alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 52 - Tracking 'Gray Ghosts' with Landsat      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we hear how satellite imagery helps track invasive insects on the East Coast.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary:** The invasive species hemlock woolly adelgid is a threat to eastern hemlocks, filling some southeastern U.S. forests with what are called “gray ghosts” of the trees. Until recently, the insect had stayed in the southern part New York, but late last summer, an infestation was discovered in the Adirondacks. On this episode of Eyes on Earth, a New York university researcher talks about his effort to help detect the insect, which is the size of a poppy seed, by using remote sensing such as Landsat.

**Guest:** Andrew Reinmann, assistant professor of ecology and environmental science at The City University of New York Advanced Science Research Center and Hunter College

**Host:**Jane Lawson

**Producer:** John Hult

**Release date:**June 14, 2021

**More on fighting invasive species**: 
                            - New York Tries Creative Ways – Like Satellites – to Fight Hemlock-Killing Insect
                            - Gypsy Moth Infestation Viewed by Landsat
                            - EROS Maps Offer Aid in Understanding, Management of Invasive Grasses

### Contacts

#### Timothy A. Glynn

##### Chief of Staff

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

tglynn@usgs.gov

605-594-6046
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 23-325

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 07/24/23 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of July 17, 2023

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

July 24, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 23-325

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of July 17, 2023: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-207 (July 19, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture 

Margins - Effective July 20, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-209 (July 20, 2023), Performance Bond Requirements: Agriculture, 

Energy, Equity, FX, Interest Rate and Metal Margins - Effective July 21, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-211 (July 21, 2023), August 2023 Delivery Date Memo - Effective July 

21, 2023

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 23-213 (July 21, 2023), SPAN 2 Indicative Margins on CME Website -

Effective July 21, 2023

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
#### Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE AGENCY, et al.; United States of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-2540.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2013.

Decided: May 6, 2013.

*228Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hurt v. U.S. Secret Serv. Agency,*No. 8:12-cv-03279-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 4.1


 


*Subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions
printed on the back of this certificate and made a part hereof. *


 


 


ORGANIZED UNDER THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE


 


 


	
  CERTIFICATE NO.          

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
                      CAPITAL
  UNITS

  



 


 


ETHANOL GRAIN PROCESSORS, LLC

Capital Units


 


 


THIS CERTIFIES THAT                                                                                                                               is
the owner of                                  (                    )
Capital Units of Ethanol Grain Processors, LLC, transferable on the books of
the Company in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and sealed with the
seal of the Company, as of the           day
of                            ,
20       .


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  NO
  SEAL

  	
   

  	
  President

  



 





















 


For
Value Received,              hereby sell, assign and transfer unto                                                                                                           

Units represented by the
within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                                                             , Attorney, to transfer the said Units on the books of the within named
Company, with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated                                               ,
20      


 


In presence of


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SUBSCRIPTION
AGREEMENT.


 


THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS AS TO THEIR SALE, TRANSFER,
HYPOTHECATION, OR ASSIGNMENT AS SET FORTH IN THE OPERATING AGREEMENT OF THE
COMPANY AND AGREED TO BY EACH MEMBER OF THE COMPANY.  SAID RESTRICTIONS PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, THAT NO VENDEE, TRANSFEREE, ASSIGNEE, OR ENDORSEE OF A MEMBER SHALL
HAVE THE RIGHT TO BECOME A MEMBER WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF
GOVERNORS, WHICH CONSENT MAY BE GIVEN OR WITHHELD IN THE SOLE AND ABSOLUTE
DISCRETION OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS.
# C_2019112EN.01004003.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/40

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Albacete — Spain) — The borrowers v Globalcaja, S.A.

(Case C-617/18) (1)

(2019/C 112/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 5

# FREDRIKSON &
BYRON, P.A.200 South Sixth
Street, Suite 4000Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

# Telephone: (612)
492-7000Facsimile: (612) 492-7077

November 8, 2005

Scanner Technologies Corporation
14505 21st Ave. N., Suite 220Minneapolis, MN 55447

Re:
 Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies/Gentlemen:

We
are acting as corporate counsel to Scanner Technologies Corporation (the
Company) in connection with the original registration by the Company on Form
S-8 (the Registration Statement) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Act) of options and 1,300,000 shares (the Shares) of Common
Stock issuable pursuant to the Companys 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Plan).

In
acting as such counsel and for the purpose of rendering this opinion, we have reviewed
copies of the following, as presented to us by the Company:

| | 1. |  | The
Companys Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. |  | Certain
corporate resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors and shareholders
               of the Company pertaining to the adoption and approval of the Plan.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. |  | The
Plan.
| | -- |  | ---------

| | 5. |  | The
Registration Statement.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------

Based
on, and subject to, the foregoing and upon representations and information provided by the
Company or its officers or directors, it is our opinion as of this date that:

| | 1. |  | The
Shares are validly authorized by the  Companys  Articles of Incorporation,
as amended.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | Upon
issuance  and  delivery  of the Shares  against  receipt  by the  Company of the
consideration  for the Shares pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Shares will
be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We
hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

| | Very truly yours,       
| | ------------------------
|
| | FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.
|
|
| |                         
| | Robert K. Ranum         
| |                         

---
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
141 So. 713

#### L. L. WAGES v. STATE.

6 Div. 156.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

Ross, Bumgardner, Ross & Ross, of Bessemer, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

See, also, Wages v. State, 141 So. 707.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of L. L. Wages for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Wages v. State, 141 So. 709.

Writ denied.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.4**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Encana Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall K. Eresman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the   requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The information contained in the   Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
|   | By:                           | /s/ Randall K. Eresman                         |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                          | Randall K. Eresman                             |
|   |                          | President & Chief   Executive Officer |
|   |                          |                                           |
|   | Dated: February 23, 2012 |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,766]


SPEC Cast, Dyersville, IA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 5, 2001, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Spec Cast, Dyersville, Iowa.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
at the subject firm remains in effect (TA-W-38,714). Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 16th day of May, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-13222 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
October 31, 2006

Via E-Mail

Office of the Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission -
Three Lafayette Centre : “of
1155 21st Street, N.W. “ -
Washington, D.C. 20581 Dy

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.126: Notification : Cy
of Amendments to Exchange Rule 9.24(E), Original Margin :
Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit.

Dear Ms. Eileen Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (““CFTC” or “Commission”) of amendments to
Exchange Rule 9.24(E), Original Margin Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit.

Currently, NYMEX Rule 9.24(E) limits the dollar value of Letters of Credit issued by
“approved” banks on behalf of our Clearing Members to the lesser of 10% of such bank’s capital
or $500 million. Effective Wednesday, November 1, 2006, the Exchange will increase the
maximum dollar value of Letters of Credit to $1 billion, but retain the percentage basis at 10%.
Pursuant to Section Sc(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the
Exchange hereby certifies that the attached rule amendments comply with the Act, including
regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Arthur McCoy, Vice
President, Financial Surveillance and Risk Management, at (212) 299-2928, and Joseph
Sanguedolce, Senior Director, Financial Surveillance, at (212) 299-2855.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management

ce: Brian Regan

“3
pau
0



(Additions are in bold/underlined; deletions in bold/strikethrough.)
Rule 9.24 — Original Margin Depositories and Originators of Letters of Credit

(E) No approved original margin depository or issuer of a letter of credit may commit, with
respect to Exchange contracts, more than the lesser of ten percent (10%) of its capital and surplus
or $500-mition $1 billion, provided, however, that an issuer may issue letters of credit up to
$600-4milien $1.1 billion, if such issuer establishes, to the satisfaction of the Exchange, an
account at another financial institution and deposits in such account, for the benefit of the
Exchange, collateral in the form of U.S. Government obligations of maturities of less than ten
(10) years valued at 95% of par value, for the excess over $500-4millien $1 billion. Such
collateral shall be deemed to secure any and all obligations of such issuer under letters of credit
issued by the issuer in favor of the Exchange. The Board of Directors, upon the application of an
issuer of letters of credit, may grant a waiver of the $6004miHtien $1.1 billion ceiling, upon such
terms and conditions as it deems appropriate.
# C_2005141EN.01001101.xml

| 10.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/11

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 141/07)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Italy (Calabria)

Aid No: N 756/2002

Title: Measures in favour of the agriculture and food sectors.

Objective: To support the agriculture, food and fisheries sectors.

Legal basis: Legge regionale n. 24 dell'8 luglio 2002.

Legge regionale n. 24 dell'8 luglio 2002

Budget: EUR 3 985 000 for the expenditure indicated in Article 18.

Aid intensity or amount: The planned measures do not include State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.

Duration: Unspecified.

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
# C_2019305EN.01002301.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/23

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — Delfarma sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych

(Case C-387/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - Free movement of goods - Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction - Protection of health and life of humans - Parallel import of medicinal products - Reference medicinal products and generic medicinal products - Requirement that the imported medicinal product and that which has been granted a marketing authorisation in the Member State of importation are both reference medicinal products or are both generic medicinal products)

(2019/C 305/28)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Delfarma sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 34 and 36 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires, for the issue of a parallel import licence for a medicinal product, that that medicinal product and the medicinal product which has been granted a marketing authorisation in that Member State are both reference medicinal products or both generic medicinal products and which, therefore, prohibits the issue of any parallel import licence for a medicinal product where it is a generic medicinal product whereas the medicinal product previously authorised in that Member State is a reference medicinal product.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
# C_2020068EN.01001101.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo, Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 20 de Barcelona — Spain) — Bondora AS v Carlos V.C. (Case C-453/18), XY (C-494/18)

(Joined Cases C-453/18 and C-494/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - European order for payment procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - Provision of additional documents to support the claim - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - Review by the court seised in the context of an application for a European payment order)

(2020/C 68/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo, Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 20 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bondora AS

Defendants: Carlos V.C. (Case C-453/18), XY (C-494/18)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2)(d) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure and Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, as interpreted by the Court and read in the light of Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as allowing a ‘court’, within the meaning of that regulation, seised in the context of a European order for payment procedure, to request from the creditor additional information relating to the terms of the agreement relied on in support of the claim at issue, in order to carry out an ex officio review of the possible unfairness of those terms and, consequently, that they preclude national legislation which declares the additional documents provided for that purpose to be inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.

---