alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017249EN.01004501.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/45

---

Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)

(Case T-367/17)

(2017/C 249/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design ‘Electrically operated lifting column’ — Community design No 101 159-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1411/2015-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Group Holdings Limited. Registered in England No. 4743602 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

VIA EMAIL TO: FOIAsubmissions@CFTC.gov 

08 November 2022

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Attention: FOIA Compliance Office 1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington, DC 20581

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir/Madam,

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d), LCH Limited (“LCH”) respectfully requests 

confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, for Appendix I 

of the §40.6(a) rule filing submission submitted via the CFTC Portal on November 8, 2022, titled 

“Confidential App I - Margin Collateral Haircut Schedule” including any subsequent emails and replies 

between LCH and Commission staff (the “Information”) under §39.18(g)(1).

LCH is requesting confidential treatment for the Information pursuant to Commission Regulation 

145.9(d)(ii), which provides that confidential treatment may be requested on the grounds that 

disclosure would reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. LCH further 

requests that the Information receives confidential treatment in perpetuity. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential 

treatment accorded by law, and LCH will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. LCH 

requests notification from the Commission in advance of any disclosure of the Information pursuant 

to the FOIA or the Commission’s Rules of Practice so that this request for confidential treatment may 

be substantiated.

Yours sincerely,

Ebba Andersson

Senior Compliance Officer

LCH Limited
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27867-27868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD09-01-001]
RIN 2115-AE47


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Manitowoc River, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27868]]

SUMMARY: On March 6, 2001, we published a direct final rule (66 FR 
13433). This direct final rule notified the public of our intent to 
revise the operating regulations governing the Eighth Street bridge 
(mile 0.29), Tenth Street bridge (mile 0.43), and the Wisconsin Central 
(formerly Soo Line) bridge (mile 0.91), on the Manitowoc River. The 
direct final rule re-established the schedule published in 1983 that 
was erroneously removed by another rule in 1984. We have not received 
an adverse comment or notice of intent to submit adverse comment on 
this rule. Therefore, this rule will go into effect as scheduled.

DATES: The effective date of the direct final rule is confirmed as June 
4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Scot M. Striffler, Project 
Manager, Ninth Coast Guard District (obr), at (216) 902-6084.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
James D. Hull,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-12722 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
**Exhibit
      32.1**






Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)







I,
      Beaufort J.B. Clarke, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of
      ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





2.  The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      LLC.










*Date:
      April 13, 2007*







*/s/
      Beaufort J.B. Clarke*


Beaufort
      J.B. Clarke


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

Confidential Treatment has not been requested

Organization Name: New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Organization Type: DCM

Registered Entity Identifier: NYMEX Submission No. 14-257

Submission Number: 1408-0815-0322-68

Submission Date: 08/08/14 03:03:22 PM

Submission Type: Rule - 40.6(a) Rule Certification

Submission Description:

Revs. to NYMEX Position Limit, Position Accountability and 

Reportable Level Tbl. in the Interpretations and Special Notices Sec. of 

Ch. 5 of the NYMEX Rulebook Comprised of Corrections and 

Administrative Changes Reflecting the Accurate Terms 

Rule Numbers: NYMEX Chapter 5
# C_2017129EN.01003302.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/33

---

Action brought on 6 March 2017 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-145/17)

(2017/C 129/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Gombe, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 of 12 December 2016 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Mr Célestin Kanyama; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 of 12 December 2016 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Mr Célestin Kanyama;

| — | order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and all interveners. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and all interveners.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-139/17, Kibelisa v Council.

Kibelisa

Council

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1367-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa, (FEMA-1367-DR), dated May 2, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 9, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 2, 2001: Wapello County for (Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-12670 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Robert M. McLaughlinRobert M. McLaughlinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 29, 2008
# C_2020077EN.01003601.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Saint-Brieuc — Chambre détachée de Guingamp — France) — Procureur de la République v Tugdual Carluer, Yann Latouche, Dominique Legeard, Thierry Leleu, Dimitri Pinschof, Brigitte Plunian, Rozenn Marechal

(Case C-115/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/48)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129502 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SHARON TAYLOR, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 129502 

 COA: 252808 
 Wayne CC: 03-301766-CK

USA LAWYERS SERVICE, and ROBERT 

STAFFORD, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
Internal 

Eurex Clearing AG 

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments 

No. 020-23 

April 6, 2023 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of April 3, 2023: 

· Eurex Clearing Circular No. 020-23 (April 3, 2023): Amendments to the Clearing Conditions and 

FCM Default Rules regarding Default Management: Introduction of Residual Settlement for 

Default Management Hedging Auctions and further clarifications - End of Consultation. This 

circular states that there were no comments received regarding Amendments D set forth in Eurex 

Clearing Circular 009-23, which was submitted previously as a 40.6 submission, and confirms the 

effective date of May 1, 2023 stated in that circular. 

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer 

By: Eric Seinsheimer 

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG 

Dated: April 6, 2023
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-272

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 07/03/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of June 26, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

July 3, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-272

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of June 26, 2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-188 (June 28, 2023), USD LIBOR to SOFR Secondary Swap 

Conversion – Effective July 3, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-189 (June 28, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture 

Margins - Effective June 29, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-190 (June 29, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements - Agriculture, 

Energy Margin - Effective June 30, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-192 (June 30, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture 

Margins - Effective July 3, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
Clearing House: General Regulations

- iApril November 2022

GENERAL REGULATIONS OF

LCH LIMITED
Clearing House: General Regulations

- 45-

April November 2022

“Intra-Day Non-Bulk 

Transfer”

means an intra-day transfer of some or all of the SwapClear 

Contracts from the Transfer Account of an Eligible 

Transferor of a Carrying Clearing Member to the Transfer 

Account of an Eligible Transferee of a Receiving Clearing 

Member, where such transfer: (i) does not exceed the Bulk 

Threshold; and (ii) does not include the transfer of an 

Associated Collateral Balance

“Intra-Day Partial Bulk 

Transfer”

means an intra-day transfer of some (but not all) of the 

SwapClear Contracts from the Transfer Account of an 

Eligible Transferor of a Carrying Clearing Member to the 

Transfer Account of an Eligible Transferee of a Receiving 

Clearing Member

“ISA Port” means a port of the Contracts and Account Balance held in a 

Custodial Segregated Account opened by a Clearing 

Member with the Clearing House in respect of a Custodial 

Segregated Client to an Individual Segregated Account 

opened for such Clearing Client by a Backup Clearing 

Member in accordance with the Default Rules and the 

relevant Collateral Management Agreement 

"IRS FCM SwapClear 

Contract"

has the meaning assigned to it in the FCM Regulations

"IRS SwapClear Contract" means a SwapClear Contract of the type of Contracts which 

are identified as being IRS SwapClear Contracts in the 

Product Specific Contract Terms and Eligibility Criteria 

Manual, which includes, in the case of the Default Rules 

(including the Rates Service DMP Annex but excluding, for 

the avoidance of doubt, the Client Clearing Annex), the FCM 

Default Fund Agreement and any other document, rule or 

procedure as specified by the Clearing House from time to 

time, an IRS FCM SwapClear Contract

"ISDA Definitions" has the meaning assigned to it in Section 1 of Part A of 

Schedule 2 of the Product Specific Contract Terms and 

Eligibility Criteria Manual

"Joint Rates Service Clearing 

Member"

means, for purposes of the Portfolio Margining Service, a 

clearing member who is both a SwapClear Clearing Member 

and a Listed Interest Rates Clearing Member

"Key Tenors" means the Key Tenors as set out in the Inflation Swaps 

Operational Specifications

"Key Tenors Market Data" has the meaning assigned to it in Regulation 60A(l)
*712*F.2d 1479

#### In re Ramon Rodriguez SOSA, Petitioner.

No. 83-1630.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 1983.

Decided July 26, 1983.

*448Ramon Rodriguez Sosa was on the petition for writ of mandamus, pro se.

Before MIKVA and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Ramon Rodriguez Sosa petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel vacation of the district court’s order transferring the underlying case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Sosa, who apparently is imprisoned in El Reno, Oklahoma, filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Attorney General Smith, seeking credit for time allegedly spent in custody prior to imposition of his sentence. On March 11, 1983, the district court issued an order directing Sosa to show cause why his complaint should not be transferred to the Oklahoma court and, one week later after considering Sosa’s response, ordered the case transferred. On April 25, by court order, the record in this case was physically transferred to the Oklahoma court. Six weeks later, Sosa filed the instant petition for mandamus relief.

Upon consideration of Sosa’s motion for a writ of mandamus, we dismiss the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Although we have held that, in extraordinary circumstances, transfer orders are reviewable under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (1976), see *In re*Scott, 709 F.2d 717 (D.C.Cir.1983), the physical transfer of the original papers in this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, a permissible transferee forum under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1976), deprives this court of jurisdiction to review the transfer, *Starnes v. McGuire,*512 F.2d 918, 924 (D.C. Cir.1974) (en banc). A new proceeding seeking retransfer in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, which may be reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, is “the appropriate course of action.” *Id.*
      *1*

. Short of dismissal, the only option available to us at this time is an informal request that the Oklahoma court retransfer the record to permit consideration of Sosa’s petition. *See, e.g., Fine v. McGuire,*433 F.2d 499, 500 n. 1 (D.C.Cir. 1970). We do not believe that the merits of Sosa’s petition warrant such extraordinary action.