alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 881 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to the 

Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human person. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. BISHOP of 

Utah, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. FRANKS

of Arizona, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. GOODLATTE, 

Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. INGLIS, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. FORTENBERRY, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. SMITH of New 

Jersey, Mr. CARTER, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. MARCHANT, 

Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. TERRY, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

WAMP, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. GARY G. MILLER

of California, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. SOUDER, 

Mr. FORBES, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. COLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of 

amendment to the Constitution for the right to life of 

each born and preborn human person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Life Act’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 881 IH

1 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE. 

2 To implement equal protection for the right to life 

3 of each born and preborn human person, and pursuant 

4 to the duty and authority of the Congress, including Con5 gress’ power under article I, section 8, to make necessary 

6 and proper laws, and Congress’ power under section 5 of 

7 the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

8 United States, the Congress hereby declares that the right 

9 to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each 

10 human being. However, nothing in this Act shall be con11 strued to authorize the prosecution of any woman for the 

12 death of her unborn child. 

13 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

14 For purposes of this Act: 

15 (1) HUMAN PERSON; HUMAN BEING.—The 

16 terms ‘‘human person’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include 

17 each and every member of the species homo sapiens 

18 at all stages of life, including the moment of fer19 tilization, cloning, or other moment at which an indi20 vidual member of the human species comes into 

21 being. 

22 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ used in the 

23 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

24 United States and other applicable provisions of the 

25 Constitution includes the District of Columbia, the 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 881 IH

1 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other terri2 tory or possession of the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ John K. Morgan                                             
|John K. Morgan Chairman, President, and Chief
Executive Officer

April 9, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1






CERTIFICATION




I,
Richard A. Baker, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NRDC Acquisition
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Omission in accordance with SEC Release
No. 33-8760] for the registrant and have:




(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
[Omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760];




(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      November 12, 2008
                          By:
                          /s/ RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2544 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2544

To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify that, during a lapse 
  in appropriations beginning on or after October 1, 2020, positions 
   relating to providing services for paying or reimbursing Federal 
  employees for official travel are excepted services under the Anti-
                Deficiency Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2019

   Mr. Case introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to clarify that, during a lapse 
  in appropriations beginning on or after October 1, 2020, positions 
   relating to providing services for paying or reimbursing Federal 
  employees for official travel are excepted services under the Anti-
                Deficiency Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATING TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES AS EXCEPTED 
              SERVICES UNDER THE ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1342 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``An officer'' and inserting ``(1) An 
        officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Any services by an officer or employee relating to paying or 
reimbursing Federal employees for official travel expenses shall be 
deemed, for purposes of paragraph (1), services for emergencies 
involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any lapse in appropriations beginning on or after October 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|/s/ John K. Morgan                                                          
|John K. Morgan Chairman, President, and Chief Executive
Officer July 2, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be
retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
                                                      Section 1350 Certification


                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer or Principal Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer of Cirmaker
Technology Corporation. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of Cirmaker Technology Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

     The undersigned certifies that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cirmaker
Technology Corporation as of December 31, 2003.

This Certification is executed as of April 26, 2004.



 By:    /s/ Bill Liao
 -----------------------------------------
Name:  Bill Liao
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



 By:    /s/ Hong Juin Chang
 -----------------------------------------
Name: Hong Juin Chang
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer))



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cirmaker Technology Corporation and will be retained by Cirmaker and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S07A0012.

#### HARRY et al. v. DALE et al.

(644 SE2d 137)

BENHAM, Justice.

In 2000, William W. Harry, Sr., and his wife Dorothy Harry gave a warranty deed for the 50-acre family property to their son, William W. Harry, Jr. In 2004, Shirley Dale and Dianne Roquemore, two daughters of William Harry, Sr., and Dorothy Harry, filed suit against their mother and brother (their father having died since the conveyance to their brother) seeking title to a five-acre plot each. Their complaint, as amended at trial, alleged multiple bases for recovery *871including specific performance, completed gift, and a trust. The plaintiffs contended their father had shown each of them a five-acre plot and had given it to them, and that each had taken possession of and had made improvements on the land given to them. A jury-awarded each plaintiff a five-acre plot and the trial court denied the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial.

Decided April 24, 2007.

*Collier & Gamble, Wilbur T. Gamble III,*for appellants.

*Weyman E. Cannington, Jr.,*for appellees.

Appellants complain on appeal that appellees’ claims were barred by the Statute of Frauds and by the provisions for land registration in Article 2 of Title 44 of the Official Code of Georgia, and that the trial court erred by permitting an express trust to be proved by parol evidence. Determination of the validity of each of those enumerations of error requires consideration of the evidence presented at trial, but the trial was not recorded. “In the absence of a transcript, we must presume that the evidence supported the jury’s verdict.” *Schroder v. Murphy,*282 Ga. App. 701, 705 (3) (639 SE2d 485) (2006). See also *Blue v. Blue,*279 Ga. 550 (1) (615 SE2d 540) (2005). Accordingly, the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONALD TIMOTHY STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CR-93-41-F)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Timothy Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders (1) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error

because Appellant's claims challenging his sentence are without

merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Nidec Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 26, 2004

|/s/   Shibenobu Nagamori                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Shigenobu Nagamori
President, Chief Executive Officer and Representative Director
ICE Swap Trade LLC

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

November 14, 2018

Submitted via the CFTC Portal

Submission 18-06

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: ICE Swap Trade, LLC – Rule Amendment

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(d) of the regulations of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), ICE Swap Trade, LLC (“IST” or the “SEF”) hereby 

notifies the Commission of amendments that were made to certain of its rules during the preceding week. The 

amendments contained herein have been made in order to affect certain administrative revisions. 

A concise explanation of the amendments to the Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the revised 

Rulebook marked to show changes against the previous Rulebook with an effective date of October 1, 2018, is 

attached hereto as Exhibit B. A clean copy of the revised Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 

IST certifies that the rule amendment complies with the requirements of the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules 

and regulations promulgated thereunder. IST is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect 

to this filing and certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the IST’s website 

and may be accessed at: https://www.theice.com/swap-trade/regulation#rule-filings. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 323-8543 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Robert James Laorno

General Counsel

Enclosure
Exhibit A

Summary of Rulebook Changes

Amendment Explanation

Chapter 1 - Definitions

Chapter 5 - Trading Practices and Business Conduct

Rules 514.A.

Amended references to expired guidance documents that 

have been extended by CFTC No-Action Letter 17-55.

Chapter 13 - Commodity Contract Terms and 

Conditions

Rule 13139

Amended the contract symbol to reflect changes made to 

the product’s code reference across ICE venues.
# C_2020077EN.01003701.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/37

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, AR, BS v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei

(Case C-712/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/50)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
# C_2010211EN.01001101.xml

| 4.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/11

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2010/C 211/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tartaric acid | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 130/2006 (OJ L 23, 27.1.2006, p. 1) | 28.1.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Tartaric acid

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 130/2006 (OJ L 23, 27.1.2006, p. 1)

28.1.2011

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
#### In the Matter of Hailey ZZ., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Tompkins County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ricky ZZ., Appellant.

Submitted March 12, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 85 AD3d 1265.

Motion by Monroe County Department of Social Services for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.