alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on January 14, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Rosemarie F. O'Keefe and Thomas Revard Thiel, Appellant

V.

Mary Martha Meek McNelis and Sean Brandon McNelis, Appellee

No. 04

- 13

- 00547

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- CI

- 02904

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on March 25, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 13

- 00547

- CV

Rosemarie F. O'Keefe and Thomas Revard Thiel

v.

Mary Martha Meek McNelis and Sean Brandon McNelis

(NO. 2013

- CI

- 02904 IN 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

COPIES $2.50 PAID THOMAS THIEL

COPIES $3.50 PAID ROSEMARY OKEFFEE

MOTION FEE $10.00 E

- PAID SEAN MCNELIS

MOTION FEE $10.00 E

- PAID SEAN MCNELIS

COPIES $3.00 PAID UNKNOWN

FILING $175.00 INDIGENT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in**  **this cause shall**  **be paid as**  **per the**  **Judgment issued by**  **this Court.** 

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this March 25, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
EXHIBIT 10.2

                 AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE INKSURE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
            2002 EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND CONSULTANT STOCK OPTION PLAN

                ------------------------------------------------

                         As adopted by resolution of the
                       Board of Directors on March 8, 2010

                ------------------------------------------------

     1. Section 3 of the InkSure Technologies Inc. 2002 Employee, Director and
Consultant Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Plan") is hereby amended by deleting the
number "3,500,000" and inserting the number "5,660,000" in its stead, wherever
the same appears.

     2. Except as hereinabove amended, the provisions of the 2002 Plan shall
remain in full force and effect.
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement (No. 333 -121223) on Form S-8 and the previously filed Prospectus constituting a part of the RegistrationStatement (No. 333-121223) on Form S-3 of Orange 21 Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Orange 21 Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in theCompany’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

San Diego, California 

March 25, 2011
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT EUGENE MERIDETH,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BRIAN BELLEQUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-35816

D.C. No. 6:04-cv-00762-ALA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ann L. Aiken, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Oregon state prisoner Robert Eugene Merideth appeals from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-35816

Merideth contends that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to: (1)

investigate the basis for an expert witness’ testimony; and (2) object to certain

prejudicial testimony. The record indicates that the state court’s decision rejecting

Merideth’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was not contrary to, or an

unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the

Supreme Court of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Strickland

v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hendricks v. Calderon, 70 F.3d 1032,

1039 (9th Cir. 1995).

Merideth’s request to remand for an evidentiary hearing is denied. See Earp

v. Ornoski, 431 F.3d 1158, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 2005). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 11



                                 VIDEONICS, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)

                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                      Year Ended December 31
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  1996         1995        1994
                                                  ----         ----        ----

Net income                                        $744       $3,746      $5,993

Common shares outstanding at end of period       5,705        5,518       5,351

Adjustments to reflect weighted average for
shares issued during period                        (89)        (105)     (1,534)

Adjustments for options calculated under the
treasury stock method                              317          378         448

Common stock equivalents issued pursuant to
SAB 83 (2)                                          -            -           62

Common and equivalent shares outstanding         5,933        5,791       4,324

Net income per share                             $0.13        $0.65       $1.39



(1)This schedule should be read with Notes 2 of Notes to Consolidated  Financial
statements.

(2)Pursuant  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission's  Staff  Accounting
Bulletin  83, all  securities  issued  during the twelve  month  period prior to
filing a registration  statement for the initial public  offering  (November 29,
1994),  are  included  in the  calculation  of common  stock  equivalents  as if
outstanding  for all periods prior to the effective  date of the initial  public
offering (December 15, 1994) even if anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents
of options are computed  under the treasury  stock  method,  using the estimated
initial public offering price and applicable exercise prices.

(3)There  is no  difference  between  primary  and fully  diluted net income per
share.



                                       70
[929 NE2d 397, 903 NYS2d 334]

#### Susan Midler, Respondent, v Richard Crane, M.D., Appellant.

Decided May 11, 2010

*879APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP,*Lake Success *(Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Ruskin Moscou Faltischek,*Uniondale *(Douglas A. Cooper*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

We agree with the Appellate Division majority that, on the facts of this case, there was no inconsistency between the findings that defendant was not negligent in failing to diagnose the plaintiffs condition and that he was negligent in failing to monitor her. However, the jury’s verdict was inconsistent in finding that defendant’s failure to monitor the patient was a substantial factor in causing her injury, while the negligence of a nonparty, Dr. Curtis, in failing to transmit his urinalysis results to defendant was not.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

*880On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: May 9, 2008
        /s/ M.J. CohenM.J. CohenInterim Chief Financial Officer








---
EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                                  CONFORMED COPY


                                                    October 20, 2005


Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
1775 Broadway, Suite 604
New York, New York 10019
Attention:  Lawrence S. Coben, Chairman and CEO

RAM Energy, Inc.
5100 E. Skelly Drive, Suite 650
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135
Attention:  Larry E. Lee, President and CEO

Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to the Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement")
dated this date by and among each of you, RAM Energy Acquisition, Inc. and the
Stockholders of the Company. Capitalized terms that are defined in the Merger
Agreement are used herein with the same meanings. This will confirm my agreement
as follows:

     1. I will exercise the option that I have to purchase 83.33 shares of
Company Common Stock (the "Option") prior to the Closing.

     2. I waive all appraisal rights with respect to shares of Company Common
Stock under the Delaware General Corporation Law that I might otherwise have as
a result of the Merger.

     3. Upon exercise of the Option, retroactive to and effective as of the date
hereof, I shall be deemed to be a Stockholder for all purposes of the Agreement,
including, without limitation, the provisions of Sections 1.16 and 5.11 through
5.15, inclusive.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   s/ C. David Stinson

                                                   C. David Stinson
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11173-AA

________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ALEXANDER VUGLER, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 26, 2017)

Before: HULL, WILSON, JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The Government=s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in 

Appellant=s plea agreement is GRANTED. United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 

(11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and 

voluntarily); see United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver 

of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or 

even blatant error).

Case: 17-11173 Date Filed: 09/26/2017 Page: 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Concession Contract

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a temporary concession contract authorizing the 
operation of food service and sundry merchandise sales facilities and 
services for the public at Fire Island National Seashore, New York for 
a term not to exceed October 31, 2001.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 2001.

ADDRESSES: National Park Service, Boston Support Office, Concession 
Management Program, 15 State Street, Boston, MA 02109-3572, Telephone 
(617) 223-5209.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This temporary concession contract is being 
awarded to the Davis Park Ferry Company, Inc., Patchoque, New York. It 
is necessary to award the contract in order to avoid interruption of 
visitor services.
    This action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR part 51.24(a). This is not 
a request for proposals and no prospectus is being issued at this time. 
The Secretary intends to issue a competitive solicitation for offers 
for a long-term operator for various services, to begin in 2001. You 
may be placed on a mailing list for receiving information regarding the 
competitive solicitation by sending a written request to the above 
address.

    Dated: April 3, 2001.
Sandra S. Corbett,
Acting, Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 01-13961 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Carmen J. Carbona, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 10th day of September 2020.

 

/S/Carmen J. Carbona

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Greg Jacobson, Appellant

No. 06-19-00011-CV v.

Arnaud Prodel and Laurence Michelle 

Prodel, Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

1 of Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C-1-

CV-18-004591). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice 

Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Greg Jacobson, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Release: 4814-03****For Release: July 8, 2003**

**CFTC REQUESTS COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGES RELATED TO CHICAGO   MERCANTILE EXCHANGE/CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE****COMMON CLEARING LINK**

**Washington, D.C.** -- The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission   (CFTC) is considering for approval, pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the   Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and Commission rule 40.5, certain proposed   rules filed by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and Chicago Board of   Trade (CBOT). The CME and the CBOT have indicated that these rules relate to   the proposed Clearing Link between them. The rules that have been submitted   for approval, as well as other rules related to the Clearing Link that the   CBOT has certified as complying with the CEA and regulations thereunder   pursuant to Commission regulations 40.4(b) and 40.6, are available **here**.  

   The Commission intends to vote on approving those rules for which approval   has been requested on Tuesday, July 15, 2003. Comments may be sent by e-mail   to [email protected]   no later than 12:00 Noon, EDT, on Monday, July 14, 2003. Reference should be   made to CME/CBOT Common Clearing Link Rule Submission.  

   ###
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


President's Commission To Strengthen Social Security

AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA).

ACTION: Announcement of meeting location and time change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: June 11, 2001, 10 a.m.- 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Willard Inter-Continental Hotel, 1401 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20004, (202) 628-9100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The May 29, 2001 Federal Register notice (FR 
Doc. 01-13486, 66 FR 29200) announcing the June 11 meeting of the 
President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security did not include a 
meeting location. The purpose of this announcement is to provide the 
meeting location and to note that the meeting will end at 4 p.m. 
instead of 6 p.m., as previously reported.
    The meeting will be open to the public at 11 a.m. The Commission 
will break for lunch at Noon, and the public meeting will reconvene at 
1 p.m. and continue through 4 p.m. In accordance with the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), the meeting will be closed to the 
public from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. to conduct housekeeping business 
relating solely to Federal personnel rules and practices and other 
administrative matters.

    Dated: June 4, 2001.
Larry G. Massanari,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 01-14527 Filed 6-5-01; 4:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-U
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, William Tay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Westmont Acquisition
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: May 7, 2008

WESTMONT ACQUISITION CORP.


/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------
William Tay, President and CEO
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of ECO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q /A for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVE CONBOY, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Steve Conboy


Steve Conboy


President


Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





August 8 , 2013