alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 16 – Predictive Modeling      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how EROS scientists project future landscape change.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

Download and Transcript Access

**Summary**: Land cover and land use across the United States are the culmination of a complex web of interwoven factors: Climate, landscape types, and economic factors among them. Remotely-sensed data from satellites like Landsat and a variety of other sources are useful for documenting and monitoring land cover and land use. When used alongside other data sources, however, remote sensing data can offer a glimpse at future land use under a range of scenarios.

**Guests**: Terry Sohl, Research Physical Scientist, EROS

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: Brian Hauge

**Release date**: Feb. 10, 2020

**More on Land Cover Projections**: 
                            -  Looking into the Future: The Art and Science of Land Use Projections 
                            -  Land Use and Land Cover Modeling 
                            -  LCMAP Projects Possibilities for Future Land Cover Change 
                            -  Land Cover Modeling Methodology - The FORE-SCE Model 

### Contacts
July 19, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2808.01
Weekly Notification of Rule Changes
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(c), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following per the attached text:

- Amendments to Regulation 3204.01 (additions bolded and underlined)
regarding the strike price listing procedure for Soybean Oil options.
Effective July 19, 2007, these amendments provide for the listing of four
additional strike prices in the “second tier” below the initial band.

Sincerely,
Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

©071007


Additions are bolded and underlined

3204.01

Striking Prices - Trading shall be conducted for put and call options with striking prices (the

“strikes") in integral multiples of one-half cent per pound per Soybean Oil futures contract (i.e., .210, .215,
.220, etc.) (the "first tier"); and in integral multiples of one cent per pound per Soybean Oil futures contract
(i.e., .210, .220, .230, etc.) (the "second tier") as follows:

1. a.

Per the first tier, at the commencement of trading for an option contract, the following strikes
shall be listed: one with a strike closest to the previous day's settlement price of the underlying
Soybean Oil futures contract, the next five consecutive higher and the next five consecutive
Jower strikes (the “initial band"). If the previous day's settlement price is midway between two
strikes, the closest price shall be the larger of the two.

Per the second tier, at the commencement of trading for an option contract, the following
strikes shall be listed: the next four consecutive strikes above the initial band and the next
four consecutive strikes below the initial band.

Per the first tier, over time, strikes shall be added as necessary to insure that all strikes within
2.5 cents of the previous day's trading range of the underlying futures contract are listed (the
“minimum band").

Per the second tier, over time, strikes shall be added as necessary to insure that the next four
consecutive strikes above and below the minimum band are listed.

No new strikes may be added by these procedures in the month in which an option expires.

2. All strikes will be listed prior to the opening of trading on the following business day. The Exchange
may modify the procedures for the introduction of strikes as it deems appropriate in order to respond
to market conditions.
No. 76-5941.

#### Miller *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                      Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, Alan J. Cox, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gray Creek Mining,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of January, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**

# NEWS RELEASE REGARDINGINCREASE IN QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND 

# BMHC Increases QuarterlyCash Dividend 33% to $0.08 per Common Share 

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept.14/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Building Materials Holding Corporation (Nasdaq: BMHC)today announced that its Board of Directors has increased the Company’s quarterlycash dividend and declared the third quarter 2004 cash dividend of $0.08 per commonshare.  The dividend is payable on October 15, 2004 to common shareholders ofrecord as of September 24, 2004. 

“We are pleased to announce theincrease of our quarterly dividend,” said Robert E. Mellor, Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer of Building Materials Holding Corporation.  “Wecontinue to focus on the expansion of our construction services business.  Wehave a high level of confidence in the long-term growth of BMHC and our dividend programenables our shareholders to participate in the success of BMHC.” 

**About BMHC**Building Materials Holding Corporationis one of the largest residential construction services companies in the UnitedStates.  The Company specializes in providing construction and installationservices, component manufacturing and high-quality building materials to residentialbuilders and contractors across the nation.  Keys to BMHC’s growth strategyare increasing construction services to production homebuilders and entry into selectivegeographic markets.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar Montes, Appellant.

Submitted February 16, 2010;

decided February 18, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

                    The Technology Panel Meeting will meet in Kirtland Air Force Base, New                           ( print page 27493)                        Mexico on May 23-25, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                

The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the direction of the study. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof.

For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-12445 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Invention for Licensing; Government-
Owned Inventions

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are made 
available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.
    U.S. Patent No. 6,192,168 (Navy Case No. 79,631) entitled ``Optical 
Waveguide-Flow Cell Integration Method'' and U.S. Provisional Patent 
No. 60/231,548 (Navy Case No. 79,856) entitled ``Pressure Relief Vent 
Fluid Control for Miniature Fluidics Devices''.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to the Naval Research Laboratory, Code 1008.2, 4555 Overlook Avenue, 
SW, Washington, DC 20375-5320, and must include the Navy Case number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine M. Cotell, Ph.D., Head, 
Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, 
Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-7230.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404)


    Dated: May 15, 2001.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13206 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Innova  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Walter Weisel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Walter Weisel
-------------------------
Name:  Walter Weisel
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  July 27, 2005
# C_2017300EN.01003701.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/37

---

Action brought on 19 July 2017 — Medisana v EUIPO (happy life)

(Case T-457/17)

(2017/C 300/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Medisana AG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘happy life’ — Application for registration No 15 164 023

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2017 in Case R 1965/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2017269EN.01003302.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/33

---

Action brought on 28 June 2017 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-391/17)

(2017/C 269/45)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: R. Radu, C.-M. Florescu, E. Gane and L. Liţu, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s (EU) decision of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s (EU) decision of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the provisions of the Treaties of the European Union relating to the competence of the Union.






  — | The proposed citizens’ initiative is exclusively aimed at improving the protection of the rights of persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities, and has no direct link with cultural diversity for the purposes of Article 3 TEU and Article 167 TFEU. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the provisions of the Treaties of the European Union relating to the competence of the Union.

—

The proposed citizens’ initiative is exclusively aimed at improving the protection of the rights of persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities, and has no direct link with cultural diversity for the purposes of Article 3 TEU and Article 167 TFEU.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons under the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU.






  — | The Commission confines itself to listing the proposals for measures by means of which statements of support will be collected from citizens and does not put forward any legal argument to support the conclusion that these fall within its sphere of competence. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons under the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU.

—

The Commission confines itself to listing the proposals for measures by means of which statements of support will be collected from citizens and does not put forward any legal argument to support the conclusion that these fall within its sphere of competence.

---
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

 

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating a portion of Encana Corporation’s petroleum and natural gas reserves as of December 31, 2010, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Encana Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F, (ii) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-150453), (iii) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-124218, 333-85598, and 333-140856); and (iv) Encana Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-9 (File No. 333-165626), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
|                     | **NETHERLAND,   SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.** |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                      |
|                     |                                                      |
|                     | By:                                                       | /s/ C.H.   (Scott) Rees III, P.E. |
|                     |                                                      |    C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E. |
|                     |                                                      |    Chairman and Chief Executive   Officer |
|                     |                                                      |   |
|                     |                                                      |   |
| Dallas,   Texas          |                                                      |   |
| February 17,   2011 |                                                      |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION

I, Darwin L. Stump, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  March   , 2004               
 /s/ Darwin L. Stump                           

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer

of the Managing General Partner of the Registrant
Exhibit 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Liberty Alliance, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Steven L. White, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Steven L. White Date: May 7, 2008 Steven L. White President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
(104 So. 917)

#### Ex parte Joe McCUTCHEN.

(6 Div. 466.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 11, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Chas. H. Fanning, of Dora, and James J. Mayfield, of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Joe McCutchen for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in McCutchen v. State, 104 So. 922. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, • C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.