alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J

- S32029

- 18 & J

- S32030

- 18

____________________________________ * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. 2018 PA Super 302

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

SCOTT ALLEN SHREFFLER

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1375 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 26, 2017 in the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin County
Criminal Division at No.: CP

- 44

- CR

- 0000247

- 2016

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

SCOTT ALLEN SHREFFLER

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1376 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 26, 2017 in the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin County
Criminal Division at No.: CP

- 44

- CR

- 0000250

- 2016

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., NICHOLS, J., and PLATT*, J.

CONCURRING OPINION BY PLATT, J.: FILED: NOVEMBER 5, 2018

Because the Commonwealth failed to obtain an order unsealing the

memorandum of consent and approval, the court order authorizing the in

home interception, and the affidavit of probable cause, as required by 18

Pa.C.S.A. § 5704(2)(iv), I concur in the resul t. I believe it unnecessary toJ

- S32029

- 18 & J

- S32030

- 18

- 2

-

address the additional provisions of the Wiretap Act set forth in the learned

Majority Opinion. The Act itself, at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5721.1(b)(5) and (6), limits

a motion to exclude in one

- party in

- home consents to claims that : “the

consent to the interception was coerced by the Commonwealth” and “the

interception was made without prior procurement of a court order or without

probable cause.” 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5721.1(b)(5), (6). 1

Implicit in the Majority Opinion and this Concurre nce is the requirement

that, on remand, the Commonwealth move to unseal these documents, and

provide them to Appellant’s counsel. Appellant also should be given an

opportunity to amend his motion to suppress, based on anything revealed in

this discovery, and, a new suppression hearing should be held, if required.

I agree that, by failing to provide discovery, the Commonwealth

prejudiced Appellant in his ability to challenge the probable cause requirement

for the wiretap, thus necessitating that we vacate h is sentence and remand.

Accordingly, I respectfully concur in the learned Majority ’ s disposition.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

1 In Commonwealth v. Fetter , 770 A.2d 762 (Pa. Super. 2001), this Court
observed that “ 18 Pa.C.S.[ A.] § 5704 is not subject to other sections of the Wiretap Act, unless specifically enumerated; instead, it lists exceptions to the generally stringent requirements for wiretaps when the interception occurs at
the direction of a law enforcement officer and one party voluntarily consents to the interception.” Fetter

, supra at 766.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
Subsidiaries of Nexstar Finance Holdings, L.L.C.

 1. Nexstar Finance, L.L.C.

 2. Nexstar Finance, Inc.

 3. Nexstar Broadcasting of Northeastern Pennsylvania, L.L.C.

 4. Nexstar Broadcasting of Joplin, L.L.C.

 5. Nexstar Broadcasting of Erie, L.L.C.

 6. Nexstar Broadcasting of Beaumont/Port Arthur, L.L.C.

 7. Nexstar Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, L.L.C.

 8. Nexstar Broadcasting of Rochester, L.L.C.

 9. Nexstar Broadcasting of Abilene, L.L.C.

10. Entertainment Reality Corporation

11. Nexstar Broadcasting of the Midwest, Inc.

12. Nexstar Broadcasting of Champaign, L.L.C.

13. Nexstar Broadcasting of Peoria, L.L.C.

14. Nexstar Broadcasting of Midland-Odessa, L.L.C.

15. Nexstar Broadcasting of Louisiana, L.L.C.

16. Nexstar Alabama Acquisition, Inc.

17. Nexstar Arkansas Acquisition, Inc.


Nexstar Finance Holdings, Inc. has no subsidiaries.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00029

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.E.W.M. , a Child

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 443CCL

Honorable Bill R. Palmer , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

It is so ORDERED on April 3, 2019

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of April, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
#### STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 304P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 152

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 October 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
#### STATE v. RICE

No. 272P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 715

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
Exhibit 32.

2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eduard Korsinsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer     November 13, 2007
EXHIBIT 23.14
                                                                  -------------



                               CONSENT OF EXPERT

          Reference is made to the Annual  Report on Form 40-F (the "40-F") of
Ivanhoe  Mines  Ltd.  (the  "Company")  to be  filed  with the  United  States
Securities and Exchange  Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

          I  hereby  consent  to the  use of and  reference  to my  name  as a
Qualified  Person for the Ovoot Tolgoi  Project in the Company's  Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial  Conditions and Results of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008, contained in the 40-F.

Sincerely,


/s/ Gene Wusaty
-----------------------------------------------
Name:    Gene Wusaty
Title:   Chief Operating Officer, Coal Division
Company: SouthGobi Energy Resources Ltd.

Date:    March  28, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Erik Olsson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RSC HoldingsIII, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not Applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 28, 2007         /s/ Erik Olsson   Erik Olsson   President andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David T. Mitchell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fabrinet for the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Fabrinet.



|                       |  |        |  |                                                                          
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | By:    |  | /S/ DAVID T. MITCHELL                                                    
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  | Name:  |  | David T. Mitchell                                                        
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|                       |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                            

I, Mark J.
Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fabrinet for the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Fabrinet.



|                       |  |        |  |                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | By:    |  | /S/ MARK J. SCHWARTZ                                            
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  | Name:  |  | Mark J. Schwartz                                                
|                       |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary
|                       |  |        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report: December 8, 2006

(Date of earliest event reported)



---

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Commission File Number: 0-27605



Minnesota
        41-1859679(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
        (IRS Employer Identification No.)




6464 Sycamore Court

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)



(763) 656-4300

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


|o | Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act ( 17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item 8.01Other Events.

On Friday, December 8, 2006, a trial date was set for the patent infringement lawsuit brought by Diomed Holdings, Inc. against Vascular Solutions Inc. and certain other defendants in March 2004 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The case has been scheduled for a jury trial beginning on March 12, 2007. The trial is anticipated to last approximately two weeks with a verdict to be rendered by the jury shortly after the end of the trial. Diomed has asked for injunctive relief, compensatory and treble damages caused by the manufacture and sale of the Vascular products, and other costs, disbursements and attorneys fees. Diomed estimates Vasculars liability for compensatory damages to be $7.0 million. Vascular believes that its products do not infringe on Diomeds patents and that Diomeds claims have no merit and will continue to vigorously defend the
lawsuit brought by Diomed.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.By:
        /s/ James HennenJames HennenChief Financial Officer




Date:  December 11, 2006





---
# C_2020320EN.01001604.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Cooperativa Novalat Scrl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto

(Case C-338/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/25)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 23.5
                                                                   ------------



                               CONSENT OF EXPERT

          Reference is made to the Annual  Report on Form 40-F (the "40-F") of
Ivanhoe  Mines  Ltd.  (the  "Company")  to be  filed  with the  United  States
Securities and Exchange  Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

          I  hereby  consent  to the  use of and  reference  to my  name  as a
Qualified  Person for the Oyu Tolgoi  Technical Report dated March 2008, under
the heading "Item 3:  Description of the Business - Oyu Tolgoi Copper and Gold
Project, Mongolia" in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008, and in the 40-F.

Sincerely,


/s/ Bernard Peters
------------------------------------------
Title:   Principal Mining Consultant
Company: GRD Minproc Limited

Date:  March 28, 2008
#### In the Matter of Daniel Goldstein et al., Appellants, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted December 21, 2009;

decided February 18, 2010

Motion for reargument etc. denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*13 NY3d 511 (2009)].
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form S-8
(Nos. 333-139810, 333-149773 and 333-158070) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, 2006 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of Affymax, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-149772, 333-158080 and 333-162275) of
Affymax, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 3, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Affymax, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Affymax, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPalo Alto, California
March 3, 2010


---



QuickLinks
#### CURRY v. BAKER

No. 359P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 182

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL
PROTECTION AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT, to the
Change in Control Protection Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as
of December 11, 2009 by and between Glenn Prillaman (the
“Executive”) and Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the
“Company” and, together with the Executive, the
“Parties”), is effective this 10th day of September,
2010.


WHEREAS, the Parties
have entered into the Agreement, have the power to amend the Agreement and now
wish to do so;


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


1.      A new
subsection (v) is hereby added to the end of the definition of
“Change in Control” in Section 1 of the Agreement as follows:


(v) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (i) above to
the contrary, (a) no acquisition of Beneficial Ownership of any additional
Stock or Voting Power by any Group through the rights offering of the Company
contemplated by the Company’s Registration Statement
(No. 333-169310) on Form S-3, as amended from time to time (the
“2010 Rights Offering”), shall be deemed to result in a Change in
Control for purposes of this Agreement; and (b) if an acquisition pursuant
to the 2010 Rights Offering results in any Group having Beneficial Ownership of
Stock or Voting Power possessing 35 percent or more of the Stock or Voting
Power, any acquisition of Beneficial Ownership of any additional Stock or
Voting Power by that Group (that occurs while the Group has Beneficial
Ownership of Stock or Voting Power possessing 35 percent or more of the
total Stock or Voting Power) that results in an increase in the percentage of
the total Stock or Voting Power held by that Group shall result in a Change in
Control for purposes of this Agreement.


2.      In all other
respects, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties have affixed their signatures hereto as of the date first written
above.



	EXECUTIVE:	 	COMPANY:
	 
			STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
	 
	/s/ Glenn Prillaman          	 	By:      /s/ Micah S. Goldstein     
	Glenn Prillaman		Name: Micah S. Goldstein           
			Its:      Chief Operating Officer
# Table 1 (ITM Zips by Landfall)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549-1004



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report:

May 23, 2007



---

INSIGNIA SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its chapter)



Minnesota
        1-13471
        41-1656308(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)
        (CommissionFile Number)
        (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)






6470 Sycamore Court North, Maple Grove, Minnesota
        55369(Address of principal executive offices)
        (Zip Code)




Registrants telephone number, including area code     (763) 392-6200



(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---

Item 5.02. Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.



On May 23, 2007, the registrants Compensation Committee approved amendments to the Change in Control Severance Agreements for Alan Jones and Tom Lucas to increase benefit payments and to require a signed release in exchange for benefit payments.



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d)
        Exhibits




10.1
        Amended Change in Control Severance Agreement for Alan Jones.




10.2
        Amended Change in Control Severance Agreement for Tom Lucas.






SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Insignia Systems, Inc.(Registrant)Date:  May 30, 2007
        
        By
        /s/ Scott F. DrillScott F. Drill, President and Chief Executive Officer






---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden
Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen F. Wiggins, Chairman and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 10, 2009



/s/ Stephen F. WigginsStephen F. Wiggins, Chairman of the Board and President
#### Charles Christiano et al., Appellants, v Solovieff Realty Co., L.L.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted February 1, 2010;

decided April 6, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution *(see Paglia v Agrawal,*69 NY2d 946 [1987]).