Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28553

NATIONAL FARMWORKER JOBS PROGRAM STATE ALLOCATIONS FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2001 ($72,163,800)—Continued

State PY 1998 allotments

PY 2001

formula allocation w/o

hold-harmless adjustment

PY 2001 formula %

share

w/o holdharmless

PY 2001 allocation with

hold-harmless adjustment

85% of

PY98

allotments

(compare)

Adjust. to

bring states

to PY 1998

levels

States with

an increase

relative

share

(percent)

Relative

share among

Col. H states

(percent)

Alloctn. to

achieve

94% min.

PY 2001 allots.

A BC D EFGH I J K

72,163,800

314,570 72,163,800

[FR Doc. 01–13019 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[NAFTA–4435]

Bayer Corporation, Consumer Care

Division, Elkhart, IN; Dismissal of

Application for Reconsideration

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an

application for administrative

reconsideration was filed with the

Director of the Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance for workers at

Bayer Corporation, Consumer Care

Division, Elkhart, Indiana. The

application contained no new

substantial information which would

bear importantly on the Department’s

determination. Therefore, dismissal of

the application was issued.

NAFTA–4435; Bayer Corporation Consumer

Care Division Elkhart, Indiana (May 2,

2001)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 3rd day of

May, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–13004 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of May, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or sub-division have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–38,350; Hill Knitting Mills,

Richmond Hill, NY

TA–W–38,798; PTC Alliance, Jane Lew,

WV

TA–W–39,642; Global Tex LLC, d/b/a

Bates of Maine, Lewiston, MI

TA–W–38,866; AGP, LLC, Sherman, TX

TA–W–38,893; The Budd Co., Stamping

and Frame Div., Philadelphia, PA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–38,694; Thrall Car, Thrall Car

North American Rail, Chicago

Heights, IL

TA–W–38,588; Rhoda, Lee, Inc., New

York, NY

TA–W–39,055; Newport Steel Corp.,

Newport, KY

TA–W–38,469; Gile Orchards, Alfred,

ME

TA–W–38,691; Cone Mills Corp., Raytex

Plant, Marion, SC

TA–W–38,923; Sunshine Precious

Metals, Inc., Kellogg, ID

TA–W–39,188; Rhoda Lee, Inc., New

York, NY

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–39,012, A & B; Commtough, Inc.,

Mountain View, CA, New York, NY

and Miami Beach, FL

TA–W–38,785; Vesuvius USA, Gadsden,

AL

TA–W–39,149; Daimler Chrysler AG,

Auburn Hills, MI

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–38,984; AVX Tantalum Corp.,

Biddeford, ME

All worker separations occurred prior

to the March 31, 2001 expiration of the

previous certification. The current

petition can only cover workers

separated after March 31, 2001. The

Melt Shop has not been in operation

since that time.

TA–W–38,848; Allvac, Latrobe, PA

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–39,072 & A; Thomasville

Furniture Industries, Johnson City,

TN & Fayette Enterprises, Fayette,

MS: April 5, 2000.

TA–W–39,140; Dunbrooke Industries,

Ocean Springs, MS: April 11, 2000.

TA–W–38,960; Spectron Lasers USA,

Inc., Warwick, RI: March 12, 2000.

TA–W–38,623; Eaton Aeroquip Corp.,

Aeroquip Precision Speres Div.,

Ann Arbar, MI: January 18, 2000.

TA–W–38,524; The Quaker Oats Co.,

Shiremanstown, PA December 20,

1999.

TA–W–39,153; Salon Manufacturing,

Rhinelander, WI: April 9, 2000.

TA–W–39,101; The Eureka Co., El Paso,

TX Including Temporary Workers of

28554 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

Southwest Staffing, Inc., Employed

at The Eureka Co, El Paso, TX:

April 3, 2000.

TA–W–38,726; Avery Dennison Fassion

Roll Div., Quakertown, PA:

February 8, 2000.

TA–W–39,154; Jonathan Engineered

Solutions, Fullerton, CA: April 6,

2000.

TA–W–38,815; Johnston Industries, Inc.,

Columbus, GA: February 15, 2000.

TA–W–38,881; Viasystems Technologies

Corp., LLC, Richmond, VA March 9,

2000.

TA–W–39,094; Ajay Leisure Products,

Inc., Delavan, WI: August 19, 1999

TA–W–38,666; Marco Distributing,

Idaho Falls, ID: January 12, 2000.

TA–W–38,634; Spectrum Dyed Yarns,

Inc., Belmont, NC: January 23,

2000.

TA–W–38,776; Smith and Nephew, Inc.,

Casting Div., Charlotte, NC: Febuary

13, 2000.

TA–W–38,540; New York Air Brake

Corp., Div. of Knorr Brake Co.,

Watertown, NY: December 30, 1999.

TA–W–39,083; Crystal Springs Apparel,

LLC, Formerly Bernstein & Son

Shirt Corp., Crystal Springs, MS:

November 10, 2000.

TA–W–39,098; Seal Glove

Manufacturing, Inc., Millersburg,

PA: April 4, 2000.

TA–W–38,807; Heckett Multiserve, Div.

of Harsco Corp., Employed at WCI

Steel, Inc., Warren, OH: January 21,

2001

TA–W–38,792 & A; Stitches, Inc., Red

Boiling Springs, TN and Gamaliel,

KY: Febraury 26, 2000.

TA–W–39,040 & A; Lebanon Apparel,

Lebanon, VA and Three Creek

Apparel, Castelwood, VA: March

28, 2000.

TA–W–38,440 & A, B, C, D; U.S. Forest

Industries, Inc., Medford, OR,

Grants Pass, OR, South Fork, CO,

Abbeville, AL & Graceville, FL:

November 21, 1999.

TA–W–39,178; Annalee Mobilitee Dolls,

Inc., Meredith, NH: April 12, 2000.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with section

250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of May, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of section 250 of

the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–04613; The Budd Co.,

Stamping and Frame Div.,

Philadelphia, PA

NAFTA–TAA–04763; CMS Hartzell

Manufacturing, St. Paul, MN

NAFTA–TAA–04661; Sunshine Precious

Metals, Inc., Kellogg, ID

NAFTA–TAA–04634; AGP LLC,

Sherman, TX

The investigation revealed that the

criteria for eligibility have not been met

for the reasons specified.

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

NAFTA–TAA–04774; Commtouch, Inc.,

Mountain View, CA

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–04586; O–Z/Gedney,

Pittston, PA: February 21, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04362 & A, B, C, D; U.S.

Forest Industries, Inc., Medford, OR,

Grants Pass, OR, South Fork, CO,

Abbeville, AL, Graceville, FL:

November 21, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04425; New York Air

Brake Corp., Div. of Knorr Brake

Co., Watertown, NY: December 30,

1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04667; Ten Cate Enbi,

West Henrietta, NY: March 14,

2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04757; Seal Glove

Manufacturing, Inc., Millersburg,

PA: April 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04736; Minnesota Rubber

Div., Quadion Corp., Minneapolis,

MN: April 5, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04765; Techalloy Co.,

Inc., Fine Wire Div., Including Die

Shop, Northampton, MA: April 5,

2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04754; Fontaine

International, Fontaine Fifth Wheel,

Rocky Mount, NC: April 5, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04559; Avery Dennison,

Fasson Roll Div., Quakertown, PA

February 8, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04744; The Eureka Co., El

Paso, TX, Including Temporary

Workers of Southwest Staffing, Inc.,

Employed at The Eureka Co., El

Paso, TX: April 4, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04764; Solon

Manufacturing, Rhinelander, WI:

April 9, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04580; Corning Cable

Systems LLC, Champion Products

Div., Pensacola, FL: January 26,

2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04820; Tridelta

Industries, Inc., Mentor, OH: April

10, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04775; Jonathan

Engineered Solutions, Fullerton,

CA: March 27, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04635; Viasystems

Technologies Corp., LLC,

Richmond, VA: March 9, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04413; The Quaker Oats

Co., Shiremanstown, PA: December

20, 1999.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of May, 2001.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–12997 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4516–30–M