alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

****CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002****

 

I, Leslie H. Cross, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of dj Orthopedics, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s fourth quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)          all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March  12, 2004 | BY:    | /s/  LESLIE H. CROSS                  |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            |   | Leslie  H. Cross                      |
|   |            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00217-CV

FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF A.S., a Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-MH-0851

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal arises from an order to compel psychoactive medications. This court must 

advance the disposition of this appeal. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 574.070(e), 

574.108 (West 2010); TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

The State’s brief was due on July 9, 2015. On the due date, the State filed a motion for 

extension of time to file its brief until July 24, 2015, for an extension of fifteen days.

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State must file its brief with this court not later 

than July 24, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE STATE’S 

BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED.

After the briefs have been filed, this court will advance this appeal on the court’s docket

in accordance with the statutory requirements. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN.

§§ 574.070(e), 574.108.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Premier Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended November 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Michael Yuster, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


January 16, 2009                        /s/ Michael Yuster
                                        ------------------
                                        Michael Yuster, President, principal
                                        executive officer, principal financial
                                        and accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### W.Y. INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARI-OUT CLUB, LLC, formerly known as Kari-Out Klub, LLC, doing business as Kari-Out Company, and Perk-Up, Inc., also known as Kari-Out, Inc., and Tripak Industrial USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and John Does Number 1-10, and ABC Companies Number 1-10, Defendants.

No. 2013-1189.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 12, 2013.

Dennis F. Gleason, Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C., of Florham Park, NJ, argued for the plaintiff-appellee.

Arthur M. Peslak, Gertner Mandel & Peslak, LLC, of Lakewood, NJ, argued for the defendants-appellants.

LOURIE, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

*996Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedemissions, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael S. Shanahan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ---- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2009 |  |      |  | /s/ Michael S. Shanahan
|                      |  | By:  |  | Michael S. Shanahan    
|                      |  | Its: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Speedemissions, Inc.
and will be retained by Speedemissions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1202

Normal Butane Fixed Swap - Mt. Belvieu Butane (LDH) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by OPIS for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS Mt. 

Belvieu Butane (LDH) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

gallons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per gallon. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per gallon. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Sanchez, Appellant.

Submitted Janaury 11, 2010;

decided February 16, 2010

Motion for reargument denied *[see*13 NY3d 554 (2009)].
Exhibit 32.02

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: December 28, 2007          /s/ Harvey Judkowitz
                                  -------------------------
                                  Harvey Judkowitz,
                                  Treasurer






<PAGE>
SCWC

- 1 9

- 0000 026

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

TAD MASON , Petitioner/Petitioner

- Appellant,

vs.

HAWAI ‘ I PAROLING AUTHORITY and STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I, Respondent s / Respondent s - Appell ee s
.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 9

- 000 0 026 ; S.P.P. NO. 1 8

- 1

- 00 1 ; C R. NO. 93

- 34 9 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson , and Eddins , J J. )

Petitioner/ Petitioner

- Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari filed on March 8, 202 1 , and deemed to be filed on

March 10 , 2021, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, April 15, 2 021

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W

. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000026 15-APR-2021 10:36 AM Dkt. 11 ODAC
Exhibit 31.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, C. Eugene Gronning certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PMI CONSTRUCTION GROUP; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

 

 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

 (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

 (c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

 (a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

 

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

| Date: November 19, 2007 | /s/ C. Eugene Gronning |
|-------------------------|------------------------|

**__________________________**

C. Eugene Gronning, Chief Accounting Officer
FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

December 21, 2022

(Submitted electronically via the CFTC Portal) 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission 

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre, 8th Floor

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 2058

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request - Amendments to the ICE Clear U.S., Inc. Clearing 

Member Default Management Procedures

Dear FOIA Compliance Staff:

In conjunction with the self-certification submitted today via the CFTC Portal by ICE Clear US, Inc. ("ICUS”),

pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), 

ICUS respectfully requests Confidential Treatment for all information attached to the submission until further 

notice.

***********************

Under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC Section 552, Section 809(g) of the Dodd-Frank Wall 

Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5) and any 

other applicable regulations under or implementing FOIA, ICUS hereby respectfully requests that confidential 

treatment be maintained for the document which bear Bates numbers ICUS 2022.12.21 - 000001 to ICUS 

2022.12.21 - 000030, until further notice. ICUS also requests that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for such documents or any other court order, subpoena or 

summons for the same. Finally, ICUS requests that it be notified in the event the Commission intends to 

disclose such documents to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit pursuant to Section 8 of 

the CEA or other applicable law. ICUS does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA or 

other applicable law with respect to any subpoena or summons for such document(s).

The basis for the request is that disclosure of these document(s) would reveal confidential commercial and 

financial information of ICUS, the disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect on, and cause injury 

to, the operations and competitive position of ICUS. This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any 

other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment accorded by law, and ICUS will rely on and invoke 

any such confidentiality protection.

***********************

If you should have any questions or require further information, please contact me at (212) 748-3964 or

Eamonn.Hahessy@ice.com.

Sincerely, 

Eamonn Hahessy

General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer

ICE Clear US, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel HUERTA-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10179.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Paul L. Pugliese, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Michael K. Powell, Esq., Cynthia S. Hahn, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Huerta-Vargas appeals from the district court’s order following a limited *633remand pursuant to *United States v. Ame-line,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), determining that it would not have imposed a materially different sentence had it known that the Guidelines were advisory. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Huerta-Vargas contends that the district court erred by not resentencing him on remand. However, because the district court ruled, in accord with the mandate from this court on *Ameline*remand, that it would not have imposed a materially different sentence had it known that the Guidelines were advisory, Huerta-Vargas was not entitled to resentencing. *See United States v. Combs,*470 F.3d 1294, 1296-97 (9th Cir.2006), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1071, 169 L.Ed.2d 816; *see also United States v. Perez,*475 F.3d 1110, 1114 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that a district court is required to comply with this court’s mandate).

He also contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by enhancing his sentence beyond two years based on its factual findings regarding the temporal relationship between his prior conviction and subsequent removal. He further contends that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is not controlling authority. These challenges, however, were previously raised and rejected during Huerta-Vargas’s 2004 appeal to this court. *See United States v. Huerta-Vargas,*142 Fed.Appx. 975 (9th Cir.2005). Thus, this court is precluded from considering them, under the law of the case doctrine. *See United States v. Cuddy,*147 F.3d 1111, 1114 (9th Cir.1998).

To the extent that Huerta-Vargas raises any new contentions in this regard, they are likewise barred because they could have been raised during the course of the first appeal. *See Combs,*470 F.3d at 1297.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Seven Arts Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QA for the quarter ended
December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Kate Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|Date:September 11, 2013
|                       
|
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1205

Natural Gasoline (Pentane) Fixed Swap - Mt. Belvieu Natural Gasoline (LDH) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by OPIS for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS Mt. 

Belvieu Natural Gasoline (LDH) price for each business day that it is determined during the 

contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

gallons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per gallon. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per gallon. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29581 

24-JAN-2013 

02:54 PM 

SCWC-29581
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

DARIA BRUCE,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 29581; CR. NO. 06-1-0018)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Daria Bruce’s 

application for writ of certiorari, filed December 28, 2012, is 

hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 24, 2013. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


Michael Jay Green


for the petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.


Tracy Murakami


for the respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack