alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2275 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to prohibit the exclusion of individuals from service on a District of Columbia jury on account 

of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to 

prohibit the exclusion of individuals from service on a 

District of Columbia jury on account of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Local Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2275 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JURIES 

2 ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR 

3 GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED. 

4 Section 11–1903, District of Columbia Official Code, 

5 is amended by inserting ‘‘(including sexual orientation or 

6 gender identity)’’ after ‘‘sex’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2052 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

with respect to a portion of the Wendell H. Ford (Western Kentucky) 

Parkway, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. COMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 with respect to a portion of the Wendell 

H. Ford (Western Kentucky) Parkway, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WENDELL H. FORD (WESTERN KENTUCKY) 

4 PARKWAY. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION AS HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR.— 

6 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation 

7 Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2052 IH

1 ‘‘(91) The Wendell H. Ford (Western Ken2 tucky) Parkway from the interchange with the Wil3 liam H. Natcher Parkway in Ohio County, Ken4 tucky, west to the interchange of the Western Ken5 tucky Parkway with the Edward T. Breathitt 

6 (Pennyrile) Parkway.’’. 

7 (b) DESIGNATION AS FUTURE INTERSTATE.—Sec8 tion 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor9 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by striking ‘‘and 

10 subsection (c)(90)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (c)(90), and 

11 subsection (c)(91)’’. 

12 (c) NUMBERING OF PARKWAY.—Section 

13 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor14 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by adding at 

15 the end the following: ‘‘The route referred to in subsection 

16 (c)(91) is designated as Interstate Route I–369.’’. 

17 (d) OPERATION OF VEHICLES.—Section 127(l)(3)(A) 

18 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘clause (i) or (ii)’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘clauses (i) through (iii)’’; and 

21 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(iii) The Wendell H. Ford (Western 

23 Kentucky) Parkway (to be designated as a 

24 spur of Interstate Route 69) from the 

25 interchange with the William H. Natcher 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2052 IH

1 Parkway in Ohio County, Kentucky, west 

2 to the interchange of the Western Ken3 tucky Parkway with the Edward T. 

4 Breathitt (Pennyrile) Parkway.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2017437EN.01004202.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/42

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2017 — Franmax v EUIPO — R. Seelig & Hille (her-bea)

(Case T-97/17) (1)

1

(2017/C 437/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

1

---
154 So. 599

#### Robert WRIGHT v. CITY OF ANNISTON.

7 Div. 253.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 10, 1934.

Merrill, Jones & Whiteside, of Anniston, for petitioner.

J. F. Matthews and Knox, Acker, Sterne & Liles, all of Anniston, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Robert Wright for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Wright v. City of Anniston, 154 So. 597.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0584

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

NICK LENIER WILSON,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 17 2021

11/17/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0584
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 12, 2008
    /s/ Gail F. GoodmanGail F. GoodmanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 12, 2008
    /s/ Steven R. WassermanSteven R. WassermanVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  27  LLC  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
September  30,  2010, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2010
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Sandeep Patel and ERCC Construction Company, LLC v. Warwick

Construction, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00208

- CV

Trial court case number: 14

- DCV

- 219641

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

T he motion for rehearing is deni ed

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Peter Kelly

_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice R adack and Justices Kelly and Landau.

Date: ____ July 19, 2022

_____
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10149

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SEALED APPELLANT 1

Defendant-Appellant,

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 4:03-CV-1233)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We are in receipt of the district court’s March 20, 2006 order, wherein it notifies 

this court that (1) Appellant wishes to waive any benefit she received from this court’s

March 3, 2006 ruling, and (2) that it has found by a preponderance of the evidence that
2

Appellant has recovered from her mental illness and defect to such an extent that her

conditional release under the regimen of care and treatment prescribed would no longer

create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person, or serious damage to property

of another. Given this notification there is nothing for this court to resolve and this case

is closed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Johnny Bernardo VILLALONA, also known as Leo Gonzalez, also known as Leo Gonzales, also known as Milton Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-4056.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 19, 2006.

*24B. Alan Seidler, New York, NY, for Appellant.

Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Scott L. Marrah, Katherine Polk Failla, Assistants, United States Attorneys, of counsel), New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, Circuit Judges, and Hon. GERARD E. LYNCH,* Judge.

*

 The Honorable Gerard E. Lynch, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Johnny Bernardo Villalona appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a guilty plea, for the crime of illegal reentry into the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 1362(a) and § 1362(b)(2). On appeal, Villalona argues that (1) his sentence of 77 months was unreasonable, and (2) his indictment unconstitutionally alleged two crimes under a single count. We assume that the parties and counsel are familiar with the facts and the procedural history of this case, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We review sentences for “reasonableness.” *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 260, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). This review applies to both “substantive reasonableness,” *viz.,*whether the length of the sentence is reasonable in light of the Sentencing Guidelines range and the seven factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), as well as “procedural reasonableness,” which includes whether the district court complied with *Booker*by treating the Guidelines as advisory, by considering the Guidelines range based on the facts it found, and by considering the other factors listed in § 3553(a). *United States v. Crosby,*397 F.3d 103, 114 (2d Cir.2005).

We conclude that the district court’s judgment was both substantively and procedurally reasonable. This Court has “recognize[d] that in the overwhelming majority of cases, a Guidelines sentence will fall comfortably within the broad range of sentences that would be reasonable in the particular circumstances,” *United States v. Fernandez,*443 F.3d 19, 27 (2d Cir.2006), and we find nothing in this case to suggest that this case is one of the exceptions. The sentence was also procedurally reasonable, because the district court considered all of the grounds on which Villalona asked the court to downwardly depart under the Guidelines, and all of the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

Villalona’s argument that the indictment was unconstitutional because it alleged two crimes under a single count is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 227, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), where it held that § 1362(a) and § 1362(b)(2) do not constitute two distinct crimes for the purposes of an indictment.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40040

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARNOLD G. THOMAS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:89-CR-178-2

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 17, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arnold G. Thomas appeals the denial of an 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment

484 to the Sentencing Guidelines. In the alternative, Thomas

argues that Amendment 371 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.11 should have been

used to calculate his sentence.

Amendment 484 changed application note 1 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1

by explaining that the term "mixture or substance" does not
No. 95-40040

-2-

include materials that must be separated from the controlled

substance before the controlled substance can be used. U.S.S.G.

App. C. amend. 484 (Nov. 1993). Amendment 484 has been given

retroactive effect. Id.; see § 1B1.10(d) (Nov. 1993).

However, Thomas's base offense level was determined by the

amount of drugs that could have been produced from the 550 pounds

of phenylacetic acid that the conspiracy sought to purchase. 

Thomas did not contend that the phenylacetic acid contained waste

products. Amendment 484 is not applicable to Thomas's case.

Thomas's § 2D1.11 argument was not raised in the district

court. "[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not

reviewable by this court unless they involve purely legal

questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest

injustice." Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir.

1991) (internal quotations and citation omitted). In any event,

the argument is meritless. See United States v. O'Leary, 35 F.3d

153, 154-55 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Bellazerius, 24

F.3d 698, 703 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 375 (1994). 

The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Xenotransplantation.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such assign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Secretary's Advisory Committee on 
Xenotransplantation.
    Date: July 2-3, 2001.
    Time: July 2, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Time: July 2, 2001, 7:30 p.m. to 9 p.m.
    Agenda: Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Time: July 3, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Mary Groesch, PhD, Executive Director, 
Secretary's Advisory Committee on Xenotransplantation, Office of 
Science Policy, Rockledge I, Room 750, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-
9838.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www4.od.nih.gov/oba/xenomtg.htm, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.187, Undergraduate 
Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.22, Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program for Individuals from 
Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 93.232, Loan Repayment Program for 
Research Generally; 93.39, Academic Research Enhancement Award; 
93.936, NIH Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan 
Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12924 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2001-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_/s/ James N. Ryan__                      

James N. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer

___July 23, 2003_________
Nodal Exchange, LLC Rulebook Appendix C: Reporting Levels, Accountability Levels and Position Limits

Physical 

Commodity Code Contract Name Reporting Level

Spot Month 

Position Limit 

(lots)

Single Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

All Month 

Accountability 

Level (lots)

Aggregation 

Group*

CFTC 

Referenced 

Contract

GHU PJM.KAMMER215.5 KVKM1_month_on_dac 25 178 178 2136 0

GHV PJM.KAMMER215.5 KVKM1_month_off_dac 25 178 178 2136 0

GJY PJM.AVONLAK214 KVUN7_month_on_dac 25 199 199 2388 45 0

GJZ PJM.AVONLAK214 KVUN7_month_off_dac 25 199 199 2388 44 0

HTO PJM.DICKERSO13 KVSTADG1_month_on_dac 25 233 233 2796 0

HTP PJM.DICKERSO13 KVSTADG1_month_off_dac 25 233 233 2796 0
[925 NE2d 581, 898 NYS2d 542]

#### Ashland Management Incorporated, Respondent, v Altair Investments NA, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Argued February 11, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

*775APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gordon & Haffner, LLP,*Harrison *(David Gordon*of counsel), for appellants.

*Grayson & Associates,*Greenwich, Connecticut *(Eric D. Grayson*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by dismissing the first, second, third, fourth and seventh causes of action to the extent they seek injunctive relief or damages for defendants’ misappropriation of client lists or trade secrets prior to their resignation, and otherwise affirmed. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

The confidentiality agreements executed by defendants did not prohibit them from soliciting plaintiffs clients or contacting its business referrers after their termination of employment. Moreover, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether its customer lists constituted a trade secret *(see Leo Silfen, Inc. v Cream,*29 NY2d 387 [1972]) and whether defendants improperly used plaintiffs performance data or took any *776confidential customer information before leaving plaintiff’s employ. But plaintiff did raise questions of fact regarding whether defendants breached their fiduciary duties by using plaintiff’s time and resources to form a new business and promote themselves while still working for plaintiff. An issue of fact also exists as to whether defendants improperly accessed plaintiffs Federal Express account to discover client information after their employment with plaintiff had ceased.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Certified question answered in the negative.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 31, 2000 and April 14, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. § 4301                     *et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The SNP Consortium (“TSC”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Specifically, International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY; Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, IL; and Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ have been added as parties to this venture. In addition, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, has been recognized and is now named Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and TSC intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 20, 1999, TSC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 7, 1999 (64 FR 54645).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-13038  Filed 4-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M