alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **3** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Port        Authority of New York and New Jersey** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 5/24/94 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 27 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|----|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **4** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **South        Florida Coffee Warehousing & Transport Association,        Inc.** |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 6/16/94 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **5** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **COEX        Coffee International, Inc.** |
|--|---------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 6/20/94 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 1 |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Resources Ltd. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando
Garcia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
9, 2009











/s/ Armando
Garcia


Armando
Garcia,


President,
Secretary & Treasurer


(principal
executive and financial officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7511

WILLIE LEE GARY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUSAN HAYES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-673-5-F)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gary v. Hayes, No. CA-95-673-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-01-021]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

June 7, 2001 at 11 a.m. 

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

  

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-362 and 731-TA-707-710 (Review) (Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on June 21, 2001.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: May 29, 2001. 

By order of the Commission: 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-14090 Filed 5-31-01; 2:02 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1087

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - NGPL Midcont - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC NGPL Midcont

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Maropco, 

Inc. and E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00573-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-35950

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

On August 29, 2022, appellants, Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., 

filed a motion to abate this appeal until the trial court concludes a new trial regarding certain 

litigation expenses and issues a new final judgment.

We grant the motion.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. This Court will consider a motion to reinstate by either party or may reinstate on its own 

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually 

Date: September 13, 2022
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Rodriguez, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 505]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered August 9, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*706Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Randy BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-5350-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 2, 2010.

Alison S. Arms, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Michael L. Desautels, of counsel), Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of Vermont, Burlington, VT, for Appellant.

Wendy L. Fuller, Assistant United States Attorney (Gregory L. Waples, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel), for Tristram J. Coffin, United States Attorney for the District of Vermont, Burlington, VT, for Appellee.

Present: JOSEPH M. McLAUGHLIN, ROBERT A. KATZMANN, and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Following the district court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant Randy Barrett’s motion seeking to dismiss the indictment on May 20, 2009, 2009 WL 1457022, Barrett entered a conditional plea on August 17, 2009 to a charge for failing to update his registration as a sex offender pursuant to *630the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA” or “the Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). On appeal, defendant reiterates his challenges to the constitutionality of SORNA, arguing that the Act is an invalid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and that his prosecution was invalid because he lacked adequate notice of the federal registration requirement in violation of his due process rights. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.1

The defendant’s appeal is wholly precluded in light of our recent decisions in *United States v. Guzman,*591 F.3d 83 (2d Cir.2010) and *United States v. Hester,*589 F.3d 86 (2d Cir.2009). In those cases, we considered and rejected a virtually identical set of challenges to the constitutionality of SORNA based on the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause.

Specifically, in *Guzman*we stated that “[w]e have no difficulty concluding that § 2250(a) is a proper congressional exercise of the commerce power.” *Guzman,*591 F.3d at 90. In *Hester,*we held that as long as the defendant has notice of a corresponding state obligation to register as a sex offender, “a due process challenge to a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) based upon a lack of notice is without merit.” *Hester,*589 F.3d at 92. Here, there is no dispute that the defendant received and affirmatively acknowledged multiple valid notices and, in fact, complied with his obligation by filing numerous change of address notifications.

Because clear circuit precedents fully preclude the defendant’s arguments, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

1

. This case was heard in tandem with *United States v. Harrison,*No. 09-4115-cr, because both cases present identical issues on appeal.
H. R. 918 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 East 

3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, as the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAN LUNDINE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel BELTRAN-MARQUEZ, d.b.a. Trinidad Romero Atondo, a.k.a. Ignacio Martinez-Chavez, a.k.a. Polo, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 12-30223, 12-30225.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Filed Oct. 3, 2013.

Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*770J. Justin Blewitt, Jr., Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Scranton, PA, Mark E. Morrison, Esq. Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, United States Attorney Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Miguel Beltran-Marquez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 188-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A); and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Beltran-Marquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Beltran-Marquez has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Beltran-Marquez has waived his right to appeal his conspiracy conviction and 188-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss Appeal No. 12-30223. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief with respect to the revocation of supervised release or the sentence imposed upon revocation. We therefore affirm the judgment challenged in Appeal No. 12-30225.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Beltran-Marquez’s pro se motions to strike the *Anders*brief and appoint substitute counsel are DENIED. To the extent Beltran-Marquez is seeking appointment of counsel to collaterally attack his conviction and sentence, he may make that request in connection with any 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that he files.

Appeal No. 12-30223 DISMISSED; Appeal No. 12-30225 AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 251 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.251

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
 To extend by 15 months the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards 
 Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 
Standards Program Extension Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS PROGRAM 
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.
    Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from 
Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-254; 6 U.S.C. 621 note) 
is amended by striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``5 years and 3 
months''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Eduard Korsinsky, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: November 13, 2008  /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Paul Goddard, ChiefExecutive Officer of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), and JohnVarian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, tothe best of his knowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned have set their handshereto as of the 13th day of November, 2008.

 

 
| By:    |       /s/  Paul Goddard         |   | By:    |       /s/  John Varian            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   Paul  Goddard, Ph.D.                              |   |   |   John Varian                                         |
|   |   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----