alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation
II (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Sang-Chul Kim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 17, 2009
                /s/ Sang-Chul KimName:
                Sang-Chul KimTitle:
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATES: Weeks of May 28, June 4, 11, 18, 25, July 2, 2001.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

Week of May 28, 2001

Wednesday, May 30, 2001
    10:25 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

Week of June 4, 2001--Tentative

Tuesday, June 5, 2001
    9:25 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)
    2:00 p.m.--Discussion of Management Issues (Closed-Ex. 2)
Wednesday, June 6, 2001
    10:30 a.m.--All Employees Meeting (Public Meeting)
    1:30 p.m.--All Employees Meeting (Public Meeting)

Week of June 11, 2001--Tentative

Thursday, June 14, 2001
    9:55 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)
    10:00 a.m.--Meeting with Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board 
(Public Meeting)
    1:30 p.m.--Briefing on License Renewal Program (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: David Solorio, 301-415-1973)

Week of June 18, 2001--Tentative

There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of June 18, 2001

Week of June 25, 2001--Tentative

Wednesday, June 27, 2001
    9:25 a.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

Week of July 2, 2001--Tentative

There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of July 2, 2001

    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: David Louis Gamberoni (301) 
415-1651.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at

http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smji/schedule.htm

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
D.C. 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving the Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to [email protected].

    Dated: May 24, 2001.
David Louis Gamberoni,
Technical Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13605 Filed 5-25-01; 10:16 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135864 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135864 COA: 273554 Wayne CC: 05-002344 MICHAEL PODLASZUK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group will meet on June 14, 2001. The agenda for the Policy Group meeting will include discussions about the CALFED Bay-Delta Program's: Record of Decision Commitments and Accomplishments; Year 2 Budget; Science Program Activities; and 2001 Funded Projects. This meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group or may file statements for consideration.

# DATES:

The CALFED Bay-Delta Program Policy Group meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday, June 14, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

This meeting will meet at the Sacramento Convention Center, 1400 J Street, Room 204, Sacramento, CA 95814.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rick Breitenbach, CALFED Bay-Delta Program, at (916) 657-2666. If reasonable accommodation is needed due to a disability, please contact Pauline Nevins at (916) 657-2666 or TDD (916) 653-6934 at least one week prior to the meeting.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta system) is a critically important part of California's natural environment and economy. In recognition of the serious problems facing the region and the complex resource management decisions that must be made, the state of California and the Federal government are working together to stabilize, protect, restore, and enhance the Bay-Delta system.

One area of Bay-Delta management includes a joint State-Federal process to develop and implement long-term solutions to problems in the Bay-Delta system related to fish and wildlife, water supply reliability, natural disasters, and water quality. This effort, the CALFED Bay-Delta Program (Program), is being carried out under the direction of the CALFED Policy Group.

Dated: May 18, 2001.

Lowell C. Ploss,

Acting Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 01-13607 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MP-M
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ANTHONY PENTON,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. SIM M S; e t a l.,

De fe nda nts-Appe lle e s. No. 15-15461 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-03319-TLNKJN M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Troy L. Nunle y , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 13, 2016 * * B e fore : HAW K INS, N.R . SM ITH, a nd HUR W ITZ, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Anthony

Pe nton a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging dueproc e ss viola tions in c onne c tion with his pla

c e m e nt in a dm i nistra

tive se g re gation a

nd his disc i plina

ry he aring. W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo 

# FIL ED SEP 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).sum

m ary judgm e nt a

nd a dismissa l unde r Fe d. R . C iv. P. 12(b)(6). Doev . Abbott Labs , 571 F.3d 930, 933 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Pe nton’ s due proc e ss c la im s re g arding his pla c e m e nt in a dm i n istra tive se gre g ation a

nd the tim i ng of his disc iplina ry he aring be c a

use Pe nton fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t he wa s de nie d any proc e dura l prote c tions tha t we re due . Se e W

olff v . Mc Donne l l , 418 U.S. 539, 563-70 (1974) (se tting forth due proc e ss re quire m e nts for prison disc iplina ry proc e e dings); Toussaint v. Mc C arthy , 801 F.2d 1080, 1100-01 (9th C ir. 1986) (se tting forth due

proc e ss re quire m e nts for pla c e m e nt in a dm inistra tive se gre gation), abrogated in part on othe r grounds by

Sandin v . C

o nne r , 515 U.S. 472 (1995). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Pe nton’ s c la im a lle ging a de nia l of his right to c a ll witne sse s be c a u se Pe nton fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine d isputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r he prope rly e xha uste d his a dm inistra

tive re m e die s, or whe the r a d m inistra tive re m e die s we re e ffe c tive ly una va ila ble to him . Se eW

oodford v . N

go , 548 U.S. 81, 84, 90 (2006) (re quiring prope r e xha

ustion, which m e ans “using a ll steps tha t the a ge nc y

holds out, a

nd doing so properly

(so tha t the a g e nc y

a ddre sse s the issue s on them e rits)” (e m pha sis, c i tation, a

nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d )); Sapp v . K imbre l l , 623

1 5 - 1 5 4 6 1 2F.3d 813, 822-24, 826-27 (9th C ir. 2010) (de sc ribing lim i te d c irc um sta

nc e s unde r whic h a dm inistra

tive re m e die s m ight be e ffe c tive ly una va ila ble or othe rwise e xc use d). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 5 4 6 1 3
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

June 18, 2015

No. 10-14-00325-CV

RR PRINCE RANCH SWD LTD

v.

WILLIAM O. WILEY, SHIRLEY WILEY AND 

WILLIAM O. WILEY D/B/A WEN-BE

From the 369th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. NOT-14-12

**JUDGMENT**

	This Court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record in this proceeding as relevant to the issues raised and finds no reversible error has been presented.  Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment signed on September 25, 2014 is affirmed.

	It is further ordered that William O. Wiley, Shirley Wiley, and William O. Wiley d/b/a Wen-Be are awarded judgment against RR Prince Ranch SWD Limited for the appellate costs that were paid, if any, by William O. Wiley, Shirley Wiley, and William O. Wiley d/b/a Wen-Be; and all unpaid appellate court costs, if any, are taxed against RR Prince Ranch SWD Limited.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

							SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparking Events, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hui-Yu Che, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated: July 20, 2009

/s/ Hui Yu CheHui-Yu CheChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sparking Events, Inc. and will be retained by Sparking Events, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Chinese Staff and Workers’ Association et al., Appellants, v Amanda M. Burden, as Director of the New York City Department of City Planning, et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 19, 2012;

decided March 22, 2012

Reported below, 88 AD3d 425.

*936Motion by Natural Resources Defense Council et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Richard A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Date:
      May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/RICHARD A.
      BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

September 17, 2020

Submitted via email and the Portal

Jonathan Lave 

Division of Market Oversight 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: JLave@cftc.gov 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Rule Amendment and Related Request for Freedom of

Information Act Confidential Treatment

Dear Mr. Lave, 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”), as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, hereby submits to the Commission a rule amendment (the

“Amendment”).

We have submitted to the CFTC Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Compliance 

Office a request that for reasons of business confidentiality, the Commission not disclose 

the Confidential Information (as defined below) or its contents in response to any FOIA 

request or otherwise for an indefinite period. We wish to inform you that the 

Confidential Information constitutes, inter alia, privileged and confidential trade secrets 

and commercial or financial information within the meaning of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 

552(b)(4) and Part 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations as well as confidential 

information covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1905. 

For your reference, the Amendment set out on Annex A hereto is referred to herein as the

“Confidential Information.” 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

600573950
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2 

David Levine 

General Counsel

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0920-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-0920-0017.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this 

matter.

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures

Trading Commission (Email: JLave@cftc.gov)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4

Annex A 

Confidential Information

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code

Rule Amendment BSEF-0920-0001– BSEF-0920-0017
# C_2019280EN.01003202.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, Federal Republic of German, French Republic

(Case C-69/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/45)

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin O. Cooper, Appellant.

Submitted December 5, 2011;

decided December 13, 2011

Reported below, 85 AD3d 1594.

*829Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy P. Donaher,- Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### In the Matter of Level 3 Communications, LLC, Respondent, v Anthony DeBellis, Appointed Assessor for the City of Mount Vernon, et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 15, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
#### COSTELLO v. HOUSE OF RAEFORD

No. 265P98

Case below: 129 N.C.App. 646

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29593-29596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Trade Adjustment Assistance Program; Designation of Certifying 
Officers

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of designation of certifying officers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The trade adjustment assistance program operates under the 
Trade Act of 1974 to furnish program benefits to domestic workers 
adversely affected in their employment by imports of articles which are 
like or are directly competitive with articles produced by the firm 
employing the workers. The North American Free Trade Agreement-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance amended the Trade Act of 1974 to 
provide assistance to workers impacted by a shift in production from 
the workers' firm to Mexico or Canada, or increased company or customer 
imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly competitive 
with those produced by the workers' firm. Workers become eligible for 
program benefits only if the worker group is certified under the Act as 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. From time to time the 
agency issues an Order designating officials of the agency authorized 
to act as certifying officers. Employment and Training Order No.
1-01, was issued to revise the listing of officials designated as 
certifying officers, superseding the previous Order. Employment and 
Training Order No. 1-01, is published below.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of May 2001.
Raymond J. Uhalde,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training 
Administration.
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M

[[Page 29594]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MY01.003


[[Page 29595]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MY01.004

[FR Doc. 01-13614 Filed 5-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-C
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 30, 2019

No. 04-19-00383-CV

Hien Minh CAO,

Appellant

v.

Hoang CAO,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV03006

Honorable John Francis Davis, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice 

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on this 30th day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: __________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                                      11

<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-15
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-15


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

         (i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master
         Servicers under the Agreement has been made under our supervision;
         and

         (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                           Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                               Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12