alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

 

September 13, 2023

(Submitted via the CFTC Portal)

Assistant Secretary of the Commission

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Act Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20851

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) has submitted to the Commission a Rule Certification 

Submission pursuant to CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) for modifications to the SPIKES Market Maker Program 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Confidential Submission” or “Program”). This Confidential Submission 

included as Exhibit A contains confidential commercial or financial information. MGEX respectfully requests 

that the Commission not release the Confidential Submission. 

MGEX specifically requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Submission pursuant to Commission 

Regulations 145.9 and 145.5. Under Commission Regulation 145.9, a submitter making this request “shall 

specify the grounds on which confidential treatment is being requested.” Confidential treatment is being 

sought on the basis that the Confidential Submission contains confidential commercial or financial 

information under Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii). In addition, MGEX represents that the 

Confidential Submission is a nonpublic record pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.5. 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), MGEX asks the Commission to afford confidential 

treatment to the Confidential Submission in perpetuity.

Should the Commission receive a Freedom of Information Request for the Confidential Submission, MGEX 

acknowledges that it will be notified of the request and then instructed to provide a detailed written 

justification for confidential treatment, per Commission Regulation 145.9(e)(1). 

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (612) 321-7128 or 

psparby@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Peter D. Sparby

Vice President, Counsel

Enclosure
Translation of Purchase Agreements dated in April 2008



 Exhibit 10.34 

Purchase Contract of Zhongshan Mingyang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. 

Contract No.: MY200808401HD 

Buyer (Party A): Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Co., Ltd. 

Seller (Party B): Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Co., Ltd. 

                         
                           Place of signing: Zhongshan 

                         
                           Time of signing: Apr.1, 2008 

Project name: Guangdong Zhanjiang Xuwen Yangqian Wind Farm Project 

I. Material name, specification, quantity, unit price and amount: 
  

											
	Product name	  	Model    	  	Unit    	  	    Quantity    
	  	    Unit price   
 	  	
Total    

amount    

	 WTGs
(including spare parts)
	  	MY1.5se    	  	Set    	  	33	  	9,480,000	  	312,840,000    
	Total: RMB (in words) THREE
HUNDRED TWELVE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED AND FORTY THOUSAND YUAN ONLY

 Note: the above prices contain 17% of VAT. 

II. Quality requirements and technical standards: the supplier shall offer the products in accordance with the technical requirements and standards of
Contract of WTGs and Auxiliary Equipment of Xuwen Yangqian Wind Farm Project of Guangdong Yudean signed between Party A and Guangdong Yudean Zhanjiang Wind Power Co., Ltd. The supplier shall guarantee the quality of the products supplied by it for
24 months since the date of being electrified, and shall be responsible for the technical guidance, on-spot debugging and after-sale service. (Note: the duplicate copy of the aforesaid contract shall be kept by Party B). 

III. Package and transportation method: factory is responsible for package (not recycled) and transporting the products to the site of installation
(Zhanjiang Xuwen Yangqian Wind Farm) designated by Guangdong Yudean Zhanjiang Wind Power Co., Ltd., and the supplier shall bear relevant expenses. 

IV. Time and place of delivery: the products shall be delivered to the site of installation (Zhanjiang Xuwen Yangqian Wind Farm) designated by Guangdong
Yudean Zhanjiang Wind Power Co., Ltd. within 180 calendar days after signing the contract (the final delivery plan will be confirmed through the negotiation among Party A, Party B and Guangdong Yudean Zhanjiang Wind Power Co., Ltd.). 

V. Means of inspection: after the goods are delivered to the buyer, they shall be inspected in accordance with relevant quality technology standards (by
Party A and Guangdong Yudean Zhanjiang Wind Power Co., Ltd. jointly, similarly hereinafter); any abnormality shall be reported to the supplier, who shall deal with it within 2 days after receiving the feedback.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Buchholz, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winchester International Resorts
          Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Winchester International Resorts Inc.

Dated: November 22, 2010


                  /s/ Andrew Buchholz
                  --------------------------------------------------------------
                  Andrew Buchholz
                  Chief Financial Officer and Director
                  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
                  Winchester International Resorts Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Winchester International Resorts
Inc. and will be retained by Winchester International Resorts Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
24

ATTORNE GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 

* OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

* Misc. Docket AG N0.2_4 

V. 

* September Term, 2017 

RAOUF MUHAMMAD -X- ABDULLAH 

Respondent. *

m 

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent 

filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Raouf M. 

Abdullah. The Court, having considered the Petition and the record herein, it is this_ 

day of September, 2017, 

ORDERED, that Respondent, Raouf M. Abbdullah. be and he is hereby 

REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 5.] of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional 

Conduct. 

Senior Judge

22nd

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr.

Y
# Precious Metals - Charges

# Base Metals - Charges

# Precious-Depository Weighmaster

# Precious Metals - Assayers

# Precious Metals - Carriers

# Gold (GC) Brands

MKR03-31-17

MKR12-14-18

MKR07-31-20C

MKR03-07-22

# Gold (4GC) Brands

MKR03-31-17

MKR12-14-18

MKR03-07-22

# Gold Kilo (GCK) Brands

MKR12-14-18

MKR03-31-17

MKR03-07-22

# Silver (SI) Brands

MKR03-31-17

MKR12-14-18

MKR03-07-22

MKR07-18-22

# Platinum (PL) Brands

MKR04-08-22

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/platinum-list/

# Palladium (PA) Brands

MKR04-08-22

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

please see: https://www.lppm.com/palladium-list/

# Base Warehouses Weighmasters

# Base Metal - Assayers

# Copper (HG) Brands

# Aluminum (ALI) Brands

# Lead (LED) Brands

# Zinc (ZNC) Brands

# ULSD & RBOB Gasoline Terminals
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David K. Ryan, the Principal Accounting Officer of Yaterra
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ David K. Ryan             
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | DAVID K. RYAN                 
| |        |                               
| | Title: | Vice President, Finance       
| |        | (Principal Accounting Officer)
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | April 20, 2009                

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
NO. 07-04-0420-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MARCH 24, 2005

	______________________________

	TAUNTON CORPORATION D/B/A MIDNIGHT RODEO	, APPELLANT

	V.

	MARY PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF

	TYLER PHILLIPS, A MINOR, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2003-522,239; HONORABLE MACKEY K. HANCOCK, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Taunton Corporation, d/b/a Midnight Rodeo, appellant, appeals the Order denying appellant’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment/Motion for New Trial signed on July 2, 2004, and the Default Judgment signed on March 3, 2004.  We will dismiss the appeal.

	We are obligated to determine, sua sponte, issues affecting our jurisdiction over an appeal.  New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 678 (Tex. 1990).  Subject to limited exceptions not applicable here, our appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of final orders and judgments.  Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  To be final and appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in the case.  Id.   The record shows appellee filed suit against appellant and Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. d/b/a KQRB 99.5 The Bear.  The judgment appellant seeks to challenge in this appeal recites it “is final, disposes of all claims against Defendant, Tauton [sic], Corporation, d/b/a/ Midnight Rodeo and is not appealable.”  The judgment made no disposition of appellee’s claims against Clear Channel Broadcasting and the record does not contain an order severing the claims against either defendant.  The order denying appellant’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment/Motion for New Trial makes no disposition of the claims against Clear Channel Broadcasting.  This record fails to show either of the trial court actions appellant seeks to challenge in this appeal is final and appealable.

	Additionally, appellant’s brief was due no later than February 25, 2005.  By letter dated March 3, 2005, we notified appellant that the due date for the brief had passed, that the brief had not been filed and no motion for extension of time to file had been received by the court.  Citing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8, the letter also notified appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining its failure to file a brief, together with a showing that the appellee has not been significantly injured by the failure, was submitted by March 14, 2005.  Appellant has not filed such a response, nor has it since submitted a brief or a motion for extension of time. 

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P.  38.8(a)(1); 42.3(a),(b).

							James T. Campbell

							         Justice
#### HEARNE v. SHERMAN

No. 309A98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 340

Motion by respondent (Sherman et al) to dismiss appeal allowed 3 December 1998. Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.
Exhibit 32.1

OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Lenox Group Inc (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                 |                                                      
|----- | --------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: | August 10, 2006 | /s/ Susan E. Engel                                   
|      |                 |                                                      
|      |                 | Susan E. Engel                                       
|      |                 | Chairwoman of the Board
  and Chief Executive Officer
|      |                 |                                                      
|     
|Date: | August 10, 2006 | /s/ Timothy J. Schugel                               
|      |                 |                                                      
|      |                 | Timothy J. Schugel                                   
|      |                 | Chief Financial Officer
  and Chief Operating Officer

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0002226

31-JUL-2014

08:43 AM
#### Quintin Irving BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7242.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 20, 2013.

Decided: Oct. 3, 2013.

*290Quintín Irving Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quintín Irving Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jurak Corporation World
Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended August 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof, I, Anthony
C. Jurak, Chairman of the Board and Director and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

        (1)  the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
             of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
             and

        (2)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
             in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

Date: October 19, 2005        /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                           ------------------------
                           Anthony C. Jurak
                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7614** 

ANGELO HAM , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. NORA CHANDLER, Deputy Clerk of Court; LARRY PROPES, Clerk of Court , Defendants

– Appellees
.

Appeal from the United St ates District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 6:10

- cv - 02020

- JMC )

Submitted : February 28 , 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Cir cuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Angelo Ham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Angelo Ham appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict
court. Ham v. Chandler , No. 6:10

- cv - 02020

- JMC (D.S.C.
Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process . AFFIRMED
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATIONS
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Viper Powersports Inc., a Nevada corporation, for the Quarter ended September 30, 2006,
the undersigned certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

| | (1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Viper Powersports Inc. for the
Quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Viper Powersports Inc.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   November 14, 2006

| | /s/   John Lai                                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | John Lai, Principal Executive Officer of Viper Powersports Inc.

Date:   November 14, 2006

| | /s/   Jerome Posey                                             
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Jerome Posey, Chief Financial Officer of Viper Powersports Inc.

---
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**DEGOLYER ANDMACNAUGHTON**

 

**5001 SPRINGVALLEY ROAD**

 

**SUITE 800 EAST**

 

**Dallas,Texas 75244**

 

 

February 18, 2010

 

 

 

EnCanaCorporation

1800-855-2nd Street SW

Calgary,Alberta T2P 2S5

Canada

 

Ladiesand Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton andreference to our name and our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2009 onCertain Properties owned by EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. SEC Case” (ourReport) evaluating a portion of EnCana Corporation’s petroleum and natural gasreserves as of December 31, 2009, and the information contained in ourReport, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) EnCanaCorporation’s Registration Statement on Form 40-F, (ii) EnCanaCorporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453),(iii) EnCana Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13956,333-124218, and 333-140856), and (iv) EnCana Corporation’s RegistrationStatement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-149370), filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Verytruly yours,

 

/s/DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

DeGolyerand MacNaughton

TexasRegistered Engineering Firm F-716

 

----