alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David T. Mitchell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fabrinet for the fiscal quarter ended December 24, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Fabrinet.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | By:    |  | /S/ DAVID T. MITCHELL                                                                       
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 2, 2011 |  |  |  | Name:  |  | David T. Mitchell                                                                           
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Mark J. Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fabrinet for the fiscal quarter ended December 24, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Fabrinet.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | By:    |  | /S/ MARK J. SCHWARTZ                                                                         
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 2, 2011 |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Mark J. Schwartz                                                                             
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

d0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140188

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140188 COA: 293024 Oakland CC: 2003-191406-FH ELLIOT JEROME JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# C_2010327EN.01001601.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2010/C 327/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 2.7.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 2.7.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HKE/571214 |
| Species | Hake (Merluccius merluccius) |
| Zone | VI and VII; EU and international waters of Vb; international waters of XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

2.7.2010

Duration

2.7.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

HKE/571214

Species

Hake (Merluccius merluccius)

Merluccius merluccius

Zone

VI and VII; EU and international waters of Vb; international waters of XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1167]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board adopts the following Order: 

*Whereas*, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for “* * * the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,” and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;                 

*Whereas*, the Pensacola-Escambia County Promotion and Development Commission (the Grantee), a Florida public corporation, has made application to the Board (FTZ Docket 34-2000, filed 7/6/00), requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone at sites in the Pensacola and Escambia County, Florida, area, adjacent to the Pensacola Customs port of entry;                 

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (65 FR 43288, 7/13/00); and,                 

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest;                 

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 249, at the sites described in the application, and subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of May 2001. 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Donald L. Evans,

Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer. 

Attest: 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-14135 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# CE2013153EN.01016702.xml

| 31.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 153/167 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 153/167

---

Tuesday 15 November 2011Athens Convention on carriage of passengers and their luggage by sea – excluding Articles 10 and 11 ***

P7_TA(2011)0478

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 November 2011 on the draft Council decision concerning the accession of the European Union to the Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, with the exception of Articles 10 and 11 thereof (08663/2011 – C7-0142/2011 – 2003/0132A(NLE))

2013/C 153 E/25

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08663/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08663/2011),

| — | having regard to the Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention Relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 (08663/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention Relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 (08663/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(8) first subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0142/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(8) first subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0142/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0356/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0356/2011),

| 1. | Consents to accession to the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to accession to the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the International Maritime Organization. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the International Maritime Organization.

---
#### In the Matter of: Neil Martin ROSE, Debtor. Neil Martin Rose, Appellant, v. Richard M. Ruggerio; et al., Appellees.

No. 08-60034.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.*

Filed April 21, 2010.

Neil Martin Rose, Scottsdale, AZ, pro se.

Jean Marie McCoy, Esquire, Lander-holm Law Firm, Vancouver, WA, Timothy William Dore, Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellees.

Kathryn Ellis, Seattle, WA, pro se.

Before: RYMER, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ned Martin Rose, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment, removing a lis pendens recorded by Rose against property sold by the bankruptcy trustee, and enjoining Rose from filing other documents clouding title to the property without prior court approval. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision, *Sigma Micro Corp. v. Healthcentral.com*
      *609
      *(In re Healthcentml.com),*504 F.3d 775, 783 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly canceled the invalid lis pendens. *See*Wash. Rev. Code § 4.28.325 (providing that a court may cancel a lis pendens upon a showing of good cause).

The bankruptcy court properly enjoined Rose from filing documents clouding title to the property without prior court approval. *See Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.,*500 F.3d 1047, 1056-62 (9th Cir.2007) (affirming pre-filing review orders where litigant received notice and an opportunity to be heard, there was an adequate record on appeal for review, the court found the litigant’s actions frivolous and harassing, and the order was narrowly tailored).

We reject Rose’s contention that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction because his allegations, even if true, do not affect jurisdiction.

Rose’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

The Chapter 7 trustee’s motion to be dismissed as a party to this appeal is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

                      

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Capital Resource Alliance Inc.. (the “Company”) for the year endedNovember 30, 2008 each of the undersigned Joseph Forzani, the Chief Executive Officer, and Frederick Fitzgerald**,** the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
NUMBER 13

- 14

- 003 06

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
DR. ROLANDO POSADA
, A ppellant
,

v.

DR. JUAN M. GARCIA
, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 445 th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 22, 2014 . On

October 2, 2014 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely

filed and that the appeal w as subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of

the Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not2

significantly inj ured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed t he 30th day of October , 20 14

.
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-101076, and the Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-101077 of
Millennium Bankshares Corporation, of our report dated April 5, 2005 on the consolidated financial statements of Millennium Bankshares Corporation as of December 31, 2004 for the year then ended as included in the registrants annual report on
Form 10-K.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC                                
|Crowe Chizek and Company LLC  Lexington, Kentucky April 14, 2005
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT of ARANSAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 31st day of

August, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Charles Leo Anderson III, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00002-CR (Tr.Ct.No. A-13-5066-CR)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 20th day of November, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
# C_2019164EN.01004601.xml

| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of two oblique red curves)

(Case T-829/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing two oblique red curves - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2019/C 164/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Coesia SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2017 (Case R 1272/2017-5), regarding an application for registration of a figurative sign representing two oblique red curves as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Coesia SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Coesia SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.

---
#### BRING v. N.C. STATE BAR

No. 355PA97

Case below: 348 N.C. 655

Petition by plaintiff to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 30 September 1998.
Exhibit 4.mmm




Exhibit 4.mmm




February 3, 2010

Mr. Gordon Cummings

Chief Executive Officer

Kimber Resources Inc.

800 West Pender Street

Suite 215

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada, V6C 2V6


			
		Re: 	Engagement Letter 




Gentlemen:

Reference is made hereby to that certain Engagement Agreement (the “Engagement Agreement”) dated December 7, 2009 by and among Kimber Resources Inc. and Scarsdale Equities LLC("Scarsdale").

1. Section 5(b) of the Engagement Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“5(b) With respect to the expenses set forth in Section 3, upon termination of the Offering Engagement Period, Scarsdale shall be entitled to collect its actual out-of-pocket expenses accrued through the date of termination, not to exceed $30,000.”

2. Section 5(d) of the Engagement Agreement is hereby removed in its entirety.

Very truly yours,

SCARSDALE EQUITIES LLC


				
		By: 	/s/ Wade Black 	
		 	Wade Black 	
		 	Chief OperatingOfficer 	













  Kimber Resources, Inc.

February 3, 2010

Page 2



Confirmed and accepted as of

this 3rd day of February, 2010:



KIMBER RESOURCES, INC.


			
	By:	/s/ GordonCummings 	
		Gordon Cummings 	
		Chief Executive Officer
J & S TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

II,

Appellant,

v.

HABCO ENGINEERS & 

ERECTORS, INC.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4740

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Hon. L. P. Haddock, Judge.

Henry G. Gyden of Anderson Law Group, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Ryan C. Wagner of Lawcraft, Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Since there remain genuine issues of material fact, as pointed out by 

appellant under its first point on appeal, we hold the trial court erred in entering 

final summary judgment in favor of appellee. For this reason, we do not reach the 
merits of appellant’s second point, but, instead, remand the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this 

opinion.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
#### Daniel Singer, Appellant, v Casey Krul, Respondent.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided March 29, 2012

Reported below, 90 AD3d 1378.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution *(see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth.,*65 AD3d 434 [2009], *Iv dismissed*14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
32.2
            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.




I, Chet
Gutowsky, the Chief Financial Officer of Southfield Energy Corporation, hereby
certify that to my knowledge, Southfield Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Southfield
Energy Corporation.




Date: May
14, 2010




/s/
      Chet GutowskyChet
      Gutowsky
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Milton A. Alpern, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Milton A. Alpern
                                    -----------------------------------------
Date: March 31, 2005                Milton A. Alpern
                                    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer