alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report
dated February 23, 2006, accompanying the financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Insignia Systems,
Inc. on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Insignia Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-127606, 333-120504, 333-107087, 333-97513,
333-83062, 333-65172, 333-41240, 333-41242, 333-80261, 333-59709, 333-43781, 33-92376, 33-92374, 33-75372 and 33-47003) and Forms
S-3 and amendments (File Nos. 333-102486 and 333-121587).

/s/   Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 2006

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2365 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the ability to assess a 

fee for health care services for prisoners, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the ability 

to assess a fee for health care services for prisoners, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of 

5 Prisons Medical Care Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO FEE FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES FOR PRIS7 ONERS. 

8 Section 4048 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2365 IH

1 (1) by amending subsection (b) to read as fol2 lows: 

3 ‘‘(b) FEES FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES.—In the 

4 case of health care services provided to a prisoner in con5 nection with a health care visit that results from an injury 

6 inflicted on a prisoner by another prisoner, the Director, 

7 in accordance with this section and with such regulations 

8 as the Director shall promulgate to carry out this section, 

9 may assess and collect a fee in connection with each such 

10 health care visit, from the account of the prisoner who 

11 inflicted the injury, as determined by the Director.’’; 

12 (2) by striking subsection (c); and 

13 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘or whether 

14 the prisoner qualifies under an exclusion under this 

15 section’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2019280EN.01003303.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Bulgarian Air Charter Limited v NE

(Case C-758/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/48)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

---
# C_2020137EN.01001201.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — AURES Holdings a.s. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

(Case C-405/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Transfer of a company’s place of effective management to a Member State other than its registered seat - Transfer of tax residency to that other Member State - National legislation not allowing a tax loss incurred in the Member State of incorporation before the transfer of its seat to be claimed)

(2020/C 137/14)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AURES Holdings a.s.

Defendant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a company incorporated under the law of a Member State, which transfers its place of effective management to another Member State without that transfer affecting its status as a company incorporated under the law of the first Member State, may rely on that article for the purposes of contesting a refusal in the second Member State to defer losses prior to that transfer; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a company incorporated under the law of a Member State, which transfers its place of effective management to another Member State without that transfer affecting its status as a company incorporated under the law of the first Member State, may rely on that article for the purposes of contesting a refusal in the second Member State to defer losses prior to that transfer;

| 2. | Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which excludes the possibility for a company, which has transferred its place of effective management and, as a result, its tax residency to that Member State, from claiming a tax loss incurred, prior to that transfer, in another Member State, in which it has retained its registered seat. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which excludes the possibility for a company, which has transferred its place of effective management and, as a result, its tax residency to that Member State, from claiming a tax loss incurred, prior to that transfer, in another Member State, in which it has retained its registered seat.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-2584.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 7, 2006.

Amanda A. Robertson, Office of the United States Attorney, Benton, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter M. Cohen, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, and Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

After we ordered a limited remand, see *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), the district judge informed us that he would have imposed the same sentence on Daniel Ross had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that sentence is within the properly calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable. *United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Ross now contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it is longer than necessary to promote respect for the law and because his time incarcerated will leave him inadequately educated and vocationally unprepared. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). But neither these arguments nor our independent review suggest unreasonableness, and therefore the judgment is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20539



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT

TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of report (Date of earliest event reported):  August 31, 2004



Nature Vision, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Minnesota

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)



0-7475

41-0831186

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)



213 NW 4th Street

Brainerd, Minnesota 56401

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)



(218) 825-0733

(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Photo Control Corporation4800 Quebec Avenue NorthMinneapolis, MN 55428(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):



[   ]

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



[   ]

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



[   ]

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



[   ]

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



---

Item 7.01  Regulation FD Disclosure.



On September 1, 2004, Nature Vision, Inc. will begin to make presentations to various brokers.  A copy of managements presentation slides are attached as Exhibit 99.1.



The information in this Form 8-K shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise be subject to the liabilities of that section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



Item 9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(c)  Exhibits.



99.1

Slides to be used at broker presentations.



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



SIGNATURES



NATURE VISION, INC.



Date:  August 31, 2004

/s/ Jeffrey P. Zernov



Jeffrey P. Zernov

President and

Chief Executive Officer







---
ex10-3.htm



Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT #1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












ePlus inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and Elaine D. Marion (the “Executive”) (collectively, “the Parties”) have previously entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective September 30, 2009.  The Parties hereby agree to this Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1”)







1.           Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:







(b) “Employment Term” shall be the period from the date of the last signature below through and including September 30, 2011.







2.           The last sentence of Section 5(b) shall be replaced with the following:







In no event will any bonus earned under this Section 5(b) be paid later than the next December 31st following the fiscal year in which the bonus was earned, unless calculation of the bonus is not administratively practicable by that date, and further delay would not violate Code Section 409A.







3.           Subsection 7(c)(5) shall be added which reads as follows:







              (5)           Any release and certification required from the Executive under the first paragraph of this Section 7(c) shall be on the form attached as Exhibit 1 unless the Company has provided Executive a different form on or before his termination of employment.  The applicable release and certification must be signed and returned by Executive to the Company within twenty one (21) days of the date of termination of employment and not revoked in order for Executive to be entitled to payments under Section 7(c).  Except as provided by subsection 7(c)(4), provided the requirements of this subsection are met, any lump sum payment due Executive under subsection 7(c)(1), (2),  or (3) shall be paid on the last day of the thirty (30) day, sixty (60) day or other applicable period in which the Company may make such payment in compliance with the applicable provision.







4.           Sample Release and Certification







The Sample Release included as Exhibit 1 to the Agreement shall be amended to include the following as the penultimate sentence:







Employee hereby certifies he has complied with Sections 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of his Employment Agreement (confidentiality, intellectual property, non-compete, non-solicit, conflict of interest and return of property provisions).







No other provision of the Agreement is affected by this Amendment #1.







 







	
/s/ Phillip G. Norton  

	  	
/s/ Elaine D. Marion

	  
	
 
Phillip G. Norton



	  	
 
Elaine D. Marion



	  
	
 
Chief Executive Officer



	

 
Chief Financial Officer





	  
	
Date: September 16, 2010

	
Date: September 14, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Seection 1350, that:
 
 (1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Kelly T. HickelKelly T. Hickel

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30 DAY-35-01]
 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-7090. Send written comments to CDC, Desk Officer; Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235; Washington, DC 20503. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Proposed Project National Disease Surveillance Program—I. Case Reports (0920-0009)—Extension—National Center for Infectious Diseases (NCID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Formal surveillance of 22 separate reportable diseases has been ongoing to meet the public demand and scientific interest for accurate, consistent, epidemiologic data. These ongoing diseases include: Bacterial meningitis, 
                    ( print page 28168)
                    dengue, hantavirus, HIV/AIDS, Idiopathic CD4+T-lymphocytopenia, Kawasaki syndrome, Legionellosis, lyme disease, malaria, Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease, plague, Reye Syndrome, tick-borne Rickettsial Disease, toxic shock syndrome, toxocariasis, trichinosis, typhoid fever, and viral hepatitis. Case report forms enable CDC to collect demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of cases of these diseases. This information is used to direct epidemiologic investigations, to identify and monitor trends in reemerging infectious diseases or emerging modes of transmission, to search for possible causes or sources of the diseases, and to develop guidelines for the prevention of treatment. It is also used to recommend target areas in most need of vaccinations for certain diseases and to determine development of drug resistance. Because of the distinct nature of each of the diseases, the number of cases reported annually is different for each. The total annualized burden is 34,038 hours (131,307 × .259225). Respondents
Number of respondents
Number of responses per respondent
Average burden respondent 
                             (in hours)Health care workers
55
131,307
0.259225
 Dated: May 10, 2001. Nancy Cheal, Acting Associate Director for Policy, Planning, and Evaluation Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


[FR Doc. 01-12774  Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-415-000]

Take notice that on May 11, 2001, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of June 1, 2001:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 117

Third Revised Sheet No. 314

El Paso states that the tariff sheets are being filed to revise the Billing Determinant for El Paso Electric Company to 37,318 dth per day and to revise the related revenue crediting threshold.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be field in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12781  Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2335 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2335

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure compensation 
   for certain hours of work for border patrol agents, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2019

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to ensure compensation 
   for certain hours of work for border patrol agents, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Border Patrol Pay Security Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS PAY FOR BORDER PATROL AGENTS.

    (a) Purpose.--The purposes of this Act are to strengthen U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection and ensure that border patrol agents are 
compensated for certain hours of work with premium pay for certain 
hours of overtime work.
    (b) Fair Labor Standards Act Premium Pay.--Section 7 of the Fair 
Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 207) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(t) Employment as a Border Patrol Agent.--No public agency shall 
be deemed to have violated subsection (a) with respect to the 
employment of any border patrol agent, as defined in paragraph (1) of 
section 5550 of title 5, United States Code, if, during a work period 
of 14 consecutive days, the border patrol agent receives compensation 
at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at 
which he or she is employed for all hours of work from 80 hours to 100 
hours. Payments required under this section shall be--
            ``(1) in addition to any payments made under such section 
        5550;
            ``(2) made notwithstanding any pay limitations set forth in 
        that title; and
            ``(3) paid as additional `half-time' as the straight time 
        portion shall be deemed paid for the hours for which payments 
        under such section 5550 have been made.''.
    (c) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 13(a) of the Fair 
Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. section 213(a)) is amended by 
striking paragraph (18).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018032EN.01004501.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/45

---

Action brought on 28 November 2017 — Parfümerie Akzente v EUIPO (GlamHair)

(Case T-787/17)

(2018/C 032/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Parfümerie Akzente GmbH (Pfedelbach, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘GlamHair’ — Application No 15 211 956

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 in Case R 82/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### In the Matter of Robert Del Vecchio, Appellant, v *726Dominick D. Pierro et al., Respondents, and Vincent Natrella et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Dominick D. Pierro as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1989, for the public office of Westchester County Legislator for the 6th County Legislative District, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 11, 1989, as granted the application of Vincent Natrella and Frederick Tedesco to intervene in the proceeding and directed the respondent members of the Board of Elections "to afford the members of the Conservative Party an opportunity to express their choice * * * by write in ballot”.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements *(see, Matter of Hunting v Power,*20 NY2d 680; *Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections,*48 NY2d 614). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.