alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WiTel, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Tsitron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 23, 2009                                                  | By:  /s/ Gary Tsitron
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|Gary Tsitron                                                             
|Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1259

KIRK E. WEBSTER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JAMES MATTIS, Secretary of Defense , Defendant

- Appellee , and
ROBERT CARDILLO, Director, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency; JACK W. RICKERT, Assistant General Counsel; JOHN ZIMMERMAN, Supervisory Benefits Specialist; JAMES L. LEE, Deputy General Counsel (EEOC); KENNETH MORSE, Federal Sector Mediator; PATSY COLEMAN, Na tional Geospatial Intelligence Agency Director, Resolution Center; THEODORE HARPER, Supervisor, Debt Processing Branch , Defendants ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Party

- in

- Interest

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 01384

- TSE

- IDD )

Submitted : June 28, 2018 Decided: July 17, 20182 Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kirk E. Webster, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Sara Levenson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Kirk E. Webster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (2012 ), for want of jurisdiction

. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion to strike the response brief an d affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webster v. Mattis , No. 1:17

- cv
- 01384

- TSE

IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 27, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McAFEE, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Symantec Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and Trend Micro Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2013-1135.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2013.

*1000Christopher D. Banys, Banys, P.C., of Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard C. Lin. Of counsel on the brief was Andre J. Bahou, Prism Technologies, LLC, of Brentwood, TN.

Dan L. Bagatell, Perkins Coie, LLP, of Phoenix Arizona, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Christina Jordan McCullough, of Seattle, WA for defendant-appellee, McAfee, Inc. Of counsel on the brief were Dean G. Dunlavey, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Costa Mesa, CA, and Mark A. Flagel, of Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee, Symantec Corporation; Mark D. Fowler and Robert Buergi, DLA Piper LLP (US) of East Palo Alto, CA; and Stanley Joseph Panikowski, III, of San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellee Trend Micro Incorporated. Of counsel were Rubendra Bains, Leisa Talbert Peschel, Matthew R. Rodgers, Danny L. Williams, and David K. Wooten, Williams Morgan & Amerson of Houston, TX, and John Patrick Passarelli, Kutak Rock, LLP, of Omaha, NE, for defendant-appellee, McAfee; Inc. and Kathy Yu, Latham *&*Watkins, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee, Symantec Corporation.

LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Order entered February 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00488-CR

No. 05-13-00489-CR

No. 05-13-00490-CR

No. 05-13-00505-CR

LUIS ALFREDO JUAREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-35332-I, F11-35928-I, F11-35929-I, F11-35930-I

ORDER

The State’s brief in this case was due to the Court on January 2, 2014. The Court is 

gravely concerned about counsel for the State taking no steps to request additional time to file its 

brief for over fifty days since its brief was initially due. The basis for extension was given as 

follows: 

The undersigned attorney was out of the office several days during the week of 

Christmas; January 1 and 20, 2014, were county holidays; the office was closed due to 

inclement weather more than one day; and the undersigned attorney was out of the office 

two days due to illness during this time. 
Only two of these purported impediments to timely filing are before the initial brief deadline of 

January 2, 2014.

Nevertheless, in the interest of justice and to avoid default by the State, the Court 

GRANTS the state’s February 26, 2014 motion for extension of time to file state’s brief, but 

notes its grave reservations in doing so.

We ORDER the Clerk of Court to file the state’s brief as of the date of this order. 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-372-001]


New England Power Company; Notice of Filing

January 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 29, 2000, New England Power Company 
(NEP), pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824d 
(1994) and section 35.13 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, 18 
CFR 35.13, withdraws its service agreement filed with the Commission on 
November 6, 2000 in Docket No. ER01-372-000, and submits for filing a 
First Revised Service Agreement No. 124 between NEP and ANP Bellingham 
Energy Company for Firm Local Generation Delivery Service under NEP's 
Open Access Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 
No. 9.
    Copies of the filing were served upon ANP Bellingham Energy Company 
and regulators in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before January 19, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1312 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Internal

Eurex Clearing AG

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments

No. 067-23, 068-23

October 20, 2023

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of October 16, 2023:

• Eurex Clearing Circular No. 067-23 (October 18, 2023): Amendments to the Clearing Conditions 

of Eurex Clearing AG - End of Consultation. This circular states that there were no comments 

received regarding Amendments C and D set forth in Eurex Clearing Circular 058-23, which was 

submitted previously as a 40.6 submission, and confirms the effective date of November 20, 2023 

stated in that circular.

• Eurex Clearing Circular No. 068-23 (October 19, 2023): Derivatives on Cryptocurrencies: 

Temporary transaction fee waiver for Agent account. This circular provides for a fee waiver, from 

October 23, 2023 through June 30, 2024, for all A-Account transaction fees in Futures and Options 

on FTSE Bitcoin Index.

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: October 20, 2023
# C_2021079EN.01000301.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 January 2021 — Päivi Leino-Sandberg v European Parliament

(Case C-761/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Access to documents of the EU institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 10 - Refusal to grant access - Action before the General Court of the European Union against a decision by the European Parliament refusing to grant access to a document - Disclosure of the annotated document by a third party after the action was lodged - Order that there was no need to adjudicate pronounced by the General Court on the ground that was no longer any interest in bringing proceedings - Error of law)

(2021/C 79/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (represented by: O.W. Brouwer and B.A. Verheijen, advocaten, and by S. Schubert, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos, I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented: initially by A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, J. Lundberg and H. Eklinder, and subsequently by C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev and H. Eklinder, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 20 September 2018, Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (T-421/17, not published, EU:T:2018:628); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 20 September 2018, Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (T-421/17, not published, EU:T:2018:628);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, NIH-ES-01-06.
    Date: June 18, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: NIEHS--East Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 122, 
79 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institutes of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD/EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, 919/541-4964.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, NIH-ES-01-07
    Date: June 19, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: NIEHS, 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, Building 4401, Conference 
Room 3446, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institutes of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD/EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, 919/541-4964.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS 
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS 
Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic Research and Education; 
93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental 
Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 17, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13108 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 11.1

Computation of Earnings
Per Share

The
following summarizes the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:

|                                                               | 2005 |  | 2004
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- |  | ----
|                                                               |      |  |     
|Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:               |      |  |     
|Historical common equivalent                                   |      |  |     
|Weighted average common shares issued during period            |      |  |     
|                                                               |      |  |     
|Weighted average common shares outstanding  basic and diluted |      |  |     
|                                                               |      |  |     
|                                                              
|Net Loss                                                       |      |  |     
|                                                               |      |  |     
|                                                              
|Net loss per basic and diluted share                           |      |  |     
|                                                               |      |  |     

Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased for potentially dilutive
common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of equity instruments is
calculated using the treasury stock method.

Warrants
to purchase 937,334 and 887,334 common shares as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, were excluded from the treasury stock calculation because they were
anti-dilutive due to the Companys net losses.

---
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-195

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 04/18/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of April 10, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

April 18, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-195

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of April 10, 2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-121 (April 11, 2023), REMINDER: LIBOR Fallback; ED-to-SOFR 

Fallbacks Conversion Production Weekend - Effective April 17, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-122 (April 13, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy, Equity, 

and FX – Effective April 14, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-123 (April 13, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy -

Effective April 14, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7991

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

NUCHON DELON CARMICHAEL, a/k/a Nu,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

Senior District Judge. (5:97-cr-00133-H-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 4, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nuchon Delon Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, 

Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nuchon Delon Carmichael appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction 

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Carmichael, No. 5:97-cr-0133-

H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
April 28, 2023

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending April 28, 2023, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rate for an European risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

eric.nield@ice.com or (312)836-6742.

Sincerely,

Eric Nield

General Counsel
# C_2019220EN.01003602.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) v Commission

(Case T-754/17) (1)

(State aid - General corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market - Existing aid - Concept of economic activity - Services of general interest - Principle of sound administration - Duty to state reasons - Error of assessment)

(2019/C 220/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Chambre de commerce et d’industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) (Brest, France) (represented by: J. Vanden Eynde and E. Wauters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2116 of 27 July 2017 on aid scheme SA.38398 (2016/C, ex 2015/E) implemented by France — Taxation of ports in France (OJ 2017, L 332, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the chambre de commerce et d’industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the chambre de commerce et d’industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.

---