alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Taylor *vs.*Simmons.

The certificate of a collector o£ internal revenue of the United States that a paper is a correct copy of a bond of file in his office, is not sufficient, without more, to authorize the admission of such copy in evidence in the courts of this state.

December 15, 1885.

Evidence. Bonds. Officers. 'Revenue Collector. Before Judge Branham. Walker Superior Court. February Term, 1885.

Simmons sued out an attachment against Taylor, based on a note and an account. The account was “ to amt. pd. on distiller’s warehousing land for W. B. Taylor, he being joint security with W. B. Simmons on said bond, $151.50.” The defendant pleaded the general issue and set-off; also that the plaintiff was a partner in the firm of Rackley & Franklin, who gave the bond, and was jointly liable as a principal thereon; and that the plaintiff took part and aided in the illegal removal of the liquor, which was the breach of the bond.

On the trial, a copy of the bond, certified to be such by the collector of internal revenue for the second district of .Georgia, was offered in evidence, and admitted over objection.

*14After verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant moved for a new trial, which was refused, and he excepted.

I. E. Shumate ; E. M. W. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.

EL P. Lumpkin ; F. W. Copeland, for defendant.

Blandford, Justice.

The only question in this case which is necessary to be considered by this court is, whether a copy bond, certified by the United States collector of internal revenue to be a correct copy of a bond of file in his officfe, can be admitted in evidence, without more, by the courts of this state. There is no law of this state which will admit this paper in evidence, and no law of the United States, either by statute or the decisions of the courts of that government, which authorizes the admission of such a paper in evidence in the courts of this state. Neither the constitution of the United States nor the acts of congress passed in pursuance thereof authorize the admission of this paper in evidence by the state courts; so we think that the court erred in admitting the paper in evidence in this case over the objection of counsel for plaintiff in error

Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Richard P. Rainey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of AVAX Technologies, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared; and

          (b)  Reserved.

          (c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

          (d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
     design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: May 24, 2004


/s/ Richard P. Rainey
------------------------------------
Richard P. Rainey
President (Principal Financial Officer)
Order entered February 27 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00488 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00489 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00490 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00505 - CR LUIS ALFREDO JUAREZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F10 - 35332 - I , F11 - 35928 - I, F11 - 35929 - I, F11 - 35930 - I 

### O RDER The State’s brief in this case was due to the Court on January 2, 2014. The Court is gravely concerned about counsel for the State taking no steps to request additional time to file its brief for over fifty days since its brief was initially due. The basis for extension was given as follows: The undersigned attorney was out of the office several days during the week of Chr istmas; January 1 and 20, 2014, were county holidays; the office was closed due to inclement weather more than one day; and the undersigned attorney was out of the office two days due to illness during this time.Only two of these purported impediments t o timely filing are before the initial brief deadline of

January 2, 2014. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice and to avoid default by the State, t he Court GRANTS the state’s February 26, 2014 motion for extension of time to file state’s brief , but

not es its grave reservations in doing so

.

We ORDER the Clerk of Court to file the state’s brief as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Applied
Optoelectronics, Inc. (the “Company”), and Stefan J. Murry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Company’s Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, to which this Certification is attached
as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto
as of May 14, 2015.



|/s/
    Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin    |  | /s/
    Stefan J. Murry | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|Chih-Hsiang (Thompson)
    Lin        |  | Stefan J. Murry         | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer | 



This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Applied
Optoelectronics, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29156-29157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 29157]]


    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel RFA: HL-01-004 (Blood and Marrow Transplant 
Clinical Research Network).
    Date: June 28-29, 2001.
    Time: 7 PM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Mariott Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road NW., 
Washington, DC 20008.
    Contact Person: Diane M. Reid, MD, Review Branch, Room 7182, 
Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
435-0277.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13338 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


I, Olivier Dubois, Chief Financial Officer of
Technip-Coflexip, a société anonymeorganized
under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Technip-Coflexip on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, to my knowledge:



| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                                                        
|
| |  | the information contained in such Annual Report
    on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of
    Technip-Coflexip.



| |     |                   
| | --- | ------------------
| | By: | /s/ Olivier Dubois

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| |                                
| | Name: Olivier Dubois           
| | Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 24, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05866-LTS Document 10 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Laural
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mandi
Luis, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
October 7, 2008








MANDI
LUIS





Mandi
Luis


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director








-1-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel General Clinical Research Centers.                    

*Date:*                         June 12, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 10 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John L. Meyer, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, One Rockledge Centre, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0806, meyerj@ncrr.nih.gov

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 16, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-12928  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2090 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2090

 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2019

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Pocan) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Scenic Trails Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third and fourth sentences and 
inserting ``The trail shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as a unit of the National Park System.''.

SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System,'' after ``administer the trail''.
                                 <all>
```
# EXHIBIT 5.1

[BLANK ROME LETTERHEAD]

May 18, 2006

IntriCon Corporation
1260 Red Fox Road
Arden Hills, MN 55112

Gentlemen:

You have requested our
opinion with respect to the offering by you, IntriCon Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), pursuant
to a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the Registration Statement) to be filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Act), of up to 1,217,500 shares of the Companys common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the
Option Shares), issuable pursuant to awards available for grant under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Plan). This opinion is furnished pursuant to the requirements of Item 601(b)(5) of Regulation S-K.

In rendering this opinion, we
have examined only the following documents: (i) the Companys Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (as amended) and
the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws; (ii) resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company; (iii) the
Registration Statement; and (iv) the Plan. We have not performed any independent investigation other than the document examination
described. Our opinion is therefore qualified in all respects by the scope of that document examination. We have assumed and
relied, as to questions of fact and mixed questions of law and fact, on the truth, completeness, authenticity and due
authorization of all certificates, documents, and records examined and the genuineness of all signatures. In rendering this
opinion we have assumed that 5,149,814 shares of the Companys Common Stock are outstanding. This opinion is limited to the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Based upon and subject to the
foregoing, we are of the opinion that the shares of Common Stock of the Company which are being offered and sold by the Company
pursuant to the Registration Statement and the Plan, when sold in the manner and for the consideration contemplated by the
Registration Statement and the Plan, if any, will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

We hereby consent to the
filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,
/s/   Blank Rome LLP
BLANK ROME LLP

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 136905 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS and Stephen J. Markman, 

### UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH J ustices 

### SYSTEM, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 136905 COA: 276710 Washtenaw CC: 06-000034-CK TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH 

### , W EAVER 

### , and K ELLY


### , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 26, 2008

Clerk
(84 South. 925)

#### Ex parte STATE. CHAMBERS v. STATE.

(8 Div. 204.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1919.)

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Horace Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Street & Bradford, of Guntersville, for appellee.

THOMAS, J.

Petition by the State of Alabama, on the relation of the Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court, reversing the appeal of Ben Chambers v. State, 84 South. 638. Writ denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00446-CV

D & D Unlimited, Appellant

v.

Tracie S. Kitchens-Savage, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY 

NO. 23CCV00697, THE HONORABLE PAUL A. MOTZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due on November 6, 2023. By letter dated November 28, 

2023, this Court notified appellant that appellant’s brief was overdue and that failure to file a 

satisfactory response by December 8, 2023, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want 

of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 4, 2024
173 P.3d 1021

#### STATE of Arizona v. Troy Richard MOSS.

No. CR-07-0196-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Nov. 29, 2007.

ORDERED: Petition for Review = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.