alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2275 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2275

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to prohibit the 
exclusion of individuals from service on a District of Columbia jury on 
           account of sexual orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to prohibit the 
exclusion of individuals from service on a District of Columbia jury on 
           account of sexual orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Local Juror 
Non-Discrimination Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL 
              ORIENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 11-1903, District of Columbia Official Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(including sexual orientation or gender identity)'' after 
``sex''.
                                 <all>
```
trueEX

December 19, 2014 

Via E-Mail: submissions@cftc.gov 

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

Acting Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments; Submission Pursuant to Regulation 

40.6(d) (trueEX LLC submission #2014-19S)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick: 

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation 40.6(d), 

trueEX LLC (“trueEX”) submits this weekly notification of the following rule amendments made 

effective on the date set forth below during the calendar week preceding the date of this notice.

On December 12, 2014, trueEX made the following non-substantive changes to its 

rulebook: 

Rule 1002 Market Agreed Coupon (MAC) Interest Rate Swap Contracts

• Listing Criteria. trueEX amended this rule to allow for the Series Listing Criteria.

trueEX previously listed two Series concurrently and this rule change allows for

the concurrent listing of a third Series during the current IMM month.

• Quoting Convention. trueEX clarified the Quoting Convention to reflect that the

MAC Swap can be quoted either as a function of price or Upfront Payment.

• Minimum Price Increment. trueEX amended this rule to reflect the minimum

price increments in effect for MAC IRS contracts, both when it is quoted based on

price or UpFront Payment. In all cases, the minimum price increments were

lowered to reflect the functionality of the Platform.

• Upfront Fee Calculation. trueEX amended the Upfront Fee calculation to correct

errors in the formula used for calculation of the fee depending on whether the swap

trades at a premium of discount.

• Block Trades. trueEX amended the language to clarify the minimum block sizes

applicable to MAC IRS.

• Schedule 1002 was amended to clarify the MAC Swaps that are listed for trading

on the trueEX DCM and SEF Trading Systems.

Page 1 of 2 
trueEX

The revisions to Rule 1002 and Schedule 1002 are redlined and are attached as Exhibit A 

and B, respectively

trueEX certifies that these rules amendments comply with the Act and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder. All changes are non-substantive in nature and clarify the terms and 

conditions of the MAC IRS offered by trueEX. 

There were no substantive opposing views expressed by the trueEX governing board or 

market participants to the rule amendments. trueEX certifies that this certification has been 

concurrently posted on the Exchange’s Web Site at http://www.trueex.com/rules-and-notices. 

These amendments were effective on December 12, 2014. 

If you have questions regarding this notice, please contact me at (646) 786-8527 or 

by email at fran@trueex.com. 

Sincerely,

Fran Kenck

Chief Compliance Officer/Chief Regulatory Officer

cc: submissions@cftc.gov

dmosubmissions@cftc.gov

regulatory@trueex.com

.

Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Hosting Site Network, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September  30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Scott Vicari, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of  the  Company.


/s/ Scott Vicari
----------------------------------------------
Name:    Scott Vicari
Title:   Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date:    January 13, 2003

                                       49
<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James GOOSLIN, a/k/a Jimmy, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-7383.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2010.

Decided: May 6, 2010.

*290James Gooslin, Appellant Pro Se. Erik S. Goes, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL,* DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Judge Michael was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Gooslin seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gooslin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gooslin’s motion for a copy of the Government’s motion in limine, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 1 7 I 0 0 7 2

. R

I C K Y D

. L O C K

A M Y v

. M A R G I E L O C K

A M Y

.

R i c k y D

. L o c k a

m y f i l e d t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n s e e k i n g i n t e r l o c u t o r y r e v i e w o f t h e t r i a l

c o u r t ’ s o r d e r r e f

o r m i n g t h e p a r t i e s ’ 2 0 0 9 d i

v o r c e d e c r e e

. T h e S u

p r e m e C o u

r t h a s

a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r a l

l d i v o r c e a

n d a l i m o n y c a s e s , i

n c l u d i n g t h o s e c a s e s

a n c i l l a r y t o t h e d i v o r c e p r o c e e d i n g

s

. S e e G a

. C o n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, A r t

. V I

, S e c

. V I

, P a r

.
I I I ( 6 ) ; M o r r i s v

. S u r g e s , 2 8 4 G a

. 7 4 8

, 7 5 0 ( 2 ) ( 6 7 0 S E 2 d 8 4 ) ( 2 0 0 8 )

. B e c a u s e t h e

u n d e r l y i n g s u b j e c t m a t t e r o f t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n i s d i v o r c e , i t i s h e r e b y T R

A N S F E R R E D

t o t h e S u p r e m e C o u

r t f o r d i s p o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, At l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i

s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r

t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w

r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/14/2016 November 14, 2016
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ March 1 9 , 201 9

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 20 16

- 2746

XITRONIX CORPORATION , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

KLA

- TENCOR CORPORATI ON, DBA KLA

- TENCOR, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee

Decided: March 14, 2019 Non

- P recedential O rder

______________________ Please make the following change:

P age 2 , line 2 9 , change “ cannon ” to “canon

. ”
This disposit ion is not appropriate f or publication and is not pre cedent except as * provided by

Ninth Circuit Rul e 36-3. The Honorable Gloria M. Nava rro, United States D istrict Judg e for the District of ** Nevada, sitting by

designation. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif

f - A p p e lle e , v. I S A A C R E Y E S M A R T I N E Z , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50093 D . C . N o. 8: 10 -C R -000 33 -A G -2 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A ndr e w J . G ui l f

or d, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r8, 2012

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : R E I NH AR DT a n d T HO MAS , C i r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n dNA VA R R O, ** D i stri ctJudg e. A ppe l l a ntI s a a c R e y e s M a rt i ne z appe a l s hi s c onvi c t i on a f t e rj urytr i a l f

or c o n s p i r a c yt o p o s s e s s w i th i n t e n tt o d i s tr i b u t e me th a mp h e t ami n e , 2 1 U . S. C. §§ 841( a ) ( 1) a nd 846, a nd pos s e s s i on of f i r e a rm s i n f

urthe r a nc e of

adrug tra ff i cki ng cr i m e, 18 U . S . C . § 9 24 (c )( 1)(A )( i ). 

# FI LED DE C 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

W e h o ldth a t th e g o v e rn m e n t v io la te dA p p e lla n t’s F if th A m e n d m e n t r ig h t to be conv i ct ed sol el y on the evi dence adduced attri al , un der U ni ted States v. Schu ler , 813 F . 2d 978, 981–82 ( 9th C i r . 1987) , byc om m e nt i ng i n i t s c l os i ng ar g u m en t o n A p p ellan t’ s d em ea n o r in th e c o u rtro o m d u rin g w itn es s A co sta- R u iz’s t e s t i m onya nd i de nt i f

i c a t i on of

A ppe l l a nt . A na l y z i ng the r e c or d f orha rm l e s s e rr or pur s ua ntt o Ch a

p m a n v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 18, 24 ( 1967) , w e c a nnotc onc l ude th a t th is e rr o rw a s h a rm le s s b e y o n dar e a s o n ab le d o u b t. See U ni ted States v. W e athe rs poon , 4 1 0 F . 3 d 1 1 4 2 , 1 1 5 1 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ). T h erefo re w e rev erse A p p e lla n t’s c o n v ic tio n a n d r e m a n dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f o ran e w tr ia l.

RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
# C_2021297EN.01002901.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Calhau Correia de Paiva v Commission

(Case T-202/17) (1)

(Language regime - Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of competition law, corporate finance, financial economics, industrial economics and macroeconomics (AD 7) - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Plea of illegality - Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English, French or German - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1) of the Staff Regulations - Discrimination based on language - Justification - Interests of the service)

(2021/C 297/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: V. Villante, G. Pandey and D. Rovetta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon, I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, firstly, of the decision of the selection board for competition EPSO/AD/293/14 — Administrators (AD 7) in the fields of competition law, corporate finance, financial economics, industrial economics and macroeconomics of 9 November 2015 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list drawn up at the end of the selection procedure, secondly, of the decision of 23 June 2016 reviewing that first decision, thirdly, of the decision of 22 December 2016 rejecting the complaint filed by the applicant against the first decision and, fourthly, of the reserve list drawn up at the end of the selection procedure referred to above in so far as that reserve list concerns the field of competition law.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AD/293/14 of 23 June 2016, transmitted by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), rejecting the request for review made by Ms Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva following her exclusion from the reserve list of the competition by a decision of 9 November 2015; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AD/293/14 of 23 June 2016, transmitted by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), rejecting the request for review made by Ms Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva following her exclusion from the reserve list of the competition by a decision of 9 November 2015;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Ms Calhau Correia de Paiva to bear one third of her own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Calhau Correia de Paiva to bear one third of her own costs;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Ms Calhau Correia de Paiva. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Ms Calhau Correia de Paiva.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00345-CR

Gerardo VENEGAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CRH001475 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the State’s motion to dismiss this appeal 

is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED June 22, 2016.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 8-K

---



CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  February 12, 2007



---

THE VALSPAR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware
        1-3011
        36-2443580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
        (Commission
File Number)
        (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)






1101 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota
        55415(Address of principal executive offices)
        (Zip Code)






Registrants telephone number, including area code:(612) 332-7371



Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---

Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.



On February 12, 2007, the Company issued the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1, which sets out the Company's results of operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(d)
        Exhibits




99.1
        First Quarter Earnings Press Release dated February 12, 2007






SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





THE VALSPAR CORPORATIONDated:
        February 12, 2007
        
        /s/ Rolf EnghName:  Rolf EnghTitle:  Secretary




---
#### STATE v. GOYENS

No. 461P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 486

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1998.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Henry T. CochranHenry T. CochranChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
21




Schedule
of Subsidiaries




Percentage
      InterestName
      of Entity
                          
                          2009
                          
                          
                          2008Jingzhou
      Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd., “ Henglong ”
                          
                          
                          80.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          80.00
                          %Shashi
      Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd., “Jiulong”
                          
                          
                          81.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          81.00
                          %Shenyang
      Jinbei Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd.,
      “Shenyang”
                          
                          
                          70.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          70.00
                          %Zhejiang
      Henglong & Vie Pump-Manu Co., Ltd., “Zhejiang”
                          
                          
                          51.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          51.00
                          %Universal
      Sensor Application Inc., “USAI”
                          
                          
                          83.34
                          %
                          
                          
                          83.34
                          %Wuhan
      Jielong Electric Power Steering Co., Ltd., “Jielong”
                          
                          
                          85.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          85.00
                          %Wuhu
      HengLong Auto Steering System Co., Ltd., “Wuhu”
                          
                          
                          77.33
                          %
                          
                          
                          77.33
                          %Jingzhou
      Hengsheng Automotive System Co., Ltd., “Hengsheng”
                          
                          
                          100.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          100.00
                          %Jingzhou
      Henglong Automotive Technology (Testing) Center, “Testing
      Center”
                          
                          
                          80.00
                          %
                          
                          
                          -
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2366 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2366

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to remove the requirement that 
residents of residential reentry facilities pay 25 percent of any gross 
 income earned during work release to offset the cost of being housed, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2019

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to remove the requirement that 
residents of residential reentry facilities pay 25 percent of any gross 
 income earned during work release to offset the cost of being housed, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Successful Reentry Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT PRISONERS ON WORK RELEASE PAY PART OF THEIR 
              GROSS INCOME OVER FOR HOUSING.

    Section 3622(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking all that follows after ``facility if'' and inserting the 
following: ``the rates of pay and other conditions of employment will 
not be less than those paid or provided for work of a similar nature in 
the community.''.
                                 <all>
```