alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTORIA MISHUSTINA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-70513

Agency No. A077-427-431

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 16, 2010** 

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Victoria Mishustina petitions for review of a final decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen a proceeding in which she was

denied asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality

FILED

AUG 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158, 1231(b)(3), and denying her motion for reinstatement of

voluntary departure, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229c. 

 A motion to reopen must ordinarily be filed within ninety days after the

final decision of the BIA. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Mishustina’s was not. 

Mishustina seeks to avail herself of the exception to the timing requirement for

cases in which there are “changed circumstances arising in the country of

nationality or in the country to which deportation has been ordered, if such

evidence is material and was not available and could not have been discovered or

presented at the previous hearing.” Id. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). But to show changed

circumstances, Mishustina points only to Russian laws that had already been

enacted at the time of her hearing. These laws could have been discovered or

presented at Mishustina’s original hearing. Her motion to reopen was untimely. 

The BIA reviewed Mishustina’s motion to reopen under its established

standard for untimely motions to reopen. In re Beckford, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1216

(BIA 2000). The BIA did not abuse its discretion by failing to reopen based upon

the limited evidence that Mishustina presented. See He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d

1128, 1133 (9th Cir. 2007).

Mishustina’s petition for review also suggests that the BIA abused its

discretion in refusing to reinstate her voluntary departure. We lack jurisdiction to
3

review the BIA’s decision to grant or deny a request for voluntary departure. 

Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004) (order).

The petition for review is DENIED.
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 24-054

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 01/08/24 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - January 1, 2024

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
20 S Wacker Dr Chicago, IL 60606 T 312 466 7478 tim.elliott@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

January 8, 2024

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 24-054

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of January 1, 

2024: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 24-003 (January 4, 2024), Review of Collateral Haircuts - Effective January 

4, 2024

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 24-004 (January 4, 2024), January 2024 Corporate Bond, Stock and ETF 

Update - Effective January 4, 2024

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 24-005 (January 4, 2024), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture, 

Equities, FX Margins - Effective January 5, 2024

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (312) 466-7478.

Sincerely,

/s/ Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00576-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF DEBORA SUE MAUN, DECEASED

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-PR-00281-4A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 4, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period
ending May 31, 2008 of River Exploration, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Andrew Aird, Chairman, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.


/s/ ANDREW AIRD
_____________________________________________
Andrew Aird
President, Secretary Treasurer,
Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Sole Director


Date: July 14, 2008
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1309

Crude Oil Basis Swap - Argus WTS (1st month) - Argus Media TMA

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of Argus WTS (1st month) for 

a specific set of dates.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus WTS (1st month) differential weighted average (Diff weighted average) index price from 

Argus Media, which is based on the weighted average index price of Argus WTS (1st month)

minus the "WTI Formula Basis" price from Argus Media, for the trade month period beginning 

with the first business day after the 25th calendar day two months prior to the contract month 

through the last business day that falls on or before the 25th calendar day of the month prior to 

the contract month. If the 25th calendar day is a weekend or holiday, the Trade month period 

shall end on the first business day prior to the 25th calendar day.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
ROCKIES
REGION 2007 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


(A West
Virginia Limited Partnership)








Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-Q/A as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/
      Richard W. McCullough
            
            December
      10, 2008Richard
      W. McCulloughChief
      Executive Officer
              Petroleum
      Development Corporation,
              Managing
      General Partner of the Registrant





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.7****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name as a Qualified Person for thesubsection on open pit mine geotechnical in the Oyu Tolgoi Technical Report dated March 30, 2007,under the heading “Item 3: Description of the Business – Oyu Tolgoi Copper and Gold Project” in theCompany’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2006, dated March 30, 2007, andin the 40-FSincerely,   */s/ Allan Haines* Title: Principal Geotechnical Consultant  Company: Steffen Robertson Kirsten(Australia) Pty Ltd.  Date: March 30, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.20


[*] The asterisk denotes that confidential portions of this exhibit have been
omitted in reliance on Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
confidential portions have been submitted separately to the Securities and
Exchange Commission.




                               [EXELON LETTERHEAD]

Exelon Generation Company, LLC 800-355-8326
300 Exelon Way
Kennett Square, PA 19348


TO: Ian Carter

COMPANY:    Commonwealth Energy Corporation (d/b/a/ electricAMERICA)

      This confirmation letter ("Letter") shall confirm the agreement reached on
      July 22, 2003, between Commonwealth Energy Corporation and Exelon
      Generation Company, LLC, for the sale and purchase under the terms and
      conditions as follows:

Seller: Exelon Generation Company, LLC ("Exelon")

Buyer: Commonwealth Energy Corporation ("Commonwealth")

Product: Firm (LD) Energy

Term: 24 Months

Start Date: Hour Ending 0100 January 1, 2004

End Date: Hour Ending 2400 December 31, 2005

Quantity: [Confidential Treatment Requested]*

Schedule: 7 x 24 (around the clock)

Delivery Point: PECO Transmission Zone, PJM Interconnection

Price: [Confidential Treatment Requested]*

Operations: Exelon will initiate a contract or contracts in eSchedules or its
successor. Such contract or contracts will be designated as "real-time" and will
identify PECO Zone as source and sink.
<PAGE>
Payment:  Exelon will bill Commonwealth twice per month in arrears in
accordance with the following billing schedule:

[Confidential Treatment Requested]*


Enabling Authority: This Confirmation is entered into under that certain EEI
Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement between Commonwealth and Exelon dated as
of July 1, 2003 (the "Master Agreement"). In the case of a conflict between the
terms of this Confirmation and the Master Agreement, the terms of this
Confirmation will govern over those of the Master Agreement. All terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Master Agreement.


                                      -2-
<PAGE>
EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC           COMMONWEALTH ENERGY CORPORATION




By:   /S/ IAN MCLEAN /KWC                        By:   /S/ IAN B. CARTER
    ----------------------------------              ----------------------------
Name: Ian McLean                                 Name: Ian B. Carter

Title: President of Exelon Power Team            Title: Chairman & CEO




                                       -3-
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Kerry J. McCullagh, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Contact Minerals Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    |                             
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Kerry J. McCullagh
| | Name:  | KERRY J. MCCULLAGH          
| |        |                             
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and 
| |        | Chief Financial Officer     
| |        |                             
| | Date:  | June
      14, 2010         

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pax Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Leslie
      Hammond, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      14th
      day of December 2007.




/s/
      Paul Leslie
      Hammond


Principal
      Executive Officer, Financial Officer


and
      Accounting Officer
S06Y1432.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES S. QUAY.

(640 SE2d 290)

Per curiam.

James S. Quay, a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 2000, pled guilty to and was sentenced in 2005 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas for one count of filing a false income tax return, a felony. See 26 USC § 7206 (1). Conviction of a felony is a violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d), with the maximum penalty for such violation being disbarment. The State Bar of Georgia filed a petition for a hearing under the Georgia Rules of *550Professional Conduct at which hearing respondent Quay was required to show cause why he should not be disbarred for violating Rule 8.4 (a) (2). Quay filed a petition for voluntary discipline in which he set forth his educational background (M.S. in Accounting, L.L.M. in Taxation) and his involvement in providing clients with income tax return preparation and advanced asset protection systems, among them a Common Law Business Organization.* After conducting a hearing, the special master concluded Quay’s guilty plea constituted a violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) and that filing his own false tax return was serious criminal conduct involving dishonesty and entailed a dishonest or selfish motive. The special master found that Quay’s conduct caused clients serious or potentially serious injury and demonstrated a failure to understand fundamental legal doctrines. After acknowledging Quay’s lack of a disciplinary record, his evidence of good character and interim rehabilitation, and the fact that he had suffered other penalties as a result of his conduct, the special master recommended that Quay’s petition for voluntary discipline be rejected and that he be disbarred.

Decided January 22, 2007.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State*Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

After reviewing the record, we concur in the recommendations of the special master and agree that disbarment is the proper sanction for Quay’s conduct. Quay is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c). It is hereby ordered that his name be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*

 In his voluntary petition Quay sought imposition of an 18-month suspension of his license to practice law in Georgia.
Nodal Exchange, LLC Rulebook Appendix C: Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and Position Limits**

Physical 

Commodity 

Code

Contract Name

Reporting 

Level

Spot Month 

Position Limit 

(lots)

Spot Month 

Accountability Level 

(lots)

Single Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

All Month 

Accountability Level 

(lots)

Aggregation 

Group*

MCJ MA SREC Carve Out II V26 Future 25 37380 37380 37380

MRJ MD SREC V26 Future 25 12000 12000 12000

NSJ NJ SREC V26 Future 25 45000 45000 45000

PSJ PA SAEC V26 Future 25 10000 10000 10000

WSH CCA Specific V24 Future 25 4500 4500 4500

* In addition to the individual position limit of each contract, Nodal Exchange has a separate algorithm to check the combined position limit of contracts within the 

same aggregation group.

** For Options expiring during, or at the close of, the Underlying Contract's delivery period, the combined Underlying Contract and futures-equivalent Options position 

will be subject to the position limit established for the Underlying Contract.

*** Reporting Level for Option is 25.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

September 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51111 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS JOSE LOZANO-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(EP-99-CR-1497-3)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Jose Lozano-Ramirez appeals his convictions for

conspiracy to possess, and possession, with the intent to

distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. He challenges the

sufficiency of the evidence.

Lozano’s presence a t certain places and times supports the

jury’s finding that he was a member of the conspiracy. S ee United

States v. Turner , 319 F.3d 716, 721 (5th Cir.)(mere presence will2

not alone support an inference of conspiracy; however, this factor

may be considered in finding conspiratorial activity), c ert.

denied

, 123 S. Ct. 1939 (2003); United St ates v. Paul , 142 F.3d

836, 840 (5th Cir. 1998) (jury may find par ticipation from

defendant’s presence when presence would be unreasonable for anyone

other than a knowledgeable participant). In addition, Benjamin

Haro, a co-defendant, testified that Lozano and an other codefendant were “working for the bosses” and “in charge”. Because

Haro’s testimony was not “factually insubstantial or incredible”,

it is sufficient evidence to support Lo zano’s conspiracy

conviction. United States v. Westbrook , 119 F.3d 1176, 1190 (5th

Cir. 1997). In sum, “a reasonable trier of fact could have found

that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”.

United States v. Mendoza , 226 F.3d 340, 343 (5th Cir. 2000).

Lozano’s brief lists the suff iciency of evidence supporting

his possession with intent to distribute conviction as an issue on

appeal, but he does not discuss the issue in his brief. Because he

has failed to brief this issue, it is abandoned. See F ED

. R. A PP

.

P. 28 (a)(9)(A); e.g., Yohey v. Collins

, 985 F.2d 222, 224 (5th

Cir. 1993)(failure to specifically brief issue results in its

abandonment).

AFFIRMED