alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
**AUSTIN**Hon. Stephen P. Bsbert, Page 2

eke11 enter jadgraent on the ttirdlat or plea aad the 8ai #hall be ereouted 

### as provided by Chapter 4, Title 9, of the Oode ot Criminal prooedure of the State of Texae. Provided turthesr, that the Court or Judge thereof, In the exeraiee of sound discretion My permit ths defenUa.nti where Judemen%is deierred, to remain at lsrge on his own reoogniminoe, or may require him to enter Into bond in a muaat leaat doubl,e the amount of the aeeeerrt3 tlnb land ooata, oonditionsd that the defendant and suretletii, Jointly and severally, will pay auoh fine and ooarte unless the defendant personally appears 05 the day set In the order and 618ohargee the judgment fn the rammer provlde4 **by** Chepter 4, Title 8 of the Code of GrimInal Prooedure of the Stats of Texa6; and for the enforoement of eny Judgment enter&, all writs, proowaee axd remetlies o? *.he Gods of Criminal Prdeedpre are made applioeble 80 tar aa neaeerary t6 oarrf out’the prortrions of this ArtIole.*
WI rtatuta oleerly provibee that th6 jud:gent shell not be deferre& for &longer period of time than six (6) month8 ind that in, etexy inetanee where the 

### w$qurt ereioirrr &la, 

### dimhtlon to defer the Judgment, hia order 60 dQiag mast 

### f&xthe date to irhioh the jtulgment is Ueferred, uid thet 6ay muet’not be m&e than six months 

### from the date of the reception of the Yerbiot or plea of guilty. 

### Xc242 tk Inrtenoe 

### thatthe judgraent hae been lîë;h,

.%wa%,

iz+&a.

6í?ERT,sLa,

rl+ XLsnnnn dieoretion, rrj permit the defendant to remain at large on hie ownretignIzanoer

TM euthority of the oonrt to permit the defendant to remain at 1-e on his own rmognizanee where the ju4gment has **bra&** Aeferr,ed ie~neoe8aarIlp linit.ed by the preoed

### ing prorimfoji6 of

’ this rtetuts 

### prrsoribing the period ot time rox #hioh th# judgment mey be deterred. The authOrIt;r of the aoura La to permit the derendent, where ju5agnent Is defa!rdl, to’romiiin et laXg6 Ou hie Own reOOgiBanOe during the period ot Qefersent, AnF,ettempt on the part of the 0-t, b]r arder, to dti9r juag4tmifnbefInitel~, or beyond th0 air 8mhltr pcrxltra;, ox to’ pqmit tlke.defendant 

### to ramin at large OQ.h$u owx reabgniranoe Ixdetlnitelf, OFbecnb the 01~ months peri&, .*@Ld not, only oonsti~tute a 

### violationHon. stephan P. Hebert, Pege 3

of the protlslons of ArtioLe 698, but would aonetitute RII rttenpteff exeroise of the p?+rdonIng power, 1 powor n.Uch is veeted by the Conetitutlon of the State of TeXPe exolus5.~oly In the Governor of this St-te,. euhJeot, of ooureo, to the nffinmtive reaommendation of the Bonrd of ::?nrdona&tkroles.

Trueting tlmt the foregoing cnawaro yo.ur queetlon, we sre Yours very truly A’ITOR~HiCY

GZ!?!EP!lL

CFTMS

BY (,&4&t&

R. ii’

. Fnfrohild

Assletent
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theron Resource
Group. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine month period ended
February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: April 14, 2011

|/s/ | Jerry R. Satchwell
|--- | --------------------

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Theron Resource
Group. and will be retained by Theron Resource Group. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Order entered May 29 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00883

- CR

ROBERT GARRETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F10

- 52395

- R



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On April 17, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief had not been filed. On May 27, 2014, we received appellant’s brief, together with an

extension motio n. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 17,
2014 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the May 27, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as

of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Group. 

# DATES:

July 18, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Fourth floor conference room, 645 “G” Street, Anchorage, Alaska. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Mutter, Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 “C” Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, (907) 271-5011. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Public Advisory Group was created by Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in settlement of                     *United States of America*                     v.                     *State of Alaska,*                     Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The meeting agenda will feature discussions on the draft fiscal year 2002 restoration work plan and the proposed Gulf Ecosystem Monitoring program.                 

Willie R. Taylor,

Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.

[FR Doc. 01-14118 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RG-M
Secretary of the Commission
October 30, 2014
Page 3
EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION Sc OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE
ACT, 7 U.S.C. §7A-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
REGULATION 40.2, 17 C.F.R. §40.2

tpSEF Inc. (“tpSEF”) hereby certifies that: (i) CDS Index Contract — European Crossover SY
Swaps and Swaptions (the “Contract”) complies with the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §1
et seq. and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) regulations thereunder;
and (ii) concurrent with this submission, tpSEF posted on its website: (a) a notice of pending
certification of the Contracts with the Commission and (b) a copy of this submission.

TPSEF INC,

By:

Name: Ma pbell

Title: Chief Operating Officer
Date: October 30, 2014
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**













**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan
      K. Bedford, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
      the
      Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:






(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the end
      of,
      and for the period covered by the Report.











**REPUBLIC
              AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC.**Date: February
              27, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Bryan
              K. BedfordName:
              Bryan K. BedfordTitle:
              President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
              Board










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.4

                      TRANSBOTICS SECURES AGV SYSTEM ORDER
                            IN THE PRINTING INDUSTRY

CHARLOTTE, NC - August 15, 2005 - Transbotics Corporation, (OTC BB: TNSB)
(www.transbotics.com), announced it received an order for an Automatic Guided
Vehicle (AGV) system expansion from an existing customer in the printing
industry. The order, totaling approximately $230,000 includes the addition of
multiple vehicles to an existing system.

For over 20 years Transbotics Corporation has specialized in the design,
development, support and installation of automation solutions with an emphasis
on Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs). The Company is a North American automation
solutions integrator that manufactures, installs and supports various automation
technologies including: AGVs, robots, conveyors, batteries, chargers, motors and
other related products.

Transbotics provides unique automation solutions to a variety of industries,
including automotive (tier one supplier), aerospace and defense, food and
beverage, paper and allied products, newsprint and publishing, entertainment,
microelectronics, plastics and primary metals. Transbotics' current customers
include Fortune 500 companies as well as small manufacturing companies.

This release (including information incorporated by reference herein) may be
deemed to contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance
and business of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve certain
risk, including, without limitation, the uncertainties detailed in Transbotics
Corporation Securities and Exchange Commission filings.





                                       25
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Raul Getino, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Descanso Agency,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Raul Getino
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 1075 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 21, 2010. 

Whereas the Agri-business Development Teams of the National Guard began as a pilot program started in Missouri, and the Missouri National Guard worked with the 

Missouri Farm Bureau and the University of Missouri to 

draw a blueprint that could be followed by other Army 

National Guard units; 

Whereas the Agri-business Development Teams consist of 

National Guard members who have a civilian background 

in farming or a related agricultural business; 

Whereas the Agri-business Development Teams now consist 

of units from 11 States; 

Whereas before deploying overseas, members of an Agri-business Development Team collaborate with land-grant universities, which spend weeks teaching and preparing 

strategies for the farms to which the Agri-business Development Team will deploy; 

Whereas in Afghanistan, the goals of the Agri-business Development Teams include improving irrigation systems 

and providing sustainable methods for fertilizing, planting, harvesting, marketing, and storing agricultural 

crops, modernizing slaughter facilities, setting up markets to trade crops and livestock, developing a juicing 
2 

•HRES 1075 EH 

and canning facility, and improving livestock health 

through mobile vet clinics, all of which can help divert 

cropland from poppy production; 

Whereas the Agri-business Development Teams also are 

partnering with the Department of Agriculture to have a 

directory of 50–60 experts in a variety of agricultural 

areas in Afghanistan; and 

Whereas the Agri-business Development Teams have been 

quick to use alternative energy sources, such as wind, 

solar, and small water dams, which in the absence of a 

national energy grid in Afghanistan are more reliable and 

easier to protect from enemy attack: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends 

the members of the Agri-business Development Teams of the 

National Guard and the National Guard Bureau for their efforts, together with personnel of the Department of Agriculture and the United States Agency for International Development, to modernize agriculture practices and increase 

food production in war-torn countries. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CHIMERA
INVESTMENT CORPORATION


1211
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS


SUITE
2902


NEW YORK,
NEW YORK 10036







CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009 to be filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Matthew Lambiase, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




1.
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the
    Report.




It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




/s/ Matthew
Lambiase


Matthew Lambiase


Chief Executive Officer and
President


November 6, 2009




59
# C_2010343EN.01002101.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 343/15

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 17.3.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 17.3.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | DWS/56789- |
| Species | Deep-sea sharks |
| Zone | Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 4134 |

Date and time of closure

17.3.2010

Duration

17.3.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

DWS/56789-

Species

Deep-sea sharks

Zone

Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

4134

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Marko S., Also Known as Marko Alexander S., Also Known as Marko A., Respondent, v Heather S., Also Known as Heather Kim S., Appellant.

Submitted December 27, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 2011 NY Slip Op 77742(D).

Motion for reargument and other relief denied [see 17 NY3d 900 (2011)].
# C_2010211EN.01001401.xml

| 4.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/14

---

Corrigendum to notice 2010/C 205/02 for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision CFSP/413/2010 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 apply

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 205 of 29 July 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 205 of 29 July 2010

2010/C 211/11

Page 6, first paragraph should read as follows:

‘The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË’ |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË’

---
#### Demetric Gray PEARSON, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10-5064.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 7, 2010.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the amended brief and appendix filed by appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 24, 2010, dismissing appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, be affirmed. The complaint is an outgrowth of an ongoing matter in D.C. Superior Court. United States district courts do not have authority to review or otherwise interfere with ongoing D.C. Superior Court matters. *See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 486, 103 S.Ct. *231303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983) (United States district courts do not have jurisdiction over challenges to state court decisions in particular cases arising out of judicial proceedings even if those challenges allege that the state court’s action was unconstitutional); *Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 416, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923) (U.S. district court has no authority to review final determination of state court); *Richardson v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*83 F.3d 1513, 1515 (D.C.Cir.1996) (approving application of *Rooker-Feldman*to decisions of lower state courts, such as D.C. Superior Court).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.