alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ArtVentive Medical Ventures Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the second quarter
ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, H. James Graham, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.     /s/
H. James Graham ____________ H. James Graham President, Chief
Financial Officer  Dated: August 6,
2010       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ArtVentive Medical Ventures Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the second ending June
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Leon Rudakov, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.     /s/
Dr. Leon Rudakov ____________ Dr. Leon Rudakov,
CEO, CTO  Dated:  August
16, 2010
Exhibit 31.1**Certifications**I, J. Ross Craft, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Approach Resources Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controlsand procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely
 

 
   affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.         By:  /s/ J. Ross Craft    J. Ross Craft    President and Chief Executive Officer   May 8, 2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28755-28756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Communication Disorders Review Committee, June 20, 2001, 8 am to June 
22, 2001, 5 pm, Governor's House, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036 which was published in the Federal Register on May 
2, 2001, 66 FR 21992.
    The meeting has been changed to start on June 20, 2001 and end on 
June 21, 2001. The meeting is closed to the public.

[[Page 28756]]

    Dated: May 17, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Directror, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13110 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-31615) of RDO Equipment Co. of our reports dated
March 14, 2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Minneapolis Minnesota
April 21, 2003
# C_2019255EN.01003101.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Dalli v Commission

(Case T-399/17) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Investigation by OLAF - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Non-material damage - Causal link)

(2019/C 255/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: John Dalli (St. Julians, Malta) (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. P. Keppenne and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the illegal conduct of the Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), connected with the termination of his office as a Member of the Commission on 16 October 2012.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr John Dalli to bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr John Dalli to bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.

---
# C_2017277EN.01005902.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/59

---

Action brought on 5 July 2017 — Item Industrietechnik v EUIPO (EFUSE)

(Case T-427/17)

(2017/C 277/84)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Item Industrietechnik GmbH (Solingen, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt, V. Töbelmann and M. Vitt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘EFUSE’ — Application No 15 463 011

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2017 in Case R 1882/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CalbaTech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James DeOlden, CEO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on the Company.


By: /s/ James DeOlden
------------------------
James DeOlden, CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7392

VANCE MARCEL GIBSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00461-WLO)

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 4, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without

prejudice Gibson’s motion for the return of seized property. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Gibson v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00461-WLO

(M.D.N.C. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2017144EN.01005701.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/57

---

Action brought on 17 March 2017 — M & K v EUIPO — Genfoot (KIMIKA)

(Case T-171/17)

(2017/C 144/77)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: M & K Srl (Prato, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Genfoot, Inc. (Montreal, Québec, Canada)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘KIMIKA’ — Application for registration No 13 233 391

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2017 in Case R 1206/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | recognize and declare that the recourse presented by the applicant is admissible and well founded; and consequently |
| --- | --- |

—

recognize and declare that the recourse presented by the applicant is admissible and well founded; and consequently

| — | reform the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

reform the contested decision;

| — | send the case back to EUIPO for a reforming decision and therefore give way to a definitive registration of the EU trade mark No 13 233 391 even in the classes contested; |
| --- | --- |

—

send the case back to EUIPO for a reforming decision and therefore give way to a definitive registration of the EU trade mark No 13 233 391 even in the classes contested;

| — | condemn the counterpart to pay fees and costs of the three proceeding. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the counterpart to pay fees and costs of the three proceeding.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred when it assessed the risk of confusion between the trade marks. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred when it assessed the risk of confusion between the trade marks.

---
#### United States *v.*Tod.

*Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio, W.*D.

November, 1885

1. “Infamous” Crimes—Criminal Information.

Offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one year may, upon conviction thereof, subject the defendant to an “infamous” punishment, and cannot be prosecuted by criminal information.

8. Samp;—Pension Frauds.

The offenses created by sections 4716, 5118, and *54.70*can be prosecuted only by indictment. ‘

Demurrer to Criminal Information.

*J. G. Harper,*for demurrer.

*Henry Hooper,*Asst. U. S. Atty., *contra.*

Sage, J.,

*(orally.)*The defendant is charged in a criminal information with violating sections 4746, 5418, and 5479, Rev. St. He demurs on the ground that the offenses are “infamous,” and can be prosecuted only by indictment or presentment of a grand jury. The counts under sections 5418, 5479, are clearly within *Ex parte Wilson,*114 U. S. 417, S. C. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 935, as those sections in terms authorize imprisonment at hard labor. Section 4746 authorizes a sentence of “imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years.” *816Under section 5541, if the sentence be for a period longer than one year, it may be executed in a penitentiary, and, under section 5539, subject to the discipline and treatment applied to prisoners under sentence by the state courts. Prisoners in the Ohio penitentiary are, by law, kept at hard labor. A sentence by this court to imprisonment in the Ohio penitentiary is therefore in effect a sentence to imprisonment at hard labor. See *Ex parte Karstendick,*93 U. S. 396, and *Ex parte Geary, 2*Biss. 485. The criterion laid down in *Ex parte Wilson*is “whether the crime is one for which the statutes authorize the court to award an infamous punishment, not whether the punishment ultimately awarded is infamous. When the accused is in danger of being subjected to an infamous punishment if convicted, he has the right to insist that he shall not be put upon trial except on the accusation of a grand jury.” 114 U. S. 426, and 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 939.

As the crime charged in the counts under section 4746 would, upon conviction, authorize a sentence to the penitentiary, and in fact subject the accused to a term at hard labor, it is infamous, and cannot be prosecuted by information. Demurrer sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40939

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR VALDEZ-VALDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-320-1

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Valdez-Valdez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Valdez-Valdez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40939 Document: 00511149064 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
# C_2017078EN.01003801.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/38

---

Action brought on 25 January 2017 — VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg v SRB

(Case T-42/17)

(2017/C 078/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg eG (Siegburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and K. Rübsamen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), in so far as the contested decisions affect the applicant’s contribution; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), in so far as the contested decisions affect the applicant’s contribution;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-14/17, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.

Landesbank Baden-Württemberg

SRB

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

ADAM BROWN and HANA R. BROWN,

Appellees.

No. 2D2023-2088

August 30, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Hunter W. Carroll, 

Judge.

Alec P. Hayes of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Atlanta, 

Georgia, for Appellant.

Scott D. McKay of McKay Law Firm, P.A., Bradenton, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 10 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
June 4, 2003
# C_2005149EN.01000201.xml

| 21.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/2

---

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between Tarbes (Lourdes-Pyrénées) and Paris (Orly)

(2005/C 149/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | France has decided to alter, with effect from 1 June 2005, the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Tarbes (Lourdes-Pyrénées) and Paris (Orly) published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 22 of 27 January 2004 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

France has decided to alter, with effect from 1 June 2005, the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Tarbes (Lourdes-Pyrénées) and Paris (Orly) published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 22 of 27 January 2004 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

Official Journal of the European Union

| 2. | The public service obligations are amended as follows:
  The obligations set out in Point 2 regarding the type of aircraft used and the capacity to be provided are replaced by the following:
  ‘The minimum daily capacity which must be available throughout the year is 360 seats from Monday to Friday and 180 on Saturdays and Sundays. The services must be operated with a pressurised aircraft.’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

The public service obligations are amended as follows:

The obligations set out in Point 2 regarding the type of aircraft used and the capacity to be provided are replaced by the following:

‘The minimum daily capacity which must be available throughout the year is 360 seats from Monday to Friday and 180 on Saturdays and Sundays. The services must be operated with a pressurised aircraft.’

---
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date November 3, 2010
    /s/ Harpreet S. GrewalHarpreet S. GrewalExecutive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
# Butter Warehouse

# NonFat Dry Milk Warehouse

# Dry Whey Warehouse