alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2451 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2451

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, as the ``Elizabeth 
                       Buffum Chace Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 575 Dexter Street in Central Falls, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Elizabeth Buffum Chace Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elizabeth 
Buffum Chace Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Comdial Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nickolas A. Branica, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 27, 2003                 By: /s/ Nickolas A. Branica
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Nickolas A. Branica
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2020297EN.01000701.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — AFMB Ltd and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

(Case C-610/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Migrant workers - Social security - Legislation applicable - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 14(2)(a) - Concept of ‘person who is a member of the travelling personnel of an undertaking’ - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 13(1)(b) - Concept of ‘employer’ - Long-distance lorry drivers normally employed in one or more Member States or States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) - Long distance lorry drivers who have entered into an employment contract with one undertaking but are in fact subject to the authority of another undertaking established in the Member State where those drivers reside - Determination of which undertaking is the ‘employer’)

(2020/C 297/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: AFMB Ltd and Others

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(2)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 631/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, and Article 13(1)(b)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, must be interpreted as meaning that the employer of an international long-distance lorry driver, for the purposes of those provisions, is the undertaking which has actual authority over that long-distance lorry driver, which bears, in reality, the costs of paying his or her wages, and which has the actual power to dismiss him or her, and not the undertaking with which that long-distance lorry driver has concluded an employment contract and which is formally named in that contract as being the employer of that driver.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 25.335-1A, Design Dive Speed. This AC sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, of demonstrating compliance with the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes related to the minimum speed margin between design cruise speed and design dive speed for transport category airplanes. Like all ACs, it is not regulatory but is to provide guidance for applicants in demonstrating compliance with the objective safety standards set forth in the rule.

# DATES:

Advisory Circular 25.335-1A was issued by the Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, ANM-100, on September 29, 2000.

*How to Obtain Copies:*                         A paper copy of AC 25.335-1A may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, or faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC also will be available on the Internet at                         *http://www.faa.gov/​avr/​air/​airhome.htm*, at the link titled “Advisory Circulars” under the “Available Information” down-drop menu.                    

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 8, 2001.

Donald L. Riggin,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, ANM-100.

[FR Doc. 01-1287  Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-30209 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CHARLES LEE GREEN, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:02-CR-60053-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charles L e e Green has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v . F lores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Green h as not filed a r esponse. W e have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue f or appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e a ve to withdraw i s GRANTED, counsel is U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-30209 Document: 00512420034 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013No. 13-30209

excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R . R

. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-30209 Document: 00512420034 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 28408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[WV-042-6011b; FRL-6983-5]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants; State of West Virginia; Control of Emissions 
From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the municipal solid waste landfill 
111(d) plan submitted by the West Virginia Division of Environmental 
Protection (DEP), on May 29, 1998, and as amended on May 15, and 
December 20, 2000, for the purpose of controlling landfill gas 
emissions from existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. Also, 
EPA proposes to delegate its authority to the DEP for the enforcement 
of the Federal landfill 111(d) plan's compliance schedules. In the 
final rules section of the Federal Register, EPA is approving the plan. 
A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If EPA 
receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by June 22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief, Air 
Quality Planning and Information Services Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale at (215) 814-2190, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3c7dcc3c0d2dfd69dd9dadef3d6c3d29dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bffe4fbf8eae7eea5e1e2e6cbeefbeaa5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>. While additional information may be 
obtained via e-mail, comments must be submitted in writing to the 
address provided above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final rule of the same title which is located in the rules section of 
the Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.

    Dated: May 1, 2001.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 01-12889 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2019288EN.01000701.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/7

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2019 — Marion Le Pen v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-525/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - European Parliament - Rules governing the expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid)

(2019/C 288/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Marion Le Pen (represented by: R. Bosselut, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and C. Burgos, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. F. Jensen, M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Ms Marion Le Pen shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Marion Le Pen shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.

---
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of The Valspar Corporation

The following are the significant subsidiaries of The Valspar Corporation. Where the name of the subsidiary
includes the Valspar name, that subsidiary does business under the Valspar corporate name:

State of IncorporationEngineered Polymer Solutions, Inc.

DelawarePlasti-Kote Co., Inc.

OhioValspar Coatings Finance Corporation

MinnesotaValspar Finance Corporation

MinnesotaValspar Inc.

CanadaValspar Refinish, Inc.

MississippiValspar Sourcing, Inc.

MinnesotaThe Valspar Corporation Limitada

BrazilThe Valspar (Australia) Corporation Pty Limited

AustraliaThe Valspar (Nantes) Corporation, S.A.S.

FranceThe Valspar (France) Corporation, S.A.S.

FranceValspar Industries GmbH

GermanyThe Valspar (Germany) GmbH

GermanyThe Valspar (H.K.) Corporation Limited

Hong KongValspar Hai Hong Coatings (Shenzhen) Company Limited

PRCValspar Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoValspar Rock Company Ltd.

JapanThe Valspar (Singapore) Corporation Pte Limited

SingaporeThe Valspar (South Africa) Corporation (Pty) Limited

South AfricaThe Valspar (UK) Corporation, Limited

United KingdomThe Valspar (Switzerland) Corporation AG

SwitzerlandThe Valspar (Malaysia) Corporation Sdn Bhd

MalaysiaDongguan Lilly Paint Industries Limited

PRCLilly Industries (Shanghai) Limited

PRCHua Run Paints Holdings Company Limited

Hong KongValspar Powder Coatings Limited

United Kingdom


Subsidiaries not listed would not, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute
a significant subsidiary.



---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Richard P. Dealy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report")            by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

                

 

|   |   |                                  |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Richard P. Dealy                  |   |
|   | Name:  | Richard P. Dealy, Executive Vice      |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | Date:  | June 13, 2008                         |   |
# C_2019383EN.01003401.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/34

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt

(Case C-541/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 3(1)(b) - Distinctive character - Criteria for assessment - Sign comprising a hashtag)

(2019/C 383/37)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AS

Defendant: Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that in examining the distinctive character of a sign in respect of which registration as a trade mark is sought, all the relevant facts and circumstances must be taken into account, including all the likely types of use of the mark applied for. The latter correspond, in the absence of other indications, to the types of use which, in the light of the customs in the economic sector concerned, can be practically significant.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Ken Eickerman       | 
|----------------------- | 
|Ken Eickerman           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: May 11, 2010      | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41378

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

REYES RAMOS-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-422-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reyes RamosSalazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Salazar has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41378 Document: 00513446492 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2016
No. 15-41378

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41378 Document: 00513446492 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0428

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TONY RAY MANYGUNS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 19, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 13 2023

12/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0428
151 So. 921

#### GRAND COURT, ORDER OF CALANTHE OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al. v. RISING SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF PROTECTION et al.

6 Div. 286.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 1, 1933.

Wm. B. McCollough, of Birmingliam, for appellants.

C. B. Powell, of Birmingham, for appellees.

PER CUBIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# C_2017374EN.01004701.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/47

---

Action brought on 15 September 2017 — Vallina Fonseca v SRB

(Case T-625/17)

(2017/C 374/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Antonio Vallina Fonseca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Sellés Marco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017, concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017, concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Order the SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the SRB to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---