alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Submission No. 23-131

September 27, 2023

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Delisting of Certain Oil Americas Futures - Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Act and Regulation 40.6(a) 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)1 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”) and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), ICE Futures U.S., Inc. 

(“Exchange”) submits notice to the Commission that, effective as of the close of business today, September 

27, 2023, the Exchange will delist all contract months of the following futures contract: 

• ICE HITAN EDM 1a Index Future (“HTN”)

The product above currently has no open interest.

The Exchange certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on 

the Exchange’s website and may be accessed at (https://www.theice.com/futures-us/regulation). 

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 312-836-6745 or at 

patrick.swartzer@ice.com.

Sincerely,

Patrick Swartzer

Director

Market Regulation

Enc.
cc: Division of Market Oversight

New York Regional Office
Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 33      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 33      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 33      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 3 of 3
144 So. 916

#### Charlie JONES, alias Johnson, v. STATE.

6 Div. 232.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 15, 1932.

THOMAS, J.

The appeal presents for review the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. We have examined the record, and find no error.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
Exhibit 10.4





EXHIBIT 10.4




SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 17th day of June, 2010
to that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002, as amended
(collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between CHARLES D. FRAZER (“Employee”) and JOS.
A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).



FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby
amend the Employment Agreement and agree as follows:



1. Subject to earlier termination as otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last
day of the Employment Period shall be January 28, 2012.



2. Effective on the day on which general salary increases, if any, become effective for other
employees of the Employer for fiscal 2010, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $280,000.



Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment
and the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall
control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective
meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a
part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written.



JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ R. Neal Black
	 	/s/ CHARLES D. FRAZER	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	R. Neal Black,
	 	CHARLES D. FRAZER
	 	 
	 
	 	President-Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017357EN.01001301.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/13

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 August 2017 — Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie v Commission

(Case T-451/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions - Biodiesel - European Commission Communication BK/abd/ener.c.1(2017)2122195 - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 357/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie e.V. (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Stein, P. Friton and H.-J. Prieß, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Becker, J.-F. Brakeland and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Communication BK/abd/ener.c.1(2017)2122195 of 27 April 2017.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HULON LEON WILSON, JR.

No. 97PA98

(Filed 6 November 1998)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 688, 497 S.E.2d 416 (1998), vacating judgment entered 22 May 1996 by Manning, J., in Superior Court, Durham County, and remanding this case to the trial court for imposition of judgment and sentence on false imprisonment. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 October 1998.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Charles J. Murray, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.*

*Daniel Shatz for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of
Gen-Net Lease Income Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas D. Peschio, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 1 of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: October 6, 2003

                                                    /s/ THOMAS D. PESCHIO
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Thomas D. Peschio, President,
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Treasurer
# Exhibit A (08.25.23)

# Exhibit B (COB 09.28.23)
#### Eight Hundred and Forty-One Tons of Iron Ore.1

*District Court, E. D. New York.*

July 9, 1885.

Admiralty Practice — Supplemental Libel—Chartep. Party—Demurrage Arising after Piling Libel.

A libel having been filed claiming freight and demurrage under a charter party, the libelant thereafter filed a supplemental libel, setting up the samé and additional facts, and claiming the same freight and demurrage, and additional demurrage. *EM,*that, as this additional demurrage arose from the breach of the charter party set up in the original libel, there was no reason why such demurrage should not be recovered in this action, although such demurrage occurred after the filing of the original libel; and that the practice pursued, if not strictly regular, in this case tended to save trouble and expense.

In Admiralty.

See opinion in the same case on exceptions to the supplemental libel and motion to strike out the supplemental libel. 15 Fed. Rep. 615.

*Ullo, Ruebsamen é Hubbe,*for libelant, Aniello Basile, master of the bark Giulia.

*Benedict, Taft & Benedict,*for claimant, D. W. B. Bead. •

1

 Reported by R. D. & Wyllys Benedict, Esqs., of the New York bar.

Benedict, J.

Considering that only a part of .the cargo was seized at the time of issuing process upon the original libel, and that the freight on such cargo was then due the libelant, and considering, also, that subsequent to the filing of the original libel the claimant received cargo under the charter party set up in the libel, and considering also that claimant had paid into court in this cause all that is due for freight under the charter party set out in the libel, leaving due only a balance of demurrage, and that this demurrage may be awarded as part of the damage arising from the breach of the charter party set forth in the original libel, no reason is discovered why this unpaid demurrage may not be recovered in this action, notwithstanding the fact that the said detention occurred after the filing of the original libel. No injustice can result to the claimant from this course. The practice pursued, if not strictly regular, has in this case wronged no one, but, on the contrary, tended to save trouble and expense. It is concluded, therefore, that the libelant may have a decree in this action for the amount due and unpaid upon the charter party, including therein 12 days’ demurrage at the rate of $61.84 per day, and deducting the amount of the freight and six days’ demurrage, the whole freight and six days’ demurrage having been paid into court herein, and the same drawn out by the libelant, as the evidence is understood.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


SSA GLOBAL


 


 


Executive Bonus Compensation Plan


 


For Fiscal Year Ending July 31, 2006


 





















 


SSA Global


FY06 Executive Bonus Plan


 


 


Objective:


Your
plan has been approved by the Board Compensation Committee and is intended to
measure superior performance with respect to financial targets and specific
management objectives.


 


Criteria:


The
criteria are defined on your calculation matrix for the following measures:


 


	
  Revenue

  	
   

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  Proforma Net Income

  	
   

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  Cash Flow

  	
   

  	
  20

  	
  %

  
	
  MBO

  	
   

  	
  20

  	
  %

  



 


Payment
Date:


Annual
Bonus will be
calculated based on the year end figures generated by the Finance department
and will be paid in October, 2006 subject to the Board Compensation Committee’s
approval.


 


Quarterly
Bonus will be
calculated on quarterly financial statements generated by the Finance
department and will be paid within 60 days after the quarter end subject to the
Board Compensation Committee’s approval.


 


Eligibility:


You
must be an employee of the company at the time of payment date to qualify for
the annual bonus.  No pro-rata earnings
of the annual bonus shall apply if you who leave the company for whatever
reason prior to year-end or the payout date.


 


Administration:


The
plan is administered solely by the Board Compensation Committee and the CEO,
and their interpretations will be final.


 


 


Signature:


 


I
have read and received a copy of the Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Date:
# C_2019093EN.01001801.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln — Germany) — Proceedings brought by Klaus Manuel Maria Brisch

(Case C-102/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 - Article 65(2) - European Certificate of Succession - Application for a certificate - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1329/2014 - Mandatory or optional nature of the form established by Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation No 1329/2014))

(2019/C 93/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Klaus Manuel Maria Brisch

Operative part of the judgment

Article 65(2) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession and Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1329/2014 of 9 December 2014 establishing the Forms referred to in Regulation No 650/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of an application for a European Certificate of Succession, within the meaning of Article 65(2) of Regulation No 650/2012, the use of Form IV in Annex 4 to Implementing Regulation No 1329/2014 is optional.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Second Amendment”) is made as
of this 30th day of December, 2005, by and between OLD LINE BANK, a Maryland-chartered commercial
bank (the “Bank” or “Employer”) and JOSEPH BURNETT (the “Employee”). This Second Amendment amends
in certain respects that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2003, between the
Bank and Employee, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement
dated December 31, 2004 (collectively the “Original Agreement”).


1. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings assigned to them in the Original Agreement.



2. Amendments. The Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of
Section 3(A) in its entirety and replacing said section with the following:





     “The Employee’s salary under this Agreement shall be $142,000 per annum, payable on a
bi-weekly basis.”


All of the provisions of the Original Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall
remain and continue in full force and effect as amended by this Second Amendment.



3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be considered an original for all purposes but all of which shall together constitute
one and the same instrument.




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Second Amendment, under seal,
as of the day and year first hereinabove written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS/ATTEST:	 	OLD LINE BANK.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Christine M. Rush

	 	By: 	/s/ Charles A. Bongar, Jr.
	 	(SEAL)
	 

	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Charles A. Bongar, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Chairman of Compensation Committee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Christine M. Rush

	 	/s/ Joseph Burnett
	 	(SEAL)
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	JOSEPH BURNETT	 	 







2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Eve Morrow, Division of National Health Service Corps, at (301) 594-4144.

Dated: May 17, 2001.

Jane M. Harrison,

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.

[FR Doc. 01-12910 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
# C_2018408EN.01004802.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2018 — Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte v ACER

(Case T-123/17) (1)

((Energy - Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER - Rejection of the application to intervene - Direct and existing interest at the end of the procedure - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard))

(2018/C 408/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: B. Rajal, lawyer)

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER of 17 February 2017 rejecting the applicant’s application to intervene in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
Exhibit 31.2
  Section 302 Certification of Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 I,Lee Shorey, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Corporate Outfitters, Inc.
 2.   Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances   under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.   Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
  b)   evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly  report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c)   presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and
  b)   any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls.
 
 6.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether
or not there were significant changes in  internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.
  Date:August 14, 2009
 
 /s/Lee Shorey
 Lee Shorey
 ChiefFinancialOfficer
   20
# C_2018399EN.01001501.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/15

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Sophie Montel v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-84/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Admissibility - European Parliament - Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid))

(2018/C 399/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Sophie Montel (represented by: G. Sauveur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A.F. Jensen, M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.

| 2. | Ms Sophie Montel shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Sophie Montel shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
144 So. 916

#### Elijah GOLDSBY v. STATE.

2 Div. 13.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 15, 1932.

BROWN, J.

This appeal is on the record without a bill of exceptions. The record has been examined, and appears in all things regular and free from error. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.