alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010091EN.01001401.xml

| 9.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/14

---

Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in conformity with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 91/06

Aid No: XF 12/09

Member State: Italy

Region/Authority granting the aid: Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia

Direzione centrale risorse agricole, naturali e forestali

Servizio pesca e acquacoltura

Title of aid scheme/name of company receiving individual aid: regolamento recante criteri e modalità per l’attuazione degli interventi creditizi in materia di pesca e acquacoltura erogabili ai sensi dell’articolo 5, lettera n) della legge regionale 20 novembre 1982 n. 80

Legal basis: decreto del Presidente della Regione 11 maggio 2009, n. 0125/Pres.

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of individual aid granted: EUR 412 000

Maximum aid intensity: Up to 40 %

Date of entry into force:

Duration of the scheme or individual aid award (not later than 30 June 2014); indicate:

| — | under the scheme: the date until which aid may be granted; |
| --- | --- |

—

under the scheme: the date until which aid may be granted;

| — | until 30 June 2014 |
| --- | --- |

—

until 30 June 2014

Objective of aid: The aid is intended to support credit schemes for SMEs engaged in constructing, enlarging and modernising aquaculture facilities, investments in the processing and marketing sector, and the application of new technologies to improve the environment, hygiene conditions and product quality

Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Article 11 ‘Aid to productive investments in the aquaculture sector’ and Article 16 ‘Aid to processing and marketing’

Activities concerned: Fisheries and aquaculture

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Direzione centrale risorse agricole, naturali e forestali |
| --- |
| Servizio pesca e acquacoltura |
| Via Sabbadini 31 |
| 33100 Udine UD |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0432555225 |
| Fax +39 0432555140 |
| E-mail: s.pesca.agrifor@regione.fvg.it |

Direzione centrale risorse agricole, naturali e forestali

Servizio pesca e acquacoltura

Via Sabbadini 31

33100 Udine UD

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0432555225

Fax +39 0432555140

E-mail: s.pesca.agrifor@regione.fvg.it

Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://arpebur.regione.fvg.it/newbur/visionaBUR?bnum=2009/05/20/20

Justification: indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund: A scheme has been established to implement Regional Law No 80 of 20 November 1982, which provides for credit schemes for fisheries and aquaculture, as an alternative to the types of aid provided for under the EFF

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence K. White, Interim Chief Financial Officer& Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May 23, 2011

/s/ Lawrence K. WhiteLawrence K. WhiteInterim Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,966
<PP&E>                                          27,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,126
<BONDS>                                          1,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,553
<SALES>                                        141,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,360
<CGS>                                           87,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,031
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.67
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: November 18, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 69511]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18no02-31]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 5, 2002.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-29322 Filed 11-14-02; 12:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 56748]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se04-37]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 29, 2004.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-21349 Filed 9-20-04; 10:24 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### Anthony A. BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAMILY DOLLAR, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1971.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.

Anthony A. Brothers, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Brothers seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing Brothers’ action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brothers seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Brothers’ motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronne L. Steinocher,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of March 2010.


/s/ Ronne L. Steinocher
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Mitchell
      Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August
                13, 2008
            /s/
                Scott Mitchell RosenbergScott
                Mitchell RosenbergChief
                Executive Officer andChairman
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT 11.1
       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                        ENERGY SEARCH, INCORPORATED
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         YEAR ENDED
                                                                      DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                                                      -----------------
<S>                                                                       <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net Income                                                                  (367,281)
Shares
  Weighted average shares                                                  2,996,533
  outstanding                                                              3,768,241
Basic earnings per share                                                        (.14)

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net Income                                                                  (367,281)
Shares
  Weighted average shares                                                  2,996,533
  outstanding                                                              3,768,241
Diluted earnings per share                                                      (.14)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Fritz L. LaPorte, in his capacity as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MAKO Surgical Corp., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
     the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and(ii)
     the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MAKO Surgical Corp.
   November 3, 2010
     /s/ Fritz L. LaPorteFritz L. LaPorte
Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAKO Surgical Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.            33


---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 28, 2020 No. 04-20-00234-CV Kyle BRATTON , Appellant v. HOLT TEXAS, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas, Appellee From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05583 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within fifteen days after the deadline but without a motion for extension of time to file the notice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1, 26.3. On August 17, 2020, we ordered Appellant to file a written response presenting a reasonable explanation for the late notice of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant timely filed a written response explaining the late notice of appeal; our August 17, 2020 order is satisfied. See Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc. , 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989) (noting a “reasonable explanation” comprises all but “deliberate or intentional noncompliance”). We reinstate the appellate timetable. Appellant’s brief is due on September 16, 2020.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 11127 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**John Lewis Davis, II,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 669

- 2

Before **Smith, Dennis,**  and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent John Lewis Davis , II , has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Davis has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 1, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-11127 Document: 00516413812 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2022No. 21

- 11127

2 and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellat e review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-11127 Document: 00516413812 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2022
Exhibit 23.1
                         Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
GreenMan  Technologies,  Inc.  on  Form  S-3  (Nos.  333-22813,  333-27625,  and
333-49485) of our report,  which  contains an  explanatory  paragraph  about the
Company's  ability to continue as a going concern,  dated August 7, 1998, except
for Note 19 as to which  the date is  September  4,  1998,  on the  consolidated
balance  sheets of GreenMan  Technologies,  Inc. as of May 31, 1997 and 1998 and
the related consolidated statements of loss, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the years then ended,  which report appears in the Form 10-KSB of
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1998.

                                                                        
                                                  Wolf & Company, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts
September 14, 1998
S06A0764.

#### HUMAN v. HARPAGON COMPANY, LLC.

(637 SE2d 684)

Melton, Justice.

Property owned by Larry Human, a delinquent taxpayer, was levied in 2002 for collection of past due property taxes and sold to Heartwood 11, LLC (“Heartwood”). Human was served with a notice barring the right of redemption pursuant to OCGA § 48-4-45, which informed Human that his right to redeem the property would expire on February 20,2004. Human did not redeem the property within the redemption period (see OCGA § 48-4-42), and on February 20, 2004 Heartwood conveyed the property to the Harpagon Company, LLC (“Harpagon”). On April 21, 2004, Harpagon filed a petition to quiet title to the property pursuant to OCGA § 23-3-40. Following a hearing, a special master concluded that the property was lawfully levied for failure to pay taxes and that fee simple interest in the property vested in Harpagon. Human appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that the tax sale was void because of alleged deficiencies in the tax sale process and that the trial court erred in denying him a jury trial.

1. Human contends that the special master erred by denying his right to a jury trial in Harpagon’s quiet title action. However, because this action was brought “to remove clouds on [Harpagon’s] title” pursuant to the conventional quia timet statute, OCGA § 23-3-40, Human had no right to a jury trial. *Johnson v. Red Hill Assoc., Inc.,*278 Ga. 334, 335 (2) (602 SE2d 572) (2004).

2. Human’s remaining arguments challenge the trial court’s adoption of the special master’s findings regarding the legitimacy of the tax sale. “However, since no transcript was made of the proceeding before the special master in which the facts of the case were established, the special master’s findings on which the trial court’s *373judgment was based cannot be reviewed.” (Citation omitted.) *Johnson v. Red Hill Assoc., Inc.*at 336 (3).*

Decided November 20, 2006

Reconsideration denied December 15, 2006.

*Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Richard N. Hubert, Barry L. Zimmerman,*for appellant.

*Proctor, Chambers & Hutchins, Robert J. Proctor, Bradley A. Hutchins, Edward T. McAfee,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*

 To the extent that Human claims that the trial court’s final judgment was void because the court did not file the special master’s report until several months after it had already entered its final judgment, such argument is without merit. It is undisputed that Human had actual notice of the special master’s findings and conclusions prior to the trial court entering the order adopting the special master’s findings.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP98-150-000 and CP98-151-000]


Millennium Pipeline Company, LP, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation; Notice of Site Visit

May 25, 2001.
    From Monday, June 4 through Wednesday June 6, 2001, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a site visit of an 
alternative route along and within the Consolidated Edison of New York, 
Inc. (ConEd) electric transmission and the Taconic State Parkway 
rights-of-way. This alternative is referred to as the ConEd Offset/
Taconic Alternative and is between approximate mileposts 391.2 and 
404.1 of the proposed Millennium Pipeline Project.
    We will meet at the following locations on these dates and times:
    <bullet> Jane E. Lytle Memorial Arboretum parking area (go through 
the Hudson National Golf Course on Lounsbury Road, Croton-on-Hudson, 
New York) on June 4, 2001, at 12 noon; and
    <bullet> Teatown Lake Reservation Nature Center, 1600 Spring Valley 
Road, Ossining, New York, on June 5, 2001, at 9 am and will continue 
along the ConEd Offset/Taconic Alternative.
    For further information call the Office of External Affairs, at 
(202) 208-0004.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13728 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Puramed Bioscience Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

          (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | Dated:  May 14, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Russell W. Mitchell |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | Russell W. Mitchell |
|--------|---------------------|

|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | Dated:  May 14, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------|

 

|   | /s/ James W. Higgins |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | James W. Higgins |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Chief Financial and Operating Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------|