alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019423EN.01001501.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Caseificio Cirigliana Srl, Mail Srl, Sorì Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero della Salute

(Case C-569/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Article 4(c) and Article 7(1)(e) - Quality schemes applicable to agricultural products and foodstuffs - Fair competition - PDO Mozzarella di Bufala Campana - Obligation to separate production areas for ‘PDO Mozzarella di Bufala Campana’)

(2019/C 423/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties in the main proceedings

Appellants: Caseificio Cirigliana Srl, Mail Srl, Sorì Italia Srl

Respondents: Ministero delle Politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero della Salute

Intervener: Consorzio di Tutela del Formaggio Mozzarella di Bufala Campana

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(c) and Article 7(1)(e) of Regulation No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, and the product specification for ‘PDO Mozzarella di Bufala Campana’ must be interpreted as not precluding national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which provide that ‘PDO Mozzarella di Bufala Campana’ must be produced in areas exclusively designated for the production of that cheese, including within one set of premises, in which the holding and storage of milk originating from farms that are not subject to the monitoring system for the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Mozzarella di Bufala Campana’ is prohibited, if those rules are a necessary and proportionate means of safeguarding the quality of that product or ensuring that the specification for that PDO is monitored, which is a matter for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.11.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ning C. Wu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Care Technologies Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical Care Technologies Inc.





Dated this 24th day of May, 2012.





/s/ NING C. WUNing C. WuPresident and Director, (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Care Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Medical Care Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3674] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Picasso: The Artist's Studio,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford, CT from on or about June 7, 2001 to on or about September 23, 2001, and at The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH from on or about October 28, 2001 to on or about January 6, 2002, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: May 16, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,  Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-13149 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
#### Abbas KHAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-60353

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 8, 2006.

Frank Guerra, George R. Willy, Sugar Land, TX, for Petitioner.

Donald Anthony Couvillon, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, John Clifford Cunningham, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Immigration Litigation, Hipólito Acosta, Houston, TX, U.S. Immigration *&*Naturalization Service District, Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Abbas Khan seeks a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) February 8, 2005, order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision finding him removable and denying a continuance pending the adjudication of his labor certification application as well as the BIA’s March 31, 2005, order denying his motion to reconsider. Because the petition for review is timely only as to the March 31, 2005, order, we have jurisdiction over that order only. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 394, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995); *Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS,*997 F.2d 108, 111 (5th Cir.1993); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), (b)(1).

Khan has not demonstrated any abuse of discretion on the BIA’s part in connection with the denial of his motion to reconsider. *See Lara v. Trominski,*216 F.3d 487, 496 *425(5th Cir.2000); *see also Matter of Cerna,*20 I. & N. Dec. 399, 402, 1991 WL 353528 (BIA1991). His argument that the motion automatically tolled his voluntary-departure period is without merit, as is his contention that the instant petition for review tolled his voluntary-departure date. *See Bandar-Ortiz v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 387, 389-91 (5th Cir.2006). The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant Section906 of the**

**Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**I, DavidH. Bateman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K ofEvans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland ComputerCorporation.**
| Date: March 30, 2007 |       | By:        | /s/ David H. Bateman    |   |
|----------------------|------------|------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | David H. Bateman        |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | Chief Executive Officer |

 

**I, PaulL. Dailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K ofEvans & Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.**
| Date: March 30, 2007 |       | By:        | /s/ Paul L. Dailey      |   |
|----------------------|------------|------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | Paul L. Dailey          |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | Chief Financial Officer |

 

**Theforegoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.**

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
  th
 Initial Public Offering of Global Consumer Acquisition Corp.
  IPO Company
   Prospectus Schedule A Schedule A
 Lock-Up Period




---



##### 



Undersigneds Shares
  provided however
     - 2 -




---



##### 



Claim
  - 3 -




---



##### 



provided that
     - 4 -




---



##### 



Affiliate
 Business Combination
 Hayground Cove Entity
 
 Insider
 
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Insider Shares
 Insider Warrants
 IPO Shares
 Registration Statement
 Trust Account
    - 6 -




---



##### 



Exhibit
10.2
 Sincerely,By:
    
    /s/ Jason N. AderName:
    
    Jason N. AderTitle:
    
    Sole Member
 Accepted and agreed:GLOBAL CONSUMER ACQUISITION CORP.By:
    
    /s/ Scott LaPortaName:
    
    Scott LaPortaTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CoroWare, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lloyd T. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CoroWare, Inc. and will be retained by CoroWare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





April 18, 2012





/s/ Lloyd T. Spencer

---------------------------

Lloyd T. Spencer

Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )
# C_2019423EN.01001301.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — SD v Agrárminiszter

(Case C-490/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Apiculture sector - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1366 - Application for aid - Conditions - Minimum number of bee colonies - Fixing with retro-active effect - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations)

(2019/C 423/15)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SD

Defendant: Agrárminiszter

Operative part of the judgment

Subject to verifications which it is for the referring court to carry out, the principles of legal certainty and of protection of legitimate expectations must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in accordance with Article 55(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, establishes the programme in the apiculture sector for a new period of three years, firstly, fixes the conditions for the grant of aid in that sector different from those provided for in the previous programmes, and, secondly, allows beekeepers to benefit from that aid from a date prior to the entry into force of that regulation, if they fulfil the new conditions provided for by that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
# C_2017347EN.01003601.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/36

---

Action brought on 7 August 2017 — SFP Asset Management and Others v SRB

(Case T-502/17)

(2017/C 347/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: SFP Asset management and Others (Geneva, Switzerland), Twenty First Trade Inc. (Panama, Panama), Merlos Infor, S.L. (Badalona, Spain) (represented by: J. Gálvez Pascual, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare that, by adopting in its executive session of 7 June 2017 Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 establishing the resolution scheme in respect of the financial institution Banco Popular Español S.A., the Single Resolution Board (‘the SRB’) infringed EU law; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by adopting in its executive session of 7 June 2017 Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 establishing the resolution scheme in respect of the financial institution Banco Popular Español S.A., the Single Resolution Board (‘the SRB’) infringed EU law;

| — | consequently, annul that measure, and any subsequent implementing measures too that the SRB may have adopted, with effect ex tunc. |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul that measure, and any subsequent implementing measures too that the SRB may have adopted, with effect ex tunc.

ex tunc

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Archstone-Smith
Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the Issuer), hereby
certifies, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) of the
Issuer for the year ended December 31, 2002, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m(a)) and that the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Date: February 28, 2003

| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /S/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR                      
| |                                                 
| | Charles E. Mueller, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

LISA VAR GAS,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. NIKOLIS PER EZ, a

n individual; JONATHAN R OJAS, a

n individual , De fe nda n ts-Appe lla

nts,

and C OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a gove rnm e nta l e ntity ; DOES, 1 to 10, inc lusive , De fe nda

n ts. No. 21-55054 D.C . No. 2:19-c v-03279-PSG-AS

M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , C hie f Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2021 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# FIL ED
NOV 30 2021 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).B e fore : LINN, *** B YB EE, a nd B ENNETT, C irc uit Judge s. Whe n a n inte rloc utory

a ppe a l c ha lle nge s the distric t c ourt’ s de te rm i nation that the re is suffic ie n t e vide nc e to c re ate a ge nuine dispute a s to m at e ria l fa c t, we la c k a ppe lla te jurisdic tion. Estate

of Ande r son v . Marsh , 985 F.3d 726 (9th C ir. 2021). B e c a

use a ppe lla nts’ a ppe a l a m ounts to a

c ha lle nge to the distric t c ourt’ s de c ision on the

fa c ts, we la c k jurisdic tion. DISM I SSE D.

* * * The Honora

ble R ic ha rd Linn, Unite d

Stat e s C irc uit Judge for the U.S. C ourt of Appe a ls for the Fe d e ra l C irc uit, sitting by de signa tion. 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dennis Lacey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 3, 2010 |  | /s/ Dennis Lacey                                                                                 
|                        |  | Dennis Lacey                                                                                     
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sinobiopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xinjie Mu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Date:  April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Xinjie MuXinjie Mu

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)