alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 13, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Raymond and Ruth Schnake, St. Peter, Illinois; to retain voting 
shares of St. Peter Bancshares, Inc., St. Peter, Illinois, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of First State Bank of St. Peter, St. 
Peter, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 24, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13559 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2382 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2382

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that 
the United States Postal Service prepay future retirement benefits, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USPS Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIRED PREPAYMENT OF FUTURE POSTAL SERVICE 
              RETIREMENT BENEFITS.

    Subsection (d) of section 8909a of title 5, United States Code, is 
repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy W Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers of the Fund hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY W FUND, LLCDated:
            November
      9, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            November
      9, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy W Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy W Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 10.2**

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**PEPLIN, INC. 2007 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN**

This Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Peplin, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”) was adopted byPeplin, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on October 5, 2008. 

RECITALS 

A. The Board of Directors of the Company deemed it advisable to amend the 2007 Plan. 

B. Pursuant to Section 11.2 of the 2007 Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company has the authority to amend the 2007 Plan, subject to certainlimitations. 

AMENDMENT 

1. Subject to stockholder approval, Section 2.1(a) of the 2007 Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(a)Subject to Section 11.3 and Section 2.1(b), the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be equal to two million five hundred thousand(2,500,000) shares.” 

2. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribedthereto in the 2007 Plan. 

3. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment, the 2007 Plan remains in full force and effect inaccordance with its terms. 

4. This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with theinternal laws, and not the laws relating to conflicts or choice of laws, of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within the State of Delaware. 

I hereby certify that this Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Peplin, Inc. on October 5, 2008. 

Executed this 25th day of November, 2008.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6548

JONATHAN HENSLEE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00048-GCM)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Henslee, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Henslee seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Henslee has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Henslee’s motions for discovery and to compel, and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 14


                            HOSTING SITE NETWORK INC.

                                 CODE OF ETHICS

                                       FOR

       CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CHIEF ACCOUNTING
         OFFICER OR CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING SIMILAR FUNCTIONS

GENERAL PHILOSOPHY

The  honesty,  integrity  and sound  judgment  of Hosting  Site  Network  Inc.'s
("Hosting" or the "Company") Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Accounting Officer
or  Controller  and  persons  performing  similar  functions  (collectively  the
"Principal  Officers")  is  fundamental  to  our  reputation  and  success.  The
professional  and ethical conduct of the Principal  Officers is essential to the
proper functioning and success of Hosting.

APPLICABILITY

This Code of Ethics shall apply to Hosting's Principal Officers.

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT

To the best of their knowledge and ability, the Principal Officers shall:

      o     act with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of
            actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
            professional relationships;

      o     provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure
            in reports and documents that Hosting files with, or submits to, the
            Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") and in other
            public communications made by Hosting;

      o     comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

      o     promote the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of
            Ethics to Hosting's board of directors and outside legal counsel;

      o     respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
            employment;

      o     maintain the skills necessary and relevant to Hosting's needs; and

      o     proactively promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of
            Hosting and its subsidiaries.

All Principal Officers are expected to adhere to the Hosting Code of Ethics. Any
violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to appropriate  discipline,  up
to and including  dismissal from the Company and prosecution  under the law. The
board of directors shall have  responsibility for administration of this Code of
Ethics and shall have the sole and absolute  discretionary  authority to approve
any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics for Principal Officers.  In the
event that a waiver of,  modification of and/or change to this Code of Ethics is
approved and granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification, and/or change
shall be  disclosed as may be required by SEC rules or the rules of any exchange
on which the securities of the Company are then trading.
<Page>


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 30 to Registration Statement No. 033-19421 of Variable Account D of Union
Security Insurance Company (formerly Fortis Benefits Insurance Company), on
Form N-4, of our report dated February 24, 2005, relating to the statements
of assets and liabilities of Variable Account D as of December 31, 2004, and
the related statements of operations for the year then ended and the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 21, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WiTel, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Tsitron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 23, 2009                                                  | By:  /s/ Gary Tsitron
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|Gary Tsitron                                                             
|Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

In accordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad Retirement Board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such Section 3221(c) on every employer, with respect to having individuals in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is paid by such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter beginning July 1, 2001, shall be at the rate of 26 cents.

In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined that for the quarter beginning July 1, 2001, 38.6 percent of the taxes collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account and 61.4 percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Supplemental Account.

Dated: May 24, 2001.

By Authority of the Board.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-13766  Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Carl Russo, Chief Executive Officer of Calix, Inc. (the Company), and Michael Ashby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th, day of April, 2011.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Carl Russo         
|Carl Russo             
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Michael Ashby      
|Michael Ashby          
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Calix, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Scott R. JensenScott R. JensenChief Financial Officer 1
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-393-CR

DEION SHARRA GABRIEL APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 362 DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ND

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Withdrawal Of Notice Of Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 18, 2008
Exhibit 7.1

MTR Corporation Limited

Computation of

Ratio of Debt to Shareholders Equity(2)

Based on Hong Kong GAAP

(Expressed in millions of HK$)



|                                                                |  |                      |  |        |  |        |  |        |  |       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------ |  | ------ |  | ------
|                                                                |  | As of December 31(1)
|                                                                |  | 2001                 |  | 2002   |  | 2003   |  | 2004   |  | 2005  
|Loans, obligations under finance leases and bank overdrafts (A) |  | 31,385               |  | 33,508 |  | 32,025 |  | 30,378 |  | 28,264
|Shareholders Equity(2)(B)                                      |  | 50,130               |  | 52,453 |  | 56,123 |  | 61,892 |  | 69,875
|Ratio of Debt to Shareholders Equity(2)(A)/(B)                 |  | 0.63                 |  | 0.64   |  | 0.57   |  | 0.49   |  | 0.40  

---

|(1) | Due to the retrospective adoption of certain new HKFRS, restatement of the 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 financial data was necessary. See Note 3 of Notes to the Financial Statements.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The amount represents total equity attributable to equity shareholders of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------