alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2142 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2142

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2019

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and 
 Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized 
         website for compliance guides, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CENTRALIZED WEBSITE FOR COMPLIANCE GUIDES.

    Section 30 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(e) Centralized Website.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
of the enactment of this subsection, the Ombudsman shall maintain a 
publicly available website that includes--
            ``(1) hyperlinks to small entity compliance guides 
        described under section 212(a)(1) of the Small Business 
        Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; and
            ``(2) with respect to each such small entity compliance 
        guide, the contact information for an individual who can offer 
        assistance to small entities with respect to the rules that are 
        the subject of such guide.
    ``(f) Report on Agency Compliance.--The Ombudsman shall include in 
the annual report required under subsection (b)(2)(C) an assessment of 
agency compliance with the requirements of section 212 of the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 for the year 
covered by such annual report.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The Gratitude.1

*District Court, E. D. New York.*

July 13, 1885.

Tug and Tow—Stranding—Negligence in Proceeding in Pog.

A tug was held liable for tbe stranding of a boat in its tow, caused by tbe negligence of tbe master in proceeding in a fog on a course based upon a mere guess of the pilot as to their position, and in not anchoring.

In Admiralty.

*Carpenter &*Mosher, for libelant.

*Jas. K. Hill, Wing d Shoucly,*for claimant.

1

 Reported by it. D. *&*Wyllys Benedict, Bsqs., of tbe New York bar.

Benedict, J.

Under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, the immediate cause of the stranding of the libelant’s boat upon the Negro Head rocks inside of Branford reef, upon Long Island Sound, is the conclusion arrived at by the master, when waked by the pilot, that it was proper to proceed in the fog rather than to anchor. If the master had then anchored, instead of proceeding, no disaster would have followed. The master knew that the pilot had hauled up to^east, and was proceeding upon the idea that he had passed Branford reef. He also knew, or was bound to know, that the pilot had hauled up without knowing the distance run, and had acted upon the belief that he had passed Branford reef, when he had no facts upon which to found such a belief. In hauling up to east the pilot had acted upon a mere guess, as the master knew. Between proceeding in the- fog upon a course based upon a mere guess of the pilot, and anchoring, by which safety would have been made sure, the master chose the former. To make such an election under the circumstances was, in my opinion, negligence, and renders the tug liable for the injuries caused the tow by the stranding that ensued.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12400]



[[Page 27497]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER91-195-046]


Western Systems Power Pool; Notice of Filing

May 11, 2001.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2001, the Western Systems Power Pool 
(WSPP) tendered for filing certain information as required by Ordering 
Paragraph (D) of the Commission's June 27, 1991 Order (55 FERC 61,495) 
and Ordering Paragraph (C) of the Commission's June 1, 1992 on 
Rehearing Denying Request Not To Submit Information, and Granting In 
Part and Denying In Part Privileged Treatment. Pursuant to 18 CFR 
385.211 (1999), WSPP has requested privileged treatment for some of the 
information filed consistent with the June 1, 1992 order.
    Copies of WSPP's informational filing are on file with the 
Commission, and the non-privileged portions are available for public 
inspection.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protests such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 21, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12400 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) by Scanner Technologies Corporation (Registrant), I, Elwin
M. Beaty, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

|                         | By: | /s/   Elwin M. Beaty                                            
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  November 7, 2005 |     | Elwin M. BeatyChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer

---
# C_2017129EN.01003702.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/37

---

Action brought on 10 March 2017 — Cristalfarma v EUIPO — Novartis (ILLUMINA)

(Case T-157/17)

(2017/C 129/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cristalfarma Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ILLUMINA’ — Application for registration No 11 934 239

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2017 in Case R 1187/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party, should it intervene, to pay the costs of proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party, should it intervene, to pay the costs of proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 75, 42(2) and 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 75, 42(2) and 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the three months ended March 31, 2010 The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of March 31, 2010. This Certification is executed as of May 14, 2010. By:/s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Executive Officer and  Principal Financial Officer)    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017112EN.01004302.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/43

---

Action brought on 7 February 2017 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS)

(Case T-89/17)

(2017/C 112/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erwin Müller GmbH (Lingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Grüger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novus Tablet Technology Finland Oy (Turku, Finland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘NOVUS’ — Application for registration No 13 206 611

Trade mark at issue:

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Proceedings before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2016 in Case R 2413/2015-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul in part the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 2 October 2015, Application No B 2 456 336, namely in so far as they relate to goods in Class 9 — ‘bags adapted for laptops; holders adapted for mobile phones; computer peripheral devices’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul in part the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 2 October 2015, Application No B 2 456 336, namely in so far as they relate to goods in Class 9 — ‘bags adapted for laptops; holders adapted for mobile phones; computer peripheral devices’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2005183EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/17 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2005/C 183/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | XT 53/03 | | | |
| Member State | Italy | | | |
| Region | Autonomous Province of Trento | | | |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Funding for company, sectoral and regional training schemes — 2004 | | | |
| Legal basis | Deliberazione della Giunta Provinciale n. 3035 di data 28/10/2003. | | | |
| Annual expenditure planned or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount — year 2004 | | EUR 615 000 (EUR 0,62 million) |
| Loans guaranteed | | |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | | |
| Loans guaranteed | | |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) of the Regulation | | Yes | |
| Date of implementation | 28.11.2003 | | | |
| Duration of the scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.12.2006 | | | |
| Objective of aid | General training | | Yes | |
| Specific training | | Yes | |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for training aid | | Yes | |
| Limited to specific sectors | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agriculture | | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Fisheries and aquaculture | | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Coalmining | | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | All manufacturing | | | | |
| or | | | |
| Steel | | | |
| Shipbuilding | | | |
| Synthetic fibres | | | |
| Motor vehicles | | | |
| Other manufacturing | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | All services | | | | |
| or | | | |
| Maritime transport services | | | |
| Other transport services | | | |
| Financial services | | | |
| Other services | | | |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Name: Provincia Autonoma di Trento — Servizio Addestramento e Formazione professionale | | | |
| Address: via Gilli, 3 — I-38100 Trento | | | |
| Large individual aid grants | In conformity with Article 5 of the Regulation The measure excludes awards of aid or requires prior notification to the Commission of awards of aid, if the amount of aid granted to one enterprise for a single training project exceeds EUR 1 million. | | Yes | |

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2224

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Labor 
   to prioritize the provision of services to homeless veterans with 
  dependent children in carrying out homeless veterans reintegration 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Labor 
   to prioritize the provision of services to homeless veterans with 
  dependent children in carrying out homeless veterans reintegration 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veterans with Children 
Reintegration Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY UNDER HOMELESS VETERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS FOR 
              HOMELESS VETERANS WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN.

    (a) Priority for Homeless Veterans With Dependent Children.--
Subsection (a) of section 2021 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Subject to'' and inserting ``(1) Subject 
        to''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) In conducting programs under this section, the Secretary 
shall prioritize the provision of services to homeless veterans with 
dependent children.''.
    (b) Additional Reporting Requirements.--Subsection (d) of such 
section is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the report an evaluation of services'' 
        and all that follows and inserting ``each such report--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(1) an evaluation of services furnished to veterans under 
        this section and an analysis of the information collected under 
        subsection (b);
            ``(2) an analysis of any gaps in access to shelter, safety, 
        and services for homeless veterans with dependent children; and
            ``(3) recommendations for improving any gaps identified 
        under paragraph (2).''.
                                 <all>
```
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



_____________________________





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 19, 2004







ORPHAN MEDICAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





|Delaware                                       | 0-24760                  | 41-1784594                             
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission file number) | (I.R.S. employer identification number)





|Suite 250,
13911 Ridgedale Drive,
Minnetonka, MN | 55305      | (952) 513-6900                                      
|------------------------------------------------ | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|(Address of principal executive offices)         | (zip code) | (Registrant's telephone number,
including area code)





|Not Applicable                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)









---

Item 5.          Other Events.

On May 19, 2004, the Company
announced the initial results of a Phase III(b) clinical trial regarding its Xyrem® (sodium
oxybate) oral solution product.



---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.

|Date: May 19, 2004. | ORPHAN MEDICAL, INC.                                                                                                                                                             
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   
|                   
|                    | /s/ Timothy G. McGrath                                                                                                                                                           
|                    | Timothy G. McGrath
                                                                               Chief Financial Officer(duly authorized officer andprincipal financial officer)



---

EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit
Number | Description
|-------------- | -----------
|              
|99.1           |            

---
**Exhibit 4.34**

 

 

**Auditors' Letter Regarding Change in Auditor**

 

 

April 29, 2013

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We were previously principal auditors for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG and, under the date of April 29, 2013, we re-issued our report on the consolidated financial statements of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. We had originally issued our report under the date of April 26, 2012 reporting on these consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. On July 10, 2012, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG formally notified the regulator / market that under CVM  Instruction 308/99 the principal auditors would be changed as from the second quarter of 2012.

 

We have read Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG statement included under item 16F of its Form 20F dated April 29, 2013, and we agree with such statement.

 

 

 

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes

 

KPMG Auditores Independentes

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, to the best of my
knowledge, hereby certifies that the report of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc., filed on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006: (1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc.

Date:
March 21, 2007



/s/ James B. KimseyJames B. Kimsey, President andChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reliabrand, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

CFO

Dated: May 22, 2015





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.