alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Westfield Financial, Inc. 10-KA





Exhibit
32.1



statement
furnished pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002, 18 u.s.c. section 1350



The undersigned,
James C. Hagan, is the Chief Executive Officer and President of Westfield Financial, Inc. (“Westfield Financial”).



This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by Westfield Financial of Westfield Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”).



By execution of
this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Westfield Financial as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement is
authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report
is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Westfield Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Westfield
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|April 29, 2016 |  | /s/ James C. Hagan                   
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated          |  | James C. Hagan                       
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|               |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



I, Scott Longval, Chief Financial Officer of IntriCon Corporation certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntriCon Corporation;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        [Intentionally Omitted];




(c)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: May 10, 2007

/s/
        Scott LongvalScott LongvalChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer)




---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of International Card Establishment
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Candace Mills, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 8, 2009

                                                By: /s/ CANDACE MILLS
                                                    ____________________________
                                                        Candace Mills
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Management Assertion


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, First Union National Bank (the Bank) complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $20 million, respectively.
Wachovia Securities is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC, and through other bank and non-bank and broker-deaier subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation, including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.
September 4, 2019

Via the CFTC Web Submission Portal

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request: Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d)

To Whom It May Concern:

On this date, trueEX LLC (“trueEX”) submitted 2019-06S, to the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the "Commission") via the Commission Portal to notify it of an 

amendment to the Designated Market Maker Program for Tassat (formerly trueDigital)

Products. Exhibit A-2 is the Confidential Material for which trueEX is requesting 

confidential treatment. 

By this petition, trueEX requests confidential treatment pursuant to Section 145.9(d) of 

the Commission’s regulations of the Confidential Material. A copy of this Confidential 

Material is attached. 

Pursuant to Sections 8(a) of the Act, and Commission Regulation § 145.9(d), trueEX 

requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Material on the grounds that disclosure 

of such material would reveal trade secrets of trueEX and/or reveal confidential 

commercial information of trueEX. The Confidential Material is proprietary to trueEX and 

contain highly sensitive and confidential business and technology information; in addition 

to violating trueEX’s proprietary rights, the disclosure of the Confidential Materials would 

grant competitors an unfair competitive advantage and/or compromise the competitive 

advantages possessed by trueEX. Accordingly, trueEX is requesting the Commission to 

take appropriate steps to keep Confidential Material submitted to them confidential and 

to restrict the re-distribution of the Confidential Material.

Pursuant to Commission Regulation § 145.9(d)(5), trueEX hereby requests that the 

Confidential Material be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity.

trueEX requests that the Commission notify the undersigned immediately after receiving 

any FOIA request, any court order, subpoena, or summons seeking to access the 

Confidential Material in whole or in part. trueEX further requests notification (through the 

undersigned) in the event that the Commission intends to disclose the Confidential 

Material in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. trueEX does not waive its notification rights under 
Section 8(f) of the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons with respect to the 

Confidential Material in whole or in part. 

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact 

me by telephone at (312) 320-8934 or by email at fran@trueex.com. 

Sincerely,

Fran Kenck 

Chief Compliance Officer

Attachment:

CFTC 2019-06S Designated Market Maker Program.pdf
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Joseph Levi, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;      5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: November 13, 2007  /s/ Joseph Levi Joseph Levi Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
NEX SEF LIMITED 

2 Broadgate

London 

EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

July 2, 2019

Via Email

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts

Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“Applicant”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) a rule certification in NEX SEF-2019-R-6 pursuant to CFTC Reg. 40.6 in order 

to issue a Market Regulation Advisory Notice (“Certification”). Attached as Exhibit B to the 

Certification is MRAN 2019-02.

The Applicant hereby requests that MRAN 2019-02 as set forth in Exhibit B to the Certification 

(“Confidential Information”) be treated as confidential in order to prevent disclosure of 

Applicant’s trade secrets and confidential commercial and financial information upon a request 

under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). We request the Confidential Information be 

provided confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, 2 Broadgate, 

London EC2M 7UR, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by NEX SEF

LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying numbers and codes, as applicable: NEX SEF-2019-R-6-Exhibit B. 
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

2 Broadgate

London EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 245640835
#### Andrei ROJANKOVSKI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71445.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2013.

Filed May 24, 2013.

James G. Roche, Esquire, Roche Law-firm LLC, David W. Williams, Esquire, *581Law Office Of David W. Williams, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioner.

Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, Esquire, Trial, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: WARDLAW and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

An immigration judge denied petitioner Andrei Rojankovski’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and the BIA dismissed Rojankovski’s appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny Rojankovski’s petition for review.

Rojankovski may have been “teased, bothered, discriminated against and harassed” in Soviet Russia, but the record “does not *compel*a conclusion that [he] suffered from past persecution” on account of his religion. *See Nagoulko v. I.N.S.,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (emphasis in original). A reasonable adjudicator could have concluded that the incidents Rojankovski described neither individually nor cumulatively rose to the level of persecution and that Rojankovski’s malefactors were motivated by his belligerence rather than his religion. *See Halaim v. I.N.S.,*358 F.3d 1128, 1132 (9th Cir.2004) (finding no past persecution where petitioners “were the victims of many derogatory comments and, over the course of 50 years, a few incidents that might be deemed police harassment”); *cf. Krotova v. Gonzales,*416 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir.2005) (“The combination of sustained economic pressure, physical violence and threats against Petitioner and her close associates, and the restrictions on Petitioner’s ability to practice her religion cumulatively amount to persecution.”).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rojankovski’s motion to remand, because Rojankovski failed to comply with 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). *See In re Yewondwosen,*21 I. & N. Dec. 1025, 1026 (BIA 1997) (en banc) (stating a “failure to submit an application for relief ... will typically result in the Board’s denial of the motion”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rojan-kovski’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim because it is unexhausted. *Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder,*688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir.2012).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### STATE v. RICH

No. 384A95-3

Case below: Greene County Superior Court

Petition by Marshall Dayan, as Next Friend of James David Rich, for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Superior Court, Greene County denied 17 September 1998. Motion by Marshall Dayan, as Next Friend of defendant James David Rich, for stay of execution denied 17 September 1998.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-1183; MM Docket No. 01-58; RM-10071] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a petition filed on behalf of Copper Valley Radio proposing the allotment of Channel 290A to Morenci, Arizona, as that community's first local aural transmission service, based upon the lack of an expression of interest in pursuing the proposal by any party.                         *See*66 FR 13870, March 8, 2001. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order,*                     MM Docket No. 01-58, adopted May 2, 2001, and released May 11, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th                           ( print page 28875)                        Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-13244 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7020

GARY IVAN TERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARLENE A. VELTRI, Warden; JEFF TILLEY,

Discipline Hearing Officer; RODNEY TABRON,

Unit Manager; TONY PARKS, Senior Correctional

Officer; THERESA WOODS, Senior Correctional

Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-697-5-F)

Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Ivan Terry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gary Ivan Terry appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court

properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Terry did not demonstrate to the

district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or

that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the

action was not an abuse of discretion. Terry may refile his action

after exhaustion; therefore, we modify the dismissal to be without

prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (2000). Accordingly, we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s

order as modified. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED