alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12921]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Disease Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 12, 2001.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6700 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Nasrin Nabavi, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2156, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301 496-2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#137d7d202367537d7a7b3d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07696934377347696e6f29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 15, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12921 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2022284EN.01002101.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v SRB

(Case T-481/17) (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Adoption of a resolution scheme by the SRB in respect of Banco Popular Español - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Admissibility - Right to be heard - Right to property - Obligation to state reasons - Articles 18, 20 and 24 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014)

(2022/C 284/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno (Madrid, Spain), Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL) (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Pelayo Jiménez, A. Muñoz Aranguren and R. Pelayo Torrent, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. King and M. Fernández Rupérez, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, L. Aguilera Ruiz, S. Jiménez García and J. Rodríguez de la Rúa Puig, acting as Agents), European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller, M. Martínez Iglesias, L. Visaggio, J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and M. Sammut, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, J. Bauerschmidt, A. Westerhof Löfflerová and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents), Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) (represented by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, A. Rodríguez Conde, D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero and J. Remón Peñalver, laywers)

Re:

Application under Article 263TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the SRB of 7 June 2017, concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL) to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and Banco Santander, SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL) to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and Banco Santander, SA;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall J. BEMIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-35199.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 5, 2006.*

Filed June 9, 2006.

Stephen Gunnels, AUSA, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Randall J. Bemis, Sheridan, OR, pro se.

Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*628MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed the opening brief. This appeal is appropriate for summary disposition under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6 because appellant challenges his sentence based on *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), but *Booker*does not apply to cases on collateral review. *United States v. Cruz,*423 F.3d 1119, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:  November 16,
      2009
            By:
            /s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
              Title:
            Nicholas
      D. Gerber
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
# C_2017195EN.01004502.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/45

---

Action brought on 28 April 2017 — Der Grüne Punkt v EUIPO — Halston Properties (Representation of a circle with two arrows)

(Case T-253/17)

(2017/C 195/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Der Grüne Punkt — Duales System Deutschland GmbH (Cologne, Gemany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and N. Ebbecke, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Halston Properties, s. r. o. GmbH (Bratislava, Slovakia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a circle with two arrows) — EU trade mark No 298 273

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2017 in Case R 1357/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

| — | in the event that the other party decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the event that the other party decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to bear its own costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United
Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Kevin P. Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                              |     |                                                                                                                         
|----------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                              | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;     
|and                          
|                              |     |                                                                                                                         
|                              | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
|of operations of the Company.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Kevin P. Clark      | 
|                        | 
|Kevin P. Clark          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|March 29, 2006          | 

---
---

EXHIBIT 10.9





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) entered into as of the 26th day of December, 2008, by and between International Aerospace Enterprises, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and John Peck, an individual residing at 2050 Russett Way, Carson City, Nevada 89703 (“Peck”).




WHEREAS, the Company and Peck entered into the Agreement which provided for the terms of Peck’s employment by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer;




WHEREAS, the Company and Peck wish to amend the annual stock compensation section of said Agreement;




WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to employ Peck and Peck desires to continue to be employed by the Company and Pelleg upon revised compensation terms; and




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Company and Peck hereby agree as follows:




1.  Section 6(B) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“(B) The Employee will receive 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock that votes on a converted basis with the common stock on a  100:1 basis, which shares shall be redeemable by the Company upon his termination of employment.”





2.  All other terms of the Agreement shall remain the same.





3.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Nevada, excluding its conflicts of laws provisions.  Any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be decided by binding arbitration by the American Arbitration Association and shall be held in Carson City, Nevada.  The ruling of the arbitrator shall be final and may be enforced by any party to such arbitration in any court of competent jurisdiction located in Carson City, Nevada.





4.  This Amendment is executed in original or faxed counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment was executed on April 15, 2010





International Aerospace Enterprises, Inc.a Nevada corporationBy:
/s/ Saffet UsluSaffet UsluPresident/s/ John M. PeckJohn M. Peck
Eurex Clearing AG

ECAG Rule Certification 096-23

January 12, 2024

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Price List (“Price List”) of Eurex Clearing is appended as 

Attachment A. Any additions are underlined and any deletions are struck through.

2. The date of intended implementation is February 5, 2024.

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange 

Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this 

submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ecen/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

4. A concise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears 

below.

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

6. Confidential treatment is not requested.

___________________________________________________________________________________

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF 

THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, 

INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

Eurex Clearing is proposing to amend the Price List to reflect the launch of Bloomberg Emerging Market 

USD Sovereign and Sovereign Owned Index Futures and Sterling Liquid Corporate Bond Index Futures on 

Eurex Deutschland, as outlined in Eurex Clearing Circular 096/23, which is appended as Attachment 

A. Eurex Clearing will provide clearing services for these contracts. For avoidance of doubt, Eurex 

Clearing will clear these contracts outside the scope of its DCO license, which applies only to swaps.

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed 

in Attachment A.

Eurex Clearing has identified the following derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) Core Principles as 

potentially being relevant to the above amendments:

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will 

comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendments list new contracts, which Eurex 

Clearing clears outside the scope of its DCO license, and all products cleared by Eurex Clearing 

under its DCO license will continue to be subject to appropriate standards in compliance with this 

Core Principle.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7 

U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that:

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder; and

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing 

to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: January 12, 2024
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2364 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require issuers to disclose 

in an annual report any substantial financial relationship with any manufacturer or dealer of firearms or ammunition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2019 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

issuers to disclose in an annual report any substantial 

financial relationship with any manufacturer or dealer 

of firearms or ammunition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investor Choice 

5 Against Gun Proliferation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2364 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL RELA2 TIONSHIP WITH ANY MANUFACTURER OR 

3 DEALER OF FIREARMS OR AMMUNITION. 

4 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

5 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(s) DISCLOSURE OF SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL RE8 LATIONSHIP WITH MANUFACTURER OR DEALER OF FIRE9 ARMS OR AMMUNITION.—Each issuer required to file an 

10 annual report under subsection (a) shall disclose in such 

11 report any substantial financial relationship such issuer 

12 has with any manufacturer or dealer of firearms or ammu13 nition.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2333 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2333

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
  assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of 
Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coordinators, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support for Suicide Prevention 
Coordinators Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, 
              AND VACANCY RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATORS.

    (a) Assessment Required.--The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, 
training, and vacancy rates of Department of Veterans Affairs suicide 
prevention coordinators. Such assessment shall include a determination 
of--
            (1) the extent to which the use and staffing of suicide 
        prevention coordinators varies between Department facilities; 
        and
            (2) the extent to which the Secretary provides oversight of 
        suicide prevention coordinators.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of 
Representatives a report containing the findings of the assessment 
required by subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2333

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
  assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of 
Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention coordinators, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
**Exhibit 8.1****Subsidiaries of Quebecor Media Inc.**       **Jurisdiction of Incorporation or** **Equity Interest/Voting Interest****Name of Subsidiary** **Organization** ** **Videotron Ltd / Vidéotron ltée Québec 100% / 100%     CF Câble TV inc. / CF Cable TVInc. Canada 100% / 100%     Le SuperClub Vidéotron ltée Québec 100% / 100%     3535991 Canada Inc. Canada 100% / 100%     Sun Media Corporation /Corporation Sun Media British Columbia 100% / 100%     Bowes Publishers Limited British Columbia 100% / 100%     Sun Media (Toronto) Corporation British Columbia 100% / 100%     Groupe TVA Inc. / TVA Group Inc. Québec 45.2% / 99.9%     TVAPublishing Inc. Canada 100% / 100%     Groupe Archambault inc. /ArchambaultGroup Inc. Canada 100% / 100%     GroupeLivre Quebecor Média Inc. Canada 100% / 100%     CEC Publishing Inc./ Les ÉditionsCEC inc. Québec 100% / 100%     Groupe Sogides Inc. Canada 100% / 100%     Canoë inc. / Canoe Inc. Québec 92.4% / 100%     Nurun Inc. Canada 57.9% / 57.9%
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 30, 2011

d0323 

# Order

March 30, 2011

140569

LABARON ELLIS and THOMAS J. EDMUNDS, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of SAUNDRA L. EDMUNDS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v SC: 140569 COA: 284319 Wayne CC: 04-426500-NH HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, SACHIN GOEL, M.D., JOSEPH LEBEL, D.O., and JOHN FERRARA, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH



### , M ARILYN 

### K ELLY 

### , and H ATHAWAY 

### , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
#### In the Matter of M.G.M. Insulation, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Colleen C. Gardner, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted December 5, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 812.

Motion by the Firemen’s Association of the State of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed, and for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted, three copies of the brief to be served and an original and 19 copies filed within 30 days.