alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019155EN.01004101.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)

(Case T-760/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Triotherm+ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard)

(2019/C 155/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Meesenburg Großhandel KG (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Freiherr von Oldershausen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 (Case R 1786/2016-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Triotherm+ as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Meesenburg Großhandel KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 39-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 39-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1896 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to expand 

the military student identifier program to cover students with a parent 

who serves in the reserve component of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mr. CORREA (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GOMEZ, 

Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. CARBAJAL, 

Mr. WALTZ, Ms. MOORE, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, and Mr. 

FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to expand the military student identifier program to cover students with a parent who serves in 

the reserve component of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Children 

5 of the National Guard and Reserve Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1896 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL STATE REPORT CARD. 

2 Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(ii) of the Elementary and Sec3 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

4 6311(h)(1)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘on active duty 

5 (as defined in section 101(d)(5) of such title)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.7.3
 
   rd
 Attention:
    
    Mr. John DaltonGeneral Manager, Log Supply
  Supply Arrangements for Chips, Sawdust, Hog Fuel and Sawlogs
     
 
 WESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS INC.Per:




---



##### 



SCHEDULE OF REVISED TERMS
 Chip and Sawlog Agreement
 
    
    Annual commitment of Chips sold to Norske by Western to be varied for the 1st year
following the effective date of the CCAA arrangement (Effective Date) to (***) Volumetric
Units in first four months, (***) in the next four months and (***) in the last four months.
The annual commitment for years 2, 3 and 4 after the Effective Date will be (***) Volumetric
Units and for the balance of the term will be (***) Volumetric Units per year
 
    
    Term extended so that the agreement expires 10 years from the Effective Date
 
    
    All Chips produced at Westerns Ladysmith, Cowichan Bay and Western Lumber sawmills
(Saltair and Nanaimo) will be delivered to Norske. Norske will deliver back to Western the
volume of Chips in excess of the annual commitment.
 
    
    Norske will arrange for Western to be offered (***) cubic metres of Sawlogs for every
Volumetric Unit of Chips purchased by Norske under the Agreement up to the annual commitment
volume
 
    
    Norske will also have the first right to purchase all other Chips produced by Westerns
Ladysmith, Cowichan Bay, Duke Point, Vancouver and Western Lumber (Saltair and Nanaimo) mills
that are surplus to the needs of the Woodfibre Pulp Mill
 
    
    Other terms and conditions, including pricing, quality, and delivery arrangements remain in
effect
 Sawdust Agreement
 
    
    Term extended so that the agreement expires 10 years from the Effective Date. Cancellation
by either party on 12 months notice shall not apply until after the second last year of the
term.
 
    
    Western will sell all Sawdust (except red cedar) produced at all of its sawmill facilities
in coastal British Columbia, including Ladysmith, Cowichan Bay, Duke Point, Vancouver and
Western Lumber facilities (currently Saltair and Nanaimo)
 
    
    Cedar sawdust will be purchased at Norskes option for use in the sawdust process
 
    
    Other terms and conditions, including pricing, quality and delivery arrangements remain in
effect
 Hog Fuel Supply Agreement
 
    
    Term extended so that the agreement expires 10 years from the Effective Date. Cancellation
by either party on 12 months notice shall not apply until after the second last year of the
term.
 
    
    Hog Fuel produced at the mills referenced under the heading Chip and Sawlog Agreement will
be delivered to Norskes Crofton mill or other mills as directed by Norske
 
    
    Norske will have the first right to purchase all other Hog Fuel produced by Westerns Duke
Point mill and merchandiser and Vancouver mill that are surplus to the needs of the Woodfibre
Pulp Mill
 
    
    All other terms and conditions of the existing Hog Fuel supply arrangement between Norske
and Western, including pricing, quality and delivery arrangements will apply
 Pulplog Supply Arrangement
   - 2 -
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 30 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 30 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 30 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 30 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 30 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 5
# C_2019432EN.01003501.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — E-Control v ACER

(Case T-332/17) (1)

(Energy - Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER - Determination of the capacity calculation regions - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissible in part - Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 - ACER’s competence)

(2019/C 432/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: F. Schuhmacher, lawyer)

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Verbund AG (Vienna) (represented by: S. Polster, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil and T. Müller, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision A-001-2017 (consolidated) of the Board of Appeal of ACER of 17 March 2017 dismissing the appeals brought against Decision No 6/2016 issued by ACER regarding the determination of capacity calculation regions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision A-001-2017 (consolidated) of the Board of Appeal of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 17 March 2017 dismissing the appeals against Decision No 6/2016 issued by ACER regarding the determination of capacity calculation regions in so far as it dismisses the appeal brought by Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision A-001-2017 (consolidated) of the Board of Appeal of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) of 17 March 2017 dismissing the appeals against Decision No 6/2016 issued by ACER regarding the determination of capacity calculation regions in so far as it dismisses the appeal brought by Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Declares that ACER is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay one quarter of the costs incurred by E-Control; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that ACER is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay one quarter of the costs incurred by E-Control;

| 4. | Declares that E-Control is to bear three quarters of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that E-Control is to bear three quarters of its own costs;

| 5. | Declares that the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland and Verbund AG are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Declares that the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland and Verbund AG are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2066 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the 
    Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program in the Department of 
               Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DHS Intelligence Rotational 
Assignment Program Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INTELLIGENCE ROTATIONAL ASSIGNMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 844 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 414) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program.--
            ``(1) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
        of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall establish 
        an Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program as part of the 
        Rotation Program under subsection (a).
            ``(2) Administration.--The Chief Human Capital Officer, in 
        conjunction with the Chief Intelligence Officer, shall 
        administer the Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program 
        established pursuant to paragraph (1).
            ``(3) Eligibility.--The Intelligence Rotational Assignment 
        Program shall be open to employees serving in existing analyst 
        positions within the Department's Intelligence Enterprise and 
        other Department employees as determined appropriate by the 
        Chief Human Capital Officer and the Chief Intelligence Officer.
            ``(4) Coordination.--The responsibilities specified in 
        paragraph (3)(B) of subsection (a) that apply to the Rotation 
        Program under such subsection shall, as applicable, also apply 
        to the Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program under this 
        subsection.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the 
    Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program in the Department of 
               Homeland Security, and for other purposes.
```
Order filed November 22 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 22

- 00559

- CV

____________

JRJ PUSOK HOLDINGS, LLC , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS AND KYLE MADSEN IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF RIGHT OF WAY , A p pellee s

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1128555



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 30, 2022

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. On September 27, 2022, this court ordered the cou rt r eporter to file

the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because

the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order :We order Alexandra L. McDaniel , the official court reporter, to file the

r ecor d in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. No further

extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances . The trial and

appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is

timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Alexandra L. McDaniel does not

timely file the record as ordered, we may issue an order directing the trial court to

conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists o f Ju stices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04509-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Hugh Wain Swapp, the Chief Financial Officer of INTERNATIONAL CARD
ESTABLISHMENT, INC. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to International Card Establishment, Inc. and will be retained by
International Card Establishment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  October 25, 2005


/s/ HUGH WAIN SWAPP
___________________________
    Hugh Wain Swapp
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ning C. Wu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Care Technologies Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical Care Technologies Inc.





Dated this 28th day of June, 2011.





/s/ NING C. WUNing C. WuPresident, Principal Executive Officer

and a member of the Board of Directors




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Care Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Medical Care Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mark Ryland DOWDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6367.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Mark Ryland Dowdy, Appellant pro se.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*269PER CURIAM:

Mark Ryland Dowdy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dowdy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Dowdy’s motion to reconsider our denial of his motion for leave to file computer disks. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jim
Hinrichs, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Alere Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jim Hinrichs       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Jim Hinrichs           
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 1 

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 5-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 5-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 5-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 5-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 4 of 4
## ORNEY GENERAL OF EXAS
~R*WPORD c. MARTIN *x-rORNEY GENERAL August 1, 1967 Won.Alwin E. Pape County Attorney Guadalupe County Seguin, Texas Opinion No. M-113 Re: Power of Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority ‘tosubdivide and sell certain lands not necessary to the business of the district.

Youhave requested the opinion of this office in regard to the,following qnaation : Whether Guadalupe-Blanoo River Authority has the authority to subdivide and sell property-in competition to the Estate from which said property wasderived, or whether it must first be offered for sale to the Estate from which it is derived?

‘~ Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, hereinafter referred to as GBRA,is a caratura of Art. 8280-106 andpossesses the rights, privileges, and functions: conferred by General Lawupon such Districts, However, going beyond the application of the General Law, the Act specifically authorizes the following powers: Section 2(e). “to acquire bypurchase, lease, gift or in anyother manner (otherwise than by condemnation) and&maintain, use .nd operate any and all property of any kind, real, personal, ormixed, or any interest therein, within or without the boundaries of the District, necessary or convenient to the exercise of the powers, -’ rights, privileges and functions conferred uoon it by this Act.”

Section Z(i). “
. . . to construct, extend, improve, maintain,
. .’
. and to use andoperate, m andall facilities of any kind necessary or convenient to the exercise of such powers, rights, privileges and functions;”

(Emphasis added.) Construing the above provisions, wethink the questioned activity of subdividing and selling of lands not necessary to the business of GBRAis within the power of GBRAas specified by the Legislature. Subsection 2(e) above clearly



## -521-Hon. Alwin E. Pape, page 2 (M-113) authorizes GBRAto acquire anduse any land which is either necessary or convenient
. Since the land obtained from the Estate in question has proven not to be necessary to the business of GBRA,it authorizes the sale or other disposition of property not necessary to the business of the District. Thestatute does not require, however, that the property be sold to the former owner and it maybe sold to the former owner or anyone else. Thestatute, however, likewise does not contemplate that GBRAwould be in the real estate business and, in our opinion, does not give the District the authority to install roads, utilities andother improvements not necessary for the general purposes of the District but solely for the purpose of selling surplus lands. SUMMARY GBRAproperty which is not necessary to the business of the,District maybe sold to one or more purchasers anddoes not have to be but maybe sold to the original owner. TheDistrict maynot makeimprovements solely for the purpose of selling surplus land. : Yours/jery, truly,

General of Texas Prepared by Roger Tyler Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman Kerns Taylor, Co-Chairman John Duren Fred Davis Alan Minter Polk Shelton STAFFLEGALASSISTANT A. J. Carubbi, Jr.

-

## 522-