alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.3




Certification
of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the Three and Nine Months September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby
certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the
      Report.





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:           November
9, 2009











/s/
            L.
      Mark PanellaL.
      Mark PanellaExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                         EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT

We consent to the Incorporation by reference in the registration statements of 
ThrustMaster, Incl. and its subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-40323 and 
File No. 333-93082) and Form S-3  (File No. 333-73333) of our report dated 
January 25, 19999, except as to Note 13, which is as of January 28m, 19999 on 
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of ThrustMaster, Inc and 
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three 
years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this 
Annual Report on form 10-K.


                                   /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

                                   Portland, Oregon
                                   March 31, 1999
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") by
CapSource Financial, Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



     DATE:  July 25, 2007                By: /s/ Fred C. Boethling
                                             -------------------------
                                         Name: Fred C. Boethling
                                         Chief Executive Officer
PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, and Lemons, JJ., 

and Carrico and Stephenson, S.JJ. 

MERRY CHRISTINE PEASE 

 PER CURIAM 

v. Record No. 030081 

 October 31, 2003 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

 We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider 

whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the trial 

court did not err in (1) failing to dismiss the indictment on 

double jeopardy grounds, (2) failing to disqualify the special 

prosecutor and to dismiss and quash the indictment, and (3) 

failing to set aside the jury verdict because the evidence was 

insufficient as a matter of law. 

 We have considered the questions, and, for the reasons 

stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 39 Va. 

App. 342, 573 S.E.2d 272 (2002), we will affirm its judgment. 

Affirmed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1645 V

UNPUBLISHED

SHANNON COBB

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 2, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administr ation (SIRVA)

J ason Phillip Osteen

, Dempsey & Kingsland , P .C.

, Kansas City

, MO , for P etitioner.

Lauren Kells , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 23, 2019

, Sh annon Co bb filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that Petitioner s uffered a shoulder injury relate d to

vaccine ad ministration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered

to her on October 29, 2016 . Petit ion at 3 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 29, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent states that “ [P]etitioner has satisfied the cr iteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and Qualifications and Aids to I nterpretation

. ” Id. at 9 . Respondent

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

further agrees that “ the medical records demonstrat e that [P]etitioner has experie nced

the residual effects of her SIRVA for more than six months

. ” Id. at 10.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ERIC COOPER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 576 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
* District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion shou ld not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-30529

DHANPAT MOHNOT; SURENDRA PUROHIT; SUNIL PUROHIT,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

VERSUS

RAJEEV BHANSALI; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CHRISTOPHER E. KALMUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

#99-CV-2332

March 5, 2003

Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge and ROSENTHAL * , District Judge.

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: **

The defendant Christopher Kalmus challenges the district court’s order summarily rejecting2

his claim for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and F.R.C.P. 11.

After rejecting all of plaintiffs’ claims as meritless, the district court denied sanctions in the

following language:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ respective claims for sanctions are

DISMISSED and shall not be considered by this Court. Almo st every claim made

herein was derivative and dismissed for failure to make the required pre-suit demand

on the Board of Directors of the corporati ons ( i.e., ICL or ITIL). Plaintiffs should

not take heart in this pronouncement, as they were the instigators, the prime movers

and shakers, responsible for breathing life into this war of attrition.

Unfo rtunately this summary treatment of the defendant’s claim for sanctions gives us no

insight into the district court’s reasoning. As we stated in Schwartz v. Folloder

, 767 F.2d 125 (5th

Circ. 1985) “where a district court fails to explain its decision to deny attorney’s fees we do not know

whether the decision wa s wit hin the bounds of its discretion or was based on an erroneous legal

theory.”

Our review of the record reveals that Kalmus made a colorable claim for sanctions under §

1927 and F.R.C.P. 11, but because the district court did not explain its reasons for rejecting Kalmus’

sanction claim, we must remand this case to the district court to give it an opportuni ty to explain why

it denied this claim. See S chwartz v. Folloder and Copeland v. Wassersten, Perella & Co., Inc.

, 278

F.3d 472, 484 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the district court’s order dismissing defendant Kalmus’

sanctions claim is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedi ngs

consistent with this opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
```

[Federal Register: January 22, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 14)]
[Notices]
[Page 3017]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ja03-39]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION



Sunshine Act Meeting


Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 7, 2003.


Place: 1155 21 st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.


Status: Closed.


Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Meeting.


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.


Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-1421 Filed 1-16-03; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 13.2



MTR Corporation Limited



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Lincoln K.K. Leong, Finance Director of MTR Corporation Limited (the Company), hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        |  |                   
|------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------
|Date: June 25, 2004 |  |                        |  |                   
|                    |  | /s/ Lincoln K.K. Leong
|                    |  | Name:                  |  | Lincoln K.K. Leong
|                    |  | Title:                 |  | Finance Director  



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-93542, 333-2824 and 333-33207) pertaining to the 1995 Employee
Stock Incentive Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ENVOY Corporation of our report dated March 5,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
ENVOY Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.

                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Nashville, Tennessee
March 5, 1998
```

[Federal Register: June 16, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 115)]
[Notices]
[Page 35631]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn03-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, June 27, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

For Further Information Contact: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-15228 Filed 6-12-03; 11:07 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: May 19, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 28883-28884]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19my04-30]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Global Markets Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(a), that the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Global Markets Advisory
Committee will conduct a

[[Page 28884]]

public meeting on Wednesday, June 2, 2004. The meeting will take place
in the first floor hearing room of the Commission's Washington, DC
headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581 from 2 to 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss global markets-related issues in the financial services and
commodity markets.
    The agenda will consist of the following:
    (1) Call to order and introductions.
    (2) Report on activities of CFTC Office of International Affairs.
    (3) Cross-border clearing issues.
    (4) International regulatory coordination/enforcement
harmonization.
    (5) Other business.
    (6) Discussion of future meetings and topics.
    (7) Adjournment.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory
Committee, Commissioner Walter L. Lukken, is empowered to conduct the
meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate the orderly
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a
written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the
statement to the attention of: Global Markets Advisory Committee, c/o
Commissioner Walter L. Lukken, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581,
before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral
statements should inform Commissioner Lukken in writing at the
foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting.
Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for oral
presentations of no more than five minutes each in duration.
    For further information concerning this meeting, please contact
David A. Stawich at 202-418-5071.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on May 12, 2004.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-11274 Filed 5-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 116)]
[Notices]
[Page 41219-41220]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn02-27]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity,
Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission

AGENCY:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or agency) in
accordance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554; H.R. 5658)
as implemented by the final guidelines published by the Office of
Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, on September
28, 2001 (66 FR 49718) and on January 3, 2002 (67 FR 369) (and
reprinted in their entirety on February 22, 2002, 67 FR 8452),
"Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity,
Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal
Agencies," posted its draft guidelines on the CFTC website, http://www.cftc.gov/ on April 22, 2002 (see 67 FR 19558, April 22, 2002).

DATES: Comment period extended to July 19, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Comments should be sent by email to
mailto:[email protected] or by FAX to Information Quality at
(202) 418-5541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to requests to extend the
comment period in order to provide additional time for review of the
draft guidelines, the Commission extended

[[Page 41220]]

the comment period from June 1, 2002 to July 19, 2002.

    Dated: June 11, 2002.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-15179 Filed 6-14-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-208-000]


Amoco Production Company, et al.; Notice of Emergency Petition

DATE: January 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2001, Amoco Production Company, BP 
Exploration & Oil Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., ExxonMobil Gas Marketing 
Company, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Shell Offshore Inc. 
(Producers) tendered for filing an emergency petition requesting the 
Commission to issue an immediate temporary restraining order, prior to 
January 9, 2001, to prevent Southern Natural Gas Company from shutting 
in natural gas supply upstream of the Toca processing plants, located 
in Louisiana. In addition, the Producers request the Commission to 
schedule an emergency technical conference to explore all of the issues 
as soon as possible.
    Producers states that copies of the filing have been served upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before January 16, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1424 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald M Prest, certify that;

(1)          I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009 of Omnicity Corp.;

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  June 15, 2009
UNITED STATES