alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28529-28530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    Date: June 7, 2001.
    Time: 9 am to 3:30 pm.
    Agenda: Report from the Acting Director, NIH, Update on the 
Reorganization Activities in the Center for Scientific Review, 
Report from the Extramural Construction Working Group, Technology 
Transfer Issues, and an Update on Regulatory Burden and Modular 
Grants.

[[Page 28530]]

    Place: 31 Center Drive, Bldg. 31, Conf. Rm. 10, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Janice C. Ramsden, Committee Mgmt. Officer, 
Office of the Director, NIH, Building 1, Room 333, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-0959.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nih.gov/about/director/acd.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.187, Undergraduate 
Scholarship Program for individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.22, Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program for Individuals from 
Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 93.232, Loan Repayment Program for 
Research Generally; 93.39, Academic Research Enhancement Award; 
93.936, NIH Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan 
Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 15, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12914 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
143 So. 345

#### In re OPINIONS OF JUSTICES. In re COUNTY OFFICERS.

No. 16.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 12, 1932.

Response of the Justices.

To the House of Representatives.

Replying to Resolution 52, inquiring if the officeholders there mentioned are eoun*360tj officers within the meaning of Amendment 2 to the Constitution of 1901, will say: While they all hold office under the state, all except the circuit judges and solicitors are, strictly speaking, county officers as included in and dealt with in said amendment. The circuit judges and solicitors are what might be termed circuit or state officers. State ex rel. Montgomery v. Merrill, 218 Ala. 149, 117 So. 473.

' JOHN O. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

LTJCIEN D. GARDNER,

WILLIAM H. THOMAS,

A. B. FOSTER, Justices.
# C_2019319EN.01001701.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — European Medicines Agency v Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd, European Commission

(Case C-359/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Orphan medicinal products - Article 5 - Application for designation of a medicinal product as an ‘orphan medicinal product’ - Validation - Existence of a prior marketing authorisation (MA) for the same medicinal product)

(2019/C 319/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: initially by S. Marino, S. Drosos, T. Jabłoński and A. Spina, Agents, and subsequently by S. Marino, S. Drosos and T. Jabłoński, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd (represented by: G. Castle, Solicitor, D. Anderson QC and M. Birdling, Barrister and by S. Cowlishaw, Solicitor), European Commission (represented by: K. Petersen and A. Sipos, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

---
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 76-7 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 76-7 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 76-7 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 76-7 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 76-7 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH     Document 7      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH     Document 7      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
intlstar_ex1003.htm










Exhibit 10.3


 


 



AMENDMENT TO


CORPORATE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE







THIS AMENDMENT TO CORPORATE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”), which is effective as of the 7th day of May, 2010, is entered into by and between Kilpatrick’s Rose-Neath Funeral Homes, Crematorium and Cemeteries, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (“Lender”), and International Star, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”).







WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower entered into a certain Corporate Loan Agreement (the “Agreement”) and a certain Promissory Note (the “Note”), each dated December 3, 2007; and







WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower desire to extend the term of the Agreement and the Note for an additional two years;







NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the recitals above and in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein and contained in the Agreement and the Note, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Borrower hereby agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
The Agreement and the Note are each hereby amended to provide that the principal amount of the Note is due in full, together with any accrued and unpaid interest thereon, on December 3, 2012 (the “Maturity Date”), and that Borrower shall pay interest only until such Maturity Date.













	
2.  

	
Except as amended hereby, the parties acknowledge that the Agreement and the Note shall remain in full force and effect.













	
3.  

	
All capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Agreement and the Note.













	
4.  

	
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, and all of which, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly caused the execution of this Amendment by their duly authorized representative or officer, as of this 7th day of September, 2010.









	
LENDER

	  	
BORROWER

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	
By: /s/ Margaret S. Shehee

	  	
By: /s/ Jacqulyn B. Wine

	  
	
Name: Margaret S. Shehee

	  	
Name: Jacqulyn B. Wine

	  
	
Title: Vice President

	  	
Title: Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
Case 7:07-cv-05800-KMK-LMS Document 2 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global BPO Services Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Charles F. Kane, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles F. Kane                                 
|                         |  |  |  | Charles F. Kane                                     
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017318EN.01001401.xml

| 25.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/14

---

Action brought on 10 July 2017 — Fruit of the Loom v EUIPO — Takko (FRUIT)

(Case T-424/17)

(2017/C 318/19)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Takko Holding GmbH (Telgte, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FRUIT’ — EU trade mark No 5 077 508

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 in Case R 2119/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019413EN.01001201.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București — Romania) — Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA

(Case C-267/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public Procurement - Public procurement procedure - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 57(4) - Optional grounds for exclusion - Exclusion of an economic operator from participating in a public procurement procedure - Early termination of a prior contract on account of partial subcontracting - Concept of ‘significant or persistent deficiencies’ - Scope)

(2019/C 413/13)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA

Defendant: Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 57(4)(g) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as meaning that the subcontracting, by an economic operator, of part of the works under a prior public contract, decided upon without the contracting authority’s authorisation and which led to the early termination of that contract, constitutes a significant or persistent deficiency shown in the performance of a substantive requirement under that public contract, within the meaning of that provision, and is therefore capable of justifying that economic operator being excluded from participation in a subsequent public procurement procedure if, after conducting its own evaluation of the integrity and reliability of the economic operator concerned by the early termination of the prior public contract, the contracting authority which organises that subsequent procurement procedure considers that such subcontracting entails breaking the relationship of trust with the economic operator in question. Before deciding such an exclusion, the contracting authority must however, in accordance with Article 57(6) of that directive, read in conjunction with recital 102 thereof, allow that economic operator the opportunity to set out the corrective measures adopted by it further to the early termination of the prior public contract.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

APPENDIX A

REDACTED
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

APPENDIX B

REDACTED
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

APPENDIX C

REDACTED
# C_2017144EN.01005502.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/55

---

Action brought on 14 March 2017 — Apple and Pear Australia and Star Fruits Diffusion v EUIPO — Pink Lady America (WILD PINK)

(Case T-164/17)

(2017/C 144/75)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Apple and Pear Australia Ltd (Victoria, Australia), Star Fruits Diffusion (Caderousse, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pink Lady America (Yakima, Washington, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘WILD PINK’ — Application for registration No 11 701 216

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 in Case R 87/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicants before the Office’s Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicants before the Office’s Fourth Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No. 207/2009 and the rights of defense; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No. 207/2009 and the rights of defense;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU, |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU,

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and/or of Article 8(5) of Regulation No. 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and/or of Article 8(5) of Regulation No. 207/2009.

---
# C_2020399EN.01000901.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rēzeknes tiesa — Latvia) — LSEZ SIA ‘Elme Messer Metalurgs’ v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra

(Case C-743/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Structural Funds - European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) - Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Article 2(7) - Concept of ‘irregularity’ - Infringement of a provision of EU law resulting from an act or omission on the part of an economic operator - Prejudice caused to the general budget of the European Union - Insolvency of the beneficiary’s sole business partner)

(2020/C 399/11)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Rēzeknes tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LSEZ SIA ‘Elme Messer Metalurgs’

Defendant: Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 539/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that a situation in which the beneficiary of European Regional Development Fund funding fails to achieve, during the relevant period, the level of turnover expected as part of the project eligible for financing because the activities of its sole business partner have been suspended or because that partner has become insolvent may be regarded as an ‘irregularity’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.

---
Easy Scripts 10-Q period ended 12-31-09





Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Easy Scripts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kendra Marcoux, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








February 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Kendra MarcouxKendra Marcoux
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022024EN.01002401.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Anastassopoulos and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-147/17) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Restructuring of Greek public debt - Private sector involvement - Collective action clauses - Private creditors - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Equal treatment - Natural and legal persons - Limitation periods - Whether European Union answerable for the measures at issue - Admissibility - Strict liability - Unusual and special damage)

(2022/C 24/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Nikolaos Anastassopoulos (Nea Erythraia, Greece), Aristeidis Anastassopoulos (Nea Erythraia), Alexia Anastassopoulos (Nea Erythraia), Maria-Myrto Anastassopoulos (Nea Erythraia), Sophie Velliou (Kifisia, Greece) (represented by: K. Floros, M. Meng-Papantoni and H. Tagaras, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Michoel, E. Chatziioakeimidou and J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne, L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking damages for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the implementation of a mandatory exchange of State bonds in the context of the restructuring of Greek public debt in 2012, on account of the participation of private investors involving the application of collective action clauses, based on conduct or acts of the Eurogroup, its President, the Heads of State or Government of the euro area and the Commission relating thereto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr. Nikolaos Anastassopoulos, Mr. Aristeidis Anastassopoulos, Ms Alexia Anastassopoulos, Ms Maria-Myrto Anastassopoulos and Ms Sophie Velliou to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr. Nikolaos Anastassopoulos, Mr. Aristeidis Anastassopoulos, Ms Alexia Anastassopoulos, Ms Maria-Myrto Anastassopoulos and Ms Sophie Velliou to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Communication Disorders Review Committee, June 20, 2001, 8 am to June 22, 2001, 5 pm, Governor's House, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 2, 2001, 66 FR 21992.                

The meeting has been changed to start on June 20, 2001 and end on June 21, 2001. The meeting is closed to the public.

      ( print page 28756)    
Dated: May 17, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Directror, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-13110  Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
154 So. 916

#### AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. Dewey Franklin WHITE et al.

7 Div. 241.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1934.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.