alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, David Miller, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Philip BloomPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerDate: February 1, 2011/s/ David MillerPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate: February 1, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
exv4w1




     



Exhibit 4.1







	COMMON STOCK




	Core Site Realty Corporation
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSCUSIP 21870Q 10 5




	COMMON STOCK
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MARYLAND




	THISCERTIFIESTHATis the record holder ofFULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01
PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OFSEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSCUSIP 21870Q 10 5CoreSite Realty
Corporationtransferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly
authorized attorney, upon surrender of thisCertificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not
valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.




	Witness the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers.
DATED:




	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE




	BY:




	TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC(New York, NY)TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR





 









 










	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they
were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:




	TEN COM—as tenants in commonTEN ENT—as tenants by the entiretiesJT TEN—as joint tenants with
rightof survivorship and not astenants in commonAdditional abbreviations may also be used though
not in the above list.For value received,
hereby sell, assign and transfer untoTHE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND
WITHTHE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, INEVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, ORANY CHANGE WHATEVER.The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though theywere written out in
full according to applicable laws or regulations:NotiCe:SharesPLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEEof the common stock represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocablyconstitute and appointto transfer the said stock on the books of the
within-named Corporation with full power ofsubstitution in the premises.Dated,PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHERIDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEEPleaSe iNitial tHe aPProPriate SeleCtioN For tHiS
ProoF:oK?aS iSoK WitH CHaNGeSMaKe CHaNGeS aND SeND aNotHer ProoFUNIF GIFT MIN
ACT—......................... Custodian .........................(Cust)
(Minor)under Uniform Gifts to MinorsAct
        ..............................................................




	Attorney




	SiGNatUre(S) GUaraNteeD: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTORINSTITUTION




	(BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONSAND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE




	GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Plunkett, Appellant.

Submitted April 2, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 77 AD3d 1442.

Motion by American Academy of HIV Medicine et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Opinion issued Octob er 3 , 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 24
- 00466
- CV

——————————— IN RE SHELL RETAIL AND CONVENIENCE OPERATIONS LLC , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order granting real party in interest Instafuel Sellers’ Representative Wisam Nahhas ’ motion to compel the deposition of Peter Muschick, a non resident employee , to be taken in Houston, Texas . Relator moved for an emergency stay of the trial court’s order, which this Court granted.2

Relator has filed an agreed motion to dismiss this original proceeding as
moot, 1 asserting that Instafuel’s new counsel no longer seeks to depose Muschick in person in Houston and has agreed to depose him via remote electronic means. Relator states that the parties entered into a written agreement concerning Muschick’s deposition via remote electronic means. Accordingly, relator asserts that there is no longer a controversy between the parties and relator and Instafuel jointly ask that this Court dismiss the mandamus. The Court grants the motion and dismisses the proceeding. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1, 43.2(f). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. The stay granted by order of June 21, 2024 is lifted. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Rivas

- Molloy.

1 The underlying case is Instafuel LLC Sellers’ Representative, Wisam Nahhas v. Shell Retail and Convenience Operations LLC , cause number 2023

- 48496 , pending in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier presiding.
**                              **                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

 

I, C. Eugene Gronning, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2009 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
ACCEPTED07-14-00445-CVSEVENTH COURT OF APPEALSAMARILLO, TEXAS4/2/2015 4:23:25 PMVivian Long, Clerk
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1025

Natural Gas Basis Swap - NNG Demarc - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC NNG Demarc

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### Henry T. SANDERS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America and United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Appellees.

No. 05-5264.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 2, 2006.

*14Henry T. Sanders, Landover, MD, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Civil Appellate, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellees.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, the supplement thereto; and the appendix, and the supplements thereto, filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 9, 2005, and March 29, 2006, be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (providing for Supreme Court review, by way of writ of certiorari, of decisions of circuit courts of appeals). Furthermore, judges and court clerks “are immune from damage suits for performance of tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process.” *See Sindram v. Suda,*986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C.Cir.1993).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2436 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2436

    To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise the 
  definitions of a ``small business'' and ``small organization'' for 
purposes of assessing the impact of the Commission's rulemakings under 
                  the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2019

Mr. San Nicolas (for himself and Mr. Huizenga) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise the 
  definitions of a ``small business'' and ``small organization'' for 
purposes of assessing the impact of the Commission's rulemakings under 
                  the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investment Adviser Regulatory 
Flexibility Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SMALL BUSINESS OF SMALL ORGANIZATION.

    Not later than the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 
shall revise the definitions of a ``small business'' and ``small 
organization'' under section 275.0-7 of title 17, Code of Federal 
Regulations, to provide alternative methods under which a business or 
organization may qualify as a ``small business'' or ``small 
organization'' under such section. In making such revision, the 
Commission shall consider whether such alternative methods should 
include a threshold based on the number of nonclerical employees of the 
business or organization.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018005EN.01004701.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/47

---

Action brought on 4 October 2017 — De Longhi Benelux v EUIPO (COOKING CHEF GOURMET)

(Case T-697/17)

(2018/C 005/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: De Longhi Benelux SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Arnott, A. Nicholls, solicitors and G. Hollingworth, barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘COOKING CHEF GOURMET’ — Application for registration No 15 549 637

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2017 in Case R 231/2017-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | the Office shall bear its own costs of the proceedings before the Office and General Court and pay those of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Office shall bear its own costs of the proceedings before the Office and General Court and pay those of the Applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit      32**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                                                                        |                                 |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Dated:                March 31, 2008 | By:                                                                                                               | /s/              Bruce Littell  |
|                                 | Bruce                Littell Chairman,                  Chief Executive Officerand                  Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DANIEL JUNIOR JACKSON

No. 126PA98

(Filed 6 November 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 626, 495 S.E.2d 916 (1998), finding no error in a jury trial resulting in a judgment entered by Stanback, J., on 31 October 1996 in Superior Court, Durham County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 October 1998.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Jill B. Hickey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Mark E. Edwards for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVTDENTLY ALLOWED.
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  I, Eduard Korsinsky, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  August 14, 2008 /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I, Peter J. Christianson, Chief Financial Officer ofTitan Machinery Inc., certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Titan Machinery Inc.;

 

2              Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: January 11, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Peter J. Christianson             |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Peter J. Christianson                 |
|   | President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----