Abatement Order filed October 13, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00569

- CR

____________ WALTER R SAM , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1419418

ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Wilford Anderson. On September 10 , 2015, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no
motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the trial court were notified on September 22, 2015, that no brief had been received. No response from appell ant has been received.
Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge of the 337th District Court shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at whichappellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, either i n person

or by video teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (b) whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal or whether appellant has failed to make necessary

ar rangements for filing a brief; (d) the reason for the failure to file a brief; (e) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief will be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearin g. If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make
find ings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing
the f indings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this

court by November 13, 2015

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active doc ket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsi bility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAMR ULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief.
(b) Criminal Cases

. (1) Effect. An appellant = s failure to timely file a brief does not
authorize either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration of the appeal without briefs.

(2) Notice

. If the appellant = s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the appellate court does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or,
if no t indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations.

(3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, a nd have a record of the proceedings prepared, which record

C including any order and findings

C must be sent to the appellate court.

(4) Appellate Court Action

. Based on the trial court = s record, the appellate court may act appropriately to ensure that the ap pellant = s rights are protected, including initiating contempt proceedings against appellant = s counsel. If the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, or that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the ne cessary arrangements for filing a brief, the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require.