alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Gregory B. Milton, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2006



/s/ Gregory B. MiltonGregory B. MiltonChief Accounting Officer




38
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2108 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2108

   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2019

 Mr. Palmer (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retirement Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT OUT OF THE MEDICARE PART 
              A BENEFIT.

    Any individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits under part A 
of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may elect (in such form and 
manner as may be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services) to opt out of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an 
election, such individual--
            (1) may (in such form and manner as may be specified by the 
        Secretary) subsequently choose to end such election and opt 
        back into such entitlement (in accordance with a process 
        determined by the Secretary) without being subject to any 
        penalty;
            (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits under 
        title II of such Act as a condition for making such election; 
        and
            (3) shall not be required to repay any amount paid under 
        such part A for items and services furnished prior to making 
        such election.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2382 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2020 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that the United States Postal Service prepay future 

retirement benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2382 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USPS Fairness Act’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIRED PREPAYMENT OF FUTURE 

4 POSTAL SERVICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS. 

5 Subsection (d) of section 8909a of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017283EN.01005402.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/54

---

Action brought on 12 July 2017 — CompuGroup Medical v EUIPO — Medion (life coins)

(Case T-444/17)

(2017/C 283/84)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CompuGroup Medical AG (Koblenz, Germany) (represented by: B. Dix, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Medion AG (Essen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘life coins’ — Application for registration No 12 541 538

Mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 in Case R 1569/2016-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019172EN.01002601.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2019 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-614/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/35)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William J. Kullback, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)of
InriCon Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1)       the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
         ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: June 27, 2005

                                              /s/ William J. Kullback
                                              --------------------------------
                                              William J. Kullback
                                              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Treasurer (principal financial
                                              officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency


Membership of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of membership--2001 DLA PRB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Defense Logistics Agency Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition is required by 5 
U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior 
Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations to 
the Director, Defense logistics Agency, with respect to pay level 
adjustments and performance awards, and other actions related to 
management of the SES cadre.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, STE 
2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karon Webb, SES Program Manager, 
HQC Human Resources Office, Defense Logistics Agency, Department of 
Defense, (703) 767-6427.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 1-year term, 
which begins on July 1, 2001.
PRB CHAIR:
    Mr. Phillip Steely, Executive Director
MEMBERS:
    Mr. Frank Lotts, Deputy Director, Logistics Operations
    Ms. Phyllis Campbell, Deputy Commander, Defense Distribution Center
    Dr. Linda Furiga, Comptroller

RADM Raymond A. Archer III, SC, USN
Vice Director, Defense Logistics Agency
[FR Doc. 01-13155 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3620-01-M
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2001 / Notices 28945

WOMEN’S PROGRESS

COMMEMORATION COMMISSION

Meeting

Agency: Women’s Progress

Commemoration Commission.

Action: Meeting Notice.

Time and Date: Monday, June 11,

2001, 10 a.m.–4 p.m.

Place: The meeting site is the

Radisson Barcelo Hotel Washington,

2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC

20037.

Status: The meeting is open to the

public.

Purpose: To hear testimony and

determine the final report regarding an

appropriate process for designating

women’s history sites and for raising

public awareness about the sites across

the country.

Contact Person: For further

information, contact Beth Newburger,

Executive Director of the Women’s

Progress Commemoration Commission.

Phone number (202) 418–3437.

Beth W. Newburger,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 01–13292 Filed 5–24–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–PF–U
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORT



PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):October 31, 2006

---

Rimage Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Minnesota

(State Or Other Jurisdiction Of Incorporation)



000-00619
        41-1577970(Commission File Number)
        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)




7725 Washington Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN
        55439(Address Of Principal Executive Offices)
        (Zip Code)




(952) 944-8144

Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):



oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---

Items under Sections 1 and 3 through 8 are not applicable and therefore omitted.



ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.



The Company hereby furnishes a press release, issued on October 31, 2006, disclosing material non-public information regarding its results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and hereby furnishes statements of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer made on October 31, 2006 at a telephone conference relating to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 results.



ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.



Exhibit No.
        
        Description99.1
        
        Press Release issued on October 31, 2006.99.2
        
        Statements of Bernard P. Aldrich, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert M. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer, at a telephone conference held on October 31, 2006.






SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





RIMAGE CORPORATIONBy:
        /s/ Robert M. WolfRobert M. Wolf
Chief Financial Officer


Date:
        November 1, 2006


---
#### Aumock v. Jamison.

1. Service oe summons on return day. A service of summons made on the return day thereof is sufficient to require the defendant to appear to the • action, and is effectual to support a judgment by default if- he fail to • appear.

This was a bill in chancery, filed in the District' Court for Douglas county. It alleged that, on the 27th of July, 1862, Jamison sued Aumock, in the said court, for the recovery of a debt, and that the summons issued in said action was returnable on the 4th day of August, 1862, and that" the summons was served on Aumock on that day and was also returned on that day. -The defendant failed to appear to the. suit and judgment was entered, against him. Execution was thereupon issued to the sheriff, who levied the same on certain lands of Aumock. He filed the bill for an injunction restraining the sheriff from selling the property on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment. A decree was rendered for the plaintiff, and Jamison appealed. The’question was whether the service of the summons was good under the 69th section of the Code, which is as follows : “The service shall be by delivering a copy of the summons to the defendant personally, or by leaving one at his usual place of residence at any time before the return day.”

*Hedióle <&*Briggs, for appellant. "

*A. J.*Poppleton, contra.

The court,

by Dundy, J.,

held that a service of summons made upon the return day named therein was sufficient to require the defendant to appear thereto, and, if he-did not do so, that it was effectual to support a judgment by default.

Kellogg, Ch. J., dissented.

• Deoree reversed.
#### William M. SYKES, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7187.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 21, 2006.

William M. Sykes, pro se.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, MAYER and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss William M. Sykes’ appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment in *Sykes v. Nicholson,*05-3273, for lack of jurisdiction.

On November 16, 2005, Sykes filed an appeal seeking review of a January 5, 2005 Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that denied his request to reopen his claim for service connection for the residuals of a low back injury. An appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must be filed within 120 days of the date of mailing of the Board’s decision. 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a). The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determined that there was nothing to support tolling of the appeal period and dismissed the appeal as untimely. Sykes appeals.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Veterans Court. *See Forshey v. Principi*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

A determination whether an appeal is timely filed or whether the appeal period should be tolled involves the application of the law to the facts of the case. *Leonard v. Gober,*223 F.3d 1374 (Fed.Cir.2000). Thus, this appeal is not within our jurisdiction. *See*38 U.S.C. § 7292(d).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat S.A. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such
officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Date: March 8, 2011 |  | /S/ MICHAEL
MCDONNELL                    
|                    |  | Michael McDonnell Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-605

In Re: CLAUDE RAYMOND CURRY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-91-262)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Raymond Curry, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Claude Raymond Curry filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

from this court seeking an order compelling enforcement of his constitutional rights. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when

there are no other means by which the relief sought could be

granted, see In Re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and

may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba

Indian Tribe of S.C., 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, although we grant the motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 5 O2.                     

*Date:*                         June 6, 2001.                     

*Time:*                         2 pm to 3 pm.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         6707 Democracy Blvd, 2 Democracy Plaza, Rm 653, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Francisco O. Calvo, Chief, Review Branch, DES NIDDK, Room 752, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MC 20892-6600, (301) 594-8897.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 18, 2001. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13199  Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M