alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6259

VICTOR KIRKLAND, a/k/a Victor Kirkland-Bey,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-708-PJM)

Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Kirkland, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Kirkland v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-708-PJM (D. Md.

Feb. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant-Respondent, v Edgar Morales, Respondent-Appellant.

Submitted April 16, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 147.

Motion by Center on the Administration of Criminal Law for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. CP98-150-000 and CP98-151-000]

From Monday, June 4 through Wednesday June 6, 2001, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a site visit of an alternative route along and within the Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. (ConEd) electric transmission and the Taconic State Parkway rights-of-way. This alternative is referred to as the ConEd Offset/Taconic Alternative and is between approximate mileposts 391.2 and 404.1 of the proposed Millennium Pipeline Project.

We will meet at the following locations on these dates and times:
    - Jane E. Lytle Memorial Arboretum parking area (go through the Hudson National Golf Course on Lounsbury Road, Croton-on-Hudson, New York) on June 4, 2001, at 12 noon; and
    - Teatown Lake Reservation Nature Center, 1600 Spring Valley Road, Ossining, New York, on June 5, 2001, at 9 am and will continue along the ConEd Offset/Taconic Alternative.

For further information call the Office of External Affairs, at (202) 208-0004.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13728 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131614 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 131614 

 COA: 269525 
 Ingham CC: 04-001475-FC

JOHNNY LEE HALL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 24, 2017

No. 04-17-00529-CR & 04-17-00530-CR

Zachary SCHULTZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-1592-CR-C & 16-1593-CR-C

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

These appeals were consolidated by order. Pursuant to that order, all documents filed in 

this court – except for the clerk’s records and reporter’s records – are to be filed in a single 

document that reference both appellate numbers. On October 23, 2017, the court reporter filed 

separate notifications of late record – one in each appellate cause number. This does not 

comport with this court’s prior consolidation order. Accordingly, we ORDER the court reporter, 

with regard to any future documents filed in this court, to file such documents in accordance with 

the court’s prior order of consolidation. In her notifications, she asks for an additional thirty 

days in which to file the reporter’s records. After review we GRANT the reporter’s requested 

extension and ORDER her to file the reporter’s records in this court on or before November 20, 

2017. The reporter is reminded that with regard to the reporter’s record, a separate 

record must be filed in each appellate cause number. 

 We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the 

court reporter.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of October, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Approach Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.Date: November 5, 2009
    /s/ Steven P. SmartSteven P. SmartExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michele E. LoBianco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
































/s/ Michele E. LoBianco


Michele E. LoBianco


Chief Financial Officer


Secretary and Treasurer


May 17, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

          1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all
reports on Form 8-K and Form 8-K/A containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
of Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1;

          2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

          4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

          5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date: March 30, 2004                        /s/Michael Frank Connor
                                            -----------------------
                                            Michael Frank Connor
                                            President
Consulting Agreement
 
  
 RECITALS
 
  
  
  
  
 AGREEMENT
 
  
 1.  DUTIES OF THE CONSULTANT
 
 Services
 
 Staffing
 
 Reliance
 
 1 
 2. COMPENSATION
 
 Retainer
 
 Warrants Exhibit B Exhibit C
 
 Success Fee
   
    
  
 3.  EXPENSES.
 
 4.  INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS.
 
 2
  5.  CONFIDENTIALITY
 
 Confidential Information
 
 Acceptance and Use of Confidential Information
 
 6.  INVENTIONS
 
 Definition
 
 Activities
 
 3
  
 
  
  
  
 7.  EQUITABLE REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT.
 
 8.  TERM AND TERMINATIONS
 
 Term
 
 Method of Termination
 
  
  
 4
   
  
 Effect of Termination
 
  
  
 Survival of Provisions
 
 9.   INDEMNIFICATION .
 
 5
  
 
 10. DISPUTES .
 
 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
 
 Notices
 
 
 If to the Company:      If to the Consultant:
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 6
  Nonwaivers of Rights
 
 Validity of Provisions: Severability
 
 Governing Law
 
 Assignments
 
 Entire Agreement: Amendments
 
 Counterparts
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 ___/s/ Bahram Yusefzadeh__________________    __/s/ Rich Parlontieri____________________
 
 
 
 7 
 EXHIBIT A
 
 
 
 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
 
 
   
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8
   Exhibit B
 
 
 
 
 
 
  9
433 West Van Buren Street › Suite 700S › Chicago, IL 60607 › cboe.com

October 31, 2023

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request:

Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d)

All:

Pursuant to § 145.9(d) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and pursuant 

to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Cboe Clear Digital, LLC (“CCD”) hereby petitions the 

Commission for confidential treatment of Exhibits A-P to the Self-Certification in connection with 

various CCD policies and procedures to supplement the expansion of its product offerings to include 

digital asset futures on a margined basis (CCD-2023-05C) submitted to the CFTC via the CFTC 

Portal on October 31, 2023 (“Covered Information”).

The Covered Information should be afforded confidential treatment based on, among other 

things, § 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations, which implements FOIA Exemption 4 of 

the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)), because disclosure would reveal CCD trade 

secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. CCD hereby requests that the Covered 

Information be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity.

CCD requests that the Commission notify CCD upon the receipt of any request by any party 

for any access under FOIA to the Covered Information or any court order, subpoena, or summons for 

disclosure of the Covered Information for the entire duration that the Commission retains the Covered

Information. CCD further requests notification in the event that the Commission intends to disclose

the Covered Information in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. CCD does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the

CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for the Covered Information.

The address at which CCD can be reached is as follows:

433 West Van Buren Street, Suite 700S

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Attention: General Counsel

Please contact me at kkirkpatrick@cboe.com or (312) 786-7431 if you have any questions
regarding this request.

Cboe Clear Digital, LLC

/s/ Katherine Kirkpatrick

By: Katherine Kirkpatrick, Chief Legal Officer
# PL & Accountability

# Table Notes

Diminishing Balance ContractsThere are specific futures contracts whose front month volume in any given contract month diminishes as the contract month progresses towards month end.Position LimitsPosition Limits shall be calculated on a net futures-equivalent basis by contract, and will include contracts that aggregate into one or more base contracts as set forth in the Table.  AccountabilitiesFor the purpose of  Chapter V, Section 13, Accountability levels will be calculated three separate ways:1. Spot Month/Single Month/All Month Accountability Levels will be calculated on a net futures-equivalent basis by contract, and will include contracts that aggregate into one or more base contracts as set forth in the Table.2. Spot Month/Single Month/All Month Accountability Levels will be calculated on a net futures-only basis. 3. Spot Month/Single Month/All Month Accountability Levels for options will be calculated per quadrant (long call, long put, short call, short put) on a gross basis. AggregationUsing the Spot-Month as an example, for contract that aggregate into only one base contract during the spot-month, the base contract will be identified in the “Spot-Month Aggregate Into Futures Equivalent Leg (1)” column and will denote a positive correlation with the base contract. The aggregation ratio for the Leg (1) base contract will be identified in the “Aggregate Into Ratio Leg (1)” column. For contracts that aggregate into two separate base contracts during the spot month, the base contract noted in the “Spot-Month Aggregate Into Futures Equivalent Leg (1)” column will denote a positive correlation, and the aggregation ratio for the Leg (1) base contract will be identified in the “Aggregate Into Ratio Leg (1)” column. The base contract noted in the “Spot-Month Aggregate Into Futures Equivalent Leg (2)” column will denote a negative correlation with respect to the base contract, and the aggregation ratio for the Leg (2) base contract will be identified in the “Aggregate Into Ratio Leg (2)” column.Aggregation of option positions shall be calculated on a net futures, delta-equivalent basis by contract month.  Individual option deltas can be found via the OCC OFRA file that is posted daily on the CME SPAN FTP website (ftp://ftp.cmegroup.com/pub/span/data/),  or the OCC Market Data Full - Prices Non-Propietary DDS transmission (http://www.theocc.com/components/docs/membership/dds_ref/ENCORE_DDS_Guide_Non_Proprietary_Transmissions.pdf). Please contact your OCC Member Services Representative if you have additional questions about accessing this information.
# C_2018182EN.01000802.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19 February 2018 — flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-130/18)

(2018/C 182/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Eurowings GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1) (‘the Air Passenger Rights Regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that there is no right to compensation in the event of cancellation less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure even in the case where the passenger is subject to a loss of time of less than three hours but more than two hours as a result of re-routing, because the actual arrival, in comparison with the scheduled arrival, is delayed by more than two hours but by less than three hours?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of March 31, 2011.  This Certification is executed as of May 16, 2011. VISION INDUSTRIES CORP. By:/s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Secretary, Treasurer,  and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/ALLAN LEGATORAllan Legator
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2335 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure compensation 

for certain hours of work for border patrol agents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure 

compensation for certain hours of work for border patrol 

agents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Patrol Pay Se5 curity Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS PAY FOR BORDER PATROL 

7 AGENTS. 

8 (a) PURPOSE.—The purposes of this Act are to 

9 strengthen U.S. Customs and Border Protection and en10 sure that border patrol agents are compensated for certain 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2335 IH

1 hours of work with premium pay for certain hours of over2 time work. 

3 (b) FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT PREMIUM PAY.— 

4 Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 

5 U.S.C. 207) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(t) EMPLOYMENT AS A BORDER PATROL AGENT.— 

8 No public agency shall be deemed to have violated sub9 section (a) with respect to the employment of any border 

10 patrol agent, as defined in paragraph (1) of section 5550 

11 of title 5, United States Code, if, during a work period 

12 of 14 consecutive days, the border patrol agent receives 

13 compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half 

14 times the regular rate at which he or she is employed for 

15 all hours of work from 80 hours to 100 hours. Payments 

16 required under this section shall be— 

17 ‘‘(1) in addition to any payments made under 

18 such section 5550; 

19 ‘‘(2) made notwithstanding any pay limitations 

20 set forth in that title; and 

21 ‘‘(3) paid as additional ‘half-time’ as the 

22 straight time portion shall be deemed paid for the 

23 hours for which payments under such section 5550 

24 have been made.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2335 IH

1 (c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

3 (29 U.S.C. section 213(a)) is amended by striking para4 graph (18). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  We hereby
consent to (i) the inclusion in EnCana Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F
for the year ended December 31, 2006; and (ii) the incorporation by reference
in registration statements on Form F-9 (File Nos. 333-133648, 333-133648-01 and
333-137182); and (iii) the incorporation by reference in registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-124218, 333-13956 and 333-85598), of our
audit report dated February 22, 2007, relating to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2006
and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of EnCana Corporation as of December 31, 2006.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered AccountantsCalgary, ABFebruary 23, 2007