alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-415-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 16, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 11, 2001, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 1, 2001:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 117
Third Revised Sheet No. 314

    El Paso states that the tariff sheets are being filed to revise the 
Billing Determinant for El Paso Electric Company to 37,318 dth per day 
and to revise the related revenue crediting threshold.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be field in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12781 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financialand Operating Officer and principal financial officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”), certifythat (i) the Annual Report of the Trust on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date:March 30, 2007
|        |   |   | /s/ Gregg Buckbinder                                                 |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |      Gregg Buckbinder                       |   |
|   |   |   |      Chief Financial and  Operating Officer |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide authority to add 

additional vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

authority to add additional vaccines to the list of taxable 

vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vaccine Access Im5 provement Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1973 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NEW VACCINES TO LIST OF TAXABLE 

2 VACCINES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(Q) Any vaccine which is not described in 

7 any other subparagraph of this paragraph and 

8 which is included on the Vaccine Injury Table 

9 under section 2114 of the Public Health Service 

10 Act.’’. 

11 (b) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days after the 

12 Secretary of Health and Human Services adds a vaccine 

13 to the Vaccine Injury Table pursuant of section 2114 of 

14 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–14), the 

15 Secretary shall notify the Secretary of the Treasury, the 

16 Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of 

17 the Senate, the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the 

18 Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 

19 Representatives, and the Committee on Ways and Means 

20 of the House of Representatives of such designation. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

22 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply to sales and uses on or 

24 after the date on which the Secretary of Health and 

25 Human Services lists any new vaccine pursuant to 

26 section 2114 of the Public Health Service Act (42 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1973 IH

1 U.S.C. 300aa–14) for purposes of compensation for 

2 any vaccine-related injury or death through the Vac3 cine Injury Compensation Trust Fund. 

4 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

5 (1) and section 4131 of the Internal Revenue Code 

6 of 1986, in the case of sales on or before the effec7 tive date described in such paragraph for which de8 livery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 

9 be considered the sale date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge the
Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/  WILLIAM ATKINS    
|                      |  |  |  | William Atkins         
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 2.1.2
               ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT DATED MARCH 20, 2003

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                   TO THE
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                               CALBATECH, INC.

PURSUANT to the provisions of the Nevada Revised Statues, the
corporation has adopted an amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation, and, therefore, causes these Articles of Amendment and
a copy thereof to be executed by its duly authorized officers, as
follows:

The name of the corporation is CalbaTech, Inc.

The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted
by the shareholders of the corporation as of March 20, 2003, in the
manner described by the Nevada Revised Statues:

ARTICLE IV IS REPLACED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE FOLLOWING:

4. AUTHORIZED CAPITAL. The authorized capital stock of the
corporation is 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001.
and 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $.001.

     Common Stock.  Reverse-Split.  For each and every Fourteen (14)
shares of common stock currently held by each shareholder, each and
every shareholder will receive One (1) share, with the next higher
number of shares being issued in lieu of fractional shares.  The
total number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue
was set within the Articles of Incorporation and is Two Hundred
Million (200,000,000) shares, all of which have a par value of $.001
per share. Each issued and outstanding share of common stock will
entitle the holder thereof to one (1) vote on any matter submitted to
a vote of or for contest of shareholders.

     Preferred Stock. Issued and outstanding shares of Preferred
Stock, Series A, will entitle the holders thereof only to those votes
and other rights and preferences, if any, which may expressly be
fixed as hereinafter provided for the respective series thereof.  The
Board of Directors are authorized to provide, from time to time, for
the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock, Series A and to fix from
time to time before issuance, the designation, preferences,
privileges and voting powers of the shares of Series A of Preferred
Stock and the restrictions or qualifications thereof, and do so
without requiring shareholder approval thereof.

There were 97,527,750 shares of the corporation issued and
outstanding and entitled to be cast in connection with the proposed
Amendment, of which 86,932,630 votes were cast and 86,932,630 were
cast in favor of the Amendment, thereby representing 100% of the
votes cast.

DATED: March 20, 2003


______________________                          ________________________
By: Edward H. Deese, President                  By: James DeOlden, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 91-137, RM-7494, FCC 00-409]


FM Broadcasting Services; Saltville, VA and Jefferson, NC.

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In MM Docket No. 91-137, the Commission denied an application 
for review filed by Smith Communications, licensee of Station WZJS(FM), 
Channel 264A, Banner Elk, North Carolina, of the Memorandum Opinion and 
Order, 61 FR 20,490, published May 7, 1996. The Commission denied 
review because it found no reason to depart from staff's reasoning set 
forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. It found that the staff had 
fully considered and rejected each of Smith's contentions that 
irregular terrain would prevent full signal coverage by the proposed 
upgraded Jefferson, North Carolina station. Additionally, since the 
release of the Memorandum Opinion and Order, a construction permit had 
been granted for an actual transmitter site at a location different 
from the theoretical one used previously. The Commission reexamined the 
expanded coverage area from that site and found the coverage to be 
adequate and of similar size to that predicted using the theoretical 
site. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Bertron Withers, Jr., Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Memorandum Opinion 
and Order, MM Docket 91-137, adopted November 17, 2000, and released 
November 28, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Information Center (room CY-A257), 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision 
may be also purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.

Federal Communications Commission.
 William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-127 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-U
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed registration statement (No. 333-110633) on Form S-8 of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.(the Company) of our report dated December 17, 2003, with respect to the balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years inthe two-year period ended September 30, 2003, which report appears in the September 30, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

December 19, 2003
#### Jones v. Edwards.

1. Verdict : It is not usual for courts to disturb the verdict of a jury, because it is against the weight of evidence, when there is any evidence to support it.

2. Fraud in sale : It is fraud in a vendor of a horse not to acquaint a vendee, when negotiating for the purchase, of facts affecting the value of the animal, which, if known to him, would prevent the vendee from buying.

This was a petition in error to review a judgment rendered, upon a verdict, by the District Court for Otoe county. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

*J. JV. 8'hambaugh,*for plaintiff in error.

*Calhoun*and *Oroxton,*for defendant in error.

Crounse, J.

It is not usual for courts to disturb the verdict of a jury because it is against the weight of evidence, where there is any evidence to support it. We see no occasion to do so in this case.

The action was brought in the District Court by J ones against Edwards, to recover damages, because of fraud practiced in the sale of a horse. The defendant, with the cunning not unfrequently intro dued into this class of transactions, seems to have provided against much evidence being brought against him. Still, enough appears to warrant the verdict.

In the November previous to the sale, Edwards traded for the horse. He was then afflicted with sweany, stiffness of the neck, and other ailments. Edwards cut some cords about the nose and neck, and turned the horse out in the yard, relieved from work. In March, Jones came along *171wishing to purchase a team suitable for farm purposes. His business being known to Edwards, the latter represented that he had just the team. He hitched up the pair, the doctored horse being one, and in driving Jones about was careful not to trot them. He assured Jones that they were “sound as far as he knew“he would not warrant them sound — he never warranted the soundness of a horse, because he could not always know whether a horse was sound or not.” Not a word appears to have been said, to acquaint Jones of the former ailment and treatment of the horse. Relying on Edwards’ representations, Jones took the team. Upon trotting and working him, this horse disclosed a difficulty in breathing, and after working some three weeks to plough ten acres, he ceased breathing entirely. The jury on the trial below said there was fraud, and I think they were quite right. Fair dealing would have called upon Edwards to acquaint Jones of those facts which were calculated to affect the value of the horse, a knowledge of which would very likely have determined him not to purchase.

The judgment, although somewhat informal, is good, and must stand.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.




Dated: July 20, 2011
/s/ Harvey JudkowitzHarvey Judkowitz, Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification of Tim T. Hart**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned, Tim T. Hart, Chief Financial Officer of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, herebycertifies that: 

 

(i) the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 of the Company (the “Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: December 14, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2012 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2012

  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that Federal law 
                      shall not preempt State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2019

 Ms. DeGette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that Federal law 
                      shall not preempt State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect States' and Citizens' Rights 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    Section 708 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 903) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``No provision'' and inserting ``(a) In 
        General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no provision''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Special Rule Regarding State Marihuana Laws.--In the case of 
any State law that pertains to marihuana, no provision of this title 
shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress 
to occupy the field in which that provision operates, including 
criminal penalties, to the exclusion of State law on the same subject 
matter, nor shall any provision of this title be construed as 
preempting any such State law.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-05562-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05562-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2142 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2142

   To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and 
 Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized 
         website for compliance guides, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

Mr. Delgado (for himself and Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and 
 Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to create a centralized 
         website for compliance guides, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CENTRALIZED WEBSITE FOR COMPLIANCE GUIDES.

    Section 30 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(e) Centralized Website.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
of the enactment of this subsection, the Ombudsman shall maintain a 
publicly available website that includes--
            ``(1) hyperlinks to small entity compliance guides 
        described under section 212(a)(1) of the Small Business 
        Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; and
            ``(2) with respect to each such small entity compliance 
        guide, the contact information for an individual who can offer 
        assistance to small entities with respect to the rules that are 
        the subject of such guide.
    ``(f) Report on Agency Compliance.--The Ombudsman shall include in 
the annual report required under subsection (b)(2)(C) an assessment of 
agency compliance with the requirements of section 212 of the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 for the year 
covered by such annual report.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, John Terwilliger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Houston American Energy Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Houston American Energy Corp.


                                           By:  /s/ John F. Terwilliger
                                           Name: John F. Terwilliger
                                           Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                           Dated: March 27, 2008
# C_2005168EN.01002401.xml

| 8.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/24

---

Commission Communication concerning the Financial Report (activity report and financial statements) of the ECSC in liquidation, at 31 December 2004

(2005/C 168/04)

On 6 July 2005 the Commission approved the Financial report for 2004 (document C(2005)2033), comprising the report on the activities of the ECSC in liquidation and its financial statements as at 31 December 2004, drawn up in accordance with Article 3 of Council Decision No 2003/76/EC of 1 February 2003 and Article 6 of the annex to Council Decision No 2003/77/EC of 1 February 2003.

This document can be consulted at:

| | http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex (reference C(2005)2033) |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex (reference C(2005)2033)

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/ecsc_en.htm |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/ecsc_en.htm

---