alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                   |   | 2010   |   |    | 2009   |   |    | 2008    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|---------|---------|--------|
|                                                                                   |   |   |   |    |   |   |    |    |   |
| Great Genesis Holdings Limited, “Genesis”                                  |   |   | 100.00 | %       |   |   | 100.00  | %       |   |   | 100.00 | % |
| Henglong USA Corporation, “HLUSA”                                          |   |   | 100.00 | %       |   |   | 100.00  | %       |   |   | 100.00 | % |
| Jingzhou Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd., “Henglong”                   |   |   | 80.00  | %  |   |   | 80.00   | %  |   |   | 80.00 | % |
| Shashi Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd., “Jiulong”                   |   |   | 81.00  | %  |   |   | 81.00   | %  |   |   | 81.00 | % |
| Shenyang Jinbei Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd., “Shenyang”  |   |   | 70.00  | %  |   |   | 70.00   | %  |   |   | 70.00 | % |
| Zhejiang Henglong & Vie Pump-Manu Co., Ltd., “Zhejiang”                |   |   | 51.00  | %       |   |   | 51.00   | %       |   |   | 51.00 | % |
| Universal Sensor Application Inc., “USAI”                                  |   |   | 83.34  | %       |   |   | 83.34   | %       |   |   | 83.34 | % |
| Wuhan Jielong Electric Power Steering Co., Ltd., “Jielong”                 |   |   | 85.00  | %       |   |   | 85.00   | %       |   |   | 85.00 | % |
| Wuhu HengLong Auto Steering System Co., Ltd., “Wuhu”                       |   |   | 77.33  | %       |   |   | 77.33   | %       |   |   | 77.33 | % |
| Jingzhou Hengsheng Automotive System Co., Ltd., “Hengsheng”                |   |   | 100.00 | %       |   |   | 100.00  | %       |   |   | 100.00 | % |
| Jingzhou Henglong Automotive Technology (Testing) Center, “Testing Center” |   |   | 80.00  | %       |   |   | 80.00   | %       |   |   | — |   |
| Beijing Henglong Automotive System Co., Ltd., “Beijing Henglong”           |   |   | 50.00  | %  |   |   | — |    |   |   | — |   |

----
#### Divine Awah CHE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.

No. 05-2298.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 2006.

Decided: June 8, 2006.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, Noto & Oswald, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Katherine A. Schlech, NCES, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Divine Awah Che, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s denial of Che’s motion to reopen. Che sought rescission of a final order of deportation entered in absentia, asserting that his absence from court was due to exceptional circumstances beyond his control. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the denial of the motion to reopen the in absentia order was not an abuse of discretion. *See INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(I), (e)(1) (West 2005).

We therefore deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 
 Exhibits 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oxford Investments Holdings Inc., a company organized under the laws ofunder the laws of Ontario, Canada (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 1.

the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.


By:    /S/    Michael Donaghy
 Michael Donaghy
 Chief Executive Officer





Date: June 30, 2011
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of President and Chief
Executive Officer of Approach Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.Date: September 29, 2009
    /s/ J. Ross CraftJ. Ross CraftPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017178EN.01002601.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-145/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (La Gombe, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 21, 2016

No. 04-16-00699-CR

IN RE Albert NICOLAS,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B93-6 and B93-7

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Relator's Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.2







AGREEMENT FOR TERMINATION OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Agreement for Termination of Employment Agreement is made and entered into this 27th day of August, 2010, by
and between WESTWOOD ONE, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and NORMAN J. PATTIZ (“Employee”), with respect to
the following facts:



A. Employee founded Company, and has most recently been employed under an Employment Agreement dated April 29,
1998, as amended, and currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Company;



B. Employee wishes to retire from Company, to terminate his Employment Agreement with Company, and to pursue other
interests; and,



C. The parties desire to provide by this Agreement for the termination of Employee’s Employment Agreement (as
amended), for Employee’s Resignation from Company’s Board of Directors, and for Employee’s provision of continuing
consulting services to Company, all as hereinafter set forth.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



1. Termination of Employment Agreement.



a. The Employment Agreement between Employee and Company, dated as of April 29, 1998, as amended by Amendment to
Employment Agreement dated as of October 27, 2003, by Amendment No. Two to Employment Agreement dated as of November
28, 2005, by Amendment No. Three to Employment Agreement dated as of January 8, 2008, by Amendment No. Four dated as of
December 31, 2008, and Amendment No. Five, dated as of January 11, 2009, is hereby terminated, effective August 31,
2010.



b. The provisions of Paragraph 7 of the Employment Agreement shall survive termination of the Agreement; all other
provisions of the Agreement, as amended, shall no longer be of any force or effect.



AGREEMENT FOR TERMINATION OF


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



PAGE 1


 


1









 





c. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Employee will deliver to Company his resignation as Chairman
of the Board of Directors, effective August 31, 2010, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.



2. Consulting Agreement.



Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Company and Courtside, LLC, will enter into a Consulting
Agreement, whereby Courtside, LLC will provide Company with the consulting services of Employee, all on the terms and
conditions as set forth in Exhibit B hereto.




	 	3.	 	Publicity Releases.






Each party herein will permit the other party to approve any written press releases relating to Employee’s
retirement, the termination of Employee’s employment, and Employee’s continuing consulting services to Company, prior
to public disclosure of any such release.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement for Termination of Employment Agreement effective
August 31, 2010.



	 	 	 	 
	“Company”	 	“Employee”
	 
	WESTWOOD ONE, INC.	 
	 
	By	/s/ Roderick M. Sherwood, III	 	/s/ Norman J. Pattiz
	 	NORMAN J. PATTIZ
	 
	Roderick M. Sherwood, III	 	 
	(printed name)	 	 
	 
	President and CFO	 	 
	(title)	 	 







AGREEMENT FOR TERMINATION OF


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



PAGE 2



 


2
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas A. Krosschell, Chief Financial Officer of DTLL, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of DTLL, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 30, 2004

/s/ Thomas A. Krosschell



Thomas A. Krosschell

Chief Financial Officer



---
# C_2019072EN.01000301.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland — Netherlands) — criminal proceedings against ET

(Case C-97/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Principle of mutual recognition of confiscation orders - Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA - Article 12(1) and (4) - Law governing the execution - Law of the executing State authorising recourse to imprisonment for the non-execution of the confiscation order - Conformity - Law of the issuing State also authorising recourse to a term of imprisonment - Lack of effect))

(2019/C 72/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Nederland

Party to the main, criminal proceedings

ET

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 12(1) and (4) of Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders must be interpreted as not precluding the application of the legislation of an executing State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purpose of enforcing a confiscation order adopted in an issuing State, authorises, where necessary, a term of imprisonment to be imposed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 12(1) and (4) of Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders must be interpreted as not precluding the application of the legislation of an executing State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purpose of enforcing a confiscation order adopted in an issuing State, authorises, where necessary, a term of imprisonment to be imposed.

| 2. | The fact that the legislation of the issuing State also authorises possible recourse to a term of imprisonment has no bearing on the application of such a measure in the executing State. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The fact that the legislation of the issuing State also authorises possible recourse to a term of imprisonment has no bearing on the application of such a measure in the executing State.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
#### Michael Grucci, Appellant, v Christine Grucci, Respondent.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided March 27, 2012

Reported below, 81 AD3d 776.

*944Motion to vacate this Court’s January 24, 2012 preclusion order granted.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golden
Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael C. Litt, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                                       
|------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|              |  | 
|July 20, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Michael C. Litt                                
|              |  |  |  | Michael C. Litt, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Kevin Glassman, Respondent, v ProHealth Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion by Greater New York Hospital Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
EXHIBIT 32

BISON INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Edward G. Lampman,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bison Instruments, Inc. (the
Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2005 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies
that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: April 18, 2005

| |  |                         |  |                                                               | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/   Edward G. Lampman
| | 
| |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director | 

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li De Hai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: June 3, 2011
By:
/s/ Li De HaiLi De HaiChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

 
| ** ** | ** **                        |
|------------|-----------------------------------|
| ** ** | **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**    |
| ** ** | **Chartered Accountants**         |
|       | 111 5 Avenue SW,  Suite 3100 |
|       | Calgary, Alberta                  |
|       | Canada T2P 5L3                    |
|       | Telephone +1 403 509  7500        |
|       | Facsimile +1 403 781  1825        |

 

 

**Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

 

 

We hereby consent to (i) theinclusion in EnCana Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the yearended December 31, 2009; and (ii) the incorporation by reference inregistration statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453); and (iii) theincorporation by reference in registration statements on Form S-8 (FileNos. 333-124218, 333-13956 and 333-140856); and (iv) the incorporation byreference in registration statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-149370),of our audit report dated February 17 , 2010, relating to the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements as at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2009and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of EnCanaCorporation as of December 31, 2009.

 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Chartered Accountants 

Calgary, Alberta

February 18, 2010

 

 

 

“PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, anOntario limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, thePricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. 

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2389 

To allow States to elect to observe year-round daylight saving time, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2019 

Mr. ROGERS of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow States to elect to observe year-round daylight saving 

time, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPTIONAL YEAR-LONG APPLICATION OF DAY4 LIGHT SAVING TIME. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 

6 U.S.C. 260a) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘or may by law apply the ad8 vancement of time described in this section for the 

9 duration of the year,’’ after ‘‘may by law exempt 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2389 IH

1 itself from the provisions of this subsection providing 

2 for the advancement of time,’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘the standard time otherwise 

4 applicable during that period’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

5 same standard time’’; 

6 (3) by striking ‘‘may by law exempt either the 

7 entire State as provided in (1) or’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

8 by law, may apply either standard time provided for 

9 in paragraph (1) to the entire State,’’; and 

10 (4) by inserting ‘‘, or may apply the advance11 ment of time for the duration of the year to the en12 tire area of the State lying within any time zone’’ 

13 before the period at the end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS