alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Effective Date: 06.08.202011.9.2020

TW SEF LLC

SWAP EXECUTION FACILITY

RULES

303924732 v7303924732 v8
418. Work-Up Protocol

The Company may adopt rules and implement trading protocols from time to time to allow

Participants to engage in work-up sessions following the execution of trades pursuant to Rule

404 and as may be permitted by CFTC Regulations. 419. Post-Trade Name Give-Ups

For all Required Transactions, no Person shall directly or indirectly, including through a

third-party service provider, disclose the identity of a counterparty to a Swap that is executed

anonymously and intended to be cleared; provided that, if the Swap (or Swap component(s) of

a Package Transaction) is not intended to be cleared, disclosing the identity of a counterparty

shall not violate this Rule 419. For purposes of this Rule 419 “executed anonymously” shall

include any swap that is pre-arranged or pre-negotiated anonymously, including by any

Participant.

49

303924732 v7303924732 v8
# C_2018427EN.01010302.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/103

---

Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Wall Street Systems UK v ECB

(Case T-579/17) (1)

(2018/C 427/137)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
exv4w5






Exhibit No. 4.5




CONSENT OF COUNSEL



To: The Board of Directors of Boralex Inc.



We hereby consent to the reference to us in Section 28 of the Circular with respect to “Certain
United States Income Tax Considerations” in the Offer and Circular dated May 18, 2010, as amended,
as such disclosure has been modified in the Notice of Extension and Variation dated August 31,
2010, with both such documents included in the Registration Statement on Form F-8 dated May 18,
2010, as amended, relating to the registration of senior subordinated convertible debentures of
Boralex Inc.




New York, New York

August 31, 2010




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                  /s/ K&L Gates LLP
 	 
	 	K&L Gates LLP
Exhibit 31.1

I,
Sang S. Wang, certify that:

Date:
November 26, 2003

| |  | /s/SANG S. WANGSang S. Wang
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board |  | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

I, Tammy S. Liu, certify that:

Date:
November 26, 2003

| |  | /s/TAMMY S. LIUTammy S. Liu
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance and Administration
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of A & J Venture Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

CEO

Dated: February 7, 2011
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case Nos. 5D2022-1169 

 5D2022-1170

 5D2022-1171

 5D2022-1172

LT Case Nos. 2021-305573-CFDB

 2021-305756-CFDB

 2021-306034-CFDB

 2021-305663-CFDB

_____________________________

LARRY D. ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

Leah R. Case, Judge.

Larry D. Roberts, Punta Gorda, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. 

Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

July 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.
2

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Panel To Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of the Mass 
Destruction

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
next meeting of the Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic 
Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. 
Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. (Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: June 18 & 19, 2001

ADDRESSES: Rand, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 222022-5050
    Proposed Schedule and Agenda: Panel to Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass 
Destruction will meet from 8:30 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. on June 18, 2001 
and from 8:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on June 19, 2001. Time will be 
allocated for public comments by individuals or organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: RAND provides information about this Panel on 
its web site at http://www.rand.org/organization/nsrd/terrpanel; it can 
also be reached at (703) 413-110 extension 5282. Public comment 
presentations will be limited to two minutes each and must be provided 
in writing prior to the meeting. Mail written presentations and 
requests to register to attend the open public session to: Priscilla 
Schlegel, RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050. 
Public seating for this meeting is limited, and is available on a 
first-come, first-served basis.

Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-13136 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Tribal-
State Compact for Class III Gaming Between the Hoh Indian Tribe and the 
State of Washington, which was executed on May 25, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective January 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: December 22, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 01-1263 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
# C_2017369EN.01003801.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/38

---

Action brought on 13 September 2017 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-624/17)

(2017/C 369/52)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector, notified under document C(2017) 4449; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector, notified under document C(2017) 4449; and

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission incorrectly classified the Polish tax on the retail sector as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU by reason of a manifest error in its assessment of the condition of selectivity. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission incorrectly classified the Polish tax on the retail sector as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU by reason of a manifest error in its assessment of the condition of selectivity.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision contains a deficient and inadequate statement of reasons. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision contains a deficient and inadequate statement of reasons.

---
25 April 2023

Via E-mail

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

201-418-5000

FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE Clear Europe Limited (“Submitter”) hereby respectfully requests that the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (the “CFTC”) accord confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. §145.9 in relation to the ‘Investment 

Management Procedures Amendments’ document submitted today which bear the bates number 25.04.2023-

000039-CFTC and 25.04.2023-000052-CFTC and all information derived therefrom (collectively, the 

“Confidential Information”).

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) because Submitter believes 

that the Confidential Information is covered by one or more exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act (the 

“FOIA”) (5 U.S.C. §552(b)) and is therefore exempt from the CFTC’s public disclosure requirements pursuant 

to 17 C.F.R. §145.5. In particular, 5 U.S.C. §552(b) (4) and 17 C.F.R. §145.9(d) (1) (ii) exempts disclosure that 

would reveal the Submitter’s trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. Submitter 

believes that the Confidential Information contains confidential commercial and financial information as well as 

proprietary information regarding business procedures and systems that should be protected from public 

disclosure pursuant to this exemption. Confidential treatment is requested for a period of five years. 

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment 

accorded by law, and Submitter will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. Submitter requests 

that the CFTC advise the undersigned, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §145.9(e) (1), in advance of any disclosure of the 

Confidential Information pursuant to the FOIA, so that this request for confidential treatment may be 

substantiated.

If you should have any questions or comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the 

undersigned at philip.tooke@ice.com or +44 (0)20 3142 0842.

Very truly yours,

Philip Tooke

Senior Compliance Analyst
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |     |                                        
| | --- | ---------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ ROBERTM. BROWN                     
| |     | Robert M. Brown
Chief Financial Officer



Date: November 14, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018427EN.01007101.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/71

---

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — eSlovensko v Commission

(Case T-664/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Subsidies - Finding of irregularities - Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty - Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union for a period of two years - Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database - Challenge - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/94)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko (Lučenec, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the Commission of 21 June 2017, imposing the administrative penalty of exclusion of the applicant from procurement and grant award procedures financed from the general budget of the European Union for a period of 24 months and consequently registering it in the early detection and exclusion system database provided for in Article 108(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ 2012 L 298, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | eSlovensko shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

eSlovensko shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
# C_2019383EN.01001901.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Joaquín Nadal Esteban

(Case C-104/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Article 52(1)(b) - Bad faith at the time that an application for a trade mark is filed)

(2019/C 383/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ (represented by: J. Güell Serra and E. Stoyanov Edissonov, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Joaquín Nadal Esteban (represented by: J.L. Donoso Romero, abogado)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 November 2017, Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Nadal Esteban (STYLO & KOTON) (T-687/16, EU:T:2017:853). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 November 2017, Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Nadal Esteban (STYLO & KOTON) (T-687/16, EU:T:2017:853).

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 June 2016 (Case R 1779/2015-2). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 June 2016 (Case R 1779/2015-2).

| 3. | Rejects the claim that the contested mark should be declared invalid. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Rejects the claim that the contested mark should be declared invalid.

| 4. | Orders Mr Joaquín Nadal Esteban and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay, in equal parts, the costs incurred by Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ both of the proceedings at first instance in Case T-687/16 and of the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Joaquín Nadal Esteban and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay, in equal parts, the costs incurred by Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ both of the proceedings at first instance in Case T-687/16 and of the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 22-6 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 24 of 24
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Edgar Correa, Respondent.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion by Chief Administrative Judge Ann Pfau et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
# C_2017437EN.01003102.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2017 — Steiniger v EUIPO — ista Deutschland (IST)

(Case T-80/17) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark IST - Prior EU figurative mark ISTA - Relative ground for refusal - Relevant public - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2017/C 437/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ingo Steiniger (Nümbrecht, Germany) (represented by: K. Schulze Horn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Mensing and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: ista Deutschland GmbH (Essen, Germany) (represented by: F. Lindenberg, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 December 2016 (Case R 2242/2015-5) concerning opposition proceedings between ista Deutschland and Mr Steiniger.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ingo Steiniger to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ingo Steiniger to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

1

---