alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Dunlap FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-8039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 29, 2013.

Larry Dunlap Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Dunlap Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Frazier has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Chesapeake Bay Activities 

#           Connect        

## Learn more about USGS leaders of Chesapeake Bay science topics

Find out more

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-    Connect    -  Locations 
  -  Social Media 
-  Partners 
-  About 

USGS Chesapeake Bay studies are carried out by integrated teams of scientists located in Science Centers across the watershed. The scientists working on Chesapeake Bay projects are listed in the Employee Directory at the bottom of this page. Information on each Science Center is provided under Locations. Leaders of the integrated science topics can be found by clicking the green button below.

USGS Chesapeake Bay Topic Leaders

Locations

Social Media

## Contacts

#### Ken Hyer, Ph.D.

##### Chesapeake Bay Coordinator

Chesapeake Bay Activities

kenhyer@usgs.gov

804-382-7111

## Employee Directory
EXHIBIT 99.1




 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


This 31st day of March, 2003.



/s/ J. Michael Womble
-----------------------
J. Michael Womble
Chief Executive Officer


/s/Kathy Hulsey
-----------------------
Kathy Hulsey
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Ann Rader Troitino Johnston, Admitted as Ann Rader Troitino. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department.

Motion denied wherein it seeks reargument, and granted wherein it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and this court, pursuant to CPLR 5713, states that questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 1, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00692-CV

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

V.

DEBREK BOOKMAN; BRIDGET PEARL BRANCH; EDDIE DAVID 

BROOKS; RAYNETTA M. BROOKS; JAMES CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN CARTER 

(DECEASED) AND LUERENE CARTER (DECEASED); MADILINE 

CORMIER; MARY DAVENPORT; JAMES DOSIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES A. DOSIA, SR. 

(DECEASED); EVA DOUGLAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOE WILLIAM DOUGLAS 

(DECEASED); RETHA DOZE; PONDER EDMONSON, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RUBY MARIE 

EDMONSON (DECEASED); JOHN FOREMAN; ANTHONY FREEMAN, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

BOBBIE FREEMAN (DECEASED); REGINA HARMASON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

ARTHUR BROWN (DECEASED); MAURINE HUNTER; EOLA MAE 

JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF LEE HUEY JACKSON (DECEASED); JERMED JONES, 
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

DONALD JONES (DECEASED); MARTHA JOURNET; ELMO 

MOREHEAD JR.; JOYCE PITMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF BERNARD ALLEN PITTMAN (DECEASED); 

BRENDA JOYCE PRICE; LUCILLE WILTURNER; PAMELA SMITH, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

WILLIE HILLARD (DECEASED); SHONE JEFFERSON, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LEWIS JEFFERSON 

(DECEASED); JOE HICKMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES HICKMAN 

(DECEASED); BARBARA BRANTLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE MCGILBRAY 

(DECEASED); JOSEPHINE H. BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FLORITA HELLEMAN 

(DECEASED); FREDDIE MOREHEAD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LENA MOREHEAD 

(DECEASED); ATTIMA HARVEY; SHIRLEY JONES; TROY JACKSON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

MARVIS JACKSON (DECEASED); DEANDRA DAVIS JOHNSON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

EDDIE DAVIS (DECEASED); AND CHLOE WARE; INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DORATHY REED 

(DECEASED) AND BRUCE REED (DECEASED), Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-50469

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is a statutory interloutory appeal from an order signed November 10, 

2021. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 27.003, 51.015(12). On August 

23, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted. 
We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

2
(104 So. 914)

#### Ex parte David A. HIGDON.

(8 Div. 797.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 25, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Proctor & Snodgrass, of Scottsboro, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

MILLER, J.

Petition of David A. Higdon for certiorari to the Court of Appeals, to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Higdon v. State, 20 Ala. App. 649, 104 So. 913.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAXRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
No. 419.

#### George F. Dunbar et al., Petitioners, *v.*David H. Cascaden.

October 19, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. *Mr. J. C. Campbell*and *Mr. W. H. Met-son*for petitioners. *Mr. Hayden. Johnson*for respondent.
# C_2020240EN.01000302.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu — Poland) — Dong Yang Electronics sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

(Case C-547/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 44 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 - Article 11(1) - Supply of services - Point of reference for tax purposes - Concept of a ‘fixed establishment’ - Taxable person for VAT purposes - Subsidiary of a company of a non-Member State located in a Member State)

(2020/C 240/04)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dong Yang Electronics sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

Operative part of the judgment

Article 44 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008, and Article 11(1) and Article 22(1) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112, must be interpreted as meaning that the existence, in the territory of a Member State, of a fixed establishment of a company established in a non-Member State may not be inferred by a supplier of services from the mere fact that that company has a subsidiary there, and that supplier is not required to inquire, for the purposes of such an assessment, into contractual relationships between the two entities.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certifying Statement of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence F. Curtin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and will be retained by Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                        |     |                                                    
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                                    
|                        |    
|Date:  October 08, 2008 | By: | /s/ Lawrence F. Curtin                             
|                        |     | Lawrence F. Curtin                                 
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
(105 So. 703)

#### Ex parte W. D. PINCKARD et al.

(7 Div. 596.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Motley & Motley, of Gadsden, for petitioners.

Culli,- Hunt & Culli, of Gadsden, opposed.

SOMERVILLE, J.

Petition of W. D. Pinek-

ard and Carl Lay, doing business as Pinekard & Lay, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Pinckard et al. v. Burnett Cotton Co. et al., 105 So. 702.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BÓULDIN, JX, concur.
600335672

Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

October 30, 2020

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST

Submitted via the Portal and via email

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for 

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations.

David Levine

General Counsel

Bloomberg L.P.

731 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as 

the “Confidential Information.”
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2

600365906

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-1020-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-1020-0130.”

[signature page follows]
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3

600365906

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours,

Devu Shanmugham

Chief Compliance Officer

Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (Email: JLave@cftc.gov)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 4

600365906

Annex A

Confidential Information

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-1020-0001–BSEF-1020-

0130
(83 South. 33)

#### ELLEDGE et al. v. FUNKE.

(8 Div. 120.)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 1919.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1919.

Quieting title <&wkey;12(l)—Possession essential TO ACTION TO REMOVE CLOUD.

In suit to cancel a deed as a cloud on complainant’s title, and to enjoin respondents from trespassing on the land or removing timber, it is essential that complainant allege and prove his actual possession of the land at the time of filing of the bill; right to relief and jurisdiction being dependent tbereon.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

Suit in equity by Ferdinand Funke against J. M. Elledge and another. From a decree for complainant, respondents appeal.

Reversed and rendered.

Kirk & Rather, of Tuscumbia, for appellants.

James H. Branch and Al H. Carmichael, both of Tuscumbia, for appellee.

SOMERVILLE, J.

The bill of complaint is filed to cancel a certain deed to 40 acres of land, executed by one Mack Gipson to the respondents, Elledge and Jeffries, as a cloud on complainant’s title, and to enjoin said respondents from trespassing on the land or removing timber therefrom. The bill admits that the legal title to the land was formerly in respondents’ predecessor and privy in estate, but alleges that it had been divested by complainant’s adverse possession for 10 and 20 -years, and that complainant is in possession of the land.

In a case of this character it is, of course, essential that the complainant allege and prove his actual possession of the land at the time of the filing of his bill. Jones v. DeGraffenreid, 60 Ala. 145; Belcher v. Scruggs, 125 Ala. 336, 27 South. 839. The right to relief, and, indeed, the jurisdiction of the court, is dependent upon that fact.

We have examined the testimony with critical care, and we are constrained to hold that complainant has not met the burden of proof upon this issue. In fact, we are satisfied that, whatever acts of ownership complainant may have exercised on previous occasions, respondents were in the actual possession of the land, under a regular chain of title, and bona fide claim of ownership, when this suit was begun, and that complainant had been effectually disseised by them.

On the evidence^ we think complainant should have resorted to an action of ejectment and recovered the possession, before resorting to this remedy. A discussion of the evidence would be tedious and useless, and we shall not undertake it. Let the decree of the circuit court be reversed, and a decree here rendered, denying relief and dismissing the bill of complaint.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager
of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine,
LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report")
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The  information  contained in the Annual  Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated: November 14, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Sang S. Wang, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nassda Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nassda Corporation.





By:

/S/    SANG S. WANGName:

Sang S. WangTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board





I, Tammy S. Liu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nassda Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nassda Corporation.





By:

/S/    TAMMY S. LIUName:

Tammy S. LiuTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance and Administration
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

p1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139583 

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Counter-DefendantAppellee, 

v SC: 139583 

 COA: 283557 

Charlevoix CC: 99-184718-CK 

FRANCIS LADI, LAURA WILSON, 

MARK SOKOLOWSKI and LISA 

SOKOLOWSKI, CHARLES CRADDUCK and 

DIANA CRADDUCK, DEBORAH YAGER, 

MARK YAGER ESTATE, MEGAN YAGER, 

MARK YAGER, KATIE YAGER, 

EMILY YAGER, MARCELLA YAGER, 

TADEUSZ DOBROWOLSKI, JANET 

DOBROWOLSKI, CHRISTOPHER 

DOBROWOLSKI, ADAM DOBROWOLSKI, 

KYLE DOBROWOLSKI, RICHARD DAVIS, 

SECOND CHANCE, FIREWORKS NORTH, 

INC, MICHAEL JAY, GLENN CRAWFORD, 

LAWRENCE GRISE and DENNIS HALVERSON, 

Defendants, 

and 

AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE CO, 

 Intervening-Counter-Plaintiff- 

 Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
VI, L.P., Series 10 (the “Partnership”) for the years ended March 31, 2010,
2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Melanie R. Wenk, Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK


Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: May
27, 2011
# C_2019054EN.01001901.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz — Austria) — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG

(Case C-466/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 41-4 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 41-4 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 41-4 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 41-4 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 4 of 4