alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 27, 2010

Before

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

Nos. 08

‐ 2512 & 08

‐ 2443

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant/

Cross

‐ Appellee

,

v.

BERNARD ELLIS,

Defendant

‐ Appellee /

Cross

‐ Appellant.

No. 08

‐ 4055

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

BERNARD ELLIS,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the

United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 05 CR 756

Wayne R. Andersen,

Judge

.

Appeal from the

United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division.

No. 3:05 CR 131

Robert L. Miller, Jr.

Judge.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of DEFENDANT

‐ APPELLANT’S MOTION TO AMEND

OPINION filed by counsel on September 22, 2010,Nos. 08

‐ 2512, 08

‐ 2443 & 08

‐ 4055 Page 2

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The slip opinion issued on

September 17, 2010, is amended in two ways. First, the last two sentences of the first

paragraph of the opinion are replaced with the following two sentences: “Ellis appealed his

conviction and sentence in the Indiana case, and the government appealed the district

court’s sentencing decision in the Illinois case. Ellis then cross

‐ appealed in the Illinois case

challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.” Second, the caption for the Illinois appeals

is amended to reflect that the United States is the Plaintiff

‐ Appellant/Cross

‐ Appellee and

Bernard Ellis is the Defendant

‐ Appellee/Cross

‐ Appellant.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2268 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat certain menstrual products as misbranded if their labeling does not list each ingredient or component of the product, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

treat certain menstrual products as misbranded if their 

labeling does not list each ingredient or component of 

the product, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Menstrual Products 

5 Right To Know Act of 2019’’. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2268 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS MISBRANDED IF 

2 LABELING DOES NOT INCLUDE INGREDI3 ENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 502 of the Federal Food, 

5 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(ee) If it is a menstrual product, such as a men8 strual cup, a scented, scented deodorized, or unscented 

9 menstrual pad or tampon, a therapeutic vaginal douche 

10 apparatus, or an obstetrical and gynecological device de11 scribed in section 884.5400, 884.5425, 884.5435, 

12 884.5460, 884.5470, or 884.5900 of title 21, Code of Fed13 eral Regulations (or any successor regulation), unless its 

14 label or labeling lists the name of each ingredient or com15 ponent of the product in order of the most predominant 

16 ingredient or component to the least predominant ingre17 dient or component.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) applies with respect to products introduced 

20 or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce on 

21 or after the date that is one year after the date of the 

22 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Hui Liu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Care Technologies Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical Care Technologies Inc.





Dated this 24th day of May, 2012.





/s/ HUI LIUHui LiuTreasurer and Director, (Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Care Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Medical Care Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 73 and 74

[MM Docket No. 95-31, FCC 00-120]


Reexamination of Comparative Standards for Noncommercial 
Educational Applicants

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission adopted new rules for selecting among mutually 
exclusive applicants for noncommercial educational broadcast stations. 
Certain rules contained new and modified information collection 
requirements and were published in the Federal Register on June 8, 
2000. This document announces the effective date of these published 
rules.

DATES: Effective August 1, 2000 with respect to the amendments to 
Secs. 73.202, 73.3527, and 77.3572 published at 65 FR 36375 (June 8, 
2000).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Bleiweiss, Mass Media Bureau, 
Audio Services Division, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 1, 2000, the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection requirements 
contained in Sections 73.202; 73.3527; and 73.3572 pursuant to OMB 
Control Nos. 3060-0948. Accordingly, the information collection 
requirements contained in these rules became effective on August 1, 
2000.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1308 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2021

No. 04-21-00171-CV

Leticia RODRIGUEZ 'Cross-Appellee',

Appellant

v.

Lydia RODRIGUEZ and Robert Pereida 'Cross-Appellants',

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19456

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 9, 2021, the court reporter Mary O. Berry filed a notification of late record, 

notifying this court that the reporter’s record has not been filed because (1) appellant has failed 

to request the record, and (2) appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the 

reporter’s fee for preparing the record. 

 It is therefore ORDERED that appellant Leticia Rodriguez provide proof to this court 

within ten (10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to 

prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and 

the exhibits to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1).

 It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) 

days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have 

been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee.

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the date appellant’s 

written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, 

appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the clerk’s record is filed, and 

the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a 

reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

p0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

148067

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148067

COA: 314109

Saginaw CC: 11

- 036750

- FC

SENARCHI DEVONTE BUFORD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
144 So. 916

#### Charlie FREENEY et al. v. R. M. STURGIS.

4 Div. 643.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 10, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andreas Klimm, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November 16, 2009 /s/ Andreas Klimm Andreas Klimm, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
        32.2
  SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350
  CHINA
        AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
  18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
  AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of China Automotive Systems, Inc., the
        “Company”, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I, Jie Li,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                March 25, 2008
              
              /s/
                  Jie LiJie
                  Li
                Chief
                    Financial Officer
Offer Letter - Michael W. Hagee



 Exhibit 10.46 

 

 

 46600 Landing Parkway 

Fremont, California 94538 

P. 408.240.8300 
 F.
408.321.0293 
 www.rackable.com 

January 29, 2008 
 Mr. Mike Hagee

  

	Re:	Position on the Board of Directors of Rackable Systems, Inc. (“Rackable Systems”) 


Dear Mike: 
 I am very happy to
offer you a position on the Board of Directors of Rackable Systems (the “Board”). 
 All members of Rackable
Systems’ Board receive an annual cash retainer of $45,000 paid quarterly. Additional cash retainers are paid to Board members who serve as chairman or members of Board committees. 

In addition, upon appointment to the Board you will be granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of Rackable
Systems’ common stock. This option will vest over a four year period commencing on the date of your appointment, with 1/48th vesting per month of service. In addition, all Board members are granted a stock option to purchase 2,833 shares of
Rackable Systems’ common stock upon their re-election to Board at each year’s annual stockholders meeting. 
 Rackable
Systems will also reimburse you for your travel expenses in attending Board and committee meetings. 
 If the terms of this
letter are acceptable to you, please confirm to me your willingness to serve on Rackable Systems’ Board. Upon your agreement, I will submit your nomination to the Board for formal consideration. We look forward to your favorable reply.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Gary Griffiths

		 	Gary Griffiths
		 	Chairman Nominating and Corporate
		 	Governance Committee
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li De Hai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 28, 2012
By:
/s/ Li De HaiLi De HaiChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Richard A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  August 5,
      2009
                By:
                /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 13110 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16

- cr - 00012

- LGW

- BWC

- 18

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TY RONE MIDDLETON, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

___________ _____________ (July 8, 202 1) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge, NEWSOM and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-13110 Date Filed: 07/08/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Junita M. Holsey, appointed counsel for Tyrone Middleton , in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appel lant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Middleton has moved for appointment of new counsel or for leave to proceed
pro se . Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANT ED , Middleton’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED , and Middleton’s motion for appointment of counsel or for leave to proceed pro se is DENIED

.

USCA11 Case: 20-13110 Date Filed: 07/08/2021 Page: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Capital Newspapers Division of the Hearst Corporation et al., Appellants, v City of Albany et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided May 6, 2010

Motion by Advance Publications, Inc. et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

May 18, 2001.
    The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public 
information collection requests (ICRs) to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of 
this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by 
calling the Department of Labor. To obtain documentation contact Darrin 
King at (202) 693-4129 or E-Mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b4062656c264f6a797962654b6f6467256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc4e6e1e8a2cbeefdfde6e1cfebe0e3a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 ((202) 395-7316), within 30 
days from the date of this publication in the Federal Register.
    The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Agency: Employment and Training Administration (ETA).
    Title: Benefit Rights and Experience Report.
    OMB Number: 1205-0177.
    Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Government.
    Frequency: Quarterly.
    Number of Respondents: 53.
    Number of Annual Responses: 216.
    Estimated Time Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Burden Hours: 108.
    Total Annualized Capital/Startup Costs: $0.
    Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing 
services): $0.
    Description: The ETA Form 218 provides information used in solvency 
studies, in budgeting projections and for evaluation of adequacy of 
benefit formulas to analyze the effects of proposed changes in state 
law.

Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13286 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Anthony Macaluso, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Single Touch Systems Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:





1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 29, 2010
/s/ Anthony MacalusoAnthony MacalusoDirector, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00360-CV

SaveRGV, Sierra Club, and Carrizo/Comecrudo Nation of Texas, Inc.

v.

Texas Attorney General

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-DCL-05887-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 1, 2024