alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 233 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 233

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority 
  of State Medicaid fraud and abuse control units to investigate and 
 prosecute cases of Medicaid patient abuse and neglect in any setting, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Walberg (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority 
  of State Medicaid fraud and abuse control units to investigate and 
 prosecute cases of Medicaid patient abuse and neglect in any setting, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Patient Abuse Prevention 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFYING AUTHORITY OF STATE MEDICAID FRAUD AND ABUSE CONTROL 
              UNITS TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE CASES OF MEDICAID 
              PATIENT ABUSE AND NEGLECT IN ANY SETTING.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(q)(4)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(q)(4)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting after 
``patients residing in board and care facilities'' the following: ``and 
of patients (who are receiving medical assistance under the State plan 
under this title) in a noninstitutional or other setting''.
    (b) Availability of Funding.--Section 1903(a)(6) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(6)) is amended, in the matter 
following subparagraph (B), by striking ``(as found necessary by the 
Secretary for the elimination of fraud in the provision and 
administration of medical assistance provided under the State plan)''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

                                                                   Exhibits 32.1

 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oxford Investments
Holdings Inc., a company  organized under the laws of under the laws of Ontario,
Canada (the  "Company"),  for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

1.       the  Report  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,   with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




By:  /S/Michael Donaghy
-----------------------
Michael Donaghy
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  July 15, 2004
Translation of Supplemental Agreement dated in March 2010



 Exhibit 10.17 

Supplementary Agreement 

No.:2010022411 
 Buyer: Inner
Mongolia Branch of Shanxi Zhangze Electric Power Co., Ltd. 
 Seller: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Industry Group Co., Ltd. 

WHEREAS, the Buyer and the Seller entered into the CPI Bayin Obo 49.5MW Wind Farm Project: Purchase Contract of Wind Turbine Generator in July
2007. To better specify the provisions on warranty payment and quality assurance, the two Parties agree as follow through amicable negotiations: 
  

	1.	Provisions of Article 4.3.6. of the original Contract specifying that “The Buyer shall pay 5% of the total unit contract equipment price (14,429,250 Yuan in
total, RMB fourteen million four hundred and twenty nine thousand two hundred and fifty Yuan) to the Seller as the payment of the warranty period within 28 days by dint of the following documents submitted by the Seller after each wind
turbine generator passes through final acceptance and after the Buyer checks there is no errors on: A. One original and two copies of financial receipt which amounted 5% of the total unit contract equipment price.”


 hereby be amended to be “the Seller shall issue a Bank Guarantee in the amount of 5% percent of the
remaining contract equipment price as warranty provision within one (1) week upon preliminary acceptance of the wind turbine generators, and the Buyer shall pay to the Seller the remaining warranty provision (14,429,250 Yuan in total, RMB
fourteen million four hundred and twenty nine thousand two hundred and fifty Yuan) upon receipt of the aforesaid Bank Guarantee.” 
  

	2.	Provisions of Article 10.14 of the original Contract specified that “After final acceptance, if the major components (wind wheel, generator, gear box, main shaft,
nacelle, nacelle base plate) are damaged to be replaced within the designed use life due to design defects, the Seller shall replace the damaged components within the specified period free of charge. If the above major components are damaged to be
replaced within 2 years after the warranty period due to the Seller’s manufacturing and materials, the Seller shall provide the components within the specified period free of charge.” 


The aforementioned provisions was based on the fact that the wind turbines of the Seller were not certified and the equipments have not
yet been operated. Now that the wind turbine generators of the Seller have received Certifications form GL and CGC, and are highly reliable after two years of operation. Hence, the aforesaid article shall be cancelled. 








	3.	This Agreement is in quadruplicated. Two for each party. 


Buyer (Seal): 
 Inner Mongolia Branch of Shanxi
Zhangze Electric Power Co., Ltd. 
 Authorized Representative (Signed by): 

Seller (Seal): 
 Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power
Industry Group Co., Ltd. 
 Authorized Representative (Signed by): 

Date:
March 16th, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned operating manager of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) hereby certifies to
his knowledge that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 26, 2008 |  | /s/ Thomas R. Reeg           
|                        |  | Thomas R. Reeg               
|                        |  | Operating Manager            
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2015

Order 

November 4, 2015

152128(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

MICHAEL EUGENE GARY,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 152128

COA: 327537

Kent CC: 14-005495-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

to file a corrected reply is GRANTED. The corrected reply submitted on October 26, 

2015, is accepted for filing.
#### Barzillai Brown *versus*Lewis Watson *& al.*

The certificate of two Justices of the Peace and Quorum, that the creditor has been notified according to law, of the time and place of his debtor’s disclosure, is conclusive upon this point.

It is not essential that the certificate of the justices should be filed with the prison keeper prior to the suit on the bond.

This was an action of debt on a poor debtor’s bond, in the usual form, given by the defendant, Watson. ' The parties agreed to submit the case, upon the following facts, to the Court for their decision.

The defendant, Watson, in this case, applied to a magistrate *453Instead of the gaoler, who issued a citation to the creditor, which was duly served. At the return day of the execution, the debtor appeared and disclosed. The plaintiff appeared, by his attorney, and proposed certain interrogatories, which were answered. No objection was then taken because the citation issued from a justice instead of the gaoler. The debt- or disclosed no property, except certain choses in action, which the plaintiff’s attorney declined taking.

The debtor was admitted to the oath and received the usual certificate, which was not filed in the gaoler’s office till after the commencement of this suit.

*J. A. Poor,*for *the*plaintiff,

referred to Stat. 1835, c. 19, § 9; *Knight*v. *Norton,*327 ; *Putnam*v. *Longley,*11 Pick. 487 ; *Slasson*v. *Broad,*20 Pick. 486; *Sturgis*v. *Crowninshield,*4 Wheat. 122.

*Blake,*for the defendants,

cited *Thayer*v. *Seavey,*2 Fairf. 290; *Kendrick*v. *Gregory,*9 Greenl. 22 ; *Black*v. *Bollard,*13 Maine R. 239.

*The*opinion of the Court was delivered by

Weston C. J.

Two justices of the peace and of the quorum, to whom jurisdiction of the subject matter belonged, having found and certified, that the creditor had been duly notified according to law, their certificate is conclusive upon this point, as was decided by this Court in *Churchill*v. *Balch,*17 Maine R. 411, where the proper distinction was pointed out between that case and *Knight*v. *Norton & al.*15 Maine R. 337. It was not essential to the defence, that the certificate of the justices should be filed with the prison keeper, prior to the suit. *Kendrick*v. *Gregory & al.*9 Greenl. 22.

*Judgment for the defendants.*
Exhibit 10.2








			
	Exhibit 10.2


	 
	 
	AMENDMENT TO

STANDARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN


	 
	 
	          WHEREAS, Alliance One International, Inc. (the “Employer”), as successor in interest to Standard Commercial Corporation, is the sponsor of the Standard Commercial Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”); and


	 
	          WHEREAS, the Employer has retained the right to amend or modify the Supplemental Plan; and


	 
	          WHEREAS, the Qualified Plan is being merged into the Alliance One International, Inc. Pension Plan (formerly known as the DIMON Incorporated Cash Balance Plan) (the “Alliance One Plan”) as of January 1, 2006, and the Employer desires to freeze benefits under the Supplemental Plan prior to such merger;


	 
	          NOW, THEREFORE, the Supplemental Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective December 30, 2005:


	 
	1.

	A new paragraph shall be added at the end of Section 1.06 of the Supplemental Plan, which shall read as follows:


	 
	 	“The Participant’s Excess Pension Plan Benefit shall not be greater than his or her Excess Pension Plan Benefit determined as of December 31, 2005, based on his or her accrued benefit under the Basic Plan as of December 31, 2005.”


	 
	2.

	A new Sections 3.14 shall be added at the end of Section III of the Supplemental Plan, which shall read as follows:


	 
	 	
                

      "3.14
        Good Faith Compliance with 409A.  If any portion of a Participant’s
        benefit under this Plan is subject to the requirements of Section 409A
        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”),
        then the Plan shall be administered in good faith compliance with Section
        409A and applicable guidance thereunder with respect to that portion of
        the Participant’s benefit.”


	 
	3.

	Capitalized words not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the definitions attributed to them in the Supplemental Plan.


	 
	          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Alliance One International, Inc. has, by an authorized officer, executed this amendment on this the 30th day of December, 2005.


	 
	 	ALLIANCE ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


	 	 
	 	By:  /s/  Michael K. McDaniel                     


	 	Name:   Michael K. McDaniel


	 	Title:     Senior Vice President – 

              Human Resources


	-1-
Exhibit No. 32.1


BTHC XIV, Inc.


File No. 0-52722


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended March 31, 2011








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BTHC XIV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick D. Souter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 6, 2011
By:
/s/ Patrick D. SouterPatrick D. SouterChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMSA Crane Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by SMSA Crane Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
By Electronic Mail

August 21, 2015

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Amendments to ICE Trade Vault, LLC Fee Schedule and Rulebook Pursuant to Section 

5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6, ICE Trade Vault, LLC (“ICE Trade Vault”) submits, by

written certification, an amendment to the Fee Schedule to address repository fees for swaps and options in the 

foreign exchange and interest rate asset classes. This amendment complies with CFTC Regulation § 49.27(b)(1), 

“Fees,” which states that any fees or charges imposed by a registered SDR shall be equitable and established in a 

uniform and nondiscriminatory manner.

ICE Trade Vault is additionally hereby submitting a written request for review of ICE Trade Vault’s 

proposed amendments to the Rulebook updating various sections to incorporate the reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements for swaps and options in the foreign exchange and interest asset classes. The proposed amendments 

are blacklined in the text of the ICE Trade Vault Rulebook attached hereto.

ICE Trade Vault certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules 

and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder. No substantive opposing views have been expressed 

by Participants or others with respect to the amendments. ICE Trade Vault further certifies that, concurrent with this 

filing today, a copy of this submission was posted on its website and may be accessed at: www.icetradevault.com. 

ICE Trade Vault intends to implement this amended Fee Schedule and Rulebook on September 4, 2015.

As noted above, enclosed with this letter is a marked version of the ICE Trade Vault Fee Schedule and ICE 

Trade Vault Rulebook, which is being submitted in whole due to the number of amendments made thereto. If you 

have any questions or need further information, please contact me at Kara.Dutta@theice.com or (770) 916-7812.

Sincerely,

Kara Dutta

General Counsel

ICE Trade Vault, LLC

Enclosures
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2261 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code, to allow full subrogation, 

including subrogation to the priority rights of the United States, of 

claims for the payment of customs duties. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. WELCH, 

Mr. VELA, and Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code, to allow 

full subrogation, including subrogation to the priority 

rights of the United States, of claims for the payment 

of customs duties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Customs Business 

5 Fairness Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2261 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 507(d) of title 11, United States Code, is 

3 amended by inserting ‘‘excluding subparagraph (F)’’ after 

4 ‘‘(a)(8)’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub7 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

8 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

10 made by this Act shall not apply with respect to cases com11 menced under title 11 of the United States Code before 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2019206EN.01001501.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 — The Green Effort Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA)

(Case C-282/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Appeals procedure - Time limits - Electronic notification - Calculation of time limits)

(2019/C 206/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: The Green Effort Limited (represented by: A. Ziehm, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, T. Dolde and K. Lüder, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders The Green Effort Limited to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Green Effort Limited to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA).

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
27214 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2001 / Notices

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Response: See chart above.

Frequency of Response: 1 per year.

Estimated Total Reporting Burden:

312.

Acting Clearance Officer: Sally W.

Watts, (202) 906–7380, Office of Thrift

Supervision, 1700 Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20552.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202)

395–7860, Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10202, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Deborah Dakin,

Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations &

Legislation Division.

[FR Doc. 01–12383 Filed 5–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC–5: OTS Nos. H–3746 and 04232]

Globe Bancorp, Inc., Metairie, LA;

Approval of Conversion Application

Notice is hereby given that on May 10,

2001, the Director, Examination Policy,

Office of Thrift Supervision, or his

designee, acting pursuant to delegated

authority, approved the application of

Globe Homestead Federal Savings

Association, Metairie, Louisiana, to

convert to the stock form of

organization. Copies of the application

are available for inspection at the

Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift

Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20552, and the

Midwest Regional Office, Office of

Thrift Supervision, 225 E. John

Carpenter Freeway, Suite 500, Irving,

Texas 75062–2326.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision,

Nadine Y. Washington,

Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–12264 Filed 5–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2201

 To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 
   exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in 
        Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

Mr. Westerman (for himself, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. McClintock, 
Mr. Panetta, Mr. Gianforte, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Gallagher, Ms. Speier, 
Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. 
 Blunt Rochester, Mr. Hill of Arkansas, Mrs. Demings, Mr. Deutch, and 
 Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 
   exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in 
        Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR 
              VETERANS WHO WERE EXPOSED TO HERBICIDE AGENTS WHILE 
              SERVING IN THE ARMED FORCES IN THAILAND DURING THE 
              VIETNAM ERA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure 
that if the Secretary creates a presumption of service connection 
between the occurrence of a disease and exposure to a herbicide agent 
while serving in the Armed Forces during the Vietnam era at a military 
base in Thailand, such presumption also applies to exposure to a 
herbicide agent while serving in the Armed Forces during the Vietnam 
era at any military base located in Thailand without regard to where on 
the base the veteran was located or what military job specialty the 
veteran performed.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Herbicide agent.--The term ``herbicide agent'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 1116(a) of title 38, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Veteran and vietnam era.--The terms ``veteran'' and 
        ``Vietnam era'' have the meaning given such terms in section 
        101 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```