alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Hilary
Davis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Lynn Two, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Lynn Two, Inc.





Date:
      August 20, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
                  Hilary
      DavisHilary
      DavisChief
      Executive Officer,Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer













The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

          - [Docket No. RP01-314-001]

Take notice that on May 11, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised  Volume No. 1, the compliance tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to become  effective May 1, 2001.

Williston Basin states that on April 27, 2001, the Commission issued its “Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets, Subject to Refund and Conditions and Denying Request for Waiver, (Order)” in the above referenced docket. That Order accepted Williston Basin's proposed park and loan service subject to Williston Basin making a  compliance filing to address the conditions of the Order. The instant filing is being made in compliance with the provisions of that Order.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's  Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web  site at http:­//www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12779  Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  May 20, 2010

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Acting Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries

|Name of Subsidiary                               |  | State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|                                                 |  |                                             
|Insurance subsidiary:                            |  |                                             
|                                                 |  |                                             
|Professionals Direct Insurance Company           |  | Michigan                                    
|                                                 |  |                                             
|Non-insurance subsidiaries:                      |  |                                             
|                                                 |  |                                             
|Professionals Direct Insurance Services, Inc.    |  | Michigan                                    
|Professionals Direct Finance, Inc.               |  | Michigan                                    
|Professionals Direct Employer Organization, Inc. |  | Michigan                                    
|Professionals Direct Statutory Trust I           |  | Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Corps of Engineers; Notice of Availability for the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Report (EIS/EIR) for the 
Pier J South Maine Terminal Expansion Project, Los Angeles County, CA

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION:  Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, in 
coordination with the Port of Long Beach, has completed a Draft EIS/EIR 
for the Pier J South Maine Terminal Expansion Project. The Port Long 
Beach requires authorization pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water 
Act and section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors act for 115 acres of 
landfill in three phases, dredging up to 10,000,000 cubic yards of 
sediment, construction of a new concrete pile-supported wharf, new 
terminal buildings and a new rail yard.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions or comments concerning the 
Draft EIS/EIR should be directed to Dr. Aaron O. Allen, Project 
Manager, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 
532711, Los Angeles, California, 90053-2325, (213) 452-3413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13665 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
# C_2010108EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 108/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 9.11.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 579/09 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Molise, Toscana, Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | ITTIERRE S.p.A. |
| Legal basis | Decreto Legislativo 270/1999, «Nuova disciplina dell'amministrazione straordinaria delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza»; decreto-legge 347/2003, «Misure urgenti per la ristrutturazione industriale di grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza», e decreto 319/2004, «Condizioni e le modalità di prestazione della garanzia statale sui finanziamenti a favore delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza». |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Rescue of firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 64,2 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 10.11.2009-10.5.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Manufacturing industry |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero dello Sviluppo economico |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

9.11.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 579/09

Member State

Italy

Region

Molise, Toscana, Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

ITTIERRE S.p.A.

Legal basis

Decreto Legislativo 270/1999, «Nuova disciplina dell'amministrazione straordinaria delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza»; decreto-legge 347/2003, «Misure urgenti per la ristrutturazione industriale di grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza», e decreto 319/2004, «Condizioni e le modalità di prestazione della garanzia statale sui finanziamenti a favore delle grandi imprese in stato di insolvenza».

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Rescue of firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 64,2 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

10.11.2009-10.5.2010

Economic sectors

Manufacturing industry

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero dello Sviluppo economico

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1136

NYMEX Henry Hub (LD) (CAD/MMBtu) Options

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled call or put option based upon the monthly price published by NYMEX for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to that day's settlement price for the last scheduled trading day of 

the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract for the Delivery Date.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the average daily settlement price 

during the calendar month of the first nearby NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures contract (as described 

in Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On expiration of a Put Option, the 

value will be the difference between the strike price and the average daily settlement price during the 

calendar month of the first nearby NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures contract (as described in Floating 

Price A), or zero whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be in GJ. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in GJ, multiplied by the 

settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 156 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in Canadian dollars and cents per GJ. The minimum price fluctuation shall be $0.01 per GJ. The 

minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease three Business Days prior to the first calendar day of the Contract Period.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement in Canadian Dollars. Final settlement, following termination of 

posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price A.

CURRENCY CONVERSION 

Daily WRM Noon Rate for CAD per unit of USD as reporting by Refinitiv.
# C_2010094EN.01000801.xml

| 14.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 94/05

| Date of adoption of the decision | 23.1.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 577/08 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Madrid |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayudas para producciones teatrales, musicales y de danza |
| Legal basis | Ley 2/95 de 8 de marzo — Subvenciones de la Comunidad de Madrid; Ley 38/2003 de 17 de noviembre — General de subvenciones; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo por la que se convocan ayudas a la producción coreográfica para el año 2009 y 2010; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo, por la que se convocan ayudas a la actividad teatral para los años 2009 y 2010; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo, por la que se convocan ayudas a la producción musical para el año 2009 y 2010 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 4 257 500 million
  Overall budget: EUR 8 515 000 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 25.11.2008-25.11.2010 |
| Economic sectors | Recreational, cultural sporting activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Comunidad de Madrid |
| Consejería de Cultura y Turismo |
| C/ Alcalá, 31 |
| 28014 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |

Date of adoption of the decision

23.1.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 577/08

Member State

Spain

Region

Madrid

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayudas para producciones teatrales, musicales y de danza

Legal basis

Ley 2/95 de 8 de marzo — Subvenciones de la Comunidad de Madrid; Ley 38/2003 de 17 de noviembre — General de subvenciones; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo por la que se convocan ayudas a la producción coreográfica para el año 2009 y 2010; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo, por la que se convocan ayudas a la actividad teatral para los años 2009 y 2010; proyecto de Orden de la Consejería de Cultura y Turismo, por la que se convocan ayudas a la producción musical para el año 2009 y 2010

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 4 257 500 million

Overall budget: EUR 8 515 000 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

25.11.2008-25.11.2010

Economic sectors

Recreational, cultural sporting activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Comunidad de Madrid

Consejería de Cultura y Turismo

C/ Alcalá, 31

28014 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2271

ZEENIA S. SATTI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01008-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. *

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zeenia Satti, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* The opinion is filed by a quoru m of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).2 PER CURIAM:

Zeenia Satti appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Satti v. Bank of

America, N.A. , No. 1:08-cv-01008-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 7,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance Holdings,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2004



/S/    G. ROBERT THOMPSONG. Robert ThompsonChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
June 4, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ENZO INVESTMENTS, LP, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00509-CV V.

CHARLES WHITE, Appellee

________________________________

CHARLES WHITE, Cross-Appellant

 V.

ENZO INVESTMENTS, LP; IP INVESTMENTS, LLC; AND IP REAL ESTATE, LLC, 

Cross-Appellees

________________________________

This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former judgment of 

May 12, 2015, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of May 

12, 2015, withdrawn. 

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed March 14, 2013 in favor of 

appellee/cross-appellant Charles White, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore MODIFY the portion of 

the trial court’s judgment awarding White “the amount of $377,567.50 for reasonable and 

necessary attorneys’ fees through the date of trial and an additional $20,625.00 for postverdict matters in the trial court,” and instead award White “the amount of $209,192.50 for 

reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees for work performed in the trial court.” We order the 

remainder of the judgment AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee/cross-appellant Charles White.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TitanMachinery Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,David J. Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date: September 15, 2008

 

 
|   |   | /s/ David J. Meyer      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | David J. Meyer          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6756

FRANCHOT LANE CHRISTMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID CHESTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-931)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franchot Lane Christmas, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Christmas v. Chester, No. CA-97-931 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED