alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.43**

THIRD AMENDMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 

WHEREAS, David P. McGlade (the “Executive”) hasentered into an employment agreement with Intelsat, Ltd. (the “Company”) and Intelsat Holdings, Ltd., dated as of January 28, 2005, as amended June 21, 2005 and March 8, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”);

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the partieshereto do hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement, effective as of March 16, 2007, as follows (the “Amendment”): 

1.        Capitalized Terms.    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement. 

2.        Base Salary.    The Employment Agreement is amended to add the following twosentences to the end of section 2.1(a): “Effective as of February 19, 2007, Base Salary shall be increased to be $814,000. Increases to the Base Salary, as approved by the Compensation Committee from time to time, shall not require writtenamendment of this Agreement, and the increased Base Salary, once effective, shall be the Base Salary for purposes of this Agreement.” 

3.        Governing Law.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the District of Columbia without regard to its conflict of lawsprinciples. 

4.         Successor.    This Amendment shall bind andinure to the benefit of the Company, its successors and assigns, and the Executive and his or her personal representatives and assigns. 

5.        Miscellaneous. 

(a)  This Amendment shall notbe construed so as to grant the Executive any right to remain in the employ of the Company or any Subsidiary. 

(b)  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one and the same original. 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by its officer thereunder duly authorized and the Executive has hereunto set his hand, all as of the day and year first set forth above. 

INTELSAT HOLDINGS, LTD.
153 So. 746

#### IRWIN v. WEIL et al.

8 Div. 441.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 1, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1934.

Lynne & Lynne, of Decatur, for appellant

Julian Harris and A. J. Harris, both of Decatur, for appellees.

THOMAS, Justice.

The trial was had by the court.without a jury, and judgment rendered for plaintiffSi

It may be said that the judgment was rendered on June 9, 1931; the appeal was tak*490en, and. security for costs given and' approved on May 11, 1932; and the question of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal is presented. Section 6127, Code; Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley Bank, 225 Ala. 632, 144 So. 803; Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield, 221 Ala. 216, 128 So. 219; Collins Paving Co. v. Holseapple, 221 Ala. 308, 128 So. 599; Thompson v. State ex rel. Reeves, 216 Ala. 348, 113 So. 296; City of Troy v. Murphree, 214 Ala. 118, 107 So. 83.

The appeal, taken after the time prescribed by statute, will be dismissed ex mero motu, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider same. Snider v. Funderburk, 209 Ala. 663, 96 So. 928; Boshell v. Phillips, 207 Ala. 628, 93 So. 576; Bickley v. Hays, 183 Ala. 506, 62 So. 767.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. X, and BROWN and KNIGHT, XL, concur.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Plus Resource Corp., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, H. James Graham, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  [exhibit3233108002.gif]  H. James Graham CEO, Chief Accounting Officer  Dated:  May 15, 2008
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Don Crosbie, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CLAIMSNET.COM INC.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) [Reserved]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: July 26, 2005   /s/ Don Crosbie  Don Crosbie  President and Chief Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ALLEN KOERSCHNER, 

Appellant, 

VS. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 70283 

FILED 

JUL 2 8 2016 

TRACIE K LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING APPEAL 

Appellant filed a document entitled "Appeal: Denial of Rule 

60(b)(4) Motion by North Las Vegas Township Justice Court and Writ of 

Mandamus" in the district court. The district court clerk transmitted the 

document to this court and it was docketed as a criminal appeal. 

Upon further review of the document, it appears that Mr. 

Koerschner intended to file the document in the district court. The 

document's caption identifies the Eighth Judicial District Court, and it 

appears that the document seeks relief from that court based on 

proceedings that occurred in the Justice Court. Accordingly, we direct the 

clerk of this court to administratively close this appeal. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Allen Koerschner 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

(0) 1947A
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3661] 

The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday June 13, 2001, in room 6103, U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC. The purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 47th session of the Subcommittee on Safety of Navigation (NAV) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) which is scheduled for July 2-6, 2001, at the IMO Headquarters in London. 

Items of principal interest on the agenda are: 

                    —Routing of ships, ship reporting and related matters                           ( print page 26904)    

—Integrated bridge systems (IBS) operational aspects 

—Guidelines relating to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) chapter V 

—Training and certification of maritime pilots and revision of resolution A.485(XII) 

—Navigational aids and related matters 

—International Telecommunication Union (ITU) matters, including Radiocommunication ITU-R Study Group 8 

—Effective voyage planning for large passenger vessels 

Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing: Mr. Edward J. LaRue, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard (G-MWV-2, Room 1407, 2100 Second Street SW, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: (202) 267-0416. 

Dated: May 7, 2001.

Stephen M. Miller,

Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-12210 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM HUSSMANN INTERNATIONAL'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              36
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   453
<PP&E>                                             374
<DEPRECIATION>                                     175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              200
<BONDS>                                            297
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       777
<SALES>                                            295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   295
<CGS>                                              240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     11
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.13<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 3 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 4 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 5 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 6 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 7 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 8 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 9 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 10 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 11 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 12 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 13 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 14 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 15 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 16 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 17 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 18 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 19 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 20 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 21 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 22 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 23 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 24 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 25 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 26 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 27 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 28 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 29 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 30 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 31 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 32 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 33 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 34 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 35 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 36 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 37 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 38 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 25-2 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 39 of 39
# C_2017382EN.01004502.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/45

---

Action brought on 30 September 2017 — FV v Council

(Case T-153/17)

(2017/C 382/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FV (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the staff reports for 2014 and 2015 definitively adopted on 5 December 2016; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the staff reports for 2014 and 2015 definitively adopted on 5 December 2016;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law, alleging that, in the present case, the staff reports for 2014 and 2015 adopted by the Council of the European Union concerning the applicant are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment, insufficient reasoning and a breach of the duty of care.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128570 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan HARVEY J. COWAN and SUE COWAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128570 COA: 251645 Macomb CC: 02-001182-NO LAKEVIEW VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, METROPOLITAN PROPERTY MANAGE MENT, INC., and T & J LANDSCAPING AND SNOW REMOVAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY
, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2005

Clerk
# C_2019280EN.01003501.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — EIB v Syria

(Case T-543/17) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Syrian Healthcare Loan Agreement No 21595 - Non-performance of the agreement - Repayment of the sums advanced - Default interest - Procedure by default)

(2019/C 280/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by P. Chamberlain, T. Gilliams, F. Oxangoiti Briones and J. Shirran, and subsequently by F. Oxangoiti Briones, J. Klein and J. Shirran, acting as Agents, and D. Arts, lawyer, and T. Cusworth, Solicitor)

Defendant: Syrian Arab Republic

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 272 TFEU, seeking an order that the Syrian Arab Republic repay sums due under Syrian Healthcare Loan Agreement No 21595, plus default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to repay the European Union, represented by the European Investment Bank (EIB) the sums of EUR 62 646 209,04 and 3 582 381,15 US dollars (USD); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to repay the European Union, represented by the European Investment Bank (EIB) the sums of EUR 62 646 209,04 and 3 582 381,15 US dollars (USD);

| 2. | Declares that those sums are to bear default interest, in accordance with the method laid down in Article 3.02 of Syrian Healthcare loan agreement No 21595, entered into by the EIB and the Syrian Arab Republic on 15 June 2002 and amended on 17 October and 29 November 2007, on the principal amounts and on the contractual interest, from 9 August 2017 until the date that payment is made; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that those sums are to bear default interest, in accordance with the method laid down in Article 3.02 of Syrian Healthcare loan agreement No 21595, entered into by the EIB and the Syrian Arab Republic on 15 June 2002 and amended on 17 October and 29 November 2007, on the principal amounts and on the contractual interest, from 9 August 2017 until the date that payment is made;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Syrian Arab Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.

---
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

May 5, 2023

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC – Amendment of Rule 901 (Swap Specifications)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), TW SEF LLC 

(“TW SEF”) hereby submits an amendment to its Rulebook related to the above-captioned Rule. 

Specifically, the Rulebook has been amended as detailed below.

The Rulebook has been amended to reflect updates in the Fixed to Floating Specification and 

more granular information in the Overnight Index Swap Specification.

In connection with this submission, TW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. TW SEF certifies that it has posted a notice of this pending certification with the

Commission and a copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website, including a redline

of Rule 901, which is attached hereto as Attachment A, and a copy of Rule 901, which

is attached hereto as Attachment B;

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s regulations 

thereunder; and 

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rules were expressed to TW SEF 

by its governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market 

participants.
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

May 5, 2023

2

Should you have questions regarding this submission, please contact the undersigned at (646) 

767-4923 or by email at Devi.Shanmugham@tradeweb.com. 

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham

TW SEF CCO
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

May 5, 2023

3

Attachment A

Redline Version of Rule 901
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

May 5, 2023

4

Attachment B

Amended Rule 901
55 WATER STREET

DTCC Data Repository ee

May 19, 2017

By Electronic Submission

Mr. Chris Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments
Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:
Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation § 40.6(d), DTCC Data

Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendment
issued during the week of May 19, 2017:

e DDR has amended its Fee Schedule for CFTC Reporting (the “Fee Schedule”) to correct an
error in the example contained in Annex A of the Fee Schedule.

A copy of the Fee Schedule is available on DDR’s public website and may be accessed at:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/derivatives-services/global-trade-repository/gtr-us.

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 813 470-1447 or via
email at kromig@dtcc.com.

Sincerely,

fz

le Romig
Director and Assistant General Counsel