alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                
|Mark R. Bachmann                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|July 9, 2008                                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be
retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
5

March 12, 2009

        ATTORNEYS AT LAW

777 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI  53202-5306
414.271.2400 TEL
414.297.4900 FAX
www.foley.com

CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER
051892-0101




MAKO Surgical Corp.

2555 Davie Road

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33317



Ladies and Gentlemen:



We have acted as counsel for MAKO Surgical Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), with respect to the preparation of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the Registration Statement), including the prospectus constituting a part thereof (the Prospectus), to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), relating to the resale from time to time by the selling stockholder named therein of up to 741,075 shares (the Shares) of the Companys Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, in the manner set forth in the Prospectus.  The Shares were awarded to the selling stockholder under the MAKO Surgical Corp. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan).



In connection with our representation, we have examined: (1) the Plan; (2) the Registration Statement, including the Prospectus; (3) the Companys Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws, each as amended to date; (4) resolutions of the Companys Board of Directors relating to the authorization of the issuance of the Shares; and (5) such other proceedings, documents and records as we have deemed necessary to enable us to render this opinion.



Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:



1.

        The Company is a corporation validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.




2.

        The Shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.




We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to references to our firm therein.  In giving our consent, we do not admit that we are experts within the meaning of Section 11 of the Securities Act or within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act.



Very truly yours,



/s/ Foley & Lardner LLP



BOSTON
BRUSSELS
CENTURY CITY
CHICAGO
DETROIT

        JACKSONVILLE
LOS ANGELES
MADISON
MIAMI
MILWAUKEE

        NEW YORK
ORLANDO
SACRAMENTO
SAN DIEGO

        SAN DIEGO/DEL MAR
SAN FRANCISCO
SHANGHAI
SILICON VALLEY

        TALLAHASSEE
TAMPA
TOKYO
WASHINGTON, D.C.




MILW_8460695.2

E-2

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1078

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - EP San Juan - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC EP San Juan

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
S06Y1680.

#### IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW WAYNE WALLACE.

(635 SE2d 706)

Decided September 18, 2006.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report of the Special Master recommending that this Court accept Matthew Wayne Wallace’s petition for voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment.

The record shows that Wallace improperly disbursed trust account funds and failed to properly account for those funds. He also failed to respond to the State Bar’s Notice of Investigation in this matter. Such conduct violates Rules 1.15 (I) and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The record shows that Wallace was previously suspended for two years based on his abandonment of a client matter to the client’s detriment and lying to the client about the matter. *In the Matter of Wallace,*275 Ga. 629 (571 SE2d 388) (2002).

After a review of the record, we hereby accept the petition for voluntary surrender of Wallace’s license. It is hereby ordered that the name of Matthew Wayne Wallace be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Wallace is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cinnabar Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephanie Wood, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of April, 2008.


/s/ Stephanie Wood
-------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS AMENDED

(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002)



I, Antonio Treminio, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alternative Investment Corp; and



2. Based upon my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report.



|Date: August 24, 2020 |                         | 
|--------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                      | /s/ Antonio Treminio    | 
|                      | Antonio Treminio        | 
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |
#### Freddie N. RAYNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob ROLLINS (Wake County); Fred Wurters; Mona Bhatti; Dorothea Dix Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.

Freddie N. Raynor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert O. Crawford, III, Crawford Law Office, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Granberry Corbett, North Carolina Department Of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Freddie N. Raynor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Raynor’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Raynor has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Raynor’s motion for a stay and for appointment of counsel, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-934-5700; COC60743, COC60750, COC60755, COC60756, COC60757, COC60758, COC60759, COC60760] 

                    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e), and 43 CFR                           ( print page 29982)                        3108.2-3 (a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas leases, COC60743, COC60750, and COC60755, COC60756, COC60757, COC60758, COC60759, and COC60760, for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, were timely filed and were accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.                 

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively.                 

                    The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $158 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the leases as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate leases COC60743, COC60750, COC60755, COC60756, COC60757, COC60758, COC60759, and COC60760, effective October 1, 2000, subject to the original terms and conditions of the leases and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Beverly Derringer,

Supervisory Land Law Examiner, Oil and Gas Lease Maintenance.

[FR Doc. 01-13975 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-U
# C_2010315EN.01000401.xml

| 19.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/4

---

Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for pig meat products

2010/C 315/04

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pig meat products. The import licence applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2010 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2010 do not, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2011; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 16 473 700 |
| 09.4170 | 2 361 000 |
| 09.4204 | 2 312 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011

(in kg)

09.4038

16 473 700

09.4170

2 361 000

09.4204

2 312 000

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1124

Natural Gas Option - Dom South - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled Dom South put and call options on the Dom South contract specified in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Dom South published price for the 

corresponding contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between Platts Inside FERC Dom South

published price (as described in Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On 

expiration of a Put Option, the value will be the difference between the strike price and Platts Inside FERC

Dom South published price (as described in Floating Price A), or zero whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued as the contract 

quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per barrel and prices shall be in multiples of $0.001 per MMBtu. The 

minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. The minimum price increment 

will be $0.0001. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Daniel J. Waibel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 8, 2008 /s/ Daniel J. Waibel   Daniel J. Waibel   Chief Financial Officer   
2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13891]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Cancellation of Previously Announced Meeting: Tuesday, June 5, 2001, 10 
a.m.; Meeting closed to the public.

Date & Time: Thursday, June 7, 2001 to follow the open meeting

Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:   
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Date & Time: Thursday, June 7, 2001 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:   
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2001-07: The Nuclear Management Company 
Political Action Committee by George Aandahl.
    Administrative Matters.

Person to contact for information: Mr. Ron Harris. Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-13891 Filed 5-30-01; 10:30 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Eloida Cruz AVALOS, a.k.a. Elodia Cruz Avalos, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73600.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Eloida Cruz Avalos, La Habra, CA, pro se.

Kate Deboer Balaban, Esquire, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, *293DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eloida Cruz Avalos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Cruz Avalos failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Cruz Avalos’ motion to reopen as to cancellation of removal because the motion failed to set forth any new facts or present any new evidence to demonstrate the requisite hardship. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (providing that a motion to reopen “shall state the new facts that will be proven at a hearing to be held if the motion is granted and shall be supported by affidavits or other evidentiary material”).

In her opening brief, Cruz Avalos fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s determination that her claim of hardship to her younger daughter is moot. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Cruz Avalos’ motion to reopen to apply for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture because the BIA considered the evidence she submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.