alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 1.15


QUEBECOR MEDIA INC.




by-law


1.
    
    Section 3 Powers of By-law 2002-001 is repealed and replaced by the following section:


Powers. Subject to the provisions provided in the Shareholders Agreement
which apply to the Company, the Executive Committee shall have and may exercise all powers
of the Board of Directors, subject to restrictions imposed by the Board of Directors of the
Company from time to time. However, the Executive Committee shall not have the power to
grant options as such power has been delegated by the Board of Directors to the
Compensation Committee. Moreover, the Executive Committee shall not have the power to
remove or replace directors.


Any member of the Executive Committee may at any time require that any matter which he
deems important be referred to the Board of Directors rather than be decided by the
Executive Committee. All acts performed by the Executive Committee shall be reported to the
Board of Directors and are subject to revision or amendment by said Board, provided that
the rights of third parties are not adversely affected or invalidated thereby.


2.
    
    Any director or officer of the Company shall be authorized to sign all documents and to do
all things necessary and expedient to give full effect to this By-law.






(signed)
    
    (signed)President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Secretary
Exhibit
32.2




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350




CHINA
AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Automotive Systems, Inc., the
“Company”, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I, Jie Li,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 25, 2009





/s/ Jie LiJie
      LiChief
      Financial Officer
# C_2018032EN.01004001.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/40

---

Action brought on 24 November 2017 — Beats Electronics v EUIPO — TrekStor (i.Beat)

(Case T-770/17)

(2018/C 032/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Beats Electronics LLC (Culver City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Petersenn, lawyer, I. Fowler and I. Junkar, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: TrekStor Ltd (Hong-Kong, Hong-Kong)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘i.Beat’ — EU trade mark No 5 009 139

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2017 in Joined Cases R 2175/2016-4 and R 2213/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the Applicant’s appeal recorded under number R 2175/2016-4 and allowed the Contested Mark to remain registered for MP3-players, in particular based on USB flash memory with mini hard discs; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the Applicant’s appeal recorded under number R 2175/2016-4 and allowed the Contested Mark to remain registered for MP3-players, in particular based on USB flash memory with mini hard discs;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 read in conjunction with Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 read in conjunction with Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009.

---
# C_2020215EN.01002602.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Germanwings v Commission

(Case T-716/17) (1)

(State aid - Aviation sector - Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports - Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market - Imputability to the State - Beneficiaries - Advantage for co-contracting airlines - Market economy operator principle - Effect on trade between Member States - Adverse effect on competition - Obligation to state reasons - Aid scheme - De minimis aid - Recovery)

(2020/C 215/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Germanwings GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA 33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI) (OJ 2017 L 268, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Germanwings GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Germanwings GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.

---
# C_2017129EN.01003402.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/34

---

Action brought on 8 March 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL)

(Case T-150/17)

(2017/C 129/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FLÜGEL’ — EU trade mark No 637 686

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2016 in Case R 282/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity;

| — | order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjuction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjuction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of final advisory circular (AC) on damage tolerance for high energy turbine engine rotors.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) No. 33.14-1, Damage Tolerance for High Energy Turbine Rotors. 

# DATES:

Advisory Circular No. 33.14.1, was issued by the New England Aircraft Certification Service, Engine and Propeller Directorate on January 8, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tim Mouzakis, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, at the above address, telephone (781) 238-7114, fax (781) 238-7199. A copy of the subject AC may also be obtained electronically by writing to the following Internet address: “tim.mouzakis@faa.gov”. Additionally, you may obtain a copy of the AC directly from the internet at the following address: “http://www.faa.gov/​avr/​air/​acs/​achome.htm”. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance and information on acceptable methods, but not the only methods of compliance with § 33.14 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Section 33.14 contains requirements of life management requirements applicable to the design and life management of titanium alloy high energy rotating parts of aircraft engines. Although this AC does refer to regulatory requirements that are mandatory, this ACT is not, in itself, mandatory. This AC neither changes any regulatory requirement nor authorizes changes in or deviations from the regulatory requirements. 

This advisory circular would be published under the authority granted to the Administrator by 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704, provides guidance for Damage tolerance for high energy turbine engine rotors.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 8, 2001. 

David A. Downey, 

Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 01-1285 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
144 So. 916

#### Otis C. GIBSON v. R. W. PRICE.

6 Div. 134.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 1, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Filed 7/25/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 149

Jennifer Makelky, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Richard Makelky, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20100406

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Theresa Luan Kellington, 521 East Main Avenue, Suite 400, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellant.

Richard Makelky, 4200 McKenzie Drive Southeast #107, Mandan, N.D. 58554, defendant and appellee; self-represented.

Makelky v. Makelky

No. 20100406

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jennifer Makelky appeals from a district court divorce judgment, arguing that the district court erred in awarding primary residential responsibility of the parties’ three minor children to Richard Makelky.  We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Georgia Dawson, S.J.

[¶3]The Honorable Georgia Dawson, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, D. Ben Berry, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc., a NorthCarolina corporation (the “registrant”); (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:March 30, 2006 By: */s/ D. Ben Berry*         D. Ben Berry    President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting in Mesquite, Nevada. 

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff will hold a public meeting on the high-level waste repository licensing process. The meeting is intended to foster a common understanding among the stakeholders on issues that would be associated with the licensing process, should the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submit a license application to the NRC for a possible geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. All meetings will be facilitated by Francis X. Cameron, Special Counsel for Public Liaison, of the NRC Office of the General Counsel. 

The meeting is primarily to acquaint the public with the NRC's high-level waste licensing process. It will begin with an overview of the licensing process, followed by NRC presentations on the role of the NRC technical staff in evaluating the DOE license application, and the NRC role with respect to the transportation of high-level waste. An opportunity for questions will be provided. In addition, members of the NRC staff will be available for informal discussion with members of the public. The time, date, and location of the Public Meeting is shown below. 

*Time/Date:*                         Thursday, May 24, 2001, from 5:30 p.m.-7 p.m. (Pacific time).                     

*Place:*                         Mesquite City Hall, Council Chamber, 10 E. Mesquite Boulevard, Mesquite, Nevada.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Francis X. Cameron, Special Counsel for Public Liaison, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, or by telephone: (301) 415-1642 or e-mail: fxc@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day of May, 2001. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Newton K. Stablein, 

Acting Chief, High-Level Waste and Performance Assessment Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 01-12037 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

VIA CFTC Portal

Mr Christopher Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington DC 20581

27 September 2022

Subject: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendment for the Week of 3 October 2022

Dear Mr Kirkpatrick,

Please accept this notification pursuant to CFTC regulation § 40.6(d) of the below-described changes to the 

LCH Limited (“LCH”) London Deposit Rate (“LDR”) and the RepoClear Deposit Rate (“RDR”). 

The RDR is applicable to cash balances held on RepoClear service accounts. The LDR is applicable to all other

cash balances, including those held on SwapClear and ForexClear services clearing member accounts

(excluding the default fund). 

The changes recommended by the LCH Spread and Accommodation Review Group were approved by the LCH 

CEO and are as follows:

RDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 53.0bp Change from (48.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

GBP SONIA 32.0bp Change from (30.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp Change from (31.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

LDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 53.0bp Change from (48.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

GBP SONIA 32.0bp Change from (30.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp Change from (31.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

CHF SARON 45.0bp Change from (35.0bp) 4 October 2022 onwards

These changes will be notified via circular to clearing members in advance of the effective date.

No change is required to the LCH Rulebook.

Should you have any questions regarding this submission please contact me on ebba.andersson1@lseg.com. 

Yours sincerely,
An LSEG Business

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square | London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

LCH Group Holdings Limited | LCH Limited | Banque Centrale de Compensation | LCH.Clearnet LLC

LCH Limited. Registered in England No. 25932 Registered Office: 10 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7LS

Ebba Andersson

Senior Compliance Officer, LCH Limited
# C_2005022EN.01002202.xml

| 27.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/22

---

Corrigendum to the appointment of members of the Senior Labour Inspectors' Committee

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 10 of 14 January 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 10 of 14 January 2005

(2005/C 22/10)

On page 2, against Portugal:

for:

‘Mr Nuno Ataíde das Neves

Mr José-Manuel Santos’,

read:

‘Mr Paulo Morgado de Carvalho

Mr Manuel Ferreira Maduro Roxo’.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 16 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 16 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of RxBids (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Mack Bradley, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.








Date:
11/12/10

By:
/s/Mack BradleyMack BradleyChief Executive OfficerActing Principal Accounting Officer