alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
153 So. 918

#### Ex parte Roscoe RAGLAND.

6 Div. 550.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 19, 1934.

Carl W. Vann, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM,

Denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
No. 136.

#### Passera et al. *v.*Pontchartrain Realty Co., Inc.

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.

De*574cided October 19, 1931.

*Messrs. Wm. C. Dufour*and *J. Zach Spearing*for appellants.

*Mr. Henry P. Dart, Jr.,*for appellee..

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Wabash Ry. Co.*v. *Flannigan,*192 U. S. 29; *Erie R. Co.*v. *Solomon,*237 U. S. 427; *C. A. King & Co.*v. *Horton,*276 U. S. 600; *Bank of Indianola v. Miller,*276 U. S. 605; *Roe*v. *Kansas,*278 U. S. 191.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ergo ScienceCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Charles E. Finelli, President, Chief Executive Officer andacting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Charles E. Finelli                                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles  E. Finelli                                                     |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and acting  Chief Financial Officer |
| March 30, 2005                                                     |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00270-CV

MICHAEL JAMISON APPELLANT

V.

IRVING HOLDINGS, INC., D/B/A 

YELLOW CHECKER CAB. CO., 

TOMMIE CARTER, JR., JOHN 

DONOR, AND G. CRAIG HUBBLE

APPELLEES

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: August 25, 2011
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, David Miller, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                           | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Philip
 Bloom                         
|                                           | 
|Principal
 Financial Officer and          
|Principal
 Accounting Officer             
|January 26,
 2009                         
|                                          
|/s/ David
 Miller                         
|                                           | 
|President
 and Principal Executive Officer
|January 26,
 2009                         

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1131 

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - AECO 5a Fixed (CAD/MMBtu)

DESCRIPTION 

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the settlement price(s) published by NGX for the 

location specified in the Floating Price A. 

FLOATING PRICE A 

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the NGX AB-NIT 

SAME DAY INDEX 5A (C$/GJ), converted to MMBTU, from and including the first day of the 

Calculation Period through and including the last day o the Calculation Period.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE 

The contract quantity shall be in MMBTU. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in MMBTU, multiplied by the settlement price. 

LISTING CYCLE 

Up to 65 daily Contract Periods. 

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS 

Prices shall be quoted in Canadian dollars and cents per MMBTU. The minimum price fluctuation 

shall be $0.001 per MMBTU. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation. 

TERMINATION OF TRADING 

Trading shall cease one Canadian Business Day prior to the first calendar day of the Contract 

Period. 

FINAL SETTLEMENT 

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement in Canadian Dollars. Final settlement, 

following termination of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price A. 

CURRENCY CONVERSION 

Daily WRM Noon Rate for CAD per unit of USD as reporting by Refinitiv.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
John A. Orwin, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affymax, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



By:

/s/JOHN A. ORWIN Chief Executive Officer
and Member of the Board of
Directors (Principal Executive Officer)


Date:
March 10, 2011

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



I, Mark S. Gorder, Chief Executive Officer of IntriCon Corporation certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntriCon Corporation;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        [Intentionally Omitted];




(c)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: May 10, 2007

/s/
        Mark S. GorderMark S. GorderChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)




---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2334 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2334

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
 outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Wilson and Young Medal of 
                           Honor VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON AND YOUNG MEDAL OF HONOR VA CLINIC.
    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Private First Class Alfred 
``Mac'' Wilson of the Marine Corps and Staff Sergeant Marvin ``Rex'' 
Young of the Army were both posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for 
their heroic actions in the Vietnam War.
    (b) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs community-
based outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Wilson and Young 
Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilson and 
Young Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2019065EN.01001901.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Full Chamber) of 10 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session (Scotland), Edinburgh — United Kingdom) — Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

(Case C-621/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 50 TEU - Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union - Consequences of the notification - Right of unilateral revocation of the notification - Conditions))

(2019/C 65/24)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Session (Scotland), Edinburgh

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Andy Wightman, Ross Greer, Alyn Smith, David Martin, Catherine Stihler, Jolyon Maugham, Joanna Cherry

Defendant: Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

Interveners: Chris Leslie, Tom Brake

Operative part of the judgment

Article 50 TEU must be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has notified the European Council, in accordance with that article, of its intention to withdraw from the European Union, that article allows that Member State — for as long as a withdrawal agreement concluded between that Member State and the European Union has not entered into force or, if no such agreement has been concluded, for as long as the two-year period laid down in Article 50(3) TEU, possibly extended in accordance with that paragraph, has not expired — to revoke that notification unilaterally, in an unequivocal and unconditional manner, by a notice addressed to the European Council in writing, after the Member State concerned has taken the revocation decision in accordance with its constitutional requirements. The purpose of that revocation is to confirm the EU membership of the Member State concerned under terms that are unchanged as regards its status as a Member State, and that revocation brings the withdrawal procedure to an end.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais—CEMIG (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luiz Fernando Rolla, Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                      | /s/ Luiz   Fernando Rolla                                |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Name:Luiz   Fernando Rolla                               |
|                      | Title:Chief Officer for Finance and Investor   Relations |
| Date: April 30, 2014 |                                                     |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Order entered March 20, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01132-CR

TONNIEL MARQUIS BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-11801-U

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Sasha Brooks’s March 17, 2020 second 

request for additional time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request 

and ORDER the reporter’s record filed by April 13, 2020. We caution Ms. Brooks 

that further extensions are disfavored.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-60897 Summary Calendar

HUGO MAIRENA-MONCADA, also known as Hugo Moncada Mairena,
Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A088 809 225

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hugo Mairena-Moncada petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dis m i s s a l of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s order denying withholding of removal. The BIA’s determination that an alien is not eligible for withholding of removal is a finding of fact reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. E.g. , Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). “We will affirm the B[IA]’s decision unless the evidence c ompels a contrary conclusion.” Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 29, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-60897 Document: 00511678196 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2011No. 10-60897

Maire n a contends the BIA erred in determining he did not demonstrate
p a s t persecution. Substantial evidence supports that findin g
. M air e n a’ s ac c o u nt of verbal threats over a four to five month period and one physical attack does not constitute past persecution. See Eduard v. Ashcroft , 379 F.3d 182, 187-88 (5th Cir. 2004); Abdel-Masieh v. INS, 73 F.3d 579, 583-84 (5th Cir. 19 96). Mairena also contends the BIA erred in determining he had n o t established a well-founded fear of future persecution. Because Mairena’s abovedescribed past treatment does not amount to persecution, it does not support a presumption of future persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1)(i) (showing of past persecution results in rebuttable presumption life wi l l be threatened in future). Additionally, Mairena’s gener alized fear of violence cannot constitute

a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Eduard , 3 7 9 F.3d at 190. Further, the reasonableness of Mairena’s fear of future per s ecution is diminished because a number of M a irena’s family members have continued to reside in Nicaragua and have remained unharmed. Id. at 193. DENIED.

2 Case: 10-60897 Document: 00511678196 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2011
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of North Shore Acquisition Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Barry
      J.
      Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: August 13, 2008
              
              /s/
                Barry J. GordonName:Barry
                J. GordonTitle:Chairman
                  and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**[LETTERHEAD OF THOMPSON, GREENSPON & CO., P.C.]**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Millennium Bankshares Corporation — Form S-8,Registration No. 333-101076, and Form S-8, Registration No. 333-101077 — and in the prospectus related to each, of our report dated January 31, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Millennium Bankshares Corporationincluded in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Millennium Bankshares Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/  Thompson, Greenspon & Co., P.C. 

 

Fairfax, Virginia 

March 30, 2004