alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Hossein Fateh and Mark L.
Wetzel, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, respectively, of the sole general partner of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |        |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Hossein Fateh                                              
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Hossein Fateh                                                  
|                       |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|                       |  |       
|                       |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mark L. Wetzel                                             
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Mark L. Wetzel                                                 
|                       |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

In accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 101-6.1015(a), this notice of intent to establish the National Nuclear Security Administration Advisory Committee. This intent is to establish follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretary of the General Services Administration, pursuant to 41 CFR Subpart 101-6.10. 

The purpose of the Committee is to provide the Administrator for Nuclear Security with advice, information, and recommendations on NNSA mission performance, needs, and priorities. The Committee will provide an organized forum for the community to provide advice and input to programs concerning nonproliferation, stockpile stewardship and naval reactor issues, and their related technology, research and development. 

                    Committee members have been identified; they were selected to ensure an appropriately-balanced membership to bring into account a diversity of viewpoints, including representatives from universities, industry, and others who may significantly contribute to the deliberations of the Committee. Advance notice of all meetings of this Committee will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

The establishment of the National Nuclear Security Administration Advisory Committee has been determined to be compelled by consideration of national security, essential to the conduct of Department of Energy business, and in the public interest. 

Further information regarding this Committee may be obtained from Dr. Maureen McCarthy, Chief Scientist, National Nuclear Security Administration, Washington, DC 20585, phone (202) 586-5555. 

Issued in Washington, DC, May 23, 2001. 

James N. Solit, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-13495 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
H. R. 2336 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to the definition of ‘‘family 

farmer’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farmer Relief Act of 

2019’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FAMILY FARMER. 

Section 101(18) of title 11, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘$3,237,000’’ each place that term appears and inserting 

‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bonfire Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and 2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
 May 15, 2009/s/ Tim
DeHerrera--------------------------Tim DeHerreraPresident,
Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Director         Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bonfire Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and 2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
 May 15, 2009/s/ Richard
Luthmann----------------------------------Richard
LuthmannChief Legal Officer, principal accounting officer and
Director
# C_2019399EN.01001801.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UTEP 2006. SRL v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály

(Case C-600/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Road transport - Articles 91 and 92 TFEU - Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 - Article 32(3), Article 33(1) and Article 41(1) - Infringement of the rules on the use of tachographs - Duty of Member States to make provision for effective, dissuasive and non-discriminatory penalties - Resident and non-resident small and medium-sized enterprises - Differential treatment)

(2019/C 399/20)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UTEP 2006. SRL

Defendant: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály

Operative part of the judgment

Article 41(1) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport, must be interpreted as precluding an administrative practice of a Member State according to which, unlike non-resident small and medium-sized road transport enterprises, those that are established in the territory of that Member State are liable to receive a lesser penalty, in the form of a warning rather than an administrative fine, where such enterprises commit, for the first time, an infringement of Regulation No 165/2014 of the same degree of gravity.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008.  The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   November
19,
2008               
/s/ Fred
Zolla


Fred
Zolla


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)














Dated:   November
19,
2008               
/s/ Craig
Stout


Craig
Stout


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Officers Certificate

February 28, 2020

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC. 
  One Bryant Park 
4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading

    New York, New York
10036

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS
TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, James W. P. Hall,
Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), hereby
certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as successor to United
States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the
Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached
schedule.

| | Very truly yours,                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                 
| | The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as Trustee
| |                                                                                 
| | By: /s/ James W. P. Hall                                                        
| | Name: James W. P. Hall
      Title: Vice President                              



| |  | 
| |  | 

---







SCHEDULE

PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1 
  INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
154 So. 917

#### J. E. CULPEPPER et al. v. R. N. PITTS.

4 Div. 765.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 10, 1934.

A. L. Patterson, J. B. Hicks, Roy L. Smith, and J. W. Brassell, all of Phenix City, for appellants.

B. de G. Waddell, of Seale, and Rushton, Crenshaw & Rushton, of Montgomery, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellants.
# EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of IntriCon Corporation (formerly Selas Corporation of America) and subsidiaries of our reports dated February 18, 2006
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of IntriCon Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for the year then ended, which reports are included in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of
IntriCon Corporation.

/s/   VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 17, 2006

---
1

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Submission No. 23-104

June 22, 2023

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Amendments to Block Trade Procedures - Establishment of Block Trade Minimums

for New Physical Environmental Futures Contracts - Submission Pursuant to

Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity

Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), ICE Futures U.S., Inc. (“IFUS”

or “Exchange”) self certifies amendments to the Exchange’s Block Trading Procedures (the

“Procedures”), which are reflected in the Exchange’s Block Trade FAQ (“FAQ”), as set forth in

Exhibit A.

The Exchange is amending the FAQ to establish minimum block trade quantities for new Physical

Environmental futures contracts being listed by the Exchange and pending self-certification (See

Submission Nos. 23-102 and 23-103). The Exchange is setting the minimum block trade quantity

for these new contracts at the levels specified in Exhibit A. The Exchange is setting the minimum

block trade quantities at levels consistent with levels established for similar futures contracts

currently listed by the Exchange.

The Exchange is not aware of any opposing views and certifies that the amendments to the FAQ,

which will become effective on July 10, 2023, or such other date as the Exchange shall determine

which shall be no sooner than the first business day following the tenth business day following

submission to the Commission, comply with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
2

regulations promulgated thereunder. Specifically, the amendments comply with Core Principle 9,

which allows designated contract markets (“DCM’) to authorize transactions, such as block trades,

that are executed away from the DCM’s centralized marketplace. The Exchange further certifies

that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the Exchange’s website,

which may be accessed at (https://www.theice.com/futures-us/regulation#Rule-Filings).

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 312-836-6745 or at

patrick.swartzer@ice.com.

Sincerely,

Patrick Swartzer

Director

Market Regulation

Enc.

cc: Division of Market Oversight
3

EXHIBIT A

ICE FUTURES U.S.

BLOCK TRADE - FAQs

* * *

2. What are the eligible contracts and the minimum threshold quantities for a

block trade?

The minimum quantity requirements for block trades of eligible Oil and Energy

futures and options contracts can be found under the “Energy Forms” tab at

the link below:

* * *

Contract Name Commodity

Code

Contract

Size

Unit of

Trading

Block

Minimum

(in Lots)

* * *

Washington Carbon Allowance Vintage 2025 Future WCC 1,000 Allowances 10

Washington Carbon Allowance Vintage 2026 Future WCD 1,000 Allowances 10

* * *
(83 South. 926)

#### HENDERSON SHIP BLDG. CO. v. DENNIS.

(1 Div. 111.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 11, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Joel W. Goldsby, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
AMERICAN UNITED GLOBAL, INC.
                         108 Village Square, #327 Somers
                                 New York 10589

                                                               December 29, 2005

Kraft Rt.
Konkoly Thege
u. 29-33 Budapest H-1121

      Re:   Secured Promissory Note dated September 28, 2005

Gentlemen:

      Reference is hereby made to the Secured Promissory Note (the "Note") dated
September 28, 2005 in the amount of $500,000 payable by Kraft Rt.  ("Kraft"),  a
Hungarian  corporation,  to American  United Global,  Inc. (the  "Company").  We
hereby agree to extend the Maturity Date, as defined in the Note, to January 30,
2005.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Robert Rubin
                                           -----------------
                                           Robert Rubin, CEO

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

KRAFT RT.


By: /s/Zoltan Kiss
    --------------
Name: Zoltan Kiss
Title: Director
#### STATE v. VAUGHN

No. 332P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 456

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 18 August 1998.
# C_2020137EN.01001801.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against X

(Case C-717/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Article 2(2) - Execution of a European arrest warrant - Removal of verification of the double criminality of the act - Conditions - Offence punishable by the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence for a maximum period of at least three years - Amendment of the criminal legislation of the issuing Member State between the date of the acts and the date of issue of the European arrest warrant - Version of the law to be taken into account in verifying the maximum sentence threshold of at least three years)

(2020/C 137/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

X

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to ascertain whether the offence for which a European arrest warrant has been issued is punishable in the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years, as it is defined in the law of the issuing Member State, the executing judicial authority must take into account the law of the issuing Member State in the version applicable to the facts giving rise to the case in which the European arrest warrant was issued.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.

---
NO. 07

- 12

- 0165

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 10

, 2012

______________________________

DAMIEN HERNANDEZ CORTEZ

,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FRO M THE 320th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 62,862

- D ; HON. DON EMERSON , PRESIDING

_______________________________

Order of Dismissal

_______________________________

Before QUINN , C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE , JJ.

Pending before the court is the appeal of Damien Hernandez Cortez. No

certificate of right to appeal appears of record, however. Because of that, the trial court

and district clerk were notified of the missing item and directed to supple ment the record

with such a signed certificate by June 25, 2012, but one has not been received to date.

Consequently, we dismiss the appeal as mandated by Texas Rule of Appellate2

Procedure 25.2(d). We would entertain a timely motion for rehearing accomp anied by

the requisite certification should one be acquired.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.