alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13390]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially 
Closed Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on June 13, 
2001, 10:30 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street 
between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to materials and related 
technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Opening remarks and introductions.
    2. Presentation of papers and comments by the public.
    3. Status report on proposed revision to missile technology 
controls for composites and composite production equipment: 
relationship of cure temperature and glass transition temperature after 
curing.

Closed Session

    4. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive Order 
12958, dealing with U.S. export control programs and strategic criteria 
related thereto.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the materials should be 
forwarded prior to the meeting to the address below: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, OSIES/EA/BXA MS: 3876, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14 St. & 
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on March 7, 
2000, pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended, that the series of meetings or portions of meetings of the 
Committee and of any Subcommittee thereof dealing with the classified 
materials listed in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(1) shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in section 10(a)(1) and 
(a)(3) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The remaining series of 
meetings or portions thereof will be open to the public. A copy of the 
Notice of Determination to close meetings or potions of meetings of the 
Committee is available for public inspection and copying in the Central 
Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 6020, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, Washington, DC. For more information or copies of the 
minutes call Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter at (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: May 22, 2001.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13390 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
# C_2010353EN.01001101.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/11

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Article 4(1)(b) of Council Decision 2010/801/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire apply

2010/C 353/08

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/801/CFSP (1) renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire.

1

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above-mentioned Annex should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/801/CFSP.

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 341, 23.12.2010.

1

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1510

1M Aluminum Roll - LME Aluminum CMA Swap - LME

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the price published by LME for the location specified in 

Floating Price A minus Floating Price B.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the LME Official Cash 

Settlement Price for Primary Aluminum for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the LME Official Cash 

Settlement Price for Primary Aluminum for each business day that it is determined during the first 

month following the contract month referenced in Floating Price A.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be metric tons. Each contract based shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in metric tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars per metric ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall be 

$0.01 per metric ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
ONG
CHENG GUAN

      134 Pasir
Ris St. 11, #08-261

      Singapore  510134

      


      


      September
7, 2010

      


      Nexgen
Petroleum Corp.

      2808
Cowan Circle

      Las
Vegas, NV  89107

      


      Attention:
Mr. Hsien Loong Wong, CEO

      


      Dear
Sir:

      


      
        	
                Re:

              	
                Settlement
      and Conversion of US$510,000 debt owing from Nexgen Petroleum Corp. to Ong
      Cheng Guan

              


      

      


      I hereby
agree to the settlement of the US$510,000 debt owed to me from Nexgen Petroleum
Cop. (the “Company”) in exchange for the conversion of such debt into 3,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.17 per
share.

      


      If the
foregoing is satisfactory, please indicate your agreement by executing a copy of
this letter where indicated below and returning an originally signed copy to the
undersigned on or before September 14, 2010.

      


      I
appreciate your prompt response and action in settling the above
matter.

      


      Yours
truly,

    

    
      


      
        
          	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/ Ong Cheng
      Guan

                	 	 	
                   

                	 
	
                        
                    ONG
      CHENG GUAN

                  

                	 	 	
                   

                	 


        

      

      
        


        The above
terms and conditions are acknowledged and agreed to this 8th day of
September, 2010.

        


        


        NEXGEN
PETROLEUM CORP.

        per:

         

        
          
            
              	 	 	 	 	 
	
                      /s/ Hsien Loong
      Wong

                    	 	 	
                       

                    	 
	
                            
                        (Authorized
      Signatory)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60636 Summary Calendar

MARGARTIA DAVTIAN, also known as Margarita Davtian, also known as Margarita Garner, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A70 646 808

-------------------- Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Margartia Davtian petitions for review of an order of theBoard of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that affirmed the determination of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying, as untimely, her motion to reopen her deportation proceedings. Davtian argues that she is entitled to equitable tolling based on the alleged ineffective assistance of attorneys Roy Petty and Maggie Mills. DavtianNo. 05-60636 -2- also contends that the IJ breached the IJ’s duties toward her and that her proceedings are void on account of deficiencies in the order to show cause. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). We have not issued a published opinion squarely adopting the doctrine of equitable tolling in the context of a motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Nevertheless, even if we assume, without deciding, that such tolling is available to Davtian, she has not established that she is entitled to it. The record does not show that Davtian has filed an appropriate complaint in relation to Petty’s alleged deficiencies. She thus has not adduced sufficient information to support her claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in relation to her deportation proceedings. See Lara v. Trominski , 216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir.2000). Further, even if Davtian had produced the pertinent documents, she would not be entitled to equitable tolling based on Petty’s performance, because his alleged deficiencies had no bearing on the timeliness vel non of her motion to reopen. Davtian’s argument that she is entitled to equitable tolling based on Petty’s performance is unavailing. Davtian’s contention that she is entitled to equitable tolling based on Mills’s performance was raised for the first time in her petition for review. This claim is thus unexhausted, so we decline to consider it. See Ramirez-Molina v. Ziglar, 436 F. 3d 508, 513No. 05-60636 -3- (5th Cir. 2006); Wang v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001); Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft , 252 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 2001). Davtian’s claims concerning the IJ’s purported breach of the IJ’s duties and the alleged deficiencies in the IJ’s order to show

cause were not presented to the BIA. Accordingly, we will not consider them. See Ramirez-Molina, 436 F.3d at 513; Wang, 260 F.3d at 452-53; Goonsuwan, 252 F.3d at 387. The petition for review is DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Robert M. McLaughlin

Robert M. McLaughlin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 29, 2007
# C_2019155EN.01001401.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v État belge

(Case C-174/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Equal treatment - Income tax - Legislation for the avoidance of double taxation - Pension received in a Member State other than that of residence - Method of calculating the exemption in the Member State of residence - Loss of part of the benefit of certain tax advantages)

(2019/C 155/17)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

Defendant: État belge

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the application of tax legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which has the effect of depriving a couple resident in that State, one of whom receives a pension in another Member State which is exempt from taxation in the first Member State pursuant to a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation, of part of the benefit of the tax advantages granted by the Member State of residence.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
Order entered May 29, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00506-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.V.L., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-17-01086-W

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal was due May 9, 2019. When it was not 

filed, we notified court reporter Martha Grant by postcard dated May 10, 2019 that it was past 

due and directed her to file the reporter’s record within ten days. On May 20, 2019, Ms. Grant 

notified the Court that a substitute court reporter, Kristin McDowell, sat for her on this case.

We order court reporter Kristin McDowell to file, WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE 

DATE OF THIS ORDER, the reporter’s record in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(b).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Andrea Martin 

Lane, Presiding Judge, 304th Judicial District Court; Martha Grant, official court reporter, 304th 

Judicial District Court; court reporter Kristin McDowell, P.O. Box 530473, Grand Prairie, TX 

75053 (Kris10mcdowell@sbcglobal.net); and counsel for all parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.3








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine,
LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.







Date: March
25, 2010





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 923 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 923

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                 resources in the State of New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2009

  Mr. Lujan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                 resources in the State of New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Mexico Aquifer Assessment Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the United States Geological Survey (referred to in this 
Act as the ``Secretary''), in coordination with the State of New Mexico 
(referred to in this Act as the ``State'') and any other entities that 
the Secretary determines to be appropriate (including other Federal 
agencies and institutions of higher education), shall, in accordance 
with this Act and any other applicable law, conduct a study of water 
resources in the State, including--
            (1) a survey of groundwater resources, including an 
        analysis of--
                    (A) aquifers in the State, including the quantity 
                of water in the aquifers;
                    (B) the availability of groundwater resources for 
                human use;
                    (C) the salinity of groundwater resources;
                    (D) the potential of the groundwater resources to 
                recharge;
                    (E) the interaction between groundwater and surface 
                water;
                    (F) the susceptibility of the aquifers to 
                contamination; and
                    (G) any other relevant criteria; and
            (2) a characterization of surface and bedrock geology, 
        including the effect of the geology on groundwater yield and 
        quality.
    (b) Study Areas.--The study carried out under subsection (a) shall 
include the Estancia Basin, Salt Basin, Tularosa Basin, Hueco Basin, 
and middle Rio Grande Basin in the State.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the 
House of Representatives a report that describes the results of the 
study.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Jamal WILSON, a/k/a Cash, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6284.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 30, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 4, 2013.

*298Donald Jamal Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Jamal Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Kelyn Brannon-Ahn, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calix, Inc. for the quarter ended June 26, 2010;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 22, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ KELYN BRANNON-AHN  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Kelyn Brannon-Ahn      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer