alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6 

CHARTER OF

  THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

  OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  OF DANIELS CORPORATE ADVISORY COMPANY, INC.

The Executive Committee of Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is a committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, the composition and responsibilities of which are described in this Executive Committee Charter.

1.

Composition.  In accordance with Article III of the Bylaws of the Company, the Board of Directors, by resolution adopted by a majority of the whole Board of Directors, may designate an Executive Committee.  The Executive Committee shall consist of no fewer than ___ members.  The members of the Executive Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors.  The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall be the Chair of the Executive Committee; provided, however, that if the Chairman of the Board of Directors is an executive officer or employee of the Company, then the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors shall be an independent director.  The members of the Executive Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors or until their successors shall be duly designated.  Vacancies in the Executive Committee shall be filled by the Board of Directors.

2.

Responsibilities.  In accordance with Article III of the Bylaws of the Company, during the intervals between the meetings of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee shall have and may exercise all of the authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business affairs of the Company to the extent authorized by the resolution providing for the Executive Committee or by subsequent resolution adopted by a majority of the whole Board of Directors.  This authorization is subject to the limitations imposed by law, the Bylaws of the Company or the Board of Directors.

3.

Reporting.  The Executive Committee shall keep written minutes of each meeting, which shall set forth the Committee’s actions, and shall be duly filed in the Company’s records.  Reports of meetings of the Executive Committee, including a report of all actions taken, shall be made to the Board of Directors at its next regularly scheduled meeting, following the Executive Committee meeting, accompanied by any recommendations to the Board of Directors approved by the Executive Committee.
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14


OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




I,
Humberto Garcia Borbon, Chief Financial Officer of Sitesearch Corporation.,
certify that:




(1)           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
October 31, 2009 (the “Report”);




(2)           Based
on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this Report; and




(3)           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the small business issuer as of, and for,
the periods represented in this Report.




(4)           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)           designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which the Report is being prepared;




(b)           evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           disclosed
in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and




(5)           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and to the audit committee of the board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):




(i)           all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(ii)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:           December
15, 2009




/s/Humberto Garcia
Borbon


Humberto
Garcia Borbon


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anvil Forest Products Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Zhijiang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11thday of February, 2009.

ZHIJIANG ZHANG
Zhijiang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

















---
ICAP Global Derivatives Limited 

2 Broadgate 

London 

United Kingdom 

EC2M 7UR 

July 23, 2021 

Submitted via CFTC Portal 

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

Office of the Secretariat 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: ICAP Global Derivatives Limited – Regulation 40.6(a) Rule Certification – 

Notification of Amendments to IGDL Fee Schedule (IGDL-2021-R-7)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), 

ICAP Global Derivatives Limited (“IGDL”), a registered swap execution facility, hereby notifies 

the Commission that it wishes to amend its fee schedule (the “Fee Schedule”), as described more 

fully in the Exhibits attached hereto. The amended Fee Schedule will become effective on 

August 6, 2021. 

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6, this submission includes: 

(i) A concise explanation and analysis of the amended Fee Schedule and its compliance 

with applicable provisions of the Act, attached as Exhibit A; 

 

(ii) A clean copy of the amended Fee Schedule, attached as Exhibit B; and 

 

(iii) A copy of the amended Fee Schedule marked to show changes to the currently 

effective version, attached as Exhibit C. 

IGDL hereby certifies that the amendment complies with the requirements of the Act and 

Commission regulations thereunder. IGDL is not aware of any substantive opposing views 

expressed with respect to this filing and certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this 
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

July 23, 2021 

Page 2 

submission was posted on IGDL’s website. 

Please contact Brian D. Donnelly, Chief Compliance Officer, at (201) 984-6956 or by email at 

bddonnelly@tullettprebon.com with any questions regarding this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

ICAP Global Derivatives Limited 

By: __________________________ 

Name: Brian D. Donnelly 

Title: Chief Compliance Officer 

Date: July 23, 2021 

Enclosures 

cc: CFTC Division of Market Oversight (dmosubmissions@cftc.gov) 

Nancy Markowitz, CFTC (nmarkowitz@cftc.gov) 
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

July 23, 2021 

EXHIBIT A 

Explanation of Amendments to IGDL Fee Schedule 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested] 
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

July 23, 2021 

EXHIBIT B

Amended IGDL Fee Schedule 

(Clean Version) 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested]
Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

July 23, 2021 

EXHIBIT C

Amended IGDL Fee Schedule 

(Marked Version) 

[FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDMON WASHINGTON, an individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; ERIC OLIVE, 

Officer, Los Angeles Police Department, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-55622 

D.C. No. 

2:17-cv-02829-PA-FFM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 12, 2019

Pasadena, California

Before: KELLY,** PAEZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Edmon Washington (“Washington”) appeals the district court’s

grant of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 action alleging use of excessive force by Defendant Eric Olive (“Olive”), a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

JAN 29 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Los Angeles Police Department officer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291 and review de novo the district court’s determination that Olive is entitled 

to qualified immunity. Glenn v. Washington Cty., 673 F.3d 864, 870 (9th Cir. 

2011). We affirm. 

“In evaluating a grant of qualified immunity, we ask two questions: 

(1) whether, taking the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, the 

officers’ conduct violated a constitutional right, and (2) whether the right was 

clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct.” Id. We may exercise 

our discretion to decide either prong first. Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236 

(2009). We begin with the second.

“The plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the rights [he] claims were 

‘clearly established’ at the time of the alleged violation.” Robinson v. York, 566 

F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2009) (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted). 

Washington relies on three decisions: Glenn, 673 F.3d 864, Deorle v. Rutherford, 

272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2001), and Booke v. County of Fresno, 98 F. Supp. 3d 

1103 (E.D. Cal. 2015). None “place[] the . . . constitutional question [implicated 

by Olive’s conduct] beyond debate.”

1

 Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741

(2011). Olive reasonably believed Washington was armed with an assault weapon

1 Because we conclude Booke does not place the constitutional question beyond 

debate, we need not consider whether a district court decision can clearly establish 

the law.
3 

and, unlike the officers in Glenn, Deorle, or Booke, here the officers provided

repeated, clear, and specific warnings to Washington that they would use less 

lethal force if he continued to resist their orders to lie on the ground. Washington 

has not shown that Olive violated clearly established law. See Pearson, 555 U.S. 

at 245.

Therefore, the district court properly granted summary judgment to Olive on 

the basis of qualified immunity. 

AFFIRMED.
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12

- 405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer

generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A
- 1
- CA
- 41182
BLC ALBUQUERQUE
- GC, LLC,
Pla intiff

- Appellee,

v. RUBY BERNICE CARMONA,
Defendant

- Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Victor S. Lopez, District Court Judge
Littler Mendelson PC Jay J. Athey Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Ruby Bernice Carmona Albuquerque, NM
Pro Se Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION DUFFY, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing s o has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. MEGAN P. DUFFY, JudgeWE CONCUR:

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity
Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
            November
      16, 2009
            By:
            /s/Howard
      MahName:
              Title:
            Howard
      Mah
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
LP
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2027 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require the President 

to place any financial conflicts of interest into a blind trust, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

the President to place any financial conflicts of interest 

into a blind trust, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drain the Swamp and 

5 the President’s Assets Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2027 IH

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PRESIDENT’S FINANCIAL CON2 FLICTS OF INTEREST INTO BLIND TRUST. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Ethics in Govern4 ment Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 101 et seq.) is amended 

5 by inserting after section 111 the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 112. The President: placement of financial conflicts 

7 of interest into blind trust 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date that is 30 

9 days after the date that the President first assumes office, 

10 the President may not hold any asset that would otherwise 

11 be considered a disqualifying financial interest under sec12 tion 208 of title 18, United States Code, if the President 

13 were subject to such section. 

14 ‘‘(b) BLIND TRUST.— 

15 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President may place 

16 any asset covered by subsection (a) into a blind trust 

17 (as that term is defined in section 102(f)(3)). 

18 ‘‘(2) DIVESTITURE.—Not later than 30 days 

19 after any such asset is placed in a blind trust, the 

20 trustee or other entity who is involved in the man21 agement or control of the blind trust shall divest the 

22 blind trust of such asset.’’. 

23 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub24 section (a) shall apply to any President assuming office 

25 on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2027 IH

1 SEC. 3. VIOLATIONS. 

2 A violation of the amendment made by this Act shall 

3 constitute a high crime and misdemeanor for the purposes 

4 of article II, section 4 of the Constitution of the United 

5 States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kathryn V. Marinello, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 3, 2010 |  | /s/ Kathryn V. Marinello                                                     
|                        |  | Kathryn V. Marinello                                                         
|                        |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2212 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right of a claimant 

in a civil action before a Federal court to retain a structured settlement 

broker to negotiate the terms of payment of an award, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself and Mr. HIGGINS of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right 

of a claimant in a civil action before a Federal court 

to retain a structured settlement broker to negotiate 

the terms of payment of an award, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Structured Settlement 

5 Claimants Rights Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2212 IH

1 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

2 (a) FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS.—Chapter 111 

3 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘§ 1660. Right to retain structured settlement broker 

6 ‘‘A claimant in any civil action before a Federal court 

7 shall have the right to retain a structured settlement 

8 broker to act on behalf of that claimant for purposes of 

9 negotiating a schedule of payments or other terms of pay10 ment of a sum certain previously agreed to paid by or on 

11 behalf of the defendant in satisfaction of a judgment 

12 against that defendant or in accordance with the terms 

13 of a settlement. The court shall inform the claimant of 

14 this right at the appropriate time. The defendant shall 

15 provide timely notice of any professional relationship be16 tween the defendant and the broker if any such relation17 ship exists or has existed.’’. 

18 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS.—Section 554 of 

19 title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

20 end the following: 

21 ‘‘(f) In the case of any proceeding under this section, 

22 a party to that proceeding shall have the right to retain 

23 a structured settlement broker to act on behalf of that 

24 party for purposes of negotiating a schedule of payments 

25 or other terms of payment of a sum certain previously 

26 agreed to paid by or on behalf of another party in satisfacVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:52 Apr 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2212.IH H2212

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2212 IH

1 tion of a decision against that party or in accordance with 

2 the terms of a settlement between the parties. The agency 

3 shall inform the claimant of this right at the appropriate 

4 time. The defendant shall provide timely notice of any pro5 fessional relationship between the defendant and the 

6 broker if any such relationship exists or has existed.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS