alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #10 LTD. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                        |
| Freddie M. Kotek                                            |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| August 14, 2014                                             |
S07A0302.

#### HENDERSON v. HENDERSON.

(640 SE2d 254)

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Clara Henderson, appeals from an order of the probate court ruling that she did not timely file an amended caveat raising the issue that a will she was challenging was a forgery. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in this ruling, we reverse.

Where, as here, there is no pre-trial order, an amendment to a complaint “may be filed up to the time evidence is taken at trial.”1 In this case, the trial court ruled that the appellant filed her amended caveat “after the beginning of the proceedings” and that it was therefore untimely. The trial court’s order, however, does not make a finding regarding whether the amendment was filed before or after evidence was taken at trial. Moreover, our review of the record shows that, although the appellant did not file the amended caveat in the trial court clerk’s office until the morning the trial was scheduled to begin, she did so before the trial began. In addition, at the beginning *554of the trial, before the trial court heard any evidence, the parties and the court discussed the fact that the appellant had filed the amended caveat the morning of the trial. Thus, the record shows that the appellant filed the amended caveat before any evidence was taken. Accordingly, as there was no pre-trial order, the trial court erred in refusing to permit the appellant to raise the issue asserted in the amended caveat. We thus reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Decided January 22, 2007.

*Goldberg & Cuvillier, Laurene C. Cuvillier,*for appellant.

*Albert E. Jones,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

*L. S. Land Co. v. Burns,*275 Ga. 454, 456 (569 SE2d 527) (2002), quoting *Haywood v. Aerospec,*193 Ga. App. 479, 480 (388 SE2d 367) (1989).
---



EXHIBIT 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Burcon NutraScience
Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Jade Cheng, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: June 23, 2015 |                        
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    |                        
|                    | /s/ Jade Cheng       
|                    | Jade Cheng             
|                    | Chief Financial Officer

---
# C_2019288EN.01000401.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/4

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas — Lithuania) — TE, UD, YB, ZC v Luminor Bank AB

(Case C-8/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Markets in financial instruments - Natural person who has acquired a derivative financial instrument from a bank - Classification of that person within the meaning of EU law)

(2019/C 288/04)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Vilniaus apygardos teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: TE, UD, YB, ZC

Defendant: Luminor Bank AB

Operative part of the order

Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments, amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU must be interpreted as not applying to the acquisition of bonds using borrowed funds, such as those at issue in the case in the main proceedings, in so far as those acquisitions were made prior to 1 November 2007.

The first and second questions, in so far as they relate to Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2001 on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities, Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse), Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending Directive 2001/34, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 of 29 April 2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards information contained in prospectuses as well as the format, incorporation by reference and publication of such prospectuses and dissemination of advertisements, are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mitchell K. Fogelman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 5, 2010



/S/ MITCHELL K. FOGELMANMitchell K. Fogelman Principal
Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549   FORM 8-K   CURRENT REPORT  Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) February 23, 2009 -------------  CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC. (Name of Small Business issuer in its charter)   COLORAD00-5272490-0219158___ (State or other jurisdiction of            (Commission File No.)    (IRS Employer incorporation or organization)                                                 Identification No.)  16125 Shawbrooke Road  SWCalgary, AlbertaCanada                                           T2Y 3B3 (Address of principal executive offices)  (403) 827-7936 (Registrants telephone number) ------------------------- -------------------------            Item 8 01. Other Events  Joseph Forzani of Calgary, AB has resigned as President and CEO on February 23, 2009 and Fred Fitzgerald will take over interim duties of CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer.  In the same meeting it has been decided to move the offices of Capital Resource Alliance Inc., to 16125 Shawbrooke Rd. SW     Calgary, AB.  A copy of the minutes of the meeting is including in this document as Exhibit 99.1  ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.  EXHIBITS  99.1  February 23, 2009  Minutes of The Board of Directors   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  Capital Resource Alliance Inc.  /s/ Fred Fitzgerald Secretary, Treasurer and Director  February 24, 2009      Exhibit 99.1  Board of Directors Minutes  MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC.  February 24, 2009  A telephone meeting of the Board of Directors of CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC. (the Corporation), was held on February 23, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.  Directors participating in the meeting were:    Joe Forzani and Fred Fitzgerald  The Board unanimously resolved the following:  RESOLVED:  That Joseph Forzani of Calgary, AB resigned as president of CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC.  That Fred Fitzgerald was elected President and CEO  to serve until the next annual meeting.   There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.   /s/ Fred Fitzgerald Nadir Walji, Secreta                                      Fred Fitzgerald,   President, Ceo and secretary treasurer and chief accounting officer.   February 23, 2009
#### Lenora Alvarado, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 96]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered on or about September 14, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, in this action for personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of a lack of police protection, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

Flaintiff alleges that while acting as an interpreter for defendant police department during the course of an investigation into a complaint of domestic violence, she was assaulted by a *428knife-wielding individual who was involved in a dispute with his girlfriend. Plaintiff alleges that the injuries she sustained during the attack were the result of the failure of the police to protect her from a man who was known to be violent and dangerous.

“[Mjunicipalities generally enjoy immunity from liability for discretionary activities they undertake through their agents, except when plaintiffs establish a ‘special relationship’ with the municipality” *(Kovit v Estate of Hallums,*4 NY3d 499, 505 [2005]). On this motion to dismiss, where “the pleading is to be afforded a liberal construction” and where the court is only to determine “whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” *(Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we conclude that plaintiff sufficiently set forth the elements of a “special relationship” *(see Cuffy v City of New York,*69 NY2d 255, 260 [1987]), and that the complaint was improperly dismissed.

The record shows that plaintiff was not simply a member of the public at large, but was a translator whose services had been requested by defendant police department to aid officers in the investigation of a complaint of domestic violence. Under these circumstances, the police department assumed an affirmative duty to avoid placing plaintiff in a dangerous position and at the mercy of a person the officers suspected was capable of violence. It also cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the police were unaware that inaction on their part might cause harm to someone in the suspect’s vicinity. Furthermore, there was direct contact between plaintiff and the police, and as someone who was summoned by the police to a possible crime scene, plaintiff had a right to expect that she would receive protection from the individual suspected of domestic violence, thereby satisfying the element of justifiable reliance on the municipality’s affirmative undertaking *(see Mastroianni v County of Suffolk,*91 NY2d 198 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0545 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. CHARLES GALEN LANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Robin Lee is granted an extension of time to and including May 28 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 28 2024

03/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0545
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Robert H. Cooper, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
      and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:






(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the end
      of,
      and for the period covered by the Report.






**REPUBLIC
                AIRWAYS**Date: November
                3, 2005
              By:
              /s/
                Robert H. CooperRobert
                H. CooperTitle:
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### LaSalle Bank National Association, Respondent, v Keisha Henderson, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted April 19, 2010;

decided June 17, 2010

*935Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant failed to appeal to the Appellate Division from the judgment of Supreme Court which aggrieved her *(see Matter of Frost v Blum,*48 NY2d 1013 [1980]).

Judge Jones taking no part.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

              PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1


                                       2
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David K. Ryan, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/
      David K. Ryan        
| | ------ | -------------------------------
| |        |                                
| | Name:  | DAVID K. RYAN                  
| |        |                                
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer and
| |        | Principal Accounting Officer   
| |        |                                
| | Date:  | January 25, 2012               



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---