Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28421

or indirectly, in any way in any

transaction involving any commodity,

software, or technology (hereinafter

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)

exported or to be exported from the

United States that is subject to the

Regulations, or in any other activity

subject to the Regulations, including,

but not limited to:

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using

any license, License Exception, or

export control document;

B. Carrying on negotiations

concerning, or ordering, buying,

receiving, using, selling, delivering,

storing, disposing of, forwarding,

transporting, financing, or otherwise

servicing in any way, any transaction

involving any item exported or to be

exported from the United States that is

subject to the Regulations, or in any

other activity subject to the Regulations;

or

C. Benefitting in any way from any

transaction involving any item exported

or to be exported from the United States

that is subject to the Regulations, or in

any other activity subject to the

Regulations.

Fourth, that no person may, directly

or indirectly, do any of the following:

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf

of TAL or its successors, assigns,

officers, representatives, agents, or

employees (hereinafter the ‘‘denied

person’’) any item subject to the

Regulations;

B. Take any action that facilitates the

acquisition or attempted acquisition by

the denied person or the ownership,

possession, or control of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States, including financing or other

support activities related to a

transaction whereby the denied person

acquires or attempts to acquire such

ownership, possession or control;

C. Take any action to acquire from or

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted

acquisition from the denied person of

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been exported form the United

States.

D. Obtain from the denied person in

the United States any item subject to the

Regulations with knowledge or reason

to know that the item will be, or is

intended to be, exported from the

United States; or

E. Engage in any transaction to serve

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been or will be exported from the

United States and that is owned,

possessed or controlled by the denied

person, or service any item, of whatever

origin, that is owned, possessed or

controlled by the denied person if such

service involves the use of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States. For purposes of this paragraph,

servicing means installation,

maintenance, repair, modification or

testing.

Fifth, that, after notice and

opportunity for comment as provided in

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any

person, firm, corporation, or business

organization related to the denied

person by affiliation, ownership,

control, or position of responsibility in

the conduct of trade or related services

may also be made subject to the

provisions of this Order.

Sixth, that this Order does not

prohibit any export, reexport, or other

transaction subject to the Regulations

where the only items involved that are

subject to the Regulations are the

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.-

origin technology.

Seventh, that TAL shall produce to

the Department of Commerce any

documents, in its custody, care or

control, that were supplied to the

United States in the case of U.S. v.

CATIC, et al., No. 99–353 (PLF), and

TAL hereby certifies that these

documents are all the documents that

are relevant to the sale, licensing or

diversion of the machine tools from the

McDonnell Douglas plant in Columbus,

Ohio that were allegedly to be used in

the Trunkliner program;

Eighth, that for the purposes of

authenticating documents and as

otherwise agreed to by the parties, TAL

shall, at its own expense, made its

appropriate employees, representatives,

officers or agents available to the

Department of Commerce to testify at

any administrative proceeding initiated

by BXA in connection with the sale,

licensing and diversion of the machine

tools from the McDonnell Douglas plant

in Columbus, Ohio that were allegedly

to be used in the Trunkliner program.

Ninth, that the proposed charging

letter, the Settlement Agreement, and

this Order shall be made available to the

public.

This Order, which constitutes the

final agency action in these matters, is

effective immediately.

Dated: Entered this 11th day of May, 2001.

Dexter M. Price,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Export

Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 01–13024 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Initiation of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of initiation of

antidumping and countervailing duty

administrative reviews.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

has received requests to conduct

administrative reviews of various

antidumping and countervailing duty

orders and findings with April

anniversary dates. In accordance with

the Department’s regulations, we are

initiating those administrative reviews.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Holly A. Kuga, Office of AD/CVD

Enforcement, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)

482–4737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department has received timely

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR

351.213(b)(2000), for administrative

reviews of various antidumping and

countervailing duty orders and findings

with April anniversary dates.

Initiation of Reviews

In accordance with section 19 CFR

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating

administrative reviews of the following

antidumping and countervailing duty

orders and findings. We intend to issue

the final results of these reviews not

later than April 30, 2002.

Period to be reviewed

Antidumping Duty Proceedings

Japan: Mechanical Transfer Presses, A–588–810 ..................................................................................................................... 2/1/00–1/31/01

Hitachi Zosen Fukui Corporation d/b/a/ H & F Corporation *

28422 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

Period to be reviewed

* Inadvertently omitted from initiation notice published on March 22,2001 (66 FR 16037).

Taiwan: Static Random Access Memory Semiconductors, A–583–827 ..................................................................................... 4/1/00–3/31/01

G-Link Technology Corporation

Giga Semiconductor, Inc., dba GSI Technology

Mosel Vitelic, Inc./Mosel Vitelic Corp.

Winbond Electronics Corporation

The People’s Republic of China: Brake Rotors,** A–570–846 ................................................................................................... 4/1/00–3/31/01

China National Automotive Industry Import & Export Corporation, and manufactured by any company other than

Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry

Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry, and manufactured by any company other than Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry

Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd., and manufactured by any other company other than Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd., or Laizhou Luyuan Automobile Fitting Co.

Laizhou Luyuan Automobile Fitting Co., and manufactured by any company other than Laizhou Luyuan Automobile

Fitting Co., or Shenyang Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd.

China National Machinery and Equipment Import & Export (Xinjiang) Corporation, and manufactured by any company

other than Zibo Botai Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Qingdao (Gren) Co.

** If one of the named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of brake rotors from the People’s

Republic of China who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.

Turkey: Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A–489–807 .................................................................................................. 4/1/00–3/31/01

Ekinciler Holding, A.S./Ekinciler Demir Celik A.S.

Colakoglu Metalurji A.S./Colakoglu Dis Ticaret

ICDAS Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi, A.S

Diler Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S./Yazici Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./Diler Dis Ticaret A.S.

Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazler Istihsal Endustrisi A.S.

Countervailing Duty Proceedings

None.

Suspension Agreements

None.

During any administrative review

covering all or part of a period falling

between the first and second or third

and fourth anniversary of the

publication of an antidumping duty

order under section 351.211 or a

determination under section

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or

suspended investigation (after sunset

review), the Secretary, if requested by a

domestic interested party within 30

days of the date of publication of the

notice of initiation of the review, will

determine whether antidumping duties

have been absorbed by an exporter or

producer subject to the review if the

subject merchandise is sold in the

United States through an importer that

is affiliated with such exporter or

producer. The request must include the

name(s) of the exporter or producer for

which the inquiry is requested.

Interested parties must submit

applications for disclosure under

administrative protective orders in

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.

These initiations and this notice are

in accordance with section 751(a) of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 USC

1675(a)), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).

Dated: May 17, 2001.

Holly A. Kuga,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Group II

for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–13054 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–580–809]

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe

From the Republic of Korea; Amended

Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review of circular welded non-alloy

steel pipe from the Republic of Korea.

SUMMARY: On April 11, 2001, the

Department published the final results

of the administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on circular

welded non-alloy steel pipe from the

Republic of Korea (see Circular Welded

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic

of Korea; Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review, 66 FR 18747

(April 11, 2001) (‘‘Final Results’’)). On

April 16, 2001, the respondents

Hyundai Pipe Co., Ltd., Shinho Steel

Co., Ltd., and SeAH Steel Corporation

submitted allegations of ministerial

errors. On April 23, 2001, the domestic

interested parties submitted comments.

Based on our review of the submissions

received from all parties regarding

potential ministerial errors, we have

made certain corrections to the margin

calculation for all three respondents.

This correction results in a margin of

2.53 percent for HDP, 0.95 percent for

SeAH, and 2.99 percent for Shinho.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg

Campbell or Suresh Maniam, Group 1,

Office I, Antidumping/Countervailing

Duty Enforcement, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–2239 or (202) 482–

0176, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the ‘‘Act’’), are references to