alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
308396712.2 

SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional) Date: December 16, 2020

 IMPORTANT: CHECK BOX IF CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED. 

ORGANIZATION iSwap Euro B.V. 

 FILING AS A: DCM SEF DCO SDR ECM/SPDC 

TYPE OF FILING

 Rules and Rule Amendments 

 Certification under § 40.6 (a) or § 41.24 (a) 

 “Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” under § 40.4 (b)(5)

 Notification under § 40.6 (d) 

 Request for Approval under § 40.4 (a) or § 40.5 (a)

 Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change under § 40.10 (a)

 Products 

 Certification under § 39.5(b), § 40.2 (a), or § 41.23 (a) 

 Swap Class Certification under § 40.2 (d) 

 Request for Approval under § 40.3 (a) 

 Novel Derivative Product Notification under § 40.12 (a) 

RULE NUMBERS 

Rule 18.4. 

DESCRIPTION 

iSwap Euro B.V. hereby submits a notification regarding products listed for trading and 

amendments to its Rulebook related to the definition of a “Business Day” and revisions to 

Rule 18.4.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40372

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TRINIDAD FEDERICO-ABREO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2044

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Trinidad

Federico-Abreo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2021044EN.01003803.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/38

---

Order of the President of the Ninth of the Court of 13 November 2020 — Wallapop, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Unipreus, S.L.

(Case C-763/18) (1)

(2021/C 44/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omnitek Engineering Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Werner Funk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Janice M. Quigley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Werner Funk By: Werner Funk Chief Executive Officer Dated: August 16, 2010    /s/ Janice M. Quigley By: Janice M. Quigley Chief Financial Officer Dated: August 16, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Gary Stapleton, Appellant, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously vacated, determination confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The only issue raised in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence. The matter should have been transferred to this court *(see,*CPLR 7804 [g]), and we will consider it as if it had been properly transferred in the first instance *(see, Matter of Melvin v Kelly,*126

*1012AD2d 956, *Iv denied*69 NY2d 609; *Matter of Curl v Kelly,*125 AD2d 948).

The determination was based on the written report and oral testimony of the charging officer, as well as petitioner’s admission. It was supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130; Matter *of Melvin v Kelly, supra).*(Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No.03-51190

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS CARLOS HEREDIA-PAYAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-878-ALL-PRM

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Luis Carlos Heredia-Payan appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Heredia-Payan contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Heredia-Payan maintains that he
No. 03-51190

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Heredia-Payan acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christopher S. Alexander, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hypercom Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 9, 2004 By: /s/ C.S. Alexander  Christopher S. Alexander Chief Executive Officer
Delaware -

The First State

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "SMALL EXCHANGE, INC." IS DULY
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD
STANDING AND HAS A LEGAL CORPORATE EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS
OF THIS OFFICE SHOW, AS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, A.D.
2018,

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL REPORTS HAVE
BEEN FILED TO DATE.

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE SAID "SMALL EXCHANGE,

INC." WAS INCORPORATED ON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER, A.D. 2017.

BE

6542561 8300 Authentication: 203975377

SR# 20187829087 ae Date: 11-28-18
You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml
# C_2020068EN.01001401.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-677/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 6212 and 9021 - Mastectomy bras - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 - Validity - Notion of ‘accessories’ - Sincere cooperation)

(2020/C 68/11)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Amoena Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Operative part of the judgment

The examination of the questions referred has not revealed any elements capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 of 26 June 2017 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
# C_2019172EN.01000502.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/5

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Patron — Greece) — XT v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-689/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Internal taxation - Prohibition of discriminatory taxation - Luxury tax - Motor vehicles - Exemption from tax depending on the date on which the goods first entered into service in the taxing Member State - No account taken of the date on which the goods first entered into service in another Member State)

(2019/C 172/06)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Dioikitiko Protodikeio Patron

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XT

Defendant: Elliniko Dimosio

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which any owner or keeper of a private car with a large cylinder capacity, the age of which, calculated as from the date on which it first entered into service in that Member State and irrespective of any possible prior entry into service in another Member State, is more than ten years, is exempt from luxury tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
Exhibit 10.8 



DANIELS CORPORATE ADVISORY COMPANY, INC.

CHARTER OF THE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE

Purpose

The purpose of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors is to assist the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become Board members and determining the composition of the Board and its committees.

Membership And Procedures

Membership and Appointment.  The Committee shall consist of not less than three members of the Board, with the exact number being determined by the Board.  The members of the Committee shall be appointed and replaced from time to time by the Board.

placeCityIndependence.  Each member shall meet the independence requirements of applicable provisions of the federal securities laws and the rules promulgated thereunder and the applicable rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange, or any other exchange where the shares of the Company may be listed or quoted for sale.

Authority to Retain Advisers.  In the course of its duties, the Committee shall have sole authority, at the Company’s expense, to engage and terminate search firms, as the Committee deems advisable, to identify director candidates, including the sole authority to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

Evaluation.  The Committee shall annually review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board.

Duties And Responsibilities

The Committee shall:

1.

Evaluate and make recommendations regarding the composition and size of the Board.

2.

Determine the composition of committees of the Board, with consideration of the desires of individual Board members.

 

3.

Monitor compliance with Board and Board committee membership criteria.

 

4.

Recommend nominees to the full Board to fill vacancies on the Board.

 

5.

Investigate suggestions for candidates for membership on the Board and shall recommend prospective directors, as required, to provide an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board, including stockholder nominations for the Board.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-381-007]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd,; Notice of Compliance Filing

January 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2001, Wyoming Interstate Company, 
Ltd. (WIC) tendered for filing as part if its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 2, the sheets listed on Appendix A and Appendix B to 
the filing, to become effective on the dates indicated on each sheet.
    WIC asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's order issued September 27, 2000 in Docket No. RP99-381 
approving settlement and granting interlocutory appeal. Specifically, 
this filing reflects the transportation rates from January 1, 2000 
forward for consenting and contesting parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1256 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2018427EN.01005801.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/58

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2018 — Wilhelm Sihn jr. v EUIPO — in-edit (Camele'on)

(Case T-472/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Camele’on - Earlier international and national word marks CHAMELEON - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2018/C 427/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG (Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: in-edit Sàrl (Mondorf-les-Bains, Luxembourg)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2017 (Case R 570/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Wilhelm Sihn jr. and in-edit.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of GeoBio Energy, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Clayton Shelver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Clayton Shelver


By: Clayton Shelver


Its: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer





January 13, 2012





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GeoBio Energy, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of GameStop Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, R. Richard Fontaine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ R. Richard FontaineR. Richard FontaineChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
GameStop Corp.
May 20, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.