alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-444

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 10/17/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of October 9, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
20 S Wacker Dr Chicago, IL 60606 T 312 466 7478 tim.elliott@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

October 17, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-444

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of October 9,

2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-308 (October 9, 2023), OTC IRS New Release Advisory – COP, CLP 

IRS Valuation Curve Input Changes – Effective October 11, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-311 (October 12, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Interest Rate 

Margins – Effective October 13, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-312 (October 12, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy, 

Equity, FX, Interest Rate and Metal Margins – Effective October 13, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (312) 466-7478.

Sincerely,

/s/ Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Felicia Inez HAMLETT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6338.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 2006.

Decided: June 1, 2006.

Felicia Inez Hamlett, Appellant Pro Se. Sonya LaGene Sacks, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Felicia Hamlett seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and related filings as time-barred, and denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration. These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of her constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hamlett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### In re: LAWNMOWER ENGINE HORSEPOWER MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION.

MDL No. 1971.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Aug. 12, 2008.

Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiffs in all three actions have jointly moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the District of New Jersey. All responding defendants agree that centralization is appropriate. Defendant MTD Products, Inc., supports centralization in the District of New Jersey, while the nine other responding defendants1 suggest centralization in the Southern District of Illinois or, alternatively, the Northern District of Illinois.

This litigation presently consists of three actions listed on Schedule A and pending in three districts as follows: one action each in the Northern District of California, the Southern District of Illinois and the District of New Jersey.2

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we are not persuaded that Section 1407 centralization would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses or further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. While these putative statewide class actions share some questions of fact relating to alleged fraudulent marketing of lawnmower engines, movants have failed to convince us that those questions are sufficiently complex and/or numerous to justify Section 1407 transfer at this time. Alternatives to transfer exist that may minimize whatever possibilities there might be of duplicative discovery and/or inconsistent pretrial rulings. *See, e.g., In re Eli Lilly and Co. (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litigation,*446 F.Supp. 242, 244 (J.P.M.L.1978); *see also Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth,*§ 20.14 (2004).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of these three actions is denied.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 1971 — IN RE: LAWNMOWER ENGINE HORSEPOWER MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

*Northern District of California*

*Carl Phillips v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., et al.,*C.A. No. 4:08-2671

*Southern District of Illinois*

*Ronnie Phillips, et al. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., et al.,*C.A. No. 3:06-412

*District of New Jersey*

*William Fritz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., et al.,*C.A. No. 3:08-2545

1

. Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Deere & Co.; Tecumseh Products Co.; Briggs & Stratton Corp.; Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A.; The Toro Co.; Electrolux Home Products, Inc.; The Kohler Co.; and Husqvarna Outdoor Products, Inc.

2

. The Panel has been notified of one additional related action.
EXHIBIT 23.12
                                                                  -------------



                               CONSENT OF EXPERT

          Reference is made to the Annual  Report on Form 40-F (the "40-F") of
Ivanhoe  Mines  Ltd.  (the  "Company")  to be  filed  with the  United  States
Securities and Exchange  Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

          I  hereby  consent  to the  use of and  reference  to my  name  as a
Qualified Person for the "Technical Report: Ovoot Tolgoi Property" dated March
27.  2008,  under the heading  "Item 3:  Description  of the  Business - Ovoot
Tolgoi  Coal  Property,  Mongolia - Ovoot  Tolgoi  Project  (Open Pit)" in the
Company's Annual  Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2007, dated
March 28, 2008, and in the 40-F.

Sincerely,


/s/ Richard D. Tifft III
------------------------------------------
Title:   Vice President, Geologic Services
Company: Norwest Corporation

Date:  March 28, 2008
Page 1 of 1

Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. 

March 20, 2015

1. Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. (“Cantor Exchange”) is delisting its BRITISH POUND 

SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS CONTRACT, JAPANESE YEN SPOT INDEX 

DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS CONTRACT and EURO SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX 

SWAPS CONTRACT as of March 20, 2015, at 5:30 pm ET, at which time there will be 

no open interest in the foregoing contracts. 

2. Below please find a certification that: (1) this delisting complies with the Commodity 

Exchange Act (“Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent 

with this submission, Cantor Exchange posted on its website a notice of such delisting

and the repeal of corresponding Cantor Exchange rules.

3. There were no opposing views expressed regarding this delisting.

4. Confidential treatment is not requested.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE 

ACT, 7 U.S.C. §7A-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 

17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that: 

(1) this delisting complies with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission’s regulations thereunder; and 

(2) Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. has posted on its website a copy of this delisting.

_________________________

By: Manavinder S. Bains

Title: Counsel & Chief Regulatory Officer

Date: March 20, 2015
Exhibit 32.2



SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy Blankenhagen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 8, 2007
        
        By
        /s/   Nancy BlankenhagenNancy BlankenhagenChief Financial Officer










---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1377]



[[Page 3995]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 010901G]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Black 
Sea Bass Advisors and other members of the commercial fishing industry 
will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 1, 2001, from 10 
a.m. until 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Sheraton International 
Hotel, BWI Airport, 7032 Elm Road, Baltimore, MD; telephone: 410-859-
3300.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Room 
2115, 300 S. New Street, Dover, DE 19904.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 302-674-2331, ext. 
19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss 
the problems and possible solutions associated with the commercial 
management system for black sea bass.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office 
at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 01-1377 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13602]



[[Page 29564]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1509-000]


Elizabethtown Power, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 24, 2001.
    Elizabethtown Power, LLC (Elizabethtown) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Elizabethtown will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. 
Elizabethtown also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. 
In particular, Elizabethtown requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liability by Elizabethtown.
    On May 10, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Elizabethtown should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Elizabethtown is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations 
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in 
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance 
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes 
of the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Elizabethtown's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 11, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13602 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31(a)

I, John K. Morgan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: April 14, 2008



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Morgan                              
|John K. Morgan                                  
|Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DAVID A. ADEWUMI,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 842 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6041

CLARENCE A. MOYLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRED W. GREENE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-234)

Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence A. Moyler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

December 4, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on December 7, 1998. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence A. Moyler seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note

that the earliest date on which we can consider Moyler’s § 2254

petition to have been properly filed is February 2, 1998, the date

he signed it, because that is the earliest date on which he could

have delivered it to prison officials for mailing. See generally

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). Nevertheless, it was not

filed within the one-year limitations period prescribed by 28

U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West Supp. 1999). Even giving Moyler the

benefit of every doubt after reviewing his often contradictory

pleadings, we conclude that the one-year limitations period expired

no later than October 2, 1997, well before he attempted to file any

challenge to his conviction in federal court. Accordingly, we deny

Moyler’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See

Moyler v. Greene, No. CA-98-234 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 1998).* We
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Dimetreus A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 376]

— Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2008, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees and menacing in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s decision to credit the complainant’s testimony and not that of appellant. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.