alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 19, 2018 

Via the CFTC Web Submission Portal 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request: Petition Pursuant to Regulation 145.9(d) 

To Whom It May Concern: 

On this date, trueEX LLC (“trueEX”) submitted a notice, 2018-04S, to the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (the "Commission") via the Commission Portal to notify it of 

the fees trueEX intends to charge for activity on its swap execution facility effective May 

3, 2018. Exhibits A and B to 2018-04S details the fee schedule and is the Confidential 

Material for which trueEX is requesting confidential treatment. 

By this petition, trueEX requests confidential treatment pursuant to Section 145.9(d) of 

the Commission’s regulations of the Confidential Material. A copy of this Confidential 

Material is attached. 

Pursuant to Sections 8(a) of the Act, and Commission Regulation § 145.9(d), trueEX 

requests confidential treatment of the Confidential Material on the grounds that disclosure 

of such material would reveal trade secrets of trueEX and/or reveal confidential 

commercial information of trueEX. The Confidential Material is proprietary to trueEX and 

contain highly sensitive and confidential business and technology information; in addition 

to violating trueEX’s proprietary rights, the disclosure of the Confidential Materials would 

grant competitors an unfair competitive advantage and/or compromise the competitive 

advantages possessed by trueEX. Accordingly, trueEX is requesting the Commission to 

take appropriate steps to keep Confidential Material submitted to them confidential and 

to restrict the re-distribution of the Confidential Material. 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation § 145.9(d)(5), trueEX hereby requests that the 

Confidential Material be afforded confidential treatment in perpetuity. 

trueEX requests that the Commission notify the undersigned immediately after receiving 

any FOIA request, any court order, subpoena, or summons seeking to access the 

Confidential Material in whole or in part. trueEX further requests notification (through the 

undersigned) in the event that the Commission intends to disclose the Confidential 

Material in whole or in part to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. trueEX does not waive its notification rights under 
Section 8(f) of the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons with respect to the 

Confidential Material in whole or in part. 

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact 

me by telephone at (312) 320-8934 or by email at fran@trueex.com. 

Sincerely, 

Fran Kenck 

Chief Compliance Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2963

_____________________________

SHERMAN TAYLOR MORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

July 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee; Sherman Taylor Morris, pro se, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ex10_20.htm


 Exhibit 10.20 







 Equity Transfer Agreement 


 (English Translation) 







 Parties: 



 



	 Transferor:      	 Sun Peng (Personal Identification #220702760208141) 
	 Transferee:   	 Song Yuan North East Petroleum Technical Services Co., Ltd. 












 As a result of mutual consultation, Sun Peng agrees to transfer registered capital in the amount of RMB 100,000 representing 10% of the total registered capital of Chang Ling Long De Oil & Gas Development Co., Ltd. to Song Yuan North East Petroleum Technical Services Co., Ltd. Following the transfer, Transferee shall enjoy the rights and obligations in proportion to the equity interest received by the Transferee. 

















 Transferor:      /s/ Sun Peng 







 Transferee:      /s/ Wang Hong Jun 







 Chang Ling Long De Oil & Gas Development Co., Ltd. 







 March 17, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned manager of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) hereby certifies to his
knowledge that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Roger A. May                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Roger A. May Manager (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28568-28569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on June 6, 2001, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

[[Page 28569]]

    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, June 6, 2001--12:15 p.m. Until 1:00 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 15, 2001.
James E. Lyons,
Associate Director for Technical Support ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 01-13017 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Don ERWIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-4798.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 19, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Jason P. Peavy, Law Office of Jason P. Peavy, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, T. DeWayne Pearson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

After a jury trial, Gary Don Erwin was convicted of one court of conspiracy to embezzle money from the United States and one count of embezzling money in excess of $1000 from the United States, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (2006). On appeal, Erwin claims that law enforcement engaged in outrageous conduct during the course of the criminal investigation to such an extent that it violated his right to due process. The district court rejected this claim and we affirm.

In *United States v. Russell,*411 U.S. 423, 431-32, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973), the Supreme Court acknowledged that there may be “a situation in which the conduct of law enforcement agents is so outrageous that due process principles would absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction[.]” Whether law enforcement’s conduct is so outrageous as to call for the dismissal of the indictment is a question of law reviewed de novo. *United States v. McClelland,*72 F.3d 717, 721 (9th Cir.1995). In *United States v. Jones,*13 F.3d 100, 104 (4th Cir.1993), we noted that a “generalized claim” of outrageous government conduct during the course of a criminal investigation is difficult to make out. *180We quoted *United States v. Santana,*6 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1993) for the proposition that “the doctrine is moribund; in practice, courts have rejected its application with almost monotonous regularity!.]” We further noted that as a practical matter, “only those claims alleging violation of particular constitutional guarantees are likely to succeed.” *Jones,*13 F.3d at 104. This court has a “high shock threshold” when there is a claim of outrageous government conduct. *United States v. Osborne,*935 F.2d 32, 36 (4th Cir.1991).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Erwin has failed to show that law enforcement’s conduct in this case was so outrageous as to shock the conscience and violate his right to due process. There is no indication that law enforcement manufactured evidence or directed a third party to manufacture evidence. There is also no indication that law enforcement engaged in unlawful conduct in order to complete the investigation.

Because we find no outrageous conduct on the part of law enforcement, we affirm the convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 8.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|1. | Intelsat (Bermuda), Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Intelsat Subsidiary Holding Company, Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Intelsat Holdings LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Intelsat LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Intelsat Global Sales & Marketing Ltd., a company organized under the laws of England and Wales.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Intelsat Global Service Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Dennis Neclerio                                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Dennis Neclerio                                                                       |
|   | President (principal executive officer andprincipal financial and accounting officer) |
|   |                                                                                  |
|   | May 16, 2011                                                                          |

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2115 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide greater transparency 

of discounts provided by drug manufacturers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself, Mr. ARRINGTON, and Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE

of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide 

greater transparency of discounts provided by drug manufacturers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Disclosure of 

5 Drug Discounts Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF DRUG DISCOUNTS. 

7 Section 1150A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1320b–23) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2115 IH

1 (1) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘(other than as per3 mitted under subsection (e))’’ after ‘‘disclosed by the 

4 Secretary’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(e) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN INFORMA8 TION.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to allow the com10 parison of PBMs’ ability to negotiate rebates, dis11 counts, and price concessions and the amount of 

12 such rebates, discounts, and price concessions that 

13 are passed through to plan sponsors, beginning Jan14 uary 1, 2020, the Secretary shall make available on 

15 the Internet website of the Department of Health 

16 and Human Services the information with respect to 

17 the second preceding calendar year provided to the 

18 Secretary on generic dispensing rates (as described 

19 in paragraph (1) of subsection (b)) and information 

20 provided to the Secretary under paragraphs (2) and 

21 (3) of such subsection that, as determined by the 

22 Secretary, is with respect to each PBM. 

23 ‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY OF DATA.—In carrying out 

24 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure the fol25 lowing: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2115 IH

1 ‘‘(A) CONFIDENTIALITY.—The information 

2 described in such paragraph is displayed in a 

3 manner that prevents the disclosure of informa4 tion on rebates, discounts, and price conces5 sions, with respect to an individual drug or an 

6 individual plan. 

7 ‘‘(B) CLASS OF DRUG.—The information 

8 described in such paragraph is made available 

9 by class of drug, using an existing classification 

10 system, but only if the class contains such num11 ber of drugs, as specified by the Secretary, to 

12 ensure confidentiality of proprietary informa13 tion or other information that is prevented to 

14 be disclosed under subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017202EN.01002401.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/24

---

Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Adapta Color v EUIPO — Coatings Foreign IP (Rustproof System ADAPTA)

(Case T-226/17)

(2017/C 202/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Adapta Color, SL (Peniscola, Spain) (represented by: G. Macías Bonilla, G. Marín Raigal and E. Armero Lavie, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coatings Foreign IP Co. LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Rustproof System ADAPTA’ — European Union trade mark No 9 905 548

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2017 in Case R 2408/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the present action in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action in its entirety;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant and, where appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the present proceedings, as well as the costs incurred in the proceedings for a declaration of invalidity and the subsequent appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, where appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the present proceedings, as well as the costs incurred in the proceedings for a declaration of invalidity and the subsequent appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those put forward in Case T-223/17. |
| --- | --- |

—

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those put forward in Case T-223/17.

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 11, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 11, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0134. FIRST AMERICAN ASSETS LLC et al. v. MARY ALICE GRAVITT et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20SUCV0678
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

National Science Foundation, National Science Board.

# DATE AND TIME:

May 23, 2001: 12 Noon-12:30 p.m.—Closed Session. May 24, 2001: 1 p.m.-2:15 p.m.—Closed Session. May 24, 2001: 2:15 p.m.-5 p.m.—Open Session.

# PLACE:

The National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, www.nsf.gov/​nsb.

# STATUS:

Part of this meeting will be closed to the public. Part of this meeting will be open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Wednesday, May 23, 2001

### Closed Session (12 Noon-12:30 p.m.)

—Closed Session Minutes, March, 2001

—Election, NSB Executive Committee

## Thursday, May 24, 2001

### Closed Session (1 p.m.-2:15 p.m.)

—Awards and Agreements

—NSF Budget

### Open Session (2:15 p.m.-5 p.m.)

—Presentations: Honorary Awards Recipients

—Open Session Minutes, March, 2001

—Closed Session Items for August, 2001

—Chairman's Report

—Director's Report

—NSB Annual Business

—Committee Reports

—Other Business

Marta Cehelsky,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 01-12386 Filed 5-11-01; 3:39 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen C. Farrell, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Stephen C. Farrell                              
|                         |  | Stephen C. Farrell                                  
|                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer