alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sue SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, for the State of WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-35480.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.*

Oct. 4, 2013.

Sue Sherman, pro se.

William Gerard Clark, Assistant Attorney General, AGWA-Office of the Washington Attorney General, Seattle, WA, Defendant-Appellee.

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sue Sherman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from state court proceedings concerning real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine because Sherman’s action amounted to a forbidden “de facto appeal” of a state court judgment and raised constitutional claims that were “inextricably intertwined” with that state court judgment. *See id.*at 1163-65 (discussing *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine); *see also Henrichs v. Valley View Dev.,*474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir.2007) *(.Rooker-Feldman*doctrine barred plaintiffs claim because alleged legal injuries arose from the “state court’s purportedly erroneous judgment” and the relief he sought “would require the district court to determine that the state court’s decision was wrong and thus void”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing without leave to amend because amendment would have been futile. *See Albrecht v. Lund,*845 F.2d 193, 195 (9th Cir.1988) (dismissal without leave to amend is not an abuse of discretion if amendment would be futile).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

Sherman’s contentions concerning the finality of the state court judgment, her entitlement to a jury trial in this action, and defense counsel’s allegedly improper citations to judicially noticeable state court proceedings and documents are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2019263EN.01001701.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/17

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Terre wallonne ASBL v Région wallonne

(Case C-321/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directive 2001/42/EC - Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment - Decree - Establishment of conservation objectives for the Natura 2000 network, in accordance with Directive 92/43/EEC - Definition of ‘plans and programmes’ - Obligation to undertake an environmental assessment)

(2019/C 263/21)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Terre wallonne ASBL

Defendant: Région wallonne

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2) and (4) of Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, must be interpreted as meaning that a decree, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by which a body of a Member State establishes, at regional level for its Natura 2000 network, conservation objectives which have an indicative value, whereas the conservation objectives at site level have a statutory value, is not one of the ‘plans and programmes’, within the meaning of that directive, for which an environmental impact assessment is mandatory.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
#### GARNER v. RENTENBACH CONSTRUCTORS INC.

No. 255PA98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 624

Petition by defendant (Rentenbach) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 October 1998. Petition by third party defendant (Allied Clinical) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 October 1998.
Internal

Eurex Clearing AG

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments

No. 071-23

October 27, 2023

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of October 23, 2023:

• Eurex Clearing Circular No. 071-23 (October 25, 2023): Amendments to the Clearing Conditions 

of Eurex Clearing AG related to corporate actions. This circular provides for non-substantive 

clarifications on corporate actions on Repo Transactions and FWB Transactions, which are both 

cleared outside of Eurex Clearing’s DCO license, which applies only to swaps.

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: October 27, 2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ELIZABETH SHAPIRO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2012-5152

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 99-VV-0552, Judge Francis M. Allegra.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CLIFFORD J. SHOEMAKER, Shoemaker, Gentry & 

Knickelbein, of Vienna, Virginia, argued for petitionerappellant. 

LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA, Trial Attorney, Torts Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the 

brief were STUART F. DELERY, Principal Deputy Assistant 
 

Attorney General, RUPA BHATTACHARYYA, Director, 

VINCENT J. MATNAOSKI, Deputy Director, and GABRIELLE 

M. FIELDING, Assistant Director. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Erin Mulligan

DDR Compliance Director 

May 12, 2021 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC 

55 Water Street 

New York, NY 10041-0099 

Tel: (813) 470-1242 

emulligan@dtcc.com

Dear Staff: 

Pursuant to Section 145.9 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, DTCC Data 

Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) requests that the following Form SDR exhibits being submitted 

to the Commission and the information contained therein (together, the “Documents”), be 

afforded confidential treatment until further notice under the Freedom of Information Act and the 

Commission's Regulations: 

Documents: 

 GG(1) DTCC Global Privacy Policy 

The request set forth in the preceding paragraph also applies to any memoranda, notes, 

transcripts, other writings or materials of any sort whatsoever that are made by, or at the request 

of, any employee of the Commission (or any other federal agency) and which incorporate, 

include or relate to any aspect of the Confidential Material. 

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact the undersigned at (813) 470- 

1242. 

Very truly yours, 

Erin Mulligan 

DDR Compliance Director
##### 



Exhibit 13.2
 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of
Quebecor Media Inc.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Louis MorinName:
    Louis MorinTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ William Orchow                  | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|                                    | 
|William Orchow                      | 
|President & Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: May 14, 2008                  | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
ex10-2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2







  





1











  











  





2











  






 







  





3











  











  





4











  











  





5











  









 




  





6











  






 







  





7











  











  





8











  






 







  





9











  






 







  





10











  






 







  





11











  






 







  





12











  






 







  





13











  






 







  





14











  






 







  





15











  






 







  





16











  






 







  





17











  






 







  





18











  






 







  





19











  






 







  





20











  






 





21
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Denise S. Houghtaling, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Majic Wheels Corp. (the Company), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 3, 2010

| |        |                                                                   
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                                   
| | By:    | /s/ Denise S. Houghtaling                                         
| | Name:  | Denise S. Houghtaling                                             
| | Title: | President. Chief Executive Officer, Financial Officer and Director
| |        | (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)           



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018032EN.01004502.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/45

---

Action brought on 29 November 2017 — Szabados v EUIPO — Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (Separ) (MicroSepar)

(Case T-788/17)

(2018/C 032/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Szabados (Grünwald, Germany) (represented by: S. Wobst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (Separ) (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘MicroSepar’ — Application No 14 576 532

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2017 in Case R 2420/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
1

SwapEx Contract Specifications

The Non-Deliverable Forward Contract Specifications are as follows:

Contract Structure Notional amounts down to single currency units traded 

against deliverable counter currencies for a custom or 

standard maturity using a default or custom fixing date.

Trading Hours Trading hours consecutive from 5:00 p.m. EST on 

Sunday through to Friday at 5:00 p.m. EST. Each day at 

5:00 p.m. EST, SwapEx rolls the trade date.

Reference Currency (i.e., Non-deliverable 

currency)

ARS – Argentine Peso

BRL – Brazilian Real

CLP – Chilean Peso

CNY – Chinese Renminbi

COP – Colombian Peso

IDR – Indonesian Rupiah

INR – Indian Rupee

KRW – South Korean Won

MYR – Malaysian Ringgit

PEN – Peruvian Nuevo Sol

PHP – Philippine Peso

RUB – Russian Ruble

TWD – Taiwan Dollar

Settlement Currency USD

Underlying Swap Tenor The duration of time from the Effective Date to the 

Fixing Date. Subject to specific end date defined by 

user or SwapEx

Forward Rate Currency exchange rate expressed as the amount of 

Reference Currency per unit of Settlement Currency. 

Rate negotiated at the time of execution

Contract Size Minimum contract size is $1.

Effective Date The date on which the parties enter into the contract.

Maturity / Valuation Date The date specified in the contract when the trade will be 

cash settled; it needs to be later than Effective Date.
2

Fixing Dates The date at which the difference between the prevailing 

market exchange rate and the agreed upon exchange 

rate is calculated.

The Fixing Date is defined by the counterparties at the 

time of entering into the contract; it needs to be earlier 

than Maturity / Valuation Date.

Last Trading Day for Defined (Fixed) 

Tenors

The last day on which the contract can be traded is the 

New York business day preceding the Maturity Date

Settlement Procedure Bilateral settlement performed in settlement currency

Quoting Convention A currency pair is the quotation of the relative value of 

a currency unit against the unit of another currency in 

the foreign exchange market. SwapEx follows market 

convention with regards to quoting, but allows users the 

flexibility with regards to whether the quantity traded is 

expressed in base or terms notional. NDFs can be 

quoted up to 6 decimal places.

In addition to the above, all of the template terms for the confirmation of an NDF transaction in 

the currency pair that is the subject of a particular Contract, as the term Contract is defined in 

SwapEx’s rules, as recommended by EMTA, Inc. (“EMTA”) or a recognized successor (such 

template terms in effect on the Effective Date and published and available at www.emta.org or 

any successor website, the “Relevant EMTA Template”) shall apply to such Contract. For the 

avoidance of doubt, if the Relevant EMTA template becomes effective after the Effective Date 

of a Contract, such Relevant EMTA Template shall not apply to or amend the terms of such 

Contract.
141 So. 917

#### T. H. HOPPER v. W. J. HOPPER et al.

6 Div. 818.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 19, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ending November 30 of Sparking Events, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Carlo Giusto, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   /s/ Carlo Giusto  _______________________________________________ Carlo Giusto President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Sole Director   Date: January 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Officers Certificate

February 22, 2022

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC. 
  One Bryant Park 
4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading

    New York, New York
10036

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS
TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Terrence White,
Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), hereby
certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee  under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between
  MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC., as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as successor to United
States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case  as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the
Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached
schedule.

| | Very truly yours,                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                 
| | The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as Trustee
| |                                                                                 
| | By: /s/ Terrence White                                                          
| | Name: Terrence White
      Title: Vice President                                



| |  | 
| |  | 

---







SCHEDULE

PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1 
  INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly Report of Kushi Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief
Executive Officer and principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





October 20,
2009





/s/ Kelly T.
Hickel


--------------------------------------


Kelly T.
Hickel


Chief
Executive Officer


Principal
Financial Officer
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2333 

AN ACT 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, 

and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans Affairs 

suicide prevention coordinators, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2333 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for Suicide 

3 Prevention Coordinators Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPON5 SIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, AND VACANCY 

6 RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF7 FAIRS SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINA8 TORS. 

9 (a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Comptroller Gen10 eral of the United States shall conduct an assessment of 

11 the responsibilities, workload, training, and vacancy rates 

12 of Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coor13 dinators. Such assessment shall include a determination 

14 of— 

15 (1) the extent to which the use and staffing of 

16 suicide prevention coordinators varies between De17 partment facilities; and 

18 (2) the extent to which the Secretary provides 

19 oversight of suicide prevention coordinators. 

20 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year 

21 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comp22 troller General shall submit to the Committees on Vet23 erans’ Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives 
3 

•HR 2333 EH

1 a report containing the findings of the assessment re2 quired by subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2333 

AN ACT 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United 

dinators, and for other purposes. ment of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coorsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of DepartStates to conduct an assessment of the respon-