alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Scott m.
      Brunsdon | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Scott Brunsdon                | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|Date: November 14, 2008       | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOAO AVELINO MENESES PEDRO,

a.k.a. John Pedro,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73559

Agency No. A036-066-382

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 22, 2014** 

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Joao Avelino Meneses Pedro, a native and citizen of Portugal, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

JUL 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Meneses Pedro’s undisputed removability for an aggravated-felony

conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) limits our jurisdiction to colorable

constitutional claims and questions of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D); see

also Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 993, 998 n.5 (9th Cir. 2007)

(“[W]ithdrawal of judicial review over final orders of deportation also withdraws

jurisdiction from motions . . . to reopen deportation proceedings for those aliens

deportable for having committed a crime enumerated in the statute.” (citation

omitted)).

Meneses Pedro has failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim or

question of law that would invoke our jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). 

See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir. 2009) (“To be

colorable in this context, the [constitutional claim or question of law] need not be

substantial, but the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 12-73559
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2173 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reserve EB–5 visas each 

fiscal year for investors in new commercial enterprises in areas with 

respect to which a major disaster has been declared by the President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico (for herself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reserve 

EB–5 visas each fiscal year for investors in new commercial enterprises in areas with respect to which a major 

disaster has been declared by the President. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESERVATION OF EB–5 VISAS FOR INVESTORS 

4 IN DISASTER AREAS. 

5 Section 203(b)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and 

8 (D) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2173 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(C) SET-ASIDE FOR MAJOR DISASTER

4 AREAS.— 

5 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Of the visas made 

6 available under this paragraph for each fis7 cal year, the number required under clause 

8 (ii) shall be reserved for qualified immi9 grants who invest in a new commercial en10 terprise described in subparagraph (A) 

11 which will create employment in an area 

12 with respect to which a major disaster has 

13 been declared by the President under sec14 tion 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Dis15 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

16 (42 U.S.C. 5170). 

17 ‘‘(ii) NUMBER OF RESERVED VISAS.— 

18 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—In the case 

19 of each area with respect to which one 

20 or multiple major disasters have been 

21 declared by the President under sec22 tion 401 of the Robert T. Stafford 

23 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist24 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in a single 

25 fiscal year, the Secretary of State and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2173 IH

1 the Secretary of Homeland Security 

2 shall coordinate so as to ensure that 

3 100 visas are reserved under this sub4 paragraph for the area for— 

5 ‘‘(aa) the fiscal year in 

6 which the declaration or declara7 tions occur and the two suc8 ceeding fiscal years; or 

9 ‘‘(bb) the 3 fiscal years fol10 lowing the fiscal year in which 

11 the declaration or declarations 

12 occur. 

13 ‘‘(II) TIMING.—The decision 

14 whether to implement subclause (I) 

15 according to item (aa) or (bb) shall be 

16 made jointly by the Secretary of State 

17 and the Secretary of Homeland Secu18 rity based upon the number of visas 

19 already made available under this 

20 paragraph on the date on which the 

21 declaration (or the first of multiple 

22 declarations) occurs and other factors 

23 deemed appropriate by such secre24 taries.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John W. Smolak, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HypercomCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:   a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;   b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):   a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and   b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date:  May 7, 2004   By: /s/ John W. Smolak    John W. Smolak    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2377 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2377

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency to publish a maximum contaminant 
level goal and promulgate a national primary drinking water regulation 
 for total per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2019

  Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Pallone, Mr. 
Tonko, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency to publish a maximum contaminant 
level goal and promulgate a national primary drinking water regulation 
 for total per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Drinking Water from PFAS Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR REGULATIONS ON PFAS.

    Section 1412(b)(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300g-
1(b)(12)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.--
                Notwithstanding any other deadline established in this 
                subsection, not later than 2 years after the date of 
                enactment of this subparagraph, the Administrator shall 
                publish a maximum contaminant level goal and promulgate 
                a national primary drinking water regulation for total 
                per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018022EN.01006101.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/61

---

Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Pan v EUIPO — Entertainment One UK (TOBBIA)

(Case T-777/17)

(2018/C 022/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Xianhao Pan (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Oliva, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Entertainment One UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘TOBBIA’ — EU trade mark No 11 775 509

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2017 in Case R 1776/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in its entirety the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety the contested decision.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Failure to state reasons, breach of the valuation method of the relationship between the brands as well as a lack of assessment as to the assessment of likelihood of confusion of the marks; |
| --- | --- |

—

Failure to state reasons, breach of the valuation method of the relationship between the brands as well as a lack of assessment as to the assessment of likelihood of confusion of the marks;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(b)(1) in relation to Article 53(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(b)(1) in relation to Article 53(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
AFH Holding IV, Inc. 10-Q





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding IV, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 15, 2010





/s/ Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir F. HeshmatpourPresident, Secretary and Sole Director(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Black, Appellant.

Submitted January 25, 2010;

decided February 11, 2010

*738Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fahey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
**EXHIBIT
      23**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement of the
      Form
      S-8, File No. 333-126271 and 333-122353 of our report dated April 24,
      2006, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Dijji Corp.
      and
      subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (as restated) for the years
      ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as restated, respectively, included in
      this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. We also consent to the reference to our
      firm
      under the caption "Experts" in this Registration Statement and
      Prospectus.








Eisner
      LLP








New
      York,
      New York


April 24,
      2006
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00044-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.N. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-105773-17)

April 18, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
# C_2020313EN.01001901.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/19

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 17 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — Royaume-Uni) — Sandoz Ltd, Hexal AG v G.D. Searle LLC, Janssen Sciences Ireland

(Case C-114/18) (1)

(2020/C 313/23)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

May 2, 2019 

Submitted via email and the Portal 

Jonathan Lave 

Division of Market Oversight 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: JLave@cftc.gov 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Rule Amendment and Related Request for Freedom of 

Information Act Confidential Treatment 

Dear Mr. Lave, 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”), as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, hereby submits to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

We have submitted to the CFTC Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Compliance 

Office a request that for reasons of business confidentiality, the Commission not disclose 

the Confidential Information (as defined below) or its contents in response to any FOIA 

request or otherwise for an indefinite period. We wish to inform you that the 

Confidential Information constitutes, inter alia, privileged and confidential trade secrets 

and commercial or financial information within the meaning of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 

552(b)(4) and Part 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations as well as confidential 

information covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1905. 

For your reference, the Amendment set out on Annex A hereto is referred to herein as the 

“Confidential Information.” 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

David Levine 

General Counsel 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 2 

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0519-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-0519-0644.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 3 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this 

matter. 

Very truly yours, 

Devi Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Enclosures 

 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4 

Annex A 

Confidential Information 

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code 

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0519-0001– BSEF-0519-

0644
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | 
| |  |  |  | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Ouvo, Inc. (Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Kent Carasquero, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 8, 2007

/s/ Kent Carasquero

Kent Carasquero

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN RE BAILEY

No. 317P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 340

Petition by petitioner for writ of supersedeas denied 12 August 1998. Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 8 October 1998.
142 So. 108

#### Asa MARKER v. STATE.

7 Div. 127.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 9, 1932.

McCord & McCord, of Gadsden, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Asa Marker for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Marker v. State, 142 So. 105.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Department 56, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   August 10, 2005  | /s/   Susan E. Engel                                                  
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Susan E. EngelChairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer     
|                        
|                        
|Date:    August 10, 2005 | /s/   Timothy J. Schugel                                              
|                         | Timothy J. SchugelChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

---