alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Anthony FORD, Petitioner.

No. 13-1380.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Anthony Ford, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Ford petitions this court for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration * to perform her official duties related to payment of Ford’s benefits, which were suspended during his pretrial detention. We deny the petition.

The All Writs Act vests all statutorily created courts, including this court, with *214authority to issue “all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). In this case, however, the district court for the District of Maryland has original jurisdiction over Ford’s petition, and is therefore the proper venue for adjudication of the petition. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1361, 1391 (2006). Nonetheless, we conclude that the interest of justice does not require us to transfer the petition to the District of Maryland. *See Sorda v. Holder,*643 F.3d 117, 122 (4th Cir.) (holding “that where we ha[ve] jurisdiction but lack venue, we have inherent authority to transfer a case to another [court] where both venue and jurisdiction exist” and “that in the exercise of such inherent authority it is appropriate ... to consider whether the interest of justice mandates transfer”) (internal quotation marks omitted), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 776, 181 L.Ed.2d 487 (2011).

Accordingly, we grant Ford’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motions for release of funds to retain private counsel, to appoint counsel, to expedite the hearing and verdict, and for relief from judgment, and we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 The Acting Commissioner is Carolyn Colvin.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

April 6, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – Exhibit B - AEGIS SEF Self Certification

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit B (“Exhibit”), which 

were submitted to the Commission as 40.2 Listing products for trading by certification on this 

date. This request pertains to all material in the Exhibit. The Exhibit bears the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8, as 

Exhibit contains information that would reveal the trade secrets or confidential commercial or 

financial information of AEGIS SEF and its affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-431-4217 or mvalenzuela@aegis-sef.com with any 

questions regarding this matter.

Melody Valenzuela

Vice President, Compliance

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         I, Sheldon R. Rose, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Premier Nursing Products Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Premier Nursing Products
Corp.

March 21, 2008                          By: /s/ Sheldon R. Rose
                                            -------------------
                                            Sheldon R. Rose,
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Nursing Products Corp. and will be retained by Premier
Nursing Products Corp. and furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### STATE v. AIKEN

No. 283P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 151

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied 30 September 1998. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 September 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review as to additional issues dismissed as moot 30 September 1998.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
      to


Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Registrant”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Richard A. Baker, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      of
      the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/
                  Richard A. BakerName:
            
            Richard
                A. Baker
              (Chief
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)Date:
            
            December
                3, 2007
September 15, 2023

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments –

Updates to Risk Parameters Established by ICC 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 

40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending September 15, 2023, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• bid/offer widths for CDX and iTraxx credit indices

• concentra�on charge thresholds for index and single name risk factors

• Kendall Tau rank-order correla�ons for NA, EU, Asia/Pacific (“AP”), and Emerging Market 

(“EM”) risk factors

• MAD es�mates (inclusive of EWMA) for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• le� and right tail parameters for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned 

at olivia.bazor@ice.com or 904-855-5580.

Sincerely,

Olivia Bazor

Staff Attorney
EXHIBIT 10.2

Transfer Agreement

This Transfer Agreement ("Transfer Agreement") is made November 7, 2008, by and between Capmark Financial Group Inc.
("Capmark") and D. Steven Lin ("Transferor"). All capitalized terms used herein but not defined will have the meanings set forth in Capmark's October 30, 2008 letter to Transferor.

Capmark
and the Transferor agree as follows:

1.     For
value received, Transferor hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto Capmark Six Hundred Sixty Thousand (660,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share,
of Capmark, registered in the name of Transferor on the books of said corporation, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                    its Attorney to transfer
said shares on the books
of Capmark with full power of substitution in the premises. Transferor hereby surrenders to Capmark for automatic cancellation all outstanding exercisable stock options granted to Transferor under the
Agreements; following such surrender and automatic cancellation by Capmark, Transferor shall have no rights whatsoever with respect to such options.

2.     In
exchange for the Stock Purchase Price, Transferor hereby releases and forever discharges Capmark and its affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively, the "Capmark
Group"), any and all of their employee benefit plans, fringe benefit plans or programs, and any and all of their respective present and past officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents and
representatives, and the successors and assigns of each from any and all manner of claims, suits, demands, actions, causes of action, administrative claims, liability, claims for damages, class action
claims or other claims made on Transferor's behalf whatsoever that Transferor, Transferor's heirs, representatives, agents, successors, guardians, trusts, trustees or assigns ever had, have now or may
have arising from or relating to the Common Stock and Options issued to Transferor (the "Securities"), the sale and transfer of the Securities hereunder, and any provisions of the Agreements, in each
case whether known, suspected or unknown, and however originating or existing, from the beginning of time to the date set forth above.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Transfer Agreement effective as of the date set forth above.

By:

/s/ D. STEVEN LIN D. Steven Lin


CAPMARK FINANCIAL GROUP INC.By:

/s/ BENJAMIN MITTMANName:

Benjamin MittmanTitle:

Vice President


---



QuickLinks
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission May 26, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-28

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the preceding week:

• May 17, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members advising of approved changes to clearing and 

exchange margin requirements for the SPIKES Volatility Index futures margin rates. These 

changes were effective for positions held at the close of business on May 18, 2023.

• May 18, 2023 Memo to Bitnomial Clearing Members advising of approved changes to clearing and 

exchange margin requirements for Bitcoin and Deci Bitcoin futures. These changes introduced an 

inter-commodity spread credit for portfolios holding spreadable positions in the Bitcon and Deci 

Bitcoin contracts. MGEX also announced approved changes to intra-commodity spread margin 

rates for the products. These changes were effective for positions held at the close of business on 

May 22, 2023.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at http://www.mgex.com under the “Announcements” 

tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7143 or 

lhopkins@mgex.com. 

Sincerely, 

Lindsay Hopkins

Vice President & Senior Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Intelligence Needs for 
Homeland Defense Chemical Panel will meet in closed session on June 5-
6, 2001, in Las Vegas, Nevada. This Task Force will consider a broad 
spectrum of intelligence issues as they relate to chemical warfare 
issues, from early threat detection to deterrence, through response 
including attribution.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Task Force will review and evaluate the Department's 
ability to evaluate the collection and analysis of target-related 
information and weapon unique information relative to chemical warfare 
issues; examine the role of HUMINT against these missions as well as 
the technology that the HUMINT collectors need to be equipped with; 
consider strategic indications and warning and tactical warning 
dissemination and how the two need to be merged; analyze methodology to 
correlate large data flows spatially, temporally and functionally; and 
assess the robustness of today's intelligence apparatus for coping with 
these challenges.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C., App. II), it has been 
determined that this Defense Science Board Task Force meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: May 10, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-13570 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Translation of Supplemental Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15 

Supplementary Agreement 

No.:2010022413 
 Buyer: Datang
Xiangyang Wind Power Co., Ltd 
 Seller: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd 

The Contract “Datang Jilin Xiangyang Wind Farm Phase-I Project (400 MW) Wind Turbine Generators and Subsidiary Devices” was entered into by
both parties. In order to better regulate the payment of Guarantee Deposit and the Guarantee Deposit clauses, both parties agree as follows upon friendly consultation: 
  

	1.	The original contract clause “Art.19.4 he Buyer shall pay 2% of the total contract amount of Phase I to the Seller after 72 hours of testing when the primary
acceptance check is finished and accepted, which is ¥3,485,990.00. At the beginning of the second, third, and fourth year of the warranty period, the Buyer shall pay 2% of the total contract amount of Phase I to the Seller, which is
¥3,485,990.00. After the warranty period, the Buyer shall pay 2% of the total contract amount of Phase I to the Seller, which is ¥3,485,990.00. The payment of the aforesaid amounts shall be made by T/T or bank draft to the Seller within one
month after the Buyer has verified the financial billings without error.” 

 shall be changed into “The
remaining provision which is 10% of the contractual equipment amount shall, within one week of the preliminary examination of wind turbines, be paid in such way that the Seller issues a letter of bank guarantee of quality to the Buyer in the same
amount, and the Buyer shall pay off the remaining provision which is 10% of the contractual equipment amount within one week upon the receipt of the said letter”. 
  

	2.	The original contract clause “Art.17.3 At expiry of warranty period, the Buyer is entitled to authorize a third party to estimate the conditions of primary parts
of the wind turbine generators in five (5) years. The designed life time of a wind turbine generator is no shorter than twenty (20) years. Thereinto, the primary parts (wind rotor, rotor blades, generator, gearbox, main shaft, nacelle,
main frame and tower) shall not be replaced during warranty period. Should replacement of the aforesaid primary parts due to design, manufacturing or material defects, the Seller shall be responsible for all expenses thus caused” was signed
when the Seller’s products were not yet authenticated and the equipment was not put into use. Since the Seller’s products have been authenticated by GL and CGC and the equipment has been operating for two years, which demonstrates
relatively high reliability, the clause is hereby cancelled. 

  

	3.	This agreement is made in quadruplicate. Each party holds two counterparts. 









					
	 Buyer:
	  		  	 Seller:

			
	Datang Xiangyang Wind Power Co., Ltd	  		  	Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd
			
	Authorized representative (signature)	  		  	Authorized representative (signature)
			
		  		  	Date:
# C_2019319EN.01002001.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/20

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Galeria Parque Nascente-Exploração de Espaços Comerciais SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-438/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States - Directive 90/434/EEC - Articles 4 and 11 - Directive 2009/133/EC - Articles 4 and 15 - ‘Reverse merger’ - Tax system leading to a situation whereby, in the event of a ‘reverse merger’, costs which are incurred by the parent company relating to a loan taken out by that parent company for the purchase of shares of the subsidiary acquiring the parent company and which are deductible for that parent company are considered non-deductible for that subsidiary)

(2019/C 319/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Galeria Parque Nascente-Exploração de Espaços Comerciais SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office of an SE or SCE between Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2006/98/EC of 20 November 2006, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which leads to a situation whereby costs which were considered tax deductible for the acquired company before the merger of the companies concerned, and which would have been tax deductible if that merger had not taken place, are not considered tax deductible for the acquiring company.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.

---
#### Floyd Dell JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charlie CROCKETT, Sgt., Maximum Security Unit, ADC; Billy Straughn, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC; S. Outlaw, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC; Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-1759.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 7, 2013.

Filed: Nov. 14, 2013.

Floyd Dell Johnson, Tucker, AR, pro se.

James Owen Howe, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas Department of Correction inmate Floyd Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Upon careful de novo review, *see King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr.,*598 F.3d 1051, 1052 *728(8th Cir.2010), we agree that, based on the evidence before the district court, dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies was proper. *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (no action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under § 1983 by prisoner until available administrative remedies are exhausted); *Jones v. Bock,*549 U.S. 199, 211, 218, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007) (prison’s administrative exhaustion requirements govern whether exhaustion has occurred; unexhausted claims cannot be brought into court or considered). Johnson has submitted additional evidence on appeal, contending that it shows exhaustion, but such evidence was not before the district court, so we will not consider it. *See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.,*988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir.1993). Because the dismissal was without prejudice, we note Johnson is free to refíle his complaint in the district court, *see Schafer v. Moore,*46 F.3d 43, 45 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (dismissal without prejudice permits plaintiff to refile complaint), where he may submit his additional evidence of exhaustion.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
DTCC Confidential (Yellow)

Richard A. Schwartz

DDR Compliance Director

August 11, 2023 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC

470 Washington Boulevard

Jersey City, NJ 07310

Tel: (212) 855-2256

rschwartz@dtcc.com

Dear Staff:

Pursuant to Section 145.9 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, DTCC Data 

Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) requests that the following document(s) being submitted to the 

Commission and the information contained therein (together, the “Document(s)”), be afforded 

confidential treatment until further notice under the Freedom of Information Act and the 

Commission's Regulations: 

Document(s): 

• Exhibit MM – DDR Wind-Down Policy and Procedures 

• Exhibit GG(1) – DTCC Global Privacy Policy 

The request set forth in the preceding paragraph also applies to any memoranda, notes, 

transcripts, other writings, or materials of any sort whatsoever that are made by, or at the request

of, any employee of the Commission (or any other federal agency) and which incorporate, 

include, or relate to any aspect of the Confidential Material.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (212) 855-2256. 

Kind regards, 

Richard A. Schwartz 

DDR Compliance Director