alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011248EN.01015401.xml

| 25.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/154

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)’

COM(2011) 189 final — 2011/0080 (COD)

2011/C 248/28

On 10 May 2011 the European Parliament and on 3 May 2011 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 192, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)

COM(2011)189 final — 2011/0080 COD.

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CES 23/81 fin, adopted on 29 April 1981 (1), it decided, at its 472nd plenary session of 15 and 16 June 2011 (meeting of 15 June 2011), by 154 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 15 June 2011.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---

(1)  EESC opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive concerning the assessment of the environmental effects of certain public and private projects, OJ C 185, p. 8 of 27 July 1981.

1

---
| 1.   | I      have reviewed the Report; |
|----------------|----------------------------------|

| 2.   | based      on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the      Report; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the      Report. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### In the Matter of Gabriella R., a Neglected Child. Broome County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mindyn S., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Submitted February 8, 2010;

decided April 1, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Dirk A. Sodestrom, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Westaff, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to take the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: January 28, 2005

 
| /s/ Dirk A. Sodestrom                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dirk A. Sodestrom                                  |
| Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
| Westaff, Inc.                                      |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                      |

 

----
#### Dylan Scerri et al., Respondents, v John Walsh et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 12, 2010;

decided June 8, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
No. 482.

#### Jardine *v.*Superior Court et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted December 14, 1931.

Decided January 4, 1932.

*Messrs. H. W. O’Melveny, Walter K. Tuller,*and *Irving M. Walker*for appellant.

*Messrs. Leslie R. Hewitt, Aloysius I. McCormick,*and *Guy Richards Crump*for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Sugg*v. *Thornton,*132 U. S. 524; *United Mine Workers*v. *Coronado Coal Co.,*259 U. S. 344.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: May 8, 2008
        
        
        /s/ M. J. CohenM.J. CohenInterim Chief Financial Officer








---
#### Mauhoi Tung, Appellant, v Henry Chiu D.D.S., Doing Business as Mott Street Dental Services, P.C., Respondent.

Submitted March 29, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

*856On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1160

Natural Gas Index Swaps - Tenn 800L - Platts Gas Daily Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price 

published by Platts Inside FERC Tenn 800L, for Floating Price B, from the average of the daily 

prices published by Platts Gas Daily Tenn 800L, for Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily Tenn 800L published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Tenn 800L

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024 SC-2024-0321 Ex parte D.C.H. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: D.C.H. v. D.P.D. and E.C.D.) (Madison Circuit Court: DR-20-305; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0939).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on July 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Stewart, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA Although appellant's counsel has not appealed from the

district court's order, he asks that we overrule our longstanding precedent holding that a party's counsel is not a party with standing to appeal. Office of Washoe Cnty. Dist. Attorney. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 116 Nev. 629, 635, 5 P.3d 562, 566 (2000) (concluding that district attorney was not a party to order imposing NRCP 11 sanctions against him); Albert D. Massi, Ltd. v. Bellmyre, 111 Nev. 1520, 1520, 908 P.2d 705, 706 (1995);
A. W. Albany v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 106 Nev. 688, 799 P.2d 566 (1990). We decline to do so. Appellant's counsel's remedy is in the form of an original writ petition challenging the district court's order. See Office of Washoe Cnty. Dist. Attny., 116 Nev. at 635, 5 P.3d at 566.

Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta

Gibbo s 

# Pi 

# 7 Pickering

cc: Hon. Frances Doherty, District Judge, Family Court Division Justice Law Center Luna Law Firm, PA Washoe District Court Clerk Tarah 

### H. Heying-Stampfli

pl 1947A e'D
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Tribute Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Langille, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








June 5, 2013
By:
/s/ Scott LangilleScott LangilleChief Financial Officer
ex10-1.htm









EXHIBIT 10.1







GEORGETOWN SAVINGS BANK


INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


GOALS FOR JULY 1, 2010 – DECEMBER 31, 2010



















Organizational Level:  Executive








	
Employee:

	
Robert E. Balletto

	
Incentive Target (6-months):  18% ($16,601)


	
Title:

	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	  










The dollar figures presented in this example are estimates.  Incentive payments will be based on the employee’s base compensation, which includes actual straight-time pay (excludes overtime), jury duty, holiday, vacation, personal and sick pay for the period of July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010.









 





Minimum Thresholds




In order to receive payment for achievement of the goals listed below, the following thresholds must be met:



	
  

	
1.

	
CAMELS ratings must be at a rating of “2” or better at all time during the Plan Year.  This will be measured by both internal audit results and OTS rating.








	
  

	
2.

	
Asset Quality must be at a level of “Satisfactory” or better at all time during the Plan Year.  This will be measured by both internal audit results and OTS rating.












Tier 1: Bank-wide Performance


 


GOAL: #1: Profitability – Achieve Return on Assets (ROA)







 Payout Percentage: 55% = $9,131








	
 


Goals

	
Payout


	
95% of budget

	
$3,044


	
At budget

	
$6,087


	
110% of budget

	
$9,131


	
Stretch Goal

	  
	
Every .05% over 110% of budget

	
$3,044






















GOAL: #2: Profitability – Achieve Efficiency Ratio







 Payout Percentage: 25% = $4,150








	
 


Goals

	
Payout


	
At budget

	
$2,767


	
97% of budget

	
$4,150


	
Stretch Goal

	  
	
Every 2% under 97% of budget

	
$1,383


























  





  











  


















Tier 2: Team Performance







GOAL: #3: Prepare and present a Business Plan to address the strategic initiative of increasing local commercial loan growth that meets the approval of the Board of Directors no later than December 20, 2010.







 Payout Percentage: 20% = $3,320


 







 












Tier 3: Individual Performance








	
Goals:

	
None












Minimum Level of Expectations


To be eligible for this Incentive Compensation Plan the employee must meet the following:



	
  

	
·

	
Performing at a satisfactory level or above,








	
  

	
·

	
Not on written warning, and








	
  

	
·

	
Actively employed at the time of the incentive payment.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                               Agreement Between
                        ______________and______________

It is hereby mutually agreed between Messrs ______________ and Messrs
_____________ that ________________ will act as the exclusive broker for ships
managed by __________________ Ltd. for a period of five years commencing on the
date of this agreement. Thereafter it shall continue until terminated by either
party giving to the other notice in writing, in which event the Agreement shall
terminate upon the expiration of a period of three months from the date upon
which such notice was given. In accordance with industry levels the commission
charged by _____________ is hereby agreed as follows:

1. 1.25% for all chartering contracts,

2. 1% for all pool entry participation contracts,

3. 1% for all Sale and Purchase transactions
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Neal R. Verfuerth, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 8, 2008 /s/ Neal R. Verfuerth   Neal R. Verfuerth   President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50390

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gaspar Vallejo-Arias, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-1297-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Gaspar Vallejo-Arias has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Vallejo-Arias has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 19, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50390 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024
No. 23-50390

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50390 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2024