alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bancinsurance Corporation's 1984 Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Stock Option
Plan on Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Bancinsurance Corporation as of December
31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years ended December 31 1998, 1997 and 1996 which
report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our
report on the financial statement schedules of Bancinsurance Corporation as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Columbus, Ohio
February 26, 1999
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Exhibit 23.2


                           Independent Auditor's Consent





The Board of Directors
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-98203 on Form S-8 of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. of our report dated November 4,
2002, with respect to the balance sheet of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. as of
September 30, 2002, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hennessy Advisors, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP
San Francisco, California
December 19, 2003







                                       47
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2265 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2265

   To enhance the ability of Federal agencies to deliver relocation 
 management services to the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

  Mrs. Luria introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance the ability of Federal agencies to deliver relocation 
 management services to the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Relocation Expense Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL 
              INCOME TAXES INCURRED DURING TRAVEL, TRANSPORTATION, AND 
              RELOCATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 5724b of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``of employees 
        transferred'';
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``employee, 
                or by an employee and such employee's spouse (if filing 
                jointly), for any moving or storage'' and inserting 
                ``individual, or by an individual and such individual's 
                spouse (if filing jointly), for any travel, 
                transportation, or relocation''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking 
                ``employee'' and inserting ``individual, or the 
                individual''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) For purposes of this section, the term `travel, 
transportation, or relocation expenses' means all travel, 
transportation, or relocation expenses reimbursed or furnished in kind 
pursuant to subchapter II of this chapter or chapter 41.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 5724b and inserting the following:

``5724b. Taxes on reimbursements for travel, transportation, and 
                            relocation expenses.''.
    (c) Retroactive Effective Date.--The amendments made by this 
section shall take effect as though enacted on January 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey
Judkowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended May 31,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc.





Dated:
      July 13, 2010
              /s/
      Harvey JudkowitzHarvey
      Judkowitz, Principal
  Accounting Officer
CX and

CX Clearinghouse

499 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10022

+1 877-300-4555

info@cantorexchange.com

www.cantorexchange.com

CX is a registered trademark of CX Futures Exchange, L.P. or its affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries.

November 2, 2018

By Electronic Submission via CFTC Portal

Assistant Secretary of the CFTC 

for FOIA Matters 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Freedom of Information Act Confidential Treatment Request for:

Confidential Attachment A to Submission 2018-10 CX Futures 

Exchange Compliance Manual

Dear Sir or Madam:

CX Futures Exchange L.P. (the “Requestor”) hereby requests that the 

document referenced above and enclosed herewith be afforded confidential 

treatment in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC 

552 and CFTC rules thereunder, 17 C.F.R. 145.9, for an indefinite period of time 

due to the sensitive commercial and proprietary nature of such information, 

public disclosure of which could be detrimental to the Requestor. As prescribed 

by 17 C.F.R. 145.9(d)(4), each page of the documents included in this request 

bear the legend “Confidential Treatment Requested by CX Futures Exchange, 

L.P.”

In accordance with the foregoing regulations, kindly notify me at 

nglantz@cantorexchange.com or 212-610-3645 of any request under FOIA for 

access to the enclosed documents to enable the Requestor to substantiate the 

grounds for confidential treatment, or if you have any questions regarding this 

document.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Nolan Glantz

Chief Operations Officer

CX Futures Exchange, L.P.

Enclosure: CX Compliance Manual 40.6 Update 2018-11.pdf
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

JOHN NEELY KENNEDY, TREASURER 

OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 15-1365C

(Filed: January 17, 2020)

ORDER

This case was stayed pending decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit in LaTurner v. United States, Case No. 13-1011C, and Lea v. United 

States, Case No. 16-43. On August 13, 2019, the Federal Circuit reversed this Court’s 

grant of summary judgment to the plaintiffs in LaTurner and Lea, and remanded with 

instructions to grant summary judgment in favor of the government. See LaTurner v. 

United States, 933 F.3d 1354, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Accordingly, on December 19, 

2019, this Court granted summary judgment for the government in both cases and 

subsequently lifted the stays in the related cases. See ECF No. 43, Lea v. United States

(Dec. 19, 2019).

In a joint status report, the parties in this case as well as other related cases 

notified the Court that the plaintiff in LaTurner is currently seeking the required approval 

from the Kansas Attorney General to timely seek review of the Federal Circuit’s August 
2

13, 2019 decision in the Supreme Court. The parties thus anticipate that the issues in 

LaTurner will remain live and that the Supreme Court will act on LaTurner’s anticipated 

petition during its 2021 term. 

Therefore, the Court orders the proceedings in this case are to be STAYED 

pending either a decision by the Supreme Court denying the LaTurner petition for 

certiorari or disposing of the case on the merits, or until the decision of the Federal 

Circuit becomes final and unappealable. The parties shall file a joint status report within 

14 days of the date on which the Supreme Court issues its decision or the Federal Circuit 

judgment becomes final. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Elaine D. Kaplan

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Judge
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**
| **Name**                              | ** ** | ** **        | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------|------------|-------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
| NASSDA International  Corporation     |       | California        |
| NASSDA EUROPE*                        |       | France            |
| NASSDA GmbH*                          |       | Germany           |
| NASSDA International  Cayman Islands* |       | Cayman Islands    |
| NASSDA International U.K. Limited*    |       | England and Wales |

----

*                    A wholly ownedsubsidiary of NASSDA International Corporation

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3340; Amendment #1]

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated May 17, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include the municipalities of Adjuntas, Rincon and Sabana Grande in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico as disaster areas caused by severe storms, flooding and mudslides beginning on May 6, 2001 and continuing. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the municipalities of Aguada, Anasco, Ponce and Utuado in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. Any municipalities contiguous to the above named primary municipalities and not listed here have been previously declared. 

All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is July 15, 2001 and for economic injury the deadline is February 15, 2002. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: May 21, 2001. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-13232 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, being the Chief Executive
Officer of Archstone-Smith Trust, a Maryland real estate
investment trust (the Issuer), hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual
Report) of the Issuer for the year ended December 31,
2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m(a)) and that
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ R. SCOT SELLERS

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | R. Scot Sellers                     
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 5, 2004
# C_2017168EN.01003302.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/33

---

Action brought on 7 April 2017 — Pear Technologies v EUIPO — Apple (PEAR)

(Case T-215/17)

(2017/C 168/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pear Technologies Ltd (Macau, China) (represented by: J. Coldham, Solicitor and E. Himsworth, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘PEAR’ — Application for registration No 13 115 076

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2017 in Case R 860/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision; and/or

| — | remit the matter for further consideration by the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit the matter for further consideration by the Board of Appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the Applicant before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the Applicant before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the Applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the Applicant before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                   |                                                                     
|----- | ----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: | November 16, 2009
|      |                   |                                                                     
|      | By:               | /s/ Robert M. Brown                                                 
|      | Name:             | Robert M. Brown                                                     
|      | Title:            | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1033
MICHAEL H. DITTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEGAL TIMES; AM-LAW PUBLISHING CORPORATION; AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA, L.P., ASSOCIATED PROPERTIES OF DELAWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1277-A) Submitted: September 30, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael H. Ditton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard S. Hoffman, Megan E. Hills, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Ditton v. Legal Times , 947 F. Supp. 227 (E.D. Va. 1996). 2 PER CURIAM:Michael H. Ditton appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment aga inst him in this defamation action under the court's diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1997). Ditton alleged that he was defamed in an article published in the Legal Times on August 12, 1996, and subsequently republished in at least two other outlets. The article discussed a lawsuit Ditton had brought against a law firm with which he hadbeen associated. The district court heard oral argument on defendants' motion for summary judgment, and subsequently granted the motion. Ditton appeals this order, as well as an order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion to vacate the judgment and to compel production of documents. The district court, in a thorough opinion, concluded that defendants were protected by the privilege to fairly report on judicial proceedings. * Ditton challenges the applicability of this privilege on appeal. We have thoroughly reviewed his claims, and conclude that they are without merit. We agree with the district court's conclusion that the privilege applies in this case, and affirm the judgment. In addition, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment on Ditton's Rule 59 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the3facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



---



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 of WFS Financial
2001-C Owner Trust of our report dated February 4, 2002, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Financial Security
Assurance Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2001, which appears as an exhibit in Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2002
Exhibit 21

**Schedule of Subsidiaries**

|                                                            |   | **Percentage   Interest** |               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------------------|
|                                                            |   |                           |               |
| **Name of   Entity**                                            |   | **2005**                  |               | **2004** |   | **2003** |   |
|                                                                 |   |                           |               |  |   |  |   |
| Jingzhou   Henglong Automotive Parts Co., Ltd.                  |   |                      | 44.5               | % |   | 44.5 | % |   | 42.0 | % |
| Shashi   Jiulong Power Steering Gears Co., Ltd.                 |   |                      | 81.0               | % |   | 81.0 | % |   | 81.0 | % |
| Shenyang   Jinbei Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd. |   |                      | 70.0               | % |   | 70.0 | % |   | 55.0 | % |
| Zhejiang   Henglong & Vie Pump-Manu Co., Ltd.               |   |                      | 51.0               | % |   | 51.0 | % |   | 51.0 | % |
| Jingzhou   Henglong Fulida Textile Co., Ltd.                    |   |                      | —   |   |   | —   |   |   | 51.0 | % |
| Universal   Sensor Application Inc.                             |   |                      | 60.0               | % |   | —   |   |   | —   |   |
# C_2017402EN.01005201.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/52

---

Action brought on 2 October 2017 — Khadi and Village Industries Commission v EUIPO — BNP Best Natural Products (Khadi)

(Case T-681/17)

(2017/C 402/68)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Khadi and Village Industries Commission (Mumbai Maharashtra, India) (represented by: J. Guise, N. Rose and V. Ellis, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BNP Best Natural Products GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Khadi’ — EU trade mark No 10 479 954

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2017 in Case R 2083/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and find that the contested EUTM is invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and find that the contested EUTM is invalid;

| — | make an award of costs in the favour of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an award of costs in the favour of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | The Board of Appeal distorted the evidence; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal distorted the evidence;

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(g) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(g) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(i) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(i) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---