alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification of
CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of
International Specialty Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Sunil Kumar, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and Salvatore J. Guccione, as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  (2)           The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Sunil
  KumarName:
  Sunil KumarTitle:
  President and Chief
  Executive OfficerDate:
  March 30, 2005/s/
  Salvatore J. GuccioneName:
  Salvatore J. GuccioneTitle:
  Senior Vice President
  andChief Financial OfficerDate:
  March 30, 2005   This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Applica Incorporated
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Harry D. Schulman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Applica Incorporated,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applica Incorporated. Dated: March 11, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Harry D. SchulmanHarry D. Schulman
President and Chief Executive Officer
 -30-
No. 548.

#### John. W. Auchincloss et al., Petitioners, *v.*Constantine & Pickering Steamship Company, Owners, etc.; John W. Auchincloss et al., Petitioners, *v.*Constantine *&*Pickering Steamship Company, Owners, etc.; and John W. Auchincloss et al., Petitioners, *574*v.*W. McLean et al., Owners, etc.

*573No. 549.

No. 550.

*574October 19, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.. *Mr. George H. Emerson*for petitioners.. *Mr. J. Parker Kirlin*for respondents. •
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofThe Iberian Group Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period endedJuly 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Thomas P. Hayward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 26thday of December, 2007.                                                                                                                
|   



THOMAS P. HAYWARDThomas P. Hayward, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors.

















---
#### Pino Alto Partners, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v Erie County Water Authority, Appellant.

Submitted December 28, 2009;

decided February 11, 2010

*740Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
# C_2019270EN.01000901.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania — Italy) — Meca Srl v Comune di Napoli

(Case C-41/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2014/12/EU - Article 57(4)(c) and (g) - Award of public service contracts - Optional grounds for exclusion from participation in a public procurement procedure - Grave professional misconduct calling into question the integrity of an economic operator - Termination of an earlier contract on account of failures in its execution - Action before the courts preventing the contracting authority from assessing the breach of contract until the end of the judicial proceedings)

(2019/C 270/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Meca Srl

Defendant: Comune di Napoli

Intervener: Sirio Srl

Operative part of the judgment

Article 57(4)(c) and (g) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation pursuant to which an action before the courts against a decision to terminate a public contract, taken by a contracting authority on account of significant deficiencies arising in the execution of that contract, prevents the contracting authority which issues a new call for tenders from conducting any assessment, at the stage of the selection of tenderers, of the reliability of the operator concerned by that termination.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
### NUMBER S 13 - 11 - 00095 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ GEORGE CANO , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 347 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



# MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, George Cano, pro se , attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for the second degree felony offense of burglary of a building in trial court cause number
88

- CR

- 992

- H. We dismiss the appeal for want of juri sdiction. The judgment in th is cause w as entered in 198 8 . Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on February 22, 2011. That same day, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant2

that it appeared that the appeal w as not timely perfected. Appell ant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect w as not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court = s directive. Appellant has not responded to the Court’s directive. This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a crim inal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed . TEX. R. APP. P . 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the p arty files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal i n a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out

- of

- time appeal by filing a post

- conviction writ of
habea s corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN . art. 11.07, ' 3(a) ( West Supp. 2010 ); see also Ex parte Garcia , 988 S.W.2d 240 (T ex. Crim. App. 1999) ; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W. 2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).3

Th is appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 28th day of July , 20 11

.
142 So. 682

#### John Allen RIDDLE v. STATE.

5 Div. 121.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 11, 1932.

Paul J. Hooton, of Roanoke, for petitioner.

Thos, E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of John Allen Riddle for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Riddle v. State, 142 So. 680.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and POSTER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Hui Liu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Care Technologies Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical Care Technologies Inc.





Dated this 28th day of June, 2011.





/s/ HUI LIUHui LiuPrincipal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer

and a member of the Board of Directors








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Care Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Medical Care Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
141 So. 918

#### Erle PETTUS et al. v. HUDSON & THOMPSON.

3 Div. 977.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Health & Development Consequences of Prenatal Exposure to Methamphetamine.                

*Date:*                     June 15, 2001.                

*Time:*                     12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate grant applications.                

*Place:*                     Radisson Barcelo Hotel, 2121 P Street NW., Washington, DC 20037.                

*Contact Person:*                     Kesinee Nimit, MD, Health Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1432.                

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: May 22, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13343 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Jacquelyn M. FRIEDSAM, Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.

No. 03-1432.

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

June 5, 2006.

Before KASOLD, MOORMAN, and DAVIS, Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On May 26, 2006, the appellant filed through counsel an unopposed motion for a 45-day extension of time in which to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 8, 2006, opinion. The only reason proffered by the appellant for needing more time is that, although she is inclined to make a motion for reconsideration, such time is needed for her counsel to review the issues on appeal, analyze the details of her case and different courses of action, and to consult with her. These are standard actions required in every case and therefore cannot, standing alone, constitute good cause for an extension of time, or else the rule would be eviscerated. *See*U.S. Vet.App. R. 26(b), 35(d)(2), 36.

The Court, “in order to get its work done, must insist on strict compliance with its rules. Violations of [the Rules] ... are all too frequent. In addition to imposing an unfair burden on opposing parties, violations of our rules are also a burden on the [C]ourt. The [C]ourt must consider a large number of appeals each year. It can only conduct its work fairly and efficiently if counsel cooperate by abiding by the pertinent rules.” *In re Violation of Rule 28(c),*388 F.3d 1383, 1385 (Fed.Cir.2004).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the May 26, 2006, motion for a 45-day extension of time is denied.
# C_2019280EN.01000902.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-619/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Rule of law - Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law - Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence - Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges - Application to judges in post - Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic)

(2019/C 280/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks, H. Krämer and S.L. Kalėda, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Majcher and S. Żyrek)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, first, by providing that the measure consisting in lowering the retirement age of the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) is to apply to judges in post who were appointed to that court before 3 April 2018 and, secondly, by granting the President of the Republic the discretion to extend the period of judicial activity of judges of that court beyond the newly fixed retirement age, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, first, by providing that the measure consisting in lowering the retirement age of the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) is to apply to judges in post who were appointed to that court before 3 April 2018 and, secondly, by granting the President of the Republic the discretion to extend the period of judicial activity of judges of that court beyond the newly fixed retirement age, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs;

| 3. | Declares that Hungary is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that Hungary is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
Opinion issued June 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00093-CV

———————————

SOUTH TEXAS MEDICAL CLINICS, P.A., Appellant

V.

MARIA BARRERA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF V.B. 

AND F.B., MINORS, DAVID A. BARRERA, GABRIELA BARRERA, 

KARLA BARRERA AND STEFANI BARRERA, AS WRONGFUL DEATH 

BENEFICIARIES OF SONIA BARRERA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 434th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12DCV198295

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 15, 2013, we granted the unopposed motion by appellant, South 

Texas Medical Clinics, P.A., to abate the appeal for mediation proceedings.
2

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that 

the parties have reached a mediated settlement of the underlying case. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant appellant’s motion to dismiss,

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other 

pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
H. R. 2333 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an assessment 

of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans 

Affairs suicide prevention coordinators, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for Suicide Prevention 

Coordinators Act’’. 

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES, 

WORKLOAD, AND VACANCY RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATORS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the 

United States shall conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, 

workload, training, and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans 

Affairs suicide prevention coordinators. Such assessment shall 

include a determination of— 

(1) the extent to which the use and staffing of suicide 

prevention coordinators varies between Department facilities; 

and 

(2) the extent to which the Secretary provides oversight 

of suicide prevention coordinators. 

(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall 

submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 

House of Representatives a report containing the findings of the 

assessment required by subsection (a). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scottrell MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-30978

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 2010.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Betty Lee Marak, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Scottrell Morris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Morris has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Morris’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
October 30, 2009





By:
                  /s/
      Asher ZwebnerName:
                  Asher
      ZwebnerTitle:
                  Interim
      Chief Executive Officer,Financial
      Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive, Financial andAccounting
      Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.