alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Denise Houghtaling, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Majic Wheels Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





MAJIC WHEELS CORP.Date: January 26, 2012
By:
/ s/ Denise HoughtalingName: Denise HoughtalingTitle: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 3, 2010

0526 

# Order

June 3, 2010

140382

CHRISTINE HELMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 140382 COA: 286397 Genesee CC: 07-085849-CZ ROBERT J. LEMIEUX, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the Francis J. Lemieux and Ruth Lemieux Revocable Living Trust dated July 16, 1999, Defendant-Appellant,

v

STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that there was a conflict between the annuity application and the annuity polic y with regard to the annuitant status of the two signing applicants. Reading the contract as a whole, the interpretation that harmonizes all of the relevant language is that the two applican ts were “joint annuitants,” as the Genesee Circuit Court correctly found. The applic ation indicated that Ruth LeMieux was an “annuitant” jointly with another person, and th e policy declaration identified that “joint annuitant” as Francis LeMieux. However, the Circuit Court erred in concluding that the death of one joint annuitant ex tinguished the rights of the remaining annuitant under the policy, where no provision in the policy justifies that conc lusion, and the policy states
that “after the Annuitant’s d eath, any payments due will be paid to the Beneficiary,”
which in the case of two annuitants should be viewed as operative after the death of the last annuitant. As such, Francis LeMieux re tained his annuitant rights under the policy
after Ruth LeMieux died. We REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for further proceedings not inco nsistent with this order.
Nodal Exchange, LLC Rulebook Appendix C: Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and Position Limits

Physical

Commodity

Code

Contract Name Reporting

Level

Spot Month

Position Limit

(lots)

Single Month

Accountability Level

(lots)

All Month

Accountability

Level (lots)

Aggregation

Group*

CFTC

Referenced

Contract

HTL PJM.AVONLAK220 KVUN9_month_off_dac 25 199 199 2388 44 0

HTK PJM.AVONLAK220 KVUN9_month_on_dac 25 199 199 2388 45 0

GHB PJM.CHESWICK24 KVUNIT1_month_off_dac 25 159 159 1908 0

GHA PJM.CHESWICK24 KVUNIT1_month_on_dac 25 159 159 1908 0

HJN PJM.MANSFIEL17 KVUN1_month_off_dac 25 685 685 8220 0

HJM PJM.MANSFIEL17 KVUN1_month_on_dac 25 685 685 8220 0

HSV PJM.ZIMMER225 KVZM1_A_month_off_dac 25 357 357 4284 0

HSU PJM.ZIMMER225 KVZM1_A_month_on_dac 25 357 357 4284 0
Exhibit31.2


CERTIFICATION





I, Thomas
J. Owens, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vemics, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a.  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.
 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.  
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





6.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





/s/
Thomas J.
Owens


Thomas J.
Owens


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)


Date: May
22,
2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00899-CV

Laura Leticia Zepeda VASQUEZ, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Jose Abraham 

Vasquez,Jr.,

Appellants

v.

Legend Natural Gas III, LP; Legend Natural Gas, /s

LEGEND NATURAL GAS III, LP; Legend Natural Gas, LLC; Lewis Energy Group, LP; and 

Lewis Petro Properties, Inc,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-07-00119-CVL

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee XTO Energy, Inc’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date 

been received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the 

Appellee’s brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to May 21, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Jeffrey Lee Dorrell

Hanszen Laporte, LLP

11767 Katy Freeway, Suite 850

Houston, TX 77079

William A. Abernethy

Donnell, Abernethy & Kieschnick, P.C.

PO Box 2624

Corpus Christi, TX 78403-2624

Joel Vale Jr.

Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez, LLP

818 W. Pecan Blvd.

McAllen, TX 78501

Jose E. Garcia

Garcia & Villarreal, L.L.P.

4311 North McColl Road

McAllen, TX 78504
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of ArtVentive Medical Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, H. James Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ H. James Graham ____________ H. James Graham Chief Executive Officer  Dated: August 9, 2011       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of ArtVentive Medical Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for quarter ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Leon Rudakov, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Leon Rudakov____________ Dr. Leon Rudakov, President  Dated: August 9, 2011
154 So. 917

#### I. M. EUBANKS et al. v. E. B. SOPER, Rec’r, etc.

8 Div. 544.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 17, 1934.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# ORIGINIL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0420 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. GERALD COOPER SCHWEGEL,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED DEC 2 8 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

The record was filed for purposes ofthis appeal on October4, 2021. Nothing further was filed, and on November 15, 2021, this Court ordered that Appellant prepare, file, and serve the opening briefno later than December 15, 2021. Nothing further has been filed. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Gerald Cooper Schwegel and to all counsel ofreco44. , DATED this2

-"‘

— day ofDecember, 2021. ChiefJustice 12/28/2021
Case Number: DA 21-0420
View All Circulars / Subscribe / Contact Us / Media Inquiries

Registered name: ICE Clear Europe Limited, (Registered in England, No. 06219884) 

Registered office: Milton Gate, 60 Chiswell Street, London EC1Y 4SA, United Kingdom

ICE Clear Europe Ltd is a recognised clearing house under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and is supervised by the Bank of England.

ICE Clear Europe

DD Month 2023

Circular C23/XXX

Notification of Changes to (1) ICE Deposit Rate (“IDR”) Spread for EUR & GBP 

& (2) the basis points charged for Collateral Margin Deposits 

Category

General

Attachments

NoneClearing Members are advised that ICE Clear Europe (“ICEU”) is (1) updating the spread applied to the ICE Deposit 

Rate (“IDR”). The IDR is calculated daily and applied to cash balances held at the close of business on the previous 

business day in respect of three currencies, US Dollar (“USD”), Euro (“EUR”) and Pound Sterling (“GBP”). Additionally, 

ICEU is (2) updating the charges for collateral margin deposits posted to the Clearing House. 

(1) ICEU intends to change the IDR spreads for EUR and GBP as follows:

EUR IDR will be calculated as the net income earned on EUR cash deposits (positive or negative) less a charge of 20

basis points (up from 15 basis points currently). 

GBP IDR will be calculated as the net income earned on GBP cash deposits (positive or negative) less a charge of 20 

basis points (up from 12 basis points currently). 

The spread for USD will remain unchanged at 15 basis points.

The IDR is an annualized fee that is calculated daily, accrued monthly, and credited to (or charged to, if applicable)

Clearing Members on a monthly basis. The IDR is updated daily in ECS and published on a Daily Interest Rate Report 

distributed through MFT.

(2) ICEU intends to update the charge on collateral margin deposits as follows:

House and Affiliate Accounts, Segregated Customer Accounts and Standard Omnibus Indirect Customer Accounts will 

move to 10 basis points (up from 8.33 basis points currently).

Gross Omnibus Indirect Customer Accounts and Individually Segregated Operationally Co-mingled (“ISOC”) Accounts

will move to 12 basis points (up from 10.33 basis points currently).

Individually Segregated Sponsored Accounts will move to 15 basis points (up from 13.33 basis points currently).

The changes will take effect no sooner than 14th December 2023, subject to regulatory approval.

Should you have any questions in relation to this Circular or require any further information, please contact the ICE 

Clear Europe Treasury team by email icecleareuropetreasury@ice.com.

Please ensure that the appropriate members of staff within your organisation and customers are advised on the content 

of this Circular.

For more information, please contact:

Treasury Department

+44 207 429 4580

ICEClearEuropeTreasury@ice.com
Translation of Loan Agreement dated in April 2009



 Exhibit 10.37 

Loan Agreements 
 Party A:
Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd. 
 Party B: Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. 

Both parties agree on the following matters, signing this agreements. 
  

	1.	Party A shall lend 160 million RMB (160,000,000,00 RMB) to Party B before April 25, 2009. 


 

	2.	Borrowing Rate: Interest shall be calculated at a 14.5% annualized rate (the combined annual ratio of Ming Yang Electric Appliance Plant paid to Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China for loans collateralized with equity mortgages). 

  

	3.	Borrowing Period: From April 10, 2009 to April 8, 2010 (If changed, both parties should negotiate). 


 

	4.	Repayment Date and Method: It shall be repaid before April 8, 2010 (If the repayment term changed, both parties should negotiate to solve it).


  

	5.	Liability for Breach of Contract: Carry out according to Law of Contract. 


 

	6.	This agreements comes into effect at the time when the funds arrives at Party A’s bank account. This agreements is made out in quadruplication and each party holds
two. 

  

			
	 Party A:
Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power
 Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Party B:
Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical
 Appliance Co., Ltd.

	 	 
	Representative of Party A:	  	Representative of Party B:
	 	 
	Date: April 9, 2009	  	Date: April 9, 2009
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 December 21, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-12859

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 01-02562-CV-S

MONEY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

MARK P. PORRARO,

PORRARO AND ASSOCIATES, 

FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY, 

ALLMERICA INVESTMENTS, INC., 

ALLMERICA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(December 21, 2005)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.
2

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Money Management Services, Inc. (MMS) appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants First Allmerica Financial Life

Insurance Company, Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity, Allmerica

Investments, Inc., Allmerica Investment Management Co., Inc. (“Allmerica”) and

Mark Porraro, Allmerica’s General Agent in Georgia and (during part of the

relevant time period) Alabama. At the time of summary judgment, MMS

maintained claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment against all

Defendants.

The district court found that Porraro’s only role in any contract was as

Allmerica’s agent. MMS does not dispute this factual finding. As the district court

stated, “agents cannot be held liable for a principal’s breach of contract.” Harrell

v. Reynolds Metals Co., 495 So. 2d 1381, 1389 (Ala. 1986). We affirm the grant of

summary judgment to Porraro.

The district court found that Allmerica was entitled to summary judgment on

MMS’s breach of contract claim because MMS “failed to adduce evidence which

would afford a reasonable jury a basis to fix damages on the Plaintiff’s alleged

breach of contract.” We agree.

Finally, the district court granted Allmerica summary judgment on MMS’s
3

claim of unjust enrichment or quasi-contract on two bases: (1) MMS put forth no

evidence that it provided any uncompensated service to Defendants and (2) MMS

presented no evidence of the reasonable value of any services it may have

provided. We find the same deficiencies in proof. And, we find no basis to shift to 

Defendants the burden of proving damages or the reasonable value of any

uncompensated services.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bill Otis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:   August 11, 2005               By  /s/ Bill Otis
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bill Otis
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       32
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2009/s/ David MathiesonDavid MathiesonSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2009
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of BG Medicine, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul R. Sohmer                                                                           
|                       |  |  |  | Paul R. Sohmer, M.D.                                                                         
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                        
|                       |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)                                                                
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen P. Hall                                                                          
|                       |  |  |  | Stephen P. Hall                                                                              
|                       |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(principal financial officer)
#### In the Matter of Town of Wallkill, Respondent, v Civil Service Employees Association, Inc. (Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Town of Wallkill Police Department Unit, Orange County Local 836), et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 5, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 968.

Motion by New York State Public Employment Relations Board for leave to orally argue as amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2323 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain veterans 

organizations to take into account the membership of spouses, widows, 

and widowers of members of the Armed Forces for purposes of determining tax exempt status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2019 

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain veterans organizations to take into account the 

membership of spouses, widows, and widowers of members of the Armed Forces for purposes of determining 

tax exempt status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spousal Membership 

5 for Veterans Organizations Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2323 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPOUSES, WIDOWS, AND WIDOWERS TAKEN INTO 

2 ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING TAX EXEMPT 

3 STATUS OF CERTAIN VETERANS ORGANIZA4 TIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(19) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following flush matter: 

8 ‘‘Any post or organization for which there is no aux9 iliary unit or society may elect to take into account 

10 any member who is a spouse, widow, or widower of 

11 a past or present member of the Armed Forces of 

12 the United States for purposes of determining 

13 whether the post or organization meets the 75-per14 cent requirement of subparagraph (B).’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS