alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10104 Summary Calendar

DIANE LYNN HOPPER, On behalf of herself and all other women similarly situated; WANDA DIANE NASH SMITH, On behalf of herself and all other women similarly situated; BILLA JOAN FRANKLIN, On behalf of herself and all other women similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus COMMISSIONERS COURT, of Dallas County, Texas; JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Sheriff of Dallas County; DALLAS COUNTY PRE-TRIAL RELEASE SERVICES; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, by and through James Collins, Executive Director; DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISORS & CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, by and through Ron Goethals, Director; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JAIL STANDARDS COMMISSION; TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, by and through, Carol Vance, Jerry Hodge, Joshua Allen, Sr., Ellen J. Halbert, Allan Poulumsky, R.H. (Rufus) Duncan, The Honorable Gilberto Jinojosa, Sr., John R. Ward, Thomas Dunning, Board Members; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE DIVISION, by and through Jack Kyle, Chairman; TDCJ, PARDON AND PAROLE DIVISION, by and through Melinda Bozarth, Interim Director; TDCJ COMMUNITY JUSTICE ASSISTANCE DIVISION, by and through Dimitria Pope, Director; DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-54-X

- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *No. 95-10104 - 2 - The appellants appeal the orders of the district court denying a preliminary injunction and class certification. They argue that 1) the district court erred in denying the application for a preliminary injunction as moot, 2) their standing to appeal the denial of class certification should be determined as of the date of filing of their motion for class certification, and 3) their claims are “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” For the reasons given by the district court, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of the application for a preliminary injunction as moot. We do not address the arguments concerning the denial of class certification, and we DISMISS the appeal of that order for lack of jurisdiction. See Carson v. American Brands, Inc. , 450 U.S. 79, 84 (1981); Shanks v. City of Dallas,

Tex. , 752 F.2d 1092, 1095 (5th Cir. 1985). The appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED, and the appellants’ motion for sanctions is also DENIED.
#### Sam Futersak, Appellant, v Sheldon Perl, Also Known as Shloime Perl, et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 1309; 2011 NY Slip Op 89601(U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Andrew Godfrey,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of First Quantum Ventures, Inc., (the "Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:





(1) The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the Company.






By:
/s/ Andrew GodfreyAndrew GodfreyChief Executive Officer


Date:May 13, 2011
   -------------------
 This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020287EN.01000302.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Santen SAS v Directeur général de l’Institut national de la propriété industrielle

(Case C-673/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal product for human use - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Article 3(d) - Conditions for the grant of a certificate - Obtaining the first authorisation to place the product on the market as a medicinal product - Authorisation to place on the market a new therapeutic application of a known active ingredient)

(2020/C 287/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Santen SAS

Defendant: Directeur général de l’Institut national de la propriété industrielle

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(d) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that a marketing authorisation cannot be considered to be the first marketing authorisation, for the purpose of that provision, where it covers a new therapeutic application of an active ingredient, or of a combination of active ingredients, and that active ingredient or combination has already been the subject of a marketing authorisation for a different therapeutic application.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Chen Schor, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 29, 2016 | /s/ CHEN SCHOR                                                             |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Chen Schor                                                                 |
|                      | *President and Chief   Executive Officer****(principal executive officer)* |

 

----
# C_2012024EN.01007901.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/79

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection status (recast)’

COM(2011) 319 final — 2009/0165 (COD)

2012/C 24/15

On 19 July 2011, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection status (Recast)

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection status (Recast)

COM(2011) 319 final — 2009/0165 (COD).

Since the Committee has already set out its views on the subject of the proposal in question in its opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast), adopted on 28 April 2010 (1), it decided, at its 475th plenary session of 26 and 27 October 2011 (meeting of 26 October), by 149 votes to none with 5 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast)

1

Brussels, 26 October 2011.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---

(1)  EESC opinion ‘Minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast)’, OJ C 18 of 19.01.2011, p. 85.

1

---
Exhibit 99.1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549   FORM 8-K   CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) January 18th, 2008 CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC. (Name of Small Business issuer in its charter)   COLORAD0000-5283120-5966439 (State or other jurisdiction of            (Commission File No.)    (IRS Employer incorporation or organization)                                                 Identification No.)   1013 1st Avenue, NW, Calgary, AB T2N 0A8 Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada (Address of principal executive offices)  403-827-7936 (Registrants telephone number) -------------------------   Item 8 01. Other Events  On  January 18, 2008 the Board of Directors of the registrant passed unanimously a resolution authorizing a stock dividend of three additional shares for each share issued, bringing the total common shares issued and outstanding to 20,400,000.  A copy of the minutes of the meeting is including in this document as Exhibit 99.1  ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.   EXHIBITS  99.1      Board Minutes  January 18, 2008.   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  January 18, 2008.  Capital Resource Alliance, Inc.  /s/ Joseph Forzani Joseph Forzani, President  /s/Frederick Fitzgerald Frederick Fitzgerald, Secretary/Treasurer  Exhibit 99.1      MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE, INC.  At a telephone meeting of the Board of Directors of Capital Resource Alliance, Inc., notice being waived and both directors present the following resolution was put forth:  RESOLVED:That a stock dividend of three (3) additional shares for each share presently issued and outstanding be affected immediately bringing the total issued and outstanding shares to 20,400,000. The corporate Secretary is hereby instructed to notify the transfer agent of this action.  January 18, 2008.  s/s Joseph Forzani Joseph Forzani, President and director  s/s Frederick Fitzgerald Frederick Fitzgerald, Secretary and director
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2698

_____________________________

ERRON MARKESE COLEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

May 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 23, 2013

s1016

Order 

Clerk

October 23, 2013

147522

SC: 147522

In re AJR, Minor. COA: 312100

Kent CC Family Division:

12-024817-AY

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether the Court of Appeals properly interpreted the statutory phrase “the 

parent having legal custody of the child” in the stepparent adoption statute, MCL 

710.51(6), as necessarily referring to “the” sole parent with legal custody; (2) whether the 

phrase “legal custody” in § 51(6) is synonymous with the concept of joint custody in the 

Child Custody Act, MCL 722.26a(7)(b), whereby “the parents share decision-making 

authority as to the important decisions affecting the welfare of the child”; and (3) if the 

Court of Appeals did not err in interpreting the statute, what, if any, remedy is available 

to the petitioners in this case that is consistent with the general purposes of the Adoption 

Code, MCL 710.21a. 

The State Bar of Michigan Family Law Section and the Michigan Chapter of the 

American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. 

Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Action of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Willamette Province Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on Thursday, June 21, 2001. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m., and will conclude at approximately 2 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Salem Office of the Bureau of Land Management; 1717 Fabry Road SE; Salem, Oregon; (503) 375-5646. The tentative agenda includes:

(1) BPA Lower Columbia Assessment process, (2) Growth and development of old-growth forests, (3) Public Forum, (4) Subcommittee organization, (5) REO update and information sharing.

The Public Forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3-4 minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material cannot be presented within the time limits for the Public Forum. Written comments may be submitted prior to the June 21 meeting by sending them to Designated Federal Official Neal Forrester at the address given below. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For more information regarding this meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Neal Forrester; Willamette National Forest; 211 East Seventh Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401; (541) 465-6924.

Dated: May 30, 2001.

Daniel L. Call, 

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-14047 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2002 and as amended on March 31, 2003 and
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Walt Hilger, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Walt Hilger
                              --------------------------
Dated: May 19, 2003           Walt Hilger
                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applix, Inc. and will be retained by Applix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       47
#### Crystal Biton, Also Known as Saphyre Bedford, Appellant, v Joe Turco et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided February 9, 2012

Reported below, 2008 NY Slip Op 88890(U).

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*17 NY3d 845 (2011)].
Exhibit 32.2





CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORPORATION


1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS


SUITE 2902


NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036







CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Alexandra Denahan, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the Report.




It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




/s/ A. Alexandra DenahanA. Alexandra DenahanChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2010
# C_2010324EN.01002001.xml

| 1.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/20

---

Notice concerning the implementation of Article 9a(7) of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of air navigation services in the single European sky

(Publication of Member States’ decisions establishing functional airspace blocks)

(Publication of Member States’ decisions establishing functional airspace blocks)

2010/C 324/06

| Member State(s) | Reference | Name of functional airspace block | Entry into force |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Denmark, Sweden | State agreement, signed 17 December 2009 | Danish-Swedish Functional Airspace Block | 1 July 2010 |

Member State(s)

Reference

Name of functional airspace block

Entry into force

Denmark, Sweden

State agreement, signed 17 December 2009

Danish-Swedish Functional Airspace Block

1 July 2010

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Ventures,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended February
28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Ian Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: April 14, 2009

/s/ Ian Jackson

Ian JacksonChief Executive
Officer

---