alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Victor GALINSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ben CURRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-16415.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 7, 2010.

Victor Galinski, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Denise A. Yates, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Victor Galinski appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Galinski contends that the Board’s 2005 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights.1 The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the Board’s decision. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 563 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).

Galinski’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Galinski’s request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2005 decision of the California Board of Parole Hearings ("the Board”) to deny parole violated due process.
f1012g0910a1ex10i_gsp1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Description of Verbal Management Consulting Agreement Between GSP-1, Inc. and Peter Goldstein












On September 3, 2010 Mr. Goldstein, the President and sole director of the Company, verbally agreed to provide funding to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond, until the Company is engaged in business activities that provide cash flow sufficient to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations. We currently have no written contractual agreements in place with Mr. Goldstein to provide such funding. During the next 12 months, Mr. Goldstein has agreed to cover costs including, but not limited to, the filing of Exchange Act reports, and consummating an acquisition. At this time we do not have the funds to pay for these filings and do not have any written agreement to raise funds to cover these expenses. However, we believe we will be able to meet these costs with funds provided by Mr. Goldstein. At such time that the Company has the ability to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations with cash flow from operations, Mr. Goldstein will no longer be obligated to cover such costs.
II 

Calendar No. 138 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 987 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 601 8th Street in Freedom, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘John Scott Challis, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN SCOTT CHALLIS, JR. POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 601 8th Street in Freedom, 

6 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John 

7 Scott Challis, Jr. Post Office’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 987 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Scott Challis, 

5 Jr. Post Office’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 138 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 987 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘John Scott Challis, Jr. al Service located at 601 8th Street in Freedom, 

JULY 30, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Leon O. Moulder, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/ LEON O. MOULDER, JR.Leon O. Moulder, Jr.Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 The undersigned, Jeffrey Peterson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Peterson, Principal Accounting Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated:  August 20, 2010
 By:  /s/ Jeffrey Peterson
 Jeffrey Peterson
 Chief Executive Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
 
 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Rene COCHISE, Appellant v. Kenneth Lee SALAZAR, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Appellee.

No. 09-5115.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 24, 2010.

Rehearing En Banc Denied July 21, 2010.

Frazer Walton, Jr., Esquire, Law Office of Frazer Walton, Jr., Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Christian A. Natiello, Assistant U.S., R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: HENDERSON, ROGERS, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Dis*30trict of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. *See*D.C.CiR. Rule 36(d). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Title VII prohibits the federal government from retaliating against one of its employees for engaging in action protected by Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a); *Steele v. Schafer,*535 F.3d 689, 695 (D.C.Cir.2008). In order to make out a retaliation claim, a “plaintiff must show that a reasonable employee would have found the challenged action materially adverse, ‘which in this context means it well might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.’ ” *Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White,*548 U.S. 53, 68, 126 S.Ct. 2405, 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (2006) (quoting *Rochon v. Gonzales,*438 F.3d 1211, 1219 (D.C.Cir.2006)). Cochise points to four events as instances of actionable retaliation. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Cochise, *Malik v. District of Columbia,*574 F.3d 781, 783 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.2009), we agree with the district court that none of these incidents— which plaintiff herself characterized as “slights” at oral argument — constitutes a materially adverse employment action.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.CiR. Rule 41.
| | MTS Systems Corporation

14000 Technology Drive

Eden Prairie, MN  55344-2290

Telephone 952-937-4000

Fax 952-937-4515
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

News Release




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJune 6, 2007
        For More Information Contact:Paul Runice, Treasurer and
Director of Investor Relations(952) 937-4003




MTS names Laura Hamilton President and Chief Operating Officer

Sidney Emery continues as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



Eden Prairie, Minnesota, June 6, 2007 -- MTS Systems Corporation (Nasdaq: MTSC) announced that its Board of Directors has elected Laura B. Hamilton President and Chief Operating Officer and appointed her a member of the Board of Directors, effective June 1, 2007. Sidney W. Emery, Jr. will continue in his capacity as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.



Hamilton, 45, joined the Company in 1999 and most recently has been Senior Vice President in charge of the Test Segment, which contributes approximately 85% of the Companys revenues. She assumed that role in October of 2003 when the Company consolidated the test business units of the former MTS Mechanical Testing and Simulation Segment.



Laura brings excellent credentials to her new role at MTS, Emery said. She has been an outstanding leader of our global Test business. MTS enjoys a much stronger position around the world in the mechanical testing solutions market than we did before she took over. This is a natural progression for Lauras personal growth and consistent with the Companys objective of developing our future leaders from within.



About MTS Systems Corporation



MTS Systems Corporation is a leading
global supplier of test systems and industrial position sensors. The Companys testing hardware, software, and service
solutions help customers accelerate and improve their design, development, and manufacturing processes and are used for
determining the mechanical behavior of materials, products and structures. MTS high-performance position sensors enhance
control to improve the productivity and safety of fixed and mobile industrial equipment. MTS had 1,510 employees and revenue of
$397 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. Additional information on MTS can be found on the worldwide web at
http://www.mts.com.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date:  10 a.m., Wednesday, June 6, 2001.

Place:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information:  Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to 
the Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13907 Filed 5-30-01; 11:19 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
exh102.htm




Exhibit 10.2


 




 


Consultants Work Agreement







Parties This consulting agreement is made between the following parties: Consultant, Robert Tassanari of 33 Main Street, Newtown CT 06470, herein after referred to as Tassanari, and QE Brushes Inc., a Nevada Corporation, herein referred as QE.







Recitals QE Brushes wishes to engage the services of Tassanari, and Tassanari wishes to assist QE in its business endeavors.







Worked to be performed by Tassanari, complete all necessary work for the transfer of control and assist the new board of directors in understanding the operations of QE and assist them in their transition period.  Be available to answer any questions about the company’s operations to date.  Assist the new board in marketing the pet toothbrush and in the manufacturing process of any new orders for its new pet toothbrush.  Assist in the promotion of QE to the investment community and assist in any venture capital fund raising activities.







Compensation to Tassanari for services rendered QE agrees to compensate Tassanari by issuing 2,500,000 million common shares of common stock in return for his services and work to be performed.







Governing Law the laws of Connecticut and Nevada shall govern this agreement depending upon the state the aggrieved party files its action in.







Integration Clause this agreement includes all of the parties understandings to date mentioned herein.  Any prior oral or written facts that conflict with this agreement shall not be made part of this agreement and this agreement supersedes any prior understanding that the parties my have understood prior to this agreement.







Covenants The QE Director or officer warrants and promises that they have the authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of its corporation and shall provide a unanimous resolution by its board of directors agreeing to this consultant work agreement.













	Consultant:   	
ROBERT TASSANARI

	  	
Date 7/7/10


	 	  	  	  
	 	  	  	  
	Director of QE Brushes: 	
FRANCIS D’AMBROSIO

	  	
Date 7/7/10
H. Res. 1034 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 23, 2010. 

Whereas since its invention by Louis Braille (1809–1852), 

the reading and writing code for the blind that bears his 

name has become the accepted method of reading and 

writing for the blind the world over; 

Whereas the Braille code is used to represent not only the 

alphabets of most written languages, but is also used for 

mathematical and scientific notation and the reproduction of musical scores; 

Whereas while technology has improved the lives of blind people by facilitating quick access to information, Braille literacy gives blind people the ability to read and to write 

and to do the two interactively; 

Whereas despite its efficiency, versatility, and universal acceptance by the blind, the rate of Braille literacy in the 

United States has declined to the point where only 10 

percent of blind children are learning the code; 

Whereas Braille is an important tool in the independence, 

productivity, and success for blind people; 

Whereas while 70 percent of the blind are unemployed, 85 

percent of those who are employed know Braille; 

Whereas the United States Congress officially recognized the 

importance of Braille by passing the Louis Braille Bicen-
2 

•HRES 1034 EH 

tennial-Braille Literacy Commemorative Coin Act authorizing the striking of a United States silver dollar marking 

the 200th anniversary of the birth of Louis Braille and 

emphasizing the connection between learning Braille and 

true independence and opportunity for the blind; and 

Whereas the National Federation of the Blind, the Nation’s 

oldest and largest organization of blind people and a 

leading advocate for Braille literacy in the United States, 

has launched a national ‘‘Braille Readers are Leaders’’ 

campaign to promote awareness of the importance of 

Braille and to increase the availability of competent 

Braille instruction and of Braille reading materials in 

this country: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the importance of Braille and the role 

that Braille plays in the lives of blind people; 

(2) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the National 

Federation of the Blind; and 

(3) supports the efforts of the National Federation 

of the Blind and other organizations to promote Braille 

literacy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, R. Scott Murray, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2008 |  | /s/ R. Scott Murray                 
|                         |  | R. Scott Murray                     
|                         |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.02    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fero Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leigh-Ann Squire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Leigh-Ann Squire By: Leigh-Ann Squire Chief Financial Officer  Dated: February 14, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1675-000]


Entergy Solutions Supply Ltd.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 31, 2001.

    Entergy Solutions Supply Ltd. (Entergy Supply) submitted for filing 
a rate schedule under which Entergy Supply will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. Entergy 
Supply also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In 
particular, Entergy Supply requested that the Commission grant blanket 
approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Entergy Supply.
    On May 23, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Entergy Supply should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Entergy Supply is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations 
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in 
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance 
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes 
of the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Entergy Supply's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 22, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14215 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M