alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 1 6

- 00 269

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.T., D.R.M., J .Y.M., D.M.M., and D.N.M.,

MINOR CHILDREN

On appeal from th e 430th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELL EE ’ S BRIEF

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the C ourt on appellee’s first unopposed moti o n for extension

of time to file its brief. This Court, having fully e xamined and considered appell ee ’ s

motion is of the opinion that, in t he interest of justice, appellee’s first motion for extension

of time to file its brief should be granted with order. Th e Court, however, requires strict

adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases , such as this2

appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by such extension requests. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6; see also id. at R. 28.4.

The Court GRANTS IN PA RT and DENIES IN PART appell ee ’ s first motio n for

extension of time. This motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will extend appellee’s

deadline to file the brief until July 28, 2016 . This motion is DENIED insofar as the Court

will not allow an extension until August 8, 2016

. Further motions for extension of time

will not be favorably entertained by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed t he

22nd day of July , 201 6

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14163]



[[Page 30472]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Ultrasound Research Interface.
    Date: June 18, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, Conference Room E & D, 6130 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Kenneth L. Bielat, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8043, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7576.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14163 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 5, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10836 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-81021-DTKH

WILLIAM BROWNSBERGER, 

ANDREW SMILLIE, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 versus

NEXTERA ENERGY, INC., 

NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC, 

GEXA ENERGY, LP, 

GEXA ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, 

GEXA ENERGY, GP, LLC, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 5, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PERCURIAM:
The plaintiffs appeal the January 19, 2011 order of the district court

dismissing without prejudice defendant Gexa Texas for lack of personal

jurisdiction, and, in the exercise of the discretion afforded the court under 28

U.S.C. § 1406(a), declining to transfer the case against the remaining defendants

to the Northern District of Texas. Instead, as § 1406(a) provides, the court

dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against those defendants without prejudice to their

right to refile the claims in an appropriate forum. 

We find no error in the district court’s determination that it lacked personal

jurisdiction over the claims against Gexa Texas and no abuse of discretion in the

court’s decision to dismiss the claims against the remaining defendants under §

1406(a).

AFFIRMED.

2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[WH-FRL-6989-9]


National Drinking Water Advisory Council Research Working Group 
Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given that a meeting of the 
Drinking Water Research Working Group of the National Drinking Water 
Advisory Council established under the Safe Drinking Water Act, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. S300F et seq.), will be held on June 21-22, 2001. On 
June 21 the meeting will be held from 1:30-6:00 pm ET (with a possible 
evening session), and on June 22 from 9:00-3:00 pm, at Resolve, 1255 
23rd Street, NW., Suite 275, Washington, DC 20037. The meeting will be 
open to public to observe and statements will be taken from the public 
as time allows. Seating is limited.
    This is the second meeting of the Drinking Water Research Working 
Group. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) anticipates 2 meetings 
of this working group over the course of the next year. The purpose of 
this working group will be to provide advice to NDWAC as it develops 
recommendations for EPA on a Comprehensive Drinking Water Research 
Strategy (as required under the Safe Drinking Water Act) that will 
consider a broad range of research needs to support the Agency's 
drinking water regulatory activities. The research strategy will 
include an assessment of research needs for microbes and disinfection 
by-products (M/DBPs), arsenic, contaminants on the Contaminants 
Candidate List (CCL), and other critical cross-cutting issues, such as 
sensitive subpopulations, distribution systems, contaminants mixtures, 
future scenarios and source water assessment. This meeting will focus 
on reviewing the new outline for the Comprehensive Drinking Water 
Research Strategy, and discussing selected contaminants and cross-
cutting/emerging issues.
    For more information, please contact Maggie Javdan, U.S. EPA 
(4607), Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. The telephone is 202-260-9862, fax 
202-401-6135, and e-mail (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df7fcebf9fcf3b3f0fcfafaf4f8ddf8edfcb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b3b8afbdb8b7f7b4b8bebeb0bc99bca9b8f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: May 23, 2001.
Janet Pawlukiewicz,
Designated Federal Officer, National Drinking Water Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 01-13945 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2363 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2363

    To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to employee 
            protective arrangements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2019

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to employee 
            protective arrangements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Transit Modernization Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5333 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Prevailing Wages Requirement.--''; 
        and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Formula grants for rural areas.--Section 5311(i) of 
        title 49, United States Code, is repealed.
            (2) Administrative provisions.--Section 5334(a)(1) of title 
        49, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(except terms 
        the Secretary of Labor prescribes under section 5333(b) of this 
        title)''.
                                 <all>
```
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

September 1, 2022

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Rule Certification AEGIS SEF, LLC

Contract Accountability Levels Table

Dear Sir:

Pursuant to Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”, or the “Commission”), AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS”) hereby notifies 

the Commission that it has filed its Contract Accountability Levels Table, (“TABLE”). The 

filing is in reference to SEF Product Listings filed separately under 40.2(a) on August 30, 2022 

and August 31, 2022. The rule became effective on September 1, 2022.

A concise explanation and analysis of the rule and its compliance with applicable provisions of 

the Act, including core principles and the Commission’s regulations, is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A. A copy of the TABLE is attached under separate cover as Exhibit B.

AEGIS hereby certifies that: (i) the rule complies with the Act and the

Commission’s regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being

concurrently posted on AEGIS’s website. There were no substantive opposing views to the

amendments to the rule.

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-hedging.com with any 

questions regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Exhibit A – Explanation 

Amendment and Explanation Supporting Rule / Core Principle

Contract Accountability Levels Table

• Established Contract Accountability 

standards

• Accountability levels were derived 

using a standard 5000 contracts level

of the closest reference contract but 

are in terms of the underling measure,

including: barrel, mmbtu, short tons, 

metric tons and pounds gallons

• Oil reference contract: 1 contract 

equals 1000 barrels

• NGL reference contract: 1 contract 

equals 42,000 gallons

• Natural Gas reference contract: 1 

contract equals 10,000 mmbtus

• Metal reference contract: 1 contract 

equals 55.116 lbs, 1 short ton contract 

equals 20 tons, 1 metric ton contract 

equals 25 tons

• Position accountability levels adopted 

are for the attached contracts 

identified in Exhibit B to the filing 

AEGIS SEF Self Certifications which 

were each separately certified under 

40.2(a) to the Commission on August 

30, 2022 and August 31, 2022

• 40.6(a)

• 150.5(b)(3)

• AEGIS SEF Product Listing, selfcertified under 40.2(a) as AEGIS SEF

Rule 1000-1508
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Exhibit B – TABLE

(attached under separate cover)
#### Pierre FOUCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott A. HOLENCIK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-56108.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Filed Oct. 4, 2013.

Pierre Fouché, Herlong, CA, pro se.

*784Geri Lynn Green, Esquire, Law Offices of Geri Lynn Green, LC, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Pierre Fouché appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action, brought under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging constitutional violations in connection with new search policies employed at his prison job site. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). *Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Fouché’s Fourth Amendment claim based on the “pat search” policy because the complaint and documents attached thereto showed that the challenged policy was reasonably related to a legitimate, penological interest, and that the searches were reasonable under the circumstances. *See Nunez v. Duncan,*591 F.3d 1217, 1227-28 (9th Cir.2010) (setting forth the standards for evaluating prison searches and prison policies that allegedly infringe on prisoners’ constitutional rights, and explaining that controlling contraband within a prison is a legitimate, penological interest); *cf. Michenfelder v. Sumner,*860 F.2d 328, 332-34 (9th Cir.1988) (discussing the limited circumstances under which an inmate strip search may be unconstitutional). ■

We reject Fouché’s contention that the challenged policy was unconstitutional because it provided for searches that did not comport with the definition of a “pat search” under a federal regulation.

We do not consider the dismissal of Fouché’s Fourth Amendment claim based on the visual search policy because Fouché expressly states in his opening brief that the visual searches are not at issue in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2010286EN.01000101.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 286/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 24.9.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 358/10 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Förderrichtlinie zur Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten in der Seeschifffahrt |
| Legal basis | Richtlinienentwurf zur Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten in der Deutschen Seeschifffahrt |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Employment |
| Form of aid | Reduction of social security contributions |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 57 million
  Overall budget: EUR 171 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2012 |
| Economic sectors | Sea and coastal water transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie |
| Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78 |
| 20359 Hamburg |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

24.9.2010

Reference number of State Aid

N 358/10

Member State

Germany

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Förderrichtlinie zur Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten in der Seeschifffahrt

Legal basis

Richtlinienentwurf zur Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten in der Deutschen Seeschifffahrt

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Employment

Form of aid

Reduction of social security contributions

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 57 million

Overall budget: EUR 171 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2012

Economic sectors

Sea and coastal water transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie

Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78

20359 Hamburg

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
# C_2010278EN.01001601.xml

| 15.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/16

---

Appointment of the Hearing Officer

2010/C 278/10

On 8 September 2010, the Commission appointed Mr Wouter WILS to the post of Hearing Officer, in accordance with Article 1 of the Commission Decision of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition cases (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21).

---
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

trsrsqyrqqqx|xrsv
# CE2012390EN.01007502.xml

| 18.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 390/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 390/75

---

Thursday 23 June 2011EC-Canada agreement on civil aviation safety ***

P7_TA(2011)0282

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 June 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Community and Canada (06645/1/2010 – C7-0100/2010 – 2009/0156(NLE))

2012/C 390 E/16

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06645/1/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06645/1/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and Canada on civil aviation safety (15561/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and Canada on civil aviation safety (15561/2008),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Articles 100(2), 207(4), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point(a), and Article 218(8), first subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0100/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Articles 100(2), 207(4), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point(a), and Article 218(8), first subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0100/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0298/2010) |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0298/2010)

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada.

---
#### UNITED TEACHER ASSOC. INS. CO. v. MacKEEN & BAILEY, INC.

No. 439P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 759

Petition by defendants (MacKeen & Bailey and W. Duncan MacKeen) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998.
#### Doreen Harris, Appellant, v Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al., Defendants, and NAPCO Holding LLC, Respondent.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *868the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it *(see*CPLR 5602).
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Morgan                              
|John K. Morgan                                  
|Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
|January 9, 2009                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be
retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.