alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 254 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 254

To make technical amendments to chapter 3084 of title 54, United States 
   Code, to correct references to the African American Civil Rights 
                    Network, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2019

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make technical amendments to chapter 3084 of title 54, United States 
   Code, to correct references to the African American Civil Rights 
                    Network, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO REFERENCES TO THE AFRICAN AMERICAN 
              CIVIL RIGHTS NETWORK.

    (a) Chapter Amendments.--Chapter 3084 of title 54, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``U.S. Civil Rights Network'' each place 
it appears and inserting ``African American Civil Rights Network'' 
(using identical font as used in the text being replaced).
    (b) Amendments to List of Items.--The list of items of title 54, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``U.S. Civil Rights 
Network'' each place it appears and inserting ``African American Civil 
Rights Network'' (using identical font as used in the text being 
replaced).
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law (other than in this Act), 
regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States 
to the ``U.S. Civil Rights Network'' shall be considered to be a 
reference to the ``African American Civil Rights Network''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60636

Summary Calendar

MARGARTIA DAVTIAN, also known as Margarita Davtian, 

also known as Margarita Garner,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A70 646 808

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Margartia Davtian petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that affirmed the determination of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying, as untimely, her

motion to reopen her deportation proceedings. Davtian argues that

she is entitled to equitable tolling based on the alleged ineffective assistance of attorneys Roy Petty and Maggie Mills. Davtian
No. 05-60636

-2-

also contends that the IJ breached the IJ’s duties toward her and

that her proceedings are void on account of deficiencies in the

order to show cause. We review the denial of a motion to reopen

for abuse of discretion. INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24

(1992).

We have not issued a published opinion squarely adopting the

doctrine of equitable tolling in the context of a motion to reopen

immigration proceedings. Nevertheless, even if we assume, without

deciding, that such tolling is available to Davtian, she has not

established that she is entitled to it. 

The record does not show that Davtian has filed an appropriate

complaint in relation to Petty’s alleged deficiencies. She thus

has not adduced sufficient information to support her claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel in relation to her deportation

proceedings. See Lara v. Trominski, 216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir.

2000). Further, even if Davtian had produced the pertinent documents, she would not be entitled to equitable tolling based on

Petty’s performance, because his alleged deficiencies had no bearing on the timeliness vel non of her motion to reopen. Davtian’s

argument that she is entitled to equitable tolling based on Petty’s

performance is unavailing. 

Davtian’s contention that she is entitled to equitable tolling

based on Mills’s performance was raised for the first time in her

petition for review. This claim is thus unexhausted, so we decline

to consider it. See Ramirez-Molina v. Ziglar, 436 F.3d 508, 513
No. 05-60636

-3-

(5th Cir. 2006); Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir.

2001); Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 2001). 

Davtian’s claims concerning the IJ’s purported breach of the

IJ’s duties and the alleged deficiencies in the IJ’s order to show

cause were not presented to the BIA. Accordingly, we will not consider them. See Ramirez-Molina, 436 F.3d at 513; Wang, 260 F.3d at

452-53; Goonsuwan, 252 F.3d at 387. 

The petition for review is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting, Advisory Committee (Expert Panel on Cost 
Estimating) for the Public Assistance Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App.), announcement is made 
of the following committee meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee (Expert Panel on Cost Estimating) for the 
Public Assistance Program.
    Date of Meeting: June 26-28, 2001.
    Place: Crystal City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Salons 
B and C, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Time: June 26: 9 a.m.-5 p.m., June 27: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., June 28: 8 
a.m.-5 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: The Panel will be provided with: (1) An overview 
of the Stafford Act (P.L. 93-288) and the provision of the Disaster 
Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390) that directs FEMA to establish a 
methodology, consistent with industry practices, for estimating the 
cost to repair, restore or replace eligible public facilities that are 
damaged during a major disaster. (2) A briefing on the Grant 
Acceleration Program that FEMA employed during the Northridge 
Earthquake. (3) A briefing on the Cost Estimating Format for Large 
Projects that FEMA has used since the inception of the redesigned 
Public Assistance Program. Discussion will also be held regarding the 
Public Assistance Program and cost estimating issues for roads and 
bridges, water control facilities, buildings, utility systems, and 
recreational facilities. Finally, the Panel will consider current and 
future requirements for making recommendations on both a cost 
estimating methodology and reasonable floor and ceiling percentages 
related to the estimated cost by the first quarter of calendar year 
2002.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with seats available on a 
first-come, first-served basis. All members of the public interested in 
attending should contact James D. Duffer, at 202-646-3532.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and available for public 
viewing at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 
Infrastructure Division, Response and Recovery Directorate, 500 C 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472 and posted on FEMA's Web Page located 
at http://www.fema.gov/r-n-r/pa. Copies of the meeting minutes will be 
available upon request 90 days after the meeting.

Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response & Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-13268 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 918 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. STAN LUNDINE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in James4 town, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A
of Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.





Date:
      November 23, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Gordon KnottName:
                Gordon
      KnottTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      November 23, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Douglas E. WellsName:
                Douglas
      E. WellsTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1312

Crude Oil Fixed Swap - Argus WTI Houston - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Argus Media for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus WTI Houston price for each business day that it is determined during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

barrels multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
# Fourth Court **of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 7, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00710

- CR

Daniel WEBSTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR2112A

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presi ding



### ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. We

ORDER appellant to file his brief on or before January 9, 2019.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of North Shore Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marc H.
Klee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 14, 2009
                /s/ Marc H. KleeName: 
      Marc H.
      KleeTitle:  
       President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JASON STONE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1906

[ February 8, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Hon. Bernard I. Bober,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 03

- 000 215CF10A

.

Jason Stone , Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER

, C ONNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 24 , 201 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00 564

- CR

____________ LARRY DERNELL CHAMPION , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09CR3425



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted a ppellant of aggravated robbery. Appellant entered a plea of true to the enhancement paragraph and the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty

- five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional ev aluation of the2

record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appe llate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was provided
to him. A ppellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief.
We have carefully reviewed the rec ord, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the
state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe
v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

- 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the tria l court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofLexicon United Incorporated, aNevadacorporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year endedDecember31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:April 15, 2009





/s/ Elie
      SaltounElie
  SaltounPrincipal Executive Officer and
      PrincipalAccounting
      Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided toLEXICON
UNITED INCORPORATEDand
will be retained byLEXICON
UNITED INCORPORATEDand
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Plaza 5, 185 Hudson St #2200 

Jersey City, NJ 07311

March 7, 2023

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: DW SEF LLC – Rule Changes- IRS Fee Schedule

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), DW SEF LLC 

(“DW SEF”) hereby submits amendments to its IRS Fee Schedule, which has been amended to 

reflect updates to certain terms and fees. The amendment will become effective on March 21,

2023, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. Pursuant to Commission Regulations 

40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A are the updates to the IRS Fee Schedule with the 

additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this submission, DW SEF 

hereby notifies the Commission that:

The amendment will become effective on March 21, 2023 no fewer than ten business days from 

the date hereof.

In connection with this submission, DW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, DW SEF is seeking to keep certain 

information confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential 

commercial or financial information and has posted a notice of pending certification 

with the Commission and a redacted copy of this submission on DW SEF’s website.

DW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s regulations 

thereunder; and 

2. DW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s regulations 

thereunder, including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Fee Schedule 

is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rules were expressed to DW SEF 

by its governing board or committee members, members of DW SEF or market 

participants.
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

March 7, 2023

2

Should you have questions regarding this submission, please contact the undersigned at (646) 

767-4923 or by email at Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com. 

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

DW SEF CCO
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

March 7, 2023

3

APPENDIX A

IRS Fee Schedule

(Blackline and Clean Versions)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant To the Oil Pollution 
Act of 1990 (OPA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree (Decree) in 
United States v. V-1 Oil Company, Civil Action No. 96-0454-E BLW, was 
lodged May 2, 2001, with the United States District Court for the 
District Of Idaho.
    The Complaint filed in the above-referenced matter alleges that V-1 
Oil Company (the Defendant) is liable under the Oil Pollution Act of 
1990 (OPA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA) for costs incurred by the 
Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Coast Guard as a 
result of the release or substantial threat of a release of oil at a 
former gasoline service station in Preston, Idaho (the Facility). In 
the Complaint, the United States also sought civil penalties for 
violation of an administrative order issued pursuant to the CWA and the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
    Under the proposed Decree, the Defendant shall pay $722,000 in 
reimbursement of removal costs. Additionally, the Defendant shall pay 
$478,000 in civil penalties. In exchange, the United States is granting 
Defendant a covenant not to sue or take administrative action against 
Defendant for the claims alleged in the Complaint. This covenant not to 
sue extends only to Defendant and does not extend to any other persons.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer 
to United States v. V-1 Oil Company, DOJ Ref. #90-5-1-1-4396A.
    The proposed Decree may be examined at the office of the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 
Seattle, Washington 98101. A copy of the proposed Decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy of the Consent Decree, 
please refer to the referenced case number and enclose a check in the 
amount of $4.50, payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert Maher,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-13029 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M