alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Deposit Account Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the
13th day of November, 2008 by and between The Bank of New
York Mellon, in its capacity as trustee of the
CurrencySharesSM Swiss Franc Trust, a trust formed under
New York law (the “Trust”) and the London Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). 

W I T N E S S E T H 

WHEREAS, The Trust and the Bank are parties to that certain Deposit Account Agreement dated June 8, 2006 (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows: 
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Agreement. 
 2. Amendment. Section 6.4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

 “The Bank reserves the right not to accept, and to return without interest to the remitter of funds, the amounts
received for deposit to the Interest Account on any Bank business day, if the aggregate deposit liability of the Bank to the Trust following the deposit of such amounts would exceed the Swiss Franc equivalent of $1.5 BILLION U.S. Dollars calculated
at the Swiss Franc/U.S. dollar exchange rate as determined by WM/Reuters at 4:00 PM (London time) on each Bank business day (the “Closing Spot Rate”) or another recognized market rate for the Swiss Franc if the Closing Spot Rate is
not available on the bank day such deposits are received by the Bank.” 
 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

4. Other. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this
Amendment shall control. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature
Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
hereof. 
  

			
	CURRENCYSHARES SWISS FRANC TRUST,
		
	By:	 	The Bank of New York, in its capacity as Trustee of the CurrencyShares Swiss Franc Trust and not in its individual capacity.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrew Pfeifer
	Name:	 	Andrew Pfeifer
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LONDON BRANCH
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael G. Davisson
	Name:	 	Michael G. Davisson
	Title:	 	Vice President
# C_2020061EN.01000701.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Brussels Securities SA v État Belge

(Case C-389/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Directive 90/435/EEC - Prevention of double taxation - First indent of Article 4(1) - Prohibition on taxing profits received - Inclusion of the dividend distributed by the subsidiary in the parent company’s tax base - Deduction of the dividend distributed from the parent company’s tax base and the indefinite carrying forward of the surplus to the following tax years - The order in which tax deductions on profits are to be applied - Loss of a tax advantage)

(2020/C 61/08)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Brussels Securities SA

Defendant: État Belge

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2003/123/EC of 22 December 2003 must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that dividends received by a parent company from its subsidiary must first be included in the tax base of the parent company, before 95 % of the amount of the dividends is then deducted, and any surplus may be carried forward to subsequent tax years indefinitely, that deduction having priority over another tax deduction which may only be carried forward for a limited time.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29723-29724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1271, MM Docket No. 01-53, RM-10040]


Television Broadcast Service; Galesburg, IL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Northwest Television, Inc., 
substitutes TV channel 53 for TV channel 67 at Galesburg, Illinois. See 
66 FR 12922, March 1, 2001. TV channel 53 can be allotted to Galesburg 
with a zero offset in compliance with the principle community coverage 
requirements of Section 73.610 and with the criteria set forth in the 
Commission's Public Notice released on November 22, 1999, DA 99-2605. 
The coordinates for channel 53 at Galesburg are (41-18-45 N and 90-22-
45 W.
    With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective July 9, 2001.

[[Page 29724]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-53, adopted May 24, 2001, and 
released May 25, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.606  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.606(b), the Table of Television Allotments under 
Illinois, is amended by removing TV channel 67 and adding TV channel 53 
at Galesburg.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-13713 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
Belen Betts, Individually, and

as Executrix /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00473

- CV

ARC PARKLANE, INC. d/b/a Parklane West Healthcare Center, Appellant

v.

Belen BETTS , Individ ually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Delbert Betts, Deceased, and Shirle Betts, and Dana Gibson, Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 10178 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief in this interlocutory appeal was due July 21, 2015, but the court granted an extension of time to file the brief. On August 25, the court suspended the appellate deadlines so the parties could mediate their dispute. The parties have filed a joint motion requesting

additional time

, stating the mediation has been rescheduled to October 28, 2015.

We grant the motion. We order appellant’s brief or a motion that disposes of th is appeal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 is due November 11, 2015

. The court will not look favorably on any further requests for extensions of time.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2 3rd day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 964 

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to exempt any 

solar energy project on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management from an environmental impact statement requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Ms. 

FOXX, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. 

LATTA, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. BILBRAY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

to exempt any solar energy project on lands managed 

by the Bureau of Land Management from an environmental impact statement requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Solar 

5 Power Permit Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 964 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS FROM 

2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE3 QUIREMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the National Environ5 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 106. No action relating to the development, de8 ployment, or operation of a solar energy project on lands 

9 managed by the Bureau of Land Management shall be 

10 considered a major Federal action for the purposes of sec11 tion 102(2)(C).’’. 

12 (b) EFFECT FOR STATEMENTS UNDERWAY.—Each 

13 department and agency of the Federal Government shall 

14 cease the preparation of a statement, commenced pursu15 ant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 

16 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)), for any action 

17 described in the amendment made by subsection (a), to 

18 the extent that the preparation of such statement would 

19 delay or otherwise interfere with such action. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
James Hardie Industries, N.V. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company. Dated: November 22, 2004 /s/ Louis GriesLouis GriesInterim Chief Executive Officer/s/ Russell ChenuRussell ChenuInterim Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP97-369-016 and RP98-39-023]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Distribution of Refunds 
Paid

May 24, 2001.

    Take notice that on May 18, 2001, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) submitted worksheets reflecting the distribution of refunds 
paid to jurisdictional sales customers on February 9, 2001.
    Northern states that these refunds are being made pursuant to the 
Commission's Order in Public Service Company of Colorado, et al., 
Docket Nos. RP97-369-000, et al., and the Commission's Order Approving 
Settlement in Northern Natural Gas Company, Docket No. RP98-39-000.
    Northern states that a copy of this report is being mailed to each 
of Northern's affected jurisdictional sales customers and state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 1, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13598 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### STATE ex rel. UTIL. COMM’N v. CAROLINA INDUS. GROUP

No. 437P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 636

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6570

RODNEY ANTONIO PEELE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-99-2120-2) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Rodney Antonio Peele, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney Antonio Peele seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Peele v. Angelone , No. CA-99- 2120-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-32.1
      4
      ex321.htm EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Agro Sciences Corp. (the “Company”)
      on Second Amended Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Zhengquan Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
      Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and


(2)Information
      contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





COMPANY
                NAME CORPORATIONDate: January
                15, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Zhengquan
                WangZhengquan
                WangPresident





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agro Sciences Corp. and will be retained by China Agro Sciences Corp.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
EXHIBIT 1

Nodal Exchange Environmental Incentive Program 9

Program Purpose

The purpose of the Program is to encourage Program participants to increase Exchange 

volume enhancing market liquidity. More liquidity benefits all participants in the market.

Product Scope – Eligible Contracts

All environmental contracts offered by the Exchange are Eligible Contracts under the 

Program.

Eligible Participants

REDACTED

Program Term

Start date is January 1, 2023. End date is June 30, 2023December 31, 2023, unless extended 

by the Exchange.

Incentives

REDACTED

Monitoring and Termination of Status

The Exchange shall monitor trading activity and participants’ performance and shall retain 

the right to revoke Designated Program Participant status if it determines that a 

Designated Program Participant no longer meets the eligibility requirements of the 

Program.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1516

Nickel Fixed Swap - LME Nickel 3rd Wednesday - LME

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the price published by LME for the location specified in 

Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the LME Official Cash Settlement Price for Nickel 

of 99.80% purity (minimum) conforming to B39-79 (2008) for the Monday prior to the third Wednesday

during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be metric tons. Each contract based shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in metric tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars per metric ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall be 

$0.01 per metric ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the third Tuesday of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Brett Henrichsen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Masterbeat Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Masterbeat Corporation.








Date: November 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Brett HenrichsenName:  Brett HenrichsenTitle: Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.4 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of EnCana Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John D. Watson, Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ John D. WatsonJohn D. WatsonExecutive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
 February 25, 2005
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00046

- CV

___________________________

Original Pr oce eding

153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153

- 304457

- 18

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### J OE 

### B YRD 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus a nd

appli cation for emergency ex parte restrain ing order and is of the opinion that relief

should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

appli cation for emergency ex parte restrain ing order are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : February 17, 2023
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  November 24, 2008



---

THE VALSPAR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware

        1-3011

        36-2443580(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)

        (CommissionFile Number)

        (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)1101 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota

        55415(Address of principal executive offices)

        (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code:(612) 332-7371



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.



On November 24, 2008, the Company issued the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1, which sets out the Companys results of operations for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and for the full year.



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d)

        Exhibits




99.1

        Fourth Quarter Earnings Press Release dated November 24, 2008






SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





THE VALSPAR CORPORATIONDated:  November 24, 2008

        

        

        /s/ Rolf EnghName:Title:

        Rolf EnghSecretary






---