alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0044-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 5, 2007

		______________________________

	ADRIAN TENORIO, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2006-413201; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	Appellant Adrian Tenorio has given notice of appeal from a conviction and sentence for aggravated robbery.  The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk’s record on March 6, 2007, and received and filed the trial court reporter’s record on April 10, 2007. 

	Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 10, 2007.  The Court, on May 18, 2007, notified counsel for appellant that the brief was due and gave a May 29, 2007 deadline for the brief to be filed or the appeal would be abated and remanded to the trial court.  Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been received. 

	Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).  Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: 

	(1) 	whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 

	(2)	if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant’s present counsel should be replaced; and

	(3)	what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.

If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the court shall cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed attorney.  

	In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.  The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record.  Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court no later than July 9, 2007.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, of Capitol Acquisition Corp. (the Issuer).

I, Mark D. Ein, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of
my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Mark D. Ein                                                           
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Mark D. Ein                                                               
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13071]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 650

RIN 3052-AB56


Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation; Risk-Based Capital 
Requirements; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule 
under part 650 on April 12, 2001 (66 FR 19048). In this final rule, we 
amended our regulations, through the Office of Secondary Market 
Oversight (OSMO), by establishing risk-based capital regulations for 
the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac). The final 
rule in part 650 sets forth the risk-based capital regulations for 
Farmer Mac, including definitions, methods, parameters and guidelines 
for developing and implementing the risk-based capital stress test; 
specifies capital calculation, reporting, and compliance requirements; 
and delineates our monitoring, examination, supervisory, and 
enforcement activities with respect to Farmer Mac's compliance with the 
rule's risk-based capital requirements; and prescribes certain 
requirements for business and capital planning. In accordance with 12 
U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the 
date of publication in the Federal Register during which either or both 
Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions 
of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is May 23, 2001.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 650 published on 
April 12, 2001 (66 FR 19048) is effective May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carl A. Clinefelter, Director, Office of Secondary Market Oversight, 
Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4280, TDD 
(703) 883-4444, or

Dennis K. Carpenter, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Policy and 
Analysis, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-
4498, TDD (703) 883-4444, or

Joy Strickland, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit 
Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 883-
4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
Kelly Mikel Williams,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 01-13071 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-U
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bold View Resources, Inc. for the quarter      ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended August 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Bold View Resources,      Inc.. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Richard Howie                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Richard      Howie                                                              |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | October      21, 2008                                                           |
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard B. Collins, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to United Financial Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by United Financial Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                 |  |                                                
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard B. Collins                         
|Dated            |  | Richard B. Collins                             
|                 |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Pharmatech, Inc. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
their knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.


Date: April 14, 2008                      /s/ Zongsheng Zhang
                                          -----------------------------------
                                   Name:  Zongsheng Zhang
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer

This Certification of the Chief Financial Officer is pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Kelly, Appellant.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

24, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00479-CV

SHRIHARI ENTERPRISES, INC, Appellant

V.

SATIESH Y. RAO AND SAI & SAI, INC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-54280

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 4, 2012. On January 11, 

2013, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teresa MARIBLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4393.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.

Decided: Sept. 26, 2013.

Tony E. Rollman, Enka, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Kellie Hamby Ferry, Assistant United States Attorney, Benjamin Bain-Creed, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Marible appeals her conviction and thirty-six-month sentence following her guilty plea to conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (2006). In accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Marible’s counsel has filed a brief certifying that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but questioning whether Marible’s trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during Marible’s plea and sentencing proceedings by failing to investigate her case, failing to challenge the forfeiture of a vehicle, and misadvising her about the possibility of release on bond before sentencing. Marible has declined to file a supplemental brief. We affirm.

In the absence of conclusive evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record, Marible’s claims are not cognizable on direct appeal. *United States v. Powell,*680 F.3d 350, 359 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 376, 184 L.Ed.2d 222 (2012). Rather, “[cjlaims of ineffective assistance of counsel are normally raised before the district court via 28 U.S.C. § 2255[.]” *Id.*(internal quotation marks omitted); *United States v. Baptiste,*596 F.3d 214, 216 n. 1 (4th Cir.2010). Because the record does not conclusively establish that counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the proceedings in the district court, we decline to address Marible’s ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform Marible, in writing, of her right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Marible requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Marible. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *255court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# C_2018022EN.01006001.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/60

---

Action brought on 27 November 2017 — Café del Mar and Others v EUIPO — Guiral Broto (Café del Mar)

(Case T-773/17)

(2018/C 022/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Café del Mar SC (Sant Antoni de Portmany, Spain), José Les Viamonte (Sant Antoni de Portmany) and Carlos Andrea González (Sant Antoni de Portmany) (represented by: F. Miazzetto and J. L. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Café del Mar’ — European Union trade mark No 1 054 303

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2017 in Case R 1542/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare European Union figurative mark No 1 054 303 containing the word elements ‘Café del Mar’ invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare European Union figurative mark No 1 054 303 containing the word elements ‘Café del Mar’ invalid;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings, and order the proprietor of the trade mark at issue to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings, and order the proprietor of the trade mark at issue to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |   |                                       |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| August      16, 2010 |   |   | /s/      Justin N. Craig                   |   |
|                 |   |   | Justin      N. Craig                       |   |
|                 |   |   | President      and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

October 23, 2023

Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments: Updates to Data Feed – Submission 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation §40.6(d) 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick,

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), and 

§40.6(d) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) under the Act, North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. d/b/a Crypto.com | Derivatives 

North America (“Nadex” or “CDNA” or the “Exchange”) hereby submits this Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments that have been made effective during the week of October 22, 2023:

• Revisions to the Exchange Rules 12.24, 12.25, 12.87, 12.88, 12.91, 12.92, 12.94, and 12.96 to 

reflect the use of an additional underlying data provider, Lukka, Inc., for the UpDown Contracts 

and Event Contracts set forth in the rules above.

Attached to this filing is a redline showing the changes to the Exchange Rulebook. This filing and 

the revised Exchange Rulebook are available at www.nadex.com. 

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me by 

telephone at (312) 884-0161 or by email at kevin.dan@nadex.com.

 

Sincerely, 

Kevin J. Dan

Chief Compliance Officer
#### Pedro R. CRUZ, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7143.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 2006.

Pedro R. Cruz, pro se.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether it should be dismissed as untimely.

Pedro R. Cruz appealed a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals that denied his claim for an effective date prior to August 30, 1989, the date that he applied for an increased rating for a psychiatric disability. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the Board’s decision and entered judgment on September 12, 2005.

On February 23, 2006, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims received a letter from Lydia P. Cruz, who is identified as a legal custodian of Pedro Cruz. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims treated the letter as a possible notice of appeal to this court. In the event that the letter was intended to be a notice of appeal, it was not timely received by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. A notice of appeal is due within 60 days of the entry of the judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). Any notice of appeal was due by November 11, 2005 and the letter was received 104 days after the due date. Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, the appeal must be dismissed. *See Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. United States,*716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Cruz’s appeal is dismissed as untimely.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.