alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heritage PropertyInvestment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David G. Gaw, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
|                             |   | /s/ DAVID  G. GAW          |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                        |   | David G. Gaw                    |
|                        |   | Senior Vice President, Chief    |
|                        |   | Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| Dated: March 15,  2006 |   |                            |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1200; MM Docket No. 98-159, RM-9290]


FM Broadcasting Services; Wallace, ID and Bigfork, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Alpine Broadcasting Limited 
Partnership, substitutes Channel 264C (100.7 MHz) for Channel 264C2 at 
Wallace, Idaho, reallots Channel 264C from Wallace to Bigfork, Montana, 
and modifies Station KSIL(FM)'s license to specify Bigfork as the new 
community of license. See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 63 FR 49,323, 
published September 15, 1998. Channel 264C can be reallotted to Bigfork 
in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements at a site located at North Latitude 48 deg.02'45" and West 
Longitude 114 deg.22'00" and restricted to 26.8 kilometers (16.7 miles) 
east of Bigfork.

DATES: Effective June 25, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Bertron Withers, Jr., Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket 98-159, adopted May 2, 2001, and released 
May 11, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, S.W., 
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20036,

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 reads continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Sections 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments, under Montana, is 
amended by adding Bigfork, Channel 264C.
    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments, under Idaho, is 
amended by removing Channel 264C at Wallace.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-13714 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2022294EN.01001801.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Eleveté Invest Group and Others v Commission and SRB

(Case T-523/17) (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Non-contractual liability)

(2022/C 294/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Eleveté Invest Group, SL (Madrid, Spain) and the other 19 applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: B. Cremades Roman, J. López Useros, S. Cajal Martín and P. Marrodán Lázaro, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer), Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. King and M. Fernández Rupérez, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. Rodríguez de la Rúa Puig and L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agents), Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) (represented by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, A. Rodríguez Conde, D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero and J. Remón Peñalver, lawyers)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the SRB of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA, and for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. (OJ 2017 L 178, p. 15), second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of those decisions and, third, application for a declaration that the provisional valuation is invalid, and for compensation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Eleveté Invest Group, SL and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and Banco Santander, SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eleveté Invest Group, SL and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and Banco Santander, SA;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13511]



[[Page 29308]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6987-7]


Chesapeake Bay Program FY2002 Request for Proposals

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program is 
issuing a request for proposals (RFP) that will further goals of the 
Chesapeake 2000 agreement. Up to 750,000 dollars may be available for 
Fiscal Year 2002. The Chesapeake Bay Program is seeking innovative, 
cost-effective proposals to accomplish the outcomes listed in the RFP. 
These outcomes were designed to help meet the Chesapeake 2000 goals. 
Any nonprofit organization, federal, state or local government agency, 
interstate agency, college or university is eligible to submit 
proposals in response to the RFP. Funding will be provided to an 
organization under the authority of Clean Water Act, section 117.
    The RFP will be available May 30, 2001 at the following website: 
http://www.epa.edu/r3/chespk/ You may receive a paper copy by calling 
Kim Scalia at 214-814-5421 or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#522131333e3b337c393b3f123722337c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9baaaa8a5a0a8e7a2a0a489acb9a8e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
calling Lori Mackey at 410-267-5715 or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d000c0e0608144301021f042d081d0c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bf6faf8f0fee2b5f7f4e9f2dbfeebfab5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>. All proposals must be postmarked by Monday, July 
16, 2001. Any late, incomplete, or faxed proposals will not be 
considered.

Diana Esher,
Acting Director, Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
[FR Doc. 01-13511 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:  May 20, 2010

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Chief Executive Officer 

               This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

               A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2













CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Mark
Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp.,
the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Annual Report of ICON
Income Fund Nine, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations
      of the LLC.








Date:
March 25, 2010





/s/Mark
Gatto


Mark
Gatto


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
Exhibit 99.1

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) January 18th, 2008

CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC.

(Name of Small Business issuer in its charter)





COLORAD0000-5283120-5966439

(State or other jurisdiction of            (Commission File No.)    (IRS Employer

incorporation or organization)                                                 Identification No.)





| | 1013 1st Avenue, NW, Calgary, AB T2N 0A8 Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Address of principal executive offices)



403-827-7936

(Registrants telephone number)

-------------------------







Item 8 01. Other Events



On  January 18, 2008 the Board of Directors of the registrant passed unanimously a resolution authorizing a stock dividend of three additional shares for each share issued, bringing the total common shares issued and outstanding to 20,400,000.



A copy of the minutes of the meeting is including in this document as Exhibit 99.1



ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.





EXHIBITS



99.1      Board Minutes  January 18, 2008.





SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



January 18, 2008.



Capital Resource Alliance, Inc.



/s/ Joseph Forzani

Joseph Forzani, President



/s/Frederick Fitzgerald

Frederick Fitzgerald, Secretary/Treasurer





Exhibit 99.1











MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF

CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLIANCE, INC.



At a telephone meeting of the Board of Directors of Capital Resource Alliance, Inc., notice being waived and both directors present the following resolution was put forth:



RESOLVED:That a stock dividend of three (3) additional shares for each share presently issued and outstanding be affected immediately bringing the total issued and outstanding shares to 20,400,000. The corporate Secretary is hereby instructed to notify the transfer agent of this action.



January 18, 2008.



s/s Joseph Forzani

Joseph Forzani, President and director



s/s Frederick Fitzgerald

Frederick Fitzgerald, Secretary and director
#### Benjamin William FAWLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6823.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 6, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 4, 2013.

Benjamin William Fawley, Appellant Pro Se. David Michael Uberman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin William Fawley seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fawley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and deny Fawley’s motion for default judgment. We deny Fawley’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as moot, as he has already paid the filing fee, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Data Storage Consulting Services, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Neil Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
              /s/ Neil
      BernsteinNeil
      Bernstein
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerDate: May 14, 2008
# C_2019103EN.01002401.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council

(Case T-117/17) (1)

((Public service contracts - Negotiated procedure - Most economically advantageous tender - Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer - Discretion of a contracting authority - Lawfulness of the evaluation method - Principle of sound financial management))

(2019/C 103/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Proximus SA/NV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and S. Cholakova, acting as Agents, and by P. de Bandt, P. Teerlinck and M. Gherghinaru, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Council of 23 December 2016 to award the framework contract for the provision of cybersecurity services [confidential], to another tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Proximus SA/NV to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Proximus SA/NV to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Exhibit 12.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Gérard Mestrallet, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUEZ; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Reserved]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control of internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 28, 2004
# C_2010286EN.01000201.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 286/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.7.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 416/09 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Quelle GmbH |
| Legal basis | Bundeshaushaltsordnung und Länderhaushaltgesetze von Sachsen und Bayern |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Rescue of firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Rescue aid loan |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 50 million
  Overall budget: EUR 50 million |
| Intensity | Measure does not constitute aid |
| Duration (period) | 10.7.2009-31.12.2009 |
| Economic sectors | Retail services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Land Bayern, Land Sachsen und Bundesrepublik
  DEUTSCHLAND |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.7.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 416/09

Member State

Germany

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Quelle GmbH

Legal basis

Bundeshaushaltsordnung und Länderhaushaltgesetze von Sachsen und Bayern

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Rescue of firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Rescue aid loan

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 50 million

Overall budget: EUR 50 million

Intensity

Measure does not constitute aid

Duration (period)

10.7.2009-31.12.2009

Economic sectors

Retail services

Name and address of the granting authority

Land Bayern, Land Sachsen und Bundesrepublik

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---