### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T Dec e m be r 21, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12859 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 01 -025 62 -C V -S M O N E Y M A N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E S , I N C ., P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s MAR K P . P OR R AR O, P O R R A R O A N D A S S O C I A T E S , F I R S T A L L M E R I C A F I N A N C I A L L I F E I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y , A L L M E R I C A F I N A N C I A L L I F E I N S U R A N C E A N D A N N U I T Y , A L L M E R I C A I N V E S T M E N T S , I N C ., A L L M E R I C A I N V E S T M E N T M A N A G E M E N T C O M P A N Y , I N C ., D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 21, 2005) B efo re C A RN E S , M A R C U S an d C O X , C i rcu i tJu d g es.2

P E R C U R I A M: P l ai nt i ff M on eyM anagem entS ervi ce s, Inc. (M M S ) app ea l s the di stri ct court ’ s gra ntof sum m ary j ud gm entt o D ef endant s F i rs tA l l m er i caF i nanci al L i fe Insura nce C om pany, A l l m er i caF i nanci al L i fe Insura nce a nd A nn ui ty, A l l m er i ca I nve s tm e nt s , I nc . , A l l m e r i c a I nve s tm e ntM a na ge m e ntC o. , I nc . ( “ A l l m e r i c a ” ) a nd M a rk P orr a r o, A l l m e r i c a ’ s G e ne r a l A ge nti n G e or gi a a nd ( dur i ng pa r tof the r e l e v a n tt i m e p e r i o d ) A l ab a m a . A tth e t i m e o f s u m m a ry j u d g m e n t , MMS m a in ta in e d c la im s f

o rb r e a c h o f

c o n tr a c t a n d u n

ju s t e n r ic h m e n t a g a in s t a ll D efen d an t s. T he di stri ctcourtfoun d thatP orra ro’ s onl y r ol e i n any contra ctw as as A l l m er i ca ’ s a gent . M M S do es no tdi sput e thi s f ac tual fi nd i ng . A s the di stri ctcourt st at ed, “ agent s c anno tbe hel d l i abl e f or a pri nci pal ’ s bre ac h o f c on tra ct . ” H a r r e ll v . R e y nolds Me tal

s C o. , 495 S o. 2d 1381, 1389 ( A l a . 1986) . W e a f f i rm the gr a ntof s um m a ry j udgm e ntt o P orr a r o. T he di s tr i c tc our tf

ound tha tA l l m e r i c a w a s e nt i t l e d t o s um m a ry j udgm e nton M M S ’ s bre ac h o f c on tra ctcl ai m because M M S “ fa i l ed t o add uce e vi dence w hi ch w ou l d aff

ord a re as on abl e j ury abasi s t o fi x d am ages on the P l ai nt i ff’ s a l l eged brea ch of contra ct . ” W e a gree . F in ally, th e d istrict co u rt g ra n ted A ll m er ica s u m m ar y ju d g m en t o n M M S ’s3

c l a i m of unj us te nr i c hm e ntorqua s i - c ontr a c ton tw o ba s e s : ( 1) M M S putf or th no e v i d e n c e th a ti tp r o v i d e d a n y u n c o m p e n s a t e ds e rv i c e t o D e f e n d a n t s a n d ( 2 ) MMS pr e s e nt e d no e vi de nc e of the r e a s onabl e va l ue of a ny s e rvi c e s i tm a y ha ve pr ovi de d. W e f

i nd the s a m e de f

i c i e nc i e s i n pr oof

. A nd, w e f

i nd no ba s i s t o s hi f

tt o D e f e nda nt s the bur de n of

pr ovi ng da m a ge s orthe r e a s onabl e va l ue of a ny u n co m p en sat ed serv i ces. AF F I R ME D.