alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) by CapSource Financial, Inc.
(Registrant), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to CapSource Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|DATE: March 27, 2006 | By: | /s/ Fred C. Boethling  
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                     |     |                        
|                     |     | Name: Fred C. Boethling
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer

---
23-034

November 1, 2023

VIA CFTC PORTAL

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Nodal Exchange Incentive Program Extensions: Certification Submission No. 

23-034 Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(a)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Exchange, LLC (“Nodal Exchange” or 

“Exchange”) is notifying the Commission by self-certification of the Exchange’s intention to 

continue the incentive programs listed below. A complete description of each Program is 

included and segregated as Exhibit A for which the Exchange seeks confidential treatment. 

A redacted version is also included. The Programs, which are set to expire on December 

31, 2023, are being extended.

The following Programs are being extended:

Power and Gas Incentive Program 1

Electric Power Futures and Options – Broker Incentive Program

Electric Power Options – Broker Incentive Program

Power Incentive Program 2

Power Incentive Program 3

Power Incentive Program 4

Power Incentive Program 5

Power Incentive Program 6

Power Incentive Program 7

Natural Gas Broker Incentive Program

Natural Gas Incentive Program 1

Natural Gas Incentive Program 2

Natural Gas Incentive Program 4

Natural Gas Incentive Program 5

Natural Gas Market Maker Incentive Program 1

Natural Gas Strategic Revenue Share Program 1
23-034

Exchange management has assessed each Program and certifies its compliance with the 

Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), including the Commissions Regulations and the Core 

Principles. Specifically, the Program complies with Core Principle 2 (Compliance with 

Rules), Core Principle 4 (Prevention of Market Disruption), Core Principle 9 (Execution of 

Transactions), Core Principle 12 (Protection of Market Participants), and Core Principle 18 

(Recordkeeping). 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Act and Commission Regulation 40.6, the Exchange 

certifies that each Program complies with the Act and the Commission’s Regulations 

thereunder. There have not been any opposing views expressed regarding the Program.

Nodal Exchange certifies that, concurrent with this submission, a redacted version of each

Program was posted on the Nodal Exchange website at www.nodalexchange.com. 

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submission, please 

contact me at 703-962-9853 or Markotic@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Max Markotic

Managing Director

Attachments:

• Exhibit A: Confidential Programs

• Exhibit B: Redacted Programs

• Request for Confidential Treatment
May 25, 2023

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments –

Updates to Risk Parameters Established by ICC 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to risk parameters 

established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group and/or Risk Working Group. 

ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During the week 

ending May 25, 2023, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• bid/offer widths for CDX and iTraxx credit indices and single name risk factors

• concentration charge thresholds for index and single name risk factors

• Kendall Tau rank-order correlations for NA, EU, Asia/Pacific (“AP”), and Emerging Market (“EM”) risk factors

• MAD estimates (inclusive of EWMA) for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• left and right tail parameters for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this submission. 

Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at olivia.bazor@ice.com

or 904-855-5580.

Sincerely,

Olivia Bazor

Staff Attorney
# C_2017231EN.01002901.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/29

---

Action brought on 26 April 2017 — António Conde & Companhia v Commission

(Case T-244/17)

(2017/C 231/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: António Conde & Companhia, SA (Gafanha de Nazaré, Portugal) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that the European Commission has failed to act in application of Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1386/2007 of 22 October 2007 laying down conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (OJ 2007 L 318, p. 1) by requesting Portugal to submit to it a list of Portuguese-flagged vessels authorised to fish in the NAFO Regulatory Area for the season 2017 which excludes the fishing vessel CALVÃO, with the consequence that it has failed to forward a list including that vessel to the NAFO Secretariat; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the European Commission has failed to act in application of Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1386/2007 of 22 October 2007 laying down conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (OJ 2007 L 318, p. 1) by requesting Portugal to submit to it a list of Portuguese-flagged vessels authorised to fish in the NAFO Regulatory Area for the season 2017 which excludes the fishing vessel CALVÃO, with the consequence that it has failed to forward a list including that vessel to the NAFO Secretariat;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission breached Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1386/2007 by unlawfully failing to forward a list of vessels including the applicant’s fishing vessel CALVÃO for the purposes of authorisation to fish in the NAFO Regulatory Area for the season 2017.

The applicant maintains that the Commission lacks powers to participate in the drafting of the lists of authorised vessels which remains an exclusive competence of the Member States. The applicant has requested the Commission to desist from interfering in the drafting of the list concerned and has called upon it to fulfil its obligations regarding the forwarding of the list including its fishing vessel CALVÃO to the NAFO Secretariat.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meeting 
will convene in Salem, Oregon on Saturday, June 2, 2001. The meeting is 
scheduled to begin at 9 a.m., and will conclude at approximately 2 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at the Salem City Library, Anderson Room B, 
located at 585 Liberty Street SE in Salem, Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Public Law 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. The tentative agenda will focus on describing the desired 
future condition of the SRA.
    The public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 1 
p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the June 2 meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips at the 
address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips; 
Willamette National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, 
Mill City, OR 97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: May 10, 2001.
Darrel L. Kenops,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-12415 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 19, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-0977 Lower Tribunal No. 19-19566

________________ 

### Elisa Soler, etc., et al. , Appellants,
vs. 

### People's Trust Insurance Company, etc. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge. Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula and W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller, for appellants. Bazinsky, Korman, & Baker, P.A., and Kevin Luis Cabrera and Stephen W. Bazinsky (Plantation), for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-4006. In re SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., SECURITIES LITIGATION. Harvey WEINER, et al., a national banking association, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., Charles J. Zwick, John Porta, G. Dodson Mathias, Paul Hill, Kirsten M. Hudak, Defendants,

William A. Brandt, Jr., as Administrator of the Investment Plus Plan of Southeast Banking Corp., Appellant. May 9, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (No. 90-760-CIV-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge. Before COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and FAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM: This appeal arises from a class action settled against Southeast Banking Corporation. The district court approved the settlement and was faced with the issue of attorneys's fees and costs. William A. Brandt, Jr., as administrator of a pension plan for former Southeast Bank employees, objected to the request for attorneys's fees by class counsel. The district judge overruled the objection and approved attorneys's fees of twenty-five percent of the settlement. Brandt attempts to appeal that ruling. Brandt was not a named party. He never moved to intervene in the class action as administrator of the pension plan. Here, he attempts to base standing to appeal on his having objected to the request for attorneys's fees. We find that our Circuit's precedent is clearly established inGuthrie v. Evans, 815 F.2d 626 (11th Cir.1987). Brandt, a non-named class member who failed to intervene, lacks standing to appeal the district court's order on attorneys's fees. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of June 30, 2011.  This Certification is executed as of August 12, 2011. VISION INDUSTRIES CORP. By:/s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Secretary, Treasurer,  and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/ALLAN LEGATORAllan Legator
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TeraExchange, LLC

P.O. Box 169 

Summit, NJ 07901

Via CFTC Portal Submission

November 3, 2020

Christopher Kirkpatrick 

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Center

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Certification under CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) 

TeraExchange, LLC – Rulebook Amendment

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), and Section 

40.6(a) of the Regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), 

TeraExchange, LLC (“TeraExchange”), a registered swap execution facility, hereby notifies the 

Commission that it has amended its Rulebook.

A concise summary of the amended Rules is attached as Exhibit A. The text of the amended 

Rulebook marked to show changes from the prior version is attached as Exhibit B. Any additions 

are underlined, and deletions struck through. A clean copy of the amended Rulebook is attached

as Exhibit C.

The amended Rules will take effect on November 17, 2020, ten business days following this submission.

TeraExchange hereby certifies that: (i) these amendments comply with the requirements of the Act 

and the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder, and (ii) concurrent with 

this filing, TeraExchange will post a copy of this submission on its website. There were no 

substantive opposing views expressed regarding these amendments. Confidential treatment is not

requested.
Please contact the undersigned at 908-273-8277 or by e-mail at crossman@teraexchange.com with 

any questions regarding this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

ChristopherRossman

Christopher Rossman 

Chief Compliance Officer 

TeraExchange, LLC

Enclosures
Exhibit A

Explanation of Amended Rules

TeraExchange has amended its Rulebook as provided below. Capitalized terms used but not 

defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Rulebook.

Section/Rule Description of Revision

Reason and/or 

Supporting Core 

Principle or Regulation

Cover Page Updated version number and effective date Conforming changes

Rule 531(d) Rule amended to express Executing Firm 

compliance requirement with Rule 537 

regarding post-trade anonymity for arranged 

transactions intended to be cleared.

Edit rule to conform with 

new rule 537 regarding 

post-trade anonymity in 

reference to CFTC final 

rule §37.9(d)

Rule 537 New rule explaining prohibition of post-trade 

name give-up for swaps executed 

anonymously and intended to be cleared.

Add rule to explain posttrade anonymity in 

reference to CFTC final 

rule §37.9(d)

Rule 906 Rule amended to remove reference to certain 

trademarks no longer protected by the 

company

Correcting stale reference
EXHIBIT B

TeraExchange Rulebook v1.17 (redline)

[see attached]
EXHIBIT C

TeraExchange Rulebook v1.17 (clean)

[see attached]
# C_2018142EN.01003201.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 31 January 2018 — AS Tallinna Vesi v Keskkonnaamet

(Case C-60/18)

(2018/C 142/42)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Tallinna Ringkonnakohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: AS Tallinna Vesi

Appellant:

Respondent: Keskkonnaamet

Respondent:

Intervener: Keskkonnaministeerium

Intervener:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | In the case where end-of-waste criteria have not been set at EU level for a particular type of waste, should Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives be interpreted to mean that a national legal act providing that end-of-waste status depends upon whether criteria set in a generally applicable national legal act exist for a particular type of waste is in keeping with that provision of Directive 2008/98/EC? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the case where end-of-waste criteria have not been set at EU level for a particular type of waste, should Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives be interpreted to mean that a national legal act providing that end-of-waste status depends upon whether criteria set in a generally applicable national legal act exist for a particular type of waste is in keeping with that provision of Directive 2008/98/EC?

1

| 2. | In the case where end-of-waste criteria have not been set at EU level for a particular type of waste, does the first sentence of Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives grant the waste holder the right to apply to the competent authority or to a court in a Member State for a decision on end-of-waste status in keeping with the applicable case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, irrespective of whether criteria set in a generally applicable national legal act exist for a particular type of waste? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the case where end-of-waste criteria have not been set at EU level for a particular type of waste, does the first sentence of Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives grant the waste holder the right to apply to the competent authority or to a court in a Member State for a decision on end-of-waste status in keeping with the applicable case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, irrespective of whether criteria set in a generally applicable national legal act exist for a particular type of waste?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 312, p. 3.

1

---
# C_2019220EN.01001501.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/15

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 — Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament

(Case C-462/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - European Parliament - Rules governing the expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid)

(2019/C 220/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Mylène Troszczynski (represented by: F. Wagner, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by S. Seyr and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Ms Mylène Troszczynski shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Mylène Troszczynski shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018

---
|    |                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calix, Inc. for the quarter ended September 29, 2012; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |  |  |
| Date: December 18, 2012 |   |   |   | /s/ Michael Ashby |
|                    |   |   |   | Michael Ashby |
|                    |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |