alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clearing Notice 

    

    

CDSClear ‐ Start of Real Time (SoRT) and End of Real Time

In accordance with Section 1.1.1 of the CDS Clearing Rule Book, this Clearing Notice specifies that,

unless notified otherwise:                                                                                                                                          

 the Start of Real Time (SoRT) means on each Clearing Day, the earlier of: (i) the time when all

relevant Clearing Members have satisfied the Morning Call; and (ii) 09.05 (Paris time)CET; and

 the End of Real Time means 19.30 CET16.30 (New York time) on each Clearing Day.

If for any reason LCH SA is not able to start or end the Real Time Session at the times indicated

above, or is required to start or end the Real Time Session otherwise than at the times indicated

above, LCH SA may decide to change the Start of Real Time and/or the End of Real Time to a different

time for operational or other reasonsthat will be communicated to the Clearing Members(including,

but not limited to, on a Clearing Day that is a holiday in the United States). In such exceptional

casecircumstances, the Clearing Members shall be informed of the amended the Start of Real Time

and/or the amended End of Real Time through shall be the time where the relevant service

notification of the opening or the closing (as applicable) of the Real Time Session is sent.

Capitalised terms used in this Clearing Notice and not otherwise defined herein shall have the

meaning given pursuant to the document entitled "CDS Clearing Rule Book" published by LCH SA, as

amended from time to time.

Any amendments or modifications to the current list of means of accesscontent of this Clearing

Notice will be published by LCH SA in an updated Clearing Notice.

LCH SA

Email: Legal.SA@lch.com

Website : lch.com                   

LCH © 20212023

 

2023/[●]

Published on dd/mm/2023  

Effective from dd/mm/2023  

@LCH
March 10, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb
Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2646.01
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

‘- Amendments to CBOT Rulebook Appendix 9B-3 per the attached text (additions
bold and underlined).

The referenced amendments will codify e-cbotTM “no-bust” ranges for CBOT 100 oz. Gold and
5,000 oz. Silver Options. (The Exchange’s “e-cbot Error Trade Policy” for electronic trading, as
set forth in Rulebook Appendix 9B-2, incorporates, by reference, a “‘no-bust” range, as specified
in Appendix 9B-3, for each electronically traded product.)

This submission of amended Appendix 9B-3 supersedes a previous version, submitted by letter
dated February 6, 2006 (CBOT Reference File #2630.01), which contained typographical errors.

The CBOT intends to implement these amendments no sooner than one day after the
Commission’s receipt of this filing.

There were no opposing views concerning these amendments.

The CBOT certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b012406



Additions are bold and underlined.

APPENDIX 9B-3

TICK BREAKDOWN PER CBOT PRODUCT

fates

mini-sized Eurodollar YE “AB 10 ticks 5 Points 5 points N/A
Point

100 oz. Gold ZG 10 cents 40 ticks $4.00 $4.00 N/A
100 oz. Gold Options OZG 10 cents N/A NA $2.00 N/A
mini-sized Gold YG 10 cents 40 ticks $4.00 $4.00 N/A
5,000 oz. Silver ZI 1/10 cent 80 ticks 8 cents 8 cents N/A
5,000 oz. Silver Options OZI 1/10 cents NA N/A 4cents N/A
mini-sized Silver YI 1/10 cent 80 ticks 8 cents 8 cents N/A
Ethanol ZE 1/10 cent 40 ticks 4 cents 4 cents 15 cents
Com ZC cent 40 ticks 10 cents 10 cents 20 cents
Corn Options OZC 1/8 cent N/A N/A 2% cents 20 cents
Wheat ZW. Y cent 40 ticks 10 cents 10 cents 30 cents
Wheat Options OZW. 1/8 cent N/A N/A 2% cents 30 cents
Oat ZO Y cent 40 ticks 10 cents 10 cents 20 cents
Oat Options OZO 1/8 cent N/A N/A 2% cents 20 cents
Rough Rice ZR. % cent 40 ticks 20 cents 20 cents 50 cents
Rough Rice Options OZR Ya cent N/A N/A Scents | 50 cents
South American ZK %” cent 80 ticks 20 cents 20 cents 50 cents
Soybeans
Soybeans ZS Ya cent 80 ticks 20 cents 20 cents 50 cents
Soybean Options OZS 1/8 cent N/A N/A 5 cents 50 cents
Soybean Meal ZM. 10 cents 80 ticks $8.00 $8.00 $20
Soybean Meal Options OZM 5 cents N/A N/A $2.00 $20
Soybean Oil ZL 1/100 cents | 80 ticks -80 cents -80 cents 2 cents
Soybean Oil Options OZL __| 5/1000 cents NA NA -20 cents 2 cents
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Louisiana Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 7 p.m. and adjourn at 9 p.m. on June 20, 2001, at the Hilton Lafayette, 1521 West Pinhook Road, Lafayette, Louisiana 70505. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future projects.

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, May 17, 2001.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-13167 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1220, MM Docket No. 01-41, RM-10058]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Merced, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sainte 51, L.P., permittee 
of station KNSO(TV), substitutes DTV channel 5 for DTV channel 38 at 
Merced, California. See 66 FR 10982, February 21, 2001. DTV channel 5 
can be allotted to Merced in compliance with the principle community 
coverage requirements of section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates 
(37-04-18 N. and 119-25-53 W.) with a power of 12.9, HAAT of 532 meters 
and with a DTV service population of 1452 thousand. With this action, 
this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective July 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-41, adopted May 16, 2001, and 
released May 18, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR Part 73--[Amended]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under California, is amended by removing DTV channel 38 and adding DTV 
channel 5 at Merced.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12992 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
(105 So. 704)

#### Ex parte Ross BATTLES.

(7 Div. 592.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Jas. A. Embry, of Ashville, for petitioner. '

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

SOMERVILLE, J.

Petition of Ross Battles for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Battles v. State, 105 So. 704.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey
Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended November 30,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.





Dated:
      January 7, 2011
              /s/ Harvey JudkowitzHarvey
      Judkowitz, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | /s/                Kim                Bradford                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                        |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Kim                Bradford |

|   | Chief                Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | (Principal                Financial Officer) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Kim                Bradford                                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                         |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Kim                Bradford, |

|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer, |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (Principal                Executive Officer) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National, Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--nLine Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 11, 2000, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), nLine Corporation has 
filed written notification simultaneously with the Attorney General and 
the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are nLine Corporation, Austin, TX; 
InterScience, Inc., Troy, NY; PixelVision, Inc., Beaverton, OR; and 
Light Age, Inc., Somerset, NJ. The nature and objectives of the venture 
are to conduct research on technology for advanced semiconductor device 
inspection. The activities of this venture will be partially funded by 
an award from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-13040 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Neligh *v.*Bradford.

1. The release of one of several joint obligors operates a release of all.

This was an action brought in the District Court for Otoe county, upon an instrument in the following words :

“Whereas, William Neleigh has this day sold to us the following described property, to wit: The one-half of the southwest quarter, and the one-half of the northwest quarter of section number six, and the one-half of the northwest quarter, and the one-half of the southwest quarter of section seven, and his interest in the fractional parts of said section, all in township number nine, north of range number fourteen east, and the one-half of the southeast quarter of section twelve, and the one-half of the southeast quarter of section number one, in township number nine, range thirteen east of the sixth principal meridian, Nebraska Territory, for which we agree to pay him sixteen thousand dollars, in manner following, to wit: One-fourth in twelve months from this date, and one-fourth in eighteen months from this date, and one-fourth in thirty months from this date, all of the payments to be upon interest at the rate of ten per cent after the first six months, in the following proportion amongst ourselves, to wit: Allen A. Bradford, two thousand dollars ; S. F. Nicholls, four thousand dollars ; Jacob Dawson, four thousand dollars ; William E. Pardee, two' thousand dollars; Jacob Salford, four thousand dollars.

Given this 22d day of April, A. D. 1857.

(Signed) ALLEN A. BRADFORD.

S. F. NICHOLLS.

By H. Nicholls.

W. E. PARDEE.

JACOB SAFFORD.

JACOB DAWSON.

Upon delivery to me, William Neleigh, of a good title in *452fee from Jacob Safford, for the interest and title of the said Jacob and John Safford, to their share of the lots in and by virtue of. their purchase of the foregoing property, a credit of four thousand .dollars in full, as said Safford’s interest, is hereby entered on this contract, releasing the said Jacbb Safford from all further liability on this contract.

(Signed) WM. NELEIGH.”

The defendant’s demurred as follows :

1. “ That the petition shows that there is no cause of action against said defendants.

2. That petition shows that there is no cause of action against either one of said defendants.

3. That petition on its face shows that whatever cause of action may have at any time have existed against said defendants, the same is shown to be released by the plaintiff.

4. The release' mentioned in said, petition to the said Jacob Safford is a release of all said defendants.

5. That there is a defect of parties defendant, for the reason' that Jacob Safford' is a necessary party to this suit, and said petition shows that there is no cause of action against him.”

Judgment was given in favor of the defendants on the demurrer and the petition dismissed. The plaintiff brought the cause' here by petition in error.

*W. H.*Taylor, for plaintiff in error.

■ , *O. P.*Mason, contra.

The court,

by Lockwood, J.,

held that the release of .Safford released all the other defendants, and that notwithstanding the apportionment between them of the amount .each was to pay, they were joint obligors. '

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2017357EN.01002602.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/26

---

Action brought on 4 September 2017 — Demp v EUIPO (Representation of the colours grey and yellow)

(Case T-595/17)

(2017/C 357/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Demp BV (Vianen, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Gehweiler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Colour mark (Representation of the colours grey and yellow) — Application for registration No 15 439 987

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 July 2017 in Case R 1624/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# Exhibit C

# Exhibit D
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George Whatley, Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Gold Corp., (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2005





/s/  George Whatley

George Whatley

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
Exhibit 99.1
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    2
   Methodology and Procedures




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    3
   Definition of Reserves
  Proved oil and gas reserves




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    4




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    5
  Developed oil and gas reserves
   Undeveloped oil and gas reserves 




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    6
  Primary Economic Assumptions
  Oil Prices
  Natural Gas Prices




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    7
  NGL Prices
  Operating Expenses and Capital Costs
   Summary of Oil and Gas Reserves




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    8
 Net Proved Reserves as of June 30, 2010Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughtonOil and
    
    
    Natural Gas
    
    
    SalesCondensate
    
    
    Liquids
    
    
    Gas(Mbbl)
    
    
    (Mbbl)
    
    
    (MMcf)Proved DevelopedAngus
    
    
    1,161
    
    
    
    2,872
    
    
    
    16,204North Bald Prairie
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    1,493Ozona Northeast
    
    
    616
    
    
    
    6,628
    
    
    
    49,184Total Proved Developed
    
    
    1,777
    
    
    
    9,500
    
    
    
    66,881Proved UndevelopedAngus
    
    
    1,834
    
    
    
    2,145
    
    
    
    12,046North Bald Prairie
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    13,516Ozona Northeast
    
    
    981
    
    
    
    6,822
    
    
    
    47,454Total Proved Undeveloped
    
    
    2,815
    
    
    
    8,967
    
    
    
    73,016Total Proved
    
    
    4,592
    
    
    
    18,467
    
    
    
    139,897
 Extractive Industries  Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation
and Disclosures




---



##### 



DeGolyer and MacNaughton
    
    9
  Submitted,/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughtonDeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTONTexas Registered Engineering Firm F-716/s/ Paul J. Szatkowski, P.E.Paul J. Szatkowski, P.E.[SEAL]
    
    Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION
  1.
    
    That I am a Senior Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did
prepare the letter report addressed to Approach dated July 29, 2010, and that I, as Senior
Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report.2.
    
    That I attended Texas A&M University, and that I graduated with a Bachelor of Science
degree in Petroleum Engineering in the year 1974; that I am a Registered Professional
Engineer in the State of Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of
Petroleum Engineers and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists; and that I have
in excess of 35 years of experience in the oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves
evaluations.
 /s/ Paul J. Szatkowski, P.E.Paul J. Szatkowski, P.E.[SEAL]
    
    Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton
#### Hameron MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Bobby P. SHEARIN; The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6532.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

*245Hameron Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hameron Murray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Murray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*