alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

| | By:    | /s/
      Jarrett F. Bousquet     
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| |        |                                   
| | Name:  | Jarrett F. Bousquet               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | July
      15, 2009               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

1

December 21, 2022

VIA COMMISSION PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Commission Regulation 40.6(a) – Rule Certification

LedgerX LLC Submission No. 23-05

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC (d/b/a FTX US Derivatives) (the “Company”) hereby notifies the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of 

the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), that it is 

certifying the attached amendments to the Company’s Derivatives Clearing Organization

(“DCO”) Rulebook. The attached amendments will become effective within 10 business days 

hereof. The current estimated effective date is January 8, 2024. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendments, and their compliance with 

applicable provisions of the CEA, including the Core Principles and the Commission’s 

Regulations, are as follows.

Rule 13.3.2 has been amended to add a new paragraph H, allowing for the 

Clearinghouse to invest cash deposited by Kalshi Participants as collateral in interest bearing 

U.S. bank accounts only, as further specified this in. This revision is consistent with a prior 

revision to Rule 7.2 applicable to LedgerX Participants generally, and is consistent with DCO 

Core Principle F and CFTC Regulation 39.15 in that it is designed to protect and ensure the 

safety of member and participant funds and assets, and presents minmal credit, market, and 

liquidity risks to deposited funds.

The changes to the DCO Rulebook are reflected in a redlined copy designated as 

Appendix A. The final version of the revised DCO Rulebook is attached at Appendix B. 

The Company certifies that the above changes and amendments comply with the CEA 

and Commission Regulations thereunder. The Company additionally certifies that it has 

concurrently posted a copy of this submission letter and the attachments hereto on the Company 

website at https://ledgerx.com/reg-notices. The Company is not aware of any or substantive 

opposing views to the changes and amendments.
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

2

Please contact the undersigned at gc@ledgerx.com if you have any questions or you 

would otherwise like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Brian G. Mulherin

General Counsel, LedgerX LLC
# C_2020010EN.01002002.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/20

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — SATI - Societa Autocooperative Trasporti Italiani SpA v Aziendo di Trasporti Molisana — SpA (ATM)

(Case C-475/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public passenger transport services - Article 5 - Direct award of public service contracts - Prohibited by national law - Article 8(2) - Transitional arrangements)

(2020/C 10/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SATI - Societa Autocooperative Trasporti Italiani SpA

Defendant: Aziendo di Trasporti Molisana — SpA (ATM)

Intervener: Regione Molise

Operative part of the order

Article 5 and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 must be interpreted as meaning that Article 5(4) of that regulation is not applicable to decisions of competent local authorities relating to the direct award of public service contracts for the provision of local transport taken before 3 December 2019.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
#### Frank Fusca, Respondent, v A & S Construction, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted October 24, 2011;

decided December 15, 2011

Reported below, 84 AD3d 1155.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 249 

To amend the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 to improve reporting 

about animal testing and alternative test method use by Federal agencies, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Ms. TITUS, and Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 to improve reporting about animal testing and alternative test 

method use by Federal agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Accountability 

5 in Chemical Testing Act’’ or the ‘‘FACT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; PROVISION OF INFOR7 MATION. 

8 (a) REPORT CONTENTS.— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 249 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (7) of section 

2 3(e) of the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (42 

3 U.S.C. 285l–3(e)) is amended by inserting before 

4 the period at the end of the paragraph the following: 

5 ‘‘, to include a description of the progress on the de6 velopment, validation, acceptance, and utilization of 

7 alternative test methods (including animal use data 

8 by species, number, and test type) for toxicological 

9 testing conducted, supported, or required by, or sub10 mitted to, each Federal agency listed in subsection 

11 (c) during the reporting period’’. 

12 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

13 by paragraph (1) applies with respect to reports that 

14 are made available to the public on or after the date 

15 that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this 

16 Act. 

17 (b) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—Section 4 of the 

18 ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 285l–4) 

19 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(f) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—Each Federal 

21 agency carrying out a program described in subsection (a), 

22 or its specific regulatory unit or units, shall provide 

23 ICCVAM with information needed to carry out this Act.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Lockport Smart Growth, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Town of Lockport et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Lockport Smart Growth, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Town of Lockport Zoning Board of Appeals et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted January 4, 2010;

decided February 23, 2010

Motion by James Harris et al. for leave to file a memorandum of law amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein denied, and for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein dismissed as academic.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

645 

KA 14-00512 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WALTER M. EDWARDS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J.

Murphy, III, J.), rendered February 28, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the first degree,

intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree and assault in

the third degree (two counts). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury

verdict of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law

§ 140.30 [2]) and intimidating a victim or witness in the second

degree (§ 215.16 [2]), defendant contends that the verdict is against

the weight of the evidence with respect to those crimes. Viewing the

evidence in light of the elements of those crimes as charged to the

jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject that

contention (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People

v Gibson, 89 AD3d 1514, 1515, lv denied 18 NY3d 924). Defendant’s

further contention that the verdict is inconsistent because he was

convicted of burglary in the first degree but was acquitted of the

count of assault in the third degree related to that same incident is

not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to object to

the verdict before the jury was discharged (see People v Bartlett, 89

AD3d 1453, 1454, lv denied 18 NY3d 881), and we decline to exercise

our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the

interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We reject defendant’s

challenge to the severity of the sentence. 

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George Whatley, Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Gold Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 28, 2007





/s/  George Whatley

George Whatley,

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Premier Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Yuster, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


January 15, 2009                           /s/ Michael Yuster
                                           ------------------
                             President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
                             Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                             and Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive Officer  April 22, 2010/s/ Patricia D. ChiodoPatricia D. ChiodoVice President, Controller and
Interim Chief Financial Officer  April 22, 2010
June 9, 2023

(Submitted via CFTC Portal)

Assistant Secretary of the Commission

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Act Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20851

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) has submitted to the Commission a Rule Certification 

Submission pursuant to CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) for modifications to the Hard Red Spring Wheat Futures 

Incentive Program (hereinafter referred to as the “Confidential Submission” or “Program”). This Confidential 

Submission included as Exhibit A contains confidential commercial or financial information. MGEX 

respectfully requests that the Commission not release the Confidential Submission. 

MGEX specifically requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Submission pursuant to Commission 

Regulations 145.9 and 145.5. Under Commission Regulation 145.9, a submitter making this request “shall 

specify the grounds on which confidential treatment is being requested.” Confidential treatment is being 

sought on the basis that the Confidential Submission contains confidential commercial or financial 

information under Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii). In addition, MGEX represents that the 

Confidential Submission is a nonpublic record pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.5. 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), MGEX asks the Commission to afford confidential 

treatment to the Confidential Submission in perpetuity.

Should the Commission receive a Freedom of Information Request for the Confidential Submission, MGEX 

acknowledges that it will be notified of the request and then instructed to provide a detailed written 

justification for confidential treatment, per Commission Regulation 145.9(e)(1). 

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (612) 321-7141 or 

cstuhlmann@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Carmen M. Stuhlmann

Associate Counsel

Enclosure
CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, David Davis, Chief Financial Officer of Cycle Country
Accessories Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cycle
Country Accessories Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and


<PAGE>                                 1

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: December 31, 2002

     /s/ David Davis
     ---------------
     David Davis
     Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>                                 2
PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION


EXHIBIT 10.4

PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION




SCHEDULE OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS’ FEES




EFFECTIVE JUNE 24, 2010







BOARD





			
	Annual retainer

	$45,000

	 

	Meeting fee

	$2,000

	If attended in person

Plus expenses


	 
	$1,000 

	If telephonic or director participates by phone


	Equity Award – Restricted Stock Units

	$125,000

	This award is targeted to equal the number of restricted stock units with a value of approximately $125,000 as of the date of grant.


	Presiding director fee

	$20,000

	 









AUDIT COMMITTEE





			
	Fee to chair

	$15,000

	 

	Meeting fee

	$2,500 

	If attended in person

Plus expenses


	 
	$1,250 

	If telephonic or director participates by phone










COMPENSATION COMMITTEE





			
	Fee to chair

	$10,000

	 

	Meeting fee

	$1,500

	If attended in person

Plus expenses


	 
	$750 

	If telephonic or director participates by phone










NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE





			
	Fee to chair

	$10,000 

	 

	Meeting fee

	$1,500

	If attended in person

Plus expenses


	 
	$750 

	If telephonic or director participates by phone














CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE





			
	Fee to chair

	$10,000 

	 

	Meeting fee

	$1,500

	If attended in person

Plus expenses


	 
	$750 

	If telephonic or director participates by phone










The above fees are for non-management directors not designated by stockholders.  Any nominee of a stockholder pursuant to the terms of a stockholder agreement does not receive fees, if elected, unless the stockholder agreement provides otherwise.