alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3674]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso: The Artist's Studio''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Picasso: The Artist's 
Studio,'' imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without 
profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit 
objects at the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford, CT from on or about June 
7, 2001 to on or about September 23, 2001, and at The Cleveland Museum 
of Art, Cleveland, OH from on or about October 28, 2001 to on or about 
January 6, 2002, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
Helena Kane Finn,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-13149 Filed 5-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302**
 **of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I, Debra
Fine, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of SMALL WORLD KIDS, INC.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 ****Date: March 24, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Debra FineName: Debra FineTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Richard B.      Collins                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard      B. Collins                             |
|   | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

|                         | /s/ Mark A.      Roberts                                  |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Mark      A. Roberts                                      |
|                         | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   May 7,      2010 |                                                      |
Ice*

June 4, 2018

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments Pursuant to Regulation 40.6(d)
Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Europe Limited (“ICE Clear Europe”), a registered derivatives clearing
organization under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, hereby submits to the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Commission
Regulation 40.6(d), this weekly notification of a non-substantive revision to ICE Clear
Europe’s Clearing Rules (the “Rules”).

Specifically, in Rule 106(d), ICE Clear Europe has made a non-substantive change to
remove the defined term “Data Subject” as the term is not otherwise used in the Rules.

ICE Clear Europe has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with
the filing of this submission.

If you or your staff should have any questions or comments or require further
information regarding this submission, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned
at Rachel Pearson, Legal Counsel, at rachel.pearson@theice.com or +44 20 7429 3065.
Very truly yours,

Rachel Pearson
Legal Counsel

{CE Clear Europe
#### In the Matter of Gail Price, Appellant, v Southwest Airlines, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted March 22, 2010;

decided May 4, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### The Young America.1

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

July 7, 1885.

Tug and Tow—Approaching Squadl—Negligkncb in not Anchoring.

A tug which had assumed command oí a bark on commencing to tow her, with the responsibility of determining when to proceed and when to anchor, was *held*negligent in not anchoring the bark in time, in the face of an approaching squall, which it was evident would be severe, and liable for damage caused the bark by coming in contact with other vessels during the squall, before she was able to reach her destination.

In Admiralty.

*Butter, Stillman d Hubbard,*for libelant.

*Beebe & Wilcox,*for claimant.

1

 Reported by R. D. & Wyllys Benedict, of the New York bar.

Benedict, J.

The tug in this instance assumed the command of the bark upon commencing to tow her, and with the responsibility of determining when to proceed and when to anchor. The fouling of the bark in the heavy squall that struck the tug and her tow before she was able to reach her destination at Eric basin cannot be attributed to any negligence on the part of the tng in the management of the tow during the squall. Her negligence, if there was any, consisted in omitting to anchor the hark before she was struck by the squall. It seems to me evident that, under the circumstances, prudence required the tug to bring the bark to anchor, and not to attempt to get the bark into Erie basin in the face of the approaching squall. The case, then, turns upon the question whether the tug had sufficient notice of the coming of the squall *to*enable her to anchor the bark before the storm reached her. Upon this point my conclusion is adverse to the tug. I am of the opinion that the squall was seen to he coming, and that it was evident that it would be severe. Two courses were open to the tug: to anchor in time, or to keep on and attempt to reach the basin before the storm. She chose the latter course. Unfortunately, the storm came faster than the tug had calculated, and caught her before she could gain the protection of the basin, and her tow was in consequence damaged by coming in contact with other vessels. The consequences of this error of judgment in the tug cannot he cast upon the bark, but must be borne by the tug, because she, without necessity, assumed the risk. In *the*face of an approaching squall she endeavored to reach the Erie basin, when *she*could easily have anchored the bark. For this culpable error of judgment she must be held responsible for the damage sustained by the bark while in her charge.
# C_2017293EN.01003501.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/35

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 July 2017 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission

(Case T-130/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Application by the Bundesnetzagentur for review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the EU requirements for its operation - Commission decision amending the exemption from the EU requirements - Application for a stay of execution of a measure - Lack of any urgency))

(2017/C 293/42)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the requirements on third party access and tariff regulation granted under Directive 2003/55/EC.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      



| | By:    | /s/
      Jarrett F. Bousquet     
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET               
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)     
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | July
      20, 2011               





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 5 O2.
    Date: June 6, 2001.
    Time: 2 pm to 3 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Blvd, 2 Democracy Plaza, Rm 653, Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Francisco O. Calvo, Chief, Review Branch, DES 
NIDDK, Room 752, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MC 20892-6600, (301) 594-8897.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-13199 Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 23-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 23-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2021072EN.01000301.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 January 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-631/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Market for financial instruments - Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 - Failure to transpose and/or to notify transposition measures)

(2021/C 72/03)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: V. Klemenc, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | By failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure compliance with Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 of 7 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to safeguarding of financial instruments and funds belonging to clients, product governance obligations and the rules applicable to the provision or reception of fees, commissions or any monetary or non-monetary benefits, or by failing to notify those measures to the European Commission, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of Delegated Directive 2017/593; |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure compliance with Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 of 7 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to safeguarding of financial instruments and funds belonging to clients, product governance obligations and the rules applicable to the provision or reception of fees, commissions or any monetary or non-monetary benefits, or by failing to notify those measures to the European Commission, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of Delegated Directive 2017/593;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.

---
# C_2020137EN.01001001.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-384/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Services in the internal market - Directive 2006/123/EC - Article 25(1) and (2) - Restrictions on multidisciplinary activities of accountants)

(2020/C 137/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck, M. Jacobs and C. Pochet, acting as Agents, and by C. Smits and D. Grisay, lawyers, M. Vossen, G. Lievens and F. Haemers)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by prohibiting the exercise of accounting activities in conjunction with the activities of an insurance broker or agent, or of an estate agent, or with any banking or financial services activity, and by permitting the chambers of the Professional Institute of Approved Accountants and Tax Consultants to prohibit the exercise of accounting activities in conjunction with any artisanal, commercial or agricultural activity, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 25 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market and Article 49 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by prohibiting the exercise of accounting activities in conjunction with the activities of an insurance broker or agent, or of an estate agent, or with any banking or financial services activity, and by permitting the chambers of the Professional Institute of Approved Accountants and Tax Consultants to prohibit the exercise of accounting activities in conjunction with any artisanal, commercial or agricultural activity, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 25 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market and Article 49 TFEU;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
# C_2017300EN.01003401.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/34

---

Action brought on 14 July 2017 — Oy Karl Fazer v EUIPO — Kraft Foods Belgium Intellectual Property (MIGNON)

(Case T-437/17)

(2017/C 300/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oy Karl Fazer Ab (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: L. Laaksonen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kraft Foods Belgium Intellectual Property (Halle, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MIGNON’ — Application for registration No 10 995 892

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2017 in Case R 1859/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the trademark to be registered for all applied goods. |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the trademark to be registered for all applied goods.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---