alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) by CapSource Financial, Inc. (Registrant), I,
Steven J. Kutcher, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
CapSource Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

| | DATE:   May 15, 2006 | By:   | /s/   Steven J. Kutcher                 
| | -------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------------------
| |                      | Name: | Steven J. KutcherChief Financial Officer
|

---
# C_2018328EN.01002201.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against LM

(Case C-216/18 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 1(3) - Surrender procedures between Member States - Conditions for execution - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal))

(2018/C 328/28)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

LM

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, where the executing judicial authority, called upon to decide whether a person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution is to be surrendered, has material, such as that set out in a reasoned proposal of the European Commission adopted pursuant to Article 7(1) TEU, indicating that there is a real risk of breach of the fundamental right to a fair trial guaranteed by the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, on account of systemic or generalised deficiencies so far as concerns the independence of the issuing Member State’s judiciary, that authority must determine, specifically and precisely, whether, having regard to his personal situation, as well as to the nature of the offence for which he is being prosecuted and the factual context that form the basis of the European arrest warrant, and in the light of the information provided by the issuing Member State pursuant to Article 15(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended, there are substantial grounds for believing that that person will run such a risk if he is surrendered to that State.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13090]



[[Page 28741]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-421-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 18, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 16, 2001, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP 
(Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing to be effective October 1, 2001.
    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with Ordering Paragraph (F) of the Order Issuing Certificate issued 
April 12, 2001, in Docket No. CP00-404-000 (April 12 Order). Texas 
Eastern states that the revised tariff sheets implement the incremental 
recourse rate approved in the April 12 Order and the related negotiated 
rate.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions as well as 
parties to the proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13090 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kushi Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rajan Rai, President,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Rajan Rai


Rajan
Rai


Chief
Executive Officer






July 15,
2008






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kushi Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rajan Rai, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Rajan Rai


Rajan
Rai


Chief
Financial Officer






July 15,
2008
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hague Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ BRIAN
    LUKIANBrian
      Lukian,Chief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      23, 2009
# C_2020137EN.01001202.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 February 2020 — European External Action Service v Ruben Alba Aguilera and Others

(Case C-427/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials and members of staff - European External Action Service (EEAS) - Remuneration - Staff Regulations - Article 110 - EU staff posted to a third country - Annex X - Third subparagraph of Article 1 and Article 10 - Allowance for living conditions - Annual revision and adjustment - Reduction for staff posted to Ethiopia - Requirement to adopt general implementing provisions beforehand - Scope)

(2020/C 137/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents, M. Troncoso Ferrer and S. Moya Izquierdo, abogados, F.-M. Hislaire, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Ruben Alba Aguilera, Simone Barenghi, Massimo Bonannini, Antonio Capone, Stéphanie Carette, Alejo Carrasco Garcia, Francisco Carreras Sequeros, Carl Daspect, Nathalie Devos, Jean-Baptiste Fauvel, Paula Cristina Fernandes, Stephan Fox, Birgitte Hagelund, Chantal Hebberecht, Karin Kaup-Laponin, Terhi Lehtinen, Sandrine Marot, David Mogollon, Clara Molera Gui, Daniele Morbin, Charlotte Onraet, Augusto Piccagli, Gary Quince, Pierre-Luc Vanhaeverbeke, Tamara Vleminckx, Birgit Vleugels, Robert Wade, Luca Zampetti (represented by: T. Martin and S. Orlandi, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls paragraphs 1 and 3 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 April 2018, Alba Aguilera and Others v EEAS (T-119/17, EU:T:2018:183). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls paragraphs 1 and 3 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 April 2018, Alba Aguilera and Others v EEAS (T-119/17, EU:T:2018:183).

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union.

| 3. | Orders that the costs be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders that the costs be reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
# C_2020313EN.01000202.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/2

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — DŚ v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Jaśle

(Case C-522/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 313/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DŚ

Defendant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Jaśle

Intervener: Prokuratura Krajowa

Operative part of the order

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland), made by decision of 2 August 2018 in Case C-522/18.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
# C_2021088EN.01000501.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission, Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl

(Case C-595/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company - Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence - Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company)

(2021/C 88/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (represented by: A. Mangiaracina, avvocatessa, and J. Koponen, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, C. Sjödin, T. Vecchi and J. Norris, acting as Agents), Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (represented by: C. Tesauro and L. Armati, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
# C_2017424EN.01004202.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/42

---

Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v Commission and SRB

(Case T-660/17)

(2017/C 424/62)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Miralla Inversiones, S.L. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU;

| — | Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board.

---
##### 



Exhibit 14.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-110865, No. 333-110857 and No. 333-90266) of
Technip of our report dated April 2, 2004 (except for the
Notes 30-32 to the consolidated financial statements for which
the date is May 10, 2004), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of
Technip included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
December 31, 2003. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
June 29, 2004  
 BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES
ERNST & YOUNG
Represented by Gilles Puissochet
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2230 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2230

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay educational assistance or subsistence 
   allowances to certain individuals during school term, quarter, or 
                semester breaks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

 Mr. Cisneros introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay educational assistance or subsistence 
   allowances to certain individuals during school term, quarter, or 
                semester breaks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Break Relief for Every Academic Kind 
of Period in an Academic Year for Veterans Act'' or the ``BREAK PAY for 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE OR SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES TO 
              CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DURING SEMESTER BREAKS.

    Section 3680(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and inserting 
        a semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``disapproval.'' 
        and inserting ``disapproval; or'';
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(C) during periods between school terms, quarters, or 
        semesters where the educational institution certifies the 
        enrollment of the eligible veteran or eligible person on an 
        individual term basis if--
                    ``(i) the period between those terms, quarters, or 
                semesters does not exceed eight weeks; and
                    ``(ii) both terms, quarters, or semesters 
                immediately preceding and immediately following the 
                period are not shorter in length than the period.''; 
                and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or 
chapter 35 of this title, any payment of an educational assistance 
allowance described in paragraph (2)(C) of this subsection shall not--
            ``(A) be charged against the entitlement of any individual 
        under this chapter; or
            ``(B) be counted toward the aggregate period for which 
        section 3695 of this title limits the receipt of assistance of 
        an individual.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Management and Budget
 Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires a monthly report listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted to Congress. This report gives the status, as of May 1, 2001, of two deferrals contained in one special message for FY 2001. The message was transmitted to Congress on January 18, 2001. Deferrals (Attachments A and B) As of May 1, 2001, $1.5 billion in budget authority was being deferred from obligation. Attachment B shows the status of each deferral reported during FY 2001. Information From Special Message The special message containing information on the deferrals that are covered by this cumulative report is printed in the edition of the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     cited below: 66 FR 8985, Monday, February 5, 2001. Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Director.
 Attachment A Status of FY 2001 Deferrals
[In millions of dollars]
Budgetary resourcesDeferrals proposed by the President
1,946.7Routine Executive releases through May 1, 2001
−408.5Overturned by the CongressCurrently before the Congress
1,538.2


BILLING CODE 3110-01-P [FR Doc. 01-13075 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110-01-C