alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | /s/                Ran                Furman                                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ran                Furman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (Principal                Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |

|   | /s/                Kim                Bradford                                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Kim                Bradford,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer,                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (Principal              Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

The Commercial Space Technology, Systems Architecture & Policy Panel and Threat Panel Meeting will meet in Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico on May 31-June 1, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the direction of the study.  This meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof.

For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-13006  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
# C_2017424EN.01005301.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/53

---

Action brought on 12 October 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi)

(Case T-702/17)

(2017/C 424/76)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: V. Marsland, Solicitor and S. Malynicz, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Papouis Dairies LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colours containing the word elements ‘Papouis Halloumi’ — Application for registration No 11 176 344

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 August 2017 in Case R 2782/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Northeast Dairy Compact Commission

# AGENCY:

Northeast Dairy Compact Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Compact Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting to consider matters relating to administration and enforcement of the price regulation. This meeting will be held in Wenham, Massachusetts, continuing the Commission's program of holding a meeting in each of the Compact states. In addition to receiving reports and recommendations of its standing Committees, the Commission will receive a number of informational reports about the impact of the over-order price regulation in Massachusetts. 

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, June 6, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Wenham Museum, 132 Main Street, Wenham, Massachusetts. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel Smith, Executive Director, Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 64 Main Street, Room 21, Montpelier, VT 05602. Telephone (802) 229-1941. 

Authority:7 U.S.C. 7256

Dated: May 18, 2001. 

Daniel Smith, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 01-13180 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1650-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 19 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2021462EN.01000601.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — FN, GM, Adler Real Estate AG, HL, Petrus Advisers LLP v Übernahmekommission

(Case C-546/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Takeover bids - Directive 2004/25/EC - Article 5 - Mandatory bid - Article 4 - Supervisory authority - Definitive decision establishing an infringement of the obligation to submit a takeover bid - Binding effect of that decision in the context of subsequent administrative-penalty proceedings conducted by the same authority - Principle of the effectiveness of EU law - General principles of EU law - Rights of the defence - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 47 and 48 - Right to silence - Presumption of innocence - Access to an independent and impartial tribunal)

(2021/C 462/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: FN, GM, Adler Real Estate AG, HL, Petrus Advisers LLP

Defendant: Übernahmekommission

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 4 and 17 of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, as amended by Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014, read in the light of the rights of the defence guaranteed by EU law, in particular of the right to a hearing, and of Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as precluding a practice of a Member State whereby a decision by means of which a breach of that directive was established and which has become definitive has a binding effect in subsequent proceedings for the imposition of a penalty for an administrative offence owing to an infringement of the provisions of Directive 2004/25/EC, in so far as the parties concerned by those proceedings were not able, during the earlier proceedings in which that breach was established, fully to exercise the rights of the defence, in particular the right to a hearing, or to assert the right to silence or to benefit from a presumption of innocence in respect of the facts that will subsequently be used in support of the accusation, or are not able to benefit from the right to an effective remedy against such a decision before a court having jurisdiction to resolve questions of fact and of law.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
Delaware

The First State

Page 1

 

7766488 8100 Authentication: 204900049

SR# 20234298369 Date: 12-23-23

You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF “LMX LABS, LLC”,

CHANGING ITS NAME FROM "LMX LABS, LLC" TO "COINBASE

DERIVATIVES, LLC", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-FIRST DAY

OF DECEMBER, A.D. 2023, AT 11:21 O`CLOCK A.M.
# C_2017424EN.01005001.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/50

---

Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v SRB

(Case T-685/17)

(2017/C 424/73)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Miralla Inversiones (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

First — take note of the present application and acknowledge the lodging of annulment proceedings against Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of 7 June 2017 concerning the resolution of Banco Popular, as well as the valuation on which it is based and, once the relevant verifications have been carried out, declare the action admissible and follow the procedure set out in Article 120 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;

Second — In accordance with the application, order SRB to submit without delay the provisional valuation carried out by DELOITTE in accordance with Article 20 of the Regulation (EU) 806/2014 for the purpose of enabling the proper exercise of the right of the defence and, once that valuation has been submitted, allow the applicant a specific period to analyse and examine it in detail, so that it is in a position to oppose it during the reply stage;

Third — In the event that it does not accept the claims made in the previous paragraph and the proceedings continue, rule that Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of 7 June 2017 concerning the resolution of Banco Popular and the valuation on which it is based are contrary to EU law.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board.

---
# C_2019155EN.01001201.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Textilis Ltd, Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag

(Case C-21/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU trade mark - Concept of ‘shape’ - Shape giving substantial value to the goods - Two-dimensional mark - Figurative mark also constituting a work for the purpose of copyright - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(e)(iii) - Regulation (EU) 2015/2424)

(2019/C 155/15)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Textilis Ltd, Ozgur Keskin

Defendant: Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the [European Union] trade mark, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015, must be interpreted as meaning that it is not applicable to marks registered before the entry into force of Regulation No 207/2009, as amended by Regulation 2015/2424. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the [European Union] trade mark, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015, must be interpreted as meaning that it is not applicable to marks registered before the entry into force of Regulation No 207/2009, as amended by Regulation 2015/2424.

| 2. | Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 207/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that a sign such as that at issue in the main proceedings, consisting of two-dimensional decorative motifs, which are affixed to goods, such as fabric or paper, does not ‘consist exclusively of the shape’, within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 207/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that a sign such as that at issue in the main proceedings, consisting of two-dimensional decorative motifs, which are affixed to goods, such as fabric or paper, does not ‘consist exclusively of the shape’, within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.

---
# C_2019093EN.01005501.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — UR v Commission

(Case T-761/17) (1)

((Civil service - Open competition - Notice of competition EPSO/AD/322/16 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) - Eligibility condition - Required qualification - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Article 27, first paragraph, of the Staff Regulations))

(2019/C 93/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UR (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Mihaylova and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of 11 August 2017 of the selection board in Competition EPSO/AD/322/16, taken following a review, not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for that competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders UR to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders UR to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

---
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Breanna Spencer

, * From the 35th District

Court of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR21994

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00007

- CR * March 5, 2015

The State of Texas

, * Opinion by Bailey, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,732 and TA-W-38,732A]

                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 12, 2001, applicable to workers of Haggar Clothing Company, Edinburg Manufacturing, Edinburg, Texas and Haggar Clothing Company, Weslaco Operations, Weslaco, Texas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 2, 2001 (FR 66 22006).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce men's pants, shorts and coats. New findings show that there was a previous certification, TA-W-35,858 and TA-W-38,858A, issued on April 30, 1999, for workers of Haggar Clothing Company, Edinburg Manufacturing, Edinburg, Texas and Haggar Clothing Company, Weslaco Operations, Weslaco, Texas who were engaged in employment related to the production of men's pants, shorts and coats. That certification expired April 30, 2001. To avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the certification is being amended to change the impact date from February 14, 2000 to May 1, 2001, for workers of the subject firm.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,732 and TA-W-38,732A is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Haggar Clothing Company, Edinburg Manufacturing, Edinburg, Texas (TA-W-38,732) and Haggar Clothing Company, Weslaco Operations, Weslaco, Texas (TA-W-38,732A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 1, 2001 through April 12, 2003 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of May, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-12998  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M