29322 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2001 / Notices

who conduct or sponsor research on

pesticides, the Agency has not

attempted to describe all the specific

entities that may be affected by this

action. If you have any questions

regarding the information in this action,

consult the designated contact person

listed for the individual EUP.

B. How Can I Get Additional

Information, Including Copies of this

Document and Other Related

Documents?

You may obtain electronic copies of

this document, and certain other related

documents that might be available

electronically, from the EPA Internet

Home Page at http://www.epa.gov. To

access this document, on the Home Page

select ‘‘Laws and Regulations,’’

‘‘Regulations and Proposed Rules,’’ and

then look up the entry for this document

under the ‘‘Federal Register—

Environmental Documents.’’ You can

also go directly to the Federal Register

listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. EUP

EPA has issued the following EUP:

71049–EUP–1 and 71049–EUP–2.

Issuance. KIM-C1, LLC, 6333 East

Liberty Avenue, Fresno, California

93727. This EUP allows the use of 61.78

(1st year), 62.74 (2nd year), 63.11 (3rd

year) pounds of the plant growth

regulator CPPU [N-(2-chloro-4-

pyridinyl)-N′-phenyl urea] on 4,185 (1st

year), 4,250 (2nd year), 4,275 (3rd year)

acres of almond, apple, blueberry,

cranberry, fig, grapes, kiwifruit, olive,

pear, and plums (fresh) to evaluate the

control of fruit size and/or yield. The

program is authorized only in the States

of California, Florida, Georgia,

Michigan, and Washington. The EUP is

effective from April 1, 2001 to April 1,

2004. A tolerance has been established

for residues of the active ingredient in

or on almond, apple, blueberry,

cranberry, fig, grapes, kiwifruit, olive,

pear, plums (fresh).

Persons wishing to review this EUP

are referred to the designated contact

person. Inquiries concerning this permit

should be directed to the person cited

above. It is suggested that interested

persons call before visiting the EPA

office, so that the appropriate file may

be made available for inspection

purposes from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday

through Friday, excluding legal

holidays.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection,

Experimental use permits.

Dated: May 16, 2001.

James Jones,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 01–13279 Filed 5–29–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6987–6]

Proposed CERCLA Administrative

Settlement Agreement—Service First

Barrel and Drum Site, Salt Lake City,

Salt Lake County, UT

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice and request for public

comment.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

requirements of section 122(h)(1) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C.

9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of the

proposed administrative settlement

under section 122(h) of CERCLA, 42

U.S.C. 9622(h), concerning the Service

First Barrel and Drum site between EPA,

and Miguel A. Alpizar and Sylvia P.

Orozco (‘‘Settling Parties’’). The Service

First Barrel and Drum Site, is located at

1066 South Redwood Road, in Salt Lake

City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the

‘‘Site’’). The settlement, embodied in the

proposed Administrative Settlement

Agreement, EPA Docket No. CERCLA–

8–2001–05 (‘‘Agreement’’), is designed

to resolve the Settling Parties’’ liability

at the Site through a covenant not to sue

for all response costs incurred and to be

incurred in connection with removal

activities at the Site.

Miguel A. Alpizar and Sylvia P.

Orozco are the owners of one of the

parcels of land which comprise the Site.

Settling Parties purchased the parcel of

land where a former drum cleaning and

reconditioning business had been

conducted. At the time of purchase, and

pursuant to the Real Estate Purchase

Contract, the seller agreed to take full

responsibility for any and all necessary

remediation procedures required to

cleanup any contamination on the

property. The proposed Agreement is a

cash-out of the Settling Parties’ liability

under section 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, 42

U.S.C. 9607(a)(1). Under the terms of the

proposed Agreement, the Settling

Parties agree to grant access to all

parties conducting removal activities at

the Site and will reimburse the United

States the sum of $2,000. In exchange,

the Settling Parties will settle their

liability for all response costs incurred

at the Site in connection with the

planned removal activities and will

receive contribution protection from

other parties associated with the Site.

OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT: For thirty

(30) days following the date of

publication of this notice, the Agency

will consider all comments received and

may modify or withdraw its consent to

the settlement if comments received

disclose facts or considerations which

indicate that the settlement is

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

The Agency’s response to any comments

received will be available for public

inspection at the EPA Superfund Record

Center, 999 18th Street, 5th Floor, in

Denver, Colorado.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before June 29, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement

and additional background information

relating to the settlement are available

for public inspection at the EPA

Superfund Records Center, 999 18th

Street, 5th Floor, in Denver, Colorado.

Comments and requests for a copy of the

proposed settlement should be

addressed to Carol Pokorny,

Enforcement Specialist (8ENF–T),

Technical Enforcement Program, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 999

18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado

80202–2466, and should reference the

Service First Barrel and Drum Site, Salt

Lake City, Utah and the EPA Docket No.

CERCLA–8–2001–05.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol Pokorny, Enforcement Specialist

(8ENF–T), Technical Enforcement

Program, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 999 18th Street, Suite 300,

Denver, Colorado 80202–2466, (303)

312–6970.

It Is So Agreed.

Dated: May 17, 2001.

Carol Rushin,

Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of

Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental

Justice, Region VIII.

[FR Doc. 01–13510 Filed 5–29–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

May 22, 2001.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2001 / Notices 29323

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before June 29, 2001. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th

Street, SW, DC 20554 or via the Internet

to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via the

Internet at jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–0206.

Title: Part 21, Multipoint Distribution

Service Stations.

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 15,858.

Estimated Time Per Response: .083

hours—6 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

and annual reporting requirements,

third party disclosure requirement, and

recordkeeping requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 10,221 hours.

Total Annual Cost: $1,244,300.

Needs and Uses: The information

requested in part 21 is used by the

Commission staff to fulfill its

obligations as set forth in Sections 308

and 309 of the Communications Act of

1934, as amended. The information is

used to determine the technical, legal

and other qualifications of applicants to

operate a station in MDS. The

information is also used to determine

whether grant of an application will

serve the public interest, convenience

and necessity. The FCC staff uses the

information to ensure that applicants

and licensees comply with the

ownership and transfer restrictions

imposed by Section 310 of the Act.

The information collection has been

revised due to suspension of the EEO

rules. The increase in public costs is

due to an estimated increase in the

various requirements of Part 21.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0717.

Title: Billed Party Preference for

InterLATA 0+ Calls, CC Docket No. 92–

77 (47 CFR 64.703(a), 64.709, and

64.710).

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 1,500

respondents; 1,2000,000,000 responses.

Estimated Time Per Response: 2

seconds per call—50 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

and annual reporting requirements,

third party disclosure requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 699,157 hours.

Total Annual Cost: $216,000.

Needs and Uses: Pursuant to Section

64.703(a), Operator Service Providers

(OSP’s) are required to disclose, audibly

and distinctly to the consumer, at no

charge and before connecting any

interstate call, how to obtain rate

quotations, including any applicable

surcharges. Section 64.709 codifies the

requirements for OSP’s to file

informational tariffs with the

Commission. Section 64.710 requires

providers of interstate operator services

to inmates at correctional institutions to

identify themselves, audibly and

distinctly, to the party to be billed,

among other things.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–13456 Filed 5–29–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB

for Review and Approval

May 21, 2001.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commissions, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before June 29, 2001. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les

Smith, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–A804, 445 12th

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 or

via the Internet to lesmith@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Les

Smith at (202) 418–0217 or via the

Internet at lesmith@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control Number: 3060–0110

Title: Application for Renewal of

License for AM, FM, TV Translator or

LPTV.

Form Number: FCC 303–S.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; and Not-for-profit

institutions.

Number of Respondents: 3,217.

Estimated Time per Response: 40

mins. to 11 hrs. 30 mins.

Frequency of Response: Reporting

once every eight years; Third party

disclosure.

Total Annual Burden: 5,271 hours.

Total Annual Costs: $1,567,850.

Needs and Uses: FCC Form 303–S is

used to apply for renewal of a