alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019044EN.01004101.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi)

(Case T-702/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 44/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 August 2017 (Case R 2782/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 August 2017 (Case R 2782/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 August 2017 (Case R 2782/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies Ltd;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi;

| 3. | Orders Papouis Dairies to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Papouis Dairies to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 460-001 Washington]

                    a.                     *Date and Time of Teleconference:*                     Thursday, May 31, 2001 at 1:00 pm (EDT).                

                    b.                     *FERC Contact:*                     Patrick Murphy at 202-219-2659, patrick.murphy@ferc.fed.us

                    c.                     *Purpose of the Teleconference:*                     To clarify the additional information requested by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in a letter dated February 1, 2001, to prepare a biological opinion on the effect of relicensing and operating the Cushman Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 460, Mason County, Washington, on the federally listed as threatened distinct population segment of Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout (                    *Salvelinus confluentus*).                

d. Only the FWS and the Commission are consulting parties for purposes of the teleconference. However, the License applicant and other interested parties to the relicensing proceeding will be permitted to provide relevant information, consistent with the limited purpose of the teleconference. Any party wishing to participate in the teleconference should notify Mr. Patrick Murphy of the Commission staff at 202-219-2659 by May 29, 2001. Those participants who are located in the project area (i.e., western Washington state) are asked to coordinate with other participant locations to minimize the telephone connection sites. Details of the connection procedure will also be provided when you contact Mr. Murphy. Please contact Mr. Lynn Childers, FWS, Lacey, WA at 360-753-5831, to coordinate consolidation of telephone connection sites.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-13096 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, May 30, 2001, at the Wind River Training Center, located at 1262 Hemlock Road, Carson, Washington. The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to: (1) Discuss fish passage and habitat restoration at Hemlock Dam, and (2) Provide for a Public Open Forum. All Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The “open forum” provides opportunity for the public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The “open forum” is scheduled as part of agenda item (2) for this meeting. Interested speakers will need to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business at any time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Linda Turner, Public Affairs Specialist, at (360) 891-5195, or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

Dated: May 14, 2001.

Lynn Burditt,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 01-12772  Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2325 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

100 Calle Alondra in San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘65th Infantry 

Regiment Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 100 Calle Alondra in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 

as the ‘‘65th Infantry Regiment Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 65TH INFANTRY REGIMENT POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 100 Calle Alondra in San Juan, 

7 Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘65th 

8 Infantry Regiment Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2325 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in law, map, regu2 lation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘65th Infantry Regi5 ment Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

                         CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
                         -------------------------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             ----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the annual report of Cycle Country Accessories Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"),
I, Ron Hickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RON HICKMAN
------------------------------
Ron Hickman
Chief Executive Officer
December 29, 2004
# C_2017437EN.01004001.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/40

---

Action brought on 9 October 2017 — Ntolas v EUIPO — General Nutrition Investment (GN Laboratories)

(Case T-712/17)

(2017/C 437/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christos Ntolas (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: C. Renger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Nutrition Investment Co. (Delaware, Arizona, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘GN Laboratories’ — Application for registration No 11 223 559

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2017 in Case R 2358/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition brought against the application for the Community Trademark No 011223559; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition brought against the application for the Community Trademark No 011223559;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019112EN.01004002.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/40

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Austrian Airlines AG v MG, NF

(Case C-566/18) (1)

(2019/C 112/47)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
#### Hector L. RESSY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KING COUNTY; D. Benevente, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-35584.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Hector L. Ressy, Puyallup, WA, pro se.

John R. Scannell, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Daniel Kinerk, Esquire, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hector L. Ressy appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was treated roughly and handcuffed too tightly during his pre-hearing detention for a probation violation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency,*261 F.3d 912, 919 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s excessive force claim because Ressy failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Benevente’s use of force was unreasonable. *See Gibson v. County of Washoe, Nev.,*290 F.3d 1175, 1197 (9th Cir.2002) (“[T]he Fourth Amendment sets the ‘applicable constitutional limitations’ for considering claims of excessive force during pretrial detention.” (citation omitted)); *LaLonde v. County of Riverside,*204 F.3d 947, 961 (9th Cir.2000) (the extent of the injury inflicted on the plaintiff is relevant to the reasonableness inquiry).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s cruel and unusual punishment claim because Ressy failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether Benevente maliciously and sadistically used force to cause him harm. *See Wilkins v. Gaddy,*559 U.S. 34, 130 S.Ct. 1175, 1178, 175 L.Ed.2d 995 (2010) (per curiam) (extent of injury is relevant to Eighth Amendment inquiry); *Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.,*609 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir.2010) (“Although the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, rather than the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment, ap*555plies to pretrial detainees, we apply the same standards in both cases[.]” (internal citation omitted)).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s negligence claim because Ressy failed to raise a triable dispute as to causation. *See Folsom v. Burger King,*135 Wash.2d 658, 958 P.2d 301, 308 (1998) (“In order to establish actionable negligence, a plaintiff must establish: (1) the existence of a duty owed to the complaining party; (2) a breach of the duty; (3) resulting injury; and (4) that the breach was the proximate cause of the injury.”); *Fabrique v. Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc.,*144 Wash.App. 675, 183 P.3d 1118, 1122 (2008) (expert medical testimony is necessary to establish causation where the nature of the injury involves medical factors beyond a lay person’s ordinary understanding).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2017374EN.01004301.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/43

---

Action brought on 31 August 2017 — Rubik’s Brand v EUIPO — Simba Toys (Shape of a cube)

(Case T-601/17)

(2017/C 374/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rubik’s Brand Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Szamosi and M. Borbás, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG (Fürth, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU tridimensional mark (Shape of a cube) — EU trade mark No 162 784

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2017 in Case R 452/2017-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and those of the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and those of the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
1

EXHIBIT 1

Hard Red Spring Wheat Futures Incentive Program

Program Purpose

The purpose of the Hard Red Spring Wheat Futures Incentive Program (the “Program”) is to incentivize 

participants to support the continued development of the product listed below. The continued liquidity in the

contract benefits all participants in the market.

Product Scope

Hard Red Spring Wheat futures contract (“Product”).

Eligible Participants

Proprietary Trading Groups, which means an organization whose owners, employees, and/or contractors 

trade in the name of accounts owned by the group and exclusively use the funds of the group for all of their 

trading, and individuals trading their personal account are eligible to participate in the Program. There is no 

limit to the number of participants in the Program. There is no member requirement for participants.

Prospective participants must have an account with an MGEX Clearing Member (omnibus accounts are not 

eligible). Prospective participants must complete a Program application with MGEX, LLC (“MGEX” or “the 

Exchange”), which is used to determine eligibility. A link to the application can be found on the MGEX 

website, or can be obtained by contacting MGEX at mgex@mgex.com. In determining whether or not a 

prospective participant is selected to participate in the Program, the Exchange may take into account a 

variety of factors, including whether the Exchange believes that the prospective participant can maintain 

Program obligations based on the application, the prospective participant’s ability to meet trade volume 

thresholds in the Product, and the prospective participant’s historical trading volume of related products.

The Exchange may, from time to time, add or subtract from the aforementioned requirements as it deems 

necessary.

Program Term

Start date is January 1, 2023. End date is December 31, 2023June 30, 2024.

Hours

RTH and ETH.

Obligations

In order to be eligible to receive the incentives, participants must meet certain volume thresholds.

Incentives

Upon meeting all obligations, as determined by the Exchange, participants will be eligible to receive 

predetermined incentives.

Monitoring and Termination of Status

The Exchange will monitor trading activity and participants’ performance and retain the right to revoke 

participant status if it concludes from review that a participant no longer meets the eligibility requirements, 

fails to meet the obligations of the Program, or participant fails to comply with Exchange rules (including, 

but not limited to, rules relating to market manipulation, wash trades, etc.) or any applicable law.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2237 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2237

   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a bollard 
          installation grant program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

Mr. Espaillat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a bollard 
          installation grant program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Threats On Pedestrians Act 
of 2019'' or the ``STOP Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. BOLLARD INSTALLATION GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish 
a program to assist bollard installation projects designed to prevent 
pedestrian injuries and acts of terrorism in areas utilized by large 
numbers of pedestrians.
    (b) Grant Authority.--In carrying out the program established under 
subsection (a), the Secretary may award a grant, on a competitive 
basis, to a local government entity.
    (c) Application.--To be eligible for a grant under this section, a 
local government entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at 
such time, in such form, and containing such information as the 
Secretary determines appropriate, which shall include, at a minimum--
            (1) a description of the proposed bollard installation 
        project to be carried out;
            (2) a description of the pedestrian injury or terrorism 
        risks with respect to the proposed installation area; and
            (3) an analysis of how the proposed project will mitigate 
        such risks.
    (d) Grant Uses.--A recipient of a grant awarded under this section 
may use the proceeds of such grant only for a bollard installation 
project.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the costs of a bollard 
installation project assisted with a grant awarded under this section 
may not exceed 100 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation to carry out this 
section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2029.
    (g) Bollard Installation Project Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``bollard installation project'' means a project to install raised 
concrete or metal posts on a sidewalk adjacent to a roadway that are 
designed to slow or stop a motor vehicle.
                                 <all>
```