# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 0074 V (not to be published)

RICHARD JOSEPH SPAHR

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 12, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Andrew Gordon Melling, Burr & Forman LLP, Columbia, South Carolina , for P etitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 23, 2020

, Richard Spahr filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered cellulitis as a result of an influenza

vaccination received on December 30, 2017

. (Amended Petition , filed July 23, 2021, at
1)

. On March 9, 2022

, a decision was issued awarding compensation to P etitioner based

on the parties’ stipulation

. (ECF No. 53 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated March 16,

2022 , requesting a total award of $ 35,564.65 (representing $ 34,397.50 in fees and
$ 1,167.15 in costs). (ECF No. 59 at 5). In accordance with General Order No. 9,

Petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that he incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses.
(ECF No. 58 )

. Respondent reacted to the motion on March 22, 2022, indicating that he
is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are

met in this case

, but deferring resolut ion of the amount to be awarded at the Court’s

discretion

. (ECF No. 60)

. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 35,564.65 (representing $ 34,397.50 in fees and $ 1,167.15 in costs) as
a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this dec ision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.