alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019270EN.01001001.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Pamplona — Spain) — Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui v Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra

(Case C-72/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4(1) - Principle of non-discrimination - Public sector education - National provision granting particular additional remuneration only to teachers employed for an indefinite duration as established public officials - Exclusion of teachers employed under a fixed-term contract governed by public law - Concept of ‘objective grounds’ - Characteristics inherent in the status of established public official)

(2019/C 270/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Pamplona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui

Defendant: Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which restricts entitlement to particular additional remuneration to teachers employed for an indefinite duration as established public officials, to the exclusion of, in particular, teachers employed under fixed-term contracts governed by public law, if the completion of a certain period of service is the only condition for grant of that additional remuneration.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
# C_2019220EN.01001101.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău — Romania) — SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală a Vămilor

(Case C-268/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined nomenclature - Subheadings 85269120 and 85285900 - GPS navigation system with multiple functions)

(2019/C 220/14)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bacău

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SC Onlineshop SRL

Respondents: Agenția Natională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală a Vămilor

Operative part of the judgment

The combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1754 of 6 October 2015, must be interpreted as meaning that multifunctional devices of the kind used in motor vehicles which, like that at issue in the main proceedings, combine, in the same housing, as its primary function, a radio navigation monitor which uses pre-installed GPS navigation applications and, subsidiarily, a radio broadcasting transmitter, an audio/video reproduction apparatus and a screen with a diagonal measurement of approximately 5 inches (12.7 cm), must be classified under subheading 85269120 in that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
# C_2017374EN.01004001.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/40

---

Action brought on 17 August 2017 — Inversiones Flandes and Others v SRB

(Case T-573/17)

(2017/C 374/60)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Inversiones Flandes SL (Madrid, Spain), New Winds Group, SL (Madrid, Spain), Sarey Investments, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Jiménez Velasco, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the Single Resolution Board in the light of the recitals, articles and principles set out and order the adoption of a new decision which reflects, with full transparency and certainty, the actual financial situation, in commercial terms, of Banco Popular Español, S.A., and, on that basis, order that appropriate measures be taken; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the Single Resolution Board in the light of the recitals, articles and principles set out and order the adoption of a new decision which reflects, with full transparency and certainty, the actual financial situation, in commercial terms, of Banco Popular Español, S.A., and, on that basis, order that appropriate measures be taken;

| — | Expressly order SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Expressly order SRB to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00-1997-001; ER97-3189-030; ER98-1569-004; ER00-1014-
001]


PPL Electric Utilities Corporation; Notice of filing

May 15, 2001
    Take notice that on May 10, 2001, PPL Electric Utilities 
Corporation (PPL) tendered for filing a letter stating that PPL will 
not be filing the requested effective tariff in accordance with the 
Commission's letter order on April 13, 2001. The April 13, 2001 letter 
order directed PPL to file the effective tariff language for a 
settlement offer filed on March 9, 2001 with Allegheny Electric 
Cooperative (Allegheny), in accordance with Order No. 614. The subject 
settlement offer does not contain effective tariff language to be filed 
in a PPL Electric rate schedule. Rather, the settlement contains 
specific commitments with regard to the disposition of disputes that 
were outstanding with Allegheny and with regard to future actions not 
affecting current jurisdictional service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 31, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12783 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Innova Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eugene Gartlan,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




*/s/* *Eugene
              Gartlan**Name:
              Eugene Gartlan**Title:
                Chief
                Financial Officer*
              *Date: April 19,
                2006*
# C_2018427EN.01006101.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/61

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2018 — Pint v Commission

(Case T-634/17) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to EU Pilot procedure No 8572/16 CHAP(2015) 00353 - Refusal of access - Article 4(2) third indent of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations - General presumption of confidentiality - Overriding public interest)

(2018/C 427/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Anikó Pint (Göd, Hungary) (represented by: D. Lazar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, G. Koós and M. Tátrai, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decisions of the Commission of 1 June and 17 July 2017 refusing to grant the applicant access to documents relating to EU Pilot procedure No 8572/16 CHAP(2015) 00353.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Anikó Pint to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Anikó Pint to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Hungary to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

---
Exhibit
32.3








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine,
LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.









Date: March
26, 2009





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1986 

To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a scrivener’s 

error. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. RATCLIFFE (for himself, Miss RICE of New York, and Mr. HURD of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, 

to correct a scrivener’s error. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Effective Prosecution 

5 of Possession of Biological Toxins and Agents Act of 

6 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE POSSESSION OF BIOLOGICAL 

8 TOXINS AND AGENTS. 

9 Section 175b of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1986 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)(1) No restricted’’ and 

3 all that follows through the end of paragraph 

4 (1) and inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for a 

7 restricted person to— 

8 ‘‘(A) ship, transport, or possess in or af9 fecting interstate or foreign commerce any bio10 logical agent or toxin described in paragraph 

11 (2); or 

12 ‘‘(B) receive any biological agent or toxin 

13 described in paragraph (2) that has been 

14 shipped or transported in interstate or foreign 

15 commerce. 

16 ‘‘(2) AGENTS AND TOXINS COVERED.—A bio17 logical agent or toxin described in this paragraph is 

18 a biological agent or toxin that— 

19 ‘‘(A) is listed as a non-overlap or overlap 

20 select biological agent or toxin under part 73 of 

21 title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, pursuant 

22 to section 351A of the Public Health Service 

23 Act (42 U.S.C. 262a); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1986 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is not excluded or exempted under 

2 part 73 of title 42, Code of Federal Regula3 tions.’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘(2) Whoever’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘(3) PENALTY.—Whoever’’ and adjusting 

6 the margin accordingly; and 

7 (2) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding 

8 paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘DEFINITIONS.—’’ be9 fore ‘‘In this section:’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
In the Senate of the United States, 

December 16, 2020. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 221) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes.’’, do pass 

with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Envoy to Mon3 itor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

5 Congress finds that, since the Global Anti-Semitism 

6 Review Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–332) was enacted, in 

7 many foreign countries acts of anti-Semitism have been fre8 quent and wide in scope, the perpetrators and variety of 

9 threats to Jewish communities and their institutions have 
2 

† HR 221 EAS 

1 proliferated, and in some countries anti-Semitic attacks 

2 have increased in frequency, scope, violence, and deadliness. 

3 SEC. 3. MONITORING AND COMBATING ANTI-SEMITISM. 

4 Section 59(a) of the State Department Basic Authori5 ties Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2731(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

8 (i) by inserting before the period at the 

9 end the following: ‘‘, who shall be appointed 

10 by the President, by and with the advice 

11 and consent of the Senate’’; and 

12 (ii) by adding at the end the following 

13 new sentence: ‘‘The Special Envoy shall re14 port directly to the Secretary.’’; and 

15 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

16 (i) in the heading, by striking ‘‘AP17 POINTMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘NOMINATION’’; 

18 (ii) by striking the first sentence; 

19 (iii) in the second sentence, by striking 

20 ‘‘If the Secretary determines that such is 

21 appropriate, the Secretary may appoint’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘If the President determines 

23 that such is appropriate, the President may 

24 nominate’’; and 
3 

† HR 221 EAS 

1 (iv) in the third sentence, by striking 

2 ‘‘The Secretary may allow such officer or 

3 employee to retain the position (and the re4 sponsibilities associated with such position) 

5 held by such officer or employee prior to the 

6 appointment’’ and inserting ‘‘Such officer 

7 or employee may not retain the position (or 

8 the responsibilities associated with such po9 sition) held by such officer or employee 

10 prior to the nomination’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new para12 graphs: 

13 ‘‘(3) DUTIES.—The Special Envoy shall serve as 

14 the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, 

15 the United States Government relating to monitoring 

16 and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic in17 citement that occur in foreign countries. 

18 ‘‘(4) RANK AND STATUS OF AMBASSADOR.—The 

19 Special Envoy shall have the rank of ambassador. 
4 

† HR 221 EAS 

1 ‘‘(5) QUALIFICATIONS.—The Special Envoy 

2 should be a person of recognized distinction in the 

3 field of combating anti-Semitism.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 221 

AMENDMENT
enon

October 31, 2006

Via Electronic Mail

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Vhree La te Centre

HSS 2st Street, N.W

Washington. D.C, 20581

Re: CBOE LLC Rule Certification
Submission Number CFE-2000-17

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended ("Act"), and
§40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under
the Act, CBOE Futures Exchange. LLC ("CFE” or "Exchange") hereby notifies the Commission
of the dehsting of the followmg futures contracts and of the following related amendment to
CEES Rules ("Delisting")

i:feetive pnor to the openmeg of trading on November 1. 2006, CPE will: () delist CF
Gas At The Pump ("GAPP") U.S. Futures contract. GAPP East Coast Futures contract, GAPP
Gull Coast Futures contract, GAPP Midwest Futures contract. GAPP Rocky Mountain Futures
contract. and GAPP West Coast Futures contract and (11) delete CFE: Rule Chapter 22, which sets
forth the contract specifications for these futures contracts. There 1s no open interest in any of the
outstanding contract months for these futures contracts. and the Delisting includes all of the
outstanding contract months in these futures contracts

CFE is not aware of any substantive opposing views to the Delisung. CFE hereby
certifies that the Delisting complies with the Act and the regulations thereunder.

Questions regarding this submission may be direeted to Arthur Reinstein at (312) 786-
570 or Jennifer Klebes at (312) 786-7466. Please reference our submission number CFE-2006-
17 in any related correspondence.

CBOE Futures Exchange. LLC

patrick JF
Managing Director
ce: Steven Benton (CFTC)

I-dward Dasso (NFA)
The Options Clearing Corporation

400 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Minois 60605-1023 www.cboe.com/cfe
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of

Quebecor Media Inc.

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quebecor Media Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Francois Pruneau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 21, 2011

/s/ Jean-Francois PruneauName: Jean-Francois PruneauTitle: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

JORGE TOLEDO,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4518-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 23 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 17, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 23 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Approach Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.By:
    /s/ J. ROSS CRAFTJ. Ross Craft,President and Chief Executive Officer