alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017330EN.01001302.xml

| 2.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/13

---

Action brought on 28 July 2017 — García Suárez and Others v Commission and SRB

(Case T-483/17)

(2017/C 330/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: María de la Soledad García Suárez (Madrid, Spain), María del Carmen Chueca García (Madrid), Sol María Chueca García (Madrid), Alejandro María Chueca García (Madrid), José María Chueca García (Madrid) and Ignacio María Chueca García (Madrid) (represented by: A. Rivas Rodríguez, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 (SRB/EES/2017/08) concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A., and of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 (SRB/EES/2017/08) concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A., and of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Order the defendant[s] to remedy the harm and damage resulting from the loss in value of the shares in Banco Popular Español, S.A. held by the applicants, taking the difference in the value of the shares on 6 June 2017, namely EUR 9 212,34, as reference for the compensation, together with interest at the appropriate rate. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant[s] to remedy the harm and damage resulting from the loss in value of the shares in Banco Popular Español, S.A. held by the applicants, taking the difference in the value of the shares on 6 June 2017, namely EUR 9 212,34, as reference for the compensation, together with interest at the appropriate rate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-482/17 Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and SRB.

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and SRB

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Momentive Performance Materials Inc. for the fiscal three-month period ended June 28, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Jonathan D. Rich    |  |  |  | /s/ Anthony S. Colatrella
|Jonathan D. Rich        |  |  |  | Anthony S. Colatrella    
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer  
|                        |  | 
|DATE: August 5, 2009    |  |  |  | DATE: August 5, 2009     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and will be retained by Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Exhibit 32.1

# OFFICER CERTIFICATION

# PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Department 56, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

(1)  
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   May 12, 2005 | /s/ Susan E. Engel                                                     
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Susan E. Engel
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer     
|                    
|                    
|Date:   May 12, 2005 | /s/ Timothy J. Schugel                                                 
|                     | Timothy J. Schugel
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(104 So. 918)

#### Ex parte John Henry SCOTT.

(7 Div. 579.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 11, 1925.)

Certiorari- to Court of Appeals.

Bailey & Weaver, of Ft. Payne, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of John Henry Scott for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Scott v. State, 104 So. 925. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12956]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-317-001]


Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

May 17, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 14, 2001, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission 
Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective 
May 1, 2001:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 253

    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's order issued April 27, 2001 in Docket No. RP01-317-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://
www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12956 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of International Card Establishment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Lopshire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 8, 2009

                                By: /s/ WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
                                        ________________________________________
                                        William Lopshire
                                        President (principal executive officer)
```

To The Board of Directors
Yi Wan Group, Inc.

                       Consent of Independent Accountants
                               Yi Wan Group, Inc.
                          Audited Financial Statements
                           December 31, 2001 and 2000

We consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report of Yi Wan Group, Inc. on
Form 10-K of our report dated February 21, 2002 on our audits of the
financial statements of Yi Wan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000 and for the years then ended, which our reports are incorporated
in the Form 10-K.

Walnut, California
March 25, 2002
```
# SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

# FORM 8-K

---

CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 11, 2005

---

Woodhead Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Delaware                                      |  | 0-5971                   |  | 36-1982580                            | 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- | 
|(State or otherJurisdiction of Incorporation) |  | (Commission File Number) |  | (I.R.S EmployerIdentification Number) | 

3 Parkway North, Suite 550, Deerfield, IL 60035
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

847-236-9300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

---

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):

|o |  | Written Communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Pre-commencement pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o |  | Pre-commencement pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

# Item 8.01.   Other Events

On November 11, 2005, one of the Companys subsidiaries (the
Subsidiary) entered into an agreement to settle litigation with another party (the Defendant) relating to
allegations of breach of contract filed by the Subsidiary and to counterclaims alleged by the Defendant against the Subsidiary
relating to allegations of breach of a related contract. Under the terms of the settlement, the Subsidiary will receive
approximately $1.5 million (after payment of amounts owed to the former owner of certain assets purchased by the Subsidiary). The
confidential settlement, in which neither party admits liability, provides for mutual releases, dismissal of all actions between
the parties and termination of the parties obligations under certain agreements between the parties.

# SIGNATURE

Under the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 this report was signed on behalf of the Registrant by the authorized person below.

|                          | WOODHEAD INDUSTRIES, INC.
|------------------------- | -------------------------
|                         
|Date:   November 16, 2005 | By:                      
|                          |                          
|                         

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

In the Matter of the Notice of 

Seed SEF LLC

Requesting Vacation of Registration 

as a Swap Execution Facility 

ORDER OF VACATION

On September 9, 2021, Seed SEF LLC (“Seed SEF”) submitted a notice to the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) requesting the vacation of its 

registration as a swap execution facility (“SEF”), pursuant to Section 7 of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 11, and Commission Regulation 37.3(g), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(g). 

WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Act provides that “[a]ny person that has been designated or

registered a registered entity in the manner [herein provided] may have such designation or 

registration vacated and set aside by giving notice in writing to the Commission requesting that 

its designation or registration as a registered entity be vacated, which notice shall be served at 

least ninety days prior to the date named therein as the date when the vacation of designation or

registration shall take effect”;

WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Act further provides that “[u]pon receipt of such notice the

Commission shall forthwith order the vacation . . . effective upon the day named in the notice”;
WHEREAS, Commission Regulation 37.3(g) provides that “[a] [SEF] may request that 

its registration be vacated under section 7 of the Act by filing a vacation request electronically 

with the Secretary of the Commission”;

WHEREAS, Seed SEF was granted registration as a SEF by Commission Order on 

August 23, 2016, pursuant to Section 5h of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission 

Regulation 37.3(b)(6), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b)(6); 

WHEREAS, Seed SEF served written notice to the Commission on September 9, 2021,

requesting that the Commission vacate Seed SEF’s registration, and such notice was provided at 

least 90 days prior to the requested effective date of December 17, 2021; and 

WHEREAS, Seed SEF has represented it will continue to comply with all applicable

recordkeeping obligations in accordance with Section 5h(f)(10) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b3(f)(10), and Commission Regulations 37.1000-1001, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1000-1001. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that the registration of Seed SEF as a SEF be 

vacated and set aside, effective December 17, 2021. 

Issued in Washington, D.C. on this 17th day of December, 2021. 

By the Commission.

______________________________

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2066 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 

the Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program in the 

Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2066 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Intelligence Ro3 tational Assignment Program Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INTELLIGENCE ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENT PRO5 GRAM. 

6 Section 844 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

7 (6 U.S.C. 414) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(b) INTELLIGENCE ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENT PRO10 GRAM.— 

11 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year 

12 after the date of the enactment of this section, the 

13 Secretary shall establish an Intelligence Rotational 

14 Assignment Program as part of the Rotation Pro15 gram under subsection (a). 

16 ‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATION.—The Chief Human 

17 Capital Officer, in conjunction with the Chief Intel18 ligence Officer, shall administer the Intelligence Ro19 tational Assignment Program established pursuant 

20 to paragraph (1). 

21 ‘‘(3) ELIGIBILITY.—The Intelligence Rotational 

22 Assignment Program shall be open to employees 

23 serving in existing analyst positions within the De24 partment’s Intelligence Enterprise and other Depart25 ment employees as determined appropriate by the 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2066 RFS

1 Chief Human Capital Officer and the Chief Intel2 ligence Officer. 

3 ‘‘(4) COORDINATION.—The responsibilities 

4 specified in paragraph (3)(B) of subsection (a) that 

5 apply to the Rotation Program under such sub6 section shall, as applicable, also apply to the Intel7 ligence Rotational Assignment Program under this 

8 subsection.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Filed 1/27/99 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1999 ND 4

In the Matter of the Estate of

Lilly Hartleib, Deceased

Charles Hartleib,                                       Appellant

       v.                                               

Bremer Bank, N.A., fka

First Bank America, NA, successor

Personal Representative of

the Estate of Lilly Hartleib,                            Appellee

Civil No. 980200    

  Appeal from the District Court for Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Glenn Dill III, Judge.

  AFFIRMED.

  Per Curiam.

  John J. Gosbee, 103 3rd Avenue N.W., Mandan, N.D. 58554-3129, for appellant.

  Richard P. Olson, of Olson Burns Lee, P.O. Box 1180, Minot, N.D. 58702-1180, for appellee.

Matter of Estate of Hartleib

Civil No. 980200

  Per Curiam.

[&P&1]  Charles Hartleib, the initial personal representative of the estate of Lilly Hartleib, appealed from an order approving the final account, the final settlement of the estate, and the discharge of the personal representative.  All of the heirs and creditors of the estate who objected to Hartleib’s claimed compensation and expenses of administration had standing to do so.  See N.D.C.C. &S& 30.1-01-06(25); Jordan v. Anderson, 421 N.W.2d 816, 818 (N.D. 1988).  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[&P&2]  Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

  Dale V. Sandstrom

  William A. Neumann

  Mary Muehlen Maring

  Carol Ronning Kapsner
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302**

 

I, Safi R. Bahcall,Ph.D., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

 
|     | Dated:  November 10, 2009 | /s/ SAFI R.  BAHCALL, PH.D.         |
|----------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|     |                                | Safi R. Bahcall, Ph.D.                   |
|     |                                | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * * | * *                            | *(principal executive officer)*          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

                         CYCLE COUNTRY ACCESSORIES CORP.
                         -------------------------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             ----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the annual report of Cycle Country Accessories Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"),
I, Ron Hickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ DAVID DAVIS
-------------------------------
David Davis
Chief Financial Officer
December 29, 2004
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas GeraisCEMIG (the "Company") for
the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Djalma Bastos de Morais, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | /s/DJALMA BASTOS DE MORAIS
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | Name:                     
| |  | Title:                    

Date:
July 1, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1028

KIMBERLY MALLETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DISNEY ENTERPRISES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00616-RDA-JFA)

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimberly Mallett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Mallett appeals the district court’s order striking her amended complaint.*

 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. 

R. 34(b). Because Mallett’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district 

court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. See 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Mallett v. Disney Enters., 

No. 1:21-cv-00616-RDA-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2021). We deny Mallett’s motions to 

appoint counsel and for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Mallett seeks to appeal the district court’s November 24, 2021, order 

dismissing her original complaint, the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and we therefore 

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”).