alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f8k092110ex10i_jinmimi.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


TERMINATION OF MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT


 


This mutual Termination of Management Consultancy Agreement is made and entered into on the 16th day of September, 2010, by and between Shenzhen Jinmimi Network Technology Co. Ltd, a Shenzhen corporation ("Shenzhen Jinmimi") and Chuangding Investment Consultant (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, a Shenzhen corporation ("Chuangding").







WHEREAS,








	
A.  

	
Shenzhen Jinmimi and Chuangding entered into a Management Consultancy Agreement dated December 18, 2008 relating to Chuangding providing full operating services for Shenzhen Jinmimi which provides services in the development of network technology and related services;








	
B.  

	
Shenzhen Jinmimi and Chuangding have determined that profit making performance by all parties under the Management Consultancy Agreement is not feasible without unreasonable expense and delay;








	
C.  

	
Shenzhen Jinmimi and Chuangding desire to terminate the Management Consultancy Agreement and release each other from all duties, obligations, covenants and representations under or arising out of the Management Consultancy Agreement; and








	
D.  

	
Shenzhen Jinmimi and Chuangding agree to appoint Xi Li and Silky Road International Group Limited (collectively known as “Successor”) to be the successor of the management consultancy agreement concurrently with the termination.












IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED as follows:







        1.     TERMINATION AND MUTUAL RELEASE. The Management Consultancy Agreement is hereby mutually terminated and effective immediately. Shenzhen Jinmimi and Chuangding hereto hereby release and forever discharge the other party hereto, its officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims liabilities, suits and damages arising or in any way related to the Management Consultancy Agreement and agrees not to commence any such suit or make any such claim against the other party,







        2.     SUCCESSOR. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Xi Li and Silky Road International Group Limited agree to accept and shall be the successor of the new management consultancy agreement among the Successor and Shenzhen Jinmimi. The Successor, Xi Li and Silky Road International Group Limited, also agree to cancel the promissory notes issued to them by Jinmimi Network Inc., the parent company of Chuangding.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 




 



	 Shenzhen Jinmimi Network Technology Company Limited	 	 Silky Road International Group Limited
	 	 	 
	 By:_______________________________	 	 By:_______________________________
	 Title: President	 	 Title: President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 Chuangding Investment Consultant (Shenzhen) Company Limited	 	 Xi Li
	 	 	 
	 By:_______________________________	 	 By:_______________________________
	 Title: President	 	 Name: Xi Li
#### Alfredo GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-40359

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 2006.

Alfredo Garcia, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Rosharon, TX, pro se.

Sallie Christian-Carnal, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alfredo Garcia, Texas prisoner # 668073, appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the revocation of his release on mandatory supervision as time-barred. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) with respect to the question whether Garcia’s motion to reopen the revocation proceedings constituted “other collateral review” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). We need not decide this question in this case. Even if it is assumed that Garcia’s motion constituted “other collateral review,” the limitation period nevertheless expired prior to the filing of the federal habeas petition. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D). Although Garcia contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling, COA was not granted as to that question.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      November 12, 2008
                            By:
                            /s/ RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-411

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 09/19/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of September 11, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

September 19, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-411

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of September 11,

2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-281 (September 14, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy 

Margins - Effective September 15, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-282 (September 14, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Equity 

and Interest Rate Margins - Effective September 15, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-51 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 24 of 24
# C_2018112EN.01002401.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 24 January 2018 — Compagnie d’entreprises CFE SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

(Case C-43/18)

(2018/C 112/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Compagnie d’entreprises CFE SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Does an order by which a Member State body designates a special area of conservation, under Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, (1) and which contains conservation objectives and general preventive measures having regulatory force, constitute a plan or programme within the meaning of Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment? (2)

1

2

More particularly, does such an order fall within Article 3(4), as a plan or programme which sets the framework for future development consent of projects, with the result that the Member States must determine whether it is likely to have significant effects on the environment, in compliance with Article 3(5)?

Must Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment be interpreted as meaning that the designation order in question is exempt from the application of Article 3(4) of that directive?

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7.

1

(2)  OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
EMC Metals Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Dated:
August 11,
2014                      
/s/
George Putnam

George Putnam

Principal Executive
Officer
Exhibit
32.1
 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  
 Date:
      May 17, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                  Title:
                Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                  President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                  General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund,
  LP
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of SPECTRUM ACQUISITION CORPORATION  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Harry J. Orfanos, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Harry J. OrfanosHarry J. Orfanos, President and Director November 28, 2007
Order entered June 2 1 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00465
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D .P.B. AND D.Z.B., MI NOR CHILDREN On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial Dist rict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 05
- 12682



### O RDER The briefing deadline in this appeal was triggered on May 3, 2019 when the clerk’s record was filed. Although the reporter’s record had not yet been filed, appellant indicated in hi s docketing statement that he had not requested the record and did not indicate he would be requesting it. Appellant did not file his brief by the deadline, and when he had still not filed the brief two days later, was notified by the Court that his brie f was late. Before the Court is his response , a letter filed June 14 th explaining he requested the reporter’s record in April and had just received

a n invoice for the record of th e first of two trial dates he reque sted

. He states further that he has made p ay ment arran g ements f or th is invoice and asks the briefing deadline be reset until the complete record is filed

. We GRANT the request and ORDER as follows.We ORDER Donna Kindle, as the Official Court Reporter for the 303 rd Judicial District

Court to f ile, no later than June 25, 2019, written verification appellant has been invoiced for the record of December 7, 2018, the second trial date. We further ORDER appellant to file, no later than June 28, 2019, written verification he has paid or made arrange ments to pay that invoice. The complete reporter’s record shall be filed no later than July 15, 2019 and appellant shall file his brief no later than August 14, 2019.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Kindle and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
# C_2019187EN.01002501.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Idi Srl v Arcadis Agenzia Regionale Campana Difesa Suolo

(Case C-101/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 45(2), first subparagraph, point (b) - Personal situation of the candidate or tenderer - Possibility for the Member States to exclude from participation in a public contract any operator subject to a procedure for an arrangement with creditors - National legislation providing for the exclusion of persons subject to an ‘ongoing’ procedure for a declaration of admission to an arrangement with creditors, except where the insolvency plan provides for the continuation of the business - Operator having filed an application for an arrangement with creditors, reserving the possibility to submit a plan providing for the continuation of the business)

(2019/C 187/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Idi Srl

Defendant: Arcadis — Agenzia Regionale Campana Difesa Suolo

intervening parties: Regione Campania

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45(2), first subparagraph, point (b) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows the exclusion from a public procurement procedure of an economic operator who, at the date of the exclusion decision, has filed an application for an arrangement with creditors, while reserving the right to present a plan which provides for the continuation of the business

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
#### Maria Auqui et al., Respondents, v Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership et al., Appellants.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided February 16, 2012

Reported below, 83 AD3d 407.

Motion by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

               Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of UnitedFinancial Corp. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2004, appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of United Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

/s/ Moss Adams, LLP 

Spokane, Washington
#### Michael D. GILLISPIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5080.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 15, 2006.

Richmond J. Brownson, Timothy M. White, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*745Wyn Dee Baker, United States Attorney, Tulsa, OK, Katauna J. King, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Dallas, TX, for DefendantAppellee.

Before LUCERO, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Michael D. Gillispie appeals the district court’s denial of an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). In *McGraw v. Barnhart,*450 F.3d 493 (10th Cir.2006), this court held that § 406(b)(1) allows an award of fees when the district court has remanded a Title II Social Security case for further proceedings. Thus, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in light of *McGraw.*Appellant’s motion to file an addendum of recent citations is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to accept the addendum for filing as of the date of original receipt.

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
#### IN RE APPEAL OF MITSUBISHI SEMICONDUCTOR AM., INC.

No. 292P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 150

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 34      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 34      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 34      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 3 of 3