alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Additions to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add to the Procurement List 
services to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: July 2, 2001.

ADDRESS: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick T. Mooney (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible 
impact of the proposed actions.
    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List. Comments on this certification are invited. 
Commenters should identify the statement(s) underlying the 
certification on which they are providing additional information.
    The following services have been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Services

Janitorial/Custodial
    U.S. Army Reserve Center, Bullville, Route 17K, Bullville, New 
York
    NPA: Occupations, Inc., Middletown, New York
Mailroom Operation
    Department of Health and Human Services, Program Support Center 
Headquarters, Dallas, Texas
    NPA: Dallas Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc., Dallas, Texas

Louis R. Bartalot,
Director, Program Analysis and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 01-13818 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00048-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.M., A 

CHILD

----------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 324-560679-14

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant J.D.R. attempts to appeal from the trial court’s “Default Order 

Establishing the Parent-Child Relationship.” The trial court signed the order on 

January 12, 2015, but J.D.R. did not file his notice of appeal until February 13, 

2015, several days late.

2

 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

J.D.R. filed a motion for new trial, but it too was late; therefore, it did not 

extend the time to file the notice of appeal. See Florence v. Shelly, No. 01-13-

00730-CV, 2014 WL 1678913, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 24, 

2014, no pet.) (mem. op.).
2

be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed). Because J.D.R.’s late 

notice of appeal was filed within fifteen days after its due date, we notified him 

that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a 

response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of 

appeal, the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). We have not 

received a response. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10.4
                                                                    ------------


                             CITYFED FINANCIAL CORP.

                                      PROXY

                                 AUGUST 15, 2005


The undersigned hereby appoints Stephen L. Ranzini proxy, with full power of
substitution, to vote all shares of stock (the "Shares") of CityFed Financial
Corp. (the "Company") which the undersigned is entitled to vote at any annual or
special meeting of stockholders of the Company or pursuant to any consent by
stockholders in lieu of an annual or special meeting, in each case until the
expiration of this proxy, subject to the following conditions:

     1. This proxy is granted solely with respect to matters required to be
taken to effect a reorganization of the Company.

     2. On each matter for which the Shares are voted pursuant to this proxy,
Mr. Ranzini shall vote the shares consistent with the vote cast by the majority
of remaining outstanding shares of voting stock of the Company on such matter.

This proxy shall expire and be of no further force and effect on September 30,
2006.



                                          Signature: /s/ John W. Atherton, Jr.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John W. Atherton, Jr.

                                          Date: August 22, 2005
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST

2003 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN




     WHEREAS, by resolution at a meeting of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of First Potomac
Realty Trust (the “Company”) on February 11, 2005, the Board unanimously approved adoption of this
amendment (the “Amendment”) to the First Potomac Realty Trust 2003 Equity Compensation Plan (the
“Plan”), subject to shareholder approval, for the purpose of increasing the total number of shares
reserved for issuance under the plan by 650,000 shares;



     WHEREAS, the Amendment was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company held on May 20, 2005;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1.      Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced in its stead with
the following new Section 3(a) in order to increase the total number of shares reserved for
issuance under the Plan by 650,000 shares:



     “3. Shares Subject to the Plan


Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described below, the aggregate number of
common shares of beneficial interest, $0.001 par value, of the Trust (“Common Shares”) that may be
issued or transferred under the Plan is 1,560,800 Common Shares; provided, however, that no more
than 18.2% of the Common Shares shall be available for issuance as Share Awards. The maximum
aggregate number of Common Shares that shall be subject to Grants made under the Plan to any
individual during any calendar year shall be 400,000 Common Shares, subject to adjustment as
described below. The Common Shares may be authorized but unissued Common Shares or reacquired
Common Shares, including Common Shares purchased by the Trust on the open market for purposes of
the Plan. If and to the extent Options or SARs granted under the Plan terminate, expire, or are
canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised or if any Share Awards,
Performance Units or Equity Awards (including restricted Share Awards received upon the exercise of
Options) are forfeited, the Common Shares subject to such Grants shall again be available for
purposes of the Plan.”




     2.      Except to the extent hereby amended, the Plan remains unchanged and shall continue in full
force and effect.



     3.     The effective date of this Amendment is May 20, 2005.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gérard Lamarche, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUEZ;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

[Reserved];

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and;

5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 26, 2006

| |  | /s/ Gérard Lamarche                    
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | Gérard Lamarche
Chief Financial Officer
**Form SEF: Exhibit E**

Exhibit E-Page 1

101650984
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marquise Murphy, Appellant.

Submitted January 19, 2010;

decided April 1, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that defendant is not available to obey the mandate of the Court of Appeals.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2163SI

_____________

IBP, Inc., *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

John E. Allis, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 10, 1999

Filed: February 18, 1999 

_____________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

IBP, Inc. appeals from the denial of IBP's request for a preliminary injunction

in this diversity-based dispute about the enforceability of a non-compete provision

in an employment agreement between IBP and John E. Allis. Having considered the

record and the parties' arguments, we are satisfied the district court appropriately

considered the factors enumerated in Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d

109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc), and did not abuse its discretion in denying the

requested injunction. Because the parties' submissions show they are thoroughly

familiar with the issues before the court, we believe an extensive discussion about a

non-compete provision that is unique to these parties would serve no useful
2–

precedential purpose. Having rejected IBP's contentions of reversible error, we affirm

without further discussion and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1107

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Socal Citygate - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily Socal Citygate published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
DIONTE STALLWORTH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0843

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed August 25, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

.

Dionte Stallworth, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorn ey

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1062

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Waha - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Waha

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 955 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 955

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ``John 
                       `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN ``BUD'' HAWK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, shall 
be known and designated as the ``John `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John `Bud' 
Hawk Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 955

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ``John 
                       `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.
```
Liability Limitation Agreement (for Outside Corporate Auditors)



 Exhibit 4.2 

Liability Limitation Agreement 

NKSJ Holdings, Inc (“NKSJ Holdings”) and its Outside Corporate Auditor (the “ Outside Corporate Auditor ”) (see
*Note below) agree as follows in accord with Paragraph 1 of Article 427 of the Companies Act and NKSJ Holdings’ articles of incorporation. 

Section 1. Limitation of Liability 

If the Outside Corporate Auditor acts in good faith and is not grossly negligent in performing his/her duties, the Company and the Outside
Corporate Auditor agree that the Outside Corporate Auditor’s liability under Paragraph 1 of Article 423 of the Companies Act (the “Liability”) is limited to the minimum liability amount specified in Paragraph 1 of Article 425 of the
Companies Act. 
 Section 2. Procedure for Limitation of Liability 

If any Liability arises from the Outside Corporate Auditor’s performance his/her duties, the Company shall determine whether to limit
the Liability under the preceding Section 1 and promptly notify the Outside Corporate Auditor of the decision. 
 Section 3.
Limitation of Benefits 
 If the Company decides to limit the Liability, it will not thereafter give to the Outside Corporate
Auditor any property benefits provided in Paragraph 4 of Article 425 of the Companies Act without obtaining the approval of the Company’s shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting. 

Section 4. Termination of Agreement 

This agreement terminates if: 
  

	 	(1)	the Outside Corporate Auditor retires from office due to non-reappointment; 


 

	 	(2)	the Outside Corporate Auditor takes a position as executive director, officer, or manager or other employee of the Company or its subsidiaries; or


  

	 	(3)	the Company and the Outside Corporate Auditor enter into a separate liability limitation agreement with each other. 


Section 5. Consultation 

Matters not provided for in this Agreement shall be determined through consultation between the Company and the Outside Corporate Auditor.

 The parties are signing and sealing this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each of the parties.

 April 1, 2010 
 NKSJ Holdings,
Inc. 
 26-1 Nishi-Shinjuku 1-chome, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 

By: /s/ Masatoshi Sato 
 Name: Masatoshi
Sato 
 Title: Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer 

*Note: The Company has entered into Liability Limitation Agreements with the Outside Corporate Auditors listed below. 

By: /s/ Koichi Masuda, Makiko Yasuda, Motoyoshi Nishikawa 

Name: Koichi Masuda, Makiko Yasuda, Motoyoshi Nishikawa
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meridian Acquisition Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicholas Lahanas, Chief Financial Officer of Meridian Acquisition Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Nicholas LahanasNicholas Lahanas, Chief Financial Officer February 14, 2008