alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Catherine GIERBOLINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS SCIENCE APPLICATION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, John P. Thumper; K. Stuart Shea; Mark W. Sopp; Thomas G. Baybrook, Joseph W. Carver, III; Anthony J. Maraco; Deborah Lee James; Amy E. Alving; Laura Kennedy; James E. Cuff; Brian F. Keenan; Vincent A. Maffeo, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-1475.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

Catherine Gierbolini, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, Is-ler, Dare, Ray, Radcliffe *&*Connolly, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Gierbolini appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gierbolini v. Bd. of Dir. Sci. Application Int’l Corp.,*No. 1:13-cv-00103-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# C_2017221EN.01003501.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/35

---

Action brought on 4 May 2017 — Uponor Innovation v EUIPO — Swep International (SMATRIX)

(Case T-264/17)

(2017/C 221/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Uponor Innovation AB (Borås, Sweden) (represented by: A. Kylhammar, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Swep International AB (Landskrona, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SMATRIX’ — Application for registration No 12 540 431

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2017 in Case R 236/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

| — | order SWEP International to compensate the Applicant for the costs before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order SWEP International to compensate the Applicant for the costs before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-337-002]

Take notice that on May 15, 2001, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following pro forma tariff sheets:

Sheet No. 124

Sheet No. 125

Sheet No. 126

Sheet No. 126-A

Sheet No. 127

Sheet No. 128

Sheet No. 200

Sheet No. 201

Sheet No. 202

Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to submit pro forma tariff sheets revising Kern River's scheduling procedures to specify how mainline, receipt point and delivery point capacity will be allocated in compliance with Order No. 637, and to propose a segmentation policy to be added to Kern River's tariff.

Kern River also states that in the April 17, 2001 technical conference in this docket, the parties agreed to file comments on this pro forma proposal by June 1, 2001.

Kern River states that it has served a copy of this filing upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13085  Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                      Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, Lynn Wigen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sterling
     Exploration Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
21st day of December, 2007.


/s/ Lynn Wigen
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of
Quebecor Media Inc.
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Commission Releases
Nos.33-8238 (June 5, 2003) and 33-8618 (September 22, 2005)];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
 
 Date:  February 8, 2008
    /s/ Louis MorinName:  Louis MorinTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alco Energy Corp. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: February 13, 2009 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Dismissed and Opinion Filed May 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-11-01448-CV

ROBERT AND KATHY WEBB, Appellants

V.

GLENBROOK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-00591-06

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell

We reinstate this appeal. This case was abated in 2012 due to bankruptcy. See 

TEX.R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public 

Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) which shows the bankruptcy 

proceeding associated with this appeal was terminated on April 20, 2015.

We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status 

of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would 

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To 

date, neither party has responded.
–2–

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this 

appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for 

publication).

111448f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell//

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ROBERT AND KATHY WEBB, 

Appellants

No. 05-11-01448-CV V.

GLENBROOK OWNERS' 

ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-00591-06.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Osborne and Pedersen, III 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 11th day of May, 2021.
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC     Document 38      Filed 12/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                      Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, Lynn Wigen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sterling
     Exploration Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Lynn Wigen
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
401 South Tryon Street
Suite 2300
Charlotte, NC 28202-1911


Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors First Union National Bank:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that First Union National Bank (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
March 6, 2002
# C_2005240EN.01004101.xml

| 30.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/41

---

Announcement (1) of the period for the monitoring and evaluation of the labour-rights situation in Belarus in view of the temporary withdrawal of benefits under the scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP)

1

(2005/C 240/09)

Under Article 26(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 (2) applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences, the preferential arrangements may be withdrawn from a GSP beneficiary country for ‘serious and systematic violation of the freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining or the principle of non-discrimination in respect of employment and occupation, or use of child labour, as defined in the relevant ILO conventions’.

2

On the basis of information received from the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and the World Confederation of Labour (WCL), the Commission carried out an investigation on the alleged systematic and serious violations of the freedom of association in Belarus, as defined in ILO Conventions Nos 87 and 98.

The Commission considers that the findings justify the temporary withdrawal for the reason given in Article 26(1)(b) and has decided, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001, to monitor and evaluate the situation in Belarus for a period of six months. The Commission intends to submit to the Council a proposal for the temporary withdrawal of the trade preferences granted under Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 unless, before the end of the period, Belarus makes a commitment to take the measures necessary to conform within eight months with the principles referred to in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, as expressed in the twelve recommendations of the ILO Commission of Enquiry report of July 2004.

---

(1)  Commission Decision of 17 August 2005 on the monitoring and evaluation of the labour-rights situation in Belarus for temporary withdrawal of trade preferences.

1

(2)  OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1.

2

---