alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Plus Resource Corp., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, H. James Graham, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  ***/s/ H. James
Graham***  H. James Graham CEO, Chief Accounting
Officer  Dated:  August
19, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2198 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2198

 To amend the Natural Gas Act with respect to application of the right 
    to exercise eminent domain in construction of pipelines for the 
          exportation of natural gas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

 Mr. DeFazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Natural Gas Act with respect to application of the right 
    to exercise eminent domain in construction of pipelines for the 
          exportation of natural gas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reaffirming Constitutional Property 
Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR EXPORTS.

    Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Notwithstanding subsection (h), a holder of a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity may not exercise the right of eminent 
domain with respect to a pipeline to be constructed for the purpose of 
transporting natural gas to an LNG terminal for export to a foreign 
country from the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45922

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ARMANDO GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: December 24, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Nancy Baskin, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for correction of an illegal 

sentence, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Armando Garcia pled guilty to trafficking in heroin, Idaho Code § 37-2732B(a)(6)(C). 

The district court imposed a unified sentence of thirty years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of fifteen years. 

Garcia filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for correction of an illegal sentence, 

asserting that his sentence is illegal because the determinate term exceeds the mandatory 

minimum term. The district court denied Garcia’s motion, finding that Garcia’s sentence is not 

illegal. Garcia appeals.
2

In State v. Clements, 148 Idaho 82, 87, 218 P.3d 1143, 1148 (2009), the Idaho Supreme 

Court held that the term “illegal sentence” under Rule 35 is narrowly interpreted as a sentence 

that is illegal from the face of the record, i.e., does not involve significant questions of fact or 

require an evidentiary hearing. Rule 35 is a “narrow rule,” and because an illegal sentence may 

be corrected at any time, the authority conferred by Rule 35 should be limited to uphold the 

finality of judgments. State v. Farwell, 144 Idaho 732, 735, 170 P.3d 397, 400 (2007). Rule 35 

is not a vehicle designed to reexamine the facts underlying the case to determine whether a 

sentence is illegal; rather, the rule only applies to a narrow category of cases in which the 

sentence imposes a penalty that is simply not authorized by law or where new evidence tends to 

show that the original sentence is excessive. Clements, 148 Idaho at 87, 218 P.3d at 1148. Idaho 

Code Section 19-2513 does not require a court to impose a determinate term of exactly the 

mandatory minimum provided by statute; rather, the court may impose a sentence “of any 

duration” between the mandatory minimum determinate term and the maximum term authorized 

by statute. State v. Ramsey, 159 Idaho 635, 636-37, 364 P.3d 1200, 1201-02 (Ct. App. 2015).

The record supports the district court’s finding that Garcia’s sentence is not illegal. 

Therefore, the district court properly denied Garcia’s motion. Accordingly, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown and the district court’s order denying Garcia’s Rule 35 

motion is affirmed.
#### Jeffrey J. PROSSER, et al., petitioners, v. NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 10-894.

March 21, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2281 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2281

  To direct the Attorney General to amend certain regulations so that 
  practitioners may administer not more than 3 days' medication to a 
person at one time when administering narcotic drugs for the purpose of 
                  relieving acute withdrawal symptoms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

   Mr. Ruiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Attorney General to amend certain regulations so that 
  practitioners may administer not more than 3 days' medication to a 
person at one time when administering narcotic drugs for the purpose of 
                  relieving acute withdrawal symptoms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Easy Medication Access and Treatment 
for Opioid Addiction Act'' or the ``Easy MAT for Opioid Addiction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADMINISTRATION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF RELIEVING 
              ACUTE WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Attorney General shall revise section 1306.07(b) of title 21, Code 
of Federal Regulations, so that practitioners are allowed to administer 
not more than a three-day supply of medication to one person or for one 
person's use at one time.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




| | /s/   Howard Root                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | Howard RootChief Executive OfficerJanuary 29, 2007

---
# C_2021228EN.01000201.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH, thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v European Commission

(Case C-572/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Customs union - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 211(6) - Authorisation for inward processing of certain grain-oriented electrical steel products - Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers - Examination of the economic conditions - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 - Article 259 - European Commission’s conclusion on the economic conditions - Article 263 TFEU - Act not open to challenge)

(2021/C 228/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH, thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo (represented by: M. Günes and L.C. Heinisch, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal in Case C-572/18 P; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal in Case C-572/18 P;

| 2. | Orders thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
**Exhibit
      23**




**Schwartz
      Levitsky Feldman llp**


CHARTERED
      ACCOUNTANTS


LICENSED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TORONTO,
      MONTREAL




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




The
      undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our
      name and the use of our opinion dated March 24 ,
      2008 on
      the
      consolidated financial statements of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K being filed by the
      Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and its incorporation
      by
      reference into Registration Statement No. 333-126959.




Toronto,
                Ontario, CanadaMarch
                24, 2008
            
            /s/
                Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLPChartered
                Accountants
              Licensed
                  Public Accountants




1167
        Caledonia Road
 Toronto,
          Ontario M6A 2X1
 Tel:
            416
            785 5353
 Fax:
              416
              785 5663
# C_2017347EN.01004301.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/43

---

Action brought on 17 August 2017 — Staropilsen v EUIPO — Pivovary Staropramen (STAROPILSEN; STAROPLZEN)

(Case T-556/17)

(2017/C 347/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Staropilsen s. r. o. (Pilsen, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Kodrasová, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pivovary Staropramen s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘STAROPILSEN; STAROPLZEN’ — EU trade mark No 9 034 893

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2017 in Case R 236/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | cancel the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

cancel the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(a) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(a) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019103EN.01002104.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Minister for Justice and Equality v ND

(Case C-685/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/26)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.

---
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com - miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex

Via Portal Submission November 3, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-61

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of October 23, 2023:

• October 24, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. CT Monday, 

October 30, 2023 deadline to report offsets of November 2023 SPIKES Volatility Index futures, and 

Hard Red Spring Wheat Index, Hard Red Winter Wheat Index, Soft Red Winter Wheat Index, 

National Corn Index and National Soybean Index futures and options, effective for the Friday, 

October 27, 2023 trade date.

Effective October 24, 2023, MGEX made the following non-substantive typographical corrections to the 

following Rules:

• General formatting updates throughout

• The “0” in Rule 435.00. was removed due to typographical error

• “estalishing” was corrected to “establishing” in Rule 1015.00.(3)(a).

• “permissable” was corrected to “permissible” in Rule 1015.00.(3)(b).

• Text for Rules 1016.00., 1017.00., 1018.00., 1019.00., and 1020.00. were moved to separate 

paragraphs and not on the same line as the rule heading

• “withcash” was corrected to “with cash” in Rule 1020.00.

• The reference to “Page 7031” in Rule 2036.00. was removed

• “ealsewhere” was corrected to “elsewhere” in Rule 2060.00.

• “a” was corrected to “an” on the Response to Commission Complaint Form

• “dependant” was corrected to “dependent” in Rule 826.00.

• “heat” was corrected to "Wheat” in Rule 8006.00.

A copy of the current MGEX Rulebook reflecting these changes is available at the following links: 

http://www.mgex.com/regulation.html - https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex.
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com - miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at the following links: 

https://www.mgex.com/announc.html - https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-futures/mgex/alerts. If 

there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7188 or 

randerson@mgex.com.

Sincerely, 

Ryan Anderson

Associate Counsel
# C_2019305EN.01001101.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019 — VG, successor in title to Ms v European Commission

(Case C-19/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages against the European Commission - Decision of the Commission to put an end to a collaboration in connection with the Team Europe network - Compensation for the damage suffered - Plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission - Whether the dispute is contractual or tortious)

(2019/C 305/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: VG, successor in title to Ms (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Martínez del Peral, C. Ehrbar and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders VG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders VG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 83, 5.3.2018.

---
#### *Ex parte*PATRICK.

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.'

Submitted November 9, 1908.

Decided November 16, 1908.

Appeal from decision of the Circuit Court denying a petition for *habeas corpus*when petitioner was detained under power of a state court dismissed for want of jurisdiction. There was no certificate of probable cause for allowing the appeal in conformity with the act of March 10, 1908, c. 76, 35 Stat. 40.1

*Mr. Albert T. Patrick*in *propria persona*and *Mr. William L. . McDonald,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Robert C. Taylor*for the State of New York appeared by leave of the court.

1

 For this act in full see *ante,*p. 551.

*Per Curiam:*

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act , of March 10,1908, c. 76, 35 Stat. 40; *Bilik*v. *Strassheim,*sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, decided October 19,1908, *ante,*p. 551. Application for writ of *habeas corpus*denied.
Crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

May 26, 2023

Via CFTC Portal Submissions

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

3 Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20581

RE: CFTC Regulation 40.6(d) Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation 

40.6(d) North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”) d/b/a crypto.com | Derivatives North America 

hereby submits this self-certification to amend its Rulebook. The amendments being made are as follows:

● Updates to the Exchange Rulebook to include contract specifications previously self-certified; and

● Updates to the Exchange Rulebook definition related to contract specifications previously self-certified.

The Exchange is making these revisions for purposes of consistency and clarity throughout the Rulebook. 

Amendments to the relevant rules are reflected in Exhibit A.

The Exchange Rulebook as revised is available at https://www.nadex.com/rules/. 

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 

(312) 884-0161 or by email at kevin.dan@nadex.com. 

 

Sincerely, 

Kevin J. Dan

Chief Compliance Officer

Chief Regulatory Officer
 Crypto.com | Derivatives North America

200 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1400

Chicago, IL 60606

EXHIBIT A

Additions underscored; deletions strikethrough 

See Attached Exchange Rulebook
No. 512.

#### Winnisimmet Company, Petitioner, *v.*Mary L. Davenport et al.

November 2, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Coürt of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. *Mr. Edward E. Blodgett*and *Mr. Arthur P. Teele*for petitioner. *Mr. William*-A. *Davenport*for respondents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Energy Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James L.
Oliver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: October 29, 2002                       By:       /s/ James L. Oliver
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                         James L. Oliver
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reliabrand, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

CEO

Dated: May 12, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.