alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        23.1**
 **Independent
        Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent**


Re:  Adsouth
      Partners, Inc. Registration Statement No. 333-118049.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the aforementioned Registration
      Statement of Adsouth Partners, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2006,
      except for Note No. 17 (b) which is as of March 15, 2006, Note 17(c) which
      is as
      of March 1, 2006, and Note No. 17 (d) which is as of March 28, 2006 with respect
      to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, of Adsouth Partners,
      Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
      2004
      appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Adsouth Partners, Inc. for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the reference of our firm
      under
      the heading “Experts” in such Prospectuses.








/s/
      Marcum & Kliegman LLP








New
      York,
      New York


March
      29,
      2006
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Momentive Performance Materials Inc. for the fiscal three-month period ended
June 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         |  |  |  |                                              
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jonathan D. Rich                     |  |  |  | /s/ Anthony S. Colatrella                    
|Jonathan D. Rich Chief
Executive Officer |  |  |  | Anthony S. Colatrella Chief
Financial Officer
|                                         |  | 
|DATE: August 9, 2010                     |  |  |  | DATE: August 9, 2010                         

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and will be retained by Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of MERIDIAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Nicholas Lahanas, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Nicholas LahanasNicholas Lahanas, President and Director November 28, 2007
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2515 

To amend the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 to amend the definition 

of whistleblower. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA, and Mrs. CAROLYN B. 

MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 to 

amend the definition of whistleblower. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WHISTLEBLOWER. 

4 Section 21F(a)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u–6(a)(6)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(6) WHISTLEBLOWER.—The 

7 term’’ and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(6) WHISTLEBLOWER.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2515 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—Solely for the pur4 poses of subsection (h), the term ‘whistleblower’ 

5 shall also include any individual who takes an 

6 action described in subsection (h)(1)(A), or two 

7 or more individuals acting jointly who take an 

8 action described in subsection (h)(1)(A).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
31.1








Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Ross
Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1)   I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Data Storage Consulting Services,
Inc.;





2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4)   The
issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and we have:





a)   Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





b)   Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;





c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and





5)   The
issuer's other certifying officer (s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
auditors and the auditcommittee
of the issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming
the equivalent functions):








a)   All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process summarize and report
financial information; and





b)   Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial
reporting.





Date: August 22, 2008
              By:
              /s/ 
      Ross BernsteinRoss
      Bernstein
                Chief
      Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Agro Sciences Corp. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhengquan
      Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January
                16, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Zhengquan
                WangZhengquan
                WangIts:
                  Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agro Sciences Corp. and will be retained by China Agro Sciences Corp.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### In the Matter of Benjamin Seegars, Appellant, v Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 24, 2011;

decided February 9, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 1653.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 17*NY3d 711 (2011)].
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of
Directors
MTS Systems Corporation:

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-75880,
333-28661, 333-39388, 333-82582 and 333-136113) on Form S-8 of MTS Systems
Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated November 27, 2007, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MTS Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries as of September 29, 2007, and September 30, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders investment and comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended September 29, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule II and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September
29, 2007, which reports appear in the September 29, 2007, annual report on Form
10-K of MTS Systems Corporation and subsidiaries.

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
November 27, 2007

The Board of
Directors
MTS Systems Corporation:

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 898 

To authorize grants to establish and improve criminal forensic laboratories. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. ROSKAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize grants to establish and improve criminal 

forensic laboratories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Crimi5 nal Forensic Laboratory Enhancement Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS AUTHORIZED. 

7 Subject to the availability of appropriations, the At8 torney General shall award grants to States, units of local 

9 government, and Indian Tribes to— 

10 (1) establish new criminal forensic laboratories 

11 to provide the services necessary for State, local, and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 898 IH

1 tribal law enforcement agencies to investigate and 

2 prosecute crimes; 

3 (2) expand or improve existing criminal forensic 

4 laboratories to provide the services described in 

5 paragraph (1); 

6 (3) hire and train new forensic laboratory pro7 fessionals and technicians necessary to provide the 

8 services described in paragraph (1); and 

9 (4) for any other purpose the Attorney General 

10 determines to be necessary to improve State, local, 

11 and tribal criminal forensic laboratory services. 

12 SEC. 3. SELECTION OF GRANTEES. 

13 (a) APPLICATIONS.—A State, unit of local govern14 ment, or Indian Tribe desiring a grant under this Act shall 

15 submit to the Attorney General an application at such 

16 time, in such manner, and containing such information as 

17 the Attorney General may require. 

18 (b) PRIORITY.—In awarding grants under this Act, 

19 the Attorney General shall give priority to State, local, and 

20 tribal law enforcement agencies with the largest backlogs 

21 of criminal forensic examinations per capita, compared 

22 with other State, local, and tribal law enforcement agen23 cies, respectively. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 898 IH

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

3 this Act $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2010 and for each 

4 subsequent fiscal year. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Cardinal Energy Group, Inc., formerly Koko Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Daniel Troendly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 17th day of May, 2013.








DANIEL TROENDLYDaniel TroendlyChief Financial Officer
#### CONLEY v. EMERALD ISLE REALTY, INC.

No. 358PA98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 309

Petition by defendants (Ingrams) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 November 1998. Petition by defendant (Emerald Isle) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 November 1998.
##### 



Exhibit D

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Fording Canadian Coal
Trust (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James
M. Gardiner, the President, and Allen R. Hagerman, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                   |  |                                               
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 20, 2003 |  |                                               
|                   |  | /s/ James M. Gardiner

President              
|                  
|                   |  | /s/ Allen R. Hagerman

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fording Canadian Coal Trust and will be retained by Fording
Canadian Coal Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Annual Report of Cycle Country Accessories Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Robert Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 16, 2012/s/ Robert DavisRobert DavisChief Executive Officer
#### Graubard Miller, Respondent, v Ronald I. Nadler, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 461]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered August 10, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, in this action seeking payment of legal fees, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its causes of action for an account stated and for quantum meruit, and directed entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal amount of $103,492.44 plus costs and disbursements, and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the quantum meruit claim, and order, same court and justice, entered November 16, 2007, granting defendant’s motion to reargue and, upon reargument, adhering to its prior determination, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Plaintiff law firm established entitlement to summary judgment on its claim for an account stated by production of documentary evidence showing that defendant received and retained the invoice without objection *(see Federal Express Corp. v Federal Jeans, Inc.,*14 AD3d 424 [2005]). Defendant’s “self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated” *(Darby & Darby v VSI Intl.,*95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]).

Plaintiff also established its claim for quantum meruit by the production of documentary evidence demonstrating the firm’s performance of services in connection with the subject transaction, the acceptance of such services, the firm’s expectation of *500payment therefor, and the reasonable value of the services *(see e.g. Soumayah v Minnelli,*41 AD3d 390, 391 [2007]).

Plaintiffs failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided *(see Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP,*55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; *Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea,*41 AD3d 54, 63-64 [2007]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 32476(U).]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0681
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. ANDREW DAVID SHEROD,

Defendant and Appellant. 

## DEC 20 272
Ecw n G-- en - -ci urt C. 0, is

....- )ntar.a ORDER

Andrew David Sherod moves this Court for appointment ofcounsel in his appeal. As grounds, he states that he is indigent and currently incarcerated. Sherod appeals an October 27, 2022 Judgment issued in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, wherethe court sentenced Sherod to the Montana StatePrison for felony negligent homicide. On the same day that Sherod filed his Notice ofAppeal, this Court received the District Court record, Judgment, and a copy ofthe sentencing transcript. Sherod has a recent conviction, and he may be entitled to appointment ofcounsel in this appeal. Section 46-8-103(1), MCA. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Sherod's Motion forAppointment ofCounsel is GRANTED. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date ofthis Order within which to file either a Notice of Appearance or a Motion to Rescind this Order appointing counsel. If Sherod were to qualify for appointed counsel, the Appellate Defender Division shall order any other necessary transcripts. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to: the Appellate Defender Division, counsel ofrecord, and Andrew David Sherod. DATED this c-46

—day ofDecember, 2022. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 12/20/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0681
---



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report: March 15, 2007

(Date of earliest event reported)



LENOX GROUP INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Commission File Number: 1-11908



Delaware
        
        13-3684956(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
        
        (IRS Employer Identification No.)




One Village Place, 6436 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, MN 55344

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)



(952) 944-5600

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



---

---

Item 2.02
        Results of Operations and Financial Condition.




Lenox Group Inc. (the Company) issued a news
release, dated March 15, 2007, entitled Lenox Group Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Results, a copy of which is
furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.



The information set forth under Item 2.02 in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. The information set forth under Item 2.02 in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.





Item 9.01
        Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(d)
        Exhibits




99.1
        Press Release dated March
15, 2007, entitled Lenox Group Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Results.




2

---

SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



LENOX GROUP INC./s/ Timothy J. SchugelTimothy J. SchugelChief Financial and Operating OfficerDated:   March 15, 2007






3

---

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.
        
        Description99.1
        
        Press Release,
dated March 15, 2007, entitled Lenox Group Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Results.






4

---