alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MEI LAN CHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Alberto R. Gonzales,1 Attorney General, Respondents.

No. 04-6113-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 26, 2006.

David X. Feng, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Matthew D. Orwig, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas, Paul *58Ñaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Beaumont, TX, for Respondent.

Present: WILFRED FEINBERG, JOSÉ A. CABRANES and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

1

. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as a respondent in this case.

SUMMARY ORDER

Mei Lan Chen, though counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Elizabeth Lamb’s decision denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

When the BIA summarily affirms the decision of the IJ without issuing an opinion, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003. 1(e)(4), we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination. *See, e.g., Twum v. INS,*411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005); *Yu Sheng Zhang v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*362 F.3d 155, 158 (2d Cir.2004). We review the agency’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard, treating them as “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); *see, e.g., Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS,*386 F.3d 66, 73 & n. 7 (2d Cir.2004). However, when the agency’s analysis proves inadequate for this Court to review, we must remand to the agency for further consideration. *See Ivanishvili v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*433 F.3d 332, 337 (2d Cir.2006); *Jin Shui Qiu v. Ashcroft,*329 F.3d 140, 149 (2d Cir.2003).

Here, the IJ failed to address adequately whether Chen had articulated a particular social group, political opinion, or other protected ground for relief, simply stating without further analysis that she had failed to state a basis for asylum. Because this Court may not decide in the first instance whether Chen, a young Chinese woman who alleged that her village chief tried to force her into a marriage against her will, articulated a particular social group, and the agency’s findings on this issue are inadequate, we remand to the agency for detailed consideration of this issue. *See Gonzales v. Thomas,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1613, 1615, 164 L.Ed.2d 358 (2006) (per curiam). On remand, we direct the agency to address whether the members of this alleged group fall within the BIA’s definition of “particular social group”articulated in *Matter of Acosta,*19 I. & N. Dec. 211, 233, 1985 WL 56042 (BIA 1985), and whether Chen established that she would be persecuted on account of such status.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Having completed our review, any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel General Clinical Research Centers.
    Date: June 12, 2001.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: John L. Meyer, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of 
Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes 
of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, One Rockledge Centre, 
Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0806, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de0e8f4e8ffe7cde3eeffffa3e3e4e5a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bbb3afb3a4bc96b8b5a4a4f8b8bfbef8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12928 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

EXHIBIT 8

CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Catalyst Paper
Corporaiton (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Ralph Leveton, Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|A. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|B. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Ralph
      Leverton                                    | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Ralph Leverton                                            | 
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
      Officer
|                                                          | 
|February 3, 2006                                          | 

---
# C_2017424EN.01005501.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/55

---

Action brought on 11 October 2017 — Euroways v SRB

(Case T-707/17)

(2017/C 424/79)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euroways, SL (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and C. Iglesias Megías, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived the applicant of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities it owned; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived the applicant of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities it owned;

| — | Order the Board to pay the applicant compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’):






  — | Principally, the reimbursement of the investments made, namely EUR 543 242,11 in Banco Popular shares; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Order the Board to pay the applicant compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’):

—

Principally, the reimbursement of the investments made, namely EUR 543 242,11 in Banco Popular shares;

| — | In the alternative to the above claim, EUR 44 055,19; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative to the above claim, EUR 44 055,19;

| — | Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;

| — | Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points. |
| --- | --- |

—

Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.

| — | Order the SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the SRB to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17 Vallina Fonseca v SRB.

Vallina Fonseca

SRB.

---
# C_2017129EN.01002602.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/26

---

Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte v ACER

(Case T-123/17)

(2017/C 129/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: B. Rajal, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 17 February 2017 given by the Board of Appeal of the defendant in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated) concerning the rejection of the application for leave to intervene lodged by the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 17 February 2017 given by the Board of Appeal of the defendant in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated) concerning the rejection of the application for leave to intervene lodged by the applicant; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure of the Board of Appeal of the defendant and infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since the Board of Appeal erred in finding that the applicant had no legitimate interest in the outcome of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure of the Board of Appeal of the defendant and infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since the Board of Appeal erred in finding that the applicant had no legitimate interest in the outcome of the appeal proceedings.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU (serious failure to state reasons). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU (serious failure to state reasons).

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard, since the Board of Appeal failed to notify the applicant of the position taken by the defendant in relation to the application made by the applicant for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard, since the Board of Appeal failed to notify the applicant of the position taken by the defendant in relation to the application made by the applicant for leave to intervene.

---
# C_2020161EN.01000701.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — Buonotourist Srl v European Commission, Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV)

(Case C-586/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - State aid - Undertaking operating bus route networks in the Regione Campania (Campania Region, Italy) - Compensation for public service obligations paid by the Italian authorities following a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy) - European Commission decision declaring the aid measure unlawful and incompatible with the internal market)

(2020/C 161/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Buonotourist Srl (represented by: M. D'Alberti and L. Visone, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, P.-J. Loewenthal and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) (represented by: M. Malena, avvocato)

Operative part

The Court

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Buonotourist Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Buonotourist Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied American Steel Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jes Black, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Jes BlackName:
Jes BlackTitle:
Chief Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
May 23, 2011
SCWC-16-0000349

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

REGINALD BOTELHO, 

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,

vs.

ATLAS RECYCLING CENTER, LLC and HAWAIʻI EMPLOYERS’ MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Respondents/Employer/Insurance Carrier/Appellees,

and

SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND, 

Respondent/Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000349; 

Case No. AB 2009-334(H)(S)(DCD No. 1-06-00818))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Reginald Botelho’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on December 16, 2019,

is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000349

30-JAN-2020

02:57 PM
2

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, January 30, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TERESA TINAJERO,

 Appellant,

v.

J. JESUS TINAJERO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00147-CV

Appeal from the

254th Judicial District Court

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# DF-06-18437-R) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant represents that the parties reached an agreement to settle and

compromise their differences and requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. Appellee has not

objected to the motion, and there is no indication that dismissal would prevent Appellee from

seeking the relief to which he would otherwise be entitled. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). We

therefore grant Appellant’s motion, and dismiss the appeal pursuant to the parties settlement

agreement. As the motion does not indicate the parties have agreed otherwise, costs will be

taxed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

January 22, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of GameStop Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Richard
Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of           the Company.

| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ R. Richard Fontaine

R. Richard Fontaine
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
GameStop Corp.
May 2, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Robert FIELDS, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Kenneth J. Biby, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Ralph E. Walton, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Betty J. Satterfield, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Robert V. Nichols, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 2005-7188, 2006-7014, 2006-7016, 2006-7027, 2006-7038.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 2, 2006.

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The parties move without opposition to vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ decisions in *Fields v. Nicholson,*03-1809, 20 Vet.App. 144 (2005), *Biby v. Nicholson,*03-2123, 2005 WL 2669731 (2005), *Walton v. Nicholson,*04-168, 2005 WL 2670373 (2005), *Satterfield v. Nicholson,*04-444, 2005 WL 3059393 (2005), and *Nichols v. Nicholson,*03-790, 2005 WL 3682934 (2005) and remand for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in *Mayfield v. Nicholson,*444 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.2006).

*970Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions are granted.

(2) All sides shall bear there own costs.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, David Natan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q/A of SunSi Energies Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the “Report”), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SunSi Energies Inc.





/s/ DAVID NATAN


David Natan


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: May 23, 2011
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer of Approach Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.Date: May 6, 2009
    /s/ J. Ross CraftJ. Ross CraftPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2019270EN.01001101.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Línea Directa Aseguradora, SA v Segurcaixa, Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros

(Case C-100/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 2009/103/EC - Article 3, first paragraph - Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ - Damage to property as a result of a fire in a vehicle parked in the private garage of the property - Compulsory insurance cover)

(2019/C 270/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Línea Directa Aseguradora, SA

Defendant: Segurcaixa, Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, must be interpreted as meaning that a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a vehicle parked in a private garage of a building, used in accordance with its function as a means of transport, has caught fire, giving rise to a fire which originated in the electrical circuit of that vehicle and caused damage to that building, even though that vehicle has not been moved for more than 24 hours before the fire occurred, falls within the concept of ‘use of vehicles’ referred to in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---