alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      UNDER** **SECTION
      906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each
      of
      the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of
      Finance, respectively, of Professionals Direct, Inc., a Michigan corporation
      (the “Company”), hereby certify, in their capacities as officers of the Company,
      that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
      December 31, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
      in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition at December 31, 2006, and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods then ended.





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose and shall not be deemed
      filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended.














/s/
Stephen
              M. Tuuk
            
            /s/
Stephen
              M. WestfieldStephen
                M. Tuuk
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              Dated:  March
                30, 2007
            
            Stephen
                M. Westfield
              Vice
                President of Finance
              Dated:  March
                30, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Madeline Acosta, Respondent, v New York City Department of Education et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 19, 2010;

decided February 11, 2010

Motion by Community Service Society et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Andreas Klimm, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of A&J Venture Capital Group, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: February 15, 2010 /s/ Andreas Klimm Andreas Klimm, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
#### MARY HOWARD, Employee v. SQUARE-D COMPANY, Employer, and SELF-INSURED (JAMES C. GREEN AND COMPANY, SERVICING AGENT)

No. 46PA98

(Filed 9 October 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 to review a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 303, 494 S.E.2d 606 (1998), reversing an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission entered 21 January 1997. Heard in the Supreme Court 1 October 1998.

*Young Moore and Henderson, P.A., by John A. Michaels and, Dawn M. Dillon, for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, by Dayle A. Flammia and Tamara R. Nance, for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVTDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28874-28875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13244]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1183; MM Docket No. 01-58; RM-10071]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Morenci, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition filed on behalf of Copper 
Valley Radio proposing the allotment of Channel 290A to Morenci, 
Arizona, as that community's first local aural transmission service, 
based upon the lack of an expression of interest in pursuing the 
proposal by any party. See 66 FR 13870, March 8, 2001. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-58, adopted May 2, 2001, and 
released May 11, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. The complete text of 
this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th

[[Page 28875]]

Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-13244 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
www.theice.com

Intercontinental Exchange

353 North Clark, Suite 3100

Chicago, IL 60654

Sarah Williams

Staff Attorney

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

March 28, 2017

VIA E-MAIL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Formalization of the ICC Model Validation Framework Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6(a)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

In conjunction with the self-certification submitted by ICE Clear Credit LLC (“ICC”) today, March 28, 2017,

to the Secretary of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 

5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), ICC submits the attached 

confidential document. 

***********************

Under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC Section 552, Section 809(g) of the Dodd-Frank 

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), 

Federal Reserve Board Regulation 261.15 and any other applicable regulations under or implementing 

FOIA, ICE Clear Credit hereby respectfully requests that confidential treatment be maintained for the 

documents which bear Bates numbers 03.28.2017-000001-CFTC1 to 03.28.2017-000013-CFTC1 until 

further notice. ICE Clear Credit also requests that the Commission or the Board notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for such documents or any other court order, subpoena or 

summons for the same. Finally, ICE Clear Credit requests that it be notified in the event the Commission

or the Board intends to disclose such documents to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“CEA”) or other applicable law. 

ICE Clear Credit does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA or other applicable

law with respect to any subpoena or summons for such document(s).

The basis for the request is that disclosure of these document(s) would reveal confidential commercial 

and financial information of ICE Clear Credit, the disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect 

on, and cause injury to, the operations and competitive position of ICE Clear Credit. This request is not to

be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment accorded by 

law, and ICE Clear Credit will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection.

***********************

Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

sarah.williams@theice.com or (312) 836-6883.
www.theice.com

2

Sincerely,

Sarah Williams

Staff Attorney

Enclosure
# C_2018190EN.01002103.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 March 2018 — Confédération européenne des associations d’horlogers-réparateurs (CEAHR) v European Commission, LVMH Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton SA, Rolex, SA, The Swatch Group SA

(Case C-3/18 P) (1)

1

(2018/C 190/39)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

1

---
# C_2019280EN.01001202.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/12

---

Order of the Court of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu — Croatia) — Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY

(Case C-657/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 - European Enforcement Order - Notaries acting in enforcement proceedings based on an authentic document - Ex parte proceedings - Article 18 TFEU - Reverse discrimination - Lack of connection to EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2019/C 280/15)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hrvatska radiotelevizija

Defendant: TY

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Municipal Court, New Zagreb, Croatia).

---

(1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice B. QUARLES, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7486.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2013.

Decided: May 24, 2013.

Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

*193Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice B. Quarles, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Quarles,*No. 3:08-cr-00868-JAG-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13386]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in 
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those information collections 
recently submitted to OMB.
    1. Organizing an Institutional Investigation Assistance Program: A 
Feasibility Study--NEW--A review group charged with examining the 
Office of Research Integrity's (ORI) role in handling allegations of 
research misconduct developed numerous recommendations. One of the 
recommendations stated that ``HHS should encourage the development of a 
consortium-based approach to be used by awardee institutions that do 
not have the capacity to conduct the fact-finding process, or at which 
there is otherwise inadequate institutional or organizational 
capacity.'' The Office of Research Integrity is proposing a survey of 
research institutions, educational institutions, and related 
organizations to assess the level of interest in the development of 
consortia.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit; Non-profit 
institutions; State or local governments; Number of Respondents: 1,000; 
Burden per Response: 20 minutes; Total Burden: 333 hours. OMB Desk 
Officer: Allison Herron Eydt.
    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be 
obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated 
above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments may also be sent to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports 
Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received 
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: May 21, 2001.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 01-13386 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-M
# C_2018134EN.01001602.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki upravni sud (Croatia) lodged on 8 February 2018 — Hrvatska banka za obnovu i razvitak (HBOR) v Povjerenik za informiranje Republike Hrvatske

(Case C-90/18)

(2018/C 134/22)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Referring court

Visoki upravni sud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hrvatska banka za obnovu i razvitak (HBOR)

Applicant:

Defendant: Povjerenik za informiranje Republike Hrvatske

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 15(3) TFEU and Articles 4(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43) be interpreted as precluding national legislation providing that access to information regarding the use of public funds must always be permitted, without exceptions, even when access to that information is restricted on account of its constituting a trade (banking) secret?

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Daniel C. Staton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Daniel C. Staton Daniel C. Staton May 14, 2008 President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 

I, Michael W. Rogers, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BG Medicine, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [reserved] / paragraph omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:May 12, 2011 

/s/ Michael W.Rogers                    

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 

(principal financial officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7062
WAYLON DALE NUNNERY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; TOM MARTIN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-227-5-BR) Submitted: March 10, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Waylon Dale Nunnery, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting inpart the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's request for appointed counsel, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      August 11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)