alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-422

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 10/03/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of September 25, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

October 3, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-422

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of September 25,

2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-293 (September 25, 2023), SPAN2 Cross Model Offset ("CMO") Product 

Eligibility Modifications - Effective October 2, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-295 (September 28, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: 

Agriculture and Energy Margins - Effective September 29, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-296 (September 28, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy, 

FX, Interest Rate and Metal Margins – Effective September 29, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose FUENTES-GONZALES, a/k/a Pepe, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-7704.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2010.

Decided: May 5, 2010.

*283Jose Fuentes-Gonzales, Appellant Pro Se. Michael E. Savage, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Fuentes-Gonzales seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fuentes-Gonzales has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Eurex Clearing AG

ECAG Rule Certification 061-23

September 29, 2023

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Clearing Conditions (“Clearing Conditions”) of Eurex 

Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) and Price List (“Price List”) of Eurex Clearing is appended as Attachment 

A. Any additions are underlined and any deletions are struck through.

2. The date of intended implementation is October 23, 2023.

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange 

Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this 

submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ecen/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

4. A concise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears 

below.

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

6. Confidential treatment is not requested.

___________________________________________________________________________________

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF 

THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, 

INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

Eurex Clearing is amending the Clearing Conditions and Price List to reflect the launch of Options contracts 

on FTSE Bitcoin Index Futures in EUR and USD on Eurex Deutschland, as outlined in Eurex Clearing 

Circular 061/23, which is appended as Attachment A. Eurex Clearing will provide clearing services for 

these contracts. For avoidance of doubt, Eurex Clearing will clear these contracts outside the scope of its 

derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) license, which applies only to swaps.

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed 

in Attachment A.

Eurex Clearing has identified the following DCO Core Principle as potentially being relevant to the above 

amendments:

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will 

comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendments list new contracts, which Eurex 

Clearing clears outside the scope of its DCO license, and all products cleared by Eurex Clearing 

under its DCO license will continue to be subject to appropriate standards in compliance with this 

Core Principle.
2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7 

U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that:

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder; and

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing 

to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: September 29, 2023
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer
and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    January 31, 2007By:
    
    /s/ John MackenJohn MackenChief Executive Officer
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      International Mergers and AcquisitionsCorp. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 13, 2008                                       |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |
| /s/      Robert Palumbo                                          |
| Robert      PalumboPresident, CEO,      CFO,  Director |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4000-4001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form Number, and OMB Number: Description of Vessels, 
Description of Operations; ENG Form 3931, 3932; OMB Number 0710-0009.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 2,500.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,500.
    Average Burden Per Response: 48 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,000.
    Needs and Uses: The data collected provide information on vessel 
operators and their American Flag vessels operating or available for 
operation on the inland waterways of the United States in the 
transportation of freight and passengers. The information provides 
accurate U.S. Flag fleet

[[Page 4001]]

statistics for use by the Army Corps of Engineers and other agencies, 
such as the U.S. Coast Guard and Federal and State agencies involved in 
transportation.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Jim Laity.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Laity at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Room 10202, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: January 8, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-1320 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rockies Region 2007 Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

May 18, 2009Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

May 18, 2009Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[923 NE2d 582, 896 NYS2d 299]

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Henry Cozzani, Respondent.

Decided February 11, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Spota III, District Attorney,*Riverhead *(Thomas C. Costello*of counsel), for appellant.

*Aaron M. Wallenstein,*New York City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed *(see People v Price,*14 NY3d 61 [2010] [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) by CapSource Financial, Inc.
(Registrant), I, Steven J. Kutcher, the person performing the function of
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

|DATE: November 15, 2004 | By: /s/ Steven J. Kutcher                                                       
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Name: Steven J. KutcherPerson performing the function of Chief Financial Officer

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6409 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration from 

requiring the replacement of street and highway signs that are in upper 

case letters with such signs that are in mixed case lettering with the 

initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2010 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration from requiring the replacement of street 

and highway signs that are in upper case letters with 

such signs that are in mixed case lettering with the 

initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO NEW SIGNS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad5 ministrator of the Federal Highway Administration may 

6 not require the replacement of street and highway signs 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6409 IH

1 that are in upper case letters with signs that are in mixed 

2 case lettering with the initial letter in upper case followed 

3 by lower case lettering. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### TRIVETTE v. N.C. BAPTIST HOSP., INC.

No. 448A98

Case below: 131 N.C.App. 73

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the court of appeals allowed 3 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Erik Olsson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RSC HoldingsIII, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Not Applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 1, 2008       /s/ Erik Olsson     Erik Olsson    President and    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)