alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017382EN.01004701.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/47

---

Action brought on 16 August 2017 — González Calvet v SRB

(Case T-554/17)

(2017/C 382/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ramón González Calvet (Barcelona, Spain) and Joan González Calvet (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: P. Molina Bosch, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should take note that an action against Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board has been lodged and, following the completion of the relevant legal procedures, uphold the present action and annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board, thereby rendering the implementation of the decision and the actions taken as a result thereof devoid of effects. If the Court does not annul that decision, the applicants claim that they are entitled to compensation for the loss of their shares.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
# C_2005040EN.01000801.xml

| 17.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/8

---

Notice concerning the anti-subsidy and anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India: change in the name of a company subject to individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates

(2005/C 40/05)

Imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India are subject to a definitive countervailing duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 (1) and to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 (2).

1

2

The exports to the Community of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film of MTZ Polyesters Limited, a company located in India, are subject to an individual countervailing duty rate of 8,7 % and an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 49,0 %. An undertaking concerning the imports subject to an anti-dumping duty was accepted by Commission Decision 2001/645/EC (3). The company has informed the Commission that it has changed its name to MTZ Polyfilms Limited. The company has argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates nor the right to benefit from the undertaking given by the company under its previous name of MTZ Polyesters Limited.

3

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999, of Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 and those of Commission Decision 2001/645/EC. Therefore, the reference to MTZ Polyesters Limited should be read as MTZ Polyfilms Limited in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999, in Article 1 and 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 and in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2001/645/EC.

The Taric additional code A031 previously attributed to MTZ Polyesters Limited shall apply to MTZ Polyfilms Limited.

---

(1)  OJ L 316, 10.12.1999, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 56.

3

---
Exhibit 10.2

August 6, 2010


RE:   LOCK-UP AGREEMENT

Gentlemen:

The undersigned, a director and major security holder of Monster Offers, a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), understands that the Company is the
process of conducting a private placement offering to further capitalize the
Company.  This lock up agreement adds a level of protection to new investors,
to prevent the undersigned from liquidating his stock holdings and adversely
effecting the market of the stock.

The undersigned is the record owner of 10,000,000 shares of the common stock
of Monster Offers, par value $0.001 per share (the "Shares), and understands
that some of their Shares may be eligible for sale under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, subject to certain limitations included in said Rule.

It is further agreed that:

1.      The undersigned will not sell any of their shares of the common stock
owned by the undersigned, directly or indirectly, until August 6, 2011.

2.      The undersigned acknowledges that Empire Stock Transfer, 1859 Whitney
Mesa Dr., Henderson, NV 89014, the transfer agent for the Company, has been
advised of the restrictions described herein and that any attempts by the
undersigned to violate said restriction may result in legal action(s) by the
Company.  The undersigned further agrees, upon the request of the Company,
that in addition to any other restrictions reflecting that the Shares have
not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be
placed on individual certificates issued.

THIS LOCK-UP AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS
PRINCIPLES THEREOF.

Sincerely,

/s/ Scott J. Gerardi
--------------------
    Scott J. Gerardi

cc: Empire Stock Transfer

<PAGE>
No. 557.

#### Rainy Lake River Boom Corporation, Petitioner, *v.*Rainy River Lumber Company, Limited.

October 19, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. *Mr. Halvor Steenerson, Mr. Charles Loring*and *Mr. Samvel Herrick*for petitioner. *Mr. Chelsea J. Bockwood*and *Mr. A. Y. Merrill*for respondent. , ;
Case 1:07-cv-05884-CM     Document 10      Filed 03/12/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05884-CM     Document 10      Filed 03/12/2008     Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        05 January 2021    

#                     Department of the Navy Releases Strategic Blueprint for a Blue Arctic                   

                The Department of the Navy released its strategic blueprint for the Arctic titled a Blue Arctic.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  | USFF FOIA | DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 99.2 Certain Remarks of Fred B. Parks, Chief Executive Officer Urologix, Inc. Teleconference Held on August 10, 2004  Fourth Quarter 2004 Results: 

Treatment revenue increased 8% from the prior quarter
and 45% from the prior year quarter.  

As forecasted, revenue from the sale of control units
declined this [fourth] quarter, down approximately $190,000 from prior quarter and almost $300,000 from the prior year
quarter.  

40 new accounts committed to our technology during the quarter.  

While it obviously was not significant to overall sales
performance, we did fall short of our target of 35 bulls eye accounts. We achieved 31 of these high volume
accounts this year.  

We dont enjoy missing any goal, however, to put
the matter in context, achieving another 4 bulls eye accounts would have added less than 0.5% additional revenue in the
quarter.  

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
over the prior quarter, due to higher variable selling expenses associated with premium commissions earned
by a number of our sales people who exceeded their annual targets.


---

Fiscal 2004 Results: 

In a market that we believe grew slightly more than 20%,
we were able to gain market share while simultaneously improving our cost structure.  

Revenue from treatment catheters grew 37% from prior
year while control box revenue declined almost $600,000, due to continuing pricing pressure and a resulting drop in
control unit ASPs.   Fiscal Year 2005 Guidance: 

Continuing down the list of topics, we estimate fiscal
year 2005 revenue in the range of $30 million to $32 million, a 23% to 32% improvement over fiscal 2004. We
believe this performance would represent a market share increase and can be supported with only four or five additional
sales people. We expect sales to be strongest in the second half of the fiscal year.  

Gross margins are expected to be in the 70% range as a
larger percent of business will come from the sale of our higher margin treatment catheters.  

Examining first quarter 2005 in particular, and
remembering the traditional summer pause is here in the device market, we expect sales between $6.8 and 7.2 million, the
same level as the previous quarter, but almost 34% to 42% ahead of the prior year quarter.


---
#### MATTER OF HARDRAT.

APPLICATION FOB WBIT OF HABEAS COBPUS.

Original.

Submitted November 9, 1908.

Decided November 16, 1908.

Leave to file petition for *habeas corpus*by person confined under inde-, terminate sentence act of Michigan, denied.

*Mr. Frederick S. Tyler*presented the application on behalf . of the petitioner.

No brief was filed in opposition.

*Per Curiam:*

Motion for leave to file a writ of *habeas corpus*denied.
# C_2017357EN.01001901.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/19

---

Action brought on 3 August 2017 — UE v Commission

(Case T-487/17)

(2017/C 357/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: UE (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the European Commission’s decision dated 4 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s requests dated 14 October 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Commission’s decision dated 4 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s requests dated 14 October 2013;

| — | if needed, annul the European Commission’s decision dated 26 April 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 5 January 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

if needed, annul the European Commission’s decision dated 26 April 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 5 January 2017;

| — | compensate the applicant for the moral and material prejudiced suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 120 000 euro (moral harm), 748 800 (loss of earnings), and 576 000 euro (loss of pension); |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the applicant for the moral and material prejudiced suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 120 000 euro (moral harm), 748 800 (loss of earnings), and 576 000 euro (loss of pension);

| — | compensate the applicant for the harm caused by the course and the outcome of the inquiry on the issue of harassment, evaluated at the sum of 50 000 euro; |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the applicant for the harm caused by the course and the outcome of the inquiry on the issue of harassment, evaluated at the sum of 50 000 euro;

| — | reimburse the applicant’s incurred costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reimburse the applicant’s incurred costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of sound administration, violation of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, violation of the right to be heard and violation of the adversarial principle. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of sound administration, violation of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, violation of the right to be heard and violation of the adversarial principle.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, factual errors and a violation of Article 35, second sentence of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, factual errors and a violation of Article 35, second sentence of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TalecrisBiotherapeutics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated:  October 28, 2010                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |
|   | /S/  John M. Hanson                                   |
|   | John  M. Hanson                                       |
|   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Commitment Letter



 Exhibit 10.2 

 

					
	



	  	 U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20416
	  	

 COMMITMENT LETTER 

License No. 05/05-5 134 

SEP – 1 2010 
 Mr. Dean
Pickerell 
 Executive Vice President 

Medallion Capital, Inc. 
 3000 W. County Road 42,
Suite 301 
 Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 

Dear Mr. Pickerell: 
 The Small Business
Administration (“SBA”) is hereby committing to reserve Leverage (as defined in 13 CFR 107.50) in the form of debentures in an amount equal to $5,000,000.00, to be issued by Medallion Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on or
prior to September 30, 2014 subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Commitment Letter and in 13 CFR 107.1200-1240. As used herein, terms which are defined in 13 CFR Part 107 shall have the meanings assigned to them therein.

 Each issuance of Leverage under this Commitment Letter is conditioned upon the Company’s creditworthiness (as determined by SBA) and the
Company’s full compliance (as determined by SBA) with each of the other terms and conditions set forth in 13 CFR 107.1200-1240. 
 SBA may
limit the amounts that may be drawn each year under this Commitment Letter. 
 This Commitment Letter shall terminate automatically at 5:00 P.M.
Eastern Time on September 30, 2014 You must pay to SBA a non-refundable leverage fee in the amount of $50,000.00 within thirty days of the date of this letter or prior to the submission of the initial draw request, whichever is sooner.
The remaining portion of the leverage fee in the amount of $100,000.00 will be deducted pro rata as commitment proceeds are drawn. 
 By
its acceptance of this Commitment Letter, the Company agrees to pay, indemnify and hold SBA harmless from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of
any kind or nature whatsoever with respect to or arising out of this Commitment Letter. 

 

 








 This Commitment Letter is subject to the provisions of Part 107 of Title 13 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, including without limitation 13 CFR 107.1200-1240, which are incorporated herein by reference. 
 This Commitment Letter has been
issued in reliance upon the written representations and certifications made by the Company to SBA in connection with its application for a commitment. 

This Commitment Letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, federal law. 

 

			
	U.S. Small Business Administration
		
	 By:
	 	
 




		 	Sean J.Greene
		 	 Associate Administrator

    for Investment



  

			
	Agreed and Accepted:
	
	 Medallion Capital, Inc.

		
	 By:
	 	
 




		
	 Date:
	 	 9/7/10
# C_2019044EN.01008202.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/82

---

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2018 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-730/17) (1)

(2019/C 44/112)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.

---
Presidential Documents

27825

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 98

Monday, May 21, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 2001–14 of April 30, 2001

Certification To Permit U.S. Contributions to the International Fund for Ireland With Fiscal Year 2000 and 2001

Funds

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 5(c) of the Anglo-Irish Agreement Support Act of 1986

(Public Law 99–415), as amended in section 2811 of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained

in Public Law 105–277), I hereby certify that I am satisfied that: (1) the

Board of the International Fund for Ireland, as a whole, is broadly representative of the interests of the communities in Ireland and Northern Ireland;

and (2) disbursements from the International Fund (a) will be distributed

to individuals and entities whose practices are consistent with the principles

of economic justice; and (b) will address the needs of both communities

in Northern Ireland and will create employment opportunities in regions

and communities of Northern Ireland suffering from high rates of unemployment.

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination, together

with the attached statement setting forth a detailed explanation of the basis

for this certification, to the Congress.

This determination shall be effective immediately and shall be published

in the Federal Register.

[FR Doc. 01–12847

Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 30, 2001.

W

Billing code 4710–10–M
February 16, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2631.02
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following, which supplements CBOT’s previous filing on this subject dated February
6, 2006 (CBOT Reference File #2631.01):

- Establishment of an Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program for CBOT 100 oz.
Gold Options. (Summary of program’s salient features is attached).

There were no opposing views in connection with this program.

The CBOT intends to implement this program concurrently with the launch of trading in 100 oz.
Gold Options (presently targeted for March 3, 2006).

The CBOT certifies that this program complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b012406


CBOT® 100 oz. Gold Futures Options
Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program

EMM Obligations

Participants in this non-exclusive EMM program will provide two-sided markets in CBOT 100
oz. Gold Options on the CBOT’s electronic platform (e-cbot®), on a continuous basis and in
response to requests-for-quote (“RFQs”) during daytime U. S. market hours for such options,
unless prevented from doing so as a result of extraordinary circumstances beyond the EMM’s
reasonable control or due to position limits.

EMM participants agree that they will quote prices continuously, and respond to RFQs, for
CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options at agreed upon minimum size and maximum bid/offer spread levels
for specified options series.

EMM Incentives

In return for an EMM’s fulfillment of its obligations, such EMM will receive the following for
the period coinciding with EMM’s period of participation in this program:

Transaction fees: All CBOT electronic transaction fees will be rebated for EMM proprietary
transactions in CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options during the market hours of their assignment.

Preferencing/Entitlements: After the allocation of any priority order, EMMs will be entitled to a
percentage of each transaction in CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options, in a percentage to be determined,
where EMMs have matched the bid or offer prior to trade completion, during the hours of their
assignment. Total preferencing among all EMMs will be limited to 40%. The CBOT reserves
the right to periodically review and reallocate entitlement percentages among the EMMs.

Term

The program will have an initial term through February 29, 2008, and may be extended if
mutually agreed.

Termination

EMM Agreements may be terminated for uncorrected material breach, upon specified advance
notice, or by mutual consent.