alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xodtec LED, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yao-Ting Su, as Chief Executive and Financial Officerhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date: December 10, 2010
By:
/s/ Yao-Ting SuYao-Ting SuChief Executive and Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
28 September 2023

Via E-mail

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

201-418-5000

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE Clear Europe Limited (“Submitter”) hereby respectfully requests that the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”) accord confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. §145.9 in relation to the ‘Clearing 

Membership Policy and Procedures’ document submitted today which bear the bates number 28.09.2023-000001-

CFTC and 28.09.2023-000020-CFTC and all information derived therefrom (collectively, the “Confidential 

Information”).

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) because Submitter believes 

that the Confidential Information is covered by one or more exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act (the 

“FOIA”) (5 U.S.C. §552(b)) and is therefore exempt from the CFTC’s public disclosure requirements pursuant 

to 17 C.F.R. §145.5. In particular, 5 U.S.C. §552(b) (4) and 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) (ii) exempts disclosure that 

would reveal the Submitter’s trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. Submitter 

believes that the Confidential Information contains confidential commercial and financial information as well as 

proprietary information regarding business procedures and systems that should be protected from public 

disclosure pursuant to this exemption. Confidential treatment is requested for a period of five years. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment 

accorded by law, and Submitter will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. Submitter requests 

that the CFTC advise the undersigned, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(e) (1), in advance of any disclosure of the 

Confidential Information pursuant to the FOIA, so that this request for confidential treatment may be 

substantiated.

If you should have any questions or comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the 

undersigned at philip.tooke@ice.com or +44 (0)20 3142 0842.

Very truly yours,

Philip Tooke

Senior Compliance Analyst
#### TISE v. YATES CONSTR. CO.

No. 489P98

Case below: 131 N.C.App. 153

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alco Energy Corp. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 14, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1072

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - CIG Rockies - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily CIG Rockies published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES FREEMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 36 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofThe Iberian Group Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedJuly 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Thomas P. Hayward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 24thday of October, 2007.                                                                                                                 
|   



THOMAS P. HAYWARDThomas P. Hayward, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors.

















---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00487-CR

EX PARTE Rogelio Contreras SORIANO

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10435CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is due on September 28, 2022. Before the due date, Appellant filed a 

first motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is granted. Appellant’s brief is due on November 28, 2022. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(d). Any further motion for an extension of time to file the brief may be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-2 has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-2 has been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated July 2, 2001, as supplemented.

 

		

/s/ Tim Condon 
/s/ John O'Brien
Tim Condon
John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer -
Group Director-Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance
Household Auto Finance    
February 28, 2004
February 28, 2004
Date
Date
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |   |
| March                30, 2006                                          |   |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICKY LEE GRAVES, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D19-1040, 4D19-1042, 4D19-1045,

4D19-1047 and 4D19-1048

[March 18, 2020]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2017-CF000630, 43-2017-CF-000626, 43-2017-CF-000628, 43-2017-CF-000495, 

and 43-2017-CF-000624.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

After sentencing and while represented by counsel, the defendant filed 

a timely pro se “Motion to Withdraw Open Court Plea” and “Motion for 

Appointment of Counsel During Motion to Withdraw Open Court Plea.” He 

claimed, inter alia, that his attorney generally misadvised him, including 

a failure to advise him of the dangers and consequences of entering an 

open plea. At a hearing, the court allowed defense counsel to withdraw 

and appointed the public defender for purposes of the defendant’s appeal. 

The court struck the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea on the 

grounds that he was represented by counsel. Because this was error, the 

state’s concession of error is well taken.

When a defendant files a pro se motion to withdraw plea alleging that 

his attorney misadvised him, misrepresented the terms of the plea, or 
- 2 -

coerced him into entering a plea, an adversarial relationship exists and the 

trial court should not strike the pleading as a nullity. “Rather, the trial 

court should hold a limited hearing at which the defendant, defense 

counsel, and the State are present. If it appears to the trial court that an 

adversarial relationship between counsel and the defendant has arisen 

and the defendant’s allegations are not conclusively refuted by the record,

the court should either permit counsel to withdraw or discharge counsel 

and appoint conflict-free counsel to represent the defendant.” Sheppard 

v. State, 17 So. 3d 275, 286-87 (Fla. 2009). Based on Sheppard, we reverse 

and remand for the trial court to consider the defendant’s motion to 

withdraw his plea with the assistance of conflict-free counsel.

Reversed and remanded.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Opinion issued June 23, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00427-CV

———————————

IN RE PROBIR K. BONDYOPADHYAY AND MADHURI 

BONDYOPADHYAY, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, have

filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the local administrative court’s

ruling, which denied their requests to institute a new suit.

1

 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE § 11.102(f).

1 The underlying case is Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay v. 

Anthony Scott Vincent, cause number 2021-43287, pending in the 157th District 

Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Tanya Garrison presiding.
2

We deny the mandamus petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending 

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Hightower.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Titanium Asset Management Corp. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert Brooks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated:
      November 15, 2010
            /s/ Robert BrooksRobert
      BrooksChief
      Executive Officer
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Group Holdings Limited. Registered in England No. 4743602 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

CORPORATE

VIA EMAIL TO: FOIAsubmissions@CFTC.gov 

14 March 2023

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Attention: FOIA Compliance Office 1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington, DC 20581

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir/Madam,

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d), LCH Limited (“LCH”) respectfully requests 

confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, for Appendix I 

of the §40.6(a) rule filing submission submitted via the CFTC Portal on March 14, 2023, titled 

“Confidential App I – LCH Margin Collateral Haircut Schedule” including any subsequent emails and 

replies between LCH and Commission staff (the “Information”) under §39.18(g)(1).

LCH is requesting confidential treatment for the Information pursuant to Commission Regulation 

145.9(d)(ii), which provides that confidential treatment may be requested on the grounds that 

disclosure would reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. LCH further 

requests that the information receives confidential treatment in perpetuity. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential 

treatment accorded by law, and LCH will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. LCH 

requests notification from the Commission in advance of any disclosure of the Information pursuant 

to the FOIA or the Commission’s Rules of Practice so that this request for confidential treatment may

be substantiated.

Yours sincerely,

Ebba Andersson

Senior Compliance Officer

LCH Limited
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Yinlips Technology, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Zhao ZifengZhao
      ZifengChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)August
      20, 2009/s/
      Wang XingguiWang
      XingguiInterim
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)August
      20, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Yinlips
Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.