alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11



National Presto Industries, Inc.



The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be exercised.



(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



Second Quarter
        
        First Six Months2006
        
        2005
        
        2006
        
        2005Net Earnings (1)
        
        $
        3,614
        
        $
        1,574
        
        $
        5,532
        
        $
        2,850Weighted average common shares outstanding  (2)
        
        
        6,831
        
        
        6,826
        
        
        6,830
        
        
        6,824Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive
        
        
        1
        
        
        2
        
        
        1
        
        
        2Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation  (3)
        
        
        6,832
        
        
        6,828
        
        
        6,831
        
        
        6,826Net earnings per share:Basic  (1 divided by 2)
        
        $
        0.53
        
        $
        0.23
        
        $
        0.81
        
        $
        0.42Diluted  (1 divided by 3)
        
        $
        0.53
        
        $
        0.23
        
        $
        0.81
        
        $
        0.42






---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Life  Sciences  Research,  Inc.
("LSR") on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Andrew
H Baker,  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of LSR  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSR.




Date:    March 30, 2005                   /s/       Andrew H Baker

                                                    --------------------
                                                    Andrew H Baker
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
      II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Ronald D. Ormand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2008
            /s/
                Ronald D. OrmandName:
            Ronald
                D. OrmandTitle:
            President
                and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.7

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report
on Form 40-F (the 40-F) of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the Company) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name as a qualified person for the IDOP Technical Report dated
March 29, 2012, under the headings Description of the Business  Qualified Persons and Description of the Business  Oyu Tolgoi Project, and to the use of and reference to my name in Interests of
Experts, (i) in the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011, dated March 30, 2012, (ii) in the 40-F and (iii) to the incorporation by reference of such information in the
Companys Form S-8 (333-113048, 333-128205, 333-135595, 333-143550 and 333-160783).



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                
|                                          
|/s/ Scott Jackson                         
|Title: Principal Consultant               
|Company: Quantitative Geoscience Pty. Ltd.

Date: March 30, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20222

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS JAIR SOLIS-VIVEROS, also known as Carlos J. Solis, also known as

Carlos Solis-Viveros, also known as Carlos Solis-Rivero, also known as Carlos

Jair Solis-Rivero,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-694-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Jair Solis-Viveros has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Solis-Viveros has been deported from the

United States and has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-20222 Document: 00511085626 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
No. 09-20222

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States

v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2007).

2

Case: 09-20222 Document: 00511085626 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2458 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require a certain 

percentage of funds appropriated for revolving fund capitalization grants 

be used for green projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2019 

Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require 

a certain percentage of funds appropriated for revolving 

fund capitalization grants be used for green projects, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Infrastructure 

5 Sustainability and Efficiency Act’’ or the ‘‘WISE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPITALIZATION GRANTS. 

7 Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Con8 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1382(c)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2458 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (13), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (14), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(15) beginning on the date of enactment of 

7 this paragraph, to the extent there are sufficient eli8 gible project applications and with respect to any 

9 funds for capitalization grants made available in any 

10 appropriations Act that the State receives, the State 

11 will use not less than 20 percent of such funds for 

12 projects to address green infrastructure, water or 

13 energy efficiency improvements, or other environ14 mentally innovative activities.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Mark Freedman, Appellant, v Regan Horike, Respondent. (And Another Related Proceeding.)

Submitted January 19, 2010;

decided April 1, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Family Court’s order that denied a motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally *812determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

Cargo Care, Inc., 1300C South Finley Road, Suite 104, Lombard, IL 60148. Officers: Thomas S. Fornell, President (Qualifying Individual), Olaf Sodemann, Vice President 

Deltamax Freight System Corporation, 10834 S. La Cienega Blvd., Inglewood, CA 90304. Officers: Jack Y.M. Kao, President/Managing Director (Qualifying Individual), Yoke Liu, Vice President

S&T Shipping, 810 Kangaroo Ct., Deltona, FL 32738. Timothy A. Voit, Sole Proprietor

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

Venture Transport, Inc., 314 North Post Oak Lane, Houston, TX 77024. Officers: Richard S. Higgins, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Ronnie Murphy, President 

Maraly International Corp., 7206 N.W. 84th Avenue, Miami, FL 33166. Officer: Robert Esquivel, President (Qualifying Individual) 

Magellan Maritime Ltd., 391 Grand Avenue, Englewood, NJ 07631. Officers: Michael Rubin, President (Qualifying Individual), Mona Rubin, Vice President 

Pum Yank Logistics, Inc., 425 Victoria Terrace, Ridgefield, NJ 07657. Officers: Young Joo Shin, President (Qualifying Individual), Hae Sook Lee, Chairman 

Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

Malvazia Co. d/b/a Advanced Cargo, 2535 Seaboard Coastline Drive, Savannah, GA 31401. Officers: Patrice A. Kiley, Secretary (Qualifying Individual), Stefanos Vassilakos, President 

Dated: May 25, 2001. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-13701 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### In the Matter of Hank Richardson, Jr., Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v New York City Housing Authority, Patterson Houses, Respondent.

Submitted April 19, 2010;

decided June 10, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
|                                  |             | Exhibit 99(a) 
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------
|Household Finance Corporation     |             |               
|Household Automotive Trust 2001-2 |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|Original Principal Class A        |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 149,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                         | 173,000,000 |               
|Class A-3                         | 205,000,000 |               
|Class A-4                         | 173,000,000 |               
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)   |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 149,000     |               
|Class A-2                         | 173,000     |               
|Class A-3                         | 205,000     |               
|Class A-4                         | 173,000     |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             | 2003 Totals   
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|CLASS A                           |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution   |             | 0.00          
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution  |             | 13,041,009.15 
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution   |             | 46,801.91     
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution  |             | 138,888,958.29
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution   |             | 6,943,646.34  
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution   |             | 9,324,699.96
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Gérard Lamarche, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SUEZ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and; 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2005
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
      II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Ronald D. Ormand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 15, 2008
            /s/
                Ronald D. OrmandName:
            Ronald
                D. OrmandTitle:
            President
                and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### HIGH v. BOLAND

No. 264P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 647

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan PASILLAS-MANRRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50285.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2010.*

Filed April 21, 2010.

Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los An-geles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kathryn Ann Young, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Pasillas-Manrriquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pasillas-Manrriquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

In accordance with *United States v. Rivera-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). *See United States v. Herrera-Bianco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED but REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1739

CLOTHILDA WILLIAMS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER BERGER; SERGEANT ENGLISH; OFFICER JENNINGS, Crash Crew 

Investigator; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE; HENRICO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00433-JAG)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clothilda Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1739 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Clothilda Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1739 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit
99.9  GLJ
  Petroleum
  Consultants
  Principal Officers:
  Harry
  Jung, P. Eng.
  President, C.E.O.
  Dana
  B. Laustsen, P. Eng.
  Executive V.P., C.O.O.
  Keith
  M. Braaten, P. Eng.
  Executive V.P.
  
  Officers / Vice Presidents:
  Terry
  L. Aarsby, P. Eng.
  Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.
  Neil I. Dell, P. Eng.
  David
  G. Harris, P. Geol.
  Myron
  J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.
  Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.
  John
  H. Stilling, P. Eng.
  Douglas
  R. Sutton, P. Eng.
  James
  H. Willmon, P. Eng.   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS   We
hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating a
portion of EnCana Corporation's petroleum and natural gas reserves as of
December 31, 2005, and the information derived from our reports, as described
or incorporated by reference in: (i) EnCana Corporations Annual Report on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005; (ii) EnCana Corporations and EnCana
Holdings Finance Corp.s registration statement on Form F-9 (File No.
333-113732); (iii) EnCana Corporations registration statement on Form F-9
(File No. 333-118737); and (iv) EnCana Corporations registration statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-124218, 333-13956 and 333-85598), filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.  Your truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.ORIGINALLY SIGNED BYHarry Jung, P. Eng.President  Calgary, Alberta February 17, 2006  4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2·(403) 266-9500·Fax (403) 262-1855·GLJPC.com