alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Howard
Mah, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United States 12 Month Natural
Gas Fund, LP;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  
       December 23, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Howard MahName:
              Howard
      MahTitle:
              Chief
      Financial OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund,
  LP
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)






In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Steele Resources Corporation (the Company), for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to our knowledge




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








STEELE RESOURCES CORPORATIONDated: November 7, 2011 /s/ A. Scott DockterA. Scott Dockter, Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 7, 2011 /s/ David BridgefordDavid Bridgeford, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019399EN.01001701.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019 — Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-556/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - European Union water policy - Directive 2000/60/EC - Article 13(1) and (7) and Article 15(1) - Failure to adopt, publish and communicate to the European Commission revised and updated river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro (Spain) - Article 14 - Failure to inform and consult the public relating to the revision and the updating)

(2019/C 399/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: Manhaeve and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Rules that, by not having completed, within the prescribed time-limit, the information and consultation of the public relating to the revision and the updating of the river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro, and by not having, within the prescribed time-limit, adopted, published and communicated to the European Commission the revision and updating of those management plans, the Kingdom of Spain failed to fulfil the obligations imposed on it in accordance with Article 13(7), read in conjunction with Article 13(1), and Article 14 and 15(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, as amended by Council Directive 2013/64/EU of 17 December 2013. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Rules that, by not having completed, within the prescribed time-limit, the information and consultation of the public relating to the revision and the updating of the river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro, and by not having, within the prescribed time-limit, adopted, published and communicated to the European Commission the revision and updating of those management plans, the Kingdom of Spain failed to fulfil the obligations imposed on it in accordance with Article 13(7), read in conjunction with Article 13(1), and Article 14 and 15(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, as amended by Council Directive 2013/64/EU of 17 December 2013.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 1

SPIKES Market Maker Program

Program Purpose

The purpose of the SPIKES Market Maker Program (the “Program”) is to incentivize participants to support 

the continued development of the products listed below. The resulting additional central limit order book 

liquidity benefits all participants in the market.

Product Scope

SPIKES Volatility Index Futures that are traded on MGEX via the CME Globex® trading platform 

(“Product”). The Program consists of four Sections for participants.

Eligible Participants

With the exception of one subset, there is no limit to the number of participants in the Program. There are

no member requirements for participants.

For Section 1, the Exchange may designate one or more participants who agree to make two-sided markets 

in the Product throughout the Regular Trading Session (“RTS”) and, as specified, one or more Extended 

Trading Sessions (“ETS”). In determining whether or not to select a prospective participant for the 

Program, the Exchange may take into account a variety of factors, including: whether the prospective 

participant is willing to quote throughout RTS and, where specified, ETS; the strength of the quoting 

obligations the prospective participant is willing to commit to provide; whether the Exchange believes that 

the prospective participant can maintain such obligations based on the application; and historical trading 

volume in related products. The Exchange may, from time to time, add or subtract from the aforementioned 

requirements as it deems necessary. Failure to meet quoting requirements, among other things, may 

result in removal from the Program. Participants must complete an application with the Exchange to be 

eligible for Section 1 of the Program. An application can be received by contacting MGEX at 

mgex@mgex.com.

For Sections 2, 3, and 4, there are no application requirements. 

Program Term

Start date is October 1, 2021. End date is August 31, 2023September 30, 2023.

Hours

RTS and/or ETS.

Obligations

In order to be eligible to receive the incentives, participants must quote two-sided markets in the Product 

at predetermined average bid/ask spreads meeting certain volume thresholds at specified time-in-market 

requirements.

Incentives

Upon meeting all obligations, as determined by the Exchange, participants will be eligible to receive 

predetermined incentives.

Monitoring and Termination of Status
The Exchange will monitor trading activity and participants’ performance and retain the right to revoke 

participant status if it concludes from review that a participant no longer meets the eligibility requirements, 

fails to meet the obligations of the Program, or fails to comply with Exchange rules (including, but not limited 

to, rules relating to market manipulation, wash trades, etc.) or any applicable law.
EXHIBIT 31(d)

I, Mark R. Bachmann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
Zep Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 22, 2009                                              
|                                                                     
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                                 
|Mark R. Bachmann Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
has been provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# C_2018399EN.01003102.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 August 2018 — European Commission v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-86/18) (1)

(2018/C 399/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 3, 2013

s0327 

# Order

April 3, 2013

144414

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144414

COA: 279161

Kent CC: 06

- 003485

- FC

DENNIS LEE TOMASIK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of People v Musser (Docket No. 145237) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28492-28493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 6, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Robert Shaw Owen, Alan Craig Owen, and Eric Lyle Owen, all of 
Gleason, Tennessee; to acquire additional voting shares of Bancshares 
of Gleason, Inc., Gleason, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly acquire 
additional voting shares of Bank of Gleason, Gleason, Tennessee.


[[Page 28493]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-12970 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2020036EN.01000501.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia — Spain) — Antonio Bocero Torrico (C-398/18), Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode (C-428/18) v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social, Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social

(Joined Cases C-398/18 and C-428/18) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Early retirement pension - Eligibility - Requirement for the pension to be received to be higher than the statutory minimum - Account taken only of pension acquired in the Member State concerned - No account taken of the retirement pension acquired in another Member State - Difference in treatment of workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement)

(2020/C 36/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Antonio Bocero Torrico (C-398/18), Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode (C-428/18)

Defendants: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social, Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(a) of Regulation No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which requires, as a condition for a worker to be eligible for an early retirement pension, that the amount of the pension to be received must be higher than the minimum pension that would be due to that worker upon reaching the statutory retirement age under that legislation, where the term ‘pension to be received’ is interpreted as referring only to the pension from that Member State, and not including the pension which that worker may receive through equivalent benefits payable by one or more other Member States

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
### NUMBER 13 - 17 - 0 0685 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE MANUEL ANTONIO SEAS, M.D.; INPATIENT CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS, P.L.L.C.; AND IPC THE HOSPITALIST COMPANY, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam
Relator s Manuel Antonio Seas, M.D.; Inpatient Consultants of Texas, P.L.L.C.; and IPC the Hospitalist Company, Inc. , f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause

on December 15, 2018

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator s seek to compel the trial court to withdraw its orders of March 21, 2017 and Ju ly 31, 2017 denying relators’ motion to designate a responsible third party and to grant their motion. T he Court requests that the real part ies in interest , Miguel David Garza, Beatrice Garza, and David
J. Lumber , or any others whose interest would be dir ectly affected by the relief sought,2

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. Relators’ request for emergency temporary relief will be CARRIED WITH THE CAS E pending review of the
response. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 19th day of December , 201 7

.
# C_2019213EN.01002701.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-49/17) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Financial corrections - Meaning of ‘producer’ - Investments made outside the premises of a producer organisation - Checks carried out before the approval of an operational programme - Check carried out in the authorisation of expenditure - Single financial correction - Flat-rate financial correction - Proportionality - Duty to state reasons)

(2019/C 213/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Spain (represented initially by V. Ester Casas, abogado del Estado, and subsequently by S. Jiménez García, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and M. Morales Puerta, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2018 of 15 November 2016, excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2016, L 312, p. 26).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.

---
No. 03-14-00672-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

________________________________________________ 

JOHN DALE DUNN AND 

PATRICIA LOUISE SOMMER 

v.

MARRIOTT HOTEL CORP. 

D/B/A RENAISSANCE AUSTIN HOTEL 

________________________________________________ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT 

________________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

Appellants John Dale Dunn and Patricia Louise Sommer (together, 

“Appellants”) file this unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal pursuant to a 

settlement between the parties. Appellants no longer wish to pursue this appeal 

and, therefore, respectfully request that this Court dismiss this appeal. 

Respectfully submitted, 

_____/s/ MB CHIMENE_________ 

THE CHIMENE LAW FIRM 

Michele Barber Chimene 

State Bar NO. 04207500 

15203 Newfield Bridge Ln. 

Sugar Land, TX. 77498 

PH: (713) 474-5538 

michelec@airmail.net

ACCEPTED

03-14-00672-CV

3937630

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/28/2015 4:07:29 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/28/2015 4:07:29 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

1179007

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Jane Webre, counsel for Appellee, informed the undersigned that Appellee is 

is not opposed to the relief sought through this motion. 

_____/s/ MB CHIMENE_________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of this Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 

Settlement has been served on counsel for Appellee, Jane Webre, Scott, Douglass 

& McConnico, LLP, 600 Congress Ave. Ste. 1500, Austin, TX. 78701 by ECF and 

email on Jan 28, 2015.

_____/s/ MB CHIMENE_________
# C_2019103EN.01000602.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — Solvay Chemicals GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-561/18)

(2019/C 103/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Solvay Chemicals GmbH

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

By order of 6 February 2019, the Court (First Chamber) ruled as follows:

The second subparagraph of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and point 20(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the installation for production of soda ash, regardless of whether that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 181, p. 30.

---