alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Stephen Gould, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, and David Miller, President and Principal
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)     The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen
  M. Gould                                                            
|                                                                                  
|Principal
  Financial Officer and 
  Principal Accounting Officer
  April 10, 2008

|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David
  Miller                                          
|                                                            
|President
  and Principal Executive Officer
  April 10, 2008

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection
with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michele
E. LoBianco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of
my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Michele E. LoBianco


Michele
E. LoBianco


Chief
Financial Officer






August
14, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant-Respondent, v Gerard Ippolito, Also Known as Gerald Ippolito, Respondent-Appellant.

Submitted March 26, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 89 AD3d 1369.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the respondent-appellant on the appeal herein.
# C_2010206EN.01000501.xml

| 30.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/5

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in Thailand: proposal to accept a request to change the name of a company subject to an average anti-dumping duty for cooperating companies

2010/C 206/05

Imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in Thailand are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 (1) (Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006).

1

Ziplas International Co., Ltd., a company located in Thailand, whose exports to the Union of certain plastic sacks and bags are subject to an average anti-dumping duty for cooperating companies of 7,9 % imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006, has informed the Commission that as a result of it being bought by Illinois Toolworks Incorporated, on 6 March 2007 its name was changed to ITW Minigrip (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

The company has argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name of Ziplas International Co., Ltd.

The Commission has examined the information provided and has concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006. Therefore, the reference in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 to:

Ziplas International Co., Ltd.

should be read as:

ITW Minigrip (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

The TARIC additional code A772 previously attributed to Ziplas International Co., Ltd. shall apply to ITW Minigrip (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 4.

1

---
#### Anna DINARDO, Augusta Dinardo, Victoria Dinardo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Karen M. MILLER, Honorable, Palm Beach County Circuit, Court Judge, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-10806

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 14, 2006.

Anna Dinardo, Deerfield Bch, FL, pro se.

Augusta Dinardo, Deerfield Bch, FL, pro se.

Victoria Dinardo, Deerfield Bch, FL, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court’s final order of dismissal is affirmed. *See D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482-88, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 1315-18, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 415-16, 44 S.Ct. 149, 150, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); *Goodman ex rel. Goodman v. Sipos,*259 F.3d 1327, 1332 (11th Cir.2001); *Siegel v. LePore,*234 F.3d 1163, 1172 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc) (“The *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine provides that federal courts, other than the United States Supreme Court, have no authority to review the final judg*866ments of state courts. The doctrine extends not only to constitutional claims presented or adjudicated by a state court, but also to claims that are inextricably intertwined with a state court judgment. A federal claim is inextricably intertwined with a state court judgment if the federal claim succeeds only to the extent that the state court wrongly decided the issues before it.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report: April 7, 2008

(Date of earliest event reported)



---

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Commission File Number: 0-27605



Minnesota
        41-1859679(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
        (IRS Employer Identification No.)




6464 Sycamore Court

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369

(Address of principal executive offices)



(763) 656-4300

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act ( 17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 7.01.   Regulation FD Disclosure



On April 8, 2008 Vascular Solutions, Inc. issued a press release to report the results of its lawsuit against Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc.  On April 7, 2008 the jury returned a verdict in favor of Vascular Solutions, finding that Marine Polymer Technologies made certain false and disparaging statements concerning the safety of Vascular Solutions D-Stat Dry hemostat product and awarded Vascular Solutions $4.5 million in monetary damages.  The jury rejected Marine Polymers counterclaims in their entirety.  A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Report.



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.Date:   April 9, 2008
        
        By:
        /s/ James HennenJames HennenIts:
        Chief Financial Officer


---

EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.
        
        Description99.1
        
        Press Release dated April 8, 2008 of Vascular Solutions, Inc.






---
[929 NE2d 387, 903 NYS2d 325]

#### Parker Realty Group, Inc., Appellant, v A. Michelle Petigny, Individually and as President of Eastern Parkway Holdings LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Decided May 6, 2010

*865APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Kip Lenoir,*New York City, for appellant.

*Howard L. Sherman,*Ossining, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Recovery under the theory of quantum meruit is

*866not appropriate where, as here, an express contract governed the subject matter involved *(Miller v Schloss,*218 NY 400, 406-407 [1916]; *see also Julien J. Studley, Inc. v New York News,*70 NY2d 628, 629 [1987]). Additionally, plaintiff failed to establish that the parties modified their exclusive brokerage agreement. In the absence of a valid governing exclusive brokerage agreement, plaintiff was not entitled to a commission on the sale to the ultimate buyer, as it was not the procuring cause of the sale *(see Greene v Hellman,*51 NY2d 197, 206 [1980]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
#### Yong I. FENLON, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2013-3139.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 14, 2013.

Yong I. Fenlon, Carlsbad, CA, pro se.

Devin Andrew Wolak, Esq., Trial Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Order It Is Ordered That:

The petition for review is hereby dismissed as moot.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1320

Crude Oil Option - Argus LLS - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

Monthly cash settled Argus LLS put and call options on the Argus Media Argus LLS price specified in Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media Argus LLS price for 

each business day that it is determined during the contract month.

OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

TRADING UNIT

On expiration of a Call Option, the value will be the difference between the arithmetic average of the Argus 

Media Argus LLS (as described in Floating Price A) and the strike price, or zero whichever is greater. On 

expiration of a Put Option, the value will be the difference between the strike price and the arithmetic 

average of the Argus Media Argus LLS (as described in Floating Price A), or zero whichever is greater.

TYPE OPTION

Cash-settled European-Style Average Price option which cannot be exercised prior to expiration.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity multiplied by the 

settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per barrel and prices shall be in multiples of $0.01 per barrel. The minimum 

price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum price fluctuation. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination of posting for a 

contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price will be the Floating Price calculated for 

each contract month.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. 
                    ( print page 29805) License No.
Name/address
Date reissued14323N
Hefco International, Inc. d/b/a Hefco International, d/b/a Sea Viper Shipping, 16725 Aldine Westfield, Houston, TX 77032
March 29, 2001.4619NF
Amad Corporation d/b/a Amad Shipping, 7250 N.W. 35th Terrace, Miami, FL 33122
November 8, 2000.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 01-13700 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
SECOND DI VI SI ON BA RNES, P. J. , RI CKM A N and GOSS, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a l s .us /r ule s

A ugust 15, 2018



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 6 A0 76 3 . DOHERTY v . BROW N et al

. A16A 0765. S O U T H E A S T E R N P A I N A M B U L A TORY SURGERY CENTER LLC. v . BROW N et al

. A1 6 A0 7 6 6

. SOUTHEASTERN PAIN SPECIALISTS, P. C. v

. BROW N et al

.

B A R N E S , Pres i d i n g J ud g e.

In Do h er t y v. B r o wn , 3 3 9 G a

. A p p

. 5 6 7 (7 9 4 SE2 d 2 1 7 ) (2 0 1 6 ) t hi s Co u rt

affi rm ed t h e ju ry ’ s v erd ict i n fav o r o f t he p l ai n ti ffs

. Ho wev er, i n S o ut h ea st er n Pa in

S p eci a l i s t s , P. C. v. Br o wn , 3 03 Ga. 2 6 5 (8 11 SE2 d 3 6 0 ) (2 0 1 8 ), t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

o f Geo rg i a rev ers ed t h i s Co u rt ’ s o p i n i o n u p o n fi n d i ng t h at becau s e t h e ev i d en ce d id

n o t s up p o rt t h e cl ai m , t h e t ri al co u rt h ad erred i n g i v i n g an i n s tru ct i on on o rd i n aryn eg li g en ce. Id

. at 2 72 -2 73 (2 ) (b ). Th e Co u rt i n st ru ct ed t h at t h i s Co urt “ o n rem an d

o rd er a fu l l ret ri al as t o t h e ap p el l an ts .” Id . at 2 6 6

. 1

Th u s , we v acat e o u r o p i n i o n i n t h e s e cas es an d ad op t th e o p i ni o n o f o u r

Su p rem e Co u rt as o u r own

. In acco rd an ce wi t h t h e d irect i v e o f t h e Su p rem e Co u rt ,

t h e ju ry ’ s v erd i ct m

u s t b e rev ers ed an d t h e cas e rem an d ed fo r a n ew t ri al

.

Ju d g men t r ever sed . Ri ckma n a n d Go s s , JJ., co n cu r

.

1 Th e p l ai n t i ff-ap p el l an t s i n Cas e No

. A 1 6 A0 7 6 4
, B r o wn et a l

. v. S ou t h ea s t er n Pa i n Sp eci a li s t

s , et a l.
, d i d n o t fi l e a s ep arat e p et i t i o n ch al len g i n g th i s Co urt ’ s affi rm an ce o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s ex cl u s i on of cert ai n ev i den ce an d d en ial o f t h ei r m o t i o n fo r a m is t ri al

. T h u s , as t o t h e ev i d en t i ary is s u es ru l ed o n an d as s ert ed i n t h at ap p eal
, t h e Su p rem e Co u rt hel d t h at t h e i s s u es were “ b ey o n d t he s co p e o f [i t s ] g ran t o f
cert io rari ” b u t , “ t h e t ri al co u rt rem ai n s free t o rev i s i t i t s ru l i n g as i t co n s i d e r s t h e ad m i s s i b i l i t y o f ev i d en ce o n ret ri al .” S ou t h ea s t er n Pa i n S

peci a l i s t s at 3 0 3 Ga. at 2 7 4

- 2 7 5 (2 ) (c).

2
EX-32.2 5 ex32-2.htm EXHIBIT 32.2





EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric J. Dosch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Eric J. Dosch


Eric J. Dosch


Chief Financial Officer


Secretary and Treasurer


May 16, 2011
### 24



### ATTORNE GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * 

### IN THE OF 

### MARYLAND COURT OF 

### APPEALS * OF 

### MARYLAND Petitioner * 

### Misc.Docket 

### AG N0.2_4 V. * September Term,2017

-X- 

### RAOUF 

### MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH

Respondent. * 

# m
This matter came before the

### Court on the 

### Joint Petition

### for Reprimand by Consent 

### filed by the 

### Attorney Grievance 

### Commission

### of Maryland and Respondent, 

### Raouf M. 

### Abdullah. The Court, having considered the 

### Petition and the record herein,itis this 

# _

day

### of September, 2017, 

### ORDERED, that Respondent, 

### Raouf M. 

### Abbdullah. be and heis hereby 

### REPRIMANDEDfor violating Rule 

### 5.]

### of the 

### Maryland Lawyers’ Rules

### of Professional Conduct.

Senior Judge 

### 22nd

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Y
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of GameStop Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David W. Carlson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David W. CarlsonDavid W. CarlsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
GameStop Corp.
May 20, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Arlene M.
Morris, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director, and Paul B. Cleveland, Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer, of Affymax, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



By:

/s/ ARLENE M. MORRIS President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)




By:

/s/ PAUL B. CLEVELAND Executive Vice President Corporate
Development and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


Date:
March 12, 2009

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Affymax, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 135048 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 135048 COA: 277870

TROY L. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. Bay CC: 06-010480-FY

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave gran ted. On remand, the Court of Appeals may, at its option, remand to the trial court for further proc eedings, e.g., for factual determinations concerning the reasonable and customary hourly fees paid to experts of the type sought by the defendant, the hourly f ees paid to the proposed defens e expert by the prosecution in prior cases, and whether the fee cap set in this case effectively precludes the defendant from access to an expert witness. We further ORDER th at the trial not occur until the completion of this appeal.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

d1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2007

Clerk
#### STATE v. RICH

No. 315P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 113

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998. Justice Wynn recused.