alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal July 22, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending July 22, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for a North American risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-50922

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

MIGUEL FERNANDO MONARREZ-LOZANO

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

3:01-CR-1900-ALL-DB

---------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand for resentencing in light of Supreme Court’s opinion in

Booker and this Court’s opinion in Mares is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unoppose d motion to

extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days from the

Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is MOOT. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D April 15, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 213 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of Cuba coming to 

the United States to play organized professional baseball. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of 

Cuba coming to the United States to play organized 

professional baseball. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Diplomacy 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS. 

7 (a) RESTRICTION ON EMBARGO AUTHORITY.—The 

8 authorities of section 620(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 213 IH

1 of 1961, those authorities under section 5(b) of the Trad2 ing with the Enemy Act that were being exercised with 

3 respect to Cuba on July 1, 1977, as a result of a national 

4 emergency declared before that date, and are being exer5 cised on the date of the enactment of this Act, and section 

6 203 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 

7 may not be exercised to regulate or prohibit— 

8 (1) those transactions permitted under section 

9 515.571 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, by 

10 or on behalf of a Cuban national who enters the 

11 United States from Cuba on a visa issued under sec12 tion 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and 

13 Nationality Act for the purpose of playing organized 

14 professional baseball; and 

15 (2) a Cuban national described in paragraph 

16 (1) from returning to Cuba with the earnings made 

17 in playing organized professional baseball. 

18 (b) RESTRICTION ON IMMIGRATION AUTHORITY.— 

19 The authority contained in section 212(f) of the Immigra20 tion and Nationality Act may not be used to deny a visa 

21 described in subsection (a)(1) to a Cuban national for the 

22 purpose of playing organized professional baseball. 

23 (c) INAPPLICABILITY OF OTHER RESTRICTIONS.— 

24 This section applies notwithstanding section 102(h) of the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 213 IH

1 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) 

2 Act of 1996. 

3 SEC. 3. DURATION OF VISA. 

4 A visa described in section 2(a)(1)— 

5 (1) shall permit the alien to whom the visa is 

6 issued to remain in the United States only for the 

7 duration of the baseball season; and 

8 (2) need not be renewed for subsequent entries 

9 into the United States for the duration of a valid 

10 contract entered into between the alien and the pro11 fessional baseball team with which the alien played 

12 in the preceding baseball season. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 46-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 46-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017374EN.01004202.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/42

---

Action brought on 2 August 2017 — Serra Noguera and Others v SRB

(Case T-592/17)

(2017/C 374/64)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Juan Carlos Serra Noguera (Sant Jordi de ses Salines, Spain) and 56 other applicants (represented by: R. García-Bragado Acín, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | acknowledge the filing of this action and take note of this APPLICATION FOR ANNULMENT of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of 7 June 2017 concerning the resolution of Banco Popular, as well as the valuation on which it is based; |
| --- | --- |

—

acknowledge the filing of this action and take note of this APPLICATION FOR ANNULMENT of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of 7 June 2017 concerning the resolution of Banco Popular, as well as the valuation on which it is based;

| — | Given that it is practically impossible to reverse the implementation of that decision, declare that SRB is under an obligation to make good the damage caused to the applicants, which corresponds to the amount of their investment or the amount determined at the time of enforcement of the judgment. |
| --- | --- |

—

Given that it is practically impossible to reverse the implementation of that decision, declare that SRB is under an obligation to make good the damage caused to the applicants, which corresponds to the amount of their investment or the amount determined at the time of enforcement of the judgment.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
**Exhibit 3.21**

 

**AGREEMENT**

 

This Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of January 28, 2005, by and between Zeus Holdings Limited, a Bermuda company(“Parent”), and Intelsat, Ltd., a Bermuda company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Intelsat”); 

 

**WHEREAS**, Parent and Intelsat wish to implement the letter and intent of Bye-law 83A of Parent and Bye-laws 14, 17 and 19 of Intelsat (collectively,the “Bye-laws”) by a contractual agreement between them; and 

 

**WHEREAS**, Parent and Intelsat have determined for good and valuable consideration received to enter into this Agreement for their benefit and the benefit of the shareholders of Parent. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,agree as follows: 

 

1. Parent and Intelsatagree that, in accordance with the Bye-laws, and for so long as Parent owns a majority of the outstanding voting stock of Intelsat, the Board of Directors of Intelsat shall consist exclusively of Designated Company Directors. A “DesignatedCompany Director” is a person who has been selected by the shareholders of Parent as a Designated Company Director in accordance with the Bye-Laws of Parent. 

 

2. The parties hereto shall take all steps as they may reasonably request to implement this Agreement fromtime to time. 

 

3. This Agreement shall begoverned by and construed in accordance with the laws of Bermuda. 

 

[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorizedofficers of the parties hereto as of the date first written above. 

 
ZEUS HOLDINGS LIMITEDBy: 
/s/
  
Name: Andrew D. Africk
  
Title: Vice President

 
INTELSAT, LTD.By: 
/s/
  
Name:
  
Title:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,932]

      ( print page 28555)    
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on March 26, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc., El Paso, Texas.

The petitioning workers work at a production facility outside of the United States and consequently have no standing to file a petition. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

A petition for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance has been filed on behalf of workers at the subject firm (NAFTA 4668). A determination on that petition will be made concurrently with this determination.

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of May, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-12996  Filed 5-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# C_2017256EN.01004002.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/40

---

Action brought on 20 June 2017 — Triggerball v EUIPO (Shape of a ball-like object with edges)

(Case T-387/17)

(2017/C 256/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Triggerball GmbH (Baiern-Piusheim, Germany) (represented by: H. Emrich, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: Three-dimensional EU mark (Shape of a ball-like object with edges) — Application No 15 528 615

Mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 in Case R 376/2017-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2017063EN.01004302.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/43

---

Action brought on 13 January 2017 — APF v Parliament

(Case T-16/17)

(2017/C 063/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alliance for Peace and Freedom (APF) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Number: FINS 2017 15) relating to the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the agreed maximum amount and the order that security be provided; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Number: FINS 2017 15) relating to the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the agreed maximum amount and the order that security be provided;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are essentially identical with or similar to the pleas in law set out in Case T-13/17, Europa Terra Nostra v Parliament.

Europa Terra Nostra

Parliament

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2267 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant formula 

as adulterated if its use by date has passed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself and Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

treat infant formula as adulterated if its use by date 

has passed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Infant Formula Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPIRED INFANT FORMULA. 

7 (a) ADULTERATION.—Section 412(a) of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)) is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2267 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘, or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) the use by date of such infant formula, as 

7 specified in the labeling of such formula in accord8 ance with section 107.20 of title 21, Code of Federal 

9 Regulations (or any successor regulations), has 

10 passed.’’. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) applies beginning on the date that is 6 months 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### FRANK LEROY ROBINSON, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Appellee.

No. DA 09-0166.

Submitted on Briefs January 13, 2010.

Decided March 16, 2010.

Withdrawn April 27, 2010.

2010 MT 51.

355 Mont. 326.

The Supreme Court issued an order dated April 27, 2010 withdrawing this opinion. A revised opinion was issued on May 11, 2010 and is cited at 356 Mont. 282.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 12, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6700 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nasrin Nabavi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2156, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301 496-2550, nn30t@nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 15, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-12921  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://ledgerx.com

October 3, 2022

VIA COMMISSION PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Commission Regulation 40.6(a) – Rule Certification

LedgerX LLC Submission No. 22-13

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC, d/b/a FTX US Derivatives, (“FUSD”) hereby notifies the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), that it is certifying the attached 

amendments to the FUSD Compliance Manual. The attached amendments will become effective 

on October 18, 2022. 

The following is a concise explanation and analysis of the changes and amendments, and 

their compliance with applicable provisions of the CEA, including the Core Principles and the 

Commission’s Regulations. FUSD has revised its compliance manual to minimize potential 

conflicts of interest with affiliated or related market participants. While this policy previously was 

scoped to one entity that was part of the FUSD corporate family, it has been expanded to include 

affiliated or related market participants owned by a controlling shareholder of FUSD, regardless 

of whether the entity is part of the FUSD corporate family. Additionally, provisions no longer 

applicable to a previously owned affiliate have been removed.

The above changes are consistent with core principals as follows. They are consistent with 

DCM Core Principle 16 in that they minimize potential conflicts of interest between the selfregulatory responsibilities and the commercial interests of the contract market. They are also 

consistent with SEF Core Principle 12, in that they establish rules to minimize conflicts of interest 

in its decision-making process. They are also consistent with DCO Core Principle P, in that it 

establishes rules to minimize conflicts of interest in the decision making process of the derivatives 

clearing organization.

Redlines reflecting these changes and amendments to the Compliance Manual are attached 

hereto as Appendix A. The final version of the revised Compliance Manual is attached at 

Appendix B.

FUSD certifies that the changes and amendments comply with the CEA and Commission 

Regulations thereunder. FUSD additionally certifies that it has concurrently posted a copy of this 
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://ledgerx.com

2

submission letter and the attachments hereto on FUSD’s website at https://derivs.ftx.us/. FUSD is 

not aware of any or substantive opposing views to the changes and amendments.

Please contact the undersigned at brian@ftx.us if you have any questions or you would 

otherwise like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Brian G. Mulherin

General Counsel, FTX US Derivatives