alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xin Li, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SGB International
      Holdings Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of SGB International Holdings Inc..                                                  

|Date: November 22, 2010 | /s/ Xin Li                                                    
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Xin Li                                                        
|                        | President, CEO, CFO and Director                              
|                        | Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
|                        | and Principal Accounting Officer                              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SGB
International Holdings Inc. and will be retained by SGB International Holdings
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
# CE2013056EN.01012601.xml

| 26.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 56/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 56/126

---

Tuesday 27 September 2011EU-US Memorandum of Cooperation in civil aviation research and development ***

P7_TA(2011)0399

European Parliament legislative resolution of 27 September 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Memorandum of Cooperation NAT-I-9406 between the United States of America and the European Union (09390/2011 – C7-0141/2011 – 2011/0021(NLE))

2013/C 56 E/21

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09390/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09390/2011),

| — | having regard to the Memorandum of Cooperation Nat-I-9406 between the United States of America and the European Union (06458/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Memorandum of Cooperation Nat-I-9406 between the United States of America and the European Union (06458/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6) and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0141/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6) and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0141/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0301/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0301/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Memorandum of Cooperation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Memorandum of Cooperation;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America.

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jonathan Medved, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vringo, Inc.; 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)): 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) [Omitted pursuant to the transition period exemptionfor newly public companies]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: May 16, 2011
#### Kerry Lee WOODARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth HORNING; The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 09-6872.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2010.

Decided: May 10, 2010.

Kerry Lee Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

*330Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kerry Lee Woodard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Woodard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the comet and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Mack MOBLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-11559

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 29, 2010.

Johnny Mack Mobley, Beaver, WV, pro se.

R. Brian Tanner, James C. Stuchell, U.S. Attorney’s Office Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Mack Mobley, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Mobley’s motion was based on Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced base offense levels applicable to crack cocaine. On appeal, Mobley argues that the district court: (1) erred by denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion based on his post-sentencing conduct; (2) violated *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by considering such conduct, (3) violated his constitutional double jeopardy rights; and (4) erred by considering his prison disciplinary reports without allowing him an opportunity to respond.

We review a district court’s decision not to reduce a defendant’s sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Moreno,*421 F.3d 1217, 1219 (11th Cir.2005). An abuse of discretion occurs if a district court “fails to apply the proper legal standard or to follow proper procedures in making [its] determination.” *Birmingham Steel Corp. v. TVA,*353 F.3d 1331, 1335 (11th Cir.2003).

In *United States v. Jules,*595 F.3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir.2010), we held that “each party must be given notice of and an opportunity to contest new information relied on by the district court in a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding.” In that case, the district court relied on a memorandum from the Probation Office containing information on Jules’s prison conduct in denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion. *Id.*at 1241. In this case, the district court relied on Mobley’s prison conduct record in denying Mobley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion; however, the record does not demonstrate that Mobley was given notice or an opportunity to contest the information contained within that record. Thus, the district court abused its discretion by not affording Mobley this opportunity. On remand, Mobley must be given an opportunity to contest the information contained in his prison conduct record. The district court is not required to grant Mobley a hearing to contest this information; allowing him to contest it in writing is sufficient. *Id.*at 1244-45.

We reject Mobley’s additional allegations of error.

AFFIRMED, in part; VACATED, in part; AND REMANDED.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 15, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D15- 2314 & 3D15-2140

Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-32AP & 14-244AP

________________



### Todd Alexander,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, William R. Ptomey, Jr.

, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler and Jeffrey Paul

DeSousa, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, C.J. and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J.In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Todd Alexander challenges both (i)

his conviction for animal cruelty, and (ii) the trial court’s revocation of his

probation based on the animal cruelty conviction. Because the jury’s verdict is

supported by competent, substantial evidence of when Alexander committed the

crime, we affirm. Gonzalez v. State

, 841 So. 2d 650, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (jury

verdict supported by competent, substantial evidence must be sustained on appeal).

We remand only to allow the trial court to enter a correct written order, consistent

with its oral pronouncement, to reflect that the crime was not committed using a

weapon.

Affirmed; remanded.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raul Getino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Descanso
Agency Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Descanso Agency Inc.


Date: October 27, 2008                By:    /s/ Raul Getino
                                             -----------------------------------
                                      Name:  Raul Getino
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that Descanso Agency, Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
#### Ersaline EDWARDS, Appellant v. Archie RICH, Individually and in his official capacity as a member of the D.C. Bar Association and lawyer of the District of Columbia, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-7005.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 4, 2010.

Ersaline Edwards, Laurel, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Archie Rich, The Rich Firm, PC, Washington, DC, pro se.

*599Larry C. Williams, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed March 31, 2009, and January 4, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s constitutional claims for lack of a state actor pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court also properly granted summary judgment for the appellees on appellant’s legal malpractice claims, because appellees timely filed a legally sufficient notice of claim pursuant to D.C.Code § 12-309 (requiring notice within 6 months of the approximate time, place, cause, and circumstances of the injury). Appellant therefore suffered no legal harm as a result of appellees’ representation. *See Thomas v. Powell,*247 F.3d 260, 264 (D.C.Cir.2001).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

pursuant to

Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

as adopted pursuant to

Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard T. Green, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WageWorks, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2013



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                    
|/s/ Richard T. Green
|Name:                |  | Richard T. Green                                     
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
H. Res. 1074 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 24, 2010. 

Whereas Hermine ‘‘Miep’’ Gies was born on February 15, 

1909, in Vienna, Austria; 

Whereas Miep Gies was sent to live with a host family in the 

Netherlands when she was 11 years old after the tumult 

of World War I led to food shortages in Austria; 

Whereas in 1933, Miep Gies took a job as an office assistant 

to Otto Frank, owner of Opekta, a pectin manufacturing 

company, and father of Anne Frank; 

Whereas Miep Gies agreed without hesitation to hide and assist the Frank family to avoid Jewish persecution at the 

hands of Nazi Germany; 

Whereas Miep Gies helped hide and sustain the Frank family, 

along with Hermann and Auguste Van Pels, their son 

Peter, and later Fritz Pfeffer, for two years in a secret 

room above Opekta’s offices, bringing them food, supplies, and writing supplies for Anne; 

Whereas when the Gestapo captured the Frank family, the 

Van Pels family, and Mr. Pfeffer, on August 4, 1944, 

Miep Gies discovered the pages of Anne Frank’s diary in 

the secret room and hid them for safekeeping; 

Whereas after learning that Anne Frank and her sister Margot died of typhus at Bergen-Belsen, Miep Gies gave 
2 

•HRES 1074 EH 

Anne Frank’s diary to her father Otto, the only surviving 

member of the family; 

Whereas ‘‘The Diary of a Young Girl’’ by Anne Frank, which 

has been translated into 70 languages, is both an inspirational story about hope in the face of senseless tragedy 

and an important testament for future generations to the 

horrors of the Holocaust; 

Whereas Miep Gies shared her recollections to author Alison 

Leslie Gold for the book ‘‘Anne Frank Remembered’’, 

which was later made into a powerful documentary film; 

Whereas Miep Gies, who would recount her extraordinary life 

with a self-effacing modesty that betrayed her unfailing 

courage and integrity, serves as a powerful symbol of resistance against the forces of oppression and injustice; 

Whereas Miep Gies represents the valor demonstrated by the 

countless ordinary individuals who stood up to and helped 

defeat Adolph Hitler’s Nazi regime; and 

Whereas Miep Gies passed away on January 11, 2010: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes Miep Gies’s courage in risking her 

own life to hide and provide for the Frank family while 

they were in hiding; 

(2) commends Miep Gies for retrieving and preserving the diary of Anne Frank, which has served as an 

inspiration to countless people the world over; and 
3 

•HRES 1074 EH 

(3) honors Miep Gies for her bravery during Nazi 

occupation of the Netherlands and her dedication to preserving the memory of Anne Frank and the Holocaust. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of N8CONCEPTS,INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, STEVECONBOY, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\ Steve ConboySteve ConboyPresidentPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerSeptember 23, 2009
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 32.2




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350





DIGUANG INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO.,
LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Diguang International Development Co., Ltd., the “Company”, on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission onthe
date hereof, the “Report”, I, Keith Hor, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:March 31, 2009


/s/ Keith
    HorKeith
HorChief Financial
      Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENT TO MINOR 

JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD

:

:

:

:

NO. 533

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of May, 2023, Kimberly Booth*, Allegheny County, is 

hereby reappointed as a member of the Minor Judiciary Education Board for a term of 

three years, commencing July 1, 2023.

* Lay-elector member