alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 3, 2010 

0526 

Order 

 

June 3, 2010 

140382 

CHRISTINE HELMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140382 

 COA: 286397 

Genesee CC: 07-085849-CZ 

ROBERT J. LEMIEUX, Individually and as 

Successor Trustee of the Francis J. Lemieux and 

Ruth Lemieux Revocable Living Trust dated 

July 16, 1999, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

v 

STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF INDIANA, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. 

The Court of Appeals erred by finding that there was a conflict between the annuity 

application and the annuity policy with regard to the annuitant status of the two signing 

applicants. Reading the contract as a whole, the interpretation that harmonizes all of the 

relevant language is that the two applicants were “joint annuitants,” as the Genesee 

Circuit Court correctly found. The application indicated that Ruth LeMieux was an 

“annuitant” jointly with another person, and the policy declaration identified that “joint 

annuitant” as Francis LeMieux. However, the Circuit Court erred in concluding that the 

death of one joint annuitant extinguished the rights of the remaining annuitant under the 

policy, where no provision in the policy justifies that conclusion, and the policy states 

that “after the Annuitant’s death, any payments due will be paid to the Beneficiary,” 

which in the case of two annuitants should be viewed as operative after the death of the 

last annuitant. As such, Francis LeMieux retained his annuitant rights under the policy 

after Ruth LeMieux died. We REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for 

further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No.: 09/09-5299]


Ally Finance Corporation; Notice of Surrender of License

    Notice is hereby given that Ally Finance Corporation, located at 
14011 Park Avenue, Suite 310, Victorville, California 92392, has 
surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment 
company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(the Act). Ally Finance Corporation was licensed by the Small Business 
Administration on June 6, 1982.
    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the 
Regulations promulgate thereunder, the surrender of the license was 
accepted on May 9, 2001, and accordingly, all rights, privileges and 
franchises derived therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 01-13188 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Monk, Appellant.

Submitted December 19, 2011;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 83 AD3d 35.

Motion to vacate this Court’s November 30, 2011 dismissal order granted *[see*17 NY3d 950 (2011)].
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company            fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          

 

 

|   |   |                             |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Scott D. Sheffield           |   |
|   | Name:  | Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer          |   |
|   | Date:  | June 13, 2008                    |   |
EXHIBIT
32




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Abtech Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  October
20, 2010




By:
              /s/ Mandi LuisMandi
      LuisChief
      Executive Officer and PresidentBy:
              /s/ Robert MacKayRobert
      MacKayChief
      Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
                Treasurer,
      and Secretary
#### The President, Directors & Co. of the Portland Bank *versus*Charles Fox.

It is no defence to a note secured by mortgage, that the mortgagee has entered for the purposes of foreclosure, and that the premises are of more value than the debt for which they arc security — unless the time of redemption has expired.

The mortgagee is not bound to account for rents and profits, unless the premises are redeemed.

*Mem.*— Emery J. being interested did not sit in the hearing or decision of this case.

This was assumpsit upon a note of hand signed by the defendant, which was secured by mortgage. The plaintiff had entered to foreclose, but the three years had not expired from the time of his entry. The defence was that the mortgaged premises were of more value than the debt — and that if the note was not to be considered as paid, that the plaintiff should account for the rents and profits of the premises in part satisfaction of it.

Longfellow, for plaintiff,

cited *West*v. Chamberlain, 8 Pick. 336.

Fox, for defendant, cited

*Amory*v. *Fairbanks,*3 Mass. R. 562.

*Per Curiam.*

The mortgagee in this case has entered to foreclose, but his title has not yet become perfected by lapse of time. The defendant, relying upon the case of *Amory*v. *Fairbanks,*3 Mass. R. 562, insists that by taking possession of the premises mortgaged, the debt for which they stood as security, is satisfied. But the law has been settled otherwise in *West*v. *Chamberlain,*8 Pick. 336. The property mortgaged constitutes no payment, till the title becomes absolute. The rights of the parties require such a conclusion. It is absurd to say that a debt is satisfied, when the party has a right to redeem — for if the debt be satisfied, then there is nothing to pay.

Neither can the rents and profits be allowed in reduction of damages. If there should be a redemption, the mortgagee is *100to account for them. If not, they belong to the mortgagee. They are to be considered as necessary for the payment of the debt due him; If it were otherwise, the presumption is that the premises would be redeemed.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2427 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to 

reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 

Watertrails Network. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2427 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Gate3 ways and Watertrails Network Reauthorization Act of 

4 2019’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY GATE6 WAYS AND WATERTRAILS NETWORK. 

7 Section 502(c) of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act 

8 of 1998 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 105–312) 

9 is amended by striking ‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2025’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2427 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 

ways and Watertrails Network. 1998 to reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Gate-
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Edgar Correa, Respondent.

Submitted March 15, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for a stay denied.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 23, 2009 |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | PREMIER      ENERGY CORP. |                                                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                      |                                                                                          |   |
|        | By:                       | /s/ Anton      Prodonavic                                                                |   |
|   |                      | Anton      Prodonavic, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|   |                      |                                                                                          |   |
|   |                      |                                                                                          |   |

|   |   |                                                                                         |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                         |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Alexey      Goleshev                                                                |   |
|   |   | Alexey      Goleshev, Chief Financial Officer and Director(Principal      Financial Officer) |   |
|   |   |                                                                                         |   |
|   |   |                                                                                         |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Army announces the general availability of exclusive, partially exclusive, or nonexclusive licenses under the following patent listed in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         paragraph.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, phone (508) 233-4928 or e-mail:                         *Robert.Rosenkrans@natick.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404. The following patent number, title, and issue date is provided:

*Patent Number:*                     US 6,228,997 B1.                

*Title:*                     Transesterification of Insoluble Polysaccharides.                

Issue Date: May 8, 2001.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-13158 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1335]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION BOARD MEETING

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: January 30, 2001, 10 a.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: 901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

STATUS: Open session except for the portion specified as closed session 
as provided in 22 CFR Part 1004.4 (f).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  
 Approval of the Minutes of the November 30, 2000, Meeting 
of the Board of Directors
 Interim President's Report
 Congressional Activities and Plans for Fiscal Year 2001
 Expansion of the Advisory Council
 Review of Business Sector Participation in Foundation 
Grants
 Presentation of the Foundation's Results System and 
Indicators
 Review of a Sample of Successful Closed-Out Grants
 Closed Session To Discuss Personnel Issues. Closed session 
as provided in 22 CFR Part 1004.4 (f)

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Carolyn Karr, General Counsel, 
(703) 306-4350.

    Dated: January 11, 2001.
Carolyn Karr,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-1335 Filed 1-11-01; 12:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 10, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00686

- CR

Karen Michelle Watson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal of the trial

court’s judgment of conviction : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the

Court that the trial court’s judgment of conviction is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that

the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and

that this decision be certified below for observance.
#### George P. MURRAY, Jr., Appellant v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS, Appellee.

No. 10-5004.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 26, 2010.

George P. Murray, Jr., Jasonville, IN, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, supplement, and notice filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order issued November 6, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the appellant’s complaint because the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is immune from suits seeking damages for the performance of judicial functions. *See Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of Mayor,*567 F.3d 672, 682-83 (D.C.Cir.2009); *see also Clark v. Library of Congress,*750 F.2d 89,103 n. 31 (D.C.Cir.1984) (noting that Congress has not waived the sovereign immunity of the United States as to constitutional tort claims).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6756

FRANCHOT LANE CHRISTMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID CHESTER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-931) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Franchot Lane Christmas, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Christmas v. Chester , No. CA-97-931 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Report of Data Storage Consulting
Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Neil Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
              /s/ Neil
      BernsteinNeil
      Bernstein
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerDate: July 24, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2359 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2359

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress a 
report on the Department of Veterans Affairs advancing of whole health 
                            transformation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2019

  Mr. Lamb (for himself and Mr. Ryan) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress a 
report on the Department of Veterans Affairs advancing of whole health 
                            transformation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Whole Veteran Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ADVANCING OF WHOLE 
              HEALTH TRANSFORMATION.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a 
report on the implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
memorandum dated February 1, 2019, on the subject of Advancing Whole 
Health Transformation Across Veterans Health Administration. Such 
report shall include an analysis of the accessibility and availability 
of each of the following services with respect to the implementation of 
such memorandum:
            (1) Massage.
            (2) Chiropractic services.
            (3) Whole health clinician services.
            (4) Whole health coaching.
            (5) Acupuncture.
            (6) Healing touch.
            (7) Whole health group services.
            (8) Guided imagery.
            (9) Meditation.
            (10) Hypnosis.
            (11) Yoga.
            (12) Tai chi or Qi gong.
            (13) Any other service the Secretary determines 
        appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EKATERINI ALEXOPOULOS

, Appellant,

v.

STEVEN GOLDSMITH, P.A. and STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 2571

[ May 19, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez , Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 13480

CACE (14)

.

Ekaterini Alexopoulos, Boca Raton, pro se.

Seth A. Kolton and Anthony Rodriguez of Shendell & Pollock, P.L., Boca

Raton, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.