alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1012 

Commending the 175th anniversary of The Blade, a newspaper in Toledo, 

Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2010 

Mr. LATTA (for himself and Ms. KAPTUR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the 175th anniversary of The Blade, a 

newspaper in Toledo, Ohio. 

Whereas, on December 19, 1835, raw pages of history rolled 

off a printing press with the publication of No. 1, Vol. 

1 of the Toledo Blade; 

Whereas a primary reason for the newspaper’s establishment 

was to promote the municipality that resulted when pioneer settlements of Port Lawrence and Vistula were incorporated as Toledo; 

Whereas the Toledo Blade’s first issue is believed to have 

been printed on a hand press, possibly in a log cabin, and 

transported on a wagon over rutted roads; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1012 IH 

Whereas the oldest continuous business in Toledo, the Toledo 

Blade was published on Saturdays until it became a triweekly publication in May 1846; 

Whereas with the advent of the telegraph, the paper became 

a daily publication in 1848; 

Whereas during all but its first 30 years, the newspaper has 

been owned and operated by 2 families, the Lockes from 

1865 to 1926 and the Blocks from 1926 to the present; 

Whereas The Blade is known for its long-standing tradition 

of publishing accurate, truthful stories, and as a result 

of its credibility, the newspaper is widely respected; and 

Whereas historians often use newspapers as a primary source 

for information about people, places, and events: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends The Blade for its 175th anniversary and the impor3 tant role it serves in reporting news events in Northwest 

4 Ohio and Southeast Michigan. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Order entered May 2 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00778
- CV D. REGINALD STOVER, JACE HARKEY, ROBERT H. HOLMES AND THE HO LMES LAW FIRM, INC., Appellant s

V. ADM MILLING CO., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 13400



### O RDER Before the Court is the April 22, 2019 motion for leave to file supplement to the motion for en banc rehearing of Robert H. Homes and the Holmes Law Firm, Inc. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the supplement to the motion for en banc rehearing of Robert H. Homes and the Holmes Law Firm, Inc. filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   March 15, 2011 |   | /s/ J. Francisco Terreforte                                                                                              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   | J. Francisco TerreforteChief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,  President and Chairman of the Board |   |
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Simpson Development Co., Inc., et al. v. City of Alexandria

April 3, 1991

Case Nos. (Law) CL90-1102 through 1112, 1122, 1123, 1157 through 1162, 1169 and CL91-0001

By JUDGE DONALD H. KENT

In their Motions for Declaratory Judgment, the plaintiffs seek to invalidate an amendment to the City’s tax ordinance and a refund of utility taxes paid since July, 1990. The defendant has demurred on the ground that municipalities may create classifications of taxpayers to be taxed at different rates or exempted entirely and that the defendant complied with the provisions of § 58.1-3814 of the Code which requires that the ordinance not be effective until sixty days after notice to the utility corporation.

The Court having considered the pleadings and arguments of counsel finds that the demurrers should be sustained.

Under the provisions of § 58.1-3814 of the Code, local governments may create classes of utility users to which different rates may apply so long as the classifications are reasonable. In addition, the City has been granted the authority from the state in § 2.02 of its Charter to levy and collect taxes from purchasers of public utility services.

The Court finds no merit in the plaintiffs’ effective date position. The City’s approach is both practical and consistent with the requirements of the Code.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Steven J. MalcolmSteven J. MalcolmChief Executive Officer of Williams Pipeline GP
LLC, general partner of  Williams Pipeline Partners
L.P. (Principal Executive Officer) 31