alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury Office of Thrift Supervision
 DATES: Submit written comments on or before June 25, 2001. *OMB Number:*
                         1550-0078. *Form Number:*
                         Not applicable. *Type of Review:*
                         Renewal. *Title:*
                         Lending and Investment. *Description:*
                        Savings associations must maintain adequate documentation to support their lending and investment 
                        ( print page 28773)
                        activities. OTS staff may request the information during examinations. *Respondents:*
                         Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks. *Estimated Number of Respondents, Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent, Frequency of Response, and Total Reporting Burden:* Regulatory provision (12 C.F.R.)
Number of respondents
Number of 
                             annual responses
Total number of yearly 
                             responses
Number of hours per 
                             response
Total number of hours yearly§ 560.101 and Appendix A to § 560.101
1,068
1
1,068
40
42,720§ 562.1(b); § 560.170
1,068
1
1,068
44.4
47,419§ 563.41(e); § 563.42(e)
1,068
1
1,068
4.6
4,913§ 560.172; Part 564
1,068
130
138,840
.33
45,817§ 560.93(f)(2)
1,068
9
9,612
1
9,612§ 560.210 (Initial Notice)
1,068
415
443,220
.11
48,754§ 560.210 (Adjustment Notice)
1,068
415
443,220
.4
177,288§ 590.4(h)
176
2
352
1
352§ 560.32
1,068
1
1,068
8
8,544§ 560.35
120
1
120
20
2,400Totals




387,819
 *Acting Clearance Officer:*
                     Sally W. Watts, (202) 906-7380, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20552. *OMB Reviewer:*
                    Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503. Deborah Dakin, Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations & Legislation Division.


[FR Doc. 01-13125 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
153 So. 918

#### Arthur PITTS v. STATE.

8 Div. 546.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 1, 1934.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

KNIGHT, Justice.

The appellant, Arthur Pitts, was indicted by a grand jury of Madison county of the offense of murder in the first degree, and upon his trial, upon said indictment, in the circuit court of said county, was convicted of murder in the second degree. Defendant’s punishment was fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the penitentiary of the state for a term of twenty-five years.

Prom the judgment and sentence of the court, entered upon the verdict of the jury, the sa'id defendant prosecutes this appeal.

There is no bill of exceptions in the cause, and the record proper discloses no errors of law.

It follows that the judgment appealed from is due to. be here affirmed; and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jurak Corporation World
Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended November 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof, I,
Anthony C. Jurak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

        (1)  the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
             of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
             and

        (2)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
             in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Date: January 19, 2006                 /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony C. Jurak
                                       Chief Financial Officer

        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this
written statement has been provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and
will be retained by Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 7      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 7      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 7      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 3 of 3
MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE, LLC

400 South 4th Street | 130 Grain Exchange Building | Minneapolis, MN 55415

612-321-7101

mgex.com

Via Portal Submission 

June 2, 2023

 MGEX Submission No. 23-30

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act Section 5c and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 

40.6(d), the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, LLC (“MGEX”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following 

rule amendments made effective during the week of May 22, 2023:

• May 23, 2023 Memo to MGEX Clearing Members reminding them of the 7:30 a.m. CT Tuesday, 

May 30, 2023 deadline to report offsets of June 2023 Hard Red Spring Wheat and SPIKES Volatility 

Index futures, and Hard Red Spring Wheat Index, Hard Red Winter Wheat Index, Soft Red Winter 

Wheat Index, National Corn Index, and National Soybean Index futures and options, effective for 

the Friday, May 26, 2023 trade date.

A copy of the above-referenced memo is available at http://www.mgex.com under the “Announcements” 

tab. If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-7188 or 

randerson@mgex.com. 

Sincerely,

Ryan Anderson

Associate Counsel
# C_2018142EN.01005002.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2018 — Rstudio v EUIPO — Embarcadero Technologies (RSTUDIO)

(Case T-230/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark RSTUDIO - Earlier EU word mark ER/STUDIO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2018/C 142/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rstudio, Inc. (Boston, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC and G. Smith, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2017 (Case R 493/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Embarcadero Technologies and Rstudio.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rstudio, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rstudio, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.

1

---
# C_2017374EN.01004002.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/40

---

Action brought on 25 August 2017 — Asics v EUIPO — Van Lieshout textile Agenturen (Representation of four crossing lines)

(Case T-581/17)

(2017/C 374/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asics Corporation (Kobe, Japan) (represented by: M. Polo Carreño, M. Granado Carpenter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Van Lieshout textiel Agenturen BV (Berkel-Enschot, The Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of four crossing lines) — Application for registration No 11 952 678

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2017 in Case R 2129/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the reimbursement of its costs in this appeal before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the reimbursement of its costs in this appeal before the General Court.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Breach of the duty of the Board to revise the legality of the first instance decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the duty of the Board to revise the legality of the first instance decision;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Leff, J.), rendered on March 5, 1986, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of GFY Foods, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), I, Edward E. Schwalb, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 23, 2004                       /s/ Edward E. Schwalb
                                             ---------------------------
                                                 EDWARD E. SCHWALB
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017231EN.01004701.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/47

---

Action brought on 18 May 2017 — Sata v EUIPO — Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools (5000)

(Case T-304/17)

(2017/C 231/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sata GmbH & Co. KG (Kornwestheim, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Simon, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools Co. Ltd (Pengjie Town, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: The sign ‘5000’ — EU trade mark No 12 333 555

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2017 in Case R 655/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

| — | in the event that the respondent before the Board of Appeal decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the event that the respondent before the Board of Appeal decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of sound administration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of sound administration.

---
# C_2020077EN.01000401.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA)

(Case C-178/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - First indent of Article 4(2) - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Article 4(3) - Protection of the decision-making process - Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - General presumption of confidentiality - No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)

(2020/C 77/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV (represented by: C. Thomas, Barrister, J. Stratford QC, B. Kelly, Solicitor, and P. Bogaert, advocaat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (initially represented by: T. Jabłoński, S. Marino, S. Drosos and A. Rusanov, subsequently by T. Jabłoński, S. Marino and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
By Electronic Submission

Mr. Chris Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, NW.

Washington, D.C. 20581

DDR Rule Filing: DDRO7

Re: Amendments to DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC Rulebook Pursuant to Section 5c(c) (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation § 40.6

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation § 40.6, DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) submits, by written certification, amendments to the DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC Rulebook (“DDR Rulebook”), including, but not limited to, the changes enumerated below.

I. DDR has amended the cover page of the DDR Rulebook to update the effective date.

II. DDR has amended various sections of the DDR Rulebook to replace references to DDR Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with references to DDR Senior Officer.

III. DDR has amended various sections of the DDR Rulebook to replace references to a specific individual DDR Counsel with a general reference to DDR legal counsel.

IV. DDR has amended DDR Rulebook Section 10.3 to update the process. timing. approval and notification requirements associated with the Involuntary Termination of a User.

V. DDR has amended DDR Rulebook Section 10.4 to limit the scope of the section to suspension of a User and the assessment of costs resulting from such action against a User.
take the actions or bear the responsibility and obligations described. This could be a

Managing Director, business manager or Chief Executive Officer, if one is designated, or such other individual with the requisite authority.”

In addition to the changes described above, additional minor edits have been made throughout the DDR Rulebook. Any material modifications to the DDR Rulebook, including the DDR Operating Procedures, outlined in this letter have been approved by the DDR Board pursuant to DDR Operating Procedures Important Legal Information Section 3 Notices.

DDR certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder. No substantive opposing views have been expressed with respect to the amendments. DDR further certifies that, concurrent with this filing today, a copy of this submission was posted on its website and may be accessed at: http://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-fihings?subsidiary=DerivSERV&pgs= 1.

Enclosed with this letter is a marked version of the DDR Rulebook. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 813 470-1447.

Sincerely,

KyIeRoñig

Director and Assistant General Counsel

Enclosures
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 4, 2010
    /s/ Gail F. GoodmanGail F. GoodmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, R. Scott Murray, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                              
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2010 |  | /s/    R. Scott Murray                                                       
|                   |  | R. Scott Murray                                                              
|                   |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)