alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2336 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to 

the definition of ‘‘family farmer’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2336 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farmer Relief 

3 Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FAMILY FARMER. 

5 Section 101(18) of title 11, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘$3,237,000’’ each place that term 

7 appears and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

8 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

9 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

10 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

11 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

12 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

13 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

14 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro15 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

16 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2336 

AN ACT 

respect to the definition of ‘‘family farmer’’. 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2125 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2125

   To provide coverage under the Wildfires and Hurricanes Indemnity 
 Program to certain crop, tree, bush, and vine losses due to flooding 
                occurring in Iowa in calendar year 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2019

  Mrs. Axne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide coverage under the Wildfires and Hurricanes Indemnity 
 Program to certain crop, tree, bush, and vine losses due to flooding 
                occurring in Iowa in calendar year 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WHIP COVERAGE FOR FLOODING IN IOWA.

    Amounts made available under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 
(Public Law 115-123) under the heading ``Department of Agriculture 
Agricultural Programs--Processing, Research and Marketing--Office of 
the Secretary'' for necessary expenses related to the consequences of 
hurricanes and wildfires occurring in calendar year 2017 are authorized 
to be used by the Secretary of Agriculture for necessary expenses 
related to crop, tree, bush, and vine losses due to flooding occurring 
in Iowa in calendar year 2019 under such terms and conditions as 
determined by the Secretary of Agriculture.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB     Document 19      Filed 08/24/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB     Document 19      Filed 08/24/2007     Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT  99.4


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  (the  "Report") on the Form 10-KSB of
Tylerstone  Ventures  Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended August 31,
2005,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I,  Louise Murphy, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
     15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information  contained  in  this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.


Date:  October  24,  2005
                                            /s/  "Louise  Murphy"
                                            ---------------------
                                                Louise  Murphy
                                        Chief  Accounting  Officer,  Chief
                                         Financial  Officer  and  Director
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(1)    The quarterly report on form 10-Q of the Company for the annual period ended August 31, 2011 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Dated: October 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Kelly T. HickelKelly T. HickelChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018142EN.01002701.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania (Italy) lodged on 22 January 2018 — Meca Srl v Comune di Napoli

(Case C-41/18)

(2018/C 142/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Meca Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Napoli

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the Community principles of protection of legitimate expectations and of legal certainty, laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and the principles deriving therefrom, such as those of equal treatment, non-discrimination, proportionality and effectiveness, referred to in Directive 2014/24/EU, (1) and the provisions of Article 57(4)(c) and (g) of that Directive, preclude the application of national legislation, such as the Italian legislation founded on Article 80(5)(c) of Legislative Decree No 50/2016, according to which challenging before the courts significant deficiencies identified in the performance of a previous procurement procedure, which resulted in the early termination of a previous procurement contract, excludes any assessment by the procuring entity as to the reliability of the tenderer, until a final ruling has been issued in the civil proceedings, when the undertaking concerned has not demonstrated that it has adopted any ‘self-cleaning’ measures in order to remedy the breaches and avoid any repetition of them?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

1

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
I n the Matter of the Personal Restraint of : SHAQUILLE CAPONE JONES , Petitioner

. No. 83076

- 7

- I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION

P ER C URIAM

. — Shaquille Jones challenges th e judgment and sentence imposed following his jury conviction for three counts of assault in the first degree with a firearm (counts 1

- 3), unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree (count 4), possessing a stolen firearm (count 5), and tampering with a witness (count 6) in Snohomish County Superior Court No. 15

- 1

- 01621

- 5. Among other claims, Jones argu es that his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm , which was based on the predicate offense of possession of a controlled substance, must be vacated under State v. Blake , in which our Supreme Court held that Washington’s strict liability drug pos session statute, RCW 69.50.4013(1) , is unconstitutional and therefore void. 197 Wn.2d 170, 481 P.3d 521 (2021). The State concedes that Jones’s petition is timely and that his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm must be vacated under Blake

. The constitutional validity of the underlying conviction is an element of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm. State v. Swindell , 93 Wn.2d 192, 197, 607 P.2d 852No. 83076

- 7

- I/ 2

- 2

- (19 80). A conviction for that crime may not stand if the underlying offense has been subsequently found unconstitutional. State v. Gore , 101 Wn.2d 481, 487, 681 P.2d 227 (1984). Because the statute criminalizing unlawful possession of a controlled substance was held constitutionally invalid in Blake , it cannot serve as a predicate offense for unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree. The State additionally concedes that Jones is entitled to resentencing on his remaining convictions with a revised of fender score

. See State v. Ammons , 105 Wn.2d 175, 187

- 88, 713 P.2d 719 (1986) (“[A] prior conviction [that] has been previously determined to have been unconstitutionally obtained or which is constitutionally invalid on its face may not be considered” in a defendant’s offender score)

. Jones’s offender scores for c ounts 1, 5, and 6 included one point for the unlawful possession of firearm conviction. Jones is entitled to be resentenced on those counts accordingly. We accept the State’s concession s , grant Jones’s petition, and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion

. 1

WE CONCUR:

1 Given that Jones will be resentenced on a reduced offender score, we need not address Jones’s remaini ng challenges to his sentence.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 49 62

_____________________________
L ACHLAN R OTSCHREK , Appellant,

v.

M ARGUERITE M ORGAN as Administrator of the Florida State Hospital, and T HE D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Francis Allman , Judge

. July 10, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W ETHERELL , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Lachlan Rotschrek, pro se
, Appellant.

Way lon Lewis, Senior Attorney, Department of Children and Families, Chattahoochee
, for Appellee s

.
Delaware sac

The First State

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF “FORECASTEX LLC”, FILED

IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, A.D. 2021,

AT 2:13 O°CLOCK P.M.

\y~ W. Bullock, Secretaryo Sisley

6403457 8100

Authentication: 204726759
SR# 20213825248

Date: 11-18-21



State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 02:13 PM 11/17/2021

FILED 02:13 PM 11/17/2021 STATE OF DELAWARE

SR 20213825248 - FileNumber 6403457

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The undersigned authorized person, desiring to form a limited liability company pursuant
to the Limited Liability Company Act of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as
follows:

I. The name of the limited liability company is ForecastEx LLC

2. The Registered Office of the limited liability company in the State of Delaware is
located at 251 Little Falls Drive (street),
in the City of Wilmington , Zip Code_19808 . The

name of the Registered Agent at such address upon whom process against this limited
liability company may be served is Corporation Service Company

By: C) ——

Z “Authorizgd Person

Name: Jeffrey Benner
Print or Type
EXHIBIT 10-01

    PROTOCALL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC (the
"Company")

     

    CONSENT TO ACT AS
DIRECTOR

     

    I hereby consent to act as a director,
President, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company and acknowledge that I am not
disqualified to become or to act as a director under Chapter 78 of the Nevada
Revised Statutes.

     

    I hereby confirm
that:

     

    
      	
              1. I am not under the age of 18
      years;

            


    

     

    
      	
              2. I have not been found by a
      court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable
      of managing my own affairs;

            


    

     

    
      	
              3. I am not an undischarged
      bankrupt; and

            


    

     

     

    
      	
              4. I have not been convicted in or
      out of Nevada of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or
      management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence
      involving fraud.

            


    

     

     

    In addition, the undersigned hereby
consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the
directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other
communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject
meetings to communicate adequately with each other.

    


    This consent shall continue in effect
from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of
directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent
or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect
from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or
resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such
resignation.

     

    DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND
OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON
SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

     

    
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Dated

            	
              September  20th,
      2010

            
	
              Print name

            	
              Bryan
  Cowan

            
	
              Address

            	
              4654 Delwood Park
      Blvd.

               Panama City Beach, Florida
      32408

            
	 	 
	
              Signature

            	
              /s/: Bryan
      Cowan
[925 NE2d 926, 899 NYS2d 123]

#### Awards.com, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Kinko’s, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Argued February 10, 2010;

decided March 30, 2010

*792APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Chadbourne & Parke, LLP,*New York City *(Alan I. Raylesberg, George Bundy Smith, Thomas E. Butler*and *Eric Twiste*of counsel), and *Berg & Androphy (David H. Berg*and *Christopher Gadoury*of the Texas bar, admitted pro hac vice of counsel) for appellants.

*Terrence O. Reed*of the Tennessee bar, admitted pro hac vice, and *Connie Lewis Lensing*for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of Supreme Court appealed from and the order *793of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, defendant Kinko’s, Inc. was justified in terminating its contract with plaintiff Inspire Someone, LLC. The failure of Inspire Someone to pay its monthly rent promptly was a material breach *(see Madison Ave. Leasehold, LLC v Madison Bentley Assoc. LLC,*8 NY3d 59, 65 [2006]; *Fifty States Mgt. Corp. v Pioneer Auto Parks,*46 NY2d 573, 578 [1979]); the contract contained no provision for a grace period, and no requirement that Kinko’s give notice of a breach and an opportunity to cure it; and Kinko’s did not waive its right to terminate.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Judgment of Supreme Court appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
# C_2017437EN.01003501.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/35

---

Action brought on 11 October 2017 — MAN Truck & Bus v EUIPO — Halla Holdings (MANDO)

(Case T-698/17)

(2017/C 437/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MAN Truck & Bus AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Halla Holdings Corp. (Yongin-si, Republic of Korea)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MANDO’ — Application for registration No 11 276 144

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of 13 July 2017 in Case R 1919/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### William Marr *versus*Stephen Boothby, *& als.*

An administrator’s deed made after more than one year had elapsed since the license to sell was granted by the Judge of Probate, is void.

A deed of release and quit-claim without proof of actual or constructive possession of the premises by the grantor, or of any entry by the grantee, is not sufficient proof of title to enable the grantee to maintain trespass *quare clausum.*

This was an action of trespass *quare clausum. Ttie*general issue was pleaded. The trespass alleged was for breaking .and entering lot 69, third division, in Standish, and for cutting down and carrying away a number of pine trees.

The plaintiff offered in evidence a deed of said lot from Mehitable Pierce, administratrix of William Pierce, to himself. The deed purported on its face to have been given by said .administratrix after more than one year had elapsed from the date of her license to sell real estate. He also read a deed of quit-claim of said lot to himself, from. John Sands, dated July 5, 1832 — also a collector’s deed from the collector of Standish, to said Sands, on which was the following indorsement ; —

“ Sfandish, March 2, 1833. Received of Stephen C. Watson, for William Pierce, the amount which I have paid for the within deed, and interest. I therefore give up all the claims which I have on the within named lot. John Sands.”

Upon this evidence, Shepley J. directed a nonsuit, which is to be confirmed pr set aside, and a new trial granted, as the Court shall determine, upon consideration of the case.

*JBoward*and *Osgood,*for the plaintiff.

*Beblois*and *Swasey,*cited *Willard*v. *Nason,*5 Mass. R. 240; *Wellman*v. *Lawrence,*15 Mass. R. 326 ; *Bolt*v. *Burnell,*9 Mass.. R. 96; *Macy*v. *Raymond,*9 Pick. 285.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Whitman C. J.

This being an action of trespass *quare clausum,*it was incumbent on the plaintiff to give some evidence of title. For this purpose he produced a deed of the *151premises, purporting to have been made by an administratrix, pursuant to a license for that purpose. But at the time of making it more than one year had elapsed since the license was granted. The deed therefore was inoperative. *Macy*v. *Raymond,*9 Pick. 285.

The plaintiff then produced a deed of release and quit-claim from a person, who seems to have claimed to have purchased the premises, or *locus in quo,*at a sale by a collector of taxes. Under such a deed the plaintiff should have given evidence of his possession at the time of the execution of it, either actual or constructive ; or that he had since entered and become possessed of the premises; neither of which appearing in the case a nonsuit was properly ordered, and must be confirmed, and judgment be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 137-002 California]


Pacific Gas and Electric; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

May 17, 2001.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the 
Mokelumne River Hydroelectric Project, a complex of multiple 
reservoirs, diversions, conduits, and powerhouses on the North Fork 
Mokelumne River, east of Sacramento, California in Alpine, Amador, and 
Calaveras Counties and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment 
(FEA) for the project. The project occupies federal lands managed by 
the USDA Forest Service (Eldorado and Stanislaus National Forests) and 
the USDI Bureau of Land Management.
    The FEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the 
project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not 
constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review at the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The FEA may be viewed on the web 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance).
    For further information, contact Jim Fargo (202) 219-2848.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12951 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2018134EN.01001601.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 2 February 2018 — Skatteministeriet (Danish Ministry of Taxation) v KPC Herning

(Case C-71/18)

(2018/C 134/21)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteministeriet (Danish Ministry of Taxation)

Applicant:

Defendant: KPC Herning

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it compatible with Article 135(1)(j), cf. Article 12(1)(a) and (2), read in conjunction with Article 135(1)(k), cf. Article 12(1)(b) and (3), of the VAT Directive (1) for a Member State, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, to consider a supply of land on which at the time of supply there is a building as a sale of building land subject to value added tax (VAT), when it is the parties’ intention that the building is to be demolished completely or partially in order to make room for a new building?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---