alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    March 30, 2006By:
    
    /s/ Robert M. Friedland

Robert M. FriedlandChief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pluristem Life Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Irit Arbel, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Irit Arbel/s/ Irit ArbelPresident and Chief Executive
Officer

October 14, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00458-CV

Axelle Francine PARKER,

Appellant

v.

William A. PARKER II,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI15237

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant Axelle Francine Parker.

SIGNED January 20, 2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2530 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2530

  To provide temporary authority to the general counsel of the Merit 
 Systems Protection Board to grant stays of personnel actions, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2019

 Mr. Connolly (for himself and Mr. Cummings) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide temporary authority to the general counsel of the Merit 
 Systems Protection Board to grant stays of personnel actions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interim Stay Authority To Protect 
Whistleblowers Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR MSPB GENERAL COUNSEL TO ISSUE STAYS OF 
              PERSONNEL ACTIONS.

    During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act and ending on the first date after such date of enactment that an 
individual is confirmed by the Senate as a member of the Merit Systems 
Protection Board under section 1201 of title 5, United States Code, the 
general counsel of the Board shall carry out the functions and 
authorities relating to stays of personnel actions provided to a member 
of the Board under subparagraph (A), or to the Board under subparagraph 
(B), (C), or (D), of section 1214(b)(1) of such title.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY FOR MSPB MEMBER TO CARRY OUT DUTIES OF THE BOARD IN 
              THE EVENT OF A LACK OF QUORUM.

    Section 1214(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by inserting after ``The Board'' 
        the following: ``, or, if the Board lacks the number of members 
        appointed under section 1201 required to constitute a quorum, 
        any remaining member of the Board,''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (D), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by striking ``A stay may be terminated by the Board at any 
        time, except that a stay may not be terminated by the Board'' 
        and inserting the following: ``A stay may be terminated by the 
        Board, or, if the Board lacks the number of members appointed 
        under section 1201 required to constitute a quorum, any 
        remaining member of the Board, at any time, except that a stay 
        may not be terminated by the Board or any remaining member of 
        the Board (as the case may be)''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50885

Summary Calendar

David Roy Hutchings, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

County of Llano, Texas; Llano County Sheriff’s 

Office; 424th Judicial District Court, Llano County, 

Texas; Llano Central Appraisal District; Llano County 

Tax Assessor/Collector; Llano Independent School 

District; Llano County Emergency Services; Ron 

Cunningham, Llano County Judge; Judge Evan Stubbs, Llano 

County; Bill Blackburn, Sheriff of the Llano County Sheriff’s Office; 

Scott Dudley, Llano Central Appraisal District; Kris Fogelberg, 

Officer in the Llano County Tax Assessor/Collector’s Office; Mac 

Edwards, Officer/Superintendent of the Llano ISD; Gilbert 

Bennett, Officer of Llano County Emergency Services; Joyce Gillow, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CV-308

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50885 Document: 00516323852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2022
No. 20-50885

2

Per Curiam:

David Roy Hutchings, proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his 

civil lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. “This Court must 

examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley 

v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a 

jurisdictional prerequisite when, as herein, the time limit is set by statute. See 

Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 16-17, 21 (2017); 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

Hutchings filed a notice of appeal on October 15, 2020, outside of the 

30-day window for filing a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. 

P. 4(a)(1)(A). We construe his notice of appeal, which asserted reasons for 

his untimely filing, as a motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

4(a)(5)(A) to extend the time to file a notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the district court for the 

limited purpose of ruling on this motion and determining whether there is 

excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. Upon making this 

finding, the district court shall return the case to this court for dismissal or 

further proceedings, as may be appropriate.

Case: 20-50885 Document: 00516323852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/18/2022
NEX SEF LIMITED 

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London E1 6PW

United Kingdom

July 2, 2019

Via Email

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts

Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: Amended FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“Applicant”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) a rule certification in NEX SEF-2019-R-6 pursuant to CFTC Reg. 40.6 in order 

to issue a Market Regulation Advisory Notice (“Certification”). Attached as Exhibit B to the 

Certification is MRAN 2019-02. This letter amends the FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

previously filed with respect to MRAN 2019-02 by updating the address of the Applicant. 

The Applicant hereby requests that MRAN 2019-02 as set forth in Exhibit B to the Certification 

(“Confidential Information”) be treated as confidential in order to prevent disclosure of 

Applicant’s trade secrets and confidential commercial and financial information upon a request 

under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). We request the Confidential Information be 

provided confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, London Fruit and 

Wool Exchange, 1 Duval Square, London E1 6PW, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by NEX SEF

LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying numbers and codes, as applicable: NEX SEF-2019-R-6-Exhibit B. 
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London E1 6PW

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 245640835
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008.  The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   Februarty
17, 2009
               
/s/ Fred
Zolla


Fred
Zolla


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)














Dated:   Februarty
17, 2009   
             /s/ Craig
Stout


Craig
Stout


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)
#### TYSON v. DUKE UNIVERSITY

No. 340P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 153

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998.
#### Janetta SCONIERS and Tiyeondrea McGlothin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mario SANTOS, in his individual and official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-15601.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 6, 2010.

Janetta Sconiers, Fresno, CA, pro se.

Tiyeondrea McGlothin, Fresno, CA, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Janetta Sconiers and Tiyeondrea McGlothin appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from their eviction from low income housing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order).

We affirm the dismissal of the action for failure to state a claim for the reasons provided in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation entered on December 8, 2008, and adopted by the district court on February 26, 2009.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. *See Gardner v. Martino,*563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.2009) (“A district court does not err in denying leave to amend where the amendment would be futile.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel because they failed to demonstrate “exceptional circumstances.” *Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).

The remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mickey Cass, Appellant.

Submitted January 30, 2012;

decided February 16, 2012

Reported below, 79 AD3d 768.

Motion for removal of assigned counsel and permission to proceed pro se on appeal denied. Motion to enlarge the record on appeal denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/   John R. HawkinsJohn R. HawkinsChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2007








---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

The C2 Advisory Group Meeting will meet in Langley Air Force Base, Virginia on May 24-25, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the direction of the study. This meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof.

For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-13007 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2246 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ``Deputy 
  Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPUTY DONALD WILLIAM DURR, CORPORAL ZACH MOAK, AND 
              PATROLMAN JAMES WHITE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Deputy Donald William Durr, Corporal 
Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ``Deputy 
  Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 10.3(b)


          Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (refinancing) Issued by
             NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on October 18, 2005


                                                                     Conversion
        Issue Date           Due Date            Principal             Price
      --------------      --------------      ---------------       ------------
         10/18/05            04/18/06          $ 968,035.46           $ 0.0049
## 2001 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

7-11-2001 

# A D B edel l W holes ale v

. P hi li p M or r i s I nc

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ocke t 00-3410

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2001 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" A D Be de l l W ho le s ale v

. P hi l ip M or r i s I nc " (2001). 2001 D e cisio n s

. P ape r 153. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001/153

### Filed July 11, 2001

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 00-3410

A.D. BEDELL WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC.; TRIANGLE CANDY & TOBACCO CO., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants

v.

PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED; R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.; BROWN AND WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania D.C. Civil Action No. 99-cv-00558 (Honorable Donetta W. Ambrose)
Argued December 14, 2000
Before: SCIRICA, FUENTES and GARTH, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the caption of the slip opinion in the above case, filed June 19, 2001, be amended at page 2 by adding
Dennis J. O'Brien, Esquire USX Tower, Suite 660 600 Grant Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

### as an additional attorney for appellants. Mr . O'Br ien's name

and address shall be added immediately below that o f Alan R. Wentzel, Esquire.

BY THE COURT,
/s/ Anthony J. Scirica Circuit Judge

DATED: July 11, 2001

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2