alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit C

Physical 

Commodity 

Code

Contract Name

Reporting 

Level

Spot Month 

Position Limit 

(lots)

Single Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

All Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

Aggregation 

Group*

CFTC 

Referenced 

Contract

LJI ISONE..I.SALBRYNB345 1_month_on_dap 25 175 175 2100 395 0

LJJ ISONE..I.SALBRYNB345 1_month_off_dap 25 175 175 2100 396 0

BGP ISONE..I.SALBRYNB345 1_month_on_dac 25 175 175 2100 395 0

BNR ISONE..I.SALBRYNB345 1_month_off_dac 25 175 175 2100 396 0
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ BROADBAND ITV, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC., OCEANI C TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC, T IME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2016

- 1082, 2016

- 1083

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in No s . 1:14

- cv

- 00169

- ACK

- RLP, 1:15

- cv

- 00131

- ACK

- RLP, Judge Alan C. Kay.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
F REDERICK A. T ECCE , Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for plaintiff

appellant. Also represented by K EITH A ARON J ONES , J OHN D AVID S IMMONS ; P AUL A LSTON , J OHN S. R HEE , Alston, Hunt, Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI.

S ASHA G. R AO , Maynard Cooper & Gale LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant

- appellee HawaiianTelcom, Inc. Also represented by A LEXANDRA D RURY , B RANDON H. S TRO Y ; W ILFORD E DWARD B AILEY , J OHN C OWLES N EIMAN , J R

. , Birmingham, AL.

C HARLES K RAMER V ERHOEVEN , Quinn Emanuel U rquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants -appellees Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc. Also represente d by C ARL G. A NDERSON , D AVID E ISEMAN , IV; D EEPA A CHARYA , P HILIP C HARLES S TERNHELL , Washington, DC; J OSEPH M ILOWIC , III, New York, NY; D AVID B ENYACAR , D ANIEL R EISNER , Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY.

R OBERT G REENSPOON , Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago , IL, for amicus curiae United Inventors Associ ation of the United States of America.

A RTHUR S TEVEN B EEMAN , Arent Fox LLP, San Fra ncisco, CA, for amicus curiae Tranxition, Inc. Also repr esented by J OEL M UCHMORE

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , D YK , and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 26, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the report of Emo Capital Corp. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to
my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Juanming Fang

Juanming Fang,

Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer

Dated: August 8, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fredrick Jenkins, Appellant.

Submitted May 24, 2010;

decided June 3, 2010

*906Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
#### STATE v. BOGGS

No. 364P98

Case below: 130 N.CApp. 341

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Janice Clarke, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date:  April 9, 2009



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | /s/  Janice Clarke           
| | Janice Clarke                
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principle Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 976 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 976

                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM PARLAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ibrahim Parlak enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim 
Parlak shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-16274.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2012.

Rodolfo Velasquez, Vallejo, CA, pro se.

*646Neill Tseng, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Defendani>-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Velasquez's request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Rodolfo Velasquez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his employment action alleging disability discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Walton v. U.S. Marshals Serv.,*492 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Velasquez failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he suffered discrimination because of his disability. *See id.*(“To state a prima facie case under the Rehabilitation Act, a plaintiff must demonstrate that ... [he] suffered discrimination because of [his] disability.”). Even assuming that Velasquez raised a triable dispute as to the prima facie case, Velasquez failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether the United States Postal Service’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for assigning him to a new job position was pretextual. *See Coons v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Treasury,*383 F.3d 879, 884 (9th Cir.2004) (same analysis under Rehabilitation Act and Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)); *Snead v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*237 F.3d 1080, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2001) (under the ADA, if an employee establishes a prima facie case and the employer provides a nondiscriminatory reason for its adverse action, the employee must raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to pretext).

We are not persuaded by Velasquez’s remaining contentions, including those regarding the district court’s decision not to allow his witness to testify at the summary-judgment hearing. *See Thompson v. Mahre,*110 F.3d 716, 719 (9th Cir.1997) (“[0]rdinarily there is no such thing as an evidentiary hearing ... on a summary judgment motion.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**MTR Corporation Limited**

**Certification**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, C.K. Chow, Chief Executive Officer of MTR Corporation Limited (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 21, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2010327EN.01001901.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 327/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 30.8.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 30.8.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/2A3AX4 |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | EU waters of IIa and IV; that part of IIIa not covered by the Skagerrak and Kattegat |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 541780 |

Date and time of closure

30.8.2010

Duration

30.8.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Sweden

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/2A3AX4

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

EU waters of IIa and IV; that part of IIIa not covered by the Skagerrak and Kattegat

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

541780

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer
of Nidec Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: June 30, 2011



/s/    Masuo YoshimatsuMasuo Yoshimatsu
Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Director
|                                                     | /s/ Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     | “SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP”                  |
|                                                     |                                                         |
|                                                     |                                                         |
| Toronto, Ontario, CanadaMarch 16, 2010 except for note 2 | Canada Chartered AccountantsLicensed Public Accountants |
| which is as of June 23, 2011                             |                                                         |

|   | 1167 Caledonia Road          |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1     |
|   | Tel:  416 785 5353 |
|   | Fax:  416 785 5663 |

----
# C_2011318EN.01016301.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/163 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/163

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals (recast)’

COM(2011) 245 final — 2011/0105 COD

2011/C 318/27

On 10 May 2011 the European Parliament and on 27 May 2011 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 192, paragraph 1 of the Treaty and Article 304 on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals (recast)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals (recast)

COM(2011) 245 final — 2011/0105 COD.

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008 (1) and CESE 799/2007, adopted on 30 May 2007 (2), it decided, at its 473rd plenary session of 13 and 14 July 2011 (meeting of 13 July 2011), by 137 votes with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

1

2

Brussels, 13 July 2011.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---

(1)  EESC opinion on the proposal for a Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, OJ C 204, p. 47 of 9 August 2008

1

(2)  EESC opinion on the proposal for a Regulation concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals, OJ C 175, p. 40 of 27 July 2007

2

---
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Data Storage Consulting Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Neil Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: August 18,
      2009
              By:
              /s/ 
      Neil BernsteinNeil
      BernsteinChief
      Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Board of Education of Bay Shore Union Free School District, Appellant, v Thomas Kain, Respondent.

[875 NYS2d 239]—

In a proceeding pursuant to Education Law § 4404 (3) (b) to review a determination of the State Review Officer of the New York State Education Department dated November 22, 2004, which sustained a decision of a hearing officer dated September 3, 2004, made after a hearing, requiring the petitioner to provide Ryan Kain with an individual aide on site at his private school, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), entered February 20, 2008, which denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Ryan Kain was referred to the Committee on Special Education (hereinafter the CSE) of the Bay Shore Union Free School District (hereinafter the District) by his first-grade teacher at the privately-operated St. Patrick School. Based on a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, the CSE developed an individualized education plan (hereinafter IEP) for Kain that, inter alia, included the services of a one-on-one aide for three hours per week. The IEP indicated that the aide would be provided by the District at the public Fifth Avenue School, rather than at the private school in which the respondent was enrolled. Believing that he was entitled to the services of the aide on-site at his private school, Kain, by his father, sought review of the CSE’s determination before an impartial hearing officer pursuant to both the Education Law and the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 USC § 1400*et seq.).*A hearing was held, after which the hearing officer agreed with Kain and ordered the District to provide the aide at his private school. The District appealed to the State Review Officer of the New York State Education Department (hereinafter the State Review Officer), who agreed with the hearing officer that Kain was entitled to the services of the aide at his private school. The Supreme Court confirmed the determination of the State Review Officer and denied the District’s petition to review the determination. We affirm.

In *Board of Educ. of Monroe-Woodbury Cent. School Dist. v Wieder*(72 NY2d 174, 188 [1988]), the Court of Appeals held that Education Law § 3602-c neither mandates that all services for children with disabilities be provided on location in public schools, nor contains a “general compulsion” that those services be provided in every case on location at a private school in *852which a student is voluntarily enrolled. Contrary to the District’s contention, the location of the services is to be determined on a case-by-case basis, “guided generally by [the student’s] individual educational needs in the least restrictive environment” *(id.*at 188). Under the circumstances here, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the determination requiring the District to provide Kain with a one-on-one aide at his private school *(see*Education Law § 4404 [3] [b]).

The District’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.
Refinitiv US SEF LLC

28 Liberty Street

57th Floor

New York, NY 10005

London Stock Exchange Group plc. Registered in England & Wales No 05369106. Registered office 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS.

CORPORATE

November 20, 2023

Submitted Via CFTC Portal

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581

RE: CFTC Regulation 40.6(d) – Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Refinitiv US SEF LLC (“Refinitiv SEF”) submits this weekly notification of rule amendments in 

accordance with 17 CFR 40.6(d). The following rule amendment was made effective during the week 

of November 13, 2023. 

The Refinitiv SEF website has been rebranded to LSEG FX SEF because of the recent purchase of 

Refinitiv by the London Stock Exchange Group (“LSEG”) SEF (Swap Execution Facility) | LSEG. A notice 

to market participants was sent out on November 17th notifying such participants of the change and the 

Refinitiv SEF rulebook has also been rebranded to LSEG FX SEF. No other material changes have 

been made to the Refinitiv SEF rulebook. 

LSEG FX SEF is still owned and operated by Refinitiv US SEF LLC, and therefore, no contractual or 

other changes from market participants are needed at this time. 

Please feel free to reach out to me at stephanie.feldt@lseg.com regarding any information contained 

herein. 

Sincerely, 

Stephanie Feldt

Chief Compliance Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
MONEYZONE.COM'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                           974,611
<SECURITIES>                     270,000
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,597,945
<PP&E>                           118,052
<DEPRECIATION>                      2,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,713,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           44,435
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         6,246
<OTHER-SE>                      1,662,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,713,217
<SALES>                               710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      710
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  299,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              6,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (304,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (304,693)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .085
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .085




</TABLE>