T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T WI R A G UN AWAN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71345 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 630- 165 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W i r aG unaw an, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU L 20 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71345 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e , L i v . A s h c r o ft , 378 F . 3 d9 5 9 , 9 6 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatG un aw an es t abl i shed c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s to e x c u s e h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 4 ) ; R am adan v. G on zales , 4 7 9 F .3 d6 4 6 , 6 5 7 - 5 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . A cco rd i n g l y, h i s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e IJ’ s ad v erse cred i b i l i ty fi n d i n g b ecau se G unaw an’ s t e s t i m onyw a s i nc ons i s t e ntw i th hi s a s y l um appl i c a t i on a s t o w he n he le arn e dh e w a s a lle g e d lyo n ag o v e rn m e n ta l “b la c klis t,” s e e Li , 378 F . 3d a t964 (“ [s ] o l on g as one of the i dent i fi ed grou nd s i s s up po rt ed by subst ant i alevi dence an dg o es to th e h ea rt o f [ th e] claim o f p er se cu ti o n , w e a re b o u n dto ac ce p t th e I J’s advers e c re di bi l i ty f

i nd i ng ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on om i tt ed), and the agency r e a s o n ab lyr e

je c te dh is e x p lan a tio n f o rth e in c o n s is te n c y , se e R i ve ra v. Mukasey , 5 0 8 F . 3 d1 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ). In th e ab sen ce o f cred i b l e t est i m o n y, G u n aw an ’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e G una w an’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s a m e t e s t i m onyf ound t o be notc r e di bl e , a nd he poi nt s t o no othe re vi de nc e the I Js houl d ha ve c ons i de r e d, subst ant i alevi dence al so supp ort s the deni alof C A T re l i ef . Se e id. a t1156- 57. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.