alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Fidelis  Energy,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Julianne  DeGrendele,
Treasurer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


 /s/    Julianne DeGrendele
Julianne DeGrendele
Secretary / Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


March 30, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.2



Consulting Agreement



between



Image Sensing Systems, Inc. and Arthur Bourgeois



This agreement between Image Sensing Systems, Inc.
(Company) and Arthur Bourgeois (Consultant) is effective from January 2, 2007 through March 31, 2007. This agreement can be
extended by the Company and both the Company and Consultant have the right to cancel provided either party provides a 30 day
notice during the contracting period.



The Company will pay the Consultant a retainer of
$1,000 per month and will reimburse the Consultant on all out of pocket expenses related to his consulting role. The consultant
will also be paid an hourly rate of $150.00 per hour for his services during this period.



During the consulting period, the Consultant will
provide to the Companys Chief Financial Officer (CFO) basic accounting support which includes but is not limited
to:



2006 Year-end financial statements

2006 Tax preparation

2006-Q4-10K

2007 Budget

CD & A Support as required by SOX

|Consultant                 
|---------------------------
|                           
|Agreed:                    
|                           
|                           
|Dated:                     
|                           
|Image Sensing Systems, Inc.
|                           
|Agreed:                    
|                           
|                           

---
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF DANIEL VALOT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND OLIVIER DUBOIS, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of Daniel Valot, Chief Executive Officer, and Olivier Dubois, Chief
Financial Officer, of Technip, a société anonymeorganized under French law,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Technip on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to his knowledge:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Technip. By:
    /s/ Daniel ValotName:
    Daniel ValotTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer By:
    /s/ Olivier DuboisName:
    Olivier DuboisTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer Date: June 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




November 4, 2010

/s/ Byron EltonByron EltonChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of West Metro Financial Services, Inc.



This 25th day of March,
2005.



/s/ Kathy HulseyKathy HulseyPrincipal Accounting and Chief Financial Officer
#### Ladd, Trustee, etc., *v.*Cameron.

*Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.*

August 15, 1885.

1. Patents for Inventions—Preliminary Injunction—Decision in Another Circuit as to Validity of Patent.

Where a patent has been declared valid by a decision in another circuit in a contest respecting a preliminary injunction, such decision will bo followed unless new evidence is presented of such a character and significance that it would probably, if introduced in the first cause, have led to a different decision.

2. Same—Laches.

A preliminary injunction will not be granted when it is shown that the defendant has, with the knowledge of complainant, openly used the infringing mechanism for more than seven years before the institution of the suit.

Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

*Chas. D. Adams*and *W. C. Witter,*for the motion.

*M. 2\ Neidbold*and *A. Z. Keasbcy, contra.*

Nixon, J.

The application for a preliminary injunction in this case must be refused. The complainant’s patent has been declared valid, after protracted litigations, by the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York. I fully recognize the propriety of following the decisions of my brethren in other circuits, and in all contests respecting preliminary injunctions. I accept as conclusions such adjudications, unless new evidence is presented of such a character and significance that it would probably, if intro*38duced into the first case, have led to a different decision. See *Bailey Wringing-machine Co.*v. *Adams,*3 Ban. & A. 96. Upon this motion I must accept the uncontradicted affidavit of the defendant as true. He swears to the existence of two facts, either of which is sufficient to defeat this application. (1) That he has been in the open, notorious use of the flexible and elastic foundation strips, in the construction; (2) that the owners of the patent have, since 1878, known of his use of the mechanism now complained of, and have taken no steps, except making idle threats, to restrain him. This laches is accounted for, and attempted to be excused, by the statement that the owners of the patent were quarreling among themselves, from the date of the patent until 1882, and that since that latter date they have been constantly engaged in establishing their rights against other infringers. This is not satisfactory for such a long delay. If the complainant and those whom he represents could, for any cause, refrain from proceeding against open infringers for more than seven years, it will be no hardship for them to wait for a few months longer for an injunction, if it shall appear, on final hearing, that one should be issued.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of North Shore Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marc H.
Klee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: August 11, 2009
                /s/
      Marc H. KleeName:
                Marc
      H. KleeTitle:
                President,
      Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Terrance S. Lynn, certify that:



| | 1. | I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SITO Mobile, Ltd.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 30, 2019



|/s/ Terrance S. Lynn          | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Terrance S. Lynn              | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 99.2

             XRG, INC. NAMES EDDIE R. BROWN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

             THIRTY-FIVE YEAR INDUSTRY VETERAN TO HEAD GROWTH PLANS

         FEBRUARY 21, 2006; PITTSBURGH, PA - XRG, INC. (XRGI:OTCBB), which
continues to see improved results from the implementation of its restructuring
strategy of transitioning from an asset based carrier to a non-asset based
carrier, announces the appointment of Eddie R. Brown, as the new Chief Executive
Officer effective immediately.

         Mr. Brown brings over thirty-five years of trucking industry experience
to the Company. He is the co-founder and CEO of Highway Transport, Inc. in
Evergreen, Alabama, a terminal which operates with XRG on an agency agreement
and has served on XRG's Board of Advisors since February 2005. Furthermore, for
eight years Mr. Brown served as president of several divisions of Landstar, an
industry leading publicly-held non-asset based carrier. His experience should
help XRG emulate their success, which XRG has used as a model to form its
restructuring strategy.

         Mr. Brown expressed his thanks to his fellow members of the XRG Board
of Advisors and the Board of Directors for their confidence in him to lead the
Company. Mr. Brown said "With the establishment of our own general and
administrative functions in Chattanooga, XRG will be in closer proximity to its
operating divisions and able to be more responsive to their daily business
needs. Looking past this, the goal is to increase our revenue base by creating
new agency and brokerage relationships that benefit the Company and fit our
planned growth and operation."

About XRG, Inc.
XRG, Inc. is a public company trading on the OTCBB under the symbol XRGI that
was established in November 2000 to provide truckload freight and transportation
logistics services nationally. In addition to organic growth, the company is
targeting expansion through terminal agreements, brokerage agreements and
acquisition of well-managed carriers.

Safe Harbor Statement
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for
forward-looking information made on the company's behalf. All statements, other
than statements of historical facts which address the company's expectations of
sources of capital or which express the company's expectation for the future
with respect to financial performance or operating strategies, can be identified
as forward-looking statements. Such statements made by the company are based on
knowledge of the environment in which it operates, but because of the factors
previously listed, as well as other factors beyond the control of the company,
actual results may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the
forward-looking statements.

Contact:
Terence F. Leong
Walker Street Associates
TEL: 518-828-4988
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11

<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                       ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-19
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-19


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Servicer"), which has assumed all
duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

         (i)   A review of the activities of the Servicers during the preceding
         calendar year and of the performance of the Servicers under the
         Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
VICE PRESIDENT


                                      12
<PAGE>


FIFTH THIRD BANK


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                       ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-19
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-19


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Fifth Third Bank (the "Servicer") and do hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

         (i)   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
         calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the
         Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
         has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
         year.




/s/ James Sapitro                                       Dated: March 25, 2002


James E. Sapitro
VICE PRESIDENT








                                      13
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of Laural
      Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mandi
      Luis, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:
      September 17, 2007








MANDI
      LUIS




Mandi
      Luis


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director








-1-
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00431-CV

ELIZABETH A. FLACK-BATIE AND 

LISA A. BATIE

APPELLANTS

V.

JOHN HENRY BATIE AND U-HAUL 

CO. OF FT. WORTH, CO.

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On February 22, 2011, we ordered appellants to pay the required $175.00 

filing fee for the appeal and pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record and reporter’s record on or before Monday, March 21, 2011. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5 and Supreme Court Order of July 21, 1998 regarding fees to be 

charged in civil cases. Because appellants have failed to comply with our 

February 22, 2011 order, a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure, and 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2 we dismiss the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 7, 2011

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil 

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing 

fees in courts of appeals).
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1124

___________ Donald H. Brancato, * * Appellant, * * v. * * St. Louis Community College at * Florissant Valley; Richard Booker, * * Appellees. *

___________ Appeals from the United States No. 98-1127 District Court for the

___________ Eastern District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED] Donald H. Brancato, * * Appellee, * * v. * * St. Louis Community College at * Florissant Valley; Richard Booker, * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: September 2, 1998 Filed: September 8, 1998

___________The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. -2- Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Donal d H. Brancato appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary 1 judgment based on res judicata in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action stemming from hi s arr est. Defendants filed a cross-appeal based on the district court’s failure to awar d them attorney’s fees. We conclude that Brancato’s action is res judicata-barred because the claims and allegati ons in his current suit arise from the same events as those raised in his 199 6 state c ourt suit, involve the same parties, and were or could have been raised in tha t action. See Brown v. S t. Louis Police Dep’t , 691 F.2d 393, 396 (8th Cir. 1982), cert. denied , 461 U.S. 908 (1983). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discre tion in denying defendants attorney’s fees. See Garionis v. Newton , 827 F.2 d 306, 310 (8th Cir. 1987) (standard of review). Finally, we den y defendants’ motion for Fed. R. App. P. 38 sanctions on appeal. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Pennsylvania R. Co. and others *v.*Allegheny Valley R. Co. and others.

*Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.*

January 7, 1885.

Removal oe Cause—Motion to Remand—Collusive Joinder *ov*Parties.

It, is good practice to raise *in limine,*by petition to remand, tlie question of tlie alleged collusive joinder of a party for tlie purpose of creating a case removable to the circuit court; and tlie right so to raise the question is not waived by reason of a prior unsuccessful motion to remand on jurisdictional grounds supposed to appear on the face of the record.

*Sur*Petition to Bemand Suit, etc.

*Wayne MacVeagh,*for the motion. ,

*George Sidras, Jr.,*and *D. T. Watson, contra.*

Acheson, J.

As tlie fifth section of the act of congress of March 3, 1S75, makes it the duty of the circuit court to remand a suit removed thereto from a state court, if at any time it shall appear to the satisfaction of the circuit court that the parties to such suit have been improporly-or collusively made or joined, either as plaintiffs or defendants, for the purpose of creating a case removable under the act, it seems to me to be good practice to raise the question of the alleged improper or collusive joinder of a party for such purpose *in limine,*by petition to remand, as has been done here. And there was no waiver of the right so to raise the question by reason of the prior motion to remand on jurisdictional grounds supposed to appear upon the face of the record.

The plaintiffs’ petition charges that E. W. Boss was improperly and collusively made a defendant, for the purpose of creating a case removable into this court. If this be so, this court is concerned to know tho fact as soon as possible, and the plaintiffs shall now have the fullest opportunity to establish the truth of their allegation by testimony taken in accordance with the rules and practice in equity causes.

Mr. Boss has filed'an answer to said petition in denial thereof. That answer strikes me to be fairly responsive to the averments of the petition, and exceptions to it have not been filed. Hence, at present, I see no good reason for making the order I am asked to do requiring Mr. Boss to come from his home, in the state of New York, to Pittsburgh, and submit to an oral examination before the clerk of this court. Leave, however, is granted the plaintiffs (if they desire so to do) to supplement their said petition by interrogatories addressed to Mr. Boss, to be answered by him under oath.
#### BUNCOMBE COUNTY DSS v. HARDIN

No. 429P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 610

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31f denied 3 December 1998.
Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05340-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7