alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice of designation of certifying officers. 

# SUMMARY:

The trade adjustment assistance program operates under the Trade Act of 1974 to furnish program benefits to domestic workers adversely affected in their employment by imports of articles which are like or are directly competitive with articles produced by the firm employing the workers. The North American Free Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance amended the Trade Act of 1974 to provide assistance to workers impacted by a shift in production from the workers' firm to Mexico or Canada, or increased company or customer imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the workers' firm. Workers become eligible for program benefits only if the worker group is certified under the Act as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. From time to time the agency issues an Order designating officials of the agency authorized to act as certifying officers. Employment and Training Order No.1-01, was issued to revise the listing of officials designated as certifying officers, superseding the previous Order. Employment and Training Order No. 1-01, is published below.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of May 2001.

Raymond J. Uhalde,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.

      ( print page 29594)          ( print page 29595)    

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M

[FR Doc. 01-13614 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 4510-30-C                      ( print page 29596)
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janice Clarke, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:  March 29, 2010





/s/  Janice ClarkeJanice ClarkeChief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted November 21, 2011;

decided January 10, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.0

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-1146 of The L.L. Knickerbocker Co., Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration
Statements No. 333-15185 and No. 333-37101 on Form S-3 of our report, dated
March 31, 1998, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of The L.L.
Knickerbocker Co., Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 31, 1998
# C_2020222EN.01000601.xml

| 6.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others

(Case C-228/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101(1) TFEU - Card payment systems - Interbank agreement fixing the level of interchange fees - Agreement restricting competition ‘by object’ and ‘by effect’ - Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’)

(2020/C 222/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Gazdasági Versenyhivatal

Respondents: Budapest Bank Nyrt., ING Bank NV Magyarországi Fióktelepe, OTP Bank Nyrt., Kereskedelmi és Hitelbank Zrt., Magyar Külkereskedelmi Bank Zrt., ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt., Visa Europe Ltd, MasterCard Europe SA

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the same anticompetitive conduct from being regarded as having as both its object and its effect the restriction of competition, within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the same anticompetitive conduct from being regarded as having as both its object and its effect the restriction of competition, within the meaning of that provision.

| 2. | Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that an interbank agreement which fixes at the same amount the interchange fee payable, where a payment transaction by card takes place, to the banks issuing such cards offered by card payment services companies operating on the national market concerned cannot be classified as an agreement which has ‘as [its] object’ the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition, within the meaning of that provision, unless that agreement, in the light of its wording, its objectives and its context, can be regarded as posing a sufficient degree of harm to competition to be classified thus, a matter which is for the referring court to determine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that an interbank agreement which fixes at the same amount the interchange fee payable, where a payment transaction by card takes place, to the banks issuing such cards offered by card payment services companies operating on the national market concerned cannot be classified as an agreement which has ‘as [its] object’ the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition, within the meaning of that provision, unless that agreement, in the light of its wording, its objectives and its context, can be regarded as posing a sufficient degree of harm to competition to be classified thus, a matter which is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum Studios, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Mitchell
Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






May
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Scott
      Mitchell RosenbergScott
      Mitchell RosenbergChief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph P. Allman, Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.








By:/s/ Joseph P. AllmanVice President and Corporate ControllerMarch 15, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13986]



[[Page 30220]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Drug 
Testing Advisory Board to be held in June 2001. A portion of the 
meeting will be open and will include a Department of Health and Human 
Services drug testing program update, a Department of Transportation 
drug testing program update, and an update on the draft guidelines for 
alternative specimen testing and on-site testing.
    If anyone needs special accommodations for persons with 
disabilities, please notify the Contact listed below.
    The meeting will also include the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of sensitive National Laboratory Certification Program 
(NLCP) internal operating procedures and program development issues 
which may contain information of a personal nature and confidential 
commercial information obtained from a person. Therefore, a portion of 
the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by the SAMHSA 
Administrator in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) and 
5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(d).
    A roster of the board members may be obtained from: Mrs. Giselle 
Hersh, Division of Workplace Programs, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockwall II, 
Suite 815, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-6014. The 
transcript for the open session will be available on the following 
website: www.health.org/workplace. Additional information for this 
meeting may be obtained by contacting the individual listed below.
    Committee Name: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Drug Testing 
Advisory Board.
    Meeting Date:

June 5, 2001; 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
June 6, 2001; 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

    Place: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20815.
    Type:

Open: June 5, 2001; 8:30 a.m.-Noon
Closed: June 5, 2001; Noon-4:30 p.m.
Closed: June 6, 2001; 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

    Contact: Donna M. Bush, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Telephone: 
(301) 443-6014, and FAX: (301) 443-3031.

    Dated: May 29, 2001.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-13986 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theron Resource
Group (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six month periods ended
November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Jerry R. Satchwell, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: January 13, 2009

/s/ Jerry R. Satchwell

Jerry R. Satchwell Chief Financial
Officer

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Chateau Communities, Inc. or CP Limited Partnership on Form S-8
(File Nos. 333-40166, 333-28583, 333-38900 and 333-73566) and Form S-3 (File
Nos. 333-36323, 333-28703, 333-38898, 333-38898-01, 333-39228, 333-43981,
333-43981-01, 333-74399, and 333-38307) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-75936) of our
report dated February 27, 2002 relating to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule of Chateau Communities, Inc. and CP Limited
Partnership, respectively as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, which appear in the Annual
Reports on Form 10-K, respectively.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2002
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1667

___________

Larry Kenneth Alexander, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

John A. Hedback, Trustee of the *

Bankruptcy Estate of Georgia *

Yvonne Stephens, *

*

Appellee. *

___________ Appeals from the United States

District Court for the

No. 10-1855 District of Minnesota and

___________ the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

*

In re: G. Yvonne Stephens *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Debtor *

*

--------------------------------------- *

*

G. Yvonne Stephens *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

John A. Hedback, Trustee of the *

Bankruptcy Estate of G. Yvonne *

Stephens; Mary Jo A. *
1

The Honorable Davis S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

2

The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

-2-

Jensen-Carter, Trustee of the *

Bankruptcy Estate of Larry *

K. Alexander, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 4, 2010

Filed: October 6, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Larry Alexander challenges the district court’s1

order dismissing his action for a declaratory judgment as to his ownership of real

property (No. 10-1667); and G. Yvonne Stephens challenges the order of the

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s2

 approval of a

settlement between trustees regarding the same property (No. 10-1855). 

In No. 10-1667, we find that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Followell v. United States, 532 F.3d 707, 708 (8th Cir. 2008) (de

novo review). In No. 10-1855, we agree with the BAP’s analysis in all respects. See

In re Vote, 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002) (court of appeals applies same
-3-

standard of review as BAP, reviewing bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear

error, and its conclusions of law de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________
Digital Angel Corporation







Exhibit 4.14

POWERCOLD CORPORATION 







July 29, 2004

Scott J. Giordano 

Loeb & Loeb LLP 

345 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10154 

Direct Dial:  (212) 407-4104 

Fax:  (212) 407-4990

RE:

POWERCOLD CORPORATION – Escrow Release 

Gross Escrow Deposit: $5,000,000




Dear Mr. Giordano:

These instructions are given to you pursuant to a Funds Escrow Agreement among POWERCOLD CORPORATION (the “Company”), Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., and Loeb & Loeb LLP as Escrow Agent. Subject to the terms set forth below, you are instructed to disburse or allocate $5,000,000 of the investor’s funds received by you to and on the Company’s behalf as follows:




1.

$4,798,500 the Company pursuant to the following wire instructions:

The Northern Trust Company

801 South Canal Street

Chicago, IL  60607

ABA 071000152

Credit Account No. 57711 Legg Mason

Further Credit To: Account No. 366-03685 PowerCold Corporation







2.

$175,000 – Laurus Capital Management, L.L.C. (management fees)

North Fork Bank

New York, NY 10022

ABA Number: 021-407912

For Credit to:  Laurus Capital Management, L.L.C.

Account Number: 2774045278




3.

$24,500 - Laurus Capital Management, L.L.C. (due diligence and legal fees:)

Northfork Bank

New York, NY 10022

ABA Number: 021-407912

For Credit to:  Laurus Capital Management, L.L.C.

Account Number: 2774045278






	 	 	





















4.

$2,000 – Loeb & Loeb LLP (escrow agent fee)

Bank:  

Citibank, N.A.

ABA No:

021000089

Acct. No.:

02674308

Reference:

Laurus Escrow Arrangement














	 	2
#### Hendrik KARUNDENG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-2061.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 2006.

Decided: June 1, 2006.

Alex Chanthunya, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Song E. Park, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Hendrik Karundeng, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s order denying relief from removal. Karundeng contends that the Board and Immigration Judge erred in finding him ineligible for withholding of removal.

“To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” *Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 324 n. 13 (4th Cir.2002) (citing *INS v. Stevic,*467 U.S. 407, 430, 104 S.Ct. 2489, 81 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984)). Having conducted our review, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Karundeng failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*311fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
Advantest Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that, to such officers knowledge:



|1. | The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 26, 2009



By:

/s/    HARUO MATSUNOName:

Haruo MatsunoTitle:

Representative Director, President and CEO




Date: June 26, 2009



By:

/s/    YUICHI KURITAName:

Yuichi KuritaTitle:

Director and Managing Executive Officer
#### ISBELL v. TOWER MILL, INC.

No. 299P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 340

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-31081 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PIERO ANGELO MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-139-3-A

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Piero Angelo Morales pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of distribution of cocaine and ecstasy. The district court sentenced him to 115 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Morales now appeals the district court’s judgment. Morales argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in litigating his involuntariness claim during sentencing.No. 02-31081 -2- As a general rule, this court declines to review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, although we may do so in exceptional cases. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987); United States v. Gibson , 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995); see also Massaro v. United States , 123 S. Ct. 1690 (2003). This is not the exceptional case. Accordingly, we decline to review Morales’ ineffective-assistance claim in this direct appeal. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# PL & Accountability