T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L OR I WE B B KN UD S E N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N os . 12- 30258 12- 30331 D. C. No . 4 : 1 2 - c r - 0 0 0 0 4 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S T E VE N L L OY D KNU DS E N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng 

# FI LED OC T 02 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS Case: 12-30258 10/02/2013 ID: 8806176 DktEntry: 22-1 Page: 1 of 3T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A cc ordi ng l y, S t even K nuds e n’ s r e que s tf

oror a l a r gum e nti s de ni e d. 12- 30258 & 12- 30331

2 S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an d C H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e ap p e a ls , L o r i W e b b K n u d s e n ( “L o r i” ) ap p e a ls f r o m th e 2 7 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e d f

o llo w in g h e rg u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir a c y to c o m m it bank and fraud bank fr aud, i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . §§ 37 1 and 13 44 . S t even L l oy d K nuds e n ( “ S t e ve n” ) appe a l s f r om the 35- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for c on vers i on of se cure d p roperty and F eder al A gr i c ul tur a l L oa n G ua r a nt e e f r aud, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . §§ 658 a nd 1 0 0 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d i n b o th ap p e a l s we a f f i rm. L ori cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y denyi ng her r equestfor a m itig a tin g r o le a d

ju s tm e n t p u r s u a n t to U .S .S .G . § 3 B 1 .2 ( b ) . T h e r e c o r d r e f le c ts tha tthe c ourtpr ope r l y c om pa r e d L or i ’ s c onduc tt o S t e ve n’ s c onduc ti n a s s e s s i ng w h e th e rto g r a n t th e a d

ju s tm e n t. Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . C a n tr e ll , 433 F . 3d 1269, 1 2 8 3 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ). B ecau se L o ri fai l ed t o p ro v e th atsh e w as su b st an t i al l y l ess c ul pabl e tha n S t e ve n, the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notc l e a r l y e rrby de ny i ng the a d ju s tm e n t. See U .S .S .G . § 3 B 1 .2 c m t. n .3 ( A ) ; C a n tr e ll , 433 F . 3d a t1282- 83. Case: 12-30258 10/02/2013 ID: 8806176 DktEntry: 22-1 Page: 2 of 312- 30258 & 12- 30331 3 S t even cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d w hen i tappl i ed a tw o-l evel aggravat i ng rol e e nh ance m entun der U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 1(c) . H e argues thatthe court erre d b y r el yi ng on hi s a dm i ss i on atthe change of ple a heari ng thathe w as re spon si bl e f

or the offens e, and cl ai m s thatthe re cord do es no totherw i se supp ort the enhancem ent . C on traryt o S t even’ s c on t ent i on , the re cord ref l ec t s thatL ori a c t e d a thi s di r e c t i on. A c c or di ngl y , the c ourtdi d notc l e a r l y e rrby appl y i ng the a d ju s tm e n t. Se e U

ni te d State s v . M

aldonado , 21 5 F . 3d 10 46 , 10 50 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). L ori and S t even al so cont end thatthei r r es pect i ve se nt ence s are su b st an t i v el y u n reaso n ab l e i n l i g h to f th ei r b ack g ro u n d , l acko f cri m i n al h i st o ry, lo w r is kf

o rr e c id iv is m , a n d th e irin ab ility to p a y r e s titu tio n w h ile in c a r c e r a te d . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in im p o s in g th e s e n te n c e s . Se e G a ll v. U ni ted Stat es , 552 U . S . 38, 51 ( 2007) . T he s e nt e nc e s i m pos e d w e r e w i thi n the a dvi s ory S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s r a nge a nd a r e s ubs t a nt i ve l y r e a s onabl e i n l i ghtof th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s a n d th e to ta lity o f th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See id .AF F I RME D. Case: 12-30258 10/02/2013 ID: 8806176 DktEntry: 22-1 Page: 3 of 3