alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      OF JAMES WATSON**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | February                4, 2008 |
|-------|---------------------------------|

| /s/                James                Watson                              |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Scott WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-14786

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 3, 2013.

William H. Beckerleg, Jr., Laurie E. Rucoba, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Laud-erdale, FL, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Kathleen Mary Salyer, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert N. Berube, Robin J. Farnsworth, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant. Jeffrey Scott Watson, Coleman, FL, pro se.

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robin Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Watson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Watson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-89,675-01

EX P ARTE ERIC ALFREDO BE RRIOS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 933712-A IN THE 176TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal P ro ce du re , the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of capital murder in 2002, and a life sentenc e in prison was a ssessed. Applicant filed a pro se habea s application in the trial court on November 7, 2008, and habea s counsel filed a supplemental habea s application on Dec ember 28, 2012. The trial court has enter ed finding s on these habea s applications and re co mmends that habea s relief be denied. The fin d i n gs an d recommendation are supported by the habea s rec ord. Applicant filed another pro se habea s application in the trial c ourt on April 3, 2019. There are no finding s or rec ommendation as2

to its claims, but this Court’s revie w of the habeas re cord shows that the claims lack merit. Ba sed

on the trial court’s finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as well as this Court’s independe nt revie w of the ha beas r ecor ds, habea s relief is denied.

Filed: J une 5, 2019 Do not publish
# C_2017369EN.01002902.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/29

---

Action brought on 16 August 2017 — Maña and Others v SRB

(Case T-552/17)

(2017/C 369/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Maña, S.L. (Teo, Spain) and 113 other applicants (represented by: P. Rúa Sobrino, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Take note of the annulment proceedings against the ‘Decision of the Single Resolution Board made at the Executive Session on 7 June 2017 relating to the resolution plan of Banco Popular Español, S.A., legal person identification No 80H66LPTVDLM0P28XF25, addressed to the FROB (SRB/EES/2017/08)’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Take note of the annulment proceedings against the ‘Decision of the Single Resolution Board made at the Executive Session on 7 June 2017 relating to the resolution plan of Banco Popular Español, S.A., legal person identification No 80H66LPTVDLM0P28XF25, addressed to the FROB (SRB/EES/2017/08)’;

| — | Annul the contested Decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested Decision;

| — | Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable;

| — | Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 1 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 2 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 3 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 4 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 5 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 6 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE     Document 14      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 7 of 7
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Justin N.      Craig                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Justin N.      Craig                       |
|   | President and Chief      Financial Officer |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | May 14,    2010                            |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-232-001]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 18, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 15 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective 
August 16, 2001:

Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 16
Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 17
Sub Seventh Revised Sheet No. 18
Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 18-A
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 30
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 31
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 32
First Revised Sheet No. 33
Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 100
Sub Original Sheet No. 100-A
Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 254
Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 255
Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 256
Third Revised Sheet No. 257
Second Revised Sheet No. 311
Second Revised Sheet No. 312
Second Revised Sheet No. 322
Original Sheet No. 323
Sheet No. 324
Second Revised Sheet No. 357
Original Sheet No. 357-A

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets, Subject 
to Refund and Conditions issued March 16, 2001 in Docket No. RP01-232-
000 (Order). Northwest states that it has submitted (1) responses to 
the questions in the Order, and (2) revised tariff sheets pertaining to 
its facilities reimbursement procedures.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13091 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ActiveUS 136696998v.1

Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. 

October 8, 2014

1. Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. (“Cantor Exchange”) discontinued listing trading months 

(contract expiries) pursuant to a Notice to Participants dated October 23, 2013, in the 

following products EURO SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS; BRITISH POUND 

SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS; and JAPANESE YEN SPOT INDEX 

DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS. 

2. Attached, please find a certification that: (1) these rules comply with the Commodity 

Exchange Act (“Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent 

with this submission, Cantor Exchange posted this submission on its website.

3. A concise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of each of the 

amended rules appears below.

4. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

5. Confidential treatment is not requested.

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND 

EFFECT OF THE RULE AMENDMENT AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE

PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6(a)(7)(vi), the following is a concise explanation and analysis 

of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rules. 

By Notice to Participants on October 23, 2013, Cantor Exchange discontinued listing contracts 

within their established listing cycle. 

The consequence of this notice was to interrupt the automatic listing of trading months (contract 

expiries) within their established cycle. The change did not amend or affect the terms and 

conditions of the contracts or their trading mechanics. The affected contracts were:

 EURO SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS; 

 BRITISH POUND SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS; and

 JAPANESE YEN SPOT INDEX DIGITAL FLEX SWAPS. 
2

ActiveUS 136696998v.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE 

ACT, 7 U.S.C. §7A-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 

17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that: 

(1) the amended Rules above comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s regulations thereunder; and 

(2) concurrent with this submission, Cantor Futures Exchange, L.P. posted on its website: 

a copy of this submission. 

_________________________

By: Manavinder S. Bains

Title: Counsel & Chief Regulatory Officer

Date: October 8, 2014
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 28      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 28      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 28      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 28      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 28      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>




Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the WaMu Mortgage
               Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-AR1 dated as of March 22,
               2002

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

         The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his own behalf for purposes of
the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-AR1, as follows:

         1. I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Vice President of the
            Company.

         2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
            meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing
            Agreement related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.

         3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
            Certificate on behalf of the Company.

         4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
            preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has
            been made under my supervision.

         5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
            Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
            throughout such year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 22, 2002.


                               By: /s/ Richie Moore
                                   ----------------------
                                   Richie Moore
                                   Vice President
**Exhibit 32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of dj Orthopedics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, Leslie H. Cross, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Vickie L. Capps, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

 

(1)               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March  4, 2005 |   | /s/ Leslie  H. Cross                                                   |   |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Leslie H.  Cross                                                       |
|                 |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer                                 |
|                 |   |                                                                   |
|                 |   | /s/ Vickie  L. Capps                                                   |   |
|                 |   | Vickie L.  Capps                                                       |
|                 |   | Senior Vice  President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2020061EN.01000501.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag — Netherlands) — Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV

(Case C-263/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3(1) - Right of communication to the public - Making available - Article 4 - Distribution right - Exhaustion - Electronic books (e-books) - Virtual market for ‘second-hand’ e-books)

(2020/C 61/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers

Defendants: Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV

Operative part of the judgment

The supply to the public by downloading, for permanent use, of an e-book is covered by the concept of ‘communication to the public’ and, more specifically, by that of ‘making available to the public of [authors’] works in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them’, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

---
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 14

- 00863

- CV

WEATHERFORD ARTIFICA L LIFT SYSTEMS, INC. , Appellant

V.

A& E SYSTEMS SDN BHD , Appellee

Appeal from the 295th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012

- 62091).

TO THE 295TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GR EETINGS :

Before this Court, on the 14th day of July 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on October 3, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s order contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court

affirms the trial court’s order.

The Court further orders that the appellant, Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems, Inc., pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered July 14, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

September 25, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
Loan commitment letter



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 

 
  
 December 29, 2005 
  

			
	AWI Gaming, Inc.	 	Via: E-mail (originals mailed)
	Mr. Bruce Dewing, President	 	 
	675 Grier Drive	 	 
	Las Vegas, NV 89119	 	 

  
 Dear Bruce: 
  
 Millennium Bank is pleased to provide the binding loan commitment outlined below to American
Wagering, Inc. and AWI Gaming, Inc. subject to receipt and approval of the conditions to close items listed herein: 
  

			
	 Borrower:
	  	AWI Gaming, Inc.
		
	 Guarantor:
	  	American Wagering, Inc.
		
	 Facility:
	  	Interest only commercial loan.
		
	 Loan Amount:
	  	$1,100,000
		
	 Rate:
	  	Wall Street Journal listed prime plus 2.0% floating daily
		
	 Term:
	  	2 years from date of closing
		
	 Collateral:
	  	1st Deed of Trust on said property
		
	 Closing Date:
	  	1st day of the month after the Nevada Gaming Commission
approval.
		
	 Prepayment Penalty:
	  	None
		
	 Closing Costs:
	  	Normal closing costs and out-of-pocket expenses apply, including but not limited to title insurance, flood certificate, tax certificate, credit report, appraisal fee, recording fees, release
fees and loan origination fee of 2%.

  
 Conditions to Close: 
  

	 	•	 	Acceptable appraisal of Sturgeon’s Inn & Casino 

  

	 	•	 	Executed documents by Borrower and participant - Great Basin Bank 

  

	 	•	 	Nevada Gaming Commission approval 

  

	 	•	 	Title commitment policy for $1,100,000 identifying Millennium Bank in first lien position. 

  
 Upon receipt of the items listed under the Conditions to Close, Millennium Bank will prepare the loan documents and order the title
insurance commitment. On behalf of Millenium Bank, we look forward to working with you on this exciting business opportunity. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
 Jeff Halverson , Vice President 
 MILLENNIUM BANK 
 1140 Edwards Village Blvd, Suite B102-104 
 Edwards, CO 81632 
 E-mail:  jeffh@millenniumprivatebank.com 

	Phone:	  970-569-3633 


	Fax:      	970-569-3664