alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

JOHN NEELY KENNEDY, TREASURER

OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Defendant. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) No. 15

- 1365 C

(Filed: January 17, 2020 )

ORDER

This case was stayed pending decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for

the Federal Circuit in LaTurner v. United States , Case No. 13

- 1011C, and Lea v. United

States , Case No. 16

- 43. On August 13, 2019, the Federal Circuit reversed this Court’s

grant of summary judgment to the plaintiffs in LaTurner and Lea , and remanded with

instructions to grant summary judgment in favor of the government. See LaTurner v.

United Sta tes , 933 F.3d 1354, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Accordingly, on December 19,

2019, this Court granted summary judgment for the government in both cases and

subsequently lifted the stays in the related cases. See ECF No. 43, Lea v. United States

(Dec. 19, 2019).

In a joint status report, the parties in this case as well as other related cases

notified the Court that the plaintiff in LaTurner is currently seeking the required approval

from the Kansas Attorney General to timely seek review of the Federal Circuit’s August2 13, 2019 decision in the Supreme Court. The parties thus anticipate that the issues in

LaTurner will remain live and that the Supreme Court will act on LaTurner ’s anticipated

petition during its 2021 term.

Therefore, the Court orders the proceedin gs in this case are to be STAYED

pending either a decision by the Supreme Court denying the LaTurner petition for

certiorari or disposing of the case on the merits, or until the decision of the Federal

Circuit becomes final and unappealable. The parties sh all file a joint status report within

14 days of the date on which the Supreme Court issues its decision or the Federal Circuit

judgment becomes final.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Elaine D. Kaplan

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Judge
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 15, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22

- 205

Lower Tribunal No. 10

- 53384

________________



### Doron Jockey Club, LLC, etc.

,

Appellant,

vs.



### B.V.K., LLC, et c

. , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William

Thomas and Lisa S. Walsh , Judge s

.

Carlton Fields, P.A., and Dean A. Morande (West Palm Beach) and Christopher Smart (Tampa) , for appellant.

Law Offices of Geoffrey B. Marks and Geoffrey B. Marks ; Venable LLP and Jessie F. Beeber (New York, NY) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and L OBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 17 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH Document 29-2 Filed 10/08/2007 Page 35 of 35
# C_2019131EN.01004201.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-366/17) (1)

(ERDF - Refusal to confirm a financial contribution to a major project - Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Assessment of whether a major project is consistent with the priorities of the operational programme - Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Time limit exceeded)

(2019/C 131/47)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, A. Kyratsou and M. Siekierzyńska, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 1904 final of 24 March 2017 refusing to confirm to the Republic of Poland a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘Starting production of a next-generation diesel engine by Volkswagen Motor Polska’ in the context of the Priority Axis IV of operational programme ‘Innovative Economy’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 7, 2008
    
    /s/ Gail F. Goodman

Gail F. GoodmanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 7, 2008
    
    /s/ Steven R. Wasserman

Steven R. WassermanVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Keith R. Klein, certify that:
1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Transport Corporation of America, Inc.;
2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.            The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 5.            The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 3, 2005/s/ Keith R. KleinKeith R. KleinChief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer


---
Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 7 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2138 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility of lowincome veterans to receive dental care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the 

eligibility of low-income veterans to receive dental care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dental Care for Low5 Income Veterans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DENTAL CARE TO LOW-INCOME VET7 ERANS. 

8 Section 1712(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘or’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2138 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as sub2 paragraph (I); and 

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph (H): 

5 ‘‘(H) beginning on the date that is two years 

6 after the date of the enactment of this subpara7 graph, from which a veteran whose attributable in8 come is not greater than the amount set forth in 

9 section 1722(b) of this title is suffering; or’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 13 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/7/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

KRIS K. AGRAWAL, Ph.D. P.E., individually, ) doing business as Kay Kay and Associates ) Engineers; GENERAL MINERALS ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) v. ) No. 95-6321 ) (D.C. No. CV-94-1701) TANA WALKER, individually; OKLAHOMA ) (W.D. Oklahoma) CORPORATION COMMISSION, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT and LOGAN , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this2

appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiffs Kris K. Agrawal and General Minerals Corporation appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment and dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. §1983 suit against Tana Walker and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC). Agrawal is a licensed engineer who has been engaged in business in Oklahoma, including as a consultant on fuel storage facilities. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant Walker, manager of the Fuel Storage Department for defendant OCC, violated their constitutional rights when she sent Agrawal a letter stating that his companies, Kay Kay and Associates and General Minerals Corporation, were to refrain from performing any work on sites subject to Oklahoma’s storage tank regulation laws. Defendant Walker sent copies of the letter to owners and operators of tanks on which the companies wereoperating under agreements. Plaintiffs produced documents indicating that after receiving the letter, some of the owners and operators terminated their agreements with plaintiffs. They further alleged that defendant Walker’s action in sending the letter impaired obligations of contract, in violation of Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution; and deprived them of property and liberty interests without due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. They also asserted that Walker denied Agrawal certification as an underground storage tank consultant in retaliation for exercising his right to counsel, thereby violating his First Amendment rights. Plaintiffs sought monetary damages from3

Walker and equitable relief from both defendants. The district court in a well reasoned order discussed plaintiffs’ claims and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Walker and dismissed the action against the OCC as well. Plaintiffs appealed. We have considered the arguments in plaintiffs’ briefs and examined the record submitted to the court. After this review we are satisfied that the district court accuratelysummarized the facts and correctly applied the law. We therefore AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated in the district court order of August 25, 1995.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court James K. Logan Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 30, 2001, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Financial Services Technology 
Consortium, Inc. (``Consortium'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, University Bank, 
Ann Arbor, MI has joined the Consortium as a principal member. 
Authentor Systems, Inc., Englewood, CA joined the Consortium as an 
associate member. National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST), 
Gaithersburg, MD joined the Consortium as an advisory member. Also, 
Department of Treasury, Washington, DC; FundServ, Inc., Toronto, 
Ontario, Canada; IntraNet, Newton, MA; National Center for 
Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS), Ann Arbor, MI; and NEC Corporation, 
Tokyo, Japan have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Financial Services Technology 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 21, 1993, Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc. 
filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. 
The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 14, 1993 (58 FR 65399).
    The last notification was files with the Department on December 27, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 20, 2001 (66 FR 15758).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-12858 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4644-N-21]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 24, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                    v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: May 17, 2001.

John D. Garrity,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 01-12841  Filed 5-24-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 29-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 29-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 29-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 29-2 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Campbell, Appellant.

Submitted March 8, 2010;

decided March 25, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, *787Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
EXHIBIT 32.1 EXHIBIT 99 Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dialpoint Communications Corporation ("DCC") on Form 10-QSB for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Billy Radford, President and Chief Executive Officer of DCC, and I, Eileen Casey, Principal Financial Officer of DCC, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DCC. Date: October 29, 2007  /s/ Billy Radford Billy Radford President and Chief Executive Officer Date: October 29, 2007  /s/ Eileen Casey Eileen Casey Principal Financial Officer