alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 233 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority 

of State Medicaid fraud and abuse control units to investigate and 

prosecute cases of Medicaid patient abuse and neglect in any setting, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the authority of State Medicaid fraud and abuse control 

units to investigate and prosecute cases of Medicaid patient abuse and neglect in any setting, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Patient 

5 Abuse Prevention Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 233 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFYING AUTHORITY OF STATE MEDICAID 

2 FRAUD AND ABUSE CONTROL UNITS TO IN3 VESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE CASES OF MED4 ICAID PATIENT ABUSE AND NEGLECT IN ANY 

5 SETTING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(q)(4)(A)(ii) of the 

7 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(q)(4)(A)(ii)) is 

8 amended by inserting after ‘‘patients residing in board 

9 and care facilities’’ the following: ‘‘and of patients (who 

10 are receiving medical assistance under the State plan 

11 under this title) in a noninstitutional or other setting’’. 

12 (b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING.—Section 1903(a)(6) 

13 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(6)) is 

14 amended, in the matter following subparagraph (B), by 

15 striking ‘‘(as found necessary by the Secretary for the 

16 elimination of fraud in the provision and administration 

17 of medical assistance provided under the State plan)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
STATE’S ADDITIONAL CITATIONS PAGE 1 OF 3 

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

Adan Flores v. The State of Texas 

NO. 04-14-00915-CR

Trial Court No. 2014CRS000311-D1 

STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL CITATIONS 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

NOW COMES THE STATE OF TEXAS, and respectfully moves the Court 

to permit the filing of the attached additional citations and commentary in support 

of the State’s Brief. Although Local Rule 8.3 permits the filing of additional 

citations and succinct commentary without leave of the Court, and the attached 

document consists only of citations and commentary, it totals 25 pages and 5,449 

words due to the sheer number of cases summarized: there are fifteen fully 

summarized cases (for and against the State’s position), two tables of further 

citations, and about a page and a half of summarizing commentary. Therefore, out 

of an abundance of caution, the State requests leave to file the attached document 

as if it was a supplemental brief under Local Rule 8.4. 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00915-cr

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

8/31/2015 4:49:53 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 08/31/2015 4:49:53 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
STATE’S ADDITIONAL CITATIONS PAGE 2 OF 3

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays the Court grant 

leave to file the attached document.

Respectfully submitted,

ISIDRO R. ALANIZ

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

49TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

By:___/s/__________________

David L. Reuthinger, Jr.

Assistant District Attorney 

Webb County, 49th Judicial District

1110 Victoria St., Suite 401

Laredo, Texas 78040

(956) 523-4900 / (956) 523-5070 (Fax)

Bar No. 24053936

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE
STATE’S ADDITIONAL CITATIONS PAGE 3 OF 3

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The word count of the foregoing document is 148. 

Date: August 31, 2015

___/s/__________________

David L. Reuthinger, Jr.

Attorney for Appellee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been delivered to Armando Trevino, attorney for the Appellant, via 

eFileTexas e-Service to Armando_trevinolaw@hotmail.com

Date: August 31, 2015.

___/s/__________________

David L. Reuthinger, Jr.

Attorney for Appellee
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of the Company



Name of Subsidiary
        Jurisdiction




FL 56 Inter., Corp.
        Delaware


D 56 Inc.
        Minnesota


Lenox, Incorporated
        New Jersey


Lenox Worldwide LLC
        Delaware


Lenox Retail, Inc.
        Minnesota


Lenox Sales, Inc.
        Minnesota


---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARIMULLAH QURESHI; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71122

Agency Nos. A075-526-473

 A075-526-474

 A076-715-255

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Karimullah Qureshi, and his family, natives and citizens of Bangladesh,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to

FILED

MAY 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71122

reopen. See Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the

petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely and number-barred where the motion was filed over four years

after the BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to

present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in Bangladesh to qualify for

the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The

critical question is . . . whether circumstances have changed sufficiently that a

petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a

well-founded fear of future persecution.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, of Capitol Acquisition Corp. (the Issuer).

I, Mark D. Ein, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of
my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark D. Ein                                                           
|                       |  |  |  | Mark D. Ein                                                               
|                       |  |  |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2334 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2334

    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Wilson and Young Medal of 
                           Honor VA Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2019

Mr. Conaway (for himself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Hurd of Texas, 
  Mr. Babin, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Brady, Mr. Olson, Mr. Carter of 
   Texas, Mr. Cloud, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. 
Arrington, Mr. Williams, Mr. Wright, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Vela, Mr. Veasey, 
    Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Cuellar, and Mr. Roy) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Wilson and Young Medal of 
                           Honor VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON AND YOUNG MEDAL OF HONOR VA CLINIC.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Private First Class Alfred 
``Mac'' Wilson of the Marine Corps and Staff Sergeant Marvin ``Rex'' 
Young of the Army were both posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for 
their heroic actions in the Vietnam War.
    (b) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs community-
based outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Wilson and Young 
Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilson and 
Young Medal of Honor VA Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2267 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2267

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant 
         formula as adulterated if its use by date has passed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

 Ms. Meng (for herself and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant 
         formula as adulterated if its use by date has passed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Infant Formula Protection Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EXPIRED INFANT FORMULA.

    (a) Adulteration.--Section 412(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``, or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the use by date of such infant formula, as specified 
        in the labeling of such formula in accordance with section 
        107.20 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any 
        successor regulations), has passed.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
beginning on the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010184EN.01000101.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 1 July 2010

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Národná banka Slovenska

(ECB/2010/6)

2010/C 184/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Národná banka Slovenska’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2009. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Národná banka Slovenska’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2009. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2010.

| (3) | Národná banka Slovenska has selected Ernst & Young Slovakia, spol. s r.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2010 to 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Národná banka Slovenska has selected Ernst & Young Slovakia, spol. s r.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2010 to 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young Slovakia, spol. s r.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Národná banka Slovenska for the financial years 2010 to 2014.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 1 July 2010.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger A. May                     
|                      |  |     |  | Roger A. May                         
|                      |  |     |  | Manager
(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2019220EN.01000701.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Budimex S.A. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-224/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 66 - Chargeable event and chargeability of the tax - Time of the supply of the services - Construction and installation work - Taking into account the time of the acceptance of the work stipulated in the contract for the supply of services)

(2019/C 220/09)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Budimex S.A.

Other party to the proceedings: Minister Finansów

Operative part of the judgment

Point (c) of the first paragraph of Article 66 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as not precluding, if an invoice relating to the performance of the service supplied is not issued or is issued late, the formal acceptance of that service from being regarded as the time when that service was supplied, where, as in the case in the main proceedings, the Member State provides that VAT is to become chargeable on expiry of a time limit running from the day when the service was supplied, provided, first, that the formality of acceptance was stipulated by the parties in the contract that binds them according to contractual terms reflecting the economic and commercial realities in the field in which the service is supplied and, second, that that formality constitutes the actual completion of the service and determines the amount of consideration due, which is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
#### Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Respondent, v Jared King, Appellant.

Submitted January 1, 2010;

decided February 11, 2010

Motion by AARP et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
August 9, 2022

VIA CFTC PORTAL 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Certification: Amendments to Nodal Clear Risk Policies

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear, LLC 

(“Nodal Clear” or “Clearing House”) hereby notifies the Commission that it is self-certifying amendments to the Nodal 

Clear Risk Policies ("Risk Policies"). The Risk Policies are attached hereto with indications as to the specific text that 

is being amended. Amendments to the Risk Policies are to be effective on August 23, 2022.

Nodal Clear proposes to amend its Risk Policies to adjust its initial margin coverage confidence level from 99.7% to 

99.5% for all live accounts. Such coverage level remains in excess of the requisite 99% coverage level prescribed in 

Commission Regulation 39.13(g)(2)(iii). 

Nodal Clear management has assessed the amendments to the Risk Policies and their compliance with applicable 

provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), including the Commission’s Regulations and DCO Core Principles. 

Nodal Clear has identified that the amendments may have some bearing on the following Core Principles:

Core Principle B – Financial Resources: The amendments to the Risk Policies continue to ensure Nodal Clear’s ability 

to discharge its financial, operational, and managerial responsibilities as a DCO.

Core Principle D – Risk Management: The amendments to the Risk Policies continue to ensure Nodal Clear’s ability to 

identify and manage the risks associated with discharging the responsibilities of a DCO.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the CEA and the Commission’s Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear certifies that the 

amendments to the Risk Policies comply with the CEA and the Commission’s Regulations thereunder. Nodal Clear is 

not aware of any opposing views expressed regarding the amendments to the Risk Policies. Nodal Clear certifies that 

this submission has been concurrently posted on the Nodal Clear website at www.nodalclear.com.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact me at 703-962-9864 

or alvarez@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/Cody Alvarez

Cody Alvarez

Chief Compliance Officer

Corporate Counsel

Attachments:

Nodal Clear Risk Policies Redline (confidential treatment requested)
143 So. 924

#### PIERCE DEVELOPMENT CO. v. William S. DOUGLASS.

8 Div. 411.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 6, 1932.

Joseph H. Morey, of Buffalo, N. Y., Proctor & Snodgrass, of Scottsboro, and Lanier & Pride, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Travis Williams, of Russellville, and Taylor, Richardson & Sparkman, of Huntsville, for appellee.

FOSTER, J.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur;
12/13/22, 10:16 AM FX Derivatives: lemporary transaction tee waiver tor FX Futures and amenaments or the revenue snaring calculation

13 Dec 2022
Eurex Clearing

FX Derivatives: Temporary transaction fee
waiver for FX Futures and amendments of
the revenue sharing calculation

Eurex Clearing Circular 093/22 FX Derivatives: Temporary transaction fee

waiver for FX Futures and amendments of the revenue sharing
calculation

1. Introduction

Effective from 1 January 2023 until 31 March 2023, Eurex Clearing AG will
waive the TES transaction fees for FX Futures as further detailed below.

Production start: 1 January 2023
2. Required action

There is no required action for the participants.

3. Details

To promote the block and EFP trading activity in the existing FX Futures (all
G10 and EM FX Futures and Rolling Spot Futures), Eurex Clearing AG will offer
a fee waiver regarding the TES transaction fees in FX Futures, pursuant to
Number 3.1 of the Price List of Eurex Clearing AG. This fee waiver will be
effective from 1 January 2023 until 31 March 2023.

The transaction costs for order book remain unaffected by this fee waiver.

Furthermore, during the same period from 1 January 2023 to 31 March 2023,
Eurex Frankfurt AG and Eurex Clearing AG will temporarily suspend the
reduction of USD 0.05 per traded contract in the calculation of the Revenue
Sharing Pool, as described in Number 4.1 in the "PSS FX 01 - FX Futures and FX
Rolling Spot Futures”.

httne:/iwww erirex eam/ec-enifind/cirenlars/clearina-circiilar-23R3RRP


12/13/22, 10:16 AM

FX Derivatives: 1emporary transaction tee waiver tor FX Futures and amenamenis or the revenue snaring calculation

Unless the context requires otherwise, terms used and not otherwise defined
in this circular shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Clearing
Conditions or FCM Clearing Conditions of Eurex Clearing AG, as applicable.

Further information

Recipients:

Target
groups:

Contact:

Related
circular:

Web:

Authorized
by:

All Clearing Members, ISA Direct Clearing Members, Disclosed
Direct Clients of Eurex Clearing AG, vendors and other affected
contractual parties

Front Office/Trading, Middle + Backoffice, IT/System
Administration, Auditing/Security Coordination

client.services@eurex.com

Eurex circular 119/22

www.eurex.com/ec-en/

Matthias Graulich

Eurex Eurex Clearing Eurex Repo EEX 360T Xetra Boérse Frankfurt

Clearstream

Disclaimer

Qontigo

Privacy notice Imprint Eurex Clearing Rules & Regulations Sitemap

httne:/iwww erirex eam/ec-enifind/cirenlars/clearina-circiilar-23R3RRP

219
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

August 30, 2019 

Page 3 

EXHIBIT A 

Explanation of Amended Rules 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested]
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

August 30, 2019 

EXHIBIT B 

Exhibit Q to tpSEF Inc.’s Form SEF 

(Clean Version) 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested]
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

August 30, 2019 

EXHIBIT C 

Exhibit Q to tpSEF Inc.’s Form SEF 

(Marked Version) 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested]