28422 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

Period to be reviewed

* Inadvertently omitted from initiation notice published on March 22,2001 (66 FR 16037).

Taiwan: Static Random Access Memory Semiconductors, A–583–827 ..................................................................................... 4/1/00–3/31/01

G-Link Technology Corporation

Giga Semiconductor, Inc., dba GSI Technology

Mosel Vitelic, Inc./Mosel Vitelic Corp.

Winbond Electronics Corporation

The People’s Republic of China: Brake Rotors,** A–570–846 ................................................................................................... 4/1/00–3/31/01

China National Automotive Industry Import & Export Corporation, and manufactured by any company other than

Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry

Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry, and manufactured by any company other than Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry

Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd., and manufactured by any other company other than Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd., or Laizhou Luyuan Automobile Fitting Co.

Laizhou Luyuan Automobile Fitting Co., and manufactured by any company other than Laizhou Luyuan Automobile

Fitting Co., or Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd.

China National Machinery and Equipment Import & Export (Xinjiang) Corporation, and manufactured by any company

other than Zibo Botai Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Qingdao (Gren) Co.

** If one of the named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of brake rotors from the People’s

Republic of China who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.

Turkey: Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–489–807 .................................................................................................. 4/1/00–3/31/01

Ekinciler Holding, A.S./Ekinciler Demir Celik A.S.

Colakoglu Metalurji A.S./Colakoglu Dis Ticaret

ICDAS Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi, A.S

Diler Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S./Yazici Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./Diler Dis Ticaret A.S.

Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazler Istihsal Endustrisi A.S.

Countervailing Duty Proceedings

None.

Suspension Agreements

None.

During any administrative review

covering all or part of a period falling

between the first and second or third

and fourth anniversary of the

publication of an antidumping duty

order under section 351.211 or a

determination under section

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or

suspended investigation (after sunset

review), the Secretary, if requested by a

domestic interested party within 30

days of the date of publication of the

notice of initiation of the review, will

determine whether antidumping duties

have been absorbed by an exporter or

producer subject to the review if the

subject merchandise is sold in the

United States through an importer that

is affiliated with such exporter or

producer. The request must include the

name(s) of the exporter or producer for

which the inquiry is requested.

Interested parties must submit

applications for disclosure under

administrative protective orders in

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.

These initiations and this notice are

in accordance with section 751(a) of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 USC

1675(a)), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).

Dated: May 17, 2001.

Holly A. Kuga,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Group II

for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–13054 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–580–809]

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe

From the Republic of Korea; Amended

Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review of circular welded non-alloy

steel pipe from the Republic of Korea.

SUMMARY: On April 11, 2001, the

Department published the final results

of the administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on circular

welded non-alloy steel pipe from the

Republic of Korea (see Circular Welded

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic

of Korea; Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review, 66 FR 18747

(April 11, 2001) (‘‘Final Results’’)). On

April 16, 2001, the respondents

Hyundai Pipe Co., Ltd., Shinho Steel

Co., Ltd., and SeAH Steel Corporation

submitted allegations of ministerial

errors. On April 23, 2001, the domestic

interested parties submitted comments.

Based on our review of the submissions

received from all parties regarding

potential ministerial errors, we have

made certain corrections to the margin

calculation for all three respondents.

This correction results in a margin of

2.53 percent for HDP, 0.95 percent for

SeAH, and 2.99 percent for Shinho.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg

Campbell or Suresh Maniam, Group 1,

Office I, Antidumping/Countervailing

Duty Enforcement, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–2239 or (202) 482–

0176, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the ‘‘Act’’), are references to

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28423

1 In a letter dated January 5, 2001, HDP informed

the Department that its corporate name would

change to Hyundai Steel Company effective

February 1, 2001. On February 27, 2001, the

Department initiated a changed circumstances

review to determine whether entries naming

‘‘Hyundai Hysco’’ as manufacturer or exporter

should receive the cash deposit rate currently

applied to HDP. Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy

Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; Initiation of

Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review, 66 FR 12460 (February 27,

2001). Pending a final determination in that

changed circumstances review, we will continue to

refer to the respondent in the instant review as

HDP.

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (‘‘URAA’’). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department of Commerce’s

(‘‘Department’s’’) regulations are to 19

CFR Part 351 (2000).

Background

On April 11, 2001, the Department

published the Final Results. On April

16, 2001, the respondents Hyundai Pipe

Co., Ltd.1 (‘‘HDP’’), Shinho Steel Co.,

Ltd. (‘‘Shinho’’), and SeAH Steel

Corporation (‘‘SeAH’’) submitted

allegations that the Final Results

contained ministerial errors. On April

23, 2001, the domestic interested parties

submitted comments regarding Shinho’s

and SeAH’s allegations. The period of

review (‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 1998,

through October 31, 1999.

The Department has conducted this

administrative review in accordance

with section 751 of the Act.

Scope of the Review

The merchandise subject to this

review is circular welded non-alloy

steel pipe and tube, of circular crosssection, not more than 406.4mm (16

inches) in outside diameter, regardless

of wall thickness, surface finish (black,

galvanized, or painted), or end finish

(plain end, beveled end, threaded, or

threaded and coupled). These pipes and

tubes are generally known as standard

pipes and tubes, and are intended for

the low-pressure conveyance of water,

steam, natural gas, air, and other liquids

and gases in plumbing and heating

systems, air-conditioning units,

automatic sprinkler systems, and other

related uses. Standard pipe may also be

used for light load-bearing applications,

such as for fence tubing, and as

structural pipe tubing used for framing

and as support members for

reconstruction or load-bearing purposes

in the construction, shipbuilding,

trucking, farm equipment, and other

related industries. Unfinished conduit

pipe is also included in this order.

All carbon-steel pipes and tubes

within the physical description above

are included within the scope of this

review except line pipe, oil-country

tubular goods, boiler tubing, mechanical

tubing, pipe and tube hollows for

redraws, finished scaffolding, and

finished conduit. In accordance with the

Department’s Final Negative

Determination of Scope Inquiry on

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy

Steel Pipe and Tube from Brazil, the

Republic of Korea, Mexico, and

Venezuela (61 11608, March 21, 1996),

pipe certified to the API 5L line-pipe

specification and pipe certified to both

the API 5L line-pipe specifications and

the less-stringent ASTM A–53 standardpipe specifications, which falls within

the physical parameters as outlined

above, and entered as line pipe of a kind

used for oil and gas pipelines is outside

of the scope of the antidumping duty

order.

Imports of these products are

currently classifiable under the

following Harmonized Tariff Schedule

of the United States (HTSUS)

subheadings: 7306.30.10.00,

7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32,

7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55,

7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90.

Although the HTSUS subheadings are

provided for convenience and customs,

the written description of the scope of

this proceeding is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

HDP argued that, due to an anomaly

in the SAS software used for the margin

calculations, certain U.S. sales were

matched to home market sales in a less

contemporaneous month, despite the

existence of more contemporaneous

home market sales of similar

merchandise. SeAH and Shinho argued

that although the Department intended

to remove specification as a matching

criterion for similar matches only it, in

fact, inadvertently removed

specification from the calculation

program completely—even for purposes

of identical matches.

The domestic interested parties made

no comments regarding HDP’s

ministerial error allegation. Regarding

SeAH’s and Shinho’s ministerial error

allegation, the domestic interested

parties argued that the allegations are

not ministerial in nature. Rather, the

domestic interested parties content,

SeAH and Shinho are merely rearguing

a major point from their briefs, namely,

that the margin calculation program

ought to reflect the matching

methodology or prior reviews of this

order.

We have addressed these comments

regarding ministerial error allegations in

detail in the Memorandum to Susan

Kuhback, ‘‘Ministerial Error Allegations

for Final Results of Review’’ (May 7,

2001). As explained in that

memorandum, we agree with DHP’s

ministerial error allegation. This error,

however, affects the margin program for

all three respondents and, therefore, we

have corrected the error for HDP, as well

as for SeAH and Shinho. Regarding

SeAh’s and Shinho’s ministerial error

allegations, we find these alleged errors

do not constitute ministerial errors

under 19 CFR 351.224(c) and,

accordingly, have made no changes to

the margins to correct them.

Amended Final Results

Based on our review of comments

received regarding ministerial errors, we

have made the following change to the

Final Results: We have corrected the

SAS calculation program to allow

proper matching of U.S. sales to home

market sales.

We determine the following dumping

margins exist for the period November

1, 1998, through October 31, 1999:

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin

(percent)

Shinho ....................................... 2.99

SeAH ........................................ 0.95

HDP .......................................... 2.53

We are issuing and publishing this

determination and notice in accordance

with sections 751(a)(1) and 771(i) of the

Act.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

Faryar Shirzad,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–13052 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–865]

Notice of Postponement of Final

Determination of Antidumping Duty

Investigation: Certain Hot-Rolled

Carbon Steel Products From the

People’s Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of postponement of final

determination of antidumping duty

investigation.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carrie Blozy or James Doyle, Office IX,