alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1025 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for members of 

the Armed Forces who fight terrorism and the sense of the House 

of Representatives that the United States Government should pay for 

the legal expenses of members of the Armed Forces who are accused 

of committing crimes related to the treatment of a suspected terrorist, 

if the member is acquitted or the charges are dropped. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2010 

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CARTER, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. WOLF, 

and Mr. MCCAUL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for 

members of the Armed Forces who fight terrorism and 

the sense of the House of Representatives that the 

United States Government should pay for the legal expenses of members of the Armed Forces who are accused 

of committing crimes related to the treatment of a suspected terrorist, if the member is acquitted or the 

charges are dropped. 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are vital national assets; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1025 IH 

Whereas they must be commended and rewarded for their 

service; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces must be provided all 

of the tools and authorities they need to hunt down terrorists; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces must be allowed to 

fight terrorists without the fear they will be accused of 

wrongdoing due to political correctness; 

Whereas the al Qaeda handbook instructs al Qaeda operatives 

to always claim they are tortured and mistreated while 

being detained, and states specifically: ‘‘At the beginning 

of the trial . . . the brothers must insist on proving that 

torture was inflicted on them by state security before the 

judge. Complain of mistreatment while in prison.’’; 

Whereas the United States Government is currently funding 

the legal defense of accused terrorists; and 

Whereas it is the responsibility of the United States Government to ensure that those who defend the Nation are 

provided the best possible legal defense should they be accused of committing a crime while engaged in the fight 

on terrorists and extremists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports members of the Armed Forces as 

3 they continue to fight the war against terrorists; 

4 (2) opposes their prosecution when rooted in an 

5 excess of political correctness and over-sensitivity; 

6 and 

7 (3) expresses the sense of the House of Rep8 resentatives that any member of the Armed Forces 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1025 IH 

1 who is accused of a crime related to the treatment 

2 of a suspected terrorist should have any outside legal 

3 fees related to their defense paid for by the United 

4 States Government, if the member is acquitted or 

5 the charges are dropped. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0499

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

ESANDRO ROMAN RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2022

06/17/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0499
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-37-002]

Take notice that on January 8, 2001, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with an effective date of November 1, 2000:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 255 

Equitrans states that this tendered sheet is filed in compliance with Order No. 587-L, issued in Docket No. RM96-1-014 by the Commission on June 30, 2000 and implements 18 CFR 284.(c)(ii), regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on Equitrans' system, and further responds to the Commission's directive in its Order of December 21, 2000, herein.

Equitrans states that a copy of the filing is being served on each of Equitrans' jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1423 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2010337EN.01001401.xml

| 14.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/14

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Finland

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid C 9/10 (ex N 417/09) — Temporary capital tax gains tax relief on sales of cultivated land

2010/C 337/04

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure initiated under Article 108(2) of the TFEU on 24 March 2008 in respect of the measure referred to above (1), in view of the fact that Finland withdrew its notification on 29 April 2010.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.9.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nevwest Explorations Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Abah, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of June, 2008.


/s/ Albert Abah
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                       EXHIBIT 12.1

                          WINSLOEW FURNITURE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                       Years Ended December 31,
                          --------------------------------------------------
                            1999        1998        1997      1996     1995
                          ---------   ------   ----------   -------   -------
  <S>                     <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
( In thousands )
Income Statement Data:
Income from continuing
 operations before
 income taxes and
 extraordinary items     $27,850    $29,247     $17,999    $13,377     $6,946

Add:
Interest expense           8,910        635       2,296      3,083      3,841
                          -------   --------    --------   --------   -------
Earnings as defined       36,760     29,882      20,295     16,460     10,787
  by agreement
Fixed charges
Interest expense
  including amortization
  of debt expensed         9,309        635       2,296      3,083      3,841

Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges            3.9x       47.1x       8.8x        5.3x      2.8x

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION





I, Craig Stout, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vemics, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.











Vemics, Inc.

(Registrant)Date: May 24, 2010
By:
/s/ Craig StoutCraig StoutChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

*Summary:*                     The Advisory Committee was established by Pub. L. 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.                

*Time and Place:*                     Tuesday, June 19, 2001, at 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                

*Agenda:*                     This meeting will include a discussion on developments in private sector finance.                

*Public Participation:*                     The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to November 3, 2000, Nichole Westin, Room 1257, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3542 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                

*Further Information:*                     For further information, contact Nichole Westin, Room 1257, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3542.                

John M. Niehuss,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-13767  Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Ventures,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, Ian Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Date: February 18, 2008

/s/      Ian Jackson

Ian JacksonChief Financial
Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Stephen Gould, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, and David Miller, President and Principal
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen
 M. Gould           
|                                
|Principal
 Financial Officer and
|Principal
 Accounting Officer   
|November 14,
 2007              

|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ David
 Miller                         
|                                          
|President
 and Principal Executive Officer
|November 14,
 2007                        

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6008

RANDY LIGHTLY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; STEPHEN M. SHILOH,

General Manager; RUSTY BELL, Assistant General

Manager; SID STORKE, Regional Manager; JIM

CLUSTER, Graphic Plant #1 Manager; CINDY

ALBAN, Employee; WILLIAM GOBLE, Classification

Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(CA-99-3028-DKC)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Lightly, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

November 16, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on November 17, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Randy Lightly, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find that the appeal is

frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Lightly v. Filbert, No. CA-99-3028-DKC (D. Md.

Nov. 17, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11095

Conference Calendar

 

RICKY JOE PETTIT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RANDALL COUNTY, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-12

- - - - - - - - - -

February 20, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Joe Pettit has filed a brief which restates the

factual allegations in his original complaint pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The merits of his complaint were never addressed

because the district court ordered Pettit to supplement his

complaint with further factual information and Pettit failed to

comply with the order. The district court dismissed the

complaint for failure to prosecute. 
No. 96-11095

- 2 -

Pettit fails to argue in his appeal brief any error on the

part of the district court, e.g., that the district court erred

in dismissing his complaint for want of prosecution. Pettit has

presented nothing for this court to review. His appeal is

frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Grant v. Cuellar, 59

F.3d 523, 524-25 (5th Cir. 1995); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1043 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1043

  Recognizing Brescia University for 60 years of leadership in higher 
                               education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

 Mr. Guthrie submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing Brescia University for 60 years of leadership in higher 
                               education.

Whereas Brescia University was founded in 1950;
Whereas Brescia University is a Catholic University located in Owensboro, 
        Kentucky;
Whereas Brescia offers 6 different degrees in over 60 different programs;
Whereas students at Brescia University receive a personalized education with a 
        12 to 1 student to teacher ratio;
Whereas the Brescia Bearcats have 13 athletic teams that participate in National 
        Association of Intercollegiate Athletics in the Kentucky Intercollegiate 
        Athletic Conference;
Whereas Brescia University emphasizes ``Making a difference'', encouraging 
        students to serve others in the community, and has established a history 
        of serving Owensboro, Kentucky, and the surrounding region; and
Whereas for 60 years, Brescia University has provided a quality liberal arts 
        education and worked to prepare its students for successful careers and 
        service to others: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Brescia University for 60 years of service 
        as an institution of higher education; and
            (2) commends Brescia University for leadership and service 
        to students and the community of Owensboro, Kentucky, and the 
        surrounding region.
                                 <all>
```