alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RSC Holdings
III, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Not Applicable]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ David MathiesonDavid MathiesonSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7671

CHARLES B. KEATON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-811-1)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles B. Keaton, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles B. Keaton filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices

of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district

court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on August 17, 1998;

Keaton’s notice of appeal was filed on November 6, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. His failure to note a timely

appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this

court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Keaton’s appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden
Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen F. Wiggins, Chairman and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |                                                        
|--------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                |  | 
|August 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen F. Wiggins                                 
|                |  |  |  | Stephen F. Wiggins, Chairman of the Board and President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Arlene M. Morris, President and Chief
Executive Officer and Director, and Paul B. Cleveland, Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer, of Affymax, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to the
best of our knowledge:



|                     |  | By: | /s/ARLENE M. MORRIS                                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |     | Arlene M. Morris
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                     |  | By: | /s/PAUL B. CLEVELAND                                                                                                      
|                     |  |     | Paul B. Cleveland
Executive Vice President Corporate
Development and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|Date: March 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### Dominika Zakrzewska, Respondent, v The New School, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion by New York University et al. to join as amici curiae in the brief submitted by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center et al. granted.
#### Hair *vs.*The State of Georgia.

The verdict of guilty in this case t was demanded by the evidence; and in such a case, unless there was a patent error of law, a new trial should not be granted. There was no such, if any error at all, in this case, and construing the clauses of the charge excepted to with the entire charge, there was no error at all. 61 Ga., 379; 71 *Id.,*164, 167, and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

October 27, 1885.

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[ John Hail was indicted for assault with intent to mur-der. The evidence for the state was, in brief, as follows: ■Hr. Broom was in charge of the convict camp conducted by one Bryan, and kept the commissary department of tlie camp. He slept in a room which' was also used as a dining-room by several' others, including the defendant. The latter had been absent for some days. He came to the camp about twelve or one o’clock'at night and went into Broom’s room, the door being open. He said he wanted some supper. Broom told him there was something to eat in the safe, but did not get'up, having gone to bed and not having been well. The defendant went out, came back and went out again; ' Broom then fastened the 'door and went back to bed. The defendant returned, and on Broom’s declining to get up arid'open the door, broke .it open. Broom sprang out of the bed for the purpose of putting him out; defendant ran upon him, thrust a pistol *861in his face and fired, hitting Broom in the chin. There were two loaded guns and a pistol in the room at the time. The defendant stated a few minutes before the shooting that he intended to kill Broom, and after the shooting, he said that if he knew that case would hurt hiin, he would kill Broom. He indulged in a consider able amount of profane language. After the shooting, he did not run away. He said he shot in self-defence; that Dr. Broom had knocked him'out of the house that night.

A witness for the defendant stated that Broom called to the defendant with an oath, saying that if he was coming in there, he had better come on; that the defendant went; that the witness heard a noise. He heard the defendant say, “ If you move, ” or “ if you put your hands on it, by G— I will shoot; ” he then heard the shot. When the witness saw the defendant, the latter had a bruised place on his face, which he said was caused by Broom’s slamming the door on him.

Two witnesses testified that Broom was generally considered a sensitive, passionate man.

The defendant stated that he went into the room three times; that Broom slammed the door on him; that, as it went open, he saw Broom going.for the guns; that he said to Broom, “ If you go there, I will shoot you ; ” that he had to shoot in self-defence; that Broom had been mad with him about some sugar.

In rebuttal, a witness for the state testified that the defendant told him he scratched his face running round the house.

The jury found the defendant guilty. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and Re excepted.]
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Ezra Shashoua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Ezra Shashoua Ezra Shashoua Chief Financial Officer May 11, 2009
f10k2010ex10iii_dongsheng.htm



Exhibit 10.3


 


Labor Contract







Party A:Sichuan Xintai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd


Legal Representative:Xiaodong Zhu


Company Address:    Room 10,9 Floor, Building 5, 9 Gaoshengqiao Road (Dayi Louver Plaza), Wuhou District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Prov, 610041, P.R.China







Party B:  Di Wu   


Sex:                               Male  


Birth of Date:              5/31/1967


ID No.:                         320502196705310511                                                                     


Education:                   Postdoc


Physical Address:      Room 401, Building 52 Xinsheng Xinyuan Huli District, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province


Post code:                   215000







In accordance with relevant provisions of the “The People’s Republic of China Labor Law,” “The People’s Republic of China Labor Contract Law,” both Party A and Party B have reached an agreement through friendly consultation to conclude this contract.







1. Term of the Labor Contract







The labor contract is a fixed term labor contract, which is effective from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2011.







2. Content of Work







Party B agrees to serve as Vice President and Chief Development Officer in accordance with the working requirements of Party A.







3. Labor Remuneration







The amount of basic salary of Party B is RMB 20,000.  The month salary of Party B is income before tax. The amount of personal income tax is paid as prescribed by the State and monthly withheld by the company.


 




 





	Party A  	 	 	Party B	 
	Legal Representative (Signature)	 	 	(Signature)	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Xiaodong Zhu

	 	 	
/s/ Di Wu

	 
	
 

	 	 	
 

	 
	
Date : 

	 	 	


Date :
#### STATE v. ALEXANDER

No. 230P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 648

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Howard Glenn Blake, Alleged to be Larry Wayne Barnett, Appellant, v George E. Pataki, as Governor of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted February 22, 2010;

decided March 30, 2010

Motion for renewal and reargument denied *[see*13 NY3d 912 (2010)].
**EXHIBIT
23.2**
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
SB-2 and Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2004 relating to the 2003 and
2002 consolidated financial statements of Speedemissions, Inc. (accounting and
reporting successor to SKTF Enterprises, Inc.) and subsidiary included in the
Form 10-KSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
April 15, 2005.
 
 /s/
Bennett Thrasher PC
 
 Bennett
Thrasher PC
 
 
 Atlanta,
Georgia
 April 14,
2005
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM GameStop Corp.
Grapevine, Texas We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 No.
333-82652 and No. 333-126154 of GameStop Corp. of our reports dated March 30, 2005 (except for Note 16 which is dated August 24, 2005), relating to the consolidated
financial statements and the effectiveness of GameStop Corp.s internal control over financial
reporting, which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated March 30, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule which appears in this Form
10-K/A. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLPBDO SEIDMAN, LLP Dallas, Texas
August 30, 2005
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                                      11
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2001-8
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-17


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master
     Servicers under the Agreement has been made under our supervision;
     and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2072 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the charitable 

mileage rate with the business travel rate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize 

the charitable mileage rate with the business travel rate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volunteer Driver Tax 

5 Appreciation Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE MILEAGE RATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘14 cents per mile’’ and inserting ‘‘the rate determined 

10 by the Secretary, which rate shall not be less than the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2072 IH

1 standard mileage rate used for purposes of sections 162 

2 and 212’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable year beginning after De5 cember 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Airgas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Roger F. Millay, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

/s/ Roger F. Millay
------------------------------------
Roger F. Millay
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
June 10, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0638

_________________

WJG, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BOBBI HURLEY & JOHN AND JANE DOES

1-10,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant Bobbi Hurley has filed a motion for extension of time within which to file the

opening brief. Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until September 23, 2022, within 

which to file the opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2022

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0638
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joseph PHOENIX, a/k/a Kenny, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7984.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2006.

Decided: June 6, 2006.

Joseph Phoenix, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Phoenix seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Phoenix has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Phoenix’s motion to ap*323point counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
      II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Lawrence S. Coben, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 13, 2008
            /s/ Lawrence S. CobenName:Lawrence S. CobenTitle:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer)