alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | ENTERCONNECT      INC.       |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                            |                         |
|                            |                         |   |
| Date: August      14, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Sam Jankovich |
|                            | Sam Jankovich           |
|                            | Chief      Executive Officer |

|                            | ENTERCONNECT      INC.       |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                            |                         |
|                            |                         |   |
| Date: August      14, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Carolyn Zelnio |
|                            | Carolyn Zelnio          |
|                            | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John F. Kelch, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court’s charge with respect to temporary and lawful possession correctly informed the jury that *984the People had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant’s possession of a weapon was unlawful *(see, People*v *Williams,*50 NY2d 1043; *People v Montgomery,*106 AD2d 410; 1 CJI[NY] 9.65). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, DePasquale, J. — criminal possession of weapon, third degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Integrative Activities; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Integrative Activities (1373).
    Date/Time: June 5-7, 2001--8:30 am--5:30 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts, Director, Office of 
Integrative Activities, Room 1270, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, 
Virginia 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8040.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate full proposals submitted to the 
Science and Technology Centers: Integrative Partnerships Program.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under U.S.C. 552B(c)(4) and (6) 
of the Government Sunshine Act.


    Dated: May 15, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12588 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK Document 7 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 32-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 11 of 11
#### In re Tyrone HURT, Petitioner.

No. 12-2532.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2013.

Decided: May 6, 2013.

Tyrone Hurt, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to act on two cases filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He gives no details about those cases other than their docket numbers. Following a thorough review of the district court docket sheets, we conclude that there is no pending matter awaiting a ruling in either case. *See Hurt v. Dedley & Singletary, Inc.,*No. 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va.); *Hurt v. Clinton,*No. 1:08-cv-01050-LMB-TCB, 2008 WL 9007257 (E.D.Va.2008). Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
# C_2019131EN.01004601.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/46

---

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Comprojecto Projectos e Construções and Others v ECB

(Case T-768/17) (1)

(Action for failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Supervision of credit institutions - Unlawful acts allegedly committed by certain Portuguese credit institutions - Implied rejection of the request to take action made to the ECB - Manifest inadmissibility in part - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2019/C 131/53)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicants: Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal), Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon), Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon), Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon) (represented by: M. Ribeiro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta and P. Ferreira Jorge, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the ECB unlawfully failed to take action against a Portuguese credit institution in the context of preventing the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering, secondly, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s decision not to take action and, thirdly, application for compensation under Article 268 TFEU in respect of the loss and harm which the applicants allegedly sustained as a result of that failure to take action.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda, Mr Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo, Mr Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo and Ms Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda, Mr Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo, Mr Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo and Ms Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
#### Dominika Zakrzewska, Respondent, v The New School, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted February 16, 2010;

decided February 18, 2010

Motion by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
PUBLIC

12 September 2022

US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: FOIA Compliance Office

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: FOIA Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Sir/Madam:

In accordance with Commission Regulation 145.9(d), LCH SA (“LCH”) respectfully requests 

confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act (the “FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, for the

following LCH SA documents attached to the self-certification submission filed on today: LCH SA 

Reference Guide: CDS Margin Framework (V3.14) and CDS Default Fund Methodology (V1.9)

(the “Information”).

LCH SA is requesting confidential treatment for the Information pursuant to Commission Regulation 

145.9(d)(ii), which provides that confidential treatment may be requested on the grounds that 

disclosure would reveal trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. LCH

further requests that the Information receives confidential treatment in perpetuity.

This request is not to be construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential 

treatment accorded by law, and LCH will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. LCH

SA requests notification from the Commission in advance of any disclosure of the Information 

pursuant to the FOIA or the Commission’s Rules of Practice so that this request for confidential 

treatment may be substantiated.

Yours sincerely,

Francois Faure

Chief Compliance Officer

francois.faure@lseg.com

+33 1 70 37 65 96
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID M. SCATES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:98-cr-00087-REP; 3:06-cv-00086-REP) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his “Motion to Correct Criminal Judgment and Motion to Correct Error Arising From Oversight” as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it on that basis, and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scates has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 5 

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 8
# C_2019082EN.01005001.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Azarov v Council

(Case T-247/17) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and of economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Right to property - Right to pursue an economic activity - Manifest error of assessment))

(2019/C 82/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mykola Yanovych Azarov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: G. Lansky and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and F. Naert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 34), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 1), in so far as the applicant’s name has been maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies covered by those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harvey Judkowitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Dated: October 17, 2011
/s/ Harvey JudkowitzHarvey Judkowitz, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TalecrisBiotherapeutics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), orincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | Dated: November 9, 2009                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                 |
|   | /s/ John M. Hanson                                   |
|   | John M. Hanson                                       |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10690

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GILBERTO GOMEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 119

- 2

Before DAVIS, JONES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges

. W. EUGENE DAVIS : *
Pursuant to this court’ s opinion of September 26, 2018, the district court
conducted a re

- sentencing hearing of Defendant Gilberto Gomez on November 26, 2018. The district court reduced the original sentence from 652 to 480 months. Because the district court amended its sentence, we need not address whether the original sentence is substantively reasonable, which is the only remaining issue. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this appeal as moot. This

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 7, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10690 Document: 00514751790 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2018No. 17

- 10690

2 dismissal has no bearing on Defendant’s right to file a new appeal as to the district court’s amended judgment.
DISMISSED AS MOOT. Case: 17-10690 Document: 00514751790 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2018
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy Blankenhagen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

|Date: | March 22, 2005                            |  | /s/   Nancy Blankenhagen
|----- | ----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|      |                                           |  |                         
|      | Nancy BlankenhagenChief Financial Officer

67

---
e 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 731 Lexington Avenue Tel +1 212 318 2000 

New York, NY 10022 bloombergsef.com

December 2, 2022 

Submitted via Portal

Melissa Jurgens

Office of the Secretariat 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Certification 2022-R-07 (Notice to Participants) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”, or the 

“Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) hereby notifies the Commission that 

Bloomberg SEF released the Notice to Participants attached hereto as Exhibit A on 

December 02, 2022 (the "Notice"). 

The Notice informed Participants that BSEF is suspending trading on all CDS options and IRS 

swaptions effective Monday, December 5, 2022. 

BSEF hereby certifies that: (i) the Participant Bulletin complies with the Act and the 

Commission’s regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being

concurrently posted on BSEF’s website. There were no substantive opposing views to the 

Notice. 

600365904 
Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-7331 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Marilee Dalman, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission 
EXHIBIT A 
BLOOMBERG SEF LLC  

Notice to Participants No. 2022‐3

Effective Monday, December 5, 2022, BSEF is suspending trading in all CDS options and IRS swaptions.

Please contact BSEF Compliance if you have any questions.