alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third Amendment to the Frisch's Executive Savings Plan



 EXHIBIT 10 (j) 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE FRISCH’S 
 EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Frisch’s Restaurants, Inc. (“Employer”) adopted the Frisch’s Executive Savings Plan (“Plan”) effective as of November 5, 1993; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Article VIII of the Plan, the Employer has the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any
time; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer previously amended the Plan to
adopt a prototype plan sponsored by Fidelity Management Trust Company to govern all Participant-directed investments other than investments in common stock of the Employer; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to further amend the Plan to change the Plan Year and to make changes required by the Internal
Revenue Code; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, effective as of January 1,
2005, except as noted below, the Employer hereby modifies and amends the Plan as follows: 
  
 1. Section 2.15 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
 “Plan Year means the calendar year.” 
  
 2. Section 3.3 shall be amended effective March 15, 2005 pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code solely for the 2005 Plan
Year to permit Participants to file elections to defer Compensation with the Committee on or before March 15, 2005 to apply to Compensation earned after March 15, 2005 but on or before December 31, 2005. 
  
 3. In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, has caused
this Amendment to be executed this 7th day of June 2005. 
  

			
	 FRISCH’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/    DONALD H. WALKER        
	 	 	Vice president and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Madeline Acosta, Respondent, v New York City Department of Education et al., Appellants.

Submitted June 1, 2010;

decided June 3, 2010

Motion by the Legal Aid Society et al. to join as amici curiae in the brief to be filed by Community Service Society et al. granted.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





EXHIBIT
      32.2





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Asher
      Zwebner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





i.
 
      The certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





ii. A
      certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
      liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.





/s/
                Asher ZwebnerAsher
                Zwebner


Chief Accounting/Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Cite as State ex rel. Oko v. McDonnell, 2012-Ohio-3698.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio 

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 98241 

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., MICHAEL OKO 

RELATOR 

vs.

NANCY R. MCDONNELL, JUDGE 

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED 

Writ of Mandamus 

Motion No. 454873 

Order No. 457102

RELEASE DATE: August 13, 2012 
FOR RELATOR

Michael Oko, pro se 

Inmate No. 500-505 

Lake Erie Correctional Institution 

501 Thompson Road 

Conneaut, Ohio 44030 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

William D. Mason 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

James E. Moss 

Assistant County Prosecutor 

9th Floor Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113 
MARY J. BOYLE, J.: 

{¶1} Relator requests that this court compel respondent judge to dispose of his 

motion for jail-time credit in State v. Oko, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-447702. (Although 

Oko avers that the motion was filed on January 20, 2012, the docket reflects that the 

motion was filed on March 29, 2012.) 

{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a 

copy of a journal entry issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on April 4, 

2012, in which respondent granted relator 134 days jail-time credit. Relator has not 

opposed the motion for summary judgment. Respondent argues that this action in 

mandamus is, therefore, moot. We agree. 

{¶3} Additionally, Oko 

failed to file an affidavit containing a description of each civil action or 

appeal of a civil action that he had filed in the previous five years in any 

state or federal court, in violation of R.C. 2969.25(A). Furthermore, he failed 

to include in his affidavit of indigency a statement setting forth the balance 

in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified by 

the institutional cashier, in violation of R.C. 2969.25(C). 

State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnell, 126 Ohio St.3d 511, 2010-Ohio-4726, 935 N.E.2d 

830, at ¶ 2. Oko’s failure to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25 provides a 

basis for dismissal. Id. at ¶ 3. 

{¶4} Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is granted. 

Relator to pay costs. The clerk of court is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this 

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B). 
{¶5} Writ denied. 

_________________________________________ 

MARY J. BOYLE, JUDGE 

MELODY J. STEWART, P.J., and 

LARRY A. JONES, SR., J., CONCUR
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission November 4, 2022

 MGEX Submission No. 22-47

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of October 24, 2022:

• October 28, 2022 Rulebook update to amend Rule 83.5., which reduces the minimum price 

increment for SPIKES Volatility Index Futures from $0.05 to $0.01, effective as of the October 31, 

2022 trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at http://www.mgex.com under the “Announcements” 

tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7141 or 

cstuhlmann@mgex.com. 

Sincerely, 

Carmen M. Stuhlmann

Assistant Corporate Counsel
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”)
amends the December 30, 2009 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Agreement”)
made between THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY
USA, a corporation existing under the laws of Colorado (“Thompson
Creek”), and PAMELA L. SAXTON (“Executive”) (together, the “Parties”).


 


WHEREAS Section 22 of the Agreement permits the
Parties to amend the Agreement by a witnessed signed writing and the Parties
each desire to amend the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF the covenants
and agreements contained in this Amendment, and other good and valuable
consideration, including the Executive’s employment with Thompson Creek, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as
follows:


 


1.             Effective as of August 5, 2010, Section 14(a) of the Agreement is
amended by deleting the second sentence thereto.


 


The Parties hereto have duly executed this
Amendment.


 


 


	
  THOMPSON CREEK METALS
  COMPANY USA

  	
   

  	
  PAMELA L. SAXTON

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Kevin Loughrey

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Pamela L. Saxton

  
	
  Kevin Loughrey

  	
   

  	
  Signature

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  September 27, 2010

  	
   

  	
  September 27, 2010

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Janette Bush

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Janette Bush

  
	
  Witness

  	
   

  	
  Witness
#### MICHAEL ANTHONY WILLIAMS and KATHERINE WILLIAMS v. RONALD FLOYD HOLSCLAW and CITY OF RALEIGH

No. 28PA98

(Filed 9 October 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 205, 495 S.E.2d 166 (1998), affirming in part and reversing in part orders entered 4 October 1996 and 24 October 1996, by Barnette, J., in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 30 September 1998.

*Law Office of Robert E. Ruegger, by Robert E. Ruegger, for unnamed defendant-appellant Integon Indemnity Corporation.*

*Fuller, Becton, Slifkin & Bell, by James C. Fuller and Asa L. Bell, Jr., for plaintiff-appellees.*

*Haywood, Denny & Miller, L.L.P., by Robert E. Levin and Thomas H. Moore, on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
| **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Microsystems, Inc.** |
|--|------------------------|

| DATE: | 7/29/98 | FR        PAGE: | N/A | PAGES: | 4 | PDF        SIZE: | 85        KB | PDF        LINK: | cf9822c001.p |
|-------|---------|------------------|-----|--------|---|-------------------|---------------|-------------------|--------------|

|  | **-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
    Previous
Next
Last
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Carver STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant. *326United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Carver Stephens, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 13-4163, 13-4164.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 7, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 9, 2013.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In 1998, Thomas Carver Stephens pleaded guilty in two separate cases to bank robbery, in ■violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2006), and possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). The district court sentenced Stephens to 168 months of imprisonment for the bank robbery conviction and a concurrent 120 months of imprisonment for the firearm conviction, followed by three years of supervised release. After his release from incarceration, the district court found that Stephens had violated the terms of his supervised release. The court revoked Stephens’ supervised release and sentenced him to twenty-four months of imprisonment on each conviction, to be served concurrently. Stephens appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.

Stephens argues that the revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable as the district court failed to properly consider his need for substance abuse treatment in sentencing him above the advisory Guidelines range. We review a sentence imposed on revocation to determine whether the sentence was plainly unreasonable. *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006). Although a district court must consider the policy statements in Chapter Seven of the United States Sentencing Guidelines along with the statutory requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (2006) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006), “the court ultimately has broad discretion to revoke its previous sentence and impose a term of imprisonment up to the statutory maximum.” *Id.*at 439 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed the record and the relevant legal authorities and conclude that the sentence is reasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
| 1.   | I      have reviewed the Report; |
|----------------|----------------------------------|

| 2.   | based      on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the      Report; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the      Report. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered August 26, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00464-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant

V.

ERICA KAY JACKSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 79,917

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s August 25, 2014 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before September 15, 2014. We caution appellee that 

no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
# C_2010029EN.01000101.xml

| 5.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 29/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.1.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 397/09 |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region | Pohjanmaa/Ostrobothnia |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Kiinteistö Oy Cargo Apron Vaasa (Tuki Vaasan lentoaseman lentorahtitoimintoihin liittyvään infrastruktuuriin) |
| Legal basis | Laki valtionavustuksesta yritystoiminnan kehittämiseksi 1336/2006 (Lag om statsunderstöd för utvecklande av företagsverksamhet 1336/2006); Asetus valtionavustuksesta yritystoiminnan kehittämiseksi 675/2007 (Förordning om statsunderstöd för utvecklande av företagsverksamhet 675/2007) |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Guarantee |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 2,947 million
  Overall budget: EUR 2,947 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 1.2010-4.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Air transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Pohjanmaan TE-keskus, työllisyyden ja yrittäjyyden vastuualue |
| PL 131 |
| FI-65101 Vaasa |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.1.2010

Reference number of State Aid

N 397/09

Member State

Finland

Region

Pohjanmaa/Ostrobothnia

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Kiinteistö Oy Cargo Apron Vaasa (Tuki Vaasan lentoaseman lentorahtitoimintoihin liittyvään infrastruktuuriin)

Legal basis

Laki valtionavustuksesta yritystoiminnan kehittämiseksi 1336/2006 (Lag om statsunderstöd för utvecklande av företagsverksamhet 1336/2006); Asetus valtionavustuksesta yritystoiminnan kehittämiseksi 675/2007 (Förordning om statsunderstöd för utvecklande av företagsverksamhet 675/2007)

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant, Guarantee

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 2,947 million

Overall budget: EUR 2,947 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

1.2010-4.2010

Economic sectors

Air transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Pohjanmaan TE-keskus, työllisyyden ja yrittäjyyden vastuualue

PL 131

FI-65101 Vaasa

SUOMI/FINLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
Exhibit23.1  Consent Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-138926 and No. 333-163060 and Form S-8 No. 333-161186) of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., and in the related prospectuses of our reports dated February 23, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Five Star Quality Care, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.   /s/   Ernst & Young LLPBoston,   MassachusettsFebruary 23,   2011
H. Res. 1042 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 13, 2010. 

Whereas the Boise State University Broncos football team 

won the 2010 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, defeating the Texas 

Christian University Horned Frogs by a score of 17–10 

at the University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on January 4, 2010; 

Whereas the Broncos finished their 2009 season with a flawless 14–0 record and have gone undefeated 3 of their last 

4 regular seasons; 

Whereas the Broncos’ only loss in 2008 was against Texas 

Christian University in a 1-point nail-biter, making the 

2010 Fiesta Bowl victory all the more gratifying for the 

team; 

Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen called for a courageous fake punt play with less than 10 minutes remaining in the game that led to the game-winning touchdown; 

Whereas Broncos head coach Chris Petersen received the 

Paul ‘‘Bear’’ Bryant Award for the second time in just 

4 years, which recognizes the best college football coach 

in the Nation; 

Whereas sophomore quarterback Kellen Moore threw 39 

touchdown passes this season, the most for a single season in school history; 
2 

•HRES 1042 EH 

Whereas the 2010 Fiesta Bowl victory comes just 3 years 

after the Broncos’ historic Fiesta Bowl victory in 2007; 

Whereas the entire Broncos team should be commended for 

its steadfast resolve, tireless work ethic, and solid sportsmanship; 

Whereas the Broncos should be considered serious National 

Championship contenders next year with 21 of its 22 

starters returning to the field, ready to pick up from 

where they left off; and 

Whereas the Broncos have brought great honor to themselves, their university, the city of Boise, and the State 

of Idaho: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) commends the Boise State University Broncos 

football team for winning the 2010 Fiesta Bowl; and 

(2) congratulates the team for completing an 

undefeated, 14–0 season. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Osprey Ventures,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended August 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), I, Ma Cheng Ji, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: October 14, 2010

/s/ Ma Cheng Ji

Ma Cheng JiChief Executive
Officer

---