alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017256EN.01003101.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/31

---

Action brought on 25 May 2017 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIF

(Case T-320/17)

(2017/C 256/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Sfyri and C-N. Dede, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Investment Fund (EIF)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s award decision disclosed to the applicants on 16 March 2017 regarding the tender filed by the applicants in response to the open procurement procedure (reference 2016-MIBO_IPA_PPI-002) by which they were informed that their bid had not been ranked as the most economically advantageous tender; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s award decision disclosed to the applicants on 16 March 2017 regarding the tender filed by the applicants in response to the open procurement procedure (reference 2016-MIBO_IPA_PPI-002) by which they were informed that their bid had not been ranked as the most economically advantageous tender;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicants exemplary damages reaching the amount of EUR 100 000 (one hundred thousand Euros); and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicants exemplary damages reaching the amount of EUR 100 000 (one hundred thousand Euros); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicants’ legal fees and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicants’ legal fees and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, alleging that the the defendant infringed the EU law on public procurement, the principles of transparency and the provisions of the directives on public procurement, together with the EIF Practical Guide, by not communicating to the applicants the scores awarded in each award criterion to the winning tender and a detailed analysis of the strong and weak points of their tender in relation to those of the winning tender. The applicants argue that the defendant acted in breach of the principle of sound administration by adversely affecting the applicants’ right to an effective remedy against the contested decision.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 28911)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than June 12, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Raymond and Ruth Schnake,*                     St. Peter, Illinois; to retain voting shares of St. Peter Bancshares, Inc., St. Peter, Illinois, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First State Bank of St. Peter, St. Peter, Illinois.                

**B.  Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1.  William James Collier,*                     Post, Texas, Thomas Curtis Darden, Linda Ann Lewis, both of Lubbock, Texas, and Jesse Lee Reese, Ralls, Texas; to acquire voting shares of Kenco Bancshares, Inc., Jayton, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Kent County State Bank, Jayton, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-13281 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### March 8, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

FOREST GUARDIANS; CARSON FOREST WATCH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-2306 (D.Ct. No. 05-CIV-372-JB/DJS)

ORDER

Before HENRY , Chief Judge, TACHA , KELLY , BRISCOE , LUCERO , MURPHY , HARTZ, O’BRIEN , TYMKOVICH , GORSUCH , and HOLMES , Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the appellants’ Petition For Panel Or En Banc Rehearing . We also have a response from the United States Forest Service. Both the petition and response were circulated to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was called, and a majority voted to grant rehearing an banc. Consequently, the appellants’ petition is GRANTED. On or before April 23, 2010, the appellants shall file a supplemental brief, limited to 20 pages in length in a 13 point font, addressing the issues raised and arguments addressed-2- in Section II B of the majority opinion i ssued on August 26, 2009, and the dissent which accompanied that decision. On or before Friday June 4, 2010, the Forest Service shall file a supplemental response addressing the same issues. The appellants may submit an optional reply, limited to 10 pages in length, within 10 days of service of the response brief. All of the supplemental briefs shall be filed using the court’s Electronic Case Filing system. In addition, within 2 business days of the ECF filing, 15 hard copies of the briefs must be received in the clerk’s office. We also direct both parties to submit an additional 10 hard copies of their original merits briefs at the time the hard copies of the supplemental briefs are submitted. This matter will be heard on the court’s September 2010 argument calendar. That calendar is currently set for the week of September 20, 2010. The parties will be advised of the exact day and time for the argument when the calendar is finalized.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de MinasGerais—CEMIG (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Luiz Fernando Rolla, Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|                                                          |   | /s/   Luiz Fernando Rolla |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   | Name:                                    |   | Luiz Fernando Rolla |
|                                                     |   | Title:                                   |   | Chief Financial and Investor |
|                                                     |   |                                     |   | Relations Officer |
| Date:       July 23,  2007 |   |                                     |   |   |
|                                                          |        |                                          |        |  |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

November 1, 2018 

Submitted via email and the Portal

Jonathan Lave 

Division of Market Oversight 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: JLave@cftc.gov 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Rule Amendment and Related Request for Freedom of

Information Act Confidential Treatment

Dear Mr. Lave, 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”), as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, hereby submits to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”).

We have submitted to the CFTC Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Compliance 

Office a request that for reasons of business confidentiality, the Commission not disclose 

the Confidential Information (as defined below) or its contents in response to any FOIA 

request or otherwise for an indefinite period. We wish to inform you that the 

Confidential Information constitutes, inter alia, privileged and confidential trade secrets 

and commercial or financial information within the meaning of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 

552(b)(4) and Part 145.9(d)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s regulations as well as confidential 

information covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1905. 

For your reference, the Amendment set out on Annex A hereto is referred to herein as the 

“Confidential Information.” 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2 

David Levine 

General Counsel

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-1118-0001” and ending 

with “BSEF-1118-0463.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-8302 with any questions regarding this 

matter. 

Very truly yours,

Gregory Dumark

Chief Compliance Officer

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Enclosures 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 4 

Annex A 

Confidential Information

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-1118-0001-

BSEF-1118-0463
# C_2020313EN.01000301.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/3

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad — Vidin — Bulgaria) — Corporate Commercial Bank, in liquidation v Elit Petrol AD

(Case C-647/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Retroactive amendment to the implementation conditions for reciprocal compensation entered into with a bankrupt credit institution - Rule of law - Principle of legal certainty - Right to an effective remedy)

(2020/C 313/04)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Okrazhen sad — Vidin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Corporate Commercial Bank, in liquidation

Defendant: Elit Petrol AD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Okrazhen sad Vidin (Regional Court of Vidin, Bulgaria), by decision of 15 October 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Power Smoothie Cafe
Franchising, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William Cullen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                    /s/ WILLIAM CULLEN
                                    ------------------
                                    WILLIAM CULLEN
                                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, AND
                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Date: June 30, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-421-000]

      ( print page 28741)    
Take notice that on May 16, 2001, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing to be effective October 1, 2001.

Texas Eastern states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with Ordering Paragraph (F) of the Order Issuing Certificate issued April 12, 2001, in Docket No. CP00-404-000 (April 12 Order). Texas Eastern states that the revised tariff sheets implement the incremental recourse rate approved in the April 12 Order and the related negotiated rate.

Texas Eastern states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all affected customers and interested state commissions as well as parties to the proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13090 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2020061EN.01001301.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — GN, represented for legal purposes by HM v ZU, acting as administrator in the insolvency of Niki Luftfahrt GmbH

(Case C-532/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Montreal Convention - Article 17(1) - Air carrier liability in the event of accidents - Concept of ‘accident’ - Aircraft in flight - Spillage of a cup of coffee placed on the tray table of a seat - Bodily injuries caused to the passenger)

(2020/C 61/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GN, represented for legal purposes by HM

Defendant: ZU, acting as administrator in the insolvency of Niki Luftfahrt GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(1) of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, concluded in Montreal on 28 May 1999, signed by the European Community on 9 December 1999 and approved on its behalf by Council Decision 2001/539/EC of 5 April 2001, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘accident’ within the meaning of that provision covers all situations occurring on board an aircraft in which an object used when serving passengers has caused bodily injury to a passenger, without it being necessary to examine whether those situations stem from a hazard typically associated with aviation.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIMPLE TECH, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Aviad
Krief, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


                                      /s/ Aviad Krief
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Aviad Krief
                                      Principal Executive Officer
                                      October 29, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0455

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JACOB WILLIAM ABEL

, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

 Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

and good cause appearing as well as agreement,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including September 2, 2020, within which to prepare,

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 21 2020

07/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0455