alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019432EN.01001201.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sardegna — Italy) — Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Regione Autonoma della Sardegna

(Case C-515/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public passenger transport services - Rail transport - Public service contracts - Direct award - Obligation to publish a prior information notice in relation to the direct award - Scope)

(2019/C 432/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sardegna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato

Defendant: Regione Autonoma della Sardegna

Intervener: Trenitalia SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 must be interpreted as meaning that competent national authorities which intend directly to award a public service contract for the transport of passengers by rail are not required, first, to publish or communicate to any interested economic operators all the information necessary in order to enable them to submit a sufficiently detailed offer which may be subject to a comparative assessment and, second, to carry out such a comparative assessment of all bids that may have been received following publication of that information.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
**Exhibit 3.14**

 

December 22, 2004 

 

David McGlade 

Penthouse 

Athena Court 

2 Finchley Road 

London, NW8 6DP 

 

Re:    Intelsat Ltd. Employment Agreement

 

Dear Mr. McGlade: 

 

You agree toenter into the Employment Agreement substantially in the form attached as Annex A hereto (the “Employment Agreement”), and Zeus Holdings Limited (“Zeus”) agrees to enter into, and to cause Intelsat Ltd. to enter into, theEmployment Agreement substantially in the form attached as Annex A hereto, upon the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement (the “Intelsat Acquisition”). 

 

Prior to January 7, 2005, you may advise Zeus in writing that you would liketo purchase additional Common Parent Shares and Preferred Parent Shares at the Closing, at the same price, in the same relative proportion and pursuant to the same methodology as set forth in Section 2.1(c)(ii) of the Employment Agreement, and in anamount which, when added to the amounts set forth in Section 2.1(c)(ii), is not greater than $1,000,000. 

 

If the Intelsat Acquisition is not completed by May 1, 2005, or is otherwise formally abandoned at anytime (pursuant to the terms of the TransactionAgreement), you may advise Zeus in writing that you will not enter into the Employment Agreement. If your obligation to enter into the Employment Agreement or your obligation to commence employment is terminated by you pursuant to the immediatelypreceding sentence or otherwise does not become effective (other than as a result of your actions either before Closing or on or after Closing and prior to your employment commencement (an “Executive Nonperformance”)), there will be noliability or obligation on the part of you, Intelsat Ltd. or Zeus, other than that Zeus shall (i) pay you your monthly mmO2 base salary (equivalent to approximately $1 million per year) for a period of up to 6 months from the time of yourtermination of employment from mmO2 to the time of you starting a new employment arrangement and (ii) reimburse you for any legal fees and expenses which would otherwise have been due under Section 7.10 of the Employment Agreement. In suchcircumstances, you agree in good faith to actively seek new employment commensurate with your title and position at mmO2 (or a similar executive position). 

 

The governing law of this letter and dispute resolution shall be as set forth for the Employment Agreement under Section 7 of the Employment Agreement.

David McGlade 

December 22,2004 

Page 2 

 

Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment Agreement or the Transaction Agreement, as applicable. 

 
Yours truly yours,ZEUS HOLDINGS LIMITEDBy:     Accepted and Acknowledged: David McGlade
#### In the Matter of State of New York, Respondent, v C.B., Appellant.

Submitted December 5, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 88 AD3d 599.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTWINE REID,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, David Miller, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                 | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Philip
 Bloom                | 
|                                 | 
|Principal
 Financial Officer and | 
|Principal
 Accounting Officer    | 
|Date:
 February 8, 2010          | 

|                                           | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ David
 Miller                          | 
|                                           | 
|President
 and Principal Executive Officer | 
|Date:
 February 8, 2010                    | 

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WiTel Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November
      10, 2008
            /s/ James E.
      Renton
              James
      E. Renton
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 17 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 6 of 6
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3097

___________ Homer Buckles, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Bill Hedrick, Warden, U.S. Medical * Western District of Missouri. Center for Federal Prisoners, * [Unpublished] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 2003 Filed: October 7, 2003

___________ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM Federal inmate Homer Buckles, confined in the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners at Springfield, Missouri, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as moot. We grant Buckles leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We conclude the case is not moot because the record does not foreclose all reasonable expectations that the alleged violation could recur during Buckles’s incarceration. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis , 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass’n Int’l Ass’n of Fire Fighters Local-2- 73 v. City of St. Louis, Mo. , 96 F.3d 323, 329 (8th Cir. 1996). Nonetheless, Buckles has not rebutted respondent’s evidence that Buckles failed to exhaust administrative remedies. See 28 C.F.R. § 542 (2002); United States v. Chappel , 208 F.3d 1069, 1069-70 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, but modify it to reflect that the dismissal is for Buckles’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
Order entered December 19, 2022 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01335-CV 

IN RE UMTH GENERAL SERVICES, L.P., Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-09833 

ORDER 

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle 

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition 

for writ of mandamus. We also DENY relator’s motion to stay and request for 

expedited consideration as moot. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK 

 JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of KOKO, LTD. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”),
I, Gregory Ruff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 11th day of November, 2009.








GREGORY RUFF
Gregory RuffChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David K. Ryan, the Principal Accounting Officer of Yaterra
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/
      David K. Ryan       
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | DAVID K. RYAN                 
| |        |                               
| | Title: | Vice President, Finance       
| |        | (Principal Accounting Officer)
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | April
      19, 2011          



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex

Via Portal Submission 

December 29, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-64

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of December 18, 2023:

 December 22, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. CT 

Thursday, December 28, 2023 deadline to report offsets of January 2024 Hard Red Spring Wheat 

Index, Hard Red Winter Wheat Index, Soft Red Winter Wheat Index, National Corn Index and 

National Soybean Index futures and options, effective for the Wednesday, December 27, 2023

trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at the following link: 

https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex/alerts. If there are any questions regarding this 

submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7128 or psparby@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Peter D. Sparby

Vice President, Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 30, 2019

No . 04

- 19

- 00383

- CV

Hien Minh CAO,

Appellant

v.

Hoang CAO

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV03006

Honorable John Francis Davis, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the m otion is

DENIED.

I t is so ORD ERED on this 30th day of August, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# C_2020036EN.01001101.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission

(Case C-591/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for underground and submarine power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Fines - Rights of the defence - Access to the file - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Distortion of the evidence)

(2020/C 36/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellants: Brugg Kabel AG, Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding (represented by: A. Rinne, M. Lichtenegger and S. Schricker, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Leupold, H. van Vliet and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
Exhibit 99.1

| | 500 Spruce Tree Centre
1600 University Avenue WestSt. Paul, Minnesota 55104-3825 USA
651.603.7700 Fax:  651.603.7795
www.imagesensing.com
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEWS RELEASE



|Contacts: | Art Bourgeois, Chief Financial Officer
|--------- | --------------------------------------

Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Phone: 651.603.7700



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



Image Sensing Systems Receives Favorable Compliance Letter From Nasdaq



Saint Paul, Minnesota.- May 18, 2006-Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (ISS) (NASDAQ: ISNS)

As previously disclosed, ISS received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) indicating that the ISS failed to comply with the nominating committee requirements for continued listing set forth in Marketplace Rule 4350(c)(4). On May 15, 2006, ISS received a letter from Nasdaq stating that the Nasdaq staff has determined that ISS complies with Marketplace Rule 4350(c)(4) and that the matter is closed.



Headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, ISS combines expertise in image processing, hardware and software engineering, and communications to develop video vehicle detection systems for traffic management and control applications. The Autoscope vehicle detection system is the world leader in video detection for advanced traffic management systems for highways, tunnel incident detection, intersection control, and traffic data collection. The Autoscope system provides traffic managers the means to reduce roadway congestion, improve roadway planning, and improve cost efficiencies.

###

---
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of  Bonfire  Productions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed  with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  January 30, 2009

/s/ Nadezda Maximova
--------------------------
Nadezda Maximova
President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      J.
      John Cheng, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
      of
      China Bottles Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of China Bottles Inc.




I,
      Chong
      Hui Zhao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
      of
      China Bottles Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of China Bottles Inc.




By:
            /s/
J.
              John ChengJ.
                John ChengChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
              Officer)By:
            /s/
Chong
              Hui ZhaoChong
                Hui ZhaoChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




December
      2, 2008
QueiJTm) Uf&HtnfoJ FILED IN Co^Cf ofL1ImJjlotok ^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS < „ „ J/, ,

27 ;.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

MoW fo£ £*T/U 77m* &*. Poiiiio^ fbf- IWgp^J-feuiftJ

&$£El

ttsffcrwiy fto^ frtrtrMb^ nth** *»v**# fe//^

„ RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIWIWAL APPE4LS

Aba8Acosta, Cterfc ^ ty^W&yrf&J