alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
433 West Van Buren Street › Suite 700S › Chicago, IL 60607 › cboe.com

November 1, 2023

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request:

Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d)

All:

Pursuant to § 145.9(d) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and pursuant 

to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), Cboe Clear Digital, LLC (“CCD”) hereby petitions the 

Commission for confidential treatment of Exhibit A to the Self-Certification in connection with the 

CCD Risk Management Procedures (CCD-2023-07C) submitted to the CFTC via the CFTC Portal on 

November 1, 2023 (“Covered Information”).

The Covered Information should be afforded confidential treatment based on, among other 

things, § 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations, which implements FOIA Exemption 4 of 

the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)), because disclosure would reveal CCD trade 

secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. CCD hereby requests that the Covered 

Information be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity.

CCD requests that the Commission notify CCD upon the receipt of any request by any party 

for any access under FOIA to the Covered Information or any court order, subpoena, or summons for 

disclosure of the Covered Information for the entire duration that the Commission retains the Covered

Information. CCD further requests notification in the event that the Commission intends to disclose

the Covered Information in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. CCD does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the

CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for the Covered Information.

The address at which CCD can be reached is as follows:

433 West Van Buren Street, Suite 700S

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Attention: General Counsel

Please contact me at kkirkpatrick@cboe.com or (312) 786-7431 if you have any questions
regarding this request.

Cboe Clear Digital, LLC

/s/ Katherine Kirkpatrick

By: Katherine Kirkpatrick, Chief Legal Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 32 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2020137EN.01000401.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 March 2020 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Vodafone Magyarország Mobil Távközlési Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-75/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Tax on the turnover of telecommunications operators - Progressive tax having a greater impact on undertakings owned by natural or legal persons of other Member States than on national undertakings - Progressive tax bands applicable to all taxable persons - Neutrality of the amount of turnover as a criterion of differentiation - Ability to pay of taxable persons - State aid - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Turnover taxes - Meaning)

(2020/C 137/04)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodafone Magyarország Mobil Távközlési Zrt.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Articles 49 and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the legislation of a Member State that establishes a progressive tax on turnover, the actual burden of which is mainly borne by undertakings controlled directly or indirectly by nationals of other Member States or by companies that have their registered office in another Member State, due to the fact that those undertakings achieve the highest turnover in the market concerned. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Articles 49 and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the legislation of a Member State that establishes a progressive tax on turnover, the actual burden of which is mainly borne by undertakings controlled directly or indirectly by nationals of other Member States or by companies that have their registered office in another Member State, due to the fact that those undertakings achieve the highest turnover in the market concerned.

| 2. | Article 401 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding the introduction of a tax which is based on the overall turnover of the taxable person and which is levied periodically, and not at each stage of the production and distribution process, there being no right to deduct tax paid at an earlier stage of that process. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 401 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding the introduction of a tax which is based on the overall turnover of the taxable person and which is levied periodically, and not at each stage of the production and distribution process, there being no right to deduct tax paid at an earlier stage of that process.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.

---
# C_2020423EN.01000401.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Schoonzicht v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-791/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Immovable property acquired as capital goods - Deduction of input tax paid - Adjustment of the initial deduction - Single adjustment of that deduction in full after the goods in question are first used - Adjustment period)

(2020/C 423/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stichting Schoonzicht

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 184 to 187 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding a capital goods adjustment scheme, laid down in national rules in which the adjustment is to be spread over several years, from providing that, in the year the goods in question are first used, where that year is also the first adjustment year, the total amount of the initial deduction for those capital goods is adjusted in a single step, if, when first used, it becomes apparent that that deduction deviates from the deduction which the taxable person was entitled to apply on the basis of the actual use of those goods.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
# C_2019206EN.01009701.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/97

---

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2019 — Boehringer Ingelheim International v Commission

(Case T-191/17) (1)

(2019/C 206/86)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**and**


**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hosting Site Network Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
      Vicari, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
                  Scott VicariName:
              Scott
                  VicariTitle:
              Chief
                  Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
              December
                  20, 2007
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.       

 

 

|   |   |                             |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Scott D. Sheffield           |   |
|   | Name:  | Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer          |   |
|   | Date:  | November 6, 2008                 |   |
#### Jose Aguirre JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71792.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 16, 2006.

Philippe Dwelshauvers, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Esq., Earle B. Wilson, Esq., Leslie McKay, Anthony W. Nor-wood, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Aguirre Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations, *Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.

Because the notice to appear was served when suspension of deportation relief was no longer available, Aguirre Jimenez was properly placed in removal proceedings. *See Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 597 (9th Cir.2002). Moreover, Aguirre Jimenez’s contention that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is impermissibly retroactive is without merit. *See id.*at 601-02.

Aguirre Jimenez’s contention that the case must be remanded for the BIA to clarify the basis of its decision is unavailing. The IJ denied cancellation on the sole ground that Aguirre Jimenez failed to establish ten years of continuous physical presence. *See Lanza v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 917, 932 (9th Cir.2004) (compelling remand with instructions to clarify where BIA summarily affirms an IJ decision that is based on both renewable and non-reviewable grounds).

Aguirre Jimenez’s contention that the BIA’s streamlined decision was conclusory and failed to offer a reasoned explanation is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity
Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      January 25, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Howard MahName:
                  Howard
      MahTitle:
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
#### IN RE WILKINSON CHILDREN

No. 355P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 340

Petition by respondent (Lisa Wilkinson) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 December 1998.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Placement Service.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: ES-2, ES-20a, ES-20b, ES-21, UI-35 and Job 
Vacancies Report.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0057.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 9/30/2001.
    (5) Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Application for Benefits, program planning or 
management.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 13,750.
    (8) Total annual responses: 27,000.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 1,494.
    (10) Collection description: Under the RUIA, the Railroad 
Retirement Board provides job placement assistance for unemployed 
railroad workers. The collection obtains information from job 
applicants, railroad and non-railroad employers, and State Employment 
Service offices for use in placement, for providing referrals for job 
openings, reports of referral results and for verifying and monitoring 
claimant eligibility.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the forms and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Joe Lackey (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13210 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of Laural
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended February 29, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mandi
Luis, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
April 4, 2008








MANDI
LUIS





Mandi
Luis


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director











-1-
# C_2019054EN.01001801.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/18

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 8 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — VE v WD

(Case C-227/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/27)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 4:30 p.m. on June 19, 2001, at the Buck Library in the Buena Vista Conference Center, 661 duPont Highway, New Castle, Delaware 19720. The purpose of the meeting is to hold a press conference to release the Committee's report, Delaware Citizens Guide to Civil Rights and Supporting Services, and to hear comments on the report from invited speakers representing minority community and civic organizations in Delaware. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Chairperson Dr. James E. Newton, 302-831-8683, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, May 21, 2001. 

Edward A. Hailes, Jr., 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 01-13248 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Henry T. CochranHenry T. CochranChief Executive Officer
# C_2018052EN.01003801.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/38

---

Action brought on 12 December 2017 — Classic Media v EUIPO — Pirelli Tyre (CLASSIC DRIVER)

(Case T-811/17)

(2018/C 052/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Classic Media AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Masberg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘CLASSIC DRIVER’ — International Registration No 1 108 587

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2017 in Case R 59/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition with costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition with costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---