alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017357EN.01002001.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/20

---

Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Imasa, Ingeniería y Proyectos v Commission and SRB

(Case T-516/17)

(2017/C 357/26)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Imasa, Ingeniería y Proyectos (Oviedo, Spain) (represented by: B. Gutiérrez de la Roza Pérez, P. Rubio Escobar, R. Ruiz de la Torre Esporrín and B. Fernández García, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the following measures:

| — | Decision (SRB/EES/2017/08) of the Single Resolution Board agreed at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A. |
| --- | --- |

—

Decision (SRB/EES/2017/08) of the Single Resolution Board agreed at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A.

| — | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A. |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Carl Russo, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calix, Inc. for the quarter ended March 27, 2010;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ CARL RUSSO         
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Carl Russo             
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Peter McCausland

Peter McCausland
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 29, 2007
# C_2017221EN.01003401.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/34

---

Action brought on 3 May 2017 — Bank of New York Mellon v EUIPO — Nixen Partners (NEXEN PULSE)

(Case T-260/17)

(2017/C 221/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: A. Klett and K. Schlüter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nixen Partners (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘NEXEN PULSE’ — Application for registration No 13 374 194

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2017 in Case R 1571/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings as well as of the proceeding in front of the Board of Appeal and at the Opposition Division, including all necessary expenses of the Applicant in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings as well as of the proceeding in front of the Board of Appeal and at the Opposition Division, including all necessary expenses of the Applicant in these proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### In the Matter of Susan Wiley, Respondent, v Roger Dawson, Appellant.

Decided March 30, 2010

Appeal, insofar as taken from the December 1, 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal, insofar as taken from the January 5, 2010 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
# CE2010305EN.01001901.xml

| 11.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 305/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 305/19

---

Wednesday 20 January 2010Election of the European Ombudsman

P7_TA(2010)0001

European Parliament decision of 20 January 2010 electing the European Ombudsman

2010/C 305 E/06

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 24 and Article 228 thereof,

having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties (1),

1

having regard to Rule 204 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the call for applications (2),

2

having regard to its vote of 20 January 2010,

| 1. | Elects Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS to serve as European Ombudsman; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Elects Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS to serve as European Ombudsman;

| 2. | Requests Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS to take an oath before the Court of Justice; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Requests Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS to take an oath before the Court of Justice;

| 3. | Instructs its President to have the annexed decision published in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to have the annexed decision published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

Official Journal of the European Union

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

1

(2)  OJ C 216, 10.9.2009, p. 7.

2

---

Wednesday 20 January 2010ANNEX

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 20 January 2010

electing the European Ombudsman

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 24 and Article 228 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties (1),

Having regard to Rule 204 of its Rules of Procedure,

Having regard to the call for applications (2),

Having regard to its vote of 20 January 2010,

HAS DECIDED:

to elect Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS to serve as European Ombudsman.

Done at Strasbourg, 20 January 2010

For the European Parliament

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

---

(1)  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

1

(2)  OJ C 216, 10.9.2009, p. 7.

2

---
#### Jon-Musa AROUSH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72994.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Marc Jason Wigul, Law Offices of Marc J. Wigul, Encino, CA, for Petitioner.

Oil, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Jesse Matthew Bless, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jon-Musa Aroush, a native and citizen of Syria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de*292nying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de novo claims of due process violations in removal proceedings, including claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The BIA abused its discretion in denying Aroush’s motion to reopen for lack of due diligence. *See Ghahremani v. Gonzales,*498 F.3d 993, 999-1000 (9th Cir.2007).

We remand to the BIA to allow it to consider the remaining issues in the first instance. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In the Matter of M.G.M. Insulation, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Colleen C. Gardner, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted December 5, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 812.

Motion by Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed, *904and for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted, three copies of the brief to be served and an original and 19 copies filed within 30 days.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending May 31, 2008 of Sparking Events, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Carlo Giusto, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   /s/ Carlo Giusto ---------------------------------- Carlo Giusto  President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director   Date: July 15, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1507-000]


Lumberton Power, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 24, 2001.
    Lumberton Power, LLC (Lumberton) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Lumberton will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. Lumberton also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In Particular, Lumberton 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Lumberton.
    On May 10, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Lumberton should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Lumberton is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Lumberton's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 11, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13603 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 205 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to permanently 

extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself and Ms. CASTOR of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 

to permanently extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting and Secur5 ing Florida’s Coastline Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON 

7 LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE GULF 

8 OF MEXICO. 

9 Section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security 

10 Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended by striking 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 205 IH

1 ‘‘Effective during’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the Sec2 retary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Diane J. Harrison, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Cheetah Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.    
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 10, 2008  /s/ Diane J.
  HarrisonDiane J. Harrison
Principal Executive Officer
#### Kimberly Hurrell-Harring et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 29, 2010;

decided April 29, 2010

Motion by Pro Bono Publico Bar Association, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein dismissed as untimely *(see*Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23 [a] [1] [iii]).