alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29570-29571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13667]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

[[Page 29571]]

holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 14, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervision) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. William Robert Baierl, Wexford, Pennsylvania; to retain voting 
shares of NSD Bancorp, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Northside Bank, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Bill Ray Foster, Springfield, Missouri; to acquire additional 
voting shares of Village Bancshares, Inc., Springfield, Missouri, and 
thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Village Bank, 
Springfield, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 25, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13667 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Bruce Ovitz, Appellant, v Bloomberg L.P. et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 9, 2012;

decided January 12, 2012

Reported below, 77 AD3d 515.

Motion by Sirius XM Radio Inc. for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 908 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 

Act of 1994 to reauthorize the Missing Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Alert Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 908 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Missing Alzheimer’s 

3 Disease Patient Alert Program Reauthorization of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MISSING ALZHEIMER’S 

5 DISEASE PATIENT ALERT PROGRAM. 

6 Section 240001 of the Violent Crime Control and 

7 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14181) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(a) GRANT.—Subject to the availability of appro12 priations to carry out this section, the Attorney General, 

13 through the Bureau of Justice Assistance and in consulta14 tion with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

15 shall award competitive grants to nonprofit organizations 

16 to assist such organizations in paying for the costs of plan17 ning, designing, establishing, and operating locally based, 

18 proactive programs to protect and locate missing patients 

19 with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and other 

20 missing elderly individuals.’’; 

21 (2) in subsection (b)— 

22 (A) by inserting ‘‘competitive’’ after ‘‘to re23 ceive a’’; and 

24 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

25 sentence: ‘‘The Attorney General shall periodi26 cally solicit applications for grants under this 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

HR 908 RFS

1 section by publishing a request for applications 

2 in the Federal Register and by posting such a 

3 request on the website of the Department of 

4 Justice.’’; 

5 (3) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(c) PREFERENCE.—In awarding grants under sub8 section (a), the Attorney General shall give preference to 

9 national nonprofit organizations that have a direct link to 

10 patients, and families of patients, with Alzheimer’s disease 

11 and related dementias.’’; and 

12 (4) by amending subsection (d) to read as fol13 lows: 

14 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

15 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

16 $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 

17 2016.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 10, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
f1012ga2ex10i_europa2.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Description of Verbal Management Consulting Agreement Between Europa Acquisition II, Inc. and Peter Reichard












On June 30, 2010, Mr. Reichard, the President and sole director of the Company, verbally agreed to provide funding to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond, until the Company is engaged in business activities that provide cash flow sufficient to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations. We currently have no written contractual agreements in place with Mr. Reichard to provide such funding. During the next 12 months, Mr. Reichard has agreed to cover costs including, but not limited to, the filing of Exchange Act reports, and consummating an acquisition. At this time we do not have the funds to pay for these filings and do not have any written agreement to raise funds to cover these expenses. However, we believe we will be able to meet these costs with funds provided by Mr. Reichard. At such time that the Company has the ability to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations with cash flow from operations, Mr. Reichard will no longer be obligated to cover such costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pluristem Life Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 28, 2004



/s/ Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi
Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Tommy Lee STEVENS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Washington, DC and Department of Health and Human Resources, Appellees.

No. 09-5443.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 23, 2010.

Tommy Lee Stevens, Mount Olive, NC, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and supplement filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order issued December 8, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the appellant’s complaint as frivolous. The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be “fantastic or delusional.” *See Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). The district court did not err in dismissing the complaint without the consent of the Attorney General, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), because pro se plaintiffs may not file a qui tam action pursuant to the False Claims Act, and section 3730(b)(1) only applies to voluntary dismissals by qui tam plaintiffs. *See United States ex rel. Mergent Servs. v. Flaherty,*540 F.3d 89, 91-94 (2d Cir.2008).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Allied First Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Kenneth
L. Bertrand, President and Chief Executive of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: September 27, 2004                  /s/Kenneth L. Bertrand
                                          -----------------------
                                          Kenneth L. Bertrand
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heritage Property
Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David G. Gaw, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of
the Company.

                                       Heritage Property Investment Trust, Inc.



                                       By: /s/ David G. Gaw
                                           -------------------
                                           David G. Gaw
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Treasurer

Dated: March 12, 2004
# C_2010057EN.01001501.xml

| 9.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/15

---

Information related to the Commission’s ‘compiled list’ of Member States’ trusted lists as notified under Commission Decision 2009/767/EC (1)

1

2010/C 57/10

Digest information to ensure the authenticity and integrity of the Commission’s ‘compiled list’ of Member States’ trusted lists as notified to the Commission by Member States pursuant to Article 2.3 of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC was published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 23 February 2010
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

The digest information published on 23 February 2010 for the certificate that supports the TLS/SSL secured connection for the publication of the human readable version of the ‘compiled list’ expires on 7 March 2010. The new certificate supporting the TLS/SSL connection is valid as of 8 March 2010 and can be authenticated through the following digest information:

| — | SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: 81 bc 61 fa 39 fa f5 b4 d5 d8 77 98 be 53 bd 68 68 af 06 ff 05 78 bf a9 3b 15 76 5a 6f da 8d ad |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: 81 bc 61 fa 39 fa f5 b4 d5 d8 77 98 be 53 bd 68 68 af 06 ff 05 78 bf a9 3b 15 76 5a 6f da 8d ad

| — | SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: 5e 98 89 3b ed 90 44 ef b0 9a 94 c4 8a fd b6 52 b5 19 70 8f |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: 5e 98 89 3b ed 90 44 ef b0 9a 94 c4 8a fd b6 52 b5 19 70 8f

| — | SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: gbxh+jn69bTV2HeYvlO9aGivBv8FeL+pOxV2Wm/aja0= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: gbxh+jn69bTV2HeYvlO9aGivBv8FeL+pOxV2Wm/aja0=

| — | SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: XpiJO+2QRO+wmpTEiv22UrUZcI8= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: XpiJO+2QRO+wmpTEiv22UrUZcI8=

The above data is valid until 28 March 2013.

The authenticity and integrity of the ‘compiled’ list should be verified by relying parties prior to any use. The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the content of the pointed national trusted lists which lies exclusively with the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 299, 14.11.2009, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ C 45, 23.2.2010, p. 16.

2

---
H. R. 2451 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 575 Dexter 

Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum Chace 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-54164, Form S-3 No. 333-127034
and Form S-3 No. 333-114231) of our report dated January 16, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Vascular Solutions, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule of Vascular Solutions, Inc. listed in Item 15(a). This
schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

| | /s/   Ernst & Young LLP
| | -----------------------

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 30, 2006

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/25/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RONALD LARRY MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-4149

(D.C. No. 94-CV-656)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Miller appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. 

28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The petition is a collateral attack upon several bank robbery

convictions entered upon a guilty plea in the District of Utah in 1969. In 1992, Mr. Miller

was convicted in the Western District of Missouri of being a felon in possession of a

firearm, and the bank robbery convictions were used to enhance his sentence, 18 U.S.C.
- 2 -

§§ 922(g) & (e). See United States v. Miller, 20 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir.), cert. denied,

115 S. Ct. 226 (1994). Mr. Miller’s basic contention that the 1969 plea was invalid has

been rejected by this court as well as the Eighth Circuit. See Id. at 932-33; Miller v.

United States, No. 75-1698, unpub. op. (10th Cir. Sept. 1, 1976) (affirming denial of §

2255 relief). We remain unpersuaded; “coram nobis relief is not available to litigate

issues already litigated.” Klein v. United States, 880 F.2d 250, 254 n.1 (10th Cir. 1989). 

Mr. Miller has in no way demonstrated the compelling circumstances necessary for

issuance of the writ. See United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511 (1954).

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
July 11 , 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHARLES J. ARAMBURO, M.D. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00812

- CV V.

THELMA BROWN , Appellee

________________________________
This ca use, an appeal from the trial court’s order in favor of appellee, Thelma Brown, signed August 10, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the recor d and find error in the trial court’s order . We therefore
order the order of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause fo r proceedin gs in accordance with the court’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Thelma Brown.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Trevis D. Baker, Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided February 9, 2012

Reported below, 82 AD3d 1656.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy P. Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13807]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3669]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 
1 PM on Tuesday, June 19, 2001, in Room 6332, Department of 
Transportation Headquarters, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590-0001. The purpose of the meeting is to finalize 
preparations for the Sixth Session of the Subcommittee on Dangerous 
Goods, Solid Cargoes and Containers of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) which will be held on July 16-20, 2001, at the IMO 
Headquarters in London.
    The agenda items of particular interest are:

--Amendment 31-02 to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) 
Code, its Annexes and Supplements including harmonization of the IMDG 
Code with the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of 
Dangerous Goods, and implementation of Annex III of the Marine 
Pollution Convention (MARPOL 73/78), as amended.
--Revision of the Emergency Schedules (EmS).
--Review of the Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes (BC Code), 
including evaluation of properties of solid bulk cargoes.
--Cargo securing manual.
--Casualty and incident reports and analysis.
--Development of an instrument for multimodal training requirements.
--Stowage and segregation requirements for freight containers on 
containerships with partially weatherproof hatchway covers.
--Development of a manual on loading and unloading of solid bulk 
cargoes for terminal representatives.
--Amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at 
Sea (SOLAS) chapters VI and VII and MARPOL Annex III to make the IMDG 
Code mandatory.

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Mr. E. P. Pfersich, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MSO-3), 2100 Second 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 267-1577.

    Dated: May 24, 2001.
Stephen M. Miller,
Exective Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 01-13807 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
MICHAEL EDWARD JOHNSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS

,

Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
D ISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5624

Opinion filed July 14, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Michael E. Johnson, pro se , Petitioner.

Jennifer Parker, General Counsel; Michael T. Kennett and Barbara Debeli us, Assistant Generals Counsel, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits

.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ.

, CONCUR.