alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |     |                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID F. HACKETT                    
| |     | David F. Hackett
Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 14, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3676]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On August 24, 2000, Notice was published on page 52804 of the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 65, Number 169) by the Department of State pursuant to Pub. L 89-259 relating to the exhibit “Eternal Egypt: Masterworks of Ancient Art from the British Museum.” The referenced Notice is corrected as follows. In the                         **SUMMARY**                         after “July 7, 2002,” add the following additional venue: “The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, CA, California Palace of the Legion of Honor, from on or about August 10, 2002, to on or about November 3, 2002,”                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: May 16, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,  Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-13151 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

June 14, 2022

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, June 14, 2022, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 22-250s) to the Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a) to certify 

amendments to NEX SEF Limited Form SEF Exhibits for Migration to the CME Globex Electronic Trading

Platform and General NEX SEF/CME Group Integration (collectively, the “Amendments”). This 

supplemental filing includes an Appendices 1 through 7.

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendices 1 through 7 (“Confidential Information”), on the 

grounds that Appendices 1 through 7 contain confidential commercial information of the submitter (NEX 

SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendices 1 through 7 until 

further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned immediately 

after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendices 1 through 7 or any other court order, subpoena, or 

summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission intends to 

disclose such Appendices 1 through 7 to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit pursuant 

to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA with 

respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendices 1 through 7.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3663]

Advisory Committee on Historical Deiplomatic Documentation; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation will 
meet in the Department of State, 2201 ``C'' Street NW., Washington, DC, 
June 18-19, 2001 in Conference Room 1107. Prior notification and a 
valid photo are mandatory for entrance into the building. One week 
before the meeting, members of the public planning to attend must 
notify Gloria Walker, Office of the Historian (202-663-1124) to provide 
dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and telephone numbers.
    The Committee will meet in open session from 1:30 p.m. through 3 
p.m. on Monday, June 18, 2001, to discuss declassification and transfer 
of Department of State electronic records to the National Archives and 
Records Administration and the Foreign Relations series. The remainder 
of the Committee's sessions from 3:30 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. on Monday, June 
18, 2001 and from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Tuesday, June 19, 2001, will be 
closed in accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The agenda calls for discussions of 
still unresolved options for modernizing the Foreign Relations series 
as well as agency declassification decisions concerning the series. 
These are matters not subject to public disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1), and the public interest requires that such activities be 
withheld from disclosure.
    Questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Marc J. 
Susser, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical 
Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, 
Washington, DC 20520, telephone (202) 663-1123, (e-mail 
[email protected]).

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
Marc J. Susser,
Executive Secretary of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-13147 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
```
# C_2017382EN.01005001.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/50

---

Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Ardigo and UO v Commission

(Case T-615/17)

(2017/C 382/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Nicola Ardigo (Lissone, Italy) and UO (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare and rule that






  — | the decisions confirming the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights into the European Union pension scheme are annulled; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Declare and rule that

—

the decisions confirming the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights into the European Union pension scheme are annulled;

| — | the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on tow pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement by the Appointing Authority of Article 7(1) of the General Implementing Provisions (GIPs) of 3 March 2011 in the calculation by that Authority of the deduction of the amount representing the increase in value of that capital between the date of the application for transfer and that of the actual transfer. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement by the Appointing Authority of Article 7(1) of the General Implementing Provisions (GIPs) of 3 March 2011 in the calculation by that Authority of the deduction of the amount representing the increase in value of that capital between the date of the application for transfer and that of the actual transfer.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural measures, namely breaches by the Appointing Authority of its obligations to state reasons and to establish, through the GIPs, the mathematical formula by which it calculated the coefficients necessary for the conversion of the capital transferred into years of pensionable service. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural measures, namely breaches by the Appointing Authority of its obligations to state reasons and to establish, through the GIPs, the mathematical formula by which it calculated the coefficients necessary for the conversion of the capital transferred into years of pensionable service.

---
**Exhibit        32.2**

**Certification        of Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

|                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |                                                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       |                                                                           |
| Date:                August                14, 2008 |                                                                                                                                                                                                       | By:                     /s/ Howard                Mah |
|                                                | Name:                Howard                Mah                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                                | Title:                      Chief Financial OfficerUnited                    States Commodity Funds LLC, General                    Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,                    LP |
***EXHIBIT 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL        OFFICER

PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF        2002

 

In        connection with the report on Form 10-K of Trustcash Holdings, Inc. for the annual period        ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date        hereof (“Report”), I, Kent Carasquero, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to        the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section                        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,                        in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the                        end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the                        registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: April        14, 2008

 

/s/ Kent        Carasquero 

Kent        Carasquero, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

This        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be        deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act        of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any        filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of        1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of        any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed        original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the        registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41
#### Clark, Adm’x, *v.*American Dock & Improvement Co.

*Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

November 25, 1885.

Costs—Witness Fees—Witness not Examined.

Witness foes are taxable for necessary and proper attendance in court, although the witnesses were not actually called and sworn on the trial.

Appeal from Taxation of Costs.

Wheeler, J.

The clerk has taxed for witnesses not actually called and sworn on trial. No facts are reported as found as a ground of taxation or for refusing taxation. It is taken from the fact of taxation that all facts necessary wore found; and no question arises except whether witnesses can be taxed for upon any state of facts when they are not called. Witness fees are taxable for attendance in court. Bev. St. § 848. This of course moans necessary and proper attendance in good faith, which the clerk must have found. Taxation of clerk approved.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRIS KOHLER, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MIDWAY LAND, LLC and SEA FINANCIAL, INC., Defendants - Appellees. No. 13-55759D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00148-JMWMC
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 3, 2015 Pasadena California Before: REINHARDT and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior District Judge. ** 

# FILED
FEB 09 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 1In this case, brought under the ADA, the district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. It concluded that although “there would be a material issue of fact with respect to the slope of the areas challenged by Plaintiff because [Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ witnesses, both of whom made measurements after remediation had purportedly occurred,] r each contrary conclusions,” Kohler’s witness had not demonstrated his qualifica tions to serve as an expert witness; therefore, it refused to consider his declaration. Subsequently, we held in Strong v. Valdez Fine Foods , 724 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2013), that a disabled plaintiff comp laining of precisely the same barrier – excessive slopes in a parking lot – was not required to offer expert evidence or precise measurements to survive summa ry judgment. We therefore vacate the portion of the district court’s judgment challenged on appeal and remand this case for reconsideration in light of Strong
. 1 VACATED and REMANDED. Costs awarded to Kohler.

1 We also conclude that the allegations in Kohler’s complaint and declaration are sufficient to establish standing under Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc. , 631 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc). 2
LCH Rule Submission

Appendix A

Margin Collateral Haircut Schedule
# C_2019432EN.01001001.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Eni SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (C-364/18), Shell Italia BV SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Autorità di Regolazione per l’Energia, Reti e Ambiente, formerly Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas e il sistema idrico (Case C-365/18)

(Joined Cases C-364/18 and C-365/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 94/22/EC - Energy - Conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons - Royalties - Methods of calculation - QE and PFOR indices - Discriminatory nature)

(2019/C 432/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

(Case C-364/18)

Applicant: Eni SpA

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

Interveners: Autorità di Regolazione per l’Energia, Reti e Ambiente, formerly Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas e il sistema idrico, Regione Basilicata, Comune di Viggiano, Regione Calabria, Comune di Ravenna, Assomineraria

(Case C-365/18)

Applicant: Shell Italia BV SpA

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Autorità di Regolazione per l’Energia, Reti e Ambiente, formerly Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas e il sistema idrico

Interveners: Regione Basilicata, Comune di Viggiano, Assomineraria

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons, read in the light of the sixth recital thereof, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which the amount of royalties payable by holders of licences for the extraction of natural gas is calculated on the basis of an index based on the prices of oil and other fuels in the medium and long term and not an index that reflects the short-term market price of natural gas.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 17, 2010.
              By:
              /s/
      Asher ZwebnerName: Asher
      ZwebnerTitle: Interim
      Chief Executive Officer, Financial Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Simon Thurlow, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary and Chief
Financial Officer of Autocarbon, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   April 20, 2004

/s/ Simon Thurlow
--------------------------
Simon Thurlow,
President/Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer