alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Suhardi ISKANDER, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Respondents.

No. 05-2726.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 16, 2006.

Filed: June 19, 2006.

Sigang Li, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.

Jonathan Potter, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Before: FISHER, CHAGARES, and REAVLEY,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Suhardi Iskander is an ethnic Chinese citizen of Indonesia, who petitions for review of an adverse Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dated April 28, 2005. The BIA dismissed Iskander’s appeal of the denial of his requests for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

We review the BIA’s findings of fact under the “extremely deferential” substantial evidence standard. *Chen v. Ashcroft,*376 F.3d 215, 223 (3d Cir.2004). We will not vacate the BIA’s findings unless “[a] reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” *Toure v. Att’y Gen.,*443 F.3d 310, 316 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting *Shardar v. Ashcroft,*382 F.3d 318, 323 (3d Cir.2004)). As we write solely for the parties, we need not relate the facts.

A thorough review of the record leads us to conclude that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s findings that Iskander failed to show past persecution, a clear probability of future persecution, or a clear probability of torture upon his removal to Indonesia. The three attacks Iskander suffered from 1985 to 1998, along with various incidents of harassment, could reasonably be viewed as isolated incidents that do not rise to the extreme level of persecution or torture. Both the infrequency of the incidents and the relative *146safety of his family still living in Indonesia support the finding that persecution or torture is not a clear probability upon his return. Further, the State Department Reports in the record do not compel the conclusion that Iskander will more likely than not suffer persecution or torture if removed, because, *inter alia,*they indicate a decrease in attacks against ethnic Chinese (as distinguished from incidents involving Christians or women). *See Lie v. Ashcroft,*396 F.3d 530, 536-38 (3d Cir. 2005) (substantial evidence supported findings that harms to an ethnic Chinese citizen of Indonesia were not so severe as to constitute persecution, and that pattern or practice of persecution did not exist); *Tarrawally v. Ashcroft,*338 F.3d 180, 188 (3d Cir.2003) (even where evidence indicates that government commits “gross human rights abuses” and “many civilians are killed arbitrarily,” the record was “insufficient to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that a particular civilian ... will be tortured”).

Accordingly, we will deny Iskander’s petition.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Andrew Godfrey, Chief Executive Officer of First Quantum Ventures, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Andrew GodfreyAndrew GodfreyChief Executive Officer


Date: February 15, 2011











This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. FULLWOOD

No. 37A86-4

Case below: Buncombe County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Buncombe County denied 8 October 1998. Motion by defendant for temporary stay of ruling on petition for writ of certiorari denied 8 October 1998. Justice Orr recused.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARIA GABRIEL,

Petitioner

v.

ARMANDO AGUSTIN AGUSTIN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 238 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 11 of 25
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)


                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2001-A
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association                     J P Morgan Chase Bank
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126                     fka, The Chase Manhattan Bank
Chicago, IL 60670                                  4 New York Plaza 6th Floor
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration               New York, NY 10004
Phone: (312) 407-0192                              ATTN: ABS Administration
Fax:   (312) 407-1708                              Phone: (212) 623-5437
                                                   Fax:   (212) 623-5933

Key Bank USA, National Association                 MBIA Insurance Corporation.
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor                        113 King Street
Cleveland, OH 44114                                Armonk, NY  10504
ATTN: Key Education Resources                      ATTN: Data Administration
Student Loan Trust 2001-A                          Phone: (914) 765-3772
Phone: (216) 828-9342                              Fax:   (914) 765-3810
Fax:   (216) 828-9417

Key Consumer Receivables LLC
c/o Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave 4th Floor
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax:   (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Great Lakes Educational Loan
Services, Inc., as Subservicer, dated as of September 1, 2001 (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Subservicer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the
Master Servicer and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to the Subservicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the standard
as set forth in the Agreement.



                                    Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.,
                                    Subservicer

Date: March 26, 2003                By:    /S/ MICHAEL J. NOACK
                                       --------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Michael J. Noack
                                    Title: Chief Servicing Officer
EXHIBIT  32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Online  Holdings,  Inc.  a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  annual period ending
December  31,  2003  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"),  I,  Dennis  Lairamore,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d));  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Dennis  Lairamore
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Dennis  Lairamore
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer
Date: March 17, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert M. Friedland, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.;2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  (a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 30, 2005 By:
    /s/ Robert M. FriedlandRobert M. FriedlandChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mitchell K. Fogelman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



/s/ MITCHELL K. FOGELMANMitchell K. Fogelman Principal
Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
# C_2010276EN.01000801.xml

| 13.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/8

---

Publication of the application for recognition of a traditional term as provided for in Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009

2010/C 276/06

According to Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 (1), an application for recognition of a traditional term shall be published in the Official Journal, C Series, in order to inform third parties of the existence of such an application, with the view of possibly objecting to the recognition and protection of the traditional term applied for.

1

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009

PUBLICATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF A TRADITIONAL TERM ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 33 OF COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 607/2009

| Date of receipt | 22.6.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Language of the application | English |
| File number | TDT-US-N0018 |

Date of receipt

22.6.2010

Number of pages

15

Language of the application

English

File number

TDT-US-N0018

Applicant:

| Wine America |
| --- |
| 1212 New York Avenue, Suite 425 |
| Washington, DC 20005 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

Wine America

1212 New York Avenue, Suite 425

Washington, DC 20005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

| California Export Association |
| --- |
| 425 Market St., Suite 1000 |
| San Francisco, CA 94105 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

California Export Association

425 Market St., Suite 1000

San Francisco, CA 94105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Denomination: CRUSTED

Traditional term under Article 118u(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007

Language:

| — | Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 31(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009

List of protected designations of origin or geographical indications concerned:

| — | Protected designations of origin |
| --- | --- |

—

Protected designations of origin

Grapevine products categories:

| — | Liqueur wine (Annex XIb to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007) |
| --- | --- |

—

Liqueur wine (Annex XIb to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007)

Definition:

| — | Crusted describes a fortified wine in which deposits may develop in the bottle. |
| --- | --- |

—

Crusted describes a fortified wine in which deposits may develop in the bottle.

---

(1)  OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 60.

1

---
# C_2010215EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

2010/C 215/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19.4.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 118/10 |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Rahmenregelung für landwirtschaftliche Beihilfemaßnahmen zur Bekämpfung der aktuellen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise („Österreichregelung landwirtschaftliche Kleinbeihilfen“) |
| Legal basis | „Regelung zur vorübergehenden Gewährung geringfügiger Beihilfen im Geltungsbereich der Republik Österreich während der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise (Österreichregelung landwirtschaftliche Kleinbeihilfen)“
  Landwirtschaftsgesetz 1992, Landwirtschaftsgesetze der Länder |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Soft loan, Interest subsidy, Guarantee, Direct grant |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 1,20 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ämter der Landesregierungen, verschiedene Anschriften in den Bundesländern |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

19.4.2010

Reference number of State Aid

N 118/10

Member State

Austria

Region

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Rahmenregelung für landwirtschaftliche Beihilfemaßnahmen zur Bekämpfung der aktuellen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise („Österreichregelung landwirtschaftliche Kleinbeihilfen“)

Legal basis

„Regelung zur vorübergehenden Gewährung geringfügiger Beihilfen im Geltungsbereich der Republik Österreich während der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise (Österreichregelung landwirtschaftliche Kleinbeihilfen)“

Landwirtschaftsgesetz 1992, Landwirtschaftsgesetze der Länder

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Soft loan, Interest subsidy, Guarantee, Direct grant

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

EUR 1,20 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2010

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Ämter der Landesregierungen, verschiedene Anschriften in den Bundesländern

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
# C_2010072DE.01002502.xml

| 20.3.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 72/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 72/25

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung 2010/C 17/01 der Kommission — Ausführliche Leitlinien für die verschiedenen Kategorien von Änderungen der Zulassungen von Human- und Tierarzneimitteln

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 17 vom 22. Januar 2010
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 17 vom 22. Januar 2010

2010/C 72/12

Auf Seite 17, Punkt 10:

anstatt:

„Bei Tierarzneimitteln für zur Lebensmittlerzeugung genutzte Tierarten ein Nachweis darüber, dass der Hilfsstoff in Anhang II der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2377/90 des Rates aufgeführt ist, bzw. eine Begründung dafür, dass der Hilfsstoff in der dem Zieltier verabreichten Dosis keine pharmakologische Wirkung zeigt.

Anmerkung: Die Nummer der Verordnung wird sich demnächst ändern.“

muss es heißen:

„Bei Tierarzneimitteln für zur Lebensmittelerzeugung genutzte Tierarten ein Nachweis darüber, dass der Hilfsstoff unter Artikel 14 Absatz 2 Buchstabe c der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 470/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 6. Mai 2009 über die Schaffung eines Gemeinschaftsverfahrens für die Festsetzung von Höchstmengen für Rückstände pharmakologisch wirksamer Stoffe in Lebensmitteln tierischen Ursprungs, zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2377/90 des Rates und zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2001/82/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 726/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates fällt, bzw. eine Begründung dafür, dass der Hilfsstoff in der dem Zieltier verabreichten Dosis keine pharmakologische Wirkung zeigt.“

---
#### Herson Daniel HERNANDEZ-ELIAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72881.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Herson Daniel Hernandez-Elias, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Remi Adalemo, OIL, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*295Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Herson Daniel Hernandez-Elias, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and for special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NA-CARA”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Hernandez-Elias’ contention that the agency erred in denying relief under NACARA because he failed to raise that issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

In his opening brief, Hernandez-Elias fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the agency’s determination that he did not establish eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under the CAT. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

Hernandez-Elias’ contention that the BIA violated due process by affirming without opinion the IJ’s decision is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 848 (9th Cir.2003) (BIA’s summary affirmance procedure does not violate due process).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.