alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Brittany Annette M., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Danielle McC., Appellant; Episcopal Social Services, Respondent.

Submitted November 28, 2011;

decided January 12, 2012

Reported below, 88 AD3d 466.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Eric KHOUNLO, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE CREDIT; R. Steven Brubaker, Appellees.

No. 09-3085.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 4, 2010.

Filed: June 9, 2010.

Erie Khounlo, Des Moines, IA, pro se.

Frank Boyd Harty, Debra Lynne Hu-lett, Nyemaster & Goode, argued, Des Moines, IA, for Appellees.

*573Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eric Khounlo appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se employment-discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Khounlo’s appeal must be dismissed: his brief does not identify any alleged error by the district court or provide a relevant statement of issues or facts, and therefore it presents nothing for our review. *See Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr.,*87 F.3d 1025, 1026 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (dismissing pro se appeal where brief did not present statement of issues or identify any basis for alleged error). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we also deny the pending motion to strike as moot.

1

. The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 10.4(b)


                Schedule of Warrants (new refinancing) Issued by
              NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on October 14, 2005


                         Expiration           Exercise           Shares
       Grant Date            Date               Price            Granted
       ----------       ------------         ----------        -----------
        10/14/05          10/14/10            $ 0.0049           16,500,000
        10/14/05          10/14/10            $ 0.0049           10,000,000
LOAN AGREEMENT
 SN Kosan Ltd. Borrower NIDEC CORPORATION Lender Agreement
 Article 1
  Article 2
 1.
    
    The repayment deadline shall be full five years after the loan execution date.2.
    
    The Borrower may, from time to time, make repayment(s) prior to the repayment deadline, and
shall make full repayment before the repayment deadline.3.
    
    Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if any outstanding debt remains at the repayment
deadline, the Borrower shall repay the Lender at once any remaining amount at the repayment
deadline.
 Article 3
  Article 4
 1.
    
    In the event any of the following events becomes applicable to the Borrower, even if there is
no demand notice from the Lender, the Borrowers obligation shall automatically become due and
payable, and the Borrower shall immediately pay the principle and the interest:
 (1)
    
    if the Borrower once fails to pay any interest provided in Article 3;(2)
    
    if the Borrower is subject to any provisional seizure, provisional
disposition or compulsory execution in regard to other debts;(3)
    
    if the Borrower dishonors any bill or becomes insolvent;(4)
    
    if the Borrower files or has filed against it an application for
bankruptcy, civil rehabilitation, corporate reorganization and the like;(5)
    
    if the Borrower undergoes dissolution, merger, corporate split or if
there is any material change in the shareholder composition in the Borrower;(6)
    
    if the Lender judges there is any deterioration (or any fear of
deterioration) in the




---



##### 



financial status of the Borrower; or(7)
    
    if the Borrower violates any provision of this Agreement.
 Article 5
  Article 6
 1.
    
    The jointly and severally responsible guarantor, Shigenobu Nagamori, shall guaranty the
Lender, jointly and severally along with the Borrower, the Borrowers debt to the Lender
provided in this Agreement.2.
    
    In order to secure any and all debts of the Borrower to the Lender, which is made under this
Agreement, the jointly and severally responsible guarantor shall create a pledge to the
4,500,000 shares of the Lenders shares that such jointly and severally responsible guarantor
owns.
  3
#### The Empire Center for New York State Policy, Appellant, v New York City Police Pension Fund, Respondent.

Submitted December 19, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 88 AD3d 520.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the  Amended Quarterly Report of All American Gold Corp.,  formerly Osprey Ventures, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the first quarter ended November 30, 2010,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly  Report”), I, Brent Welke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Amended Quarterly Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and                               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | the information contained in the Amended Quarterly  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 20, 2010

/s/ Brent Welke

Brent WelkeChief Executive Officer

---
No. 294.

#### Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *v.*Howes Brothers Hide Co. et al.

Certiorari submitted October 5, 1931..

Decided November 23, 1931.

*Per Curiam:*

The petition for a writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree *584herein is reversed upon the authority of *Handy & Harman*v. *Burnet, ante,*p. 136.

*Solicitor General Thacher,*As*sistant Attorney General*Youngquist, and *Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, John Henry McEvers,*and *Paul D. Miller*for petitioner.

*Mr. Robert A. Littleton*for respondents.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alton B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


























/s/ Alton B. Lewis


Alton B. Lewis


Chief Executive Officer


May 17, 2010
# C_2010187EN.01000101.xml

| 10.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/1

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the available quantity for the September 2010 subperiod in the framework of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector

2010/C 187/01

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1). No import licence applications have been submitted during the first seven days of May 2010 for the quotas with order numbers 09.4189 and 09.4190.

1

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities for which applications are not submitted are to be added to the following subperiod.

2

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 quantities available in the following subperiod are communicated by the Commission before the 25th day of the last month of a given subperiod.

As a result, the total available quantity for the September 2010 subperiod under the quotas with order numbers 09.4189 and 09.4190 as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the May 2010 subperiod | Total available quantity for the September 2010 subperiod (in kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 24 815 000 |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 10 000 000 |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the May 2010 subperiod

Total available quantity for the September 2010 subperiod (in kg)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

24 815 000

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

10 000 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6823

JASON ROBERT TWARDZIK,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-hc-02269-FL)

Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Robert Twardzik, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason Robert Twardzik, a state pretrial detainee, seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Twardzik has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1  I, David Rogers, certify that:  1 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Industrial Enterprises;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5 The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  May 8, 2009     /s/ David Rogers David Rogers Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending May 25, 2001

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under subpart 
B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2001-9737.
    Date Filed: May 22, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 12, 2001.
    Description: Application of Vensecar Internacional C.A. pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. 41302 and 14 CFR Parts 211 and 302 (subpart B), requesting a 
foreign air carrier permit, authorizing it to engage in scheduled 
foreign air transportation of property and mail between a point or 
points in Venezuela, on the one hand, and Miami, Florida, on the other 
hand, via the Netherlands West Indies, Jamaica and Cuba, as permitted 
by the U.S.-Venezuela Bilateral Air Transport Services Agreement.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-14099 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
EXHIBIT
31.1





SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








I,
Russell W. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of PuraMed Bioscience Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of PuraMed Bioscience Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:









a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and





5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated:
            November
      14, 2008By:
            /s/
      Russell W. MitchellRUSSELL
      W. MITCHELLChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1001 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1001

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 13, 2010.
Whereas the North Central College Cardinals' men's cross country team won the 
        NCAA Division III National Championship on November 21, 2009;
Whereas all seven North Central College team members that competed in the 
        championship earned All-American status;
Whereas the 2009 championship Cardinals team is comprised of Neal Klein, Michael 
        Spain, Ryan Carrigan, Nathaniel Hird, Kyle Brady, Nathan Rutz, Sean 
        Carlson, and head Coach Al Carius;
Whereas the North Central College Cardinals compete in 22 intercollegiate sports 
        and study more than 55 different majors;
Whereas North Central College, located in Naperville, Illinois, is a four-year 
        liberal arts college with students from 31 States and 23 countries; and
Whereas the North Central College men's cross country team national title is one 
        example of the excellence students have demonstrated in athletics, as 
        well as academics and all areas of collegiate life: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates North Central College and its athletes, coaches, 
        faculty students, and alumni on the winning of the 2009 NCAA Division 
        III men's cross country championship; and
            (2) recognizes North Central College for excellence in academics, 
        athletics, and collegiate life.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28161-28162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12879]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[WH-FRL-6982-3]


Meeting of the Arsenic Cost Working Group of the National 
Drinking Water Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
Arsenic Cost Working Group of the National Drinking Water Advisory 
Council established under the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended (42 
U.S.C. S300f et seq.), will be held on May 29 and May 30, 2001, from 
8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, at RESOLVE, 1255 23rd Street, NW., 
Suite 275, Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public, but from 
past experience, seating will likely be limited.
    Following the January 22, 2001 Federal Register promulgation of the 
arsenic rule, a number of concerns were raised to EPA by States, public 
water systems, and other stakeholders regarding the adequacy of science 
and the basis for national cost estimates underlying the rule. Because 
of the importance of the arsenic rule and the national debate 
surrounding it related to science and costs, EPA's Administrator 
publicly announced on March 20, 2001, that the Agency would take 
additional steps to reassess the scientific and cost issues associated 
with this rule and seek further public input on each of these important 
issues.
    The purpose of this meeting is to bring nationally recognized 
technical experts together to review the cost of compliance estimates 
associated with the final arsenic in drinking water rule. The meeting 
is open to the public to observe. The working group members are meeting 
to: (1) Gather information; and (2) analyze relevant issues and facts. 
Statements from the public will be taken if time permits.

[[Page 28162]]

    For more information, please contact Amit Kapadia, Acting 
Designated Federal Officer, Arsenic Cost Working Group, U.S. EPA, 
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Mailcode 4607, 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Phone number: (202)-
260-1688. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a8a2b3a2a7aaa2eda2aeaab783a6b3a2eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca7adbcada8a5ade2ada1a5b88ca9bcade2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 14, 2001.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 01-12879 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>