alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[926 NE2d 255, 899 NYS2d 751]

#### American Transit Insurance Company, Appellant, v Arthur Brown, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Decided April 1, 2010

*811APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Marjorie E. Bornes,*New York City, for appellant.

*Blank & Star, PLLC,*Brooklyn *(Scott Star*and *Helene E. Blank*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals *(22*NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, defendant Brown’s motion for summary judgment denied, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment granted and judgment granted declaring that plaintiff’s disclaimer of coverage was proper, that it had no obligation to defend or indemnify its insured in the subject underlying action and that it is not responsible for payment of any portion of the judgment rendered therein. Defendant Brown failed to provide a valid excuse for his failure to use reasonable diligence in providing plaintiff insurer with notice of the underlying personal injury action.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gray Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan J. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of March, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex

Via Portal Submission December 1, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-62

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of November 20, 2023:

• November 22, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. CT 

Wednesday, November 29, 2023 deadline to report offsets of December 2023 Hard Red Spring 

Wheat and SPIKES Volatility Index futures, and Hard Red Spring Wheat Index, Hard Red Winter 

Wheat Index, Soft Red Winter Wheat Index, National Corn Index and National Soybean Index 

futures and options, effective for the Tuesday, November 28, 2023 trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at the following link: 

https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex/alerts. If there are any questions regarding this 

submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7141 or cstuhlmann@mgex.com.

Sincerely, 

Carmen M. Stuhlmann

Associate Counsel
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection
with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alton
B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


























/s/ Alton B.
Lewis


Alton B.
Lewis


Chief
Executive Officer


November
13, 2009
Exhibit 31.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth L. Bertrand, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Allied First Bancorp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respect the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2003


/s/ Kenneth L. Bertrand
-------------------------------------
Kenneth L. Bertrand
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Jimmy P. PIKE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent.

No. 2006-3187.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 2006.

Jimmy P. Pike, pro se.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The court treats Jimmy P. Pike’s letter received on March 8, 2006 as a motion for reconsideration of this court’s previous rejection of his petition for review as untimely-

A petition for review must be received by the court within 60 days of receipt of the Board’s final decision or order. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1). To be timely filed, the petition must be received by this court on or before the date that the petition is due. *Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management,*931 F.2d 1544, 1546 (Fed.Cir. 1991) (petition is filed when received by this court; court dismissed petition received nine days late).

On December 7, 2005, this court received a facsimile from Pike in which he requested review of the Merit Systems Protection Board order that his counsel received on October 14, 2005, in Board case no. SF0752040589-I-1, 100 M.S.P.R. 321. Pike argues that the facsimile was timely received by the court. However, a petition for review may not be filed by facsimile. Fed. Cir. R. 25. The court received a submission by mail from Pike on December 14, 2005, or 61 days after the date of receipt of the Board’s decision. Thus, Pike’s petition for review was untimely and must be dismissed. *Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp., Fed. Aviation Admin.,*735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984) (the period for petitioning for review is statutory, mandatory, and jurisdictional); *Pinat,*931 F.2d at 1546 (deadline for filing petition for review may not be waived).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion for reconsideration is denied and this petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40372 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TRINIDAD FEDERICO-ABREO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2044

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Trinidad Federico-Abreo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xodtec LED, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yao-Ting Su, as Chief Executive and Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: January 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Yao-Ting SuYao-Ting SuChief Executive and Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN FUENTES CARRENO,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-73498

Agency No. A079-536-437

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Julian Fuentes Carreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597

FILED

DEC 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Fuentes Carreno’s motion as

untimely, where Fuentes Carreno has not established that any statutory or

regulatory exception to the filing deadline applies. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C);

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3) (setting forth exceptions to the filing limitations for

motions to reopen); cf. Poblete Mendoza v. Holder, 606 F.3d 1137, 1141 (9th Cir.

2010) (“A conviction vacated for reasons ‘unrelated to the merits of the underlying

criminal proceedings’ may be used as a conviction in removal proceedings whereas

a conviction vacated because of a procedural or substantive defect in the criminal

proceedings may not.” (internal citation omitted)). 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen proceedings

sua sponte. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011);

cf. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court has

jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited

purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional

error.”).

2 14-73498
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Fuentes Carreno’s remaining

contentions regarding the basis of the vacatur of his conviction or his eligibility for

cancellation of removal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 14-73498
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2383 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2383

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit the expenditure 
  of certain grant funds to purchase firearms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2019

Mrs. Demings (for herself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, and Mr. Payne) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit the expenditure 
  of certain grant funds to purchase firearms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Communities and Safe Schools 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPENDITURE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 
              FUNDS TO PURCHASE FIREARMS.

    Subsection (b) of section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 609) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) Firearms.--A grant awarded under section 2003 or 2004 
        may not be used to purchase firearms or firearms accessories, 
        such as ammunition, including for use by teachers.''.
                                 <all>
```
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Bonfire Productions, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed  with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  October 28, 2008


/s/ Elena Bylbash
----------------------------------
Elena Bylbash
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Treasurer, principal accounting
officer and Director
# C_2010064EN.01000301.xml

| 16.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/3

---

Extract from the Decision concerning Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

2010/C 64/03

| Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. |
| --- |
| 2-4, rue Beck |
| 1222 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| No RC B78804 |

Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A.

Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A

2-4, rue Beck

2-4, rue Beck

1222 Luxembourg

1222 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

LUXEMBOURG

No RC B78804

No

Last date for claims

Last date for claims

Formal steps have been taken in the liquidation of Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. to fix a last date for claims.

Last date for claims: 14 May 2010

Last date for claims: 14 May 2010

The last date by which creditors must file their claims in order to receive dividends from Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. in liquidation has been formally set at 14 May 2010. Creditors who do not file their claims by this date will be excluded from the right to receive dividends.

14 May 2010

If you wish to file a claim, you should send it as soon as possible, with all evidence to support it, to following address:

| Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg, XVème chambre |
| --- |
| Cité judiciaire — Bâtiment Commerce |
| 7, rue du St-Esprit |
| 2080 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |

Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg, XVème chambre

ème

Cité judiciaire — Bâtiment Commerce

7, rue du St-Esprit

2080 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

It is recommended to send your claim by registered post so that its receipt by this deadline can be verified.

Filed claims

Filed claims

If you have filed a claim and the liquidation team did not confirm the receipt of this claim to you so far, you should contact the liquidator immediately by using the details set out at the end of this notice.

Liquidation expenses/Services to the liquidation

Liquidation expenses/Services to the liquidation

Any party who has supplied services to the liquidation or who otherwise has a claim for payment as an expense of this liquidation, and who has not yet been paid, should contact the liquidator immediately by using the details set out at the end of this notice.

Future conduct of the liquidation

Future conduct of the liquidation

The liquidator is continuing to pursue various recoveries and will not proceed to final closure until these recovery actions have been concluded.

| Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. in Liquidation |
| --- |
| 2-4, rue Beck |
| 1222 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 2619291 |
| Fax +352 26192929 |
| E-mail: customerrelations@landsbanki.lu |

Landsbanki Luxembourg S.A. in Liquidation

2-4, rue Beck

1222 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 2619291

Fax +352 26192929

E-mail: customerrelations@landsbanki.lu

---
Form of Ordinary Share Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 

Incorporated in the Cayman Islands 

Global Education & Technology Group Limited 

This is to certify that 

is / are the registered shareholders of: 
  

					
	 No. of Shares
	  	 Type of Share
	  	Par Value
	 Date of Record
	  	Certificate Number	  	% Paid

 The above
shares are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company and transferable in accordance therewith. 
  

							
	  
	 	 Director
	  	  
	  	Director / Secretary
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard A. Parlontieri, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard A. Parlontieri
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | By:                        |  | Richard A. Parlontieri               
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Its:                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc.
and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Shanahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Michael S. Shanahan
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | By:                     |  | Michael S. Shanahan    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Its:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc.
and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.