alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2488 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2488

   To require the Secretary of State to submit a report on potential 
benefits and impact to the United States of establishing a joint United 
           States-Israel cybersecurity center of excellence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2019

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Weber of 
 Texas, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mr. Higgins of New York) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of State to submit a report on potential 
benefits and impact to the United States of establishing a joint United 
           States-Israel cybersecurity center of excellence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S.-Israel Cybersecurity Center of 
Excellence Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND IMPACT TO THE UNITED STATES OF 
              ESTABLISHING A JOINT UNITED STATES-ISRAEL CYBERSECURITY 
              CENTER OF EXCELLENCE.

    Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a report examining the potential benefits and 
impact to the United States of establishing a joint United States-
Israel Cybersecurity Center of Excellence based in the United States 
and Israel to leverage the experience, knowledge, and expertise of 
institutions of higher education (as such term is defined in subsection 
(a) or (b) of section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1001)), private sector entities, and government entities in the 
area of cybersecurity and protection of critical infrastructure (as 
such term is defined in subsection (e) of section 1016 of the Critical 
Infrastructures Protection Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c; enacted in 
title X of the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56)).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020045EN.01001001.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/10

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia — Spain) — OH (C-439/18), ER (C-472/18) v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)

(Joined Cases C-439/18 and C-472/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 97/81/EC - Framework Agreement on part-time work - Clause 4 - Male and female workers - Principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation - Directive 2006/54/EC - Article 14(1) - Vertical part-time worker - Recognition of length of service - Method of calculation of three-yearly length-of-service increments - Exclusion of periods not worked)

(2020/C 45/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: OH (C-439/18), ER (C-472/18)

Defendant: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)

Operative part of the order

Clause 4.1 and 4.2 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded on 6 June 1997, annexed to Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, and Article 14(1) of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding a national rule and a national business practice, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, in so far as, as regards vertical part-time workers, they take into account only periods actually worked and thus exclude periods not worked from the calculation of the period of service required in order to receive three-yearly length-of-service increments as additional remuneration, while full-time workers are not subject to such a rule or practice.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
# C_2010300EN.01003701.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/37

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request made on behalf of a Member State

2010/C 300/08

On 26 October 2010, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors. The first working day following receipt of the request is 27 October 2010.

This request, which comes from the Kingdom of Denmark, concerns exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in that country. Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply where the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months to take a decision on this request, starting on the working day referred to above. The period therefore ends on 27 January 2011.

The provisions of the third subparagraph of the abovementioned paragraph 4 are applicable. Consequently, the period allowed to the Commission may be extended by one month. Any such extension must be published.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30830

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EUGENE MATTHEW WARE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:03-CR-50043-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eugene Matthew Ware appeals his sentence for having

distributed five or more grams of crack cocaine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Ware contends that the district court

erred under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), in

attributing 45.8 grams of crack to him for sentencing purposes. 

Ware also argues that the district court erred by sentencing him

under the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime that was held to

be unconstitutional in Booker.
No. 04-30830

-2-

The Government argues, inter alia, that because Ware was

sentenced in the middle of the applicable guideline range, the

sentencing error was harmless. This court has rejected such an

assertion. See United States v. Garza, 429 F.3d 165, 170-71 (5th

Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1444 (2006). Moreover, the

record in this case does not show that the district court would

have imposed the same sentence under an advisory regime. Thus,

the Government cannot bear its burden of establishing beyond a

reasonable doubt that the district court’s error was harmless. 

See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Accordingly, Ware’s sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED

for further proceedings. See id. at 466. Because we vacate

Ware’s sentence and remand for resentencing under an advisory

guideline regime, we do not reach the other claim of sentencing

error that Ware raises. See United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d

360, 377 n.62 (5th Cir. 2005). 

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

 

06-3272 

FRED F. VAUGHN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

 Respondent. 

___________________________ 

 DECIDED: December 13, 2006 

___________________________ 

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judge. 

PER CURIAM. 

The Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) dismissed Fred F. Vaughn’s petition 

for review as untimely. Mr. Vaughn had requested waiver of interest accumulated on 

his noncontributory Federal services from 1981 to 1987. Fred F. Vaughn v. Merit Sys.

Protection Bd., SF-0841-05-0426-I-1 (M.S.P.B., June 20, 2005) (Initial Decision); Fred 

F. Vaughn v. Merit Sys. Protection Bd., SF-0841-05-0426-I-1 (M.S.P.B., Apr. 21, 2006) 

(Final Decision). Because the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) sent a letter 

dated September 12, 2006 to Mr. Vaughn notifying him that they improperly calculated 

the amount of interest and contribution, as well as incorrectly calculated the amount 

under the wrong retirement system, this court dismisses Mr. Vaughn’s appeal as moot. 
On February 1, 2005, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) told Mr. 

Vaughn that he owed $1,359 in required contributions and $4,659 in interest on the 

unpaid required contributions under the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS).

OPM provided Mr. Vaughn with claim number U52 2 304 089, and under that claim

number he sought a waiver of interest accumulated on his 1981-1987 Federal service. 

OPM denied his request. On OPM’s claim number U52 2 304 089, the Board affirmed. 

Initial Decision, slip op. at 5. Now, however, the amount of interest that the OPM states

Mr. Vaughn owes under FERS has changed. On September 12, 2006, the OPM 

notified Mr. Vaughn that it had incorrectly calculated his original FERS contributions.

Instead, OPM should have computed the amount under the Civil Service Retirement 

System. The September 12, 2006 letter gives Vaughn a new claim number: CSD 7 

090 360. This new claim covers a period beginning in 1981 and ending in 1988. 

After receipt of the September 12, 2006 letter, Mr. Vaughn filed a copy with this

court and requested a refund of his $450 filing fee. Under the Practice Notes of Federal 

Circuit Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, docketing fees cannot be refunded. Upon

deposit into the United States Treasury, a docket fee cannot be accessed. Therefore, 

though this court dismisses Mr. Vaughn’s appeal as moot, and cannot refund his

docketing fee in the amount of $450, it orders the Clerk of the Court to waive a 

docketing fee for Mr. Vaughn’s appeal, if any, on claim number CSD 7 090 360. To 

receive that fee waiver in an appeal to this court involving claim number CSD 7 090 360 

Mr. Vaughn should attach a copy of this order with any waiver request. 

06-3272 2
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/Kyle Schlosser By: Kyle Schlosser Chief Executive Officer  Dated: May 16, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

{ss|xrsv
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 28, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Millennium Bancorp, Inc., Edwards, Colorado; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Millennium Bank, Edwards, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 29, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13817 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 10.3 

Amendment No 2 to the

  
  IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL INC.

  2001 Stock Plan


     In connection with the transactions contemplated by, and pursuant to the provisions of, Section 5.7(a) of Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September
15, 2005, by and among Imagistics International Inc., Océ N.V. and Orange Merger Corp. (the “Merger Agreement”), the Imagistics International Inc. 2001 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby
amended as follows effective as of October 11, 2005, subject to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement: 


     1.       Section 16 of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting therein the following definitions: 


       (ee) “Authorized Officer” means each of the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Human Resources Officer, and the Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and such other officers of the Company as any of the foregoing may designate in writing.

        (ff) “Effective Time” has the meaning set forth in the Merger Agreement.

        (gg) “Merger Agreement” means that Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 15, 2005, by and among Imagistics International Inc., Océ N.V. and Orange Merger Corp. 

        (hh) “Offer Price” has the meaning set forth in the Merger Agreement. 

        (ii) “Option Cancellation Agreement” means an agreement substantially in the form set forth as Exhibit A to the Merger Agreement.

        (jj) “Outstanding Options” means each Option previously granted hereunder that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. 




     2.        Section 14. Special Merger Provisions. 


        (a) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, each Outstanding Option shall be 100% vested and fully exercisable.

        (b) Effective as of the Effective Time each Outstanding Option shall be cancelled and each holder thereof who delivers to the Company a duly executed Option Cancellation Agreement shall be
    entitled to receive from the Company an amount of cash equal to the product of the following: (i) the excess, if any, of (x) the Offer Price over (y) the exercise price per share of the Shares subject to such Outstanding Option, multiplied by (ii)
    the number of Shares issuable pursuant to the unexercised portion of such Outstanding Option, less applicable withholdings. 

        (c) The Plan shall be suspended effective immediately following the Effective Time and no Option shall thereafter be granted or exercised under the Plan. 

        (d) Each Authorized Officer shall be authorized under the Plan to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary or appropriate to implement this Section 14.
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **2** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Schaefer, Michael R.     (NFA's Special Committee to Review Technology)** |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 4/24/02 | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: | 2 | PDF SIZE: | 54 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/ |
|-------|--|---------|----------|--|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|--------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **Trendstat Capital     Management, Inc. (Basso, Thomas F.)** |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: | 1 | PDF SIZE: | 46 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/ |
|-------|----------|--|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|--------------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection
with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
R. Sharp, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


























/s/ Michael R.
Sharp


Michael
R. Sharp


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 15,
2009
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1126

Natural Gas Option - NYMEX Henry Hub (Last Day) - NYMEX

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled NYMEX Henry Hub (Last Day) put and call options on the NYMEX Henry Hub (Last Day) contract 

specified in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub futures contract final settlement 

price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading day for that contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the average daily settlement price 

during the calendar month of the first nearby NYMEX Henry Hub contract (as described in Floating Price A) 

and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On expiration of a Put Option, the value will be the 

difference between the strike price and the average daily settlement price during the calendar month of the 

first nearby NYMEX Henry Hub contract (as described in Floating Price A), or zero whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued as the contract 

quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per barrel and prices shall be in multiples of $0.001 per MMBtu. The 

minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. The minimum price increment 

will be $0.0001. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.