alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Carmen J. Carbona, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 11  th  day of August 2020 .

 

/S/Carmen J. Carbona

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**













**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan
      K. Bedford, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
      the
      Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:






(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the end
      of,
      and for the period covered by the Report.













**REPUBLIC
                AIRWAYS**Date: November
                3, 2005
              By:
              /s/
                Bryan K. BedfordBryan
                K. BedfordTitle :
                President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
                Board









A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.8





Summary of Directors Ongoing Compensation





As of June 30, 2011 our non-executive officer directors receive cash compensation as follows:





·
Annual compensation of $12,500;




·
Meeting participation fee of $935 per in-person meeting; and




·
For meeting participation by telephone, $435 per meeting.




If the compensation is paid in New Israeli Shekels (“NIS”), the exchange rate of the directors’ fees used to calculate the fees will be not less then $4.25 per NIS.





The directors are also entitled to two and a half percent (2.5%) from amounts received by us from non diluting funding and strategic deals.
NICK PANEBIANCO, ESQ./ APPELLANT, THE FORMER ATTORNEY FOR THE EMPLOYEE/CLAIMANT/ELIZ ABETH VASQUEZ , Appellant,

v.
JACKSON HEALTH SYSTEM AND CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. , AND ELIZABETH VASQUEZ, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5501

_____________________________/ Opinion filed January 25, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Stephen L. Rosen , Judge

. Date of Accident: November 3, 2007.

Nick J Panebianco of the Law Offices of Nick J. Panebianco, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant.
Richard S. Powers of Richard S. Powers, LLC, Coral Gables, and R.A. Cuevas, Jr., County Attorney, Miami, and Marlene P. Klein, Assistant County A ttorney, Miami , for Appellee s

.2 PER CURIAM. Because Mr. Panebianco was not afforded meaningful due process below, we
vacate the order entered on November 3, 2014, and remand for a new evidentiary hearing at which he shall be heard and shall have the righ t to cross

- examine

witnesses. See Giddins v. Giddins , 151 So. 3d 54, 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ( reversing for hearing to satisfy due process requirements that party have opportunity to be

heard and call witnesses )

. See also § 90.502 (4)(c) , Fla. Stat. (2014) ( no attorney

client privilege exists as to communication s relevant to “ an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer, arising from the lawyer

client relationship ” ); R. Reg. Fla. Bar 4

- 1.6(c)(2) ( lawyer may reveal conf idential information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary “ to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and
client”). This disposition renders moot the other issues raised on appeal, on which

we therefore express no opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.3 ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2378 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2378

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
 naturalization processes for the immediate relatives of public safety 
    officers who die as a result of their employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2019

Mr. Bacon (for himself, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, 
 Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Panetta, and Mrs. Demings) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
 naturalization processes for the immediate relatives of public safety 
    officers who die as a result of their employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kerrie Orozco First Responders 
Family Support Act''.

SEC. 2. NATURALIZATION FOR IMMEDIATE RELATIVES OF PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS.

    Section 319 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1430) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Immediate Relatives of Public Safety Officers.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any person who is the surviving spouse, 
        child, or parent of a United States citizen, whose citizen 
        spouse, parent, or child dies as a result of injury or disease 
        incurred in or aggravated by employment as a public safety 
        officer, and who, in the case of a surviving spouse, was living 
        in marital union with the citizen spouse at the time of his 
        death, may be naturalized upon compliance with all the 
        requirements of this title, except that no prior residence or 
        specified physical presence within the United States shall be 
        required.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `public safety officer' has the meaning given such term in 
        section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
        of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284).''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-63564) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-87882,
33-87776, 33-89382, 333-02340, 333-06303, 333-16963, 333-20853, 333-52603,
333-80861, 333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550 and 333-97101) of Applix, Inc. of our
report dated January 24, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8531
WAYNE ALLEN STRICKLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER BANICK, Roanoke City Police Department, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-1283-R) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 31, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Allen Strickland, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingwithout prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064,1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine "whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending the complaint." Id. at 1066-67. A dismissal without prejudice could be a final, appealable order if "no amendment [to the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. Since Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert some claims, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction becausewe find the order is not appealable. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7349

ANDREW L. GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-28-2) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew L. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andrew L. Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Angelone , No. CA-00-28-2 (E.D. Va. filedSept. 7, 2000; entered Sept. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

 ___________

 No. 98-1124

 ___________

Donald H. Brancato, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

St. Louis Community College at *

Florissant Valley; Richard Booker, *

*

Appellees. *

 ___________

Appeals from the United States

 No. 98-1127 District Court for the

 ___________ Eastern District of Missouri.

 [UNPUBLISHED]

Donald H. Brancato, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

St. Louis Community College at *

Florissant Valley; Richard Booker, *

*

Appellants. *

___________

Submitted: September 2, 1998

Filed: September 8, 1998

___________
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Donald H. Brancato appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary

1

judgment based on res judicata in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action stemming from his

arrest. Defendants filed a cross-appeal based on the district court’s failure to award

them attorney’s fees.

We conclude that Brancato’s action is res judicata-barred because the claims and

allegations in his current suit arise from the same events as those raised in his 1996

state court suit, involve the same parties, and were or could have been raised in that

action. See Brown v. St. Louis Police Dep’t, 691 F.2d 393, 396 (8th Cir. 1982), cert.

denied, 461 U.S. 908 (1983). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying defendants attorney’s fees. See Garionis v. Newton, 827 F.2d

306, 310 (8th Cir. 1987) (standard of review). Finally, we deny defendants’ motion for

Fed. R. App. P. 38 sanctions on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 23.1



<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333 -06665 and  333-21003) of Videonics,  Inc.
of our reports  dated January 28, 2000  relating to the  consolidated  financial
statements and financial  statement schedule of Videonics,  Inc. which appear in
this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 27, 2000
# C_2010157EN.01000901.xml

| 17.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/9

---

Communication from the Kingdom of Belgium concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 157/05

Pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (1), the Kingdom of Belgium hereby notifies to the European Commission the list of competent authorities responsible for dealing with applications relating to areas located within the Walloon Region.

1

| — | Pursuant to the Walloon Government Decree of 19 March 2009 laying down the procedure and detailed rules for examining applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas, and amending the Walloon Government Decree of 4 July 2002 establishing the list of projects subject to an impact assessment and of classified installations and activities, all applications for licences to explore for and extract oil and gas must be submitted to the following authority:





  Région Wallonne |
| --- | --- |
| Service public de Wallonie — Direction générale opérationnelle agriculture, ressources naturelles et environnement |
| Département des permis et des autorisations |
| Avenue Prince de Liège, 15 |
| 5100 Jambes |
| BELGIQUE |

—

Pursuant to the Walloon Government Decree of 19 March 2009 laying down the procedure and detailed rules for examining applications for licences to explore for and produce oil and gas, and amending the Walloon Government Decree of 4 July 2002 establishing the list of projects subject to an impact assessment and of classified installations and activities, all applications for licences to explore for and extract oil and gas must be submitted to the following authority:

Région Wallonne

Service public de Wallonie — Direction générale opérationnelle agriculture, ressources naturelles et environnement

Département des permis et des autorisations

Avenue Prince de Liège, 15

5100 Jambes

BELGIQUE

| — | The Walloon Government will take a decision on any such licence applications. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Walloon Government will take a decision on any such licence applications.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

1

---
Exhibit
31.2




Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, David
W. Jaffin, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AirSharesTM EU Carbon Allowances
Fund;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  June
      15, 2009
                By:
                /s/ David W. JaffinName:
                David
      W. JaffinTitle:
                Chief
      Financial OfficerXShares
      Advisors LLC,Sponsor
      of AirSharesTM EU Carbon Allowances
Fund
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 934 

AN ACT 

To convey certain submerged lands to the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands in order to give that 

territory the same benefits in its submerged lands as 

Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa have 

in their submerged lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 934 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN SUBMERGED LANDS 

2 TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN 

3 MARIANA ISLANDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of Public Law 

5 93–435 (48 U.S.C. 1705) is amended by inserting ‘‘the 

6 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after 

7 ‘‘Guam,’’ each place it appears. 

8 (b) REFERENCES TO DATE OF ENACTMENT.—For 

9 the purposes of the amendment made by subsection (a), 

10 each reference in Public Law 93–435 (48 U.S.C. 1705) 

11 to the ‘‘date of enactment’’ shall be considered to be a 

12 reference to the date of the enactment of this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 934 

AN ACT 

To convey certain submerged lands to the CommonAmerican Samoa have in their submerged lands. merged lands as Guam, the Virgin Islands, and to give that territory the same benefits in its sub- wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in order