alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 30, 2014

By Email: submissions@cftc.gov

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: tpSEF Inc. – Regulation 40.2 Certification of CDS Index Contract – North 

America Investment Grade 7Y Swaps and Swaptions (#14-20P)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

tpSEF Inc. (“tpSEF”) herby notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) of its intent to list CDS Index Contract – North America Investment Grade 7Y 

Swaps and Swaptions (the “Contract”) on tpSEF’s swap execution facility. tpSEF intends to list 

the Contract on November 3, 2014.

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.2, this submission includes:

i. A copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in 

Appendix D to Part 40 of the Commission’s regulations;

ii. The intended listing date – November 3, 2014;

iii. A certification by tpSEF that: (a) the Contract complies with the Commodity 

Exchange Act, as amended, and the Commission regulations thereunder; and (b) 

concurrent with this submission, tpSEF posted on its website: (i) a notice of 

pending certification of the Contract, and (ii) a copy of this submission, attached 

as Exhibit A;

iv. The Contract’s terms and conditions, attached as Exhibit B; and

v. An explanation and analysis of the Contract’s compliance with applicable core 

principles and Commission regulations, attached as Exhibit C.

tpSEF is listing the Contract by virtue of updating the terms and conditions of CDS Index 

Contract – North America Investment Grade 7Y submitted to the Commission for selfcertification pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.2 on September 29, 2013. A copy of the 

terms and conditions marked to show changes from the version submitted on 

September 29, 2013 is attached as Exhibit D.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131740 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JOHN ORZEL, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131740 

 COA: 269636 
 WCAC: 04-000426 

POLLAS FAMILY MARKET and UNITED 

STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY 

COMPANY, SHIELD RISK SERVICES, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND, TOTAL & 

PERMANENT DISABILITY PROVISION, 

 Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 30, 2006 

 Clerk
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1017

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Iroquois Z2 - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Iroquois Z2

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael FELIX-NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50916.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*627Submitted June 5, 2006.*

Filed June 9, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., William A. Crowfoot, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Terry J. Amdur, Esq., Law Offices of Terry J. Amdur, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Supreme Court’s decision in *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Supreme Court overrules it. *See United States v. Weiland, 420*F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that we continue to be bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in *Almendarez-Torres*that a district judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt); *see also United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234*F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir.2000).

Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion for summary affirmance.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Yvette Huff, Respondent, v Anita L. Rodriguez, Formerly Known as Anita L. Rosario, et al., Appellants.

Decided January 10, 2012

Reported below, 88 AD3d 1274.

*870Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order sought to be reviewed does not necessarily affect the final judgment as required by CPLR 5601 (d) *(see*Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 9:5, at 312 [3d ed rev]).
#### In the Matter of David D., a Disbarred Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Respondent.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided April 3, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
Maverick Minerals Corporation - Exhibit 10.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






September 15, 2010 

Senergy Partners LLC 
2245 N. Green Valley Parkway, Suite
429 

  Henderson, NV 89014 

          Re:
Amendment to Loan Agreement 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

          This
letter will confirm that Maverick Minerals Corporation (“MVRM”) agrees as
follows: 

         
(a)         If and at such time as Art
Brokerage, Inc. (“AB”) enters into that certain Loan Agreement with
respect to a loan of $2,400,000 (US) from AB to MVRM (the “AB Loan
Agreement”), MVRM agrees that the Loan Agreement dated February 13, 2009
(the “Senergy Loan Agreement”), between MVRM and Senergy Partners
LLC, an affiliate of AB (“Senergy”), is hereby amended to provide that at
no point thereafter shall the outstanding balance of principal and accrued
interest under the Senergy Loan Agreement exceed $500,000 (US) (the
“Balance Limit”) and Senergy shall have no obligation to make
further Advances under Senergy Loan Agreement to the extent that it believes in
good faith that such Advance would lead to MVRM’s violation of the Balance
Limit; and

         
(b)         If, at any time following
AB’s entry into the AB Loan Agreement, the outstanding balance of principal and
accrued interest under the Senergy Loan Agreement exceeds the Balance Limit, the
presence of such excess shall be deemed an Event of Default under Section 7.1(b)
(or, if applicable, both Sections 7.1(a) and 7.1(b)) of the Senergy Loan
Agreement and Senergy shall have all of the rights incident thereto. 

          MVRM
acknowledges that the inducement provided by this letter is material to AB’s
willingness to enter into the AB Loan Agreement and waives any future challenge
or objection to the enforcement of this letter on the basis of a lack of
consideration or for any other reason.

Sincerely, 

MAVERICK MINERALS CORPORATION 

   

  Robert Kinloch, President
**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION**

**FORM SEF**

**SWAP EXECUTION FACILITY**

**APPLICATION OR AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION**

**COVER SHEET**

****If this is an **APPLICATION** for registration, complete in full and check here.

****If this is an **AMENDMENT** to an application, or to an existing order of registration, list all items that are amended and check here.

See Schedule A (confidential treatment requested)

**GENERAL INFORMATION**

1. Name under which the business of the swap execution facility is or will be conducted, if different than name specified above (include acronyms, if any):

N/A

2. If name of swap execution facility is being amended, state previous swap execution facility name:

N/A

100017098

**Confidential Treatment Requested by GFI Swaps Exchange LLC**

100017098
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14



I, Peter Riehl, the Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company), certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of  a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|               |  |     |                        
|-------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|March 30, 2007 |  | By: | /s/Peter Riehl         
|               |  |     | Peter Riehl            
|               |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
|               |  |     |
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended June
30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.


Date:
      November 22, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Gordon KnottName:
                Gordon
      KnottTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer
 Date:
      November 22, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Sabrina JohnsonName:
                  Sabrina
      JohnsonTitle:
                  Chief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
**Exhibit 13.2**

**MTR Corporation Limited**

**Certification**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Lincoln K.K. Leong, Finance Director of MTR Corporation Limited (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 21, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Emily Figueroa, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Herbert J. Moses, J. at plea; Lyle E. Frank, J. at sentencing), rendered May 2, 2017, convicting her, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree, and sentencing her to three years probation.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Herbert J. Moses, J. at plea; Lyle E. Frank, J. at sentencing), rendered May 2, 2017, affirmed. </p><p>We are unpersuaded that the probationary sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe, and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (<i>see People v Fair</i>, 33 AD3d 558 [2006], <i>lv denied </i>8 NY3d 945 [2007]). Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with her bargained-for plea and should not now "be heard to complain that [s]he received what [s]he bargained for" (<i>id.</i> at 558, quoting <i>People v Chambers</i>, 123 AD2d 270 [1986]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 15, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Fero industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-q for the year ending
september 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Schlosser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/Kyle Schlosser By: Kyle Schlosser Chief Executive Officer  Dated: December 13, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 56. No. 57. No. 58.

#### Stuart et al. *v.*Fox et al.; Same *v.*Minott; and Same *v.*Shwartz et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.

Decided October 19, 1931.

*Messrs. Frank H. Purinton*and *573
      *Jacob H. Berman*for appellants.

*572
      *Per Curiam:*

The appeals herein' are dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (á), Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

*573
      *Mr. Robert Hale*for appellees.

Reported below: 129 Me. 407; 152 Atl. 413.
Exhibit
32.1





CHIMERA
INVESTMENT CORPORATION


1211
AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS


SUITE
2902


NEW YORK,
NEW YORK 10036







CERTIFICATION






PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chimera Investment
Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009 to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Matthew Lambiase, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:




1.
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates of, and for the periods covered by, the
    Report.




It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




/s/ Matthew
Lambiase


Matthew Lambiase


Chief Executive Officer and
President


August 10, 2009








64
Belen Betts, Individually, and 

as Executrix /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2015

No. 04-14-00473-CV

ARC PARKLANE, INC. d/b/a Parklane West Healthcare Center,

Appellant

v.

Belen BETTS, Individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Delbert Betts, Deceased, and 

Shirle Betts, and Dana Gibson,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-10178

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief in this interlocutory appeal was due July 21, 2015, but the court granted 

an extension of time to file the brief. On August 25, the court suspended the appellate deadlines 

so the parties could mediate their dispute. The parties have filed a joint motion requesting 

additional time, stating the mediation has been rescheduled to October 28, 2015.

We grant the motion. We order appellant’s brief or a motion that disposes of this appeal 

in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 is due November 11, 2015. The 

court will not look favorably on any further requests for extensions of time.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.2



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the amended annual report of SITO Mobile, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kurt
Streams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:  July
    1,     2016 |     |                                                                                                   
|--------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     |                                                                                                   
|                            | By: | /s/ Kurt
    Streams                                                                              
|                            |     | Chief
    Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer)