alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

| | By:    | /s/
      Jarrett F. Bousquet     
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | July
      15, 2010               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2246 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, 

Mississippi, as the ‘‘Deputy Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2246 EH

1 SECTION 1. DEPUTY DONALD WILLIAM DURR, CORPORAL 

2 ZACH MOAK, AND PATROLMAN JAMES WHITE 

3 MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 West Cherokee Street in 

6 Brookhaven, Mississippi, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Deputy Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach 

8 Moak, and Patrolman James White Memorial Post Office 

9 Building’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg11 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

12 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

13 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Deputy Donald Wil14 liam Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James 

15 White Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2246 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. trolman James White Memorial Post Office ald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Pa- in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Deputy Don- al Service located at 201 West Cherokee Street
Translation of Equity Interest Transfer Agreement dated in July 2008



 Exhibit 10.29 

Equity Transfer Agreement 

Transferor: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. 

Transferee: Zhang Chuanwei 

Upon negotiation, both parties hereby enter into the following equity transfer agreement: 

1. The Transferor agrees to transfer to the Transferee an equity of 90% (equal to 18 million yuan) of the registered
capital of Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd., in which the Transferor holds 100% equity (totaling 20 million yuan). 

2. The Transferee agrees to accept from the Transferor the equity of 90% (equal to 18 million yuan) of the registered
capital of Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd., in which the Transferor holds 100% equity (totaling 20 million yuan). 

3. Once the transfer is completed, the Transferee shall bear limited liabilities and debts in proportion to the equity
transferred to him in Tianjin Mingyang New Energy Investment Co., Ltd. 
 Signature (or seal) of the Transferor: 

(seal of Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd.) 

Date: July 28, 2008 

Signature (or seal) of the Transferee: (Zhang Chuanwei) 

Date: July 28, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29293-29294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13458]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the

[[Page 29294]]

following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Supplement Part 219, Small Business Programs and 
Associated Causes at 252.219; OMB Number 0704-0386.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 41.
    Responses per respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 41.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 41.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary to 
implement the reporting requirements of the acquisition-related 
sections of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631, et seq.) and the 
applicable sections of the Armed Services Procurement Act (10 U.S.C. 
2302, et seq.). DFARS 219.704 and the clause at DFARS 252.219-7003, 
Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business 
Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts), require prime contractors to 
notify the administrative contracting officer of any substitution of 
firms that are not small, small disadvantaged, or women-owned small 
businesses for the firms listed in those subcontracting plans that 
specifically identify small, small disadvantaged, and women-owned small 
businesses. Notifications must be in writing and may be submitted in a 
contractor-specified format.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit; Not-For-Profit 
Institutions.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. David M. Pritzker. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Pritzker at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 22, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-13458 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
# C_2021289EN.01000302.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 — The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd v Pirelli Tyre SpA (C-818/18 P), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Pirelli Tyre SpA (C-6/19 P)

(Joined Cases C-818/18 P and C-6/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Absolute grounds for refusal or invalidity of registration - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) - Sign consisting of a shape which does not represent a significant part of the goods)

(2021/C 289/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

(Case C-818/18 P)

Appellant: The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd (represented by: D. Martucci and F. Boscariol de Roberto, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: Pirelli Tyre SpA (represented by: T.M. Müller and F. Togo, Rechtsanwälte), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Association of Trade Mark Owners (Marques) (represented by: M. Viefhues, Rechtsanwalt)

(Case C-6/19 P)

Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: Pirelli Tyre SpA (represented by: T.M. Müller and F. Togo, Rechtsanwälte), The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd (represented by: D. Martucci and F. Boscariol de Roberto, avvocati)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Association of Trade Mark Owners (Marques) (represented by: M. Viefhues, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals in Cases C-818/18 P and C-6/19 P; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals in Cases C-818/18 P and C-6/19 P;

| 2. | Orders The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs in relation to the appeal proceedings in Cases C-818/18 P and C-6/19 P and to pay, in equal parts, the costs incurred by Pirelli Tyre SpA in relation to those proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Yokohama Rubber Co. Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs in relation to the appeal proceedings in Cases C-818/18 P and C-6/19 P and to pay, in equal parts, the costs incurred by Pirelli Tyre SpA in relation to those proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the European Association of Trade Mark Owners (Marques) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Association of Trade Mark Owners (Marques) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.

---
S06G0575.

#### VATACS GROUP, INC. et al. v. HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

(635 SE2d 758)

Melton, Justice.

In this declaratory judgment action regarding the priority of certain mortgages over others, we granted certiorari to answer the following limited question: Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that “ ‘laches is an equitable doctrine not applicable in a petition for declaratory judgment, which is an action at law.’ ” *VATACS Group v. HomeSide Lending,*276 Ga. App. 386, 393 (3) (623 SE2d 534) (2005). We find that the Court of Appeals did not err in its holding and affirm.

It is a longstanding and well-established rule that the doctrine of laches is an equitable defense which is not applicable to actions at law, which include declaratory judgment actions. See, e.g., *Stuckey v. Storms,*265 Ga. 491 (1) (458 SE2d 344) (1995); *Jones v. Douglas County,*262 Ga. 317 (1) (a) (418 SE2d 19) (1992). This continues to be a valid statement of the law.

Contrary to appellants’ contention otherwise, *Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Assn.,*271 Ga. 745 (524 SE2d 464) (1999), did not abrogate this fundamental rule. To the contrary, the sole issue in *Redfearn*was whether this Court had equity jurisdiction over a matter in which the plaintiffs sought equitable injunctive relief and the defendants asserted laches as a defense. Holding that the matter was not within this Court’s equity jurisdiction, we found that the resolution of the equitable claim was secondary to the primary legal issue of whether *51the trial court properly construed a contract between the parties. We further pointed out that the defendants’ mere assertion of laches did not automatically convert the action into one falling under our equity jurisdiction because the equitable issues remained ancillary to legal ones. In reaching this conclusion, we recognized that a great deal of uncertainty surrounded the area of this Court’s equity jurisdiction, and we even noted that some scholars had opined that “law courts [have] continuously taken over equity’s substantive ideas,” Dobbs, *Handbook on the Law of Remedies,*§ 2.6, p. 74 (1973), including laches, thereby exacerbating the difficulty of determining which cases are subject to this Court’s equity jurisdiction. *Redfearn,*supra at 749 (4), n. 22. We did not, however, overrule the sound principle of law that the equitable doctrine of laches is not applicable to an action at law such as this declaratory judgment matter. *Jones,*supra. To the extent that *Gerschick v. Pounds,*262 Ga. App. 554, 558 (3), n. 23 (586 SE2d 22) (2003) and *Ajayi v. Williams,*248 Ga. App. 325, 329 (1) (d), n. 4 (546 SE2d 537) (2001), hold otherwise, they are hereby overruled.

Decided October 2, 2006.

*Cauthorn & Nohr, Thomas E. Cauthorn III, Melissa M. Nohr, Justin B. O’Dell,*for appellants.

*Beloin & Associates, Charles W. Brown, Morris, Manning & Martin, Lewis E. Hassett,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2017300EN.01003801.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/38

---

Action brought on 20 July 2017 — Bopp v EUIPO (Representation of an equiangular octagon)

(Case T-460/17)

(2017/C 300/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carsten Bopp (Glashütten, Germany) (represented by: F. Pröckl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Sign (Representation of an equiangular octagon) — Application for registration No 11 005 196

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 May 2017 in Case R 1954/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### Craig Arthur HUMPHRIES; Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Leroy Baca, individually and in his official capacity as Los Angeles County Sheriff; Michael L. Wilson, individually and in his official capacity as a Detective and/or Deputy of the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department; Charles T. Ansberry, individually and in his official capacity as a Detective of the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-56467.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 26, 2011.

Esther G. Boynton, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Lillie Hsu, Martin Stein, Esquire, Greines Martin Stein & Richland, LLP, Paul C. Epstein, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, Mark Denis Rutter, Carpenter Rothans and Dumont, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: JAY S. BYBEE and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges, and RICHARD MILLS, Senior District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.

ORDER

After finding Appellants to be the prevailing parties in this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, we ordered Appellee County of Los Angeles to pay 10% of Appellants’ attorney’s fees. *See*No. 05-56467 (June 22, 2009) at 1, 3-4. We later adopted the recommendation of the Appellate Commissioner, which calculated this portion of the fee award to be $59,258.09. *See*No. OS-56467 (Dec. 2, 2009) at 2.

The United States Supreme Court subsequently reversed this portion of the judgment of this court. We likewise reverse and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in *Los Angeles Cnty., Cal. v. Humphries,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 447, 453-54, 178 L.Ed.2d 460 (2010).
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of September 30, 2009. This Certification is executed as of November 23, 2009. By: /s/ MARTIN SCHUERMANN Martin Schuermann
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)  By: /s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORN
Lawrence Weisdorn
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|               | IMedicor, Inc.(Registrant) |                                  |
|--------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|               |                       |                                  |   |
| Date: May 23, 2011 | By:                        | /s/ Fred Zolla                        |   |
|               |                       | Fred Zolla                            |   |
|               |                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               |                       | (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |

|               |   |                           |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|               |   |                           |   |
| Date: May 23, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Craig Stout                |   |
|               |   | Craig Stout                    |   |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|               |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November 14, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
No. 76-328.

#### Gruner et al. *v.*Superior Court of California, County of Fresno.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari dismissed September 27, 1976, under this Court’s Rule 60.
Exhibit 4.1


 


TORNIER N.V.


 


	
  with registered seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands,

  	
   

  
	
  trade register number 34250781

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  THIS CERTIFIES THAT

  



 


[              ]


 


	
  IS THE OWNER OF

  



 


REGISTERED ORDINARY SHARE(S) OF EUR     EACH


 


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Executive Director

  	
   

  



 

















 


                                      is
the holder of the registered ordinary share(s) mentioned on the reverse
side of this share certificate.


 


1.                                                  transfers
such registered ordinary share(s) to                              on                                      ,
which Tornier N.V. acknowledged on                                          .


 


 


	
  Signed

  	
   

  	
  and

  	
   

  	
   .

  
	
  (signature transferor)

  	
   

  	
  (signature Tornier N.V.)

  	
   

  



 


2.                                                 transfers
such registered ordinary share(s) to                              on                                      ,
which Tornier N.V. acknowledged on                                          .


 


 


	
  Signed

  	
   

  	
  and

  	
   

  	
   .

  
	
  (signature transferor)

  	
   

  	
  (signature Tornier N.V.)

  	
   

  



 


 


3.                                                 transfers
such registered ordinary share(s) to                              on                                      ,
which Tornier N.V. acknowledged on                                          .


 


 


	
  Signed

  	
   

  	
  and

  	
   

  	
   .

  
	
  (signature transferor)

  	
   

  	
  (signature Tornier N.V.)

  	
   

  



 


 


This share certificate, the share(s) mentioned herein and the
transfer of such share(s) are subject to

the laws of the Netherlands and the Articles of Association of Tornier N.V.
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Richard A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  August 5,
      2009
                By:
                /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)