alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

January 19, 2022

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC - Rule Change - Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (All Credit Default Swap 

Indices)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby 

submits amendments to its Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (All Credit Default Swap Indices) (the 

“Fee Schedule”), which has been amended to reflect updates to certain terms and fees. The amendments will 

become effective on February 2, 2022, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. Pursuant to 

Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A is the update to the Fee Schedule, with 

the additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this submission, TW SEF hereby 

notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain information 

confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial 

information and has posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a redacted 

copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rule complies with the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder, 

including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Fee Schedule is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rule were expressed to TW SEF by its 

governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market participants.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (646) 767-4923 or by email at 

Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

Tradeweb SEF CCO
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY TW SEF LLC PURSUANT TO 17 CFR PART 145
APPENDIX A

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (All Credit Default Swap Indices) 

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
February 3, 2023

VIA Portal

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(d) Notification: Nodal Exchange Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) Regulation 

40.6(d), Nodal Exchange submits this weekly notification of non-substantive revisions made, during 

the week of January 23, 2023, to the Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix A (Contract 

Specifications). For Texas Compliance Renewable Energy Certificate from CRS Listed Facilities 

Vintage 2024 Front Half futures contract, Nodal Exchange is amending the contract series to 

“Monthly contracts beginning with May of the corresponding vintage year through December of the 

year following the vintage year”.

The revision went into effect on January 24, 2023. This revision has no effect on the economic 

characteristics of the contract in accordance with CFTC Regulation 40.6(d)(i).

The Nodal Exchange Rulebook Appendix A contract specifications for the revised contract is

attached hereto with the correction noted in red.

If you have any question or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact 

me at 703-962-9853 or markotic@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Max Markotic

Senior Director 

Attachments:

Appendix A – Contract Specifications (redline)
No. 209.

#### MacAndrews and Forbes Company, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*The United States; and J. S. Young Company, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*The United States.

No. 210.

In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. October 13, 1908. Dismissed on the authority of counsel for the plaintiffs,in error. *Mr. James*
      *586
      *Parker*and *Mr. DeLancey Nicoll*for plaintiffs in error. *The Attorney General*for defendant in error.
#### Paul Eldridge, Respondent, v Carmel Central School District Board of Education et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 82 AD3d 1147.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*18 NY3d 853 (2011)].
# C_2020068EN.01002101.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/21

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — NE v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld

(Case C-645/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Freedom to provide services - Posting of workers - Article 56 TFEU - Directive 2014/67/EU - Articles 9 and 20 - Reporting of workers - Retention of records of wages - Penalties - Proportionality - Fines of a predefined minimum amount - Cumulative - No upper limit - Court fees)

(2020/C 68/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NE

Defendant: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld

Intervener: Finanzpolizei

Operative part of the order

Article 20 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which lays down, in the event of non-compliance with labour law obligations relating to the reporting of workers and the retention of records of wages, the imposition of high fines:

| — | which may not be lower than a predefined amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

which may not be lower than a predefined amount;

| — | which are imposed cumulatively in respect of each worker concerned and without an upper limit, and |
| --- | --- |

—

which are imposed cumulatively in respect of each worker concerned and without an upper limit, and

| — | to which is added a contribution to court costs of 20 % of the amount of the fines if the appeal against the decision imposing those fines is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

—

to which is added a contribution to court costs of 20 % of the amount of the fines if the appeal against the decision imposing those fines is dismissed.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10458

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR MANUEL VARELA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-271-1-G

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Victor Manuel Varela on

appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief, the record, and Varela’s

response to his attorney’s request to withdraw discloses no

nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 02-10458

-2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

Exhibit 12

                                  AIRGAS, INC.

                         COMPUTATION OF FINANCIAL RATIOS

                          (in thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             2001        2002        2003        2004         2005
----------------------------------                          ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
EARNINGS COMPUTATION:

Add:
Pretax income from continuing operations before
   equity earnings and minority interest..............      $   47,763  $   75,530  $  106,620  $  123,632   $  148,413

Fixed charges.........................................          77,746      68,378      69,149      66,378       83,323

Distributed income of unconsolidated Affiliate........             911         901         943         724           --
                                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------

                                                            $  126,420  $  144,809  $  176,712  $  190,734   $  231,736
                                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========   ==========

Subract:

Preferred dividend requirements of consolidated
affiliate.............................................              --          --          --      (1,151)      (4,626)
                                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------
Earnings for purposes of computation..................      $  126,420  $  144,809  $  176,712  $  189,583   $  227,110
                                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========   ==========

FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION:

Interest expense (1)..................................      $   62,964  $   53,020  $   50,639  $   46,340   $   57,547

Estimate of the interest component of rent expense....          14,782      15,358      18,510      18,887       21,150

Preferred dividend requirements of consolidated
affiliate.............................................              --          --          --       1,151        4,626
                                                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------   ----------

Fixed charges for purposes of computation.............      $   77,746  $   68,378  $   69,149  $   66,378   $   83,323
                                                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========   ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                               1.63X       2.12X       2.56X       2.86X        2.73X
</TABLE>

(1)   includes amortization of capitalized financing costs and discount on trade
      receivable securitization.
# C_2020262EN.01000501.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris — France) — Trendsetteuse SARL v DCA SARL

(Case C-828/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Self-employed commercial agents - Directive 86/653/EEC - Concept of ‘commercial agent’ - Negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal - Intermediary lacking the power to change the conditions of sale and the prices of the goods that intermediary sells)

(2020/C 262/06)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Trendsetteuse SARL

Defendant: DCA SARL

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents must be interpreted as meaning that a person does not need to have the power to change the prices of the goods which he or she sells on behalf of the principal in order to be classified as a commercial agent within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---
Exhibit
99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Laural
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three and nine months ended February 28,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Robert MacKay, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
 
 
 Date:
April 9, 2010
 
 
 ROBERT
MACKAY
 Robert
MacKay
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 -1-
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28919-28920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13200]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 13, 2001.
    Time: 1:30 pm to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6700 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anthony Macaluso, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIAID/DEA, Scientific Review Program, Room 2217, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-
7465, [email protected]

[[Page 28920]]

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13200 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0619

_________________ CHARLES DRESCHER,

Plaintiff, Counter Defendant , and Appellee, v. JOHN MALEE,

Defendant, Counter Claimant , and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy her eo f to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Ray Dayton , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2022

04/13/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0619
#### McHenry and others *v.*New York, P. & O. R. Co. and others.

*Circuit*Court, *W. D. Pennsylvania.*

August 13, 1885.

Removal of (Jause—Receiver—Order Appointing, Rescinded.

An order was made in the state court upon an *ex, parte*application appointing a receiver of a railroad company. After removal of the suit to the circuit court, upon a hearing of both sides, it not appearing that the property of the company was in jeopardy, or in need of the protecting control of the court, and the continuance of the receivership being likely to prove prejudicial to innocent holders of the securities of the company, *held,*that the order appointing the receiver should be rescinded.

In Equity. *Sur*motion to rescind the order appointing a receiver.

*W. W. MacFarland, R. P.*Ranney, *Adams & Russell,*and *John J. Henderson,*for the motion.

*J. B. Brawley, W. R. Bole,*and *C. Heydrich, contra.*

*Coram*McKennan and Acheson, JJ.

Acheson, J.

The order appointing a receiver was made by’the learned judge of the court of common pleas upon an *ex parte*application, while we have had the benefit of a fuller hearing and a discussion by counsel representing both sides. It would, of course, be altogether premature at this preliminary stage of the case for us to consider the merits of the controversy or intimate any opinion thereon. We content ourselves with saying that the most material allegations of the bill are denied, and the right of the plaintiffs to any final relief is not yet satisfactorily established.

It is not shown to our satisfaction that the property of the defendant company is in any jeopardy, or needs the protecting control of the court. On the other hand, it is not difficult to see how the innocent holders of the securities of the company may be greatly embaí’-rassed and prejudiced by the continuance of the receivership. Indeed, the effect of the order in question is to suspend the operation of the trust established by the agreement of all the parties in interest, and this, too, when the trustees are not before .the court.

The office order that the bill be taken *pro confesso*as against the New York, Pennsylvania & Ohio Bailroad Company, for want of an appearance, was entered by the prothonotary upon the baldest technical default, if, indeed, even that had occurred. A motion to vacate that order was immediately made, and, although not yet acted upon, it ought to be considered as allowed, in relief of innocent parties whose rights are here involved. We have no hesitation in holding that the order appointing a receiver should no longer remain in force. And now, August 13, 1885, upon consideration, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order made in this case on July 11,1885, appointing a receiver, etc., be, and the same is, rescinded, and the receiver is discharged.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3675]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Syria: Land of Civilization,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Riverfront Arts Center in Wilmington, DE from on or about July 14, 2001 to on or about October 21, 2001 and at the Fernbank Museum of Natural History, Atlanta, GA, from on or about February 15, 2002 to on or about May 20, 2002 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

      ( print page 28771)    
Dated: May 16, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-13150 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
# Effective 2.27.23

# Effective 5.8.23
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark S.
Gorder, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of IntriCon
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | the annual
  report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
  Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | 2) | the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                          

Date: March
17, 2006

| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| | /s/ Mark S. Gorder                     
| |                                        
| | Mark S. Gorder                         
| | President
  and Chief Executive        
| | Officer
  (principal executive officer)

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---