Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2001 / Notices 29831

1No response to this request for information is

required if a currently valid Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 01–5–063,

expiration date July 31, 2002. Public reporting

burden for the request is estimated to average 7

hours per response. Please send comments

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC

20436.

your workers are employed or which are

members of your association.

(3) A statement indicating whether

your firm/entity is willing to participate

in this review by providing information

requested by the Commission.

(4) A statement of the likely effects of

the revocation of the antidumping duty

order on the Domestic Industry in

general and/or your firm/entity

specifically. In your response, please

discuss the various factors specified in

section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

§ 1675a(a)) including the likely volume

of subject imports, likely price effects of

subject imports, and likely impact of

imports of Subject Merchandise on the

Domestic Industry.

(5) A list of all known and currently

operating U.S. producers of the

Domestic Like Product. Identify any

known related parties and the nature of

the relationship as defined in section

771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1677(4)(B)).

(6) A list of all known and currently

operating U.S. importers of the Subject

Merchandise and producers of the

Subject Merchandise in the Subject

Country that currently export or have

exported Subject Merchandise to the

United States or other countries since

1995.

(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the

Domestic Like Product, provide the

following information on your firm’s

operations on that product during

calendar year 2000 (report quantity data

in short tons and value data in

thousands of U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant).

If you are a union/worker group or

trade/business association, provide the

information, on an aggregate basis, for

the firms in which your workers are

employed/which are members of your

association.

(a) Production (quantity) and, if

known, an estimate of the percentage of

total U.S. production of the Domestic

Like Product accounted for by your

firm’s(s’) production;

(b) the quantity and value of U.S.

commercial shipments of the Domestic

Like Product produced in your U.S.

plant(s); and

(c) the quantity and value of U.S.

internal consumption/company

transfers of the Domestic Like Product

produced in your U.S. plant(s).

(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a

trade/business association of U.S.

importers of the Subject Merchandise

from the Subject Country, provide the

following information on your firm’s(s’)

operations on that product during

calendar year 2000 (report quantity data

in short tons and value data in

thousands of U.S. dollars). If you are a

trade/business association, provide the

information, on an aggregate basis, for

the firms which are members of your

association.

(a) The quantity and value (landed,

duty-paid but not including

antidumping or countervailing duties)

of U.S. imports and, if known, an

estimate of the percentage of total U.S.

imports of Subject Merchandise from

the Subject Country accounted for by

your firm’s(s’) imports;

(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.

port, including antidumping and/or

countervailing duties) of U.S.

commercial shipments of Subject

Merchandise imported from the Subject

Country; and

(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.

port, including antidumping and/or

countervailing duties) of U.S. internal

consumption/company transfers of

Subject Merchandise imported from the

Subject Country.

(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,

or a trade/business association of

producers or exporters of the Subject

Merchandise in the Subject Country,

provide the following information on

your firm’s(s’) operations on that

product during calendar year 2000

(report quantity data in short tons and

value data in thousands of U.S. dollars,

landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port

but not including antidumping or

countervailing duties). If you are a

trade/business association, provide the

information, on an aggregate basis, for

the firms which are members of your

association.

(a) Production (quantity) and, if

known, an estimate of the percentage of

total production of Subject Merchandise

in the Subject Country accounted for by

your firm’s(s’) production; and

(b) the quantity and value of your

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an

estimate of the percentage of total

exports to the United States of Subject

Merchandise from the Subject Country

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.

(10) Identify significant changes, if

any, in the supply and demand

conditions or business cycle for the

Domestic Like Product that have

occurred in the United States or in the

market for the Subject Merchandise in

the Subject Country since the Order

Date, and significant changes, if any,

that are likely to occur within a

reasonably foreseeable time. Supply

conditions to consider include

technology; production methods;

development efforts; ability to increase

production (including the shift of

production facilities used for other

products and the use, cost, or

availability of major inputs into

production); and factors related to the

ability to shift supply among different

national markets (including barriers to

importation in foreign markets or

changes in market demand abroad).

Demand conditions to consider include

end uses and applications; the existence

and availability of substitute products;

and the level of competition among the

Domestic Like Product produced in the

United States, Subject Merchandise

produced in the Subject Country, and

such merchandise from other countries.

(11) (Optional) A statement of

whether you agree with the above

definitions of the Domestic Like Product

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree

with either or both of these definitions,

please explain why and provide

alternative definitions.

Authority: This review is being conducted

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to

section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules.

Issued: May 21, 2001.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–13685 Filed 5–31–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–365–366

(Review) and 731–TA–734–735 (Review)]

Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews

concerning the countervailing and

antidumping duty orders on certain

pasta from Italy and Turkey.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives

notice that it has instituted reviews

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)

to determine whether revocation of the

countervailing and antidumping duty

orders on certain pasta from Italy and

Turkey would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of

the Act, interested parties are requested

to respond to this notice by submitting

the information specified below to the

Commission; 1 to be assured of

29832 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2001 / Notices

consideration, the deadline for

responses is July 23, 2001. Comments

on the adequacy of responses may be

filed with the Commission by August

15, 2001. For further information

concerning the conduct of these reviews

and rules of general application, consult

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part

207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain

information on this matter by contacting

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for

these investigations may be viewed on

the Commission’s electronic docket

(EDIS-ON-LINE) at http://

dockets.usitc.gov/eol/public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On July 24, 1996, the Department of

Commerce issued countervailing and

antidumping duty orders on imports of

certain pasta from Italy and Turkey (61

FR 38544). The Commission is

conducting reviews to determine

whether revocation of the orders would

be likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to the

domestic industry within a reasonably

foreseeable time. It will assess the

adequacy of interested party responses

to this notice of institution to determine

whether to conduct full or expedited

reviews. The Commission’s

determinations in any expedited

reviews will be based on the facts

[available, which may include

information provided in response to this

notice.

Definitions

The following definitions apply to

these reviews:

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or

kind of merchandise that is within the

scope of the five-year reviews, as

defined by the Department of

Commerce.

(2) The Subject Countries in these

reviews are Italy and Turkey.

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the

domestically produced product or

products which are like, or in the

absence of like, most similar in

characteristics and uses with, the

Subject Merchandise. In its original

determinations, the Commission

defined the Domestic Like Product as all

dry pasta. One Commissioner defined

the Domestic Like Product differently.

(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.

producers as a whole of the Domestic

Like Product, or those producers whose

collective output of the Domestic Like

Product constitutes a major proportion

of the total domestic production of the

product. In its original determinations,

the Commission defined the Domestic

Industry as producers of dry pasta. One

Commissioner defined the Domestic

Industry differently.

(5) The Order Date is the date that the

countervailing and antidumping duty

orders under review became effective. In

these reviews, the Order Date is July 24,

1996.

(6) An Importer is any person or firm

engaged, either directly or through a

parent company or subsidiary, in

importing the Subject Merchandise into

the United States from a foreign

manufacturer or through its selling

agent.

Participation in the Reviews and Public

Service List

Persons, including industrial users of

the Subject Merchandise and, if the

merchandise is sold at the retail level,

representative consumer organizations,

wishing to participate in the reviews as

parties must file an entry of appearance

with the Secretary to the Commission,

as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of

the Commission’s rules, no later than 21

days after publication of this notice in

the Federal Register. The Secretary will

maintain a public service list containing

the names and addresses of all persons,

or their representatives, who are parties

to the reviews.

Former Commission employees who

are seeking to appear in Commission

five-year reviews are reminded that they

are required, pursuant to 19 CFR 201.15,

to seek Commission approval if the

matter in which they are seeking to

appear was pending in any manner or

form during their Commission

employment. The Commission’s

designated agency ethics official has

advised that a five-year review is the

‘‘same particular matter’’ as the

underlying original investigation for

purposes of 19 CFR 201.15 and 18

U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute

for Federal employees. Former

employees may seek informal advice

from Commission ethics officials with

respect] to this and the related issue of

whether the employee’s participation

was ‘‘personal and substantial.’’

However, any informal consultation will

not relieve former employees of the

obligation to seek approval to appear

from the Commission under its rule

201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol

McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics

Official, at 202–205–3088.

Limited Disclosure of Business

Proprietary Information (BPI) Under an

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

and APO Service List

Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the

Commission’s rules, the Secretary will

make BPI submitted in these reviews

available to authorized applicants under

the APO issued in the reviews, provided

that the application is made no later

than 21 days after publication of this

notice in the Federal Register.

Authorized applicants must represent

interested parties, as defined in 19

U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the

reviews. A separate service list will be

maintained by the Secretary for those

parties authorized to receive BPI under

the APO.

Certification

Pursuant to section 207.3 of the

Commission’s rules, any person

submitting information to the

Commission in connection with these

reviews must certify that the

information is accurate and complete to

the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In

making the certification, the submitter

will be deemed to consent, unless

otherwise specified, for the

Commission, its employees, and

contract personnel to use the

information provided in any other

reviews or investigations of the same or

comparable products which the

Commission conducts under Title VII of

the Act, or in internal audits and

investigations relating to the programs

and operations of the Commission

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.

Written Submissions

Pursuant to section 207.61 of the

Commission’s rules, each interested

party response to this notice must

provide the information specified

below. The deadline for filing such

responses is July 23, 2001. Pursuant to

section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s

rules, eligible parties (as specified in

Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also

file comments concerning the adequacy

of responses to the notice of institution

and whether the Commission should

conduct expedited or full reviews. The

deadline for filing such comments is

August 15, 2001. All written

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2001 / Notices 29833

submissions must conform with the

provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3

of the Commission’s rules and any

submissions that contain BPI must also

conform with the requirements of

sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s

rules do not authorize filing of

submissions with the Secretary by

facsimile or electronic means. Also, in

accordance with sections 201.16(c) and

207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each

document filed by a party to the reviews

must be served on all other parties to

the reviews (as identified by either the

public or APO service list as

appropriate), and a certificate of service

must accompany the document (if you

are not a party to the reviews you do not

need to serve your response).

Inability To Provide Requested

Information

Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the

Commission’s rules, any interested

party that cannot furnish the

information requested by this notice in

the requested form and manner shall

notify the Commission at the earliest

possible time, provide a full explanation

of why it cannot provide the requested

information, and indicate alternative

forms in which it can provide

equivalent information. If an interested

party does not provide this notification

(or the Commission finds the

explanation provided in the notification

inadequate) and fails to provide a

complete response to this notice, the

Commission may take an adverse

inference against the party pursuant to

section 776(b) of the Act in making its

determinations in the reviews.

Information To Be Provided in

Response to This Notice of Institution

If you are a domestic producer, union/

worker group, or trade/business

association; import/export Subject

Merchandise from more than one

Subject Country; or produce Subject

Merchandise in more than one Subject

Country, you may file a single response.

If you do so, please ensure that your

response to each question includes the

information requested for each pertinent

Subject Country. As used below, the

term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.

(1) The name and address of your firm

or entity (including World Wide Web

address if available) and name,

telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official.

(2) A statement indicating whether

your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of

the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union

or worker group, a U.S. importer of the

Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer

or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,

a U.S. or foreign trade or business

association, or another interested party

(including an explanation). If you are a

union/worker group or trade/business

association, identify the firms in which

your workers are employed or which are

members of your association.

(3) A statement indicating whether

your firm/entity is willing to participate

in these reviews by providing

information requested by the

Commission.

(4) A statement of the likely effects of

the revocation of the countervailing and

antidumping duty orders on the

Domestic Industry in general and/or

your firm/entity specifically. In your

response, please discuss the various

factors specified in section 752(a) of the

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the

likely volume of subject imports, likely

price effects of subject imports, and

likely impact of imports of Subject

Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.

(5) A list of all known and currently

operating U.S. producers of the

Domestic Like Product. Identify any

known related parties and the nature of

the relationship as defined in section

771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1677(4)(B)).

(6) A list of all known and currently

operating U.S. importers of the Subject

Merchandise and producers of the

Subject Merchandise in each Subject

Country that currently export or have

exported Subject Merchandise to the

United States or other countries since

1995.

(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the

Domestic Like Product, provide the

following information on your firm’s

operations on that product during

calendar year 2000 (report quantity data

in thousands of pounds and value data

in thousands of U.S. dollars, f.o.b.

plant). If you are a union/worker group

or trade/business association, provide

the information, on an aggregate basis,

for the firms in which your workers are

employed/which are members of your

association.

(a) Production (quantity) and, if

known, an estimate of the percentage of

total U.S. production of the Domestic

Like Product accounted for by your

firm’s(s’) production;

(b) the quantity and value of U.S.

commercial shipments of the Domestic

Like Product produced in your U.S.

plant(s); and

(c) the quantity and value of U.S.

internal consumption/company

transfers of the Domestic Like Product

produced in your U.S. plant(s).

(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a

trade/business association of U.S.

importers of the Subject Merchandise

from the Subject Countries, provide the

following information on your firm’s(s’)

operations on that product during

calendar year 2000 (report quantity data

in thousands of pounds and value data

in thousands of U.S. dollars). If you are

a trade/business association, provide the

information, on an aggregate basis, for

the firms which are members of your

association.

(a) The quantity and value (landed,

duty-paid but not including

antidumping or countervailing duties)

of U.S. imports and, if known, an

estimate of the percentage of total U.S.

imports of Subject Merchandise from

each Subject Country accounted for by

your firm’s(s’) imports;

(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.

port, including antidumping and/or

countervailing duties) of U.S.

commercial shipments of Subject

Merchandise imported from each

Subject Country; and

(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.

port, including antidumping and/or

countervailing duties) of U.S. internal

consumption/company transfers of

Subject Merchandise imported from

each Subject Country.

(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,

or a trade/business association of

producers or exporters of the Subject

Merchandise in the Subject Countries,

provide the following information on

your firm’s(s’) operations on that

product during calendar year 2000

(report quantity data in thousands of

pounds and value data in thousands of

U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at

the U.S. port but not including

antidumping or countervailing duties).

If you are a trade/business association,

provide the information, on an aggregate

basis, for the firms which are members

of your association.

(a) Production (quantity) and, if

known, an estimate of the percentage of

total production of Subject Merchandise

in each Subject Country accounted for

by your firm’s(s’) production; and

(b) the quantity and value of your

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an

estimate of the percentage of total

exports to the United States of Subject

Merchandise from each Subject Country

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.

(10) Identify significant changes, if

any, in the supply and demand

conditions or business cycle for the

Domestic Like Product that have

occurred in the United States or in the

market for the Subject Merchandise in

each Subject Country since the Order

Date, and significant changes, if any,

that are likely to occur within a

reasonably foreseeable time. Supply

conditions to consider include

technology; production

29834 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2001 / Notices

methods; development efforts; ability to

increase production (including the shift

of production facilities used for other

products and the use, cost, or

availability of major inputs into

production); and factors related to the

ability to shift supply among different

national markets (including barriers to

importation in foreign markets or

changes in market demand abroad).

Demand conditions to consider include

end uses and applications; the existence

and availability of substitute products;

and the level of competition among the

Domestic Like Product produced in the

United States, Subject Merchandise

produced in each Subject Country, and

such merchandise from other countries.

(11) (Optional) A statement of

whether you agree with the above

definitions of the Domestic Like Product

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree

with either or both of these definitions,

please explain why and provide

alternative definitions.

Authority: These reviews are being

conducted under authority of title VII of the

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published

pursuant to section 207.61 of the

Commission’s rules.

May 21, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–13684 Filed 5–31–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Under the Resource Conservation and

Recovery Act and the Clean Water Act

Notice is hereby given that on May 14,

2001, a proposed consent decree in

United States v. A&S Tribal Industries,

Civil Action No. CV–01–96M–DWM,

was lodged with the United States

District Court for the District of

Montana.

In this action, the United States

sought injunctive relief and the payment

of civil penalties for A&S Tribal

Industries’ alleged violations of the

hazardous waste generator and

treatment, storage and disposal

requirements of the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act

(‘‘RCRA’’, and the pretreatment

requirements of the Clean Water Act, at

its facility located near Poplar, Montana.

Under the proposed decree, the

defendant A&S Tribal Industries will

pay the sum of $40,000 over a three year

period. The settlement sum is based

upon the financial inability of A&S

Tribal Industries to pay more. The

proposed decree also requires that A&S

Tribal Industries take specified

injunctive measures to prevent RCRA

generator and waste storage violations

in the future and to perform initial

sampling at facility locations where

hazardous waste releases have occurred.

The proposed decree also requires that

A&S Tribal Industries install, operate

and maintain pretreatment equipment

necessary to achieve applicable

discharge limits.

The Department of Justice will receive

for a period of thirty (30) days from the

date of this publication comments

relating to the proposed consent decree.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General of the

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20530, and should refer

to United States. v. A&S Tribal

Industries, D.J. Ref. 90–7–1–06092.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, 2929 3rd Avenue

North, Suite 400, Billings, Montana

59103; and at U.S. EPA Region VIII, 999

18th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. A

copy of the proposed consent decree

may be obtained by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611,

Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a

copy, please enclose a check in the

amount of $12.00 (25 cents per page

reproduction cost) payable to the

Consent Decree Library.

Robert D. Brook,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 01–13773 Filed 5–31–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—the Asymmetrical Digital

Subscriber Line Forum

Notice is hereby given that, on April

17, 2001, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the

National Cooperative Research and

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The Asymmetrical

Digital Subscriber Line Forum (‘‘ADSL’’)

has filed written notifications

simultaneously with the Attorney

General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing changes in its

membership status. The notifications

were filed for the purpose of extending

the Act’s provisions limiting the

recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual

damages under specified circumstances.

Specifically, Hitachi, Kanagawa,

JAPAN, BRECIS Communications, San

Jose, CA; Charles Industries, Rolling

Meadows, IL; State Farm Insurance,

Bloomington, IL; Energis

Communications, Reading, Berkshire,

England, UNITED KINGDOM;

International Engineering Consortium,

Chicago, IL; Symmetricom, San Jose,

CA; Knowledge Junction, Coquitlam,

British Columbia, CANADA; Telekom

Austria, Vienna, AUSTRIA; AccessLan

Communications, San Jose, CA;

Verilink, Huntsville, AL; VDSL Systems,

Oy, Espoo, FINLAND; Avaya, Inc.,

Whippany, NJ; Bulldog

Communications, London, England,

UNITED KINGDOM; e-Site, Tustin, CA;

Actiontec Electronics, Orange, CA;

DETEL, Taipei, TAIWAN; BroadMAX

Technologies, Delray Beach, FL; TUV

Rheinland of N.A., Pleasanton, CA;

Incognito Software, Vancouver, British

Columbia, CANADA; Comtest

Networks, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA;

UAT, Taipei, TAIWAN; riodata AG,

Zurich, SWITZERLAND; and TEG

Worldwide Media, Irving, TX have been

added as parties to this venture.

The following parties have changed

their names: Mitel Corporation, Kanata,

Ontario, CANADA is now Mitel

Networks; GTS Network Systems,

Hoeilaart, BELGIUM is now EBONE;

Eicon Technology, Montreal, Quebec,

CANADA is now Eicon Networks; Fluke

Corporation, Everett, WA is now Fluke

Networks, Inc.; First Telecom,

Frankfurt, GERMANY is now Atlantic

Telecom; Clare Remtech, San Diego, CA

is now Sumida; Cable & Wireless HKT,

Hong Kong, HONG KONG–CHINA is

now Pacific Century Cyberworks; and

Ericsson Aheadcom, Vienna, AUSTRIA

is now Ahead Communications.

In addition, Silicon Spice, Mountain

View, CA has been acquired by

Broadcom, Irvine, CA; and Chiplogic,

Santa Clara, CA has merged with Analog

Devices, Inc., Wilmington, MA.

Also, Belgacom, Brussels, BELGIUM;

Bintec Corporation, Nurnberg,

GERMANY; Pliant Systems, Research

Triangle Park, NC; Digi International,

Minnetonka, MN; Edgcumbe

Instruments, Glasgow, Scotland,

UNITED KINGDOM; ITRI, Taejon,

TAIWAN; Fantastic Corporation, Zug,

SWITZERLAND; Iceland Telecom,

Reykjavik, ICELAND; Interlink, Seoul,

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; INTERSPEED,

North Andover, MA; Inverness Systems,

Marlborough, MA; IPM Datacom,

Frattamaggiore Napol, ITALY; Italtel,

Settimo Milanese, ITALY; Jato

Communications, Denver, CO; Katron

Technologies, Taipei, TAIWAN; Korea

Telecom, Taejon, REPUBLIC OF

KOREA; LASAT Networks, Nibe,