alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-133]

[[Page 372]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collections; 
Comment Request

    The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary will periodically publish summaries of proposed information 
collections projects and solicit public comments in compliance with the 
requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. To request more information on the project or to obtain a copy of 
the information collection plans and instruments, call the OS Reports 
Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.
    1. Self-Evaluation and Recordkeeping Required by the Regulation 
Implementing Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (45 CFR 
84.6(c))--Extension--0990-0124--Recipients of DHHS funds must conduct a 
single-time evaluation of their policies and practices for compliance 
with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Recipients with 
fifteen or more employees must maintain records of their self-
evaluation for three years. Respondents: State or local governments, 
businesses or other for-profit, non-profit institutions; Annual Number 
of Respondents: 2,120; Frequency of Response: once; Burden per 
Response: 16 hours; Total Annual Burden: 33,920 hours.
    Send comments to Cynthia Agnes Bauer, OS Reports Clearance Officer, 
Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20201. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this 
notice.

    Dated: December 15, 2000.
Dennis P. Williams,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 01-133 Filed 1-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4153-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2008

/s/ PATRICK SOON-SHIONG, M.D.Patrick Soon-Shiong, M.D. Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
ex10_19.htm


 Exhibit 10.19 


 Equity Transfer Agreement 


 (English Translation) 







 Parties: 


 



	 Transferor:      	 Wang Hong Jun 
	 Transferee:   	 Ju Gui Zhi 





 


 In accordance with the applicable laws of the Company’s bylaws: “Any stockholder transferring his registered capital contribution shall provide the other stockholders the right of first refusal.” As a result of mutual consultation, stockholder Wang Hong Jun agrees to transfer his share of the registered capital in the amount of RMB 490,000 of Song Yuan North East Petroleum Technical Service Co., Ltd. to Ju Gui Zhi. Following the transfer, Transferee shall enjoy the rights and obligations in proportion to the equity interest received by the Transferee. 

















 Transferor:    /s/ Wang Hong Jun 







 Transferee:    /s/ Ju Gui Zhi 







 China North East Petroleum Holdings Ltd. (U.S.) 







 Song Yuan North East Petroleum Technical Service Co., Ltd. 












 December 20, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2361

 To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to administer 
vaccinations for hepatitis A, at no cost to the inoculated, in certain 
                areas at risk of a hepatitis A outbreak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2019

   Mr. Mast introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to administer 
vaccinations for hepatitis A, at no cost to the inoculated, in certain 
                areas at risk of a hepatitis A outbreak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hepatitis Exposure Prevention Act of 
2019'' or the ``HEP A Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. VACCINATION FOR HEPATITIS A IN AREAS AT RISK OF A HEPATITIS A 
              OUTBREAK.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting directly or by 
entering into contracts or awarding grants, may administer vaccinations 
for hepatitis A, at no cost to the inoculated, in any area within a 
State for which there is in effect a declaration by the Governor of the 
State designating such area as at risk of a hepatitis A outbreak.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0725. PAMELA DELORES GREEN v. THE STATE.

Pamela Delores Green was convicted of burglary and theft by deception, and

her conviction was affirmed on appeal. See Green v. State, 301 Ga. App. 866 (689

SE2d 132) (2010). Green has since filed several motions seeking to modify her

allegedly void sentence. Most recently, Green filed a motion alleging that her

sentence was void because the trial court failed to merge her sentences and

improperly sentenced her as a recidivist. The trial court denied this motion, and

Green filed this appeal.

In Green’s prior discretionary application, Case Number A14D0124, we

addressed the same arguments she is attempting to raise in this direct appeal. We

dismissed that application on the basis that Green failed to raise a valid void sentence

claim. “It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The

same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.” Echols v. State, 243

Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000); see also Jordan v. State, 253 Ga. App.

510, 511 (2) (559 SE2d 528) (2002). Our ruling in the prior application is res

judicata. See Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). 

Thus, Green is estopped from seeking further judicial review on these issues. See id;

see also Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 328 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (law of the case

rules bars successive void sentence appeals). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Given that we have already addressed a prior application raising essentially the

same arguments, this appeal is frivolous. This Court is empowered to impose

sanctions upon a party who files a frivolous notice of appeal. See Court of Appeals

December 19, 2014
Rule 15 (b). We thus caution Green against filing future frivolous appeals in this

Court as such will result in the imposition of sanctions.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/19/2014
#### In the Matter of James W. McDonald III, Respondent, v Jhenna A. Reed, Now Known as Jhenna A. Laflair, Appellant.

Submitted January 4, 2010;

decided February 18, 2010

*759Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved *(see*CPLR 5511).
**Exhibit 10(e)**

**AMENDMENT NO. 2**

**TO THE**

**ZEP INC. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN**

THIS AMENDMENT is made and executed by Zep Inc. (the “Company”) on this 8th day of January, 2010 to be effective as set forth herein. 

WHEREAS, the Company adopted and maintains the Zep Inc. Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan, effective as of October 31, 2007 (the“Plan”), as amended; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan with respect to the treatment of salarythat is earned during the final payroll periods of one year but paid according to normal payroll practices in the immediately following year; and 

WHEREAS, The Treasury Regulations issued with respect to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, permit changes with respect to the treatment of final payroll periods but onlyif such changes take effect at least 12 months after adoption; and 

WHEREAS, Section 8.1 of the Plan authorizes theCommittee (or its designee) to amend the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects, suchamendments to be effective as of 12 months from the date this Amendment is executed and enacted: 

1. Definitions.Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by revising the definition of “Compensation” to provide as follows: 

“Compensation” means the annual cash compensation (salary plus bonuses whether under a Performance-Based Plan or other annual bonuses) paid by the Employer to the Participant for the Plan Year, provided that (i) abonus actually paid during a subsequent Plan year based upon performance during the preceding Plan Year shall be treated as Compensation for such preceding Plan Year and (ii) salary paid in January under the Employer’s normal payrollpractices for a payroll period that includes services performed in December of the immediately preceding year shall be treated as compensation earned during January. The Participant’s Compensation shall include amounts deferred by theParticipant to this Plan and any other deferred compensation plan of the Employer (whether or not qualified), and any salary reduction amounts contributed to a welfare plan. The term “Compensation” shall not include long-term incentivepayments, income from stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards or other stock awards, car allowances, non-cash remuneration, such as health benefits, life insurance, and other fringebenefits, moving expenses, relocation allowances, and payments from this Plan or any other deferred compensation plan. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan Administrator of the Company has caused this Amendment to beexecuted by its duly authorized officer, to be effective as set forth herein. 

 
ZEP INC.By: 
    /s/ Robert S. Collins
     Robert P. Collins 
    Vice President and

    Chief Administrative Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 14 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert M. Friedland, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 40-F of
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report. Date:
    
    June 21, 2004By:
    
    Robert M. FriedlandRobert M. Friedland
Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure of Tax Liens by County of Schuyler. County of Schuyler, Respondent; Edward Solomon Jr., Respondent, and Solomon Financial Center, Inc., Appellant. Margaret E. Starbuck, as County Treasurer of the County of Schuyler, et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 83 AD3d 1243.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*17 NY3d 850 (2011)].
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-2 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 35 of 35
SECOND DIVISION

BARNES, P. J.,

RICKMAN and GOSS, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

August 15, 2018

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A16A0763. DOHERTY v. BROWN et al.

A16A0765.SOUTHEASTERNPAINAMBULATORY SURGERY

CENTER LLC. v. BROWN et al.

A16A0766. SOUTHEASTERN PAIN SPECIALISTS, P. C. v.

BROWN et al.

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

In Doherty v. Brown, 339 Ga. App. 567 (794 SE2d 217) (2016) this Court

affirmed the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. However, in Southeastern Pain

Specialists, P. C. v. Brown, 303 Ga. 265 (811 SE2d 360) (2018), the Supreme Court

of Georgia reversed this Court’s opinion upon finding that because the evidence did

not support the claim, the trial court had erred in giving an instruction on ordinary
negligence. Id. at 272-273 (2) (b). The Court instructed that this Court “on remand

order a full retrial as to the appellants.” Id. at 266.

1

Thus, we vacate our opinion in these cases and adopt the opinion of our

Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with the directive of the Supreme Court,

the jury’s verdict must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Judgment reversed. Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.

1 The plaintiff-appellants in Case No. A16A0764, Brown et al. v. Southeastern

Pain Specialists, et al., did not file a separate petition challenging this Court’s

affirmance of the trial court’s exclusion of certain evidence and denial of their motion

for a mistrial. Thus, as to the evidentiary issues ruled on and asserted in that appeal,

the Supreme Court held that the issues were “beyond the scope of [its] grant of

certiorari” but, “the trial court remains free to revisit its ruling as it considers the

admissibility of evidence on retrial.” Southeastern Pain Specialists at 303 Ga. at 274-

275 (2) (c).

2
EXHIBIT 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to incorporation by reference in this Form S-8 Registration Statement of Scanner Technologies Corporation of our report dated March 28, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Scanner Technologies Corporation, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Scanner Technologies Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.







/s/ Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP








Minneapolis, Minnesota

August 28, 2007





---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoHub, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li De Hai,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated: November
      16, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Li De HaiLi
      De HaiChief
      Financial Officer
##### 



Page 23 of 23Exhibit 99(h) KeyBank National Association, formerly
    
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formallyknown as Key Bank USA, National Association
    
    known as Bank One, National Association800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
    
    as Eligible Lender TrusteeCleveland, OH 44114
    
    4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10004
 MBIA Insurance Corporation
  as Securities Insurer
113 King Street
Armonk, New York 10504 Independent Accountants Report
For KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2001-A We have examined managements assertion, included in its representation letter dated March 9, 2005
that KeyBank, National Association (KBNA), formerly known as Key Bank USA, National Association, a
wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complies with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b), 4.08(c), 5.05,
5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2001-A Sale and Servicing Agreement and
sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2001-A Administration
Agreement (collectively, the Agreements) as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended.
Management is responsible for KBNAs compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on managements assertion about KBNAs compliance based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
basis, evidence about KBNAs compliance with those requirements and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section
5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of reports prepared
by KBNAs student loan processor. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on KBNAs compliance with the
specified requirements. In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBNAs student loan processor,
managements assertion that KBNA complied with the aforementioned requirements as of December 31,
2004 and for the year then ended is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLPCleveland, Ohio
March 9, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 876 

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 

relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment 

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 

Kazakhstan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV 

4 OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO THE PROD5 UCTS OF KAZAKHSTAN. 

6 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN7 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith8 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 

9 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 876 IH

1 (1) determine that the denial of nondiscrim2 inatory treatment should no longer apply to the 

3 products of Kazakhstan; and 

4 (2) after making a determination under para5 graph (1) with respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the 

6 extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal 

7 trade relations treatment) to the products of 

8 Kazakhstan. 

9 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICABILITY OF TITLE

10 IV.—On and after the date on which the President ex11 tends nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of 

12 Kazakhstan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 

13 Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to Kazakhstan. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 21, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00699

- CR

IN RE Albert NICOLAS

,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B93

- 6 and B93

- 7

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Relator's Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court