alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Financial Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Diane J. Harrison,
President and Chief Financial Officer of Cheetah Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.    
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2008  /s/ Diane J. HarrisonDiane J. Harrison
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Officers Certificate

February 28, 2017

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC. 
  One Bryant Park 
4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading

    New York, New York
10036

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS
TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, James W. P. Hall,
Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), hereby
certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as successor to United
States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the
Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached
schedule.

| | Very truly yours,                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                 
| | The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as Trustee
| |                                                                                 
| | By: /s/ James W. P. Hall                                                        
| | Name: James W. P. Hall
      Title: Vice President                              



| |  | 
| |  | 

---







SCHEDULE

PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1 
  INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
Exhibit 32.1. and


Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








The undersigned, Jeffrey Peterson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Peterson, Principal Financial Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2011 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  August 2, 2011


By:  /s/ Jeffrey Peterson


Jeffrey Peterson


Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12
 AIRGAS, INC.
 COMPUTATION OF FINANCIAL RATIOS
  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009EARNINGS COMPUTATION:Add:Pretax income from continuing operations before
equity earnings and minority interest
    
    $
    147,627
    
    
    $
    208,037
    
    
    $
    257,144
    
    
    $
    370,762
    
    
    $
    429,353Fixed charges
    
    
    83,139
    
    
    
    93,205
    
    
    
    107,340
    
    
    
    144,302
    
    
    
    134,433$
    230,766
    
    
    $
    301,242
    
    
    $
    364,484
    
    
    $
    515,064
    
    
    $
    563,786Subtract:Preferred dividend requirements of consolidated
affiliate
    
    
    (4,626
    )
    
    
    (4,589
    )
    
    
    (4,589
    )
    
    
    (1,147
    )
    
    
    Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (502
    )
    
    
    (1,647
    )
    
    
    (3,400
    )Earnings for purposes of computation
    
    $
    226,140
    
    
    $
    296,653
    
    
    $
    359,393
    
    
    $
    512,270
    
    
    $
    560,386FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION:Interest expense (1)
    
    $
    57,547
    
    
    $
    64,067
    
    
    
    76,227
    
    
    
    110,888
    
    
    
    101,279Estimate of the interest component of rent expense
    
    
    20,966
    
    
    
    24,549
    
    
    
    26,524
    
    
    
    32,267
    
    
    
    33,154Preferred dividend requirements of consolidated
affiliates (2)
    
    
    4,626
    
    
    
    4,589
    
    
    
    4,589
    
    
    
    1,147
    
    
    
    Fixed charges for purposes of computation
    
    $
    83,139
    
    
    $
    93,205
    
    
    
    107,340
    
    
    
    144,302
    
    
    
    134,433RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    
    
    2.72
    X
    
    
    3.18
    X
    
    
    3.35
    X
    
    
    3.55
    X
    
    
    4.17
    X
 
 (1)
    
    Includes capitalized interest, amortization of capitalized
financing costs and discount on trade receivable
securitization.(2)
    
    Preferred stock of National Welders was
converted to Airgas common stock on July 3, 2007.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of
      China Agro Sciences Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
      September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      or
      about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhengquan Wang, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  January
                15, 2008
            /s/
                Zhengquan WangBy:  Zhengquan
                WangIts:  Chief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agro Sciences Corp. and will be retained by China Agro Sciences Corp.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Translation of Equity Interest Transfer Agreement dated in July 2008



 Exhibit 10.41 

Equity Transfer Agreement 

Transferor: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Company Ltd. 

Transferee: Wang Xian 
 Upon
negotiation, both parties hereby enter into the following equity transfer agreement: 
 1. The Transferor agrees to transfer to
the Transferee an equity of 10% (equal to 2 million yuan) of the registered capital of Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd., in which the Transferor holds 100% equity (totaling 20 million yuan). 

2. The Transferee agrees to accept from the Transferor the equity of 10% (equal to 2 million yuan) of the registered capital of
Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd., in which the Transferor holds 100% equity (totaling 20 million yuan). 

3. Once the transfer is completed, the Transferee shall bear limited liabilities and debts in proportion to the equity transferred to him
in Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd. 
 Signature (or seal) of the Transferor: 

(seal of Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Company Ltd.) 

Date: July 28, 2008 

Signature (or seal) of the Transferee: (Wang Xian) 

Date: July 28, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JORGE GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 109 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JORGE VICTOR GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 110 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
      Officer of Lexicon United Incorporated. This Certification is made pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies
      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Lexicon United Incorporated for the year
      ended December 31, 2005.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lexicon
      United Incorporated as of December 31, 2005.





This
      Certification is executed as of November 20, 2006.





*By:
                /s/ Elie Saltoun*
              *Name:
                Elie Saltoun*
              *Title:
                Chairman, CEO and Treasurer*
              *(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Lexicon United Incorporated and will be retained by Lexicon and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1217

Natural Gasoline (Pentane) Option - Conway Natural Gasoline (in-well) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled put and call options published by OPIS for the location specified in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS Conway Natural Gasoline 

(in-well) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the average daily settlement price 

during the calendar month of the first nearby OPIS Conway Natural Gasoline (in-well) (as described in 

Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On expiration of a Put Option, the value 

will be the difference between the strike price and the average daily settlement price during the calendar 

month of the first nearby OPIS Conway Natural Gasoline (in-well) (as described in Floating Price A), or zero 

whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style Average Price option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be U.S. gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity multiplied by the 

settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per gallon and prices shall be in multiples of $0.001 per gallon. The 

minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Lyndon R. Rive, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of SolarCity Corporation; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 10, 2014



/s/ Lyndon R. RiveLyndon R. Rive
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Najib SHEMAMI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Sara M. REVELL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6658.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 2, 2013.

Lynne Louise Reid, L.L. Reid Law, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for appellant. Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*262PER CURIAM:

Najib Shemami, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.CA. § 2241 (West 2006 *&*Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Shemami v. Revell,*No. 5:12-hc-02133-FL, 2013 WL 1164510 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2013). We deny Shemami’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Amendment to Deposit Account Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the
13th day of November, 2008 by and between The Bank of New
York Mellon, in its capacity as trustee of the
CurrencySharesSM Mexican Peso Trust, a trust formed under
New York law (the “Trust”) and the London Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). 

W I T N E S S E T H 

WHEREAS, The Trust and the Bank are parties to that certain Deposit Account Agreement dated June 8, 2006 (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows: 
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Agreement. 
 2. Amendment. Section 6.4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

 “The Bank reserves the right not to accept, and to return without interest to the remitter of funds, the amounts
received for deposit to the Interest Account on any Bank business day, if the aggregate deposit liability of the Bank to the Trust following the deposit of such amounts would exceed the Mexican Peso equivalent of $1.0 BILLION U.S. Dollars calculated
at the Mexican Peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate as determined by WM/Reuters at 4:00 PM (London time) on each Bank business day (the “Closing Spot Rate”) or another recognized market rate for the Mexican Peso if the Closing Spot Rate
is not available on the bank day such deposits are received by the Bank.” 
 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

4. Other. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this
Amendment shall control. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature
Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
hereof. 
  

			
	CURRENCYSHARES MEXICAN PESO TRUST,
		
	By:	 	The Bank of New York, in its capacity as Trustee of the CurrencyShares Mexican Peso Trust and not in its individual capacity.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrew Pfeifer
	Name:	 	Andrew Pfeifer
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LONDON BRANCH
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael G. Davisson
	Name:	 	Michael G. Davisson
	Title:	 	Vice President
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-31296

_____________________________________

AMERICAS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

APACHE CORPORATION, FALCON DRILLING COMPANY, INC., FALCON DRILLING SERVICES, INC. and FALCON MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(95-cv-863)

______________________________________________________

August 12, 1996 Before DAVIS, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Essentially for the reasons stated by the dist rict court in

its careful memorandum ruling of August 23, 1995, we affirm the

court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. In

summary we agree with the district court that Louisiana Civil Code

Article 3540 authorizes enforcement of the parties' choice-of-law

provision unless the application of that law c onflicts with the

public policy of the state whose law would apply in the absence of2

the choice-of-law provision. We agree with the district court's

analysis that Texas law would apply in the absence of the parties'

choice-of-law provision. Finally, we disagree with appellant that

Matte v. Zapata Offshore Co.

, 784 F.2d 628 (5th Cir. 1986),

requires a different result. In M atte

, the accident and injury

occurred on the Outer Continental Shelf and the Outer Continental

Shelf Lands Act directed the application of Louisiana law. I d

. at

630. Thus, the question was whether the application of the general

maritime law under the a choice-of-law provision violated the

public policy of the State of Louisiana. The court answered this

question in the aff irmative because the general maritime law

include d none of the prohibitions against indemnity agreements

Louisiana required in the Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act. In

today's case, the question is whether the public policy of the

State of Texas is offended by the application of the choice-of-law

provision. The parties agree that answer to that question is in

the negative.

For the above reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.