alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-544

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 12/18/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of December 11, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
20 S Wacker Dr Chicago, IL 60606 T 312 466 7478 tim.elliott@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

December 18, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-544

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of December 11,

2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-367 (December 11, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Interest 

Rate & Agriculture Margins - Effective December 12, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-369 (December 14, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: 

Agriculture, Energy, Equity, FX and Metal Margins - Effective December 15, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-370 (December 14, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Energy -

Effective December 15, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (312) 466-7478.

Sincerely,

/s/ Timothy Elliott

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
# UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

# FORM 8-K

---

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (date of
earliest event reported): January 25, 2006

---

CNS, Inc.(Exact name of
Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware(State Or Other
Jurisdiction Of Incorporation)

|0-16612                  | 41-1580270                          
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

|7615 Smetana LaneEden Prairie, MN        | 55344     
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|(Address Of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)

(952) 229-1500Registrants
Telephone Number, Including Area Code

---

Check the appropriate box below if
the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the
registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2.
below):

|o |  | Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

Items under Sections 1 and 3 through
7 are not applicable and therefore omitted.

# Item 2.02      Results Of
Operations And Financial Condition.

The Company hereby furnishes a press
release issued on January 25, 2006 disclosing material non-public information regarding
its results of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2005. A copy of the press
release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

# Item 8.01      Other Events

On January 24, 2006, the Company
issued a press release, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2, announcing a six-cent per share
quarterly dividend payable March 3, 2006 to shareholders of record as of February 17,
2006.

# Item 9.01      Financial
Statements And Exhibits

|Exhibit No. |  | Description
|----------- |  | -----------

|99.1 |  | Press
Release issued on January 25, 2006.
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------

|99.2 |  | Press
Release issued on January 24, 2006.
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------

# SIGNATURE

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| | CNS, INC.
| | ---------
|
| | By:      
| |          

Date:  January 25, 2006

---
##### 



Exhibit 99.6 (MCDANIEL LOGO) Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating a
portion of EnCana Corporations petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December
31, 2004, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated
by reference in: (i) EnCana Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2004; (ii) EnCana Corporations and EnCana Holdings Finance
Corp.s registration statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-113732); (iii) EnCana
Corporations registration statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-118737); and (iv)
EnCana Corporations registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-13956 and
333-85598), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Sincerely, McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. signed by W. C. Seth
_____________________
W. C. Seth, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director Calgary, Alberta
Dated: February 25, 2005 Suite 2200, Bow Valley
Square 3, 255-5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G6
Tel: (403) 262-5506  Fax: (403) 233-2744  Email: mcdaniel@mcdan.com  Website: www.mcdan.com
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 24-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017347EN.01004801.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/48

---

Action brought on 28 August 2017 — Unigroup v EUIPO — Pronova Laboratories (nailicin)

(Case T-587/17)

(2017/C 347/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unigroup ApS (Lyngby, Denmark) (represented by: M. Rijsdijk, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pronova Laboratories BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘nailicin’ — Application for registration No 14 096 499

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2017 in Case R 2359/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare Benelux registration no. 894 557 unsubstantiated and remit the matter to the Opposition Division or Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare Benelux registration no. 894 557 unsubstantiated and remit the matter to the Opposition Division or Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | violation of Rule 19 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark. |
| --- | --- |

—

violation of Rule 19 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

---
#### The Sarah E. Kennedy. McCarthy and others *v.*The Sarah E. Kennedy.

*District Court, D. New Jersey.*

November 11, 1885.

Admiralty Practice—Consolidation of Suits—Libels for Wages and Reduction of Provisions—Rev. St. §§ 978, 4508.

The several libels filed by the crew of a vessel for wages due, and for compensation and allowance for the reduction of provisions during a voyage, may be consolidated.

Libels *in Rem.*Motion to consolidate, etc.

*Bedle, Muirheid & McGee,*for libelants.

*Owen & Gray,*for respondent.

Nixon, J.

Fourteen several libels have been filed by the crew of the brig Sarah E. Kennedy for wages due, and for compensation and allowance for the reduction of provisions during the voyage. A motion is now made by the claimant for a consolidation of the suits. It is resisted by the proctors for libelants on the ground that the additional claim of the several libelants for compensation, on account of the bad quality of the provisions furnished for the voyage, takes the cases out of the category of actions that should have been joint, or should be consolidated. The motion must prevail. See *The Prinz Georg,*19 Fed. Rep. 653. Indeed, it would be a great hardship for the libel-ants to refuse it, inasmuch as the court is forbidden to allow them more than the costs of one libel, although they may recover in all the suits. It is provided in section 978 of the Revised Statutes that when proceedings are had before a court of the United States in several libels against any vessel and cargo which might legally be joined in one libel, there shall not be allowed thereon more costs than in one libel, unless special cause for libeling the vessel and cargo separately is satisfactorily shown on motion in open court. No such cause is shown in these cases. The claim for allowance on account of insufficient supply of proper food is in addition to their wages, and is specifically provided for in section 4568,.Rev. St. The principles on which compensation is to be awarded to the seamen are so clearly stated in the statute, that quite as little difficulty will arise in determining the amount in one libel, as occurs in ascertaining the several sums due for wages earned.

Let an order be entered consolidating the several suits.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**NICHOLE MARIE RICE SMITH**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 104 DB 2016 (No. 59 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 200855** 

**(Centre County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25 th**  **day of August, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated August 11, 2016, is app roved and it is ORDERED**  **that Nichole Marie Rice Smith, who has been on Inactiv e Status, has never been**  **suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he ha s the moral qualifications,**  **competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
#### HUGHES v. WELCH

No. 282P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 843

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
# C_2018022EN.01005001.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/50

---

Action brought on 15 November 2017 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Beats Electronics (i.Beat)

(Case T-748/17)

(2018/C 022/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong-Kong, China) (represented by: O. Spieker, M. Alber, A. Schönfleisch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beats Electronics LLC (Culver City, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘i.Beat’– EU trade mark No 5 009 139

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2017 in Joined Cases R 2175/2016-4 and R 2213/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as it dismisses the appeal of the Applicant against the decision of the Defendant’s Cancellation Division dated September 29th, 2016 and thus upholds the Cancellation Applicant’s application for revocation and revokes the Applicant’s rights in respect of European Union trade mark No 005009139 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it dismisses the appeal of the Applicant against the decision of the Defendant’s Cancellation Division dated September 29th, 2016 and thus upholds the Cancellation Applicant’s application for revocation and revokes the Applicant’s rights in respect of European Union trade mark No 005009139

th

| — | dismiss of Cancellation Applicant’s application for revocation; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss of Cancellation Applicant’s application for revocation;

| — | order the Cancellation Applicant and EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings including the costs necessarily incurred by the Applicant before the Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Cancellation Applicant and EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings including the costs necessarily incurred by the Applicant before the Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a), of Regulation No 2017/1001; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a), of Regulation No 2017/1001;

| — | Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the            Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.       

 

 

|   |   |                             |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Scott D. Sheffield           |   |
|   | Name:  | Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer          |   |
|   | Date:  | August 11, 2009                  |   |
# C_2017382EN.01005501.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/55

---

Action brought on 20 September 2017 — Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v Commission and SRB

(Case T-637/17)

(2017/C 382/68)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros, SA (Oviedo, Spain) and Medicina Asturiana, SA (Oviedo) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU;

| — | Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

MTS Systems Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-75880, 333-28661, 333-39388, 333-82582 and 333-136113) of MTS Systems
Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated December 8, 2006, with respect to: (a) the consolidated balance sheets
of MTS Systems Corporation as of September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders investment and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule; and (b) managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006; which reports appear in the September 30, 2006
annual report on Form 10-K of MTS Systems Corporation.



/S/   KPMG LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 8, 2006

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Savage, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the evidence of forcible compulsion was legally insufficient, or, alternatively, that it was against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). We disagree. The jury could reasonably have concluded that the victim submitted to sodomy and sexual abuse on the occasion at issue because defendant threatened her with physical injury *(see,*Penal Law § 130.00 [8]). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find that none has merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — sodomy, first degree; sexual abuse, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Den-man, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.