alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TEXAS COURT DF CRIMINAL APPEAL^

AUSTIN, TEXAS

wmc&m,v.mii

M

Muldrow, Johnny

(Petitioner)

OCT 05 2015

Cause ,#©W»BtalCtefk THE STATE DF TEXAS

(Respondent)

PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENDED TIME

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AND

REQUEST TO SUSPEND T.R.A.P. RULE 9.3(b)

fiifd

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OCT 08 2015

TO THE HONORABLE ZIUSTICE(S) OF SAID COURT: Abel AcOSta, Clerk

COMES NOW, Johnny Muldrou, Petitioner, proceeding pro se and indigent

in the above-styled and numbered cause, and respectfully asks this Honorable

Court to extend the filing deadline date for an additional (60) days, thus

allowing Petitioner to prepare and present a meaningful Petition for

Discretionary Review. In addition, Petitioner requests that due to his

INDIGENT status, that T.R.A.P. Rule 9.3(b) be suspended pursuant to T.R.A.P.

Rule 2, allouing Petitioner to file ONLY the original Petition for Discretionary

Review instead of the required (11) copies, as required by Rule 9.3(b)(1).

In support thereof, Petitioner would show the Court the following:

1. Petitioner was indigent during trial as well as during his appellate

proceedings and continues to be indigent.

2. Petitioner submits that he does NOT have the legal skills capable to handle

this proceeding and requires assistance from a fellow inmate due to the

complexity of the issues involved with the case.

3. Petitioner is NOT requesting additional time to file his PDR to harass

Respondent nor delay proceedings, but for the sole purpose of preparing

and presenting a meaningful Petition for Discretionary Review.

k. This Court granted Petitioner the opportunity to file an Out-of-Time

Petition for Discretionary review in a ruling dated September 23, 2015

in Cause No. UR-83,804-01, and mandated that Petitioner file his PDR

within 30 days of the ruling.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner asks this Court to grant this

motion, extending the filing deadline date for his Petition for Discretionary

Review for an additional (60) days, or any additional time this Court deems

appropriate. ADDITIONALLY, Petitioner asks that, due to his indigent status,
T.R.A.P. Rule 9.3(b) be suspended pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 2, allowing

Petitioner to file ONLY the original of his Petition for Discretionary Review

in this Court.

Executed this 29th day of September, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Dohnny Muldrow - Petitioner

Pro Se Representation

TDC3 #1934318

Mark Li. Stiles Unit

3060 FM 3514

Beaumont, TX 77705

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing Request for Extended Time to

File Petition for Discretionary Review and Request to Suspend T.R.A.P. Rule

9.3(b), was delivered to Respondent via U.S. Postal Service, postage prepaid,

addressed to:

Gary D. Young, District Attorney

Lamar County Courthouse

119 North Main Street

Paris, TX 75460

Executed this 29th day of September, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Dohnny Muldrow - Petitioner

Pro Se Representation

TDCZI #193431:6

Mark L). Stiles Unit

3060 FM 3514

Beaumont, TX 77705
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

__________________________________________________ 

In the Matter of the Application of ICE Futures Abu Dhabi Limited 

for Registration pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act and Part 48 of the Regulations of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission in order to permit 

direct access to its order entry and trade matching system 

__________________________________________________ 

ORDER OF REGISTRATION 

Pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the Act), 7 U.S.C. 

§ 6(b)(1), and Part 48 of the Commission’s regulations, ICE Futures Abu Dhabi Limited (IFAD), 

a recognized investment exchange supervised by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority in 

the Abu Dhabi Global Market, submitted an application dated September 1, 2020, and 

supplemental submissions filed through September 29, 2020 (the Application), requesting 

registration in order to permit identified members and other participants located in the United 

States to enter trades directly into its order entry and trade matching system. 

The Commission has reviewed the Application along with the exhibits, supplemental 

documents, and other supporting information and representations, and finds that IFAD has 

demonstrated its ability to comply with the requirements of the Act and applicable Commission 

regulations thereunder, including the requirements for registration as set forth in Part 48 of the 

Commission’s regulations. 

In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the Act, 7 

U.S.C. § 6(b)(1), that IFAD is granted an Order of Registration to permit direct access, as that 

term is defined in Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act, subject to the terms and conditions specified 

herein:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the M&I Auto Loan Trust 2001-1:

We have examined management's assertion about M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank's (the
"Bank") compliance with its established minimum servicing standards identified
and included in the accompanying management assertion as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, dated March 31, 2003. Management is responsible for the
Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institue of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's
compliance with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with its minimum
servicing standards. We are independent of the Bank within the meaning of the
Code of Professional Ethics of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2002, is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 31, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130191-2 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. FRED W. BRZOZOWSKI and 

Stephen J. Markman, LA VERNE S. BRZOZOWSKI, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 130191-2 

 COA: 256701; 259098 

Berrien CC: 01-003847-CH 

ARTHUR W. WONDRASEK and 

MARY WONDRASEK,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SHEILA FINK, 

 Intervening Plaintiff. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0920 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 27, 2006 

 Clerk
<PAGE>


                               Exhibit 32.1

         Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    as adopted Pursuant to
           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of CalbaTech, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James DeOlden, CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of
operations on the Company.


By: /s/  James DeOlden
James DeOlden, CEO
#### In the Matter of Gerard E. Molony, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

January 22, 1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella (Maryann Yanarella*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent Gerard E. Molony has submitted an affidavit dated September 1, 1989, wherein he tenders his resigna*327tion as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). By order of this court dated July 5, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court and the petitioner Grievance Committee was authorized to institute a disciplinary proceeding against him.

The respondent acknowledges that he is the subject of a disciplinary proceeding, wherein he is charged, *inter alia,*with neglecting legal matters entrusted to him, engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law by abandoning his clients at a closing of real property, taking with him the deed that he had prepared without discussing his departure with his clients or the reasons therefor, failing to cooperate with the investigations of the petitioner Grievance Committee, and failing to register as an attorney with the Office of Court Administration as required by Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1.

The respondent acknowledges that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation, and that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against the charges outlined above.

Under the circumstances herein, the respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and it is directed that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the resignation of the respondent Gerard E. Molony is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Gerard E. Molony is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that Gerard E. Molony shall continue to comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Gerard E. Molony is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from *328appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12991]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1221, MM Docket No. 01-45, RM-9997]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Mountain View, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Arkansas Educational 
Television Commission, licensee of noncommercial educational station 
KEMB(TV), substitutes DTV channel *13 for DTV channel *35 at Mountain 
View, Arkansas. See 66 FR 12748, February 28, 2001. DTV channel *13 can 
be allotted to Mountain View in compliance with the principle community 
coverage requirements of section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates 
(35-48-47 N. and 92-17-24 W.) with a power of 20.0, HAAT of 425 meters 
and with a DTV service population of 337 thousand. With this action, 
this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective July 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-45, adopted May 16, 2001, and 
released May 18, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR Part 73--[Amended]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Arkansas, is amended by removing DTV channel *35 and adding DTV 
channel *13 at Mountain View.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12991 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12856]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a Consent Decree in United States v. Applied Science 
Laboratories, Inc., et al. (E.D. Va.) Civil Action No. 99CV834, was 
lodged on May 12, 2001, with the United States District Court for the 
Eastern District of Virginia. The Consent Decree resolves the claims of 
the United States under section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (``CERCLA''), for 
reimbursement of the United States' past response costs incurred in 
responding to contamination at the Applied Science Laboratories 
Superfund Site located in Richmond, Virginia. The Consent Decree 
obligates the estates of John F. Neves and Mattie R. Neves to sell the 
real property at 2216 Hull Street, Richmond, Virginia, and pay the 
first $50,000 of the proceeds from the sale to the United States in 
reimbursement of the past response costs incurred by EPA; the heirs 
will keep the next $10,000 and any balance above that will be divided 
evenly between the United States and the heirs.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environmental and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., DOJ Ref. #90-11-3-07015.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Region III Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19103; and by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 
Department of Justice, PO Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In 
requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please refer to the 
referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $5.00, payable to 
the U.S. Treasury.

Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-12856 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Plaza 5, 185 Hudson St #2200 

Jersey City, NJ 07311

Via CFTC Portal

March 20, 2020

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Commission Regulations 40.6(a)(6): Emergency Self-Certification of Market Regulation 

Advisory Notice (COVID-19 Emergency Notice)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

DW SEF LLC (“DW SEF”) hereby notifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and 

Commission Regulation 40.6(a)(6)(ii), that it is self-certifying a Market Regulation Advisory 

Notice entitled COVID-19 Emergency Notice (the “COVID-19 Notice”).

The COVID-19 Notice is an Emergency Rule and will be effective on March 20, 2020. The 

COVID-19 Notice was implemented under DW SEF Rule 412 (Emergencies) and its issuance 

was approved by the Board of DW SEF.

In connection with its submission, DW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. DW SEF certifies that it has posted the COVID-10 Notice on DW SEF’s website and has 

provided this notification to the Commission;

2. DW SEF certifies that the COVID-19 Notice complies with the DW SEF Rulebook, the 

Act and the Commission’s regulations, thereunder, specifically Core Principle 8 

(Emergency Authority); and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the COVID-19 Notice were expressed to 

DW SEF by its governing board or committee members, or market participants.

This submission letter contains the following attachments:

Attached as Exhibit A is the COVID-19 Notice, which provides a concise explanation and 

analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the emergency rule and its compliance 

with applicable provisions of the Act, including core principles, and the Commission's 

regulations thereunder.
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

March 20, 2020

2

304592000 v1

In the event that you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (646) 560-7223 or 

Gregory.Compa@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Gregory Compa

Chief Compliance Officer

DW SEF LLC
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

March 20, 2020

3

304592000 v1

EXHIBIT A

DW SEF COVID-19 EMERGENCY NOTICE
Exhibit 10.2
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 PERFORMANCE VESTING
AND TIME VESTING REQUIREMENTS
 Approach Participant
 Committee Plan Common Stock
    1. Restricted Stock Award Award Restricted Shares Grant Date
 2. Vesting and Forfeiture
 Section
2(a)(ii) Restricted Period Section 2(a)(i) Restrictions
 1




---



##### 



Performance Vesting Requirement Performance Vesting
Requirement Performance Goals Article XI Appendix A Section 2(a)(ii)
 Time Vesting Requirement Time Vesting Requirement
     paragraph (c) Section 2 paragraph (a) Section 2 paragraph (a) Section 2
 2




---



##### 



Change in Control and Termination of Employment or Service for Death or
Disability
 Change in Control
 Termination of Employment or Service for Death or Disability
 3. Rights as Stockholder Section 2 Section 2
 4. Optional Issuance in Book-Entry Form
 5. Withholding Taxes
  Section 5(a)
 3




---



##### 



paragraphs (a) or (b) Section
5
 6. Reclassification of Shares
 7. Effect on Employment
 8. Investment Representations
   9. Assignment
 10. Binding Effect
 11. Notices Section 15.7 Section 15.7
 12. Governing Law; Exclusive Forum; Consent to Jurisdiction
 4




---



##### 



13. Execution of Receipts and Releases
 14. Severability
 15. Headings
 16. Amendment
 17. Entire Agreement
  APPROACH RESOURCES INC.By:Name:Title:PARTICIPANTParticipant SignatureParticipant Printed Name 5




---



##### 



STOCK POWER AND ASSIGNMENT
 SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE
 Agreement Approach
  PARTICIPANT
 Participant SignatureParticipant Printed Name 6




---



##### 



APPENDIX A
 TO RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 Performance Goals for Performance Vesting Requiremen
 Section 1 Appendix A
 1. Performance Goals 2010 calendar year
 December 31, 2010 10.0% 2010 December 31, 2009
 F&D $2.50 2010
 December 31, 2010 2.75 2010
 2. Definitions and Calculations Procedures
      A-1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Valspar Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 27, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, William L. Mansfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Paul C. Reyelts, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William L. Mansfield  William L. MansfieldPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJanuary 9, 2007


/s/ Paul C. Reyelts  Paul C. ReyeltsExecutive Vice President(Chief Financial Officer)
January 9, 2007




---
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Plus Resource Corp., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, H. James Graham, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ H. James Graham H. James Graham CEO, Chief Accounting Officer  Dated:  May 15, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers
knowledge, the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2008 |  | /s/    DAVID
MCGLADE                 
|                     |  | David McGlade Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.