alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey
Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A, for the quarter ended May 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.





Dated:
      February 17, 2010
                /s/ Harvey JudkowitzHarvey
      Judkowitz, Chief Executive Officer
NEX SEF LIMITED 

2 Broadgate

London 

EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

February 15, 2019

Via Email

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts

Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“Applicant”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) a rule certification in NEX SEF-2019-R-3 pursuant to CFTC Reg. 40.6 in order 

to issue a Market Regulation Advisory Notice (Certification). Attached as Exhibit B is MRAN 

2019-01 and attached as Exhibit C is a marked version of MRAN 2019-01.

The Applicant hereby requests that MRAN 2019-01 as set forth in Exhibit B and Exhibit C to the 

Certification (Confidential Information) be treated as confidential in order to prevent disclosure 

of Applicant’s trade secrets and confidential commercial and financial information upon a 

request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). We request the Confidential Information 

be provided confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, 2 Broadgate, 

London EC2M 7UR, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by NEX SEF

LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying numbers and codes, as applicable: NEX SEF-2019-R-3-Exhibit B and NEX SEF2019-R-3-Exhibit B. 
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

2 Broadgate

London EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 230978827
# C_2017231EN.01004302.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/43

---

Action brought on 16 May 2017 — Sata v EUIPO — Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools (1000)

(Case T-299/17)

(2017/C 231/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sata GmbH & Co. KG (Kornwestheim, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Simon, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools Co. Ltd (Pengjie Town, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: The sign ‘1000’ — EU trade mark No 12 333 531

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 March 2017 in Case R 650/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

| — | in the event that the respondent before the Board of Appeal decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the event that the respondent before the Board of Appeal decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of sound administration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of sound administration.

---
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC,
General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








Date:
              August
      13, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Howard MahName:
                Title:
              Howard
      Mah
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
| **EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Digital Ventures Corporation a Nevada    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months period ending June    30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Bing He, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Digital Ventures Corporation, and will be retained by China Digital Ventures    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    Dated: November 20, 2009/s/ Bing He    Bing He    (Chief Financial Officer)** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION** **OF
      THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER** **PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF**


**THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June
      30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Stone, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of Stone Consulting Services, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
                September 22, 2008
            STONE
                CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.By:
            /s/
                Michael StoneMichael
                Stone, President andChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Stone Consulting Services, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by Stone Consulting Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017239EN.01004901.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/49

---

Action brought on 10 May 2017 — Michela Curto v Parliament

(Case T-275/17)

(2017/C 239/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michela Curto (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: L. Levi and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of 30 June 2016, rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance, and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of 30 June 2016, rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance, and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the defendant to award the applicant an amount of EUR 10 000, or any other amount which the Court will deem appropriate, as compensation for the non-material harm suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to award the applicant an amount of EUR 10 000, or any other amount which the Court will deem appropriate, as compensation for the non-material harm suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment






  — | The applicant maintains that the defendant erred in holding that the disputed conduct was not improper and further erred in finding that it did not have the effect of undermining the applicant’s personality, dignity or physical or psychological integrity. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment

—

The applicant maintains that the defendant erred in holding that the disputed conduct was not improper and further erred in finding that it did not have the effect of undermining the applicant’s personality, dignity or physical or psychological integrity.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging the breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations and the duty to provide assistance






  — | The applicant argues, inter alia, that the defendant failed to deal with the request for assistance seriously and expeditiously, as prescribed by the applicable case-law. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging the breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations and the duty to provide assistance

—

The applicant argues, inter alia, that the defendant failed to deal with the request for assistance seriously and expeditiously, as prescribed by the applicable case-law.

---
# C_2017382EN.01005702.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/57

---

Action brought on 26 September 2017 — Eddy’s Snack Company v EUIPO — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Eddy’s Snackcompany)

(Case T-652/17)

(2017/C 382/71)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eddy’s Snack Company GmbH (Lügde, Germany) (represented by: M. Decker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ — Application for registration No 14 363 931

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2017 in Case R 1999/2016-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | definitively reject the other party’s opposition to trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ submitted by Eddy’s Snack Company GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

—

definitively reject the other party’s opposition to trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ submitted by Eddy’s Snack Company GmbH;

| — | order EUIPO to allow trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ to proceed to registration for all designated goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to allow trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ to proceed to registration for all designated goods;

| — | at the very least, order EUIPO to grant trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ for all designated goods in Classes 29, 31 and 32; |
| --- | --- |

—

at the very least, order EUIPO to grant trade mark application No 14363931 ‘Eddy’s Snackcompany’ for all designated goods in Classes 29, 31 and 32;

| — | order the other party or EUIPO jointly or individually to pay the applicant’s costs, disbursements and fees in the proceedings before the Court and in the opposition and appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party or EUIPO jointly or individually to pay the applicant’s costs, disbursements and fees in the proceedings before the Court and in the opposition and appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 74(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 74(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### Zophar Reynolds *versus*Daniel Plummer & Benjamin Hamilton *et al.*Trustees.

Where the plaintiff moved to dismiss his own writ for want of jurisdiction, and the defendant claimed costs, they were allowed.

Exceptions to the'ruling of Whitman J.

This action was returnable to and entered at the Oct. Term, 1839, of the District Court for the Western District, to be then holden at Portland, for the county of Cumberland. Both of the trustees and the defendant lived in the county of York. At the Oct. Term, Hamilton appeared, disclosed, and was adjudged not to be a trustee. At the March Term, 1840, the plaintiff moved that the action be abated, because all the trustees named in the writ lived in the county of York, and be*23cause this Court has no jurisdiction, the blank on which the writ was made not being under the seal of the District Court, but under that of the C. C. Pleas, and thereupon the presiding Judge ordered that the writ abate, and that the defendant be allowed his costs — to which ruling as to costs, the plaintiff excepted.

*Morgan,*in support of the exceptions,

cited St. of Maine, 1839, c. 373 ; *Ball*v. *Brigham,*5 Mass. R. 406 ; *Bailey*v. *Smith,*3 Fairf. 196.

*McArthur, contra.*

*Greemoood*v. *Fates &/• Tr.,*6 Green]. 405.

By the Court.

The writ having been brought in the wrong county, where the defendant could not be legally held to answer, after the trustees were discharged, he had a right to move, that for this cause, the writ should abate and for his costs.

It would be against all precedent, as well as the manifest justice of the case, to permit the plaintiff in that stage of the cause, to avoid the payment of costs, to move to dismiss his own writ.

*Exceptions overruled.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Greg Chapman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hague Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hague Corp.



Dated:

February 13, 2008



By:           /s/ Greg Chapman

Greg Chapman

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-417-000]

Take notice that on May 14, 2001, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above captioned docket, bear a proposed effective date of May 1, 2001.

ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track rate changes attributable to storage services purchased from Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) under its Rate Schedules GSS and LSS. The costs of the above referenced storage services comprise the rates and charges payable under ESNG's respective Rate Schedules GSS and LSS. This tracking filing is being made pursuant to Section 3 of ESNG's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS.

ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12957  Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M