alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017402EN.01005301.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/53

---

Action brought on 2 October 2017 — Khadi and Village Industries Commission v EUIPO — BNP Best Natural Products (Khadi Ayurveda)

(Case T-683/17)

(2017/C 402/70)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Khadi and Village Industries Commission (Mumbai Maharashtra, India) (represented by: J. Guise, N. Rose, V. Ellis, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BNP Best Natural Products GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Khadi Ayurveda’ — EU trade mark No 13 118 724

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2017 in Case R 2086/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and find that the contested EUTM is invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and find that the contested EUTM is invalid;

| — | make an award of costs in the favour of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an award of costs in the favour of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | The Board of Appeal distorted the evidence; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal distorted the evidence;

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(g) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(g) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Greg Chapman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Osler Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Osler Incorporated.



Dated:

May 15, 2008



By:           /s/ Greg Chapman

Greg Chapman

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Djalma Bastos de Morais, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-Fof CEMIG;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofcompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
|                           |   | /s/ Djalma Bastos de Morais     |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                      |   | Name: Djalma  Bastos de Morais  |
|                      |   | Title: Chief  Executive Officer |
| Date: June 30,  2006 |   |                            |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunity in Science and Engineering; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended, the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Committee on Equal Opportunity in Science and Engineering 
(1173).
    Date/Time: June 14, 2001, 8 a.m.-5:45 p.m. and June 15, 2001, 8 
a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Michelle McMurry, Executive Secretary, CEOSE, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, 
Phone (703) 292-8094.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the Executive Secretary at the 
above address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.

Agenda

Thursday, June 14, 2001, 8 AM-5:45 PM

 8:00 AM  Breakfast with NSF Staff
 8:30 AM
    Welcome
    Approval of February 2001 Minutes
 8:45 AM  Report of Executive Council Liaison
 9:00 AM  Historical Summary of Main CEOSE Issues and Overview of 
Issues to Be Discussed At This Meeting
10:00 AM  Discussions with Dr. Bob Suzuki
12:00 PM  Lunch
 1:00 PM  Research Presentation by Dr. Thomas Windham
 1:45  Directorate Dialogue: Education and Human Resources
 3:45 PM  Break
 4:00 PM  Research Presentation by Dr. Willie Pearson
 4:45 PM  Committee Discussion I: Reflections of Departing Members
 5:45 PM  Adjourn for the day

Friday, June 15, 2001, 8 AM-3 PM

 8:00 AM  Breakfast
 8:30 AM  Committee Discussion II: Report Planning for 2002
10:30 AM  Break
10:45 AM  Directorate Dialogue: Geological Sciences
11:45 AM
    Lunch
    Committee Discussion III: Advisory Committee Reports
 1:00 PM  Budget Overview, Report Response, and Criterion 2
 2:00 PM  Committee Discussion IV: Wrap-up and Future Directions
 3:00 PM  Adjourn

    Dated: May 15, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12595 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Union Street Tower, LLC, Respondent, v Eric Richmond et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 9, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 84 AD3d 784.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                    |   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date: October 29, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Antal Markus   |   |
|                   |   | Antal Markus            |   |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                   |   |                    |   |

----
# C_2020215EN.01000701.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidshof te Gent — Belgium) — ISS Facility Services NV v Sonia Govaerts, Atalian NV, formerly Euroclean NV

(Case C-344/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2001/23/EC - Article 3(1) - Transfers of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - Public contract for cleaning services - Award of market lots to two new contractors - Re-engagement of a worker assigned to all the market lots)

(2020/C 215/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ISS Facility Services NV

Defendants: Sonia Govaerts, Atalian NV, formerly Euroclean NV

Operative part of the judgment

Where there is a transfer of undertaking involving a number of transferees, Article 3(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses must be interpreted as meaning that the rights and obligations arising from a contract of employment are transferred to each of the transferees, in proportion to the tasks performed by the worker concerned, provided that the division of the contract of employment as a result of the transfer is possible and neither causes a worsening of working conditions nor adversely affects the safeguarding of the rights of workers guaranteed by that directive, which it is for the referring court to determine. If such a division were to be impossible to carry out or would adversely affect the rights of that worker, the transferee(s) would be regarded as being responsible for any consequent termination of the employment relationship, under Article 4 of that directive, even if that termination were to be initiated by the worker.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28539-28540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine; Acadia National Park 
Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 
10), that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a 
meeting on Monday, June 4, 2001.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 
103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of 
the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management 
and development of the park, including but not limited to the 
acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation 
easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.

[[Page 28540]]

    The meeting will convene at U.S. Naval Station, Schoodic Peninsula, 
Winter Harbor, Maine, at 1:00PM to consider the following agenda:

1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held February 5, 
2001.
2. Committee reports
    Land Conservation
    Park Use
    Science
3. Old business
4. Chairman's report
5. Superintendent's report
6. Public comments
7. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting on Monday, September 10, 
2001.

    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written 
statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least 
seven days prior to the meeting.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, 
Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

    Dated: May 9, 2001.
Len Bobinchock,
Acting Superintendent, Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 01-13067 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nelson Rodriguez, Appellant, v James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted March 15, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of an individual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jud Walton

, * From the 238th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CV

- 47,184

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00237

- CV * August 30, 2013

City of Midland

, * Opinion by McCall, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Judge Herod,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Jud Walton.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6203

TROY L. RICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1953-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy L. Rice, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., AttorneyGeneral, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rice v. Warden , No. CA-98-1953-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS, petitioner, v. Jim NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 05-944.

May 30, 2006.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2127 

To prohibit the use of United States Government funds for art in United 

States embassies and consulates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Mr. BURCHETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of United States Government funds 

for art in United States embassies and consulates, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer-Funded 

5 Art in Embassies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds are authorized to be ap8 propriated, and the Secretary of State may not obligate 

9 or expend any funds, for the purchase, installation, insur10 ance, or transport of any art for the purposes of installaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:43 Apr 17, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2127.IH H2127

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2127 IH

1 tion or display in any embassy, consulate, or other foreign 

2 mission of the United States. 

3 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘art’’ in4 cludes paintings, sculptures, photographs, industrial de5 sign, and craft art. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28739-28740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2738-049]


New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Notice of Site Visit

May 18, 2001.
    On May 31, 2001, the Office of Energy Projects staff will 
participate in a site visit to the area proposed for a change

[[Page 28740]]

in land rights at the Kents Falls development of the Saranac River 
hydroelectric Project operated by New York State Electric & Gas 
Corporation, in Clinton County, New York. The inspection will begin at 
9 a.m. at the Kents Falls hydroelectric plant located on Kents Falls 
Road in the Town of Schuyler Falls, New York.
    All interested parties may attend the inspection. Those planning to 
attend must provide their own transportation. For further information, 
please contact the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 
208-0004.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13097 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13248]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Deleware Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 4:30 p.m. on June 19, 2001, at the Buck Library in 
the Buena Vista Conference Center, 661 duPont Highway, New Castle, 
Delaware 19720. The purpose of the meeting is to hold a press 
conference to release the Committee's report, Delaware Citizens Guide 
to Civil Rights and Supporting Services, and to hear comments on the 
report from invited speakers representing minority community and civic 
organizations in Delaware.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Chairperson Dr. James E. Newton, 302-
831-8683, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 21, 2001.
Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-13248 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 18, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. West End Financial Corp., Bessemer, Michigan; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Gogebic Range Bank, Bessemer, Michigan, a de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 21, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13179 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S