alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 296.

#### H. V. Mercer et al., Trustees in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellants, *v.*Andrew G. Dunlop, Trustee in Bank*589ruptcy, etc.

Appeal from the United States Circuit' Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. January 4, 1909. Dismissed per stipulation'. *Mr. M. H. Boutelle*for appellants. *Mr. Hector Baxter*for appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-482-000]

On August 15, 2000, Reliant Gas Transmission Company (Reliant) submitted a filing to comply with Order No. 637. Several parties have protested various aspects of Reliant's filing.

Take notice that a technical conference to discuss the various issues raised by Reliant's filing will be held on Thursday, June 7, 2001, at 10 am, in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Parties protesting aspects of Reliant's filing should be prepared to discuss alternatives.

All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13086  Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

November 5, 2020

DW SEF LLC

Newly Adopted Rule 419

419. Post-Trade Name Give-Ups

For all Required Transactions, no Person shall directly or indirectly, including through a third-party 

service provider, disclose the identity of a counterparty to a Swap that is executed anonymously 

and intended to be cleared; provided that, if the Swap (or Swap component(s) of a Package 

Transaction) is not intended to be cleared, disclosing the identity of a counterparty shall not violate 

this Rule 419. For purposes of this Rule 419 executed anonymously shall include any Swap 

that is pre-arranged or pre-negotiated anonymously, including by any Participant.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12847]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 27825]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2001-14 of April 30, 
                2001

                
Certification To Permit U.S. Contributions to the 
                International Fund for Ireland With Fiscal Year 2000 
                and 2001 Funds

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 5(c) of the Anglo-Irish Agreement 
                Support Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-415), as amended in 
                section 2811 of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency 
                Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 
                Public Law 105-277), I hereby certify that I am 
                satisfied that: (1) the Board of the International Fund 
                for Ireland, as a whole, is broadly representative of 
                the interests of the communities in Ireland and 
                Northern Ireland; and (2) disbursements from the 
                International Fund (a) will be distributed to 
                individuals and entities whose practices are consistent 
                with the principles of economic justice; and (b) will 
                address the needs of both communities in Northern 
                Ireland and will create employment opportunities in 
                regions and communities of Northern Ireland suffering 
                from high rates of unemployment.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination, together with the attached statement 
                setting forth a detailed explanation of the basis for 
                this certification, to the Congress.

                This determination shall be effective immediately and 
                shall be published in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 30, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-12847
Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF BIOTEL, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            NAME                                STATE OF INCORPORATION    PERCENTAGE OWNED
            ----                                ----------------------    ----------------
<S>                                                                             <C>
Braemar, Inc.                                         North Carolina            100%
Carolina Medical, Inc.                                Minnesota                 100%
Advanced Biosensor Inc.                               Delaware                  100%
Agility Centralized Research Services, Inc.           Minnesota                 100%
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gray Creek Mining Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan J.
Cox, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of September, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
----------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
# C_2020320EN.01001801.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Toscana — Italy) — FW, GY v U.T.G. — Prefettura di Lucca

(Case C-726/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/30)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1217** 

ANGELA AYRES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from th e United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv - 02077

- RWT )

Submitted : August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Newman Strandberg, REBECCA STRANDBERG & ASSOCIATES, PA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affir m for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward , LLC , No. 8:09

- cv 02077

- RWT (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th e court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial Research Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Council NIDCR June 2001 Council Meeting.
    Date: June 12, 2001.
    Open: 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Scientific Presentations, Directors Report, Council 
Business.
    Place: Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/
E2, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/
E2, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Dushanka V. Kleinman, DDS, Deputy Director, 
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Res., National 
Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 31/2C39, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-9469.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www.nidcr.nih.gov/discover/nadrc/index.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13341 Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 01-AEA-10]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

 Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects an error in the geographic coordinates of a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 13, 2001, Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-03FR                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

July 12, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Francis T. Jordan, Jr., Airspace Specialist, Airspace Branch, AEA-520 F.A.A. Eastern Region, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, NY; 11434-4809; telephone: (718) 553-4521.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

**Federal Register**                     document 01-7419, Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-03FR, published on April 13, 2001 (66 FR 19083), established Class E airspace at Salisbury, MD. An error was discovered in the geographic coordinates for the Salisbury, MD airport and two other geographic points were omitted. This action corrects those errors.                

## Correction to Final Rule

                        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the geographic coordinates for the Salisbury airport as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 13, 2001 (72 FR 19803, (                        **Federal Register**                         Document 01-7419; page 19083 column 2), are corrected as follows:                    

§ 71.71 

## AEA MD E2 Salisbury, MD (Corrected)

Salisbury-Ocean City, Wicomico County Regional Airport

By removing “(lat. 38°20.43′ N/long. 75°30.62′ W)” and substituting “(lat. 38°20′26″ N/long. 75°30′37″ W)”

By adding;

Salisbury VORTAC

(Lat. 38°20′42″ N., long. 75°30′38′ W.

Salisbury-Wicomico County Regional Airport ILS

Runway 32 Localizer

(Lat. 38°20′52″ N., long. 75°31′10″ W.)

Issued in Jamaica, New York, on May 15, 2001.

F.D. Hatfield,

Manager, Air Traffic Division, Eastern Region.

[FR Doc. 01-13314  Filed 5-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
153 So. 254

#### ALLEN v. SMITH et al.

6 Div. 418.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 11, 1934.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1934.

Jim Gibson and George Rogers, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

*279George Frey, of Birmingham, for appellees.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.

GARDNER, Justice.

 Count A (unlike count 1, upon which the cause proceeded to trial) contained no averment as to any ferocious or vicious character of the dog, and defendants’ knowledge or notice thereof. McCullar v. Williams, 217 Ala. 278, 116 So. 137; Strouse v. Leipf, 101 Ala. 433, 14 So. 667, 23 L. R. A. 622, 46 Am. St. Rep. 122.

Counsel for plaintiff insists, as to count A, that it rests for its sufficiency upon a violation of an ordinance of the city of Birmingham (Watts v. Montgomery Traction Co., 175 Ala. 102, 57 So. 471), and that, as the court takes judicial knowledge of the ordinance of said city (Gen. Acts 1915, p. 297), the substance thereof need not be set out in the complaint, citing among other authorities, Arndt v. City of Cullman, 132 Ala. 540, 31 So. 478, 90 Am. St. Rep. 922; Miles v. City of Montgomery, 17 Ala. App. 15, 81 So. 351; 43 C. J. 577, 578.

But the count in question makes no reference to the city ordinance, nor does it contain averments indicating a violation of any of its provisions, and merely charges negligence by way of conclusion without supporting facts. It may be true the ordinance need not be specially pleaded, but at least sufficient facts should be alleged to disclose a violation thereof (Kansas City, etc., R. Co. v. Flippo, 138 Ala. 487, 35 So. 457; 45 C. J. 1070), and thus put defendants on notice that plaintiff’s case is governed thereby. Numerous decisions cited in the note to 45 C. J. 1092 serve to illustrate this generally accepted rule. See, also, Hood & Wheeler Furniture Co. v. Royal, 200 Ala. 607, 76 So. 965; Alabama Power Co. v. Lewis, 224 Ala. 594, 141 So. 229; Ala. Fuel & Iron Co. v. Bush, 204 Ala. 658, 86 So. 541.

In the ease of Kitchens *v.*Elliott, 114 Ala. 290, 21 So. 965, upon which plaintiff places much reliance, the count resting upon a violation of the city ordinance made specific reference to the ordinance, stating its substance and averring facts to show a violation thereof. Upon the matter of pleading, therefore, here involved, that case is no authority in support of plaintiff’s contention.

Nor is it pretended that this count (aside from the question of any city ordinance) states a cause of action. McCullar v. Williams, supra; Strouse v. Leipf, supra.

We conclude, therefore, that the demurrer to count A was properly sustained, and the judgment will accordingly be here affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00245-CR

Charles Garza

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CR-3387-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 1, 2018
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-73966) pertaining to the Fifth Amended andRestated 1999 Stock Option Plan, the dj Orthopedics, Inc. 2001 Omnibus Plan,the dj Orthopedics, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the dj Orthopedics,Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of dj Orthopedics, Inc.; inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-111465, No. 333-112943and No. 333-115768) pertaining to the registration of shares of dj Orthopedics,Inc. common stock, of our reports dated February 22, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of dj Orthopedics Inc., djOrthopedics Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of dj Orthopedics, Inc., included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
|   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|

 

 

San Diego, California

June 1, 2005

 

----
# C_2019305EN.01002501.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 July 2019 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-434/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2011/70/Euratom - Responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste - National programme - Obligation to submit to the European Commission)

(2019/C 305/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: initially G. Gattinara and M. Patakia, and subsequently G. Gattinara and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and G. Palatiello, avvocato dello Stato)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to notify the European Commission of its national programme for the implementation of spent fuel and radioactive waste management policy, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(4), in conjunction with Article 13(1), of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to notify the European Commission of its national programme for the implementation of spent fuel and radioactive waste management policy, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(4), in conjunction with Article 13(1), of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350




CHINA
AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Qizhou
Wu, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 25, 2009





/s/
      Qizhou WuQizhou
      WuChief
      Executive Officer,
director
# C_2017129EN.01003202.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/32

---

Action brought on 6 March 2017 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council

(Case T-143/17)

(2017/C 129/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo (Kasa-Vubu, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 of 12 December 2016 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Mr Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 of 12 December 2016 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Mr Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo;

| — | order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and all interveners. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and all interveners.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-139/17, Kibelisa v Council.

Kibelisa

Council

---