alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1838 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1838

    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
  reissuance of Social Security account numbers to young children in 
           cases where confidentiality has been compromised.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2019

  Mr. Marchant (for himself and Mr. Smith of Missouri) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
  reissuance of Social Security account numbers to young children in 
           cases where confidentiality has been compromised.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Child Protection Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS TO YOUNG CHILDREN 
              IN CASES WHERE CONFIDENTIALITY HAS BEEN COMPROMISED.

    (a) In General.--Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new 
        clause:
    ``(iii) In any case in which a Social Security account number has 
been issued to a child who has not attained the age of 14 pursuant to 
subclause (IV) or (V) of clause (i) and it is demonstrated by evidence, 
as determined by the Commissioner of Social Security, and submitted 
under penalty of perjury to the Commissioner by a parent or guardian of 
the child that in the course of transmission of the social security 
card to the child, the confidentiality of such number has been 
compromised by reason of theft of such social security card, the 
Commissioner shall issue a new Social Security account number to such 
child and make note in the records maintained with respect to such 
child of the pertinent information received by the Commissioner 
regarding the theft of the social security card.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019044EN.01006201.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/62

---

Order of the General Court of 19 November 2018 — Iccrea Banca v Commission and SRB

(Case T-494/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and damages - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Determination of the ex ante contribution for 2016 - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - Hypothetical measures - Claim for damages - Closely connected with the claim for annulment - Plea of illegality - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo (Rome, Italy) (represented by: P. Messina, F. Isgrò and A. Dentoni Litta, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, A. Steiblytė and M. K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents) and Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: G. Rumi, S. Raes, M. Merola and T. Van Dyck, lawyers)

Re:

Principally, first, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Decision of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and of all further decisions of the Single Resolution Board on the basis of which the Banca d’Italia adopted national decisions No 1249264/15 of 24 November 2015, No 1262091/15 of 26 November 2015, No 1547337/16 of 29 December 2016, No 0333162/17 of 14 March 2017, and No 0334520/17 of 14 March 2017, in so far as they concern the applicant, and, secondly, application for damages based on Article 268 TFEU, or, in the alternative, application based on Article 277 TFEU.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board and the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board and the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jair Williams, Appellant.

Submitted March 1, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BEVERLY COLE, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF REGINALD

LUKE, A MINOR, 

 Appellant,

v.

MARIA MCGINNIS, R.N., TONYA

PEREZ, L.V.N., MARGARITA

CORDOVA, L.V.N., SHERI TALLEY,

M.D., EDWIN FRANKS, M.D.,

MICHAEL GRIMMETT, PH.D., TEXAS

YOUTH COMMISSION, TEXAS TECH

UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, 

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

§

§

§

§

No. 08-10-00333-CV

Appeal from the

83rd Judicial District Court

of Pecos County, Texas 

(TC# P-6554-83-CV-B) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of this

appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Costs

of appeal are assessed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

March 23, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
# C_2020287EN.01000301.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 July 2020 — Czech Republic v European Commission

(Case C-575/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Own resources of the European Union - Financial liability of the Member States - Request to be released from the obligation to make own resources available - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Letter from the European Commission - Concept of ‘actionable measure’ - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Effective judicial protection - Action alleging unjust enrichment on the part of the European Union)

(2020/C 287/03)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Appellant: Czech Republic (represented by: O. Serdula, J. Vláčil and M. Smolek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented: initially by M. Owsiany-Hornung and Z. Malůšková, and subsequently by Z. Malůšková and J.-P. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the appellant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M.K. Bulterman, C.S. Schillemans, M.L. Noort, M.H.S. Gijzen and J. Langer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager
of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine,
LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report")
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The  information  contained in the Annual  Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated: July 19, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
---------------------------------------------------
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
#### STATE v. VICK

No. 349P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 207

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 December 1998. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 3 December 1998.
Nodal Exchange, LLC Rulebook Appendix C: Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and Position Limits

Physical 

Commodity 

Code

Contract Name Reporting 

Level

Spot Month 

Position Limit 

(lots)

Single Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

All Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

Aggregation 

Group*

CFTC 

Referenced 

Contract

GMW MISO_RTO.ALTW.DAEC_month_on_dac 25 139 139 1668 0

GMX MISO_RTO.ALTW.DAEC_month_off_dac 25 139 139 1668 0
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NS8 Corporation  (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Anthony J. Alda,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that;

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/  Anthony J. Alda
--------------------
Principal Executive Officer
January 23, 2007
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00011

- CR

JOSEPH WARREN POLK, JR.

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 23752

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph Warren Polk, Jr. appeals his conviction. However, the certification of

defendant's right of appeal which Polk signed indicates that he has no right to appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d); Monreal v. State

,

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Court of

Criminal Appeals, a petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within

30 days after either the day the court of appeals' judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion

for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2 (a).Polk v. State Page 2

99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 25 , 2017

Do not publish

[CR25]
# C_2020313EN.01001903.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — KA v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social

(Case C-811/18) (1)

(2020/C 313/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.

---
# C_2017231EN.01005001.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/50

---

Action brought on 22 May 2017 — Wajos v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)

(Case T-313/17)

(2017/C 231/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wajos GmbH (Dohr, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneiders, R. Krillke and B. Schneiders, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional EU trade mark (Shape of a bottle) — Application for registration No 14 886 097

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2017 in Case R 1526/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Breach of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
ex10-2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2






 


                                                As of September 16, 2010












Hoku Corporation


1288 Ala Moana Blvd., Suite 220


Honolulu, Hawaii 96814


Attention: Chief Executive Officer







Re:           Financing Costs Reimbursement







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) dated as of the date hereof between Hoku Corporation, as borrower (“Hoku”), and China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., New York Branch, as lender (the “Lender”).  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Credit Agreement.







As an inducement and condition to the Lender’s willingness to provide a term credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000,000 to Hoku on the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement, Hoku has requested its parent company, Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. (“Tianwei”), and Tianwei has agreed, to procure a standby letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in favor of the Lender to secure Hoku’s obligations to the Lender pursuant to the Credit Agreement.







In consideration of Tianwei’s procuring the Letter of Credit, Hoku agrees to reimburse Tianwei for all interest, fees and expenses incurred by Tianwei pursuant to the Letter of Credit and all other interest, fees and expenses (including reasonable counsel fees) incurred by Tianwei in connection with the negotiation, execution or performance of the Letter of Credit (collectively, the “Reimbursement Obligations”), by promptly paying all amounts of the Reimbursement Obligations requested by Tianwei in immediately available funds to the bank account specified by Tianwei.







This letter agreement will become effective upon the execution and delivery hereof.  This letter agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of hereof.







This letter agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of law rules of such state.







 


[Remainder of page is intentionally blank]


 




  





1











  




 


 


Very truly yours,


 


 











	 	 	 	TIANWEI NEW ENERGY HOLDINGS CO., LTD.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
 

	 	By:	
/s/ Zhengfei Gao

	 
	 	
 

	 	 	
Name: Zhengfei Gao

	 
	 	 	 	 	Title: 	 
	Agreed and accepted:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	HOKU CORPORATION	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Scott B. Paul 	 	 	 	 
	 	Name: Scott B. Paul	 	 	 	 
	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 







 


 


 


2
# C_2017330EN.01001701.xml

| 2.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/17

---

Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Esfera Capital Agencia de Valores v Commission and SRB

(Case T-499/17)

(2017/C 330/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Esfera Capital Agencia de Valores, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Pastor Palomar, F. Arroyo Romero and N. Subuh Falero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 addressed to the Fund for Orderly Bank Restructuring (FROB) approving a restructuring plan in respect of Banco Popular Español; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 addressed to the Fund for Orderly Bank Restructuring (FROB) approving a restructuring plan in respect of Banco Popular Español;

| — | Annul European Commission Decision 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 supporting the resolution plan for Banco Popular Español; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul European Commission Decision 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 supporting the resolution plan for Banco Popular Español; and

| — | By virtue of the provision in Article 340 TFEU, declare that the SRB and European Commission are non-contractually liable and order them to make good the harm caused to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

By virtue of the provision in Article 340 TFEU, declare that the SRB and European Commission are non-contractually liable and order them to make good the harm caused to the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to the arguments raised in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía y Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board; T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán y Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board; T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board; T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board; T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board and T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía y Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán y Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

áchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

In particular, the applicant claims that the Commission misused its powers in the present case.

---
Exhibit 99.5  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  LLP
  Chartered
  Accountants
  111 5 Avenue
  SW, Suite 3100
  Calgary,
  Alberta
  Canada T2P
  5L3
  Telephone +1
  403 509 7500
  Facsimile +1
  403 781 1825  Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  We hereby consent to (i) the inclusion in EnCana Corporations
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008; and (ii) the
incorporation by reference in registration statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453);
and (iii) the incorporation by reference in registration statements on Form S-8
(File Nos. 333-124218, 333-13956 and 333-140856); and (iv) the
incorporation by reference in registration statements on Form F-9 (File No. 333-149370),
of our audit report dated February 19 , 2009, relating to the Consolidated
Financial Statements as at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2008
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of EnCana
Corporation as of December 31, 2008.     Chartered Accountants 
Calgary, Alberta
February 19, 2009   PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
Ontario limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.