alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018005EN.01004601.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/46

---

Action brought on 5 October 2017 — Vendrell Marti v SRB

(Case T-687/17)

(2018/C 005/62)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pedro Vendrell Marti (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Martínez Martínez and C. López-Mélida de Ramón, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EES/2017/08) and the independent expert’s valuation on which it is based in accordance with Article 20(15) of Regulation No 806/2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB/EES/2017/08) and the independent expert’s valuation on which it is based in accordance with Article 20(15) of Regulation No 806/2014;

| — | Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable;

| — | Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6047

WILLIAM ROOSEVELT CLOUD,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; KURT W. MEYERS; MICHAEL SAVAGE; 

KENNETH RANDALL; FRANK D. WHITNEY,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00775-RJC)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Roosevelt Cloud, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Roosevelt Cloud appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens 

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cloud v. United States, No. 

3:12-cv-00775-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO)

CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daming Hu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

|   | /s/ Daming Hu           |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                         |
|   | Daming Hu               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
#### DAETWYLER v. DAETWYLER

No. 372A98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 246

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 30 December 1998. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 December 1998.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report of Heckmann Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 6, 2010



|       |  |                                                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Richard J. Heckmann                               |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brian R. Anderson                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Richard J. Heckmann                                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Brian R. Anderson                                                                     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Secretary of the Company and will be retained by the Office of General Counsel of the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Cayuga Indian Nation of New York, Respondent, v David S. Gould, as Cayuga County Sheriff, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted February 16, 2010;

decided February 18, 2010

Motion by Day Wholesale, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JERRY LEE BALLARD

No. 488A97

(Filed 6 November 1998)

Criminal Law § 1095 (NCI4th Rev.)— second-degree murder— automobile accident — aggravating factor — position of trust or confidence — insufficient evidence

The evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding of the aggravating factor that defendant took advantage of a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense of second-degree murder arising from the death of a twelve-year-old child in an automobile accident while defendant was intoxicated and being pursued by a deputy sheriff.

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 127 N.C. App. 316, 489 S.E.2d 454 (1997), finding no prejudicial error in a judgment entered by Johnson (Marcus), J., on 5 June 1996 in Superior Court, Buncombe County. On 10 March 1998, the Supreme Court allowed discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 30 September 1998.

*Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Reuben F. Young, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Belser & Parke, P.A., by David G. Belser, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Martin (John C.), J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. We conclude that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples Ohio Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald
B. Scott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Rich J. Dutton, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
     the Company.


                                        /s/ Ronald B. Scott
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald B. Scott
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        September 23, 2005


                                        /s/ Rich J. Dutton
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rich J. Dutton
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                        September 23, 2005
#### GATHINGS v. CROOM

No. 297P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 843

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
# C_2019319EN.01001402.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — Red Bull GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Marques, Optimum Mark sp. z o.o.

(Case C-124/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) - Absolute ground for refusal - Invalidity proceedings - Combination of two colours per se - No systematic arrangement associating the colours in a predetermined and uniform way)

(2019/C 319/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Red Bull GmbH (represented by: A. Renck, Rechtsanwalt, and S. Petivlasova, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and D. Botis, acting as Agents), Marques (represented by: R. Mallinson, Solicitor, and T. Müller, Rechtsanwalt), Optimum Mark sp. z o.o. (represented by: R. Skubisz, J. Dudzik and M. Mazurek, adwokaci, and E. Jaroszyńska-Kozłowska, advocate)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Red Bull GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Red Bull GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.

---
#### In the Matter of Raymond C. Miller Sr., Appellant, v Patricia A. Miller, Respondent.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 90 AD3d 1185.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
crypto.com | Derivatives North America

crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

Jaime M. Walsh

+1 (312) 884-0927

Jaime.walsh@nadex.com

20230106(1)

January 6, 2023

Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments: Nadex Amends Strike Widths - Submission Pursuant to 

Commission Reg. §40.6(d)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”), and Section 40.6(d) of 

the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) under the Act 

(the “Regulations”), North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. (“Nadex”, the “Exchange”) hereby provides notice 

that it amended the strike widths of various contracts during the week of January 2, 2023 due to increased or 

decreased volatility, as the case may be, in the underlying markets upon which the Nadex contracts are based. 

Amended strike widths are reflected in Exhibit A.

Nadex hereby certifies that the additions and amendments contained herein comply with the Act, as 

amended, and the Commission Regulations adopted thereunder. No substantive opposing views were expressed to 

Nadex with respect to these additions. Nadex hereby certifies that notice of these events was posted on its website 

at the time of this filing.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 

(312) 884-0927 or by email at jaime.walsh@nadex.com.

 Sincerely, 

Jaime M. Walsh

Head of Legal
crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

20230106(1)

EXHIBIT A

Week of January 2, 2023

Contract Trade Date of Change Strike Width Adjusted 

From

Strike Width Adjusted To

20-Minute Wall Street 30 (Wide) 

Binary

January 3, 2023 8 16

20-Minute Wall Street 30 (Narrow) 

Binary

January 3, 2023 6 12

2-Hour Wall Street 30 Binary January 3, 2023 24 48

20-Minute US 500 (Wide) Binary January 3, 2023 1.5 3

20-Minute US 500 (Narrow) Binary January 3, 2023 1 2

2-Hour US 500 (Wide) Binary January 3, 2023 3 6

20-Minute US Tech 100 (Wide) Binary January 3, 2023 4 8

20-Minute US Tech 100 (Narrow) 

Binary

January 3, 2023 3 6

2-Hour US Tech 100 (Wide) Binary January 3, 2023 12 24

20-Minute US SmallCap 2000 (Wide) 

Binary

January 3, 2023 1.4 2.8

20-Minute US SmallCap 2000 

(Narrow) Binary

January 3, 2023 1.2 2.4

2-Hour US SmallCap 2000 (Wide) 

Binary

January 3, 2023 2.8 5.6

Daily Wall Street 30 Binary January 3, 2023 40 80

Daily US 500 Binary January 3, 2023 6 12

Daily US Tech 100 Binary January 3, 2023 24 48

Daily US SmallCap 2000 Binary January 3, 2023 4 8

Daily Crude Oil Binary January 3, 2023 0.4 0.8

Daily Gold Binary January 3, 2023 3 6
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME); Notice of 
Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the PRIME Program

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of funds availability (NOFA) inviting applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs Act of 1999 
(Pub.L. 106-102), enacted November 12, 1999, (``the Act'') authorizes 
the U.S. Small Business Administration (``SBA'') to award grants under 
the Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME) Program. The 
Acting Administrator of the SBA invites applications for selection as a 
participating grantee under the PRIME Program. The Final Rule (13 CFR 
part 119) published in today's Federal Register provides guidance on 
the contents of the necessary application materials, evaluation 
criteria and other program requirements. Applicants for selection as a 
participating grantee can find more detailed application content 
requirements in the PRIME program announcements, that are available on 
SBA's website at: http://www.sba.gov/financing/frprime.html
    SBA expects to award grants of up to $250,000 to a minimum of 60 
PRIME Program participants. A total of $15 million is available for 
this purpose. SBA reserves the right to select and fund some, all, or 
none of the applicants for participation in the PRIME program.

DATES: Applications may be submitted to SBA immediately. The deadline 
for receipt of an application is 4:00 p.m. EST on June 28, 2001. 
Applications received in SBA's offices after that date and time, with 
the exception of mailed applications as indicated in the Program 
Announcements, will be rejected and returned to the sender.

ADDRESSES: Applications must be sent to U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Office of Procurement and Grants Management, 409 3rd 
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20416, Attn: Mina Bookhard, Agreement 
Officer. Applications sent electronically or by facsimile will not be 
accepted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have any questions about the 
requirements for this program or application procedures, or if you are 
unable to access the application via the internet, contact Warren Boyd, 
Jaunice Cromer, or Felicia Smith at the SBA Microenterprise Development 
Branch, 202-205-6485. Applications may be downloaded from SBA's web 
site at: http://www.sba.gov/financing/frprime.html

    Program Authority: Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs 
Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, and 13 CFR part 119.

    Dated: May 21, 2001.
Jeanne Sclater,
Acting Associate Deputy Administrator, Office of Capital Access.
[FR Doc. 01-13231 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### In the Matter of World Trade Center Bombing Litigation. Steering Committee et al., Respondents, v The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Appellant.

Submitted October 31, 2011;

decided February 9, 2012

Reported below, 51 AD3d 337.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*17 NY3d 428 (2011)].

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott, Jones, Prudenti* and Mercure.*

Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Smith.

*

 Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
# C_2020271EN.01000901.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de l’entreprise de Liège — Belgium) — SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get

(Case C-833/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual and industrial property - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Articles 2 to 5 - Scope - Utilitarian object - Concept of ‘work’ - Copyright protection of works - Conditions - Shape of a product which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Folding bicycle)

(2020/C 271/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de l’entreprise de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd

Defendant: Chedech/Get2Get

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2 to 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that the copyright protection provided for therein applies to a product whose shape is, at least in part, necessary to obtain a technical result, where that product is an original work resulting from intellectual creation, in that, through that shape, its author expresses his creative ability in an original manner by making free and creative choices in such a way that that shape reflects his personality, which it is for the national court to verify, bearing in mind all the relevant aspects of the dispute in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---