alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019093EN.01005102.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2019 — Haswani v Council

(Case T-477/17) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Syria - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Error of assessment))

(2019/C 93/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: George Haswani (Yabroud, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and A. Sikora-Kalėda, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Baumgart, A. Bouquet and A. Tizzano, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/840 of 27 May 2016 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 30), Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/907 of 29 May 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 15), Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/1245 of 10 July 2017 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 178, p. 13), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1241 of 10 July 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2017 L 178, p. 1), Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/774 of 28 May 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and, secondly, an application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of Decision 2017/917 and Implementing Regulation 2017/907.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr George Haswani to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr George Haswani to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05884-CM     Document 4      Filed 09/10/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05884-CM     Document 4      Filed 09/10/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05884-CM     Document 4      Filed 09/10/2007     Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We have issued our report dated March 28, 2007,    accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule    included in the Annual Report of Optelecom-NKF, Inc. (which    report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains and    explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of  Statement of    Financial Accounting No. 123(R), “Share-based    Payment”) on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to    the incorporation by reference of said reports in the    Registration Statements of Optelecom-NKF, Inc. on    Forms S-8    (File    No. 333-48306).     /s/ Grant Thornton LLP     Baltimore, Maryland    March 28, 2007
# C_2019035EN.01002201.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Fruit of the Loom v EUIPO — Takko (FRUIT)

(Case T-424/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark FRUIT - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Res judicata - Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 35/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Takko Holding GmbH (Telgte, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 (Case R 2119/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Takko Holding and Fruit of the Loom.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fruit of the Loom, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fruit of the Loom, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
NEX SEF-2018-R-7

July 17, 2018

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Division of Market Oversight

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: NEX SEF Limited – Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification – Revised Fee Program

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), NEX SEF Limited (“NEX 

SEF” or the “SEF”) hereby notifies the Commission that it is publishing a revised “Fee Program,” which 

includes NEX SEF’s fee schedule (the “Fee Schedule”) and discount programs. 

The Fee Program has been revised to simplify and update certain discount programs. No other 

substantive changes are being made to the Fee Schedule or discount programs as part of this revised 

Fee Program.

A clean copy of the Fee Program is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and a marked copy of the Fee Program 

against the current version is attached hereto as Exhibit B. A request for confidential treatment of the Fee 

Program is being simultaneously submitted to the Commission and a copy of that request for confidential 

treatment is included with this submission. 

The Fee Program will become effective on August 1, 2018.

NEX SEF certifies that the revised Fee Program complies with the requirements of the Act and the rules 

and regulations promulgated thereunder. NEX SEF has reviewed the swap execution facility core 

principles (“Core Principles”) as set forth in the Act and has determined that the Fee Program complies 

with the requirements of impartial access in Core Principle 2 and Commission Regulation 37.202 because 

all fees and any discounts will be applied on an impartial, fair and non-discriminatory manner, and the

Fee Program will be made transparent to all Participants. In compliance with Core Principle 2 and 

Commission Regulation 37.200, the Fee Program does not incentivize manipulative trading or market 

abuse or impact NEX SEF’s ability to perform its trade practice and market surveillance obligations under 

the Act, and NEX SEF’s Market Regulation staff will continue to monitor trading to prevent manipulative 

trading and market abuse. The Fee Program also complies with the requirements for monitoring and 

trade processing in Core Principle 4 and Commission Regulation 37.401, and the recordkeeping and 

reporting requirements in Core Principle 10 and Commission Regulations 37.1000 and 37.1001. NEX 

SEF has implemented systems to track Fee Program participants’ transactions to ensure proper fee 

discounts are applied. 

NEX SEF is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and 

certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the NEX SEF website 

and may be accessed at:

http://www.nexsef.com/. 
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

2 Broadgate

London EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

ACTIVE 233982881v.1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 222 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. THORNBERRY (for himself and Mr. NEWHOUSE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Repeal Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to estate, gift, and genera9 tion-skipping taxes) is hereby repealed. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub11 section (a) shall apply to estates of decedents dying, gifts 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 222 IH

1 made, and generation-skipping transfers made after the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2018052EN.01004202.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/42

---

Action brought on 22 December 2017 — TeamBank v EUIPO — Fio Systems (FYYO)

(Case T-826/17)

(2018/C 052/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and H. Lindner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fio Systems AG (Leipzig, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FYYO’ — Application No 14 589 261

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in Case R 2337/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in appeal proceedings R 2337/2016-4 in so far as it rejected the trade mark application in respect of the goods in Class 9; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in appeal proceedings R 2337/2016-4 in so far as it rejected the trade mark application in respect of the goods in Class 9;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
December 16, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2615.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of September 2007 Corn and mini-sized Corn futures.
These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading in 2006. Due to customer
demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier than usual (i.e., the business day after
the Commission’s receipt of this filing).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
June 15, 2021

VIA CFTC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission 

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Freedom of Information Act Confidential Treatment Request - Amendments to the 

ICE NGX Canada Inc. (“ICE NGX”) Risk Management Framework

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE NGX Canada Inc. (“ICE NGX”) today submitted, via the CFTC Portal, the self-certification,

pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and Commission Regulation 

40.6(a), of certain amendments (the “Amendments”) to the ICE NGX Risk Management 

Framework (“RMF”), with the subject line Amendment to ICE NGX Canada Inc. Rules. ICE NGX

respectfully requests confidential treatment for the information attached to the submission as 

further described below until further notice.

Under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC Section 552, Section 809(g) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and pursuant to Commission Regulation 

145.9(d)(5) and any other applicable regulations under or implementing FOIA, ICE NGX hereby 

respectfully requests that confidential treatment be maintained until further notice for the 

documents titled “Confidential Description of Amendments to ICE NGX Canada Inc. Risk 

Management Framework”. As prescribed by 17 C.F.R. 145.9(d)(4), each page of the documents

included in this request bears the legend “Confidential Treatment Requested by ICE NGX Canada 

Inc.”

The basis for this request is that these documents contain sensitive commercial and proprietary 

information, public disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect on, and cause injury 

to, the operations and competitive position of ICE NGX and/or to its Contracting Parties. In 

addition, certain of this information could constitute material undisclosed information under 

Canadian securities laws. We request that you do not provide this information to anyone else or 

trade on this information until the information is no longer confidential. This request is not to be 

construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment accorded 

by law, and ICE NGX will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. 

ICE NGX requests that it be notified in the event the Commission intends to disclose such 

documents to any person, including to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA or other applicable law. ICE NGX does not waive its notification 

rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA or other applicable law with respect to any subpoena or 

summons for such documents.
In accordance with the foregoing regulations, kindly notify me (403-974-1740 or 

martin.mcgregor@ice.com) or Greg Abbott, ICE NGX President & COO (403-974-1701 or 

greg.abbott@ice.com) of any request under FOIA for access to such documents to enable ICE 

NGX to substantiate the grounds for confidential treatment, or if you have any questions regarding 

this document.

Yours truly,

Martin McGregor

General Counsel & CCO
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2194 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2194

   To amend chapter 3123 of title 54, United States Code, to protect 
                     United States Heritage Abroad.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

    Mr. Zeldin (for himself, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mr. McCaul) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend chapter 3123 of title 54, United States Code, to protect 
                     United States Heritage Abroad.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROTECTING U.S. HERITAGE ABROAD.

    Chapter 3123 of title 54, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) In section 312302, by inserting ``and unimpeded access 
        to those sites'' after ``buildings''.
            (2) In section 312304(a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``the Middle 
                East, and north Africa'' after ``Europe,'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) by inserting ``and unimpeded access to 
                        those sites'' after ``buildings''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``and protected'' and 
                        inserting ``, protected, and accessible''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``accessibility 
                of,'' after ``reports on the''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ann DiSilvestre as Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dialpoint Communications Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 19, 2008 By: /s/ Ann DiSilvestre Ann DiSilvestre, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lawrence Weisdorn, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  May 20, 2009  /s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORNLawrence Weisdorn
Principal Financial Officer