alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Officers Certificate

---

March 6, 2009

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC. North
Tower, 7th Floor 4 World Financial Center New York, New York 10080

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS
TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Joseph Panepinto,
Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York),  a New York corporation (the Trustee),
hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied,
in all material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee
under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20,1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the Securities Intermediary), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for
each trust series listed in the attached schedule with the exception of the items identified below:

- With respect to the PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1 distribution on June 16, 2008, the amount of interest to be paid by the Trust was calculated incorrectly.  As such, on September 25, 2008, BNY corrected this error and a revised 8-K was filed on October 6, 2008.
- With respect to the PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1, the September 15, 2008 Exhibit 99.1 within the Form 8-K incorrectly referenced the March 17, 2008 distribution date. On March 5, 2009 a revised 8-K was filed to reflect the correct distribution date.

| | Very
truly yours,
| | -----------------

| | The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

      The Bank of New York), as Trustee
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:
/s/ Joseph Panepinto
      Name:
Joseph Panepinto        
                                                             Title:
Vice President
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

---

SCHEDULE

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1
   PPLUS
Trust Series CMT-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
   PPLUS Trust Series
DCNA-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
   PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2 
  PPLUS Trust Series
JPM-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3 
  PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
   PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1 
  PPLUS
Trust Series TWC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
   PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
   PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust
Series FAR-1
   PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
   PreferredPLUS Trust
Series LMG-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust
Series UPC-1
   PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ben  Anderson,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Sterling  Exploration,  Inc.'s  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information
contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Sterling
Exploration, Inc.


Date: February 13, 2009               By: /s/ Ben Anderson
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Ben Anderson
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 15, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      22, 2010
#### Maribel Cuadrado, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 14, 2009;

decided February 16, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. An order denying a CPLR 4404 motion to set aside a verdict is nonfinal. The final and appealable paper to the Court of Appeals is the judgment entered after the denial of the motion.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2142 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small 

Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized website for compliance 

guides, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2142 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CENTRALIZED WEBSITE FOR COMPLIANCE 

2 GUIDES. 

3 Section 30 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 sections: 

6 ‘‘(e) CENTRALIZED WEBSITE.—Not later than 6 

7 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, 

8 the Ombudsman shall maintain a publicly available 

9 website that includes— 

10 ‘‘(1) hyperlinks to small entity compliance 

11 guides described under section 212(a)(1) of the 

12 Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 

13 Act of 1996; and 

14 ‘‘(2) with respect to each such small entity com15 pliance guide, the contact information for an indi16 vidual who can offer assistance to small entities with 

17 respect to the rules that are the subject of such 

18 guide. 

19 ‘‘(f) REPORT ON AGENCY COMPLIANCE.—The Om20 budsman shall include in the annual report required under 

21 subsection (b)(2)(C) an assessment of agency compliance 

22 with the requirements of section 212 of the Small BusiVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:24 Jul 16, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2142.RFS H2142

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2142 RFS

1 ness Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 for the 

2 year covered by such annual report.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ January 23, 2012

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2011-3078

WILLIAM B. GROSECLOSE,

v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

Decided: January 20, 2012

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change:

Page 5, line 20, change “Potenza’s insubordination” to --Groseclose’s insubordination--.
Order entered August 26, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00652-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 87836

ORDER

Before the Court is Mother’s August 21, 2020 motion for an extension of 

time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

September 14, 2020. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
ex10_2.htm








Exhibit 10.2







DSW INC. SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION








	
1.

	
Effective June 3, 2010, each director who is does not otherwise receive compensation (including severance) from DSW or Retail Ventures, Inc. receives:













	
  

	
·

	
An annual cash retainer of $50,000 payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each fiscal quarter.













	
  

	
·

	
An annual equity retainer of $100,000 payable on the date of each annual meeting of the shareholders for the purpose of electing directors, determined by dividing the amount of the retainer to be paid in stock units by the “Fair Market Value” of a share of “Stock” on the “Grant Date” pursuant to Section 7.01[3] of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.













	
  

	
·

	
An additional annual cash retainer for committee service for each committee on which such director serves (provided that the committee chairs do not receive such additional retainer) payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each fiscal quarter as follows:













	
  

	
·

	
Audit Committee - $15,000








	
  

	
·

	
Compensation Committee - $11,500








	
  

	
·

	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee - $7,500








	
  

	
·

	
Technology Committee - $7,500













	
2.

	
The Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an   additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, payable in quarterly installments of $5,000 on the last day of each fiscal quarter, for service as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.








	
3.

	
The Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $30,000, payable in quarterly installments of $7,500 on the last business day of each fiscal quarter, for service as the Chair of the Compensation Committee.








	
4.

	
The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional cash retainer of $35,000, payable in quarterly installments of $8,750 on the last business day of each fiscal quarter, for service as the Chair of the Audit Committee.








	
5.

	
The Chairman of the Technology Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, payable in quarterly installments of $5,000 on the last day of each fiscal quarter, for service as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.








	
6.

	
Non-management directors may elect to have any of their cash retainers paid in the form of stock units in lieu of cash.
# C_2019187EN.01006601.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/66

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-108/17) (1)

(REACH - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)

(2019/C 187/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the letter of the Commission of 7 December 2016 by which that institution rejected a request for internal review of 2 August 2016 against Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 3549 final of 16 June 2016, granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

---
H. R. 2372 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an assessment 

of all memoranda of understanding and memoranda of agreement between Under 

Secretary of Health and non-Department of Veterans Affairs entities relating 

to suicide prevention and mental health services. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Care Quality Transparency Act’’. 

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF MEMORANDA OF 

UNDERSTANDING AND MEMORANDA OF AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN UNDER SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND NONDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ENTITIES RELATING 

TO SUICIDE PREVENTION AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES. 

(a) ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of all memoranda of understanding and memoranda of agreement entered into 

by the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health and a nonDepartment of Veterans Affairs entity relating to— 

(1) suicide prevention activities and outreach; and 

(2) the provision or coordination of mental health services 

during the 5-year period preceding the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

(b) CONTENTS OF ASSESSMENT.—The assessment required by 

subsection (a) shall include an assessment of— 

(1) the size of the catchment area of each such entity; 

(2) the staffing structures of such entities; 

(3) any accreditation or licensure any such entity has 

obtained in relation to the services the entity provides; 

(4) any variances in the subpopulations of veterans served 

by such entities; 

(5) any limitations any such entity may face in carrying 

out its obligations under the memorandum of understanding 

or memorandum of agreement; 

(6) the extent to which the Under Secretary provides oversight and tracks outcomes of such entities; 

(7) any variations in the structure or requirements of the 

memoranda of understanding and memoranda of agreement; 

(8) a breakdown of the percentage of such entities that 

serve— 

(A) women veterans; 
H. R. 2372—2 

(B) minority veterans; 

(C) veterans who are over the age of 55; 

(D) veterans between the ages of 18 and 34; 

(E) veterans who reside in United States insular areas; 

and 

(F) veterans’ families; and 

(9) any measures taken to ensure the secure exchange 

of data and information between such entities and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 270 days after the 

completion of the assessment under subsection (a), the Comptroller 

General shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of 

the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the results 

of the assessment. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHRISTOPHER K. DAVIES
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Capital Holdings, Inc., Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:      February
3, 2011
   /s/
      Christopher K. DaviesChristopher
      K. DaviesChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting
Officer
143 So. 923

#### Lee COBB v. STATE.

1 Div. 738.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 13, 1932.

C.. E. Hamilton, of Greenville, and C.- L. Hybart, of Monroeville, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Lee Cobb for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Cobb v. State, 143 So. 926.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT,-JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1072

BASHKIM BAJRAKTARI, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, 

Respondent. 

On Petition for Review for an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. 

Submitted: July 24, 2018 Decided: August 7, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas V. Massucci, LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS V. MASSUCCI, New York, New 

York, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn 

Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jacob A. Bashyrov, Trial Attorney, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Bashkim Bajraktari, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and Bajraktari’s claims on appeal 

and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2018); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 

2009); see also Prasad v. Holder, 776 F.3d 222, 228 (4th Cir. 2015) (reaffirming that the 

Board may deny a motion to reopen “solely on the ground that [the alien] has not 

established prima facie eligibility for” the relief he seeks). We therefore deny the petition 

for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Bajraktari (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 

2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
# C_2019103EN.01002801.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — The GB Foods v EUIPO — Yatecomeré (YATEKOMO)

(Case T-336/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark YATEKOMO - National figurative mark yatecomeré - Admissibility of new information seeking to substantiate the accuracy of a well-known fact - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 103/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: The GB Foods, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: C. Buganza González and E. Torner Lasalle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yatecomeré, SL (Ribadumia, Spain) (represented by: J.C. Erdozain López, V. Arnaiz Medina and L. Montoya Terán, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2017 (Case R 1506/2016-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between Yatecomeré and The GB Foods.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders The GB Foods, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The GB Foods, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
# C_2019305EN.01004401.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Café del Mar and Others v EUIPO — Guiral Broto (C del M)

(Case T-774/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark C del M - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 305/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Café del Mar, SC (Sant Antoni de Portmany, Spain), José Les Viamonte (Sant Antoni de Portmany) and Carlos Andrea González (Sant Josep de sa Talaia, Spain) (represented by: F. Miazzetto and J. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain) (represented by: J. de Castro Hermida, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1618/2015-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González and, on the other, Mr Guiral Broto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1618/2015-5). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1618/2015-5).

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar SC, Mr José Les Viamonte and Mr Carlos Andrea González in the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar SC, Mr José Les Viamonte and Mr Carlos Andrea González in the proceedings before the General Court.

| 3. | Orders Mr Ramón Guiral Broto to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Ramón Guiral Broto to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---