alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018301EN.01001201.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/12

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-130/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(1)(c) - Right to compensation in the event of flight cancellation - Re-routing not allowing a passenger to reach his final destination less than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival of the cancelled flight - Delay of between two and three hours))

(2018/C 301/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Defendant: Eurowings GmbH

Operative part of the order

Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that a passenger who was informed of the cancellation of his flight less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure of that flight has the right to the compensation provided for in that provision where the re-routing offered by the carrier allowed him to reach his final destination more than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival of the cancelled flight, but less than three hours after that scheduled time of arrival.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
ICE Swap Trade, LLC

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

April 5, 2016

Submitted via the CFTC Portal Submission 16-03

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: ICE Swap Trade, LLC – Rule Amendment – Amended Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the regulations of the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), ICE Swap Trade, LLC (“IST” or the “SEF”) hereby notifies the Commission 

that it has amended its Rulebook. The amendments contained herein have been made in order to affect certain 

administrative/clerical revisions and clarify the process by which IST intends to implement and enforce certain of its rules. The 

Rulebook will become effective on April 20, 2016 (based upon an acknowledged filing date of April 6, 2016).

A concise explanation of the amendments to the Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the revised Rulebook

marked to show changes against the Rulebook submitted to the Commission with an effective date of January 5, 2016, is attached 

hereto as Exhibit B, and a clean copy of the revised Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 

IST certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations 

promulgated thereunder. IST is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and certifies 

that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the IST’s website and may be accessed at: 

https://www.theice.com/swap-trade/regulation#rule-filings. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 323-8543 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Robert James Laorno

General Counsel

Enclosures
Exhibit A

Summary of Rulebook Changes

Amendment Explanation

Chapter 1 - Definitions

“Block Trade” Revised to reflect the definition in Part 43 of the CFTC 

Regulations.

Chapter 2 - Ownership and Governance

Rule 205 Clerical revisions.

Chapter 5 - Trading Practices and Business Conduct

Rule 515 Revised to include a reference to CFTC No-Action Letter 

No. 16-25 (March 14, 2016).
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal July 29, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending July 29, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• bid/offer widths for CDX and iTraxx credit indices and single name risk factors

• concentration charge thresholds for North American (“NA”), European (“EU”), Asia/Pacific (“AP”), 

and Emerging Market (“EM”) risk factors

• Kendall Tau rank-order correlations for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• MAD estimates (inclusive of EWMA) for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• left and right tail parameters for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• recovery rates for EM risk factors

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 11 – EROS Fall Poster Session      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear from a few of the scientists on hand for the EROS Fall Poster Session.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

**Download and Transcript Access**

**Summary**: Each fall, EROS invites its staff scientists and area graduate students to visit for a noontime poster session. The poster sessions offer a change for those researchers to present their results to their peers and get feedback from their fellow scientists. For this episode, we’ll hear about research into biofuels, cloud-friendly Landsat data, shrubland mapping and satellite-based fire monitoring.

**Guests**: Dr. Sanath Kumar Sathyachandran, Matthew Rigge, Renee Pischke, contractors to USGS EROS; Logan Megard, South Dakota State University

**Host**: John Hult

**Producers**: Brian Hauge, John Hult

**Release date**: Dec. 5, 2019

**More on Poster Session topics**: 
                            - Prototype Downscaling Algorithm for MODIS Satellite 1 km Daytime Active Fire Detections
                            - Validating a Landsat Time-Series of Fractional Component Cover Across Western US Rangelands
                            - Landsat Collection 2

### Contacts
155 So. 93

#### STATE v. DR. PEPPER BOTTLING CO.

2 Div. 43.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1934.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Frontis H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Steiner, Crum & Weil and Sam Rice Baker, all of Montgomery, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of the state of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in State v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co., 155 So. 92.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending July 31, 2009 of EASY ESL PUBLISHING, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Cameron Wong, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  /s/ Cameron Wong ---------------------------------- Cameron Wong  President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director   Date: September 21, 2009
#### Central Trust Co. and another *v.*Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. and others.1

*Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.*

September 30, 1885.

Railroad Mortgages—Payment of Expenses of ^Negotiations between Bondholders for the Purpose of Effecting an Advantageous Sale and Reorganization.

Where, while a railroad was in the hands of a receiver appointed in foreclosure proceedings instituted by bondholders, the different classes of bondhold*70ers entered into negotiations with each other, having for their object the sale of the road to the b'est advantage under the final decree, and its purchase by them, and the reorganization of the railroad company, and certain necessary expenses for advertising, etc., were incurred in the course of the negotiations, and an order of .the court on the receiver to pay said expenses was asked by the trustees under a general mortgage; but it appeared that there was no surplus in the receiver’s hands, and that it was not certain that the negotiations would have any advantageous result: *held,*that the order must be denied.

In Equity.

• Petition of the Central Trust Company and James Cheney, trustees under the general mortgage of the Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company, asking for an order on the receivers to pay the expenses of certain negotiations between the general mortgage and collateral trust bondholders of said railway company, having for their object the sale of the mortgaged property to the best advantage when the final decree of sale is made, and a reorganization of said company. The- negotiations have resulted in an agreement which has been signed or assented to by holders of general mortgage bonds amounting to nearly'$8,000,000, and by the holders of substantially all of the collateral bonds, and the expenses in question have been incurred by a purchasing committee named in the agreement for advertising and printing, and for engraving certificates to be delivered to the bondholders who are parties to the agreement.

*Wells & Blodgett,*for receivers.

*Butler, Stillman d Hubbard,*for petitioners.

1

 Reported by Benj. E. Bex, Esq., of the St. Louis bar.

Brewer, J.,

*(orally.)*The petition of the Central Trust Company in the *Wabash Railroad Case*for an order on the receivers to pay the expenses of certain negotiations, and of the preparation of certain, certificates, etc., is denied. I doubt not that if this arrangement, which is contemplated, shall be carried out, and the sale and purchase made in pursuance thereof, these expenses will be a proper charge against the property, and to be paid out of the proceeds of the sale. If there was any surplus money in the hands of the receivers, perhaps there would be no impropriety in advancing the money for them; but. as there is no surplus money, and as, also, there is no absolute certainty that these negotiations will be carried into effect and the sale and purchase made in pursuance thereof, I do not think it proper for us at present to make the order requested.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2328 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2328

To reauthorize and extend funding for community health centers and the 
                     National Health Service Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2019

Mr. O'Halleran (for himself and Ms. Stefanik) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize and extend funding for community health centers and the 
                     National Health Service Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Health Investment, 
Modernization, and Excellence Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS AND NATIONAL 
              HEALTH SERVICE CORPS.

    Section 10503 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 254b-2) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) for fiscal year 2020, $4,200,000,000;
                    ``(H) for fiscal year 2021, $4,400,000,000;
                    ``(I) for fiscal year 2022, $4,600,000,000;
                    ``(J) for fiscal year 2023, $4,800,000,000; and
                    ``(K) for fiscal year 2024, $5,000,000,000.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) $325,000,000 for fiscal year 2020;
                    ``(H) $340,000,000 for fiscal year 2021;
                    ``(I) $355,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;
                    ``(J) $370,000,000 for fiscal year 2023; and
                    ``(K) $385,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.''.
                                 <all>
```
Petition to Rehear

#### SHACKELFORD v. CITY OF WILMINGTON

No. 561PA97

Case below: 349 N.C. 222

Petition by petitioners to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 3 December 1998.
# C_2017202EN.01002601.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/26

---

Action brought on 5 May 2017 — ExpressVPN v EUIPO (EXPRESSVPN)

(Case T-265/17)

(2017/C 202/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ExpressVPN Ltd (Glen Vine, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Muir Wood, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘EXPRESSVPN’ — Application for registration No 1 265 562

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 February 2017 in Case R 1352/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision to permit the mark proceed to registration on the basis that the mark is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character and the basis of the evidence of acquired distinctiveness submitted to the examiner and to the Fifth Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to permit the mark proceed to registration on the basis that the mark is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character and the basis of the evidence of acquired distinctiveness submitted to the examiner and to the Fifth Board of Appeal;

| — | issue an order for payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

issue an order for payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b)(c), 7(2) and 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b)(c), 7(2) and 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13186]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 237.70, Mortuary Services, DFARS Clause 
252.237-7011, Preparation History; DD Form 2063; OMB Number 0704-0231.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 800.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 800.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 400.
    Needs and Uses: This requirement provides for the collection of 
necessary information from contractors regarding the results of the 
embalming process under contracts for mortuary services. The 
information is used to ensure proper preparation of the body for 
shipment and burial. The contractor uses DD Form 2063 to provide this 
information.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. David M. Pritzker. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Pritzker at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer 
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 21, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-13186 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Subsequent arrangement. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is issued under the authority of section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed “subsequent arrangement“ under the Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America and the Swiss Federal Council Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

This subsequent arrangement concerns the addition of Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa and Ukraine to the list of countries in Annex I to the Agreed Minute to the Agreement for Cooperation. As stated in paragraph B of the Agreed Minute, countries on the list are eligible to receive retransfers of source material, uranium other than high enriched uranium, moderator material and equipment transferred under Article 7 of the Agreement. The United States has brought into force new Agreements for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, under the authority of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), with Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Kazahstan, Romania, South Africa and Ukraine. These seven countries have also made effective non-proliferation commitments. Accordingly, they are eligible third countries to which retransfers may be made.

                        In accordance with section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be                               ( print page 29097)                            inimical to the common defense and security.                    

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice.

Dated: May 21, 2001.

Trisha Dedik,

Director, International Policy and Analysis for Arms Control and Nonproliferation, Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.

[FR Doc. 01-13391  Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of AFH Holding
      III, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, I, Amir F.
      Heshmatpour, President of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 19, 2008





/s/
                Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir
                F. HeshmatpourPresident(Principal
                Executive Officer)(Principal
                Financial Officer)