alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3467

___________ H.G. Davis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Johnny Wayne Carter, Judge, one and * all; Faulkner County Quorum Court, * [UNPUBLISHED] one and all; H. G. Foster, Prosecuting * Atty, one and all; Marty Montgomery, * originally sued as Monty Montgomery, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 21, 2007 Filed: October 4, 2007

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. H.G. Davis appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to set aside judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of his postjudgment motion as untimely. See Middleton v.-2- McDonald , 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
(104 So. 917)

#### Ex parte Archie KAY.

(7 Div. 574.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 14, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

J. A. Embry, of Ashland, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Archie Kay for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Kay v. State, 104 So. 922. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.
# C_2018166EN.01003101.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/31

---

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission

(Case T-130/17) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission decision amending the conditions for exemption from the EU requirements of the rules governing operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third-party access and tariff regulation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 166/40)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57), from the rules on third-party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene.

| 3. | Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

| 4. | The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

| 5. | Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 33 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
##### 



Restated Bylaws  of  Approach Resources Inc.
 OFFICES
 Name Corporation
 Registered Office
 Other Offices
 MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings




---



##### 



Quorum; Adjournment of Meetings
 Certificate of Incorporation
  Voting
  2




---



##### 



Participation in Meeting by Means of Communication Equipment
 Notice of Stockholder Business
  3




---



##### 



Nomination of Director Candidates
   4




---



##### 



Stockholder List
 Proxies
  5




---



##### 



Treasury Stock
 Stockholder Action
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 Number
 Vacancies
 Quorum and Manner of Acting
 6




---



##### 



Regular and Special Meetings
 Participation in Meeting by Means of Communication Equipment
 Committees
 Compensation
 Resignations
 Reliance upon Books, Reports and Records
 7




---



##### 



Consents
 NOTICES
   OFFICERS
 Number, Term of Office
 Removal
 Resignation
 8




---



##### 



Vacancies
 Chairman of the Board
 Chief Executive Officer
 President
 Vice Presidents
 9




---



##### 



Treasurer
 Secretary
 Assistant Treasurers and Secretaries
 INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS
 Power to Indemnify in Actions, Suits or Proceedings proceeding
 10




---



##### 



Indemnification by a Court
 Expenses Payable in Advance
 Nonexclusivity of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses
 Insurance
 Certain Definitions
 11




---



##### 



Survival of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses
 Limitation on Indemnification
 Indemnification of Employees and Agents
 CAPITAL STOCK
 Certificates of Stock
 12




---



##### 



Transfer of Shares
 Ownership of Shares
 Regulations Regarding Certificates
 Lost or Destroyed Certificates
 13




---



##### 



MISCELLANEOUS
 Seal
 Facsimile Signatures
 Application of Bylaws
 AMENDMENTS
   14
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RxBids (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,**Mack Bradley**, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of            the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MACKBRADLEY** |
|-----|-----------------|

 

**Mack Bradley**

Chief Executive Officer

Acting Principal Accounting Officer

December 10, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,557-01

EX PARTE ROBERT LEE ADAMS, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W13412-1 IN THE 355 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to ninety-nine

years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Adams v. State, No.

02-18-00147-CR (Tex. App.—Ft. Worth July 26, 2018)(not designated for publication). Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that he had a

right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based on the record, the trial court has

determined that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and that Applicant would have timely

filed a petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient performance. 
2

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in cause number 02-18-00147-

CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this

Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: February 12, 2020

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): PA# 01036: Grants for Education Programs in 
Occupational Safety and Health, Occupational Injury Prevention Research 
Training Programs

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:
    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): PA 01036: Grants for Education Programs 
in Occupational Safety and Health, Occupational Injury Prevention 
Research Training Programs.
    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.--8:30 a.m., June 13, 2001. (Open) 8:30 
a.m.--3 p.m., June 13, 2001. (Closed)
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, 
NE., Building 16, Room 1111, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Deputy Director for 
Program Management, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement: PA# 01036.
    Contact Person for More Information: Bernadine Kuchinski, 
Occupational Health Consultant, Office of Extramural Coordination and 
Special Projects, National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE., M/S D40, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, 
telephone 404-639-3342. The Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 30, 2001.
John C. Burckhardt,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 01-12816 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
1177 Avenue of Americas

New York, New York 10036

April 9, 2020

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: TW SEF LLC – Amendment to Rule 1005(c) (New Swap/Old Terms following a DCO 

Rejected Swap) and Rule 1005(d) (New Swap/Old Terms and New Swap/Corrected 

Terms following a Cleared Error Swap)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), Tradeweb SEF 

LLC (“TW SEF”) hereby submits amendments to its Rulebook related to the above-captioned

Rules. The Rulebook has been amended to reflect updates to Rule 1005(c) and 1005(d) in 

order to implement certain requirements with respect to error trades related to CFTC No-Action 

Letter 20-01, Supplemental No-Action Relief for Swap Execution Facilities and Designated 

Contract Markets in Connection with Swaps with Operational or Clerical Errors Executed on a 

Swap Execution Facility or Designated Contract Market (Jan. 8, 2020). The amendments will 

become effective on April 23, 2020, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. In 

connection with this submission, TW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. TW SEF certifies that it has posted a notice of this pending certification with the 

Commission and a copy of this submission on TW SEF’s website, including a redline 

of the changes to Rules 1005(c) and 1005(d), which is attached here to as 

Attachment A;

2. TW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rules were expressed to TW SEF 

by its governing board or committee members, members of TW SEF or market 

participants.
2

Should you have questions regarding this submission, please contact the undersigned at (646) 

560-7223 or at Gregory.compa@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Gregory Compa

Chief Compliance Officer

cc: Dorothy D. DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight
3

ATTACHMENT A

Redline Version of Amendments to Rule 1005
Exhibit 10.7



 








EXHIBIT 10.7






LEASE AGREEMENT ADDENDUM



LESSOR: Parrish Reality, Inc. a property management company



LESSES: Global Food Technologies, Inc., represented by Mark Terry, an authorized
agent thereof



This document serves as an addendum as provided under the terms of Section 38 as written notices of change “This agreement contains the entire agreement of
the parties and merges any prior oral agreements between the parties concerning the same subject matter. This document shall not be modified except in writing
as mutually agreed by both parties.”



Effective April 1, 2002, the following Lease Agreement changes have been agreed upon by both parties, and authorized by the signatures below:





	 	1.	 	Page 1, Paragraph 3, Subsection A, shall now read:






	 	a.	 	A Research and Development company, with the rental space on the main floor only consisting of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. of the
Parrish Park Processing Facility, at 1656 Kraft Road located in Pocatello, Idaho and compromising parking facility and area
surrounding the facility and associated therewith, as outlined on attached Exhibit A.






	 	2.	 	Paragraph 2, shall now read:






	 	a.	 	LESSEES: Global Food Technologies, Inc., represented by Mark Terry, an authorized agent thereof






	 	 	 	This addendum is binding and limited to the parties hereto.





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Mark Terry
	 	 	 	4/22/02
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Mark Terry — Chief Technical Officer/Chief Operations Manager, Global Food
Technologies, Inc., authorized agent for Global Food Technologies, LESSEE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Fred J. Parrish
	 	 	 	4/24/02
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Fred J. Parrish, authorized agent for Parrish Reality, Inc. LESSOR
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1170

MONIKA GONZALEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES ASKINS, Dr.; STANLEY K. GILBERT, Dr.; WILLIAM S. BRITT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-224-5-BR) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monika Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Monika Gonzalez appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her case. We have reviewed the record and find noreversible error. Gonzales has not stated any reason which warrants granting her relief from the judgment dismissing her complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Accordingly, we affirm. Wedeny Gonzalez’s motion to adopt attachments filed in a prior appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TalecrisBiotherapeutics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), orincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | Dated: November 9, 2009              |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |
|   | /s/ Lawrence D. Stern                |
|   | Lawrence D. Stern                    |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2204 

To prohibit contracting with persons that have business operations with the 

Maduro regime, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. WALTZ (for himself and Mr. DIAZ-BALART) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit contracting with persons that have business 

operations with the Maduro regime, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Venezuelan Con5 tracting Restriction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH PERSONS 

7 THAT HAVE BUSINESS OPERATIONS WITH 

8 THE MADURO REGIME. 

9 (a) PROHIBITION.—The head of an executive agency 

10 may not enter into a contract for the procurement of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2204 IH

1 goods or services with any person that has business oper2 ations with an authority of the government of Venezuela 

3 that is not recognized as the legitimate government of 

4 Venezuela by the United States Government. 

5 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) BUSINESS OPERATIONS.—The term ‘‘busi7 ness operations’’ means engaging in commerce in 

8 any form, including acquiring, developing, maintain9 ing, owning, selling, possessing, leasing, or operating 

10 equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, 

11 personal property, real property, or any other appa12 ratus of business or commerce. 

13 (2) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

14 agency’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

15 133 of title 41, United States Code. 

16 (3) PERSON.—The term ‘‘person’’ means— 

17 (A) a natural person, corporation, com18 pany, business association, partnership, society, 

19 trust, or any other nongovernmental entity, or20 ganization, or group; 

21 (B) any governmental entity or instrumen22 tality of a government, including a multilateral 

23 development institution (as defined in section 

24 1701(c)(3) of the International Financial Insti25 tutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262r(c)(3))); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2204 IH

1 (C) any successor, subunit, parent entity, 

2 or subsidiary of, or any entity under common 

3 ownership or control with, any entity described 

4 in subparagraph (A) or (B). 

5 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply with re6 spect to any contract entered into on or after the date 

7 of the enactment of this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS