alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

y0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

143131

In re ALEX JOEL GARCIA

_____________ _______________ _____________
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 143131 COA: 300199 ALEX JOEL GARCIA, Wayne CC Family Division: Respondent-Appellant. No. 01-404473-DL

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2010140EN.01002001.xml

| 29.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/20

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 140/05

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21.4.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 1/10 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | País Vasco |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Régimen de ayudas a los museos del País Vasco |
| Legal basis | Orden de 10 de diciembre de 2009 de la Consejera de Cultura, por la que se regula el régimen de concesión de subvenciones destinadas a la promoción museística y al desarrollo de actividades museísticas relacionadas con el patrimonio y la difusión cultural |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,62 million; Overall budget: EUR 0,62 million |
| Intensity | 75 % |
| Duration (period) | 4.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Recreational, cultural sporting activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Consejería de Cultura |
| C/ Donostia, 1 |
| 01010 Vitoria-Gasteiz |
| Álava — País Vasco |
| ESPAÑA |

Date of adoption of the decision

21.4.2010

Reference number of State Aid

N 1/10

Member State

Spain

Region

País Vasco

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Régimen de ayudas a los museos del País Vasco

Legal basis

Orden de 10 de diciembre de 2009 de la Consejera de Cultura, por la que se regula el régimen de concesión de subvenciones destinadas a la promoción museística y al desarrollo de actividades museísticas relacionadas con el patrimonio y la difusión cultural

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,62 million; Overall budget: EUR 0,62 million

Intensity

75 %

Duration (period)

4.2010-31.12.2010

Economic sectors

Recreational, cultural sporting activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Consejería de Cultura

C/ Donostia, 1

01010 Vitoria-Gasteiz

Álava — País Vasco

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Buffalo Professional Firefighters Association, Inc., IAFF Local 282, Respondent, and City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 15, 2011

Reported below, 79 AD3d 1737.

*837Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*17 NY3d 854 (2011)]. An order directing further arbitration proceedings, whether before the same or a different arbitrator, is not one finally determining a proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution *(Matter of SOMA Partners, LLC v Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.,*41 AD3d 257 [2007], *Iv dismissed*9 NY3d 942 [2007]; *Matter of Beard v Town of Newburgh,*259 AD2d 613 [1999], *Iv dismissed*93 NY2d 958 [1999]; *Matter of Sachem Cent. Teachers Assn. v Board of Educ. of Sachem Cent. School Dist.,*227 AD2d 632 [1996], *Iv dismissed*88 NY2d 1064 [1996]). Older cases to the contrary *(e.g. Matter of Boar & Beards [Oleg Cassini, Inc.],*30 NY2d 649 [1972]) are no longer good law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE YEAR  ENDED  JULY  31,  1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,751,506
<SECURITIES>                                   302,589
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,860,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,784,679
<INVENTORY>                                  1,400,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,218,926
<PP&E>                                       2,021,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                 683,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,752,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,350,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     24,977
<COMMON>                                         6,339
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,255,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,752,462
<SALES>                                        958,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               958,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,379,719)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,344,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,344,205
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1069 

Congratulating Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith for being awarded 

the Nobel Prize in physics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2010 

Mr. LANCE (for himself, Mr. HOLT, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. LOBIONDO, and Mr. 

PASCRELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith for 

being awarded the Nobel Prize in physics. 

Whereas breakthroughs in scientific research are the building 

blocks of a productive, competitive, and healthy society; 

Whereas the Nobel Prize is a prestigious international award 

administered annually by the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden, and has since 1901 recognized the world’s 

most outstanding achievements in physics; 

Whereas, on December 10, 2009, in Stockholm, Sweden, Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith from Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey, were awarded the 

Nobel prize for physics for their invention of an imaging 

semiconductor circuit, the charge-coupled devise (CCD), 

in addition to Charles K. Kao from Standard TeleVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:29 Feb 04, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1069.IH HR1069

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1069 IH 

communication Laboratories in Harlow, United Kingdom, 

and the Chinese University of Hong Kong in Hong Kong, 

China, for his work concerning the transmission of light 

in fibers for optical communication; 

Whereas Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey, is an 

internationally renowned research organization founded 

in 1925 by the American Telephone & Telegraph company (AT&T); 

Whereas a total of seven Nobel Prizes for physics have been 

awarded for work completed at Bell Laboratories; 

Whereas work at Bell Laboratories has led to the invention 

or advancement of such groundbreaking technologies as 

the transistor, photovoltaic cells, the laser, the UNIX operating system, and the CCD sensor; 

Whereas scientific leadership in the United States is made 

possible by robust investments in scientific research programs in both the public and private sectors; 

Whereas continued support of science research programs is 

indispensable to maintaining the Nation’s position as the 

global leader in technology and innovation; and 

Whereas the accomplishments of these scientists are significant achievements in the field of scientific research and 

further promote the United States among the world leaders in science: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Willard S. Boyle and George 

3 E. Smith for being awarded the Nobel Prize in phys4 ics; and 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1069 IH 

1 (2) recognizes Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, 

2 New Jersey, as a contributor to leadership in sci3 entific research and innovation in the United States. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Kendra C.R., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Charles R., Appellant; Abbott House Family Services, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted March 22,

2010; decided May 6, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Abbott House Family Services, Inc., dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
----

----

| 1.   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ VAUGHN R COOK             |
| Vaughn R Cook                 |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel General Clinical Research Centers.
    Date: June 15, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 AM to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: John L. Meyer, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of 
Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes 
of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, One Rockledge Centre, 
Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0806, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b666e726e79614b6568797925656263256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f499918d91869eb49a978686da9a9d9cda939b82">[email protected]</span></a>

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14159 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. A. James Bell, on Behalf of Okechukwu Okoronkwo, Appellant, v Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 30, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 89 AD3d 1046.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
#### U.S. Bank National Association, Respondent, v Jessica Angel Quiroz et al., Defendants, and Helen Quiroz, Appellant.

Submitted March 29, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of North Shore Acquisition Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Barry
      J.
      Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 13, 2008
            /s/
                Barry J. GordonName:
            Barry
                J. GordonTitle:
            Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 17 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-63935)
(the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 31, 2005, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
(as of September 6, 2005, known as Union Security Insurance Company), which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to
us under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such
Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 21, 2005
# C_2011107EN.01007601.xml

| 6.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/76

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the operating space, access to the driving position and the doors and windows of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors’ (Codification)

COM(2010) 746 final — 2010/0358 (COD)

2011/C 107/19

On 17 January 2011, the Council and, on 16 December 2010, the European Parliament, decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the operating space, access to the driving position and the doors and windows of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the operating space, access to the driving position and the doors and windows of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

COM(2010) 746 final — 2010/0358 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 469th plenary session of 16 and 17 February 2011 (meeting of 16 February), by 108 votes in favour, with six abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 16 February 2011.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14304]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

May 30, 2001.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 9, 2001 to 
be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1354.
    Form Number: IRS Form 8833.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure Under Section 6114 
or 7701(b).
    Description: Form 8833 is used by taxpayers that are required by 
section 6114 to disclose a treaty-based return position to disclose a 
treaty-based return position to disclose that position. The form may 
also be used to make the treaty-based position disclosure required by 
regulations section 301.7701(b)-7(b) for ``dual resident'' taxpayers.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 6,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

  Recordkeeping--3 hr., 6 min.
  Learning about the law or the form--1 hr., 35 min.
  Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--1 hr., 42 min.

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 38,460 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14304 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
H. Res. 1103 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 26, 2010. 

Whereas Sam Houston was born at Timber Ridge Church, 

near Lexington, Virginia, on March 2, 1793; 

Whereas Sam Houston as an enlisted soldier fought courageously in the War of 1812, and after receiving three 

near-mortal wounds at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend, 

rose to the rank of first lieutenant; 

Whereas Sam Houston studied law, was admitted to the bar 

in 1818, and commenced practice in Lebanon, Tennessee; 

Whereas Sam Houston became District Attorney in 1819, 

Adjutant General of the State in 1820, and Major General in 1821; 

Whereas Sam Houston was elected to the United States Congress for the State of Tennessee in 1823 and again in 

1825 before serving as Governor from 1827 to 1829; 

Whereas Sam Houston moved to Oklahoma, served as an advocate for Native American rights and a representative of 

the Cherokee Nation, and then became a Cherokee citizen 

on October 21, 1829; 

Whereas Sam Houston moved to Texas in 1835 and joined 

the movement to establish separate statehood for Texas; 
2 

•HRES 1103 EH 

Whereas Sam Houston was elected as the commander-in-chief 

of the armies of Texas in 1836; 

Whereas, on April 21, 1836, Sam Houston’s forces defeated 

Mexican President and General Santa Anna, securing 

Texas’ long sought independence; 

Whereas the city of Houston, Texas, was named after thenPresident of the Republic of Texas, Sam Houston, on 

June 5, 1837; 

Whereas Sam Houston was elected the first President of the 

Republic of Texas and served 2 terms, followed by 2 

years with the Texas Congress, after which he returned 

to serve as President from 1841 to 1844; 

Whereas, after Texas joined the Union in 1845, Sam Houston was elected Senator to the United States Congress 

and served from 1846 to 1859; 

Whereas Sam Houston once again resigned his position with 

Congress to serve as Governor of Texas from 1859 to 

1861; 

Whereas Sam Houston was deposed on March 18, 1861, because he refused to take the oath of allegiance to the 

Confederate States; 

Whereas Sam Houston died in Huntsville, Texas, on July 26, 

1863, and was then interred in Oakwood Cemetery; 

Whereas Sam Houston is the only person in United States 

history to have been the Governor of 2 different States, 

Tennessee and Texas; 

Whereas a memorial museum, U.S. Army base, national forest, historical park, university, and the largest free-standing statue of a United States figure recognize the life of 

Sam Houston; and 
3 

•HRES 1103 EH 

Whereas Sam Houston still stands as a symbol for Texas solidarity and is one of the most significant individuals in 

the history of Texas: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

life and accomplishments of Sam Houston for his historical 

contributions to the expansion of the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.