alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VIA CFTC Portal

Mr Christopher Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington DC 20581

7 November 2023

Subject: Weekly Notification of addition of an indirect trading venue to SwapClear 

Dear Mr Kirkpatrick

Please accept this notification, pursuant to CFTC regulations §40.6(d), of the addition of a new

indirect trading venue for LCH Ltd’s (“LCH”) SwapClear service. 

OTCX Trading Limited is an MTF execution venue that is looking to onboard to SwapClear to send 

trades via an indirect connection i.e., via the MarkitWire affirmation platform. OTXC is an MTF 

execution venue that supports client to dealer RFQ protocol – no current plans to support dealer to 

dealer execution. They are planning to support all currencies and products that LCH SwapClear offers

for clearing (IRS, Basis, OIS, ZC, VNS, FRA, and Inflation), out to the maximum maturity for each. 

The go-live date is scheduled for 20th November 2023. The trading venue will be added to the 

SwapClear list of trading venues (which is publicly available on LCH’s website here). 

No changes to the LCH Rulebook were required.

Should you have any questions regarding this submission please contact me at 

lavannyan.mahalingam@lseg.com.

Yours sincerely

Lavannyan Mahalingam

Regulatory Advisor

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS
# C_2020390EN.01000301.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 — Republic of Austria v European Commission and Others

(Case C-594/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Articles 11 and 194 TFEU - Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty - Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Objective of common interest - Environmental objectives of the European Union - Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability - Determination of the economic activity concerned - Market failure - Proportionality of the aid - Operating or investment aid - Determination of the aid elements - Guarantee Notice)

(2020/C 390/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Austria (represented initially by G. Hesse, and subsequently by F. Koppensteiner and M. Klamert, acting as Agents, and by H. Kristoferitsch, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by É. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche, P. Němečková and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents), Czech Republic (represented by M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, T. Müller and I. Gavrilová, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented initially by D. Colas and P. Dodeller, and subsequently by P. Dodeller and T. Stehelin, acting as Agents), Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented initially by D. Holderer, and subsequently by T. Uri, acting as Agents, and by P. Kinsch, avocat), Hungary (represented by M.Z. Fehér, acting as Agent, and P. Nagy, ügyvéd), Republic of Poland (represented by B. Majczyna, acting as Agent), Slovak Republic (represented by B. Ricziová, acting as Agent), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by Z. Lavery and S. Brandon, acting as Agents, A. Robertson QC and T. Johnston, Barrister)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs relating to the appeal proceedings and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs relating to the appeal proceedings and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
# C_2017277EN.01005501.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/55

---

Action brought on 4 July 2017 — Eduard Meier v EUIPO — Calzaturificio Elisabet (Safari Club)

(Case T-418/17)

(2017/C 277/79)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eduard Meier GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Schicker and M. Knitter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Calzaturificio Elisabet Srl (Monte Urano, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Safari Club’ — Application for registration No 13 186 036

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 May 2017 in Case R 1158/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2018123EN.01000901.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 3 January 2018 — Michael Winterhoff, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of DIREKTexpress Holding AG v Finanzamt Ulm

(Case C-4/18)

(2018/C 123/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Michael Winterhoff, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of DIREKTexpress Holding AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Ulm

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is an undertaking which effects the formal service of documents pursuant to provisions of public law a ‘universal service provider’, within the meaning of Article 2.13 of Directive 97/67/EC of 15 December 1997, (1) providing a universal postal service in whole or in part, and is such service exempt from tax under Article 132(1)(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? (2)

1

2

---

(1)  Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ 1998 L 15, p. 14).

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

2

---
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Steven L. White, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Liberty Alliance, Inc.(the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. As certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and     November 6, 2007/s/ Steven L. WhiteSteven L. WhiteChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cycle Country Accessories
Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, Jeff Tetzlaff, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Jeff Tetzlaff
------------------------------------
Jeff Tetzlaff
President
January 13, 2009

<PAGE>
433 West Van Buren Street › Suite 700S › Chicago, IL 60607 › cboe.com

September 8, 2023

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request:

Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d)

All:

Pursuant to § 145.9(d) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and pursuant 

to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC (“CDE”) hereby petitions

the Commission for confidential treatment of Exhibit A to the Self-Certification for a new incentive 

program (CDE-2023-01E) submitted to the CFTC via the CFTC Portal on September 8, 2023

(“Covered Information”).

The Covered Information should be afforded confidential treatment based on, among other 

things, § 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations, which implements FOIA Exemption 4 of 

the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)), because disclosure would reveal CDE trade 

secrets and confidential commercial information. CDE hereby requests that the Covered Information

be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity.

CDE requests that the Commission notify CDE upon the receipt of any request by any party 

for any access under FOIA to the Covered Information or any court order, subpoena, or summons for 

disclosure of the Covered Information for the entire duration that the Commission retains the Covered

Information. CDE further requests notification in the event that the Commission intends to disclose

the Covered Information in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. CDE does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for the Covered Information.

The address at which CDE can be reached is as follows:

433 West Van Buren Street, Suite 700S

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Attention: General Counsel

Please contact me at kkirkpatrick@cboe.com or (312) 786-7431 if you have any questions
regarding this request.

Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC

/s/ Katherine Kirkpatrick

By: Katherine Kirkpatrick, Chief Legal Officer
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

September 8, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request –AEGIS SEF Exhibit N-1 Participant

Agreement

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit N-3 Market 

Participant Addendum Agreement (“Exhibit D” and “Exhibit E”), which was submitted to the 

Commission as 40.6(d) Weekly Notification of Amended Terms and Conditions on this date. 

This request pertains to all material in the Exhibits. The Exhibits bear the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission

Regulations 40.8, as Exhibits contain information that would reveal the

trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information of AEGIS SEF and its

affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-hedging.com with any 

questions regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
# C_2020137EN.01004301.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/43

---

Order of the President of the Court of 3 December 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-676/18) (1)

(2020/C 137/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.

---
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CompanhiaEnergética de Minas Gerais—CEMIG (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Flávio Decat de Moura, Chief Financial and InvestorRelations Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|        |   | /s/    Flávio Decat de Moura |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                                            | Flávio Decat de Moura |
|   |   | Title:                                           | Chief Financial and Investor |
|   |   |                                             | Relations Officer |

Date:       June 30, 2006

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cedric Terrance JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50449

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 11, 2013.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cedric Terrance Jones, FCI Yazoo City Medium, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cedric Terrance Jones, federal prisoner # 29464-077, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. By moving to proceed IFP, Jones is challenging the district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997).

*469The district court concluded that Jones was not eligible for a sentencing reduction pursuant to Amendment 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines because pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), his life sentence resulted from his two prior felony drug convictions. In addition, the district court found that Jones’s base offense level was not reduced by the amendment. For the first time before this court, Jones contends that the failure to reduce his sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) constitutes an equal protection violation because Amendment 750 was enacted to ameliorate sentencing disparities for powder and crack cocaine offenses. He has not established a clear or obvious error that affected his substantial rights. *See Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009); *Sonnier v. Quarterman,*476 F.3d 349, 367 (5th Cir.2007); *United States v. Hayden,*898 F.2d 966, 967 (5th Cir.1990).

Jones also contends that because the jury did not find the pertinent drug quantity beyond a reasonable doubt, he should have been sentenced for an indeterminate amount of cocaine under § 841(b)(1)(C). We decline to consider this challenge to the validity of the originally imposed sentence. *See United States v. Whitebird,*55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.1995).

As a final matter, Jones maintains that because the underlying guidelines calculation influenced the court’s sentencing decision, he is entitled to a sentencing reduction. Under the authority of this circuit, Jones’s mandatory minimum statutory penalty overrides the retroactive application of the guidelines amendments. *See United States v. Pardue,*36 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir.1994).

Jones’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983). Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129792 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129792 COA: 264292 Wayne CC: 04-012542-01 DEAN SCOT JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 15, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

10123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
#### GOON SHUNG, *alias*NG SHUNG v. UNITED STATES.

. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ' ■

No. 85.

Submitted January 14, 1909.

Decided January 25, 1909.

A judgment of the District Court of the United States, affirming , an . order of deportation of a Chinese person, affirmed without opinion. *567Plaintiff in error claimed to be entitled to trial by jury and that he had been denied due process of law.

*Mr. Thomas J. Barry, Mr. Harry J. Jaquith*and *Mr. Benjamin Dellheim*for plaintiff in error.

*The Attorney General*and *The Solicitor General*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

Judgment affirmed. Act. of September 13,1888, 25 Stat. 476, § 13; Act of May 5, 1892, 27 Stat. 25, §§ 3, 6; Act of March 3, 1893, 28 Stat. 7, § 1; Treaty of 1904, 33 Stat. 2215; Act of April 27, 1904, 33 Stat. 394; *United States*v. *Lee Yen Tai,*185 U. S. 213; *Chin Bak Kan*v. *United States,*186 U. S. 193; *Lip Hop Fong v. United States,*209 U. S. 453; *Fong Yue Ting*v. *United States,*149 U. S. 698.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Capital Asset Management, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael A. Barron, Chief Executive Officer and Theresa Carlise, Chief
Financial Officer hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
February 17, 2010




By:/s/ Michael A. Barron


Michael
A. Barron


Chief
Executive Officer





By:/s/ Theresa Carlise


Theresa
Carlise


Chief
Financial Officer