alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018427EN.01006801.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/68

---

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — RE v Commission

(Case T-257/17) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - No need to adjudicate - Explicit refusal of access - Modification of the form of order - Article 86(4)(a) and (b) of the Rules of Procedure - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/90)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: RE (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of an implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application of the applicant of 20 January 2017 for access to documents and decision C(2017) 3718 final of the Secretary General of the Commission of 24 May 2017, in so far as it refuses access to a note concerning the applicant’s recruitment, and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the refusal of access to those documents and of the delay in examining the application for access to the said documents.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application of RE of 20 January 2017 for access to documents. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application of RE of 20 January 2017 for access to documents.

| 2. | The action is dismissed for the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed for the remainder.

| 3. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

---
# C_2017300EN.01003501.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/35

---

Action brought on 18 July 2017 — Sevenfriday v EUIPO — Seven (SEVENFRIDAY)

(Case T-448/17)

(2017/C 300/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sevenfriday AG (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Mostardini, F. Mellucci, S. Pallavicini and G. Bellomo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SEVENFRIDAY’ — Application for registration No 12 915 021

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 May 2017 in Case R 2291/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision insofar that it rejected the appeal lodged by Sevenfriday AG against the decision B2400482 of 7 October 2016 and consequently allow the application No 1105144 to proceed to registration as EU trade mark.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009

---
# C_2020378EN.01000402.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission

(Case T-784/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) - Internal review of administrative acts - Limitation to measures of individual application - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 - Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ - Application for internal review - Measure of general application - Dismissal)

(2020/C 378/05)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung (represented by: A. Willand, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Bayer Agriculture BVBA (represented by: H. Berger, A. Burghardt, J. Wauters, Rechtsanwälte, and G. Forwood, avocate)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Bayer Agriculture BVBA and by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Bayer Agriculture BVBA and by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the American First Financial, Inc. (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K/A, amendment number 1 for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, J R Stirling, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date: May 20, 2011
  /s/  J. R. StirlingJ. R. StirlingChief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4644-N-22]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless.
    Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional 
properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: May 24, 2001.
John D. Garrity,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 01-13573 Filed 5-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Submission No. 23-18

February 15, 2023

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Delisting of New York Ethanol Future - Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act 

and Regulation 40.6(a) 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)1 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”) and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), ICE Futures U.S., Inc. 

(“Exchange”) submits notice to the Commission that, effective as of the close of business today, February 

15, 2023, the Exchange will delist all contract months of the New York Ethanol Future (“ETN”). This

futures product currently has no open interest.

The Exchange certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on 

the Exchange’s website and may be accessed at (https://www.theice.com/futures-us/regulation). 

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 312-836-6745 or at 

patrick.swartzer@theice.com.

Sincerely,

Patrick Swartzer

Director

Market Regulation

Enc.

cc: Division of Market Oversight

New York Regional Office
#### Lucienne HUNTER and Kevin Smith, petitioners, v. Paul MANSDORF, Chapter 7 Trustee, et al.

No. 10-8906.

March 21, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 21, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Peter Hoffman                  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Peter Hoffman                      |   |
|                    |   | Chairman of the Board of Directors |   |

| Date: November 21, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Peter Hoffman       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Peter Hoffman           |   |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |

| Date: November 21, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Elaine New          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Elaine New              |   |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

| Date: November 21, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Elaine New               |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Elaine New                   |   |
|                    |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Djalma Bastos de Morais, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CEMIG;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/DJALMA BASTOS DE MORAIS
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | Name:                     
| |  | Title:                    

Date:
July 1, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
CAVALLINI FOR ADMISSION TO THE 

BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Danielle Cavallini has filed a rnotion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Cavallini has provided the 

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on 

motion under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Danielle Cavallini may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Suprerne Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this t?. cla; . of February, 2022. 

Chie ustice
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2454 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 123 East Sharpfish Street in Rosebud, South 

Dakota, as the ‘‘Ben Reifel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2454 EH

1 SECTION 1. BEN REIFEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 123 East Sharpfish Street in 

4 Rosebud, South Dakota, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Ben Reifel Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ben Reifel Post Office 

10 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2454 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. in Rosebud, South Dakota, as the ‘‘Ben Reifel al Service located at 123 East Sharpfish Street
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Accounting Office

# AGENCY:

General Accounting Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments.

# SUMMARY:

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. This notice announces three new appointments and three reappointments to fill the vacancies occurring this year, and designates the Chair and Vice Chair of the Commission.

# DATES:

Appointments are effective May 1, 2001 through April 30, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

*GAO:*                         441 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20548;                         *MedPAC:*                         1730 K Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*GAO:*                         Molly Ryan, 202/512-3592;                         *MedPAC:*                         Murray N. Ross, Ph.D., 202/653-7220.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To fill this year's vacancies I am announcing the following:

Newly appointed members are Sheila P. Burke, Under Secretary for American Museums and National Programs, Smithsonian Institution; Allen D. Feezor, Health Benefits Administrator, California Public Employees' Retirement System; and Ralph W. Muller, President and CEO, University of Chicago Hospitals and Health System; reappointed members are Joseph P. Newhouse, Ph.D., John D. MacArthur Professor of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University; Alice F. Rosenblatt, Senior Vice President, Merger and Acquisition Integration, Wellpoint Health Networks; and John W. Rowe, M.D., Chairman, CEO, and President, Aetna Inc. I also hereby name Glenn M. Hackbarth, J.D., an independent consultant, as Chair of the Commission; and Robert D. Reischauer, Ph.D., President of the Urban Institute, as Vice Chair.

(Sec. 4022, Pub. L. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 350)

David M. Walker,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 01-13445  Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Grand Motion Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   May 14, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WiTel, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Tsitron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 23, 2009*By:  /s/ Gary Tsitron
Gary Tsitron
Chief Financial Officer

 *
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  I, Eduard Korsinsky, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. We have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 11 ,2009  /s/ Eduard Korsinsky Eduard Korsinsky Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer