alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:
September 24, 2008

| |  | /s/ Zami Aberman
Zami Aberman
| |  | -------------------------------------------



---

---
#### HUBBARD v. STATE CONSTRUCTION OFFICE

No. 352P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 254

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Millennium Bankshares Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Janet A. Valentine, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Millennium Bankshares Corporation, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (a) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

     (b) the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of Millennium Bankshares Corporation and its
subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-KSB.

By:    /s/ Janet A. Valentine                               Date: March 28, 2003
    -----------------------------                                 --------------
    Janet A. Valentine
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00786-CV

DAVID JONES, Appellant

V.

TIFFANY MONTEJO, Appellee

Appeal from the 312th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1997-17289).

TO THE 312TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 23rd day of April, 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court 

below on August 19, 2014. Appellant, David Jones, did not 

timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was 

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. 

Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of 

prosecution.

The Court orders that appellant pay all costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered April 23, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief 
Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 3, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 5

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of CP Ships Limited (the
"Company") on Form 40-F/A for the period ended 31st December 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Frank Halliwell, the Chief Executive Officer, and Ian Webber, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



                                                    /s/ Frank Halliwell
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Frank Halliwell
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                                    /s/ Ian Webber
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Ian Webber
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


Date:  12 November 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CP Ships Limited and will be retained by CP Ships Limited and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Phillips, Appellant.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

*872Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
cme @

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

March 17, 2006

Ms, Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21* Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Eligibility of LIBOR/Euroyen Futures for SUBs

Submitted per Sec. 5c(c)(1) of the CEA and Regulation Sec. 40.6(a).
CME Submission # 06-24.

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME” or “Exchange”) hereby certifies with the
Commission the eligibility of LIBOR and Euroyen Futures for the Substitution of Futures for
Forwards rules (SUBs). The Exchange certifies that this amendment complies with the Act and
tules thereunder.

The Exchange filed the certification for the SUBs rules in its submission #05-103, dated
November 21, 2005. These rules shall become effective for the regular Eurodollar futures as
well as “Cleared Only” Eurodollar futures with flexible expiration dates on April 3, 2006, as
certified in the submission #06-23. The Exchange intends to apply the same SUBs rules to the
following interest rate futures contracts, beginning April 3, 2006 as well: (a) One-month LIBOR
futures, listed for trading and clearing, (b) Three-month Euroyen futures, listed for trading and
clearing; and (c) Three-month Euroyen-LIBOR futures, listed for trading and clearing.

Please note that the Exchange does not intend to allow “flexibly dated” Cleared-Only

LIBOR or Euroyen futures for the purpose of SUBs. Only standard futures listing for trading
shall be eligible for the SUBs facility.

20 South Wacker Drive, Chicago IL 60606-7499, Tel. 312-930-1000


Ms. Jean A. Webb
March 17, 2006
Page 2 of 2

Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Richard Co at 312-930-3227 or rco@cme.com if any

questions arise during the processing of this submission. Please reference our CME Submission
#06-24 on all future correspondence for this submission.

Sincerely,

, G7

pate PE,
JC

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDDIE PALMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2)

Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant.

Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant 

to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 

2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Millennium Bankshares Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Carroll C. Markley, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Millennium Bankshares Corporation, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (a) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

     (b) the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of Millennium Bankshares Corporation and its
subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-KSB.

By:     /s/ Carroll C. Markley                            Date: March 28, 2003
     -----------------------------                              ---------------
     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30090-30091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1237; MM Docket No. 01-64; RM-10074]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Monticello, Maine

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 234A to Monticello, Maine, in 
response to a petition filed by Allan H. Wiener. See 66 FR 14873, March 
14, 2001. The coordinates for Channel 234A at Monticello, Maine, are 
46-24-20 NL and 67-50-45 WL. Although Canadian concurrence has been 
requested for the allotment of Channel 234A at Monticello, notification 
has not been received. Therefore, operation with the facilities 
specified for Monticello herein is subject to modification, suspension, 
or termination without right to hearing, if found by the Commission to 
be necessary in order to conform to the 1991 Canada-USA FM Broadcast 
Agreement or if specifically objected to by Canada. A filing window for 
Channel 234A at Monticello, Maine, will not be opened at this time. 
Instead, the issue of opening this allotment for auction will be 
addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective July 3, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 01-24, adopted May 9, 2001, and released May 
18, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's

[[Page 30091]]

Reference Center, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision 
may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, 
International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Maine, is 
amended by adding Monticello, Channel 234A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-14015 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officers of Samson Oil & Gas Limited (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to such officer’s
knowledge, that:



(1)   The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/ Terence Barr                                         | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Terence M. Barr                                          | 
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director | 
| | February 11, 2013                                        | 
| |                                                          | 
| | /s/ Robyn Lamont                                         | 
| | Robyn Lamont                                             | 
| | Chief Financial Officer                                  | 
| | February 11, 2013                                        |
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 et al., Respondents, and Village of Johnson City, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Arbitration between Village of Johnson City, Appellant, and Johnson City Firefighters Association, Local 921 IAFF, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted January 3, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 72 AD3d 1235.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*18 NY3d 32 (2011)].
#### Michael SWOFFORD, Plaintiff, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN/AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., Defendant.

No. LR-C-85-182.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D.

March 20, 1985.

*1129Timothy O. Dudley, and Gary D. Corum, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff.

Sam Hilburn, North Little Rock, Ark., for defendant.

ORDER

ROY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary Injunction asking this Court to stay proceedings in the Pulaski County Chancery Court. In the state court action, Shearson alleges that Swofford is indebted to it because of his misappropriation of funds. That action is to be tried before the Honorable Lee Mun-son on April 3, 1985. Swofford would have this Court stay the state court trial until this Court could rule on his Petition to Compel Arbitration of their dispute. As the Plaintiff points out in his brief accompanying motion the Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 2 applies to state as well as federal courts. The state court has the power to stay its action pending arbitration and has apparently refused to do so. This Court will not interfere with that decision and interrupt the normal flow of judicial business in chancery court.

Federal courts are prohibited by statute from granting injunctions to stay state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The Court does not believe that any of the exceptions to the Act are applicable here. It is within this Court’s discretion whether to stay the state court action or not. *Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.,*541 F.2d 1263 (7th Cir.1976).

The Court does not believe this is a proper case for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff has the opportunity for a trial on the merits of the action against him in the state court. There is no reason to believe that justice will not be served thereby. If the Plaintiff is correct in his assertions made here, then he has recourse in the appellate courts of Arkansas *if*he loses in state court and chooses to file an appeal.

As the Supreme Court has said: “Since the beginning of this country’s history Congress has, subject to few exceptions, manifested a desire to permit state courts to try state cases free from interference by federal courts____” *Younger v. Harris,*401 U.S. 37, 43, 91 S.Ct. 746, 750, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). That desire will be followed in this Court.

IT IS ORDERED:

That the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied.
#### Geraldine Kelley DARDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mohammed ARAIN, DefendantAppellee.

No. 12-17814.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Oct. 4, 2013.

Geraldine Kelley Darden, pro se.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

California state prisoner Geraldine Kelley Darden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000); *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Darden’s action because Darden did not allege facts showing that defendant acted with deliberate indifference when performing the lumpectomy or responding to Darden’s medical needs. *See Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1057-58, 1060 (9th Cir.2004) (deliberate indifference is a high legal standard, and it is met only if the defendant knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety; mistakes, negligence or malpractice do not rise to an Eighth Amendment violation).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Darden’s motion for appointment of counsel because Darden failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. *See Palmer v. Valdez,*560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.2009) (setting forth standard of review and “exceptional circumstances” requirement for appointment of counsel).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action without first providing an opportunity to amend after concluding that amendment would be futile. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is appropriate where the pleading cannot be cured by alleging other facts).

Darden’s contentions concerning alleged denial of due process and equal access are unpersuasive and not supported by the record.

Darden’s motions to add the legal principle of res judicata, filed on February 6, 2013 and March 19, 2013, are denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.2

I,
David G. Gaw, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heritage Property Investment Trust, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant, and we have:



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;



|Date: March 10, 2005 |  | /s/DAVID G. GAWDavid G. Gaw
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
ex10_15.htm




Exhibit 10.15 - Amendment to 2006 Stock Compensation Plan







AMENDMENT TO 2006 STOCK


COMPENSATION PLAN







On September 21, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved deleting the text in Article 8 of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan and replacing it with the following:







8.1 The Committee may not modify, extend, or renew outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan or accept the surrender of outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (to the extent not theretofore exercised) and authorize the granting of new Options and Stock Appreciation Rights in substitution therefor.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1501

Aluminum Fixed Swap - LME Aluminum 3rd Wednesday - LME

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the price published by LME for the location specified in 

Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the LME Official Cash Settlement Price for Primary 

Aluminum for the Monday prior to the third Wednesday during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be metric tons. Each contract based shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in metric tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars per metric ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall be 

$0.01 per metric ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the third Tuesday of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.