alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee Meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                     Army Science Board (ASB)—Power Panel.                

*Date of Meeting:*                     12 June 2001.                

*Time of Meeting:*                     0800-1600, 12 June 2001.                

*Place:*                     Natich, Ma.                

*Agenda:*                     The Army Science Board's (ASB) Summer Study Panel—Power will meet for discussions on the study subject. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and manner permitted by the committee. These meetings will be open to the public. For further information, please contact LTC Thomas A. McWhorter. (757) 788-2859.                

Wayne Joyner,

Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.

[FR Doc. 01-13764 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") of Mission
Energy Holding Company (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the
best of his knowledge and belief, that:



| |  | /s/THOMAS R. MCDANIELThomas R. McDaniel
Chief Executive Officer
Mission Energy Holding Company
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
Mission Energy Holding Company        

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mission Energy Holding Company and will be retained by Mission Energy Holding Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**PRINCIPAL      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**LYNN      TWO, INC.**

|  | (i) | the                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d));                and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | the                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Issuer. |
|--|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                December 3, 2007 |   | /s/                Hilary Davis                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Hilary                DavisPrincipal                Executive Officer andPrincipal                Financial Officer |

----
# C_2019383EN.01002501.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — TE v Pohotovosť s.r.o.

(Case C-331/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2008/48/EC - Consumer protection - Consumer credit - Article 10(2)(h) and (i) and Article 10(3) - Information to be included in the agreement - National legislation laying down an obligation to specify for each payment the distribution between the repayment of capital, interest and charges)

(2019/C 383/26)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: TE

Respondent: Pohotovost’ s.r.o.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 10(2)(h) to (j) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, in conjunction with Article 22(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which a credit agreement must specify the breakdown of each repayment showing, where applicable, capital amortisation, interest and other charges. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 10(2)(h) to (j) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, in conjunction with Article 22(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which a credit agreement must specify the breakdown of each repayment showing, where applicable, capital amortisation, interest and other charges.

| 2. | Articles 10(2) and 22(1) of Directive 2008/48, as interpreted by the judgment of 9 November 2016, Home Credit Slovakia (C-42/15, EU:C:2016:842), are applicable to a credit agreement, such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, which was entered into before that judgment was handed down and before the national legislation was amended in order to comply with the interpretation adopted in that judgment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Articles 10(2) and 22(1) of Directive 2008/48, as interpreted by the judgment of 9 November 2016, Home Credit Slovakia (C-42/15, EU:C:2016:842), are applicable to a credit agreement, such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, which was entered into before that judgment was handed down and before the national legislation was amended in order to comply with the interpretation adopted in that judgment.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
**CONSENT OF EXPERT**
     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name and my reports, and the inclusion ofinformation derived from my reports, under the headings “Item 4: Description of the Business –Qualified Persons” and “Item 4: Description of the Business – Oyu Tolgoi Gold and Copper Project,Mongolia” and the use of and reference to my name in “Item 12: Interests of Experts” in theCompany’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2004, dated March 30, 2005, andin the 40-F.
  Sincerely,         *"Stephen Juras"*    Name:  Dr. Stephen Juras    Title:  P.Geo.  
  Date:   March 30, 2005
#### Jermaine Edward CASEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Julie BROWN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-16594.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 16, 2010.*

Filed April 21, 2010.

Jermaine Edward Casey, lone, CA, pro se.

*620Mark D. Eibert, Esquire, Half Moon Bay, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Jeffrey M. Bryant, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Michael D. O’Reilley, Esquire, Attorney General Office, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jermaine Edward Casey appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2258, and we affirm.

Casey contends that the trial court violated his due process and confrontation rights by refusing to allow defense counsel to cross-examine a witness regarding whether she had made prior false accusations of sexual assault. The record demonstrates that the trial court considered legitimate state concerns in reaching its decision, and therefore the California state court’s decision rejecting this claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law, nor was it an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see Fowler v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept.,*421 F.3d 1027, 1038-39 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that trial court’s weighing of legitimate state interests was not “contrary to” clearly established Supreme Court law).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2010272EN.01001101.xml

| 8.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/11

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for household refrigerating appliances

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 16 of 22 January 2010
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 16 of 22 January 2010

2010/C 272/08

On page 20, point 1, ‘Publication of titles and references of transitional methods of measurement for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 643/2009 and, in particular, Annex III thereof’, the part of the table concerning ‘Noise’ is replaced by the following:

| Measured parameter | Organisation | Reference | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘Noise | International Electro-technical Commission | IEC 60704-1 | Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 1: General requirements |
| IEC 60704-2-14 | Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 2-14: Particular requirements for refrigerators, frozen-food storage cabinets and food freezers |
| IEC 60704-3 | Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 3: Procedure for determining and verifying declared noise emission values’ |

Measured parameter

Organisation

Reference

Title

‘Noise

International Electro-technical Commission

IEC 60704-1

Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 1: General requirements

IEC 60704-2-14

Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 2-14: Particular requirements for refrigerators, frozen-food storage cabinets and food freezers

IEC 60704-3

Household and similar electrical appliances — Test code for the determination of airborne acoustical noise — Part 3: Procedure for determining and verifying declared noise emission values’

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Zurvita Holdings, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: June 14, 2011
/s/Jay Shafer

Jay Shafer

Co-Chief Executive OfficerDated: June 14, 2011
/s/Jason Post

Jason Post

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Red Sun Mining, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew Taylor,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Matthew Taylor
------------------------------------
Matthew Taylor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
December 11, 2008
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 1 , 2022

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00692

- CV

UNION PACIFIC RAILRO AD COMPANY, Appellant

V.

DEBREK BOOKMAN ; BRIDGET PEARL BRANCH ; EDDIE DAVID BROOKS ; RAYNETTA M. BR OOKS ; JAMES CARTER, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIV E OF THE ESTATE OF J OHN CARTER (DECEASED) AND LUERE NE CARTER (DECEASED) ; MADILINE CORMIER ; MARY DAVENPORT ; JAMES DOSIA, INDIVID UALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES A. DOSIA, SR. (DECE ASED) ; EVA DOUGLAS, INDIVIDUAL LY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF JOE WILLIAM DOUGLAS (DECEASED) ; RETHA DOZE ; PONDER EDMONSON, IND IVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIV E OF THE ESTATE OF RUBY MARIE EDMONSON (DECEASED) ; JOHN FOREMAN ; ANTHON Y FREEMAN, INDIVIDUALLY A ND A S REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BOBBIE FREEMAN (DECE ASED) ; REGINA HARMASON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR BROWN (DECEAS ED) ; MAURINE HUNTER ; EOLA MAE JACKSON, INDIVIDUALL Y AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF T HE ESTATE OF LEE HUEY JA CKSO N (DECEASED) ; JERMED JONES,INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF

DONALD JONES (DECEAS ED) ; MARTHA JOURNET ; ELMO MOREHEAD JR. ; JOYCE PITMAN, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF BE RNARD ALLEN PITTMAN (DECEASED) ; BRENDA JOYCE PRICE ; LUCILL E WI LTURNER ; PAMELA SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF WILLIE HILLARD (DECEASED) ; SHONE JEFFERSON, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIV E OF THE ESTATE OF LEWIS JEFFERSON

(DECEASED) ; JOE HICKMAN, INDIVID UALLY AND REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E E STAT E OF CHARLES HICKMAN (DECEASED) ; BARBARA BRANTLEY, IN DIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF WILLIE MA E MCGILBRAY (DECEASED) ; JOSEPHINE H. BELL, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF FLORITA HELLEMAN (DECEASED) ; FREDDIE MOREHEAD , IN DIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF LENA MOREHEAD (DECEASED) ; ATTIMA HARVEY ; S HIRLEY JONES ; TROY JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF MARVIS JACKSON (DECEASED) ; DEANDRA DAVIS JOHNSO N, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTA TIVE OF THE ESTATE OF EDDIE DAVIS (DECEASE D); AND CHLOE WARE ; INDIVIDUALLY AND AS RE PRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DORATHY REED (DECEASED) AND BRUCE REED (DECEASED) , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the 334th District Co u rt

Har ris County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No

. 2021

- 50469

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is a statutory inter lo utory appeal from a n order signed November 10,

202 1

. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 27.003, 51.015(12). On August 23, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appe al. See Tex. R. Ap p. P.

42.1 (a)(1) . The motion is granted.W e dismi ss the appeal

. PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Gene Austin, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that thequarterly report of Convio, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofConvio, Inc.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2010 | /s/ GENE  AUSTIN                                                                                      |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Gene  Austin                                                                                               |
| * *                    | *Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),  President and Chairman of the Board of Directors* |

 

I,James R. Offerdahl, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that thequarterly report of Convio, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofConvio, Inc.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2010 | /s/  JAMES R. OFFERDAHL                                                                                  |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | James R.  Offerdahl                                                                                      |
| * *                    | *Chief  Financial Officer and Vice President of Administration (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer)* |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Convio, Inc. and will beretained by Convio, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. This certification “accompanies” theForm 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language containedin such filing.

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2496 

To provide the right of American Indians born in Canada or the United 

States to pass the borders of the United States to any individual who 

is a member, or is eligible to be a member, of a Federally recognized 

Indian tribe in the United States or Canada, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2019 

Mr. KILMER (for himself, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. 

COLE, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. YOUNG, and Ms. DELBENE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide the right of American Indians born in Canada 

or the United States to pass the borders of the United 

States to any individual who is a member, or is eligible 

to be a member, of a Federally recognized Indian tribe 

in the United States or Canada, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Border Crossing 

5 Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2496 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMERICAN INDIANS BORN IN CANADA OR THE 

2 UNITED STATES. 

3 Section 289 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

4 (8 U.S.C. 1359) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting after ‘‘born in Canada’’ the fol6 lowing: ‘‘or the United States’’; and 

7 (2) by inserting after ‘‘but such right shall ex8 tend only to persons’’ the following: ‘‘who are mem9 bers, or are eligible to be members, of a Federally 

10 recognized Indian tribe in the United States or Can11 ada, or’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS