alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capmark Financial Group Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |                                                                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/ WILLIAM F. ALDINGER                                                                         
|                        |  | Name:  William F. Aldinger III
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer                      
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/ GREGORY J. MCMANUS                                                                          
|                        |  | Name:  Gregory J. McManus
Title:Executive Vice President and
            Chief Financial Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 238 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 238

    To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James 
    Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
 Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the 
                  Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Grothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James 
    Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
 Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the 
                  Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO JAMES 
              MEGELLAS FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE BATTLE OF THE 
              BULGE.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may 
award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to James 
Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor during World War II described 
in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of James Megellas on January 28, 1945, 
in Herresbach, Belgium, during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first 
lieutenant in the 82nd Airborne Division, he led a surprise and 
devastating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, killing and 
capturing a large number and causing others to flee, single-handedly 
destroying an attacking German Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, 
and then leading his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 4.26**

 

**Summary of the Put Option agreed between Parati S.A and Fundação de Seguridade Social Braslight**

 

On July 15, 2011, Parati S.A. — Participações em Ativos de Energia Elétrica (“**Parati**”), an affiliated company of Cemig, through Luce LLC (“**Luce**”), was notified by Fundação de Seguridade Social Braslight (“**Braslight**”), owner of 25% of the units of the investment fund Luce Brasil Fundo de Investimento em Participações (“**FIP Luce**”), which in turn is indirect holder, through Luce Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., of 26,576,149 common shares issued by Light S.A. (“**Light**”), representing, approximately, 13.03% of Light’s total and voting capital, that Braslight would exercise the Option to Sell its holding in FIP Luce (the “**Put Option**”), as provided for in the Unit Holders’ Agreement of FIP Luce.

 

A Share Purchase Agreement was therefore entered into for acquisition of 25% of the holding in FIP Luce, held by Braslight.

 

The acquisition price was R$ 171.98 million, paid to Braslight.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 18, 2017

No. 04-16-00630-CR & 04-16-00631-CR

Cody Lon SMITH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B-07-057 & B-15-631

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

M. Patrick Maguire, appellant’s newly appointed appellate counsel, has filed a letter 

stating does not adopt the brief filed by former counsel. We therefore strike the brief filed by 

former counsel and deny the motion for extension of time to file it as moot. We order

appellant’s brief due August 17, 2017.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JASON LOUIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2835

[May 19, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 432010CF000586D.

Jason Louis, Carrabelle, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

# FORM 8-K

---

# CURRENT REPORT

# Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 14, 2005

|MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE                          
|------------------------------------------------------
|(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

|North Dakota                                  | 33-94644                 | 23-7222188                         
|--------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -----------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)

|7525 Red River RoadWahpeton, North Dakota |  | 58075     
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|(Address of principal executive offices)  |  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (701) 642-8411

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

| | o |  | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o |  | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-2 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-2)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o |  | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o |  | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

|ITEM 8.01 |  | OTHER EVENTS.
|--------- |  | -------------

Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative has announced that the board of directors,
following the completion of the 2005 fiscal year audit, has approved the final payment for the 2004 crop of $35.96 per ton of
beets harvested (12.598566 cents per pound of sugar). The Board of Directors has also declared and allocated to shareholders of
record, for the 2004 crop, non-qualified allocated patronage totaling $5,191,808 or $2.26 per ton of beets harvested.

---

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

|                          | MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
|------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                         
|                         
|Dated:   October 14, 2005 | By                          
|                          |                             

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2180 

To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability if a student on 

whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes disabled. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability 

if a student on whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes disabled. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Domenic and Ed’s Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT OF LOANS TO PARENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 437(d) of the Higher 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087(d)) is amended 

8 by inserting ‘‘or becomes permanently and totally disabled 

9 (as determined in accordance with regulations of the Sec10 retary), or if the student is unable to engage in any subVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:33 Apr 17, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2180.IH H2180

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2180 IH

1 stantial gainful activity by reason of any medically deter2 minable physical or mental impairment that can be ex3 pected to result in death, has lasted for a continuous pe4 riod of not less than 60 months, or can be expected to 

5 last for a continuous period of not less than 60 months,’’ 

6 after ‘‘dies,’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub8 section (a) shall apply to any outstanding loan received 

9 by a parent before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act, and without regard to the onset date of the 

11 disability or impairment. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-957-00-1420-BJ: GP01-0186]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Oregon State Office, Portland, 
Oregon, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 21 S., R. 32\1/2\ E., accepted April 27, 2001
T. 21 S., R. 33 E., accepted April 27, 2001
T. 38 S., R. 2 W., accepted April 30, 2001
T. 39 S., R. 3 W., accepted April 30, 2001
T. 21 S., R. 1 W., accepted May 1, 2001

Washington

T. 21 N., R. 12 W., accepted May 4, 2001
T. 35 N., R. 10 E., accepted May 4, 2001

    If protests against a survey, as shown on any of the above plat(s), 
are received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest(s). A plat will not be 
officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed 
and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed.
    The plat(s) will be placed in the open files of the Oregon State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1515 S.W. 5th Avenue, Portland, 
Oregon 97201, and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information only. Copies of the plat(s) may be obtained from the above 
office upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest 
against a survey must file with the State Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, Portland, Oregon, a notice that they wish to protest prior 
to the proposed official filing date given above. A statement of 
reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of protest to the 
State Director, or the statement of reasons must be filed with the 
State Director within thirty (30) days after the proposed official 
filing date.
    The above listed plats represent dependent resurveys, survey, and 
subdivision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, (1515 SW. 
5th Avenue) P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Robert D. DeViney, Jr.,
Branch of Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 01-13123 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|   |                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a Nevada Ltd company                          
|2. | MedElite, Inc., a Texas corporation                                         
|3. | Cinnergen, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|4. | PurEffect, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|5. | I-Boost, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                         
|6. | Cinnechol, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|7. | Freedom2 Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation                              
|8. | Freedom2, Inc. a Delaware corporation                                       
|9. | Exceptional Tattoo and Equipment Supply Company, Inc. a Delaware corporation



---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2333 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2333

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
   assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of 
Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coordinators, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Support for Suicide Prevention 
Coordinators Act''.
SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, 
AND VACANCY RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUICIDE PREVENTION 
COORDINATORS.
    (a) Assessment Required.--The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, 
training, and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans Affairs suicide 
prevention coordinators. Such assessment shall include a determination 
of--
        (1) the extent to which the use and staffing of suicide 
    prevention coordinators varies between Department facilities; and
        (2) the extent to which the Secretary provides oversight of 
    suicide prevention coordinators.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of 
Representatives a report containing the findings of the assessment 
required by subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### In the Matter of Stephen Rosenblum, Respondent, v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 26, 2012;

decided April 26, 2012

Reported below, 75 AD3d 426.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 18 NY3d 422 (2012)].
171 P.3d 599

#### STATE of Arizona v. Christopher Cruz CUEVAS.

No. CR-07-0082-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Sept. 25, 2007.

ORDERED: Petition for Review. DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
EXHIBIT A 

By-Laws 

Underlined text indicates new text 

Strikethrough text indicates deleted text 
ARTICLE I – DEFINITIONS

Definitions 

SECTION 1. Unless the context requires otherwise (or except as otherwise specified in the ByLaws or Rules) the terms defined herein shall, for purposes of these By-Laws and the Rules of 

the Corporation, have the meanings herein specified. 

* * *

G. 

(1) – (6) [No change.]

(7) The term “Guaranty Substitution Payment” means a payment that may be made by the 

Corporation to the correspondent clearing corporation under the terms of an agreement between 

them, as described in Rule 901, so that the correspondent clearing corporation will not reject 

settlement obligations for CCC-eligible securities that are directed by the Corporation for 

settlement through the facilities of the correspondent clearing corporation on account of a 

Clearing Member that has been suspended, as described in Rule 1102, and for which the 

correspondent clearing corporation has ceased to act.
#### Joseph W. MILLER and Cathy Miller, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

No. 84-2698C(1).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

March 20, 1985.

*805Joseph and Cathy Miller, pro se.

Mary Frances Clark, Tax Division, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, Chief Judge.

This case is now before this Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. This Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

This is a suit by plaintiffs for refund of an income tax penalty payment of $75.00. It is undisputed that plaintiffs jointly filed a tax return for the year 1983. On said tax return plaintiffs provided their names and address, but placed asterisks in all the other lines. At the bottom of each page of the tax return was an asterisk with the following language placed after it:

> This means specific objection is made under the Fifth Amendment, U.S. Constitution. Similar objection is made to the question under the First, Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth & Fourteenth Amendments for civil issues.

Pursuant to § 6702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, 26 U.S.C. § 6702, the Internal Revenue Service determined that plaintiffs’ tax return was a “frivolous” return and assessed a $500.00 penalty against them. Section 6702 was added to the Code by Section 326(a) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub.Law No. 97-248. Plaintiffs were given a notice that the penalty was assessed. Thereafter, plaintiffs made a partial payment of 15% of the penalty ($75.00) and filed a claim for a refund with the Internal Revenue Service. The plaintiffs’ claim for a refund was disallowed on October 17, 1984. On November 20, 1984, plaintiffs filed this suit for a refund. Plaintiffs’ complaint challenges the assessment of the penalty and the statute which authorized said penalty on constitutional grounds.

Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiffs’ complaint was timely filed, plaintiffs’ position is meritless as a matter of law. Plaintiffs’ constitutional objections to § 6702 and § 6703 have recently been rejected by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on more than one occasion. *Boomer v. United States,*755 F.2d 696 (8th Cir.1985); *Wall v. United States,*756 F.2d 52 (8th Cir.1985); *Baskin v. United States,*738 F.2d 975 (8th Cir.1984). Moreover, plaintiffs’ complaint was clearly “frivolous” because it does nothing but claim spurious constitutional objections. *See Ueckert v. Commissioner,*721 F.2d 248, 250 (8th Cir.1983).

Defendant seeks an award of attorney’s fees and imposition of sanctions, because plaintiffs filed a complaint which is clearly meritless and frivolous. This request is well taken. Plaintiffs’ claims were *806raised in bad faith and asserted vexatiously because they are patently frivolous and because plaintiffs intended them to impede the enforcement of the income tax laws when they filed their return. Under these circumstances, an award of defendant’s attorney’s fees and costs is appropriate under Rule 11. *Fed.R.Civ.P.*11. Plaintiffs shall pay defendant’s attorney’s fees in the amount of $200.00 and costs.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
      31,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Michael Stone, President and Chief Executive Officer of Stone
      Consulting Services, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                May 19, 2008
            STONE
                CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.By:
            /s/
                Michael StoneMichael
                Stone
              President
                and Chief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Stone Consulting Services, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by Stone Consulting Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.