alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017144EN.01004702.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/47

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — ADDE v Parliament

(Case T-48/17 R)

((Interim measures - Financing of a political party - Institutional law - Bank guarantee - Lack of urgency))

(2017/C 144/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL (ADDE) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Defalque, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures ordering a waiver of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee as a condition of the prefinancing of the subsidy flowing from Parliament Decision FINS-2017-13 of 13 December 2016 on the financing granted to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certifying Statement of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harvey Judkowitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and will be retained by Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                     |     |                                                                   
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                                   
|                     |    
|Date:  July 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Harvey Judkowitz                                              
|                     |     | Harvey Judkowitz                                                  
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
144 So. 915

#### Wiley COULLIETTE v. STATE.

4 Div. 650.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 2, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1932.

L. A. Farmer, of Dothan, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Wiley Coulliette for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Coulliette v. State, 144 So. 920.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision 

# DATES:

Submit written comments on or before June 15, 2001. 

*OMB Number:*                         1550-0062.                     

*Form Number:*                         Not applicable.                     

*Type of Review:*                         Renewal.                     

*Title:*                         Minimum Security Devices and Procedures.                     

*Description:*                         The Bank Protection Act and OTS implementing regulations require thrifts to establish security devices and procedures. Written security programs allow OTS to evaluate whether thrifts have adopted policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the law and regulations. FDIC, OCC, and FRB have substantially similar regulations.                     

*Respondents:*                         Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.                     

*Estimated Number of Responses:*                         1,068.                     

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Response:*                         2.                     

*Frequency of Response:*                         1 per year.                     

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                         2,136.                     

*Acting Clearance Officer:*                         Sally W. Watts, (202) 906-7380, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.                     

*OMB Reviewer:*                         Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                     

Deborah Dakin, 

Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations & Legislation Division. 

[FR Doc. 01-12382 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
eurex us
HAL (HERI s

September 21, 2005

Mr. Edward W. Colbert

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOI
Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Dear Mr. Colbert:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation 145.9, U.S.
Futures Exchange, LLC (“Eurex US” or “Exchange”) hereby petitions the CFTC to maintain
the following information in connection with Eurex US Currency Futures incentive programs
as confidential until further notice as against any requestor who files with the Commission a
request to inspect such information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).

The basis for this petition for confidential treatment is CFTC Regulation 145.9(d)(1)(ii), in
that such information contains trade secrets and confidential information. 1 understand that
this petition will not be evaluated by the CFTC unless and until a FOIA request has been filed
for inspection of this subject matter. In that event, please contact me at 312.544.1076.

Very truly yours,

Matt Lisle
Chief of Compliance

CC: Riva Adriance
David Van Wagner
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00218-CV

____________________

DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., Appellant

V.

EMPERATRIZ MARINA MENDOZA GOMEZ, Appellee

_______________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-12-13780 CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Dole Food Company, Inc., filed a motion to dismiss this 

appeal. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of 

this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on September 23, 2015

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
IGDL-2017-R-3

June 20, 2017

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Division of Market Oversight

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: ICAP Global Derivatives Limited - Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification - Amended Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the
regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), ICAP Global Derivatives
Limited (‘IGDL” or the “Facility") hereby notifies the Commission that it has amended its Rulebook,
specifically Rule 312 and Rule 315. The Rulebook has been amended to reflect Commission No-Action
Letter ("NAL") 16-76.

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendments to the Rulebook and their compliance with
applicable provisions of the Act and the Commission's regulations thereunder is attached hereto as
Exhibit A. A clean copy of the amended Rulebook exclusive of confidential Chapter 9 is attached hereto
as Exhibit B, and a copy of the Rulebook exclusive of confidential Chapter 9 marked to show changes
against the version last submitted to the Commission is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

The amendments will become effective on June 30, 2017. IGDL certifies that the amendments comply
with the requirements of the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. IGDL has reviewed the swap execution facility core principles (“Core Principles") as set forth

in the Commodity Exchange Act and has determined that the amendments impact the Core Principles
identified in Exhibit A.

IGDL is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and certifies
that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the IGDL website and may be
accessed at: http://www. icap.com/what-we-do/global-broking/sef.aspx

Please contact the undersigned at (201) 984-6956 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Brian Donnelly
Chief Compliance Officer

ICAP Global Derivatives Limited
2 Broadgate

London

EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom


Exhibit A
Explanation and Analysis

1. On March 24, 2017 the Commission published NAL 17-17, which extended the relief previously
provided in NAL 16-25 to the date of publication of a CFTC regulation establishing a permanent
confirmation solution for uncleared transactions. References in Rule 312(c)(4) and (5) to NAL 16-
25 have been changed to NAL 17-17

The amendments are consistent with Core Principle 2 and NAL 17-17.

2. On May 30, 2017 the Commission published NAL 17-27, which extended the relief previously
provided in NAL 16-58 to the date of publication of a CFTC regulation establishing a permanent
solution addressing clerical and operational errors in swaps executed on a swap execution
facility. Reference in Rule 315(i) to NAL 16-58 has been changed to NAL. 17-27

The amendments are consistent with Core Principle 2 and NAL 17-27

ACTIVE 222418779
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-258-001]

Take notice that on April 30, 2001, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing additional documentation and support for the proposed Transportation Electric Power Cost Adjustment as directed by a Commission letter order issued March 30, 2001, in this proceeding.

Transco states that copies of the filing are being served to all parties in the referenced proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before May 21, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12294  Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 7-6 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017161EN.01003701.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/37

---

Action brought on 27 March 2017 — CeramTec v EUIPO — C5 Medical Werks (Shape of a hip ball)

(Case T-193/17)

(2017/C 161/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CeramTec (Plochingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck and E. Nicolás Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: C5 Medical Werks (Grand Junction, Colorado, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU tridimensional mark in pink (Shape of a hip ball) — EU trade mark No 10 214 179

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2017 in Case R 929/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or, if C5 Medical Werks joins, by the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or, if C5 Medical Werks joins, by the intervener.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 59 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 59 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2017309EN.01003802.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/38

---

Action brought on 26 July 2017 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (sensotek)

(Case T-470/17)

(2017/C 309/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sensotek GmbH (Reichenbach an der Fils, Germany) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Senso Tecnologie Srl (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘sensotek’ — Application for registration No 10 648 871

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2017 in Case R 1953/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

July 23, 2020

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC – Rule Changes 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF 

LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby submits amendments to its Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule 

(Rate Swaps), which has been amended to reflect updates to certain terms and fees. The 

amendment will become effective on August7, 2020, no fewer than ten business days from the 

date hereof. Pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8 and 145.9(d), attached as Appendix A 

are the updates to the API Services Fee Schedule for Rate Swaps with the additions and 

deletions indicated in redline format. In connection with this submission, TW SEF hereby notifies 

the Commission that:

1. Pursuant to CFTC Regulations 40.8 and 145.9, TW SEF is seeking to keep certain 

information confidential because it would otherwise reveal trade secrets or 

confidential commercial or financial information and has posted a notice of pending 

certification with the Commission and a redacted copy of this submission on TW 

SEF’s website.

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder, including Core Principle 2 (Compliance with rules), as the 

Fee Schedule is a rule of the SEF; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rules were expressed to TW SEF 

by its governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market 

participants.

Should you have questions regarding this submission, please contact the undersigned at (646) 

560-7223 or at Gregory.compa@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Gregory Compa

Chief Compliance Officer
2

APPENDIX A

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Rate Swaps)

(Blackline and Clean Copies)

[REDACTED]
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY TW SEF LLC PURSUANT TO 17 CFR PART 145

APPENDIX A 

Fully Integrated API Services Fee Schedule (Rate Swaps)

(Blackline and Clean Versions)
Exhibit
99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Russell
Leslie James, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
 
 Date:
October 7, 2008
 
 
 RUSSELL LESLIE
JAMES
 Russell
Leslie James
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
May 24, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb
Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

vIBVLTUIAs yt 30°940

Reference File # 2679.01

Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

Amendments to Article V, Section 8a of the Amended and Restated Bylaws
of the CBOT per the attached text (additions underlined; deletions
bracketed).

The referenced CBOT Bylaw currently requires that corporate checks in excess of $10,000 be
countersigned by a member of the Executive Committee. The amendments will eliminate this
requirement, thus simplifying the processing of checks and conforming with standard practice
for public companies. With this change, the authorized signatories for such checks will be the
President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Accounting Officer, the Treasurer and the
Secretary.

The CBOT intends to implement these amendments one day after the Commission’s receipt of
this submission.

There were no opposing views concerning these amendments.

The CBOT certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
b052306

ne BW SZ AV AOL

45
g3Ai3038


Additions underlined; deletions bracketed
Section 8. Treasurer
The Treasurer (or, in the absence of a Treasurer, the Chief Financial Officer) shall have general

charge of all funds belonging to the Corporation, and shall be charged with the following specific
duties:

(a) He or she [The Treasurer] shall receive and [from the Secretary] deposit [of] funds belonging
to the Corporation. Checks in the amounts over $10,000 shall be signed by either the President
and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Accounting Officer, the
Treasurer[,] or the Secretary [or the Assistant Secretary and countersigned by the Chairman of
the Board of Directors, a Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors or one (1) of the three (3)
other elected members of the Executive Committee];