alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 10, 2020

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00170-CV

IN RE STEPHEN PERL AND PM FACTORS, INC. D/B/A 1ST PMF BANCORP, 

Relators

Original Proceedings from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18862

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Osborne

Before the Court are relators’ February 10, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief. Relators request that we stay the trial court’s January 28th, 2020 order 

compelling answers to certain interrogatories and responses to certain requests for production. We 

GRANT the motion and until further order of this Court, stay relators’ obligation to answer 

Interrogatory Nos. 3, 6, and 8, or respond to Request for Production Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 15.

We further request that respondent and real parties in interest file their responses, if any, to 

relators’ petition for writ of mandamus by February 24, 2020.
2

/Leslie Osborne/

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00327
- CV

__________________ GERALD BAZINET , OUTCAST TACKLE AND ARMS, LLC, AND TEXAS OUTCAST, LLC, Appellant s
V. ROBERT ADAMS JR., MARTIN GOLMON, AND KIRK FREDERIC , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 136th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D
- 203,750
- A

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 25, 2019, we notified the parties that the appellant s had not established indigen ce and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the clerk’s record or the

appe llants explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellants did not respond to this Court’s notice.2 An appellant who wishes to proceed on appeal without payment of costs must file an affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. An a ppeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution if the appellant is not entitled to appeal without payment of costs and fails to pay for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and have n ot shown that they are entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 22, 2020 Opinion Delivered January 23, 2020 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
# C_2017256EN.01004201.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/42

---

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2017 — Eco-Bat Technologies and Others v Commission

(Case T-232/17)

(2017/C 256/51)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                               |            |                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |            |
|                                     |       |                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|  Date:                May 15, 2008  | By:   | /s/ Nicholas                D. Gerber                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                          | Name:      | Nicholas                D. Gerber                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                          | Title:          | President                and Chief Executive Officer Victoria                Bay Asset Management, LLC, General                Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,                LP |

----
600573941 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

September 17, 2020 

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST 

Submitted via email1

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov 

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for 

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s 

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

David Levine 

General Counsel 

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 

1

 Request being submitted via email only given the circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 

pandemic, including a security order declared by Governor Cuomo. 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 2 

600573941 

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as 

the “Confidential Information.” 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0920-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-0920-0017.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4 

600573941 

Annex A 

Confidential Information 

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code 

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0920-0001–BSEF-0920-

0017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, June 13, 2001, 2 p.m. to June 13, 2001, 4:30 pm, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 23, 2001, 66 FR 20474.                

The meeting will be held on May 29, 2001. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13201 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PERIKLIS PAPAGEORGIOU, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR98-195-S, CA-99-2778-S) Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: June 23, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Periklis Papageorgiou, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on September 14, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket on September 15, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the datethat the order was entered on the docket that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Periklis Papageorgiou appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Papageorgiou , Nos. CR-98-195- S; CA-99-2778-S (D. Md. Sept. 15, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE v. ROTH

No. 369P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 614

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 1 September 1998.
EXHIBIT 1

SPIKES Market Maker Program

Program Purpose

The purpose of the SPIKES Market Maker Program (the “Program”) is to incentivize participants to support 

the continued development of the products listed below. The resulting additional central limit order book 

liquidity benefits all participants in the market.

Product Scope

SPIKES Volatility Index Futures that are traded on MGEX via the CME Globex® trading platform 

(“Product”). The Program consists of four Sections for participants.

Eligible Participants

With the exception of one subset, there is no limit to the number of participants in the Program. There are

no member requirements for participants.

For Section 1, the Exchange may designate one or more participants who agree to make two-sided markets 

in the Product throughout the Regular Trading Session (“RTS”) and, as specified, one or more Extended 

Trading Sessions (“ETS”). In determining whether or not to select a prospective participant for the 

Program, the Exchange may take into account a variety of factors, including: whether the prospective 

participant is willing to quote throughout RTS and, where specified, ETS; the strength of the quoting 

obligations the prospective participant is willing to commit to provide; whether the Exchange believes that 

the prospective participant can maintain such obligations based on the application; and historical trading 

volume in related products. The Exchange may, from time to time, add or subtract from the aforementioned 

requirements as it deems necessary. Failure to meet quoting requirements, among other things, may 

result in removal from the Program. Participants must complete an application with the Exchange to be 

eligible for Section 1 of the Program. An application can be received by contacting MGEX at 

mgex@mgex.com.

For Sections 2, 3, and 4, there are no application requirements. 

Program Term

Start date is October 1, 2021. End date is August 31, 2023.

Hours

RTS and/or ETS.

Obligations

In order to be eligible to receive the incentives, participants must quote two-sided markets in the Product 

at predetermined average bid/ask spreads meeting certain volume thresholds at specified time-in-market 

requirements.

Incentives

Upon meeting all obligations, as determined by the Exchange, participants will be eligible to receive 

predetermined incentives.

Monitoring and Termination of Status
The Exchange will monitor trading activity and participants’ performance and retain the right to revoke 

participant status if it concludes from review that a participant no longer meets the eligibility requirements, 

fails to meet the obligations of the Program, or fails to comply with Exchange rules (including, but not limited 

to, rules relating to market manipulation, wash trades, etc.) or any applicable law.
Order entered September 18, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00182-CR

No. 05-16-00183-CR

WALDRICK BROOKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F-1470150-S & F-1500333-S

ORDER

Before the Court is The State of Texas’s September 15, 2017 “Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Brief and for Acceptance of Contemporaneously Tendered Brief.” This appeal is set 

for submission on September 20, 2017.

The Court GRANTS the State’s September 15, 2017 motion for extension of time and 

acceptance of brief. The State’s brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Mark R. Bachmann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zep Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: April 14, 2008



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark R. Bachmann                                
|Mark R. Bachmann                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Zep Inc. and will be retained by Zep Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Airgas, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-39433, 33-48388, 33-57893, 33-61301, 33-61899, 33-63201, 33-64633, 333-08113,
333-37863, 333-46739, 333-60995, 333-61989 and 333-46266) on Form S-3, (Nos.
333-23651, 333-68722, and 333-114499) on Form S-4 and (Nos. 33-21780, 33-25419,
33-33954, 33-64056, 33-64058, 33-64112, 333-28261, 333-42023, 333-69214,
333-75256, 333-75258, 333-100187, and 333-107872) on Form S-8 of Airgas, Inc. of
our report dated May 3, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Airgas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, and
the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31,
2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Airgas, Inc. Our report refers to a change
in the Company's method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets
and derivative instruments and hedging activities effective April 1, 2001 and a
change in the Company's method of accounting for variable interest entities
effective December 31, 2003.

/s/KPMG LLP

June 10, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro VIAZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30020.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 8, 2006.*

Filed June 9, 2006.

Pamela J. Byerly, AUSA, USSP-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen R. Hormel, Esq., FPDWAFederal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & ID), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TALLMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and HUFF,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER ***

The joint motion for remand is GRANTED. The sentence for Alejandro ViazCruz is VACATED, and his case is REMANDED for resentencing.

MOTION GRANTED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by the Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### In the Matter of Develop Don’t Destroy (Brooklyn) et al., Appellants, v Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 11, 2010;

decided February 16, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*13 NY3d 713 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WASHINGTON MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-MS10;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as
servicers and sub-servicers:

     ABN AMRO,  Cendant  Mortgage Corp,  Chase Manhattan  Mortgage Corp,  Downey
Savings and Loan Association,  First Chicago NBD, First Republic Savings Bank of
NV,  Greenpoint  Mortgage  Company,  Litton Loan  Servicing  LP,  National  City
Mortgage,  Old  Kent  Bank,  Olympus  Servicing,  LP,  Wachovia  Mortgage  Corp,
Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004


                                         /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director