alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fero Industries INC., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to their knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Kyle Schlosser Kyle Schlosser, President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Leigh-Ann Squire Leigh-Ann Squire, Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  February 16, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and will be retained by Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beauty Brands Group, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Dan Kelly, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, and James Altucher, President and Principal Executive
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge,
that:






(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Dan
      KellyPrincipal
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerAugust
      10, 2009/s/James
      AltucherPresident
      and Principal Executive OfficerAugust
      10, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### David M. STROYNY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Timothy HALL, Respondent, Appellee.

No. 07-1825.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Sept. 17, 2008.

*72David M. Stroyny, on brief, pro se.

Martha Coakley, Attorney General, and Annette C. Benedetto, Assistant Attorney General, on brief, for appellee.

Before LYNCH, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, and we affirm. It was not unreasonable for the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) to reject petitioner David Stroyny’s (“Stroy-ny’s”) claim that certain remarks by his attorney during his opening statement amounted to ineffective assistance. As the SJC noted, “counsel’s opening argument advanced the defense theories of lack of criminal responsibility and mental impairment and his remarks, in context, were to that effect.” *Commonwealth v. Stroyny,*435 Mass. 635, 651, 760 N.E.2d 1201, 1215 (2002). Indeed, his brief in this court does not argue otherwise. Stroyny’s claim that his attorney’s statement somehow eviscerated his separate defense of provocation is a new one that has not been asserted before now. It was neither included in his brief before the SJC, nor was it included in Stroyny’s federal habeas petition. Accordingly, this aspect of his ineffective assistance claim is not properly before this court. Moreover, we see nothing in the opening statement that would have defeated Stroyny’s claim of reasonable provocation. While that separate defense was not mentioned in the opening statement, Stroyny’s attorney did present evidence in support of that defense and he discussed it in some detail in his closing argument.

Stroyny also objects to the SJC’s conclusion that his attorney did not provide ineffective assistance in failing to object to the admission of certain incriminating statements Stroyny made shortly after the victim’s death or to request a “humane practice” instruction. *See Commonwealth v. Benoit,*410 Mass. 506, 512, 574 N.E.2d 347, 351 (1991). The statements in question were admissible under Massachusetts law, as the SJC separately concluded; the trial court was not required under state law to give the instruction; and the evidence did not support such an instruction. Thus, it was not unreasonable for the SJC to conclude that counsel’s failure to object to admission of the statements or to request a “humane practice” instruction did not prejudice Stroyny.

Finally, Stroyny challenges his attorney’s failure to object to the trial court’s instructions on the element of malice and on the element of “extreme atrocity or cruelty.” While those instructions were erroneous under state law, the Massachusetts SJC concluded that those errors were harmless; and that conclusion was not unreasonable. Accordingly, it was not unreasonable for the SJC to conclude that counsel’s failure to object to the instructions did not prejudice Stroyny.

*Affirmed. See*1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
Exhibit 10.1

                        TRANSBOTICS SECURES SERVICE ORDER
                           IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

CHARLOTTE, NC - June 24, 2005 - Transbotics Corporation, (OTC BB: TNSB)
(www.transbotics.com), announced it has received an order from an existing
customer in the automotive industry to service a previously installed Automatic
Guided Vehicle (AGV) system. The order for a full year of on-site customer
support totals approximately $480,000.

The work is to be performed by Transbotics' Detroit office, which initially
opened in 2000 and has increased its size and scope since its inception. This
branch started as a base for support and preventative maintenance of Laser
Guided Vehicles (LGV) and automated trailers used for transportation of parts
for the automotive industry. Today the branch has expanded beyond its original
size in order to support the increased amount of preventative maintenance
contracts, new system installations, onsite support contracts, and to build and
retrofit automatic systems for the loading and unloading of trailers.

The Detroit team is strategically located to provide quicker customer support
throughout the Midwest and Canada. These qualified and experienced employees at
this office, makes turnaround for maintenance and service calls prompt and
efficient said Claude Imbleau, President of Transbotics.

For over 20 years Transbotics Corporation has specialized in the design,
development, support and installation of automation solutions with an emphasis
on Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs). The Company is a North American Automation
solutions integrator that manufactures, installs and supports various automation
technology including: AGVs, robotics, batteries, chargers, motors and other
related products.

Transbotics provides its Tailor Made automation solutions to a variety of
industries, including automotive (tier one supplier), aerospace and defense,
food and beverage, paper and allied products, newsprint and publishing,
entertainment, microelectronics, plastics and primary metals. Transbotics'
current customers include Fortune 500 companies as well as small manufacturing
companies.

This release (including information incorporated by reference herein) may be
deemed to contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance
and business of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve certain
risk, including, without limitation, the uncertainties detailed in Transbotics
Corporation Securities and Exchange Commission filings.




                                       22
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CanWest Media Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Maguire, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                /s/ JOHN E. MAGUIRE
                --------------------------------------------
                John E. Maguire
                Chief Financial Officer
                February 26, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 11, 2013

NO. 03-13-00489-CV

Larry Dewayne Garrett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has neither paid, nor made arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record; has not submitted a status report regarding this appeal, and, accordingly, 

has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that 

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### Dennis F. BRADLEY, petitioner, v. Jim NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 06-158.

Oct. 2, 2006.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
#### STATION ASSOC., INC. v. DARE COUNTY

No. 337PA98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 56

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 December 1998. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 December 1998.
# C_2010275EN.01001501.xml

| 12.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/15 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009

2010/C 275/12

According to Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009( 1 ), an application for recognition of a traditional term shall be published in the Official Journal, Series C, in order to inform third parties of the existence of such an application, with the view of possibly objecting to the recognition and protection of the traditional term applied for.

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009

| Date of receipt | 22.6.2010 |
| --------------------------- | ------------ |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Language of the application | English |
| File number | TDT-US-N0016 |

Applicant:

| Competent authority of the Member State | : | Wine America 1212 New York Avenue, Suite 425 Washington, DC 20005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA California Export Association 425 Market St., Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94105 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Wine America | 1212 New York Avenue, Suite 425 | Washington, DC 20005 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | California Export Association | 425 Market St., Suite 1000 | San Francisco, CA 94105 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| --------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------- | -------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------ |
| Wine America | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1212 New York Avenue, Suite 425 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Washington, DC 20005 | | | | | | | | | | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | | | | | | | | | | |
| California Export Association | | | | | | | | | | |
| 425 Market St., Suite 1000 | | | | | | | | | | |
| San Francisco, CA 94105 | | | | | | | | | | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | | | | | | | | | | |

Denomination: CLASSIC

Traditional term under Article 118u(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007

Language:

| — | Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 |
| - | ---------------------------------------------------------- |

List of protected designations of origin or geographical indications concerned:

| — | Protected designations of origin |
| - | -------------------------------- |

Grapevine products categories:

| — | Wine (Annex XIb to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007) |
| - | -------------------------------------------------------- |

Definition:

| — | A wine produced in an appellation of origin as defined by 27 CFR § 4.25 from a specific wine variety. |
| - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

---

( 1 )  OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 12 of 14

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(e)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2001-A
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


The Chase Manhattan Bank                    MBIA Insurance Corporation
450 West 33rd Street, 14th Floor            113 King Street
New York, NY 10001                          Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN: Structured Finance                    ATTN: Data Administration
Phone: (201) 593-6784                       Phone: (914) 765-3772
Fax: (201) 593-6459                         Fax: (914) 765-3810

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
ATTN: Key Education Resources,
      Student Loan Trust 2001A
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
2001-A, as Issuer, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee, dated
September 1, 2001, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from the inception of the Trust, through December 31,
2001, and of its performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Indenture throughout such period.

                                            KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2001-A,
                                            as Issuer

                                            By:  Bank One, National Association
                                                 as Eligible Lender Trustee

                                            By:    /s/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                               ---------------------------------
Date: March 8, 2002                         Name:  Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                            Title: Vice President
Exhibit
31.1





RULE 13a
-14(a) CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-K (CEO) CERTIFICATION





I, Yi
Song, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Diguang International
Development Co., Ltd.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a -15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:





a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;





c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date: 
      June 25, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Yi SongYi
      SongChairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
#### PYI SONE AYE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-2219.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 19, 2010.

Decided: May 10, 2010.

Carmen DiAmore-Siah, Law Office of Carmen DiAmore-Siah, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, Anthony P. Nicastro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before KING, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pyi Sone Aye, a native and citizen of Burma, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) summarily dismissing his appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A), (E) (2009). We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Aye*(B.I.A. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1091

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - NNG C - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC NNG C

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.