alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 962 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LUTETIUM OXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.75 Lutetium oxide (CAS No. 

12032–20–1) (provided for in 

subheading 2846.90.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 962 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adrian Stephen BURKE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10529.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 16, 2006.

Robert A. Bork, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Jason F. Carr, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Adrian Stephen Burke appeals from his 77-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for Unlawful Reentry of a Deported Alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand.

Burke contends that the district court erred by basing a 16-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i), on a Nevada judgment that contained two convictions, only one of which qualifies as a drug trafficking offense. Burke contends the judgment was ambiguous and thus, the enhancement was improper. We disagree. The Nevada state court judgment unambiguously reflects that Burke was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, in violation of Nev.Rev. Stat. 453.337. Based on this conviction, the district court properly imposed the 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). *See United States v. Benitez-Perez,*367 F.3d 1200, 1204 (9th Cir.2004) (“Because [Nev.Rev.Stat. § 453.337] does not reach conduct outside of a drug trafficking offense under *665§ 2L1.2, *Taylor[ v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990) ]’s categorical analysis is satisfied and the 16 level enhancement was properly applied”).

However, because Burke was sentenced under the then-mandatory guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anthony BONNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10758

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

Susan B. Cowger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, Jay Stevenson Weimer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Dianne Kathryn Jones McVay, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Bonner has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Bonner has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald M Prest, certify that;

(1)          I have reviewed this report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 of Omnicity Corp. (formerly Bear River Resources, Inc);

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  February 11, 2009
Exhibit 7.3



MTR Corporation Limited



Computation of

Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges

Based on Hong Kong GAAP

(Expressed in millions of HK$)



|                                                                  |  |         |  | As of December 31
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | -----------------
|                                                                  |  |         |  | 1998             
|Profit before tax                                                 |  |         |  | 2,819            
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|Fixed Charges:                                                    |  |         |  |                  
|Interest expenses                                                 |  |         |  | 1,123            
|Amortization of debt discount or deferred debt costs              |  |         |  | 26               
|Representative portion of interest in operating lease expenses(2) |  |         |  | 23               
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|Total fixed charges                                               |  | (B)     |  | 1,172            
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|Less: fixed charges capitalized                                   |  |         |  | 473              
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|                                                                  |  |         |  | 699              
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|Earnings before taxes and fixed charges                           |  | (A)     |  | 3,518            
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                |  | (A)/(B) |  | 3.00             
|                                                                  |  |         |  |                  

---

|(1) |  | Due to the adoption of SSAP 34, Employee Benefits, issued by the Hong Kong Society of Accountants, which became effective on January 1, 2002, a restatement of the 2001
financial data was necessary. See Note 42A of Notes to the Financial Statements.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The balance represented one third of operating lease expenses of the Group.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Online Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Shaun Carter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Shaun Carter

Shaun Carter

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 30, 2006
```

[Federal Register: December 13, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 64403]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13de01-25]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 11, 2002.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-30888 Filed 12-11-01; 11:58 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3669] 

The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 1 PM on Tuesday, June 19, 2001, in Room 6332, Department of Transportation Headquarters, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. The purpose of the meeting is to finalize preparations for the Sixth Session of the Subcommittee on Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargoes and Containers of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) which will be held on July 16-20, 2001, at the IMO Headquarters in London. 

The agenda items of particular interest are: 

—Amendment 31-02 to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, its Annexes and Supplements including harmonization of the IMDG Code with the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, and implementation of Annex III of the Marine Pollution Convention (MARPOL 73/78), as amended. 

—Revision of the Emergency Schedules (EmS). 

—Review of the Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes (BC Code), including evaluation of properties of solid bulk cargoes. 

—Cargo securing manual. 

—Casualty and incident reports and analysis. 

—Development of an instrument for multimodal training requirements. 

—Stowage and segregation requirements for freight containers on containerships with partially weatherproof hatchway covers. 

—Development of a manual on loading and unloading of solid bulk cargoes for terminal representatives. 

—Amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) chapters VI and VII and MARPOL Annex III to make the IMDG Code mandatory. 

Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing: Mr. E. P. Pfersich, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MSO-3), 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 267-1577. 

Dated: May 24, 2001.

Stephen M. Miller,

Exective Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-13807 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
EX-10.1






Stock Ownership Guidelines & Holding Requirements



Management



To provide a direct link between key executive and shareholder interests, executives will be
expected to have a significant equity interest in the Company. The individual guidelines are
established as follows:



1) The executive’s base salary is multiplied by the appropriate multiple:



Chief Executive Officer – 2 times annual base salary



Other Key Executives – 1 times annual base salary




	 	2)	 	The product is divided by The Laclede Group’s prior 365-day average closing common
stock price as reported by the New York Stock Exchange






	 	3)	 	The resulting amount is rounded to the nearest 100 shares





Stock ownership levels should be achieved by each executive within 5 years of the adoption of these
guidelines or within 5 years of the first appointment into a covered position. Once established,
as long as the covered executive remains in his or her position, the ownership guideline does not
change as a result of changes in his or her base salary or normal fluctuations in Laclede’s stock
price. However, these guidelines may be amended at any time.



Ownership under these guidelines shall include individually owned shares, restricted shares and
benefit plan investments in Laclede Group stock. Such guidelines apply to executives who; 1) are
subject to the Section 16 requirements under the Securities Exchange Act and any other designated
participants; and 2) receive annual restricted stock grants pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan.



Active executives, covered under these guidelines, are also required to retain the shares acquired
from the Equity Incentive Plan after the restrictions lapse for a minimum of 3 years.



Directors



To provide a direct link between Director and shareholder interests, members of the Board of
Directors will be expected to hold equity interest in the Company. The guideline is established as
follows:




	 	1)	 	The Director’s guideline is based on 2 times their annual cash retainer






	 	2)	 	The product is divided by The Laclede Group’s prior 365-day average closing common
stock price as reported by the New York Stock Exchange






	 	3)	 	The resulting amount is rounded to the nearest 100 shares





Stock ownership levels should be achieved by each Director within 5 years of the adoption of these
guidelines or within 5 years of the first appointment to the Board. Once established, as long as
the covered Director remains in his or her position, the ownership guideline does not change as a
result of changes in the annual retainer or normal fluctuations in Laclede’s stock price. However,
these guidelines may be amended at any time. Shares considered owned include individually owned
shares and restricted shares.



Active Directors, covered under these guidelines, are also required to retain the shares after the
restrictions lapse for a minimum of 3 years.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                   11,389
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                         18,174
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              74,962
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          0
<LOANS>                                 320,159
<ALLOWANCE>                               3,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          454,936
<DEPOSITS>                              392,054
<SHORT-TERM>                             24,984
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       2,345
<LONG-TERM>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     7,422
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                               28,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          454,936
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          25,525
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         4,978
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            842
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         31,345
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       13,552
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       15,212
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    16,133
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               537
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          13,811<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           5,319
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                5,319
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,525
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             4.18
<LOANS-NON>                                  47
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          2,849
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              (226)
<RECOVERIES>                                 35
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         3,195
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                      3,195
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0

<FN>
(F1) Other expense includes: salaries and employee benefits of $8,217, occupancy
     of $2,653, data processing of $332, federal deposit insurance of $73,
     advertising of $352, telephone and postage of $321 and supplies of $426 and
     other expenses which totaled $1,437.
</FN>

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0501

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHAWN MARIE WALSTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until May 18, 2020, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 13 2020

04/13/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0501