alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1922. JASON DARRIUS MOBUARY v. THE STATE.

In 2003, Jason Darrius Mobuary pled guilty to enticing a child for indecent

purposes. Mobuary filed a motion for out-of-time appeal and a motion for

appointment of counsel. The trial court denied both motions on December 11, 2019,

and Mobuary filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s ruling on May 26, 2020.

We lack jurisdiction.

OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) requires that a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days of

the order sought to be appealed. “[A] timely-filed notice of appeal is a jurisdictional

prerequisite to a valid appeal.” Henderson v. State, 265 Ga. 317, 317 (1) (454 SE2d

458) (1995). Because Mobuary’s notice of appeal was filed 167 days after the order

he seeks to appeal, it is untimely. We thus lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal,

which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 16, 2020

06/16/2020
H. R. 987 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 601 8th 

Street in Freedom, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘John Scott Challis, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN SCOTT CHALLIS, JR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 601 8th Street in Freedom, Pennsylvania, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘John Scott Challis, Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John Scott Challis, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NATHANIEL WATKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-260) Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Watkins appeals from the criminal judgment entered on January 11, 1991. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In criminal cases, the defendant is accorded ten days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” United States v. Raynor , 939 F.2d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 1991). The district court’s final judgment was entered on the docket on January 11, 1991. Watkins’ notice of appeal was filed on June 12, 2002. Because Watkins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00041-CR

Style: Adrian Dewayne Graves

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: May 9, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record 

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 11, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 3 Current Due date: May 10, 2013

Date Requested: May 15, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: May 15, 2013

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: May 14, 2013
```

[Federal Register: July 20, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 138)]
[Notices]
[Page 41689]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20jy05-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, August 5, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-14368 Filed 7-18-05; 11:42 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
H. Res. 1004 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 19, 2010. 

Whereas, on March 12, 1859, the origins of Northwestern 

University Feinberg School of Medicine began with Drs. 

Hosmer A. Johnson, Edmund Andrews, Ralph N. Isham, 

and David Rutter signing an agreement to establish the 

medical department of Lind University, which provided 

the first graded curriculum in a United States medical 

school; 

Whereas, on October 9, 1859, the medical school marked its 

first session; 

Whereas, on April 26, 1864, the medical department of Lind 

University became Chicago Medical College; 

Whereas in 1870, Chicago Medical College entered into an 

agreement with Northwestern University to serve as the 

University’s Department of Medicine; 

Whereas in 2002, Northwestern University Board of Trustees 

renamed the medical school in honor of benefactor Reuben Feinberg; 

Whereas the Feinberg School of Medicine is one of the Nation’s pre-eminent medical schools, producing the next 

generation of leaders in medical and related fields 

through its innovative research and educational programs; 
2 

•HRES 1004 EH 

Whereas the Feinberg School of Medicine supports the provision of the highest standard of clinical care by its clinical 

affiliates for their patients; 

Whereas the Feinberg School of Medicine is cited annually by 

national college rankings as one of the top medical 

schools for research; 

Whereas Feinberg School of Medicine alumni are leaders in 

their fields; 

Whereas the Feinberg School of Medicine is a leader in aligning experts from various disciplines to create a collaborative research enterprise that explores the fertile discovery space between disciplines; and 

Whereas Feinberg School of Medicine faculty are nationally 

and internationally prominent physicians and scientists 

who have an impact on our most pressing medical and 

research issues: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Feinberg School of Medicine 

on the momentous occasion of its 150th anniversary, and 

expresses its best wishes for continued success; 

(2) recognizes and commends the Feinberg School 

of Medicine for its dedication to educating world class 

physicians and scientists, sponsoring cutting edge medical research, and providing highly specialized clinical 

care; and 

(3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make available enrolled copies of this resolution 
3 

•HRES 1004 EH 

to the Feinberg School of Medicine for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3370

___________

Jeffery D. Williams, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Iowa State Men&s Reformatory Health * Northern District of Iowa.

Services, et al. (numerous other *

defendants), * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 5, 1997

 Filed: December 12, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey D. Williams, an Iowa inmate, appeals the district court&s 28 U.S.C.

1

§ 1915A(b)(1) dismissal of his civil rights action. Williams brought multiple claims

against the defendants alleging deliberate indifference to assorted medical needs,
-2-

violations of equal protection, and other constitutional and statutory violations. Upon

a careful review of the record and Williams&s brief, we conclude that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Williams&s complaint as frivolous. See

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992) (standard of review); Neitzke v.

Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (frivolous complaint lacks “an arguable basis

either in law or in fact”). Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny all of Williams&s

pending motions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  November      15, 2010 |   |   | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                                    |   |   | Michael      J. MauceliManager      and Member of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC, the manager of Reef      Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the Managing General Partner of the      Partnership(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard ESTRADA, also known as Taco Estrada, Appellant.

No. 94-2816.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1996.

Decided June 4, 1996.

*366Kent R. Cutler, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant.

Ted McBride, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellee.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and WILSON,* District Judge.

*

 The Hon. William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

WILSON, District Judge.

Defendant/appellant Richard Estrada (“Estrada”) was convicted in the United States District Court, District of South Dakota, of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and using or carrying a firearm in relation to drug trafficking, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Defendant appealed and this Court affirmed both the conspiracy conviction and the firearm conviction. *United States v. Estrada,*45 F.3d 1215. After the decision was rendered in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided *Bailey v. United States,*516 U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Estrada appealed this Court’s decision and the United States Supreme Court granted writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court vacated this Court’s judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of its recent holding in *Bailey, supra. Estrada v. United States,*- U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 664, 133 L.Ed.2d 516 (1995).

In *Bailey,*the Supreme Court held that to sustain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), the government must present “evidence sufficient to show an active employment of the firearm by the defendant.” *Bailey,*516 U.S. at -, 116 S.Ct. at 505. The Court further stated that the mere storage of weapons in close proximity to drugs or drug proceeds is insufficient to constitute “active employment.” *Bailey*at -, 116 S.Ct. at 508. Additionally, the Court concluded that “[i]f the gun is not disclosed or mentioned by the offender, it is not actively employed, and it is not ‘used’.” *Id.*

As this Court noted in its prior decision, a Mach 10 and a .22 caliber revolver were found in co-conspirator Dosset’s bedroom. A partially loaded magazine for the Mach 10 was found within five to seven feet from the bed in Dosset’s bedroom. There was no evidence at trial suggesting that Estrada “actively employed” the firearms as that phrase has been defined by *Bailey, supra.*Absent such evidence, a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) cannot be sustained.

In light of the Supreme Court’s holding in *Bailey,*Estrada’s conviction for using or carrying a firearm in relation to drug trafficking is reversed for lack of evidence and the case is remanded to the district court for resentencing on the remaining count. Estrada’s conspiracy conviction, however, is again affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, in connection with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |        |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
| |  | ------ |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | Dated: |  | August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael S. McClure               
| |  |        |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | Michael S. McClure                   
| |  |        |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| |  |        |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000932623
<NAME>    Red Hot Concepts, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                         534,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    201,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,515,578
<PP&E>                                       4,302,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                 356,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,757,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,615,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,623
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,757,137
<SALES>                                      9,438,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,438,739
<CGS>                                        3,045,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,589,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,778,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (164,222)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (360,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,294,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.91)
        

</TABLE>
October 30, 2014

By Email: submissions@cftc.gov

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: tpSEF Inc. – Regulation 40.2 Certification of CDS Index Contract – European 

Crossover 5Y Swaps and Swaptions (#14-22P)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

tpSEF Inc. (“tpSEF”) herby notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) of its intent to list CDS Index Contract – European Crossover 5Y Swaps and 

Swaptions (the “Contract”) on tpSEF’s swap execution facility. tpSEF intends to list these 

Contracts on November 3, 2014.

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.2, this submission includes:

i. A copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in 

Appendix D to Part 40 of the Commission’s regulations;

ii. The intended listing date – November 3, 2014;

iii. A certification by tpSEF that: (a) the Contract complies with the Commodity 

Exchange Act, as amended, and the Commission regulations thereunder; and (b) 

concurrent with this submission, tpSEF posted on its website: (i) a notice of 

pending certification of the Contract, and (ii) a copy of this submission, attached 

as Exhibit A;

iv. The Contract’s terms and conditions, attached as Exhibit B; and

v. An explanation and analysis of the Contract’s compliance with applicable core 

principles and Commission regulations, attached as Exhibit C.

tpSEF is listing the Contract by virtue of updating the terms and conditions of CDS Index 

Contract – European Crossover 5Y submitted to the Commission for self-certification pursuant 

to Commission Regulation 40.2 on September 29, 2013. A copy of the terms and conditions 

marked to show changes from the version submitted on September 29, 2013 is attached as 

Exhibit D.
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
H. Cooper, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:






(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of,
and for the period covered by the Report.






By:
              /s/ Robert
      H. CooperExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and SecretaryFebruary
      20, 2008













A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                        SUNTECH POWER HOLDINGS CO., LTD.
Number                                                           Ordinary Shares
-[___]-                                                                  -[___]-

           Incorporated in the Cayman Islands under the Companies Law
                    (as amended or revised from time to time)

       The authorized share capital of the Company is US$5,000,000 divided
        into 500,000,000 shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.10 each

THIS CERTIFIES THAT [_____] of [_______] is the registered holder of [______]
Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and
Articles of Association thereof.

Executed on behalf of the Company this [____] day of [______] 20[__].


-------------------------------------   [Seal]
Director/Secretary

<PAGE>

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS. THE
SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED FOR SALE, SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED (I) IN THE
ABSENCE OF (A) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR THE SHARES UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (B)
AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, IN A GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FORM, THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT
REQUIRED UNDER SAID ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (II) UNLESS SOLD
PURSUANT TO RULE 144 UNDER SAID ACT.

   TRANSFER

I ____________________________________ (the Transferor) for the value received
DO HEREBY transfer to ________________________________________ (the Transferee)
the _____________________________________________ shares standing in my name in

SUNTECH POWER HOLDINGS CO., LTD.

To hold the same unto the Transferee

Dated
      -------------------------------

Signed by the Transferor
In the presence of:


-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Witness                                 Transferor