alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

A LOUISIANA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Eckert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James C. Eckert    
|James C. Eckert        
|Chief Executive Officer



33
# C_2019044EN.01005901.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/59

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — UI v Council

(Case T-282/17) (1)

((Civil service - Official - Action for failure to act - No decision following the report on the probationary period - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Decision to dismiss - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: UI (represented by: J. Diaz Cordova, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the Council unlawfully failed to adopt, within the period prescribed under the Staff Regulations, a decision regarding the establishment of the applicant as an official.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.

---
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, the Chief Executive Officer of United States Commodity Funds
LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








Date:  August
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
                Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
# C_2019035EN.01002102.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial v EUIPO — Seven (SEVENOAK)

(Case T-339/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark SEVENOAK - Earlier international figurative mark 7seven - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 35/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial Ltd (Shenzhen, China) (represented by: M. de Arpe Tejero, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2017 (Case R 1326/2016-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven and Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2017 (Case R 1326/2016-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2017 (Case R 1326/2016-1);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear, in addition to its own costs, eight tenths of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear, in addition to its own costs, eight tenths of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial Ltd;

| 4. | Orders Seven SpA to bear, in addition to its own costs, a tenth of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Seven SpA to bear, in addition to its own costs, a tenth of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial;

| 5. | Orders Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial to bear a tenth of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial to bear a tenth of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NV-030-5700-BX; Closure Notice No. NV-030-01-002]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Nevada.

# SUMMARY:

The Carson City Field Office Manager announces the temporary closure of selected public lands under his administration. This action is being taken to provide for public safety during the 2001 Pylon Racing Seminar and 2001 Reno National Championship Air Races.

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

June 21 through June 24, 2001, and September 9 through September 16, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Conrad, Assistant Manager, Nonrenewable Resources, Carson City Field Office, 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City, Nevada 89701. Telephone (775) 885-6000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This closure applies to all the public, on foot or in vehicles. The public lands affected by this closure are described as follows:

## Mt. Diablo Meridian

T. 21 N., R. 19 E.,

                        Sec. 8, N                        1/2                        NE                        1/4                        , SE                        1/4                        NE                        1/4                         and E                        1/2                        SE                        1/4                        ;                    

                        Sec. 16, N                        1/2                         and SW                        1/4                        .                    

Aggregating approximately 680 acres.

The above restrictions do not apply to emergency or law enforcement personnel or event officials. The authority for this closure is 43 CFR 8364.1. Persons who violate this closure order are subject to arrest and, upon conviction, may be fined not more than $1,000 and/or imprisoned for not more than 12 months.

A map of the closed area is the Carson City Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management.

Dated: May 7, 2001.

Richard Conrad,

Assistant Manager, Nonrenewable Resources, Carson City Field Office.

[FR Doc. 01-12410 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2168 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2168

      To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals 
  incarcerated in Federal and State penal institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

  Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Banks, Ms. Lee of 
  California, Mr. Hill of Arkansas, and Mr. Richmond) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals 
  incarcerated in Federal and State penal institutions, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Education And Learning Act 
of 2019'' or the ``REAL Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 401(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (6);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6); and
            (3) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ``(7)(B)'' and 
        inserting ``(6)(B)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective for academic 
year 2019-2020 and succeeding academic years.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert M. Brown    
|                       
|Robert M. Brown        
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7130

FRANKLIN D. HOLMES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-705-AM)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004

 

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin D. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Franklin D. Holmes, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Holmes has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of June 2001.

    Name: National Advisory Council on the National Health Service 
Corps.
    Date and Time: June 21, 2001; 3 p.m.-6:30 p.m.; June 22, 2001, 8 
a.m.-5 p.m.; June 23, 2001, 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; June 24, 2001, 8 
a.m.-10:15 a.m.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel, 575 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 
02139-4896, Phone: (617) 492-1234.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: The Council will focus its agenda on strategic and 
operational plans for the current fiscal year. The Council will be 
attending three community meetings in Raymond, NH, Worcester, MA, 
and Providence, RI, on Friday, June 22, to discuss integrated 
primary medical care, the integration of primary care, mental and 
behavioral health, and oral health. Transportation will not be 
provided to the general public.
    Agenda items and times are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Eve Morrow, Division of National 
Health Service Corps, at (301) 594-4144.

    Dated: May 17, 2001.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 01-12910 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Reports

I, James C. Eckert, of Omni Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
      2004 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2)   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Omni Energy Services Corp.

Dated: August 25, 2004

                                           /s/ James C. Eckert
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           James C. Eckert
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### LUBER v. BEACH, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army.

(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Submitted March 7, 1923.

Decided May 7, 1923.)

No. 3852.

Injunction <§=>85(i|)—Remedy at law held sufficient to warrant denial of injunction against enforcement- of park regulations.

The remedy at law of an< individual against whom proceedings were pending for violation of the Regulation requiring permit for the operation of public vehicles for hire in Potomac Park was sufficiently adequate to. justify the denial of an injunction to restrain the enforcement of that regulation pending the determination of the proceedings.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

Suit by Abe Edward Luber against Lansing Beach, in his capacity as Chief of Engineers, United States Army, to restrain the enforcement of a regulation. Erom a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

Thomas H. Patterson and William L. Taggart, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Peyton Gordon and Vernon E. West, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SMYTH, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

©=>For other oases see same topic *&*KEY-NUMBER in .all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing appellant’s bill to restrain appellee, in his capacity as Chief of Engineers of the United States Army, from enforcing a regulation requiring a permit for the operation of public vehicles for hire in Potomac Park, pending-the determination of a proceeding against appellant in the police court based upon such regulation.

The case is ruled by our decision in Cave et al. v. Rudolph, Commissioner of the District of Columbia, - App. D. C. -, 287 Fed. 989 decided March 5, 1923, in which similar action by the trial court was sustained upon the ground that a plain and adequate remedy at law *639existed. In that case it was sought to restrain the commissioners from enforcing a police regulation prohibiting drivers of public vehicles for hire from stopping or loitering upon a street except at hack stands or taking on or discharging passengers. There no prosecution had been commenced, while the declared purpose of this proceeding is to stay the hand of the official until the prosecution is terminated. This difference, under the facts disclosed, is immaterial, since no ground for equitable relief is made to appear. Davis & Farnum Mfg. Co. v. Los Angeles, 189 U. S. 207, 218, 23 Sup. Ct. 498, 47 L. Ed. 778; Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U. S. 223, 241, 25 Sup. Ct. 18, 49 L. Ed. 169. Moreover, the statement is made by the district attorney in his brief that the prosecution to which appellant alludes in his bill “terminated on June 14, 1922, by appellant agreeing to forfeit $5, which he did.” Appellant’s remedy was through the prosecution of a writ of error to this court.

,The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.
Richard A. Schwartz

DDR Compliance Director

July 27, 2021

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC

55 Water Street

New York, NY 10041-0099

Tel: (212) 855-2256

rschwartz@dtcc.com

Dear Staff:

Pursuant to Section 145.9 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the

“Commission”) Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, DTCC Data

Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) requests that the following document(s) being submitted to the 

Commission and the information contained therein (together, the “Document(s)”), be afforded 

confidential treatment until further notice under the Freedom of Information Act and the

Commission's Regulations:

Document(s):

• DDR Financial Resources Procedures

The request set forth in the preceding paragraph also applies to any memoranda, notes,

transcripts, other writings or materials of any sort whatsoever that are made by, or at the request

of, any employee of the Commission (or any other federal agency) and which incorporate,

include or relate to any aspect of the Confidential Material.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (212) 855-2256.

Very truly yours,

Richard A. Schwartz

DDR Compliance Director
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 22 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1