alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SWAPE YX

September 8, 2014

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: submissions@ecfte.gov

Melissa Jurgens

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: — SwapEx Submission 07-14: Certification Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6; Rule
Amendments to Product Specifications

Dear Ms. Jurgens:

SwapEx, LLC (“SwapEx”) hereby notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the
“Commission” o r “ CFTC”), p ursuant to C ommission R egulation 40 .6(a), that it is certifying
amendments to the product specifications of the 13 non-deliverable foreign exchange forwards
(“NDFs”) that are currently listed for trading on SwapEx’s electronic trading system (the
“Trading System’). The amended specifications will become effective on September 23, 2014.
These amendments clarify and make explicit existing aspects of these products.

This submission letter contains the following attachments:
° The CFTC submission cover sheet.

e Attached as Exhibit A, a clean copy of the amended specifications, which will be published
pursuant to SwapEx’s procedures for contract specifications on SwapEx’s website in
accordance with SwapEx Rule 901(c).

e Attached as Exhibit B, a copy of the specifications marked to show the amendments being
made to the existing version of the specifications.

SwapEx certifies that these amendments comply with the CEA and Commission Regulations
thereunder. SwapEx additionally certifies that it has concurrently posted a copy of this
submission letter and attachments hereto on SwapEx’s website at
http://www.swapex.com/swapex/rules-policies-and-notices/recent-rule-filings-cftc/.

* * *

In the event that you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (312) 798-6517 or at
BJRegan@statestreet.com,


Sincerely,

Mi Uo bees,
Brian J. oi
Bean Bean

Encl. (Exhibits A and B)

ce: Mark Schlegel
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH EUGENE HOOVER

No. 128PA98

(Filed 9 October 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 749, 496 S.E.2d 851 (1998), finding no error in judgments entered 18 October 1996 by Stephens (Ronald L.), J., in Superior Court, Randolph County, upon jury verdicts of guilty of possession with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver cocaine and knowingly maintaining a dwelling for the use, keeping, or selling of a controlled substance. Heard in the Supreme Court 29 September 1998.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, and William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Robert T. Newman, Sr., for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### ERNEST K. LEHMANN & ASSOCIATES OF MONTANA, INC. and Mount Royal Joint Venture, Appellants v. Kenneth Lee SALAZAR, et al., Appellees.

No. 09-5148.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 24, 2010.

Steven J. Lechner, Esquire, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Lakewood, CO, for Appellants.

Robert H. Oakley, Justin Robert Pidot, R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Before: HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

*29*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. *See*D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Appellants Ernest K. Lehmann *&*Associates of Montana, Inc. and Mount Royal Joint Venture challenge the IBLA’s determination that appellants did not establish “discovery,” *see*30 U.S.C. § 23, on six mining claims located in the Sweet Grass Hills of Liberty County, Montana, as well as the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees. We hold that the district court correctly determined that appellants’ challenge to the applicable burden of proof fails under *Foster v. Seaton,*271 F.2d 836, 838 (D.C.Cir.1959). We note, moreover, that the burden of proof that the IBLA applied to these claims, and that appellants challenge on appeal, was the same standard that appellants cited in their briefs before the IBLA. For the reasons stated by the district court, we also conclude that the IBLA’s decision — including its application of the prudent-man, *Chrisman v. Miller,*197 U.S. 313, 322-23, 25 S.Ct. 468, 49 L.Ed. 770 (1905), and marketability tests, *United States v. Coleman,*390 U.S. 599, 602, 88 S.Ct. 1327, 20 L.Ed.2d 170 (1968), to the mining claims at issue — was neither arbitrary nor capricious. We further conclude, again for the reasons stated by the district court, that substantial evidence supports the IBLA’s determination that the Bureau of Land Management established a prima facie case contesting the claims’ validity, a case that appellants failed to overcome.

The Clerk is directed to withhold the issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
July 24, 2009





By:
                  /s/
      Asher ZwebnerName:
                  Asher
      ZwebnerTitle:
                  Interim
      Chief Executive Officer,
                    Financial
      Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive, Financial and
                    Accounting
      Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gérard Lamarche, certify that:

1.

I
  have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of SUEZ;

2.

Based
  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
  with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.

Based
  on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
  the periods presented in this report.



Date: February 1, 2007

| |  | /s/ Gérard Lamarche                    
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | Gérard Lamarche
Chief Financial Officer
#### Graham *vs.*Eastman.

This court will never interfere with the first grant of a new trial where there is any evidence at all upon which a different verdict could be sustained.

*(a.)*Where a plaintiff in ejectment does not rely upon possession, but undertakes to show title, he must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of that of his adversary; and where there are circumstances which might warrant a verdict for the defendant, the court below will'not be reversed for granting a new trial after a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor.

Judgment affirmed.

October 27, 1885.

Hall, Justice.
# C_2019295EN.01002001.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — PlasticsEurope v ECHA

(Case T-185/17) (1)

(REACH - Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Inclusion in that list of Bisphenol A as a substance which is toxic for reproduction - Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006)

(2019/C 295/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PlasticsEurope (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Cana, É. Mullier and F. Mattioli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and N. Herbatschek, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented initially by: D. Colas, J. Traband and B. Fodda and subsequently by D. Colas, J. Traband and E. de Moustier, acting as Agents), ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Kirch, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of ECHA’s decision of 4 January 2017 (ED/01/2017) by which Bisphenol A was included in the list of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3), as referred to in Article 59(1) of that regulation, on the ground that that substance had been identified as toxic for reproduction within the meaning of Article 57(c) of Regulation No 1907/2006.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PlasticsEurope to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PlasticsEurope to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

---
Exhibit 10.2





Exhibit 10.2




VIA FEDEX ENVELOPE




August 26, 2010




Mr. Gregory J. Bayne

Contracting Officer

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20260-6210





			
	RE:	 	Transportation Agreement dated July 31, 2006 (the “Transportation Agreement”)

between the United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) and Federal Express Corporation

(“FedEx”)

Change in Conversion Factor






Dear Mr. Bayne:



As provided in the previously amended Paragraph A.1.a. of Exhibit B to the Transportation
Agreement, the USPS and FedEx agree that the Conversion Factor is [ * ] effective on the September
Schedule Period that begins on August 30, 2010.



By signing this letter, the USPS and FedEx agree to this amendment of the Transportation Agreement.
All capitalized terms have the meanings set out in the Transportation Agreement.



Please sign both counterparts of this letter, retain one for the USPS’ records, and return the
other fully executed counterpart to:




Myla Williams

Legal Department

Federal Express Corporation

3620 Hacks Cross Road

Building B, 3rd Floor

Memphis, Tennessee 38125

(901) 434-8362





	 	 	 
	*	 	Blank spaces contained confidential information which has been filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.




 


 









 





Federal Express Corporation

Letter Agreement

August 26, 2010




If you should have any questions, please call Myla Williams at (901) 434-8362 or Ron Stevens at
(901) 434-8954. Thank you.



Sincerely,




FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION




/S/ PAUL J. HERRON




Paul J. Herron

Vice President

Postal Transportation Management




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 30th day of August, 2010.




THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE




	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ GREGORY BAYNE
	 
	 	 
	Its:

	 	Contractor Officer
	 

	 	The “USPS”
	 
	 	 
	cc:

	 	Mary Taylor
	 

	 	William J. Jones
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7432

ALBERT JOHNSON, III, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JAMES PENDERGRAPH, Sheriff, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00305-GCM) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Albert Johnson, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Albert Johnson, III, appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pendergraph, No. 

3:09-cv-00305-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
China Agro Sciences Corp. (the “Company”) on Third Amended Form 10-K/A for the
year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhengquan Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April
      1, 2008
            /s/
      Zhengquan WangBy:  Zhengquan
      WangIts:  President








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Agro Sciences Corp. and will be retained by China Agro Sciences Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 99.1

Press Release:



For Immediate Release



South Carolina Department of Insurance Approves

Acquisition of KMG America by Humana



Minneapolis, MN  November 27, 2007  KMG America Corporation (KMG America) (NYSE: KMA) announced today that on November 26, 2007, Humana Inc. (Humana) received the South Carolina Department of Insurances approval of the proposed acquisition of KMG America by Humana as previously announced on September 7, 2007. Such approval satisfies one of the conditions to the closing of the acquisition.



The acquisition remains subject to customary closing conditions. The closing of the acquisition is expected to occur on November 30, 2007.



About KMG America Corporation



KMG America is a holding company that was formed to acquire the Southeastern regional insurance company, Kanawha Insurance Company, and to operate and grow Kanawhas insurance and other related businesses nationwide. KMG America offers a broad mix of individual and group insurance products, along with third-party administration services to employers and individuals. For more information, visit:www.kmgamerica.com.



Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements



Certain statements in this press release are forward-looking as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements as to the expected timing, completion and effects of the proposed acquisition. Such forward-looking statements are based on facts and conditions as they exist at the time such statements are made as well as predictions as to future facts and conditions the accurate prediction of which may be difficult and involve the assessment of events beyond the control of KMG America. Due to known and unknown risks, actual results may differ materially from expectations or projections. KMG America does not undertake any obligations to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, relating to matters discussed in this press release.



The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements: the parties may be unable to complete the acquisition because, among other reasons, conditions to the closing of the acquisition may not be satisfied or waived; or other factors that may be referred to in KMG Americas reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. There can be no assurance that other factors not currently anticipated by KMG America will not materially and adversely affect future events. Viewers of this press release are cautioned to consider these risks and uncertainties and not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements.



Contact:
        Tim Daniels


Ph: (952) 930-4807

tim.daniels@kmgamerica.com





---
Exhibit 21

Subsidiary of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.

|                               |                                                                                                  
|------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Citizens
  First National Bank | Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
  owns 100 percent of the shares
  Citizens First National Bank.

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

In connection with the annual report of Viscount Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 20, 2009 | /s/ Stephen Pineau                                               
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Stephen Pineau                                                   
|                      | Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer

---
Executive Order 13212

# Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to take additional steps to expedite the increased supply and availability of energy to our Nation, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1.***Policy.*                     The increased production and transmission of energy in a safe and environmentally sound manner is essential to the well-being of the American people. In general, it is the policy of this Administration that executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take appropriate actions, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to expedite projects that will increase the production, transmission, or conservation of energy.                

**Sec. 2.***Actions to Expedite Energy-Related Projects.*                    For energy-related projects, agencies shall expedite their review of permits or take other actions as necessary to accelerate the completion of such projects, while maintaining safety, public health, and environmental protections. The agencies shall take such actions to the extent permitted by law and regulation, and where appropriate.                

**Sec. 3.***Interagency Task Force.*                     There is established an interagency task force (Task Force) to monitor and assist the agencies in their efforts to expedite their review of permits or similar actions, as necessary, to accelerate the completion of energy-related projects, increase energy production and conservation, and improve transmission of energy. The Task Force also shall monitor and assist agencies in setting up appropriate mechanisms to coordinate Federal, State, tribal, and local permitting in geographic areas where increased permitting activity is expected. The Task Force shall be composed of representatives from the Departments of State, the Treasury, Defense, Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Justice, Commerce, Transportation, the Interior, Labor, Education, Health and Human Services, Energy, Veterans Affairs, the Environmental Protection Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, General Services Administration, Office of Management and Budget, Council of Economic Advisers, Domestic Policy Council, National Economic Council, and such other representatives as may be determined by the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality. The Task Force shall be chaired by the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality and housed at the Department of Energy for administrative purposes.                

**Sec. 4.***Judicial Review.*                    Nothing in this order shall affect any otherwise available judicial review of agency action. This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal Government and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law                           ( print page 28358)                        or equity by a party against the United States, its agencies or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other person.                

[FR Doc. 01-13117

Billing code 3195-01-P