alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 August 2022

Via E-mail

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

201-418-5000

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE Clear Europe Limited (“Submitter”) hereby respectfully requests that the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”) accord confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. §145.9 in relation to the ‘Collateral and 

Haircut Procedures` document submitted today which bears the bates number 01.08.2022-000001-CFTC and 

01.08.2022-000011-CFTC and all information derived therefrom (collectively, the “Confidential Information”).

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) because Submitter believes 

that the Confidential Information is covered by one or more exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act (the 

“FOIA”) (5 U.S.C. §552(b)) and is therefore exempt from the CFTC’s public disclosure requirements pursuant 

to 17 C.F.R. §145.5. In particular, 5 U.S.C. §552(b) (4) and 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) (ii) exempts disclosure that 

would reveal the Submitter’s trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. Submitter 

believes that the Confidential Information contains confidential commercial and financial information as well as 

proprietary information regarding business procedures and systems that should be protected from public 

disclosure pursuant to this exemption. Confidential treatment is requested for a period of five years. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment 

accorded by law, and Submitter will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. Submitter requests 

that the CFTC advise the undersigned, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(e) (1), in advance of any disclosure of the 

Confidential Information pursuant to the FOIA, so that this request for confidential treatment may be 

substantiated.

If you should have any questions or comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the 

undersigned at robert.barlow@theice.com or +44 (0)20 7429 4575.

Very truly yours,

Robert Barlow 

Compliance & Regulatory Analyst
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-13-00066-CR OFFENSE: 2.03

Maurice Samuel Arrington v. The

STYLE: state ofTexas COUNTY: Bell

3*8-/5

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 426th District Court

DATE: 03/05/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 69198

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Maurice Samuel Arrington

STYLE: State of Texas

v. The

Petition

31$-AT

PRO SE CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

R&0*?P JUDGE:

DATE: /D/i>7/*-0Lr

JUDGE: IjU CU^^-

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hutton Holdings Corporation, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Douglas Goff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



                                   /s/ Douglas Goff
Date: September 27, 2005           _____________________________________
                                   Douglas Goff
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to provide that a 

member of the Armed Forces and the spouse of that member shall 

have the same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location 

of any duty station of the member. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

provide that a member of the Armed Forces and the 

spouse of that member shall have the same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location of any duty 

station of the member. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Military 

5 Families’ 2nd Amendment Rights Act’’. 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2251 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECEIPT OF FIREARM OR AMMUNITION BY SPOUSE 

2 OF MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES AT A 

3 DUTY STATION OF THE MEMBER OUTSIDE 

4 THE UNITED STATES. 

5 Section 925(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘or to the spouse of such a 

8 member’’ before ‘‘or to’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘members,’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘members and spouses,’’; 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘members or’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘members, spouses, or’’; and 

13 (4) by striking ‘‘member or’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘member, spouse, or’’. 

15 SEC. 3. RESIDENCY OF SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE 

16 ARMED FORCES TO BE DETERMINED ON THE 

17 SAME BASIS AS THE RESIDENCY OF SUCH 

18 MEMBERS FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL FIRE19 ARMS LAWS. 

20 Section 921(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

21 amended to read as follows: 

22 ‘‘(b) For purposes of this chapter, a member of the 

23 Armed Forces on active duty, or a spouse of such a mem24 ber, is a resident of— 

25 ‘‘(1) the State in which the member or spouse 

26 maintains legal residence; 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2251 IH

1 ‘‘(2) the State in which the permanent duty 

2 station of the member is located; and 

3 ‘‘(3) the State in which the member maintains 

4 a place of abode from which the member commutes 

5 each day to the permanent duty station of the mem6 ber.’’. 

7 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to con9 duct engaged in after the 6-month period that begins with 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 16, 2003


                          MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


        North Dakota                    33-94644                 23-7222188
----------------------------    ------------------------     -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)      (I.R.S. Employer
     of incorporation)                                       Identification No.)


         7525 Red River Road
         Wahpeton, North Dakota                                      58075
----------------------------------------                     -------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                          (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (701) 642-8411


<PAGE>


ITEM 1.  Not Applicable
-------  --------------


ITEM 2.  Not Applicable.
-------  --------------


ITEM 3.  Not Applicable.
-------  --------------


ITEM 4.  Not Applicable.
-------  --------------


ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.
-------  -------------

         Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative has announced that the board of directors,
following the completion of the August 31, 2003 audit, has approved the final
payment for the 2002 crop of $42.33 per ton of beets harvested (14.570881 cents
per pound of sugar). The Board of Directors has also declared and allocated to
shareholders of record, for the 2002 crop, non-qualified allocated patronage
totaling $4,767,872 or $2.00 per ton of beets harvested.


ITEM 6.  Not Applicable.
-------  --------------


ITEM 7.  Not Applicable.
-------  ---------------


ITEM 8.  Not Applicable.
-------  ---------------


ITEM 9.  Not Applicable.
-------  ---------------


ITEM 10. Not Applicable.
-------- --------------


ITEM 11. Not Applicable.
-------- --------------


ITEM 12. Not Applicable.
-------- --------------


<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE


Dated: October 16, 2003                 By /s/ David H. Roche
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David H. Roche
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-030-01-1610-DO]


Extension of Scoping Period for the Lower Potomac River 
Coordinated Management Plan/Environmental Assessment

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Milwaukee Field Office, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of scoping period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 30, 2001, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 
Milwaukee Field Office, filed a Notice of Intent to prepare a 
coordinated management plan (CMP) in the Federal Register (66 FR 21412-
3) for the Lower Potomac River project area located in Charles County, 
Maryland. The CMP will be prepared to determine whether and where to 
acquire land within the project area.
    In order to provide the public with a better opportunity to 
identify issues and concerns, the scoping period will be extended to 
June 29, 2001. See the April 30, 2001, notice for more information 
about the project.

DATES: Comments should be postmarked no later than June 29, 2001 to 
ensure the issues they raise are considered in the plan.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to the following addresses: James W. 
Dryden, Field Office Manager, Milwaukee Field Office, P.O. Box 631, 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0631 or Ed Ruda, Project Leader Manager, 
Eastern States Office, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Ruda, Project Leader at (703) 440-
1663, or by electronic mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d787930306f68797c5d786e337f7170337a726b">[email protected]</a>, or Howard Levine, 
Planning and Environmental Coordinator at (414) 297-4463, or by 
electronic mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95fdfae2f4e7f1caf9f0e3fcfbf0d5f0e6bbf7f9f8bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6aea9b1a7b4a299aaa3b0afa8a386a3b5e8a4aaabe8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 11, 2001.
James W. Dryden,
Milwaukee Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-12962 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-PN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment And Training Administration


Trade Adjustment Assistance Program; Designation of Certifying 
Officers

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of designation of certifying officers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The trade adjustment assistance program operates under the 
Trade Act of 1974 to furnish program benefits to domestic workers 
adversely affected in their employment by imports of articles which are 
like or are directly competitive with articles produced by the firm 
employing the workers. The North American Free Trade Agreement-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance amended the Trade Act of 1974 to 
provide assistance to workers impacted by a shift in production from 
the workers' firm to Mexico or Canada, or increased company or customer 
imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly competitive 
with those produced by the workers' firm. Workers become eligible for 
program benefits only if the worker group is certified under the Act as 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. From time to time the 
agency issues an Order designating officials of the agency authorized 
to act as certifying officers. Employment and Training Order No. 1-01, 
was issued to revise the listing of officials designated as certifying 
officers, superseding the previous Order. Employment and Training Order 
No. 1-01, is published below.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of May 2001.
Raymond J. Uhalde,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-12820 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### In the Matter of Anthony Odom, Appellant, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner was found guilty of assault (inmate rule 100.10) in the stabbing of another inmate. The determination was based on the written report and testimony of the charging officer and the confidential testimony of an inmate witness. Petitioner was not allowed to hear a tape of the confidential testimony or see a transcript of the interview with the inmate witness. The identity of the witness and content of the testimony were kept confidential to insure the inmate’s safety.

While the use of confidential testimony at a prison discipli*1011nary hearing implicates the inmate’s due process rights, confidentiality may be maintained in the interests of institutional safety *(see, Matter of Boyd v Coughlin,*105 AD2d 532; *Matter of Gross v Henderson,*79 AD2d 1086, *lv denied*53 NY2d 605). In such a case, the Hearing Officer must inform the inmate that confidential evidence will be considered and articulate the reason why the evidence cannot be disclosed *(Matter of Boyd v Coughlin, supra,*at 533). The reason for maintaining confidentiality must have some basis in the record, and a record of the confidential evidence must be submitted to the reviewing court *(see, Matter of Pinargote v Berry,*147 AD2d 746, 747-748). There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that he was entitled to notice that confidential testimony would be considered before the interview was conducted. "[I]t is sufficient that petitioner was given notice of the confidential testimony and a written reason for the confidentiality prior to the end of the hearing” *(Matter of Pinargote v Berry, supra,*at 748). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40112 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Luis Flores-Calderon, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CR-2231-1

______________________________ Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appo inted to represent Luis FloresCalderon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Calde ron has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva nt portions of the record reflected

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 15, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40112 Document: 67-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2024No. 23-40112

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s as sessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-40112 Document: 67-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2024
Exhibit 16.1

August 25, 2005

Securities and Exchange
CommissionWashington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal
accountants for IntriCon Corporation (the Company) and, under the date of March 18, 2005,
except as to notes 3, 4, 8, and 18, which are as of March 31, 2005, and note 2, which is
as of June 24, 2005, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of the Company
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. On August 23, 2005, our
appointment as principal accountants was terminated. We have read the Companys
statements included under Item 4.01 of its Form 8-K dated August 23, 2005 and we agree
with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with the
Companys statement that the change in independent registered public accountants was
made and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, with any of the
statements made under Item 4.01(b)(i) or (ii), or any of the Companys statements
made after the first sentence in the second paragraph of Section 4.01(a)(iv) regarding the
correction of the material weakness prior to the quarter ended June 30, 2005 or the
initiation of the policies and procedures.

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG LLP
#### Anita PURYEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tina SHRADER; Vicky Crone; Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary; United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-1680.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 22, 2013.

Decided: Aug. 26, 2013.

Anita Puryear, Appellant pro se.

Andrew George Warrens Norman, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anita Puryear appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Puryear v. Shrader,*No. 8:11-cv-03640-PJM, 2013 WL 1833262 (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Certificate of Formation of EXCO Midcontinent MLP, LLC



 Exhibit 4.24 

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION 

OF 
 EXCO
MIDCONTINENT MLP, LLC 
 This Certificate of Formation, dated November 27, 2007, has been duly executed and is filed
pursuant to Section 18-201 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “Act”) to form a limited liability company (the “Company”) under the Act. 

1. Name. The name of the Company is: 

EXCO Midcontinent MLP, LLC 

2. Registered Office; Registered Agent. The address of the registered office required to be maintained by
Section 18-104 of the Act is: 
 Corporation Trust Center 

1209 Orange Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

The name and the address of the registered agent for service of process required to be maintained by Section 18-104 of the Act are:

 The Corporation Trust Company 

Corporation Trust Center 

1209 Orange Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

3. This Certificate of Formation of EXCO Midcontinent MLP, LLC shall become effective as of 6:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on
November 27, 2007. 
 EXECUTED as of the date written first above. 

 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ William L. Boeing



			
	Name:	 	William L. Boeing
		 	Authorized Person
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Plus Resource Corp., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, H. James Graham, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.   /s/ H. James
Graham H. James Graham CEO, Chief Accounting
Officer  Dated: November 9,
2009