alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2341 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2341

  To direct the Postmaster General to modify any hard copy change of 
address form used by the United States Postal Service so that such form 
 contains a reminder that any individual using such form should update 
   the individual's voter registration as a result of any change in 
                                address.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2019

  Mr. Rouda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Postmaster General to modify any hard copy change of 
address form used by the United States Postal Service so that such form 
 contains a reminder that any individual using such form should update 
   the individual's voter registration as a result of any change in 
                                address.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF POSTAL SERVICE HARD COPY CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM TO 
              REMIND INDIVIDUALS TO UPDATE VOTER REGISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Postmaster General shall modify any hard 
copy change of address form used by the United States Postal Service so 
that such form contains a reminder that any individual using such form 
should update the individual's voter registration as a result of any 
change in address.
    (b) Application.--The requirement in subsection (a) shall not apply 
to any electronic version of a change of address form used by the 
United States Postal Service.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued October 3, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00466-CV

———————————

IN RE SHELL RETAIL AND CONVENIENCE OPERATIONS LLC, 

Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order 

granting real party in interest Instafuel Sellers’ Representative Wisam Nahhas’

motion to compel the deposition of Peter Muschick, a non resident employee, to be 

taken in Houston, Texas. Relator moved for an emergency stay of the trial court’s 

order, which this Court granted. 
2

Relator has filed an agreed motion to dismiss this original proceeding as 

moot,1asserting that Instafuel’s new counsel no longer seeks to depose Muschick in 

person in Houston and has agreed to depose him via remote electronic means. 

Relator states that the parties entered into a written agreement concerning 

Muschick’s deposition via remote electronic means. Accordingly, relator asserts 

that there is no longer a controversy between the parties and relator and Instafuel 

jointly ask that this Court dismiss the mandamus.

The Court grants the motion and dismisses the proceeding. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1, 43.2(f). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. The stay granted 

by order of June 21, 2024 is lifted. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Rivas-Molloy.

1 The underlying case is Instafuel LLC Sellers’ Representative, Wisam Nahhas v. 

Shell Retail and Convenience Operations LLC, cause number 2023-48496, pending 

in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan 

Collier presiding.
#### In the Matter of Claudia Childs, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 857] —

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
# C_2010211EN.01001001.xml

| 4.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/10

---

Extract from the Decision concerning De Nederlandsche Bank pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

2010/C 211/07

Notice of court order

Notice of court order

Upon the application of De Nederlandsche Bank in Amsterdam, the Amsterdam District Court by court order of 24 June 2010, No FTRK 10.1151, declared the emergency regulations (noodregeling), as referred to in Section 3:160 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act, applicable to the company with seat in the Netherlands

noodregeling

International Insurance Corporation (IIC) N.V.

International Insurance Corporation (IIC) N.V.

with registered and business offices in Amsterdam at Entrada 123 (1096 EB). The basis for the emergency regulations lies in Part 3.5.5 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act. Save for exceptions, the emergency regulations are subject to Dutch law. Judge M. J. E. Geradts, a member of the Amsterdam District Court, was appointed as supervisory judge. P.H.M Versteeg and M. Pannevis, both with business offices at DLA Piper Nederland N.V., PO Box 75258, 1070 AG Amsterdam, NEDERLAND were appointed as administrators. De Nederlandsche Bank is the competent supervisory authority. This court order can be appealed within eight days with the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, Prinsengracht 436, 1017 KE Amsterdam, NEDERLAND. To the knowledge of the administrators, no appeal has been filed.

---
EXHIBIT 10.6

AMENDMENT

TO THE

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



WHEREAS, St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the Company), has heretofore adopted and maintains the St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan);

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) has retained the power to amend the Plan; and

WHEREAS,the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 7(a) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of October 23, 2008, as follows:

1.  Section 2(l) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding in accordance with Section 409A of the Code at the end of the first sentence thereof.

2.  Section 6(h) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end of the last sentence of clause (iii) thereof:

; provided that the timing of any deferred payments shall be determined at the time of grant, except to the extent otherwise permitted under Section 409A of the Code.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent on this 23rd day of October, 2008.



ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.By

        /s/ Pamela S. Krop


2

---
#### STERR v. TROUTMAN ENTERS. OF CONCORD, INC.

No. 281P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 845

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 184 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2490 

[Report No. 116–232] 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 

Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 

Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 2, 2019] 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2490 RH

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating the Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2490 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC 

4 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

5 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(xx) CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HIS9 TORIC TRAIL.—The Chief Standing Bear Trail, ex10 tending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, Ne11 braska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 

12 route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 

13 people during Federal Indian removal, and approxi14 mately 550 miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, 

15 through Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, 

16 which follows the return route taken by Chief Stand17 ing Bear and the Ponca people.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 184 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2490 

[Report No. 116–232] 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct 

purposes. ing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other on the feasibility of designating the Chief Standthe Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

OCTOBER 11, 2019 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1



[Rimage Letterhead]



January 28, 2009



Mr. Sherman Black

[Address]

[Address]



Dear Sherman:



I am pleased to confirm Rimages offer of employment to you, as we discussed. The terms of the offer are as follows:



Title:

        President and Chief Operating OfficerReports to:

        Bernie AldrichBase Salary:

        $325,000 on an annualized basisBonus Opportunity:

        50% of Base SalaryStart Bonus:

        $25,000 hiring bonus, (in lieu of car allowance) to be paid with first payroll  after start date.  If you should terminate your employment with Rimage  during the first twelve months of employment, you agree to pay Rimage a prorated portion of the bonus at time of separation.Restricted Stock:

        10,000 shares vesting 1/1/2010Stock Options:

        200,000 option shares issued on start date, vesting in equal amounts over four  yearsAnnual Physical:

        Mayo Clinic Executive Health PhysicalBenefits Programs:

        As outlined in the attached benefits summary, includes Health Plan, Dental Plan, Paid Time-off (PTO) at the 24 day per year level, 401k with company match of$.50 to every dollar up to 6% of employees salary




I have enclosed a Nondisclosure and Non-competition and Severance/Change of Control Letter Agreement for your review, which you will be required to sign as a condition of employment. Rimage will also require an I-9 form that will need to be completed and turned in on your first day of work along with proof of your employment eligibility. Employment with Rimage Corporation is on an at-will basis. This offer does not constitute a contract of employment.



---

Sherman, this is an exciting time at Rimage Corporation, and we believe you will be a strong contributor to and participant in our success. We look forward to your favorable reply and will hold this offer open through Friday, January 30, 2009.  With your favorable reply, your start date will be Wednesday, April 1, 2009.



Sincerely,



/s/  Bernard P. Aldrich



Bernard P. Aldrich

President and Chief Executive Officer



If you are in agreement with the above and are not a party toa non-compete or other employment agreement that would conflict with your employment at Rimage, please sign belowand return one copy to my attention./s/ Sherman Black

        January 29, 2009Name: Sherman Black

        Date:








---
---

|DAVIDSON&COMPANYLLP |  | Chartered Accountants | A Partnership of Incorporated Professionals
|------------------- |  | --------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                    | 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED 
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 18, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Viscount Systems, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|                  | **"DAVIDSON** **& COMPANY
      LLP"**
|----------------- | --------------------------------------
|Vancouver, Canada |                                       
|                  | Chartered Accountants                 
|March 20, 2009    |                                       



1200 - 609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, BC,
  Canada, V7Y 1G6 
  Telephone (604) 687-0947 Fax (604) 687-6172

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,247,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,822,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,092,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,983,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,499,000
<PP&E>                                       6,792,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 833,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,572,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,797,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,082,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,572,000
<SALES>                                     42,095,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,095,000
<CGS>                                       21,292,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,953,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               691,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,205,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,822,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   450,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,372,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Ramon LOPEZ, also known as Mario Ramos Lopez, also known as Mario Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20054

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ramon Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lopez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|(1) |  | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
     ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
     and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the accompanying report fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |                                      
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date:   August 9, 2007 | /s/   Bernard P. Aldrich             
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |                                      

|                       |                        
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|Date:   August 9, 2007 | /s/   Robert M. Wolf   
|                       | Chief Financial Officer
|                       |                        

---
<Page>


        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 8 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-43886)
(the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 31, 2005, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
(as of September 6, 2005, known as Union Security Insurance Company), which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to
us under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such
Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 21, 2005
# C_2017374EN.01003702.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/37

---

Action brought on 8 August 2017 — Olarreaga Marques and Saralegui Reyzabal v SRB

(Case T-518/17)

(2017/C 374/56)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Gorka Olarreaga Marques (Madrid, Spain) and María-Aránzazu Saralegui Reyzabal (Madrid) (represented by: R. Jiménez Velasco, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board agreed of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board agreed of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1306

Crude Oil Basis Swap - Argus WTL Midland (1st month) - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of *Floating Price A* minus 

*Floating Price B* 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus WTL Midland (1st month) price for each business day that it is determined during the 

contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the NYMEX WTI 

Crude Oil futures first nearby contract settlement price for each business day that it is 

determined during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Marc H. Bell, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

|   | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

December 21, 2007

 

|   | /s/ Marc H. Bell |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|
|   | Marc H. Bell     |   |
|   | Treasurer        |   |