alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Fred Zolla, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMedicor, Inc;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:




a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and




c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.




6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




IMedicor, Inc.

(Registrant)Date: February 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Fred ZollaFred ZollaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 7892** 

BRUCE W. KOENIG ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; LIEUTENANT ELLSWORTH, Supervisor; INMATE GRIEVANCE OFFICE; SCOTT OAKLEY ,
Defendants

– Appellees ,
and

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS; THOMAS DEWBERRY, Chief Administrative Law Judge; JEROME WOODS, II, Administrative Law Judge ,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv

- 01087

- JFM )

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Bruce Wayne Koenig , Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Baltimore, Maryland, fo r Appellee s
.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Bruce Wayne Koenig appeals the district court ’ s order s
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint because
he failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required under

42 U.S.C. § 1997(e) (2006), and denying his motion for

reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Koenig v. Maryland , No. 1:12

- cv

- 01087

-

JFM (D. Md. Aug. 6, 2013; Oct. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before th is court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)
OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vinyl Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Douglas Brackin, Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Moore,
Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer), of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 10, 2012



|/s/ Douglas Brackin                 | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|Douglas Brackin                     | 
|Chief Executive Officer             | 
|                                    | 
|/s/ Keith Moore                     | 
|Keith Moore                         | 
|Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Vinyl Products, Inc. and will be retained by Vinyl Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.





Date:
      August 16, 2010
                      /s/
      Gordon KnottName: 
      Gordon KnottTitle:   
      Chief Executive Officer




Date:
      August 16, 2010
                        /s/
      Douglas E. WellsName: 
      Douglas E. WellsTitle:   
      Chief Financial Officer and
                          Principal Accounting Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12



COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

For Years Ended December 31

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)



|                                               |  | Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC |         
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | --------
|                                               |  | 2002                                 |         
|Earnings:                                      |  |                                      |         
|(Loss) Income from continuing operations       |  | $                                    | (579,465
|Fixed charges (see below)                      |  |                                      | 164,739 
|Income taxes*                                  |  |                                      | (362,513
|Amortization of capitalized interest           |  |                                      | 1,399   
|Income distributions of equity investees       |  |                                      |        
|Less: Capitalized interest                     |  |                                      | (10,025 
|Less: Income from unconsolidated investees     |  |                                      |        
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|Total Earnings (as defined)                    |  | $                                    | (785,865
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|Fixed Charges:                                 |  |                                      |         
|Interest expensed and capitalized              |  | $                                    | 159,710 
|Estimated interest component of rental expense |  |                                      | 5,029   
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|Total Fixed Charges (as defined)               |  | $                                    | 164,739 
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|                                               |  |                                      |         
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             |  |                                      | (A      

---

|* |  | Excludes the cumulative effect of an accounting change, minority interest, and extraordinary charges.
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(A) |  | For the year ended December 31, 2002, there is a deficiency of earnings to cover the fixed charges of $950,604.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1020

Natural Gas Basis Swap - MichCon - Platts Inside FERC

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of subtracting the price of the 

NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas futures contract, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly 

price published by Platts Inside FERC for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Platts Inside FERC MichCon

published price for the corresponding contract month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas 

futures contract final settlement price for the corresponding contract month on the last trading 

day for that contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each shall be valued as the 

contract quantity multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, as the ‘‘Stan Lundine 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. BISHOP of New 

York, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. HALL of New York, 

Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. LEE of New 

York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MAFFEI, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MASSA, Mrs. 

MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCMAHON, Mr. MEEKS of 

New York, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. 

SLAUGHTER, Mr. TONKO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Mr. WEINER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAN LUNDINE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in JamesVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:21 Feb 10, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H918.IH H918

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 918 IH

1 town, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Stan Lundine Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stan Lundine Post 

7 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 99.10

(GLJ LETTERHEAD)



INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS CONSENT





|Re: | EnCana CorporationAnnual Report on Form 40-F
|--- | --------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and our report
evaluating EnCana Corporations petroleum and natural gas reserves as at
December 31, 2003, and the information derived from our report, as described or
incorporated by reference in EnCana Corporations (i) Annual Report on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003; (ii) registration statement on Form
F-9 (File No. 333-98087); and (iii) registration statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-13956 and 333-85598), filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



| | Yours truly,
| | ------------



| | GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG
ASSOCIATES LTD.
| | -------------------------------------



| | ORIGINALLY SIGNED BY
| | --------------------



| | Harry Jung, P. Eng.
Executive Vice-President
| | --------------------------------------------

HJ/jem

February 25, 2004
Calgary, Alberta
GRANT OF E XTENSION P AGE 1 **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA**  **22 -**  **0154 DEBRA ANN CHRISTIAN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF**  **CLIFFORD CHRISTIAN ,**  **Plaintiff and**  **Appel lant**  **, vs.**  **UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant**  **and Appell**  **ee .**  **ON APPEAL FROM THE MONTANA FIRST**  **JUDICIAL**

**DISTRICT COURT HONORABLE**  **MIKE MENAHAN LEWIS AND CLARK**  **COUNTY CAUSE NO. A** **DV -**  **2018 -**  **1172**

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Pursuant to authority granted under the Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 26( 1 ), Appellee United Fire & Casualty Company is granted an extension of time until October 28 , 2022, to prepare, file and serve the Appellee’s Answer Brief. Dated this day of , 2022

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 28 2022

09/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0154
Exhibit 10.2







November 19, 2008



Mr. Fred Spivak

95 Mimosa Drive

Roslyn, NY 11576



Dear Fred:



Based on current circumstances, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the Board) of Lenox Group Inc. (the Company) has approved the following amendments to your offer of employment letter, dated October 1, 2007, as amended on May 7, 2008 (collectively, the Offer Letter):



1.  The Cash Bonus section is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



Cash Bonus:You will be eligible to participate in our annual cash incentive program with a target bonus opportunity of 55% of base salary, which could provide a maximum payout of 82.5%.  The cash bonus award associated with this program is dependent on Company performance.  Management gains Compensation Committee approval on annual performance metrics and bonuses are determined based on Company performance against these metrics. A definitive program document governs the cash bonus program.



For Fiscal 2007, the Company paid you a cash bonus in the amount of $125,000.00 which was the guarantee provided in your Offer Letter.  For Fiscal 2008, the Company will guarantee a cash bonus in the amount of $109,375.00 to be paid 50% ($54,687.50) on November 20, 2008 and 50% ($54,687.50) in the first quarter following the year close, provided you are employed by the Company at the end of this fiscal year. Said guaranteed bonus will be an offset against any cash bonus earned pursuant to the performance based bonus approved by the Board.



2.  The Relocation section is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



Relocation:You are eligible for Company relocation benefits as per our relocation policy.  For the period ending February 29, 2009 or at the time of your relocation, whichever occurs first, the Company will reimburse you for hotel and meals in accordance with the Companys Travel & Entertainment Policy for the days away from home on behalf of the Company plus reasonable commuting costs for two trips home per week.



---

Page 2





Please acknowledge your acceptance of this amendment to your Offer Letter by signing below and returning this signed letter to me.





Sincerely,

        Acknowledged and Accepted:/s/ Branka Hannon

        /s/ Fred SpivakBranka Hannon

        Fred SpivakDated:11-19-08








---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-10441

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANNIE DOBBINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-153-2-A

_________________________________________________________________ December 4, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Annie Dobbins pleaded guilty to maintain ing a place for the

purpose of distributing a controlled substance and aiding and

abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Dobbins appeals her sentence arguing that the district court erred

in enhancing her base offense level two levels for possession of a

firearm during a drug offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b).

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

find that the di strict court did not clearly err in imposing the-2-

enhancement. S ee United States v. Flucas

, 99 F.3d 177, 178 (5t h

Cir. 1996); United States v. Rodriguez

, 62 F.3d 723, 724-25 (5th

Cir. 1995).

Dobbins also argues that the district court erred by failing

to reduce her base offense level by two levels for acceptance of

responsibility pursuant to § 3E1.1. The defendant must prove that

she “clearly demonstrate[d] acceptance of responsibility fo r her

offense.” § 3E1.1. This court reviews the sentencing court’s

determination of acceptance of responsibility with greater

deference than under the clearly erroneous standard. § 3E1.1;

Flucas

, 99 F.3d at 180. Acceptance of responsibility may be

established if the defendant (1) enters a plea of guilty prior to

the commencement of trial, (2) truthfully admits th e conduct

comprising the offense of conviction, and (3) truthfully admits, or

does not falsely deny relevant co nduct for which she is

accoun table. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.3). Conduct evidencing

acceptance of responsibility may be outweighed, however, by conduct

that is inconsistent with such an acceptance. § 3E1.1, comment.

(nn.1(a) & 3). The district court did not clearly err in denying

Dobbins a reduction for accep tance of responsibility. Dobbins’s

conduct was in c onsistent with an acceptance of responsibility

because she showed no remorse or contrition, she refused to discuss

the facts of her offense with the officer who prepared the PSR and-3-

she falsely denied relevant conduct by arguing that no connection

existed between the revolver that was seized from her residence and

her drug activity. See U nited States v. Vital

, 68 F.3d 114, 121

(5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Chapa-Garza

, 62 F.3d 118, 123

(5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Helmstetter

, 56 F.3d 21, 23 (5th

Cir. 1995).

A F F I R M E D.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarter ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John K. Morgan                              
|John K. Morgan                                  
|Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
|January 10, 2008                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be
retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.