alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1033

MICHAEL H. DITTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEGAL TIMES; AM-LAW PUBLISHING CORPORATION;

AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA, L.P., ASSOCIATED

PROPERTIES OF DELAWARE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Virginia, at Alexandria. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge.

(CA-96-1277-A)

Submitted: September 30, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael H. Ditton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard S. Hoffman, Megan E.

Hills, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Ditton v. Legal Times, 947 F. Supp. 227 (E.D. Va. 1996).

2

PER CURIAM:

Michael H. Ditton appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment against him in this defamation action under the

court's diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 &

Supp. 1997). Ditton alleged that he was defamed in an article

published in the Legal Times on August 12, 1996, and subsequently

republished in at least two other outlets. The article discussed a

lawsuit Ditton had brought against a law firm with which he had

been associated. The district court heard oral argument on defendants' motion for summary judgment, and subsequently granted the

motion. Ditton appeals this order, as well as an order denying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion to vacate the judgment and to compel

production of documents.

The district court, in a thorough opinion, concluded that

defendants were protected by the privilege to fairly report on

judicial proceedings.* Ditton challenges the applicability of this

privilege on appeal. We have thoroughly reviewed his claims, and

conclude that they are without merit. We agree with the district

court's conclusion that the privilege applies in this case, and

affirm the judgment. In addition, we hold that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment on

Ditton's Rule 59 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2018399EN.01001402.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/14

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Dominique Bilde v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-67/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Admissibility - European Parliament - Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid))

(2018/C 399/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Dominique Bilde (represented by: G. Sauveur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A.F. Jensen, M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.

| 2. | Ms Dominique Bilde shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Dominique Bilde shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-106791-00] 
          - RIN 1545-AY55 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to liabilities assumed in certain corporate transactions. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, May 31, 2001, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Guy R. Traynor of the Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel, (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 4, 2001 (66 FR 748), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for May 31, 2001 at 10 a.m., in room 4718, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 301 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these regulations expired on May 10, 2001.                 

                    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of May 15, 2001, no one                           ( print page 28408)                        has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for May 31, 2001, is cancelled.                 

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization & Strategic Planning).

[FR Doc. 01-13064 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2017213EN.01003502.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/35

---

Action brought on 8 May 2017 — Ogrodnik v EUIPO — Aviario Tropical (Tropical)

(Case T-276/17)

(2017/C 213/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tadeusz Ogrodnik (Chorzów, Poland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aviario Tropical, SA (Loures, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Tropical’ — EU trade mark No 3 435 773

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2017 in Case R 2125/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | dismiss the appeal brought by Aviário Tropical, SA, against the decision of the Defendant’s Cancellation Division of 15 July 2013 in Case 6029 C; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the appeal brought by Aviário Tropical, SA, against the decision of the Defendant’s Cancellation Division of 15 July 2013 in Case 6029 C;

| — | order EUIPO and Aviário Tropical, SA, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Aviário Tropical, SA, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Yi Wan Group,  Inc. ("the  Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof ("the  Report"),  I, Cheng Wan Ming,
President and Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Cheng Wan Ming
---------------------------
Cheng Wan Ming,
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 15, 2005
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional) Date: November 3, 2015

I M P O R T A N T: CHECK BOX IF CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED. 

ORGANIZATION ICE Trade Vault, LLC

 FILING AS A: DCM SEF DCO X SDR ECM/SPDC 

TYPE OF FILING

 Rules and Rule Amendments 

 X Certification under § 40.6 (a) or § 41.24 (a)

 “Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” under § 40.4 (b)(5)

 Notification under § 40.6 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.4 (a) or § 40.5 (a)

 Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change under § 40.10 (a)

 Products

 Certification under § 39.5(b), § 40.2 (a), or § 41.23 (a)

 Swap Class Certification under § 40.2 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.3 (a)

 Novel Derivative Product Notification under § 40.12 (a)

RULE NUMBERS

ICE Trade Vault, LLC Fee Schedule and Rulebook

DESCRIPTION

ICE Trade Vault, LLC has amended its Participant Agreement to reflect the CDS asset class. 

This Participant Agreement will replace the CDS SDR Agreement. This amended Participant 

Agreement is scheduled to be effective on November 18, 2015.
# C_2018042EN.01004302.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/43

---

Action brought on 7 December 2017 — Dermatest v EUIPO (ORIGINAL excellent dermatest)

(Case T-803/17)

(2018/C 042/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ORIGINAL excellent dermatest’ — Application for registration No 15 073 364

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 in Case R 526/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05805-RJS-AJP     Document 23      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLIED PREMIER INSURANCE, a Risk 

Retention Group; a Connecticut corporation, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-55099 

D.C. No. 

5:18-cv-00088-JGB-KK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2021

Submission Withdrawn March 22, 2021

Resubmitted September 19, 2023

Pasadena, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

United Financial Casualty Company appeals from the district court’s grant of 

summary judgment to Allied Premier Insurance. Because the facts are known to the 

parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our decision. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

SEP 19 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

The only issue on appeal is whether California’s Motor Carriers of Property 

Permit Act (“MCPPA”), Cal. Veh. Code §§ 34600 et seq., continued the coverage 

of United’s insurance policy with Porras after the policy otherwise ended by its own 

terms. The district court relied on California precedent interpreting an earlier 

version of the statute to determine that United’s policy continued through Porras’s 

accident, and United was thus liable for equitable contribution to Allied. The district 

court also entered judgment for Allied on its equitable subrogation and declaratory 

relief claims. Mindful of the statutory changes since earlier California precedents, 

we certified this state law question to the California Supreme Court. Allied Premier 

Ins. v. United Fin. Cas. Co., 991 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2021). Its answer decides this 

appeal. 

“The duration of the policy’s coverage is regulated by its terms and those of 

any endorsement or amendment to the policy itself.” Allied Premier Ins. v. United 

Fin. Cas. Co., 15 Cal. 5th 20, 39 (2023). United’s policy with Porras terminated 

automatically when Porras did not renew the policy. The MCPPA did not extend its 

duration. Id. at 34. (“[T]he Act does not prevent cancellation or termination of an 

insurance policy under the terms of the contract.”). 

United’s policy coverage terminated before Porras’s accident. Accordingly,

the district court’s summary judgment on Allied’s claims for equitable 

contribution, equitable subrogation, and declaratory relief must be reversed. 
3 

REVERSED.
# C_2019319EN.01001902.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-481/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2012/39/EU - Technical requirements for the testing of human tissues and cells - Failure to communicate or failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2019/C 319/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by A. Szmytkowska and C. Sjödin, Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri, Agent, and by C. Colelli, avvocato dello Stato)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2012/39/EU of 26 November 2012 amending Directive 2006/17/EC as regards certain technical requirements for the testing of human tissues and cells (OJ 2012 L 327, p. 24), and by failing to notify to the European Commission the provisions adopted to transpose Directive 2012/39, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2012/39/EU of 26 November 2012 amending Directive 2006/17/EC as regards certain technical requirements for the testing of human tissues and cells (OJ 2012 L 327, p. 24), and by failing to notify to the European Commission the provisions adopted to transpose Directive 2012/39, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 17.9.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund VI, L.P., Series 9 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 3, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 11, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. § 4301                     *et seq.*                     (“the Act”), nLine Corporation has filed written notification simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are nLine Corporation, Austin, TX; InterScience, Inc., Troy, NY; PixelVision, Inc., Beaverton, OR; and Light Age, Inc., Somerset, NJ. The nature and objectives of the venture are to conduct research on technology for advanced semiconductor device inspection. The activities of this venture will be partially funded by an award from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-13040  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1863 

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide blood testing for firefighters 

of the Department of Defense to determine potential exposure to 

perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2019 

Mr. NORCROSS (for himself, Mr. TURNER, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. KIM, Mrs. LURIA, 

Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH, Ms. DEAN, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide blood testing 

for firefighters of the Department of Defense to determine potential exposure to perfluoroalkyl and 

polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1863 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF BLOOD TESTING FOR FIRE2 FIGHTERS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO 

3 DETERMINE EXPOSURE TO 

4 PERFLUOROALKYL AND POLYFLUOROALKYL 

5 SUBSTANCES. 

6 The Secretary of Defense shall provide blood testing 

7 to determine and document potential exposure to 

8 perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly 

9 known as ‘‘PFAS’’) for each firefighter of the Department 

10 of Defense during the annual physical exam conducted by 

11 the Department for each such firefighter. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19
- 0584

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. NICK LENIER WILSON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Jennifer B. Lint , District Judg e . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 17 2021

11/17/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0584
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Companycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated: April 28, 2010            |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Lawrence D. Stern                 |
|   | Lawrence D. Stern                     |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
141 So. 917

#### Lucien D. LEWY v. Eulalia Brock LEWY.

3 Div. 981.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.