alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6985-2]


Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Frost 
Manufacturing Company Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past response costs 
concerning the Frost Manufacturing Company site in Kenosha, Wisconsin 
with the following settling parties: S.R. Smith, LLC, and Household 
Commercial Financial Services, Inc. The settlement requires the 
settling parties to pay $100,00.00 to the Hazardous Substance 
Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue the settling 
parties pursuant to section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For 
thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the 
Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The 
Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw 
its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or 
considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, 
improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any comments received 
will be available for public inspection at the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 Records Center, seventh 
floor, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 25, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 Records 
Center, seventh floor, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 
60604. A copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Carol 
Ropski, U.S. EPA Region 5, Mail Code SE-5J, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-7647. Comments should reference the 
Frost Manufacturing Company Site, Kenosha, Wisconsin and EPA Docket No. 
V-W-01-C-639 and should be addressed to Ms. Rospki at the address shown 
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Ropski, U.S. EPA Region 5, Mail 
Code SE-5J, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 
353-7647.

    Dated: May 15, 2001
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 01-13275 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Bentoria Holdings, Inc., Respondent, v Travelers Indemnity Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 23, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 1135.

Motion by American Insurance Association et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
# UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): July 20, 2005

Rimage Corporation(Exact
name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Minnesota(State Or Other Jurisdiction Of Incorporation)

|                         |                                     
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|000-00619                | 41-1577970                          
|(Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

|7725
Washington Avenue SouthMinneapolis, MN(Address Of Principal Executive Offices) | 55439(Zip Code)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------

(952) 944-8144
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Check the appropriate box below if
the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the
registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2.
below):

oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

oSoliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))

oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))

---

Items under Sections 1 and 3 through
8 are not applicable and therefore omitted.

ITEM 2.02      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Rimage Corporation hereby furnishes a
press release, issued on July 20, 2005, disclosing material non-public information
regarding its results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and hereby
furnishes statements of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer made on
July 20, 2005 at a telephone conference relating to the quarter ended June 30, 2005
results.

ITEM 9.01      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

|Exhibit No. | Description
|----------- | -----------
|            |            
|99.1        |            
|99.2        |            
|            |            
|            |            

# SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| | RIMAGE CORPORATION                                                                                                          
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Robert M. Wolf                                                                                                      
| | Robert M. Wolf 
                                                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 21, 2005

---
# C_2020320EN.01001701.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Veneto Latte Scrl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto

(Case C-339/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/26)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 4, 2010
    /s/ Harpreet S. GrewalHarpreet S. GrewalExecutive Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020137EN.01002002.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/20

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma — Italy) — Stanleyparma Sas di Cantarelli Pietro & C., Stanleybet Malta Ltd, v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli UM Emilia Romagna — SOT Parma

(Case C-788/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Article 56 TFEU - Games of chance - Taxation - Principle of non-discrimination - Single tax on betting)

(2020/C 137/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stanleyparma Sas di Cantarelli Pietro & C., Stanleybet Malta Ltd

Defendant: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli UM Emilia Romagna — SOT Parma

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the legislation of a Member State that makes data transmission centres (DTCs) established in that Member State liable to a tax on betting jointly and severally with betting operators, their clients, which are established in another Member State, irrespective of where those operators are established and the absence of a licence to organise betting.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Ezra Shashoua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Ezra Shashoua Ezra Shashoua May 14, 2008 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 10, 2006 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in CyberOptics Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005.



| | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
| | ------------------------------



Minneapolis, Minnesota

August 10, 2006

















| | 12
| | --

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brett  Henrichsen,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Masterbeat Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q  fairly  presents in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Masterbeat Corporation.


Date: May 17, 2010                       /s/ Brett Henrichsen
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Brett Henrichsen
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
----

----

| 1.   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ BRIAN HALLADAY                                               |
| Brian Halladay                                                   |
| Chief Financial Officer                                          |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6556

ROSS JENKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARVIN PLUMLEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00159-FPS-JES)

Submitted: October 31, 2017 Decided: November 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ross Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. Hogan, Shannon Frederick Kiser, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ross Jenkinsseeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 

473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jenkins has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jenkins’ motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 15, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22

- 1469

Lower Tribunal No. 18

- 24415

________________



### Robert A. Tucker, etc.

, Appellant,

vs.



### Ali Ebadian, etc., et al.

, Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez , Judge.

Hunker Paxton Appeals & Trials , and Thomas L. Hunker and V. Ashley Paxton (Fort Lauderdale) , for appellant.

Dearr Perdigon

, and Craig R. Dearr and Wendy S. Rounds

, for appellees Ali Ebadian and Shahrouz Ebadian ; Bales Sommers & Klein, P.A., and Jason Klei n and Richard M. Bales, Jr.

, for appellee Phiston Technologies, Inc.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.2 PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoHub, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T.
Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





(1)
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
       November 13, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/
      Henry T. CochranHenry
      T. CochranChief
      Executive Officer
# C_2018112EN.01002801.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/28

---

Action brought on 6 February 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-79/18)

(2018/C 112/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen, P. Ondrůšek and M. Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2014/23/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts, with the exception of Article 46 and Article 47 in the Länder of Vienna, Styria and Carinthia, or by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the defendant has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2014/23/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts, with the exception of Article 46 and Article 47 in the Länder of Vienna, Styria and Carinthia, or by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the defendant has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

Länder

| — | impose on the defendant, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, by reason of the infringement of the obligation to notify the transposition measures, a penalty payment in the amount of EUR 52 972 per day; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the defendant, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, by reason of the infringement of the obligation to notify the transposition measures, a penalty payment in the amount of EUR 52 972 per day;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Member States were required, under Article 51(1) of Directive 2014/23/EU, to adopt the national measures necessary to transpose the obligations under that directive into national law by 18 April 2016 at the latest. Since the Republic of Austria failed to adopt all the required laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose that directive, or failed to give notification of those provisions to the Commission, the Commission decided to refer the matter to the Court of Justice.

By its application, the Commission requests the Court to impose a penalty payment in the amount of EUR 52 972 per day on the Republic of Austria. The amount of that penalty payment has been calculated taking into account the gravity and duration of the infringement and the deterrent effect based on that Member State’s ability to pay.

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 94, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28547-28548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum 
(``PERF'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 20, 2001, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Oryx Energy 
Company, Dallas, TX has been dropped as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Petroleum Environmental Research 
Forum (``PERF'') intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 10, 1986, Petroleum Environmental Research Forum 
(``PERF'') filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of 
the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 
8903).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 18, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 28548]]

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2000 (65 FR 
59875).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-13030 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M