alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden
Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen F. Wiggins, Chairman and President
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                                        
|------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|              |  | 
|July 20, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Stephen F. Wiggins                              
|              |  |  |  | Stephen F. Wiggins, Chairman of the Board and President
##### 



Exhibit 99.5 (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered Accountants111 5th Avenue SW, Suite 3100Calgary, AlbertaCanada T2P 5L3Telephone +1 (403) 509 7500Facsimile +1 (403) 781 1825
 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP We hereby consent to the inclusion in EnCana Corporations (i) Annual Report on Form 40-F for the
year ended December 31, 2004; (ii) registration statements on Form F-9 (File Nos. 333-113732 and
333-118737); and (iii) registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-13956 and 333-85598), of
our audit report dated February 7, 2005, on the consolidated balance sheets of EnCana Corporation
as at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings
and cash flows for each of years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, to be filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. signed (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta
February 7, 2005 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity
#### WILLIAM Z. DEASON v. J. KING HARRISON CO., INC. d/b/a J. KING HARRISON TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. and AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 591A97

(Filed 9 October 1998)

Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 127 N.C. App. 514, 491 S.E.2d 666 (1997), affirming a judgment entered 26 September 1996 by Morgan (Melzer A., Jr.), J., in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. On 7 May 1998, the Supreme Court granted discretionary review of an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 28 September 1998.

*Waggoner, Hamrick, Hasty, Monteith and Kratt, P.L.L.C., by S. Dean Hamrick, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Richard T. Rice and Lawrence B. Somers, for defendant-appellee American National Fire Insurance Company.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2454 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2454

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 123 East Sharpfish Street in Rosebud, South Dakota, as the ``Ben 
                     Reifel Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2019

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 123 East Sharpfish Street in Rosebud, South Dakota, as the ``Ben 
                     Reifel Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BEN REIFEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 East Sharpfish Street in Rosebud, South Dakota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Ben Reifel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ben Reifel 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Damien Antonio SAWYERS, etc., Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70181.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 8, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 14, 2010.

Hugo Florentino Larios, Hugo F. Larios Law, P.L.L.C., Tempe, AZ, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kathryn McKinney, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*314Before: BEEZER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and CARNEY,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Damien Antonio Sawyers petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1). We grant the petition.

Petitioner argues that, pursuant to *Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir.2005), we must impute to him his mother’s residency for purposes of cancellation of removal. In its response brief, the government argued that our decision in *Cuevas-Gaspar*no longer controls. As the government concedes in its Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j) letter to this court, however, we thereafter rejected those same arguments in *Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder,*580 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir.2009).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand on an open record for any further determinations that the BIA deems necessary, including a determination of when imputation should start. *See INS v. Orlando Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam); *Soto-Olarte v. Holder,*555 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir.2009). The agency must make findings in the first instance regarding the residency of Petitioner’s mother and regarding whether Petitioner was a minor residing with her.

Petition GRANTED. Case REMANDED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Health & Development Consequences of Prenatal Exposure 
to Methamphetamine.
    Date: June 15, 2001.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Radisson Barcelo Hotel, 2121 P Street NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Kesinee Nimit, MD, Health Scientist Administrator, 
Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 
National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1432.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS).

    Dated: May 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13343 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2453 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 

limitations for certain logging vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2019 

Mr. GALLAGHER (for himself, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, and Mr. GOLDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

vehicle weight limitations for certain logging vehicles, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Routes Act of 

5 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT EXEMPTIONS. 

7 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) CERTAIN LOGGING VEHICLES.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2453 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall waive, 

2 with respect to a covered logging vehicle, the appli3 cation of any vehicle weight limit established under 

4 this section. 

5 ‘‘(2) COVERED LOGGING VEHICLE DEFINED.— 

6 In this subsection, the term ‘covered logging vehicle’ 

7 means a vehicle that— 

8 ‘‘(A) is transporting raw or unfinished for9 est products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass, 

10 or wood chips; 

11 ‘‘(B) is traveling a distance not greater 

12 than 150 air miles on the Interstate from origin 

13 to a storage or processing facility; and 

14 ‘‘(C) meets State legal weight tolerances 

15 and vehicle configurations for transporting raw 

16 or unfinished forest products within the State 

17 boundaries in which the vehicle is operating. 

18 ‘‘(3) APPLICATION OF WEIGHT TOLERANCES.— 

19 The waiver in this subsection shall only apply with 

20 respect to a State legal weight tolerance in effect on 

21 the date of enactment of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40740

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OLMAN ALEXI HERRERA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-100-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Olman Alexi 

Herrera-Martinez (Herrera) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a 

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United 

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Herrera has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40740 Document: 00512540331 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-40740

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40740 Document: 00512540331 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15(d) - 14(a)

I, William Marshall, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Fidelis  Energy
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I am responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the  period  in which  this  annual  report  is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
     on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
     committee of  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the
     equivalent function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
     annual  report  whether or not there were  significant  changes in internal
     controls  or in other  factors  that could  significantly  affect  internal
     controls  subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2006
                       /s/ William Marshall
                       William Marshall
                       Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60952 Summary Calendar

DERRICK SOLOMON PRUITT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JANICE BROWN, Washington County, MS Fourth Judicial District Circuit Court Clerk, in her individual and official capacities; ASHLEY HINES, Circuit Court Judge, Fourth Judicial District, Washington County, MS; LEOLA JORDAN, Former Washington County Circuit Court Clerk, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:03-CV-442

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Derrick Solomon Pruitt, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 46846, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The district court denied Pruitt’s IFP motion and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for IFP, Pruitt is challenging the district court’s certification. Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 05-60952 -2- Pruitt alleged that Janice C. Brown, the Circuit Court Clerk for Washington County, Mississippi, denied his request for documents related to his criminal conviction. Pruitt alleged that Brown did not deliver the documents based on instructions from Circuit Judge Ashley Hines. “Judicial officers are entitled to absolute immunity from claims for damages arising out of acts performed in the exercise of their judicial functions.” Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994). This immunity can be overcome only by demonstrating that the conduct complained of was non-judicial or by showing that the conduct was “in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.” Id. Judicial acts are those that are “‘normally performed by a judge’” and that affect parties who “‘dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity.’” Id. at 285. Court clerks “have absolute immunity from actions for damages arising from acts they are specifically required to do under court order or at a judge’s discretion.” Clay v. Allen , 242 F.3d 679, 682 (5th Cir. 2001)

. On appeal, Pruitt’s arguments are based solely on the irrelevant issue of qualified immunity for Brown. Pruitt makes the conclusional assertion that Brown’s refusal was a ministerial act not covered by qualified immunity. Pruitt does not refute his allegation that Brown was acting on the instructions of Judge Hines. Pruitt has not presented a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Pruitt has not shown that the district court’s determination that his appeal would be frivolous was incorrect. The instantNo. 05-60952 -3- appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Accordingly, Pruitt’s request for IFP status is denied, and his appeal is dismissed. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2336 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to the definition of 

‘‘family farmer’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Mr. DELGADO (for himself, Mr. COX of California, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. 

PETERSON, Mr. ARMSTRONG, and Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to 

the definition of ‘‘family farmer’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farmer Relief 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2336 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FAMILY FARMER. 

2 Section 101(18) of title 11, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘$3,237,000’’ each place that term 

4 appears and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive Officer July 22, 2010/s/ Patricia D. ChiodoPatricia D. ChiodoVice President, Controller and
Interim Chief Financial Officer July 22, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMIR WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 783 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12829]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel for Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel for Social, Behavioral, and 
Economic Sciences (#1766).
    Date/Time: May 31-June 1, 2001, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Rm 525 and 535 (Stafford-
II), 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Thomas J. Baerwald, Division of Behavioral and 
Cognitive Sciences, Room 995, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8754.
    Purpose of Meeting: To evaluate proposals submitted for the 
Biocomplexity in the Environment/Dynamics of Coupled Natural and 
Human Systems competition.
    Agenda: The panel will evaluate proposals and make funding 
recommendations to NSF staff.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) 
and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act.
    Reason for Late Notice: Conflicting schedules of members and the 
necessity to proceed with the evaluation of proposals.

    Dated: May 17, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12829 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M