alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129642 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129642 

 COA: 260023 
 Wayne CC: 87-002617

DASHEA GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 27, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2009

/s/ SAFI R. BAHCALL, PH.D.Safi R. Bahcall, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)Dated: March 26, 2009

/s/ KEITH S. EHRLICH, C.P.A.Keith S. Ehrlich, C.P.A. Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Design Studios, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Justin
      Craig, President (chief executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
              the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/
                Justin Craig
              Justin
                Craig
              President
                and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 13,
              2008
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quantum Materials Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Squires, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRESStephen SquiresChief Executive OfficerSeptember 28, 2011
```

Exhibit 10.17

   Reply To The Transfer Of The Transfer Of The Stock Rights Of Jiaozuo Yi Wan
          Maple Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.

To Jiaozuo Yi Wan Maple Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.:

Your application for the transfer of the stock rights of Jiaozuo Yi Wan Maple
Leaf High Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. has been examined. The
reply is as follows:

1.   We agree that the former cooperative parties of Yi Wan Maple Leaf High
     Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.: Shun'ao Industry and
     Commerce Company of Shunde City and Yi Wan Group, Inc.can transfer their
     10% and 90% of stock rights respectively to Jiaozuo Linhai Development Co.,
     Ltd.

2.   We agree that the former cooperative parties of Yi Wan Maple Leaf High
     Technology Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. can fix a price for the right
     of land use, the buildings and other attached articles on the land and then
     transfer them to JiaozuoLinhai Development Co., Ltd.

3.   The former approval certificate of the cooperative companies (Certificate
     No. Wai Jing Mao Yu Fu Jiao Zi Zi <1998>0009) is invalid and taken back.

4.   All the registration procedures must be handled within the fixed time
     limit.

5.   The registration and documents for record should be presented to us in
     time.

                               Jiaozuo Foreign Trade Economic Cooperative Bureau
                                                                   Dec. 23, 2002

Key words: Stock Rights, Transfer, Reply

The Administrative Service Center of Jiaozuo Foreign Trade Economic Cooperative
Bureau

                                                         Issued on Dec. 23, 2002
```
# C_2017121EN.01004601.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/46

---

Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)

(Case T-120/17)

(2017/C 121/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Spyridonos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘fluo’ — Application for registration No 14 664 486

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2016 in Case R 863/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in the part that it has rejected the trade mark in question and allow the trade mark to be registered for all the goods of class 9 of the Nice classification applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in the part that it has rejected the trade mark in question and allow the trade mark to be registered for all the goods of class 9 of the Nice classification applied for;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the overall costs of the proceedings of all instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the overall costs of the proceedings of all instances.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#                                                                         Bataan Amphibious Ready Group Returns from Deployment                                                                    

##### by U.S. Fleet Forces Command Public Affairs

01 February 2012

Tags:
**Bataan Amphibious Ready Group**BATARG**USS Bataan (LHD 5)**USS Bataan**USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19)**USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41)**22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit**22nd MEU**Operation Enduring Freedom**Operation Odyssey Dawn**Naval Station Norfolk**NS Norfolk**Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story**JEBLCFS**Little Creek**Fort Story
# C_2018022EN.01005701.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/57

---

Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Eglo Leuchten v EUIPO — Di-Ka (Design for lights)

(Case T-766/17)

(2018/C 022/76)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eglo Leuchten GmbH (Pill, Austria) (represented by: H. Lauf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Di-Ka Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG (Arnsberg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the contested design: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the contested design:

Design at issue: Community design No 2 435 768-0033

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2017 in Case R 738/2016-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) and Article 6(2) of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) and Article 6(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
Order filed November 22, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00559-CV

____________

JRJ PUSOK HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS AND KYLE MADSEN IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF RIGHT OF WAY, Appellees

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1128555

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 30, 2022. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On September 27, 2022, this court ordered the court reporter to file 

the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because 

the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order:
We order Alexandra L. McDaniel, the official court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. No further 

extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and 

appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is 

timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Alexandra L. McDaniel does not 

timely file the record as ordered, we may issue an order directing the trial court to 

conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
Certificate of Formation of EXCO Equipment Leasing, LLC



 EXHIBIT 4.32 

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION 

OF 
 EXCO
EQUIPMENT LEASING, LLC 
 This Certificate of Formation, dated July 29, 2010, has been duly executed and is filed
pursuant to Sections 18-201 and 18-204 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “Act”) to form a limited liability company (the “Company”) under the Act. 

1. Name. The name of the Company is EXCO Equipment Leasing, LLC. 

2. Registered Office; Registered Agent. The address of the registered office required to be maintained by the Company pursuant to
Section 18-104 of the Act is: 
  

					
		  	 Corporate Trust Center
 1209
Orange Street
 Wilmington, Delaware 19801
	  	

 The name and the address of the registered agent of the Company for service of process required
pursuant to Section 18-104 of the Act are: 
  

					
		  	 The Corporation Trust Company

1209 Orange Street
 Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

	  	

 EXECUTED as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ William L. Boeing

		 	William L. Boeing
		 	Authorized Person


  

 Page Solo
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q REPORT OF





KL ENERGY CORPORATION





FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011





The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of KL Energy Corporation (“KL”), that to his knowledge:





1.
This Form 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KL.





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the 10-Q Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to KL and will be retained by KL and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is executed as of May 13, 2011.





/s/  PETER GROSSPeter GrossPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2020036EN.01000702.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo v Banca d’Italia

(Case C-414/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2014/59/EU - Banking Union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Annual contributions - Calculation - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 - Uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Administrative procedure involving national authorities and an EU body - Exclusive decision-making power of the Single Resolution Board - Procedure before the national courts - Failure to bring an action for annulment before the EU Courts in due time - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 - Exclusion of certain liabilities from the calculation of contributions - Interconnectedness of a number of banks)

(2020/C 36/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo

Defendant: Banca d’Italia

Operative part of the judgment

Article 103(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Article 5(1)(a) and (f) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements must be interpreted as meaning that liabilities that arise from transactions between a second-tier bank and the members of a grouping that comprises it and the cooperative banks to which it supplies various services, but where it does not control those banks, and that do not match loans granted on a non-competitive, not for profit basis, in order to promote the public policy objectives of central or regional governments in a Member State, are not excluded from the calculation of the contributions to a national resolution fund that are the subject of Article 103(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 3.9.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, to the best of
my knowledge, hereby certifies that the report of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc., filed on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007: (1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc.

Date:
March 28, 2008



/s/ Eric L. MatisticEric L. Matistic,Chief Financial Officer
Th e HONORABLE D. BROOK BARTLETT, Chief Judge, United State s 1 District Court for the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2616

___________ Robert V. Steinhilber, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, * Western District of Missouri. Attorneys-at-Law; Paul R. * Lamoree, Esq., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 4, 1998 Filed: March 17, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Steinhilber appeals from the district court & s adverse grant of summary 1 judgmentin this diversity action for abuse of process and intentional infliction o f emotional distress. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the grant o f summary judgment involved no error requiring reversal. For the reasons stated by the district court, we also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by-2-

denyi ngSteinhilber & s motion to disqualify the district court judge, and sanctionin g Steinhilber for a frivolous motion. We further conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Steinhilber & s motion to amend his complaint. Accordingly , we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellees & motion to strike Steinhilber & s brief is denied. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2019270EN.01001201.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București — Romania) — Grup Servicii Petroliere SA v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-291/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 148(a) and (c) - Exemptions related to international transport - Supply of offshore jackup drilling rigs - Concept of ‘vessels used for navigation on the high seas’ - Scope)

(2019/C 270/13)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grup Servicii Petroliere SA

Defendants: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the judgment

Article 148(a) and (c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘vessels used for navigation on the high seas’ contained in that provision does not apply to the supply of floating structures, such as the offshore jackup drilling rigs of the type at issue in the main proceedings, which are used predominantly in a stationary position to exploit hydrocarbon deposits at sea.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2078 

To prohibit the sale of food that is, or contains, unsafe poppy seeds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. WOMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale of food that is, or contains, unsafe 

poppy seeds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stephen Hacala Poppy 

5 Seed Safety Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows: 

8 (1) Stephen Hacala was a 25-year-old from 

9 Fayetteville, Arkansas, who was dearly loved by fam10 ily and friends when he died from morphine intoxicaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:27 Apr 16, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2078.IH H2078

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2078 IH

1 tion caused by consumption of contaminated poppy 

2 seeds. 

3 (2) More than a dozen people in the United 

4 States have been confirmed to have died from mor5 phine overdoses from contaminated poppy seeds. 

6 (b) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this Act to pro7 hibit the distribution and sale of contaminated poppy 

8 seeds in order to prevent harm, addiction, and further 

9 deaths from morphine-laced poppy seeds. 

10 SEC. 3. UNSAFE POPPY SEEDS AS ADULTERANTS IN FOOD. 

11 Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

12 Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by adding at the end the 

13 following: 

14 ‘‘(fff) Selling, or offering to sell, directly to con15 sumers a food that is or contains poppy seeds, including 

16 concentrates, metabolites, constituents, or extracts of 

17 poppy seeds, that contain levels of morphine, codeine, or 

18 other alkaloid compounds that may render the food inju19 rious to health.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
142 So. 917

#### R. N. HARRIS et al. v. Gertrude WILLIAMS.

8 Div. 388.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 19, 1932.

O. Kyle, of Decatur, for appellants.

A. J. Harris, of Decatur, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellants.