alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The Air University Board of Visitors will hold an open meeting on April 22-25, 2001, with the first business session beginning at 8:30 a.m. in the Air University Commander's Conference Room at Headquarters Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. (Five seats are available.) 

The purpose of the meeting is to give the board an opportunity to review Air University educational programs and to present to the Commander, a report of their findings and recommendations concerning these programs. 

For further information on this meeting, contact Dr. Dorothy Reed, Chief of Academic Affairs, Air University Headquarters, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6335, (334) 953-5159. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-1393 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-425-000]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of 
Compliance Filing

May 31, 2001.

    Take notice that on May 23, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1-A, Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 5. GTN 
requests that the above-referenced tariff sheet become effective July 
1, 2001.
    GTN asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Paragraph 37 of the terms and conditions of First Revised Volume No. 1-
A of its FERC Gas Tariff, ``Adjustment for Fuel, Line Loss and Other 
Unaccounted For Gas Percentages.'' These tariff changes reflect that 
GTN's fuel and line loss surcharge percentage will decrease to 0.0000% 
per Dth per pipeline-mile for the six-month period beginning July 1, 
2001. Also included, as required by Paragraph 37, are workpapers 
showing the derivation of the current fuel and line loss percentage in 
effect for each month the fuel tracking mechanism has been in effect.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14200 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


     The following list sets forth the subsidiaries of the Company. The Company
owns 100 percent of the outstanding stock of each of the companies listed


                                                               Place of
    Subsidiary                                               Incorporation
    ----------                                               -------------

Safari Motor Coaches, Inc.                                      Oregon
Beaver Motor Coaches, Inc.                                      Oregon
Magnum Manufacturing, Inc.                                      Oregon
Composite Technologies, Inc.                                    Oregon
Electronic Design and Assembly, Inc.                            Oregon
Harney County Operations, Inc.                                  Oregon
SMC Midwest, Inc.                                               Kansas
Safari FSC Ltd.                                                 Barbados
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30007-30008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Silicon Integration Initiative, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 2, 2001, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Silicon Integration Initiative, 
Inc. (``SI2'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Partminer, 
Inc., Englewood, CO; Aprisa, Inc., Westlake

[[Page 30008]]

Village, CA; eChips, Inc., Austin, TX; Circuit Semantics, San Jose, CA; 
ChipData, Richardson, TX; eSilicon, Palo Alto, CA; Sequence Design, 
Santa Clara, CA; Intime Software, Cupertino, CA; Silicon Metrics, 
Austin, TX; and Web-Pro, Ltd., Hong Kong, HONG KONG-CHINA have been 
added as parties to this venture. Also, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN; 
SEMATECH, Austin, TX; Infineon Technologies, Munich GERMANY; and RAPID, 
Dallas, TX have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    In addition, Questlink Technology, Inc., Austin, TX has merged into 
eChips, Austin, TX, and is itself no longer a member; Concurrent CAE 
Solutions, Inc., Santa Clara, CA was acquired by ChipData, Richardson, 
TX, and is itself no longer a member; and Frequency Technology, Inc., 
San Jose, CA has merged into Sequence Design, Santa Clara, CA, and is 
itself no longer a member.
    Finally, SGS Thompson Microelectronics, Argate Brianza, ITALY has 
changed its name to STMicroelectronics, Argate Brianza, ITALY.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SI2 intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On December 30, 1988, SI2 filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10456).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 28, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 2, 2001 (66 FR 13083).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-13864 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Federal Register: February 21, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 8008]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21fe02-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, March 22, 2002.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-4239 Filed 2-19-02; 10:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Harvey Helm v. J. Marvin Lyons et al.

March 22, 1991

Case No. (Chancery) 108895

By JUDGE THOMAS S. KENNY

This cause is before the Court pn the plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the granting of defendants’ Motion to Strike. The proper issue for decision at this time was whether the court erred in granting the Motion to Strike based on a plea to the statute of limitations.

The relevant procedural facts reveal that an issue out of chancery was ordered by this Court on January 30, 1991. The issue was tried before a jury until the close of plaintiff’s evidence, at which time the defendant raised the defense of the statute of limitations through a Motion to Strike. At the close of oral argument on this point, I granted the Motion to Strike and dismissed the Bill of Complaint. An order encapsulating these rulings was entered on March 18, 1991. It is my opinion that the Motion to Strike was improvidently granted.

Section 8.01-235 of the Virginia Code explains that the defense of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense. In *Columbia Heights*v. *Griffiths-Consumers,*205 Va. 43 (1964), the Supreme Court of Virginia held that "[w]here the statute of limitations is pleaded as a defense, the party relying thereon has the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the cause of action arose more than the statutory period before the actions was instituted." *Id.*at 47-8. (Citations omitted). Such being the law in Virginia, it was error for this Court *308to relieve defendant of his burden of proof by granting the Motion to Strike, especially in light of the disagreement among counsel as to which was the proper statute of limitations to apply and at what point the cause of action accrued.

The order granting the motion to strike will be vacated by this Court.
August 26, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PEDRO ERNESTO UMANA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00168

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit No. 32.1


BTHC XV, Inc.


File No. 0-52808


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended June 30, 2010








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BTHC XV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 4, 2010

By: /s/ Timothy P. HalterTimothy P. HalterChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BTHC XV, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC XV, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Benjamin F. McGraw, III certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Valentis, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
September 15, 2004

| |  | /s/BENJAMIN F. MCGRAW IIIBenjamin F. McGraw III, Pharm.D. Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of No Show,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate
in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
January 31, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Helen Keser
------------------
     Helen Keser
Its: Principal Executive Officer
Its: Principal Financial Officer

Date  March 15, 2010
      --------------

<PAGE>
DELISTING NOTICE

DN 2019-20

10 JUNE 2019

1 D-20190610

For questions regarding this notice please contact OneChicago Operations at 312.883.3411 or by 

email at operations@onechicago.com. 

PRODUCT DELISTING

Effective Date 

June 10, 2019

The following products will be delisted after the close of business today.

DRN1D DRV1D EDZ1D FAS1D FAZ1D JDST1D SMCI1D

TECS1D TMF1D TYO1D TZA1D
```

[Federal Register: December 16, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 74780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16de05-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 am, Friday, January 27, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-24185 Filed 12-14-05; 11:09 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### In the Matter of Ithaca City School District, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 19, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 268.

*937Motion by Advocates for Children of New York, Inc. et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
```

[Federal Register: October 18, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 52894]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18oc01-24]


[[Page 52894]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 2, 2001.

Place: 155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-26411 Filed 10-16-01; 1:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Lancer Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Aleksandr Muzis, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Amica Mutual Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff, as limited by its brief, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered April 16, 2015, which, upon reargument, adhered to its prior order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered April 16, 2015, modified by reinstating plaintiff's claim for first-party no-fault benefits billed under CPT code 99302; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><p>Defendant's documentary submissions failed to eliminate all triable issues as to whether it properly denied plaintiff's no-fault claim for $54.74, billed under CPT code 99203 (initial evaluation), thus precluding summary judgment dismissing this claim (<a href="../2015/2015_51849.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 Misc 3d 127</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51849[U][App Term, 1st Dept. 2015]).</p><p>In the absence of any prejudice, Civil Court properly exercised its discretion under CPLR 2001, to allow defendant to correct the defect in form of the IME report of its acupuncturist/chiropractor.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 13, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6008

RANDY LIGHTLY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; STEPHEN M. SHILOH, General Manager; RUSTY BELL, Assistant General Manager; SID STORKE, Regional Manager; JIM CLUSTER, Graphic Plant #1 Manager; CINDY ALBAN, Employee; WILLIAM GOBLE, Classification Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-99-3028-DKC) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Lightly, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 16, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 17, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Randy Lightly, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that the appeal isfrivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Lightly v. Filbert , No. CA-99-3028-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 17, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathan Perry, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 916]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), rendered May 11, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and attempted petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in its pretrial ruling on the People’s *Molineux*application is not properly before this Court as the defendant forfeited review of the *Molineux*ruling by virtue of his plea of guilty *(see People v Molineux,*168 NY 264 [1901]; *People v Graham,*261 AD2d 414 [1999]; *People v Gerber,*182 AD2d 252, 260 [1992]; *People v Winchenbaugh,*120 AD2d 811, 813 [1986]). Review is also precluded by the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal *(see People v Graham,*261 AD2d 414 [1999]). The defendant’s argument that he did not voluntarily enter his plea of guilty because it was coerced by an improper *Molineux*ruling is not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Clarke,*93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; *People v Thompson,*28 AD3d 498 [2006]). In any event, the record reflects that the defendant’s guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary *(see People v Garcia,*92 NY2d 869, 870 [1998]; *People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]).

Finally, the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the hearing court’s suppression determination *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Munford,*37 AD3d 855 [2007]; *People v Smith,*35 AD3d 769 [2006]; *People v Peoples,*34 AD3d 503 [2006]). Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Dillon and Eng, JJ, concur.