alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15(d) - 14(a)


I, Sterling Klein, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Fidelis  Energy
Inc.;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the  period  in which  this  annual  report  is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
     on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
     committee of  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the
     equivalent function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
     annual  report  whether or not there were  significant  changes in internal
     controls  or in other  factors  that could  significantly  affect  internal
     controls  subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2006
                       /s/ Sterling Klein
                       Sterling Klein
                       Chief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
        connection with the Annual Report of China Agro Sciences Corp. (the “Company”)
        on First Amended Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Zhengquan Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




**COMPANY
                NAME CORPORATION**Date: January
                23, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Zhengquan
                WangZhengquan
                WangPresident





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agro Sciences Corp. and will be retained by China Agro Sciences Corp.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024

SC-2024-0321

Ex parte D.C.H. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE 

COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: D.C.H. v. D.P.D. and E.C.D.) 

(Madison Circuit Court: DR-20-305; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0939).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on July 12, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Stewart, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, 

Sellers, and Cook, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
----

| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Digital Ventures Corporation. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 10, 2011                                                                                               |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                             |   |
| /s/ Robert M. Price                                                                                              |   |
| Robert M. PriceChief Executive OfficerInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |   |
#### In the Matter of Parminder Kaur et al., Respondents, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Appellant. In the Matter of Tuck-It-Away, Inc., et al., Respondents, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion by East Harlem Alliance of Responsible Merchants for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00075- CR Ro nal d Le e De lc am p, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF RUNNELS COUNTY , 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 5409, H ONO RAB LE BEN WO ODW ARD, JUDGE P RESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ronald L ee D elca

mp seeks to appe al from a judgme nt of conviction for sexual assault. Sentence was imposed on Oc tober 26, 2005. There was a timely motion for ne w trial. The deadline f

or per fec ting appeal wa s theref ore January

24, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P . 26.2(a) (2). Notice of appea l was filed on J anuar y 30, 2006. No ex tension of time for f iling notice of

appea l was reque sted. See Te x. R. A pp . P. 26 .3 . T he re is n o in dic atio n that n oti c e of a pp e a l w a s p ro pe rl y mailed to the district c lerk within the time presc ribed by rule 26.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P . 9.2(b). Under the circ umstances, we lack jurisdiction t o dispose of the purported appeal i n any manner other than by dismiss ing it for

want of jurisd i cti on. Sla ton v . S tate , 981 S.W .2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S

tate , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522-23 (Te x . Crim. App. 1996).2 The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: F ebrua

ry 24, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### Gerald L. ERICKSON, Appellant, v. Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.

No. 98-1542.

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Aug. 21, 2000.

Designated For Publication Dec. 4, 2006.

Before HOLDAWAY, IVERS and STEINBERG, Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On May 12, 2000, the Court issued its opinion in the instant appeal. Judgment was entered on June 5, 2000. On July 18, 2000, the Secretary filed an unopposed motion to (1) recall mandate and judgment; (2) withdraw the Court’s decision; (3) vacate the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision; and (4) dismiss this appeal. The Secretary asserts as a basis for the motion that the appellant died on December 30, 1999, before the Court issued its opinion here. Accompanying the Secretary’s motion is a copy of the appellant’s certificate of death.

The Court held in *Landicho v. Brown,*7 Vet.App. 42, 46-49 (1994), that substitution by a party claiming accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 5121(a) is not permissible in this Court where the appellant is a veteran who dies while the denial by the Board of the veteran’s claim for disability compensation under chapter 11 of title 38. U.S.Code, is pending here on appeal. *See also Zevalkink v. Brown,*102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.1996) (expressly agreeing with this Court’s *Landicho*holding). Under such circumstances, the Court held that the appropriate remedy is to vacate the Board decision from which the appeal was taken and to dismiss the appeal. *Landicho,*7 Vet.App. at 54. This ensures that the Board decision and the underlying regional office (RO) decision(s) will have no preclusive effect in the adjudication of any accrued-benefits claims derived from the veteran’s entitlements. It also nullifies the previous merits adjudication by the RO because that decision was subsumed in the Board decision. *See Yoma v. Brown,*8 Vet.App. 298 (1995) (relying on *Robinette v. Brown,*8 Vet.App. 69, 80 (1995)); *see also Hudgins v. Brown,*8 Vet.App. 365, 368 (1995) (per curiam order). Because this appeal has become moot by virtue of *507the death of the appellant, the appeal will be dismissed. *See Landicho,*7 Vet.App. at 53-54.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Court’s judgment is recalled. It is further

ORDERED that the Court’s May 12, 2000, opinion is withdrawn. It is further

ORDERED that the July 30, 1997, BVA decision is VACATED. It is further

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005742 03-JUN-2014 08:33 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCAIL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Lincoln Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pulos, Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln Mining Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date: February 10, 2010 By: /s/ John Pulos John Pulos, Chief Financial Officer
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1011

Natural Gas Basis Swap - EP San Juan - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC EP San Juan

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### In the Matter of Josh Brown, Appellant, v Brian Fischer et al., Respondents.

Decided May 4, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Hossein Fateh and Mark L. Wetzel, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer, respectively, of the sole general partner of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                                                                
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Hossein Fateh                                              
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Hossein Fateh                                                  
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|                     |  |       
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mark L. Wetzel                                             
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Mark L. Wetzel                                                 
|                     |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
#### Luis Thomas Jacob LEAL, Sr., Appellant v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and Natasha Dandridge, Appellees.

No. 10-5003.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 26, 2010.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 2010.

Luis Thomas Jacob Leal, Sr., Toledo, OH, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order issued November 23, 2009, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appellant’s complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), which requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” *See Ciralsky v. CIA,*355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004).

*18Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 910 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 910

               For the relief of Judge John S. Unpingco.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

 Ms. Bordallo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Judge John S. Unpingco.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF AGE AND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS.

    Judge John S. Unpingco of Piti, Guam, shall be deemed to have met 
the age requirement set forth in section 373(e) of title 28, United 
States Code, and the service requirement set forth in section 373(e)(1) 
of title 28 of such Code.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | 
| |  |  |  | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of Ouvo, Inc. (Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Kent Carasquero, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Kent Carasquero

Kent Carasquero

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February 28, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 12, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-13676

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D.C. Docket No. 03-20554-CR-ASG 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DENNISTON GLENROY BENT,

 Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

 

 (May 12, 2005)

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Denniston Glenroy Bent in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to
2

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bent’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.