alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Larry James KRAMER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-20607

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 25, 2013.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*395Seth Kretzer, Law Offices Of Seth Kretzer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Larry James Kramer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Kramer has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2237 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a bollard installation 

grant program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a 

bollard installation grant program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Threats On 

5 Pedestrians Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘STOP Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOLLARD INSTALLATION GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans9 portation shall establish a program to assist bollard instal10 lation projects designed to prevent pedestrian injuries and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2237 IH

1 acts of terrorism in areas utilized by large numbers of pe2 destrians. 

3 (b) GRANT AUTHORITY.—In carrying out the pro4 gram established under subsection (a), the Secretary may 

5 award a grant, on a competitive basis, to a local govern6 ment entity. 

7 (c) APPLICATION.—To be eligible for a grant under 

8 this section, a local government entity shall submit to the 

9 Secretary an application at such time, in such form, and 

10 containing such information as the Secretary determines 

11 appropriate, which shall include, at a minimum— 

12 (1) a description of the proposed bollard instal13 lation project to be carried out; 

14 (2) a description of the pedestrian injury or ter15 rorism risks with respect to the proposed installation 

16 area; and 

17 (3) an analysis of how the proposed project will 

18 mitigate such risks. 

19 (d) GRANT USES.—A recipient of a grant awarded 

20 under this section may use the proceeds of such grant only 

21 for a bollard installation project. 

22 (e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 

23 costs of a bollard installation project assisted with a grant 

24 awarded under this section may not exceed 100 percent. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2237 IH

1 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

2 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Trans3 portation to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of 

4 fiscal years 2020 through 2029. 

5 (g) BOLLARD INSTALLATION PROJECT DEFINED.— 

6 In this section, the term ‘‘bollard installation project’’ 

7 means a project to install raised concrete or metal posts 

8 on a sidewalk adjacent to a roadway that are designed 

9 to slow or stop a motor vehicle. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Hanlin Chen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section  13a-14(b)
          or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Hanlin Chen
-----------------------
Hanlin Chen
Chief Executive Officer

April__, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00374-CR

DEWEY CHARLES BEHRENS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Dewey Charles Behrens filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s pretrial order denying his special plea of double jeopardy. The State filed

a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we lack jurisdiction. We do not have 

jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a special plea of 

double jeopardy. Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 793–94 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1991); White v. State, No. 02-11-00015-CR, 2011 WL 582665, at *1 (Tex. App.—

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Fort Worth Feb. 17, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) 

(―While a criminal defendant may file a special plea in order to assert a claim of 

former jeopardy, . . . there is no statutory provision which grants us jurisdiction to 

review the denial of a special plea before a final judgment has been rendered.‖). 

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion to dismiss and dismiss this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 1, 2012
# C_2019288EN.01000702.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/7

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Pólus Vegas Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-665/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Games of chance - National taxes on the operation of slot machines in amusement arcades - National legislation increasing the amount of a tax five-fold and introducing an additional tax)

(2019/C 288/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pólus Vegas Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the order

Article 56 TFEU, read in the light of the judgment of 11 June 2015, Berlington Hungary and Others (C-98/14, EU:C:2015:386), must be interpreted as meaning, in so far as concerns the operation of slot machines in a Member State, a cross-border situation cannot be presumed to exist on the sole ground that EU citizens from other Member States may avail themselves of such gaming opportunities.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
# C_2017369EN.01003502.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/35

---

Action brought on 5 September 2017 — Thun v EUIPO (Figurine representing a fish)

(Case T-604/17)

(2017/C 369/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thun SpA (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: B. Giordano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Design at issue: Community design — (Figurine representing a fish) — Application for registration No 336 805-0059

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2017 in Case R 1680/2016-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | grant the application for restitutio in integrum; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the application for restitutio in integrum;

restitutio in integrum

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs.

---
# C_2018052EN.01003101.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/31

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Rogesa v Commission

(Case T-475/17) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents concerning an installation producing a mixture of pellets and sintered ore - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted before the action was brought - Application for an order that there is no need to adjudicate - Interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 052/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and A. Sitzer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking, primarily, annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 20 June 2017 and, in the alternative, of the decision of 11 July 2017 refusing to grant access to the document Ares (2017) 1684109 of 2 November 2009 and the document Ares (2017) 1685639 of 29 November 2009.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH and the European Commission shall bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH and the European Commission shall bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

1

---
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of AFH Holding
      IV, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, I, Amir F.
      Heshmatpour, President of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.  Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      May 15, 2008





/s/
      Amir F. Heshmatpour


Amir
      F.
      Heshmatpour


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 23      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 23      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH     Document 23      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.
      ( print page 28592)    
*Docket Number:*                     OST-2001-9642                

*Date Filed:*                     May 9, 2001                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association                

*Subject:*                     PTC2 EUR 0373 dated 8 May 2001                

TC2 Within Europe Expedited Resolutions r1-r4

Intended effective date: 31 May 2001

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2001-9651                

*Date Filed:*                     May 9, 2001                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association                

*Subject:*

MV/PSC/109 dated April 4, 2001

Mail Vote S075 (Euro-Related Resolutions/RP) r1-r7

Intended effective date: 1 June 2001

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2001-9669                

*Date Filed:*                     May 11, 2001                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association                

*Subject:*

PTC2 EUR 0374 dated 11 May 2001

Within Europe Expedited Resolutions r1-r20

PTC2 EUR 0375 dated 11 May 2001

Within Europe Expedited Resolutions 002q, 078y r21-r22

PTC2 EUR 0376 dated 11 May 2001

Within Europe Expedited Resolution 002L r23

Intended effective dates: 1 June, 15 June, 1 July 2001

Dorothy Y. Beard,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-12975 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### Vincent David Urban, Respondent, v City of Albany, Appellant.

Submitted January 9, 2012;

decided February 21, 2012

Reported below, 90 AD3d 1132.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
# C_2019054EN.01001804.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — KAMU Passenger & IT Services GmbH v Türk Hava Yollari A.O. — T.H.Y. Turkish Airlines

(Case C-289/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
# C_2019263EN.01003901.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — RV v Commission

(Case T-167/17) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Article 42c of the Staff Regulations - Leave in the interests of the service - Automatic retirement - Measure not open to challenge - Partial inadmissibility - Scope of the law - Court acting of its own motion - Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation)

(2019/C 263/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RV (represented by: initially, J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, subsequently, J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Intervener(s) in support of the defendant(s): European Parliament (represented by: initially, J. Steele and D. Nessaf, subsequently, J. Steele and M. Rantala, and finally, J. Steele and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 21 December 2016 to place the applicant on leave in the interests of the service pursuant to Article 42c of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and simultaneously to retire the applicant automatically pursuant to the fifth paragraph thereof.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 21 December 2016 to place RV on leave in the interests of the service and simultaneously to retire RV automatically; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 21 December 2016 to place RV on leave in the interests of the service and simultaneously to retire RV automatically;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by RV, including those incidental to the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by RV, including those incidental to the proceedings for interim measures;

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 144 of 8.5.2017.

---
142 So. 585

#### COBB & WOODHAM v. W. E. DUGGAN LBR. CO.

4 Div. 648.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1932.

A. Whaley, of Andalusia, for petitioners.

F. J. Mizell, Jr., of Florala, opposed.

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Cobb & Woodham for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Cobb & Woodham v. W. E. Duggan Lbr. Co., 142 So. 585.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Bonfire Productions, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for  the  period  ended  March 31, 2008 as filed  with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  April 29, 2008


/s/ Nadezda Maximova
----------------------------------
Nadezda Maximova
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Treasurer, principal accounting
officer and Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 30, 2019

t1226

Order 

Clerk

December 30, 2019

158932

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158932

COA: 334952 

Wayne CC: 16-003290-FC

RADU VASILE MUNTEAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County 

Prosecuting Attorney to file a response to the application for leave to appeal within 28 

days after the date of this order. The response shall be limited to whether the trial court 

erred pursuant to the rule of People v Clark, 463 Mich 459, 464 (2000), by making the 

defendant’s sentences for torture, unlawful imprisonment, and aggravated domestic 

violence consecutive to the felony-firearm sentence.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.