alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017256EN.01003601.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/36

---

Action brought on 12 June 2017 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Bee Fee Group (LV POWER ENERGY DRINK)

(Case T-372/17)

(2017/C 256/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bee Fee Group LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in black, red and white containing the word elements ‘LV POWER ENERGY DRINK’ — EU trade mark No 12 898 219

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2017 in Case R 906/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and thus declare invalid the contested mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and thus declare invalid the contested mark;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings;

| — | order the proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of legal certainty. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of legal certainty.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: Vol. 66, No. 100, 
Wednesday, May 23, 2001, page 28426.

Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, 
May 31, 2001.

Changes in Meeting: The Commission briefing on the Mid-Year Review for 
fiscal year 2001 is canceled.

Agenda: For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-0709.

Contact Person for Additional Information: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway., Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: May 25, 2001.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13696 Filed 5-25-01; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2735

JOHN D. GRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TONY LAWS, individually and officially as an

Orange County Health Department employee; DAN

REIMER, individually and officially as Orange

County Health Director; ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH

DEPARTMENT; ORANGE COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CA-93-60-5-D)

Argued: May 7, 1996 Decided: June 14, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Monroe Jackson Nichols, ALLEN & PINNIX, P.A., Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellant. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE,

CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Sasser, III, WOMBLE, CARLYLE,

SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; Geoffrey E.

Gledhill, COLEMAN, GLEDHILL & HARGROVE, Hillsborough, North

Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In Gray v. Laws, 51 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 1995), we vacated

summary judgment for defendants on appellant John Gray's claim of

retaliatory discharge in violation of his First Amendment rights

and remanded the claim "because the district court, perhaps by

oversight, failed to consider Gray's allegations of mismanagement

and their possible bearing on Gray's First Amendment claim." Id.

at 439. On remand, the district court received supplemental

briefing on the issue and again entered summary judgment for Gray's

employer Orange County Health Department and his immediate supervisors, for two alternative reasons. First, the district court

concluded that it was unclear that Gray's allegations of misconduct

by the county were protected speech at all because "[i]t appears

that many of his allegations pertained to the conditions of his own

employment," J.A. at 547, and Gray "offers no credible evidence" of

that mismanagement, J.A. at 548. Second, the district court concluded that, even if his allegations against his superiors were

protected speech, Gray failed to demonstrate "but for" causation

between those allegations, which began in 1977, and his 1990

termination, immediately following, and because of two separate and

corroborated complaints of sexual harassment lodged against him by

women whose establishments he was charged with inspecting. J.A. at

548.

We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by the parties in

their briefs and at oral argument, and, for the reasons explained
4

in the district court's thorough opinion, we affirm the judgment of

the district court.

AFFIRMED
Order entered December 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00508-CR

BRANDON DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-80734-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 19, 2019 third motion for extension of time to 

file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before December 

31, 2019.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the annual report of Viscount Systems,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006 (the
  "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
  below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|Dated: March 30, 2006 | /s/ Stephen Pineau                   
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Stephen Pineau                       
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |                                      
|Dated: March 30, 2006 | /s/ Les Fong                         
|                      | Les Fong                             
|                      | Chief Financial Officer              

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2341 

To direct the Postmaster General to modify any hard copy change of address 

form used by the United States Postal Service so that such form contains 

a reminder that any individual using such form should update the individual’s voter registration as a result of any change in address. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Mr. ROUDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the Postmaster General to modify any hard copy 

change of address form used by the United States Postal 

Service so that such form contains a reminder that any 

individual using such form should update the individual’s 

voter registration as a result of any change in address. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF POSTAL SERVICE HARD COPY CHANGE 

4 OF ADDRESS FORM TO REMIND INDIVIDUALS 

5 TO UPDATE VOTER REGISTRATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Postmaster General 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2341 IH

1 shall modify any hard copy change of address form used 

2 by the United States Postal Service so that such form con3 tains a reminder that any individual using such form 

4 should update the individual’s voter registration as a re5 sult of any change in address. 

6 (b) APPLICATION.—The requirement in subsection 

7 (a) shall not apply to any electronic version of a change 

8 of address form used by the United States Postal Service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2018427EN.01000201.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/2

---

Appeal brought on 18 January 2018 by Carrera Brands Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 16 November 2017 in Case T-419/16, Carrera Brands Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-35/18 P)

(2018/C 427/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Carrera Brands Ltd (represented by: C. Markowsky, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Autec AG

By order of 14 June 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit 10.23


 


PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


(Membership Interests)


 


This Purchase and Sale Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of this
26th day of December, 2005 by and between Inland American Acquisitions, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (“Seller”) and Minto Builders (Florida), Inc., a
Florida corporation (“Purchaser”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.                                   Seller is the sole member of and owns all of
the Membership Interest (the “GP Membership Interest”) of Inland American
Pearland Silverlake Village GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“GP”).


 


B.                                     Seller is the sole member of and owns all of
the Membership Interest (the “LP Membership Interest”) of Inland American
Pearland Silverlake Village LP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“LP”).  The GP Membership Interests and the LP
Membership Interests are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Membership
Interests.”


 


C.                                     Collectively, GP and LP own all the
partnership interests in A-S 68 Hwy 288-Silver Lake, LP., a Texas limited
partnership (the “Partnership”).  The
Partnership owns that certain property described as the Cinemark 12 Pearland
located in Pearland, Texas.


 


D.                                    Seller desires to sell and Purchaser desires
to purchase all of the Membership Interest.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Purchase and Sale.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, the Seller hereby agrees to sell and assign to Purchaser all of the
Membership Interests in and to the LP and GP. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase from Seller
all of the Membership Interests in and to the GP and LP.


 


2.                                       Purchase Price.  At
closing, Purchaser agrees to pay Seller a purchase price of $9,278,968.70 plus
or minus prorations at closing.


 





















 


3.                                       Closing.  Closing shall occur through an
escrow at Chicago Title & Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois on December 28,
2005.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the day and date first written above.


 


 


	
  SELLER:

  	
  PURCHASER:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Inland American
  Acquisitions, Inc.

  	
   

  	
  Minto Builders (Florida), Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Karen M Kautz

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Debra A. Palmer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Karen M Kautz

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Debra A. Palmer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  
									



 


2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilbert Rivera, Appellant.

Submitted March 8, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Officer’sCertification**

 

I, Preston A. Miller, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicingreports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annualreport, of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2001-C;

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under thesale and servicing agreement is included in these reports;

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale andservicing agreement, that is included in these reports.
| Date: April 21, 2004                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   | /s/ Preston A. Miller |   |
| Preston  A. Miller                     |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
#### Cargill Financial Services International, Inc., Appellant, v Bank Finance and Credit Limited, Also Known as OJSC Bank Finance and Credit, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

Motion by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
#### MACON v. MACON

No. 334P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 150

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.01-11464) published on pages 23255 and 23256 of the issue for Tuesday, May 8, 2001.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond heading, the entry for BB&T Corporation, Winstom-Salem, North Carolina, is revised to read as follows:

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond**                     (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:                

*1.  BB&T Corporation*, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to merge with F&M National Corporation, Winchester, Virginia, and thereby indirectly acquire F&M Bank-Maryland, Bethesda, Maryland; F&M Bank-Central Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; F&M Bank-Highlands, Covington, Virginia; F&M Bank-Southern Virginia, Emporia, Virginia; F&M Bank-Northern Virginia, Fairfax, Virginia; F&M Bank-Atlantic, Gloucester, Virginia; F&M Bank-Massanutten, Harrisonburg, Virginia; F&M Bank-Richmond, Richmond, Virginia; F&M Bank-Peoples, Warrenton, Virginia; F&M Bank-Winchester, Winchester, Virginia; and F&M Bank-West Virginia, Ranson, West Virginia.  Applicant also has applied to acquire up to 9 percent of F&M Corporation.                

In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to acquire F&M Trust Company, Winchester, Virginia, and thereby engage in trust company activities, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y, and Johnson Mortgage Company, LLC, Newport News, Virginia, and thereby engage in mortgage banking activities, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

Comments on this application must be received by June 1, 2001.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-12805 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
AFH Holding III, Inc. 10-Q








Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding III, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 13, 2010
 
 /s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. HeshmatpourPresident, Secretary and Sole Director(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin P. Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Kevin P. Clark                   
|-------------------------------------
|Kevin P. ClarkChief Executive Officer





August 10, 2006

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Airgas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter McCausland, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

/s/ Peter McCausland
-------------------------------------
Peter McCausland
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
June 10, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.