alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
capacity as an officer of Osage Exploration and Development, Inc. (the
"Company"), that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Date: May
13, 2009





/s/ Kim BradfordKim
      BradfordChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





Date: May
13, 2009





/s/ Kim BradfordKim
      Bradford,President
      and Chief Executive Officer,(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 23

         [LETTERHEAD OF ARMANDO C. IBARRA CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS]


February 20, 2002


TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

The firm of Armando C. Ibarra, Certified Public Accountants, APC consents to the
inclusion  of our report of January 30, 2001,  on the  financial  statements  of
Vision  In Glass,  Inc.,  as of  December  31,  2001,  in any  filings  that are
necessary  now or in the  near  future  with the U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


Very truly your

/s/ Armando Ibarra

ARMANDO IBARRA, C.P.A.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2305 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit 

made to veterans from the definition of a member business loan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2019 

Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas (for himself, Mr. COOK, Ms. GABBARD, and Mr. 

YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit made to veterans from the definition 

of a member business loan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Members 

5 Business Loan Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN DEFINITION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 107A(c) of the Federal 

8 Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2305 IH

1 (A) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (B) in clause (v), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(vi) made to a veteran;’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (3) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(4) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

13 such term under section 101 of title 38, United 

14 States Code.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect after the end of the 6- 

17 month period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

18 this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Sauer Incorporated 

Under Contract No. N40080-1O-C-0001 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60902 

Kevin J. Kelly, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Ronald J. Borra, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Stephanie Cates-Hannan, Esq. 

Assistant Director 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 10 January 2017 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60902, Appeal of Sauer 

Incorporated, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28731-28732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Coast Zone Management: Federal Consistency Appeal by Port of 
Seattle From an Objection by the State of Washington

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Dismissal of appeal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    By letters dated July 17 and August 19, 1998, the Port of Seattle 
(Appellant) filed with the Secretary of Commerce notices of appeal 
pursuant to section 307(c)(3)(A) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 
1972, as amended, (CZMA), 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and the Department of 
Commerce's implementing regulations at 15 CFR part 930, subpart H. The 
first appeal was taken from an objection by the State of Washington 
(State) to the Appellant's consistency certification for a Clean Water 
Act section 404 permit to construct a runway and airport support 
facilities at Seattle-Takoma International Airport. The second appeal 
was taken from a later ``conditional concurrence'' by the State with 
the same consistency certification.
    At the Appellant's request, the General Counsel for the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) granted a stay of the 
consistency appeals pending disposition of parallel appeals that had 
been filed simultaneously by the Port of

[[Page 28732]]

Seattle with the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (Board). 
The State did not oppose the stay. The two appeals before the Board 
have been dismissed. With the dismissal of the appeals before the 
Board, the Appellant requested that the two consistency appeals be 
dismissed. The State concurred and NOAA accordingly dismissed the 
appeals. The Appellant is barred from filing another appeal from the 
State's objection to its consistency certification. This is a final 
agency action for purposes of judicial review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Campbell, Attorney-Adviser, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1305 East-West Highway, Room 6111, Silver Spring, Maryland 
20910, (301) 713-2967.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No. 11.419 Coastal Zone 
Management Program Assistance)

    Dated: May 8, 2001.
Craig O'Connor,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-13152 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2019

159002(70)

ROBERT F. BROZ and KIMBERLY BROZ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 159002

v COA: 340381

Otsego CC: 12-014346-NM

PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before March 5, 2019.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/
      Jarrett F. Bousquet     
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | April 19, 2010                    
| |        |                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2281 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To direct the Attorney General to amend certain regulations 

so that practitioners may administer not more than 3 

days’ medication to a person at one time when administering narcotic drugs for the purpose of relieving acute 

withdrawal symptoms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2281 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Easy Medication Ac3 cess and Treatment for Opioid Addiction Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘Easy MAT for Opioid Addiction Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DISPENSATION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS FOR THE PUR6 POSE OF RELIEVING ACUTE WITHDRAWAL 

7 SYMPTOMS FROM OPIOID USE DISORDER. 

8 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Attorney General shall revise section 

10 1306.07(b) of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, so 

11 that practitioners, in accordance with applicable State, 

12 Federal, or local laws relating to controlled substances, are 

13 allowed to dispense not more than a three-day supply of 

14 narcotic drugs to one person or for one person’s use at 

15 one time for the purpose of initiating maintenance treat16 ment or detoxification treatment (or both). 

17 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

18 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

19 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

20 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

21 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

22 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

23 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:17 Nov 19, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2281.RFS H2281

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2281 RFS

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
|  | 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form      10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,      2009,  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Amir F. Heshmatpour                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Amir F. Heshmatpour                                                                           |
| President, Secretary and Sole Director                                              |
| (Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Camilo RAMOS-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41409

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Camilo Ramos-Hernandez (Ramos) appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for unlawfully transporting illegal aliens within the United States for profit. He argues that the district court reversibly erred in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the court sentenced him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines.

The district court did err in sentencing Ramos pursuant to a mandatory guidelines system. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005). The Government concedes that Ramos preserved this error for appeal. The Government, however, has not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 463; *United States v. Woods,*440 F.3d 255, 258-61 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Ramos’s sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-118510 and 333-129551 on Form S-8 of
Scanner Technologies Corporation of our report dated February 10, 2006 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Scanner Technologies Corporation appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Scanner Technologies Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

| | /s/
Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP
| | ----------------------------------------

Minneapolis, MinnesotaFebruary 28,
2006

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 0 2
- 00 533
- CR NO. 03
- 02
- 00534
- CR

Kendrick Cordell Jones , Appellant

v.
The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. 51,572 & 52,970 , HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO , JUDGE PRESIDING

Kendrick Cordell Jones seeks to appeal from judgments of conviction for aggravated assault and burglary of

a habitation. Sentence was imposed in both cases on June 14, 2002. There was no motion for new trial. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore July 15, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notices of appeal were filed on August 26, 2002. Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeals in any manner other than by dismissing for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).2 The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________ Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
F iled: September 19, 2002
Do Not Publish
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 65 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 21 of 21
exh10-1_1434015.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 4


TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED


ACCESS INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2000 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







AMENDMENT NO. 4, dated as of September 14, 2010 (this “Amendment”), to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) of Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”).


 


WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Plan, effective as of June 1, 2000; and


 


WHEREAS, in order to provide the Corporation with the flexibility to be able to grant additional stock options to its employees, the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it to be in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders to amend the Plan in order to increase the maximum number of shares of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, which may be issued and sold under the Plan from 5,000,000 shares to 7,000,000 shares and to extend the term of the Plan until June 1, 2020.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.           The first sentence of Section 5.2 shall be revised and amended to read as follows:


 


“The total number of shares of Stock (including Restricted Stock, if any) optioned or granted under this Plan during the term of the Plan shall not exceed 7,000,000 shares.”


 


2.           The final sentence of Section 13 shall be revised and amended to read as follows:


 


“No award shall be granted under this Plan on or after June 1, 2020.”


 


3.           The amendment to Section 5.2 shall be effective as of the date first set forth above, which is the date that this Amendment was approved by a majority of the outstanding votes cast at the 2010 meeting of the holders of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, and the amendment to Section 13 shall be effective as of June 1, 2010.


 


4.           In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect.








	  	
CINEDIGM DIGITAL CINEMA CORP.


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	  /s/ Gary S. Loffredo
	  	  	 
  Interim Co-CEO
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13004]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4435]


Bayer Corporation, Consumer Care Division, Elkhart, IN; Dismissal 
of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Bayer Corporation, Consumer Care 
Division, Elkhart, Indiana. The application contained no new 
substantial information which would bear importantly on the 
Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was 
issued.

NAFTA-4435; Bayer Corporation Consumer Care Division Elkhart, 
Indiana (May 2, 2001)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 3rd day of May, 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-13004 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Encana Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sherri A. Brillon, Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Sherri A. Brillon                                       |   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Sherri A. Brillon                                             |   |   |
|   |   | Executive   Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                                          |   |
|   | Dated: | February 17, 2011                                        |   |

 

----