alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017309EN.01004102.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/41

---

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Bank of New York Mellon v EUIPO — Nixen Partners (NEXEN PULSE)

(Case T-260/17) (1)

1

(2017/C 309/56)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-152833 on Form S-3 and the registration statements No. 333-141903, and No. 333-152824 on Form S-8 of
Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. of our report dated March 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears
in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Our
report includes a paragraph that states that the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.123R,Share-Based
Payment, effective January 1, 2006.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 25, 2009

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2071 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2071

   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the sale, 
 purchase, shipment, receipt, or possession of a firearm or ammunition 
        by a user of medical marijuana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2019

 Mr. Mooney of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the sale, 
 purchase, shipment, receipt, or possession of a firearm or ammunition 
        by a user of medical marijuana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS FOR MEDICAL MARIHAUNA USE FROM GROUNDS FOR FIREARM 
              AND AMMUNITION PROHIBITIONS.

    (a) Exemption for Medical Marihuana.--Section 922 of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(3), by inserting before the semicolon 
        the following: ``(except that an individual shall not be 
        treated as an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled 
        substance based on the individual using marihuana for a medical 
        purpose in accordance with State law)''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)(3), by inserting before the semicolon 
        the following: ``(except that an individual shall not be 
        treated as an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled 
        substance based on the individual using marihuana for a medical 
        purpose in accordance with State law)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
To The Board of Directors
Yi Wan Group, Inc.


                       Consent of Independent Accountants
                               Yi Wan Group, Inc.
                          Audited Financial Statements
                           December 31, 2003 and 2002


We consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report of Yi Wan Group, Inc. on
Form 10-K of our report dated March 4, 2004 on our audits of the financial
statements of Yi Wan Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and
2002 and for the years then ended, which our reports are incorporated in the
Form 10-K.



/s/ Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP
-----------------------------------------------
Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP


Walnut, California
March 30. 2004
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF     Document 34      Filed 07/10/2008     Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Theodore L. Salter, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc., a NorthCarolina corporation (the “registrant”); (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:March 30, 2006 By: */s/ Theodore L. Salter*         Theodore L. Salter    Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Annual Report of NS8 Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony Alda,
Principal  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that;

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


/s/  Anthony Alda
----------------------
Principal  Executive  Officer
August 18,  2004


                                    E - 3
<PAGE>
(104 So. 918)

#### TOWN OF FT. PAYNE v. Allen DWYER.

(7 Div. 454.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dekalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of GameStop Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David W. Carlson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David W. CarlsonDavid W. CarlsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
GameStop Corp.
September 2, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99


                             Selected Information
                                  Relating to
                          Series 2001-1 Notes and
                           Series 2001-2 Notes from
                   August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001
                  --------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                Series 2001-1         Series 2001-2
                Floating Rate         Floating Rate
                Asset Backed          Asset Backed
                Notes                 Notes
                ------------          -------------
<S>             <C>                  <C>


Interest
Paid            $38,976,636.81        $26,433,637.31

Servicing
Fee Paid        $12,500,000.00        $ 8,333,333,35
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1086

VICTORIA LANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK MOBILE HOME PARK, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-03-4043)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victoria Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Malloy Cook, COOK AND

ROY, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Victoria Lane appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss

Lane’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

while we grant Lane leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v.

Patrick Mobile Home Park, Inc., No. CA-03-4043 (D.S.C. Dec. 9,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
KPMG

401 South Tryon Street

Suite 2300

Charlotte, NC 28202 1911

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wachovia Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the    Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 10, 2003

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a US limeted liability partnership, is

A member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yi Wan Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Cheng Wan Ming,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

       (1) the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) the information contained in the Reports fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Cheng Wan Ming
Cheng Wan Ming, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004


                                       82
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 1, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 1857 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 0409

________________



### L.A., a juvenile , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Orlando A. Prescott , Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defend er , for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Asad Ali and David Llanes, Assistant Attorneys General , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR , JJ. LINDSEY, J

.2 Appellant L.A., a juvenile, appeals from an order revoking his probation . The sole basis for revoking probation was a n adjudication of delinquency for battery , which was separately appealed in L.A. v. State , 47 Fla. L. Weekly D2009 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 6, 2022) (case no. 3D20

- 1856). The State agrees with Appellant that if the finding of delinquency for battery in 3D20

- 1856 were reversed, the probation order under review in this appeal must also be reversed. See Stevens v. State , 409 So. 2d 1051, 1052 (Fla. 1982) (“[I] f a revocation is based solely on a conviction and that conviction is subsequently reversed, the revocation must also be reversed. ” (quoting Stevens v. State , 397 So. 2d 398, 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) )). In 3D20

- 1856, t his Court held that because the trial cou rt did not make

case - specific findings of necessity for a remote adjudicatory hearing, the delinquency adjudication for battery must be reversed

. L.A. , 47 Fla. L. Weekly D2009

. Because this Court has reversed the finding of delinquency for battery in 3D2 0

- 1856 , we likewise reverse the probation order under review in this appeal and remand for a new probation violation hearing. See,
e.g. , Humbert v. State , 933 So. 2d 726, 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[T] he fact that [defendant’s] conviction

. . . was reversed does not mean that his probation cannot be revoked based on the same facts. ”). Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular; Damage Tolerance for High Energy Turbine 
Engine Rotors

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of final advisory circular (AC) on damage 
tolerance for high energy turbine engine rotors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
No. 33.14-1, Damage Tolerance for High Energy Turbine Rotors.

DATES: Advisory Circular No. 33.14.1, was issued by the New England 
Aircraft Certification Service, Engine and Propeller Directorate on 
January 8, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Mouzakis, Engine and Propeller 
Standards Staff, ANE-110, at the above address, telephone (781) 238-
7114, fax (781) 238-7199. A copy of the subject AC may also be obtained 
electronically by writing to the following Internet address: 
``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89fde0e4a7e4e6fcf3e8e2e0fac9efe8e8a7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0c4d9dd9edddfc5cad1dbd9c3f0d6d1d19ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>''. Additionally, you may obtain a copy of the AC 
directly from the internet at the following address: ``http://
www.faa.gov/avr/air/acs/achome.htm''.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This advisory circular (AC) provides 
guidance and information on acceptable methods, but not the only 
methods of compliance with Sec. 33.14 of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Section 33.14 
contains requirements of life management requirements applicable to the 
design and life management of titanium alloy high energy rotating parts 
of aircraft engines. Although this AC does refer to regulatory 
requirements that are mandatory, this ACT is not, in itself, mandatory. 
This AC neither changes any regulatory requirement nor authorizes 
changes in or deviations from the regulatory requirements.
    This advisory circular would be published under the authority 
granted to the Administrator by 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 
44704, provides guidance for Damage tolerance for high energy turbine 
engine rotors.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 8, 2001.
David A. Downey,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 01-1285 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(105 So. 720)

#### Ex parte Lucy W. CHANEY.

(2 Div. 877.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Gray & Dansby, of Butler, and James J. May-field, of Montgomery, for petitioner.

T. J. Hollis, of Butler, and R. P. Roach, of Mobile, opposed.

MILLER, J.

Petition of Lucy W. Chaney and others for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the ease of Chaney et al. v. Long, 105 So. 719.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
# C_2019413EN.01001701.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen v Reinhard Westphal

(Case C-378/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Article 3(1) - Limitation period - Regulations (EEC) No 3887/92 and (EC) No 2419/2001 - Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes - Recovery of undue payments - Application of the more lenient limitation rule)

(2019/C 413/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen

Defendant: Reinhard Westphal

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49(6) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 118/2004 of 23 January 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that the starting point of the limitation period which it lays down is determined in accordance with Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and corresponds, in the case of continuous or repeated irregularities, to the day on which the irregularity ceases.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---