alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ Jarrett F. Bousquet           
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| |        |                                   
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | January 14, 2010                  
| |        |                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                          Airgas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Corporation Name                            Domicile
----------------                            --------
<S>                                         <C>
Airgas Canada, Inc.                          Canada
Airgas Carbonic, Inc.                        DE
Airgas Data, LLC                             DE
Airgas East, Inc.                            DE
Airgas Gaspro, Inc.                          DE
Airgas Great Lakes, Inc.                     DE
Airgas Gulf States, Inc.                     DE
Airgas Intermountain, Inc.                   CO
Airgas International, Inc.                   VI
Airgas Investments, Inc.                     DE
Airgas Mid America, Inc.                     DE
Airgas Mid South, Inc.                       DE
Airgas Nor Pac, Inc.                         DE
Airgas Northern California & Nevada, Inc.    DE
Airgas North Central, Inc.                   DE
Airgas S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico
Airgas Safety, Inc.                          DE
Airgas South, Inc.                           DE
Airgas Southwest, Inc.                       DE
Airgas Specialty Gases, Inc.                 TX
Airgas West, Inc.                            CA
Airgas West, S.A.de C.V.                     Mexico
ATNL, Inc.                                   DE
Nitrous Oxide Corp.                          DE
Radnor Funding Corp.                         DE
Red-D-Arc, Inc.                              NV
Red-D-Arc Limited                            Canada
Red-D-Arc S.A.de C.V.                        Mexico
Rutland Tool & Supply Co., Inc.              CA
</TABLE>
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
  **CERTIFICATION**
 
 
 I, Rick
Hennessey, certify that:
 
 
 1.  
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dwango North America Corp.;
 
 
 2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
 3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
 4.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 
 a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
 b)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
 c)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 
 5.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 
 a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
 b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:
      March 30, 2005
    /s/ Rick
      HennesseyRick
      HennesseyChief
      Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

____________________________________

:

IN RE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. : 07 Civ. 5867 (PAC)

SECURITIES LITIGATION :

: FILED ELECTRONICALLY

:

:

:

:

____________________________________:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney at law in the state of New York, affirms under penalty of 

perjury, that on November 26, 2007, he caused the Notice of Motion, Memorandum of Law of 

Andrew G. Bodnar in Support of Motion to Dismiss, and Declaration of Lawrence S. Bader in 

Support of Motion to Dismiss to be served by Federal Express upon:

Richard A. Lockridge, Esq.

Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.

100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200

Minneapolis, MN 55401

 _________________/s/___________________

Jerrold L. Steigman (JS-9137)

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 37 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017309EN.01003401.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/34

---

Action brought on 17 July 2017 — The Scotch Whisky Association v EUIPO — José Estévez (JOHN COR)

(Case T-438/17)

(2017/C 309/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Scotch Whisky Association (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Rodríguez Domínguez and J. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: José Estévez, SA (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘JOHN COR’ — European Union trade mark No 10 965 937

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2017 in Case R 1289/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JORGE GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 109 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JORGE VICTOR GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 110 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
# C_2020262EN.01000401.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Terna SpA v European Commission

(Case C-812/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Energy - Projects of common interest to the EU - EU financial assistance granted to two projects in the field of trans-European energy networks - Directive 2004/17/EC - Article 37 - Subcontracting - Article 40(3)(c) - Direct award - Technical specificity - Framework agreement - Reduction of the assistance originally granted following a financial audit - Reimbursement of amounts originally paid)

(2020/C 262/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Terna SpA (represented by: F. Covone, A. Police, L. Di Via, D. Carria and F. Degni, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, M. Ilkova, G. Gattinara and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Terna SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Terna SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
# C_2020068EN.01001102.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — HK v European Commission, Council of the European Union

(Case C-460/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 1d - First paragraph of Article 17 of Annex VIII - Pension for the surviving spouse - Conditions for granting - Concept of ‘surviving spouse’ of a Union official - Marriage and non-marital partnership - Cohabitation - Principle of non-discrimination - Comparable situation - None - Condition of duration of marriage - Combating fraud - Justification)

(2020/C 68/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: HK (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and B. Mongin, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 3 May 2018, HK v Commission (T-574/16, not published, EU:T:2018:252); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 3 May 2018, HK v Commission (T-574/16, not published, EU:T:2018:252);

| 2. | Dismisses HK’s action seeking annulment of European Commission’s decision refusing to grant him the benefit of the survivor’s pension and to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage alleged; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses HK’s action seeking annulment of European Commission’s decision refusing to grant him the benefit of the survivor’s pension and to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage alleged;

| 3. | Orders HK, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders HK, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs at first instance and on appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.

---
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 40 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 40 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017424EN.01004602.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/46

---

Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Turbo-K International v EUIPO — Turbo-K (TURBO-K)

(Case T-671/17)

(2017/C 424/68)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Turbo-K International Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Norris, A. Muir Wood, Barristers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Turbo-K Ltd (Winchester, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TURBO-K’ — Application for registration No 13 458 039

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 July 2017 in Case R 2135/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the objections to the registration of the mark in their entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the objections to the registration of the mark in their entirety;

| — | order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i)the Form
10-KSB filed by Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year
ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii)the information
contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and
for the periods presented therein. GATEWAY FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Date: March 25, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Ben BerryD. Ben BerryPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 25, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark A. HolmesMark A. HolmesSenior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3573

___________

William Patrick Johnson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

John Baldwin, IDOC Director; Sheryl *

Lockwood, Eastern Asst. Dept. * [UNPUBLISHED]

Director; Jerry Bartruff, Religious *

Coordinator; Judy Morrison, Native *

Consultant; Greg Ort, Deputy Warden; *

Lowell Brandt, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 5, 2011

Filed: August 22, 2011

___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William Patrick Johnson appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful review, we conclude that the

denial of substitute counsel was not an abuse of discretion, and that defendants were
-2-

entitled to summary judgment for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly,

the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# C_2018005EN.01004501.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/45

---

Action brought on 29 September 2017 — NeoCell v EUIPO (BIOACTIVE NEOCELL COLLAGEN)

(Case T-666/17)

(2018/C 005/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NeoCell Holding Company LLC (Sunrise, Florida, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘BIOACTIVE NEOCELL COLLAGEN’ — International registration No 1 298 829 designating the European Union

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2017 in Case R 147/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, alter the contested decision to state that the application possesses sufficient distinctive character that no objection to its registration may be raised under Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of the Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, alter the contested decision to state that the application possesses sufficient distinctive character that no objection to its registration may be raised under Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of the Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay to the application the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the application the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7 (1) (b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 (1) (b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q /A of SinoHub, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T.
Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





(1)
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
      March 16, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Henry T. CochranHenry
      T. CochranChief
      Executive Officer