alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017249EN.01002902.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/29

---

Action brought on 16 May 2017 — Fakro v Commission

(Case T-293/17)

(2017/C 249/45)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Fakro sp z o.o. (Nowy Sącz, Poland) (represented by: A. Radkowiak-Macuda, legal adviser)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | find that the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights by failing to take a position on the complaint brought before it by the applicant on 12 July 2012 concerning abuse of a dominant position by the VELUX group, notwithstanding the fact that it was formally called on to do so; |
| --- | --- |

—

find that the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights by failing to take a position on the complaint brought before it by the applicant on 12 July 2012 concerning abuse of a dominant position by the VELUX group, notwithstanding the fact that it was formally called on to do so;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs, even in the event that the case does not proceed to judgment in view of the adoption by the Commission of a decision during the judicial proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs, even in the event that the case does not proceed to judgment in view of the adoption by the Commission of a decision during the judicial proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 288 TFEU, read in conjunction with Articles 102 TFEU and 105 TFEU and with Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

The adoption, after three and a half years, of an initial, allegedly factual position in the procedure regarding the complaint lodged by the applicant does not constitute dealing with the case within a reasonable time. The Commission has not produced any evidence making it possible to determine that any action whatsoever was undertaken during the investigation procedure. Before adopting a decision, the Commission is required to carry out a thorough analysis of the matters of fact and of law put forward by the complainant. The proceedings initiated by the applicant constitute the only way in which it can safeguard its rights.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Exploration Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lynn Wigen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Lynn Wigen
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

March 14, 2023

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, March 14, 2023, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 23-059S) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6 to certify modifications

to NEX SEF’s Fee Schedule for the LATAM EBS NDF Streaming Incentive Program (“Program”). This 

supplemental filing includes an Appendix A (blacklined version) and an Appendix B (clean version).

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendix A and Appendix B (“Confidential Information”), on

the grounds that Appendix A and Appendix B contain confidential commercial information of the submitter 

(NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendix A and Appendix B

until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendix A or Appendix B or any other court order, 

subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission 

intends to disclose such Appendix A or Appendix B to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendix A or Appendix B.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cycle Country Accessories
Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 (the
"Report"), I, Randy Kempf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Randy Kempf
------------------------------------
Randy Kempf
Chief Executive Officer
December 28, 2007

<PAGE>
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
BTHC XIV, Inc.
File No. 0-52722

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of BTHC XIV, Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2007 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
P. Halter,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 25, 2007                     By:       /s/ Timothy P. Halter
      ----------------                         ---------------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTHC XIV,  Inc. and will be retained by BTHC XIV, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017078EN.01004201.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/42

---

Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Pegasus v Parliament

(Case T-57/17)

(2017/C 078/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Reference: FINS-2017-31) concerning the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the specified maximum amount and ordering that a guarantee be lodged; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Reference: FINS-2017-31) concerning the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the specified maximum amount and ordering that a guarantee be lodged;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, which is in essence identical or similar to that raised in Case T-54/17, CLF v Parliament.

CLF

Parliament

---
Exhibit
23




Schwartz
Levitsky Feldman llp


CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS




LICENSED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TORONTO,
MONTREAL




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
FIRM




The
undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp hereby consents to the use of our
name and the use of our opinion dated March 16, 2010 on the consolidated
financial statements of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 included in its Annual Report on Form 10K
being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and its
incorporation by reference into Registration Statement No:
333-126959.





Toronto,
      Ontario, Canada
                /s/
      Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLPMarch
      25, 2010Chartered
      Accountants
                  Licensed
      Public Accountants




1167
Caledonia Road


Toronto,
Ontario M6A 2X1


Tel:
416 785 5353


Fax:
416 785 5663
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ZST Digital Networks, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Zhong BoZhong
      BoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)August
      10, 2010/s/
      John ChenJohn
      ChenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)August
      10, 2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of ZST Digital
Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity
Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      August 16, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Howard
      MahName:
                Title:
              Howard
      Mah
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund,
  LP
# C_2017063EN.01004301.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/43

---

Action brought on 6 January 2017 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)

(Case T-15/17)

(2017/C 063/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Mitrakos (Palaio Faliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Bakopanou, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Juan Ignacio Belasco Baquedano (Viana, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘YAMAS’ — Application for registration No 13 645 478

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2016 in Case R 532/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, as well as the decision given by the Opposition Division which preceded the adoption of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, as well as the decision given by the Opposition Division which preceded the adoption of the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition and allow that the registration of the trade mark applied for be registered; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition and allow that the registration of the trade mark applied for be registered;

| — | order the EUIPO and/or the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EUIPO and/or the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Mark Morris, Also Known as Horace Lee, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), dated March 8, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with forgery in the second degree.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings *(see, People v Hennessy,*133 AD2d 174 [decided herewith]; *People v Bigus,*115 AD2d 751; *affd*68 NY2d 723). Niehoff, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.
October 5, 2017

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

1155 21st Street, NW Room 2205 

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Dear Staff:

Pursuant to Section 145.9 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) 

Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC 

(“DDR”) requests that the DDR Systems Development and monitoring Procedures being submitted to the 

Commission and the information contained therein (together, the “Documents”), be afforded confidential 

treatment until further notice under the Freedom of Information Act and the Commission's Regulations.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact the undersigned at 212-855-3038.

Very truly yours,

Adrienne Z. During

DDR Compliance Director

55 WATER STREET

NEW YORK, NY 10041-0099
Amendment to Deposit Account Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO DEPOSIT ACCOUNT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the
13th day of November, 2008 by and between The Bank of New
York Mellon, in its capacity as trustee of the
CurrencySharesSM Canadian Dollar Trust, a trust formed
under New York law (the “Trust”) and the London Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). 

W I T N E S S E T H 

WHEREAS, The Trust and the Bank are parties to that certain Deposit Account Agreement dated June 8, 2006 (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows: 
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Agreement. 
 2. Amendment. Section 6.4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

 “The Bank reserves the right not to accept, and to return without interest to the remitter of funds, the amounts
received for deposit to the Interest Account on any Bank business day, if the aggregate deposit liability of the Bank to the Trust following the deposit of such amounts would exceed the Canadian Dollar equivalent of $1.5 BILLION U.S. Dollars
calculated at the Canadian Dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate as determined by WM/Reuters at 4:00 PM (London time) on each Bank business day (the “Closing Spot Rate”) or another recognized market rate for the Canadian Dollar if the
Closing Spot Rate is not available on the bank day such deposits are received by the Bank.” 
 3. Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

4. Other. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this
Amendment shall control. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature
Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
hereof. 
  

			
	CURRENCYSHARES CANADIAN DOLLAR TRUST,
		
	By:	 	The Bank of New York, in its capacity as Trustee of the CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust and not in its individual capacity.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrew Pfeifer
	Name:	 	Andrew Pfeifer
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LONDON BRANCH
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael G. Davisson
	Name:	 	Michael G. Davisson
	Title:	 	Vice President
# C_2017063EN.01003802.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/38

---

Action brought on 5 January 2017 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)

(Case T-7/17)

(2017/C 063/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: John Mills Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. (Surfside, Florida, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MINERAL MAGIC’ — EU trade mark application No 12 151 379

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 in Case R 2087/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own costs and those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own costs and those incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019255EN.01003102.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 –EIB v Syria

(Case T-539/17) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Al Thawra Loan Agreement No 16405 - Non-performance of the agreement - Repayment of the sums advanced - Default interest - Procedure by default)

(2019/C 255/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by P. Chamberlain, T. Gilliams, F. Oxangoiti Briones and J. Shirran, and subsequently by F. Oxangoiti Briones, J. Klein and J. Shirran, acting as Agents, and by D. Arts, lawyer, and T. Cusworth, Solicitor)

Defendant: Syrian Arab Republic

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 272 TFEU, seeking an order that the Syrian Arab Republic repay sums due under Al Thawra Loan Agreement No 16405, plus default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to repay the European Union, represented by the European Investment Bank (EIB) the sums of EUR 404 792,06, 954 331,07 pounds sterling (GBP), 29 130 433,00 Japanese yen (JPY) and 1 498 184,58 US dollars (USD). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to repay the European Union, represented by the European Investment Bank (EIB) the sums of EUR 404 792,06, 954 331,07 pounds sterling (GBP), 29 130 433,00 Japanese yen (JPY) and 1 498 184,58 US dollars (USD).

| 2. | Declares that those sums are to bear default interest at an annual rate of 4.52% on the principal amounts and on the contractual interest, from 9 August 2017 up to the date that payment is made. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that those sums are to bear default interest at an annual rate of 4.52% on the principal amounts and on the contractual interest, from 9 August 2017 up to the date that payment is made.

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 4. | Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.

---