alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1048

Natural Gas Basis Swap - TETCO M2 - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC TETCO M2

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From Requirements

    Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads have petitioned the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance 
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of 
49 CFR part 236 as detailed below.

[Docket No. FRA-2001-9417]

    Applicant: CSX Transportation, Mr. Eric G. Peterson, Assistant 
Chief Engineer, Signal Design and Construction, 4901 Belfort Road, 
Suite 130 (S/C J-370), Jacksonville, Florida 32256.
    CSX Transportation seeks approval of the proposed modification of 
the traffic control system on Main Track No. 2, near Union City, Ohio, 
milepost QI197.64, on the Indianapolis Line Subdivision, Great Lakes 
Division. The proposed changes consist of the discontinuance and 
removal of absolute controlled signals 4E and 4W associated with the 
previous removal of the No. 1 switch.
    The reason given for the proposed changes is to eliminate 
facilities no longer needed in present day operation.
    Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be 
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
    All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified 
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401, Washington, D.C. 
20590-0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by the FRA before final action is taken. 
Comments received after that date will be considered as far as 
practicable. All written communications concerning these proceedings 
are available for examination during regular business hours (9:00 a.m.-
5:00 p.m.) at DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401 
(Plaza Level), 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590-0001. 
All documents in the public docket are also available for inspection 
and copying on the internet at the docket facility's Web site at http://dms.dot.gov.
    FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral 
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
for public hearing.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 29, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-13931 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
#### Howard ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James BENEDETTI; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-15849.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 7, 2010.

Howard Ellis, Carson City, NV, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Howard Ellis, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order of dismissal, *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend, *Halet v. Wend Inv. Co.,*672 F.2d 1305, 1310 (9th Cir.1982). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. *Buckley v. Terhune,*441 F.3d 688, 694 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed the deprivation of property claim in Count 1 of the complaint because the State of Nevada provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy. *See*Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 41.031, 41.0322; *Hudson v. Palmer,*468 U.S. 517, 533, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984) (deprivation of property does not constitute a due process violation when a post-deprivation state remedy is available). We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Ellis’s claims concerning lost or missing property.

The district court properly dismissed any due process claim Ellis sought to allege in Counts 1 and 2 of the complaint because he has no due process right to have his grievances handled in a particular manner. *See Mann v. Adams,*855 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.1988) (order). We therefore affirm the district court’s order dismissing Ellis’s challenges to the processing of his grievances.

We remand the remaining allegations of Counts 1 and 2 and instruct the district court to consider whether or not leave to amend is warranted. See *Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (leave to amend must be granted *228unless complaint’s deficiencies could not possibly be cured).

In Count 3, Ellis alleged that defendants deprived him of due process by denying without explanation his request for a live witness at a disciplinary hearing. We reverse the district court’s dismissal of Count 3 because it states a due process violation. *See Serrano v. Francis,*345 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir.2003).

In its dismissal order, the district court did not mention Counts 4 through 8 of the complaint. On remand, the court shall address these counts. *See Weilburg v. Shapiro,*488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir.2007) (pro se inmates must be given notice of complaint’s deficiencies and leave to amend if these are curable).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Scott Longval, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IntriCon Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
        [Intentionally Omitted]




c)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.






Date:
        March 16, 2007
        
        By:
        /s/Scott LongvalChief Financial Officer








---
#### Robert Dillard Jones, Appellant, v Naziemul Safi et al., Defendants, and Lazarowitz & Manganillo, P.C., et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 1, 2010;

decided March 30, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*13 NY3d 901 (2009)].
#### Global Reinsurance Corporation-U.S. Branch, Formerly Known as Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation-U.S. Branch, Respondent, v Equitas Ltd. et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 3, 2012;

decided January 5, 2012

Reported below, 82 AD3d 26.

Motion by Society of Lloyd’s for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
# C_2010072EN.01000601.xml

| 20.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 72/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.11.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 349/09 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Credit Institutions Eligible Liabilities Guarantee Scheme |
| Legal basis | The Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008 as amended |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | [...] (1) |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 1.12.2009-1.6.2010 |
| Economic sectors | — |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Minister, acting on behalf of the Government, in accordance with the Act |
| Department of Finance |
| Government Building |
| Upper Merrion Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.11.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 349/09

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Credit Institutions Eligible Liabilities Guarantee Scheme

Legal basis

The Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008 as amended

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

[...] (1)

1

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.12.2009-1.6.2010

Economic sectors

—

Name and address of the granting authority

The Minister, acting on behalf of the Government, in accordance with the Act

Department of Finance

Government Building

Upper Merrion Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---

(1)  Business secret

1

---
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 974 

For the relief of Alejandro Gomez and Juan Sebastian Gomez. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alejandro Gomez and Juan Sebastian 

Gomez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 ALEJANDRO GOMEZ AND JUAN SEBASTIAN 

5 GOMEZ. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Alejandro Gomez and Juan Sebastian Gomez shall 

9 each be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 

10 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

11 for permanent residence upon filing an application for 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 974 IH

1 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 

2 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi3 dent. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Alejandro Gomez 

5 or Juan Sebastian Gomez enters the United States before 

6 the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 

7 considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 

8 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of 

9 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation10 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica14 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

15 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Alejandro Gomez and Juan Sebastian Gomez, 

19 the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 

20 reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal 

21 year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

23 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

24 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 974 IH

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Alejandro Gomez and 

6 Juan Sebastian Gomez shall not, by virtue of such rela7 tionship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under 

8 the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David C. Scott, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
quarterly report of 3PAR Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3PAR Inc.



|                      |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  | /s/ David C. Scott                             
|                      |  | David C. Scott                                 
|                      |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  

I, Adriel G. Lares, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of 3PAR Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3PAR Inc.



|                      |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Adriel G. Lares                                  
|                      |  | Adriel G. Lares                                      
|                      |  | Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to 3PAR Inc. and will be retained by 3PAR Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing
**Exhibit 15.2****Consent of KPMG Actuaries Pty Ltd (“KPMG Actuaries”) in relation to Form 20-F filing**We hereby consent to your references to KPMG Actuaries Pty Ltd (“KPMG Actuaries”) and to ouractuarial valuation report effective as of March 31, 2007, dated May 28, 2007 (the “Report”), andto make use of, or quote, information and analyses contained within that Report for the purpose ofJames Hardie Industries N.V.’s (“JHI NV”) Annual Report on Form 20-F for fiscal year ended March31, 2007.In addition, we hereby consent to your references to past actuarial valuations performed by KPMGActuaries for the purpose of JHI NV’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for fiscal year ended March 31,2007.Your attention is drawn to the Important Note at the beginning of the Executive Summary and Section1 of the Report./s/ Neil DonlevyNeil Donlevy MA FIA FIAADirectorKPMG Actuaries Pty LtdFellow of the Institute of Actuaries (London)Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries of AustraliaSydney, AustraliaJuly 6, 2007
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 521177

________________________________ In the Matter of TERRENCE JAMES, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 19, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________ Terrence James, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to-2- 521177

which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Gunn v Annucci, 133 AD3d 989, 990 [2015]). Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy W Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Fund hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.




RIDGEWOOD ENERGY W FUND, LLCDated:
August 5, 2010
By:
/s/


ROBERT E. SWANSONName:

Robert E. SwansonTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:
August 5, 2010
By:
/s/


KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRYName:

Kathleen P. McSherryTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy W Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy W Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.