alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 13, original.

#### New Jersey *v.*City of New York.

December 7, 1931.

DECREE

This cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings, evidence, and the exceptions filed by the defendant to the report of the special master, the report of the special mas*586ter on re-reference and the form of decree prepared and filed by counsel for the parties. The court being fully advised in the premises, and for the purpose of carrying into effect the decision announced May 18, 1931, 283 U. S. 473, and the report of the special master on re-reference filed November 23, 1931,

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows:

1. On and after June 1, 1933, the defendant, the City of New York, its employees and agents, and all persons assuming to act under its, authority, be and they are hereby enjoined from dumping, or procuring or suffering to be dumped, any garbage or refuse, or other noxious, offensive or injurious matter, into the ocean, or waters of the United States, off the coast of New Jersey, and from otherwise defiling or. polluting said waters and the shores or beaches thereof or procuring them to be defiled or polluted as aforesaid.

2. That meanwhile the defendant, the City of New York, its employees and agents, and other persons assum-. ing to act under its authority, be and they are hereby enjoined to operate and utilize the existing incinerators and other facilities for the final disposition of garbage and refuse in such a manner as to- reduce to the lowest practicable limit the amount of garbage dumped at sea. ■

3. That the defendant, the City of New York, shall file with the Clerk of this- Court, on the first days of April, and October of each year, beginning April 1, 1932, a report to this Court adequately setting forth the progress made in the construction of incinerator plants for the final disposition of garbage and refuse, and their appurtenances, and also the amount of garbage and refuse dumped at sea during the periods covered by . such reports.

4. That on the coming in of each of said reports, and on due notice to the other party, either party to this suit may apply to the Court for such action or relief, either *587with respect to the time allowed for the construction, or the progress of construction, or the method of operation, of the proposed incinerator plants or other means of final disposition of garbage and refuse, or with respect to the quantities, places or character of the dumping of garbage and refuse at sea, as may be deemed to be appropriate.

5. That either of the parties hereto may, irrespective of the filing of the above-described reports, apply at the foot of this decree for any other or further action or relief, and this Court retains jurisdiction of the above-entitled suit for the purpose of any order or direction, or modification of this decree, or any supplemental decree, which it may deem at any time to be proper in relation to the subject matter in controversy.

And it is further ordered that the costs of this suit, the expenses incurred by the special master and his compensation, to be fixed by the Court, shall be taxable against the defendant.
No. 75-1744.

#### E-T Industries, Inc. *v.*Whittaker Corp. et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT
32






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beauty Brands Group, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Dan Kelly, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, and James Altucher, President and Principal Executive
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge,
that:






(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Dan
      KellyPrincipal
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerNovember
      11, 2009/s/James
      AltucherPresident
      and Principal Executive OfficerNovember
      11, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**TYRONE GREEN,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; LAWRENCE** 
**MAHALLY, SUPERINTENDENT SCI DALLAS; SETH WILLIAMS, DISTRICT**  **ATTORNEY OF PHILA.; KATHLEEN KANE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF** 
**PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 64 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21st day of June, 2016, the Application for Leav e to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extr aordinary** 

**Relief is** DENIED

**.**
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1000

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Algonquin - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Algonquin

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Maguire,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of December, 2008.


/s/ Michael Maguire
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ DEVRA G. SHAPIRODevra G. Shapiro Chief Financial
Officer


May 4, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 93

To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam and 
                   the United States Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

  Mrs. Christensen (for herself, Ms. Bordallo, and Mr. Faleomavaega) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam and 
                   the United States Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS 
              PROGRAM TO GUAM AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``, the Virgin Islands, and 
Guam'' each place such term appears.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 303(b) of the Social Security Amendments of 
        1972 (86 Stat. 1484) is amended by striking ``, Guam, and the 
        Virgin Islands''.
            (2) Sections 3(a)(2), 1003(a)(2), 1403(a)(2), and 
        1603(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 303(a)(2), 1203(a)(2), 
        1353(a)(2), and 1383 note) are each amended by striking ``, the 
        Virgin Islands, and Guam''.
            (3) Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is 
        amended by striking ``and the District of Columbia'' and 
        inserting ``, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, and 
        Guam''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the 1st day of the 3rd calendar month that begins after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michelene WRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Mark Frohman, and John Grindle, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-4272.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 6, 2006.

*121Thomas C. Nuovo, Bauer, Gravel, Farnham, Nuovo, Parker & Lang, Burlington, VT, for Appellant.

Michael Mankes, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Boston, MA, for Appellees.

Present: ROGER J. MINER, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges, JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Michelene Wray appeals a judgment of the district court dismissing her complaint — -which was removed to district court from the Chittenden County, Vermont, Superior Court — as completely preempted by the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

When the district court dismissed Wray’s complaint, it properly assumed, based on *Shafii v. British Airways, PLC,*83 F.3d 566 (2d Cir.1996), that it had jurisdiction to consider whether Wray’s claims required interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement between United Air Lines, Inc. and Wray’s present union and thus were preempted. However, in *Sullivan v. American Airlines, Inc.,*424 F.3d 267 (2d Cir.2005), we held that an intervening decision from the Supreme Court, *Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson,*539 U.S. 1, 123 S.Ct. 2058, 156 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003), required reexamination of *Shafii. Sullivan,*424 F.3d at 274. We then held that the RLA did not have complete preemptive effect and therefore did not support the removal from state court to federal court of claims that, on their face, are based solely on state law. *Id.*at 278. Thus, without any fault on the part of the district court, its refusal to remand to state court was error.

In their brief, appellees ask that this appeal be heard in banc. This panel has no power to make this determination. *See*Fed R.App. P. 35(a) (stating that a majority of the active judges on the court are required to authorize an initial in banc). Further, appellees did not file a proper in banc petition. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 35(b)(2),(c). Our disposition today, of course, does not deprive appellees of their right to seek rehearing in banc.

We therefore vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to remand this lawsuit to the Chittenden County, Vermont, Superior Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Holdings
Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul K. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 14, 2008By:

/s/ Paul K. KellyPaul K. KellyChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350





DIGUANG INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO.,
LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Diguang International Development Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yi Song,Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:March 31, 2009




/s/ Yi
  SongYi
      SongChief Executive Officer,
      director
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1116

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - TGT Zone 1 - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC TGT Zone 1

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6235

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH LOUIS DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00552-LMB-1)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Louis Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Friel Stokes, 

United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Louis Davis appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to correct a clerical error under Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Davis, No. 1:02-cr-00552-LMB-1 

(E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Yasunobu Toriyama, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Nidec Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No.33-8238;

c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  July 26, 2004

|/s/   Yasunobu Toriyama                                                                        
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Yasunobu Toriyama
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Director