alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Melvin Wesley, III, certify that:


(1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of comScore, Inc.; and


(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





/s/ Melvin Wesley, IIIMelvin Wesley, IIIChief Financial Officer


April 24, 2015
# EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
IntriCon Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of IntriCon Corporation (formerly Selas Corporation of America) and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 18,
2005, except as to notes 3, 4, 8 and 18, which are as of March 31, 2005 and note 2 which is as of June 24, 2005,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of IntriCon Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows and related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2004, which reports are included in
the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of IntriCon Corporation.

Our reports refer to the Companys restatement of the consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2004.

/s/   KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 17, 2006

---
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION





I, Fred
Zolla, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vemics, Inc;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a.  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.
 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.  
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





6.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








/s/ Fred
Zolla


Fred
Zolla


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


Date:
February 17, 2009
# EUR-Lex - 52010PC0146 - EN

*|*

# 52010PC0146

**Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the allocation of the fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands /* COM/2010/0146 final - NLE 2010/0081 */ **

*

*

[pic] | EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels, 14.4.2010

COM(2010)146 final

2010/0081 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

concerning the allocation of the fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

On the basis of the mandate given to the Commission by the Council, the Community and Solomon Islands have negotiated and initialled, on 26 September 2009, a Fisheries Partnership Agreement which provides EU fishermen with fishing opportunities in Solomon Islands fishing zone for the period 9 October 2009 – 8 October 2012. This Partnership Agreement has been provided to the Council for approval.

In accordance with the Treaty the method for allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should also be defined.

The Commission proposes that the Council adopt this Regulation.

2010/0081 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No .../...

of [...]

concerning the allocation of the fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

1. A new Fisheries Partnership Agreement was initialled on 26 September 2009 and sent for the approval by the Council.

2. The method for allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should be defined.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1. The fishing opportunities set out in the Protocol of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:

- Freezer tuna seiners: | Spain: France: | 75% of fishing possibilities available 25% of fishing possibilities available |

2. If applications for fishing authorisations from the Member States referred to in paragraph 1 do not cover all the fishing opportunities set by the Protocol, the Commission may consider applications for fishing authorisations from any other Member State.

3. Without prejudice to the provisions of the Agreement and the Protocol, Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 of 29 September 2008 concerning authorisations for fishing activities of Community fishing vessels outside Community waters and the access of third country vessels to Community waters shall apply[1].

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the first day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council

The President

[1] OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 33.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1030

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Panhandle - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC Panhandle

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August 8, 2002
on the consolidated financial statements of Peoples Ohio Financial Corporation,
as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 and for the years then ended which report and
financial statements are contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
previously filed by Peoples Ohio Financial Corporation on February 21, 2002.



                                                   /s/ BKD, LLP
                                                   ------------------------
                                                       BKD, LLP



Cincinnati, Ohio
September 24, 2002
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Frank
Arnone, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |     |                                        
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------
|Dated:
  August 18, 2009 | By: | /s/ Frank
Arnone                       
|                         |     | Frank
Arnone                           
|                         |     | President (Principal Financial
Officer)





This certification
accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```
Exhibit 5
```

```
CDMC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series
2002-3
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2002
```

```
Class   Interest          Principal PaidRealized   Ending Balance
        Distribution                    Losses
```

```
A1      5,376,938.85      23,138,355.66 0.00       105,861,644.34
A2      0.00              0.00          0.00       16,805,085.80
A3      350,633.88        710,785.82    0.00       7,689,214.18
A4      875,849.04        0.00          0.00       20,211,900.00
A5      676,000.00        0.00          0.00       15,600,000.00
A6      555,230.00        0.00          0.00       12,813,000.00
B1      131,293.94        21,717.48     0.00       3,017,612.52
B2      54,326.63         8,986.23      0.00       1,248,623.77
B3      31,690.29         5,241.92      0.00       728,358.08
B4      18,108.73         2,995.38      0.00       416,204.62
B5      13,581.55         2,246.53      0.00       312,153.47
B6      18,110.25         2,995.63      0.00       416,239.37
P       0.00              24,623.84     0.00       1,275,338.16
R       0.54              100.00        0.00       0.00
X       298,648.64        0.00          0.00       6,007,298.38
```
WACHOVIA SECURITIES	

8739 Research Drive 

Charlotte, NC 28288

								WACHOVIA SECURITIES

 

 

Management's Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Commercial Real Estate Servicing Division of Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single  Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $20 million, respectively.

 

 

Alan Kronovet					3/10/04

                 Alan Kronovet				Date

            Director/ Vice President

           Wachovia National Bank

 

 

Steven Johnson					3/10/04

                Steven Johnson				Date

           	        Director

          Wachovia National Bank
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated November 29, 2006, which appears on page F-1 of the annual report on Form 10-KSB of STEN Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended October 1, 2006, and to reference to our Firm under the caption Experts in the Prospectus.  /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP  Minneapolis, Minnesota April 2, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 4, 2015

h0128

Order 

Clerk

February 4, 2015

149041 & (96)

CHARLES MOODY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

GET WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORT,

PROGRESSIVE REHAB CENTER and

CAROL REINTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v SC: 149041

COA: 301784

Wayne CC: 10-006722-AV

HOME OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to dismiss appeal is GRANTED.
No. 472.

#### Saunders *v.*Georgia.

Jurisdictional statement submitted December 7, 1931.

Decided December 14, 1931.

*Messrs. James A. Branch*and *Wm. Schley Howard*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Hall*v. *Geiger-Jones Co.,*242 U. S. 539, 555, 556, 557; *Caldwell*v. *Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.,*242 U. S. 559; *Merrick*v. *N. W. Halsey & Co., 242*U. S. 568.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Simon Ricarte BALDERAS, Jr, also known as BJ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-41134

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 2010.

William D. Baldwin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James Wesley Volberding, Esq., Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Simon Ricarte Balderas, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Balderas has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi*399bilities herein, arid the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Daniel C. Staton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

|   | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

December 21, 2007

 

|   | /s/ Daniel C. Staton                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Daniel C. Staton                      |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
No. 04-467 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2005 MT 292N
DAVID WEBER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph W. Weber, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. GREG T. PRICE, Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL FROM: The District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, In and For the County of Cascade, Cause No. ADV 2004-215, Honorable Thomas M. McKittrick, Presiding Judge
COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Greg T. Price, Pro Se , Great Falls, Montana For Respondent: Nathan J. Hoines, Hoines & Ferguson, Great Falls, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: November 2, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005
Filed:

__________________________________________ Clerk2 

### Chief Justice Karla M. Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Pursuant to Section 1, Paragraph 3(d)(v), Montana Supreme Court 1996 Internal Operating Rules, as amended in 2003, the following memorandum decision shall not be cited as precedent. Its case title, Supreme Court cause number and disposition shall be included in this Court’s quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports. ¶2 Greg T. Price, appearing pro se , appeals from a default and judgment entered against him in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. We affirm. ¶3 The dispositive issue is whether a default against Price was entered prior to the 20 days after service in which he was required to respond to the complaint pursuant to Rules 6(a) and 12(a), M.R.Civ.P. ¶4 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d) of our 1996 Internal Operating Rules, as amended in 2003, which provides for memorandum opinions. It is manifest on the face of the briefs and the record that this appeal is without merit. The complaint was served on Price on March 22, 2004. He did not respond and his default was entered on April 14, 2004. The issue is factual, and there clearly is sufficient evidence that Price failed to plead or otherwise defend within the 20 days allowed by law. ¶5 Affirmed.

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY
We concur:3 

### /S/ JOHN WARNER /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART /S/ BRIAN MORRIS /S/ JIM RICE
#### In the Matter of Madeline Acosta, Respondent, v New York City Department of Education et al., Appellants.

Submitted May 24, 2010;

decided June 3, 2010

Motion by Senators Neil D. Breslin et al. to join as amici curiae in the brief to be filed by Senator Bill Perkins granted.
# CFTC_AEGIS SEF Product List
Exhibit A 

Below is a concise explanation and analysis of the Swaps: 

Cross-Rate Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDF) 

SwapEx hereby certifies 65 NDFs in the following FX pairs: 

- AUD/ARS; AUD/BRL; AUD/CLP; AUD/CNY; AUD/COP; AUD/IDR; AUD/INR; 

AUD/KRW; AUD/MYR; AUD/PEN; AUD/PHP; AUD/RUB; and AUD/TWD 

- CAD/ARS; CAD/BRL; CAD/CLP; CAD/CNY; CAD/COP; CAD/IDR; CAD/INR; 

CAD/KRW; CAD/MYR; CAD/PEN; CAD/PHP; CAD/RUB; and CAD/TWD 

- EUR/ARS; EUR/BRL; EUR/CLP; EUR/CNY; EUR/COP; EUR/IDR; EUR/INR; 

EUR/KRW; EUR/MYR; EUR/PEN; EUR/PHP; EUR/RUB; and EUR/TWD 

- GBP/ARS; GBP/BRL; GBP/CLP; GBP/CNY; GBP/COP; GBP/IDR; GBP/INR; 

GBP/KRW; GBP/MYR; GBP/PEN; GBP/PHP; GBP/RUB; and GBP/TWD 

- JPY/ARS; JPY/BRL; JPY/CLP; JPY/CNY; JPY/COP; JPY/IDR; JPY/INR; JPY/KRW; 

JPY/MYR; JPY/PEN; JPY/PHP; JPY/RUB; and JPY/TWD 

Each NDF is a cash-settled contract with notional amounts down to single currency units traded 

against counter currencies. For more information, the contract specifications for NDF 

instruments are attached as Exhibit B.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for Alaska

    This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under 
the EB Program for Alaska.

Summary

    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding the State's EB status:
    <bullet> June 2, 2001--Alaska's 13-week insured unemployment rate 
for the week ending April 28, 2001, fell below 6.0 percent and was less 
than 120 percent of the average for the corresponding period for the 
prior two years, causing Alaska's EB period that began March 4, 2001 to 
trigger ``off'' effective June 2, 2001.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the States by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a State ending an EB period, the State 
employment security agency will furnish a written notice to each 
individual who is currently filing a claim for EB of the forthcoming 
end of the EB period and its effect on the individual's rights to EB 
(30 CFR 615.13(c)(4)).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on May 23, 2001.
Raymond J. Uhalde,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 01-13784 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5670-30-M