alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017104EN.01005901.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/59

---

Action brought on 31 January 2017 — TenneT Holding v. EUIPO — Ngrid Intellectual Property (NorthSeaGrid)

(Case T-70/17)

(2017/C 104/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TenneT Holding BV (Arnhem, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Limperg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ngrid Intellectual Property Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NorthSeaGrid’ — Application for registration No 12 223 517

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2016 in Case R 1607/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 4.25**

 

**Summary of the Investment Agreement between RR Participações S.A., Light S.A. and Renova Energia S.A.**

 

On July 8, 2011, an Investment Agreement was entered into between RR Participações S.A. (“**RR**”), Light S.A. (LIGT3) (“**Light**”) and Renova Energia S.A. (RNEW11) (“**Renova**”): RR as controlling stockholder of Renova, Light as new investor, and Renova as investee. Light acquired an interest in Renova through subscription of new common shares in Renova, corresponding to an increase of the capital of Renova by a total of R$ 360,000,000.00 (“the Investment”).

 

The Investment Agreement established contractual rights and obligations assigned by Light to its wholly-owned subsidiary Light Energia S.A.  Following the Investment, Light owns 34.85% of the common shares of Renova and 25.83% of its total capital.

 

The Investment was previoulsy approved by the National Electricity Agency (*Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica,*or Aneel), and also authorized by the financiers of Renova and of its subsidiaries.

 

A Stockholders’ Agreement between RR and Light, and Renova as consenting party (the “**New Stockholders’ Agreement**”), governing the exercise of the right of vote by the stockholders, the corporate governance of Renova, rights of preference, rights to match offers, rights of joint sale and leaving the Company, was signed and filed at the head office of Renova.

 

----
# C_2019220EN.01000902.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 3 de Madrid — Spain) — Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos SA v Asendia Spain SLU

(Case C-259/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 97/67/EC - Common rules for the development of the internal market in postal services - Provision of the universal postal service - Exclusive rights of the designated operator - Issue of means of payment for postage other than postage stamps)

(2019/C 220/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 3 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos SA

Defendant: Asendia Spain SLU

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) and Article 8 of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service, as amended by Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which guarantees to the postal operator designated for the provision of the universal postal service an exclusive right to distribute means of payment for postage other than postage stamps.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


Report of Independent Accountants


JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables
that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2001, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over servicing of the securitized
credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------------
March 25, 2002
# C_2017104EN.01005702.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/57

---

Action brought on 1 February 2017 — Italytrade v EUIPO — Tpresso (teaespresso)

(Case T-68/17)

(2017/C 104/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italytrade Srl (Bari, Italy) (represented by: N. Clemente, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tpresso SA (Zurich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘teaespresso’ — Application for registration No 13 543 475

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2016 in Case R 1099/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision as provided for in Article 65(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and in any case according to existing rules; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision as provided for in Article 65(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and in any case according to existing rules;

| — | order, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the interveners, if any, to pay the costs incurred by Italytrade Srl in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the interveners, if any, to pay the costs incurred by Italytrade Srl in the present proceedings;

| — | order, pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the unsuccessful intervener to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order, pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the unsuccessful intervener to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019044EN.01006202.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/62

---

Order of the General Court of 6 November 2018 — Fortischem v Parliament and Council

(Case T-560/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2017/852 - Protection of human health and the environment - Prohibition on chlor-alkali production using mercury as an electrode - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fortischem a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented by: C. Arhold, P. Hodál and M. Staroň, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, L. Darie and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and J. Kneale, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of letter (d) in Annex III, Part I to Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 (OJ 2017 L 137, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden.

| 3. | Fortischem a.s. is to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Fortischem a.s. is to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

| 4. | Fortischem, the Council, the Parliament, the Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden are each to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fortischem, the Council, the Parliament, the Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden are each to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Financial Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Diane J. Harrison,
President and Chief Financial Officer of Cheetah Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.    
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 10, 2008  /s/ Diane J. HarrisonDiane J. Harrison
Principal Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41378 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
REYES RAMOS

- SALAZAR , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 422

- 1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reyes Ramos

Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos

- Salazar h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 31, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41378 Document: 00513446492 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2016No. 15

- 41378

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41378 Document: 00513446492 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY LIU; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES,

INC., 

Defendant,

 and

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-35202

D.C. No. 3:12-CV-00484-BR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2015

Portland, Oregon

FILED

AUG 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Page 2 of 2

Before: BERZON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and SOTO,** District Judge.

 

The district court properly entered summary judgment for the defendants

and denied the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint as futile. The

plaintiffs argue that the foreclosure sale of their property was invalid because the

notice of sale that they received did not identify the proper beneficiary of the trust

deed. However, the Oregon Trust Deed Act forbids post-sale challenges based on

this technical defect, for the reasons stated in Woods v. U.S. Bank N.A., __ F.3d __

(9th Cir. 2016). See Or. Rev. Stat. § 86.797(1) (formerly § 86.770(1)). 

AFFIRMED.

 ** The Honorable James Alan Soto, United States District Judge for the

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
# C_2019206EN.01001201.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia — Spain) — Cobra Servicios Auxiliares SA v José David Sánchez Iglesias (C-29/18), José Ramón Fiuza Asorey (C-30/18), Jesús Valiño Lopez (C-44/18), FOGASA (C-29/18 and C-44/18), Incatema SL,

(Joined Cases C-29/18, C-30/18 and C-44/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - Concept of ‘employment conditions’ - Comparability of the situations - Justification - Concept of ‘objective grounds’ - Compensation in the event of the termination of a permanent employment contract on an objective ground - Lower amount of compensation paid on expiry of a contract for ‘a specific task’)

(2019/C 206/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Cobra Servicios Auxiliares SA

Respondents: José David Sánchez Iglesias (C-29/18), José Ramón Fiuza Asorey (C-30/18), Jesús Valiño Lopez (C-44/18), FOGASA (C-29/18 and C-44/18), Incatema SL

Operative part

Clause 4(1) of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding a national law in accordance with which, in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which the termination of a contract for services between the employer and one of his clients has resulted, first, in the termination of contracts for a specific task made between that employer and some workers and, second, in the collective redundancy, on an objective ground, of permanent workers employed by that employer, the compensation paid for termination of the employment contract to the first of those groups of workers is less than that given to the permanent workers.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 23.4.2018

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sinobiopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lequn Huang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Date: January 19, 2011
By:
/s/ Lequn HuangLequn Huang

President, CEO, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.0

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                                     
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|            |  | /s/ Richard B. Collins                              
|            |  | Richard B. Collins                                  
|            |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|            | 
|            |  | /s/ Mark A. Roberts                                 
|            |  | Mark A. Roberts                                     
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|            | 
|May 8, 2013 |  |