# C_2010342EN.01003001.xml

| 16.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/30

---

REPORT

on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2009, together with the replies of the Joint Undertaking

2010/C 342/05

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

| | Paragraph | Page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| INTRODUCTION ... | 1-5 | 31 |
| STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE ... | 6-15 | 31 |
| COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ... | 16-22 | 32 |
| OTHER MATTERS ... | 23-32 | 32 |
| Table ... | 34 |
| Replies of the Joint Undertaking ... | 37 |

Paragraph

Paragraph

Page

Page

INTRODUCTION ...

1-5

31

STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE ...

6-15

31

COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ...

16-22

32

OTHER MATTERS ...

23-32

32

Table ...

34

Replies of the Joint Undertaking ...

Replies of the Joint Undertaking

37

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

| 1. | The SESAR Joint Undertaking was set up in February 2007 (1), located in Brussels, in order to manage the activities of the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) project. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The SESAR Joint Undertaking was set up in February 2007 (1), located in Brussels, in order to manage the activities of the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) project.

1

| 2. | The SESAR project aims to modernise air traffic management (ATM) in Europe and is divided into three phases.






  (a) | ‘Definition phase’ started in 2005 and led by the European Organisation for Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), with co-financing from the EU budget through the Trans-European Network — Transport programme. The outcome is the European ATM Master Plan, which defines the content, the development and deployment plans of the next generation of ATM systems. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The SESAR project aims to modernise air traffic management (ATM) in Europe and is divided into three phases.

(a)

‘Definition phase’ started in 2005 and led by the European Organisation for Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol), with co-financing from the EU budget through the Trans-European Network — Transport programme. The outcome is the European ATM Master Plan, which defines the content, the development and deployment plans of the next generation of ATM systems.

| (b) | ‘Development phase’ (2008-2013) managed by the SESAR Joint Undertaking (see also Table) and leading to the production of new technological systems, components and operational procedures as defined in the European ATM Master Plan. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘Development phase’ (2008-2013) managed by the SESAR Joint Undertaking (see also Table) and leading to the production of new technological systems, components and operational procedures as defined in the European ATM Master Plan.

Table

| (c) | ‘Deployment phase’ (2014-2020) to be led by industry and stakeholders, for the large-scale production and implementation of the new air traffic management infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘Deployment phase’ (2014-2020) to be led by industry and stakeholders, for the large-scale production and implementation of the new air traffic management infrastructure.

| 3. | The Joint Undertaking is designed as a public-private partnership. The founding members are the European Union represented by the European Commission, and Eurocontrol represented by its Agency. Following a call for expressions of interest, 15 public and private enterprises from the air navigation industry are members of the Joint Undertaking. These include air navigation service providers, ground and aerospace manufacturing industry, aircraft manufacturers, airport authorities and airborne equipment manufacturers. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Joint Undertaking is designed as a public-private partnership. The founding members are the European Union represented by the European Commission, and Eurocontrol represented by its Agency. Following a call for expressions of interest, 15 public and private enterprises from the air navigation industry are members of the Joint Undertaking. These include air navigation service providers, ground and aerospace manufacturing industry, aircraft manufacturers, airport authorities and airborne equipment manufacturers.

| 4. | The budget for the development phase of the SESAR project is 2,1 billion euro, to be provided in equal parts by the EU, by Eurocontrol and by the participating public and private partners. The EU contribution is funded from the Seventh Research Framework Programme and the Trans-European Networks — Transport programme. Around 90 % of the funding from Eurocontrol and the other stakeholders will take the form of in-kind contributions. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The budget for the development phase of the SESAR project is 2,1 billion euro, to be provided in equal parts by the EU, by Eurocontrol and by the participating public and private partners. The EU contribution is funded from the Seventh Research Framework Programme and the Trans-European Networks — Transport programme. Around 90 % of the funding from Eurocontrol and the other stakeholders will take the form of in-kind contributions.

| 5. | The SESAR JU started to work autonomously on 10 August 2007. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The SESAR JU started to work autonomously on 10 August 2007.

15.

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| |
| --- |

| 15. | The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question. |
| --- | --- |

The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question.

COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Implementation of the budget

Implementation of the budget

| 16. | The final 2009 budget adopted by the Administrative Board included commitment appropriations of 325 million euro and payment appropriations of 157 million euro. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 97,1 % and 43,2 % respectively. |
| --- | --- |

16.

The final 2009 budget adopted by the Administrative Board included commitment appropriations of 325 million euro and payment appropriations of 157 million euro. The utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 97,1 % and 43,2 % respectively.

| 17. | In 2009, the contributions from members (38,8 million euro) together with the outturn of the previous year (115,6 million euro) amounted to 154,4 million euro, against payments of 67,9 million euro and carryover of appropriations of 2,5 million euro. This led to a positive budget outturn of 84 million euro and deposits in bank accounts at the end of the year totalling 86,8 million euro. This is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium. |
| --- | --- |

17.

In 2009, the contributions from members (38,8 million euro) together with the outturn of the previous year (115,6 million euro) amounted to 154,4 million euro, against payments of 67,9 million euro and carryover of appropriations of 2,5 million euro. This led to a positive budget outturn of 84 million euro and deposits in bank accounts at the end of the year totalling 86,8 million euro. This is at odds with the budgetary principle of equilibrium.

| 18. | According to Article 51 of the SESAR Joint Undertaking Financial Rules, the funds paid to the Joint Undertaking by the Commission by way of the subsidy bear interest for the benefit of the EU general budget. At the end of 2009, the Joint Undertaking had not received a request to transfer the interest of 1,7 million euro accrued in the period 2007 to 2009. |
| --- | --- |

18.

According to Article 51 of the SESAR Joint Undertaking Financial Rules, the funds paid to the Joint Undertaking by the Commission by way of the subsidy bear interest for the benefit of the EU general budget. At the end of 2009, the Joint Undertaking had not received a request to transfer the interest of 1,7 million euro accrued in the period 2007 to 2009.

Presentation of the accounts: members’ contributions

Presentation of the accounts: members’ contributions

| 19. | The Court notes that the activities of the EU Joint Undertakings are funded by contributions from their members, and that the Joint Undertakings have no capital as such. The Court recommended that this specific feature of the Joint Undertakings is clearly disclosed in the accounts. |
| --- | --- |

19.

The Court notes that the activities of the EU Joint Undertakings are funded by contributions from their members, and that the Joint Undertakings have no capital as such. The Court recommended that this specific feature of the Joint Undertakings is clearly disclosed in the accounts.

| 20. | The Court therefore welcomes the fact that, in accordance with EU Accounting Rule 1 (Group Accounting), the contributions from members are presented under Net Assets in the Balance Sheets of the Joint Undertakings, and that further information on the nature of the contributions is provided in the Notes to the Accounts. |
| --- | --- |

20.

The Court therefore welcomes the fact that, in accordance with EU Accounting Rule 1 (Group Accounting), the contributions from members are presented under Net Assets in the Balance Sheets of the Joint Undertakings, and that further information on the nature of the contributions is provided in the Notes to the Accounts.

| 21. | This is a change to the accounting policy applied by the SESAR Joint Undertaking in the 2008 accounts, where the members’ contributions were recognised as revenue in the Economic Outturn Account. The relevant figures are restated in the 2008 accounts in order allow comparison with the 2009 accounts. |
| --- | --- |

21.

This is a change to the accounting policy applied by the SESAR Joint Undertaking in the 2008 accounts, where the members’ contributions were recognised as revenue in the Economic Outturn Account. The relevant figures are restated in the 2008 accounts in order allow comparison with the 2009 accounts.

| 22. | The Court considers that the presentation of members’ contributions in the accounts of the Joint Undertakings should be harmonised as far as possible and notes the intention of the Commission to issue detailed guidance in this respect to the Joint Undertakings. |
| --- | --- |

22.

The Court considers that the presentation of members’ contributions in the accounts of the Joint Undertakings should be harmonised as far as possible and notes the intention of the Commission to issue detailed guidance in this respect to the Joint Undertakings.

OTHER MATTERS

OTHER MATTERS

Internal control systems

Internal control systems

| 23. | While recognising that the Joint Undertaking was in a start-up phase in 2008, the Court observed in its previous report that the Joint Undertaking had not completely implemented its internal controls and financial information system. |
| --- | --- |

23.

While recognising that the Joint Undertaking was in a start-up phase in 2008, the Court observed in its previous report that the Joint Undertaking had not completely implemented its internal controls and financial information system.

| 24. | Although important steps were taken during 2009 (11), it remains the case that at the end of 2009, key activities of the organisation are not sufficiently formalised and that an integrated tool to manage the financial, budget and operational information was not put in place. As already observed in 2008, the underlying business processes have not yet been validated by the Accounting Officer as required by the Financial Regulation of the Joint Undertaking. |
| --- | --- |

24.

Although important steps were taken during 2009 (11), it remains the case that at the end of 2009, key activities of the organisation are not sufficiently formalised and that an integrated tool to manage the financial, budget and operational information was not put in place. As already observed in 2008, the underlying business processes have not yet been validated by the Accounting Officer as required by the Financial Regulation of the Joint Undertaking.

11

| 25. | The Court’s testing of a sample of 36 transactions identified several cases where internal controls had not operated correctly. For example, in one case the Joint Undertaking concluded a contract for cleaning services for an annual value of 19 572 euro, without following the negotiated procedure laid down in the General Financial Regulation and the SESAR Financial Regulation. For another contract amounting to 922 000 euro for assistance in the preparation of membership agreements, the Court was able to obtain evidence that the services had been performed, but could not be provided with a formal statement of services rendered as required by the Financial Rules. |
| --- | --- |

25.

The Court’s testing of a sample of 36 transactions identified several cases where internal controls had not operated correctly. For example, in one case the Joint Undertaking concluded a contract for cleaning services for an annual value of 19 572 euro, without following the negotiated procedure laid down in the General Financial Regulation and the SESAR Financial Regulation. For another contract amounting to 922 000 euro for assistance in the preparation of membership agreements, the Court was able to obtain evidence that the services had been performed, but could not be provided with a formal statement of services rendered as required by the Financial Rules.

| 26. | According to Article 25 of the SESAR Financial Rules, budget appropriations are to be used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management. The contract for office space and facilities, signed on 6 September 2007 for a period of 9 years, included the possibility of early termination without penalty at the end of each 3-year period. However, the Joint Undertaking moved offices in 2009 and had to pay 380 235 euro for a further 12 months’ rent and charges for its vacated offices. |
| --- | --- |

26.

According to Article 25 of the SESAR Financial Rules, budget appropriations are to be used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management. The contract for office space and facilities, signed on 6 September 2007 for a period of 9 years, included the possibility of early termination without penalty at the end of each 3-year period. However, the Joint Undertaking moved offices in 2009 and had to pay 380 235 euro for a further 12 months’ rent and charges for its vacated offices.

Recognition of assets

Recognition of assets

| 27. | As regards of the results of the SESAR programme, the Joint Undertaking will own all the tangible and intangible assets which it creates or which are transferred to it for the development phase of the SESAR project in accordance with specific agreements with its members (12). |
| --- | --- |

27.

As regards of the results of the SESAR programme, the Joint Undertaking will own all the tangible and intangible assets which it creates or which are transferred to it for the development phase of the SESAR project in accordance with specific agreements with its members (12).

12

| 28. | As pointed out in the Annex to the Financial Statements, at this stage the SESAR Joint Undertaking is not able to forecast the activation of assets that might arise from the results of the activities. The Court notes that an integrated management information system to allow the allocation of costs to specific work packages or to identify the funding source of operational costs was not yet in place at the end of 2009. This is necessary to ensure the proper valuation of the costs of the activities and the activation of assets when required. |
| --- | --- |

28.

As pointed out in the Annex to the Financial Statements, at this stage the SESAR Joint Undertaking is not able to forecast the activation of assets that might arise from the results of the activities. The Court notes that an integrated management information system to allow the allocation of costs to specific work packages or to identify the funding source of operational costs was not yet in place at the end of 2009. This is necessary to ensure the proper valuation of the costs of the activities and the activation of assets when required.

Financial Regulation of the Joint Undertaking

Financial Regulation of the Joint Undertaking

| 29. | The Financial Rules of the Joint Undertaking were initially adopted by the Administrative Board in July 2007. In 2008, the Court (13) observed that the Financial Rules of the Joint Undertaking should be amended to be in line with the framework Financial Regulation for EU bodies. After the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007, establishing the SESAR Joint Undertaking, the Administrative Board adopted on 28 July 2009 the current Financial Rules, repealing the Financial Rules adopted on July 2007. |
| --- | --- |

29.

The Financial Rules of the Joint Undertaking were initially adopted by the Administrative Board in July 2007. In 2008, the Court (13) observed that the Financial Rules of the Joint Undertaking should be amended to be in line with the framework Financial Regulation for EU bodies. After the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007, establishing the SESAR Joint Undertaking, the Administrative Board adopted on 28 July 2009 the current Financial Rules, repealing the Financial Rules adopted on July 2007.

13

| 30. | The Court issued its Opinion No 2/2010 on the new Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking on 15 April 2010. The Court made a number of recommendations, regarding exceptions to budgetary principles, the role of the Internal Audit Service of the Commission and the provisions concerning membership of the SESAR Joint Undertaking and co-financing of activities. |
| --- | --- |

30.

The Court issued its Opinion No 2/2010 on the new Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking on 15 April 2010. The Court made a number of recommendations, regarding exceptions to budgetary principles, the role of the Internal Audit Service of the Commission and the provisions concerning membership of the SESAR Joint Undertaking and co-financing of activities.

Internal Audit Function and Commission Internal Audit Service

Internal Audit Function and Commission Internal Audit Service

| 31. | As expressed in its Opinions No 2/2010 on the Financial Rules of SESAR Joint Undertaking and No 4/2008 on the Financial Regulation of the Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking, the Court considers that the current provision in the Statutes of the Joint Undertaking on the role of the Commission’s internal auditor should be clarified. |
| --- | --- |

31.

As expressed in its Opinions No 2/2010 on the Financial Rules of SESAR Joint Undertaking and No 4/2008 on the Financial Regulation of the Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking, the Court considers that the current provision in the Statutes of the Joint Undertaking on the role of the Commission’s internal auditor should be clarified.

| 32. | Article 7a of the Statutes of the SESAR Joint Undertaking states that the functions of the Commission’s internal auditor are to be carried out under the responsibility of the Administrative Board of the Joint Undertaking. In the Courts opinion, such an arrangement is appropriate for the internal auditing function within the Joint Undertaking but not for the Commission’s internal auditor, whose responsibilities relate to the general EU budget as a whole. |
| --- | --- |

32.

Article 7a of the Statutes of the SESAR Joint Undertaking states that the functions of the Commission’s internal auditor are to be carried out under the responsibility of the Administrative Board of the Joint Undertaking. In the Courts opinion, such an arrangement is appropriate for the internal auditing function within the Joint Undertaking but not for the Commission’s internal auditor, whose responsibilities relate to the general EU budget as a whole.

This report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mr Morten LEVYSOHN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 20 October 2010.

For the Court of Auditors

Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA

President

Table

SESAR Joint Undertaking (Brussels)

| Areas of Union competence deriving from the Treaty | Competences of the Joint Undertaking as defined in Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 | Governance | Resources made available to the Joint Undertaking in 2009 | Main products and services supplied in 2009 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Common transport policy







  1. | The provisions of this Title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway. |

Areas of Union competence deriving from the Treaty

Competences of the Joint Undertaking as defined in Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008

Governance

Resources made available to the Joint Undertaking in 2009

Main products and services supplied in 2009

Common transport policy

1.

The provisions of this Title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway.

| 2. | The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may lay down appropriate provisions for sea and air transport. They shall act after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may lay down appropriate provisions for sea and air transport. They shall act after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

(Article 100 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Research and technological development

The Union may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficient execution of Union research, technological development and demonstration programmes.

(Article 187 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Objectives

| — | to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic management system by coordinating and concentrating all relevant research and development efforts in the Union,

| — | to execute the ATM Master Plan. |
| --- | --- |

—

to execute the ATM Master Plan.

Tasks

| — | manage the research, development and validation activities of the SESAR project by combining public and private sector funding provided by its members and using external technical resources and in particular by using Eurocontrol’s experience and expertise. |
| --- | --- |

—

manage the research, development and validation activities of the SESAR project by combining public and private sector funding provided by its members and using external technical resources and in particular by using Eurocontrol’s experience and expertise.

In particular

| — | organise and coordinating the activities of the development phase of the SESAR project, in accordance with the ATM Master Plan, resulting from the definition phase of the project managed by Eurocontrol, by combining and managing under a single structure public and private sector funding, |
| --- | --- |

—

organise and coordinating the activities of the development phase of the SESAR project, in accordance with the ATM Master Plan, resulting from the definition phase of the project managed by Eurocontrol, by combining and managing under a single structure public and private sector funding,

| — | ensure the necessary funding for the activities of the development phase of the SESAR project in accordance with the ATM Master Plan, |
| --- | --- |

—

ensure the necessary funding for the activities of the development phase of the SESAR project in accordance with the ATM Master Plan,

| — | ensure the involvement of the stakeholders of the air traffic management sector in Europe, in particular: air navigation service providers, airspace users, professional staff associations, airports, and manufacturing industry; as well as the relevant scientific institutions or the relevant scientific community, |
| --- | --- |

—

ensure the involvement of the stakeholders of the air traffic management sector in Europe, in particular: air navigation service providers, airspace users, professional staff associations, airports, and manufacturing industry; as well as the relevant scientific institutions or the relevant scientific community,

| — | organise the technical work of research and development, validation and study, to be carried out under its authority while avoiding fragmentation of such activities, |
| --- | --- |

—

organise the technical work of research and development, validation and study, to be carried out under its authority while avoiding fragmentation of such activities,

| — | ensure the supervision of activities related to the development of common products duly identified in the ATM Master Plan and if necessary, to organise specific invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

—

ensure the supervision of activities related to the development of common products duly identified in the ATM Master Plan and if necessary, to organise specific invitations to tender.

1 —   Administrative Board

Composition

| (a) | a representative from each of the members of the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a representative from each of the members of the Joint Undertaking;

| (b) | a representative of the military; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a representative of the military;

| (c) | a representative of civil users of airspace; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

a representative of civil users of airspace;

| (d) | an air navigation service providers’ representative, designated by their representative organisation at European level; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

an air navigation service providers’ representative, designated by their representative organisation at European level;

| (e) | an equipment manufacturers’ representative, designated by their representative organisation at European level; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

an equipment manufacturers’ representative, designated by their representative organisation at European level;

| (f) | an airports’ representative; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

an airports’ representative;

| (g) | a representative from the bodies representing staff in the air traffic management sector, designated by their representative organisation at European level; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

a representative from the bodies representing staff in the air traffic management sector, designated by their representative organisation at European level;

| (h) | a representative of the relevant scientific institutions or the relevant scientific community, designated by their representative organisation at European level. |
| --- | --- |

(h)

a representative of the relevant scientific institutions or the relevant scientific community, designated by their representative organisation at European level.

The Administrative Board shall be chaired by the representative of the Union.

Main tasks

| (a) | adopt the ATM Master Plan endorsed by the Council as referred to in Article 1(2) of the SESAR Regulation and approve any proposal to modify it; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

adopt the ATM Master Plan endorsed by the Council as referred to in Article 1(2) of the SESAR Regulation and approve any proposal to modify it;

| (b) | give guidelines and take the decisions necessary for the implementation of the development phase of the SESAR project and exercise overall control over its implementation; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

give guidelines and take the decisions necessary for the implementation of the development phase of the SESAR project and exercise overall control over its implementation;

| (c) | approve the Joint Undertaking’s work programme and annual work programmes as well as the annual budget, including the staff establishment plan; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

approve the Joint Undertaking’s work programme and annual work programmes as well as the annual budget, including the staff establishment plan;

| (d) | authorise negotiations and decide on the accession of new members and on the relating agreements; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

authorise negotiations and decide on the accession of new members and on the relating agreements;

| (e) | supervise the execution of the agreements between members and the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

supervise the execution of the agreements between members and the Joint Undertaking;

| (f) | appoint and dismiss the Executive Director and approve the organisation chart and monitoring the Executive Director’s performance; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

appoint and dismiss the Executive Director and approve the organisation chart and monitoring the Executive Director’s performance;

| (g) | decide on the amounts and procedures for the payment of members’ financial contributions and the assessment of contributions in kind; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

decide on the amounts and procedures for the payment of members’ financial contributions and the assessment of contributions in kind;

| (h) | adopt the financial regulations rules of the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

adopt the financial regulations rules of the Joint Undertaking;

| (i) | approve the annual accounts and balance-sheet; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

approve the annual accounts and balance-sheet;

| (j) | adopt the annual report on the progress of the development phase of the SESAR project and its financial situation; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

adopt the annual report on the progress of the development phase of the SESAR project and its financial situation;

| (k) | decide on proposals to the Commission on the extension and the dissolution of the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(k)

decide on proposals to the Commission on the extension and the dissolution of the Joint Undertaking;

| (l) | establish procedures for granting rights of access to tangible and intangible assets which are the property of the Joint Undertaking and the transfer of such assets; |
| --- | --- |

(l)

establish procedures for granting rights of access to tangible and intangible assets which are the property of the Joint Undertaking and the transfer of such assets;

| (m) | lay down the rules and procedures for awarding the contracts necessary to implement the ATM Master Plan, including specific procedures for conflicts of interest; |
| --- | --- |

(m)

lay down the rules and procedures for awarding the contracts necessary to implement the ATM Master Plan, including specific procedures for conflicts of interest;

| (n) | decide on proposals to the Commission to amend the Statutes; |
| --- | --- |

(n)

decide on proposals to the Commission to amend the Statutes;

| (o) | exercise such other powers and perform such other functions, including the establishment of subsidiary bodies, as may be necessary for the purposes of the development phase of the SESAR project; |
| --- | --- |

(o)

exercise such other powers and perform such other functions, including the establishment of subsidiary bodies, as may be necessary for the purposes of the development phase of the SESAR project;

| (p) | adopt the arrangements for implementing Article 8 on the secondment of staff to the Joint Undertaking. |
| --- | --- |

(p)

adopt the arrangements for implementing Article 8 on the secondment of staff to the Joint Undertaking.

2 —   Executive Director

Appointed by the Administrative Board on a proposal from the Commission.

3 —   External Audit

Court of Auditors.

4 —   Discharge Authority

Parliament on a recommendation of the Council.

Budget

325,1 million euro Union contribution 16,9 %.

Staff at 31 December 2009

Posts in the staff establishment plan: 39

Post occupied: 18

Other posts (auxiliary contracts, seconded national experts, local staff): 8

Total staff number: 26

Staff seconded from the Joint Undertaking members as part of their in-kind contribution: 4

assigned to the following duties:

| — | operational tasks: 22, |
| --- | --- |

—

operational tasks: 22,

| — | administrative and support tasks: 16, |
| --- | --- |

—

administrative and support tasks: 16,

| — | mixed tasks: 1. |
| --- | --- |

—

mixed tasks: 1.

Main achievements in 2009:

| — | the Membership process was concluded on 26 March 2009 with the Administrative Board decision to award the membership to the 15 pre-selected candidate members together with the award of the activities included in the scope of IBAFO 1. The European Commission had previously (23 March 2009) received the position of EU Member States, following a comitology procedure as provided for pursuant to Article 5(4) of the SJU Regulation (EC) No 219/2007, |
| --- | --- |

—

the Membership process was concluded on 26 March 2009 with the Administrative Board decision to award the membership to the 15 pre-selected candidate members together with the award of the activities included in the scope of IBAFO 1. The European Commission had previously (23 March 2009) received the position of EU Member States, following a comitology procedure as provided for pursuant to Article 5(4) of the SJU Regulation (EC) No 219/2007,

| — | as at the moment of the launch of IBAFO 1 it was not possible to include all the Work Packages, inter alia, due to the need to have the final endorsement by the Provisional Council of the contribution of Eurocontrol to the SJU, a new IBAFO was launched in July 2009. The selection process was performed in November and the Executive Director presented its recommendation on the award of the activities to the SJU Administrative Board, who endorsed it, at its meeting on 14 December 2009, |
| --- | --- |

—

as at the moment of the launch of IBAFO 1 it was not possible to include all the Work Packages, inter alia, due to the need to have the final endorsement by the Provisional Council of the contribution of Eurocontrol to the SJU, a new IBAFO was launched in July 2009. The selection process was performed in November and the Executive Director presented its recommendation on the award of the activities to the SJU Administrative Board, who endorsed it, at its meeting on 14 December 2009,

| — | with the completion of the membership process as planned in 2009 and the process to award the programme activities, the SESAR programme has fully entered into operation, |
| --- | --- |

—

with the completion of the membership process as planned in 2009 and the process to award the programme activities, the SESAR programme has fully entered into operation,

| — | in line with the targets established in the AWP 2009, 69 % of the projects were initiated by the end of 2009. 126 R & D projects were kicked off; 62 Initiation Reports were received by the SJU by year end. 32 Initiation Reports were analysed out of which 13 projects were authorised by the Executive Director to start execution and 19 were considered as not fulfilling one or more of the acceptance criteria and a revised version was requested. 43 management activities were kicked off and following the submission of a Management Initiation Reports will be authorised to proceed to the execution phase at the beginning of 2010, |
| --- | --- |

—

in line with the targets established in the AWP 2009, 69 % of the projects were initiated by the end of 2009. 126 R & D projects were kicked off; 62 Initiation Reports were received by the SJU by year end. 32 Initiation Reports were analysed out of which 13 projects were authorised by the Executive Director to start execution and 19 were considered as not fulfilling one or more of the acceptance criteria and a revised version was requested. 43 management activities were kicked off and following the submission of a Management Initiation Reports will be authorised to proceed to the execution phase at the beginning of 2010,

| — | following the entry into force on 1 January 2009 of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008, the SJU realised and completed the transition to a full European Union’s Body. As a result:






  (a) | new staff was recruited under the ‘Staff Regulations of Officials and Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities’ ’ as last modified by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 31/2005 of 20 December 2004 (hereinafter the ‘Staff Regulations’); |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

following the entry into force on 1 January 2009 of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008, the SJU realised and completed the transition to a full European Union’s Body. As a result:

(a)

new staff was recruited under the ‘Staff Regulations of Officials and Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities’ ’ as last modified by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 31/2005 of 20 December 2004 (hereinafter the ‘Staff Regulations’);

| (b) | the 13 staff members in force at the beginning of 2009 were subject to an internal selection process in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 and were recruited as Temporary Agents under the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the 13 staff members in force at the beginning of 2009 were subject to an internal selection process in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 and were recruited as Temporary Agents under the Staff Regulations;

| (c) | as of end of April 2009, the SJU has been in the position to recruit Contract Agents; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

as of end of April 2009, the SJU has been in the position to recruit Contract Agents;

| (d) | on 30 March 2009, in accordance with Article 2b of the SJU Regulations, the SJU signed an Administrative Agreement with the Belgian Government which implements the provisions of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. As a consequence of the application of the Protocol, the SJU has been declared exempted from VAT and started the process to recover the VAT paid between the 16 October 2008 until the entry into force of the Administrative Agreement, and the taxes on the interest yielded in the same period. By the end of 2009, the VAT (0,4 million euro) was recovered and cashed while the taxes on the interest will be cashed during 2010; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

on 30 March 2009, in accordance with Article 2b of the SJU Regulations, the SJU signed an Administrative Agreement with the Belgian Government which implements the provisions of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities. As a consequence of the application of the Protocol, the SJU has been declared exempted from VAT and started the process to recover the VAT paid between the 16 October 2008 until the entry into force of the Administrative Agreement, and the taxes on the interest yielded in the same period. By the end of 2009, the VAT (0,4 million euro) was recovered and cashed while the taxes on the interest will be cashed during 2010;

| (e) | on 28 July 2009, the Administrative Board adopted the new SJU Financial Rules in accordance with Article 4a of the SJU Regulation, after having received the prior consent of the European Commission. The SJU Financial Rules should receive an opinion of the European Court of Auditors in 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

on 28 July 2009, the Administrative Board adopted the new SJU Financial Rules in accordance with Article 4a of the SJU Regulation, after having received the prior consent of the European Commission. The SJU Financial Rules should receive an opinion of the European Court of Auditors in 2010.

2009 was a critical year of the SJU which had, on the one hand, to go through a 360 degrees restructuring process of its organisation due to the change of its Statutes and, on the other hand, to start operationally the activities with the launch of the projects, sub-work packages and work packages while still finalising the membership process.

Source: Information submitted by the Joint Undertaking.

REPLIES OF THE JOINT UNDERTAKING

Paragraph 17

The SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) is responsible for the development phase of the SESAR programme which is expected to last until 2016. The programme was launched in 2009. It is multiannual and will be characterised during its life by an expected imbalance between revenues and expenditure, particularly in its early years.

Paragraph 24

The SJU depends upon the European Commission (EC) services for the implementation of its financial systems, ABAC and SAP, which could not be implemented by the EC at SJU until May 2010. The SJU operational programme management system is effective since the end of 2009.

Paragraph 25

The contract for 19 572 euro was established and signed by the Temporary Administrator of the SJU in 2007, at a time where the SJU had no staff nor internal organisation. The SJU has launched in 2009 the correct procurement procedure to replace the contract.

The SJU acknowledges the Court’s finding that it should have been able to obtain better evidence to support the payment of 922 000 euro and it already ensures that formal statements of services rendered are available. However, the contract comprised support activities and professional legal advice to be charged on a time basis; these activities were performed on a continuous if not daily basis, in a very dense period of activity for the SJU (completion of negotiations with members) and were continuously monitored by the SJU. The outputs of the contract, such as draft membership and multilateral framework agreements, were worked on by SJU staff and support contractors in close and continuous cooperation, in particular through multiple exchanges of documents by email.

Paragraph 26

The SJU inherited the rental contract for the former premises of the Galileo Joint Undertaking in 2007 which were soon found to be inadequate for its needs, as agreed by the Administrative Board in 2008. The SJU, consequently, had to balance the risk of delaying the programme launch with the cost of moving to adequate premises. The SJU negotiated the contract for its new premises within its rental budget without the need to request additional resources from the Administrative Board.

Paragraph 28

The SJU acknowledges the Court’s concern but remains confident that it will be able to identify the funding source and costs necessary to activate assets at a proper value when required.

Paragraph 30

The SJU is undertaking the necessary measures together with the EC services to implement the recommendations contained in the Court’s Opinion No 2/2010.

Paragraph 31

The SJU will consider the necessity to amend its Statutes taking into account the opinion of the EC services.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) (OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p. 1) amended by Regulation (EC) No 1361/2008 of 16 December 2008 (OJ L 352, 31.12.2008, p. 12).

1

(2)  These accounts are accompanied by a report on the budgetary and financial management during the year which gives, inter alia, an account of the rate of implementation of the appropriations with summary information on the transfers of appropriations among the various budget items.

2

(3)  The financial statements include the balance sheet and the economic outturn account, the cash-flow table, the statement of changes in capital and the annex to the financial statements which includes the description of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

3

(4)  The budget implementation reports comprise the budget outturn account and its annex.

4

(5)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

5

(6)  SESAR Financial Rules adopted by the Administrative Board on 28 July 2009.

6

(7)  Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72).

7

(8)  Article 38 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002.

8

(9)  The rules concerning the presentation of the accounts and accounting by EU bodies are laid down in Chapter 1 of Title VII of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 652/2008 of 9 July 2008 (OJ L 181, 10.7.2008, p. 23) and are incorporated in the Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking.

9

(10)  International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI).

10

(11)  Including the entry into force of Council Regulation No 1361/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 and the adoption of new Financial Rules of the SESAR Joint Undertaking on 28 July 2009.

11

(12)  Article 18 of the Statutes.

12

(13)  Report on the annual accounts of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year ended 31 December 2008 (OJ C 310, 18.12.2009, p. 9).

13

---