alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David C. Scott, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of 3PAR Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3PAR Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID C. SCOTT                                                           
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | David C. Scott                                                               
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Adriel G. Lares, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of 3PAR Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3PAR Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ ADRIEL G. LARES                                                                
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Adriel G. Lares                                                                    
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to 3PAR Inc. and will be retained by 3PAR Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Laural
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended November 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mandi
Luis, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:  January
8, 2009





MANDI
LUIS





Mandi
Luis


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director














-1-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert SPRAGUE, also known as Jailbird, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-30885

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 2013.

Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Luke Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lafayette, LA, Keith Becker, Anitha S. Ibra-him, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Prentice Lang White, Esq., Counsel, P.L. White Law Firm, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Robert Sprague, Tucson, AZ, pro se.

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Robert Sprague has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229*345(5th Cir.2011). Sprague has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under die limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ezequiel MENDOZA-ESPINOZA, also known as Cipriano Rodriguez-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50959

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ezequiel Mendoza-Espinoza pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been removed in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and he was sentenced within the Sentencing Guidelines to 57 months of imprisonment. He argues that his within-guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

We consider the reasonableness of a sentence by engaging in a bifurcated review process. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Because Mendoza-Espinoza does not argue that the district court committed any procedural error, we consider only the “substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” *Id.*

Although Mendoza-Espinoza asserts that a presumption of reasonableness should not apply to his within-guidelines sentence because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 lacks an empirical basis, that issue is foreclosed. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir.2009); *United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir.2009). His argument that § 2L1.2 is unreasonable because it is not empirically based likewise is foreclosed, and we have repeatedly rejected the argument that a sentence imposed pursuant to § 2L1.2 is greater than necessary to meet § 3553(a)’s goals as a result of any double counting inherent in that Guideline. *See Duarte,*569 F.3d at 529-31.

*490As for his argument that the guidelines range overstated the seriousness of his illegal reentry offense and failed to reflect his personal history and characteristics, the record reflects that the district court considered mitigation factors and balanced them against other § 3553(a) factors. Mendoza-Espinoza has failed to show that his within-guidelines sentence “does not account for a factor that should receive significant weight, ... gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or ... represents a clear error of judgment in balancing sentencing factors.” *United States v. Cooks,*589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir.2009). We find no reason to disturb the presumption of reasonableness in this case. *See id.; United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT 31**

**        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kent Carasquero, certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB (“Report”) of Ouvo, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: March 13, 2007 

/s/ Kent Carasquero

Kent Carasquero 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**27**

----
#### Jacques Sebag, Appellant, v Carlos Narvaez, Respondent.

Submitted January 19, 2010;

decided February 16, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal etc. denied *[see*13 NY3d 711 (2009)].
Sean Downey

Managing Director – Clearing Chief Compliance Officer,

Enterprise Risk Officer & Policy

CME Clearing

20 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 T 312 930 2730 Sean.Downey@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

June 29, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

CommodityFuturesTradingCommission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: FOIAConfidentialTreatment Request – Amendments to the Risk Management Framework, 

Liquidity Risk Management Framework, Model Validation Framework, Credit Policy, 

Collateral Policy, and Investment Policy.

To Whom it May Concern:

On June 29, 2023, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME Clearing”) submitted amendments to the

Risk Management Framework, Liquidity Risk Management Framework, Model Validation Framework, 

Credit Policy, Collateral Policy, and Investment Policy (collectively, the “Policies”) to the Commodity

Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) via the CFTC Electronic Portal pursuant to CFTC 

Regulaton 40.6(a). The submission consisted of the submission cover sheet and letter and amendments

to the Policies, (the “Confidential Information”).

Pursuant to Sections 8 and 8(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), as amended, and Commission

Regulation 145.9(d), CME Clearing requests confidential treatment for the Confidential Information on

the grounds that disclosure of the contents would reveal confidential commercial information of the

CME Clearing. Pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), CME Clearing requests that

confidential treatment be maintained until further notice from CME Clearing. CME Clearing also 

requests that the Commission notify the undersigned immediately after receiving any FOIA request

or any other court order, subpoena or summons for same. Finally, CME Clearing requests 

notificationin the event the Commission intends to disclose the Confidential Information to Congress

or to any other governmental agency or unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. CME Clearing does

not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons

for the Confidential Information.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 312-930-8167 or via email at

sean.downey@cmegroup.com.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sean Downey

Managing Direcotor – Clearing Chief Compliance 

Officer, Enterprice Risk Officer & Policy
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to discount 

FHA single-family mortgage insurance premium payments for first-time 

homebuyers who complete a financial literacy housing counseling program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself and Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

to discount FHA single-family mortgage insurance premium payments for first-time homebuyers who complete 

a financial literacy housing counseling program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Financial Lit5 eracy Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2162 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCOUNT ON MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM 

2 PAYMENTS FOR FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS 

3 WHO COMPLETE FINANCIAL LITERACY HOUS4 ING COUNSELING PROGRAMS. 

5 The second sentence of subparagraph (A) of section 

6 203(c)(2) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

7 1709(c)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘not exceed 2.75 

8 percent of the amount of the original insured principal ob9 ligation of the mortgage’’ and inserting ‘‘be 25 basis 

10 points lower than the premium payment amount estab11 lished by the Secretary under the first sentence of this 

12 subparagraph’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
| 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 14, 2011 | By:    | /s/ ANDREW AIRD                                                       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Andrew Aird,                                                          |   |
|                     |   | President, Secretary Treasurer,                                       |   |
|                     |   | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director |
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2409 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to capital 

for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

PAPPAS, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, and Mr. JOHN W. ROSE of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand 

access to capital for rural-area small businesses, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Capital for Rural Job Creators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSI7 NESSES. 

8 Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

9 (15 U.S.C. 78d(j)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2409 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (4)(C), by inserting ‘‘rural2 area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned small 

3 businesses,’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (6)(B)(iii), by inserting 

5 ‘‘rural-area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned 

6 small businesses,’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



Current Report



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):October 12, 2007



---

VIPER POWERSPORTS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Nevada
        000-51632
        41-1200215(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
        (Commission File Number)
        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)19950 177th St., Ste. FBig Lake, MN
        
        55309(Address of principal executive offices)
        
        (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code: (763) 263-5700



Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.



On October 12, 2007, registrant
completed a private placement of its equity securities whereby $1,004,000 of its common stock was sold at $ .75 per share, a total
of 1,338,667 shares. Sales in this private placement were made exclusively to accredited investors, and total commissions were
$82,025. Net proceeds from this private offering are being used for motorcycle component inventories and other expenses directly
related to commercial production of Viper motorcycles which has recently commenced. Sales of the restricted securities in this
offering were made in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Viper Powersports Inc.Dated: October 12, 2007
        
        By:
        /s/ John LaiJohn Lai, President




---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50963 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JAVIER VEGA

- OROZCO, also known as Javier Orozco Vega, also known as Javier Vega Orozco, also known as Javier Orozco

- Vega , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 247

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Javier Vega

- Orozco , represented by the Federal Public Defender, appeals his within

- guidelines sentence for illegal reentry after removal from the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1). On appeal, Vega

Orozco challenges the Supreme Court’s ruling in Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), arguing that his sentence pursuant to § 1326(b)(1)

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50963 Document: 00514502122 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2018No. 17

- 50963

2 is unconstitutional. Seeking to preserve the issue for possible r eview by the Supreme Court, he correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F. 3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007). In Almendarez

- Torres , the Supreme Court held that for the purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. 523 U.S. at 239

- 47

. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance . Because Vega

- Orozco’s argument is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969) . Accordingly, the Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 17-50963 Document: 00514502122 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2018