T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AR AC E L Y D E L A L UZ P OL AN C OC HINC HI L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 07- 71933 07- 72692 A ge nc yN o. A 029- 135- 265 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w , A r a c e l yD e L aL uz P ol anc oC hi nc hi l l a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng he rm ot i on t o r e ope n de port a t i on proceedi ng s und erthe N i cara gu an A dj ustm entand C entra l A m er i can R el i ef A ct 

# FI LED JU N 09 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71933 2 ( “N A C A R A ” ) , an dits o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e c o n s id e r . O u rju r is d ic tio n is gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of m o tio n s to r e o p e n a n dr e c o n s id e r , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , an dw e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n s f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng P ol anc o- C hi nc hi l l a ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n w he r e he rm ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than f

i ve y e ar s a f

t e rthe S e pt e m be r11, 1 9 9 8 , N A C A R A d e a d lin e , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .4 3 ( e ) ( 1 ) , an dP o lan c o - C h in c h illa d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te s h e a c te dw ith th e du e d ilig e n c e r e q u ir e df o re q u itab le to llin g , cf . A lbi l lo-D e L eon v. G on zalez , 41 0 F . 3d 10 90 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng P ol anc o- C hi nc hi l l a ’ s m ot i on t o r e c ons i de rw he r e the m ot i on f a i l e d t o i de nt i f

ya nye rr orof

f a c torl aw i n the B I A ’s p r io rd e c is io n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; So c o p - G o n z a lezv . I

NS , 272 F .3 d1 1 7 6 , 1 1 8 0 n .2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( e n b an c ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w P ol anc o- C hi nc hi l l a ’ s i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of c o u n s e l c la im b e c au s e s h e f a ile dto e x h au s t it b e f

o r e th e B I A . See B arron v. A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P o lan c o - C h in c h illa ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n a v a ilin g . P E T IT IO N S F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.