alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the  Amended Quarterly Report of All American Gold Corp.,  formerly Osprey Ventures, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A2 for the first quarter ended August 31, 2010, as  filed with the Securities and Exchange date hereof (the “Amended Quarterly  Report”), I, Brent Welke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | tthe Amended Quarterly Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and                              
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | the information contained in the Amended Quarterly  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 20, 2010

/s/ Brent Welke

Brent WelkeChief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to All American
Gold Corp. and will be retained by All American Gold Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission September 2, 2022

 MGEX Submission No. 22-36 

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendment made effective during the week of August 22, 2022:

• August 24, 2022 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. Tuesday, 

August 30, 2022 deadline to report offsets of September 2022 SPIKES Volatility Index and BRIXX 

Commercial Real Estate futures, and Hard Red Spring Wheat Index, Hard Red Winter Wheat Index, 

Soft Red Winter Wheat Index, National Corn Index, and National Soybean Index futures and 

options, effective for the Monday, August 29, 2022 trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at http://www.mgex.com under the “Announcements” 

tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7188 or 

randerson@mgex.com. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan Anderson

Assistant Corporate Counsel
exv4w4



 






Exhibit 4.4




CONSENT OF NICHOLAS SHEARD




     The undersigned hereby consents to the reference in any registration statement, as such
registration statement may be amended or supplemented, to be filed by Inco Limited in connection
with its announced offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge Limited,
including, but not limited to, a registration statement on Form F-8, to him as having
responsibility for the statements as to the ore reserves as of December 31, 2004 with respect to
Inco Limited’s operations in Ontario and Manitoba, the Voisey’s Bay project, the Goro project and
PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inco Limited for the
year ended December 31, 2004 under the headings “Ore Reserves and Mining Rights”, “Goro Nickel
S.A.”, “Voisey’s Bay Nickel Company Limited”, “PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk” and
“Exploration and Project Development”.



     Dated the 24th day of October 2005.



 




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	  	/s/ Nicholas Sheard	 
	 	 	Nicholas Sheard
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Chris Apple-white, Appellant, v Harold D. Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted February 21, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 1284.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.11

JAMES HARDIE -- FORM OF 364-DAY FACILITY AGREEMENT

Schedule 3 -- Extension Request (clause 5.2)

TO:      (FINANCIER) #1#

DATE:    3 APRIL 2007

EXTENSION REQUEST -- JAMES HARDIE -- 364-DAY FACILITY AGREEMENT DATED #2# JUNE
2005 BETWEEN JAMES HARDIES INTERNATIONAL FINANCE BV ("BORROWER" AND "OBLIGORS'
AGENT) AND #1# ("FINANCIER") ("FACILITY AGREEMENT")

In accordance with clause 5.2 ("Extension of Maturity Date") of the Facility
Agreement, the Obligors' Agent requests as follows;

We request that the Maturity Date under the Facility Agreement in respect of
US$#3# be extended to a date 182 days after the current Maturity Date under the
Facility Agreement.

The Maturity Date, if extended in accordance with this request, will be #4# June
2008.

If this extension request is accepted, the Facility Limit applicable from the
current Maturity Date will be US$ #3#.


----------------------------                -----------------------------
RUSSELL CHENU being an                      KAREN HUGHES being an
Authorised Officer of                       Authorised Officer of
JAMES HARDIE INTERNATIONAL FINANCE BV
as Obligors' Agent (with corporate seat in Amsterdam)

We agree to extend the maturity Dare for the requested Facility Limit in
accordance with the above notice.

Signed for the Financier on                   by:
                            -----------------


-----------------------------

                    being an Authorise Officer of the Financier
-------------------
(print name)
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of EcoBlu Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rodney H. McKinley, CFO, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/Rodney H. McKinley
 Rodney H. McKinley, CFO
 Principal Financial Officer
 
 November 22, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Michael W. Rogers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of BG Medicine, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: October 4, 2011



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael W. Rogers                                          
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(principal financial officer)
# C_2010008EN.01002501.xml

| 14.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/25

---

Publication pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions

2010/C 8/08

NORTHERN ROCK PLC TRANSFER ORDER 2009

NORTHERN ROCK PLC TRANSFER ORDER 2009

On 8 December 2009 the Treasury, the UK’s finance and economics ministry, made the Northern Rock plc Transfer Order 2009 (‘the Order’), which makes provision for certain reorganisation measures to be implemented in respect of the restructuring of Northern Rock plc (wholly owned by the Treasury).

Articles 2, 6, 7 and 8 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Order came into force on 8 December 2009. Articles 6 and 7 make provision to ensure that third parties do not acquire or incur new rights, interests, obligations or liabilities as a result of the making of the Order or things done or omitted to be done in relation to it.

The remaining provisions of the Order come into force on 1 January 2010 and make provision in conjunction with, or to give effect to, the restructuring of Northern Rock plc.

The restructuring involves the transfer of parts of Northern Rock’s business, including retail deposits, specified wholesale deposits and a proportion of unencumbered mortgages (which includes all of the business of Northern Rock’s Irish branch (registered number at the Irish Companies Registration Office of 904328)) to a new company, which is wholly owned by the Treasury and will be regulated by the Financial Services Authority (the body established to regulate the financial services industry in the UK). The remainder of Northern Rock’s mortgage book, arrangements relating to the Granite securitisation and the covered bond programme, the Government loan and other borrowings, derivatives and specified wholesale deposits (held on behalf of its wholesale funding programmes) will remain with the existing company.

Following the transfer, it is intended that the existing company will be renamed as ‘Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc’ and the new company will be named ‘Northern Rock plc’. Both companies will be operated at arms’ length from the UK Government on commercial principles.

The Order was made in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 8 and 12 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008. Further details are available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk

Persons affected by the Treasury’s decision to make the Order may apply to the Administrative Court at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL, UNITED KINGDOM, for leave to challenge the decision by way of judicial review promptly, and in any event, not later than 3 months after 8 December 2009. Information regarding the time limit (including the circumstances in which it may be extended) and the procedure for making an application is set out in Civil Procedure Rule 54, available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk

---
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 975 

For the relief of Terence George. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Terence George. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR 

4 DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, TERENCE 

5 GEORGE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 

7 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ter8 ence George may not be removed from the United States, 

9 denied admission to the United States, denied adjustment 

10 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma11 nent residence, or denied a nonimmigrant or immigrant 

12 visa by reason of any act of his that is a ground for reVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:20 Feb 11, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H975.IH H975

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 975 IH

1 moval or denial of admission and is reflected in the records 

2 of the Department of Homeland Security, or the Visa Of3 fice of the Department of State, on the date of the enact4 ment of this Act. 

5 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF GOOD MORAL CHAR6 ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra7 tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection 

8 (a) may not be considered in determining whether Terence 

9 George is, or during any period has been, a person of good 

10 moral character for purposes of the Immigration and Na11 tionality Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 876 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 876

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
          relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 
              1974 TO THE PRODUCTS OF KAZAKHSTAN.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extension of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that the denial of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment should no longer apply to the products of Kazakhstan; 
        and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the extension of 
        nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) 
        to the products of Kazakhstan.
    (b) Termination of Applicability of Title IV.--On and after the 
date on which the President extends nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
products of Kazakhstan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to Kazakhstan.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Earl WALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6616.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 3, 2013.

James Earl Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, Office of the United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Earl Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*288We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, while we grant Walton’s motion for leave to supplement his informal brief, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 99.5
 CERTIFICATION I, Jade Cheng, certify that: 1.

   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Burcon NutraScience Corporation;2.

   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

   The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: (a)

   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)

   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)

   Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)

   Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

   The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)

   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date:

   June 25, 2013/s/ Jade ChengJade ChengChief Financial Officer


---
# C_2010343EN.01001901.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 343/13

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.4.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.4.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HAD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

19.4.2010

Duration

19.4.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

HAD/1N2AB.

Species

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

Melanogrammus aeglefinus

Zone

Norwegian waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2010236EN.01000501.xml

| 1.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/5

---

Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011 under certain quotas opened by the Community for products in the poultrymeat sector

2010/C 236/05

Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of July 2010 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2010 do not, for quotas 09.4212, 09.4214, 09.4217 and 09.4218, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2011; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 5.6.2007, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4212 | 55 566 000 |
| 09.4214 | 8 263 890 |
| 09.4217 | 21 180 000 |
| 09.4218 | 6 957 600 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2011

(in kg)

09.4212

55 566 000

09.4214

8 263 890

09.4217

21 180 000

09.4218

6 957 600

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 972 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement that 

certain former members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces 

be at least 60 years of age in order to be eligible to receive health 

care benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. KLINE of Minnesota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the 

requirement that certain former members of the reserve 

components of the Armed Forces be at least 60 years 

of age in order to be eligible to receive health care 

benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE AGE REQUIREMENT FOR 

4 HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FOR NON-REGULAR 

5 SERVICE RETIREES. 

6 Section 1074(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 972 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; and 

2 (2) by striking paragraph (2). 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
null

503.381