alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marcita G. Childs, Appellant. Kaleida Health, Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted October 17, 2011;

decided December 15, 2011

Reported below, 69 AD3d 1070.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
[962 NE2d 278, 938 NYS2d 853]

#### Maryann Imperato et al., Respondents, v Mount Sinai Medical Center et al., Appellants.

Decided January 12, 2012

*872APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP,*New York City *(Richard E. Lerner*of counsel), for appellants.

*Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C.,*New York City *(Arnold E. DiJoseph, III,*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The certified question should be answered by stating that the preclusion order was properly vacated.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Division correctly determined that plaintiffs demonstrated the existence of a meritorious claim for purposes of avoiding preclusion. Specifically, the expert witness disclosure submitted by plaintiffs pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i) detailed the expert medical opinion evidence supporting the claim.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

*873On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 (the Report) of Burcon NutraScience
Corporation (the Company), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Date: July 27, 2017            | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Jade Cheng                 | 
|Name: Jade Cheng               | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 

---
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      UNDER** **SECTION
      906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each
      of
      the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of
      Finance, respectively, of Professionals Direct, Inc., a Michigan corporation
      (the “Company”), hereby certify, in their capacities as officers of the Company,
      that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
      December 31, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
      in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition at December 31, 2005, and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods then ended.





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose and shall not be deemed
      filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended.














/s/
Stephen
              M. Tuuk
            
            /s/
Stephen
              M. WestfieldStephen
                M. Tuuk
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              Dated:  March
                30, 2006
            
            Stephen
                M. Westfield
              Vice
                President of Finance
              Dated:  March
                30, 2006








A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Whatley, Chief Financial Officer of Alpha Gold Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2005





/s/  Richard Whatley

Richard Whatley

Chief Financial Officer













#
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), an announcement is made of the 
following Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board.
    Date of Meeting: July 16 through 26, 2001.
    Place: Arnold and Mabel Beckmen Center of the National Academies 
of Sciences and Engineering, Irvine, California.
    Summary: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Summer Study Panels on 
the ``Objective Force Soldier/Soldier Systems'' will meet for the 
purpose discussions, report writing, and finalizing briefings for 
their respective sponsors. As this session is for the purpose of 
coming together and compiling gathered information related to the 
FY2001 Summer Study with the ultimate goal of outbriefing the Army 
Leadership and because the proprietary matters to be discussed are 
so inextricably intertwined, this precludes opening any portion of 
these meetings to the public. For further information, please 
contact Everett R. Gooch at (703) 604-7479.

Wayne Joyner,
Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.

FY 01 SS Report Writing Session Agenda

Monday 16 July

    8-8:30 a.m.--General Orientation.
    8-8:30 a.m.--Report Writing Session (Proprietary).

Tuesday 17 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Wednesday 18 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Thursday 19 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Friday 20 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Saturday 21 July and Sunday 22 July

    Report Writing Session as needed. (Proprietary)

Monday 23 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Tuesday 24 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Wednesday 25 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)

Thursday 26 July

    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Report Writing Session. (Proprietary)
    8 a.m.-5 p.m.--Briefout to the CSA, Sponsors and invited guest. 
(Proprietary)

[FR Doc. 01-13650 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M------
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 50885 Summary Calendar

David Roy Hutchings,

Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus
County of Llano, Texas; Llano County Sheriff’s Office; 424th Judicial District Court, Llano County, Texas; Llano Central Appraisal District; Llano County Tax Assessor/Collector; Llano Independent School District; Llano County Emergency Services; Ron Cunnin gham, Llano County Judge ; Judge Evan Stubbs, Llano County ; Bill Blackburn, Sheriff of the Llano County Sheriff ’ s Office ; Scott Dudley, Llano Central Appraisal District ; Kris Fogelberg, Officer in the Llano County Tax Assessor/Collector ’ s Office ; Mac Edward s, Officer/Superintendent of the Llano ISD ; Gilbert Bennett, Officer of Llano County Emergency Services ; Joyce Gillow,

Defendants

— Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:20

- CV

- 308

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 18, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50885 Document: 00516323852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2022No. 20

- 50885

2 Per Curiam : David Roy Hutchings, proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his
civil lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. “ This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite when , as herein, the time limit is set by statute. See
Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous

. Servs. of Chi. , 138 S. Ct. 13, 16

- 17, 21 (2017);
Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
Hutchings filed a notice of appeal on October 15, 2020 , outside of the

30

- day window for filing a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App.
P. 4(a)(1)(A). We construe his notice of appeal, which asserted reasons for his untimely filing, as a motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A) to extend the time to file a notice of appeal.

A ccordingly, this case is REMANDED to the dis trict court for the limited purpose of ruling on this motion and determining whether there is excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. Upon making this finding, the district court shall return the case to this court for dismissal or
furthe r proceedings, as may be appropriate. Case: 20-50885 Document: 00516323852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/18/2022
# C_2010174EN.01000202.xml

| 1.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/2

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations as detailed in the information notice published in OJ C 174, 1.7.2010, p. 2

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 174/03

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Group of routes concerned | Elba Marina di Campo–Florence and vice versa
  Elba Marina di Campo–Pisa and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | One year (from the date of entry into force of the obligations) |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge | ENAC — Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (Italian Civil Aviation Authority) |
| Direzione centrale sviluppo economico |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Group of routes concerned

Elba Marina di Campo–Florence and vice versa

Elba Marina di Campo–Pisa and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

One year (from the date of entry into force of the obligations)

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge

ENAC — Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (Italian Civil Aviation Authority)

Direzione centrale sviluppo economico

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

http://www.enac.gov.it

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ISAAC DELGADO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3550

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 2, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier

County; Ramiro Mañalich, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 01N-0078]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; Reopening of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening the comment period to June 5, 2001, the comment period for the two proposed collections of certain information by the agency. This notice reopens the comment period on surveys of physicians and patients to examine the impact of direct-to-consumer (DTC) promotion of prescription drugs. The purpose of the proposed information collection is to followup on the agency’s 1999 patient survey and expand information collection to include physicians.

# DATES:

Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of information by June 5, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Submit electronic comments on the collection of information to: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/​scripts/​oc/​dockets/​edockethome.cfm. Submit written comments by June 5, 2001, on the collection of information to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD  20852.  All comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FDA needs information from physicians and patients about their reactions to, and behaviors that stem from, DTC prescription drug advertising in order to develop policy on appropriate requirements for regulating drug product promotional materials.  The agency is reopening the comment period for the proposed collections due to technical problems encountered on the electronic comment submission site during the previous comment period.

Dated: May 29, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13908 Filed 5-30-01; 11:29 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### BRYANT v. WEYERHAEUSER CO.

No. 314P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 135

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than June 18, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1.  Eugene J. Allen and Virginia Allen*, both of Meridian, Texas, as co-trustees of the Eugene J. Allen and Virginia Allen Living Trust; to acquire additional voting shares of Bosque Corporation, Meridian, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Bosque County Bank, Meridian, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 29, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-13816 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00181

- CR

H ARRY C. W

ASHINGTON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1 501212R)

May 23, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in two of the trial court’s three judgment s but that there was no reversible

error in the remai ning judgment

. We modify the trial court’s judgments regarding

counts one and two in cause number 1501212R to reflect that the sentences are to run

concurrently to each other and we affirm these judgments as modified. We affirm the

trial court’s judgment regarding count five in cause number 1501212R.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Cinnabar Ventures Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard Granville, Chief Executive
Officer of Cinnabar Ventures Inc., certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Cinnabar Ventures
      Inc.
 
 
 Date:
April 19,
2010
 /s/Richard
Granville
 Richard
Granville
 Chief
Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Luis MONTERROZO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10348.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.*

Filed April 21, 2010.

Dominique Thomas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Angela Milella Hansen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RYMER, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Luis Monterrozo appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Monterrozo contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. The record indicates that the court did properly consider the sentencing factors, and Monterrozo did not provide any arguments requiring further explanation. *See United States v. Ferguson,*560 F.3d 1060, 1065 (9th Cir.2009).

Monterrozo also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the bottom-of-the-Guidelines sentence was not unreasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

In accordance with *United States v. Rivera-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.