alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010095EN.01000601.xml

| 15.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/6 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

Decision on a reorganisation measure in respect of KD Life Asigurări S.A.

(Publication made in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2010/C 95/04

| Insurance undertaking | KD Life Asigurări S.A. Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 București ROMÂNIA | KD Life Asigurări S.A. | Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 | București | ROMÂNIA |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------- | ------- |
| KD Life Asigurări S.A. | | | | | |
| Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 | | | | | |
| București | | | | | |
| ROMÂNIA | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | Decision No 190 of 3 March 2010
Entry into force: 3 March 2010
Financial reorganisation under special administration | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Insurance Supervisory Commission | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Insurance Supervisory Commission | | | | |
| Special administrator appointed | Nicolae Eugen Crișan Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 București ROMÂNIA | Nicolae Eugen Crișan | Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 | București | ROMÂNIA |
| Nicolae Eugen Crișan | | | | | |
| Calea Giulești nr. 8D, et. 3, sector 6 | | | | | |
| București | | | | | |
| ROMÂNIA | | | | | |
| Applicable law | Act No 503/2004 on financial reorganisation and bankruptcy of insurance undertakings | | | | |

---
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 16 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 16 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KERRY MCCULLAGH, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Contact Minerals Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: December 10, 2007 | */s/ Kerry McCullagh*      
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | Kerry McCullagh            
|                        | Chief Executive Officer and
|                        | Chief Financial Officer    

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 13 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this annual report of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. on Form 40-F for
the fiscal period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre Masse, Chief
Financial Officer of the issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the issuer. Date: April 30, 2004 By:
    /s/ Pierre MassePierre MasseChief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy GADSON, a/k/a Tanaka, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 4, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 29, 2010.

Timothy Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

*853Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Gadson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *United States v. Gadson,*No. 4:01-cr-00817-CWH-1 (D.S.C. May 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# C_2010105EN.01000201.xml

| 24.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/2

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Italy

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU))

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid C 36/08 (ex NN 33/08) — Sulcis power plant project

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 105/02

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure initiated under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (which became Article 108(2) TFEU) on 16 July 2008 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, in view of the fact that Italy withdrew its notification on 30 September 2009.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 19.9.2008, p. 14.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Paul B.Cleveland, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affymax, Inc. ;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, [including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,]particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.      Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

|        |   | By:      | /s/ Paul B. Cleveland                                                                                       |
|--------|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | * * | Executive Vice President Corporate Development and   Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

**Date: March  30, 2007**

----
#### In the Matter of SLS Residential, Inc., et al., Appellant-Respondents, v New York State Office of Mental Health et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Submitted April 12, 2010;

decided June 8, 2010

Motion to seal dismissed as unnecessary in view of Supreme Court’s April 13, 2010 sealing order (Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.5 [b]).
#### Lee Bordeleau et al., Respondents, v State of New York et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 23, 2012;

decided February 21, 2012

Reported below, 74 AD3d 1688.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*18 NY3d 305 (2011)].
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20449

In the Matter of: SOLANO WELL SERVICES, L.L.C.; PACKARD GAS

COMPANY, formerly known as Amco Oil Company; AMCO ENERGY,

INCORPORATED, formerly known as Capco Offshore, Incorporated; CAPCO

OPERATING CORPORATION; CAPCO ASSET MANAGEMENT,

INCORPORATED; CAPCO ENERGY, INCORPORATED, formerly known as

Amco Petroleum, Incorporated,

Debtors

---------------------------------------------------------------------

VICTOR E. HARRIS,

Appellee

v.

PYRAMID GOM, INCORPORATED; ILYAS CHAUDHARY,

Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CV-1572

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appeal is reinstated and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 9, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20449 Document: 00512366998 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2013
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



May 31, 2007 (May 24, 2007)

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)



---

AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware
        000-29222
        13-3575874(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
        (Commission File Number)
        (IRS Employer
Identification Number)




2000 Hamilton Street

Suite 204

Philadelphia, PA  19130

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)



(215) 241-9760

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):



o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).




o
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12).




o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)).




o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)).








---

Item 8.01
        Other Events.




On May 31, 2007, the Company issued a press release announcing that the President of the Company, Richard P. Rainey, has been given the additional title of Chief Executive Officer and has been appointed to the Companys Board of Directors. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 9.01
        Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(d)
        Exhibits.




The following exhibit is filed with this report:




99.1
        AVAX Technologies, Inc. Press Release Issued May 31, 2007.






-1-

---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  May 31, 2007By:
        /s/   Richard P. RaineyName:
        Richard P. RaineyTitle:
        President






-2-

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TitanMachinery Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,David J. Meyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date: June 9, 2010

 

 
|   | /s/ David J. Meyer                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | David J. Meyer                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Kerry J. McCullagh, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Contact Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/ Kerry J. McCullagh     
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | KERRY J. MCCULLAGH         
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | June 3, 2011               
| |        |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Terrence CROSS, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7221.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 10, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 2, 2013.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cross has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *275materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-080-1210-PG]

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the meeting of the Upper Columbia—Salmon Clearwater District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) on Wednesday, June 13, 2001 and Thursday, June 14, 2001 in Missoula, Montana. 

Agenda items include: fire and fuels management; election of officers; and identification of future issues. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. (MDT), June 13, 2001 at the C'mon Inn, 2775 Expo Parkway, Missoula, Montana. The public may address the Council during the public comment period from 3:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. on June 13, 2001. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make oral statements, a per-person time limit may be established by the District Manager. 

The Council's responsibilities include providing recommendations concerning long-range planning and establishing resource management priorities. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ted Graf (208) 769-5004. 

Dated: May 18, 2001.

Ted Graf, 

Acting District Manager.

[FR Doc. 01-13590 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P