alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1055

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Transco St 65 (Z3) - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Transco St 65 

(Z3) published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DAVID ERASMO ESCAMILLAGALLEGOS, a.k.a. David Erasmo

Ecsamilla,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10378

D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01852-JGZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2014** 

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. 

David Erasmo Escamilla-Gallegos appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Escamilla-Gallegos contends that his guilty plea was involuntary because, at

the time of his pretrial conference and change-of-plea hearing, his confusion was

apparent and was aggravated by his recent use of pain medication. We review de

novo whether a defendant’s plea was voluntary. See United States v. Kaczynski,

239 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir. 2001). Contrary to Escamilla-Gallegos’s contention,

his statements at the hearing reflect that he pleaded guilty voluntarily. See id. at

1115 (substantial weight is given to defendant’s in-court statements).

AFFIRMED. 

2 13-10378
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert B. Wallace,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PVR GP, LLC, the general partner of PVR Partners, L.P. (the Registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant (this Report); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                       
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 18, 2014 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert B. Wallace                                                 
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Robert B. Wallace Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

OSG AMERICA L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED

 

I,Jonathan P. Whitworth, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof OSG America L.P.

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and we have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | November 6,  2008   |   | /s/  Jonathan P. Whitworth |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Jonathan  P. Whitworth   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1507

Steel Basis Swap - U.S. Midwest Hot-Dipped Galvanized Coil (Base) - CRU Group

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly prices published by CRU Group for the location 

specified in Floating Price A minus the location in Floating Price B.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the CRU U.S. Midwest 

Domestic Hot-Dipped Galvanized (Base) Steel price for each business day that it is determined during 

the contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the CRU U.S. Midwest 

Domestic Hot-Rolled Coil Steel price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be short tons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in short 

tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per short ton. The minimum price fluctuation 

shall be $0.01 per short ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
# C_2010112EN.01000501.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/5

---

Commission notice concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2010 under certain quotas opened by the Community for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin

2010/C 112/03

Commission Regulations (EC) No 1384/2007 (1) and (EC) No 1385/2007 (2) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The import licence applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2010 for the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2010 do not, for quotas 09.4091, 09.4092 and 09.4411, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (3), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 July to 30 September 2010; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

1

(2)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

2

(3)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

3

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2010
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4091 | 280 000 |
| 09.4092 | 634 202 |
| 09.4411 | 2 550 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2010

(in kg)

09.4091

280 000

09.4092

634 202

09.4411

2 550 000

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 918 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.918

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, as the ``Stan Lundine Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAN LUNDINE POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Stan Lundine Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Lundine Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### David KISSI, Appellant v. Peter J. MESSITTE, Judge USDC, et al., Appellees.

No. 09-5219.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 23, 2010.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 2010.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 3, 2010.

David Kissi, Washington, DC, pro se.

*17BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders issued May 8, 2009, and June 1, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint because the appellant sought damages from a federal district court judge in Maryland, who is absolutely immune from suit. *See Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of Mayor,*567 F.3d 672, 682 (D.C.Cir.2009). The misconduct alleged by the appellant pertains to judicial functions and, therefore, is protected by this immunity. *Id.*To the extent the appellant raised claims against the other defendants, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear them because the appellant essentially sought review of a decision rendered by a federal district court in Maryland. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1294(1).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
#### Maninder Bhugra, Appellant, v Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 2011 NY Slip Op 68561(U).

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 20, 2011 dismissal order denied *[see*17 NY3d 850 (2011)].
EXHIBIT
32.1














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to this Report of Data Storage Consulting
Services, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ross Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
              /s/ Ross
      BernsteinRoss
      Bernstein

                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate: July 24, 2008
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Levi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  August 14, 2008 /s/ Joseph Levi Joseph Levi Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-2 has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001 (the Agreement), as
supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Household Finance
Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001, as supplemented, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.


                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-2 has
been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household Finance
Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation,
as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in
Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001,
as supplemented.



/s/ TIM CONDON                              /s/ JOHN O'BRIEN
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Tim Condon                                  John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer-                    Group Director- Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance                      Household Auto Finance


February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
#### Modern Art Services, Ltd., et al., Appellants, v OCA Long Island City, LLC, Respondent.

Submitted November 21, 2011;

decided January 12, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 1040.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Louis Gries

Louis GriesChief Executive Officer
 /s/ Russell Chenu

Russell ChenuChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Craig Stout, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMedicor, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





IMedicor, Inc.

(Registrant)Date: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Craig StoutCraig StoutChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)