alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CF 2002

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q for RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane Fund Management Corporation, the general partner of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP, that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP, for the period in question.
| Date:  November 16, 2009 |   | By:   /s/   Robert L.                        Lerner                                                       

President, Principal Executive Officer and                        Principal Financial Officer

Ruvane Fund Management Corporationthe general partner of RFMC Global Directional Fund, LP |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,254,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,113,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,520)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,121,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,600,072
<PP&E>                                       1,336,398
<DEPRECIATION>                               (551,492)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,220,648                              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,561,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,453,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,220,648
<SALES>                                      7,234,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,530,623
<CGS>                                        4,172,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,366,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,907)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,032,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (725,024)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,307,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,307,057)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)
        


</TABLE>
#### SHI TUNG YAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74357.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 16, 2006.

J. Manuel Sanchez, Esq., J. Manuel Sanchez & Associates, San Ysidro, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department Of Justice Civil Div./Office Of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shi Tung Yan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on newly discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *see de Martinez v. Ashcroft,*374 F.3d 759, 761 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Yan’s motion to reopen. The evidence he submitted did not address the agency’s adverse credibility finding. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of United Refining Energy Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30,
2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                          |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|                        |  |    
|Dated: January 25, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis       
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                        |  |    
|Dated: January 25, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy     
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | James E. Murphy            
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of this Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United Refining Energy Corp. and will be retained by United Refining Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lonnie R. Meckwood, Appellant.

Submitted December 19, 2011;

decided January 5, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 865.

*867Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Brent R. Stack, Esq., care of Fitzsimmons, Mack & Mills, P.C., 3223 Church Street, PO Box 811, Valatie, New York 12184 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        3,761,301
<SECURITIES>                                 64,125,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    55,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             96,199,891
<PP&E>                                       18,970,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,747,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              121,725,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        20,728,119
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          10
<COMMON>                                        103,952
<OTHER-SE>                                   97,666,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                121,725,931
<SALES>                                       6,983,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              7,396,996
<CGS>                                         4,867,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,015,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             26,180,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,948,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (36,191,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (36,191,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                               (36,191,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.64)


</TABLE>
# C_2011107EN.01007401.xml

| 6.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/74

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors’ (Codification)

COM(2010) 717 final — 2010/0348 (COD)

2011/C 107/17

On 17 January 2011, the Council and, on 16 December 2010, the European Parliament, decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

COM(2010) 717 final — 2010/0348 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 469th plenary session of 16 and 17 February 2011 (meeting of 16 February), by 114 votes with four abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 16 February 2011.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1122

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Waha - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Platts Inside FERC for 

the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Waha

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Maurice McNALLY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7141.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.

Joseph Bradley Bennett, Salvini & Bennett, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrence Maurice McNally seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). *832When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNally has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Videonics,  Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-06665 and 333-21003)  of our report
dated January 31, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements
and financial  statement  schedule of  Videonics,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995,  and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                       /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.






San Jose, California
March 18, 1997
# C_2020054EN.01000701.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Gerona — Spain) — WA v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social

(Case C-450/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 79/7/EEC - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Article 4(1) and (2) - Article 7(1) - Calculation of benefits - Directive 2006/54/EC - Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation - National legislation granting a right to a pension supplement for women who have had at least two biological or adopted children, and who are in receipt of a contributory permanent incapacity pension - Same right not granted to men in an identical situation - Comparable situation - Direct discrimination on grounds of sex - No exceptions)

(2020/C 54/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Gerona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: WA

Defendant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes provision for the right to a pension supplement for women who have had at least two biological or adopted children and who are in receipt of contributory permanent incapacity pensions under a scheme within the national social security system, while men in an identical situation do not have a right to such a pension supplement.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
August 5, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE LISA MICHELLE ESTRADA

NO. 14-12-00797-CR 

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of 

appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.02    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Fero Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leigh-Ann Squire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Leigh-Ann Squire By: Leigh-Ann Squire Chief Financial Officer  Dated: March 9, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Xiao Qing Liu, Appellant, v Richline Group/Bel-Oro et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted January 11, 2010;

decided February 16, 2010

Motion for reargument denied *[see*13 NY3d 880 (2009)]. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
# C_2020045EN.01001101.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/11

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Aulnay-sous-Bois — France) — LC, MD v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

(Case C-756/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 99 - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Long delay of a flight - Passengers’ right to compensation - Proof of the passenger’s presence for check-in - Reservation confirmed by the air carrier)

(2020/C 45/07)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance d’Aulnay-sous-Bois

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LC, MD

Defendants: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of du 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 and, in particular, Article 3(2)(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that passengers on a flight with a delay of 3 hours or more on arrival who have a confirmed reservation on that flight cannot be denied compensation under that regulation solely on the ground that, upon claiming compensation, they failed to prove that they were present for check-in for that flight, in particular by means of a boarding card, unless it can be established that those passengers were not transported on the delayed flight at issue, which is matter for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Hylas Deangelo Polk, Appellant

No. 06-13-00161-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 203rd District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F-11-

51317-P). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that Polk 

pled not guilty to the offense of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, to reflect that Polk 

was convicted by a jury, and to reflect Polk’s plea of true and the trial court’s finding of true to 

the State’s enhancement allegation. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Hylas Deangelo Polk, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0493

_________________ J & L LANDS, LP, a Montana Limited Partnership, Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. JERRY W. NEZAT,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

________ _________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Dan Wilson , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2022

04/13/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0493