alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://derivs.ftx.us/

1

December 15, 2021

VIA COMMISSION PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Commission Regulation 40.6(a) – Rule Certification

LedgerX LLC Submission No. 21-26

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC d/b/a FTX US Derivatives (“Company”) hereby notifies the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), that it is 

certifying the attached amendments to its Rulebook. The attached amendments will become 

effective on December 31, 2021. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the changes and amendments, and their 

compliance with applicable provisions of the CEA, including the Core Principles and the 

Commission’s Regulations, are as follows.

LedgerX has updated its description of “LedgerPrime,” as that term is used in the 

Rulebook, to include not only LedgerPrime LLC, the CFTC registered commodity pool 

operator that makes markets in Company products and engages in hedging activities, but also 

to include funds operated by LedgerPrime LLC, such as the LedgerPrime Digital Asset 

Opportunities Master Fund, LP, which may also make markets in Company products and 

engage in hedging activities. See Appendix A at 20.

This change is consistent with SEF Core Principle 12, DCM Core Principle 16, and 

DCO Core Principle P in that it reflects the Company’s identification and management of 

potential conflicts of interest. It is also consistent with SEF Core Principle 2, DCM Core 

Principle 2, and DCO Core Principle C in that it promotes fair and open access by subjecting 

LedgerPrime to the same access criteria as other Participants. It is also consistent with DCM 

Core Principle 12 and SEF Core Principle 2 in that it affirms no LedgerPrime entity receives 

preferential pricing or other inherent advantage, thereby promoting fair and equitable trading.

The changes and amendments to the Rulebook are reflected in a redlined copy 

designated as Appendix A. The final version of the revised Rulebook is attached at 

Appendix B.

The Company certifies that the changes and amendments comply with the CEA and 

Commission Regulations thereunder. The Company additionally certifies that it has 

concurrently posted a copy of this submission letter and the attachments hereto on the Company 
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://derivs.ftx.us/

2

website at https://derivs.ftx.us. The Company is not aware of any or substantive opposing 

views to the changes and amendments.

Please contact the undersigned at gc@ledgerx.com if you have any questions or you 

would otherwise like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Brian G. Mulherin

General Counsel, FTX US Derivatives
Offer Letter - Douglas R. King



 Exhibit 10.45 

 

 

 46600 Landing Parkway 

Fremont, California 94538 

P. 408.240.8300 
 F.
408.321.0293 
 www.rackable.com 

January 29, 2008 
 Mr. Doug King

  

	Re:	Position on the Board of Directors of Rackable Systems, Inc. (“Rackable Systems”) 


Dear Doug: 
 I am very happy to
offer you a position on the Board of Directors of Rackable Systems (the “Board”). 
 All members of Rackable
Systems’ Board receive an annual cash retainer of $45,000 paid quarterly. Additional cash retainers are paid to Board members who serve as chairman or members of Board committees. 

In addition, upon appointment to the Board you will be granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of Rackable
Systems’ common stock. This option will vest over a four year period commencing on the date of your appointment, with 1/48th vesting per month of service. In addition, all Board members are granted a stock option to purchase 2,833 shares of
Rackable Systems’ common stock upon their re-election to Board at each year’s annual stockholders meeting. 
 Rackable
Systems will also reimburse you for your travel expenses in attending Board and committee meetings. 
 If the terms of this
letter are acceptable to you, please confirm to me your willingness to serve on Rackable Systems’ Board. Upon your agreement, I will submit your nomination to the Board for formal consideration. We look forward to your favorable reply.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Gary Griffiths

		 	Gary Griffiths
		 	Chairman Nominating and Corporate
		 	Governance Committee
# C_2017144EN.01005801.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/58

---

Action brought on 13 March 2017 — Sequel Naturals v EUIPO — Fernandes (VeGa one)

(Case T-176/17)

(2017/C 144/78)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sequel Naturals ULC (Port Coquilam, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: H. Lindström, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carlos Fernandes (Gross-Umstadt, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘VeGa one’ — Application for registration No 12 649 612

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 in Case R 2466/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned operating manager of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) hereby certifies to
his knowledge that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas R. Reeg                                            
|                      |  |  |  | Thomas R. Reeg Operating Manager (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 4.20**

 

**English Summary of Put Option Agreement between Companhia Energética deMinas Gerais — CEMIG and Enlighted Partners Venture Capital LLC**

 

OnMarch 24, 2010, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais — CEMIG (“CEMIG”)entered into a put option contract for sale of shares (the “Put Option”) withEnlighted Partners Venture Capital LLC (“Enlighted Partners”), a Delawarelimited liability company, under which CEMIG granted Enlightened Partners anoption to sell to CEMIG the share units of LUCE Investment Fund (“LUCE Fund”),a Delaware Statutory trust, which owns 75% of the share units in Luce BrasilFundo de Investimento em Participações, with headquarters in the City and Stateof Rio de Janeiro, which in turn is the indirect holder, through Luce Empreendimentose Participações S.A., of 26,576,149 common shares in Light S.A. (“Light”),representing approximately 13.03% of the total and voting capital of Light.

 

Theprice of the share units of LUCE Fund, in the event the Put Option isexercised, is US$340,455,675, plus interest equivalent to 11% per year from December 1,2009, and from this amount will be deducted any dividends or interest on equitypaid or declared by Light as from December 1, 2009 up to the exercise dateof the Put Option, in case it is exercised. The price of the shares is equivalent to R$588,750,000.00 at theexchange rate of December 1, 2009.

 

ThePut Option may be exercised at any time during the period from October 1through October 6, 2010 and its exercise shall create an obligation uponCEMIG to acquire, or indicate a third party that shall acquire, the totality ofthe share units of LUCE Fund.

 

ThePut Option contains representations and warranties and covenants of CEMIG andEnlightened Partners. Final closing of this transaction is conditional uponcertain contractually established requirements being met, and also approval bythe National Electricity Agency (“ANEEL”); the Administrative Economic DefenseCouncil (CADE); the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES); and, where necessary,the other financing agents of and debenture holders of Light and itssubsidiaries.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6482

JERRY LEE JENKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, M.H.C.; JOSEPH CURRAN, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-2409) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 30, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Lawrence Gitomer, THE LAW OFFICE OF MARK GITOMER, Baltimore,Maryland, for Appellant. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 Although the district relied upon Green v. French , 143 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1090 (1999), in its initial denial of Jenkins’ § 2254 petition, the denial of relief was also correct under the standards announced in Williams v. Taylor , U.S. , 120 S. Ct. 1495, 1523 (2000). 2 Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed” on August 5, 1999 and March 8, 2000, the district court’s records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on August 6, 1999 and March 9, 2000, respectively. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. 1 Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Jenkins v. Corcoran , No. CA-98-2409 (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1999 & Mar. 9, 2000). 2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-50922

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

MIGUEL FERNANDO MONARREZ-LOZANO

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

3:01-CR-1900-ALL-DB

---------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand for resentencing in light of Supreme Court’s opinion in

Booker and this Court’s opinion in Mares is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days from the

Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is MOOT.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 15, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit
32.3







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Chief Financial
Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with
the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::


1.
              The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations
      of the LLC.





Date:
April 14, 2008








/s/Michael A.
Reisner


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer, Co-President, and Chief Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Nine, LLC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

# For Further Information Contact:

James A. Nash, (202) 565-1542. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-12799 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2229

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To waive the passport fees for first responders proceeding abroad to 
        aid a foreign country suffering from a natural disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responders Passport Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PASSPORTS FOR FIRST RESPONDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 1 of the Act of June 4, 
1920 (22 U.S.C. 214; 41 Stat. 750; commonly referred to as the 
``Passport Act of 1920''), is amended, in the third sentence, by 
inserting after ``to attend a funeral or memorial service for such 
member;'' the following: ``at the discretion of the Secretary, from an 
individual, including a volunteer, who is operating under a contract, 
grant, or cooperative agreement with the United States Government to 
proceed abroad within the first 7 days after a natural disaster to aid 
a foreign country suffering from such natural disaster;''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the end of the first full 
fiscal year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 
a report on the number of waivers of fees for the execution and 
issuance of passports to first responders under section 1 of the Act of 
June 4, 1920, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, for such 
fiscal year.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2229

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To waive the passport fees for first responders proceeding abroad to 
        aid a foreign country suffering from a natural disaster.
```
# C_2019072EN.01002801.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2018 — Arca Capital Bohemia v Commission

(Case T-440/17) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of third parties - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - General presumption of confidentiality - Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination - Overriding public interest))

(2019/C 72/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Nedelka, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and A. Buchet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s response of 15 March 2017 to the initial application for access to documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2017) 3130 final of 4 May 2017 refusing to grant such access.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
# C_2023179EN.01002401.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube v Commission

(Case T-500/17 RENV) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (excluding cast iron) or steel (excluding stainless steel), of circular cross-section and of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in China - Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Causal link - Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment)

(2023/C 179/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (Huangshi, China) (represented by: E. Vermulst and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA (Roman, Romania), Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s. (Chomutov, Czech Republic), Vallourec Deutschland GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804 of 11 May 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (other than stainless steel), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2017 L 121, p. 3), in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA, Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s. and Vallourec Deutschland GmbH in the proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-891/19 P and in the proceedings before the General Court in Cases T-500/17 and T-500/17 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA, Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s. and Vallourec Deutschland GmbH in the proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-891/19 P and in the proceedings before the General Court in Cases T-500/17 and T-500/17 RENV.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
# C_2019255EN.01001102.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — CJ v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

(Case C-170/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - Fixed-term contract - Termination of the contract - Compliance with a judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal - Res judicata by means of a judgment annulling a decision - Limits)

(2019/C 255/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: CJ (represented by: V. Kolias, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: J. Mannheim and A. Daume, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders CJ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CJ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---