Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2001 / Notices 29557

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

Individuals seeking to determine

whether this system of records contains

information about themselves should

address written inquiries to the Privacy

Act Officer, Headquarters, Defense

Logistics Agency, ATTN: CAAR, 8725

John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort

Belvoir, VA 22060–6221.

Written requests should contain the

full name, Social Security Number, date

of birth, and current address and

telephone number of the individual.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Individuals seeking access to records

about themselves contained in this

system of records should address

inquiries to the Privacy Act Officer,

Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency,

ATTN: CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman

Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA

22060–6221. Written requests should

contain the full name, Social Security

Number, date of birth, and current

address and telephone number of the

individual.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

The DLA rules for accessing records,

for contesting contents and appealing

initial agency determinations are

contained in DLA Regulation 5400.21,

32 CFR part 323, or may be obtained

from the Privacy Act Officer,

Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency,

ATTN: CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman

Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA

22060–6221.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

The military services, the Department

of Veteran Affairs, the Department of

Education, Department of Health and

Human Services, from individuals via

survey questionnaires, the Department

of Labor, the Office of Personnel

Management, Federal and Quasi-Federal

agencies, and the Selective Service

System.

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:

None.

[FR Doc. 01–13572 Filed 5–30–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–08–U

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Corps of Engineers; Notice of

Availability for the Draft Environmental

Impact Statement/Environmental

Report (EIS/EIR) for the Pier J South

Maine Terminal Expansion Project, Los

Angeles County, CA

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, Regulatory Branch, in

coordination with the Port of Long

Beach, has completed a Draft EIS/EIR

for the Pier J South Maine Terminal

Expansion Project. The Port Long Beach

requires authorization pursuant to

section 404 of the Clean Water Act and

section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors act

for 115 acres of landfill in three phases,

dredging up to 10,000,000 cubic yards

of sediment, construction of a new

concrete pile-supported wharf, new

terminal buildings and a new rail yard.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions or comments concerning the

Draft EIS/EIR should be directed to Dr.

Aaron O. Allen, Project Manager,

Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, P.O. Box 532711, Los

Angeles, California, 90053–2325, (213)

452–3413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–13665 Filed 5–30–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–KF–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of

Engineers

Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental

Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Tampa

Harbor Navigation Project General

Reevaluation Report

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

SUMMARY: The Jacksonville District, U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers intends to

prepare a DEIS for the Tampa Harbor

Navigation Project General Reevaluation

Report. The non-Federal sponsor for the

Tampa Harbor Navigation Project is the

Tampa Port Authority.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William J. Fonferek, (904) 232–2803,

Environmental Branch, Planning

Division, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville,

Florida 32232–0019.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure of the United States

House of Representatives, requested the

Secretary of the Army to review the

report to the Chief of Engineers on the

Tampa Harbor, Florida, published as

House Document 401, 91st Congress,

2nd Session and other pertinent reports,

with a view of determining if the

authorized project should be modified

in any way at this time, with particular

reference to deep draft navigation.

The reason for the study is to

reconsider safety and economic

efficiency. Many of the project’s

channels are one-way and might be

improved to relieve safety concerns and

vessel traffic congestion.

1. Alternatives: In addition to the no

action alternative, we are considering

creating an anchorage area; a secondary

channel loop using St. Petersburg

Harbor channel; passing lanes; and

turning basins at channel intersections.

In addition, we will be looking at other

options such as main channel

deepening; East Bay Channel deepening;

constructing previously authorized

projects; and the eastward extension of

Port Sutton.

2. Issues: The Environmental Impact

Statement (EIS) will consider impacts

on safety, economic efficiency,

hardbottom communities, protected

species, shore protection, health, water

quality, aesthetics and recreation, fish

and wildlife resources, cultural

resources, energy conservation, socioeconomic resources, and other impacts

identified through scoping, public

involvement, and interagency

coordination.

3. Scoping: A scoping letter was sent

to interested parties on April 30, 2001.

In addition, all parties are invited to

participate in the scoping process by

identifying any additional concerns on

issues, studies needed, alternatives,

procedures, and other matters related to

the scoping process.

4. Public Involvement: We invite the

participation of affected Federal, State

and local agencies, affected Indian

Tribes, and other interested private

organizations and parties.

5. Coordination: The proposed action

is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the

National Marine Fisheries Service

(NMFS) under Section 7 of the

Endangered Species Act and the Marine

Mammal Protection Act, with the FWS

under the Fish and Wildlife Act, the

NMFS under the Magnuson-Stevens

Fishery Conservation and Management

Act for Essential Habitat, and with the

State Historic Preservation Officer.

6. Other Environmental Review and

Consultation: The proposed action may

involve an evaluation for compliance

with guidelines pursuant to Section

404(b) of the Clean Water Act;

application (to the State of Florida) for

Water Quality Certification pursuant to

Section 401 of the Clean Water Act;

certification of state lands, easements,

and rights of way; and determination of

Coastal Zone Management Act

consistency.