alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)**I, D. Ben Berry, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc., a NorthCarolina corporation (the “registrant”);(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;(4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 16, 2007 By:  */s/ D. Ben Berry*    D. Ben Berry    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Thomas J. GENOVESE, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7184.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 31, 2006.

Thomas J. Genovese, pro se.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, MAYER and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss Thomas J. Genovese’s appeal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in *Genovese v. Nicholson,*20 Vet.App. 453 (2006), for lack of jurisdiction. Genovese has not responded.

Genovese appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims from a 2004 Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that determined there was no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a 2002 Board decision that failed to award an effective date earlier than 1996. Genovese asserted that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) failed to assist him, misdiagnosed his disability, and improperly weighed evidence in assigning the 1996 effective date.

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims concluded that under the applicable law, a breach of the duty to assist, a change in diagnosis, or an allegation that evidence was improperly weighed is not a proper basis for finding CUE in a Board decision. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the Board’s decision of no CUE on the ground that it could not find that the Board decision was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law. Genovese appeals.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). Genovese’s appeal does not satisfy any of the grounds for invoking this court’s jurisdiction as he does not challenge the validity or interpretation of any statute or regulation relied on by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and he raises no constitutional issue. Genovese’s argument in his informal brief is that he does “not feel that all of [his] appeals and claims were read completely and judged accurately.”

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ factual determinations pertaining to the sufficiency of Genovese’s CUE claim and application of the law of CUE to the *970facts of Genovese’s case are not within our jurisdiction. In these circumstances, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Ge-novese’s appeal. *See*38 U.S.C. § 7292(d).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned, Menachem M. Schneerson, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Watchtower, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May 13, 2011
By:
/s/Menachem M. SchneersonName: Menachem M. SchneersonTitle:   President, Chief Executive Officer

and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
23-011

March 31, 2023

VIA CFTC PORTAL

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Certification: Notification of Delisting 6 Nodal 

Exchange Power Contracts

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Nodal Exchange, LLC (“Nodal Exchange” or “Exchange”) is notifying the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) that it is delisting 6 Nodal power futures 

contracts. Accordingly, the Exchange is self-certifying amendments to Appendix A 

(Contract Specifications) and Appendix C (Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and 

Position Limits) of the Nodal Exchange Rulebook pursuant to Commission Regulation 

40.6(a). The amendments to Appendix A and Appendix C are attached hereto, indicating 

the specific contracts being delisted by the Exchange. 

The Exchange is delisting 6 power futures contracts. There is no open interest on these 

contracts.

PJM AVONLAK214 KVUN7 Monthly Day Ahead On-Peak Energy plus Congestion

PJM AVONLAK214 KVUN7 Monthly Day Ahead Off-Peak Energy plus Congestion

PJM DICKERSO13 KVSTADG1 Monthly Day Ahead On-Peak Energy plus Congestion

PJM DICKERSO13 KVSTADG1 Monthly Day Ahead Off-Peak Energy plus Congestion

PJM KAMMER215.5 KVKM1 Monthly Day Ahead On-Peak Energy plus Congestion

PJM KAMMER215.5 KVKM1 Monthly Day Ahead Off-Peak Energy plus Congestion

Exchange management has assessed the amendments to Appendix A and Appendix C, and 

their compliance with applicable provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 

including the Commissions Regulations and the Core Principles. Nodal Exchange has 

identified that the delisting of the dormant contacts indicated by amendments to Appendix

A and Appendix C may affect the following Core Principles as follows:
Page 2 of 2

23-011

Core Principle 6 – Emergency Authority: There is no open interest in these contracts, and 

therefore there will be no market disruption related to their delisting.

Core Principle 7 – Availability of General Information: The Exchange is posting on its website 

(www.nodalexchange.com) the delisting of the contracts, including the contract 

specifications for the delisted contracts. Upon delisting, the terms and conditions of these 

contracts will no longer be available on the Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix A – Contract 

Specifications or Appendix C.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Act and the Commission’s Regulation 40.6, the Exchange 

certifies that the delisting of these contracts complies with the Act and the Commission’s 

Regulations thereunder. There have not been any opposing views expressed regarding these 

amendments.

Nodal Exchange certifies that this submission has been concurrently posted on the Nodal 

Exchange website at www.nodalexchange.com.

If you have any question or need additional information regarding this submission, please 

contact me at 703-962-9853 or markotic@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Max Markotic

Managing Director Compliance

Attachments:

Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix A Delisted Contracts

Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix C Delisted Contracts
# C_2018134EN.01001501.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 4 January 2018 — Criminal proceedings against Detlef Meyn

(Case C-9/18)

(2018/C 134/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Accused party: Detlef Meyn

Accused party:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the obligation of recognition under Article 2(1) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences (1) — the third driving licences directive (‘the Driving Licences Directive’) — also apply following the exchange of a driving licence by a Member State of the European Union without a test of fitness to drive, in the case where the previous driving licence is not subject to the obligation of recognition (in this case: the previous licence issued by another Member State of the European Union was for its part based on the exchange of a driving licence from a third country (third sentence of Article 11(6) of the Driving Licences Directive))?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18.

1

---
July 27, 2023

VIA CFTC PORTAL 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Certification: Amendments to the Exchange and Clearing

Transaction Fee Schedule for Nodal Exchange

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear, LLC 

(“Nodal Clear”) hereby notifies the Commission that it plans to amend its Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee

Schedule (“Fee Schedule”) for certain Nodal Exchange environmental contracts. The Fee Schedule shall become 

effective on August 11, 2023. Attached hereto is the Fee Schedule that will be applicable for Nodal Exchange futures

and options cleared at Nodal Clear.

1

The Fee Schedule is being revised to provide the fees for new environmental contracts to be launched by Nodal 

Exchange.

Nodal Clear management has assessed the Fee Schedule and its compliance with applicable provisions of the 

Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), including the Commission’s Regulations and DCO Core Principles. Nodal Clear 

has identified that the Fee Schedule may have some bearing on the following Core Principles:

Core Principle B - Financial Resources: The Fee Schedule will not impact Nodal Clear’s ability to discharge its financial, 

operational, or managerial responsibilities as a DCO.

Core Principle L - Public Information: As required by Core Principle L, Nodal Clear is publicly posting this selfcertification letter on its website to ensure that market participants receive advance notice of the Fee Schedule. On 

the effective date of the Fee Schedule, the Fee Schedule will be posted on the Nodal Clear website. 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the CEA and the Commission’s Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear certifies that the Fee 

Schedule set forth in the attachment complies with the CEA and the Commission’s Regulations thereunder. Nodal 

Clear is not aware of any opposing views expressed regarding the Fee Schedule. Nodal Clear certifies that this 

submission has been concurrently posted on the Nodal Clear website at www.nodalclear.com.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact me at 703-962-9864 

or alvarez@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/Cody Alvarez

Cody Alvarez

Chief Compliance Officer

Corporate Counsel

Attachments:

Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee Schedule (Redline)

1 Nodal Exchange, LLC is submitting a separate filing for exchange fees. Such fees are also reflected in the attachment.
#### Bender, Jenson *&*Silverstein, LLP, Respondent, v Margarita T. Walter, Appellant.

Submitted January 25, 2010;

decided April 1, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief etc. dismissed as academic.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-359-001]

Take notice that on May 15, 2001, Dominion Transmission Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing a status report reconciling actual stranded costs and surcharge recoveries under DTI's Stranded Account No. 858 tracking mechanism for the annual period ending April 30, 2001.

DTI states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with its commitment to file a report with the Commission to reconcile its surcharge collections and actual costs, as it agreed to do in its earlier March 30, 2001 filing. Further, DTI requests waiver of Section 18.2 of its GT&C of its tariff, so that it can return excess collections of $177,306, with interest, in its next annual Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment (TCRA) filing to become effective November 1, 2001 rather than through the stranded cost tracking mechanism of its tariff.

DTI states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures are being mailed to its customers and to interested state commissions.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before May 30, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13361  Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2005158EN.01002901.xml

| 29.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/29

---

Notice to banana producers

(2005/C 158/07)

Within the framework of compensatory aid regime to banana producers as set up by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, the Commission, taking into account the level of prices in the producing regions, is considering as of 1 July 2005 the suspension of the regime of advances set up by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1858/93, in order to protect the financial interests of the Community and to avoid the obligation of future repayment by the producers of the amounts paid within the framework of advances in 2005.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of RTCA Special Committee 147 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 12-13, 2001 starting at 9:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Suite 1120, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 147 meeting. The agenda 
will include:
<bullet> June 12, 13:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review/
Approve Summary of Previous Meeting, Review of Open Action Items)
    <bullet> FAA Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) 
Program Status Report (FAA Headquarters, Technical Center and ARINC 
Monitoring Program)
    <bullet> EUROCONTROL TCAS Transition Program (Implementation 
Status, Problems Discovered from Europeans, Monitoring Programs, 
EMOTION/7 Discussions)
    <bullet> Requirements Working Group (RWG) report on RWG proposed 
changes to DO-185A and review of RWG recommendations
    <bullet> Closing Session (Future Actions/Activities, Date and Place 
of Next Meeting, Adjourn)

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
FAA Special Assistant, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-13050 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #10 LTD. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| August 14, 2014                                |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Tuff, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted April 16, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 90 AD3d 1645.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.