alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J & S TECHNOLOGIES, INC., II
, Appellant,

v.

HABCO ENGINEERS & ERECTORS, INC.
, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4740

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Hon. L. P. Haddock, Judge

. Henry G

. Gyden of Anderson Law Group, Clearwater , for Appellant.

Ryan C

. Wagner of Lawcr aft, Plantation , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Since there remain genuine issues of material fact, as pointed out by

appellant under it s first point on appeal
, we hold the trial court erred in entering

final summary judgment in favor of appellee. For th is reason, we do not reach themerits of appellant’s second point, but
, instead
, remand the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1079

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - EP San Juan - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily EP San Juan published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7981

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LINCOLN MONROE BROCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00429-JAB-1; 1:08-cv-00605-JABDPD)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lincoln Monroe Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lincoln Monroe Brock seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brock has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant 

leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny a 

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 17, 2001, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), BizTech for Energy (“BizTech”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Nexen Petroleum USA, Dallas, TX has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Quillion Inc., Houston, TX; and enertia-software.com, Midland, TX have been dropped as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and BizTech intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On December 22, 2000, BizTech filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13968).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-13858 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Carmen J. Carbona, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 11  th  day of August 2020 .

 

/S/Carmen J. Carbona

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

 Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, in coordination with the Port of Long Beach, has completed a Draft EIS/EIR for the Pier J South Maine Terminal Expansion Project. The Port Long Beach requires authorization pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act and section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors act for 115 acres of landfill in three phases, dredging up to 10,000,000 cubic yards of sediment, construction of a new concrete pile-supported wharf, new terminal buildings and a new rail yard.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions or comments concerning the Draft EIS/EIR should be directed to Dr. Aaron O. Allen, Project Manager, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, California, 90053-2325, (213) 452-3413.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-13665  Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Quantum Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Barry Tenzer, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.           The Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.








Date:
January 20, 2012
By:
/s/ Barry TenzerName: Barry TenzerTitle: President, CEO and CFO(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2010349EN.01001501.xml

| 22.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/15

---

Communication from the Commission on the authority authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010

2010/C 349/06

By Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union L 310 of 26 November 2010, an import tariff quota has been opened for manioc and sweet potatoes.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010 stipulates that entitlement to this quota is conditional on the presentation of a certificate of origin.

The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of origin under this Regulation:

| General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (AQSIQ) |
| --- |
| 9 Madiandonglu |
| Haidian District |
| Beijing 100088 |
| P.R. CHINA |
| Tel. +86-10-822 60139 |
| Fax +86-10-822 60139 |

General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (AQSIQ)

9 Madiandonglu

Haidian District

Beijing 100088

P.R. CHINA

Tel. +86-10-822 60139

Fax +86-10-822 60139

---
#### Cayuga Indian Nation of New York, Respondent, v David S. Gould, Cayuga County Sheriff, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted February 8, 2010;

decided February 11, 2010

Motion by United States of America for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein etc. granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
**CERTIFICATION OF					CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER					AND					CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John J. Sutherland, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cyprium Resources Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|            | (i)        | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |                                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                                         | (ii)                                          | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | */s/ John J. Sutherland          * |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|   | Name:  | John J. Sutherland                                                                   |
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and                                                          |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                              |
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|   | Date:  | November 13, 2007                                                                    |

----
600786783 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

August 29, 2023 

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST 

Submitted via email 

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov 

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for 

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s 

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

Tom Golden 

General Counsel 

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as 

the “Confidential Information.” 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 2 

600786783 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0824-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-0824-0015.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 3 

600786783 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-7331 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4 

600786783 

Annex A 

Confidential Information 

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code 

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0824-0001–BSEF-0824-

0015
| **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT: | **CL** | **1** |
|-----------|--------|-------|

|  | **The          Andersons** |
|--|-----------------------------|

| DATE: |  | 10/24/00 | FR PAGE: |  | N/A | PAGES: | 1 | PDF SIZE: | 11 KB | PDF LINK: | cf0031c0 |
|-------|--|----------|----------|--|-----|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|----------|

|  | **--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last
#### Douglas Warney, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 114826.)

Submitted March 29, 2010;

decided May 11, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for poor person relief granted.
#### Vladimir KESHISHYAN; Karine Sergey Keshishyan, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77426.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*557Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 5, 2008.

Vladimir Keshishyan, Bronson, MO, pro se.

Karine Sergey Keshishyan, Bronson, MO, pro se.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Margaret K. Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Vladimir Keshishyan, a native of Georgia and citizen of Armenia, and Karine Sergey Keshishyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Reyes v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and review for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual findings, *Flores-Chavez v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 1150, 1155 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s findings that petitioners and their attorney both were served with the notice of the changed hearing date and the notice sent to petitioners was not returned as undeliverable; that the petitioners did not keep in contact with their attorney; and that petitioners have not made a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to *Matter of Lozada,*19 I & N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (defining exceptional circumstances as “circumstances ... beyond the control of the alien”); *Reyes,*358 F.3d at 596 (requiring *Lozada*compliance to establish exceptional circumstances due to ineffective assistance of counsel). The BIA therefore did not abuse its discretion by dismissing petitioners’ appeal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:07-cv-05831-WHP Document 3 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cannonau Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Carmen J. Carbona, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 11  th  day of August 2020 .

 

/S/Carmen J. Carbona

Carmen J. Carbona

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cannonau Corp., and will be retained Cannonau Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.