alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2332 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require the disclosure 

of tax returns of candidates for the office of President or Vice President, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. RASKIN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

the disclosure of tax returns of candidates for the office 

of President or Vice President, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Returns Unveiled 

5 to Secure Transparency Act’’ or the ‘‘TRUST Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2332 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF TAX RETURNS OF CANDIDATES 

2 FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT AND VICE 

3 PRESIDENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102 of the Ethics in Gov5 ernment Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(j)(1) Any report filed pursuant to section 101(c) 

8 by an individual who is a candidate for the office of Presi9 dent or Vice President shall include the individual’s return 

10 of Federal income tax for the previous 10 taxable years. 

11 ‘‘(2) The Director of the Office of Government Ethics 

12 may issue regulations authorizing the redaction of per13 sonal information as the Director deems necessary to pre14 vent identity theft or physical danger from disclosure of 

15 tax returns required under paragraph (1). 

16 ‘‘(3) Not later than 30 days after the date that any 

17 tax returns are submitted by an individual pursuant to 

18 paragraph (1), the Director shall publish such tax returns 

19 on the public Internet website of the Office.’’. 

20 (b) DISCLOSURE PERMITTED.—Section 6103(i) of 

21 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

22 at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(9) DISCLOSURE OF TAX RETURNS UNDER

24 THE ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT ACT OF 1978.—The 

25 Director of the Office of Government Ethics may 

26 publically disclose returns described in section 102(j) 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2332 IH

1 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 

2 App. 102(j)) to the extent such returns are required 

3 to be made available pursuant to such section.’’. 

4 (c) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by— 

5 (1) subsection (a) shall apply to any individual 

6 who becomes a candidate for the office, or assumes 

7 the office, of President or Vice President, after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act; and 

9 (2) subsection (b) shall apply to disclosures 

10 made after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 9, 2008
    /s/ Gail F. GoodmanGail F. GoodmanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: May 9, 2008
    /s/ Steven R. WassermanSteven R. WassermanVice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais—CEMIG (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Djalma Bastos de Morais, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/ Djalma Bastos de Morais |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                            | Djalma Bastos de Morais |
|   |   | Title:                           | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

Date: June 29, 2011

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2019112EN.01000801.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/8

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Atif Mahmood and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality

(Case C-169/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 112/11)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Atif Mahmood, Shabina Atif, Mohammed Ahsan, Mohammed Haroon, Nik Bibi Haroon, Noor Habib and Others

Respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality

Operative part of the order

There is no need to give a ruling on the request for a preliminary ruling made by the Court of Appeal (Ireland) by decision of 23 February 2018 in Case C-169/18.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
# C_2019423EN.01003302.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 – BASF and REACH & colours v ECHA

(Case T-806/17) (1)

(REACH - Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/9 - Requirement for joint submission of data - Joint submission with possibility of a complete opt-out - Administrative practice of ECHA requiring an agreement on the terms for making a joint submission with the lead registrant for a registered substance - Failure to reach an agreement - Dispute resolution mechanism applied by analogy - Decision granting access to a joint submission - Legal basis - Broad discretion of ECHA - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Legal certainty)

(2019/C 423/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: BASF SE (Ludwigshafen-am-Rhein, Germany) and REACH & colours Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (REACH & colours Kft.) (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: R. Cana, D. Abrahams, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, C. Jacquet, and T. Basmatzi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision DSH-30-3-0123-2017 of ECHA of 2 October 2017 granting Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB access to the joint submission lodged by REACH & colours, as lead registrant for the substance hexasodium 2,2'-[vinylenebis[(3-sulphonato-4,1-phenylene)imino[6-(diethylamino)-1, 3, 5-triazine-4,2-diyl]imino]]bis(benzene-1,4-disulphonate), EC No 255-217-5 and CAS No 41098-56-0.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BASF SE, REACH & colours Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (REACH & colours Kft.) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BASF SE, REACH & colours Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (REACH & colours Kft.) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12-1152

___________ Billy Tyler, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Joseph Caniglia, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 2012 Filed: May 8, 2012

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Billy Tyler appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his civil complaint. After careful review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________ 1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of GameStop Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David W. Carlson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David W. CarlsonDavid W. CarlsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerGameStop Corp.April 11, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Milroy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of December, 2008.


/s/ Bruce Milroy
------------------------------
Bruce Milroy
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0095 CITY OF HELENA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. INNA VIKTOROVNA POSTOLNIKOVA,

Defendant and Appellant
.

GRANT Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 2 6, 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 17 2020

04/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0095
# C_2019406EN.01002301.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Jinan Meide Casting v Commission

(Case T-650/17) (1)

(Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 - Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 - Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Normal value - Fair comparison - Non-matching product types - Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Determination of injury)

(2019/C 406/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd (Jinan, China) (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and N. Kuplewatzky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 of 28 June 2017 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd (OJ 2017 L 166, p. 23).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 of 28 June 2017 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 of 28 June 2017 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT01-22-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff and Filing of Non-Conforming Service Agreement

May 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 7, 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing and acceptance a Rate Schedule TF-2 
non-conforming service agreement. Northwest also tendered the following 
tariff sheet as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 
1, to be effective June 7, 2001:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 364

    Northwest states that the service agreement contains a scheduling 
priority provision imposing subordinate primary corridor rights. 
Northwest states that the tariff sheet is submitted to add such 
agreement to the list of non-conforming service agreements contained in 
Northwest's tariff and to update that list to reflect other minor 
changes.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12297 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 17 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 17 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 17 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27920-27921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12573]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[AZ 094-0027b; FRL-6916-3]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona State 
Implementation Plan Revision, Coconino County, Mohave County, and Yuma 
County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Coconino County, 
Mohave County, and Yuma County portions of the Arizona State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern the recision of all 
of the remaining defunct SIP rules from these counties. We are 
approving the recision of local rules that no longer regulate 
permitting procedures and various emission sources under the Clean Air 
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

[[Page 27921]]


DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by June 20, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief 
(AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
    You may inspect copies of the submitted rule and EPA's technical 
support documents (TSDs) at our Region IX office during normal business 
hours. You may also see copies of the submitted rule at the following 
locations:

Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), Ariel Rios 
Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 3033 North Central Avenue, 
Phoenix, AZ 85012.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR-
4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 744-1135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the recisions of 
defunct SIP rules from Coconino County, Mohave County, and Yuma County. 
In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are 
approving the recision of these rules in a direct final action without 
prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is not 
controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish 
a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments 
in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not plan to 
open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should 
do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further 
activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct 
final action.

    Dated: September 13, 2000.
Keith A. Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    [Editorial note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on May 15, 2001.]
[FR Doc. 01-12573 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herbert Aponte, Appellant.

Submitted April 26, 2010;

decided April 29, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6939

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRANKIE EDWARD KIMBERLIN, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-92-178-G, CA-97-725-1) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kimberlin , Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.33
 INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.2001 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTFOR EXECUTIVES




---



##### 



Name of Optionee:Number of Option Shares:Option Exercise Price Per Share:Grant Date:Expiration Date:
  Exercisability Schedule
 Number of
    
    Total Number ofExercisability
    
    Option Shares First
    
    Option SharesDate
    
    Becoming Exercisable
    
    Exercisable(25
    %)
    
    
    (25
    %)(25
    %)
    
    
    (50
    %)(25
    %)
    
    
    (75
    %)(25
    %)
    
    
    (100
    %)
  1




---



##### 



Manner of Exercise
     2




---



##### 



Termination of Employment
 Termination Due to Death
 Termination Due to Disability
 Termination for Cause
 Other Termination provided that
 3




---



##### 



Incorporation of Plan
 Securities Law Compliance
 Transferability
 Status of the Stock Option
 4




---



##### 



Tax Withholding
   5




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
   Code Section 409A
 No Advice Regarding Grant
 Electronic Delivery and Acceptance
 Severability
 Imposition of Other Requirements
 6




---



##### 



Governing Law and Venue
    7




---



##### 



For: INVERNESS MEDICAL
        INNOVATIONS, INC.By:Title:  Treasurer  Optionees SignatureOptionees name and address:
 8