alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13012]



[[Page 28450]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of these meeting be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 6 p.m.-9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Garden Plaza Hotel, 215 South Illinois Avenue, Oak Ridge, TN 
37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-
922, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-5333 or 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d151c110e18040d173d120f1253191218531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80e8e1ecf3e5f9f0eac0eff2efaee4efe5aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Stewardship: Mr. David Geiser, Director of Long-
Term Stewardship, DOE/Headquarters.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Pat Halsey at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments at the end of the meeting.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Resource 
Center at 105 Broadway, Oak Ridge, TN between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 
Monday through Friday, or by writing to Pat Halsey, Department of 
Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-922, Oak Ridge, 
TN 37831, or by calling her at (865) 576-4025.

    Issued at Washington, DC on May 17, 2001.
Belinda G. Hood,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13012 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 184.

#### Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. *v.*Morrissett, State Tax Commissioner, et al.

*585Argued November 25, 1931.

Decided November 30, 1931.

*Mr. Thomas B. Gay*for appellant.

*Mr. W. W. Martin,*with whom *Mr. Henry R. Miller, Jr.,*was on the brief, for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

Decree affirmed. *State Board of Tax Commissioners*v. *Jackson,*283 U. S. 527; *Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.*v. *Maxwell, ante,*p. 575.
# C_2010021EN.01004001.xml

| 28.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/40

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

2010/C 21/11

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain broad spectrum antibiotics | India | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 713/2005 (OJ L 121, 13.5.2005, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1176/2008 (OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 1) | 14.5.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Certain broad spectrum antibiotics

India

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 713/2005 (OJ L 121, 13.5.2005, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1176/2008 (OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 1)

14.5.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September___  2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron
Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







November
      16, 2009
            /s/
      Byron EltonByron
      EltonChief
      Executive Officer andActing
      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cinnabar Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephanie Wood, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of April, 2009.


/s/  Stephanie Wood
-------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
# C_2019383EN.01001701.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 September 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Zoran Maksimovic (C-64/18), Humbert Jörg Köfler (C-140/18, C-146/18 and C-148/18), Wolfgang Leitner (C-140/18 and C-148/18), Joachim Schönbeck (C-140/18 and C-148/18), Wolfgang Semper (C-140/18 and C-148/18) v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal

(Joined Cases C-64/18, C-140/18, C-146/18 and C-148/18) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Posting of workers - Retention and translation of records of wages - Work permit - Penalties - Proportionality - Fines of a minimum predefined amount - Cumulative - No upper limit - Court costs - Custodial sentence in lieu of a fine)

(2019/C 383/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Zoran Maksimovic (C-64/18), Humbert Jörg Köfler (C-140/18, C-146/18 and C-148/18), Wolfgang Leitner (C-140/18 and C-148/18), Joachim Schönbeck (C-140/18 and C-148/18), Wolfgang Semper (C-140/18 and C-148/18)

Defendant: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal

Intervener: Finanzpolizei

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides, in respect of non-compliance with labour law obligations in relation to obtaining administrative permits and keeping records on wages, for fines to be imposed:

| — | which may not be lower than a predefined minimum amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

which may not be lower than a predefined minimum amount;

| — | which apply cumulatively in respect of each worker concerned and without an upper limit; |
| --- | --- |

—

which apply cumulatively in respect of each worker concerned and without an upper limit;

| — | to which is added a contribution to court costs of 20 % of the amount of the fines if the appeal against the decision imposing those fines is dismissed, and |
| --- | --- |

—

to which is added a contribution to court costs of 20 % of the amount of the fines if the appeal against the decision imposing those fines is dismissed, and

| — | which are replaced by custodial sentences in the event of non-payment. |
| --- | --- |

—

which are replaced by custodial sentences in the event of non-payment.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136949 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136949 COA: 270877 Oakland CC: 2004-199771-FH RASHEEN KEYON BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1020 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2008

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 99.9

(DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON LETTERHEAD)

February 25, 2004

EnCana Corporation
1800  855 2nd Street, S.W.
P.O. Box 2850
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 2S5

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                           
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Annual Report on Form 40-F, Registration Statement on Form F-9, and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (United States Securities and Exchange
Commission)

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the references to our firm under the headings Reserves
and Other Oil and Gas Information and Appendix A of the Annual Information
Form of EnCana Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003 (AIF) and the
inclusion by reference therein of our report entitled Appraisal Report as of
December 31, 2003 on the Buzzard, Scott, and Telford Fields offshore from the
United Kingdom for EnCana U.K., U.S. Version, such AIF being included in the
EnCana Corporation Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2003 and incorporated by reference in the EnCana Corporation registration
statements on Form F-9 (file number 333-98087) and Form S-8 (file numbers
333-13956 and 333-85598).



| | Very truly yours,
| | -----------------



| | (DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON SIGNATURE)
| | ------------------------------------



| | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
| | ------------------------
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 894 

To ensure the safety of expeditionary facilities, infrastructure, and equipment 

supporting United States military operations overseas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure the safety of expeditionary facilities, infrastructure, and equipment supporting United States military 

operations overseas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Safe Facili5 ties and Equipment for American Troops Overseas Act’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 894 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION OF SAFETY OF EXPEDITIONARY FA2 CILITIES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND EQUIP3 MENT SUPPORTING UNITED STATES MILI4 TARY OPERATIONS OVERSEAS. 

5 (a) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—In order to ensure 

6 the safe utilization by the Armed Forces of expeditionary 

7 facilities, infrastructure, and equipment supporting 

8 United States military operations overseas, the Secretary 

9 of Defense shall certify to the congressional defense com10 mittees, by not later than 60 days after the date of the 

11 enactment of this Act, that each of the following actions 

12 have been accomplished: 

13 (1) That generally accepted industry standards 

14 for the safety of personnel are incorporated into 

15 military regulations establishing requirements for fa16 cilities, infrastructure, and equipment, including 

17 standards with respect to fire protection and struc18 tural integrity, and standards with respect to elec19 trical systems, water treatment, and telecommuni20 cation networks. 

21 (2) That each contract or task or delivery order 

22 carried out for the construction, installation, repair, 

23 maintenance, or operation of expeditionary facilities 

24 for the Armed Forces overseas incorporates gen25 erally accepted industry standards for the safety of 

26 personnel utilizing such facilities. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 894 IH

1 (3) That the standards required under para2 graphs (1) and (2) apply in all current and future 

3 United States military operations overseas. 

4 (b) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE5 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

6 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

7 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# C_2017347EN.01003702.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/37

---

Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Inverni and Others v Commission and SRB

(Case T-505/17)

(2017/C 347/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Inverni, SL (Madrid, Spain), Inverindesa, SL (Madrid) and Isaac Ignacio Fernández Fernández (Oviedo, Spain) (represented by: B. Gutiérrez de la Roza Pérez, P. Rubio Escobar, R. Ruiz de la Torre Esporrín and B. Fernández García, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should annul:

| — | Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A.;

| — | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español. |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1302

Crude Oil Basis Swap - Argus WTI Houston (1st month) - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of *Floating Price A* minus 

*Floating Price B* 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus WTI Houston (1st month) price for each business day that it is determined during the 

contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the NYMEX WTI 

Crude Oil futures first nearby contract settlement price for each business day that it is 

determined during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Joseph Levi, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: May 12, 2009  /s/ Joseph Levi Joseph Levi Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. FOY

No. 357P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 466

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 21 August 1998. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied and stay dissolved 14 September 1998. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 September 1998. Motion by defendant (Foy) to expedite determination of State’s petition for discretionary review and writ of supersedeas allowed 14 September 1998.