alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Andrew Godfrey, certify
that:
  1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Quantum Ventures,
Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
  a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
  5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 Date: May
17, 2010
 
 /s/Andrew
Godfrey
 Andrew
Godfrey
 Chief
Executive Officer
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1327

Crude Oil Roll Swap - WTI Diff to CMA NYMEX - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of WTI Diff to CMA NYMEX for 

a specific set of dates.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus WTI 

Differential to the Calendar Month Average (CMA) NYMEX WTI price (weighted average) under 

the heading “WTI Diff to CMA NYMEX (wtd avg)” price from Argus Media, for the trade month 

period beginning with the first business day after the 25th calendar day two months prior to the 

contract month through the last business day that falls on or before the 25th calendar day of the 

month prior to the contract month. If the 25th calendar day is a weekend or holiday, the Trade 

month period shall end on the first business day prior to the 25th calendar day.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13607]



[[Page 29590]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group will meet on June 
14, 2001. The agenda for the Policy Group meeting will include 
discussions about the CALFED Bay-Delta Program's: Record of Decision 
Commitments and Accomplishments; Year 2 Budget; Science Program 
Activities; and 2001 Funded Projects. This meeting is open to the 
public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the CALFED Bay-
Delta Program Policy Group or may file statements for consideration.

DATES: The CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group meeting will be held 
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday, June 14, 2001.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will meet at the Sacramento Convention Center, 
1400 J Street, Room 204, Sacramento, CA 95814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Breitenbach, CALFED Bay-Delta 
Program, at (916) 657-2666. If reasonable accommodation is needed due 
to a disability, please contact Pauline Nevins at (916) 657-2666 or TDD 
(916) 653-6934 at least one week prior to the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin 
Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta system) is a critically important part of 
California's natural environment and economy. In recognition of the 
serious problems facing the region and the complex resource management 
decisions that must be made, the state of California and the Federal 
government are working together to stabilize, protect, restore, and 
enhance the Bay-Delta system.
    One area of Bay-Delta management includes a joint State-Federal 
process to develop and implement long-term solutions to problems in the 
Bay-Delta system related to fish and wildlife, water supply 
reliability, natural disasters, and water quality. This effort, the 
CALFED Bay-Delta Program (Program), is being carried out under the 
direction of the CALFED Policy Group.

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
Lowell C. Ploss,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-13607 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MP-M
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Exhibit 23.3



                         Independent Auditors' Consent






To the Board of Directors
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
Novato, California


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-98203 on Form S-8 of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. of our report dated November
12, 2003, with respect to the balance sheet of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. as of
September 30, 2003, and the related statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the September 30, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hennessy
Advisors, Inc.



/s/ Pisenti & Brinker LLP

Petaluma, California
December 21, 2003



                                       48
EXHIBIT 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



PuraMed BioScience Inc., a Minnesota Corporation

Grand Realty Group, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation

Clay Blue Energy, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation

---
#### Veda PRYOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the U.S. Army; Robert M. Fano, Chief, Civilian Personnel Law Team; Eugene Johnson, Compensation Specialist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.

Veda Pryor, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Justin Friedman, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appel-lees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veda Pryor appeals the district court’s granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her complaint filed under Title VTI of the *842Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Pryor v. Germ,*No. 8:09-cv-01366-AW (D.Md. Apr. 7, 2010). We further deny Pryor’s motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Hy-Tech  Technology Group, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Martin Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Martin Nielson
------------------------
Chief Executive Officer

July 20, 2004
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00172

- CV

C HRISTOPHER T IMOTHY S HERMAN , Appellant

V

.

M OLLIE M ARIE S HERMAN , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 30th District Court

of Wichita County ( 189,894

- B(A) )
July 14 , 2022
Opinion by Justice Wallach
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete all award s

of spousal maintenance

. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed

as modified.

It is further ordered that appellee Mollie Marie Sherman shall pay all costs of
this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEA LS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

_ __ __ __ ____________ Justice Mike Wallach
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6662

ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIM WHITE, Regional Director, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-00652-DKC) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Andre Sylvester Watts, a District of Columbia inmate incarcerated in Virginia, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and motion to reconsider. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUIT TO SECURTIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Peter Riehl, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (previously Stellar International Inc.)  2. Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annual report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended annual report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of  a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended annual report (the Evaluation Date); and c) Presented in this amended annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and  6.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this amended annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date:  July 13, 2006By:/s/Peter RiehlPeter Riehl
Chief Executive Officer
----

----

| 1) |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2) |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                    |                                                                          |   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:      May 20, 2009 | /s/ Julius V. Jackson Sr.                                                     |   |   |
|                    | Julius      V. Jackson Sr.President, Chief Executive Officerand      Director |   |   |
|                    | (Principal      Executive Officer)                                            |   |   |

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6987-7]

      ( print page 29308)    
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program is issuing a request for proposals (RFP) that will further goals of the Chesapeake 2000 agreement. Up to 750,000 dollars may be available for Fiscal Year 2002. The Chesapeake Bay Program is seeking innovative, cost-effective proposals to accomplish the outcomes listed in the RFP. These outcomes were designed to help meet the Chesapeake 2000 goals. Any nonprofit organization, federal, state or local government agency, interstate agency, college or university is eligible to submit proposals in response to the RFP. Funding will be provided to an organization under the authority of Clean Water Act, section 117.

                    The RFP will be available May 30, 2001 at the following website:                     *http://www.epa.edu/​r3/​chespk/​*                     You may receive a paper copy by calling Kim Scalia at 214-814-5421 or by e-mail at                     *scalia.kim@epa.gov*                     or by calling Lori Mackey at 410-267-5715 or by e-mail at                     *mackey.lori@epa.gov*. All proposals must be postmarked by Monday, July 16, 2001. Any late, incomplete, or faxed proposals will not be considered.                

Diana Esher,

Acting Director, Chesapeake Bay Program Office.

[FR Doc. 01-13511 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Harry Orfanos, the Chief Financial Officer of Spectrum Acquisition Corporation, hereby certify that:  1. I have reviewed Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Spectrum Acquisition Corporation (theregistrant);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Harry OrfanosHarry Orfanos, Chief Financial Officer  Date:  February 14, 2008