alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020036EN.01000601.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Tedeschi Srl, acting on its own account and as agent of a temporary association of undertakings, Consorzio Stabile Istant Service, acting on its own account and as principal of a temporary association of undertakings v C.M. Service Srl, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

(Case C-402/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Public procurement - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 25 - Subcontracting - National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30 % of the total amount of the contract and preventing the prices which apply to subcontracted services from being reduced by more than 20 % by comparison with the prices stipulated in the decision awarding the contract)

(2020/C 36/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Tedeschi Srl, acting on its own account and as agent of a temporary association of undertakings, Consorzio Stabile Istant Service, acting on its own account and as principal of a temporary association of undertakings

Defendants: C.M. Service Srl, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as:

| — | precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits to 30 % the share of the contract which the tenderer is permitted to subcontract to third parties; |
| --- | --- |

—

precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits to 30 % the share of the contract which the tenderer is permitted to subcontract to third parties;

| — | precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits the possibility of reducing the prices which apply to subcontracted services by more than 20 % by comparison with the prices stipulated in the decision awarding the contract. |
| --- | --- |

—

precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits the possibility of reducing the prices which apply to subcontracted services by more than 20 % by comparison with the prices stipulated in the decision awarding the contract.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-2 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 11 of 11
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Martin Schuermann, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  May 20, 2009  /s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
Principal Executive Officer
# C_2018341EN.01000301.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/3

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v C and J, S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-269/18 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46(6) and (8) - Manifestly unfounded application for international protection - Right to an effective remedy - Authorisation to remain in the territory of a Member State - Directive 2008/115/EC - Articles 2, 3 and 15 - Illegal stay - Detention))

(2018/C 341/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, J, S

Respondents: C, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Operative part of the order

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals and Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection must be interpreted as meaning that a third-country national, whose application for international protection has been rejected at first instance by the competent administrative authority as being manifestly unfounded, cannot be detained with a view to his removal, in the case where, in accordance with Article 46(6) and (8) of Directive 2013/32, he is lawfully authorised to remain on the national territory until a decision has been taken on his action relating to the right to remain on that territory pending the ruling on the appeal brought against the decision which rejected his application for international protection.

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph Singer, Deceased. Vivian Singer, Respondent; Alexander Singer, Appellant.

Submitted February 8, 2010;

decided March 30, 2010

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*13 NY3d 447 (2009)].
# C_2019093EN.01001702.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A Ltd

(Case C-74/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2009/138/EC - Taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance - Article 13(13) - Definition of ‘Member State in which the risk is situated’ - Company established in one Member State, providing insurance services relating to contractual risks connected with company conversions in another Member State - Article 157 - Member State levying tax on insurance premiums))

(2019/C 93/22)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

A Ltd

Intervener: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Operative part of the judgment

The first subparagraph of Article 157(1) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), as amended by Directive 2013/58/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013, read in conjunction with Article 13(13) of Directive 2009/138, must be interpreted as meaning that, when an insurance company established in a Member State offers insurance covering the contractual risks associated with the value of the shares and the fairness of the purchase price paid by the buyer in the acquisition of an undertaking, an insurance contract concluded in that context is subject exclusively to the indirect taxes and parafiscal charges on insurance premiums in the Member State where the policyholder is established.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp.
for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. This Certification is executed as of
August 12, 2009. By:   /s/MARTIN SCHUERMANN Martin Schuermann
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:   /s/LAWRENCE WEISDORN Lawrence Weisdorn Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 4.22**

 

**Summary of the Share Purchase Agreement entered into between Transmissora Aliança de Energia Elétrica S.A., Abengoa Concessões Brasil Holding S.A., Abengoa Construção Brasil Ltda., NTE — Nordeste Transmissora de Energia S.A. and Abengoa Participações Holding S.A.**

 

On June 2, 2011, Transmissora Aliança de Energia Elétrica S.A. (“**Taesa**”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “**NTE Share Purchase Agreement**”) with Abengoa Concessões Brasil Holding S.A. (“**Abengoa Concessões**”) and Abengoa Construção Brasil Ltda. (“**Abengoa Construção**”), for acquisition of 100% of the equity interest held by Abengoa Concessões and Abengoa Construção in NTE —****Nordeste Transmissora de Energia S.A. (“**NTE**”).

 

The acquisition price is R$ 336.1 million, for 100% of the shares of NTE.

 

The acquisition price will be adjusted by the variation in the Selic rate (the rate calculated by the Special Settlement and Custody System — *Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia*, or Selic) for December 31, 2010 up to the business day immediately prior to the closing date of the transaction, and reduced, as applicable, by any dividends or interest on equity paid by NTE during that period. The acquisition price will also be updated in accordance with any increase or reduction of capital during the period.

 

In the event of rescission of the NTE Share Purchase Contract, the infringing party will be subject a penalty equivalent to 10% of the acquisition price.

 

The NTE Share Purchase Agreement contains warranties, guarantees and obligations by Taesa, Abengoa Concessões and Abengoa Construção. The closing of the transaction is subject to certain conditions, including:

 

·                  approval by the competent bodies, including the National Electricity Agency (*Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica*, or Aneel);

·                  and any other consents by financing banks of NTE, when necessary.

 

The acquisition will also be submitted for approval to the Economic Defense Administrative Council (*Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica*, or Cade), within the period and in the manner specified in the relevant legislation.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Alliance, Inc.,(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. White, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     November 6, 2007/s/ Steven L. WhiteSteven L. WhiteChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAUN RUSHING, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 21-2098 (UNA)

 ) 

FEDERAL BUREAU ) 

OF INVESTIGATION, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter, brought pro se, is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to 

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and his Complaint against the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation. The application will be granted, and this case will be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” 

it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting). 

Plaintiff sues the FBI based on his alleged services as an informant. He seeks “$110 

Trillon dollars.” Compl. at 1. Sovereign immunity bars a suit against the United States and its 

agencies except upon consent, which must be clear and unequivocal. United States v. Mitchell, 

445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980) (citation omitted). A waiver of sovereign immunity “must be 

unequivocally expressed in statutory text, and [it cannot] be implied.” Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 

187, 192 (1996) (citations omitted). The Tucker Act gives the United States Court of 

Federal Claims exclusive jurisdiction

to render judgment upon any claim [exceeding $10,000] against the 

United States founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of 

Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any 

express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated 

or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort. 

AUG 10 2021
2

Kidwell v. Dep't of Army, Bd. for Correction of Mil. Recs., 56 F.3d 279, 283 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

(quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1491). Plaintiff’s terse complaint is grounded upon an alleged contractual 

relationship. This and the amount sought deprive this Court of jurisdiction. A separate order of 

dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

_________/s/_______________

EMMET G. SULLIVAN

United States District Judge

Date: August 10, 2021
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Revett Minerals Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ Ken Eickerman       | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|Ken Eickerman           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: August 14, 2009   | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Revett
Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelly L. Groh, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kelly L. Groh                                  
|Kelly L. Groh Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-422-000]


Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, Notice of Tariff 
Filing

May 22, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 17, 2001, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas 
Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing to become part of KMIGT's 
FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A and Fourth Revised 
Volume No. 1-B, the revised tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the 
filing, and to be effective June 17, 2001.
    KMIGT is making this housekeeping filing as an effort to clarify 
and correct various sections of KMIGT's FERC Gas Tariff.
    KMIGT states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all of 
its customers and affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13362 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M