alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 29, 2001.
    Time: 1 pm to 3:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Stanley C. Oaks, Jr., Scientific Review Branch, 
Division of Extramural Research, Executive Plaza South, room 400C, 
6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13202 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Covert *v.*Curtis.

*Circuit Court, N. D. New York.*

October 3, 1885.

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—Rope-Clamps.

Patent Ho. 208,157, granted September 17, 1878, to James C. Covert for an improvement in rope-clamps, *held,*infringed by the sale by defendant of similar clamps, and a preliminary injunction granted.

Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

*William II. King,*for complainant.

*Coburn é Thacker,*lor defendant.

Coxe, J.

The complainant is the inventor of an improvement in rope-clamps, for which a patent, No. 208,157, was granted September 17, 1878. The specification contains two claims. The first is for the method of connecting one part of a rope adjacent to another part, or the ends of two ropes, by clamping with one or more open metallic rings, under extreme pressure. The second is for one or more open rings clamped around a braided or twisted rope, under pressure, to prevent unbraiding or untwisting. Since the date of the patent the complainant has, in the business of his firm, manufactured and sold large numbei’s of the patented clamps. Capital has been invested, expensive machinery purchased, skilled labor employed, and a high degree of proficiency attained in the character of the goods manufactured. The result is that a large and flourishing business has been established, which will be greatly injured by competition, and especially so if inferior and unworkmanlike goods are permitted in the market. Though the patented device is largely used, the complainant is in a situation to supply all demands; his exclusive right to do so having been generally acquiesced in by the public.

It is suggested in one of the affidavits read by the defendant that there is no infringement, because the ends of the rings sold by him are not beveled and do not overlap. This contention is clearly untenable. An examination of the claims discloses the fact that the beveled ends are no part of the invention. They are, in the description, recommended as being preferable to square ends, but are not claimed.

The prior patents, drawings, and exhibits referred to by the defendant have been examined, and it is thought that none of them anticipates the complainant’s invention, so far, at least, as the first claim is concerned. Neither can it be maintained upon this proof that the patent is invalid for lack of invention.

It is manifest that a refusal of the relief asked for will work great, and perhaps irreparable, injury to the complainant’s business. On the other hand, it is not easy to perceive how the defendant, who is a merchant and not a manufacturer, can be materially injured by being required to discontinue his sales until the questions at issue can be finally determined. The motion is granted.
Exhibit 99(c)


                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------


         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 2, 2001 among Household
Automotive Trust 2001-2 as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables Corporation, as
Seller, the Master Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture
Trustee (the "Master Sale and Servicing Agreement"), that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Year") and of its performance under the
         Master Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
         and

         2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Master
         Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.


                                       /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eduard Korsinsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer     November 11, 2008
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Titanium Asset Management Corp. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jonathan Hoenecke, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated:
      August 13, 2010
              /s/ Jonathan HoeneckeJonathan
      HoeneckeChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2451 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2451

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, as the ``Elizabeth 
                      Buffum Chace Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2019

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself and Mr. Langevin) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, as the ``Elizabeth 
                      Buffum Chace Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elizabeth 
Buffum Chace Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018341EN.01001201.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 June 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-61/18) (1)

(2018/C 341/19)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00431

- CV

ELIZABETH A. FLACK

- BATIE AND LISA A. BATIE APPELLANTS

V.

JOHN HENRY BATIE AND U

- HAUL CO. OF FT. WORTH, CO

. APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF T ARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On February 22, 2011 , we ordered appellant s to pay the required $175.00

filing fee for the appeal and pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and reporter’s record on or before Monday, March 21, 2011

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 5 and Supreme Court Order of July 21, 1998 regarding fees to be

charged in civil case s. Because appellant s ha ve failed to comply with our

February 22, 2011 order

, a requirement of the rules of appella te procedure

, and

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28, 2007, 2 we dismiss the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant s shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 7 , 2011

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litig ation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121


Flight Crewmember Flight Time Limitations and Rest Requirements; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement policy; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 17, 2001, at 66 FR 27548, the Federal Aviation 
Adminstration (FAA) announced to the public the Federal Aviation 
Administration's (FAA's) intent to rigorously enforce its existing 
regulations governing flight crewmember rest requirements that are 
presently codified at 14 CFR 121.471. This document corrects the title 
of the person who signed the document and inserts the date for the 
comprehensive review of certificate holders' flight scheduling 
practices.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective on May 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alberta Brown, telephone (202) 267-
8166.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 17, 2001, at 66 FR 27548, in FR Doc. 
01-12419, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 27549, in column 2, in paragraph 3, under ``Compliance 
and Enforcement Plan,'' in lines 9 and 10, correct [insert date (6 
months from publication date)]'', to read ``November 1, 2001''.
    2. On page 27549, in column 3, in the signature block, correct the 
title of the person who signed the document to read ``Acting Associate 
Administrator for Regulation and Certification.''

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 17, 2001.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.
[FR Doc. 01-12932 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4913-13-M
#### Nathaniel Caleb AVERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-72506.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 22, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 5, 2010.

Ste. E, c/o Peter Gibbons, Carson City, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Robert R. Di Trolio, Clerk, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Regina S. Moriarty, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The tax court properly upheld the tax determination because the Commissioner presented “some substantive evidence” that Nathaniel Caleb Avery (“Avery”) received unreported income, and Avery failed to submit any evidence showing “that the deficiency was arbitrary or erroneous.” *Hardy v. Comm’r,*181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.1999).

The tax court also properly upheld the late-filing addition to tax because Avery did not file a tax return for 2002 or provide any evidence suggesting reasonable cause for his failure to do so. *See*26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1).

The tax court acted within its discretion when imposed a $5,000 penalty, after finding that Avery had instituted the proceedings primarily for delay and had advanced frivolous arguments. *See*26 U.S.C. § 6673(a) (providing for sanctions up to $25,000 where “proceedings ... have been instituted or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay” or where “the taxpayer’s position in such proceeding is frivolous or groundless”); *Grimes v. Comm’r,*806 *196F.2d 1451, 1454 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam).

Avery’s contention that the tax court judge was biased is not supported by the record. *See Taylor v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.,*993 F.2d 710, 712 (9th Cir.1993) (adverse rulings alone are insufficient to demonstrate judicial bias).

Avery’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|  | (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 1O-Q of SunSi Energies Inc. for the quarter ended      November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended November 30, 2009 fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of SunSi Energies      Inc. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | January      14th, 2010          |   |              |                             |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                             |   |              |                             |   |
| By:    | /s/      Michel Laporte          |   | By:               | /s/      Daniel Julien           |   |
| Name:  | Michel      Laporte              |   | Name:   | Daniel      Julien               |   |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer |   | Title:            | Principal      Financial Officer |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Hossein Fateh and Mark L. Wetzel, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer, respectively, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |        |  |                                                                
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Hossein Fateh                                              
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Hossein Fateh                                                  
|                  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|                  |  |       
|                  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mark L. Wetzel                                             
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Mark L. Wetzel                                                 
|                  |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2427 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2427

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2020

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to reauthorize the 
            Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY GATEWAYS AND WATERTRAILS 
              NETWORK.

    Section 502(c) of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (54 
U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 105-312) is amended by striking ``2019'' 
and inserting ``2025''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```