T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E S L I E R . HO WAR D, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. RJ F FI N A N CI A L LLC, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 12- 15392 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 1 2 1 3 - G MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona G . M urr a y S now , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an d P A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e s l i e R . H ow a r d appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nt i n hi s a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tde f e nda nt ’ s de btc ol l e c t i on e f f ort s vi ol a t e d the F a i rD e bt C ol l e c t i on P r a c t i c e s A c ta nd a n A r i z onas t a tut e of l i m i t a t i ons . W e ha ve j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew de no vo bo th a di sm i ss al un der 

# FI LED AU G 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 15392 2 the R ooke r - Fe ldm an d o c tr in e a n d as u m m a ryju d g m e n t. N o e l v . H a ll , 341 F . 3d 1 1 4 8 , 1 1 5 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e ntunde rthe R ooke r - Fe ldm an doc tr i ne be c aus e H ow a r d’ s a c t i on a m ount e d t o af orbi dde n “ de f a c to ap p e a l” o f

as ta te c o u rt ju d g m e n t. Id . a t1163- 65 ( di s c us s i ng R o o kerFe ldm an d o c tr in e ) ; se e al so H enri chs v . V

al leyV i ew D ev . , 4 7 4 F .3 d 6 0 9 , 6 1 6 ( 9 th C i r. 20 07 ) (R ooke r - Fe ldm an do ctri ne barr ed pl ai nt i ff’ s c l ai m because a l l eged l egal i nj ur i e s a r os e f

r om the “ s t a t e c ourt ’ s purport e dl ye rr one ous j udgm e nt ” a nd the re li ef h e s o u g h t “ w o u ldre q u ire th e d istrict co u rt to d eter m in e th at th e s tate co u rt’s deci si on w as w rong and thu s voi d”). W e tr e a t th e ju d g m e n t a s ad is m is s a l w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e . See Kou ga si an v. T M SL , Inc. , 35 9 F . 3d 11 36 , 11 39 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( di sm i ss al s und er R ooke r - Fe ldm an a r e f

o rla c ko f

s u b je c t m a tte rju r is d ic tio n ) ; Ke ll yv . Fle e tw ood E nt er s. , Inc. , 37 7 F . 3d 10 34 , 10 36 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( di sm i ss al s f or l ac k o f s ubj ec t m a tte rju r is d ic tio n s h o u ld b e w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e ) . H o w a r d ’s c o n te n tio n s c o n c e rn in g th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to s tr ik e J e n n if

e rA c h e ’s d e c la r a tio n a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . See Sea-L an d Serv. , Inc. v. Lo z e n I n t ’ l , LLC , 285 F . 3d 808, 813 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( “ W e r e vi e w f orabus e of12- 15392 3 d is c r e tio n e v id e n tia ry ru lin g s m a d e in th e c o n te x t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t.” ) . AF F I RME D.