alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment Number 17 to the Product Purchase Agreement - Hewlett-Packard Company



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT 17 

TO THE 

PRODUCT PURCHASE AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT 17 (the “Amendment”) amends that certain Product Purchase Agreement No.1526-0331701 (the “Agreement”) which has an
effective date of December 16, 2002, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company (herein “HP”) and Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and Brocade Communications Switzerland SARL (collectively referred to herein as “Supplier”).

 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, HP and
Supplier have previously entered into the Agreement stated above; 
 WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment is to set forth commercial and other
terms and conditions for OEM Product sold by Supplier and purchased by HP pursuant to the Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, HP and Supplier desire to amend
the Agreement as herein provided; 
 WHEREAS, HP and Supplier previously entered into the Tenth Amendment of the Agreement, which includes
reference to the management of SFPs between HP and Supplier, and; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, HP and Supplier hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The effective date (“Effective Date”) of this Amendment is the last signature date below. 


 

	 	2.	After the first five (5) fiscal quarters of shipments from the clear to ship (CTS) date of [**] and throughout the remaining life cycle of the [**] and any
other[**] product’s, should the percent of HP[**]shipped exceed [**] ([**]%) percent of Supplier [**] shipped through HP, measured quarterly based on a [**] average, Supplier agrees to [**] the [**] to HP should HP so choose, with the [**]
being managed per the model defined and agreed to in Amendment 10 of the Agreement. Once this [**] is hit, this option is in force for the remainder of the Agreement. 


 

	 	3.	During the term of the [**] lifecycle, any additional [**] programs offered by Supplier will be with the option for HP to manage [**] per the model defined and agreed
to in Amendment 10 of the Agreement.

  

	 	4.	Definitions: 

 [**] 

The Agreement continues in full force and effect, and except as may be expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. 

 

					
	BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS INC.	 		  	HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
			
	 /s/ Charles Leeming
	 		  	 /s/ Cliff Henson

	Authorized Representative	 		  	Authorized Representative
			
	 4/6/10
	 		  	 5/21/2010

	Date	 		  	Date
			
	 Charles Leeming
	 		  	 Cliff Henson

	Printed Name	 		  	Printed Name
			
	 VP, OEM Sales
	 		  	 VP, SWD Global SC

	Title	 		  	Title

  

 [**] Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 









	
	 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SWITZERLAND,

SARL.

	
	 /s/ Ulrich Plechschmidt

	Authorized Representative
	
	 20-April-2010

	Date
	
	 Ulrich Plechschmidt

	Printed Name
	
	 Vice President EMEA

	Title


 

 

 April 16, 2010
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6823

JASON ROBERT TWARDZIK , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:19

- hc

- 02269

- FL )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jason Robert Twardzik , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason Robert Twardzik, a state pretrial d etainee , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appeala bility will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould f ind the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive pr ocedural ruling is debatabl e and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Twardzik has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

ar e adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission October 20, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-58

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of October 9, 2023. Effective October 11, 2023, MGEX 

made the following non-substantive Rule corrections. Please note Chapter 85 which governs Bitcoin 

Futures and Chapter 86 which governs TINI Bitcoin Futures are pending implementation in the MGEX 

Rulebook until a product launch date is determined.

• Rules 85.13. and Rule 86.13. were clarified by removing the words “respective,” “or spread,” and 

“only during the regular Hours of Trading.”

• Rules 85.13. and Rule 86.13. incorrectly listed 2:58pm as the Trade at Settlement cutoff and were

corrected to list 3:58pm.

A copy of the current MGEX Rulebook reflecting these changes is available at http://www.mgex.com under 

the “Rules & Regulations” tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at 

(612) 321-7188 or randerson@mgex.com. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan Anderson

Associate Counsel
CERTIFICATION





I, Fred Zolla, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMedicor, Inc;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








IMedicor, Inc.

(Registrant)Date: November 19, 2010
By:
/s/ Fred ZollaFred ZollaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1063

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Waha Fixed v Henry Hub Fixed - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

Platts Inside FERC Henry Hub contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly price 

published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Waha

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Henry Hub

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
# C_2010093EN.01000601.xml

| 13.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 93/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.9.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 338/09 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | Zachodniopomorskie |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | UniCredit Process & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce |
| Legal basis | Projekt umowy ramowej o udzielenie dotacji celowej pomiędzy Ministrem Gospodarki a UniCredit Processes & Administration Socjeta per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce
  Projekt uchwały Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienia programu wieloletniego pod nazwą „Wsparcie finansowe inwestycji realizowanej w Szczecinie przez UniCredit Processes & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce, pod nazwą: Centrum Ekspertyz dla krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w ramach centrum usług wspólnych w latach 2009–2011”
  Artykuł 117 Ustawy z dnia 30 czerwca 2005 r. o finansach publicznych |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Regional development, Employment |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: PLN 2,707 million |
| Intensity | 7,32 % |
| Duration (period) | Until 31.12.2017 |
| Economic sectors | Service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Minister Gospodarki |
| Plac Trzech Krzyży 3/5 |
| 00-507 Warszawa |
| POLSKA/POLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.9.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 338/09

Member State

Poland

Region

Zachodniopomorskie

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

UniCredit Process & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce

Legal basis

Projekt umowy ramowej o udzielenie dotacji celowej pomiędzy Ministrem Gospodarki a UniCredit Processes & Administration Socjeta per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce

Projekt uchwały Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienia programu wieloletniego pod nazwą „Wsparcie finansowe inwestycji realizowanej w Szczecinie przez UniCredit Processes & Administration Societa per Azioni Spółka Akcyjna Oddział w Polsce, pod nazwą: Centrum Ekspertyz dla krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w ramach centrum usług wspólnych w latach 2009–2011”

Artykuł 117 Ustawy z dnia 30 czerwca 2005 r. o finansach publicznych

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Regional development, Employment

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: PLN 2,707 million

Intensity

7,32 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2017

Economic sectors

Service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Minister Gospodarki

Plac Trzech Krzyży 3/5

00-507 Warszawa

POLSKA/POLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O . 03-1996 B OB B Y R. J ONES , A PP EL L ANT ,

V . R

. J A M ES N I C HOL S ON , S EC RE T A RY O F V ET ER A N S A FF A I RS , A PPEL L EE .
Be fore KASOL D, HAGE L , and MOORMAN, J ud ge s. O R D E R On Novembe r 10, 2003, the C ourt rec eived a n untimely

filed Notice of Appe al from the appellant. On Ma

y 20, 2004, the appellant, throug h counsel, filed a mot ion for r econside ration or, in the alternative, for a

panel de cision reg arding a May 14, 2004, nondispositi ve sing le-judg e orde r that direc ted the appe llant t o s u b m i t t o the Court evidenc e, consistent with the " g ener alized standards" outlined in Barrett v. Principi , 363 F.3d 1316 ( Fe d. Cir. 2004), that during the 120-da y judicial-appe al per iod he had a mental i llness of sufficient sever ity to war rant equitable tolling base d on mental incapa city

. On November 19, 2004, the Court de nied the motion for rec onsideration and order ed the ap p el l ant to submit any evidenc e of e ntitlement to equitable tolling on the g rounds of me nta l in c a

pa c ity . T he a

pp e lla nt ap pe a le d the Court ' s ord e r to the Un ite d Stat e s Cour t of App e a ls for the F eder al Circuit (F eder al C ircuit). On December 14, 2005, the Feder al Circuit dismiss ed the appellant' s appea l for lac k of jurisdiction. See Jones v. Nicholson , 431 F.3d 1353 ( Fe d. Cir. 2005). On M ar ch 1 0 , 2006, the Court order ed the a ppellant, within 30 day s after the date of

that order , to file his response to the C ourt' s November 2004 order . On April 13, 2006, the Court denie d the appellant' s motion to stay proce eding s pending the outcome of Barrett v. Principi , No. 02-2382, 2004 WL 1660393 (Ve t. App. J uly 16, 2004), appeal dock

eted , No. 05- 7 1 1 3 (F ed. Cir. Fe b. 28, 2005). On Ap ri l 28, 2006, the Court rec eived a letter fr om the appellant, dated April 26, 2006, stating tha t he had nothing further to offer

. Up on c on sid e ratio n o f t

he fo re g oin g , it

is2

ORDERED that this appea l is DI SMI SSED for lack of jurisdiction. DA TE D: June 9, 20 06 PER CU RI AM

. Copies to: Mark R. L ippman, Esq. VA Ge nera l Counsel (027)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.





Date:
      May 20, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Gordon KnottName:
              Gordon
      KnottTitle:
              Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      May 20, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Douglas E. WellsName:
              Douglas
      E. WellsTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIE LEE McGEE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4167 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 1, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Brian A. Iten, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON,JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Speedemissions, Inc.

1015 Tyrone
Road, Suite 220

Tyrone, Georgia 30290

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 No. 333-130199, No. 333-153428, and No. 333-153431 of our report dated March 31, 2011, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Speedemissions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) appearing in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP                            
|Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP Atlanta, Georgia March 31, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00458

- CV

Axelle Francine PARKER

, Appellant

v.

William A. PARKER II,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI15237

Honorable Karen H. Pozza , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant Axelle Franc ine Parker.

SIGNED January 20, 2021.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Shai Meretzki, Chief Executive Officer, and Yossi Keret, Chief Financial Officer of Pluristem Life Systems, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Pluristem Life Systems, Inc. for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pluristem Life Systems, Inc.

 

By: /s/ Shai Meretzki

Shai Meretzki

Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  September 23, 2005

 

By: /s/ Yossi Keret

Yossi Keret

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 23, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pluristem Life Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Pluristem Life Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.