alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel (RFA: HL-01-010) Non-Mouse Models of Diabetes 
Complications in Cardiovascular and Microvascular Diseases.
    Date: June 12, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: William J. Johnson, PhD, NIH/NHLBI/DEA/Review 
Branch, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7184, Bethesda, MD 20892-9692, 
301-435-0277.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12926 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2020010EN.01001601.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam), PG, GF v Institut national de l’audiovisuel

(Case C-484/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Exclusive rights of performers - Article 2(b) - Reproduction right - Article 3(2)(a) - Making available to the public - Authorisation - Presumption - National scheme exempting a public institution responsible for the conservation and promotion of the national audiovisual heritage from the requirement to obtain the performer’s written consent for the exploitation of archives containing fixations of that performer’s performances)

(2020/C 10/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam), PG, GF

Defendant: Institut national de l’audiovisuel

Interveners: Syndicat indépendant des artistes-interprètes (SIA-UNSA), Syndicat français des artistes-interprètes (CGT)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(b) and Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which establishes, as regards the exploitation of audiovisual archives by a body set up for that purpose, a rebuttable presumption that the performer has authorised the fixation and exploitation of his performances, where that performer is involved in the recording of an audiovisual work so that it may be broadcast.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Marc Schneebaum, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 29, 2016 | /s/ MARC SCHNEEBAUM                                                                                  |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Marc Schneebaum                                                                                      |
|                      | *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer****(p**rincipal financial and accounting   officer)* |

 

----
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George Whatley, Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Gold Corp., (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2005





/s/  George Whatley

George Whatley

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
#### The Midland Pacific Railroad Co. v. Williamson.

1. The decision in the preceding case of The Midland Pacific Railroad Company, affirmed.

This, like the preceding case, was brought up by petition in error from the District Court of Otoe county. It was argued in connection with that case.

-/S'. *II. Calhoun*and *J. H. Croxton,*for plaintiffs in error.

*I. IST. Shamhaugh,*for defendant in error.

Lake, J.

Having fully considered all the questions presented in this record in the case of this Eailroad v. McCartney, decided at this term, upon the principles therein declared, the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT

TO THE

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN




     Pursuant to Paragraph A of Article V of the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Executive Officer
Performance-Based Compensation Plan approved by the Company’s
shareowners in 1994 (the “Plan”), Paragraph C of Article III of the Plan is amended
to read as follows:




	 	C.	 	The Committee shall have no discretion to make any payment to a Covered
Employee under the Plan in excess of the amount determined under paragraph B of this
Article III. However, the Committee may, in its sole discretion,
reduce the amount otherwise payable to any Covered Employee under paragraph B for any
fiscal year by determining, on or before the last day of the fiscal year, that the
payment to such Covered Employee shall not exceed a dollar amount then specified by
the Committee.
Motion Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February

27 , 2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00418

- CV

JUNE R. WILLIAMS , Appellant

V.

STONELEIGH GARDENS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C , Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at L aw No

. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1128153

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 16 , 201 9 . The clerk’s record

was filed May 17, 2019

. The reporter’s record was filed September 16, 2019 , 2017.

Appellant’ s b ri ef was originally due October 6, 2019. We granted three

motions to exten d time to file appellant ’ s b rief until January 1 4 , 2020. When we
granted t he last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted2

absent exceptional circumstanc es. On Janua ry 1 3 , 2020

, appellant filed a further

motion to exten d time to file appellant ’ s brief u ntil February 6, 2020

. On February 4, 20 20, this court issued an order denying that motion and
stating that unless appellant filed a brie f on or before Februar y 14, 2020, the court

would dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

On Februar y 18, 2020, appellant filed a f ifth motion to exten d time to file

her bri ef. Appellant filed no brief

. According ly, the motion is denied

, a nd the

a ppeal is or dered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justice s Jewell and Spain

.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Easy Scripts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kendra Marcoux, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








August 14, 2009

By:
/s/ Kendra Marcoux/s/Name:
Kendra MarcouxTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capmark Financial Group Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2008

/s/WILLIAM F. ALDINGERName:  William F. Aldinger III
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2008

/s/GREGORY J. MCMANUSName:  Gregory J. McManus
Title:Executive Vice President and
            Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 14.1

NASSDA CORPORATION

CODE OF ETHICS FOR  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS



This Code of Ethics (the "Code") for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers and the individuals who have been deemed by the Board of Directors to be
executive officers of Nassda Corporation (the "Company") for the purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Section 16 Officers") helps maintain the
Company's standards of business conduct and ensures compliance with legal requirements, specifically Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") rules promulgated thereunder.

The
purpose of the Code is to deter wrongdoing and promote ethical conduct. The matters covered in this Code are of the utmost importance to the Company, our stockholders and our
business partners, and are essential to our ability to conduct our business in accordance with our stated values.

Nothing
in this Code, in any Company policies and procedures, or in other related communications (verbal or written) creates or implies an employment contract or term of employment.



The Code is applicable to the following persons (referred to collectively as the "Officers"):



It is the policy of the Company that each Officer:



2

---



In
all cases, if an Officer is unsure about the appropriateness of an event or action, he or she should seek assistance in interpreting the requirements of this Code by contacting the
Company's Audit Committee.



Actual violations of this Code, including failures to report potential violations by others, can lead to disciplinary action at the Company's discretion, up to
and including termination.



We are committed to continuously reviewing and updating our policies and procedures. Therefore, this Code is subject to modification. Any amendment or waiver of
any provision of this Code must be approved in writing by the Company's Board of Directors.



We are required to disclose promptly and in accordance with applicable law any change in, or waiver of, any provision of the Code.

3

---

QuickLinks
# C_2018392EN.01002701.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Leifheit v EUIPO (Position of four green squares on a scale)

(Case T-184/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU trade mark consisting of four green squares on a scale - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 392/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Leifheit AG (Nassau, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt, V. Töbelmann and P. Schneider, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by: V. Mensing and A. Schifko, and subsequently by: V. Mensing and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 (Case R 1115/2016-1) concerning an application for registration of a sign consisting of four green squares on a scale as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Leifheit AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Leifheit AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

---
# C_2020010EN.01001701.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — K.H.K. v B.A.C., E.E.K.

(Case C-555/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 - European Account Preservation Order - Article 5(a) - Obtention procedure - Article 4(8) to (10) - Definition of ‘judgment’, ‘court settlement’ and ‘authentic instrument’ - National order for payment against which an objection may be lodged - Article 18(1) - Time limits - Article 45 - Exceptional circumstances - Definition)

(2020/C 10/20)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K.H.K.

Debtors: B.A.C., E.E.K.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 4(10) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an order for payment, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is not enforceable, does not constitute an ‘authentic instrument’ within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4(10) of Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an order for payment, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is not enforceable, does not constitute an ‘authentic instrument’ within the meaning of that provision.

| 2. | Article 5(a) of Regulation No 655/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that ongoing proceedings for an order for payment, such as those in the main proceedings, may be regarded as proceedings ‘on the substance of the matter’ within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 5(a) of Regulation No 655/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that ongoing proceedings for an order for payment, such as those in the main proceedings, may be regarded as proceedings ‘on the substance of the matter’ within the meaning of that provision.

| 3. | Article 45 of Regulation No 655/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that judicial vacations are not covered by the concept of ‘exceptional circumstances’ within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Article 45 of Regulation No 655/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that judicial vacations are not covered by the concept of ‘exceptional circumstances’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF) Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Department of Health and Human Services.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that ACYF will award grant funds without competition to Western Kentucky University Head Start Quality Improvement Center (QIC) in the amount of $300,000. This award is made to the QIC to further the provision of technical assistance services nationally to grantees and regional offices when they undertake the purchase, construction or major renovation of Head Start program facilities. The award will be made for the budget period beginning September 1, 2001 for a twelve month period, under existing grant award 90YQ0016.

Authority:This award will be made pursuant to the Head Start Act, amended, 42 U.S.C. 9801 et seq. (CFDA 93.600)

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Klafehn, Acting Associate Commissioner, Head Start Bureau, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, 330 C Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20447; (202) 205-8572.

Dated: May 15, 2001.

James A. Harrell,

Acting Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.

[FR Doc. 01-12684  Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
No. 414.

#### Richard B. Shepard, Petitioner, *v.*The United States.

October 19, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. *Mr. Frank S. Bright*and *Mr. Jesse B. Roote*for petitioner. *The Attorney General*and *The Solicitor General*for respondent. .
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Supplement Acquisition Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Ian Spowart, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 15thday of December, 2008.                                                                                                                
|   

IAN SPOWARTIan Spowart, President, Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,Treasurer and sole member of the Board of Directors.














---
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 30, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00535-CV WILLIAM LEWIS AND TAMB RA LEWIS, Appellants V. AMNA BAHARA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-02395-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellants’ brief in this appeal is ove rdue. By postcard da ted August 9, 2024, we informed appellants their brief was overdue and directed appellants to file a brief within ten days. We cautione d appellants that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellants have not f iled a brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

240535F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WILLIAM LEWIS AND TAMBRA LEWIS, Appellants
No. 05-24-00535-CV V. AMNA BAHARA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-02395- D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered August 30, 2024