alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 








Mr. Carl E. Berg                                                                                                     August 26, 2010


Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC.


10050 Bandley Drive


Cupertino, CA  95014







Re: Share Purchase and Loan Conversion







Dear Mr. Berg:







This letter agreement will confirm the sale, effective as of the date set forth above, by Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) to Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC (“Berg & Berg”) of three million nine hundred forty seven thousand three hundred sixty eight (3,947,368)  shares (the Shares) of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $0.76, which represents the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on August 26, 2010, for aggregate consideration of $3,000,000.00.







This letter also confirms Berg & Berg’s instructions to apply the outstanding principal and interest on the $2,500,000 loan dated July 23, 2010, from Berg & Berg to the Company to the purchase of shares of the Company.  The aggregate of the outstanding principal and interest on August 26, 2010, is $2,508,390.41 which provides a sale of three million three hundred thousand five hundred and fourteen (3,300,514) shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $0.76, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on August 26, 2010.







These Shares were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  Berg & Berg understands that the Shares are “restricted securities” and have not been registered under the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is acquiring the Shares as principal for its own account and not with a view to or for distributing or reselling such Shares or any part thereof in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; has no present intention of distributing any of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; and has no direct or indirect arrangement or understandings with any other persons to distribute or regarding the distribution of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is an “accredited investor” as defined under Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.









	
Sincerely,

	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


	 	 
	
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

	
Berg & Berg, LLC.


	  	  
	
/s/ Ross. A. Goolsby

	
/s/ Carl. E. Berg


	
Ross A. Goolsby

	
Carl E. Berg


	
Chief Financial Officer

	
Managing Member
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 15, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerNovember
      3, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.3



MATERIAL CONTRACT FOR RETIRED EXECUTIVE OFFICER



At a special meeting of the Board of Directors on November 7, 2006, the Board of Directors, giving consideration to Mr. Bartls years of dedicated service to the Company approved that he be paid an annual retainer of $50,000 per year in calendar years 2007, 2008, and 2009, payable on a quarterly basis. Such retainer is to be paid to Mr. Bartl regardless whether he is willing or able to provide the Company any services during those years.





---
# C_2019054EN.01000302.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/3

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 November 2018 — Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament

(Case C-303/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Admissibility - European Parliament - Rules governing the expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid))

(2019/C 54/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (represented by: F. Wagner, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Jean-Marie Le Pen shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Jean-Marie Le Pen shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00374

- CR

DEWEY CHARLES BEHREN S APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Dewey Charles Behrens filed a notice of appeal from the trial
court’s pretrial order denying his special plea of double jeopardy. The State filed
a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we lack jurisdiction. W e do not have
jurisdiction ov er an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a special plea of
double jeopardy. Ex parte Apolinar , 820 S.W.2d 792, 79 3

– 94 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991); White v. State , No. 02

- 11

- 00015

- CR, 2011 WL 582665, at *1 (Tex. App.

—

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Fort Worth Feb. 17, 2011, no pet.) (mem . op., not designated for publication)
(―While a criminal defendant may file a special plea in order to assert a c laim of
former jeopardy,

. . . there is no statutory provision which grants us jurisdiction to
review the denial of a special plea before a fi nal judgment has been rendered.‖).
Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion to dismiss and dismiss this appeal for
want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )

DELIVERED: March 1 , 2012
#### T. L. HERRING & CO. v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF WILSON

No. 35A98

Case below: 128 N.C.App. 532

Motion by plaintiffs to withdraw appeal allowed 3 December 1998.
II 

Calendar No. 247 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2451 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode 

Island, as the ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 575 Dexter Street in Central 

6 Falls, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 2451 PCS

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elizabeth Buffum 

2 Chace Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 247 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2451 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuffum Chace Post Office’’. tral Falls, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Elizabeth al Service located at 575 Dexter Street in CenOCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1

 

July 13, 2023

(Submitted via the CFTC Portal)

Assistant Secretary of the Commission

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Act Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20851

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) has submitted to the Commission a Rule Certification 

Submission pursuant to CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) for modifications to the SPIKES Market Maker Program 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Confidential Submission” or “Program”). This Confidential Submission 

included as Exhibit A contains confidential commercial or financial information. MGEX respectfully requests 

that the Commission not release the Confidential Submission. 

MGEX specifically requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Submission pursuant to Commission 

Regulations 145.9 and 145.5. Under Commission Regulation 145.9, a submitter making this request “shall 

specify the grounds on which confidential treatment is being requested.” Confidential treatment is being 

sought on the basis that the Confidential Submission contains confidential commercial or financial 

information under Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii). In addition, MGEX represents that the 

Confidential Submission is a nonpublic record pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.5. 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), MGEX asks the Commission to afford confidential 

treatment to the Confidential Submission in perpetuity.

Should the Commission receive a Freedom of Information Request for the Confidential Submission, MGEX 

acknowledges that it will be notified of the request and then instructed to provide a detailed written 

justification for confidential treatment, per Commission Regulation 145.9(e)(1). 

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (612) 321-7128 or 

psparby@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Peter D. Sparby

Vice President, Counsel

Enclosure
#### The Comfort.1

*Circuit Court, E. D. New York.*

July *8,*1885.

Lien for Repairs—Non-Resident Owner—Presumption.

The decision oí the district court in the same case *{ante,*158) affirmed.

Admiralty Appeal.

*Wilcox, Adams & Macklin,*for libelant and appellee.

*Roger M. Sherman,*for claimant and appellant.

1

 Reported by R. D. *&*Wyllys Benedict, Esqs., of the New York bar.

Blatchford, Justice.

1. The district judge states in his opinion that as to the defense set up in the answer, that the work was done in an unskillful manner, he is of opinion that the weight of the evidence is in favor of the libelants. I am of the same opinion.

2. The yacht, at the time the repairs were made, was owned by a non-resident of the state of New York. Therefore, the presumption arose, the repairs being made in New York, and being necessary, and made at the request of the owner, through his authorized agent, that they were made on the credit of the vessel as well as on that of her owner. *The Emily Souder, 17*Wall. 666, 670, 671. This presumption is not displaced by the fact that the libelants did not know at the time who the owner was, or that he was a non-resident. They were entitled to the benefit of the lien which the actual *status*of the vessel gave, in the absence of evidence that they waived or supplanted the lien. It was not necessary that anything should have been said about a lien. The libelants charged the repairs to the vessel. Nothing that occurred between the libelants and the agent of the owner amounted to a waiver of the lien; nor did the giving of 90 days’ time in which to pay for the repairs.

*1603. The answer admits that the libelants did the work, and that whatever contract there was was with them. * They dealt with the agent of the owner under the name of G. & E. Poillon.

L The marshal’s costs, as taxed at $100, and with the taxation affirmed by the district judge, were paid by the claimant, as the decree states. They are not embraced in the appeal.

The libelants are entitled to a decree to the same effect with that of the district court, with costs in this court.
##### 



Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF DANIEL VALOT, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF TECHNIP, AND OLIVIER DUBOIS, PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF TECHNIP, PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


20-F




| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                        
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



|                    |     |                 
|------------------- | --- | ----------------
|Date: June 29, 2006 | By: | /s/ DANIEL VALOT

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | Daniel Valot                        
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





|                    |     |                   
|------------------- | --- | ------------------
|Date: June 29, 2006 | By: | /s/ OLIVIER DUBOIS

| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| |                                   
| | Olivier Dubois                    
| | President, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
      II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Ronald D. Ormand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 13, 2008
            /s/ Ronald D. OrmandName:Ronald D. OrmandTitle:President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, David Mathieson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RSC HoldingsIII, LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [Not Applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 1, 2008       /s/ David Mathieson     David Mathieson    Senior Vice President, and    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

TIME AND DATE: Commission Meeting, Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:   

Baby Bath Seats (Petition HP 00-4): The Commission will consider 
options regarding Petition HP 00-4, filed by the Consumer Federation of 
America and nine other organizations, requesting that the Commission 
ban baby bath seats to address a risk of injury or death by drowning.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: May 21, 2001.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13175 Filed 5-21-01; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT. Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested. oO

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 1CAP-2014-R-8

Organization: ICAP SEF (US) LLC

Filing asa: [] DCM [X] SEF L] Dco [J SDR

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 08/06/2014

Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments
SPECIFY FILING TYPE
Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

oO Certification
o Approval

oO Notification
Oo Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change
QO SIDCO Emergency Rule Change

Rule Numbers:

New Product

O
Oo
O
Oo
Oo
O
im

Certification

Certification Security Futures
Certification Swap Class

Approval

Approval Security Futures

Novel Derivative Product Notification

Swap Submission

Official Product Name:

Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Please note — only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Description:

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

§ 40.6(a)
§ 40.5(a)
§ 40.6(d)
§ 40.10(a)
§ 40.10(h)

§ 40.2(a)
§41.23(a)
$ 40.2(d)
§ 40.3(a)
§ 41.230)
§ 40.12(a)
§ 39.5

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification

Certification Security Futures
Delisting (No Open Interest)
Approval

Approval Security Futures

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change”
Notification

WOOOoOoRoo0o0o0

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products

§ 40.6(a)
§ 40.6(a)

§ 41.24(a)

§ 40.6(a)

§ 40.5(a)

§ 40.5(a)

§ 41.24(b)

§ 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)
§ 40.4(b)(5)

§ 40.6(d)

Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: IOS Index Creit Default Swaps, iBoxx Total Return Swaps and iBoxx

Liquid Leveraged Loans Total Return Swaps.

Rule Numbers: Rule 802(4), (5) and (6).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on June 22, 2001 at Harrah's Lake Tahoe Special Event Center, Highway 50, Stateline NV. This Committee, established by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998, (64 FR 2876) is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters raised by the Secretary.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 22, 2001, beginning at 9 a.m. and ending at 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Harrah's Lake Tahoe Special Event Center, Highway 50, Stateline, NV.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maribeth Gustafson or Jeannie Stafford, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Forest Service, 870 Emerald Bay Road Suite 1, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 573-2642.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The committee will meet jointly with the Lake Tahoe Basin Executives Committees. Items to be covered on the agenda include: (1) Report on the Federal Interagency Partnership meeting and Forest Service Urban Lot Program; (2) Budget Subcommittee report; (3) Other business; (4) EPA presentation on air quality; (5) public comment; and (6) Environmental Improvement Program implementation. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

Dated: May 17, 2001.

Maribeth Gustafson,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-13463  Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M