alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NEX SEF-2020-R-2 

February 13, 2020 

Submitted via CFTC Portal 

Division of Market Oversight 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: NEX SEF Limited – Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification – Amended Rulebook 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), NEX SEF Limited (“NEX 

SEF”) hereby notifies the Commission that it has amended its Rulebook, specifically Rules 304 and 903. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendment to the Rulebook and its compliance with applicable 

provisions of the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

A clean copy of the amended Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit B and a copy of the Rulebook 

marked to show changes against the version most recently submitted to the Commission is attached 

hereto as Exhibit C. 

The amendment will become effective on March 1, 2020. NEX SEF certifies that the amendment 

complies with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. NEX 

SEF has reviewed the swap execution facility core principles (“Core Principles”) as set forth in the Act and 

has determined that the amendment impacts the Core Principles identified in Exhibit A. 

 

NEX SEF is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and 

certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the NEX SEF website 

and may be accessed at: http://www.nexsef.com. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer 

NEX SEF LIMITED

London Fruit and Wool Exchange 

1 Duval Square 

London E1 6PW 

United Kingdom 
 2 

Exhibit A 

Explanation and Analysis 

NEX SEF has amended its Rulebook as provided below. Additionally, NEX SEF has made certain nonsubstantive changes related to typographical errors and formatting throughout the Rulebook. Capitalized 

terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Rulebook. 

Section/Rule Description of Revision 

Reason and/or

Supporting Rule or Core 

Principle 

Rule 304 and 

903 

• Rules 304(b) and 903 have been updated to 

specify that Pre-Arranged Crosses may only be 

intermediated by bulk risk mitigation services. 

• Core Principle 2 

ACTIVE 254055030
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2308 

To amend the VA MISSION Act of 2018 to expand the veterans healing 

veterans medical access and scholarship program to include more students and schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the VA MISSION Act of 2018 to expand the 

veterans healing veterans medical access and scholarship 

program to include more students and schools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VETERANS HEALING VETERANS MEDICAL AC4 CESS AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. 

5 Section 304 of the VA MISSION Act of 2018 (Public 

6 Law 115–182; 38 U.S.C. 7601 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘18 eligible 

8 veterans’’ and inserting ‘‘28 eligible veterans’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (g)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2308 IH

1 (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 

2 ‘‘COVERED MEDICAL SCHOOLS’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘DEFINITIONS’’; 

4 (B) in paragraph (1), by redesignating 

5 subparagraphs (A) through (E) as clauses (i) 

6 through (v), respectively (and by moving such 

7 clauses two ems to the right); 

8 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (1) 

9 through (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), 

10 respectively (and by moving such subpara11 graphs two ems to the right); 

12 (D) by striking ‘‘section, the term’’ and in13 serting the following: ‘‘section: 

14 ‘‘(1) COVERED MEDICAL SCHOOL.—The term’’; 

15 and 

16 (E) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(F) University of Puerto Rico School of 

18 Medicine. 

19 ‘‘(G) Universidad Central del Caribe 

20 School of Medicine. 

21 ‘‘(H) San Juan Bautista School of Medi22 cine. 

23 ‘‘(I) Ponce Health Sciences University. 

24 ‘‘(J) University of Texas Health Sciences 

25 Center at San Antonio. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2308 IH

1 ‘‘(2) STATE.—The term ‘State’ has the mean2 ing given that term in section 101 of title 38, United 

3 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1217

ANGELA AYRES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. 

WARD; JACOB GEESING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-

cv-02077-RWT)

Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Newman Strandberg, 

REBECCA STRANDBERG & ASSOCIATES, PA, Silver Spring, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order 

granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, 

for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv02077-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | Dated: March 20, 2008 | /s/SAFI R. BAHCALL, PH.D.Safi R. Bahcall, Ph.D. President and Chief
Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)                                                 
| |  | --------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated: March 20, 2008 | /s/KEITH S. EHRLICH, C.P.A.Keith S. Ehrlich, C.P.A. Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief
Financial Officer (principal accounting and financial officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1697JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, a/k/a Jim Young, Advertising for all living and deceased persons from tobacco related illness within USA, et al, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND, and other 49 States and Territories of United States, et al, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1260-MJG) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Maryland , No. CA-98-1260-MJG (D. Md. May 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00197

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CARLOS BENAVIDES JR . An

Incapacitated Person

, Appellant

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011PB000081L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellan t ’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing

and Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is GRANTED. The motion for rehearing and en banc

r econsideration if any, are due on April 7, 2014.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the second 
                  generation biofuel producer credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2019

  Mrs. Axne (for herself and Ms. Finkenauer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the second 
                  generation biofuel producer credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SECOND GENERATION BIOFUEL PRODUCER CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 40(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking subparagraph (J).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to qualified second generation biofuel production after December 31, 
2017.
                                 <all>
```
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Otis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

|Date: | March 22, 2005                                 |  | /s/   Bill Otis
|----- | ---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|      |                                                |  |                
|      | Bill OtisPresident and Chief Executive Officer

66

---
Exhibit 23.2

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-53308 of United Financial Corp. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 3, 2006, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of United Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2005.




Sioux Falls, South Dakota
March 29, 2006

---
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 25-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 21 of 21
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

September 15, 2022

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, September 15, 2022, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 22-404s) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a) to certify 

amendments to the NEX SEF Limited Trading Participant Holder Agreement (collectively, the “Rule 

Amendments”). This supplemental filing includes an Exhibit 1.

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Exhibit 1 (“Confidential Information”), on the grounds that 

Exhibit 1 contains confidential commercial information of the submitter (NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests 

that confidential treatment be maintained for Exhibit 1 until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request 

that the Commission notify the undersigned immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Exhibit 

1 or any other court order, subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the 

event the Commission intends to disclose such Exhibit 1 to Congress or to any other governmental 

agency or unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under 

Section 8(f) of the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Exhibit 1.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|   |                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a Nevada Ltd company                          
|2. | MedElite, Inc., a Texas corporation                                         
|3. | Cinnergen, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|4. | PurEffect, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|5. | I-Boost, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                         
|6. | Cinnechol, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                       
|7. | Freedom2 Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation                              
|8. | Freedom2, Inc. a Delaware corporation                                       
|9. | Exceptional Tattoo and Equipment Supply Company, Inc. a Delaware corporation

---
Exhibit 11

National Presto Industries, Inc.

The following presents
the computation of per share earnings reflecting the assumption that the granted shares
under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER
SHARE DATA)

|                                                                 | Second Quarter |  | First Six Months
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- |  | ----------------
|                                                                 |                |  |                 
|
|                                                                 |                |  |                 
|Net Earnings (loss) (1)                                          |                |  | $               
|                                                                 |                |  |                 
|                                                                
|Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)                   |                |  |                 
|                                                                
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive |                |  |                 
|                                                                
|Adjusted common and common equivalent                            |                |  |                 
|shares for computation (3)                                       |                |  |                 
|                                                                 |                |  |                 
|                                                                
|Net earnings (loss) per share:                                   |                | 
|Basic  (1 divided by 2)                                          |                |  | $               
|                                                                 |                |  |                 
|Diluted (1 divided by 3)                                         |                |  | $               
|                                                                 |                |  |                 



---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2052 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2052

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
  with respect to a portion of the Wendell H. Ford (Western Kentucky) 
                    Parkway, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2019

  Mr. Comer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
  with respect to a portion of the Wendell H. Ford (Western Kentucky) 
                    Parkway, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WENDELL H. FORD (WESTERN KENTUCKY) PARKWAY.

    (a) Designation as High Priority Corridor.--Section 1105(c) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(91) The Wendell H. Ford (Western Kentucky) Parkway from 
        the interchange with the William H. Natcher Parkway in Ohio 
        County, Kentucky, west to the interchange of the Western 
        Kentucky Parkway with the Edward T. Breathitt (Pennyrile) 
        Parkway.''.
    (b) Designation as Future Interstate.--Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by 
striking ``and subsection (c)(90)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)(90), 
and subsection (c)(91)''.
    (c) Numbering of Parkway.--Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The route referred to in subsection 
(c)(91) is designated as Interstate Route I-369.''.
    (d) Operation of Vehicles.--Section 127(l)(3)(A) of title 23, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``clause (i) or (ii)'' and inserting 
        ``clauses (i) through (iii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) The Wendell H. Ford (Western 
                        Kentucky) Parkway (to be designated as a spur 
                        of Interstate Route 69) from the interchange 
                        with the William H. Natcher Parkway in Ohio 
                        County, Kentucky, west to the interchange of 
                        the Western Kentucky Parkway with the Edward T. 
                        Breathitt (Pennyrile) Parkway.''.
                                 <all>
```