alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3316]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on January 5, 2001, I find that the following Counties in the State of Oklahoma constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by a severe winter ice storm beginning on December 25, 2000 and continuing: Adair, Atoka, Bryan, Carter, Cherokee, Choctaw, Cleveland, Coal, Cotton, Creek, Garvin, Grady, Haskell, Hughes, Jefferson, Johnston, Latimer, LeFlore, Lincoln, Love, Marshall, McClain, McCurtain, McIntosh, Murray, Muskogee, Okfuskee, Oklahoma, Okmulgee, Pittsburg, Pontotoc, Pottawatomie, Pushmataha, Seminole, Sequoyah, Stephens, Tulsa, Wagoner and Washington Counties. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on March 6, 2001, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on October 5, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Caddo, Canadian, Comanche, Delaware, Kingfisher, Logan, Mayes, Nowata, Osage, Pawnee, Payne, Rogers, and Tillman in Oklahoma; Benton, Crawford, Little River, Polk, Scott, Sebastian, Sevier and Washington in Arkansas; Chautauqua and Montgomery in Kansas; Bowie, Clay, Cooke, Fannin, Grayson, Lamar, Montague, Red River and Wichita in Texas. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.000For Economic Injury:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 331611. For economic injury the numbers are 9K3300 for Oklahoma, 9K3400 for Arkansas, 9K3500 for Kansas, and 9K3600 for Texas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) Dated: January 9, 2001. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 01-1324 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00058-CR

SHANNON BASS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 44585-B

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Shannon Bass has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. As authorized by Rule 

42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Scott E. Stevens

Justice

Date Submitted: May 2, 2019

Date Decided: May 3, 2019

Do Not Publish
TERRANCE TYRONE MASON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3485

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 11, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Thomas H. Duffy and Daniel R. Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Terrance Tyrone Mason, challenges the trial court’s denial of his 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error, 
2

wherein he sought credit for time served. For the reasons that follow, we reverse

and remand.

The trial court denied Appellant’s motion upon concluding that claims 

regarding jail credit must be raised in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.801, and even if they could be raised in a rule 3.800(b)(2) 

motion, they were insufficiently pled. The State properly concedes that the trial 

court erred by denying Appellant’s motion on the ground that claims regarding credit 

for time served must be raised in a rule 3.801 motion and cannot be raised in a rule 

3.800(b)(2) motion. See In re Amendments to Fla. R. of Crim. P., 204 So. 3d 944, 

944-45 (Fla. 2016) (explaining that the 2016 amendments to rules 3.800 and 3.801 

“make clear that jail credit matters can be litigated in either a motion filed under rule 

3.800(b) while a defendant’s direct appeal is pending, or in a motion filed under rule 

3.801 after a defendant’s sentence has become final”); see also Cousnard v. State, 

188 So. 3d 936, 936 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (reversing the trial court’s denial of a rule 

3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error that sought an additional award of jail 

credit); Lowe v. State, 152 So. 3d 1279, 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (quashing the 

trial court’s orders on the appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail 

credit, which it had treated as a rule 3.801 motion, without prejudice to the appellant 

filing a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion or a rule 3.801 motion after the direct appeal 

concluded). Additionally, the trial court erroneously concluded that Appellant’s 
3

claims were insufficiently pled given that he identified the alleged errors with 

specificity and set forth the amounts of credit he claims he is entitled to receive. See

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b) (“The motion must identify the error with specificity and 

provide a proposed correction.”). Therefore, we reverse and remand for further 

proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-67902, 333-69620, and 333-69786) on Form S-1 and (No. 333-128718) on Form S-3 of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company of ourreports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity, andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company.

Our reports dated March 10, 2006 refer to a change in accounting for certain nontraditional long-duration contracts and for separateaccounts in 2004. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Richmond, Virginia 

March 14, 2006
cmeé

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

August 7, 2006

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington DC 20581 =

m
sa
>
Es)

\

RE: Section 5c(c)1 and Regulation 40.6 Submission. Exchange Certification of Revisions to
the Listing Cycle for Live Cattle Futures. Submission #06-70.

Dear Ms. Donovan:

On July 11, 2006, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. approved the listing of two additional
contract months for Live Cattle Futures within the regular cycle of February, April, June,
August, October and December. This change will result in a total of 9 eligible contract months
at all times, instead of the current 7 months.

To implement this change, two additional contract months - December 2007 and February 2008
— will be listed for trading on Friday, September 1, 2006, at the same time as the regularly
scheduled listing of the October 2007 contract. The Exchange will then revert to its normal
practice of listing one new contract month immediately following each contract expiration, to
maintain a roster of 9 eligible contract months.

Notice that this change does not require amendments to any CME rules, nor does it affect any
contract month with open interest.

The Exchange certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.


Ms. Eileen Donovan

Listing of Live Cattle Months
. August 7, 2006
Page 2

If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact Mr. Paul Peterson at (312)
930-4587 or via e-mail at ppeterso@cme.com. Please refer to CME Submission #06-70 in all
correspondence regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
#### STATE v. LANE

No. 413P98

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 554

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Walter Grant, Appellant, v Susan A. Connel, Superintendent of Oneida Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Decided June 8, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5601).
#### MARTIN v. BENSON

No. 119A97

Case below: 348 N.C. 684

Petition by plaintiffs to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 8 October 1998.
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 91A95-2

Case below: Wake County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari is allowed December 1998 for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Superior Court, Wake County, for reconsideration of defendant’s motion for appropriate relief in light of this Court’s opinion in *State v. Bates,*348 N.C. 29 (1998).
#### JLG Architectural Products, LLC, Appellant, v WDF, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 87 AD3d 681.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

November 29, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Required Certification AEGIS SEF, LLC

Amendment to Rulebook (Fee Schedule)

Dear Sir:

Pursuant to Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”, or the “Commission”), AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS”) hereby notifies 

the Commission that it has amended its Fee Schedule to establish fees for new products. The 

Rule Amendments shall become effective 10 days after this submission has been filed or 

immediately upon approval by the CFTC, whichever occurs first.

A concise explanation and analysis of the rules and their compliance with applicable provisions 

of the Act, including core principles and the Commission’s regulations, is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A. A copy of the Fee Schedule is attached under separate cover as Exhibit B. A redlined 

version of the Fee Schedule is attached under separate cover as Exhibit C.

AEGIS hereby certifies that: (i) the amended rule complies with the Act and the

Commission’s regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being

concurrently posted on AEGIS’s website. There were no substantive opposing views to the

amendments to the rule.

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-sef.com with any questions 

regarding this matter.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381

Exhibit A – Explanation 

Amendment and Explanation Supporting Rule / Core Principle

Updated Fee Schedule

• Added fee categories for new 

products

• Core Principle 1(B)- Reasonable 

Discretion of swap execution facility

• § 37.202 – Impartial Access
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Exhibit B – AEGIS SEF Fee Schedule - clean

(attached under separate cover)

Exhibit C – AEGIS SEF Fee Schedule - redline

(attached under separate cover)
shouguanex10-11.htm


 


 


EXHIBIT 10.11




 


Master Agreement


The Parties







Party A:                      Penglai City Gold Mining Holding Co. Limited


Legal representative:                                            Fuan Zhang


Address:                       No.53 Dengzhou Road, Penglai, Shandong, PRC







Party B:                       Penglai XinGuan Investment Limited


Legal representative: Jianxi Yang


Address:                      Wenshitang Village East, Cunliji Town, Penglai, Shandong, PRC







As of:








	
1.

	
Party A is a PRC company holding the State license to engage in the gold industry in China. CunliJi gold mine (“the Subject Asset”) is a legally owned asset of Party A. Party A intends to cooperate with Party B on the operation of Cunliji gold mine.












2.         Party B has reached a consensus with Party A concerning the clause (1):


In accordance with the principle of willingness, fairness and trustworthiness, Party A and Party B entered into the following agreement on May 4, 2009:








	
  

	
2.1 Both parties agree that Party A shall lease Cunliji gold mine to Party B upon signing of this agreement. Party B is entitled to acquire the Subject Asset in full amount on condition that the average daily ore production amount of the Subject Asset has reached 80 tons or more for the whole year 2010, AND the Subject Asset has obtained ISO certification or equivalent on or before January 3, 2011.













	
  

	
2.2 Party B agrees to pay a rental deposit of RMB20M to Party A within 10 working days upon signing of this agreement and such amount shall be used as the initial payment upon acquisition of the Subject Asset by Party B. Party A shall return the rental deposit in full amount to Party B in the case that the conditions under clause (2.1) are not fulfilled.












Both parties shall sign legal documents to confirm the details of the lease and the acquisition of the Subject Asset.








	
3.

	
Party A agrees that Party B shall keep the gold concentrates before transporting to the smelter during leasing period. Party B shall have the right to choose the smelter.













	
4.  

	
Matters not covered in this agreement shall be discussed in a supplementary agreement.












Party A: Penglai City Gold Mining Holding Co. Limited


Legal / Authorized representative: /s/ Fuan Zhang


Name: Fuan Zhang







Party B:                       Penglai XinGuan Investment Limited


Legal / Authorized representative: /s/ Jianxi Yang


Name: Jianxi Yang
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for a Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 
sections 211.9 and 211.41, notice is hereby given that the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) has received a request for a waiver of 
compliance with certain requirements of Federal railroad safety 
regulations. The individual petitions are described below, including 
the party seeking relief, the regulatory provisions involved, the 
nature of the relief being requested and the petitioner's arguments in 
favor of relief.

Tennessee Valley Railroad Museum

[Docket Number FRA-2001-8888]

    Tennessee Valley Railroad Museum (TVRM) seeks to renew a waiver 
from compliance with 49 CFR Part 240.201(d), which was originally 
granted and became effective on November 19, 1993, for a period of one 
year. Specifically, the original waiver allowed TVRM to operate without 
complying with the requirement of 49 CFR Part 240.201(d), which 
provides that only certified persons may operate trains or locomotives. 
The waiver affects only persons who participate in the engineer charter 
``Engineer for a Day'' program. The TVRM plans to conduct this program 
on its own trackage from Mile Post No. 0.00 East Chattanooga Depot to 
Mile Post No. 3.0 Grand Junction Depot, a distance of three miles. 
Individuals participating in the program would be allowed to operate 
the train and experience the hands-on duties of a locomotive engineer.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket No. FRA-2001-
8888) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket 
Management Facility, Room PL-401, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. Communications received within 45 days of 
the date of the notice will be considered by FRA before final action is 
taken. Comments received after that date will be considered as far as 
practicable. All written communications concerning these proceedings 
are available for examination during regular business hours at the 
above address. All written communications are also accessible on the 
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington D.C. on May 22, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-13283 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Encana Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall K. Eresman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

| 1.     | The Report fully   complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The information   contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the   financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | By:                                                                                                                                                      | /s/   Randall K. Eresman |   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     | Randall K. Eresman |   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     | President &   Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |
|   | Dated:    February 17,   2011                                                                                                   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








The undersigned, Jeffrey Peterson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Peterson, Principal Financial Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: November 8, 2010
By:
/s/ Jeffrey PetersonJeffrey PetersonChief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
23




Schwartz
Levitsky Feldman llp


CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS




LICENSED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TORONTO,
MONTREAL




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FIRM




The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky
Feldman llp hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion
dated March 16, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements of China
Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) included in its Annual Report on Form
10K being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and
its incorporation by reference into Registration Statement No:
333-126959.




Toronto,
      Ontario, Canada
              /s/ Schwartz Levitsky Feldman
      LLPMarch
      26, 2009Chartered
      Accountants
                
                Licensed
      Public Accountants




1167
Caledonia Road


Toronto,
Ontario M6A 2X1


Tel:
416 785 5353


Fax:
416 785 5663