alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
154 So. 525

#### GORDY v. KING.

5 Div. 172.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 26, 1934.

Wm. S. Duke, of Opelika, for appellant.

E. Herndon Glenn, of Opelika, for appellee.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.

BROWN, Justice.

The appellant filed a petition in the probate court of Lee county praying that G. W. King, the executor of the last will and testament of Sarah Loette Gordy, be requirer to give bond. Said petition coming on for hearing, on August 7, 1933, an order was entered by the probate court requiring the executor to give a bond on or before September 7,.1933.

On August 8, 1933, the executor filed a petition praying that the administration of the estate be removed from the probate court to the circuit court in equity, and on August 10th tlie circuit court entered' an order removing the administration of the estate into the circuit court. Thereupon appellant filed a petition for the removal of the executor, on the ground that he had not complied with the order entered by the probate court

On the hearing of the last-mentioned petition, the circuit court granted the executor further time in which to give bond — until noon of November 21, 1933 — and further ordered that in the event the said executor failed to comply with the order, that “said G. W. King be and he is thereupon removed as executor of said estate,” and, requiring him to make final settlement of his executor-ship.

The sole contention of the appellant is 'that the circuit court was without authority to grant the executor further time to execute a bond.

We are of opinion that this was a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the circuit court.

However, the order from which the appeal is prosecuted is not such a decree as will support an appeal, and the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. .T„ and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 52005DP0269 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005DP0269

**European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Jean-Charles Marchiani (2005/2105(IMM)) **

*
Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0072 - 0072 *

3.

European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi (2004/2101(IMM))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the request by a barrister acting for Mr Umberto Bossi, for defence of his immunity in connection with criminal proceedings pending before the Milan Magistrates' Court, of 7 May 2004, announced in plenary sitting on 22 July 2004,

- having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

- having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 [1] of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

- having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0210/2005),

A. whereas Umberto Bossi was a Member of the European Parliament in the fourth legislative term (start of mandate on 19 July 1994, mandate verified on 15 November 1994, mandate expired on 19 July 1999) and in the fifth legislative term (start of mandate on 20 July 1999, mandate verified on 15 December 1999, mandate expired on 10 June 2001 for incompatibility),

B. whereas Members of the European Parliament are to enjoy in their own state immunity from legal proceedings equivalent to that of a Member of the Parliament of that state [2],

C. whereas in the case covered by the judgment of the Milan Magistrates' Court Umberto Bossi used violence against, and threatened, officers of the Italian police, who were conducting a search of the premises of the Milan headquarters of the Lega Nord, ordered by the Verona Public Prosecutor,

D. whereas at that time Umberto Bossi was a member of the Italian Parliament and the Italian Constitutional Court decided, on 17 May 2001, that he did not enjoy parliamentary immunity, finding that insults and acts of resistance and violence are in no way acts in which parliamentary privilege may apply,

E. whereas in such a case only Article 10(a) of the above Protocol can be applied and it appears that Members of the Italian Parliament do not enjoy Parliamentary immunity in respect of legal proceedings in such circumstances,

1. Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi in connection with the criminal proceedings pending before the Milan Magistrates' Court.

[1] Case 101/63: Wagner v. Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85: Wybot v. Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

[2] Article 10(a) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities.

--------------------------------------------------
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ISAAC DELGADO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3550 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 2, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Ramiro Mañalich, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
31.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Nicholas Gerber, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.







Date:  August
      13, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                      Nicholas D. GerberTitle:
                      Chief Executive OfficerUnited States Commodity Funds LLC,General Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date: January
      25, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                  Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
                  President
      and Chief Executive OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, to the best of my
knowledge, hereby certifies that the report of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc., filed on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007: (1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Newnan Coweta Bancshares, Inc.

Date:
March 28, 2008



/s/ James B. KimseyJames B. Kimsey, President andChief Executive Officer
Bloomberg SEF LLC

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

May 21, 2020 

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST

Submitted via the Portal and via email

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

David Levine 

General Counsel

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as

the “Confidential Information.” 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0520-5564” and ending 

with “BSEF-0520-5640.” 

[signature page follows] 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3 

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by stamping the enclosed copy of this letter and 

returning it via the pre-paid envelope included with the materials. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours,

Devi Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (Email: JLave@cftc.gov) 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 4 

Annex A 

Confidential Information

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0520-5564 - BSEF-0520-5640
#### People ex rel. Joseph Black, Appellant, v Walter Kelly et al., Respondents.

Motion to vacate abandonment and dismissal of appeal denied. Memorandum: The motion is denied because the appeal is palpably without merit. *(See,*
      *1015
      *People ex rel. Dudley v Kelly,*128 AD2d 981.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Albert BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-8060.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 29, 2013.

James Albert Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Albert Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bryant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
MAIN NUMBER 940-349-2600 MAIN FAX 940-349-2601 www.dentoncou nty
.com

Abel Acosta, Clerk PAUL JOHNSON CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY DENTON COUNTY COURTS BUILDING, 3 RD FLOOR 1450 EAST McKINNEY ; SUITE 3100 P
. 0 . BOX 2344 DENTON, TEXAS 76202



### July 6, 2015

Court of Criminal Appeals P . 0. Box 12308 , Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 RE: 

### Joseph Levy v. State a/Texas Trial Court No. F-2012-0885-A Court ofAppeals No. 11-13-00048-CR Court of Criminal Appeals No. PD-0460-15 Dear Mr. Acosta: HOT CHECKS 940 -349 -2700

The State of Texas , by and through the Criminal District Attorney of Denton County , Texas, and Appellee herein, waives response to Appellant's Petition For Discretionary Review filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals on June 26 , 2015 .

CL/sas

# ~/4- Catherine Luft Assistant Criminal District Attorney Denton County, Texas PD-0460-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/6/2015 2:31:33 PM Accepted 7/7/2015 3:43:49 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
# C_2017129EN.01002701.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/27

---

Action brought on 27 February 2017 — Torné v Commission

(Case T-128/17)

(2017/C 129/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Torné (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

Declare and rule that:

| — | The decision of 16 April 2016 to reject her application to have her pension accrual rate and her retirement date fixed is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of 16 April 2016 to reject her application to have her pension accrual rate and her retirement date fixed is annulled;

| — | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present action, the applicant contests the decision impliedly rejecting her application for an advance ruling concerning certain fixed and invariable factors in the calculation of her pension rights. She is of the opinion that the implied rejection of her application constitutes a failure to take a measure required by the Staff Regulations and, accordingly, is a measure adversely affecting her for the purpose of Article 90 of the Staff Regulations.

With regard to the factors for calculation of her pension, the applicant also contests the Commission’s practice of taking the view that the transfer of a member of the temporary staff covered by Article 2(f) of the CEOS to another EU agency entails the conclusion of a new contract, separate from the previous contract, which shows a discontinuity in the career of that member of the temporary staff and therefore entails the application of the new rules under the Staff Regulations concerning retirement pensions.

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott Brunsdon 
  _______________________________________
  Scott Brunsdon 
  Chief Financial Officer 
  Date: February 22, 2008

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Revett Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
» 07/01/05

2298 NYMEX @oo2

Mercantile Exchange

NYMEX/COMEX, Tivo drvisions, one naurberpliags 205 J 1 py 1: 39

OFC. OF

ECRETARIAT July 1, 2005

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.113: Renewal of
Temporary NYMEX Incentive Program in Support of the Listing for
Trading of the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Futures Contract on Dublin
Trading Floor

Dear Ms. Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“NYMEX”) is notifying the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) of a self-certification filing involving a two-month
renewal of a temporary NYMEX incentive program ("Incentive Program”) (that was
implemented in connection with the listing of the NYMEX Brent Crude Oil Futures
Contract (“Brent”) on the Exchange's new Dublin trading floor).

The Incentive Program has most recently included two components. These
components include the following: a travel stipend available to floor traders relocating to
Dublin and to their clerks; and a waiver of Exchange transaction and clearing fees in the
NYMEX Brent contract, including a waiver of the surcharge charged by the Exchange for
transactions on NYMEX ACCESS@ in the Brent contract. In addition, the Exchange
currently charges a monthly access fee of $100 for non-members who trade directly on
NYMEX ACCESS®. This monthly charge also will be waived during this period for
NYMEX Europe permittees.

Second, the Exchange will continue to provide a stipend of $1,000 (U.S. dollars)
per week to NYMEX Europe permittees and to their clerks. This stipend is intended to
defray in part transportation and living expenses, such as hotel bills, incurred in
connection with establishing trading operations in Dublin. This stipend is based upon a
demonstrated commitment to active involvement in the Brent contract as reflected by a
regular presence on the trading floor. While the stipend will continue to be calculated
on a weekly basis, actual payment will now shift to the end of each calendar month.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC.
Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the Incentive Program complies with the
Act, including regulations under the Act. The Incentive Program is being renewed,

New York Mercantile Exchange, Ine The New York Mercannile Exchange, Inc., is composed of two divisions, The
World Financial Center NYMEX Division offers trading in crude oil, heating oil, unleaded gusoline,
One North End Avenue natural gas, elecsricity, propanc, platinum and palladium. The COMEX Division

New York, NY 10282-1101 offers srading in gold, silver, copper, aluminum, and the FTSE Eurotop 100° index,
(212) 299.2000 and the FISE Eurotop 300" instex.


__+ 97/01/05 FRI 12:13 FAX 212 299 2298 NYMEX

effective July 5, 2005, for an additional two months until September 5, 2005. Should you
have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned at (212) 299-
2207.

Very truly yours,
Grew.

Brian Regan

Vice President ‘ounsel

cc: Riva Adriance, Esq.
Clarence Sanders, Esq.

oo3