alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April
30, 2009 (the “Report”) of AirSharesTM EU Carbon Allowances Fund (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Jeffrey L. Feldman, the Chief Executive Officer of XShares Advisors
LLC, Sponsor of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:  June
      15, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Jeffrey L. FeldmanName:
                Jeffrey
      L. FeldmanTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerXShares
      Advisors LLC,Sponsor of
      AirSharesTM EU Carbon Allowances
      Fund
#### In the Matter of Ernest Curry, Appellant, v Nassau County Sheriff’s Department et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 1, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

*854Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 3.1



ARTICLE VII

CERTIFICATE OF SHARES



Section 1.Type of Certificate.  Shares of this corporations stock may be certificated stock or uncertificated stock, as provided under Minnesota law.  Each holder of certificated stock in this corporation shall be entitled to a certificate of stock.  Certificates of shares of this corporation shall be in such form as shall be prepared or be approved by the Board of Directors.  Each certificate shall be signed by the President/Chief Executive Officer or Vice President and the Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer or Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and shall have affixed thereto the corporate seal, if any.  Said signatures and the corporate seal, if any, may be facsimiles, engraved or printed, if the certificate is signed by a Transfer Agent or Registrar.  All certificates shall contain such information as may be required by statute.



Section 2.Transfers of Shares.  Transfers of shares shall be made on the books of the corporation only by the record holder of such shares or by attorney lawfully constituted in writing, and, in the case of stock represented by a certificate, upon surrender of the certificate therefor properly endorsed or accompanied by proper evidence of succession, assignment or authority to transfer.





5

---
---

Exhibit 99.4


CERTIFICATION I, Allan Yap, certify that: 1.

   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Burcon NutraScience Corporation;2.

   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

   The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have: (a)

   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)

   Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)

   Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

   The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)

   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 12 , 2012 “/s/ Allan Yap”Allan Yap Chief Executive Officer


---
# C_2010191EN.01000501.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/5

---

Communication pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 concerning the appointment of a member, the renewal of the term of office of a current member and the appointment of substitute members of the Conciliation Body instituted in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and the EAFRD

2010/C 191/04

| 1. | The Commission has appointed Mr Gert LINDEMANN (DE) as a member for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Commission has appointed Mr Gert LINDEMANN (DE) as a member for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013.

| 2. | The Commission has renewed the term of office Mr Peter BAUMANN (DA) for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2011. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission has renewed the term of office Mr Peter BAUMANN (DA) for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2011.

| 3. | The Commission has appointed Mr Denis BYRNE (IE), Mr Helder BICHO (PT) and Mr Robert BURIAN (AU) as substitute members for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission has appointed Mr Denis BYRNE (IE), Mr Helder BICHO (PT) and Mr Robert BURIAN (AU) as substitute members for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Scott Longval, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of IntriCon Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1)
        the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 16, 2007



/s/ Scott LongvalScott Longval
Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer (principal financialofficer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.







---
# C_2010192EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/1

---

COMMISSION OPINION

of 15 July 2010

relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the COMURHEX II conversion facility, located at Pierrelatte in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the French text is authentic)

2010/C 192/01

On 6 January 2010, the European Commission received from the French Government, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the COMURHEX II conversion facility.

On the basis of these data and additional information requested by the Commission on 5 February 2010 and provided by the French authorities on 4 March 2010, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distance between the facility and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Italy, is 170 km. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distance between the facility and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Italy, is 170 km.

| 2. | Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of liquid and gaseous effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of liquid and gaseous effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State.

| 3. | Solid radioactive waste is temporarily stored on site before being transferred to licensed treatment or disposal facilities located in France. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Solid radioactive waste is temporarily stored on site before being transferred to licensed treatment or disposal facilities located in France.

| 4. | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents that may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents that may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form arising from the COMURHEX II conversion facility located at Pierrelatte in France, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in the radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2010.

For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission

---
# C_2010138EN.01002801.xml

| 28.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/28

---

Summary information concerning State aid allocated in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 138/06

Aid No: XF 14/09

Member State: France

Region/Authority granting the aid: The French State represented by the Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries

Content description: Aid awarded to the Groupement de Défense Sanitaire Aquacole d'Aquitaine (GDSAA) pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 of 22 July 2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products.

Legal basis: Contrat de Projets État-Région (CPER) Aquitaine 2007-2013

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of ad hoc aid granted: EUR 147 900

Maximum aid intensity: 60 %

Date of implementation:

Duration of the scheme or individual aid award (no later than 30 June 2014) to be added: The deadline for submitting the request for payment of the balance of the aid is 30 June 2012.

Objective of aid: To maintain a high health and environmental status for aquaculture in Aquitaine. The collective actions led by the GDSAA are for the benefit of all fish farmers in the region.

Indicate which Article(s) are used: Article 17 — Aid for collective actions

Activity concerned: Aquaculture, fish-farming

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministère de l'agriculture et de la pêche |
| --- |
| Direction des pêches maritimes et de ľaquaculture |
| Bureau de la pisciculture et de la pêche continentale |
| 3 place de Fontenoy |
| 75007 Paris |
| FRANCE |

Ministère de l'agriculture et de la pêche

Direction des pêches maritimes et de ľaquaculture

Bureau de la pisciculture et de la pêche continentale

3 place de Fontenoy

75007 Paris

FRANCE

Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.aquitaine.pref.gouv.fr

or

http://www.aquitaine.fr

Justification: The aid provided for in the Contrat de Projets État-Région makes it possible to finance the proposed action without using the EFF.

---
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.                  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the      Company. |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                                                                                                 |
| March      25, 2009 |                                                                                                                                                                 | /s/David      S. Rector,David      S. Rector, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal      executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer  |

----
# C_2010144EN.01003201.xml

| 3.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/32

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 144/09

| Member State | Finland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Helsinki–Savonlinna–Helsinki |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 October 2010 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Ministry of transport and communications |
| Kirjaamo PB 31 |
| FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto |
| Helsinki |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |
| E-mail: kirjaamo@lvm.fi |
| Fax +358 916028596 |
| Internet: http://www.lvm.fi |

Member State

Finland

Concerned route

Helsinki–Savonlinna–Helsinki

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 October 2010

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Ministry of transport and communications

Kirjaamo PB 31

FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto

Helsinki

SUOMI/FINLAND

E-mail: kirjaamo@lvm.fi

Fax +358 916028596

Internet: http://www.lvm.fi

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-15461.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

*256Pamela Martin, Assistant U.S., Adam McMeen Flake, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason F. Carr, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Estrada appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The Government contends that Estrada’s waiver of his right to appeal his sentence in a plea agreement bars this appeal. We disagree, because the plea agreement “did not expressly waive the right to bring a § 2255 motion.” *See United States v. Pruitt,*32 F.3d 431, 432-33 (9th Cir.1994); *United States v. Nunez,*223 F.3d 956, 959 (9th Cir.2000).

Estrada contends that his sentence violates the Due Process Clause because there was no evidentiary support for the district court’s imposition of a two-level role enhancement to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c). We affirm because the record reflects that Estrada exercised authority over, and was responsible for organizing, a co-conspirator. *See United States v. Maldonado,*215 F.3d 1046, 1050 (9th Cir.2000) (“A single incident of persons acting under a defendant’s direction is sufficient evidence to support a two-level role enhancement.”).

Estrada also contends that it was impermissible for the district court to impose the enhancement where the government opposed it, and he objected to the Presentence Report (“PSR”) on the grounds that he was not a leader under *257the Guidelines. Those contentions are unpersuasive. *See Maldonado,*215 F.3d at 1051 (citing *United States v. Milton,*153 F.3d 891, 897 (8th Cir.1998) for the proposition that “where government and defendant both opposed PSR recommendation, the court did not err by relying on facts presented in the PSR to establish a role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1.”); *United States v. Riley,*335 F.3d 919, 931 (holding that, absent actual evidence contradicting a PSR, “an uncontradicted PSR alone is sufficient to uphold a district court’s findings”).

Estrada also contends that the district court relied on unreliable evidence. The record belies this contention.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 13.1



MTR Corporation Limited



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, C.K. Chow, Chief Executive Officer of MTR Corporation Limited (the Company), hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 17, 2005





/s/ C.K. ChowName:

C.K. ChowTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3555-3556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1341]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provision of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below.

TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9 a.m., February 13, 2001.

PLACE: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing 
Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
(``Board'') will convene the fourteenth quarterly briefing regarding 
the status of progress of the activities associated with the Department 
of Energy's Implementation Plan for the Board's Recommendations 95-2, 
Integrated Safety Management (``ISM''). Specific topics will include 
the status of ISM implementation in the DOE complex and key actions at 
DOE Headquarters to fully implement ISM. The status of implementing 
Recommendation 98-1, Integrated Safety Management (Response to Issues 
Identified by the Office of Internal Oversight) will also be presented. 
Specific matters related to Recommendation 98-1 will include the status 
of the Corrective Action Management team, the corrective action 
tracking system, and the implementation of issues identified during the 
Recommendation 98-1 verification review. Finally, the status of 
implementing Recommendation 2000-2, Configuration Management, Vital 
Safety Systems, will be discussed. Topics will include the 
Recommendation 2000-2 Executive Team membership, roles and 
responsibilities, as well as the status of commitments in the 
Recommendation 2000-2 Implementation Plan.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Richard A. Azzaro, General 
Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, 
NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-
free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
reserves its right to further schedule and

[[Page 3556]]

otherwise regulate the course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, 
postpone or adjourn the meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority 
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
John T. Conway,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 01-1341 Filed 1-11-01; 2:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P