alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4358]


Warn Springs Forest Products Industries, Warm Springs, OR; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Warm Springs Forest Products 
Industries, Warm Springs, Oregon. The application contained no new 
substantial information which would bear importantly on the 
Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was 
issued.

NAFTA-4358; Warm Springs Forest Products Industries Warm Springs, 
Oregon (May 2, 2001)

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of May, 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-12999 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# C_2018152EN.01003301.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — SSP Europe v EUIPO (SECURE DATA SPACE)

(Case T-205/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark SECURE DATA SPACE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 152/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SSP Europe GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: B. Bittner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Tóhatí and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 January 2017 (Case R 2467/2015-5) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign SECURE DATA SPACE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SSP Europe GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SSP Europe GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00416-CR

Robert Othella James Lewis a/k/a 

Robert Lewis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1299359D)

March 12, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. We reverse the trial court’s order 

denying Robert Othella James Lewis’s motion to suppress and the trial court’s 

judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-262-001]

Take notice that on April 30, 2001, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing its responses to the five inquiries made by the Commission in seeking additional information on Columbia's retainage percentages filed on March 1, 2001.

                    Columbia states that the filing is being made in compliance with the Commission letter order issued on March 28, 2001 [1]                                          in the above-referenced proceeding.                

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before May 21, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             94 FERC ¶61,350 (2001).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-12397  Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IB 

Union Calendar No. 46 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2333 

[Report No. 116–70] 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of Department 

of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coordinators, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Mr. BRINDISI (for himself, Mr. BANKS, and Mr. BOST) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

MAY 17, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. MEADOWS, 

Mr. LYNCH, Ms. KENDRA S. HORN of Oklahoma, Mr. STEUBE, Mrs. 

CRAIG, and Ms. PORTER

MAY 17, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2333 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, 

and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans Affairs 

suicide prevention coordinators, and for other purposes. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2333 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for Suicide 

5 Prevention Coordinators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPON7 SIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, AND VACANCY 

8 RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF9 FAIRS SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINA10 TORS. 

11 (a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Comptroller Gen12 eral of the United States shall conduct an assessment of 

13 the responsibilities, workload, training, and vacancy rates 

14 of Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coor15 dinators. Such assessment shall include a determination 

16 of— 

17 (1) the extent to which the use and staffing of 

18 suicide prevention coordinators varies between De19 partment facilities; and 

20 (2) the extent to which the Secretary provides 

21 oversight of suicide prevention coordinators. 

22 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one year 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comp24 troller General shall submit to the Committees on Vet25 erans’ Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 2333 RH

1 a report containing the findings of the assessment re2 quired by subsection (a). 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 46 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2333 

[Report No. 116–70] 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United 

dinators, and for other purposes. ment of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coorsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of DepartStates to conduct an assessment of the responMAY 17, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2019230EN.01001202.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — A-PACK CZ s. r. o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

(Case C-127/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 90 and 273 - Total or partial non-payment, by the debtor, of a sum due to the taxable person in respect of a transaction subject to VAT - Taxable amount - Reduction - Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)

(2019/C 230/14)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: A-PACK CZ s. r. o.

Respondent: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Operative part of the judgment

Article 90 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that a taxable person cannot correct the value added tax (VAT) taxable amount, in the case of total or partial non-payment, by its debtor, of a sum due in respect of a transaction subject to that tax, if the debtor is no longer a taxable person for the purposes of VAT.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of CoroWare, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lloyd T. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CoroWare, Inc. and will be retained by CoroWare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May 21, 2013




/s/ Lloyd T. Spencer

---------------------------

Lloyd T. Spencer

Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )
# C_2017424EN.01005002.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/50

---

Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB

(Case T-686/17)

(2017/C 424/74)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros, SA (Oviedo, Spain) and Medicina Asturiana, SA (Oviedo) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived them of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities they owned; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived them of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities they owned;

| — | Order the Board to pay to the applicants EUR 1 850 000 and the bonds’ unpaid interest accrued up to the date of repayment as compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’); |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Board to pay to the applicants EUR 1 850 000 and the bonds’ unpaid interest accrued up to the date of repayment as compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’);

| — | Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;

| — | Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points. |
| --- | --- |

—

Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.

| — | Order the SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the SRB to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17 Vallina Fonseca v SRB.

Vallina Fonseca

SRB.

---
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of
      Tylerstone Ventures Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
      I, Louise Murphy, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:
      October 2, 2006


LOUISE
      MURPHY


Louise
      Murphy


Chief
      Accounting
      Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director










-1-
Exhibit 32.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Otis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated:   November 10, 2006 | By | /s/   Bill Otis                                
|-------------------------- | -- | -----------------------------------------------
|                           |    | Bill Otis
President and Chief Executive Officer

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc.

(Formerly Nuvilex, Inc.)

Silver Spring, Maryland

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-199440), as amended, of PharmaCyte Biotech Inc., formerly Nuvilex Inc. (the“Company”), of our report dated July 28, 2015 (except for Notes 1A, 2, 3, 7, 9, 13, 14 and 15 as to which the dateis January 19, 2016), relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule as of April 30, 2015 and for the year thenended, which appears in Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our report datedJuly 28, 2015 relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2015,which appears in Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ Farber Hass Hurley LLP

 

 

Chatsworth, California

March 2, 2016
# C_2018190EN.01002601.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2018 — Bernhard Rintisch v EUIPO, Compagnie laitière européenne (PROTICURD)

(Case T-25/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark PROTICURD - Earlier national word marks PROTI and PROTIPLUS - Earlier national figurative mark Proti Power - Relative ground for refusal - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Goods not similar - No likelihood of confusion))

(2018/C 190/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bernhard Rintisch (Bottrop, Germany) (represented by: A. Dreyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Compagnie laitière européenne SA (Condé-sur-Vire, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2016 (Case R 247/2016-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Rintisch and Compagnie laitière européenne.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bernhard Rintisch to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bernhard Rintisch to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Martin Schuermann, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  August 12, 2009  /s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
Principal Executive Officer