alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 15, 2018

t0612

Order 

Clerk

June 15, 2018

156637

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156637

COA: 333125 

Cass CC: 15-010146-FC

LEON WATSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Cass County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after 

the date of this order. Specifically, the prosecutor shall address: (1) whether the rapeshield statute, MCL 750.520j, barred evidence of the complainant’s sexual activity with 

two classmates when offered as proof of an alternative cause of the possible scarring 

observed by the sexual assault nurse examiner, see People v Shaw, 315 Mich App 668 

(2016); (2) if so, whether that evidence was nevertheless admissible to preserve the

defendant’s constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense, see People v 

Hackett, 421 Mich 338 (1984); and (3) whether the defendant’s former appellate counsel 

rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to raise these issues in the Court 

of Appeals.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Robert M. Brown    
| |                        
| | Robert M. Brown        
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 13, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2174 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2174

 To remove fish and wildlife as an authorized purpose of the Missouri 
 River Mainstem Reservoir System and to make flood control the highest 
priority of authorized purposes of such system, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove fish and wildlife as an authorized purpose of the Missouri 
 River Mainstem Reservoir System and to make flood control the highest 
priority of authorized purposes of such system, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZED PURPOSES OF THE MISSOURI RIVER MAINSTEM RESERVOIR 
              SYSTEM.

    (a) Authorization.--Fish and wildlife shall not be an authorized 
purpose of the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System.
    (b) Priority.--Flood control shall be the highest priority of 
authorized purposes for the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System at 
all times.
    (c) Revision of Control Manual.--Not later than 90 days after the 
date of enactment, the Chief of Engineers shall revise the Missouri 
River Mainstem Reservoir System Master Water Control Manual and any 
related regulations to conform with subsections (a) and (b).
                                 <all>
```
Eurex Clearing AG
ECAG Rule Certification 046-23
July 10, 2023

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Clearing Conditions (“Clearing Conditions”) of Eurex
Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) and Price List (“Price List”) of Eurex Clearing is appended as Attachment
A. Any additions are underlined and any deletions are struck through.

2. The date of intended implementation is July 31, 2023.

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange
Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this
submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-
en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings.

4. Aconcise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears
below.

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

6. Confidential treatment is not requested.

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF
THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT,
INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

Eurex Clearing is proposing amendments to reflect that the infrastructure for portfolio compression service
providers to offer compression services to Eurex Exchange Participants for listed derivatives will be
discontinued. For avoidance of doubt, Eurex Clearing clears listed derivatives outside the scope of its
derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) license, which applies only to swaps. In addition, the proposed
amendments make a non-substantive change for one listed contract in the Price List.

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed
in Eurex Clearing Circular 046-23, which is appended as Attachment A.

Eurex Clearing has identified the following DCO Core Principle as potentially being relevant to the above
amendments:

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will
comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendments discontinue clearing services for
portfolio compression trades for listed derivatives, which Eurex Clearing clears outside its DCO
license, and all offerings by Eurex Clearing under its DCO license will continue to be subject to
appropriate standards in compliance with this Core Principle.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION Sc OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7
U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that:

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s
regulations thereunder; and

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is postinga copy of this filing
to its website at: https://www.curex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cfte-dco-filings.

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer
By: Eric Seinsheimer
Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: July 10, 2023
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Bottles, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned certify pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.





Date:
      August 20,  2008




/s/
                  Chonghui ZhaoChonghui
                  Zhao
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive, Accounting and Financial
                  Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Global Pharmatech, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Joseph J. Levinson
-----------------------------------
Name:  Joseph J. Levinson
Title: Chief Financial Officer


This Certification of the Chief Financial Officer is pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
Exhibit 31.2




Section
302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer





I, Lee
Shorey, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Corporate Outfitters,
Inc.




2.   Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances   under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
amended quarterly report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations  and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;





4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly  report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and




c)   presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and




b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.





6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material
weaknesses.




Date:
November 26, 2008





By:/s/Lee
Shorey


Lee
Shorey


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 99


                             Selected Information
                                  Relating to
                          Series 2001-1 Notes and
                           Series 2001-2 Notes from
                   August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001
                  --------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                Series 2001-1         Series 2001-2
                Floating Rate         Floating Rate
                Asset Backed          Asset Backed
                Notes                 Notes
                ------------          -------------
<S>             <C>                  <C>


Interest
Paid            $38,976,636.81        $26,433,637.31

Servicing
Fee Paid        $12,500,000.00        $ 8,333,333.35
</TABLE>
Letter Agreement dated September 3, 2010



 Exhibit 10.1 

[Extreme Networks Letterhead] 

September 3, 2010 
 Mr. Bob Corey

 Dear Bob, 
 This letter is to
confirm certain additional terms in connection with your position as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Extreme Networks, Inc. (the “Company”). 

The Compensation Committee has approved the following additional terms to your existing Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement (the
“Severance Agreement”): (i) if the Company is acquired by an entity that does not have stock listed on a U.S. equity exchange, all of your unvested stock options will vest upon the closing of such a transaction, and
(ii) “Good Reason” for purposes of the Severance Agreement shall include if the Company is a party to a merger or acquisition and immediately after the closing of such transaction your duties and responsibilities are materially
reduced from serving as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the surviving publicly listed corporation. 
 To indicate
your acceptance of these additional terms to the Severance Agreement, please sign and date this letter in the space provided below and return to Michelle Wagner, Director of Human Resources at Extreme Networks, Inc. at 3585 Monroe Street, Santa
Clara, CA 95051. A duplicate original is enclosed for your records. 
 This agreement cannot be modified or amended except by subsequent written
agreement signed by you and the Company; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, elect to modify your title, compensation, duties, or benefits without any further agreement from you. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Charles P. Carinalli

	
	EXTREME NETWORKS INC.
	Charles P. Carinalli
	Lead Director,
	Board of Directors

 I agree to and accept the additional
terms to the Severance Agreement with Extreme Networks, Inc. as set forth in this agreement. 
  

									
	 /s/ Bob Corey
	 		 	 September 3, 2010
	 		 	
	Bob Corey	 		 	Date
# C_2017382EN.01004901.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/49

---

Action brought on 6 September 2017 — France v Commission

(Case T-609/17)

(2017/C 382/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas, B. Fodda and E. de Moustier, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in part Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes certain export refunds paid by the French Republic in respect of the financial years 2011 to 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes certain export refunds paid by the French Republic in respect of the financial years 2011 to 2014;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality, inasmuch as the Commission based its decision, for the most part, on purported serious failures by the French Republic to fulfil its obligations in the area of checks on the water content of frozen chickens intended for export receiving refunds.

However, it is incorrect to assert that the French authorities have seriously failed to fulfil those obligations, having regard to the EU legislation and the enhanced measures that have been put in place since 2010. The analyses of the water content form part of the checks on the sound, fair and marketable quality of frozen chickens intended for export receiving refunds that are carried out on the basis of Article 5(4) of Regulation No 1276/2008. According to the applicant, that provision does not require every physical check on frozen chickens intended for export receiving refunds to include a laboratory analysis of the water content.

Thus, it considers that it was for the French authorities to determine the control measures to be taken, provided that those measures were proportionate having regard to the financial risk for the EAGF. In that regard, the applicant claims that the French authorities have put in place an ambitious scheme which takes that financial risk into account.

---
#### In re Christopher Lamont BULLOCK, Petitioner.

No. 13-1178.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 1, 2013.

Decided: May 13, 2013.

Christopher Lamont Bullock, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lamont Bullock petitions for a writ of mandamus, challenging his state court convictions as a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We conclude that Bullock is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.*1671988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,*503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir.2007).

The relief sought by Bullock is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
# C_2017424EN.01004101.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/41

---

Action brought on 21 September 2017 — Euroways v Commission and SRB

(Case T-643/17)

(2017/C 424/60)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euroways, SL (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and C. Iglesias Megías, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

| — | Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU;

| — | Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board.

---