alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TEXAS

vs. JOSEPH EDWARD ANTHONY 

# f \l_ EO

NO. 1424230 

## ln\1j OEC '29

## p~ z: SS § IN THE DISTRICT

### 'ef\t.W!Ql**l.Cll~\\';i'** §**c~R\Cl** C.**''v r·~**  

## .0**.J~** couH l'< ·**£."'~~** 

### § 8th JUDICIAL DISlfltlet 

### § § HOPKINS COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
Now comes Joseph Edward Anthony , Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause , and gives this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from the judgment of conviction and sentence herein rendered against Joseph Edward Anthony. Respectfully submitte<l , Martin Braddy Attorney at Law 121 Oak Avenue Suite A Sulphur Springs , Texas 75482 Tel: (903) 885-2040

# :~**~** State Bar No. 00796240 martin.braddy @ verizon.net Attorney for Joseph Anthony Anthony

CERTIFJCATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on December 2'l 2015 , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office , Hopkins County , by facsimile transmi s sion to 9038850640.
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Woodhead Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending July 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Philippe Lemaitre, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BY: /s/ Philippe
LemaitrePhilippe LemaitreChief
Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13459]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing; Meeting

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a 
meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing 
is scheduled to be held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 14, 2001, and 
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 15, 2001. The meeting will be held at the 
Fulton Lane Inn, Charleston, South Carolina. The purpose of the meeting 
is to review planned changes and progress in developing computerized 
and paper-and-pencil enlistment tests and renorming of the tests. 
Persons desiring to make oral presentations or submit written 
statements for consideration at the Committee meeting must contact Dr. 
Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy), Room 2B271, 
The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone (703) 697-9271, no 
later than May 31, 2001.

    Dated: May 10, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-13459 Filed 5-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey
Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended November
30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.





Dated:
      January 7, 2011
              /s/ Harvey JudkowitzHarvey
      Judkowitz, Principal
  Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Lopshire, the Chief Executive Officer of INTERNATIONAL CARD
ESTABLISHMENT, INC. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to International Card Establishment, Inc. and will be retained by
International Card Establishment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





DATE:  NOVEMBER 22, 2005


/S/ WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
--------------------------------------
    WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL HASPEL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0326

[ March 7, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 8926CF10A.

Michael Haspel, Lowell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine

Germanowicz, Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2017277EN.01005401.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/54

---

Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese)

(Case T-417/17)

(2017/C 277/78)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Papouis Dairies LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colour containing the word elements ‘fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese’ — Application for registration No 11 180 791

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 in Case R 2650/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2273 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 

larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an increasingly larger earned income credit for families 

with more than 3 children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Fairness for All 

5 Families Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED EARNED INCOME CREDIT FOR FAMI7 LIES WITH MORE THAN 3 CHILDREN. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 32(b) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

10 as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2273 IH

1 ‘‘(1) PERCENTAGES.—For purposes of sub2 section (a)— 

‘‘In the case of an eligible individual with: 

The 

credit 

percentage is: 

The 

phaseout 

percentage is: 

1 qualifying child ............................................ 34 15.98

2 qualifying children ....................................... 40 21.06

3 qualifying children ....................................... 45 21.06

4 qualifying children ....................................... 50 21.06

5 qualifying children ....................................... 55 21.06

6 qualifying children ....................................... 60 21.06

7 or more qualifying children ......................... 65 21.06

No qualifying children .................................... 7.65 7.65’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lawrence Weisdorn, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  August 12, 2009  /s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORNLawrence Weisdorn
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Paul R.
Sohmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of BG Medicine, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 17, 2015



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul R. Sohmer                   
|Paul R. Sohmer, M.D.                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(principal executive officer)
EX-32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SunSi Energies
Inc. for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (“Report”), we certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of SunSi Energies
Inc.




Date:      April
13, 2010




By:
                /s/ Michel Laporte
                
                By:
                /s/David
      NatanName:
                Michel
      Laporte
                
                Name:
                David
      NatanTitle:
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                
                Title:
                Principal
      Financial Officer
# C_2018166EN.01002101.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 22 February 2018 — Skatteministeriet v Estron A/S

(Case C-138/18)

(2018/C 166/27)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteministeriet

Applicant:

Defendant: Estron A/S

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Note 2(a) to Chapter 90 of the Combined Nomenclature, (1) read in conjunction with General Rules Nos 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the CN, to be interpreted as meaning that ‘parts and accessories, which are goods included in any of the headings of this chapter or of Chapter 84, 85 or 91’, refers to goods in the four-digit headings in those chapters, or is the Note to be interpreted as also referring to the related subheading notes (the first six digits) in Chapters 84, 85, 90 and 91? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Note 2(a) to Chapter 90 of the Combined Nomenclature, (1) read in conjunction with General Rules Nos 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the CN, to be interpreted as meaning that ‘parts and accessories, which are goods included in any of the headings of this chapter or of Chapter 84, 85 or 91’, refers to goods in the four-digit headings in those chapters, or is the Note to be interpreted as also referring to the related subheading notes (the first six digits) in Chapters 84, 85, 90 and 91?

1

| 2. | Should connectors such as those at issue in the present case be classified under CN subheading 8544 42 90, CN subheading 9021 40 00 or CN subheading 9021 90 10? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should connectors such as those at issue in the present case be classified under CN subheading 8544 42 90, CN subheading 9021 40 00 or CN subheading 9021 90 10?

| 3. | Should Note 1(m) to section XVI be interpreted as meaning that where a good is included in Chapter 90, it cannot also be included in Chapters 84 and 85? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Should Note 1(m) to section XVI be interpreted as meaning that where a good is included in Chapter 90, it cannot also be included in Chapters 84 and 85?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).

1

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT GEOLOGIST


 


I have reviewed French Peak Resources Inc. Form SB-2 filing, I hereby provide my consent for the reference to my reports on the FRENCH Mineral Claims in Omineca Mining District British Columbia. I hereby consent to the use of my name as a consultant to the Company.


 



	
            /s/ George Nicholson   
 



 


George Nicholson P. Geo.


 


January 3, 2006
**Exhibit 99.6**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Encana Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Stevenson, Executive Vice-President & Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   William A. Stevenson                                     |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | William A. Stevenson                                           |
|   |   | Executive   Vice-President & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
|   | Dated: | February 17, 2011                                         |
|        |        |                                                                |        |  |

 

----
# UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

# FORM 8-K

---

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

# Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 15, 2006

# Commission File Number 0-23903

---

# eAUTOCLAIMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 95-4583945                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)
|                                                              
|
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       | (Zip Code)                      

# (813) 749-1020
(Registrants telephone number)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.
below):

|o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under
the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

---

Item 5.02.
        Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors;  Appointment of Principal Officers.




Mr. S. Reed Mattingly resigned his position as Chief Operating Officer of eAutoclaims, Inc. effective September 15, 2006 in order to pursue other business interests returning to his home in South Carolina. Mr. Mattingly will be entering into a consulting agreement for his services to eAutoclaims, Inc. subsequent to his departure in order to ensure a smooth transition of his duties.





---

SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





Date:   September 18, 2006
        
        eAUTOCLAIMS, INC.By:
        /s/  Eric SeidelPrint Name:  Eric Seidel
Title:  CEO and President




---
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40112 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Luis Flores-Calderon, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:21-CR-2231-1 

______________________________ 

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis FloresCalderon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Calderon has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

August 15, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40112 Document: 67-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2024
No. 23-40112 

2 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40112 Document: 67-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2024