alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020061EN.01000502.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld

(Case C-360/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Sugar sector - Production levy - Effectiveness - Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid - Applicability of national rules on limitation periods - Principle of effectiveness)

(2020/C 61/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cargill Deutschland GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Krefeld

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 of 2 December 2013 fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 marketing years, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 marketing years and the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum levy and the levy to be charged for the 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006 marketing years must be interpreted as:

| — | meaning that the sums unduly paid by economic operators by way of those production levies must be reimbursed under national law, in particular within the limitation periods provided for by that law, in compliance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness; and as |
| --- | --- |

—

meaning that the sums unduly paid by economic operators by way of those production levies must be reimbursed under national law, in particular within the limitation periods provided for by that law, in compliance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness; and as

| — | precluding national rules which, as interpreted by the competent courts, provide that the applicable limitation period during which reimbursement of unduly paid sugar production levies may be requested expired before that regulation entered into force, making it practically impossible to exercise the right, conferred on those economic operators by the EU legal order, to obtain reimbursement of those levies for the marketing years covered by that regulation. |
| --- | --- |

—

precluding national rules which, as interpreted by the competent courts, provide that the applicable limitation period during which reimbursement of unduly paid sugar production levies may be requested expired before that regulation entered into force, making it practically impossible to exercise the right, conferred on those economic operators by the EU legal order, to obtain reimbursement of those levies for the marketing years covered by that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 17.9.2018.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Porto, Appellant.

Submitted March 8, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

*789Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
12 June 2023

Via E-mail

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

201-418-5000

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE Clear Europe Limited (“Submitter”) hereby respectfully requests that the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”) accord confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. §145.9 in relation to the ‘F&O Default 

Management Procedures’ document submitted today which bear the bates number 12.06.2023-000001-CFTC and 

12.06.2023-000018-CFTC and all information derived therefrom (collectively, the “Confidential Information”).

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) because Submitter believes 

that the Confidential Information is covered by one or more exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act (the 

“FOIA”) (5 U.S.C. §552(b)) and is therefore exempt from the CFTC’s public disclosure requirements pursuant 

to 17 C.F.R. §145.5. In particular, 5 U.S.C. §552(b) (4) and 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) (ii) exempts disclosure that 

would reveal the Submitter’s trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. Submitter 

believes that the Confidential Information contains confidential commercial and financial information as well as 

proprietary information regarding business procedures and systems that should be protected from public 

disclosure pursuant to this exemption. Confidential treatment is requested for a period of five years. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment 

accorded by law, and Submitter will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. Submitter requests 

that the CFTC advise the undersigned, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(e) (1), in advance of any disclosure of the 

Confidential Information pursuant to the FOIA, so that this request for confidential treatment may be 

substantiated.

If you should have any questions or comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the 

undersigned at giulia.honorati@ice.com.

Very truly yours,

Giulia Honorati

Senior Compliance Manager
EXHIBIT 32.2


 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report  on  Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
West  Metro  Financial  Services,  Inc.


This 31st day of March, 2004.



                                          /s/ Kathy Hulsey
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Kathy Hulsey
                                          Principal Accounting and Chief
                                            Financial Officer





<PAGE>
# C_2021217EN.01000201.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others (C-798/18), Athesia Energy Srl and Others (C-799/18) v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA

(Joined Cases C-798/18 and C-799/18) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations - Energy Charter Treaty - Article 10 - Applicability - Directive 2009/28/EC - Article 3(3)(a) - Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources - Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations - Alteration of a support scheme)

(2021/C 217/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others (C-798/18), Athesia Energy Srl and Others (C-799/18)

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA

Interveners: Elettricità Futura Unione delle imprese elettriche italiane and Confederazione generale dell’agricoltura italiana — Confagricoltura

Operative part of the judgment

Subject to verifications to be carried out by the referring court taking into account all the relevant factors, Article 3(3)(a) of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, and Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, read in the light of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides for the reduction or delay of the payment of incentives for energy produced by solar photovoltaic installations which were previously granted by administrative decisions and confirmed by special agreements concluded between the operators of those installations and a public company, where that legislation concerns incentives for which provision has previously been made but which are not yet due.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
# C_2018022EN.01005602.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/56

---

Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)

(Case T-765/17)

(2018/C 022/75)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kiku GmbH (Girlan, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Dresden, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before the CPVO

Details of the proceedings before the CPVO

Proprietor of the contested plant varieties: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the contested plant varieties:

Plant variety at issue: Plant variety right for the apple variety ‘PINOVA’ — Certificate No EU 1298

Plant variety at issue:

Procedure before the CPVO: Nullity proceedings

Procedure before the CPVO

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 16 August 2017 in Case A005/2016

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the CPVO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the CPVO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 20(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles 10 and 116(1), of Regulation No 2100/94. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 20(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles 10 and 116(1), of Regulation No 2100/94.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael McGee, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered July 17, 1985, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Neither the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain of the prosecutor’s remarks on summation, nor his challenge to the trial court’s replacement of two jurors with alternates, are preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818; *People v Fernandez,*
      *602137 AD2d 709; *People v Burns,*118 AD2d 864), and we decline to address them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
#### William S. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David VENABLE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-6031.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

William S. Parker, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William S. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Parker v. Venable,*No. 5:12-ct-03107-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
---

|CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David K. Ryan, the Principal Accounting Officer of Yaterra
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    | /s/ David K. Ryan             
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | DAVID K. RYAN                 
| |        |                               
| | Title: | Vice President, Finance       
| |        | (Principal Accounting Officer)
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | January 14, 2010              
| |        |                               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# C_2021044EN.01000802.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/8

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 November 2020 — Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament

(Joined Cases C-792/18 P and C-793/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Law governing the institutions - Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union - Articles 8 and 9 - Scope - Decision to lift parliamentary immunity - Conditions)

(2021/C 44/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Jean-François Jalkh (represented by: F. Wagner, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alonso de León and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded;

| 2. | Orders Mr Jean-François Jalkh to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Jean-François Jalkh to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 29, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1 pm to 3:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stanley C. Oaks, Jr., Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, Executive Plaza South, room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13202  Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4043-4044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1307]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-005]


Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel.

DATES: Thursday, February 8, 2001, 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, 
SW., Room 9H40, Washington, DC 20546.

[[Page 4044]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David M. Lengyel, Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel Executive Director, Code Q-1, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0391, if you plan 
to attend.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel will 
present its annual report to the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration Administrator. This is pursuant to carrying out its 
statutory duties for which the Panel reviews, identifies, evaluates, 
and advises on those program activities, systems, procedures, and 
management activities that can contribute to program risk. Priority is 
given to those programs that involve the safety of human flight. The 
major subjects covered will be the National Space Transportation 
System, International Space Station, Aeronautical Operations, and 
Workforce Issues. The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel is chaired by Mr. 
Richard D. Blomberg and is composed of nine members and eight 
consultants. The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity 
of the room (approximately 60 persons including members of the Panel).

    Dated: January 11, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-1307 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 222 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 222

              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Thornberry (for himself and Mr. Newhouse) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Repeal Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, gifts made, and generation-skipping 
transfers made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```