alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SwWAPE:X’

June 2, 2015
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: submissions@efte.gov

Melissa Jurgens

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21s Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: SwapEx Submission 05-15: Certification Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6 — Delisting
from Trading of All Interest Rate Swaps (IRS) Products Listed for Trading by SwapEx

Dear Ms. Jurgens:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act’) and Section 40.6 of the
regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC” or “Commission”),
SwapEx, LLC (“SwapEx”) is delisting all IRS products listed for trading by SwapEx.
Specifically, this delisting thus includes the following interest rate swaps:

SwapEx USD LIBOR IRS: Fixed-to Floating;
SwapEx EUR EURIBOR IRS: Fixed-to Floating; and
SwapEx USD GBP LIBOR IRS: Fixed-to Floating.

This delisting of these IRS products will become effective on June 16, 2015. SwapEx certifies
that this delisting complies with the CEA and Commission Regulations thereunder and that none
of these IRS products has any open interest.

SwapEx additionally certifies that it has concurrently posted a copy of this submission letter on
SwapEx’s website at http://www.swapex.com/swapex/rules-policies-and-notices/recent-rule-
filings-cfic/ and will be deleting all IRS product specifications from the SwapEx website. There
were no substantive opposing views to the delisting of these IRS products.

In the event that you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (312) 798-6517 or

BJRegan@statestreet.com.

Sincerely,

Brian J. Y, 42
Chief Compliance @fficer
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Per Högård, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Preem Holdings AB (publ);

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 28, 2005

| |  | By: |  | /s/PER HÖJGÅRDName: Per Höjgård
Title: Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31(c)

I, John K. Morgan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Zep
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 22, 2009                                        
|                                                               
|/s/ John K. Morgan                                             
|John K. Morgan Chairman,
President, and Chief Executive Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0545

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES GALEN LANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Robin Lee is 

granted an extension of time to and including May 28, 2024, within

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 28 2024

03/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0545
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).  If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843).  Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 28, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1.  Millennium Bancorp, Inc.*, Edwards, Colorado; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Millennium Bank, Edwards, Colorado.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 29, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-13817 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Eti Zerihun YETIMGETA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-1560.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 19, 2006.

Decided: June 8, 2006.

Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Jonathan S. Gasser, United States Attorney, Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Respondent.

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Eti Zerihun Yetimgeta, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In her petition for review, Yetimgeta challenges the immigration judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination' denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Yetimgeta fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she seeks.

Similarly, because Yetimgeta does not qualify for asylum, she is also ineligible for withholding of removal. *See Camara v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.2004).

*345Finally, substantial evidence supports the finding that Yetimgeta fails to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). Yetimgeta failed to make the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1167

Natural Gas Index Swaps - TETCO M2 - Platts Gas Daily Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price 

published by Platts Inside FERC TETCO M2, for Floating Price B, from the average of the daily 

prices published by Platts Gas Daily TETCO M2, for Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily TETCO M2 published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC TETCO M2

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
**Exhibit31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Charles E. Finelli, certifythat:

 

1.                 Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ergo Science Corporation;

 

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarter report;

 

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.                 Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and I have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrants internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrants internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

Dated:  March 30, 2004

 
|   |                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |    /s/  Charles E. Finelli                                                         |   |
|   | Charles E.  Finelli, President, Chief Executive Officer,  President and acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 107 (Monday, June 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29981-29982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13975]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-934-5700; COC60743, COC60750, COC60755, COC60756, COC60757, 
COC60758, COC60759, COC60760]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Leases

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e), and 43 CFR

[[Page 29982]]

3108.2-3 (a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
leases, COC60743, COC60750, and COC60755, COC60756, COC60757, COC60758, 
COC60759, and COC60760, for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, were 
timely filed and were accompanied by all the required rentals accruing 
from the date of termination.
    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year 
and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $158 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the leases as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and Bureau of Land Management is 
proposing to reinstate leases COC60743, COC60750, COC60755, COC60756, 
COC60757, COC60758, COC60759, and COC60760, effective October 1, 2000, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the leases and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Beverly Derringer,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner, Oil and Gas Lease Maintenance.
[FR Doc. 01-13975 Filed 6-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-U
```
Exhibit 32.1

OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Lenox Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                   |                                             
|----- | ----------------- | --------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 8,
 2007 | /s/ Marc L.
 Pfefferle                      
|      |                   |                                             
|      |                   | Marc L.
 Pfefferle
 Chief Executive Officer 
|      |                   |                                             
|Date: | November 8,
 2007 | /s/ Timothy
 J. Schugel                     
|      |                   |                                             
|      |                   | Timothy J.
 Schugel
 Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gray Creek Mining Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan J. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of January, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### Michael Noel FLUHARTY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Teresa ROCHA, Jr., California Department of Corrections Director aka Steve Cambra, Jr.; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-56225.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 16, 2006.

Michael Noel Fluharty, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Marilyn L. George, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Noel Fluharty appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for corporal injury to a cohabitant.

Upon review of the record, we affirm the district court’s conclusion that Fluharty was not entitled to statutory tolling under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), although for different reasoning than upon that relied on by the district court. *See Moran v. McDaniel,*80 F.3d 1261, 1268 (9th Cir. 1996).

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2), AEDPA’s one-year limitations period is tolled for “the time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review ... is pending.” Here, the California Superior Court cited unjustified delay as a basis for denying Fluharty’s November 29, 1999, state habeas petition. Because the California courts dismissed Fluharty’s petition as untimely, his petition was not properly filed under AEDPA. *See Pace v. DiGuglielmo,*544 U.S. 408, 125 S.Ct. 1807, 1812, 161 L.Ed.2d 669 (2005) (“when a postconviction petition is untimely under state law, that [is] the end of the matter for purposes of § 2244(d)(2)”) (internal quotations omitted); *see also Bonner v. Carey,*425 F.3d 1145, 1149 (9th Cir.2005) (“Because the California courts dismissed Bonner’s petition as untimely, his petition was not ‘properly filed’ under AEDPA.”).

As Fluharty did not challenge the district court’s denial of equitable tolling, we do not reach this issue on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 of Lucky Boy Silver Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.




Very truly yours,




/s/Kenneth B. LiebscherKenneth B. LiebscherChief Executive OfficerJanuary  14, 2011/s/ Fortunato VillamagnaFortunato VillamagnaChief Financial OfficerDated: January 14, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lucky Boy Silver Corp. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.