alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017402EN.01003701.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/37

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — António Conde & Companhía v Commission

(Case T-244/17 R II)

((Interim measures - Fishing vessel - Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation - Admissibility - New facts - Change in circumstances - Application for interim measures - Lack of interest))

(2017/C 402/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: António Conde & Companhía, SA (Gafanha de Nazaré, Portugal) (represented by: J.R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, A. Lewis and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures ordering the European Commission to abstain from exerting pressure on the Republic of Portugal to exclude the fishing vessel Calvão from the list of Portuguese-flagged vessels authorised to fish in the NAFO Regulatory Area and to produce the documents pertaining to the exchanges between the Commission and the representatives of the Republic of Portugal regarding the exclusion of the applicant’s vessels from the NAFO Regulatory Area.

Calvão

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:  November
      9, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
                        Title:
                      Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                        President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                        United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                        General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Care Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Patricia Traczykowski, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 23rd day of November, 2009.





PATRICIA TRACZYKOWSKIPatricia TraczykowskiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:
      May 7, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZYTO Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vaughn R Cook, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Vaughn R CookVaughn R CookPresident and Chief Executive Officer




November 15, 2010




---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2446 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2446

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used to 
   finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2019

Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Beyer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used to 
   finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. NO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR PROFESSIONAL STADIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Professional stadium bond.--Any professional stadium 
        bond.''.
    (b) Professional Stadium Bond Defined.--Section 103(c) of such Code 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Professional stadium bond.--The term `professional 
        stadium bond' means any bond issued as part of an issue any 
        proceeds of which are used to finance or refinance capital 
        expenditures allocable to a facility (or appurtenant real 
        property) which, during at least 5 days during any calendar 
        year, is used as a stadium or arena for professional sports 
        exhibitions, games, or training.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kimberly Hurrell-Harring et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 16, 2010;

decided February 18, 2010

*758Motion by Michael A. Battle et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
142 So. 828

#### GAY v. RADNEY.

5 Div. 119.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 25, 1932.

Paul J. Hooton, of Roanoke, for appellant.-

*332D. T. Ware, of Roanoke, for appellee.

BOULD.IN, .1.

The action is by the landlord of a dwelling for the destruction of his lien upon the furniture of his tenant. Code, § 8814.

The defendant was holder of a mortgage given for the purchase money due for such furniture.

The evidence for defendant tended to show that the furniture was first placed in the house under a sort of- bailment about October 1; 1930, awaiting the arrival of the wife of the tenant before concluding a sale, and on October 15, 1930, the sale was concluded to husband and wife, who gave a joint mortgage to -defendant, whoj projnptly forwarded same by mail for record, and it was filed for record on October 17, 1930.

The rental term began October 1st, and the rent for October was paid by the tenant. Rents for subsequent months, aggregating $60, were not paid.

. The tenant, on vacating the premises, sent the key of the house to the mortgagee with directions to go and get the furniture. He did so, but did not foreclose the mortgage under power of sale, proceeding, it seems, to resell -the property as his own, and had sold some articles realizing a sufficient amount to pay most of the debt, and still had some of the articles on -hand at the time this suit was filed.

Dealing with the priorities between the parties, we note that in cases of conditional sale, contracts under existing statutes the superiority, of the landlord’s -lien only covers r.ents- accruing before actual notice -of the vendor’s ’ title, or before constructive notice. by filing the paper for record. Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. Sitz, 217 Ala. 51, 114 So. 678; La Rue v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb, 220 Ala. 2, 127 So. 241.

The same principles govern purchase-money mortgages given contemporaneously with the sale, or at least no greater interest can exist in favor of the landlord. Merely because the lien attaches for the full term as between the landlord and tenant cannot be made to subordinate the title of a mortgagee, who, as here, promptly put his mortgage to record.

Under defendant’s version of the transaction, the rent for October having been fully paid, the landlord’s lien was subordinate to the mortgage.

So far as appears, the trial court recognized this priority, but, declaring the undisputed evidence disclosed the property for which the mortgagee should account was of the value of $218, a sum more than sufficient to pay both debts, he gave the affirmative charge with hypothesis to “find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at $60.00.”

In this the court invaded the province of the jury. The court, as! we read the record, was in error in stating that even plaintiff’s testimony showed the value of the property was $218, and defendant’s evidence as to the value of articles on hand and those disposed, of was quite different.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony C. Jurak,
Chairman of the Board and Director of Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that:

|(1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
          August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
          report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: October 20, 2004 | /s/ Anthony C. Jurak                                                                                   
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Anthony C. Jurak
Chairman of the Board and Director
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as
separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and will be retained by Jurak Corporation
World Wide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

10

---
# C_2018112EN.01002201.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 18 January 2018 — V v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants, Securex Integrity ASBL

(Case C-33/18)

(2018/C 112/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: V

Applicant:

Defendants: Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants, Securex Integrity ASBL

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (1) | Is Article 87(8) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a person who, before 1 May 2010, began to pursue an activity as an employed person in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and an activity as a self-employed person in Belgium must, in order to be subject to the legislation applicable pursuant to Regulation 883/2004, submit an explicit request to that effect, even if he was subject to no obligation to pay contributions in Belgium before 1 May 2010 and was made subject to the Belgian legislation on the social security scheme for self-employed persons only retroactively, following the expiry of the three-month period starting on 1 May 2010? |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Is Article 87(8) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a person who, before 1 May 2010, began to pursue an activity as an employed person in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and an activity as a self-employed person in Belgium must, in order to be subject to the legislation applicable pursuant to Regulation 883/2004, submit an explicit request to that effect, even if he was subject to no obligation to pay contributions in Belgium before 1 May 2010 and was made subject to the Belgian legislation on the social security scheme for self-employed persons only retroactively, following the expiry of the three-month period starting on 1 May 2010?

1

| (2) | If the first question is answered in the affirmative: does the request referred to in Article 87(8) of Regulation 883/2004 and submitted in the circumstances described above entail the application of the legislation of the competent State pursuant to Regulation 883/2004 with retroactive effect from 1 May 2010? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

If the first question is answered in the affirmative: does the request referred to in Article 87(8) of Regulation 883/2004 and submitted in the circumstances described above entail the application of the legislation of the competent State pursuant to Regulation 883/2004 with retroactive effect from 1 May 2010?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Consumer
Acquisition Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report.4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Andrew Nelson

Andrew NelsonChief Financial OfficerDecember 27, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.1














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Report of Great Spirits, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dana
Hyde , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: February
12,
2008                         
By:   /s/ Dana
Hyde
 Dana Hyde
 Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-127656), relating to the 2005 Stock Option
Plan of Houston American Energy Corp., of our report dated March 26, 2007
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Houston American Energy
Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2006 that appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ Thomas Leger & Co., L.L.P.
Thomas Leger & Co., L.L.P.

HOUSTON, TEXAS
MARCH 27, 2008
#### Abdul Karim HASSAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MONTANA; Linda McCulloch, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-35402.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Abdul Karim Hassan, Queens Village, NY, pro se.

Jere Stuart Segrest, Assistant Attorney General, Montana Attorney General, Helena, MT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Abdul Karim Hassan, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t,*901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hassan’s action because Hassan failed to advance a cognizable legal theory as to why Montana’s requirement that candidates sign an oath declaring that they are constitutionally eligible for the Presidency before being placed on the ballot violates the Constitution. *See id.*(dismissal for failure to state a claim can be “based on the lack of a cognizable legal theory”); *see also Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife,*551 U.S. 644, 663, 127 S.Ct. 2518, 168 L.Ed.2d 467 (2007) (“[A] statute dealing with a narrow, precise, and specific subject is not submerged by a later enacted statute covering a more generalized spectrum.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); *Branch v. Smith,*538 U.S. 254, 273, 123 S.Ct. 1429, 155 L.Ed.2d 407 (2003) (“An implied repeal will only be found where provisions in two statutes are in ‘irreconcilable conflict,’ or where the latter Act covers the whole subject of the earlier one and ‘is clearly intended as a substitute.’” (citation omitted)); *Bullock v. Carter,*405 U.S. 134, 145, 92 S.Ct. 849, 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972) (“[A] State has an interest, if not a duty, to protect the integrity of its political processes from frivolous or fraudulent candidacies.”).

*554Hassan’s arguments concerning the absurdity doctrine are unpersuasive. *See Crooks v. Harrelson,*282 U.S. 55, 60, 51 S.Ct. 49, 75 L.Ed. 156 (1930) (noting that the absurdity doctrine will “override the literal terms of a statute only under rare and exceptional circumstances”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.