alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.16    
    


ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE 


Precision
Optics Corporation, Inc.

New York, New York

September 15, 2010 



The
10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010 and July 26, 2010 (the
"Note") of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), payable to the order of Special Situations
Fund III, QP, L.P. (the "Holder") in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which this Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following
respects: 



	1.
	The
term "Stated Maturity Date" is hereby restated to be "October 15, 2010."



	2.
	Except
as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder. 




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as
of the day and year first above written. 

 






 



							
	 	 	 	 	PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
	

 	
 	

 	
 	
By	
 	
/s/ Richard E. Forkey






  Name: Richard E. Forkey

Title: Chief Executive Officer
	Accepted:	 	 	 	 
	

SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P.
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ David Greenhouse






  Name: David Greenhouse

Title: General Partner	
 	

 	
 	

 




 

 








QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.16
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29325-29326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 12, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Jimmie Michael Luecke, The Fred Luecke Trust, The Susan 
Luecke Trust, Tim Kleinschmidt, trustee, The Jimmie Luecke Children 
Partnership, Ltd., Jimmie Luecke, general partner, all of Giddings, 
Texas; to acquire additional voting shares of Giddings Bancshares, 
Inc., Giddings, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional 
voting shares of Giddings Holdings, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and First 
National Bank, Giddings, Texas.

[[Page 29326]]

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 23, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13478 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Yuri Grebyonkin, Respondent, v 2301 Ocean Ave. Owners Corp. et al., Defendants, and Makita U.S.A., Inc., Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 391]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Makita U.S.A., Inc., appeals from an order of the *809Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated February 22, 2008, which denied its motion to compel the plaintiff to demonstrate the circumstances of his accident during a continued videotaped deposition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant Makita U.S.A., Inc. (hereinafter Makita), the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying its motion to compel the plaintiff to demonstrate the circumstances of his accident during his continued videotaped deposition. The demonstration or reenactment of an accident during discovery is not generally contemplated under the CPLR *(see e.g. Madison v Spancrete Mach. Corp.,*288 AD2d 888, 889 [2001]; *Sullivan v New York City Tr. Auth.,*109 AD2d 879, 880 [1985]). Moreover, Makita failed to demonstrate that the information it sought could not be obtained through the testimony of the plaintiff at his deposition or through other discovery devices *(see e.g. Gatta v Makita U.S.A.,*244 AD2d 457 [1997]; *Hyde v Chrysler Corp.,*150 AD2d 343 [1989]), and that the proposed demonstration would be conducted under conditions similar to those which prevailed at the time of the accident *(see generally Blanchard v Whitlark,*286 AD2d 925, 926 [2001]; *Santucci v Govel Welding,*168 AD2d 845, 846 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Dickerson and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Confidential Treatment – Written Justification

We request Confidential Treatment for the documents that are highlighted in the submission due to the 

confidential nature of the agreements. These documents are not made publicly available for any 

registered SEF.

Documents:

• AEGIS SEF Exhibit N-1 Redline

• AEGIS SEF Exhibit N-3 Redline

• AEGIS SEF Exhibit N-1

• AEGIS SEF Exhibit N-3

- AEGIS SEF
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek W McLeish,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November
      14, 2008
            /s/
      Derek W. McLeishDerek
      W. McLeishChief
      Executive Officer andActing
      Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. GREEN

No. 385A84-5

Case below: Pitt County Superior Court

Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed 5 November 1998 for the limited purpose of entering the following order. The parties shall file written briefs with the court on the following issue: Does N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(f) apply to defendants who have been convicted of a capital offense and sentenced to death who had a post-conviction motion for appropriate relief denied prior to 21 June 1996, the effective date of the statute?
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Parlontieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  |      |  | /s/ Richard A. Parlontieri           
|                      |  |  |  | By:  |  | Richard A. Parlontieri               
|                      |  |  |  | Its: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc. and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Brad Buss, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of SolarCity Corporation; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 10, 2014



/s/ Brad BussBrad Buss
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
| Dated:  August 22, 2011

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D. 

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       President and Chief Executive Officer

     Acting Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Galasso, Langione & Botter, LLP. et al., Respondents, v Thomas F. Liotti, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Frederick K. Brewington, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Submitted October 17, 2011;

decided December 15, 2011

Reported below, 81 AD3d 884.

*838Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*17 NY3d 847 (2011)]. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 15, 2016

NO. 03-14-00431-CV

Barbara A. Garrett and Nelson Gene Garrett, Appellants

v.

Shay Brinkley and Robin Brinkley, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BOURLAND AND ABOUSSIE*

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ABOUSSIE

This is an appeal from the summary judgment signed by the trial court on February 26, 2014. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s summary judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s summary judgment. The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and the court below.

* Before Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by 

assignment. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
#### STATE v. BEST

No. 300A93-2

Case below: Bladen County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Bladen County denied 5 November 1998.
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  I, Eduard Korsinsky, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: November 10 ,2009  /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Michael R. Sharp, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


























/s/Michael R.
Sharp


Michael
R. Sharp


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 15,
2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 12, 2018

No. 04-16-00838-CR

Avie Lee LOZANO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR8489

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court has considered the appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration, and the 

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2535 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to ensure that 

child protective services systems do not permit the separation of children 

from parents on the basis of poverty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Ms. MOORE (for herself and Ms. FUDGE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 

to ensure that child protective services systems do not 

permit the separation of children from parents on the 

basis of poverty, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Poverty is Not 

5 Child Neglect Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2535 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO STATES FOR CHILD ABUSE OR NE2 GLECT PREVENTION AND TREATMENT PRO3 GRAMS. 

4 Section 106(a) of the Child Abuse Prevention and 

5 Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106a(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘neglect;’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘neglect, ensuring that reports concerning 

8 a child’s living arrangements or subsistence needs 

9 are addressed through services and benefits and that 

10 no child is separated from the child’s parent for rea11 sons of poverty;’’; and 

12 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘response;’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘response, except that such system, 

14 tools, and protocols shall not authorize the separa15 tion of any child from the child’s parent or guardian 

16 on the basis of poverty;’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-11216

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eric Paul Bradix, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-95-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Paul Bradix

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bradix has not filed a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-11216 Document: 00516306792 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2022
No. 21-11216

2

During the pendency of this appeal, Bradix completed the sentence 

imposed on revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. 

Because he has not shown that he will suffer collateral consequences as 

a result of the revocation of his supervised release and because no additional 

term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal does not present 

a case or controversy, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Spencer v. Kemna, 

523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT, and counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Case: 21-11216 Document: 00516306792 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2022
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais—CEMIG (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luiz Fernando Rolla, Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/   Luiz Fernando Rolla                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:Luiz   Fernando Rolla                               |
|   | Title:Chief   Officer for Finance and Investor Relations |

 

Date: April 26, 2012

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----