alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Friday, August 11, 2006
BY EMAIL
Office of the Secretariat
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission # 06.99: Notification of =
Listing Additional Months in 32 Natural Gas Basis Futures Contracts:

a

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or Commission”) that it is expandingthe —
listed contract months for 32 of the Exchange’s Natural Gas Basis contracts to 72 months on an
annual rolling basis (contracts listed below). This futures contracts are listed for trading and
clearing on NYMEX ClearPortTM.

The affected Contracts are as followed;

Contract Name Commodity Code
Houston Ship Channel Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NH
Alberta Basis Swap (CGPR) NA
SoCal Basis Swap (NGI) NS
Panhandle Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) PH
NW Pipeline, Rockies Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NR
Texas Eastern M-3 Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NX
Dominion Trans. Appalachia (Platts IFERC) PG
NGPL Tex/Ok Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) PD
Chicago Basis Swap (NGI) NB
Malin Basis Swap (NGI) PB
Waha Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NW
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. Appalachia Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) TC
MichCon Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NF
Henry Hub Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) HB
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) Citygate Basis Swap (NGI) PC
NGPL Mid-Continent Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NL
CIG Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) cl
Transco Z6 Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NZ
Permian Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) PM
Northern Natural Gas Ventura, Iowa Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) PF
Sumas Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NK
San Juan Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NJ
TENN-ZONE 0 Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NQ
Northern Natural Gas Demarcation Basis Swap (Platts FERC) PE
ANR Oklahoma Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) NE
TETCO South Texas Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) TX
Transco Z3 Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) CZ


Columbia Gulf Transmission Onshore Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) GL

Centerpoint Basis (Plastts IFERC) Futures Contract PW
Texas Gas,SL Basis Swap (Platts IFERC) TB
ANR, Louisiana Basis Futures Contract Swap (Platts IFERC) ND
SONAT Basis Swap Futures (Platts IFERC) SZ

This expansion in listed contract months will go into effect on trade date Monday, August
14, 2006. Pursuant to Section Sc(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule
40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the listing of these additional months complies with the
Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Sean Kiley at (212)
299-2613; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert Levin
Senior Vice President, Research
153 So. 917

#### GENERAL MACHINERY CO. v. B. A. SCHRODER.

6 Div. 389.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 1, 1934.

Evans Dunn, of Birmingham, for appellant.

J. P. Mudd, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Petition dismissed by agreement.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Richard S. Mills, Esq. (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson, Esq. (JPC-9391)

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE 

LITIGATION

21 MC 102 (AKH)

HERNAN PINEDA, 

 Plaintiff, -against- 222 BROADWAY, LLC, ET. AL., 

 Defendants.

INDEX NO.: 07-CV-05376 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF AMBIENT 

GROUP, INC. S ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., by its attorneys, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its Response to the allegations set forth 

in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (Amended Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master

Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby adopts its Answer to Master Complaint

dated August 2, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re World Trade Center Lower

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., demands judgment dismissing

the above-captioned action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York

Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 32 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

May 12, 2008 

Yours etc., 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc. 

By:__ s/ John P. Cookson __________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483.9490

TO: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

(212) 267.3700

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

(212) 553.9206

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 848.5600

Thomas A. Egan, Esq.

Fleming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006-1404

(212) 412.9500

Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 32 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 12th day of May 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER BY DEFENDANT AMBIENT GROUP, INC., 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which sends notification to 

appearing parties.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP

By: _s/ John P. Cookson _____ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Case 1:07-cv-05376-AKH Document 32 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2018408EN.01005101.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2018 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-233/17) (1)

((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Portugal - Direct payments - POSEI programme - Exceeding of ceilings - Payment delays - First subparagraph of Article 11(1) of Regulation No 885/2006 - Double financial correction - Rights of the defence - Proportionality))

(2018/C 408/65)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, J. Saraiva de Almeida and P. Estêvão, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, D. Bianchi and B. Rechena, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 766 final of 14 February 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes from European Union financing certain expenditure declared by the Portuguese Republic under the ‘POSEI — specific supply arrangements’ programme and ‘direct payments pertaining to the 2010 marketing year’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.

---
# C_2019044EN.01006702.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/67

---

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Intercontact Budapest v CdT

(Case T-809/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - Inadmissible))

(2019/C 44/88)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Intercontact Budapest Fordító és Pénzügyi Tanácsadó Kft. (Intercontact Budapest Kft.) (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: É. Subasicz, lawyer)

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: M. Garnier and G. Bukodi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions of the CdT of 10 July 2017 ranking the applicant, respectively, in second and third place in the classification of tenderers selected for the conclusion of multiple framework contracts as a result of public procurement procedures FL/GEN 16-01 and FL/GEN 16-02.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.

---
cme ®@

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Il. 60606-7499
www.cme.com

December 15, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb
Office of the Secretariat Es
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre i ta
1155 21" Street, NW =
Washington, DC 20581 i

RE: CME Rules 106.D.9. and 127 =
Submission No. 06-113 ~

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or “Exchange") hereby notifies the Commission that
the Exchange has deleted CME Rules 106.D.9. and 127. Both of these rules referenced programs that
are no longer available. The purpose of the programs was to facilitate the purchase of memberships.

The text of these rule changes is attached with the deleted language lined out.

The Exchange certifies that these rule changes neither violates nor are inconsistent with any
provision of the Commodity Exchange Act or of the rules and regulations thereunder.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (312) 648-5422.
Sincerely,

/S/ Stephen M. Szarmack
Director and Associate General Counsel

SMS/elm/6015 SUB 06-113.doc


127.

106.D. Futures Industry Transfers

A member or Non-Member Investor may temporarily transfer his membership to another member who shall be
‘subject to all Exchange rules and regulations.

Transfers under this section shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:
[1-8 unchanged]

[The remainder of the rule is unchanged]

MEMBER RETENTION PROGRAM [RESERVED]

Fhe-Member Retention Rreg t ted-on-February 2-2000-Individuals-whe-have-fund deposit
ith_the-Exehange—that t-to-the-Member-Retention_R: h-funde—t
ed-pu g ¥

patetasee OVS HO ie esi
#### CLAY CENTER ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO. *v.*CITY OF CLAY CENTER.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS.

No. 630.

Motion to dismiss.

Submitted January 4, 1909.

Decided January 11, 1909.

.Writ of error to review a judgment of the state court dismissed. The Federal question was raised for the first time on petition for rehearing in the Supreme Court of the State, and that court declined to pass on it as having come too late.

*Mr. A. E. Crane, Mr. F. B. Dawes, Mr. C. P. Rutherford*and *Mr. R. C. Miller,*for defendant in error in support of motion to dismiss.

*Mr. C. C. Coleman*and *Mr. Frank L. Williams*for plaintiff in error.

*Per Curiam:*

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Oxley Stave Co.*v. *Butler County,*166 U. S. 648; *Capital National Bank of Lincoln*v. *First National Bank of Cadiz, 172*U. S. 425; *Mutual Life Insurance Company*v. *McGrew,*188 U. S. 291, 308; *White*v. *Bird,*45 Kansas, 759.
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 51TOL JKl Ur CKiMiiNrtiL^Sy,\TION^?^U^^.!i3;^^§7l^bSTAGE»RTKEYBOWES STATE OF TEXAS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE ZIP'78701 $000 26'
G001401603SEP 07 2016 

# brown RONNIEJOE Tr J|8-1447127^ WR-11,857-09 This is to advise that the Courttas^deni^without written order the appiication for writ of habeas oorpus on the findings^t^al courtwithout a RONNIE JOE BROWN ^ -TDC# 321096

%
#### Catherine Guy, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Motion for reconsideration denied. Memorandum: The motion is untimely, having been made more than one year after the date of the abandonment *(see,*22 NYCRR 1000.3 [b] [2]). Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:

Title:
Nicholas D. Gerber

President and Chief Executive Officer

United States Commodity Funds LLC,

General Partner of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Amendment No. 1 to the report of Cycle CountryAccessories Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the twelve monthsended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Robert Davis, Interim ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                    The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                    The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Robert Davis                |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Robert  Davis                    |   |
| Interim  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| February 23,  2010          |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27677-27678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-079-01-1020-AC]


Resource Advisory Council Meeting, Dillon, MT

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Montana Resource Advisory Council will convene on 
May 31, 2001 at 12 Noon at the U.S. Forest Service Sheridan Work 
Center, 103 North Main, Sheridan, Montana., A field tour of the Garden 
Creek allotment will begin from there and end at Dillon, Montana. This 
area of the Ruby Mountains has recently been assessed for compliance 
with Standards for Rangeland Health. The tour is designed to look at 
areas that are not currently meeting the standards, and discussions on 
the planning process for making changes in the current grazing 
management to initiate progress in meeting the standard will be held on 
the

[[Page 27678]]

allotment. Some watershed restoration projects in the Stone Creek 
watershed will also be visited on the way to Dillon.
    The meeting will continue at the Dillon Field Office, 1005 Selway 
Drive, Dillon, Montana at 8 a.m. on June 1, 2001. A briefing on the 
status of the Dillon Resource Management Plan will be given. Public 
comment will be accepted at 9 a.m.
    Following the public comment session, a field trip to visit an area 
that has been assessed for compliance with the Standards for Rangeland 
Health and found to be meeting the standards will be held. This will 
allow the RAC members to see how the Standards for Rangeland Health are 
being assessed on the ground. The location for this tour will be 
determined later based on weather conditions.
    The meeting is open to the public and written comments can be given 
to the Council. Oral comments may be presented to the Council on June 1 
at 9:00 a.m. The time allotted for oral comment may be limited, 
depending on the number of persons wishing to be heard. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need further information about the meeting, or who 
need special assistance, such as sign language or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Jean Nelson-Dean, Resource Advisory 
Coordinator, at the Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte, 
Montana 59702-3388, telephone 406-533-7617.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Powers, Dillon Field Manager, 
406-683-8023 or Jean Nelson-Dean at the above address and telephone 
number.

    Dated: April 27, 2001.
Dave Pacioretty,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-12510 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRA MARIA CABALLEROAGUILAR, et al. , 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71904 

Agency Nos. A209-859-524 

A209-859-525 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 1, 2022**

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Alejandra Maria Caballero-Aguilar and her minor daughter, natives and 

citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71904 

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

1

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-

85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that CaballeroAguilar did not establish that she suffered past persecution or has a well-founded 

fear of future persecution. See Duran-Rodriguez v. Barr, 918 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 

(9th Cir. 2019) (“We have been most likely to find persecution where threats are 

repeated, specific, and combined with confrontation or other mistreatment.”) 

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, Petitioners’ asylum claims

fail.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Petitioners’ remaining 

contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (“As a 

general rule courts and agencies are not required to make findings on issues the 

1 The BIA deemed waived any challenge to the IJ’s denial of withholding of 

removal and CAT protection because those denials were not meaningfully 

challenged in Petitioners’ brief to the BIA. Petitioners have not contested that 

waiver determination in this petition for review. Therefore, only the asylum claim 

is before us. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004). To the 

extent the BIA relied on the IJ’s having afforded diminished weight to CaballeroAguilar’s testimony based on significant concerns with her credibility, Petitioners 

do not argue that we should grant the petition on that basis.
3 19-71904 

decision of which is unnecessary to the results they reach.” (quoting INS v. 

Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976))).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report of Heckmann Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



|       |  |                                                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Richard J. Heckmann                               |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brian R. Anderson                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Richard J. Heckmann                                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Brian R. Anderson                                                                     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Secretary of the Company and will be retained by the Office of General Counsel of the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.