alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017178EN.01003201.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/32

---

Action brought on 18 April 2017 — Rstudio v EUIPO — Embarcadero Technologies (RSTUDIO)

(Case T-230/17)

(2017/C 178/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rstudio, Inc. (Boston, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC, and G. Smith, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘RSTUDIO’ –International registration designating the European Union No 999 644

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2017 in Case R 493/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay to the applicant the costs of and occasioned by this appeal and the costs below; in the alternative, if the potential intervener actually intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener to be jointly and severally liable for the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal and the costs below. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay to the applicant the costs of and occasioned by this appeal and the costs below; in the alternative, if the potential intervener actually intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener to be jointly and severally liable for the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal and the costs below.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the goods for which proof of use had been established and, accordingly, failed to conduct the correct comparison of goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the goods for which proof of use had been established and, accordingly, failed to conduct the correct comparison of goods;

| — | The Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the similarity of the relevant goods and the similarity of the relevant marks and, accordingly, wrongly assessed the existence of the likelihood of confusion. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the similarity of the relevant goods and the similarity of the relevant marks and, accordingly, wrongly assessed the existence of the likelihood of confusion.

---
# C_2019139EN.01002001.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Manuel Jorge Sequeira Mesquita v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-278/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC - Exemption - Article 13B(b) - Leasing or letting of immovable property - Meaning - Contract for the transfer of the use of land comprising vineyards for agricultural purposes)

(2019/C 139/19)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Manuel Jorge Sequeira Mesquita

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax on the leasing or letting of immovable property provided for in that provision is applicable to a contract for transfer of the use of land comprising vineyards for agricultural purposes to a company engaged in viticulture, entered into for a period of one year, automatically renewable and under which rent is paid at the end of each year

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Great Spirits, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas Willis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated: November 15, 2010





By:
/s/ Thomas WillisThomas Willis

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer





This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great Spirits, Inc. and will be retained by Great Spirits, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6257.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Zebrowski appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Zebrowski,*No. 3:96-er-00041-JRS-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
www.ice.com

September 27, 2023

Re: ICE Clear Credit LLC Advance Notice of 

Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to 

Commission Regulation 40.10

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit LLC (“ICC”), a registered derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) under the Commodity 

Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), that has been designated by the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council as systemically important under Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act, hereby submits to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), 

pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.10 as an advance notice of the migration of ICC’s data centers, with 

an anticipated go-live date of December 10, 2023. ICC is proving notice to the Commission of this material 

change to its operation, there are no corresponding rule changes to this operational change. 

The purpose of this notification is to alert the Commission of the migration of ICC’s data centers related to 

ICC’s CDS Clearing Platform. ICC’s primary data center located in Chicago, Illinois will migrate to a new 

data center within the same facility/building. In addition, ICC’s secondary (disaster recovery and nonproduction) data center, currently located near Atlanta, Georgia will migrate to a data center located in 

Mahwah, New Jersey. Both data center relocations involve ICC’s core clearing systems. Additional details 

regarding the migrations are included on Exhibit 1. ICC has respectfully requested confidential treatment 

for Exhibit 1, which was submitted concurrently with this advance notice submission. 

ICC reviewed the DCO core principles as set forth in the Act. During this review, ICC identified the following 

Core Principles as potentially being impacted:

System Safeguards: 

ICC has identified risks associated with the data center migrations and will implement appropriate measures 

to mitigate such risks. This migration allows ICC to achieve operational efficiencies, including: maintain 

optimal information security protection, renewal/refresh of hardware, improve power supply measures, 

while maintaining ICC’s robust business continuity program and the reliability and security of its data center 

facilities.

Certifications:

ICC hereby certifies that the proposed migration complies with the Act and the regulations thereunder. 

There were no substantive opposing views to this action.

ICC further certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of the submission was posted on ICC’s website, 

and may be accessed at: https://www.ice.com/clear-credit/regulation
 www.ice.com

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

Olivia.bazor@ice.com or 904-855-5580.

Sincerely,

Olivia Bazor

Staff Attorney 

Enclosures

cc: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
# C_2020240EN.01001101.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Orde van Vlaamse Balies, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone v Ministerraad

(Case C-667/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2009/138/EC - Legal expenses insurance - Article 201 - Insured person’s right freely to choose a lawyer - Proceedings - Meaning - Mediation proceedings)

(2020/C 240/14)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Grondwettelijk Hof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Orde van Vlaamse Balies, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone

Defendant: Ministerraad

Operative part of the judgment

Article 201(1)(a) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) must be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘proceedings’ referred to in that provision includes judicial and extrajudicial mediation proceedings in which a court is involved or is capable of being involved, whether when those proceedings are initiated or after they are concluded.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fidelis Energy, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Sterling  Klein,
Treasurer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     Sterling Klein
Sterling Klein
Secretary/Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


April 2, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Grant to the 
Institute for Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization

AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Award announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant award is 
being made to the Institute for Responsible Fatherhood and Family 
Revitalization to build the Institute's capacity and infrastructure and 
expand the provision of direct services to reunite fathers and 
families. As a Congressional setaside, this one-year project is being 
funded noncompetitively. The Institute has community-based service 
centers in several states and has successfully served so far more than 
7000 fathers and their families. The cost of this one-year project is 
$500,000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K. A. Jagannathan, Administration for 
Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Phone: 202-205-4829.

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
Howard Rolston,
Director, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 01-13143 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 243 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 243

     To exempt certain wildfire mitigation activities from certain 
          environmental requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2019

 Mr. LaMalfa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To exempt certain wildfire mitigation activities from certain 
          environmental requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combustion Avoidance along Rural 
Roads Act'' or the ``CARR Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WILDFIRE MITIGATION ACTIVITIES FROM 
              CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Wildfire mitigation activities of the Secretary of 
the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture may be carried out 
without regard to the provisions of law specified in subsection (b).
    (b) Provisions of Law Specified.--The provisions of law specified 
in this section are all Federal, State, or other laws, regulations, and 
legal requirements of, deriving from, or related to the subject of, the 
following laws:
            (1) Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy 
        Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
            (2) The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
        seq.).
    (c) Wildfire Mitigation Activity.--For purposes of this section, 
the term ``wildfire mitigation activity''--
            (1) is an activity conducted on Federal land that is--
                    (A) under the administration of the Director of the 
                National Park System, the Director of the Bureau of 
                Land Management, or the Chief of the Forest Service; 
                and
                    (B) within 300 feet of any permanent or temporary 
                road, as measured from the center of such road; and
            (2) includes forest thinning, hazardous fuel reduction, 
        prescribed burning, and vegetation management.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form Number, and OMB Number: Civil Aircraft Landing Permit 
System; DD Form 2400, 2401, 2402; OMB Number 0701-0050.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 3,600.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,600.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,800.
    Needs and Uses: The Information collection requirement is necessary 
to ensure that the security and operational integrity of military 
airfields are maintained; to identify the aircraft operator and the 
aircraft to be operated; to avoid competition with the private sector 
by establishing the purpose for use of military airfields; and to 
ensure the U.S. Government is not held liable if the civil aircraft 
becomes involved in an accident or incident while using military 
airfields, facilities, and services.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit; Not-For-Profit 
Institutions; Individuals or Households.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing. WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: January 8, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-1319 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2334 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2334

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Wilson and Young Medal of 
                           Honor VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON AND YOUNG MEDAL OF HONOR VA CLINIC.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Private First Class Alfred 
``Mac'' Wilson of the Marine Corps and Staff Sergeant Marvin ``Rex'' 
Young of the Army were both posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for 
their heroic actions in the Vietnam War.
    (b) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs community-
based outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Wilson and Young 
Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilson and 
Young Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2334

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Wilson and Young Medal of 
                           Honor VA Clinic''.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RT01-35-000; Docket No. RT01-15-000]

Take notice that Commission Staff will hold a technical conference to discuss liability issues presented by the RTO West/TransConnect application on May 24, 2001, beginning at 2 p.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

All interested persons are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12428  Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M