alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 99.9

-----Original Message-----

From:Lybecker, Martin

Sent:Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:37 PM

To:Bullard, Brian D.

Cc:Miller, Barry D.; Gorman, Richard J.; Brenner, Joe; Weiss, Harry; Douglas J. Scheidt (E-mail)

Subject:RE: Call Today at 4:30 regarding NPK



Thank you for your professional courtesy in arranging for a telephone conference call and the dial-in information. Because of travel exigencies, Harry Weiss will not be able to attend, although Joe Brenner will.



You asked in your voice mail that we provide you with our questions in advance of the telephone call. Set forth below are the initial set of questions that we would like to discuss.



| | The Company intends to make a further public disclosure on this issue that is accurate, and that you believe is accurate, and were hoping for your assistance in helping us to do that.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | To that end, are we correct in assuming that Brians 2/15/06 email still accurately reflects the staffs position?
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If so, is there a way to draft a narrative description that you will find to be accurate? What guidance can you give us on the shortcomings you saw in the last draft that we provided?



Alternatively, in order to be completely accurate, we could simply attach the 2/15/06 email (and the other correspondence) as an exhibit to a filing and let the correspondence speak for itself -- would that be preferable?



| | If the 2/15/06 email does not reflect your current position, what is your position?
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If your current position is something other than the 2/15/06 email, is there any reason why it wouldnt be accurate for the company to say that the 2/15/06 email was your prior position, and then describe your current position accurately?



Martin E. Lybecker
WilmerHale2445 M Street N.W.Washington, D.C. 20037 USA(202) 663-6240 (202) 663-6363 (fax)martin.lybecker@wilmerhale.com

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL01-81-000]

      ( print page 28893)    
Take notice that on May 17, 2000, Alternate Power Source, Inc., filed a Complaint against the ISO New England, Inc. challenging the denial of a billing adjustment request.

Copies of said filing have been served upon NEPOOL Participants, the ISO New England, Inc., as well as upon the utility regulatory agencies of the six New England States.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 6, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before June 6, 2001. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13217 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2017347EN.01003902.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/39

---

Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Financiere Tesalia and Others v Commission and SRB

(Case T-508/17)

(2017/C 347/51)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Financiere Tesalia, SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Cartera Zurbano, SA (Madrid, Spain), Finexperta, SA (Madrid), Eurosigma, SA (Madrid) (represented by: B. Gutiérrez de la Roza Pérez, P. Rubio Escobar, R. Ruiz de la Torre Esporrín and B. Fernández García, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should annul:

| — | Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A.;

| — | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español. |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  Union Calendar No. 87
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 116-118]

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

Mr. Barr (for himself, Mr. Levin of California, and Mr. David P. Roe of 
  Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

                             June 18, 2019

                   Additional sponsor: Mrs. Radewagen

                             June 18, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CREDIT HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR EDITH NOURSE ROGERS 
              STEM SCHOLARSHIP.

    Section 3320(b)(4)(A)(i) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``more than the standard 128 semester (or 192 
quarter) credit hours'' and inserting ``at least the standard 120 
semester (or 180 quarter) credit hours''.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 87

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 116-118]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 18, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2007 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a program for the 

automated disclosure of taxpayer information for third-party income 

verification, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. MCHENRY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a 

program for the automated disclosure of taxpayer information for third-party income verification, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION FOR 

4 THIRD-PARTY INCOME VERIFICATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

6 close of the 2-year period described in subsection (d)(1), 

7 the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary’s delegate 

8 (hereafter referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2007 IH

1 shall implement a program to ensure that any qualified 

2 disclosure— 

3 (1) is fully automated and accomplished 

4 through the Internet; and 

5 (2) is accomplished in as close to real-time as 

6 is practicable. 

7 (b) QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE.—For purposes of this 

8 section, the term ‘‘qualified disclosure’’ means a disclosure 

9 under section 6103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

10 1986 of returns or return information by the Secretary 

11 to a person seeking to verify the income or creditworthi12 ness of a taxpayer who is a borrower in the process of 

13 a loan application. 

14 (c) APPLICATION OF SECURITY STANDARDS.—The 

15 Secretary shall ensure that the program described in sub16 section (a) complies with applicable security standards and 

17 guidelines. 

18 (d) USER FEE.— 

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—During the 2-year period be20 ginning on the first day of the 6th calendar month 

21 beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

22 Act, the Secretary shall assess and collect a fee for 

23 qualified disclosures (in addition to any other fee as24 sessed and collected for such disclosures) at such 

25 rates as the Secretary determines are sufficient to 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2007 IH

1 cover the costs related to implementing the program 

2 described in subsection (a), including the costs of 

3 any necessary infrastructure or technology. 

4 (2) DEPOSIT OF COLLECTIONS.—Amounts re5 ceived from fees assessed and collected under para6 graph (1) shall be deposited in, and credited to, an 

7 account solely for the purpose of carrying out the 

8 activities described in subsection (a). Such amounts 

9 shall be available to carry out such activities without 

10 need of further appropriation and without fiscal year 

11 limitation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017338EN.01002101.xml

| 9.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/21

---

Action brought on 25 August 2017 — EOS Deutscher Inkasso-Dienst v EUIPO — IOS Finance EFC (IOS finance)

(Case T-583/17)

(2017/C 338/24)

Language in which the application was brought: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EOS Deutscher Inkasso-Dienst GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: B. Sorg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: IOS Finance EFC, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘IOS FINANCE’ — EU trade mark No 12 544 061

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition Proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2017 in Case R 2262/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00046-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153-304457-18

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE JOE BYRD, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

application for emergency ex parte restraining order and is of the opinion that relief 

should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

application for emergency ex parte restraining order are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 17, 2023
# C_2018341EN.01001202.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 June 2018 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-116/18) (1)

(2018/C 341/20)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
# C_2019328EN.01004201.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Île-de-France Region v Commission

(Case T-292/17) (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 - Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Advantage - Selective nature - Article 107(1) TFEU - Obligation to state reasons - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ - Article 108 TFEU - Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)

(2019/C 328/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Île-de-France Region (France) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470 of 2 February 2017 on State aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France Region (OJ 2017 L 209, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Île-de-France Region to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Île-de-France Region to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

---
|    |                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calix, Inc. for the quarter ended September 29, 2012; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |  |  |
| Date: December 18, 2012 |   |   |   | /s/ Carl Russo |
|                    |   |   |   | Carl Russo |
|                    |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1147; MM Docket No. 00-250; RM-10025]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Sauk Centre and Alexandria, 
Minnesota

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Main Street Broadcasting, 
Inc., licensee of Station KMSR(FM), Sauk Centre, Minnesota, and BDI 
Broadcasting, Inc., licensee of Station KIKV-FM, Alexandria, Minnesota, 
(1) allots Channel 232C3 in lieu of 232A at Sauk Centre, reallots 
Channel 232C3 from Sauk Centre to Alexandria, and modifies Station 
KMSR's license accordingly; and (2) reallots Channel 264C1 from 
Alexandria to Sauk Centre, and modifies Station KIKV's license 
accordingly. Channel 232C3 is allotted at Alexandria, Minnesota, in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements, with respect to domestic allotments, at petitioner's 
requested site 8.8 kilometers (5.5 miles) northwest of the community at 
coordinates 45-55-57 NL and 95-28-21 WL. Channel 264C1 is reallotted 
from Alexandria to Sauk Centre in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements, with respect to domestic 
allotments, at a site 15.6 kilometers (9.7 miles) west of the community 
at coordinates 45-41-03 NL and 95-08-14 WL.

DATES: Effective June 18, 2001 .

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-250, adopted April 25, 2001, and 
released May 4, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b) the FM Table of Allotments under Minnesota is 
amended by removing Channel 232A and adding Channel 264C1 at Sauk 
Centre, and by removing Channel 264C1 and adding Channel 232C3 at 
Alexandria.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12266 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```