alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 201 

Recognizing the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

Recognizing the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New 

York. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Comedy Cen5 ter Recognition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER IN 

7 JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK. 

8 (a) CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION.—Congress— 

9 (1) recognizes that the National Comedy Cen10 ter, located in Jamestown, New York, is the only 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 201 IH

1 museum of its kind that exists for the exclusive pur2 pose of celebrating comedy in all its forms; and 

3 (2) officially designates the National Comedy 

4 Center as the National Comedy Center. 

5 (b) EFFECT OF RECOGNITION.—The National Com6 edy Center recognized in this section is not a unit of the 

7 National Park System, and the designation shall not be 

8 construed to require or permit Federal funds to be ex9 pended for any purpose related to the Center. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2017231EN.01003501.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/35

---

Action brought on 5 May 2017 — Webgarden v EUIPO (Dating Bracelet)

(Case T-272/17)

(2017/C 231/43)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Webgarden Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: G. Jambrik, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Design at issue: European Union design ‘Dating Bracelet’ — Application for registration No 14450019

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2017 in Case R 658/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009.

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

| — | Infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

| — | Infringement of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
# National Defense Transportation Day and National 

America's achievements in transportation have helped lay the foundation for our strength and prosperity. As our Nation moves forward into the 21st century, we celebrate how modern transportation has transformed the world and recognize the many men and women who have contributed to its development and advancement.

Whether traveling by road, rail, water, or air, Americans can choose among a large number of options in reaching their destinations. But beyond moving people, our diverse transportation system also makes possible the delivery of countless products throughout the country. Whether intended for individuals, private organizations, government agencies, or merchants, the shipment and transfer of these goods helps to generate and sustain the economic growth that benefits us all.

Our transportation system also contributes vitally to the security of the United States. From the early days of the merchant marine at the time of our Nation's founding, to the latest in 21st century aircraft, our diverse methods of transportation have moved troops and carried defense cargo quickly and efficiently both in peacetime and in war.

To meet America's future needs, our Nation must take advantage of scientific and technological innovation to improve existing transportation systems and develop new ones. We must strive to enhance their reliability and efficiency and close the gap between the demand for transportation and the capacity of the transportation infrastructure.

At the same time, safety will always remain our top priority. Investments in transportation must contribute to the security of the traveling public and improve access for all Americans. Our efforts to modify and strengthen transportation systems must also safeguard the environment and use energy wisely. Through these measures, we can conserve our precious natural resources and reinforce the transportation infrastructure our Nation needs to thrive in a dynamic and competitive world.

To recognize the men and women who work in transportation and thereby contribute to our Nation's well-being, defense, and progress, the United States Congress, by joint resolution approved May 16, 1957 (36 U.S.C. 120) has designated the third Friday in May of each year as “National Defense Transportation Day,” and, by joint resolution approved May 14, 1962 (36 U.S.C. 133), declared that the week during which that Friday falls be designated “National Transportation Week.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Friday, May 18, 2001, as National Defense Transportation Day and May 13 through May 19, 2001, as National Transportation Week. I urge all Americans to recognize how our modern transportation system has enhanced our economy and contributed to our quality of life.                          ( print page 28048)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-12967

Billing code 3195-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00138

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E .D.D., III

, a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA02283

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

is AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED. It is ORDERED that no costs be

assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal because appellant qualifies as indigent under

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED August 7, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-05373-AKH Document 11 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Fut

54 of Ci dit:

"

that-phras:

p













eo
aid
io)

w
&

mT
= of!
3s OF
Fad wm
> ow

1%
|

October 31, 2005

VIA FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certifications. New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. Submission
#05.196: Deletion of NYMEX Rules 2.75C, 2.75D, 2.88, 2.89 and 2.90

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“Exchange”) is notifying the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (“Commission”) that it is deleting NYMEX Rule 2.75C, 2.75D , 2.88, 2.89 and 2.90 as
these rules pertain to permit programs that have subsequently expired. Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the
Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the attached
deletions of these rules comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act; these rule changes will
be made effective on November 2, 2005.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned at (212)
299-2207.

Very truly yours,

Brian J. Regan
Vice President and Counsel

Att.














NOTIFICATION OF DELETION OF NYMEX RULES 2.75C, 2.75D, 2.88,
2.89 AND 2.90
# C_2023083EN.01001501.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Vialto Consulting v Commission

(Case T-617/17 RENV) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance - Investigation by OLAF - On-site inspection - Irregularities and failures allegedly committed by the Commission - Right to be heard - Non-material damage - Causal link)

(2023/C 83/16)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Vialto Consulting Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: S. Paliou and A. Skoulikis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, J. Baquero Cruz and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage which it claims to have suffered as a result of the unlawful acts committed, first, by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in the course of an inspection carried out at the applicant’s premises and, second, by the European Commission following that inspection.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay Vialto Consulting Kft. compensation of EUR 5 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay Vialto Consulting Kft. compensation of EUR 5 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered;

| 2. | Orders that the compensation to be paid to Vialto Consulting be paid with default interest, as from the delivery of the present judgment to full payment of that compensation, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders that the compensation to be paid to Vialto Consulting be paid with default interest, as from the delivery of the present judgment to full payment of that compensation, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-650/19 P, the costs of the initial proceedings in Case T-617/17 and the costs of the renvoi proceedings in Case T-617/17 RENV before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-650/19 P, the costs of the initial proceedings in Case T-617/17 and the costs of the renvoi proceedings in Case T-617/17 RENV before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
December 30, 2022

VIA CFTC PORTAL 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Attention: Chris Kirkpatrick, Secretary

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Certification: Amendments to the Exchange and Clearing

Transaction Fee Schedule for Nodal Exchange

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear, LLC 

(“Nodal Clear”) hereby notifies the Commission that it plans to amend its Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee

Schedule (“Fee Schedule”) for certain Nodal Exchange environmental contracts. The Fee Schedule shall become 

effective on January 17, 2023. Attached hereto is the Fee Schedule that will be applicable for Nodal Exchange futures

and options cleared at Nodal Clear.

1

The Fee Schedule is being revised to provide the fees for new environmental contracts to be launched by Nodal 

Exchange.

Nodal Clear management has assessed the Fee Schedule and its compliance with applicable provisions of the 

Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), including the Commission’s Regulations and DCO Core Principles. Nodal Clear 

has identified that the Fee Schedule may have some bearing on the following Core Principles:

Core Principle B - Financial Resources: The Fee Schedule will not impact Nodal Clear’s ability to discharge its financial, 

operational, or managerial responsibilities as a DCO.

Core Principle L - Public Information: As required by Core Principle L, Nodal Clear is publicly posting this selfcertification letter on its website to ensure that market participants receive advance notice of the Fee Schedule. On 

the effective date of the Fee Schedule, the Fee Schedule will be posted on the Nodal Clear website. 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the CEA and the Commission’s Regulation 40.6(a), Nodal Clear certifies that the Fee 

Schedule set forth in the attachment complies with the CEA and the Commission’s Regulations thereunder. Nodal 

Clear is not aware of any opposing views expressed regarding the Fee Schedule. Nodal Clear certifies that this 

submission has been concurrently posted on the Nodal Clear website at www.nodalclear.com.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submission, please contact me at 703-962-9864 

or alvarez@nodalexchange.com. 

Sincerely,

/s/Cody Alvarez

Cody Alvarez

Chief Compliance Officer

Corporate Counsel

Attachments:

Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee Schedule (Redline)

1 Nodal Exchange, LLC is submitting a separate filing for exchange fees. Such fees are also reflected in the attachment.
# C_2017269EN.01003301.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/33

---

Action brought on 21 June 2017 — Chypre v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)

(Case T-384/17)

(2017/C 269/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: M. J. Dairies EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colour containing the word element ‘BBQLOUMI’ — Application for registration No 13 069 034

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 April 2017 in Case R 496/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nehemias LOPEZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-15076

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 10, 2013.

Peter J. Sholl, Donald L. Hansen, James A. Muench, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

John Leonard Badalamenti, Alec Fitzgerald Hall, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Nehemias Lopez-Perez appeals his sentence of 33 months of imprisonment, following his pleas of guilty to one count of conspiring to transport 100 or more illegal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(v)(I), (a)(l)(B)(i), and two counts of transporting illegal aliens within the United States, *id.*§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(B)(i); 18 U.S.C. § 2. Lopez-Perez argues that his sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion. The district court imposed a sentence at the low end of Lopez-Perez’s recommended guideline range of 33 to 41 months, and we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be reasonable. *See United States v. Hunt,*526 F.3d 739, 746 (11th Cir.2008). Lopez-Perez requested a downward variance of 15 months, but the district court reasonably rejected the request because Lopez-Perez had been responsible for transporting at least 140 aliens after they entered the country illegally. The district court also reasonably determined that a sentence of 33 months of imprisonment would best serve the statutory purposes of sentencing. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Lopez-Perez argues that he was entitled to a lesser sentence because he had no criminal history, he was not a leader of the conspiracy, his offenses “did not involve the typical ‘aggravators’ ” that often accompanied smuggling operations, and he cooperated with authorities, but we are not persuaded that Lopez-Perez’s sentence “lies outside the range of reasonable sentences dictated by the facts of [his] case.” *United States v. Irey,*612 F.3d 1160, 1190 (11th Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). The district court imposed the sentence that Lopez-Perez requested as an alternative to a sentence below the guidelines, and that sentence is reasonable.

We AFFIRM Lopez-Perez’s sentence.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kimberly Tate, the Chief Financial Officer of Autocarbon.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Special Financial Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
         fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Dated: August 8, 2002



                                                  /s/ Kimberly Tate
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Kimberly Tate
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2212 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2212

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right of a 
     claimant in a civil action before a Federal court to retain a 
 structured settlement broker to negotiate the terms of payment of an 
                     award, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

Mr. Cartwright (for himself and Mr. Higgins of New York) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right of a 
     claimant in a civil action before a Federal court to retain a 
 structured settlement broker to negotiate the terms of payment of an 
                     award, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Structured Settlement Claimants 
Rights Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    (a) Federal Court Proceedings.--Chapter 111 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1660. Right to retain structured settlement broker
    ``A claimant in any civil action before a Federal court shall have 
the right to retain a structured settlement broker to act on behalf of 
that claimant for purposes of negotiating a schedule of payments or 
other terms of payment of a sum certain previously agreed to paid by or 
on behalf of the defendant in satisfaction of a judgment against that 
defendant or in accordance with the terms of a settlement. The court 
shall inform the claimant of this right at the appropriate time. The 
defendant shall provide timely notice of any professional relationship 
between the defendant and the broker if any such relationship exists or 
has existed.''.
    (b) Administrative Proceedings.--Section 554 of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) In the case of any proceeding under this section, a party to 
that proceeding shall have the right to retain a structured settlement 
broker to act on behalf of that party for purposes of negotiating a 
schedule of payments or other terms of payment of a sum certain 
previously agreed to paid by or on behalf of another party in 
satisfaction of a decision against that party or in accordance with the 
terms of a settlement between the parties. The agency shall inform the 
claimant of this right at the appropriate time. The defendant shall 
provide timely notice of any professional relationship between the 
defendant and the broker if any such relationship exists or has 
existed.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

I,Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”), certify that(i) the Annual Report of the Trust on Form 10-K for the period ending December31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in suchAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

 
| Date:  | March  30, 2006                                     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |
|   | /s/  Harvey Beker                                   |   |
|   |     Harvey  Beker               |
|   |     Co-Chief  Executive Officer |
|        |                                                     |        |  |  |

 

----