alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Charges - Precious Metals

# Charges - Base Metals

# Gold Depositories Weighmasters

# Gold Brands

# Gold Assayers

# Gold Carriers

# Silver Depositories Weighmaster

# Silver Brands

# Silver Assayers

# Platinum Depositories

# Platinum Brands

# Platinum Assayers

# Platinum Carriers

# Palladium Depositories

# Palladium Brands

# Palladium Assayers

# Palladium Carriers

# Copper Warehouses

# Copper Weighmasters

# Copper Brands

# Copper Assayers

# Aluminum Sheds Weighmasters

# Aluminum Brands

# Aluminum Assayers

# RBOB Gasoline Facilities

# ULSD Facilities
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Taylor, Appellant.

Submitted January 25, 2010;

decided February 23, 2010

Motion to strike portions of appellant’s brief denied.
#### BAREFOOT v. FINANCIAL SERVICES OF RALEIGH, INC.

No. 303P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 646

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 251 

AN ACT 

To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 

Standards Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 251 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chemical Facility Anti3 Terrorism Standards Program Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TER5 RORISM STANDARDS PROGRAM OF THE DE6 PARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 

7 Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing Chemical 

8 Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 

9 113–254; 6 U.S.C. 621 note) is amended by striking ‘‘4 

10 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 251 

AN ACT 

To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Antiposes. ment of Homeland Security, and for other pur- Terrorism Standards Program of the Depart-
151 So. 922

#### John THOMPSON v. STATE.

1 Div. 783.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 14, 1933.

Graham A. Sullivan and Carl Booth, both of Mobile, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty.. Gen., for the •State.

KNIGHT, Justice.

The appellant, John Thompson, was indicted by a grand jury in the circuit court of Mobile county, Ala., for the offense of murder in the first degree. Upon his trial, in said court, for the offense, under said indictment, the appellant was convicted of murder in the first *701degree, as charged in the indictment, and his punishment was fixed by the jury at death by electrocution. The appellant was adjudged guilty accordingly, and duly sentenced to death upon the verdict of the jury. June 30, 1933, was the day fixed by the court for the execution of the sentence of death.

There is no bill of exceptions in the case, and the appeal is upon the record, with suspension of sentence pending the appeal.

We have carefully read and considered the record, and it affirmatively appears that the organization of the court, the indictment, arraignment, trial and conviction, and the sentence of the defendant are in all respects, and in every particular, regular. It follows, therefore, that the judgment and sentence of the circuit court of Mobile county will be, and is here, affirmed.

And, it appearing to the court that the date heretofore fixed by the circuit court of Mobile county for the execution of appellant has passed, Friday, February 9, 1934, is hereby set for the execution of the death sentence passed and pronounced upon appellant.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
20 S Wacker Dr Chicago, IL 60606 T 312 466 7478 tim.elliott@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

December 14, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for 

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, December 14, 2023, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 23-537S) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6 to certify modifications

to NEX SEF’s Fee Schedule for the increase in Basis Risk Reduction Services (“BRRS”) Crossing Access 

Fee (“BRRS Fee Increase”). This supplemental filing includes an Appendix A (blacklined version) and an 

Appendix B (clean version).

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendix A and Appendix B (“Confidential Information”), on 

the grounds that Appendix A and Appendix B contain confidential commercial information of the submitter 

(NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendix A and Appendix B 

until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendix A or Appendix B or any other court order, 

subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission 

intends to disclose such Appendix A or Appendix B to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendix A or Appendix B.

Please contact the undersigned at (312) 466-7478 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
No. 449.

#### Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted January 11, 1932.

Decided January 18, 1932.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. *Reddall*v. *Bryan,*24 How. 420; *Verden*v. *Coleman,*18 How. 86; *Augusta*
      *595
      *Power Co.*v. *Savannah River Electric Co., ante,*p. 574; *Twin City Power Co.*v. *Savannah River Electric Co., ante,*p. 574; *Brannan*v. *Harrison, ante,*p. 579.

*Mr. J. H. Everest*for .appellants.

No appearance for appellees.
# C_2010061EN.01000401.xml

| 12.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/4

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 61/03

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Rouen–Lyon (Saint-Exupéry) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | Repealed |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté du 17 février 2010 abrogeant l’arrêté du 9 juillet 2009 relatif à l’imposition d’obligations de service public sur les services aériens réguliers entre Rouen et Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)
  NOR: DEVA1004589A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction générale de l’aviation civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Rouen–Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

Repealed

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté du 17 février 2010 abrogeant l’arrêté du 9 juillet 2009 relatif à l’imposition d’obligations de service public sur les services aériens réguliers entre Rouen et Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

NOR: DEVA1004589A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction générale de l’aviation civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2011 of Lucky Boy Silver Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





Very truly yours,





/s/Kenneth B. LiebscherKenneth B. LiebscherChief Executive OfficerDated: October 21, 2011/s/ Fortunato VillamagnaFortunato VillamagnaChief Financial OfficerDated: October 21, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lucky Boy Silver Corp. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 1
433 West Van Buren Street › Suite 700S › Chicago, IL 60607 › cboe.com

January 2, 2024

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request:

Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d)

All: 

Pursuant to § 145.9(d) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and pursuant 

to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC (“CDE”) hereby petitions 

the Commission for confidential treatment of Exhibit A (including Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2) 

to the Self-Certification for updates to an incentive program for CDE Trading Privilege Holders

that are default auction liquidity providers (CDE-2024-01E), submitted to the CFTC via the CFTC

Portal on January 2, 2024 (“Covered Information”).

The Covered Information should be afforded confidential treatment based on, among 

other things, § 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations, which implements FOIA 

Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)), because disclosure would 

reveal CDE trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. CDE hereby 

requests that the Covered Information be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity. 

CDE requests that the Commission notify CDE upon the receipt of any request by any party 

for any access under FOIA to the Covered Information or any court order, subpoena, or summons for 

disclosure of the Covered Information for the entire duration that the Commission retains the 

Covered Information. CDE further requests notification in the event that the Commission intends to 

disclose the Covered Information in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental 

agency or unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. CDE does not waive its notification rights under 

Section 8(f) of the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for the Covered Information. 

The address at which CDE can be reached is as follows:

433 West Van Buren Street, Suite 700S

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Attention: General Counsel

Please contact me at kkirkpatrick@cboe.com or (312) 786-7431 if you have any questions
regarding this request.

Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC

/s/ Katherine Kirkpatrick

By: Katherine Kirkpatrick, Chief Legal Officer
#### Daniel Marks Cohen et al., Appellants, v Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 25, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 35 Misc 3d 478.

Motion by New Roosevelt Foundation, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
EXHIBIT
31.3



Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Richard O’Connell, Jr., certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SITO Mobile, Inc. for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2016;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  May 1, 2017 | By: | /s/ Richard
    O’Connell, Jr.                                        
|------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |     | Interim
    Chief Executive Officer 
    (Principal Executive Officer)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



October 18, 2007 (October 2, 2007)

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

---

AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware
        000-29222
        13-3575874(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
        (Commission File Number)
        (IRS Employer
Identification Number)




2000 Hamilton Street

Suite 204

Philadelphia, PA  19130

(Address of principal executive offices)



(215) 241-9760

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).




o
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12).




o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)).




o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)).






---

Item 5.02
        Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




As previously reported on May 31, 2007, the President of the Company, Richard P. Rainey, was given the additional title of Chief Executive Officer and appointed to the Companys Board of Directors. On October 2, 2007, the Company executed an extension of the previously expired employment agreement with Mr. Rainey. The amendment to the employment agreement is effective as of April 1, 2007, which is the date that the original employment agreement expired. In accordance with the extension, Mr. Rainey will serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, with the term of the extension expiring March 31, 2010. Mr. Rainey receives a current annual base salary of $350,000, to be reviewed annually each April 1st. Under the terms of the extension, all terms of the prior employment agreement not modified by the extension remain in force.



Item 9.01
        Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(c)
        Exhibits.




The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report:




Exhibit No.
        Description10.1
        Letter Agreement dated October 2, 2007, amending the Employment Agreement between AVAX Technologies, Inc. and Richard P. Rainey dated as of April 1, 2004.




-1-

---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Date:  October 18, 2007.
        AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:
        /s/   Richard P. RaineyName:
        Richard P. RaineyTitle:
        President and Chief Executive Officer






-2-

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 2

[Docket No. PRM-2-12]


Michael Stein; Withdrawal of Petition for Rulemaking

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing, at the 
petitioner's request, a petition for rulemaking (PRM-2-12) (64 FR 
59669; November 3, 1999) filed by Michael Stein. In PRM-2-12, the 
petitioner requested that the Commission amend its regulations 
pertaining to deliberate misconduct and employee protection to ensure 
that all individuals are afforded the right to respond to an NRC 
determination that the individual has violated these regulations.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the petitioner's email submittal, dated May 15, 
2001, requesting the withdrawal of the petition is available for public 
inspection, or copying for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room, 
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 
Maryland.
    Single copies of the petitioner's email submission may be obtained 
free of charge by writing to the Division of Administrative Services, 
Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555.
    Documents created or received at the NRC after November 1, 1999, 
are also available electronically at the NRC's Public Electronic 
Reading Room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html. For the petitioner's email, the accession number is 
ML011360325. From this site, the public can gain entry into the NRC's 
Agency wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) that provides 
text and image files of NRC's public documents. For more information, 
contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-
397-4209, (301) 415-4737, or by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74041006341a06175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2b2a6b082acb0a1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules and 
Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of 
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555, Telephone: 301-415-7163 or Toll Free: 800-368-5642.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 25th day of May, 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew L. Bates,
 Acting, Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-13739 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of May 28, 2001.

A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, May 31, 2001, at 11 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(A), 9(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (9)(i), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matters of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 31, 2001 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: May 23, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13444  Filed 5-23-01; 3:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### Gerald O. DEEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED; Estes Express Lines, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1727.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.

Gerald O. Deel, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Dwight Floyd, Jr., Lawrence Michael Hershon, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Charles Edward Raynal, IV, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III, Poy-ner Spruill, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

*787Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald O. Deel appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Deel v. Home Depot USA, Inc.,*No. 7:09-cv-02817-GRA, 2010 WL 2196272 (D.S.C. filed May 26, 2010 & entered May 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*