alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CHARLES J. WALSH, III AND LAURA

BLAU AND PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COALITION

v.

TERESA F. ISABELLA AND 325 S.18TH STREET, LLC

PETITION OF: 325 S. 18TH STREET, LLC :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s . 47 and 48 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of October , 2023, the “Petiton [sic] for Extraordinary

and[/]or King’s Bench Jurisdciton [sic]” and the “Application for Relief Seeking Permission

to File an Answer” are DENIED.
Notation of Guarantee



 Exhibit 4.6 
  
 Rule 144A Global Note 
  
 NOTATION OF GUARANTEE 
  
 For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any successor Person under the Indenture) has, jointly and severally, unconditionally guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the
provisions in the Indenture dated as of August 24, 2005 (the “Indenture”) among Syniverse Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), the Guarantors listed on Schedule I thereto and The Bank of New
York, as trustee (the “Trustee”), (a) the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium and Liquidated Damages, if any, and interest on the Notes (as defined in the Indenture), whether at maturity, by
acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on overdue principal of and interest on the Notes, if any, if lawful, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holders or the
Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in accordance
with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to the Note Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set
forth in Article 11 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the Note Guarantee. Each Holder of a Note, by accepting the same, (a) agrees to and shall be bound by such provisions, (b) authorizes and
directs the Trustee, on behalf of such Holder, to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the subordination as provided in the Indenture and (c) appoints the Trustee attorney-in-fact of such Holder for such purpose;
provided, however, that the Indebtedness evidenced by this Note Guarantee shall cease to be so subordinated and subject in right of payment upon any defeasance of this Note in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. 










			
	 Syniverse Holdings, Inc.

		
	 By
	 	/s/    RAYMOND L.
LAWLESS        
	 Name:
	 	Raymond L. Lawless
	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	
	 Syniverse Brience, LLC

		
	 By
	 	/s/    RAYMOND L.
LAWLESS        
	 Name:
	 	Raymond L. Lawless
	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	
	 Syniverse Technologies of Virginia, Inc.

		
	 By
	 	/s/    RAYMOND L.
LAWLESS        
	 Name:
	 	Raymond L. Lawless
	 Title:
	 	Secretary and Treasurer


  
 Signature Page
– Notation of Guarantee
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TitanMachinery Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Peter J. Christianson, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

Date: December 10, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Peter J. Christianson             |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Peter J. Christianson                 |
|   | President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (517)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,628
<PP&E>                                          10,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,180
<SALES>                                         22,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,801
<CGS>                                            4,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (712)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30405-30406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes in the National Handbook of 
Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intention of the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to issue a series of new or 
revised conservation practice standards in its National Handbook of 
Conservation Practices.

[[Page 30406]]

These standards include Access Road, Diversion, Drainage Water 
Management, Fishpond Management, Irrigation Land Leveling, Herbaceous 
Wind Barriers, Pond Sealing or Lining--Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing 
or Lining--Soil dispersant, Roof Runoff Structure, and Surface 
Roughening. The standards are used to convey national guidance when 
developing the Field Office Technical Guide policies. NRCS State 
Conservationists and Directors for the Pacific Basin and Caribbean 
areas who choose to adopt these practices for use within their States/
areas will incorporate them into Section IV of their Field Office 
Technical Guide. These practices may be used in resource management 
systems that treat highly erodible land or on land determined to be 
wetland.

EFFECTIVE DATES: Comments will be received until on or before August 6, 
2001. This series of new or revised conservation practice standards 
will be adopted after the close of the 60-day period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Single copies of these standards are 
available from NRCS-CED in Washington, DC. Submit individual inquiries 
and return any comments in writing to William Hughey, National 
Agricultural Engineer, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Post 
Office Box 2890, Room 6139-S, Washington, DC 20013-2890; telephone: 
(202) 720-5023. The standards are also available from, and can be 
downloaded via the Internet at: http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/practice_stds.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 requires NRCS to make available for 
public review and comment proposed revisions to conservation practice 
standards used to carry out the highly erodible land and wetland 
provisions of the law. For the next 60 days, NRCS will receive comments 
relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a 
determination will be made by NRCS regarding the disposition of those 
comments, and a final determination of change will be made.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on April 20, 2001.
Pearlie S. Reed,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 01-14149 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-U
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I, David J. Meyer, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Titan Machinery Inc.;

 

2                                          Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: December 15, 2008

 

 
|   |   | /s/ David J. Meyer      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | David J. Meyer          |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jason D. Liggins, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 2010;

decided May 11, 2010

Motion for substitution of assigned counsel granted and Robert H. Kirchner, Esq., care of Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, One Lincoln Center, Syracuse, New York 13202 is assigned in the place and stead of Richard P Ferris, Esq., as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li De Hai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Li De HaiLi De HaiChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Altounian, President, Chief Operating Officer & Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 23, 2009 

/s/ Brian Altounian
Nodal Exchange, LLC Rulebook Appendix C: Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and Position Limits**

Physical 

Commodity Code Contract Name Reporting Level

Spot Month 

Position Limit 

(lots)

Spot Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

Single Month 

Accountability Level 

(lots)

All Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

Aggregation 

Group*

MCK MA SREC Carve Out II V27 Future 25 37380 37380 37380

MFJ MA APS AEC V26 Future 25 5290 5290 5290

MRK MD SREC V27 Future 25 12000 12000 12000

NSK NJ SREC V27 Future 25 45000 45000 45000

OHJ OHIO NON-SOLAR REC V26 FUTURE 25 5000 5000 5000

PCJ PA AEC Tier 2 V26 Future 25 22500 22500 22500

PSK PA SAEC V27 Future 25 10000 10000 10000

RDJ CT REC Class 2 V26 Future 25 2500 2500 2500

WDJ DC REC Tier 1 V26 Future 25 4000 4000 4000

WRJ DC SREC V26 Future 25 1500 1500 1500

WSI CCA Specific V25 Future 25 4500 4500 4500
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00430-CV

Kevin Bierwirth, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 12-0132-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN McMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Kevin Bierwirth, acting pro se, seeks to appeal the judgment on a bench trial granting

possession of certain residential real property to Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie

Mae) in a forcible detainer suit. However, Bierwirth was not named in the judgment and was not

a party to the suit below.

Generally, only parties to a suit have standing to appeal a judgment. See City of

San Benito v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co., 109 S.W.3d 750, 754-55 (Tex. 2003) (“Under Texas

jurisprudence, an appeal can generally only be brought by a named party to the suit.”). Standing is

implicit in the concept of subject matter jurisdiction, which is essential to the authority of a court to

decide a case. Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443 (Tex. 1993). Bierwirth

signed and filed a notice of appeal and a motion for hearing to fix the amount of security to

supersede the judgment, identifying as appellant “Christopher J. Krabill and all occupants of
104 Bedrock Drive Liberty Hill, Texas, Kevin Bierwirth/as assignee.” We lack subject matter

jurisdiction over this appeal because Bierwirth was not a party to the forcible detainer suit below.

Time for filing a proper notice of appeal from this judgment has run. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1.

As such, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: February 27, 2014

2
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Altounian,
President, Chief Operating Officer&
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 November
      22, 2010
                /s/Orrin HalperOrrin
      HalperChief
      Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2490 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 

Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 

Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating the Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC 

4 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

5 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2490 IH

1 ‘‘(46) CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HIS2 TORIC TRAIL.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Standing 

4 Bear Trail, extending approximately 550 miles 

5 from Niobrara, Nebraska, to Ponca City, Okla6 homa, which follows the route taken by Chief 

7 Standing Bear and the Ponca people during 

8 Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 

9 miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through 

10 Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, 

11 which follows the return route taken by Chief 

12 Standing Bear and the Ponca people, as gen13 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘Chief 

14 Standing Bear National Historic Trail Feasi15 bility Study’, numbered 903/125,630, and dated 

16 November 2014. 

17 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map 

18 described in subparagraph (A) shall be on file 

19 and available for public inspection in the appro20 priate offices of the Department of the Interior. 

21 ‘‘(C) COMPONENTS.—The feasibility study 

22 conducted under subparagraph (A) shall include 

23 a determination on whether the Chief Standing 

24 Bear Trail meets the criteria described in subVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:01 May 09, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2490.IH H2490

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2490 IH

1 section (b) for designation as a national historic 

2 trail. 

3 ‘‘(D) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting 

4 the feasibility study under subparagraph (A), 

5 the Secretary of the Interior shall consider 

6 input from owners of private land within or ad7 jacent to the study area.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1042 

Commending the Boise State University Broncos football team for winning 

the 2010 Fiesta Bowl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2010 

Mr. MINNICK (for himself and Mr. SIMPSON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Boise State University Broncos football 

team for winning the 2010 Fiesta Bowl. 

Whereas the Boise State University Broncos football team 

won the 2010 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, defeating the Texas 

Christian University Horned Frogs by a score of 17–10 

at the University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on January 4, 2010; 

Whereas the Broncos finished their 2009 season with a flawless 14–0 record and have gone undefeated 3 of their last 

4 regular seasons; 

Whereas the Broncos’ only loss in 2008 was against Texas 

Christian University in a 1-point nail-biter, making the 

2010 Fiesta Bowl victory all the more gratifying for the 

team; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1042 IH 

Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen called for a courageous fake punt play with less than 10 minutes remaining in the game that led to the game-winning touchdown; 

Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen received the 

Paul ‘‘Bear’’ Bryant Award for the second time in just 

4 years, which recognizes the best college football coach 

in the Nation; 

Whereas sophomore quarterback Kellen Moore threw 39 

touchdown passes this season, the most for a single season in school history; 

Whereas the 2010 Fiesta Bowl victory comes just 3 years 

after the Broncos’ historic Fiesta Bowl victory in 2007; 

Whereas the entire Broncos team should be commended for 

its steadfast resolve, tireless work ethic, and solid sportsmanship; 

Whereas the Broncos should be considered serious National 

Championship contenders next year with 21 of its 22 

starters returning to the field, ready to pick up from 

where they left off; and 

Whereas the Broncos have brought great honor to themselves, their university, the city of Boise, and the State 

of Idaho: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Boise State University Bron3 cos football team for winning the 2010 Fiesta Bowl; 

4 and 

5 (2) congratulates the team for completing an 

6 undefeated, 14–0 season. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivin Williams, Appellant.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.