alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent Systems (1200).                    

*Date/Time:*                         June 4-June 5, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1150, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ephriam Glinert, Deputy Division Director, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8930.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review evaluate Computer and Social Systems proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 15, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-12589 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

                                                                   Exhibits 99.2

     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 20-F of Oxford  Investments
Holdings Inc., a company  organized under the laws of under the laws of Ontario,
Canada (the  "Company"),  for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects,  with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




By:     /S/ Michael Donaghy
       -----------------------
       Michael Donaghy
       Chief Financial Officer

Date:  June 29, 2006
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Orchow
_______________________________________William Orchow President
& Chief Executive Officer Date: November 7, 2007

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Revett Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 16 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #10 LTD. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                             |
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 12 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 12 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019413EN.01004301.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-391/17) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - Protection of national and linguistic minorities - Strengthening of cultural and linguistic diversity - Registration in part - Principle of conferral - Commission not manifestly lacking legislative powers - Obligation to state reasons - Article 5(2) TEU - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Article 296 TFEU)

(2019/C 413/50)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented initially by: R. Radu, C.-M. Florescu, E. Gane and L. Lițu, and subsequently by Florescu, Gane, Lițu and C.-R. Canțăr, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, L. Radu Bouyon and H. Stancu, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, G. Koós and G. Tornyai, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/652 of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (OJ 2017 L 92, p. 100).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Romania to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Romania to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

| 3. | Orders Hungary to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LIONEL LAMONT COX , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr - 00288

- FL

- 1; 5:15

- cv - 00571

- FL )

Submitted : March 29, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lionel Lamont Cox, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lionel Lamont Cox seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S. C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies thi s standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). W hen the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 48 4

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cox has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Cox’s motion to appoint counsel and expedite decision , and dismiss the appeal. We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey
Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended August
31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.





Dated:
      October 15, 2010
                /s/
      Harvey JudkowitzHarvey
      Judkowitz, Principal
  Accounting Officer
UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

MINNEAPOLIS FIREFIGHTERS’ RELIEF 

ASSOCIATION, on behalf of itself and all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, 

PETER R. DOLAN, and ANDREW R.J. 

BONFIELD, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

JEAN LAI, Individually and On behalf of All 

Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, 

PETER R. DOLAN and ANDREW R. J. 

BONFIELD, 

 Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-6259 (PAC) 

DECLARATION OF GERALD H. SILK IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION OF 

ONTARIO TEACHERS’ PENSION PLAN BOARD FOR (1) APPOINTMENT AS 

LEAD PLAINTIFF; (2) APPROVAL OF ITS SELECTION OF COUNSEL AS 

LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE CLASS; AND (3) CONSOLIDATION OF ALL 

RELATED ACTIONS 

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 12 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
I, Gerald H. Silk, declare as follows: 

 1. I am a member in good standing of the bars of the State of New York and 

of this Court. I am a partner in the law firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann 

LLP. I submit this declaration in support of the Motion filed by the Ontario Teachers’ 

Pension Plan Board for appointment as Lead Plaintiff, approval of its selection of 

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP to serve as Lead Counsel for the Class, and 

for consolidation of all related actions. 

 2. Attached as Exhibits A through E are true and correct copies of the 

following documents: 

Exhibit A: Certification of Ontario Teachers, with attached chart of Ontario 

Teachers’ transactions; 

 Exhibit B: First notice of pendency of this class action; 

 Exhibit C: Chart of transactions and losses (FIFO calculation); 

 Exhibit D: Chart of transactions and losses (LIFO calculation); 

 Exhibit E: Firm Biography of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP. 

I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my 

knowledge. 

Executed this twenty-seventh day of August, 2007. 

 ____/s/ Gerald H. Silk ______________ 

 Gerald H. Silk 

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 12 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
142 So. 33

#### SPEAR et al. v. VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL CORPORATION.

4 Div. 620.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 19, 1932.

*18See, also, 223 Ala. 448, 136 So. 805.

A. R. Powell and E. O. Baldwin, both of Andalusia, for appellants.

Powell, Albritton & Albritton, of Andalusia, for appellee.

GARDNER, J.

Complainant, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Virginia, recovered in May, 1929, a judgment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of the state of Florida, against T. J. Spear, and filed this bill to set aside and cancel as fraudulent and void certain conveyances to real estate and a deposit in the Bank of Florala.

Under repeated decisions of this court, any number of fraudulent grantees may be joined in such a bill, without rendering it subject to the objection of multifariousness. Gassenheimer v. Kellogg, 121 Ala. 109, 26 So. *1929; Henderson v. Farley National Bank, 123 Ala. 547, 26 So. 226, 82 Am. St. Rep. 140; Steiner Land & Lumber Co. v. King, 118 Ala. 546, 24 So. 35.

Nor is the bill deficient in failing to aver tbe complainant had complied with our statute (section 7208-7211, Code 1923; Houston Canning Co. v. Virginia Can Co., 211 Ala. 232, 100 So. 104, 35 A. L. R. 912) relating to foreign corporations engaging in business in this state.

The suit is not on any contract or agreement of any character (Houston Canning Co. v. Virginia Can Co., supra), but an effort to obtain the fruits of a judgment recovered in another state, and its consequent enforcement which is a legal right unaffected by the above noted statute. Capitol Lumber Co. v. Mullinix, 208 Ala. 266, 94 So. 88.

It is a well-recognized rule that all persons in the possession of property of the debt- or sought to be reached are proper and necessary parties to the suit. Plaster v. Thorne-Franklin Shoe Co., 123 Ala. 360, 26 So. 225; 15 Corpus Juris 1415.

This suffices as an answer to the argument on behalf of the bank and Mrs. Grider, though we are inclined to the view no assignment of demurrer is specifically directed to the sufficiency of the bill in that respect. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Lassetter, 224 Ala. 649, 141 So. 645, present term.

The demurrer to the bill was properly overruled, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10462-002-New York]


Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.; Notice of Extension of Time to 
File Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and Prescriptions

May 17, 2001.
    By letter dated April 5, 2001, Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. 
(Erie) requested an extension of time for the filing of comments in 
response to the Commission's Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis 
and Soliciting, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and 
Prescriptions issued March 27, 2001, concerning Erie's application for 
a proposed original license for the Allens Falls Project on the West 
Branch of the St. Regis River, near the village of Parishville, St. 
Lawrence County, New York. Erie stated that it had been meeting with 
the New York Department Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) as part of 
continuing negotiations on major licensing issues pertaining to the 
project and anticipated a settlement offer on those issues to be 
achieved by June 2001. Erie stated that the additional time is needed 
so the parties to the proceedings (particularly the resource agencies) 
can avoid having to develop and support positions, especially 
recommendations or mandatory conditions pursuant to Section 10(j) or 
Section 18 of the Federal Power Act, that may differ from proposals 
expected to be arrived at in the settlement offer.
    By letter dated April 23, 2001, the Department of the Interior 
supported Erie's request. By letter dated May 1, 2001, Erie reported it 
had also obtained verbal agreement on the extension request from 
representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the NYSDEC, the 
Adirondack Mountain Club, New York Rivers United, Trout Unlimited, and 
American Whitewater.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for the filing of comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, 
and prescriptions is granted, and they are now due on July 25, 2001.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12961 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.1


WOODHEAD ANNOUNCES DECISION ON AERO-MOTIVE BUSINESS

DEERFIELD, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 9, 2003--Woodhead Industries, Inc.,
(Nasdaq: WDHD) today announced that it has reached a decision on the future of
Aero-Motive Company (AMCO), its wholly owned electrical subsidiary located in
Kalamazoo, Michigan.

As previously reported, the company continually reviews the strategic fit of its
business units and product lines in order to maximize future growth and
profitability. During its fiscal 2002 year-end conference call in November 2002,
the company mentioned that it had initiated the investigation of options within
the AMCO business unit.

Philippe Lemaitre, Woodhead Industries' President and Chief Executive Officer,
stated, "we have concluded that in addition to selling several of AMCO's small
product lines that don't align strategically with our long-term goals, we will
integrate the remaining manufacturing operations into our facilities in Juarez,
Mexico. We believe that this action will strengthen our core Electrical business
unit by expanding its product line and enabling cost synergies."

The sale and integration process will take several months and it is estimated
that the Kalamazoo facility will remain open until early in calendar 2004. Since
the timing of any product line sales is not certain, the net P&L impact in any
period is not known at this time. However, it is expected that over the span of
the next eighteen months the impact will be neutral and thereafter, the impact
will be accretive. The annual revenues of the product lines to be divested total
approximately $10 million. More specific costs and savings associated with this
decision will be discussed during the company's second quarter conference call
on April 23, 2003 at 11:00 AM EDT.

ABOUT WOODHEAD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Woodhead Industries, Inc. develops, manufactures and markets electronic and
industrial communications products, primarily serving the global automation and
control market with connectivity solutions and specialty electrical products.
Through its connectivity group, Woodhead provides the industrial automation
industry with a single, worldwide source for industrial communications and
connectivity solutions. Its product lines, comprised of six recognized
industry-leading brands: SST(TM), Brad Harrison(R), mPm(TM), RJ Lnxx(R),
applicom(R) and NetAlert(R) make Woodhead the premier supplier of
application-specific connectivity solutions.

For further information on Woodhead Industries contact: Robert Fisher, Vice
President, Finance and CFO, (847)317-2400, e-mail: rfisher@woodhead.com
(mailto: rfisher@woodhead.com), or (http://www.woodhead.com).
Exhibit 32.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy Blankenhagen, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated:   November 10, 2006 | By | /s/   Nancy Blankenhagen                 
|-------------------------- | -- | -----------------------------------------
|                           |    | Nancy BlankenhagenChief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      January 25, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                  Title:
                Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                  President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                  General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP