alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010323EN.01001901.xml

| 30.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/19 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of International Insurance Corporation (IIC) NV

(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings and article 213h Dutch Bankruptcy Act)

2010/C 323/07

| Insurance undertaking | International Insurance Corporation (IIC) NV (acting as INEAS and LadyCarOnline) Entrada 123 1096 EB Amsterdam NEDERLAND | International Insurance Corporation (IIC) NV (acting as INEAS and LadyCarOnline) | Entrada 123 | 1096 EB Amsterdam | NEDERLAND |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------- |
| International Insurance Corporation (IIC) NV (acting as INEAS and LadyCarOnline) | | | | | |
| Entrada 123 | | | | | |
| 1096 EB Amsterdam | | | | | |
| NEDERLAND | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | 20 October 2010, 20 October 2010 declaration of bankruptcy | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Court of Amsterdam | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Supervisory judge M.J.E. Geradts | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | M. Pannevis Amstelveenseweg 638 1081 JJ Amsterdam (bankruptcy trustee) NEDERLAND | M. Pannevis | Amstelveenseweg 638 | 1081 JJ Amsterdam (bankruptcy trustee) | NEDERLAND |
| M. Pannevis | | | | | |
| Amstelveenseweg 638 | | | | | |
| 1081 JJ Amsterdam (bankruptcy trustee) | | | | | |
| NEDERLAND | | | | | |
| Applicable law | Netherlands law (Dutch Bankruptcy Act) | | | | |

---
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1007 

Commending the University of Alabama for winning the Bowl Championship 

Series National Championship Game. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2010 

Mr. BACHUS (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. BONNER, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BRIGHT, and Mr. ROGERS of Alabama) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Alabama for winning the Bowl 

Championship Series National Championship Game. 

Whereas, on January 7, 2010, the University of Alabama 

Crimson Tide defeated the University of Texas 

Longhorns, 37–21, in the Bowl Championship Series 

(BCS) National Championship Game in Pasadena, California; 

Whereas the University of Alabama located in Tuscaloosa, 

Alabama, has become one of the premier athletic and 

academic institutions in the country; 

Whereas the University of Alabama has been the Southeastern Conference (SEC) Football Champion a recordsetting 22 times; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1007 IH 

Whereas the University of Alabama has made an NCAArecord 57 bowl appearances; 

Whereas the Crimson Tide players won many individual accomplishments throughout the season including, Mark 

Ingram as the first player from the University of Alabama to win the Heisman Trophy, Rolando McClain as 

the Butkus Award Winner, and 6 players selected as Associated Press First Team All Americans; 

Whereas Mark Ingram rushed for 116 yards and 2 touchdowns to be named the Offensive Most Valuable Player 

of the BCS National Championship Game; 

Whereas Marcell Dareus returned an interception for a 

touchdown and was named the Defensive Most Valuable 

Player of the BCS National Championship Game; 

Whereas the Crimson Tide defense held the University of 

Texas to 276 offensive yards and forced 5 turnovers during the BCS National Championship Game; 

Whereas Nick Saban in his third year as head coach led the 

University of Alabama to its first National Championship 

since 1992; and 

Whereas residents of Alabama and Crimson Tide fans worldwide are to be commended for their longstanding support, 

perseverance, and pride in the team: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the University of Alabama for 

3 winning the Bowl Championship Series National 

4 Championship; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1007 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

2 coaches, students, and support staff who were in3 strumental in the victory; and 

4 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent5 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to Uni6 versity of Alabama President Dr. Robert E. Witt 

7 and head coach Nick Saban for appropriate display. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Step-Murphy, LLC, et al., Respondents, v B&B Brothers Real Estate Corp., Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 533]—

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that a portion of certain real property owned by the defendant is subject to an easement benefitting adjacent real property owned by the plaintiff Step-Murphy, LLC, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered October 5, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel it to execute an easement for recording.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision directing that the easement to be recorded shall recognize and include the terms of a certain letter agreement between Kear Street Properties, Inc., and Markatos Realtors, Inc., dated October 16, 1998, amending the indenture between Brookside Park Properties, Inc., and Markatos Realtors, Inc., dated May 7, 1986, which created the easement; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

*846In a companion appeal (see *Step-Murphy, LLC v B&B Bros. Real Estate Corp.,*60 AD 3d 841 [decided herewith]), we hold that the Supreme Court correctly determined that in 1986 the parties’ predecessors in interest executed an indenture providing that a portion of what is now the defendant’s real property is subject to an easement benefitting adjacent real property now owned by the plaintiff Step-Murphy, LLC, permitting that plaintiff to use that portion of the property for 12 parking spaces. In our decision and order on the companion appeal, we further hold that the parties’ predecessors in interest had modified the indenture in 1998 pursuant to a letter agreement (hereinafter the 1998 agreement) to require the defendant and its predecessors to maintain and remove snow from those 12 parking spaces and a nearby staircase in return for the payment by the plaintiff of a specified sum.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant was required to execute an easement for recording. In light of our determination in the companion appeal, the easement to be recorded must include the terms of the 1998 agreement.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2325 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2325

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2019

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 100 Calle Alondra in San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ``65th Infantry 
                    Regiment Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 65TH INFANTRY REGIMENT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Calle Alondra in San Juan, Puerto Rico, shall be known 
and designated as the ``65th Infantry Regiment Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``65th 
Infantry Regiment Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Victor C. FOURSTAR, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricardo MARTINEZ, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-30510

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 2013.

Victor C. Fourstar, Jr., Tucson, AZ, pro se.

*495Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Victor Fourstar, Jr., federal prisoner # 07418-046, appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged (1) the validity of his 2002 conviction of, and 188-month sentence for, aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a) and (2) the use of an underlying state-court conviction to enhance that sentence. We review *de novo*the district court’s determinations that Fourstar’s claims arose under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and that he had not met the requirements to proceed with a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e). *Padilla v. United States,*416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir.2005).

If his brief is liberally construed, Fours-tar appears to argue, for the first time, that his § 2241 petition falls within the savings clause based on *Bailey v. United States,*516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Because the argument is raised for the first time on appeal, we will not consider it. *See Wilson v. Roy,*643 F.3d 433, 435 n. 1 (5th Cir.2011). Even if we were to consider the newly raised argument, Fourstar cannot rely on *Bailey*to satisfy the savings clause because *Bailey*involved a firearms offense, not a sexual abuse offense, and was decided in 1995, well before Fourstar’s 2002 conviction. Thus, Fourstar has failed to meet the actual-innocence and retroactivity requirements of the savings clause. *See Bailey,*516 U.S. at 143, 116 S.Ct. 501; *see also Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 900-01, 903-04 (5th Cir.2001).

The instant appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Additionally, because Fourstar’s § 2241 petition is repetitive of earlier filings, he is cautioned that the filing of future frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive challenges to his conviction or sentence will invite the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1009 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1009

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 20, 2010.
Whereas the men and women of the Central Intelligence Agency are dedicated 
        professionals who work tirelessly to protect the United States;
Whereas many of the individuals serving the Central Intelligence Agency do so 
        under harsh conditions, far from home, and on the front lines of the 
        battle against terrorists;
Whereas these public servants face great risks in the line of duty on a daily 
        basis;
Whereas seven Americans in the service of the Central Intelligence Agency gave 
        their lives for their country in a bombing that took place in Khost, 
        Afghanistan, on December 30, 2009;
Whereas six additional Americans were wounded in the attack, some of them 
        suffering serious injuries;
Whereas the loss of these highly trained counterterrorism experts will be deeply 
        felt throughout the Intelligence Community; and
Whereas the entire Nation owes an enormous debt of gratitude to these proud 
        Americans, their families, and their loved ones for the quiet, 
        dedicated, and vital service they offered to the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the seven Americans who died in the bombing that took 
        place in Khost, Afghanistan, on December 30, 2009, and the families of 
        those patriots for their service and their sacrifice for the United 
        States;
            (2) expresses condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones 
        of those killed in the bombing;
            (3) offers support and hope for a full recovery for those who were 
        wounded in the bombing; and
            (4) shares in the pain and grief felt in the aftermath of such a 
        tragic event.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|                                    |  |                                            |  |                         
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Name                                |  | Ownership                                  |  | State of
  Incorporation
|                                    |  |                                            |  |                         
|Western
  Telephone Company         |  | 100%                                       |  | Minnesota               
|Peoples
  Telephone Company         |  | 100%                                       |  | Iowa                    
|New Ulm
  Phonery, Inc.             |  | 100%                                       |  | Minnesota               
|New Ulm
  Cellular #9, Inc.         |  | 100%                                       |  | Minnesota               
|New Ulm Long
  Distance, Inc.       |  | 100%                                       |  | Minnesota               
|Hector
  Communications Corporation |  | 33.3%                                      |  | Minnesota               
|Hutchinson
  Telephone Company      |  | 100%                                       |  | Minnesota               
|Hutchinson Telecommunication, Inc.  |  | 100% owned by Hutchinson Telephone Company |  | Minnesota               

The financial statements of all subsidiaries, other that Hutchinson Telephone Company (and its
subsidiary Hutchinson Telecommunication, Inc.) which was acquired on January 4, 2008, are included on the consolidated financial
statements of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. in this Form 10-K.

86

---
Case 1:05-cv-07117-VM Document 5 Filed 09/14/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-07117-VM Document 5 Filed 09/14/2005 Page 2 of 2
# CE2013168EN.01015201.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 168/152 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 168/152

---

Wednesday 14 December 2011Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance ***I

P7_TA(2011)0566

European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) (COM(2011)0446 – C7-0208/2011 – 2011/0193(COD))

2013/C 168 E/39

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2011)0446), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2011)0446),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 212(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0208/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 212(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0208/2011),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0397/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0397/2011),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

Wednesday 14 December 2011P7_TC1-COD(2011)0193

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 14 December 2011 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No .../2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 153/2012).

---
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 31, 2006

---

DOTRONIX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

|0-9996                   | 41-1387074                       
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------
|(Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.)



P.O. Box 677

Schofield, WI 54476

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(715-359-6373)

(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

160 First Street S.E., New Brighton, MN 55112

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

|o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)                 
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |                                                                                                       
|o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)                
|  |                                                                                                       
|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|  |                                                                                                       
|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---

Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On July 28, 2006, Dotronix, Inc. (the Company) completed the sale of 761,666 shares of common stock at a price of $0.60 per share, or a total of $456,999.60 to a group of eight accredited investors without any general solicitations. Total commissions due were $45,699.96. The shares were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





|              |  | Dotronix, Inc.
|------------- |  | --------------
|July 31, 2006 |  | By:           
|              |  |               

---
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Robert A. BOYER, Sr. Robert Arnold Boyer, Sr, Appellant.

No. 05-2582.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)—March 28, 2006.

Filed June 7, 2006.

Adam G. Safwat, Office of United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE, for Appellee.

Charles M. Oberly, III, Oberly, Jennings & Rhodunda, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.

Before: McKEE and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Louis H. Poliak, District Judge for the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

OPINION

POLLAK, District Judge:

Defendant-appellant Robert Arnold Boyer appeals the sentence that was imposed on May 2, 2005, after he pled guilty to knowingly embezzling $358,636.30 from the employee profit-sharing plan of the construction/excavation business he operated. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, *173744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Defense counsel’s brief asserts that he has carefully reviewed the record and found no non-frivolous issues for appeal in this case. Accordingly, defense counsel requests permission to withdraw.1 Our review of the record confirms counsel’s assessment that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw will be granted.

Because we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with this case, we need not set forth the full factual or procedural history of this appeal. Mr. Boyer entered a guilty plea on January 4, 2005, admitting guilt with respect to all six counts of an indictment charging him with knowingly embezzling money and assets belonging to the R.A. Boyer, Inc. employee profit-sharing plan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664. Mr. Boyer was sentenced to twenty-seven months imprisonment in May 2005.

The record indicates that Mr. Boyer’s guilty plea was properly accepted by the court, and that the sentence imposed was within the range recommended by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and in accord with *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court acknowledged the advisory nature of the Guidelines, and imposed its sentence “for reasons that were logical and consistent with the factors set forth in [ 18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a).” *United States v. Cooper,*437 F.3d 324, 326-27 (2006) (citing *United States v. Williams*425 F.3d 478, 481 (7th Cir.2005)). Defense counsel’s objection to a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice was properly denied.

Since there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal, the judgment of conviction filed May 2, 2005 will be affirmed, and counsel will be granted leave to withdraw.

1

. Defense counsel states that — by letters dated May 9, 2005 and June 20, 2004- — he advised Mr. Boyer that he saw no non-frivolous issues for appeal and intended to withdraw. Defense counsel also states that Mr. Boyer has not responded.