alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Milroy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
16th day of February, 2009.


/s/ Bruce Milroy
------------------------------
Bruce Milroy
Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/20/07 Page 21 of 21
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Cause number: 01-14-00351-CV

Style: James W. Paulsen v. Ellen A. Yarrell

Date motion filed: October 10, 2014

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

Appellee has objected to mediation. The Mediation Order dated October 9, 2014

is withdrawn.

Judge's signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Justice Michael Massengale

 x Acting individually 

 

Date: October 15, 2014

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
EXHIBIT 32

BISON INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Edward G. Lampman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Bison Instruments, Inc. (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended January 31, 2005 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date:   March 1, 2005

| |  |                         |  |                                                               | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/   Edward G. Lampman
| | 
| |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director | 

---
Exhibit 10.26


    
      

    

    December
      30, 2005

    


    


    NCR
      EasyPoint LLC f/k/a/ NCR Texas LLC

    1700
      S.
      Patterson Blvd. 

    Dayton,
      Ohio 45479

    Attn:
      John Hoak, President

    


    Tidel
      Technologies, Inc.

    Tidel
      Engineering, L.P.

    2310
      McDaniel Drive

    Carrollton,
      Texas 75006-6843

    Attn:
      Chief Executive Officer

    


    Dear.
      Messrs. Hoak and Levenick:

    


    In
      accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase
      Agreement by and among NCR EasyPoint LLC f/k/a NCR Texas LLC (“Buyer”), NCR
      Corporation, Tidel Technologies, Inc. (“Tidel”) and Tidel Engineering, L.P.
      (“Engineering” and, together with Tidel, “Sellers”) dated February 19, 2005 (the
“Agreement”), Buyer has agreed to purchase the Purchased Assets (as defined in
      the Agreement) from Sellers and Sellers have agreed to sell the Purchased Assets
      to Buyer. Pursuant to Section 13 of the Agreement, the closing of the
      transactions contemplated in the Agreement was to have taken place or before
      December 31, 2005 (the “Original Closing Date”). In addition, pursuant to the
      Agreement, the Buyer was required to deliver the Purchase Price to the Sellers
      on the Original Closing Date. 

    


    The
      parties have now agreed to change the date of the closing of the transactions
      contemplated in the Agreement from the Original Closing Date to January 1,
      2006.
      The parties have also agreed that, subject to the terms of the Agreement, the
      Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Price to the Sellers on or before Tuesday,
      January 3, 2006. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary,
      the
      parties acknowledge and agree that this extension shall not cause the Agreement
      to terminate as set forth in Section 14 of the Agreement. Except as expressly
      set forth in this letter, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain
      in full force and affect and shall not be deemed amended hereby.

    


    Please
      acknowledge your agreement to the terms hereof by signing this letter as
      provided below and returning your signed copy to my attention at the address
      above.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/
      Robert Weltner, Esq.

    NCR
      Corporation

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    ACKNOWLEDGED
      AND AGREED:

    


    NCR
      EasyPoint LLC

    F/k/a
      NCR
      Texas LLC

    


    /s/
      J.
      Hoak

    Its:
      President

    


    Date:
      12/30/05

    


    


    Tidel
      Technologies, Inc.

    


    /s/
      Robert D. Peltier

    Its:
      Interim Chief Financial Officer

    


    Date:
      12/28/05

    


    


    Tidel
      Engineering, L.P.

    


    /s/
      Mark
      K. Levenick

    Its:
      President and CEO

    


    Date:
      12/30/05
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 33 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 7 of 7
**~~\** 

### 8/5/2015 OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS**OFFI<Eb~OWJ2fl'081(!:<\'P.!WC>L** STATION AUS'Lllil T.EXAS 787

. ..1 Lr><:'TI\.GE"'"'-

. ·• -**~...;-c,,** ''-'-"'-" II) •**U.::S.I-'~IM** ,.,PITNEYBOWES 

### ST A"J;E: OF;;-::r..;; l\H\S

. 

## :i: (/) ·

# PENAtn1--f!J~~**~J~. ~** **~~IJ§§?** PRIVATE USE J A.

### r.)~"'·"·~-~- 

### . . ZIP 78701 

## $ (0)(0)(0)**~15** (4:- o 0**~~~::)0::4** .. 02 1VV D
•• "'-· I;

. • '!.: .J 

## f;ff**~n:~z g..-.~**  - 0001401623 AUG. 07 2015

:· t.) o 

## w'10 ( \ .;e.**~** 

### "Jf

### SCHON~ ALDER,

### ~ARL 

# \_it-**"t""~r. &~t!o."l.t-}&**  

## _ _**~R-~3,689"** ... _ I have this day received and presented to tl;le Court the onginal application for wnt of habeas corpus.

### ~~~- .. ·**~** Abel Acosta, Clerk

7'3412 KARL SCHONWALDER 2199 56TH STREET LUBBOCK, TX 79412 

### :t A··



## l•tt H.JIJIIr··'ttltiJI•I•t'•tJriJtll'[•fl 'Itt'' ;i 

## Jrlth"l• 1 

## tfn ·· .. l

. 'I

.1 

### ., I 

### I 

# J .((
.,
# C_2017221EN.01002902.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/29

---

Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Falmouth University v Commission

(Case T-227/17)

(2017/C 221/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Falmouth University (Falmouth, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. Sloane, Barrister, F. Harmel, lawyer and T. Kotsonis, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission finding in relation to ERDF Programming Period 2007-2013, that irregularities had occurred in the operation ‘Enhancing the Creative Knowledge Base of Cornwall’ and that a flat-rate financial correction of 25 % was required; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission finding in relation to ERDF Programming Period 2007-2013, that irregularities had occurred in the operation ‘Enhancing the Creative Knowledge Base of Cornwall’ and that a flat-rate financial correction of 25 % was required;

| — | order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission erroneously found that the selection criteria were in breach of Article 44(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC (1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission erroneously found that the selection criteria were in breach of Article 44(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC (1).

1

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission was not entitled to rely on the three additional alleged irregularities. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission was not entitled to rely on the three additional alleged irregularities.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that in any event, the Commission erroneously found there were three additional alleged irregularities. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that in any event, the Commission erroneously found there were three additional alleged irregularities.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission has acted manifestly irrationally and disproportionately in deciding that the amount of the financial correction is 25 %. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission has acted manifestly irrationally and disproportionately in deciding that the amount of the financial correction is 25 %.

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 2004, p. 114)

1

---
# C_2019319EN.01001501.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-209/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Infringement of Directive 2006/123/EC and Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Restrictions and requirements relating to the location of the registered office, legal form, shareholding and multidisciplinary activities of partnerships and companies of civil engineers, patent agents and veterinary surgeons)

(2019/C 319/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: G. Hesse, Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by T. Henze and D. Klebs and subsequently by D. Klebs, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining the requirements relating to the location of the seat for partnerships and companies of civil engineers and patent agents, the requirements relating to legal form and shareholding for partnerships and companies of civil engineers, patent agents and veterinary surgeons, and the restriction of multidisciplinary activities for partnerships and companies of civil engineers and patent agents, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1), Article 15(1), (2)(b) and (c), and (3), and Article 25 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining the requirements relating to the location of the seat for partnerships and companies of civil engineers and patent agents, the requirements relating to legal form and shareholding for partnerships and companies of civil engineers, patent agents and veterinary surgeons, and the restriction of multidisciplinary activities for partnerships and companies of civil engineers and patent agents, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(1), Article 15(1), (2)(b) and (c), and (3), and Article 25 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
The Oilgear Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-67672 and No. 33-59033) on Form S-8 of The Oilgear Company of
our report dated July 12, 2004, with respect to the statements of net
assets available for plan benefits of The Oilgear Savings Plus Plan as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of changes in net
assets available for plan benefits for the years then ended, and related schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on
Form 11-K for The Oilgear Savings Plus Plan.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
July 12, 2004















---
Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in this Form 10-K of  Fairfield
Communities,  Inc. of our report dated March 14,  1997,  except for Notes 22 and
24, as to which the date is October 9,  1997,  on our audit of the  consolidated
statements of operations,  stockholders' equity and cash flows of Vacation Break
U.S.A., Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, appearing in the registration
statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-39615) of Fairfield Communities,
Inc.  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  pursuant  to  the
Securities Act of 1933.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Miami, Florida
March 29, 1999
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have
executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

     

    RUILI GROUP RUIAN AUTO PARTS CO., LTD.

     

    By:       /s/ Baojian Tao

    Name:  Baojian Tao

    Title:    General Manager

     

     

    RUILI GROUP CO., LTD.

     

    
      By:       /s/ Xiao Ping Zhang

      Name:  Xiao Ping Zhang

      Title:    Chairman

    

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        13
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00576

- CV
IN THE ESTATE OF DEBORA SUE MAUN, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- PR

- 00281

- 4A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having c onsidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 4, 2024
EX-10.1 Instrument of Consent Dated December 22, 2



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




INSTRUMENT OF CONSENT




     The undersigned, Chair of the Compensation and Executive Development Committee of Lincoln Electric
Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), by authority delegated to me by the Board of Directors of the
Company at a meeting held on November 30, 2005, hereby approves the Instrument of Termination of
the Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated as of
January 1, 2002), as amended, substantially in the form attached hereto, with such changes not
contrary to the general tenor thereof as may be approved by any elected officer of the Company,
such officer’s signature to be conclusive evidence of such approval.



December 22, 2005




	 	 	 
	 

	 	
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Hellene S. Runtagh
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                   |                                                      
|----- | ----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 16, 2009
|      |                   |                                                      
|      | By:               | /s/ David F. Hackett                                 
|      | Name:             | David F. Hackett                                     
|      | Title:            | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
July 7, 2005
Via E-Mail

2
33
OQ ts
= ‘S
a8

ON
Office of the Secretariat a _
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 8 2
Three Lafayette Centre a
1155 21st Street, N.W. Bo
Washington, D.C. 20581 a
Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.117: Notification of
Amendments to Exchange Rule 8.55(A)(23), Failure to Supervise.
Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of amendments to
Exchange Rule 8.55(A)(23), Failure to Supervise.

Effective Monday, July 11, 2005, the Major Offenses category has been changed to
reflect that when considering evidence that an employee’s violation was a first offense, that the
Member or Member Firm took immediate remedial action upon discovering the violation, and
that the Member or Member Firm immediately informed the Exchange of the violation be
considered a mitigating factor rather than an affirmative defense. Pursuant to Section Sc(c) of the

Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the
attached rule amendment complies with the Act, including regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Nancy Minett, Vice
President, Compliance, at (212) 299-2940.

Very truly yours,

Nancy M. Minett
Vice President
Compliance Department
Brian Regan
Thomas LaSala

cc:


(Underlining in bold indicates additions; strikethroughs in bold indicate deletions.)
Rule 8.55, Classification of Offenses
(A) Major Offenses

No Member, Member Firm, or any employee of the foregoing shall commit a violation of any of
the following rules, which shall be deemed major offenses of the Exchange.

(23): Supervision.

(a) To fail to supervise any employee of a Member or Member Firm adequately to prevent the
violation by such employee of any Exchange Rule that: (i) results in substantial detriment to the
welfare and interests of the Exchange; (ii) results in harm to a customer or another Member or
Member Firm; or (iii) otherwise constitutes a Major Offense.

(b) A showing that the violation of an Exchange Rule by an employee was a first offense of that
kind and that the Member or Member Firm disclosed the violation to the Exchange and took
immediate and appropriate remedial action on its own initiative upon discovering the violation
shall be an-affirmative-defense-to considered as mitigation to a charge of violating Rule
8.55(A)(23)(a).

eae