# C_2017402EN.01005701.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/57

---

Corrigendum to the Notice in the Official Journal in Case T-501/17

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 338 of 9 October 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 338 of 9 October 2017

(2017/C 402/75)

The Notice in Case T-501/17 Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España v Commission and SRB should read as follows:

Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España v Commission and SRB

(Case T-501/17)

(2017/C 338/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Mutualidad Complementaria de Previsión Social Renault España (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Solana López, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare invalid, and consequently annul, Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. transmitted to it by the Single Resolution Board, and also annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EEX/2017/08) on the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español S.A. with identification No 80H66LPTDLMOP28XF25; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare invalid, and consequently annul, Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. transmitted to it by the Single Resolution Board, and also annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EEX/2017/08) on the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español S.A. with identification No 80H66LPTDLMOP28XF25;

| — | In the alternative, if the General Court does not uphold the invalidity application above, declare the partial invalidity and annul in part SRB’s decision mentioned above in so far as it concerns Article 6(1)(b) and (c) of that decision, relating to the conversion and depreciation of 64 695 preference shares (classified erroneously as additional capital Tier 1 instruments of the Banco Popular Español), although they were instruments issued by POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. (ISIN D00910702). |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, if the General Court does not uphold the invalidity application above, declare the partial invalidity and annul in part SRB’s decision mentioned above in so far as it concerns Article 6(1)(b) and (c) of that decision, relating to the conversion and depreciation of 64 695 preference shares (classified erroneously as additional capital Tier 1 instruments of the Banco Popular Español), although they were instruments issued by POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. (ISIN D00910702).

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán El Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Alvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

---