alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28399-28400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1222, MM Docket No. 01-29, RM-10044]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Butte, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Eagle Communications, Inc., 
licensee of station KTVM(TV), substitutes DTV channel 33 for DTV 
channel 2 at Butte, Montana. See 66 FR 9062, February 6, 2001. DTV 
channel 33 can be allotted to Butte in compliance with the principle 
community coverage requirements of section 73.625(a) at reference 
coordinates (46-00-27 N. and 112-26-30 W.) with a power of 1000, HAAT 
of 576 meters and with a DTV service population of 122 thousand. Since 
Butte is located within 400 kilometers of the U.S.-Canadian border, 
concurrence by the Canadian government has been obtained for this 
allotment.
    With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective July 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-29,

[[Page 28400]]

adopted May 16, 2001, and released May 18, 2001. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR Part 73--[Amended]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Montana, is amended by removing DTV channel 2 and adding DTV 
channel 33 at Butte.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12990 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Songzai International Holding Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hongwen Li, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 (2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/
      Hongwen LiHongwen
      LiChief
      Executive Officer
 
 Dated: 
November 25, 2009
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2171

___________

Thomas E. Yoakum, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Brian Lynn, Siloam Springs Police *

Officer, in his official and individual * [UNPUBLISHED]

capacities, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 22, 2005

Filed: May 6, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Yoakum appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his civil rights suit against a Siloam Springs police officer. After careful

de novo review, we affirm. See Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Edwards, 243 F.3d 457,

461 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam); Dulany v. Carnahan, 132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir.

1997) (standard of review). 
-2-

We agree with the district court that the undisputed facts establish defendant

did not violate Yoakum’s constitutional rights, because the officer had probable cause

to arrest Yoakum for obstructing governmental operations during an incident in the

police station lobby. See Ark Code. Ann. § 5-54-102(a)(1) (Michie Supp. 2003)

(elements of obstructing governmental operations); Garionis v. Newton, 827 F.2d

306, 309 (8th Cir. 1987) (probable cause to arrest suspect exists where reasonable

officer would believe, based on available facts and circumstances, that suspect was

committing or had committed offense); Kelley v. Arkansas, 55 S.W.3d 309, 311-12

(Ark. Ct. App. 2001) (defendant obstructed governmental operations under Arkansas

law where officer was conducting field sobriety test of motorist in defendant’s

driveway, and defendant exited his house, yelled profanities, and refused to take field

sobriety test, after which motorist stopped cooperating with officer). 

Although some facts are in dispute, they are not material. We also reject, as

unsupported and contrary to the district court’s opinion, Yoakum’s arguments that the

court made credibility findings, and that the court made its probable-cause

determination based on the conduct of Yoakum’s family members. We do not

address arguments Yoakum raises for the first time on appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

to discount FHA single-family mortgage insurance premium payments for first-time homebuyers who complete 

a financial literacy housing counseling program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2162 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Financial Lit3 eracy Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISCOUNT ON MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM 

5 PAYMENTS FOR FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS 

6 WHO COMPLETE FINANCIAL LITERACY HOUS7 ING COUNSELING PROGRAMS. 

8 The second sentence of subparagraph (A) of section 

9 203(c)(2) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

10 1709(c)(2)(A)) is amended— 

11 (1) by inserting before the comma the following: 

12 ‘‘and such program is completed before the mort13 gagor has signed an application for a mortgage to 

14 be insured under this title or a sales agreement’’; 

15 and 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘not exceed 2.75 percent of the 

17 amount of the original insured principal obligation of 

18 the mortgage’’ and inserting ‘‘be 25 basis points 

19 lower than the premium payment amount estab20 lished by the Secretary under the first sentence of 

21 this subparagraph’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

eracy housing counseling program. time homebuyers who complete a financial litmortgage insurance premium payments for firstDevelopment to discount FHA single-family
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number: 3662]


Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, reauthorized 
pursuant to Public Law 106-113 (H.R. 3194, Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2000), will meet on Thursday, June 7, 2001, in Room 600, 301 4th 
St., SW., Washington, DC from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 Noon.
    The Commission will discuss its recent trip to Asia, the future of 
public diplomacy in the Department of State, and the future of the 
Commission.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting, though 
attendance of public members will be limited to the seating available. 
Access to the building is controlled, and individual building passes 
are required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should 
contact David J. Kramer, Executive Director, at (202) 619-4463.

    Dated: May 11, 2001.
David J. Kramer,
Executive Director, Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 01-12849 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ John Shanahan                     | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|John Shanahan                         | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: November 13, 2009               | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Neal E. Murphy, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of International Specialty Holdings Inc.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 23, 2004

|/s/NEAL E. MURPHY |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Name:             |  | Neal E. Murphy                                   
|Title:            |  | Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Investools Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006,  as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Lee K. Barba, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|        |   | /s/ LEE K. BARBA   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Lee K. Barba            |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | March 16, 2007     |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to remove the requirement that 

residents of residential reentry facilities pay 25 percent of any gross 

income earned during work release to offset the cost of being housed, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to remove the requirement that residents of residential reentry facilities 

pay 25 percent of any gross income earned during work 

release to offset the cost of being housed, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Successful 

5 Reentry Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2366 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT PRISONERS ON WORK RE2 LEASE PAY PART OF THEIR GROSS INCOME 

3 OVER FOR HOUSING. 

4 Section 3622(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking all that follows after ‘‘facility if’’ and 

6 inserting the following: ‘‘the rates of pay and other condi7 tions of employment will not be less than those paid or 

8 provided for work of a similar nature in the community.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Paul Eldridge, Respondent, v Carmel Central School District Board of Education et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 7, 2011;

decided December 20, 2011

Reported below, 82 AD3d 1147.

Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by the Carmel Central School District Board of Education, dismissed upon the ground that the Board is not a party aggrieved *(see*CPLR 5511); motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
# C_2020320EN.01001703.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — XW v Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz

(Case C-536/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
cme¢é

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 te!
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.cme.com

November 27, 2006

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission : .
Three Lafayette Centre * ~
1155 21* Street, NW £ .
Washington DC 20581 i -

PS
a a
RE: — Section Sc(c)1 and Regulation 40.4(b)(8) Submission. Non-Material Agricultural Rule

Change. Exchange Certification of Change in Standard Freight Rate for Live Cattle

Futures Deliveries. CME Submission #06-109.
Dear Ms. Donovan:

The Standard Freight Rate is used in carcass graded deliveries of Live Cattle to compensate the
seller when the buyer requests delivery at a packing plant that is farther from the feedyard than
the delivery point stockyards. In accordance with Live Cattle Rule 10103.C.8., this rate is set
annually by the Exchange. For 2006, the rate was $3.00 per mile per contract, up 25 cents from
the $2.75 rate for 2005.

Results from a survey of livestock trucking firms show that freight rates have increased
substantially during the past year, largely due to higher fuel costs. On November 22, 2006, the
Exchange approved an increase in the Standard Freight Rate to $3.25, beginning with deliveries
on the February 2007 contract month.

The Exchange certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
regulations thereunder.



Ms. Eileen Donovan

Standard Freight Rate for Live Cattle Futures
November 27, 2006

Page 2

If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact Mr. Paul Peterson at (312)
930-4587 or via e-mail at ppeterso@cme.com. Please refer to CME Submission #06-109 in all
correspondence regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-061)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Biological and Physical Research Advisory Committee. 

# DATES:

Thursday, June 14, 2001, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Friday, June 15, 2001, 8 a.m. to 12 Noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., MIC-7, Room 7H46, Washington, DC 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Bradley M. Carpenter, Code UG, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0826. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 

—OBPR Personnel & Organization Status 

—ISS Status 

—OBPR Performance Targets 

—Division Director's Reports—Status

—Interim Mission Status Report 

—Subcommittee Reports 

—Discussion of Committee Findings and Recommendations 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: May 15, 2001.

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-12537 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-93,497-01 & 93,497- 02

EX P ARTE MUNDR O ROBINSO N, Applicant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 2010-426,709-A & 2010- 427,611-A IN THE 137T H DISTRICT COURT FROM LUBBOCK COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of two char g es of possession with i n tent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenc ed to twenty -five y ear s ’ im p r is o nment in eac h case . He filed these applications for writs of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded them to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends t h at h e was denied his rig ht to an appea l beca use counsel incorre ctly advised him that his g

uilty plea mea

nt that he waive d all rig hts to file an appe al althoug h he could have challeng ed the voluntariness of his plea, his plea waiver , and alleg edly err oneous d uplicate court costs on direc t appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700 (Tex. Crim.2

App. 2003). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). T h e t ri al court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the rec o rd , t h e t ri al court may use any

1 means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hea ring , it shall determine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial cour t s h al l i m m ediately notify this Court of counsel’s na

me. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as t o wh ether Applicant

was denied his rig ht to an appea l beca use trial counsel improperly advised him reg arding his appea l ri gh t s. The trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropri at e i n response to Applicant’s cla ims. The trial court shall make fi ndings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclus ions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Marc h 16, 2022 Do not publish

I f a de fenda

nt decides to a

ppeal his convic tion, trial counsel ra ther than a ppellate 1 counsel ha s the duty

to ensure tha t written notice of a ppeal is filed with the tria l court. Jones , 98 S.W .3d at 703.