 
amended by striking clauses 1 through 4, by redesignating clause 5 as 
clause 3, and by inserting before clause 3 the following new clauses:
    ``1. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or joint 
resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that 
increases the statutory limit on the public debt if there is any other 
matter in such measure.
    ``2. A bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference 
report thereon, that increases the statutory limit on the public debt 
may not be considered as passed or agreed to unless so determined by a 
vote of not less than three-fifths of the Members voting, a quorum 
being present.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32
<PAGE>

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Digital  Development  Partners,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Report"),  Jack Jie Qin, the
Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  and William E. Sluss the Principal
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


May 12, 2011                         By:/s/ Jack Jie Qin
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Jack Jie Qin, Principal Executive
                                        Officer


May 12, 2011                         By:/s/ William E. Sluss
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        William E. Sluss, Principal Financial
                                        Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 20
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


     I, James Ransom, Chief Accounting Officer of Trans-World Insurance Company
d/b/a Educaid, an Arizona corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify that:

     1. The Company (as Master Servicer and Administrator under the following
Sale and Servicing Agreements):

     A.   Educaid Student Loan Trust 1994-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1994-1
          First Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement Dated as of May 2,
          1994;

     B.   Educaid Student Loan Trust 1994-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1994-2
          Second Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement Dated as of December
          22, 1994;

     C.   ClassNotes Trust 1995-I, f/k/a Education Loan Alliance, Asset Backed
          Notes Series Series 1995-1, Sales and Servicing Agreement dated March
          17, 1995;

     D.   ClassNotes Trust 1995-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1995-2, first
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated December 31, 1995;

     E.   ClassNotes Trust 1995-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1996-1, Second
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated March 27, 1996;

     F.   ClassNotes Trust 1995-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1996-2, Third
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated December 27, 1996.

     G.   ClassNotes Trust 1997-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1997-1, first
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated February 27, 1997.

     H.   ClassNotes Trust 1997-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1997-2, Second
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated December 24, 1997.

     I.   ClassNotes Trust 1998-I, Asset Backed Notes Series 1998-1, Third
          Supplemental Sales and Servicing Agreement dated March 17, 1998

has fulfilled all of its obligations pursuant to the above-referenced
agreements, as described in Section 4.8 (annual Statement as to Compliance;
Notice of Default) for the period of January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998,
and for those transactions which closed in 1998, from their closing dates
through December 31, 1998.

     The Company has provided this Officer's Certificate to those parties listed
in Section 4.8 of the respective Sale and Purchase Agreements.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
March 25, 1999.


                                        By:  /s/ JAMES RANSOM
                                             ------------------------------
                                             James Ransom
                                             Chief Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):March 19, 2007

---

Rimage Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Minnesota

(State Or Other Jurisdiction Of Incorporation)



000-00619
        41-1577970(Commission File Number)
        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)




7725 Washington Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN
        55439(Address Of Principal Executive Offices)
        (Zip Code)




(952) 944-8144

Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing
is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions
(seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---

Items under Sections 1 through 4 and 6 though 9 are
not applicable and therefore omitted.



ITEM 5.02
        DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS.




On March 7, 2007, the Board of Directors of Rimage Corporation (the Company) approved amendments to the Companys letter agreement with its executive officers Bernard P. Aldrich, Manuel M. Almeida, David Suden, Robert M. Wolf  and Pamela V. Lampert relating to severance and change of control benefits, which amendments are described in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2007. The Company also reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2007 that the Company and Messrs. Aldrich, Almeida and Wolf and Ms. Lampert had entered into the Amended and Restated Severance/Change of Control Letter Agreement that memorialized these amendments to the letter agreement.



On March 19, 2007, the Company and David Suden, Chief Technology Officer, entered into the Amended and Restated Severance/Change of Control Letter Agreement. A copy of form of Amended and Restated Severance/Change of Control Letter Agreement between the Company and its executive officers is attached to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.





SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



RIMAGE CORPORATIONBy:
        /s/   Robert M. WolfRobert M. Wolf
Chief Financial Officer




Date:   March 22, 2007





---
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-71557 and 333-87841) of Medjet Inc. (a
Development Stage Company) of our report dated January 29, 2002 relating to the
financial statements of Medjet Inc., which report appears in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A of Medjet Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                       ROSENBERG RICH BAKER BERMAN & COMPANY

                                       /s/Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Company

Bridgewater, New Jersey
May 2, 2002
142 So. 587

#### UNITED WHOLESALE GROCERY CO. v. MINGE FLORAL CO.

1 Div. 733.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 9, 1932.

Gordon, Edington & Leigh, of Mobile, for petitioner.

Lyons, Chamberlain & Courtney, of Mobile, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of the Minge Floral Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court. in United Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Minge Floral Co., 142 So. 586.

The petition seeks to review the decision of the Court of Appeals on a finding of fact. The writ is denied on authority of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the report of Emo Capital Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending
April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang, Chief Executive
Officer,Director, Principal Financial Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350),
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Juanming Fang

Juanming Fang,

Chief Executive Officer
Director
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: November 15, 2011
No. 115.

#### Lewis et al. *v.*Reynolds, Collector of Internal Revenue.

February 15, 1932.

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph of the opinion *(ante,*pp. 282, 283):

“Also that at the timé of his. last .decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the state inheritance taxes.”

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.
Exhibit 99.1



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



VALSPAR COMPLETES SHARE REPURCHASE



MINNEAPOLIS, Minn., April 13, 2007 The Valspar Corporation (NYSE-VAL) announced today that it has repurchased two million shares of Valspar common stock at an initial purchase price of approximately $55.2 million or $27.61 per share. The shares were repurchased as part of an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co. as announced in Valspars April 10, 2007 press release.



Investor Contact:  Lori A. Walker, (612) 375-7350



Media Contact:  Mike Dougherty, (612) 375-7802



The Valspar Corporation (NYSE:VAL) is a global leader in the paint and coatings industry. Since 1806, Valspar has been dedicated to bringing customers the latest innovations, the finest quality and the best customer service in the coatings industry.

For more information, visit www.valsparglobal.com.





---

This press release contains certain
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on managements expectations and beliefs
concerning future events. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of
which are outside the control of the Company that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These
uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, dependence of internal earnings growth on economic conditions and
growth in the domestic and international coatings industry; risks related to any future acquisitions, including risks of adverse
changes in the results of acquired businesses and the assumption of unforeseen liabilities; risks of disruptions in business
resulting from the integration process and higher interest costs resulting from further borrowing for any such acquisitions; our
reliance on the efforts of vendors, government agencies, utilities and other third parties to achieve adequate compliance and
avoid disruption of our business; risks of disruptions in business resulting from the Companys relationships with customers
and suppliers; unusual weather conditions adversely affecting sales; changes in raw materials pricing and availability; delays in
passing along cost increases to customers; changes in governmental regulation, including more stringent environmental, health and
safety regulations; the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings; the outbreak of war
and other significant national and international events; and other risks and uncertainties. The foregoing list is not exhaustive,
and the Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of such statements.

# # #



---
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 9, 2011 | By:    | /s/ John C. Houghton                                               |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Name:  | John C. Houghton                                                   |
|              | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
No. 5.

#### Mitchell, Attorney General, et al. *v.*Penny Stores, Inc.

Argued October 16, 1931.

Decided October 26, 1931.

*Per Curiam:*

In this suit, brought to enjoin the

enforcement of the provisions of §§ 2 (c), 11, and 13 of article 1 of chapter 90 of the Laws of Mississippi of 1930, an application was made to the District Court of the United States for an interlocutory injunction. The District Court, composed of three judges (U. S. C., Title 28, § 380), granted an interlocutory injunction upon the giving by the plaintiffs of a bond payable to the State of Mississippi in the sum of $5,000, conditioned as required by law, restraining the enforcement of the statutory provisions until the cause could be fully heard and determined. No opinion was rendered by the District Court, and the only question'presented by the record upon this appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in granting an injunction until the case could be heard upon the merits. *Alabama*v. *United States,*279 U. S. 229, 231; *United Fuel Gas Co.*v. *Public Service Commission,*278 U. S. 322, 326; *National Fire Insurance Co.*v. *Thompson,*281 U. S. 331, 338. The *577order was made prior to the decision of this Court in *State Board of Commissioners*v. *Jackson,*283 U. S. 527, and, as no abuse of discretion is shown, the order must be affirmed.

*Mr. W. L. Guice,*with whom *Messrs. George T. Mitchell,*Attorney General of Mississippi, and *J. A. Lauderdale,*Assistant Attorney General, were on- the brief, for appellants.

*Messrs. Wm. H. Watkins, Martin A. Schenck, Clark McKercher, Robert S. Marx,*and *W. H. Danñat Pell*were on the brief, for appellee.
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 390A98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 486

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 November 1998.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)   September 5, 2007



---

INTRICON CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Pennsylvania
        1-5005
        23-1069060(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)
        (CommissionFile Number)
        (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)




1260 Red Fox Road, Arden Hills, MN 55112

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



Registrants telephone number, including area code (651) 636-9770



____________________________________________________

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 5.03.
        Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.




On September 5, 2007, IntriCon Corporation (the Company), amended the Companys Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation  to permit the Company to issue uncertificated shares in compliance with the rules of the American Stock Exchange. The amendment became effective upon the filing of the Amendment to Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on September 5, 2007. Pursuant to thePennsylvania Business Corporation of 1988, as amended, the amendment was approved by the Companys Board of Directors and effected without shareholder action. A copy of the Amendment to Articles of Incorporation is attached as Exhibit 3.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 9.01.
        Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(d) Exhibits



3.1
        Amendment to IntriCon Corporations Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation




---

SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





IntriCon CorporationBy:
        /s/Scott LongvalDate:   September 7, 2007
        
        
        Scott LongvalChief Financial Officer






---

EXHIBIT INDEX



3.1
        Amendment to IntriCon Corporations Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation


---