alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010036EN.01000201.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 36/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.1.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | NN 29/08 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Üzemanyag jövedéki adójának visszaigénylési lehetösége a vasúti, vizi és légi szállítás jogszabályban meghatározott területein |
| Legal basis | 2003. évi CXXVII. Törvény |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Sectoral development, Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Tax rate reduction |
| Budget | Annual budget: HUF 7 650 million
  Overall budget: HUF 76 500 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 5.2007-4.2017 |
| Economic sectors | Railways, Inland water transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Pénzügyminisztérium |
| Budapest |
| József Nádor tér 2–4. |
| 1051 |
| MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.1.2010

Reference number of State Aid

NN 29/08

Member State

Hungary

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Üzemanyag jövedéki adójának visszaigénylési lehetösége a vasúti, vizi és légi szállítás jogszabályban meghatározott területein

Legal basis

2003. évi CXXVII. Törvény

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Sectoral development, Environmental protection

Form of aid

Tax rate reduction

Budget

Annual budget: HUF 7 650 million

Overall budget: HUF 76 500 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

5.2007-4.2017

Economic sectors

Railways, Inland water transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Pénzügyminisztérium

Budapest

József Nádor tér 2–4.

1051

MAGYARORSZÁG/HUNGARY

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, William Tay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trivest Acquisition
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: August 8, 2008

Trivest Acquisition Corp.


/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------
William Tay, President and CEO
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 3, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00743

- CV
RAYMOND W. OLSEN, TR USTEE OF THE R.W. AN D K.A. OLSEN

REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 19

- 07018

- C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, III, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Pede rsen, III Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss th e appeal without prejudice

. Appellant explains a document he filed in the trial court was erroneously construed

as a notice of appeal by the district clerk and filed in this Court

. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a) (1)

.

200743f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RAYMOND W. OLSEN, TRUSTEE OF THE R.W. AND K.A. OLSEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, Appellant

No. 05

- 20

- 00743

- CV V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 19

- 07018

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III; Justices Whitehill and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee The State of Texas recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Raymond W. Olsen, Trust ee of The R.W. and K.A. Olsen Revocable Living Trust.

Judgment entered this 3 rd day of September, 2020.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS


Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),  Jerry Ulrich, Chief Financial Officer of Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2015 (the “Periodic Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

|   |                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 21, 2015/s/ Jerry UlrichJerry UlrichChief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies the report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### WHOLY v. BRITISH & FOREIGN S. S. CO., Limited.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 25, 1909.)

No. 277.

¡Shipping (§ 84*) — Liabilities op Vessel — Torts—Personal Injuries.

Where a section of a hatch cover was so short as to require blocking to keep it in place, but the cover was not otherwise defective, the Injury of a longshoreman by ine tipping of such cover, which fellow workmen had failed to block when replacing it, is chargeable to the negligence of fellow servants, and the vesseL is not liable therefor.

[Ed. Noto. — For oilier cases, see Shipping, Cent. Dig. § 949; Dec. Dig. g 84.*]

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

This cause comes here upon appeal to review a decree of the District Court (158 Fed. 379) dismissing the libel of libelant, a longshoreman, who was injured by the tipping up of a section of hatch cover, which caused him to fall into the hold of respondent’s steamer St. Eillans.

Alvin C. Cass (Avery E. Cushman, of counsel), for appellant. Wing, Putnam & Burlingham (James Forrester, of counsel), for appellee.

Before EACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The majority of the court are unable to distinguish this case from McDonnell v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 143 Fed. 480, 74 C. C. A. 500. In that case, as in this, the section of hatch *400cover, whicn was so short as to require blocking to keep it in place, gave way because it was not wedged, so as to bear properly on the flange. We held in the earlier case that the negligence was that of defendant’s fellow servants in setting the cover without wedging it, and that there could be no recovery. In the case at bar the District Judge found that:

> “There are but two explanations of the accident. Either the stevedore who chocked this particular hatch cover wedged'it in such a position that it did not have sufficient purchase at the lower end, or, if he inserted the blocks properly and rendered the hatch cover immovable, its condition was thereafter changed through the actions of the stevedores themselves prior to the time of the action, and on neither theory can the vessel be held liable.”

In these findings and conclusion we concur. This case is distinguished from International Mercantile Marine Co. v. Fleming, 151 Fed. 203, 80 C. C. A. 479, by the circumstance that in that case the appliances for covering the hatch “had become dangerous by the accumulation of débris which had so hardened in the slots that the strong-back which was, so to speak, the keystone of the structure, could not be properly set, thus rendering the entire covering unsuitable and dangerous.” There is no testimony of any such condition here.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.
#### Janice Clement, Respondent, v Kateri Residence, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 66]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 30, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, in this action for personal injury and negligent hiring and retention allegedly arising out of the care afforded plaintiff during her stay at defendant nursing home, granted plaintiff’s motion to compel disclosure of certain documents and denied defendant’s cross motion for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s disclosure demand for negative outcome and incident reports involving conditions and occurrences like those alleged in the complaint are not protected by the quality assurance privilege, since such reports, although utilized by defendant’s quality assurance committee, were not prepared by or at the behest of such committee, but rather were of the type routinely prepared and maintained pursuant to 10 NYCRR 415.15 (a) (3) (i) *(see Matter of Subpoena Duces Tecum to Jane Doe,*99 NY2d 434, 440 [2003]). As indicated in the affidavit of *528defendant’s director of quality management, the function of defendant’s quality assurance committee, as it pertains to the negative outcome and incident reports, appears to be no more than one of compliance with the requirements 10 NYCRR 415.15 (a) (3) (i), and, thus, subject to disclosure *(see Kivlehan v Waltner,*36 AD3d 597, 599 [2007]).

Furthermore, plaintiff’s demands, as time-limited by the court, as to, inter alia, personnel information regarding each employee who had contact with plaintiff while she was in defendant’s residence, staff medical policies, and system-wide operational materials such as contracts, licenses, and bylaws, are material and necessary *(see generally Anonymous v High School for Envtl. Studies,*32 AD3d 353, 358 [2006]), and are not overly broad or unduly burdensome, inasmuch defendant is compelled by statute and regulation to maintain and continuously collect such information *(see e.g.*Public Health Law § 2805-e; 10 NYCRR 415.15 [a] [3] [i]; 10 NYCRR 415.30 [h], [n]; 10 NYCRR 412.1; *Simmons v Northern Manhattan Nursing Home, Inc., 52*AD3d 351 [2008]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. *[See 2008*NY Slip Op 31810(U).]
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/  Donald R. ChappelDonald R. ChappelChief Financial Officer of Williams Pipeline GP LLC,
general partner of Williams Pipeline Partners L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Ventures,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, Ian Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Date: February 18, 2008

/s/      Ian Jackson

Ian JacksonChief Executive
Officer

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Rubicon Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raja M. Parvez, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William F. Weissman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Raja M. Parvez     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Raja M. Parvez President
and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William F. Weissman
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | William F. Weissman Chief
Financial Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeltal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 17-18, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 am to 2:30 pm.
    Agenda: to review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Aftab A. Ansari, PhD, National Institutes of 
Health, NIAMS, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 5AS25N, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institues of Health, HHS)
    Dated: May 31, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14362 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 469.

#### Lowry *v.*McCarl, Comptroller General, et al.

November 11, 1935.

*Mr. Fred B. Rhodes*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General MacLean,*and *Mr. Paul A. Sweeney*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.