alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Hossein Fateh and Mark L. Wetzel, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer, respectively, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Hossein Fateh 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:              |  | Hossein Fateh                                                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark L. Wetzel
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:              |  | Mark L. Wetzel                                                 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:             |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report: January 23, 2008

(Date of earliest event reported)



---

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Commission File Number: 0-27605



Minnesota
        41-1859679(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
        (IRS Employer Identification No.)




6464 Sycamore Court

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)



(763) 656-4300

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 5.05   Amendments to the Registrants Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics.



(a)   On January 23, 2008, Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) implemented a revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (as revised, the Code).  The Code applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company.  Most of the revisions to the Code clarify the Companys policies concerning interactions between the Companys employees and certain health care professionals.  In addition, various other minor clarifying and conforming changes were made in the Code to bring it up to date.  A copy of the Code is filed as Exhibit 14 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.



Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d)   Exhibits.



14
        Vascular Solutions, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as revised.






SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.By:
        /s/ James HennenJames HennenChief Financial Officer




Date:   January 29, 2008





---

EXHIBIT INDEX



ExhibitNumber
        
        Description14
        
        Vascular Solutions,  Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as revised.










---
# C_2020297EN.01000602.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2020 — Nexans France SAS, Nexans SA v European Commission

(Case C-606/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Cartels - European market for submarine and underground power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 20 - European Commission’s powers of inspection in cartel proceedings - Power to copy data without a prior examination and to examine the data subsequently at the Commission’s premises - Fines - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2020/C 297/08)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Nexans France SAS, Nexans SA (represented by: G. Forwood, avocate, M. Powell and A. Rogers, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, P. Rossi, C. Sjödin and F. Castilla Contreras, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Nexans France SAS and Nexans SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nexans France SAS and Nexans SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarter ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Morgan, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Morgan                              
|John K. Morgan                                  
|Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
|January 5, 2011
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2521 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 

information, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2019 

Mr. CRIST (for himself and Mr. WALTZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally 

identifiable information, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Moving Americans Pri5 vacy Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN7 FORMATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 431(c)(2) of the Tariff 

9 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1431(c)(2)) is amended to read 

10 as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2521 IH

1 ‘‘(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall 

2 not be available for public disclosure if— 

3 ‘‘(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an af4 firmative finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis 

5 that disclosure is likely to pose a threat of personal 

6 injury or property damage; or 

7 ‘‘(ii) the information is exempt under the provi8 sions of section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States 

9 Code. 

10 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally 

11 identifiable information, including Social Security account 

12 numbers and passport numbers, is removed from any 

13 manifest signed, produced, delivered, or electronically 

14 transmitted under this section before access to the mani15 fest is provided to the public.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November 14, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Finance, respectively, of Professionals Direct, Inc., a Michigan corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, in their capacities as officers of the Company, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at December 31, 2004, and results of operations of the Company for the periods then ended.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|/s/ Stephen M. Tuuk                                                          |  | /s/ Stephen M. Westfield                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Stephen M. Tuuk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated:  March 30, 2005 |  | Stephen M. Westfield
Vice President of Finance
Dated:  March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD) Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Board of Actuaries

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        A meeting of the board has been scheduled to execute the provisions of Chapter 56, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 1111*et seq.*). The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions to be used in the valuation of benefits under DoD retiree health care programs for medicare-eligible beneficiaries. Persons desiring to: (1) Attend the DoD Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Board of Actuaries meeting or, (2) make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for consideration at the meeting must notify Joel Sitrin at (703) 696-7412 by June 22, 2001. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.                    

# DATES:

July 17, 2001, 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hilton-Alexandria Mark Center, Plaza 1 Room, 5000 Seminary Rd., Alexandria, VA 22311.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Doyle, Chief Actuary, DoD Office of the Actuary, 1555 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22209-2405, (703) 696-7407.

Dated: May 25, 2001.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 01-13749  Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
#### Jason PATILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6569.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 23, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 8, 2013.

Jason Patillo, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jason Patillo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Patillo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *320in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Leave to amend the habeas corpus petition is denied.

*DISMISSED.*
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                             and
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

      I, Scott Vicari, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hosting Site Network
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date:  December 6, 2006       /s/ Scott Vicari
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Scott Vicari
                                       Principal Executive and Financial Officer
ex10-1.htm


 



Exhibit 10.1


 






 


 







Mr. Carl E. Berg                                                                                                                          September 28, 2010


Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC .


10050 Bandley Drive


Cupertino, CA  95014







Re: Share Purchase







Dear Mr. Berg:







This letter agreement will confirm the sale, effective as of the date set forth above, by Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) to Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC (“Berg & Berg”) of one million nine hundred twenty three thousand and seventy seven (1,923,077)  shares (the Shares) of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $1.04 which represents the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on September 28, 2010, for aggregate consideration of $2,000,000.00.







These Shares were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  Berg & Berg understands that the Shares are “restricted securities” and have not been registered under the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is acquiring the Shares as principal for its own account and not with a view to or for distributing or reselling such Shares or any part thereof in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; has no present intention of distributing any of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; and has no direct or indirect arrangement or understandings with any other persons to distribute or regarding the distribution of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is an “accredited investor” as defined under Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.








	
Sincerely,

	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


	  	  
	
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

	
Berg & Berg, LLC.


	  	  
	
/s/ Ross. A. Goolsby

	
/s/ Carl. E. Berg


	
Ross A. Goolsby

	
Carl E. Berg


	
Chief Financial Officer

	
Managing Member
J-S32029-18 & J-S32030-18

____________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

2018 PA Super 302

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

 Appellee

v.

SCOTT ALLEN SHREFFLER 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1375 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 26, 2017

in the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin County 

Criminal Division at No.: CP-44-CR-0000247-2016

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

 Appellee

v.

SCOTT ALLEN SHREFFLER 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1376 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 26, 2017

in the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin County 

Criminal Division at No.: CP-44-CR-0000250-2016

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., NICHOLS, J., and PLATT*, J.

CONCURRING OPINION BY PLATT, J.: FILED: NOVEMBER 5, 2018

Because the Commonwealth failed to obtain an order unsealing the 

memorandum of consent and approval, the court order authorizing the inhome interception, and the affidavit of probable cause, as required by 18 

Pa.C.S.A. § 5704(2)(iv), I concur in the result. I believe it unnecessary to 
J-S32029-18 & J-S32030-18

- 2 -

address the additional provisions of the Wiretap Act set forth in the learned 

Majority Opinion. The Act itself, at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5721.1(b)(5) and (6), limits 

a motion to exclude in one-party in-home consents to claims that: “the 

consent to the interception was coerced by the Commonwealth” and “the 

interception was made without prior procurement of a court order or without 

probable cause.” 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5721.1(b)(5), (6).1

Implicit in the Majority Opinion and this Concurrence is the requirement 

that, on remand, the Commonwealth move to unseal these documents, and 

provide them to Appellant’s counsel. Appellant also should be given an 

opportunity to amend his motion to suppress, based on anything revealed in 

this discovery, and, a new suppression hearing should be held, if required.

I agree that, by failing to provide discovery, the Commonwealth 

prejudiced Appellant in his ability to challenge the probable cause requirement 

for the wiretap, thus necessitating that we vacate his sentence and remand. 

Accordingly, I respectfully concur in the learned Majority’s disposition. 

____________________________________________

1

In Commonwealth v. Fetter, 770 A.2d 762 (Pa. Super. 2001), this Court 

observed that “18 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 5704 is not subject to other sections of the 

Wiretap Act, unless specifically enumerated; instead, it lists exceptions to the 

generally stringent requirements for wiretaps when the interception occurs at 

the direction of a law enforcement officer and one party voluntarily consents 

to the interception.” Fetter, supra at 766.