alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Otis, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |    |               |                                       
|-------------------- | -- | ------------- | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2007 | By | /s/ Bill Otis
|                     |    |              
|                     |    |               | Bill Otis                             
|                     |    |               | President and Chief
 Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Titanium Asset Management Corp. (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the Registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated: November 12, 2009
    /s/ Larry HasleeLarry HasleeChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Shanahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  |      |  | /s/ Michael S. Shanahan
|                      |  |  |  | By:  |  | Michael S. Shanahan    
|                      |  |  |  | Its: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc. and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CUMMINGS v. BURROUGHS WELLCOME CO.

No. 313P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 88

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
155 So. 79

#### POPE v. STATE.

8 Div. 480.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1934.

J. N. Powell, of Hartselle, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State,

No briefs reached the Reporter.

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The trial court did not err in sustaining the solicitor’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea of former jeopardy. The reasons set up in the order of the trial court for entering a mistrial conformed to section 9 of the Constitution and section 8696 of the Code of 1923. Andrews v. State, 174 Ala. 11, 56 So. 998, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 760; Spelce et al. v. State, 20 Ala. App. 412, 103 So. 694.

There are no charges, given or refused, set out in the record proper. The bill of exceptions does disclose, however, that three charges were asked in writing by the defendant and refused by the court, setting out certain unnumbered charges, but there is nothing to indicate that they were separately refused by the court or that the refusal thereof was noted on said charges and signed by the judge as required by the statute,'section 9509 of the Code of 1923. It is sufficient, however, to observe that, had the charges been asked and refused, as required by the statute, the refusal of same was not reversible error.

The rulings upon the admission and rejection of the evidence have been carefully examined, and no reversible error was committed in this respect.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, BOUDDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
# C_2017144EN.01005501.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/55

---

Action brought on 10 March 2017 — RY v Commission

(Case T-160/17)

(2017/C 144/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RY (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

Declare and rule:

| — | The decision of 27 April 2016 of the Director General of the Human Resources and Security Directorate General (DG HR) terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff concluded for an indefinite period under Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of 27 April 2016 of the Director General of the Human Resources and Security Directorate General (DG HR) terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff concluded for an indefinite period under Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS is annulled;

| — | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the right of the applicant to be heard before the adoption of the decision terminating the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period. According to the applicant, the contested decision was adopted in breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. In addition, it was adopted in breach of the obligation to state reasons and, more exactly, of the right of the applicant to be informed of all the objective complaints which underlie the contested decision and, in particular, the reasons for an alleged breakdown in the relationship of trust.

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, C. Eugene Gronning, Chief Accounting Officer of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|   | By: /s/ C. Eugene Gronning |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | ----------------------------------- |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | C. Eugene Gronning |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|--------------------------|

 

November 19, 2007

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,  2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August 14, 2009
/s/ Byron EltonByron EltonChief Executive Officer andActing Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL CHANDLER WOLFE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4832 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 3, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Keith R. Kyle, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McKenzie v. State, 153 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 2014); Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003); Batie v. State, 534 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1988); Lozano v. State, 202 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Harris v. State, 818 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); State v. Wells, 466 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

KHOUZAM, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Bennett, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 125]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York *County*(Renee A. White, J.), rendered May 15, 2007, as amended October 30, 2007, and as further amended July 29, 2008, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of seven years, unanimously reversed, on the law, the plea vacated, the full indictment reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Before defendant pleaded guilty, the prosecutor asserted that defendant was a second felony offender based on a New Jersey conviction. Defense counsel did not challenge that assertion, and following defendant’s guilty plea he was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to a term of seven years with five years’ postrelease supervision (PRS). Subsequently, by way of a CPL 440.20 motion to set aside sentence, defendant established that his New Jersey conviction did not qualify as a New York felony. At his ultimate resentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea as involuntary, claiming he had been misinformed as to his status and potential sentencing exposure. The resentencing court denied the motion, and imposed the same prison term as originally imposed, but this time with a PRS period of three years.

The plea withdrawal motion should have been granted. While defendant’s ultimate sentence was actually less (with regard to PRS) than the one he bargained for, “[a]t the time defendant pleaded guilty, [h]e did not possess all the information necessary for an informed choice among different possible courses of ac*479tion . . . Accordingly, defendant’s decision to plead guilty cannot be said to have been knowing, voluntary and intelligent.” *(People v Van Deusen,*7 NY3d 744, 746 [2006].) To the extent the People are arguing that defendant would have still have accepted a disposition involving a seven-year prison term had he known he was only a first felony offender, that argument is speculative. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Christopher James A., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Anne Elizabeth Pierre L., Appellant; New Alternatives for Children, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided February 21, 2012

Reported below, 90 AD3d 515.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2392 

To make participation in the American Community Survey voluntary, except 

with respect to certain basic questions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2019 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To make participation in the American Community Survey 

voluntary, except with respect to certain basic questions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Community 

5 Survey Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SUR7 VEY. 

8 (a) OPTIONAL QUESTIONS.—Section 193 of title 13, 

9 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: ‘‘The Secretary shall include, in the instructions 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2392 IH

1 for completing any survey authorized under this section, 

2 a statement indicating that answering any question other 

3 than questions that solicit the information described in 

4 section 221(c)(2)(A) is optional.’’. 

5 (b) REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE.—Section 221 of title 

6 13, United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Whoever, 

8 being over eighteen years of age,’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c), any person 

10 older than 18 years of age who’’; and 

11 (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol12 lows: 

13 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision under 

14 this title— 

15 ‘‘(A) no person may be compelled to disclose in16 formation relative to the person’s religious beliefs or 

17 to membership in a religious body; and 

18 ‘‘(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), no 

19 person may be fined or otherwise compelled to an20 swer questions in connection with the survey, con21 ducted by the Secretary of Commerce, which is com22 monly referred to as the ‘American Community Sur23 vey’. 

24 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1)(B)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2392 IH

1 ‘‘(A) shall not apply to any question that elic2 its— 

3 ‘‘(i) the name of the respondent; 

4 ‘‘(ii) contact information for the respond5 ent; 

6 ‘‘(iii) the date of the response; or 

7 ‘‘(iv) the number of people living or stay8 ing at the same address; and 

9 ‘‘(B) does not waive any penalty imposed for 

10 conduct described in subsection (b).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Brandon McFadden, Respondent.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided February 9, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 554.

*896Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fahey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

BRIAN ARTHUR McCORMICK

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2461 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 48 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 45238

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of May , 2018

, upon consideration of the Verified

Statement of Resignation, Brian Arthur McCormick is disbarred on consent from the Bar

of th is Commonwealth, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-139810, 333-149773, 333-158070, 333-165218 and 333-171795) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, 2006
Equity Incentive Plan, 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Affymax, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-149772 ,
333-158080, 333-162275, and 333-165220) of Affymax, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 10, 2011, with respect to the
financial statements of Affymax, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Affymax, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPalo Alto, California
March 10, 2011


---



QuickLinks
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 5
<Page>

COMMENTS BY AUDITOR FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA - U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition
of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a
change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the
comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the changes
described in Note 1(p) to the financial statements. Our report to the
shareholders dated January 20, 2003, incorporated by reference herein, is
expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not
require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the
auditors' report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately
disclosed in the financial statements.


(signed) KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
January 20, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 242

           To repeal the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2019

  Ms. Jayapal (for herself, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Khanna, Mr. McGovern, Ms. 
 Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. 
Pingree, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. 
     Clarke of New York, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Serrano, and Mr. Gomez) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To repeal the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEALER.

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 931 et seq.) is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Technology, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Roderick Cabahug, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Technology, Inc., and will be retained by Pacific
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Roderick Cabahug
--------------------------
Roderick Cabahug
Chief Executive Officer
April 29, 2003