alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1206

Propane Fixed Swap - Conway Propane (in-well) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by OPIS for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS

Conway Propane (in-well) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

gallons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per gallon. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per gallon. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Clark Richards

crichards@rrsfirm.com

816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1200, Austin, Texas 78701 | Phone: (512) 476-0005 | Fax: (512) 476-1513 | Web: www.rrsfirm.com January 23, 2015

(Via Efile) Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk of Court Third Court of Appeals Price Daniel Sr. Building

209 West 14 th , Rm. 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Case No. 03-14-00116-CV; Steve Key et al. vs. Daniel R. Richards, as Receiver for Centex Freight Lines, LLC

and Prudence Adams

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In resp onse to the Court’s notice dated January 21, 2015 regarding oral argument in the above referenced cause, please accept this as notice that Clark Richards will argue on behalf of Appellees. Also, please note that Russell Horton of George, Brothers, Kincaid & Horton, L.L.P. does not represent any party in this proceeding.

Thank you for your attention. Please let me know if I can be of assistance in any way.

Sincerely,

R ICHARDS R ODRIGUEZ & S KEITH , LLP

Clark Richards

cc: David Walsh (Via Fax & Email dmwalsh@chambleeryan.com ) Chamblee, Ryan, Kershaw & Anderson, P.C. 2777 N. Stemmons Freeway, Suite 1157 Dallas, Texas 75207 ACCEPTED
03-14-00116-CV

3880783
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
1/23/2015 2:19:51 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00056

- CR

K EDRICK D EON T HOMAS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District

Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1543324D)

February 27, 2020

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the jud gme nt of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Suddert h
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1096

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - NWP Rockies - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily NWP Rockies published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ralph Hall, Appellant, v David Rock, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Decided May 11, 2010

*883Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### STATE v. McKISSICK

No. 322P98

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 756

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 October 1998. Motion by defendant (McKissick) for leave to file an untimely petition for discretionary review denied 8 October 1998.
#### Marisol CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71569.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 15, 2008.

Gloria A. Goldman, Gloria A. Goldman, PC, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner.

Yamileth G. Handuber, Trial, OIL, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation *708Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Counsel Phoenix, Esquire, Office of the District Director U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents.

Before: PREGERSON, McKEOWN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal.

A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner is not eligible for cancellation of removal because she does not have a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D); *Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Joseph Levi, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. We have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 11, 2009  /s/ Joseph Levi Joseph Levi Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Sheldon JUPITER, a/k/a Star, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 26, 2010.

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendments 505 and 706 to the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual.*We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Jupiter,*No. 5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-63564) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-87882,
33-87776, 33-89382, 333-02340, 333-06303, 333-16963, 333-20853, 333-52603,
333-80861, 333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550 and 333-97101) of Applix, Inc. of our
report dated January 24, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 30, 2003
August 5, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE LISA MICHELLE ESTRAD A

NO. 14

- 12

- 00797

- CR

________________________________ This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued imme diately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2010294EN.01000901.xml

| 29.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/9

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

2010/C 294/04

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 11 June 2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film | India | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 (OJ L 68, 8.3.2006, p. 15) as last amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2010 (OJ L 242, 15.9.2010, p. 6) | 9.3.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film

India

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 (OJ L 68, 8.3.2006, p. 15) as last amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2010 (OJ L 242, 15.9.2010, p. 6)

9.3.2011

---

(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Osprey Ventures,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), I, James Yiu Yeung Lung, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: April 14, 2010

/s/        James Yiu Yeung
Lung

James Yiu Yeung Lung 
  Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Osprey Ventures,
Inc. and will be retained by Osprey Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2490 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2490

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2020

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(xx) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--The 
        Chief Standing Bear Trail, extending approximately 550 miles 
        from Niobrara, Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows 
        the route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
        during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 miles from 
        Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, 
        Nebraska, which follows the return route taken by Chief 
        Standing Bear and the Ponca people.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Seven Arts Entertainment Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: May 20, 2013
By:
/s/ Peter HoffmanPeter HoffmanChief Executive Officer





Date: May 20, 2013
By:
/s/ Elaine NewElaine NewChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 77.

#### Chapel State Theatre Co. *v.*Hooper.

Argued Decem,ber 1, 1931.

Decided December 7, 1931.

*Mr. Albert D. Cash,*with whom *Mr, Levi Cooke*was on the brief, for appellant.

*Mr. R. M. Lucas*was on the brief for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Judgment affirmed. *Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.*v. *Jones,*193 U. S. 632.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 12, 2007

---

WIND ENERGY AMERICA INC.

(formerly Dotronix, Inc.)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

|0-9996                   | 41-1387074                       
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------
|(Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.)



12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 100

Eden Prairie, MN  55344

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(952) 746-1313

(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o

        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item 4.01.     Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant



On May 12, 2007 registrant engaged Child, Van Wagoner
& Bradshaw, PLLC as its new principal accountant to audit the registrants future financial statements, which engagement
was approved by the Board of Directors of the registrant.



The registrants former principal accountants report on its financial statements for either of the past two years contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.



There were no disagreements between registrant and its former accountant on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the former accountants satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Wind Energy America Inc.May 14, 2007
        By
        /s/   Robert O. KnutsonRobert O. KnutsonChief Executive Officer




- 2 -



---
#### HILL v. BRADY

No. 455P98

Case below: 131 N.C.App. 152

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998.