alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13360]



[[Page 29110]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP01-333-001 and RP01-380-001]


Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Change in Gas 
Tariff

May 22, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 16, 2001, Tuscarora Gas Transmission 
Company (Tuscarora) tendered for filing for as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following substitute tariff sheets, 
to become effective May 18, 2001:

Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 66
Sub Original Sheet No. 66A

    Tuscarora states that the purpose of this filing is to incorporate 
into its currently effective tariff certain tariff provisions 
previously accepted by the Commission but inadvertently superseded by a 
subsequent, unrelated tariff filing.
    Tuscarora states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
parties listed on the official service listed prepared by the Secretary 
in these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13360 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
141 So. 717

#### William E. FRENCH v. STATE.

4 Div. 640.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

Sollie *&*Sollie, of Ozark, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of William E. French for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in French v. State, 141 So. 713.

Writ denied.

GARDNER, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: June 19, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/ ROGER A. MAY                     
|                    |  |     |  | Roger A. May                         
|                    |  |     |  | Manager (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gray Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan J. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of January, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 32 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 32 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 32 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 32 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 32 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 5 of 5
# C_2019206EN.01001401.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Syndicat des cadres de la sécurité intérieure v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Intérieur, Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics

(Case C-254/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Maximum weekly working time - Reference period - Rolling or fixed nature - Derogation - Police officers)

(2019/C 206/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Syndicat des cadres de la sécurité intérieure

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Intérieur, Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(b), Article 16(b) and the first paragraph of Article 19 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which lays down, for the purpose of calculating the average weekly working time, reference periods which start and end on fixed calendar dates, provided that that legislation contains mechanisms which make it possible to ensure that the maximum average weekly working time of 48 hours is respected during each six-month period straddling two consecutive fixed reference periods.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Rafael Lora, Respondent.

Submitted September 6, 2011;

decided December 13, 2011

Reported below, 85 AD3d 487.

Motion to dismiss the appeal granted and the appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).
EXHIBIT
31.2








Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, James
Hyde, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1)   I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Great Spirits,
Inc.;
 
 2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of
 the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 
 4)   The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and we have:
 
 a)   Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)   Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5)   The
small business issuer's other certifying officer (s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee
of the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons  performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)   All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)   Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: February
12,
2008                         
By:   /s/ James 
Hyde
 James  Hyde
 Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-142261) pertaining to the Opnext, Inc. Amended and Restated2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-142260) pertaining tothe Pine Photonics Communications Inc. 2000 Stock Plan of our report dated June19, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Opnext, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPNewYork, New York
# C_2020287EN.01001501.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/15

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Papouis Dairies Ltd, Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd, M.J. Dairies EOOD

(Joined Cases C-608/18 P, C-609/18 P and C-767/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Invalidity of the mark cited by the opposing party - Appeals which have become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 287/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, H. O’Neill and D. Botis, acting as Agents), Papouis Dairies Ltd (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros), Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros), M.J. Dairies EOOD (represented by: D. Dimitrova, advocate)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals.

| 2. | The Republic of Cyprus shall pay the costs of the appeals. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Cyprus shall pay the costs of the appeals.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

---
1

 

August 17, 2023

(Submitted via the CFTC Portal)

Assistant Secretary of the Commission

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Act Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20851

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) has submitted to the Commission a Rule Certification 

Submission pursuant to CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) for modifications to the SPIKES Market Maker Program 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Confidential Submission” or “Program”). This Confidential Submission 

included as Exhibit A contains confidential commercial or financial information. MGEX respectfully requests 

that the Commission not release the Confidential Submission. 

MGEX specifically requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Submission pursuant to Commission 

Regulations 145.9 and 145.5. Under Commission Regulation 145.9, a submitter making this request “shall 

specify the grounds on which confidential treatment is being requested.” Confidential treatment is being 

sought on the basis that the Confidential Submission contains confidential commercial or financial 

information under Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii). In addition, MGEX represents that the 

Confidential Submission is a nonpublic record pursuant to Commission Regulation 145.5. 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d)(5), MGEX asks the Commission to afford confidential 

treatment to the Confidential Submission in perpetuity.

Should the Commission receive a Freedom of Information Request for the Confidential Submission, MGEX 

acknowledges that it will be notified of the request and then instructed to provide a detailed written 

justification for confidential treatment, per Commission Regulation 145.9(e)(1). 

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (612) 321-7128 or 

psparby@mgex.com.

Sincerely,

Peter D. Sparby

Vice President, Counsel

Enclosure
# C_2021263EN.01001302.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Luxembourg and Amazon v Commission

(Cases T-816/17 and T-318/18) (1)

(State aid - Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery - Tax ruling - Transfer pricing - Selective tax advantage - Transfer pricing arrangement - Functional analysis)

(2021/C 263/18)

Language of the case: English and French

Parties

Applicant in Case T-816/17: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: T. Uri, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck, A. Steichen and J. Bracker, lawyers)

Applicants in Case T-318/18: Amazon EU Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Amazon.com, Inc. (Seattle, Washington, United States) (represented by: D. Paemen, M. Petite and A. Tombiński, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented, in Case T-816/17, by P. Stancanelli, P.-J. Loewenthal and F. Tomat, acting as Agents, and by M. Chammas, lawyer, and, in Case T-318/18, by P.-J. Loewenthal and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant in Case T-816/17: Ireland (represented by: J. Quaney and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and by P. Gallagher, Senior Counsel, B. Doherty, Barrister, and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel)

Re:

Actions pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2018/859 of 4 October 2017 on State aid SA.38944 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon (OJ 2018 L 153, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-816/17 and T-318/18 for the purposes of the present judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-816/17 and T-318/18 for the purposes of the present judgment;

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2018/859 of 4 October 2017 on State aid SA.38944 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2018/859 of 4 October 2017 on State aid SA.38944 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon EU Sàrl; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon EU Sàrl;

| 4. | Orders Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.

---
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM GameStop Corp.
Grapevine, Texas We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No.
333-82652 of GameStop Corp. of our reports dated March 30, 2005, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and the effectiveness of GameStop Corp.s internal control over financial
reporting, which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated March 30, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule which appears in this Form
10-K/A. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLPBDO SEIDMAN, LLP Dallas, Texas
May 19, 2005
# C_2018399EN.01001701.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/17

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Pauline Stiernon and Others v Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique

(Case C-237/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom of movement for workers - Freedom to choose an occupation - Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 15 - Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions))

(2018/C 399/23)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Pauline Stiernon, Marion Goraguer, Muriel Buccarello, Clémentine Vasseur, Manon Pirotton, Anissa Quotb

Defendants: Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique

Operative part of the order

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, legislation of a Member State establishing a list of allied health professions that does not include the profession of psychomotor therapist in that list, even though an undergraduate degree in psychomotor therapy has been established in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                               
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 19, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/ THOMAS R. REEG                                            
|                    |  |     |  | Thomas R. Reeg Operating
Manager (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 4.18**

 

**English Summary of Share Purchase Agreement between CompanhiaEnergética de Minas Gerais — CEMIG and Andrade Gutierrez Concessões S.A.**

 

OnDecember 30, 2009, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais — CEMIG (“CEMIG”)entered into a share purchase agreement (the “AGC Share Purchase Agreement”)with Andrade Gutierrez Concessões S.A. (“AGC”).

 

TheAGC Share Purchase Agreement was entered into in connection with theacquisition of 26,576,149 common shares of Light S.A. (“Light”),representing approximately 13.03% of the voting and total capital ofLight, of which 25,494,500 shares were acquired on March 25, 2010and 1,081,649 shares are to be acquired by September 21, 2010.

 

Thetotal price of this acquisition, corresponding to 13.03% of the total capitalof Light, is R$785,000,000.00, equivalent to approximately R$29.54 per commonshare. This amount will be updated by the CDI (Interbank CD) rate published byCetip (Securities Custody and Settlement Center), from December 1, 2009 upto the date of payment, after deduction of any dividends and interest on equitypaid or declared by Light in this period. R$718,518,134.39 (adjusted asdescribed above), corresponding to 12.50% of the total capital of Light,was paid on March 25, 2010 and R$31,949,492.20 (to be adjusted asdescribed above), corresponding to 0.53% of the total capital of Light, isto be paid by September 21, 2010.

 

TheAGC Share Purchase Agreement allows for assignment of the shares acquired to anaffiliate of CEMIG or to third parties.

 

TheAGC Share Purchase Agreement contains representations and warranties andcovenants of CEMIG and AGC and various conditions to closing.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2409 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2409

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2019

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Access to Capital for 
Rural Job Creators Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSINESSES.

    Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78d(j)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)(C), by inserting ``rural-area small 
        businesses,'' after ``women-owned small businesses,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (6)(B)(iii), by inserting ``rural-area 
        small businesses,'' after ``women-owned small businesses,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```