alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2109 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2109

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2019

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs, in awarding a contract for the procurement of goods 
  or services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boosting Rates of American Veteran 
Employment Act'' or the ``BRAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE FOR OFFERORS EMPLOYING VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 81 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding after section 8128 the following new 
section:
``Sec. 8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans
    ``(a) Preference.--In awarding a contract for the procurement of 
goods or services, the Secretary may give a preference to offerors that 
employ veterans on a full-time basis. The Secretary shall determine 
such preference based on the percentage of the full-time employees of 
the offeror who are veterans.
    ``(b) Enforcement Penalties for Misrepresentation.--(1) Any offeror 
that is determined by the Secretary to have willfully and intentionally 
misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the offeror for 
purposes of subsection (a) may be debarred from contracting with the 
Department for a period of not less than 5 years.
    ``(2) If the Secretary carries out a debarment under paragraph (1), 
the Secretary shall commence debarment action against the offeror by 
not later than 30 days after determining that the offeror willfully and 
intentionally misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the 
offeror as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete debarment 
actions against such offeror by not later than 90 days after such 
determination.
    ``(3) The debarment of an offeror under paragraph (1) includes the 
debarment of all principals in the offeror for a period of not less 
than 5 years.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
8128 the following new item:

``8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Miller, the Chief Executive Officer of Autocarbon.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Special Financial Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
         fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Dated: August 8, 2002



                                                  /s/ James Miller
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: James Miller
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Howard Hoffman, Respondent, v Parade Publications et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 26, 2010;

decided April 29, 2010

Motion by National Employment Lawyers Association/New York et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein *833granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
#### Ronald Lee COOK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INCORPORATED; Altria Group, Incorporated; Thomas Carlyle, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-2327.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2006.

Decided: June 8, 2006.

Ronald Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se. King Fitchett Tower, Durward Earl Baggett, IV, Williams Mullen, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald L. Cook appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to *349remand and dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, and we affirm the denial of the motion to remand and the dismissal of Cook’s retaliatory discharge claim for the reasons stated by the district court from the bench. *(See*Hearing Transcript at 14-17).

Regarding Cook’s common law tort claims, the district court did not specify a reason for dismissing these claims. However, while the liberal pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) demand only a “short and plain” statement of the claim, a plaintiff must often offer more detail than the bald statement that he has a valid claim of some type against the defendant. *Trulock v. Freeh,*275 F.3d 391, 405 (4th Cir.2001). “The presence [ ] of a few conclusory legal terms does not insulate a complaint from dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) when the facts alleged in the complaint” do not support the legal conclusion. *Young v. City of Mount Ranier,*238 F.3d 567, 577 (4th Cir.2001) (dismissing Fourteenth Amendment claims where complaint alleged deliberate indifference but included no facts to support allegation).

In Cook’s complaint, he asserted that his employer committed “grievous” torts by “committing perjury, slander, accusing the plaintiff of filing a false workers compensation claim, malingering, ploys, and has allowed Personnel Manager Thomas Carlyle to carry out a personal vendetta.” Cook offered no facts, dates, or details to support his claims either in his complaint, in response to the motion to dismiss, or on appeal. Accordingly, we hold that the district court did not err in dismissing these causes of action.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection with the Annual Report of M-GAB Development Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carl  M.  Berg,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
        15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     Information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results  of  operations of the
        Company.

Date:  March  27,  2003

                                    /s/  Carl M. Berg

                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Carl  M.  Berg
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief
                                   Financial  Officer




A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
Internal

Eurex Clearing AG

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments

No. 077-23

November 3, 2023

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of October 30, 2023:

• Eurex Clearing Circular No. 077-23 (November 2, 2023): Editorial changes to the GTC to the 

Agreement on Technical Connection to the Clearing EDP of Eurex Clearing AG and to the Price 

List to the Agreement on Technical Connection to the Clearing EDP of Eurex Clearing AG. This 

circular provides for non-substantive amendments to the General Terms and Conditions to the 

Agreement on Technical Connection to the Clearing EDP of Eurex Clearing AG and to the Price 

List to the Agreement on Technical Connection to the Clearing EDP of Eurex Clearing AG in order 

to reflect the discontinuation of offering for Securities Clearing GUI.

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: November 3, 2023
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Berkshire Crossing Retail, LLC
Berkshire Crossing Shopping Center, LLC
Bradley Finance Corporation
Bradley Financing Partnership
Bradley Operating Limited Partnership
Bradley Spring Mall Limited Partnership
Bradley Spring Mall, Inc.
Colby Grove Retail, LLC
Grand Traverse Crossing Shopping Center, LLC
Grove Court Shopping Center, LLC
Heritage-Austen Acquisition, Inc.
Heritage Buckingham Place SPE MGR LLC
Heritage Buckingham Place SPE Limited Partnership
Heritage Clocktower SPE LLC
Heritage Clocktower SPE MGR Inc.
Heritage County Line Plaza SPE MGR LLC
Heritage County Line Plaza SPE LLC
Heritage East Richardson GP LLC
Heritage East Richardson Limited Partnership
Heritage Mishwaka LLC
Heritage Montgomery SPE LLC
Heritage Montgomery SPE MGR Inc.
Heritage Property Acquisition LLC
Heritage Property Investment Limited Partnership
Heritage Property Investment Trust, Inc.
Heritage Realty Management, Inc.
Heritage Realty Special L.P. Corp.
Heritage Southwest GP LLC
Heritage Southwest Limited Partnership
Heritage SPE Corp.
Heritage SPE Mgr LLC
Heritage SPE LLC
Heritage Spradlin SPE LLC
Heritage Spradlin SPE MGR Inc.
Heritage Trinity Commons SPE MGR LLC
Heritage Trinity Commons SPE Limited Partnership
Heritage Warminster SPE LLC
Heritage Warminster SPE MGR Inc.
Net Manager LLC
NH Heritage Limited Partnership
Pioneer Grand Traverse Company, LLC
Salmon Run Plaza, LLC
Williamson Square Associates Limited Partnership
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Byron Elton, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








May 13, 2011
/s/ Byron EltonByron EltonChief Executive Officer andActing Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


I, Daniel Valot, Chief Executive Officer of
Technip-Coflexip, a société anonyme organized
under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Technip-Coflexip on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge:



| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                                                        
|
| |  | the information contained in such Annual Report
    on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of
    Technip-Coflexip.



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ Daniel Valot

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| |                                
| | Name: Daniel Valot             
| | Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 24, 2003
# C_2020068EN.01001701.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/17

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019 — Republic of Poland v PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH, European Commission

(Case C-181/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 - Admissibility - Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant - Regulatory act - Absence - Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Assessment of the pleas on the substance - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial - Principle of audi alteram partem - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 68/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (represented by: M. Jeżewski, adwokat), European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially by T. Henze and R. Kanitz, then by R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | The Republic of Poland is to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Poland is to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
 
 I,
        Thomas
        W. Martin, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the
        Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine,
        LLC
        (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”)
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to the
        best of my knowledge:
 
 1.  The
        Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        LLC.
 
 
 *Dated:
        December 1, 2006*
 
 */s/
        Thomas W. Martin*
 Thomas
        W.
        Martin
 Chief
        Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer)
 ICON
        Capital Corp.
 Manager
        of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2490

___________________________

Kim C. Squalls

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

Gina Dudley; Mark H. Anderson; John Doe; Jane Doe

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: April 27, 2015

Filed: May 5, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Kim Squalls appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

in her action asserting claims under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act (ADEA). Upon careful de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of

Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of

review; discussing legal standards), we conclude that the district court did not err in

its summary judgment decision, see Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844,

852-55 (8th Cir. 2012) (affirming grant of summary judgment in Title VII action;

discussing pretext); Rahlf v. Mo-Tech Corp., Inc., 642 F.3d 633, 636-40 (8th Cir.

2011) (affirming grant of summary judgment in ADEA action; discussing pretext). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The HonorableRodneyW. Sippel, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-
```
Exhibit 3
```

```
CDMC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2002-1
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2002
```

```
Class       Interest Paid   Principal Paid  Realized LossesEnding Balance
```

```
A1          9,014,485.69    23,958,901.39   0.00           154,403,098.61
A2          391,609.42      841,567.67      0.00           7,052,432.33
A3          0.00            0.00            0.00           16,624,567.67
A4          1,253,098.40    0.00            0.00           24,059,490.00
A5          755,208.30      0.00            0.00           14,500,000.00
B1          194,721.05      35,488.12       0.00           3,718,909.88
B2          64,907.07       11,829.37       0.00           1,239,637.63
B3          58,416.29       10,646.42       0.00           1,115,672.58
B4          25,962.82       4,731.75        0.00           495,855.25
B5          19,472.12       3,548.80        0.00           371,891.20
B6          25,962.80       4,731.75        0.00           495,854.85
P           0.00            29,679.40       0.00           2,156,169.76
R           0.52            100.00          0.00           0.00
X           529,613.09      0.00            0.00           8,748,197.56
```
# C_2018005EN.01004801.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/48

---

Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Traviacar and Others v SRB

(Case T-700/17)

(2018/C 005/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Traviacar, S.L. (O Carballiño, Spain) and 96 other applicants (represented by: P. Rúa Sobrino, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EES/2017/08) and the independent expert’s valuation on which it is based in accordance with Article 20(15) of Regulation No 806/2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EES/2017/08) and the independent expert’s valuation on which it is based in accordance with Article 20(15) of Regulation No 806/2014;

| — | Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable;

| — | Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---