alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1)     |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2)     |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                                    |   |                                                               |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:  November      13, 2009 |   | /s/Gordon G. Murdock                                               |   |   |
|                                    |   | Gordon      G. Murdock,                                            |   |   |
|                                    |   | President,      Chief Executive OfficerChairman      of the Board, |   |   |
|                                    |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                                 |   |   |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Brannon, Appellant.

*[875*NYS2d 62]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. *499Silverman, J.), rendered February 13, 2007, as amended April 19, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations *(see People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The combination of defendant’s suspiciously evasive conduct, the officer’s observation that defendant was carrying what was at the least a large and possibly dangerous knife, and defendant’s acknowledgment, in response to a proper common-law inquiry, that he had a knife, permitted the officer to conduct a self-protective frisk *(see People v Batista,*88 NY2d 650, 654 [1996]; *People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267, 271 [1980]; *see also People v King,*102 AD2d 710 [1984], *affd*65 NY2d 702 [1985]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
NO. 12-13-00360-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES RUSSELL SANDEL, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 159TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On March 7, 2014, the trial court conducted a telephonic hearing, at which Appellant 

participated and was represented by counsel, to determine the status of this appeal. A reporter’s 

record of the hearing has been filed with this court. At the hearing, after a discussion with his 

counsel, Appellant stated that he wished to dismiss this appeal. 

Appellant has not filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this court as required by Rule 

42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). But given Appellant’s expressed desire to forego pursuit of 

his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this 

case in accordance with Rule 2. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2; see also Silda v. State, No. 

01-04-00446-CR, 2004 WL 1746880, at *1 (Tex. App.–Aug. 5, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication) (invoking Rule 2 to suspend requirement of motion to dismiss appeal 

where appellant stated at hearing that she wished to dismiss appeal). No decision has been 

delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

Opinion delivered March 19, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle,

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 19, 2014

NO. 12-13-00360-CR

JAMES RUSSELL SANDEL,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2011-0331)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1114

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - TETCO M3 - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC TETCO M3

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global BPO Services Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, R. Scott Murray, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                                         
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2008 |  | /s/ R. Scott Murray                                     
|                  |  | R. Scott Murray                                         
|                  |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Interim
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 7.2



MTR Corporation Limited



Computation of

Ratio of Debt to
Shareholders Equity

Based on US GAAP

(Expressed in millions of HK$)



|                                                                |  |                   |  |        |  |        |  |        |  |       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ------ |  | ------ |  | ------ |  | ------
|                                                                |  | As of December 31
|                                                                |  | 2000              |  | 2001   |  | 2002   |  | 2003   |  | 2004  
|Loans, obligations under finance leases and bank overdrafts (A) |  | 27,152            |  | 31,745 |  | 34,793 |  | 32,906 |  | 30,711
|Shareholders equity (B)                                        |  | 41,322            |  | 44,870 |  | 46,942 |  | 47,534 |  | 50,480
|Ratio of Debt to Shareholders Equity (A)/(B)                   |  | 0.66              |  | 0.71   |  | 0.74   |  | 0.69   |  | 0.61
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1939

DANE C. JORGENSEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PUTT PUTT GOLF COURSES OF RICHMOND, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Putt Putt Golf and Games,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-1027-3)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dane C. Jorgensen, Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr., MAYS

& VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the

employer's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss Appellant's

claim filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42

U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jorgensen v. Putt

Putt Golf Courses of Richmond, Inc., No. CA-95-1027-3 (E.D. Va. May

28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maribel Otero, Appellant.

Submitted February 1, 2010;

decided February 11, 2010

*739Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
# C_2010322EN.01002701.xml

| 27.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/27

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 322/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dead-burned (sintered) magnesia | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 716/2006 (OJ L 125, 12.5.2006, p. 1) | 13.5.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Dead-burned (sintered) magnesia

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 716/2006 (OJ L 125, 12.5.2006, p. 1)

13.5.2011

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Janice Clarke, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





|                         |     |                        
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|Date: September 21, 2007 | By: | /s/ Janice Clarke      
|                         |     | Janice Clarke          
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 1 

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 6-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Brown, Appellant.

Submitted May 10, 2010;

decided June 3, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Baron Energy Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Maguire, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of June, 2009.


/s/ Michael Maguire
---------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10252 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE MOLINOS-MARTINEZ, also known as Rodrigo Rodriguez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-288-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge MolinosMartinez (Molinos) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordancewith Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molinos has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
EXHIBIT
      32.2











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holding, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      H. Cooper, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
      Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:






(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end
      of,
      and for the period covered by the Report.









By:
            /s/ Robert
              H. CooperName:
              Robert H. CooperTitle: Executive
              Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
              Treasurer
                and SecretaryDate: March 15,
              2007













A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Faith Astrada, Respondent, v Hulbert Archer, Defendant, and Regina Felton, Appellant.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided June 15, 2010

*923Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the March 2010 Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order granting the motion to hold appellant in contempt, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Heidgen, Appellant.

Submitted January 23, 2012;

decided February 16, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 1016.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Jillian S. Harrington, Esq., PO Box 6006, Monroe Township, New Jersey 08831 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein. Motion for waiver of strict compliance with the requirements of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals granted only to the extent that the appeal may be prosecuted upon the original file and an original and nine copies of appellant’s brief and appendix.
# C_2018152EN.01001502.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 12 February 2018 — T. Boer & Zonen BV v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

(Case C-98/18)

(2018/C 152/18)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: T. Boer & Zonen BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should the provisions of Annex III, Section I, Chapter VII, points 1 and 3, to Regulation No 853/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the cooling of meat must take place in the slaughterhouse itself — such that the loading of the meat into a refrigerated truck may commence once that meat has attained a maximum temperature of 7 degrees Celsius — or may the cooling of the meat also take place in the refrigerated truck, provided that the truck does not leave the premises of the slaughterhouse?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 55).

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Wentworth VII, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. Keating
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              October
                23, 2008