UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 10-Q  X.QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009  .TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT  For the transition period from ___________ to _____________  GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC. (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)  Delaware333- 14498226-0252191(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(Commission file number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)  30 Broad Street
15th Floor
New York, New York 10004
(Address of principal executive offices)  (212) 363-7500(Issuer's telephone number)  Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X. No .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):  Large Accelerated Filer . Accelerated Filer . Non-Accelerated Filer . Smaller Reporting Company X.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes .No X.  State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock, as of November 3, 2009.     GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  FORM 10-Q  September 30, 2009  INDEX  PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.Consolidated Financial Statements3Item 2.Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition13Item 3Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk16Item 4.Control and Procedures16PART II-OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1Legal Proceedings16Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds16Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities17Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders17Item 5.Other Information17Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K17SIGNATURES18   2   ITEM 1. Financial Information    GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  September 30, 2009 and 2008  PageITEM 1  Consolidated Financial InformationConsolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 20084Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)5Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)6Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)7Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)8   3   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  Consolidated Balance Sheets  September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)December 31,
2008ASSETSCurrent AssetsCash$18,561$22,174Purchased accounts receivable162, 747183,693Total Current Assets181,308205,867TOTAL ASSETS$181,308$205,867LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent LiabilitiesAccrued expenses$26,228$40,221Due to officers/shareholders211,320211,320Total Current Liabilities237,548251,541Stockholders' DeficitPreferred stock: $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding--Common stock: $0.0001 par value; 99,000,000 shares authorized; 2,500,000 shares issued and outstanding2,5002,500Additional paid-in capital40,40040,400Accumulated deficit(99,140)(88,574)Total Stockholders Deficit(56,240)(45,674)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT$181,308$205,867See accompanying notes to the financial statements.   4   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)  For the Three Months
Ended September 30,
2009For the Three Months
Ended September 30,
2008Revenue:Collection revenue$2,660$1,650Total revenue2,6601,650Operating Expenses:Collection fees$1,795$1,422Professional fees1,5001,625General and administrative8,5144,448Total operating expenses11,8097,495Loss before income taxes(9,149)(5,845)Provision for income taxes--Net loss$(9,149)$(5,845)Net loss per common share - basic and diluted$(0.00)$(0.00)Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  basic and diluted2,500,0002,500,000See accompanying notes to the financial statements.   5   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)  For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
2009For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
2008Revenue:Collection revenue$37,796$4,023Total revenue37,7964,023Operating Expenses:Collection fees$25,507$3,795Professional fees8,27611,625General and administrative14,5795,313Total operating expenses48,36220,733Loss before income taxes(10,566)(16,710)Provision for income taxes--Net loss$(10,566)$(16,710)Net loss per common share - basic and diluted$(0.00)$(0.00)Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  basic and diluted2,500,0002,500,000See accompanying notes to the financial statements.  6   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)  For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2009For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2008CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss$(10,566)$(16,710)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Purchased accounts receivable20,94610,420Accrued expenses(13,993)(1,279)Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(3,613)(7,569)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESDue to officer/stockholder-4,000Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities-4,000NET CHANGE IN CASH(3,613)(3,569)CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD22,17412,822CASH AT END OF PERIOD$18,561$9,253SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATIONCash Paid For:Taxes paid$2,075$400NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCINGAccounts receivable purchased for debt$-$194,820See accompanying notes to the financial statements.   7   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.  September 30, 2009 and 2008 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)  NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION  Green Mountain Recovery, Inc. (GMR or the Company) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 17, 2007. The Company provides accounts receivable management and collection for purchased portfolios of receivables that have been charged off by their original holders. The Company focuses on charged-off credit card receivables. The portfolios are purchased at a discount to their face value, and then the Company uses third party collection agencies to maximize the recovery on these receivables.  On June 26, 2008, the company formed GMR Credit LLC (LLC) under the laws of the State of New York. The LLC, of which the Company is the sole member, was formed to provide the same services as GMR.  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  Basis of Presentation  The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 and notes thereto contained in the information filed as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2009.  Use of estimates  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Cash Equivalents  The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments  The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:  Level 1Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.Level 2Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.Level 3Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.  The carrying amounts of the Companys financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.  8   The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2009 or 2008, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.  Revenue Recognition  Purchased Accounts Receivable:  The Company follows paragraph 310-30-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about accounting for loans or certain securities acquired in a transfer. The section addresses accounting for differences between contractual versus expected cash flows over an investors initial investment in certain loans when such differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality.  The Company uses all available information to forecast the cash flows of its purchased accounts receivable including, but not limited to, credit scores of the underlying debtors, sellers credit policies, and location of the debtor.  The Company acquired the accounts receivable in portfolios that were recorded at cost, which includes external costs of acquiring portfolios. Once a portfolio is acquired, the accounts in the portfolio are not changed, unless replaced, returned or sold. All acquired accounts receivable have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and the Companys acquisition of the accounts receivable, and the amount paid for a portfolio of accounts receivable reflects the Companys determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to each loans contractual terms. The Company considers expected collections, and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (expected at acquisition). The Company determines the nonaccretable difference, or the excess of the portfolios contractual principal over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted. The remaining amount represents accretable yield, or the excess of the portfolios cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, and is accreted into earnings over the remaining life of the portfolio.  At acquisition, the Company derives an internal rate of return (IRR) based on the expected monthly collections over the estimated economic life of the portfolio of accounts receivable compared to the original purchase price. Collections on the portfolios are allocated to revenue and principal reduction based on the estimated IRR for each accounts receivable. Revenue on purchased accounts receivable is recorded monthly based on applying the effective IRR for the quarter to its carrying value. Over the life of a portfolio, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its portfolio determined using the effective interest rates has decreased, and if so, records an expense to establish a valuation allowance to maintain the original IRR established at acquisition. Any increase in actual or estimated cash flows expected to be collected is first used to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that portfolio, or aggregation of portfolios, and any remaining increases in cash flows are recognized prospectively through an increase in the IRR. The updated IRR then becomes the new benchmark for subsequent valuation allowance testing.  Income Taxes  The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.  The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 740-10-25). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.  9   Net loss per common share  Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of September 30, 2009 or 2008.  Recently issued accounting standards        Recently issued accounting pronouncements       In June 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 404), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 19, 2009. Commencing with its annual report for the year ending December 31, 2010, the Company will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement  · of managements responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting; · of managements assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and · of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Furthermore, it is required to file the auditors attestation report separately on the Companys internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.  In June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820  Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures  Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 Earnings Per Share  Amendments to Section 260-10-S99,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  10   In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer commentAccounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820  Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entitys measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.   Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.   NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At September 30, 2009, the Company has minimal revenues, has negative working capital and has an accumulated deficit of $99,140.  While the Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenues, the Companys cash position may not be significant enough to support the Companys daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations or obtain adequate financing. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.  NOTE 4  INVESTMENT IN RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS  The Company follows paragraph 310-30-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about accounting for loans or certain securities acquired in a transfer. The section addresses accounting for differences between contractual versus expected cash flows over an investors initial investment in certain loans when such differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality.  The Company uses all available information to forecast the cash flows of its purchased accounts receivable including, but not limited to, credit scores of the underlying debtors, sellers credit policies, and location of the debtor.  11   The Company acquires accounts receivable portfolios that are recorded at cost, which includes external costs of acquiring portfolios. Once a portfolio is acquired, the accounts in the portfolio are not changed, unless replaced, returned or sold. All acquired accounts receivable have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and the Companys acquisition of the accounts receivable, and the amount paid for a portfolio of accounts receivable reflects the Companys determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to each loans contractual terms. The Company considers expected collections, and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (expected at acquisition). The Company determines the nonaccretable difference, or the excess of the portfolios contractual principal over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted. The remaining amount represents accretable yield, or the excess of the portfolios cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, and is accreted into earnings over the remaining life of the portfolio.  In compliance with paragraph 310-30-15-2, the Company accounts for its investments in consumer receivable portfolios using either the interest method or the cost recovery method. The interest method applies an effective interest rate, or IRR based on the expected monthly collections over the estimated economic life of the portfolio of accounts receivable compared to the original purchase price. Collections on the portfolios are allocated to revenue and principal reduction based on the estimated IRR for each accounts receivable. Revenue on purchased accounts receivable is recorded monthly based on applying the effective IRR for the quarter to its carrying value. Over the life of a portfolio, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its portfolio determined using the effective interest rates has decreased, and if so, records an expense to establish a valuation allowance to maintain the original IRR established at acquisition. Any increase in actual or estimated cash flows expected to be collected is first used to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that portfolio, or aggregation of portfolios, and any remaining increases in cash flows are recognized prospectively through an increase in the IRR. The updated IRR then becomes the new benchmark for subsequent valuation allowance testing.  If the amount and timing of future cash collections on a pool of receivables are not reasonably estimable, the Company accounts for such portfolios on the cost recovery method as Cost Recovery Portfolios. The accounts in these portfolios have different risk characteristics than those included in other portfolios. Under the cost recovery method of accounting, no income is recognized until the purchase price of a Cost Recovery Portfolio has been fully recovered. As of September 30, 2009, one portfolio accounted for using the cost recovery method, consisting of $6,799 in net book value of investment in receivable portfolios. The Company no longer anticipates a sale of these receivable portfolios and has placed them with external collection agencies. Since the Company is no longer actively collecting on these accounts internally, it has classified them as Cost Recovery Portfolios. The $6,799 in net book value, reflects the value the Company expects to realize through the collection activities of the external agencies.  All collections realized after the net book value of a portfolio has been fully recovered (Zero Basis Portfolios) are recorded as revenue (Zero Basis Revenue). During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, there was no revenue recognized on portfolios for which the related cost basis has been fully recovered.  NOTE 5  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS  The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through November 3, 2009, the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.  12   ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995  Information set forth herein contains "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may, should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. No assurance can be given that the future results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. The Company cautions readers that important factors may affect the Companys actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These factors include the Companys lack of historically profitable operations, dependence on key personnel, the success of the Companys business, ability to manage anticipated growth and other factors identified in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases and/or other public communications.  Plan of Operation  Our primary source of revenue is derived from cash collections on our purchased charged-off receivables portfolios. Since the credit originator, and in most cases other collection companies, have unsuccessfully attempted to collect these receivables, we are able to purchase them at a substantial discount to face value.  During 2008, the two officers/shareholders of the Company loaned $4,000 to the Company for working capital. The officers/shareholders also purchased portfolios of charged-off consumer debt originating from either New York or New Jersey totaling $4,967,026 and sold them to the Company for loans at their cost basis of $194,820. All loans to the officers/shareholders are payable on demand and bear no interest.  Beginning in the second quarter of 2008, the Company has purchased charged-off consumer debt originating from either New York or New Jersey and plans on collecting such debt using a legal collection model. In particular, in 2008, the Company purchased $4,967,025.37 of charged-off receivables at a cost of $194,819.50. The purchased debt consisted of 971 accounts of charged-off credit card debt and automobile deficiencies originating in the states of New York and New Jersey.  Under its legal collection model, the Company intends to outsource the collections of its debt portfolio to attorneys in New York and New Jersey that have experience in collecting debt. The Company will typically compensate the collection attorneys with a percentage of the amount of collections they achieve. As of September 30, 2009, the Company received $ 60,261 in revenues from its legal collection strategy.  The Company continues to intend to acquire portfolios of charged-off receivables to purchase that meet its criteria. Prices for charged-off accounts receivable portfolios have decreased over the past 12 months. Although we cannot give any assurances that prices will not drop further, we are determined to remain disciplined and purchase portfolios only when we believe we can achieve acceptable returns.  From time to time, we may sell previously acquired charged-off consumer receivables to third parties, retaining no claims to any of the subsequent collections. When we sell receivables prior to attempting any collection efforts, we record a gain or loss on sale by comparing the price paid for the receivables to the price received from the purchaser. If we sell receivables out of a portfolio that has received collections, we determine the basis of the sold receivables by using the pro rata share of the face amount sold to the current carrying value of the portfolio and then record the gain or the loss on sale by comparing the basis of the sold receivable to the price received from the purchaser.  We do not have sufficient resources to effectuate our business. As of September 30, 2009 we had approximately $18,561 in cash. We expect to require approximately $100,000 to fund operations over the next twelve months including general overhead expenses such as for salaries, corporate legal and accounting fees, office overhead and general working capital. Accordingly, we will have to raise the funds to pay for these expenses. We may have to borrow money from shareholders or issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party. Our officers will fund any expenses which arise until such time as the Company raises sufficient funds. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us. We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources. Since we have no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, our inability to raise funds for operations will have a severe negative impact on our ability to remain a viable company.  13   Critical Accounting Principles  Purchased Accounts Receivable:  The Company follows paragraph 310-30-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about accounting for loans or certain securities acquired in a transfer. The section addresses accounting for differences between contractual versus expected cash flows over an investors initial investment in certain loans when such differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality.  The Company uses all available information to forecast the cash flows of its purchased accounts receivable including, but not limited to, credit scores of the underlying debtors, sellers credit policies, and location of the debtor.  The Company acquired the accounts receivable in a portfolio that was recorded at cost, which includes external costs of acquiring portfolios. Once a portfolio is acquired, the accounts in the portfolio are not changed, unless replaced, returned or sold. All acquired accounts receivable have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and the Companys acquisition of the accounts receivable, and the amount paid for a portfolio of accounts receivable reflects the Companys determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to each loans contractual terms. The Company considers expected collections, and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (expected at acquisition). The Company determines the nonaccretable difference, or the excess of the portfolios contractual principal over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted. The remaining amount represents accretable yield, or the excess of the portfolios cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, and is accreted into earnings over the remaining life of the portfolio.  At acquisition, the Company derives an internal rate of return (IRR) based on the expected monthly collections over the estimated economic life of the portfolio of accounts receivable compared to the original purchase price. Collections on the portfolios are allocated to revenue and principal reduction based on the estimated IRR for each accounts receivable. Revenue on purchased accounts receivable is recorded monthly based on applying the effective IRR for the quarter to its carrying value. Over the life of a portfolio, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its portfolio determined using the effective interest rates has decreased, and if so, records an expense to establish a valuation allowance to maintain the original IRR established at acquisition. Any increase in actual or estimated cash flows expected to be collected is first used to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that portfolio, or aggregation of portfolios, and any remaining increases in cash flows are recognized prospectively through an increase in the IRR. The updated IRR then becomes the new benchmark for subsequent valuation allowance testing.  Income Taxes  The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, income taxes are provided for amounts currently payable and for amounts deferred as tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates that are assumed will be in effect when the differences reverse.  Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements  In June 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 404), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Commencing with its annual report for the year ending December 31, 2010, the Company will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement  · of managements responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting; · of managements assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and · of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Furthermore, it is required to file the auditors attestation report separately on the Companys internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.  14   In June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820  Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures  Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 Earnings Per Share  Amendments to Section 260-10-S99,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer commentAccounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820  Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entitys measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  15   Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements  We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.  Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  The Company is subject to certain market risks, including changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company does not undertake any specific actions to limit those exposures.  Item 4. Controls and Procedures  Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) (the Companys principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys CEO and CAO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys CEO and CAO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Managements Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting  Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of consolidated financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  The Companys management, including the Companys CEO and CAO, does not expect that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures or the Companys internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of the controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2009.  This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this quarterly report.  PART II - OTHER INFORMATION  Item 1. Legal Proceedings.  Currently we are not aware of any litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company.  Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds  None.  16   Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.  None  Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.  None.  Item 5. Other Information.  None  Item 6. Exhibits and Reports of Form 8-K.  (a) Exhibits  31.1 Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002  32.1 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002  (b) Reports of Form 8-K  None.  17   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.   GREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY, INC.(Registrant)November 10, 2009/s/ Joseph LeviJoseph LeviTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 10, 2009/s/ Eduard KorsinskyEduard KorsinskyTitle: Secretary and Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer    18