T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I RE NE M EL ENDEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73913 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 964- 718 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I r e ne M e l e nde z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU N 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73913 2 j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence fa ctual f in d in g s , Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 4 5 3 F . 3 d1 1 8 2 , 1 1 8 4 - 8 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) , an dwe r e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 324 F . 3d 1105, 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t M e le n d e z f

a ile dto es t abl i sh she s uffe re d p as tpers ec ut i on or has aw el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future p e r s e c u tio n o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e Mo l i n a -Mo ra les v . I NS , 237 F .3 d1 0 4 8 , 1 0 5 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ; see a l so P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 555 F . 3d 734, 740- 41 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( “ [ t ] he R e a l I D A c tr e qui r e s tha tapr ot e c t e d gr ound r e pr e s e nt‘ one c e ntr a l r e a s on’ f oran a s y l um appl i c ant ’ s pe r s e c ut i on” ) . W e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rw he the rM e l e nde z ’ s f a m i l yc ons t i tut e s apart i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup b e c au s e M e le n d e z d idn o t p r e s e n t th a t d is tin c t ar g u m e n t to th e B I A . See B arron v. A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . A c c or di ngl y , M e l e nde z ’ s a s y l um and w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se M e le n d e z f

a ile dto e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th a t s h e w ill b e to rtu r e dif r e tu rn e dto E l S a lv a d o r . See W akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 67 -68 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) .08- 73913 3 F i na l l y , M e l e nde z ’ s c ont e nt i on tha ts he w a s de ni e d due pr oc e s s be c aus e the B I A f a i l e d t o pr ovi de ar e a s one d e xpl ana t i on f ori t s de c i s i on i s be l i e d bythe r e c o r d . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 2 0 4 F . 3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (p et i t i o n er m u st s h o w e rr o ran dp r e

ju d ic e to e s tab lis h adu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.