alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1123

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Waha - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily Waha published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
No. 319.

#### Arneson et al. *v.*United Irrigation Co. et al.

Argued January 13, ■ 1932.

Decided January 18, 1932.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it *(Parson Son*
      *593
      *& Co.*v. *Bird,*248 U. S. 268; *Browne*v. *Union Pacific R. Co.,*267 U. S. 255; *Live Oak Water Users’ Assn.*v. *Railroad Commission,*269 U. S. 354, 359; *Security National Bank*v. *Twinde,*278 U. S. 659; *Garysburg Mfg. Co.*v. *Board of Commissioners,*280 U. S. 520); and for the want of a substantial federal question *(Wabash Ry. Co.*v. *Flannigan,*192 U. S. 29; *Erie R. Co.*v. *Solomon,*237 U. S. 427; *C. A. King & Co.*v. *Horton,*276 U. S. 600; *Bank of Indianola*v. *Miller,*276 U. S. 605; *Roe*v. *Kansas,*278 U. S. 191).

*Mr. S. J. Brooks,*with whom *Mr. W. L. Matthews*was on the brief, for appellants.

*Messrs. J. Q. Henry, pro hac vice,*by leave of Court, and *John A. Mobley,*with whom *Mr. W. L. Cook*was on the brief, for appellees.
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

October 3, 2022

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC - Rule Changes - Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby 

submits amendments to its Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies) (“Fee 

Schedule”), which have been amended to reflect updates to certain terms and fees. The amendments will 

become effective on October 18, 2022, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. Pursuant to 

Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A is the update to the Fee Schedule, with 

the additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this submission, TW SEF hereby 

notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain information 

confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial 

information and has posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a redacted 

copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rule complies with the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder, 

including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Fee Schedule is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rule were expressed to TW SEF by its 

governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market participants.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (646) 767-4923 or by email at 

Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

TW SEF CCO
APPENDIX A

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Emerging Market Currencies) 

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
# C_2010166EN.01000101.xml

| 25.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 166/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.10.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 327/08 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Lempelse af NOX-afgift for virksomheder med særlig store udledninger og virksomheder, der reducerer udledningen |
| Legal basis | Lov om afgift af kvælstofoxider. |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Tax rate reduction |
| Budget | Annual budget: DKK 15 million; Overall budget: DKK 150 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2010-1.1.2020 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | SKAT HC |
| Østbanegade 123 |
| 2100 |
| DANMARK |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.10.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 327/08

Member State

Denmark

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Lempelse af NOX-afgift for virksomheder med særlig store udledninger og virksomheder, der reducerer udledningen

Legal basis

Lov om afgift af kvælstofoxider.

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Tax rate reduction

Budget

Annual budget: DKK 15 million; Overall budget: DKK 150 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.1.2010-1.1.2020

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

SKAT HC

Østbanegade 123

2100

DANMARK

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
EXHIBIT 99.4

Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-160783, 333-143550, 333-135595, 333-128205 and 333-113048 on Form S-8; and to the use of our reports dated March 19, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Ivanhoe
Mines Ltd. and subsidiaries (Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.) and the effectiveness of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2011.

|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

March 30, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14054]



[[Page 30193]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of March 
20, 2001.

    In accordance with Sec. 271.5 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on March 20, 2001.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
meeting of March 20, 2001, which include the domestic policy 
directive issued at that meeting, are available upon request to the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 
20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and 
in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in 
the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent 
with reducing the federal funds rate to an average of around 5 percent.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, May 23, 2001.

Donald L. Kohn,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-14054 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2018301EN.01003101.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Link Entertainment v EUIPO — García-Sanjuan Machado (SAVORY DELICIOUS ARTISTS & EVENTS)

(Case T-694/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark SAVORY DELICIOUS ARTISTS & EVENTS - Earlier EU word mark AVORY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Articles 8(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 301/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Link Entertainment, SLU (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Estella Garbayo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sandra García-Sanjuan Machado (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Torner Lasalle, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2017 (Case R 1758/2016-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Ms García-Sanjuan Machado and Link Entertainment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Link Entertainment, SLU to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Link Entertainment, SLU to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10659

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nathan Thomas Hubbard-Nguyen, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:19-CR-7-1

Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent HubbardNguyen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hubbard-Nguyen has not filed a response. We 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10659 Document: 00515849504 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
No. 20-10659

2

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10659 Document: 00515849504 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
#### Paul MESSER, California Medicare beneficiary; Dorothy Calabrese, M.D., California Medicare physician provider, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS,* Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-56622.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.**

Filed April 21, 2010.

Paul Messer, Laguna Woods, CA, pro se.

Dorothy Calabrese, Laguna Hills, CA, pro se.

Russell William Chittenden, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Annette Kaz-merski, Esquire, Conkle, Kremer & Engel PLC, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Kathleen Sebelius is substituted for her predecessor, Michael O. Leavitt, as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*616MEMORANDUM ***

Paul Messer and Dorothy Calabrese, M.D. appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging that defendants’ denial of reimbursement claims for transfer factor therapy violated various civil and criminal federal statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Kaiser v. Blue Cross of Cal.,*347 F.3d 1107, 1111 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action because Messer and Cala-brese failed to exhaust them administrative remedies under the Medicare Act prior to filing the action. *See*42 U.S.C. §§ 1395ff(b)(l)(A), 1395Ü (incorporating 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)-(h) by reference, and thus providing that judicial review is only available after a hearing and the final decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services); *Heckler v. Ringer,*466 U.S. 602, 614-16, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984) (stating that claims arise under the Medicare Act, and are subject to its exhaustion requirements, if they are inextricably intertwined with claims for Medicare benefits).

Messer and Calabrese’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarter ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                                 
|Mark R. Bachmann Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

April 7, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Tradition SEF, Inc.

Participant Notice 19-04

Tradition SEF - Trad-X USD IRS Liquidity Provider Program (“LPP”)

August 2, 2019

To : Tradition SEF Authorized Representatives

From : Tradition SEF Legal, Compliance, and Operations

_______________________________________________________________________________

Authorized Representatives,

Tradition SEF, Inc. (“Tradition SEF”) may from time to time introduce one or more programs that 

provide Participants or Customers with incentives for meeting trading volume or liquidity thresholds 

as established by Tradition SEF from time-to-time. Pursuant to Tradition SEF Rule 536, Tradition 

SEF hereby provides notice of the introduction of a Trad-X USD IRS Liquidity Provider Program,

(the “LPP”), as set forth in the LPP Program description below. The effective date for the 

commencement of the LPP is August 16, 2019.

The objective of the LPP is to incentivise electronically streamed two-way liquidity provision to the 

Trad-X USD electronic order book. [REDACTED – CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUESTED]

Details of the LPP will be distributed directly to Participant’s and Customer’s Authorized 

Representatives.

A request for confidential treatment for the LPP has been submitted to the CFTC. Please note that the 

LPP is considered confidential and is intended only for Tradition SEF Participants and Customers, 

and is not to be disseminated outside of a Participant’s or Customer’s organization.

TRADITION SEF, INC. TRAD-X USD IRS LIQUIDITY PROVIDER PROGRAM 

DESCRIPTION

(To be considered in conjunction with the Tradition SEF Rulebook and Platform Supplements).

1. Eligibility: 

[REDACTED – CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

2. The Risk-Adjusted Average Spread (“RAAS”) Mechanism

[REDACTED – CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

3. LPP Incentives

[REDACTED – CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

For Tradition SEF legal matters, please contact:
Scot J. Halvorsen, General Counsel: (212) 377 2337 or scot.halvorsen@tradition.com

For SEF compliance or administrative questions please contact:

Eric Earnhardt, CCO: (212) 791 3497 or eric.earnhardt@tradition-na.com

Jeff Mehan, CAO: (212) 943 4567 or jeff.mehan@tradition.com
Exhibit 4.5

SUEZ
EXTRACT OF
THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
OF MARCH 3, 2004

[]



5.  Report of the Compensation and Nominations Committee of March 3, 2004



Mr. Jean Gandois, Committee Chairman, reported todays session:





Determination of the criteria for the variable part of compensation for 2004 of the three high-ranking managers.



The Committee decided to base the variable part:





for the economic part:



·

on current net earnings per share



·

on the gross cash flow





for the qualitative part:



·

on the amount of exceptional negative earnings in the 2004 financial statements



·

on the net cash surplus



·

on the achievement of reduction in operating expenditure (€900 million).



The Board of Directors gave its approval to these Committee proposals.

[]
#### Nella Manko, Appellant, v Dana Mannor et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Decided May 11, 2010

*881Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Louis Gries, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of James Hardie Industries N.V.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting. /s/Louis GriesLouis GriesDate: July 1, 2005
    Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 345P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 430

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 November 1998.