alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6981-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives notice of a Meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) Citizens Advisory Committee.

# DATES:

The Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 12, 2001, from 1 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on Wednesday, June 13, 2001, from 8:30 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meetings will be held at the Florida Marine Research Institute, 100 8th Avenue, S.E., St. Petersburg, FL, (727) 896-8626 ext. 2010

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Building 1103, Room 202, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Proposed agenda is attached.

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

Gloria D. Car,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-12897 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# C_2019131EN.01001401.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Labour Court — Ireland) — Tomás Horgan, Claire Keegan v Minister for Education & Skills, Minister for Finance, Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

(Case C-154/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 2(2)(b) - Indirect discrimination on grounds of age - Newly recruited teachers - Date of recruitment - Salary scale and classification on that scale upon recruitment less advantageous than that applicable to teachers already employed as such)

(2019/C 131/16)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Labour Court, Ireland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Tomás Horgan, Claire Keegan

Defendants: Minister for Education & Skills, Minister for Finance, Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2)(b) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted to the effect that a measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings which, as of a specific date, provides for the application on the recruitment of new teachers of a salary scale and classification on that scale which are less advantageous than that applied, under the rules previous to that measure, to teachers recruited before that date does not constitute indirect discrimination on the grounds of age within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
# C_2004208EN.01000201.xml

| 18.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/2

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of polyester staple fibres originating,
  inter alia
  , in the Republic of Korea: modification of the address of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate

inter alia

(2004/C 208/02)

Imports of polyester staple fibres originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea are subject to definitive anti-dumping duties, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 (1).

inter alia

1

Huvis Corporation, a company located in the Republic of Korea, whose exports to the Community of polyester staple fibres are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 4,8 % by the aforementioned Regulation, has informed the Commission that it has changed its address to 151-7, Samsung-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea. The company has argued that the change of address does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous address of 77-1, Garak-dong, Songpaku, Seoul, Korea.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of address in no way affects the findings of Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000. Therefore, the reference to Huvis Corporation, 77-1, Garak-dong, Songpaku, Seoul, Korea should be read as Huvis Corporation, 151-7, Samsung-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000.

The Taric additional code A 151 previously attributed to Huvis Corporation, 77-1, Garak-dong, Songpaku, Seoul, Korea shall apply to Huvis Corporation, 151-7, Samsung-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

---

(1)  OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 17.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8046

ANTHONY DACRE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT FLEMING; SGT. MITCHELL; SGT. WILSON; SGT. 

RATTCLIFF; SGT. REYNOLDS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

HOGGE, Guard; BRYANT, Guard; GREEN, Guard,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:12-cv-00055-SGW-RSB)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Dacre, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Dacre seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to 

comply with the court’s order to file an amended complaint 

clarifying what claims Dacre wished to pursue against which 

defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–

46 (1949). The order Dacre seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order 

because it is possible for him to cure the pleading deficiencies 

in the complaint that were identified by the district 

court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 

10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny 

Dacre’s motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental 

brief and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### Sanders *vs.*Williams.

A judgment may be amended by order of the court, in conformity to the verdict on which it is predicated, even after execution has been issued.

(a.) Where a plaintiff in trover elected a verdict for the horse sued for and its hire, and the jury found for him the property, with three dollars per month as hire from the 14th day of February, 1883, and judgment was so entered, there was no error in allowing the judgment to be amended at a subsequent term, so as to provide that the hire at the rate specified should continue till the delivery of the property to the officer or to the plaintiff. This was in accord with the reasonable intendment of the verdict.

January 12, 1886.

*284Judgments. Amendment. Trover. ' Before Judge Eve. City Court of Richmond County. March Term, 1885.

Reported in the decision.

F. W. Capers, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Vm. H. Fleming, by brief, for defendant.

Hall, Justice.

In an action for the recovery of a horse and his hire, the plaintiff elected, under section 3564 of the Code, a verdict for the property and its hire, and, in accordance with this election, the jury found that the-horse be returned to her, with three dollars a month,, as damages, from the 14th day of February, 1883. A judgment was entered on this verdict for the property, with $3.00 per month as hire from the time named in the verdict to the date of the same. At a subsequent term of the court, and before the property had been delivered, the judgment ¡was, on motion, amended so as to carry hire, at the rate specified, to the delivery of the property to the officer or to the plaintiff.

To this amendment, the defendant excepted, and he now assigns error on the judgment ordering it to be made.

It is well settled, and, indeed, the Code, §3494, expressly provides, that a judgment may be amended by order of the court, in conformity' to the verdict oil which it is predicated, even after execution issues. .....

The power to so amend it was not denied, but it was contended that the amendment went beyond the requirements of the verdict. We cannot, however, sanction this position. The verdict does not express in terms how long the monthly assessment of damages shall run; it merely specifies the date from which such' damages shall commence, and the fair intendment is that put upon it by the court in ordering this amendment. The jury, could not have meant that the defendant should have the use of .the plaintiff’s *285property for an indefinite time after the verdict without compensating her therefor at the rate fixed. If the defendant thought this allowance extravagant, he could have easily relieved himself of the burthen by complying with the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.
|                                                                         |   | Percentage                Interest |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Name                of Entity                                                |   | 2006                               |   | 2005 |   | 2004 |   |
|                                                                         |   |                               |   |   |   |   |   |
| Jingzhou                Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd.                  |   |                               | 44.5   | % |   | 44.5 | % |   | 44.5 | % |
| Shashi                Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd.                 |   |                               | 81.0   | % |   | 81.0 | % |   | 81.0 | % |
| Shenyang                Jinbei Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd. |   |                               | 70.0   | % |   | 70.0 | % |   | 70.0 | % |
| Zhejiang                Henglong & Vie Pump-Manu Co., Ltd.               |   |                               | 51.0   | % |   | 51.0 | % |   | 51.0 | % |
| Universal                Sensor Application Inc.                             |   |                               | 60.0   | % |   | 60.0 | % |   | — |   |
| Wuhan                Jielong Electric Power Steering Co., Ltd                |   |                               | 85.0   | % |   | — |   |   | — |   |
| Wuhu                Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd             |   |                               | 77.33  | % |   | — |   |   | — |   |

----
Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

July 26, 2018 

Submitted via email and the Portal

Jonathan Lave 

Division of Market Oversight 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: JLave@cftc.gov 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Rule Amendment and Related Request for Freedom of

Information Act Confidential Treatment

Dear Mr. Lave, 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”), as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, hereby submits to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”).

We have submitted to the CFTC Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Compliance 

Office a request that for reasons of business confidentiality, the Commission not disclose 

the Confidential Information (as defined below) or its contents in response to any FOIA 

request or otherwise for an indefinite period. We wish to inform you that the 

Confidential Information constitutes, inter alia, privileged and confidential trade secrets 

and commercial or financial information within the meaning of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 

552(b)(4) and Part 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations as well as confidential 

information covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1905. 

For your reference, the Amendment set out on Annex A hereto is referred to herein as the 

“Confidential Information.” 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2 

David Levine

General Counsel

Bloomberg L.P.

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0718-0012” and ending 

with “BSEF-0718-0290.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-8302 with any questions regarding this 

matter. 

Very truly yours,

Gregory Dumark

Chief Compliance Officer

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Enclosures 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 4 

Annex A 

Confidential Information

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0718-0012– BSEF-0718-

0290
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1372-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, (FEMA-1372-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 17, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby amended to include Public Assistance and the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 16, 2001:

Adjuntas, Rincon and Sabana Grande for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.

Añasco, Hormigueros, Lares, Las Marias, Maricao and Moca for Public Assistance.

Cabo Rojo, Guáica, Guayanilla, Lajas, San German and Yauco for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 01-13261  Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board

    The C2 Advisory Group Meeting will meet in Langley Air Force Base, 
Virginia on May 24-25, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the 
direction of the study. This meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, 
specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-13007 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
November 2021

Refinitiv SEF Notice to Members – No. 21-A 

Subject: Post-Trade Clearing of SEF-Executed Trades

Rule Reference: Refinitiv SEF Rule 601(a) – Supported Transactions – General 

Effective Date: November 22, 2021 

As prescribed by Refinitiv SEF Rule 601(a), Refinitiv US SEF LLC (“Refinitiv SEF”) only facilitates 

the execution of “swaps” (including, non-deliverable forwards) listed by Refinitiv SEF that are not 

intended to be cleared. As such, a trade executed on Refinitiv SEF may be post trade settled 

bilaterally or elected for clearing. This Notice to Participants is to remind participants that any 

decision to clear trades executed on Refinitiv SEF (regardless of how they are routed for clearing

and regardless of whether any middleware provider involved in the process is affiliated or 

unaffiliated with Refinitiv SEF) is considered to be made post-trade and without Refinitiv SEF’s 

involvement. As such, any Refinitiv SEF participants that jointly elect to clear a swap executed on 

Refinitiv SEF’s platform, together with their FCMs, are solely responsible for ensuring that all 

requirements applicable to cleared swaps are satisfied. This includes but may not be limited to 

the requirement to screen such trades in accordance with CFTC Regulation 1.73(a)(2)(iii), 17 

C.F.R. § 1.73(a)(2)(iii).

CHAPTER 6 – SUPPORTED TRANSACTIONS

RULE 601 GENERAL

(a) The SEF supports Permitted Transactions in Swaps not intended to be cleared, through the

execution methods detailed in Chapter 7.

For more information on post-trade clearing of SEF-executed trades, please contact Refinitiv 

Support at fxall.support@refinitiv.com or via telephone at: 

New York: +1 646 268 9901 

London: +44 207 173 9601 

Singapore: +65 6511 0650 

Further information regarding this Notice may be directed to Refinitiv SEF Market Regulation at 

SEF-marketregulation@refinitiv.com or to the following individuals: 

Michael.W.Rooney@refinitiv.com 

Daniella.Shteynfeld@refinitiv.com
Exhibit 18  March 30, 2005  Board of Directors of International Specialty Holdings Inc. 300 Delaware Avenue Suite 303 Wilmington, De1aware 19801  Ladies and Gentlemen:  We have audited the
consolidated balance sheets of International Specialty Holdings Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and have
reported thereon under date of March 30, 2005. The aforementioned consolidated
financial statements and our audit report thereon are included in the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. As stated in
Note 9to thesefinancial statements, the Company changed its
method of accounting for inventories from the FIFO method tothe LIFO method for the Synthetic Elastomers business segment and
states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the
circumstances because the LIFO method of valuing inventories more closely
matches current costs and revenues in periods when prices of goods and services
are increasing significantly. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed
and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment
and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of
accounting was based.  With regard to the
aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been
established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of
accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Companys
compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we
are furnishing this letter. Based on ourreviewand discussion, with reliance on managements
business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of
accounting is preferable in the Companys circumstances.  Very truly yours,/s/KPMG LLP
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Cheetah Consulting, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Cheetah Consulting, Inc. for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 The undersigned certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Cheetah Consulting, Inc. as of
June 30, 2008. This Certification is
executed as of August 12, 2008 By:/s/ Diane J. HarrisonDiane J. Harrison
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) By:/s/ Diane J. HarrisonDiane J. Harrison
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cheetah Consulting, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.