alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed June 23, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00281-CV

____________

MOHAMAD G. ALATKI, Appellant

V.

TIDEWATER FINAANCE COMPANY D/B/A TIDEWATER MOTOR 

CREDIT AND D/B/A TIDEWATER CREDIT SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1055857

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 19, 2015. The notice of 

appeal was due March 23, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, 

filed his notice of appeal on March 26, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date 

for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied 

when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to 
extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, 

appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to 

support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 

S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 23.5****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “Item 4: Descriptionof the Business – Qualified Persons” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, dated March 30, 2006 (the “AIF”), in Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “MD&A”) andin the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific and technical nature pursuant to which I have actedin a supervisory capacity under the heading “Item 4: Description of the Business – Oyu TolgoiCopper and Gold Project” of the AIF and in the MD&A.Sincerely,     */s/ CharlesP.N. Forster*     Name: Charles P. N. Forster  Title: P. Geo       Date: March 30, 2006
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MERIDIAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Nicholas Lahanas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Nicholas LahanasNicholas Lahanas, Chief Financial Officer May 15, 2008
Exhibit G-1

RTX SEF: Certificate of Formation
55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Submission No. 20-19

February 20, 2020

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Delisting of Certain Financial Power and Physical Environmental Futures and Options on 

Future Products - Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6(a) 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)1 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”) and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), ICE Futures U.S., Inc. 

(“Exchange”) submits notice to the Commission that, effective as of the close of business today, February 

20, 2020, the Exchange will delist all contract months of the following futures and options contracts:

• Cross State Air Pollution Rule NOx Ozone Season Group 2 Allowance Future - Vintage 2017

(“NOS”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR SO2 Group 1 Allowance Future - Vintage 2018 (“SOR”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR SO2 Group 2 Allowance Future - Vintage 2018 (“STQ”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR NOx Annual Allowance Future - Vintage 2018 (“NAQ”)

• Cross State Air Pollution Rule NOx Ozone Season Group 2 Allowance Future - Vintage 2018

(“NOT”)

• Option on Cross State Air Pollution Rule NOx Ozone Season Group 2 Allowance Future - Vintage 

2018 (“NOT”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR NOx Annual Allowance Future - Vintage 2017 (“NAP”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR SO2 Group 1 Allowance Future - Vintage 2017 (“SOQ”)

• Cross State Air Pollution TR SO2 Group 2 Allowance Future - Vintage 2017 (“STP”)

• Calendar One Time Option on ISO New England Massachusetts Hub Day-Ahead Peak Calendar 

Year One Time Fixed Price Future (“NEX”)

• ISO New England Massachusetts Hub Day-Ahead Peak Calendar Year One Time Fixed Price 

Future (“NEX”)

• Calendar One Time Option on PJM Western Hub Real-Time Peak (800 MWh) Calendar Year One 

Time Fixed Price Future (“PMX”)
• PJM Western Hub Real-Time Peak (800 MWh) Calendar Year One Time Fixed Price Future

(“PMX”)

These futures and options products currently have no open interest.

The Exchange certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on 

the Exchange’s website and may be accessed at (https://www.theice.com/futures-us/regulation). 

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 312-836-6745 or at 

patrick.swartzer@theice.com.

Sincerely,

Patrick Swartzer

Manager

Market Regulation

Enc.

cc: Division of Market Oversight

New York Regional Office
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

January 19, 2022

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC - Rule Change - Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Rate Swaps Currencies –

Tokyo Hours Only)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby 

submits amendments to its Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Rate Swaps Currencies – Tokyo 

Hours Only) (the “Fee Schedule”), which has been amended to reflect updates to certain terms and fees. The 

amendments will become effective on February 2, 2022, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. 

Pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A is the update to the Fee 

Schedule, with the additions and deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this submission, TW 

SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain information 

confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial 

information and has posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a redacted 

copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rule complies with the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder, 

including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the Fee Schedule is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rule were expressed to TW SEF by its 

governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market participants.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (646) 767-4923 or by email at 

Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

Tradeweb SEF CCO
APPENDIX A

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Rate Swaps Currencies – Tokyo Hours Only) 

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
AFH Holding III, Inc. 10-Q





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding III, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 15, 2010





/s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. HeshmatpourPresident, Secretary and Sole Director(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2020262EN.01000201.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn — Germany) — Thomas Leonhard v DSL-Bank — a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG

(Case C-301/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2002/65/EC - Distance loan agreement - Right of withdrawal - Consequences - Article 7(4) - Return of the services received - Payment of compensation for benefit of use - Supplier’s obligation - Precluded)

(2020/C 262/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Bonn

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Thomas Leonhard

Defendant: DSL-Bank — a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC must be interpreted as meaning that, where a consumer exercises his or her right to withdraw from a distance loan agreement concluded with a supplier, that consumer has the right to receive from that supplier, subject to certain sums which the consumer himself or herself is required to pay to the supplier under the conditions laid down in Article 7(1) and (3) of that directive, the principal repaid and the interest paid under that agreement, but does not have the right to receive compensation for the benefit of use of that principal and that interest.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
# C_2019172EN.01002502.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Vereniging Gasopslag Nederland, TAQA Onshore BV, TAQA Piek Gas BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt, other party: Gas Transport Services BV

(Case C-399/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/33)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
Exhibit 21




Schedule
of Subsidiaries




Percentage InterestName of Entity
                      
                      2008
                      
                      
                      2007Jingzhou
      Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd., “Henglong”
                      
                      
                      80.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      44.50
                      %Shashi
      Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd., “Jiulong”
                      
                      
                      81.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      81.00
                      %Shenyang
      Jinbei Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd.,
      “Shenyang”
                      
                      
                      70.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      70.00
                      %Zhejiang
      Henglong & Vie Pump-Manu Co., Ltd., “Zhejiang”
                      
                      
                      51.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      51.00
                      %Universal
      Sensor Application Inc., “USAI”
                      
                      
                      83.34
                      %
                      
                      
                      75.90
                      %Wuhan
      Jielong Electric Power Steering Co., Ltd., “Jielong”
                      
                      
                      85.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      85.00
                      %Wuhu
      HengLong Auto Steering System Co., Ltd., “Wuhu”
                      
                      
                      77.33
                      %
                      
                      
                      77.33
                      %Jingzhou
      Hengsheng Automotive System Co., Ltd., “Hengsheng”
                      
                      
                      100.00
                      %
                      
                      
                      100.00
                      %
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Fernando GONZALES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10469.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Filed Oct. 3, 2013.

*765Mark J. Wenker, USPX-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Keith J. Hilzendeger, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Fernando Gonzales-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzales-Garcia contends that the government breached the plea agreement by failing to move for a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. The government contends that the appeal is barred by a valid appeal waiver. We review de novo whether a defendant has waived his right to appeal. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th Cir.2009). In the plea agreement, Gonzales-Garcia waived his right to appeal the judgment and sentence as long as the “sentence is consistent with this agreement.” Neither the plea agreement nor the magistrate judge at the change of plea hearing explained what was meant by this provision. This ambiguity is construed against the government, *see United States v. Transfiguracion,*442 F.3d 1222, 1228 (9th Cir.2006), and we hold that Gonzales-Garcia did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to appeal.

We review for plain error whether the government breached the plea agreement because Gonzales-Garcia did not raise the issue of breach in the district court. *See United States v. Manzo,*675 F.3d 1204, 1209 (9th Cir.2012). Because Gonzales-Garcia made inconsistent statements to the probation office regarding his offense, he failed to make a “full and complete disclosure to the Probation Office” as contem*766plated by the terms of the plea agreement. Thus, the government was not obligated to move for the third point under the plea agreement.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William J.
Kullback, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of IntriCon
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | the annual
  report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
  Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | 2) | the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                          

Date: March
17, 2006

| |                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/
  William J. Kullback                                               
| |                                                                         
| | William J.
  Kullback                                                   
| | Chief
  Financial Officer and 
  Treasurer (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
#### PACK v. RANDOLPH OIL CO.

No. 343P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 335

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998.
#### STATE v. HAYES

No. 311PA98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 154

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay denied 7 August 1998. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 30 September 1998. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 30 September 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 30 September 1998. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss Appeal denied 30 September 1998.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
February 6, 2001; February 13, 2001; February 20, 2001; and February 
27, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-1269 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Sang-Chul Kim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
            /s/ Sang-Chul KimName:
            Sang-Chul
      KimTitle:
            Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)