alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Carl Russo, Chief Executive Officer of Calix, Inc. (the Company), and Kelyn Brannon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 21stday of October, 2010.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ CARL RUSSO         
|Carl Russo             
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ KELYN BRANNON      
|Kelyn Brannon          
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Calix, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
# C_2019288EN.01000601.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/6

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte, Italy) — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Gtt SpA

(Case C-425/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Award of public works contracts in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 45(2), first subparagraph, (d) - Grounds for exclusion - Grave professional misconduct - Infringement of the competition rules)

(2019/C 288/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS)

Defendant: Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Gtt SpA

Intervener: Consorzio Stabile Gestione Integrata Servizi Aziendali GISA, La Lucente SpA, Dussmann Service Srl, So.Co.Fat. SC

Operative part of the order

Article 45(2), first subparagraph, (d) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is interpreted as excluding from the scope of ‘grave professional misconduct’ on the part of an economic operator conduct consisting of infringement of the competition rules, which has been established and penalised by the national competition authority by decision upheld by the courts, and which precludes the contracting authorities from assessing such infringement independently for the purposes of determining whether that economic operator is to be excluded from a tender procedure for the award of a public contract, as a possible outcome.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  August 20, 2010

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D. 

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Chief Executive Officer 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-374

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 08/28/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of August 21, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

August 28, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-374

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of August 21,

2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-257 (August 23, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy 

Margins - Effective August 24, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-259 (August 24, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture, 

FX Margins - Effective August 25, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-260 (August 24, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Interest Rate 

Margins - Effective August 25, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
www.theice.com

Intercontinental Exchange

353 North Clark, Suite 3100

Chicago, IL 60654

Olivia Bazor

Staff Attorney

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

May 15, 2023

VIA E-MAIL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Update to ICC’s Clearing Participant Default Management Procedures Pursuant to Section 

5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6(a)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

In conjunction with the self-certification submitted by ICE Clear Credit LLC (“ICC”) today, May 15, 2023, to 

the Secretary of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 

5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), ICC submits the attached 

confidential document. 

***********************

Under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC Section 552, Section 809(g) of the Dodd-Frank 

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), 

Federal Reserve Board Regulation 261.15 and any other applicable regulations under or implementing 

FOIA, ICE Clear Credit hereby respectfully requests that confidential treatment be maintained for the 

documents which bear Bates numbers 05.15.2023-000001-CFTC3 to 05.15.2023-000067-CFTC3 until 

further notice. ICE Clear Credit also requests that the Commission or the Board notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for such documents or any other court order, subpoena or 

summons for the same. Finally, ICE Clear Credit requests that it be notified in the event the Commission

or the Board intends to disclose such documents to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“CEA”) or other applicable law. 

ICE Clear Credit does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA or other applicable

law with respect to any subpoena or summons for such document(s).

The basis for the request is that disclosure of these document(s) would reveal confidential commercial 

and financial information of ICE Clear Credit, the disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect 

on, and cause injury to, the operations and competitive position of ICE Clear Credit. This request is not to

be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment accorded by 

law, and ICE Clear Credit will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection.

***********************
www.theice.com

 

2 

Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

olivia.bazor@ice.com or 904-855-5580.

Sincerely,

Olivia Bazor

Staff Attorney

Enclosures
#### Kevin MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-18045.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Kevin Miller, Sacramento, CA, pro se.

Sheri M. Chapman, Esquire, Chance L. Trimm, Sacramento City Attorney’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Miller’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Kevin Miller appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal constitutional and state law violations in connection with his arrest for sexual battery of a minor. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Pagtalunan v. Galaza,*291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.2002) (dismissal for failure to comply with court order and failure to prosecute); *Ghazali v. Moran,*46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.1995) (dismissal under local rules). We affirm.

We construe the judgment as a dismissal with prejudice for failure to comply with local rules and court orders under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). So construed, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Miller’s action because Miller failed to file a written opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, despite having received several extensions of time to do so and a warning that such failure could result in dismissal. *See Pagtalunan,*291 F.3d at 642-43 (discussing the five factors for determining whether to dismiss a claim for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order); *Ghazali*46 F.3d at 53 (explaining that a court must weigh the same five factors to determine whether dismissal for failure to follow a local rule was an abuse of discretion).

Miller’s contention concerning the magistrate judge’s alleged bias is unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C.
SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of 11 Good Energy, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel T. Lapp, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|August 23, 2012 | /s/ E. JAMIE SCHLOSS               
|--------------- | -----------------------------------
|                |                                    
|                | E. JAMIE SCHLOSS                   
|                | INTERIM PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3315]


State of Arkansas; Amendment #1

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated January 8, 2001, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this 
disaster as beginning on December 12, 2000 and continuing through 
January 8, 2001.

    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is February 27, 2001 and for 
economic injury the deadline is October 1, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-1325 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Don M. Lee et al., Appellants, v Gabriel McQueens, Defendant, and Pedro Molasco Reyes, Respondent.

[876 NYS2d 114]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated October 24, 2007, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Pedro Molasco Reyes for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him on the ground that neither of them sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *915on the law, with costs, and the cross motion of the defendant Pedro Molasco Reyes for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as against him is denied.

The plaintiffs allegedly were injured when a motor vehicle operated by the defendant Gabriel McQueens was struck by a taxi operated by the defendant Pedro Molasco Reyes, and thereby was propelled into the plaintiffs’ parked van. After McQueens moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, inter alia, on the ground that he was not liable for the plaintiffs’ injuries, Reyes cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, on the ground that the plaintiffs’ injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

The admissible medical evidence which was submitted by Reyes failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Tchjevskaia v Chase,*15 AD3d 389 [2005]). In any event, the affidavits prepared by the plaintiffs’ treating chiropractors were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. The chiropractor averred that, through the use of a goniometer, he found limitations in the plaintiffs’ cervical and lumbar spines, both on his contemporaneous and most recent examination of the plaintiffs, which he quantified in his affidavits *(see Williams v Clark,*54 AD3d 942 [2008]; *Kerzhner v N.Y. Ubu Taxi Corp.,*17 AD3d 410 [2005]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the cross motion. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### REESE v. BARBEE

No. 269PA98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 823

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 October 1998.
EXHIBIT 2.1.4

                            ARTICLES OF MERGER
                                   OF
                           CALBATECH, INC. INTO
                          TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGY, INC.

     Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes, as
amended, the undersigned domestic corporations adopt the following
articles of merger for the purpose of merging them into one of such
corporations:

First:  Traffic Technology, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the
"parent entity"), an entity of the jurisdiction of Nevada, owns all of
the outstanding shares of each class of CalbaTech, Inc. (hereinafter
referred to as the "subsidiary entity"), an entity of the jurisdiction
of Nevada.

Second:  A plan of merger was adopted by the parent entity and the
subsidiary entity whereby the subsidiary entity is to be merged into
the parent entity.

Third:  The name of the surviving corporation is CalbaTech, Inc., and
it is to be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada.
Fourth: The Agreement and Plan of Merger, attached to these Articles,
was approved by a total of 10,000,000 shares out of a total of
10,000,000 shares entitled to vote by (no shares voted against the
merger) of the Subsidiary in the manner prescribed by the laws of
Nevada, and such vote was sufficient for approval.  The Agreement and
Plan of Merger was also approved the Board of Directors, as well as
86,932,630 shares out of a total of 97,527,750 entitled to vote by (no
shares voted against the merger) of the Parent and therefore has been
adopted by more than 50% of the outstanding shareholders in Traffic
Technology, Inc. as in the manner prescribed by the Nevada Revised
Statutes, and such vote was sufficient for approval


Dated: March 20, 2003

Parent Entity: Traffic Technology, Inc.     Subsidiary Entity: CalbaTech, Inc.


By:                                         By:
Edward H. Deese, President                  Edward H. Deese, President


Parent Entity: Traffic Technology, Inc.     Subsidiary Entity: CalbaTech, Inc.
By:                                         By:
James DeOlden, Secretary                    James DeOlden, Secretary
#### BRINKLEY v. PELL PAPER BOX CO.

No. 421P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 610

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2134 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2134

 To reauthorize the Helen Keller National Center for Youths and Adults 
                          Who Are Deaf-Blind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2019

   Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Suozzi, and Mr. Cole) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Helen Keller National Center for Youths and Adults 
                          Who Are Deaf-Blind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helen Keller National Center 
Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER REAUTHORIZED.

    (a) General Authorization of Appropriations.--The first sentence of 
section 205(a) of the Helen Keller National Center Act (29 U.S.C. 
1904(a)) is amended by striking ``1999 through 2003'' and inserting 
``2019 through 2023''.
    (b) Helen Keller National Center Federal Endowment Fund.--The first 
sentence of section 208(h) of the Helen Keller National Center Act (29 
U.S.C. 1907(h)) is amended by striking ``1999 through 2003'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2023''.
                                 <all>
```