alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-3661-001]

Take notice that on December 11, 2000, Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation (Central Hudson), tendered for filing its FERC Rate Schedule No. 201 which sets forth the terms and charges for transmission facilities provided by the Company to Consolidated Edison company of New York, Inc., and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation for the transmission of output from the Roseton Generating Station.

Rate Schedule FERC No. 201 is issued in compliance with the October 10, 2000 order issued in Docket No. ER00-3661-000, which required the Company to file rate schedule designations as required in Order No. 614. Accordingly, Rate Schedule FERC No. 201 supersede Rate Schedule FERC No. 42.

                    Central Hudson states that a copy of its filing was served on Con Edison, Niagara Mohawk and the State of New York Public Service Commission.                          ( print page 4809)    

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).  All such motions and protests should be filed on or before January 22, 2001.  Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine  the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at  http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at ­http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1417  Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Vringo, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Ellen Cohl, Vice President Finance of theCompany, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 15, 2010
# C_2010002EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2010/C 2/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.11.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 322/09 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Andalusia |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Subvenciones para la creación de nuevas estructuras de comercialización |
| Legal basis | Proyecto de Orden de, por la que se establecen las bases reguladoras para el fomento de la cooperación entre empresas de transformación y comercialización de productos agrícolas mediante la concesión de subvenciones para la creación de nuevas estructuras de comercialización y se efectua su convocatoria para 2009 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Investment in the processing and marketing of agricultural products |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | EUR 20 million |
| Intensity | The aid intensity is 30 % for large companies. In the case of aid awarded to small and medium-sized enterprises, the aid intensity is increased by respectively 20 % and 10 %. |
| Duration (period) | After the approval by the Commission to 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Agricultural sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Junta de Andalucía |
| Plaza de la Contratación, 3 |
| 41004 Sevilla |
| ESPAÑA |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.11.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 322/09

Member State

Spain

Region

Andalusia

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Subvenciones para la creación de nuevas estructuras de comercialización

Legal basis

Proyecto de Orden de, por la que se establecen las bases reguladoras para el fomento de la cooperación entre empresas de transformación y comercialización de productos agrícolas mediante la concesión de subvenciones para la creación de nuevas estructuras de comercialización y se efectua su convocatoria para 2009

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Investment in the processing and marketing of agricultural products

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

EUR 20 million

Intensity

The aid intensity is 30 % for large companies. In the case of aid awarded to small and medium-sized enterprises, the aid intensity is increased by respectively 20 % and 10 %.

Duration (period)

After the approval by the Commission to 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Agricultural sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Junta de Andalucía

Plaza de la Contratación, 3

41004 Sevilla

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
[931 NE2d 94, 905 NYS2d 125]

#### Isabella Ayoub, Respondent, v Joseph Ayoub, Appellant.

Decided June 15, 2010

*922APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Mauro Goldberg & Lilling,*Great Neck *(Matthew W. Naparty, Robert A. Ross*and *Richard J. Montes*of counsel), for appellant.

*Leitner & Getz LLP,*New York City *(Gregory J. Getz*and *Jerome M. Leitner*of counsel), for respondent.

*Cohen Hennessey Bienstock & Rabin PC.,*New York City *(Harriet Newman Cohen*of counsel), Law Guardian.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the parties’ settlement agreement subsequent to the Appellate Division order rendered the appeal to this Court moot. We decline appellant’s request to invoke the mootness exception.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, John A. Orwin,
Chief Executive Officer and Director, and Herb Cross, Chief Financial Officer, of Affymax, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



By:

/s/JOHN A. ORWIN Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/HERB CROSS Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date:
March 10, 2011

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Affymax, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
<Page>


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 9 to Registration Statement No. 333-65233 of Variable Account D of Union
Security Insurance Company (formerly Fortis Benefits Insurance Company), on
Form N-4, of our report dated February 24, 2005, relating to the statements
of assets and liabilities of Variable Account D as of December 31, 2004, and
the related statements of operations for the year then ended and the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 21, 2005
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN FACILITY LETTER


     This Amendment No. 2, dated as of March 20, 2001, is by and among Andrew H.
Baker ("Baker"),  Huntingdon Life Sciences Group plc  ("Huntingdon") and Focused
Healthcare Partners LLC ("FHP").

         WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Loan Facility Letter, dated September
25, 2000, between Baker and Huntingdon, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Loan
Facility Letter dated as of February 7, 2001, Baker agreed to make available to
Huntingdon a loan facility (the "Loan Facility") of up to (pound)2,000,000,
(pound)1,000,000 of which has already been drawn by Huntingdon;

         WHEREAS, Huntingdon has advised Baker that it intends to draw an
additional US $750,000 (the "Second Draw") under the Loan Facility on or about
March 22, 2001;

         WHEREAS, Baker, Huntingdon and FHP have agreed that the funds to be
loaned to Huntingdon under the Second Draw shall be loaned in part by FHP and in
part by Baker and that FHP shall become a party to the Loan Facility Letter.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows;

1.       From and  after  the date  hereof,  FHP shall be added to and shall be
         deemed to be a party to the Loan Facility Letter.

2.       Notice for the Second Draw shall be delivered on at least one day's
         advance written notice to FHP at the address and phone number on record
         with Huntingdon, as well as to Baker as previously provided.

3.       Payment of the Second Draw shall be made in US dollars.

4.       Baker shall fund $500,000 of the Second Draw and FHP shall fund
         $250,000 of the Second Draw.

5.       Payment of interest and repayment of principal on the Second Draw shall
         be made in US dollars and to such accounts as shall be designated by
         Baker and FHP, respectively.



Accepted and agreed:


/s/ Andrew Baker
--------------------------------------------
Andrew Baker



/s/ Julian Griffiths
---------------------------------------------
Huntingdon Life Sciences Group plc



/s/ Richard Michaelson
-----------------------------------------
Focused Healthcare Partners LLC
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jonathan Medved, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vringo, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: August 16, 2010
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

October 11, 2022

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC - Rule Changes - Access Fees and Payment Terms for Direct GUI Participants

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby 

submits amendments to its Access Fees and Payment Terms for Direct GUI Participants (“Access Fees and 

Payment Terms”), which have been amended to reflect updates to certain terms. The amendments will 

become effective on October 25, 2022, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. Pursuant to 

Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A is the update to the Access Fees and 

Payment Terms, with the additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this 

submission, TW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain information 

confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial 

information and has posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a redacted 

copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rule complies with the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder, 

including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Access Fees and Payment Terms is a 

rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rule were expressed to TW SEF by its 

governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market participants.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (646) 767-4923 or by email at 

Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

Chief Compliance Officer

TW SEF
APPENDIX A

Access Fees and Payment Terms for Direct GUI Participants

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas GeraisCEMIG (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernardo Afonso Salomão de Alvarenga, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/Bernardo Afonso Salomão de Alvarenga   
|    |  | Name: Bernardo Afonso Salomão de Alvarenga
|    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer            

Dated: May 16, 2017
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio AYALA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40278

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Fernando A. Sanchez, Jr., Law Offices of Fernando A. Sanchez, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Marco Ayala-Vasquez appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. At sentencing, the district court made a specific finding that Ayala-Vasquez’s 1994 California conviction of possessing marihuana for the purpose of a sale was a drug trafficking offense for purposes of a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i).

*341For the first time on appeal, Ayala-Vasquez argues that the district court erred in imposing the 16-level enhancement based on the California conviction. Because Ayala-Vasquez did not raise this issue in the district court, review is for plain error. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005).

It is undisputed that Ayala-Vasquez was convicted under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11359, which states, “Every person who possesses for sale any marijuana, except as otherwise provided by law, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison.” In *United States v. Palacios-Quinonez,*431 F.3d 471, 473-76 (5th Cir. 2005), we held that an offense under Cal. Health *&*Safety Code § 11351 constituted a drug trafficking offense. Section 11351 provides, “Except as otherwise provided in this division, every person who possesses for sale or purchases for purposes of sale” certain controlled substances shall be punished by imprisonment. In *Palacios-Quinonez,*it was conceded that possession for sale was a drug trafficking offense. *Palacios-Quinonez,*431 F.3d at 474. Our analysis there also equated “purchase for sale” with “possession with intent to distribute.” *Id.*at 474-76. On appeal, Ayala-Vasquez has not shown that the district court plainly erred in finding that his prior conviction was a drug trafficking offense and in sentencing him accordingly.

In light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Ayala-Vasquez challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. That argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). *United States v. Pineda-Ar-rellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cír. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of Stephen Rosenblum, Respondent, v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 5, 2011;

decided December 13, 2011

Reported below, 75 AD3d 426.

Motion by Citizens Union of the City of New York for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
|                          |   |                                             |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:       May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Laura      Lee Stewart                  |   |
|                          |   | Laura      Lee Stewart                      |   |
|                          |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                          |   |                                             |   |

|                          |   |                                                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:       May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Matthew      P. Deines                                 |   |
|                          |   | Matthew      P. Deines                                     |   |
|                          |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                          |   |                                                            |   |
# C_2010315EN.01000601.xml

| 19.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 315/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.1.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.1.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/8C3411 |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

21.1.2010

Duration

21.1.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/8C3411

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Lophiidae

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---