alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020161EN.01000901.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), M.J. Dairies EOOD

(Case C-766/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Opposition - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Criteria for assessment - Applicability in the case of an earlier collective mark - Interdependence between the similarity of the trade marks at issue and that of the goods or services covered by those marks)

(2020/C 161/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, V. Marsland, Solicitor, and K.K. Kleanthous)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent). M.J. Dairies EOOD (represented by: D. Dimitrova and I. Pakidanska, advokati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 September 2018, Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI) (T-328/17, not published, EU:T:2018:594); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 September 2018, Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI) (T-328/17, not published, EU:T:2018:594);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________________

No. 97-60167

Summary Calender

______________________________________

EDMOND RICHOUX,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICER OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ADM/GROWMARK 

RIVER SYSTEM INC.; OLD REPUBLIC 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondents, 

_____________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order 

of the Benefits Review Board 

(96-0644)

_____________________________________________

November 12, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, AND WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Our review of the record and the briefs convinces us that the

findings of fact of the Administrative Law Judge are supported by

substantial evidence and that he committed no error of law. We

affirm for the same reasons as those given by the Benefits Review

Board in its Decision and Order filed on January 28, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   February 13, 2009 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
(86 South. 213)

#### Ex parte MORRIS. MORRIS v. GOLDMAN.

(6 Div. 989.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1919.)

Pleading &wkey;>30 — Use of word “her” held clerical error for “hire.”

In a count charging that defendant, bailee for “her,” received a certain rug, the word “her” should be treated as a clerical misprision for “hire,” in view of- the fact that defendant’s demurrer proceeded upon that ground.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Petition of Joseph J. Morris, individually and doing business as the Southern Steam Carpet Cleaning Company, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court rendered in the case of Southern Steam Carpet Cleaning Co. v. Mrs. Godfrey Goldman, 84 South. 478.

.Writ denied.

Count AA is as follows:

“Plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of $300 as damages, for that heretofore, on, to wit, the--day of July, 1917, the more particular time being to the plaintiff unknown, the defendant bailee for her received from plaintiff a certain oriental rug, to be redelivered to plaintiff within a reasonable time, to wit, one week, and defendant so negligently conducted • itself in and about its duties as said bailee that it did not have and has not returned said oriental rug.”

Richard H. Fries and Hugh Morrow, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

A gratuitous bailee is only liable for gross negligence. 29 Ala. 265. An ordinary bailee is only held to such diligence as he gives his own business affairs. 46 Ala. 293; Cooley on Torts, 131. A defendant may show bis good faith, for the same reason that a plaintiff may show aggravated circumstances, in an action for damages. 13 Cyc. 121. A coinXilaint which does not contain a substantial cause of action will not support a judgment. 19S Ala. 445, 73 South. S18; 131 Ala. 220, 31 South. 566; 113 Ala. 402, 21 South. 938. If the judgment is for a greater amount than is sued for, it will be reversed. 1 Ala. 89; 1 Stewart, 79.

Beddow & Oberdorfer, of Birmingham, for appellee.

No brief reached the reporter.

PER CURIAM.

While we think that this writ should be denied, and that the result reached by the Court of Appeals is correct, we prefer treating count AA as averring that the defendant was a bailee for hire. In other words, we think that the use of the word “her,” instead of “hire,” should be treated as a clerical misprision, in view of the fact that the defendant’s demurrer proceeded upon this theory, especially grounds 2 and 8.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN, SOMERVILLE, and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.

<&wkey;>For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





EXHIBIT
      32.1





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Lavi Krasney, President
      and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





i.
 
      The certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





ii.
        A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed
“filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to
      the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.





/s/
                Lavi KrasneyLavi
                Krasney


President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-23-000]

Take notice that on May 17, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to become effective May 17, 2001: 

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 374

Williston Basin states that it has revised the above-referenced tariff sheet found in Section 48 of the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff, to rename a receipt point associated with its Pooling Service. Point ID No. 03376 is being renamed from (WRG—Madden) to (TBI—Wind River). Such name change has no effect on Williston Basin's Pooling Service, but is being made simply to reflect a change in name to clearly identify the receipt point.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13363  Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enterprise Acquisition Corp.  (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Daniel C. Staton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 14, 2008 /s/ Daniel C. Staton Daniel C. Staton President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Consumer Acquisition Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report.4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Scott LaPortaScott LaPortaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)August 14, 2008
#### Brinson *vs.*The State of Georgia.

1. The evidence was conflicting, and there was enough to support the verdict.

2. If a pistol he carried concealed hut for a moment, it is a violation of the law. 46 *6a.,*292.

Judgment affirmed.

February 17, 1886.

Blandeord, Justice.

[Brinson was indicted for having and carrying about his person a pistol concealed. The evidence was conflicting. The court charged that if the pistol was concealed but for a moment, it was a violation of the law. The defendant ivas found guilty. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and he excepted.] • '
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Troy Cartwright, Appellant.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 12, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00838

- CR

Avie Lee LOZANO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR8489

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court has considered the appellan t ’ s motion for en banc reconsideration, and the

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 5      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 5      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 5      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 3 of 3
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

CORPORATE

VIA CFTC Portal 

August 29, 2023 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Attention: FOIA Compliance Office 

1155 21st Street NW 

Three Lafayette Centre 

Washington, DC 20581 

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir/Madam, 

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d), LCH SA (“LCH”) respectfully requests confidential 

treatment under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, for the Portal submission on 

August 29, 2023, in relation to the document “8_CALRM_Liquidity Risk Modelling Framework 

V6.1_final”, including any subsequent emails and replies between LCH and Commission staff, regarding 

such submission (collectively, the “Confidential Information”). 

LCH is requesting confidential treatment for the Confidential Information pursuant to Commission 

Regulation 145.9(d)(ii), which provides that confidential treatment may be requested on the grounds 

that disclosure would reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. LCH 

further requests that the Confidential Information receives confidential treatment in perpetuity. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential 

treatment accorded by law, and LCH will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. LCH 

requests notification from the Commission in advance of any disclosure of the Confidential Information 

pursuant to the FOIA or the Commission’s Rules of Practice so that this request for confidential 

treatment may be substantiated. 

If you have any questions or comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact 

the undersigned at ryan.hajen@lseg.com. 

Yours sincerely, 

Ryan Hajen 

Ryan Hajen 

Senior Compliance Manager 

LCH
DOR Extension Letter for Gastrotech


    DORBioPharma,
      Inc.

    


    December
      12, 2005

    


    Confidential

    


    Kind
      Attn: Hans T. Schambye, PhD

    Chief
      Executive Officer

    


    Gastrotech
      Pharma A/S

    Nyhavn
      43B

    Copenhagen
      1051

    Denmark

    


    Re:
      Extension of Letter of Intent between DOR BioPharma, Inc., Gastrotech Pharma
      A/S
      and Sellers dated October 28, 2005 (“Letter of Intent”)

    


    Dear
      Hans: 

    


    This
      letter confirms our mutual agreement as of the date set forth above to extend
      both the termination date set forth in sub-clause (i) on page 4 of the Letter
      of
      Intent and the exclusivity period set forth on page 4 of the Letter of Intent
      through 11:59 pm (Eastern Standard Time) on January 15, 2006. All other terms
      of
      the Letter of Intent shall remain unchanged. 

    


    
      	
              Agreed
                and Accepted on December 29, 2005

            	
              Agreed
                and Accepted on December 20, 2005

            
	 	 
	 	 
	
              DOR
                BIOPHARMA, INC.

            	
              GASTROTECH
                PHARMA A/S

            
	 	 
	
              By:
                /s/
                Michael Sember

            	
              By:
                /s/
                Hans T. Schambye

            
	
                  Mike
                Sember

            	
                  Hans
                T.
                Schambye, PhD

            
	
                  Chief
                Executive Officer 

            	
                  Chief
                Executive Officer

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
              By:
                /s/
                Olle Isaksson

            
	 	
                  Olle
                Isaksson

            
	 	
                  Chairman
                of the
                Board of Directors 

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
              NORDIC
                BIOTECH K/S

            
	 	 
	 	
              By:
                /s/
                Christian Hansen     /s/
                Florian Schonharting

            
	 	
                  Christian
                Hansen       Florian
                Schonharting
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas GeraisCEMIG (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maura Galuppo Botelho Martins, Acting Chief Officer for Finance and Investor
Relations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Maura Galuppo Botelho MartinsName: Maura Galuppo Botelho MartinsTitle: Acting Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations


Date: May 7, 2018