alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Times and Dates: 12:30 p.m., Monday, June 4, 2001; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, 
June 5, 2001.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW, in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

Status: June 4 (Closed); June 5 (Open).

Matters To Be Considered:   

Monday, June 4--12:30 p.m. (Closed)
    1. Financial Performance.
    2. Rate Case Briefing.
    3. Facilities Update.
    4. Leveraging Assets.
    5. Strategic Planning.
    6. Compensation Issues.
    7. Personnel Matters.
Tuesday, June 5--8:30 a.m. (Open)
    1. Minutes of the Previous Meetings, May 1, May 7-8, and May 15, 
2001.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.
    3. Quarterly Report on Financial Results.
    4. Capital Investments.
    a. Surface Air Support System.
    b. Teterboro, New Jersey, Processing and Distribution Center.
    5. Tentative Agenda for the July 9-10, 2001, meeting in Evansville, 
Indiana.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David G. Hunter, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13253 Filed 5-22-01; 2:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
#### BELTHA MBONG MBOH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-1925.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 2, 2010.

Decided: May 10, 2010.

Irena I. Karpinski, Law Offices of Irena I. Karpinski, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Andrew B. Insenga, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Beltha Mbong Mboh petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s order denying her motion for a continuance and reaffirming the denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review.

*331Under 8 C.F.R. § 1008.29 (2009), the immigration judge may grant a continuance for good cause shown. *See Jean v. Gonzales,*435 F.3d 475, 483 (4th Cir.2006). The immigration judge’s refusal to grant a continuance is thus subject to review for abuse of discretion. *Onyeme v. INS,*146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir.1998). The denial of a continuance will be upheld “‘unless it was made without a rational explanation, it inexplicably departed from established policies, or it rested on an impermissible basis, e.g., invidious discrimination against a particular race or group.’ ” *Lendo v. Gonzales,*493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (quoting *Onyeme,*146 F.3d at 231).

We find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
# C_2019263EN.01001302.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Oro Efectivo SL v Diputación Foral de Bizkaia

(Case C-185/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 401 - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Acquisition by an undertaking, from private individuals, of objects with a high gold or other precious metal content with a view to resale - Duty on transfers of assets)

(2019/C 263/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Oro Efectivo SL

Defendant: Diputación Foral de Bizkaia

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax and the principle of fiscal neutrality must be interpreted as not precluding a national rule of law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which subjects to an indirect tax on asset transfers, other than value added tax, the acquisition by an undertaking, from private individuals, of objects with a high gold or other precious metal content, where those assets are intended for use in the economic activities of that undertaking, which, with a view to their being processed and placed back on the market, resells them to undertakings specialising in the manufacture of ingots or a variety of items made from precious metals.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
Exhibit 10.2





Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO




AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made this
23rd day of September, 2010, effective as of the September 21, 2010, by and between
PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Carlos A. Ruisanchez, an
individual (“Executive”), with respect to the following facts and circumstances:



RECITALS




The Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective
December 22, 2008 (the “Agreement”) with Executive having a base salary of Four Hundred Twenty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($425,000) per year.



Effective September 21, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company increased the Executive’s
base salary to Four Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($475,000) per year.




The Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect Executive’s current salary.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:



AMENDMENT




1. Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following new Article 3, Section 3.1:




“3.1 Base Salary. In consideration for Executive’s services hereunder, the Company
shall pay Executive an annual base salary, effective as of September 21, 2010, at the rate
of not less than Four Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($475,000) per year during each
of the years of the Term; payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll schedule
from time to time (less any deductions required for Social Security, state, federal and
local withholding taxes, and any other authorized or mandated similar withholdings).
Executive’s annual base salary shall be reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer and, if
appropriate, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) at least annually
beginning no more than twelve (12) months from the date hereof and may be increased (but
not decreased) at the discretion of the Board. If Executive’s annual salary is increased,
the increased amount shall not be reduced for the remainder of the Term.”



2. Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and this Amendment, the
terms of this Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Agreement or this
Amendment except in writing and signed by both the Company and Executive.


 


- 1 -









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed this
23rd day of September, 2010 and effective as of September 21, 2010.



	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.






	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Carlos A. Ruisanchez

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Anthony Sanfilippo
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Carlos A. Ruisanchez

	 	 	 	Anthony Sanfilippo, President and

Chief Executive Officer







 


- 2 -
#### LEAHY v. N.C. BD. OF NURSING

No. 360PA96

Case below: 123 N.C.App. 354

Petition by respondent (N.C. Board of Nursing) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 30 December 1998.
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Alco Energy Corp. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 14, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JASON LOUIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2835

[ May 19, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 00 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth J udicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer

, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 43 201 0 CF 000586D

.

Jason Louis

, Carrabelle, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVINE and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2058 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to remove certain 

restrictions on advertising and public relations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. AGUILAR (for himself and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act 

to remove certain restrictions on advertising and public 

relations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Job Opportunity and 

5 Business Services Act’’ or the ‘‘JOBS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS. 

7 (a) REPORTS.—Section 185(d)(1) of the Workforce 

8 Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3245(d)(1)) 

9 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2058 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(F) the advertising budget and a descrip7 tion of the advertising for which funds received 

8 under this title were used.’’. 

9 (b) CLARIFICATION ON ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC

10 RELATIONS COSTS.—Section 195 of the Workforce Inno11 vation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3255) is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

14 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

15 at the end; 

16 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

17 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

18 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(D) public relations and advertising costs 

20 for program outreach or activities otherwise re21 lated to carrying out the purposes of this Act 

22 under section 2.’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(c) REMOVAL OF CERTAIN REGULATORY RESTRIC25 TIONS.—None of the restrictions on advertising or public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2058 IH

1 relations described in section 200.421 of title 2, Code of 

2 Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), shall apply 

3 to this title.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

5 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall issue regulations 

7 to place safeguards on funds received under title I of the 

8 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 

9 3111 et seq.) that may be used to advertise to the public 

10 to ensure that such funds are not used in a fraudulent 

11 manner or in any way misappropriated. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION        OF JAMES WATSON**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                   Nov.                  14, 2007                            |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                   |   |   |   |
| /s/ James                Watson                          |   |   |   |
| James                Watson                                   |   |   |        |
| Chief                Executive                Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |   |   |

----
Bloomberg SEF LLC 731 Lexington Avenue Tel +1 212 318 2000

 New York, NY 10022 bloombergsef.com

September 28, 2023

Submitted via Portal

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: CFTCRegulation 40.6(a) Certification. Issuance of BSEF Notice to Participants 2023-R-15

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Bloomberg SEF LLC (“Bloomberg SEF”) is certifying to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”)the issuance of BSEF Notice to Participants 2023-R-15 regarding 

new requirements and actions for certain Participants due to the CFTC SDR Reporting Rules effective 

December 5, 2022. 

This Notice reminds Participants to keep their records current and up to date in Bloomberg SEF’s 

onboarding and Participant records database. The Rule Amendment is effective on September 28, 

2023. A copy ofthe Notice is attached as Exhibit A. 

Bloomberg SEF certifies that: (i) the Notice to Participants complies with the Act and the Commissions 

regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission has been concurrently posted on 

Bloomberg SEF’s website. There were no substantive opposing view to the Notice to Participants. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-7331 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Enclosure
Exhibit A 
Bloomberg SEF LLC

Notice to Participants No. 2023-R-15 

Bloomberg SEF Notice to Participants No. 2022-2 outlined new requirements and actions for certain 

Participants due to the CFTC SDR Reporting Rules effective December 5, 2022. Bloomberg SEF 

implemented new enhancements to its ENFB system, which required Participants to verify or update

their Trading Status on ENFB to ensure proper market surveillance and correct SDR reporting for each

executed trade.

Bloomberg SEF is issuing this Notice to Participants to remind each Participant to verify and if necessary,

update Trading Status on ENFB. Forexample, if a Participant conductstradesfor its own LEI, then 

Bloomberg SEF would expect the Trading Status to be “Principal Swap Dealer/MSP” or “Principal NonSwap Dealer/MSP.” If a Participant conductstrades not for its own LEI, then Bloomberg SEF would 

expect the Trading Status to be “Agent.”Participant shall select the “Agent” category that corresponds

to its activities on BSEF.

Please note that Bloomberg SEF derives the allocation indicator for each trade from the Trading Status,

therefore providing an incorrect Trading Status may result in BSEF reporting to an incorrect allocation 

indicator.

Bloomberg SEF Participants are required under Rules 301(e) and 524 of Bloomberg SEF’s Rulebook to 

keep their records current and up to date in Bloomberg SEF’s onboarding and Participant records

database. Failure to provide up-to-date and accurate Participant information may result in inaccurate

audit trail and/or SDR reporting and subsequent disciplinary action by Bloomberg SEF.

Capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, have the meanings assigned to them in the BSEF 

Rulebook, which is available at https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/product/sefcompliance/. 

Effective date: September28, 2023.
EXHIBIT 99.13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Friedland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 30, 2012
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Robert Friedland   
|                     |  | Robert Friedland       
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF DANIEL
VALOT, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
TECHNIP, AND OLIVIER DUBOIS, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF TECHNIP,
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Technip (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period
ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 30, 2005
    By:

/s/
Daniel ValotDaniel ValotChairman and Chief Executive Officer By:

/s/
Olivier DuboisOlivier DuboisChief Financial Officer
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2035 

AN ACT 

To amend title XXIX of the Public Health Service Act 

to reauthorize the program under such title relating to 

lifespan respite care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2035 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifespan Respite Care 

3 Reauthorization Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE CARE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING.—Section 

7 2904 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ii– 

8 3) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 2904. DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING. 

10 ‘‘Each eligible State agency awarded a grant or coop11 erative agreement under section 2902 shall collect, main12 tain, and report such data and records at such times, in 

13 such form, and in such manner as the Secretary may re14 quire to enable the Secretary— 

15 ‘‘(1) to monitor State administration of pro16 grams and activities funded pursuant to such grant 

17 or cooperative agreement; and 

18 ‘‘(2) to evaluate, and to compare effectiveness 

19 on a State-by-State basis, of programs and activities 

20 funded pursuant to section 2902.’’. 

21 (b) FUNDING.—Section 2905 of the Public Health 

22 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ii–4) is amended by striking 

23 paragraphs (1) through (5) and inserting the following: 

24 ‘‘(1) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2020; 

25 ‘‘(2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2021; 

26 ‘‘(3) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2022; 
3 

•HR 2035 EH

1 ‘‘(4) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2023; and 

2 ‘‘(5) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2035 

AN ACT 

To amend title XXIX of the Public Health Service 

relating to lifespan respite care. Act to reauthorize the program under such title