alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WACHOVIA        8739 Research Drive
	Charlotte, NC 28288
SECURITIES	
 
**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of            August 15, 2001, by and among Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. (formerly know as First Union Mortgage Securities, Inc.) as Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly     know as First Union National Bank) as Master Servicer, Lennar Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer,       and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association as Trustee and LaSalle Bank National Association as Paying Agent with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2001 C3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.
	Pursuant to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy E. Steward and Clyde M.             Alexander, Directors of the Master Servicer, do hereby certify that:
  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 and of its performance under the Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision; and

To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all     its obligations under  the  Agreement in all material respects throughout the period                                                                                             January 1, 2002 through  December 31, 2002; and

The Master Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the    status of REMIC I, REMIC II as a REMIC under the REMIC Provisions or of the        Grantor Trust as a "Grantor Trust" for income tax purposes under the Grantor Trust  Provisions from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.

             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the _______     day of March, 2003.

 
***Timothy E. Steward  			***Clyde M. Alexander
Timothy E. Steward, Director 			Clyde M. Alexander, Director

Wachovia Bank, National Association		Wachovia Bank, National Association	

(formerly know as First Union	 National    	(formerly known as First Union National

 Bank)		     			             Bank)

 

FUNB 2001 C3  Inv #515 615

Wachovia Securities is the trade name under which Wachovia Corporation conducts its investment banking, capital markets and institutional securities business 

through First Union Securities, Inc. ("FUSI"), member NYSE, NASD, SIPC and through other bank and non bank and broker dealer subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation,

including Wachovia Bank, N.A. and First Union National Bank.********
# C_2019139EN.01001802.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. v European Commission

(Case C-14/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Article 272 TFEU - Concept of a ‘declaratory action’ - Article 263 TFEU - Concept of an ‘administrative decision’ - Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) (2007-2013) - Audit reports finding certain declared costs to be ineligible)

(2019/C 139/17)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellants: Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. (represented by: G. Gentil Anastácio and D. Pirra Xarepe, advogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and M.M. Farrajota, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARTIN MENDES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-97-235, CA-01-9-V) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martin Mendes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Martin Mendes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Mendes has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Mendes , Nos. CR-97-235; CA-01-9-V (W.D.N.C. filed May 20, 2002, entered May 21, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



 <S>                                     <C>
                                         ----------------------------
                                            China Automotive Systems
                                          ----------------------------
                                                        |
                                                        |
                                         ------------------------------
                                                     (100%)
                                         Great Genesis Holdgins Limited
                                         ------------------------------
                                                        |
                                                        |
                                     -------------------------------------
                                                     (100%)
                                     Ji Long Enterprise Investment Limited
                                     -------------------------------------
                                                        |
                                                        |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        |                       |                       |                         |                        |
-----------------  ------------------------  ------------------------  ----------------------  ------------------------
      (42%)                    81%                     55%                      (51%)                    (51%)
   Jin Henglong      Shashi Jiulong Power    Shenyang Jinbei Henglong  Zhejiang Henlong & VIE  Jingzhou Henglong Fulida
     Co. Ltd.      Steering Company Limited     Automotive Steering     Pump Company Limited       Textile Co., Ltd.
 Automotive Parts          ("Jiulong")       Systems Company Limited         ("Zhejang")              ("Jingzhou")
   ("Henglong)                                     ("Shenyang")
-----------------  ------------------------  ------------------------  ----------------------  ------------------------
</TABLE>
153 So. 917

#### ELLIS JEWELRY CO. et al. v. B. R. PEGRAM et al.

6 Div. 190.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 29, 1934.

Ernest Matthews, of Birmingham, for appellants.

A. Leo Oberdorfer, of Birmingham, and •Sanders & Sanders, of Ensley,' for appellees.

GARDNER, Justice.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and ROSTER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ David F. Hackett   
| |                        
| | David F. Hackett       
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 13, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020068EN.01001001.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v Republic of Poland, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, European Citizens’ Initiative One of Us

(Case C-418/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Institutional law - Citizens’ initiative ‘One of us’ - Communication from the European Commission setting out its conclusions and the reasons for not taking the action requested in the citizens’ initiative)

(2020/C 68/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Patrick Grégor Puppinck, Filippo Vari, Josephine Quintavalle, Edith Frivaldszky, Jakub Baltroszewicz, Alicia Latorre Canizares, Manfred Liebner (represented by: R. Kiska, Solicitor, P. Diamond, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Citizens’ Initiative One of Us, European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent), Republic of Poland, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Patrick Grégor Puppinck, Mr Filippo Vari, Ms Josephine Quintavalle, Ms Edith Frivaldszky, Mr Jakub Baltroszewicz, Ms Alicia Latorre Canizares and Mr Manfred Liebner to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Patrick Grégor Puppinck, Mr Filippo Vari, Ms Josephine Quintavalle, Ms Edith Frivaldszky, Mr Jakub Baltroszewicz, Ms Alicia Latorre Canizares and Mr Manfred Liebner to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALFONSO DORSEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 330 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
CX Futures Exchange and

CX Clearinghouse

499 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10022

+1 877-300-4555

info@cantorexchange.com

www.cantorexchange.com

CX is a registered trademark of CX Futures Exchange, L.P. or its affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries.

November 12, 2021

By CFTC Portal Submission

Assistant Secretary of the CFTC 

for FOIA Matters

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Freedom of Information Act Confidential Treatment Request for:

Confidential Attachment A to Submission 2021-06 (CX Compliance Manual 

Addendum - Comm w CFTC 2021-11)

Dear Sir or Madam:

CX Futures Exchange L.P. (the “Requestor”) hereby requests that the 

documents referenced above and enclosed herewith be afforded confidential 

treatment in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC 

552 and CFTC rules thereunder, 17 C.F.R. 145.9, for an indefinite period of time 

due to the sensitive commercial and proprietary nature of such information, 

public disclosure of which could be detrimental to the Requestor. As prescribed 

by 17 C.F.R. 145.9(d)(4), each page of the documents included in this request 

bear the legend “Confidential Treatment Requested by CX Futures Exchange, 

L.P.”

In accordance with the foregoing regulations, kindly notify me at 

thomas.thompson@cantorexchange.com or 224-343-4559 of any request under 

FOIA for access to the enclosed documents to enable the Requestor to 

substantiate the grounds for confidential treatment, or if you have any questions 

regarding this document.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Thomas Thompson

Chief Compliance Officer

CX Futures Exchange, L.P.

Encl: Attachment A, Addendum re emails to CFTC.pdf

Cover Compliance Manual Addendum
# C_2017293EN.01003502.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/35

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 July 2017 — Argus Security Projects v EEAS

(Case T-131/17 R)

((Interim measures - EEAS - Recovery by offsetting - Application for interim measures - Financial loss - Duty of care - No urgency))

(2017/C 293/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Argus Security Projects Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and by B. Allemeersch, W. De Meester and G. Scraeyen, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures ordering, first, the suspension of operation of the Commission’s offsetting decisions, acting on behalf of the accounting officer of the EEAS, of the respective amounts of EUR 100 600, EUR 41 522 and EUR 52 600 (decisions communicated on 15 March 2017), EUR 58 924 (decision communicated on 7 April 2017) and EUR 41 422 (decision communicated on 19 April 2017) and, secondly, an injunction against EEAS adopting any further offsetting decision against the applicant pending delivery of a final judgment concerning the dispute related to the performance of the framework contract 2008/14/SEC/RELEX/K8, pending before the Court of First Instance of Brussels (Belgium).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 11

National Presto Industries, Inc.

The following presents the computation of per share
earnings reflecting the assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Third Quarter

 First Nine Months2005


2004


2005


2004Net Earnings (1)



$
2,657


$
1,989


$
5,507


$
4,877Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)




6826



6822



6825



6820Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive




2



1



2



1Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation (3)




6828



6823



6827



6821Net earnings per share:Basic (1 divided by 2)



$
0.39


$
0.29


$
0.81


$
0.72Diluted (1 divided by 3)



$
0.39


$
0.29


$
0.81


$
0.71


---
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Approach Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 APPROACH RESOURCES INC.Date: August 7, 2009
    /s/ Steven P. SmartSteven P. SmartExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive OfficerOctober 28, 2008/s/ David MathiesonDavid MathiesonSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial OfficerOctober 28, 2008
# C_2017161EN.01003801.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/38

---

Action brought on 29 March 2017 — QD v EUIPO

(Case T-199/17)

(2017/C 161/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: QD (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of EUIPO of 2 June 2016, notified to the applicant on 3 June 2016, to refuse the second renewal of the applicant’s contract as a temporary Agent pursuant to Article 2(f) CEOS; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of EUIPO of 2 June 2016, notified to the applicant on 3 June 2016, to refuse the second renewal of the applicant’s contract as a temporary Agent pursuant to Article 2(f) CEOS; and

| — | order EUIPO to pay the procedural costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the procedural costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging an infringement of the relevant provisions of the SR and CEOS, namely Article 110 SR, Article 2(f) and 8 CEOS. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging an infringement of the relevant provisions of the SR and CEOS, namely Article 110 SR, Article 2(f) and 8 CEOS.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the EUIPO breached its fiduciary duty and its duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the EUIPO breached its fiduciary duty and its duty of care.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the principle of sound administration (Art. 41 (1), Art. 41 (2)(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR)). |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the principle of sound administration (Art. 41 (1), Art. 41 (2)(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR)).

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the requirements of Regulation 45/2001 (1), especially of Article 27(1) and (2)(b). |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the requirements of Regulation 45/2001 (1), especially of Article 27(1) and (2)(b).

1

| 6. | Sixth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the legitimate expectations of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Sixth plea in law, alleging that EUIPO breached the legitimate expectations of the applicant.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 008, 2001, p. 1)

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. DAVID ER

ASM O ESC AM ILLAGALLEGOS, a . k.a . David Era sm o Ec sam illa , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10378

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-01852-JGZ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Je nnife r G. Zipps, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

April 7, 2014 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , GR AB ER , a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. David Era sm o Esc am illa -Ga lle gos a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt and c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for re e n try

a fte r de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED APR 11 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Esc am illa -Ga lle gos c onte nds tha t his guilty

ple a wa s involunta

ry be c a use , at the t im e of his pre tria l c o n fe re nc e an d c h ange -of-ple a he aring, his c onfusion wa s a ppa re nt a nd wa s a ggravate d by

his re c e nt use of pa i n m e d ic at ion. W e re vie w de novo whe the r a

de fe nda n t’ s ple a wa s volunta

ry . Se e Unite d State

s v . K ac z y nsk i , 239 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th C ir. 2001). C ontra ry to Esc am illa -Ga lle gos’ s c onte ntion, his sta t e m e nts a t the he aring re fle c t tha

t he ple a de d guilty

volunta rily . Se e id . at 1115 (substa

ntia l we ight is given to de fe n da nt’ s in-c ourt sta

te m e nts). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 3 7 8 2
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





EXHIBIT
      32.2





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Majic Wheels Corp. (the “Company”) On
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Asher Zwebner, Chief
      Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





i.
 
      The certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b)) or Rule
      15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).





ii. A
      certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
      liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
      incorporates it by reference.





/s/
                Asher ZwebnerAsher
                Zwebner


Chief Accounting/Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)