alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.71**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**CLASS B RESTRICTED SHARE AGREEMENT**

This Amendment to Class B Restricted Share Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as ofDecember 7, 2009, by and between Intelsat Global, Ltd. (the “Company”) and Phillip L. Spector (the “Employee”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee entered into that certain Class B Restricted Share Agreement dated as of May 6, 2009, by and between the Company and the Employee (the “Class BAgreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend certain terms of the Class B Agreement ashereinafter provided. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and in consideration of the mutual promisesand covenants set forth below, the Company and the Employee hereby agree as follows: 

1. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise definedherein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Class B Agreement. 

2. The first sentence of Section 8(b) of the Class BAgreement is hereby amended and restated as follows: 

“Shareholders of Class B Restricted Shares shall not be entitled toreceive their percentage interest of all Distributions paid to shareholders until each shareholder of Class A Shares receives Distributions (received after the time of the Company’s migration to Luxembourg) equal to their Paid-in-Capital(as defined below), and, thereafter, the holders of Class B Shares and holders of Class A Shares shall be entitled to receive Distributions ratably based upon the proportionate number of outstanding common shares of the Company held by eachsuch shareholder; at the time of any Distribution of Class A Shares to the holders of Class A Shares (a “Class A Share Distribution”), the Company shall simultaneously make a Class B Share distribution to the holders ofClass B Shares in an amount necessary to maintain the proportion of Class A Shares to Class B Shares in effect as of the date of such Class A Share Distribution.” 

3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Class B Agreement, and for the avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that (a) any distribution of Class A Shares in connectionwith a stock split or in connection with a stock dividend having the effect of a stock split (including, without limitation, any Class A Shares issued in connection with the recapitalization related to the Company’s migration toLuxembourg) shall not constitute a “Distribution” for purposes of the Class B Agreement, and (b) as of the date hereof, no Distributions have been made to the holders of the Class A Shares. 

4. Except as amended above, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Class B Agreement shall remainunchanged and shall continue in full force and effect. 

5. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall bedeemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 

 

2 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first abovewritten. 

 
**INTELSAT GLOBAL, LTD.**By: 
 
 Name: 
 
 Title: 
 
  **EMPLOYEE**
 
Phillip L. Spector
**[SIGNATURE PAGETO AMENDMENTTO CLASS B RESTRICTED SHARE AGREEMENT]**
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Scott Brunsdon      | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|Scott Brunsdon          | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: May 14, 2008      | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
January 23, 2024

VIA CFTC PORTAL 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Certification: Amendments to the Exchange and Clearing

Transaction Fee Schedule for Nodal Exchange

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear, LLC 

(“Nodal Clear”) hereby notifies the Commission that it plans to amend its Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee

Schedule (“Fee Schedule”) for certain Nodal Exchange environmental contracts. The Fee Schedule shall become 

effective on February 6, 2024. Attached hereto is the Fee Schedule that will be applicable for Nodal Exchange futures

and options cleared at Nodal Clear.

1

The Fee Schedule is being revised to clarify the fees associated with EFS/EFR transactions.

Nodal Clear management has assessed the Fee Schedule and its compliance with applicable provisions of the 

Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), including the Commission’s Regulations and DCO Core Principles. Nodal Clear 

has identified that the Fee Schedule may have some bearing on the following Core Principles:

Core Principle B - Financial Resources: The Fee Schedule will not impact Nodal Clear’s ability to discharge its financial, 

operational, or managerial responsibilities as a DCO.

Core Principle L - Public Information: As required by Core Principle L, Nodal Clear is publicly posting this selfcertification letter on its website to ensure that market participants receive advance notice of the Fee Schedule. On 

the effective date of the Fee Schedule, the Fee Schedule will be posted on the Nodal Clear website. 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the CEA and the Commission’s Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear certifies that the Fee 

Schedule set forth in the attachment complies with the CEA and the Commission’s Regulations thereunder. Nodal 

Clear is not aware of any opposing views expressed regarding the Fee Schedule. Nodal Clear certifies that this 

submission has been concurrently posted on the Nodal Clear website at www.nodalclear.com.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact me at 703-962-9864 

or alvarez@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/Cody Alvarez

Cody Alvarez

Chief Compliance Officer

Corporate Counsel

Attachments:

Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee Schedule (Redline)

1 Nodal Exchange, LLC is submitting a separate filing for exchange fees. Such fees are also reflected in the attachment.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 1, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1857

Lower Tribunal No. 19-0409

________________

L.A., a juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando A. 

Prescott, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, 

Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Asad Ali and David Llanes, 

Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

LINDSEY, J.
2

Appellant L.A., a juvenile, appeals from an order revoking his 

probation. The sole basis for revoking probation was an adjudication of

delinquency for battery, which was separately appealed in L.A. v. State, 47 

Fla. L. Weekly D2009 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 6, 2022) (case no. 3D20-1856). The 

State agrees with Appellant that if the finding of delinquency for battery in 

3D20-1856 were reversed, the probation order under review in this appeal 

must also be reversed. See Stevens v. State, 409 So. 2d 1051, 1052 (Fla. 

1982) (“[I]f a revocation is based solely on a conviction and that conviction 

is subsequently reversed, the revocation must also be reversed.” (quoting 

Stevens v. State, 397 So. 2d 398, 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981))). 

In 3D20-1856, this Court held that because the trial court did not make 

case-specific findings of necessity for a remote adjudicatory hearing, the 

delinquency adjudication for battery must be reversed. L.A., 47 Fla. L. 

Weekly D2009. Because this Court has reversed the finding of delinquency 

for battery in 3D20-1856, we likewise reverse the probation order under 

review in this appeal and remand for a new probation violation hearing. See, 

e.g., Humbert v. State, 933 So. 2d 726, 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[T]he fact 

that [defendant’s] conviction . . . was reversed does not mean that his 

probation cannot be revoked based on the same facts.”).

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADDED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Refining Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John A. Catsimatidis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                     |  |    
|Dated: July 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy                        
|                     |  |     |  | James E. Murphy Principal Financial
Officer
# C_2019305EN.01001502.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland — Netherlands) — HQ, IP, legally represented by HQ, JO v Aegean Airlines SA

(Case C-163/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Flight cancellation - Assistance - Right to reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket by the air carrier - Article 8(2) - Package tour - Directive 90/314/EEC - Insolvency of the tour organiser)

(2019/C 305/19)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Nederland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: HQ, IP, legally represented by HQ, JO

Defendant: Aegean Airlines SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that a passenger who, under Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours, has the right to hold his tour organiser liable for reimbursement of the cost of his air ticket, can no longer claim reimbursement of the cost of that ticket from the air carrier, on the basis of that regulation, even where the tour organiser is financially incapable of reimbursing the cost of the ticket and has not taken any measures to guarantee such reimbursement.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2334 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ‘‘Wilson and Young Medal of Honor 

VA Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2019 

Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. HURD of 

Texas, Mr. BABIN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BRADY, Mr. OLSON, Mr. 

CARTER of Texas, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. RATCLIFFE, Mr. 

THORNBERRY, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. WRIGHT, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. VELA, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. CUELLAR, 

and Mr. ROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, as the ‘‘Wilson 

and Young Medal of Honor VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON AND YOUNG MEDAL 

4 OF HONOR VA CLINIC. 

5 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that Private First 

6 Class Alfred ‘‘Mac’’ Wilson of the Marine Corps and Staff 

7 Sergeant Marvin ‘‘Rex’’ Young of the Army were both 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2334 IH

1 posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for their heroic 

2 actions in the Vietnam War. 

3 (b) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af4 fairs community-based outpatient clinic in Odessa, Texas, 

5 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘Wilson and Young Medal of Honor 

7 VA Clinic’’. 

8 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (b) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Wilson and Young 

12 Medal of Honor VA Clinic’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision Industries Corp. for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of
June 30, 2010. This Certification is executed as of
August 23, 2010. By:/s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Executive Officer and  Principal Financial Officer)    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30DAY-06-01]
 A notice announcing Jail STD Prevalence Monitoring System was published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on November 6, 2000, (65 FR 66546). This notice is a correction. On page 66546, in the third column of the notice, the last line of the last paragraph, the burden hours should be changed from 1248 to 3296. On page 66546, at the end of the notice, the burden table should be replaced with the following table: Respondents
No. of respondents
Avg. No. of forms/respondent
No. of responses/respondent
Avg. burden/response (in hrs.)State/local health departments

4 datasets/yearA. With access to electronic data
A. 8 health departments

A. 3/dataset
A. 96B. Without access to electronic data
B. 8 health departments

B. 100/dataset
B. 3,200
 
 
 All other information and requirements of the November 6, 2000, notice remain the same. Dated: January 10, 2001. Nancy E. Cheal, Acting Associate Director for Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


[FR Doc. 01-1296 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2277 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2277

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ``Fire Captain 
                   Cory Barr Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

    Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Moore, Mr. Kind, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. 
 Grothman, Mr. Steil, and Mr. Sensenbrenner) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, as the ``Fire Captain 
                   Cory Barr Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRE CAPTAIN CORY BARR POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1715 Linnerud Drive in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Fire Captain Cory Barr Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Fire 
Captain Cory Barr Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017231EN.01002601.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — RW v Commission

(Case T-170/17 R)

((Interim measures - Civil Service - Officials - Requirement to take leave and compulsory retirement - Retirement age - Article 42c of the Staff Regulations - Application for a stay of execution - Fumus boni juris - Urgency - Balance of interests))

(2017/C 231/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RW (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of the Commission’s decision of 2 March 2017 placing the applicant on leave in the interests of the service and compulsorily retiring him with effect from 1 June 2017.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The execution of the Commission’s decision of 2 March 2017 placing the applicant on leave in the interests of the service and compulsorily retiring him with effect from 1 June 2017 is stayed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The execution of the Commission’s decision of 2 March 2017 placing the applicant on leave in the interests of the service and compulsorily retiring him with effect from 1 June 2017 is stayed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27998-27999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-610-01-1220-AA]


Meeting of the California Desert District Advisory Council

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Laws 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council to the 
Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, will 
participate in a field tour of the BLM-administered public lands on 
Friday, June 15, 2001, from 7:30 a.m to 4:30 p.m., and meet in formal 
session on Saturday, June 16, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Saturday 
meeting will be held in the Pinnacles Room at the Kerr McGee Center, 
located at 100 West California Avenue in Ridgecrest, California.
    The Council and interested members of the public will assemble for 
the field tour at the Best Western China Lake Inn parking lot at 7:15 
a.m. and depart at 7:30 a.m. Tour stops will include the Rand Mountains 
and Jawbone Canyon

[[Page 27999]]

Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. Members of the public are welcome 
to participate in the tour, but should plan on providing their own 
transportation, drinks, and lunch.
    The Council will meet in formal session on Saturday. Agenda items 
will include updates/briefings on BLM's off-highway vehicle program and 
management related issues.
    All Desert District Advisory Council meetings are open to the 
public. Time for public comment may be made available by the Council 
Chairman during the presentation of various agenda items, and is 
scheduled at the beginning of the meeting for topics not on the agenda.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, Public Affairs Office, 6221 Box Springs Boulevard, 
Riverside, California 92507-0714. Written comments also are accepted at 
the time of the meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, 
will be incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doran Sanchez at (909) 697-5220, BLM 
California Desert District External Affairs.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Tim Salt,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-12697 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P