alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOANNE DESUE

v.

BANK OF AMERICA (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD)

PETITION OF: BANK OF AMERICA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 194 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

BANK OF AMERICA

v.

JOANNE DESUE (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD)

PETITION OF: BANK OF AMERICA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 195 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.

The Application for Supersedeas is DENIED.
# Effective 3.14.23

# Effective 5.1.23
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capmark Financial Group Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2009

/s/ JAY N. LEVINE Name:  Jay N. Levine
Title:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2009

/s/ GREGORY J. MCMANUS Name:  Gregory J. McManus
Title:Executive Vice President and
            Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
15




The Board ofDirectors and Unitholders of OSG America
L.P.




We are
aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-147290) of OSG America L.P. of our report dated
August 10, 2009 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements of OSG America L.P. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009.  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the
Securities Act of 1933, our report is not part of a registration statement
prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of
the Securities Act of 1933.





ERNST
& YOUNG LLP




Certified
Public Accountants




Tampa,
Florida




August
10, 2009
(I)

-r 6tt>-/5

us / f? y-'

-t— . ,/ KfcCEIVEDIN pP|p|MA| S*h^ L*-m«« K*x+//cc-jj COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

^ f AUG 272015

' '+-*-" \ZT>^'V7-i*' 6?-

Abel Acosta, Clerk

'eyshS

+> r- 7) /?

^"CrcT^^-Ai- 6^s_f^ 7 i

««** / ^c^^,

FILED !N 7~^^—*•-* *e-re~r^,n,ur/L ^er ^e^esr 6i*t £**<. A*^^ A UsllA?H

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUG 27 2Gi5

Abel Acosta, Clerk
X

&

1 OtTA/C ry (_)p J^AArceS A«JO ^- OU**StrC

, l-T- L.

0

' P/? etc rt t-> 7~

^^^^ '*<»L larw^y

re ^-<*«*>s-&Cf

2>io( £. Mt*tc~, /toy

U« CO, /> 76 7*=>J"~

}iscri~~ J0C, J2?<

zs </ 7s<s-&ssy

-re T>

/ly/tUtr-*,*/*^ tl^r/ te&Te^y- Ar-rt,,^

2sY 7r7 -*fjt{

PPe-tt&t^rj f\.PPelUr^ f\PpelL^ irrt>i!aJ£<Y

>?-*- rt*i IAotC A- •rrc^;,-,

er

r*vr-<?=/ Atope/Mr^ Arf"«*«/t7

yi Lti^ee

IA/g(c' Up CcAjr-^ssy-s

c^ ~TfcT-e=/?je7cnr

TivT«-«vv ew»T

- o 0

&csr" Or- D . i

A*<^»n<r>of-'s' Aa»o A«- WWe«creeps

'40

1,

i i

/.

2,

3.i *

*<

^

V--•6

V 9 /O

/o - r

SO, /J

<3i '*/

if

2.6
/ "D&)(. Lsp- A"7**" *-cTc€r£

T'VT'aT" c-s ~for -«^_r A»t^

,<>•«-•«. rcrarOc^vO

(31
rfi*T\£M6rtsT- CJ/z f^g. (j,^S(F

ArTut-e: ^ /jficr (—fS'f

Dm A/o\/&A7S&4 4 Z.o/3. l&T-c-r-r* / I/ O

Or- 'Possess^ £L J 0 ,-^ ••

r *'"""-*<? A fen* ****/>//& 7^*4^^

_J_,a/ /a/ Au4ou~t-/Jtf.-, f) r 7) ""« u~r o^M B^ ^„s ~fc r r

7 ' "--^ '/—, As

'»«* I. S„„y Q /A ^

-.—^ /^ 7^-^_, 7-2 ^ ^'-^-^

~s/-<i <G-<r£>

7 "^ 'Zrv<ra^c 7-2 ,. /it*- 77 A ' t-->«Tr>w- / ' ^
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.20


TO:  Shirley E. Green

FR:  Perry A. Sook

RE:  2nd Amendment to Your Employment Agreement

DA:  2/6/02



     This memorandum will serve as the second addendum to your employment
agreement with Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., dated January 5, 1999.

     Section 2., Term of Employment, is hereby extended through February 28,
2005.

     Section 4(a), Base Salary, is hereby amended as follows:

              From March 1, 2002 through February 28, 2003 your base salary will
              be $100,000.

              From March 1, 2003 through February 28, 2004 your base salary will
              be $110,000.

              From March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005 your base salary will
              be $120,000.

     Section 4(b) Bonus, is hereby amended to reflect annual bonus targets as
follows

              After the 2002 Fiscal Year:      $10,000.


              After the 2003 Fiscal Year:      $15,000.


              After the 2004 Fiscal Year:      $20,000.


     All other terms and conditions of your employment agreement remain in full
force and effect.


Sincerely,

/s/ Perry A. Sook

Perry A. Sook


                          [NEXSTAR LOGO APPEARS HERE]
         200 Abington Executive Park, Suite 201 Clarks Summit, PA 18411
                        (570)586-5400 fax (570)586-8745


























Accepted and Agreed







/s/ Shirley E. Green
__________________________________
Shirley E. Green
Vice President -- Finance and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         I, Sheldon R. Rose, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Premier Nursing Products Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Premier Nursing Products
Corp.

December 21, 2007                       By: /s/ Sheldon R. Rose
                                            -------------------
                                            Sheldon R. Rose,
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Nursing Products Corp. and will be retained by Premier
Nursing Products Corp. and furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

December 21, 2007

Mr. James R. Harris

Harris & Greenwell, L.L.P.

615 Upper N. Broadway, Suite 1700, MT-237

Corpus Christi, TX 78477-0237

Ms. Linda A. Acevedo

Assistant Disciplinary Counsel

P.O. Box 12487

Austin, TX 78711-2487

Mr. Stephen A. Moyik

Asst. Disciplinary Counsel

P.O. Box 12487 Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711-2487

RE:Case Number:  06-1008

Court of Appeals Number:  

Trial Court Number:  Boda # 38020

Style:IN THE MATTER OF EUGENE X. MERCIER

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-1008Page 1**
KET
KAEW WIMONTHA

      Blk. 770
Pasir Ris St. 71, #05-350

      Singapore  510770

      


      


      September
7, 2010

      


      Nexgen
Petroleum Corp.

      2808
Cowan Circle

      Las
Vegas, NV  89107

      


      Attention:
Mr. Hsien Loong Wong, CEO

      


      Dear
Sir:

      


      
        	
                Re:

              	
                Settlement
      and Conversion of US$510,000 debt owing from Nexgen Petroleum Corp. to Ket
      Kaew Wimontha

              


      

      


      I hereby
agree to the settlement of the US$510,000 debt owed to me from Nexgen Petroleum
Cop. (the “Company”) in exchange for the conversion of such debt into 3,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.17 per
share.

      


      If the
foregoing is satisfactory, please indicate your agreement by executing a copy of
this letter where indicated below and returning an originally signed copy to the
undersigned on or before September 14, 2010.

      


      I
appreciate your prompt response and action in settling the above
matter.

      


      Yours
truly,

    

    
      


      
        
          	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/ Ket Kaew
      Wimontha

                	 	 	
                   

                	 
	
                        
                    KET
      KAEW WIMONTHA

                  

                	 	 	
                   

                	 


        

      

      
        
          


          


          The above
terms and conditions are acknowledged and agreed to this 8th day of
September, 2010.

          


          


          NEXGEN
PETROLEUM CORP.

          per:

          
            


            
              
                	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        /s/ Hsien Loong
      Wong  

                      	 	 	
                         

                      	 
	
                              
                          (Authorized
      Signatory)
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Daniel Valot, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofTechnip;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and15d-15e) for the registrant and have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 29, 2004
/s/ *Daniel Valot*
#### Mario MARTINEZ-MORENO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent.

No. 10-1687.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 April 15, 2010.

Opinion filed: April 21, 2010.

Joyce A. Phipps, Esq., Plainfield, NJ, for Petitioner.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Esq., Thomas W. Hussey, Esq., United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Mario Martinez-Moreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States unlawfully in 1994. Approximately two years later, in April 1996, he was convicted in New Jersey Superior Court for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance on or near school property. *See*N.J.S.A. § 2C:35-7 (2005).

In December 2007, Martinez-Moreno was served with a Notice to Appear charging him with removability as an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled. *See*INA § 212(a)(6)(A)© [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)©]. Martinez-Moreno conceded removability but sought cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b) [8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) ]. Following a hearing, the Immigration Judge (IJ) denied his application on the ground that his New Jersey controlled substances conviction rendered him ineligible for relief. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C). By order entered February 5, 2010, the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision. Martinez-Moreno filed a timely petition for review in this Court.1 The government now moves for summary action.

Upon review, we agree with the government that the BIA correctly concluded that Martinez-Moreno is ineligible for cancellation of removal due to his controlled substance conviction. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C) renders an alien ineligible for cancellation of removal if he has been convicted of an offense under § 1182(a)(2). Section 1182(a)(2), in turn, states that an alien is inadmissible if he has been convicted of “a violation of ... any law or regulation of a State ... relating to a controlled substance.” 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II). Because Martinez-Moreno’s conviction under N.J.S.A. § 2C:35-7 clearly meets this description,2 he is ineligible for cancellation of removal.

Because the appeal presents no substantial question, *see*Third Cir. LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6, we grant the motion and will *141deny Martinez-Moreno’s petition for review. The motion for a stay of removal is denied.

1

. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1).

2

. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) refers to Section 802 of Title 21 for a definition of “controlled substance.”
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1525

Steel Basis Swap - U.S. Midwest Busheling Ferrous Scrap - AMM

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly prices published by AMM for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the price assessment published on the 10th of 

that given calendar month for the Steel scrap No1 busheling, index, delivered Midwest mill, $/gross ton. 

If the 10th falls into a holiday or weekend, the price will settle on the immediately following business 

day.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be long tons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in long

tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per long ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per short ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00752

- CV

Lance WINDHAM, Appellant

v.

TRIANON PROPERTIES LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 386604

Hon orable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on November 27, 2013. Neither the brief nor a motion for

extension of time has been filed.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, on or before January 27, 2014 his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by his failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written respon se by the date ordered, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

_
#### Celerino CARRASCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 07-35207, 07-35208.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Celerino Carrasco, Oaxaca, Mexico, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-06-05104-RJB, CV-06-05084-RJB.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Celerino Carrasco appeals pro se from the district court’s judgments dismissing his civil rights actions for failure to serve the summonses and complaints properly under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, and for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the Rule 4 dismissal for an abuse of discretion, *Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan),*253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Carrasco’s actions because Carrasco failed to establish that he properly served the summonses and complaints despite having additional time to do so and failed to show good cause for further extensions of time. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 4(m) (requiring service within 120 days after the complaint is filed); *In re Sheehan,*253 F.3d at 512-13 (discussing factors to establish good cause for an extension of time); *see also*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c), (e), (h), (i) (describing proper methods for service of process).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal under Rule 4, we do not reach the dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). *See Townsel v. County of Contra Costa,*820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir.1987) (affirming dismissal under Rule 4 and declining to reach alternative grounds for dismissal).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
AFH Holding III 10-Q





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding III, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 12, 2009





/s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. HeshmatpourPresident, Secretary and Sole Director(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6894
STEVEN M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Acting Commissioner; WARDEN TAYLOR, Maryland House of Corrections; WARDEN SMITH, Acting Warden; LIEUTENANT RATCLIFF; A.G. JOHNSON, Lieutenant; MAJOR RAY; MAJOR MURPHY; COMM ISSIONER OF CORRECTION; BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Commissioner; ASSISTANT WARDEN HUTCHINSON; MAJOR MITCHEL; MAJOR WILLIAMS; CAPTAIN ROLLINS; LIEUTENANT KOPPEL; MAJOR SINGLETARY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-731-JFM, CA-91-2250-JFM) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Lanham , Nos. CA-91-731-JFM; CA-91-2250-JFM (D. Md. May 16, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 75-6603.

#### McDaniels *v.*California Adult Authority.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Longval, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of IntriCon Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1)
        the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 10, 2007

/s/
        Scott LongvalScott LongvalChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



---