alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019305EN.01002302.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/23

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif — Luxembourg) — Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

(Case C-410/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for persons - Equal treatment - Social advantages - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(2) - Financial aid for higher education studies - Non-resident students - Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory - Minimum period of five years - Reference period of seven years - Method of calculation of the reference period - Date of the application for financial aid - Indirect discrimination - Justification - Proportionality)

(2019/C 305/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nicolas Aubriet

Defendant: Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the grant of financial aid for higher education studies to non-resident students subject to the condition that, at the date of the application for financial aid, one of the parents of the student has been employed or carried on an activity in that Member State for a period of at least five years in the course of a reference period of seven years calculated retroactively from the date of that application for financial aid, in so far as it does not permit the existence of any connection with the labour market of that Member State to be understood in a sufficiently broad manner.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Shmaya
Glick, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of Watchtower, Inc. (the “Company”),
certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
November 16,
2009





By:           /s/Shmaya
Glick


Name:      Shmaya
Glick


Title:        Treasurer,
Secretary and Director


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017402EN.01004801.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/48

---

Action brought on 25 September 2017 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials)

(Case T-656/17)

(2017/C 402/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA (Carnaxide, Portugal) (represented by: A. De Sampaio, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ludwig Manfred Jacob (Heidesheim, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark containing the word elements ‘Dr. Jacob’s essentials’ in orange, yellow and shades of green — Application for registration No 13 742 903

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2017 in Case R 2067/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of

Quebecor Media Inc.

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quebecor Media Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Francois Pruneau, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 23, 2017



/s/ Jean-François PruneauName: Jean-François Pruneau Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### STATE v. HALL

No. 384P98

Case below: 129 N.CApp. 429

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 November 1998.
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-4006.

In re SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., SECURITIES LITIGATION.

Harvey WEINER, et al., a national banking association,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., Charles J. Zwick, John Porta, G. Dodson

Mathias, Paul Hill, Kirsten M. Hudak, Defendants,

William A. Brandt, Jr., as Administrator of the Investment Plus

Plan of Southeast Banking Corp., Appellant.

May 9, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida. (No. 90-760-CIV-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge.

Before COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and FAY, Senior Circuit

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises from a class action settled against

Southeast Banking Corporation. The district court approved the

settlement and was faced with the issue of attorneys's fees and

costs. William A. Brandt, Jr., as administrator of a pension plan

for former Southeast Bank employees, objected to the request for

attorneys's fees by class counsel. The district judge overruled

the objection and approved attorneys's fees of twenty-five percent

of the settlement. Brandt attempts to appeal that ruling.

Brandt was not a named party. He never moved to intervene in

the class action as administrator of the pension plan. Here, he

attempts to base standing to appeal on his having objected to the

request for attorneys's fees.

We find that our Circuit's precedent is clearly established in
Guthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987). Brandt, a

non-named class member who failed to intervene, lacks standing to

appeal the district court's order on attorneys's fees.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2019103EN.01000601.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/6

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2018 — Électricité de France (EDF) v European Commission, French Republic

(Case C-221/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - First decision of the European Commission - State aid measure incompatible with the internal market - Annulment by the General Court of the European Union - Confirmation by the Court of Justice of the European Union - Second decision of the Commission - State aid measure incompatible with the internal market - Dismissal of the application for annulment - Article 266 TFEU - Infringement of the principle of res judicata attaching to the first judgment of the General Court - Distortion of evidence - Failure of the General Court to have regard for the Commission’s obligations of diligent and impartial investigation - Failure to state reasons - Classification of the measure - New or existing aid))

(2019/C 103/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Électricité de France (EDF) (represented by: M. Debroux, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and D. Recchia, acting as Agents), French Republic

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Électricité de France (EDF) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Électricité de France (EDF) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

TIME AND DATE: Commission Meeting, Thursday, May 31, 2001, 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:   

Mid-Year Review: The staff will brief the Commission on issues related 
to fiscal year 2001 mid-year review.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: May 21, 2001.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13176 Filed 5-21-01; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Petitions To Rehear

#### BETHANIA TOWN LOT COMMITTEE v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

No. 402PA97

Case below: 348 N.C. 664

Petition by plaintiffs (Bethania Town Lot Committee) to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 16 September 1998.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theannual report on Form 10-K of Lake Area Corn Processors, LLC (the “Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Mundt, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Scott Mundt         |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Scott Mundt             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated: March 31, 2009   |

 

----
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/
      Jarrett F. Bousquet     
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| |        |                                   
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | April
      19, 2011              



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

CORPORATE

VIA CFTC Portal

Mr Christopher Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington DC 20581

15 May 2023

Subject: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendment for the Week of 15 May 2023

Dear Mr Kirkpatrick,

Please accept this notification pursuant to CFTC regulation § 40.6(d) of the below-described changes 

to the LCH Limited’s (“LCH”) London Deposit Rate (“LDR”), Client Deposit Rate (“CDR”), FCM London 

Deposit Rate (“FCM LDR”) and RepoClear Deposit Rate (“RDR”).

The RDR is applicable to cash balances held on RepoClear service accounts. The FCM LDR is 

applicable to cash balances held on SwapClear client FCM accounts. The CDR is applicable to cash 

balances held on SwapClear and ForexClear client accounts. The LDR is applicable to all other cash 

balances (excluding the default fund).

The changes recommended by the LCH Spread and Accommodation Review Group were approved 

by the LCH CEO and are as follows:

RDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 48.0bp Change from (50.0bp) 22 May 2023 onwards

GBP SONIA 30.0bp Change from (31.0bp) 22 May 2023 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp No Change 22 May 2023 onwards

LDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 48.0bp Change from (50.0bp) 22 May 2023 onwards

GBP SONIA 30.0bp Change from (31.0bp) 22 May 2023 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp No Change 22 May 2023 onwards

CHF SARON 47.0bp No Change 22 May 2023 onwards

FCM LDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 41.0bp Change from (42.0bp) 29 May 2023 onwards

GBP SONIA 18.0bp No Change 29 May 2023 onwards

USD FedFunds 15.0bp No Change 29 May 2023 onwards

CDR changes
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

CORPORATE

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 41.0bp Change from (42.0bp) 29 May 2023 onwads

GBP SONIA 18.0bp No Change 29 May 2023 onwards

USD FedFunds 15.0bp No Change 29 May 2023 onwards

These changes will be notified via circular to clearing members in advance of the effective date.

No change is required to the LCH Rulebook.

Should you have any questions regarding this submission please contact me at 

james.woolley@lseg.com.

Yours sincerely,

James Woolley

Regulatory Compliance Analyst

LCH Limited
154 So. 919

#### STATE of Alabama et al. v. MOBILE & OHIO R. CO. et al.

3 Div. 104.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 17, 1934.

See, also, ante, p. 533, 154 So. 91.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Front-is H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Rufus Creekmore, of St. Louis, Mo., and Steiner, Crum & Weil, of Montgomery, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellants.
# C_2020061EN.01001201.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Engie Cartagena SL v Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, formerly Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Turismo

(Case C-523/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market in electricity - Common rules - Directive 2003/54/EC - Article 3(2) - Directive 2009/72/EC - Article 3(2) - Public service obligations - Meaning - National rules - Financing of energy efficiency plans - Designation of electricity generating undertakings - Mandatory contribution)

(2020/C 61/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Nacional

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Engie Cartagena SL

Defendant: Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, formerly Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Turismo

Interveners in support of the defendant: Endesa Generación, SA, EDP España SAU, Bizkaia Energía, SL, Iberdrola Generación SAU, Tarragona Power SL, Bahia de Bizkaia Electricidad SL, Viesgo Generación SL

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC must be interpreted as meaning that a financial contribution imposed on certain electricity generating undertakings for the purpose of financing savings and energy efficiency plans managed by a public authority does not constitute a public service obligation falling within that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
171 P.3d 599

#### CHILTON et al. v. CTR. FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al.

No. CV-07-0049-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Sept. 25, 2007.

ORDERED: Petition for Review. DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
# C_2019103EN.01002002.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: French Republic

(Case C-76/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/21)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
# C_2019187EN.01002801.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/28

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Udine — Italy) — Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation v Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-245/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Payment services in the internal market - Directive 2007/64/EC - Article 74(2) - Payment order by credit transfer - Incorrect unique identifier provided by the payer - Execution of the payment transaction on the basis of the unique identifier - Liability of the payee’s payment service provider)

(2019/C 187/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Udine

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 74(2) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC must be interpreted as meaning that, when a payment order is executed in accordance with the unique identifier provided by the payment service user, which does not correspond to the payee name indicated by that user, the limitation of payment service provider liability, provided for by that article, applies to both the payer’s and the payee’s payment service provider.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---