alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DAVID F. HACKETT   
| |                        
| | David F. Hackett       
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT TO


CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


(RKB FUND)


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO
CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT is entered into as of December 20, 2005 between RKB
Washington Property Fund I L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“RKB”), and Republic Property Limited Partnership, a Delaware
limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”).


 


WHEREAS, the Operating
Partnership and RKB previously entered into that certain Contribution Agreement
dated as of September 23, 2005 (the “Contribution Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the Operating
Partnership and RKB desire to amend certain terms of the Contribution
Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and
the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Exhibit A to the Contribution Agreement
shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


EXHIBIT A


 


Interests


 


One Hundred Percent (100%) of the outstanding
interests in each of :


 


RKB Corporate Oaks, LLC


RKB CP IV LLC


RKB Pender LLC


RKB Lakeside LLC


RKB Willowwood LLC


RKB Dulles Tech LLC


RPT Presidents Park LLC


RKB Lakeside Manager LLC


RKB Willowwood Manager LLC


RKB Dulles Tech Manager LLC


RPT Presidents Park Manager LLC


 





















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of
the parties hereto has executed and delivered this Amended Agreement, or caused
the Amended Agreement to be duly executed and delivered on its behalf, as of
the date first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  RKB Washington Property Fund I
  L.P.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: RKB Washington
  Property Fund I (General

  Partner) LLC, its General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ Mark R.
  Keller

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Mark R. Keller

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Manager

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Republic Property Limited
  Partnership

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: Republic Property
  Trust, its General

  Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ Mark R.
  Keller

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Mark R. Keller

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Executive Officer

  



 


 


[Signature Page to Amendment to RKB Fund Contribution Agreement]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice Edward JACKSON, a/k/a Moe, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-8141.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2013.

Decided: May 13, 2013.

Maurice Edward Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Edward Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, in his informal brief, Jackson requests leave to file a second or sue-*168cessive § 2255 motion. In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

> (1) newly discovered evidence that ... would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or

> (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h) (West Supp.2012). Jackson’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 10.2.1
--------------

December 30, 2005

To All Option Holders:

Please be advised that the exercise date for the option to purchase shares of
our common stock that was originally issued to Fort Street Equity, Inc. on July
25, 2004, with an expiration date of December 31, 2005, has now been extended to
March 31, 2006.

Very truly yours,

FIT FOR BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

BY: s/s Mark A.Poulsen
  -------------------------------
  MARK A. POULSEN
  CEO and PRESIDENT
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John D. Watson, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of EnCana Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




---



##### 



(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting. Dated: February 25, 2005 /s/ John D. WatsonJohn D. WatsonExecutive Vice-President & Chief FinancialOfficer (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2023271EN.01002201.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — UG v Commission

(Case T-571/17 RENV) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Termination of contract - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Incompetence - Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Entitlement to parental leave - Article 42a of the Staff Regulations - Application of the minimum requirements of Directives 2010/18/EU and 2002/14/EC to officials and other servants of the European Union - Articles 27, 30 and 33 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Workers’ right to information and consultation - Article 24b of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal - Indirect challenge to definitive acts - Inadmissibility - Principle of proportionality - Misuse of powers - Liability)

(2023/C 271/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UG (represented by: M. Richard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu-Bouyon, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, the annulment of the decision of 17 October 2016 by which the European Commission terminated her contract as a member of the contract staff and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material harm she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders UG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in the cases registered under numbers T-571/17 and C-249/20 P; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders UG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in the cases registered under numbers T-571/17 and C-249/20 P;

| 3. | Orders UG to bear her own costs and to pay a third of the costs incurred by the Commission in the case registered under the number T-571/17 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders UG to bear her own costs and to pay a third of the costs incurred by the Commission in the case registered under the number T-571/17 RENV.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of
      ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
      December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the "Annual Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
| **EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Digital Ventures Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending March    31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Con Unerkov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Digital Ventures Corporation, and will be retained by China Digital Ventures    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    Dated: May 19, 2010

/s/ Con Unerkov    Con Unerkov    (Chief Executive Officer)** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of A & J Venture Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

CFO

Dated: February 7, 2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Pamela S. Schutz, as Chief Executive Officer of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 2, 2009



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PAMELA S.
SCHUTZ                                                                          
|Pamela S. Schutz Chairperson, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cycle Country
Accessories Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Ron Hickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ David Davis
------------------------------------
    David Davis
    Chief Financial Officer
    December 29, 2005

<PAGE>
# C_2017168EN.01003201.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/32

---

Action brought on 4 April 2017 — ZGS v EUIPO (Schülerhilfe1)

(Case T-209/17)

(2017/C 168/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZGS Bildungs-GmbH (Gelsenkirchen, Germany) (represented by: T. Remmerbach, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Schülerhilfe1’ — Application No 15 113 038

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2017 in Case R 1789/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ZGS Bildungs-GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ZGS Bildungs-GmbH.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EX-10.1 COMPENSATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




COMPENSATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




As of December 30, 2005




     As in effect on December 30, 2005 and until further changed, non-employee members of the Board
of Directors of the Company are paid an annual fee of $25,000 plus reasonable travel expenses for
attending Board and committee meetings. Each non-employee director also receives $1250 for
attending each meeting of the Board or Board committee. In addition, committee chairs receive
$3,000 per year for serving in such capacity, except that the chair of the audit committee receives
$5,000 per year.



     On February 15, 2005, non-employee directors were each granted an option to purchase 6,952
shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share of $21.14, being the fair market value of
our common stock on that date. Such options have a ten-year term, are all immediately exercisable
and can be exercised by a director for a period of 90 days after he or she ceases to be a director.
The number of shares subject to each such option was determined by dividing $60,000 by $8.63, which
was determined under the Black-Scholes method to be the value of the options granted to our
executive officers on the same date and at the same exercise price as those granted to the
non-employee directors.



     Effective January 1, 2005, upon initial election or appointment to the Board, each
non-employee director receives an option, which vests immediately, to purchase 10,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock for a purchase price equal to the closing purchase price of the Company’s
common stock on the date such option is awarded. The option, which has a 10-year term, is subject
to the terms and conditions applicable to directors of the Company under any then current
Company-sponsored equity incentive plan. In addition, following the initial grant of an option to
purchase 10,000 shares, a non-employee director is eligible to receive an annual equity award under
any then current Company-sponsored equity incentive plan but, as to directors joining the Board on
or after December 23, 2005, only after his or her re-election to the Board by the shareholders of
the Company at the annual meeting of shareholders following the initial appointment of such
director.