alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005153EN.01002401.xml

| 24.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/24

---

Lifting by France of public service obligations on scheduled air services operated on the Le Havre — Rouen — Strasbourg, Saint-Brieuc — Paris, and Saint-Brieuc — Nantes routes

(2005/C 153/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

France has decided to lift the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services operated between:

| 1. | Le Havre and Strasbourg via Rouen, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 279 of 25 September 1996 and amended on 16 April 1998 (Official Journal of the European Communities C 116). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Le Havre and Strasbourg via Rouen, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 279 of 25 September 1996 and amended on 16 April 1998 (Official Journal of the European Communities C 116).

Official Journal of the European Communities

Official Journal of the European Communities

| 2. | Saint-Brieuc and Paris, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 53 of 7 March 2003. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Saint-Brieuc and Paris, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 53 of 7 March 2003.

Official Journal of the European Union

| 3. | Saint-Brieuc and Nantes, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 34 of 9 February 1999 and amended on 14 August 1999 (Official Journal of the European Communities C 233). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Saint-Brieuc and Nantes, published in the
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 34 of 9 February 1999 and amended on 14 August 1999 (Official Journal of the European Communities C 233).

Official Journal of the European Communities

Official Journal of the European Communities

---
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 24 of 24
#### Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.K. REVELEY, Jr., Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-8098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Mark Anthony Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Barnes v. Reveley,*No. 1:12-cv-01365-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2012). We deny Barnes’s motions to appoint counsel, to consider precedent authorities, and for damages. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Jersey Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the New Jersey Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
9:30 a.m. and adjourn at 4 p.m. on Wednesday, June 6, 2001, at the New 
Jersey State House, Room 319, 125 W. State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 
08625. The purpose of the meeting is to: (1) review the Committee's 
draft report on Asian American representation in the New Jersey state 
government employment; and (2) the Committee will hold a briefing 
session focusing on the Federal role in compliance with a consent 
decree remedying racial profiling practices by the New Jersey state 
police or alternatively criminal prosecutions for civil rights 
violations in New Jersey.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Chairperson Dr. Irene Hill-Smith, 856-
468-5546 or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-
376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend 
the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter 
should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days 
before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 7, 2001.
Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-12442 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ............................................................... X 

JENNIFER YANNI, 

Plaintiff, : 07 Civ. 59 1 1 (RMB) 

: ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Based on Plaintiffs letter, dated December 3,2007, indicating that the parties have 

reached a settlement agreement, it is hereby 

ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be, and the same hereby is, discontinued. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

December 4,2007 

. _ , .-.-I . , .. ,>, .. , . . . . .. . ,-,. . .. , . , . .: ,. . . . . . . . -.* .-_*,- --._ ,. . . . . , . 

! IJSDC SDNY 8 ; 

; 1 DOCGTME?\T Ij I I; : j EI,ECTI;;3L";!ci4&TJTf rErx3 i ; . , I " I1 

1. i ; #: !I 

Richard 

20 

M. Berman, U.S.D.J. 

/ 1 DATE FILED: U 

Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 5 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
ex101.htm



cMoney, Inc.

(Company Name and Address)


UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSEDNT OF DIRECTORS

OF

cMoney, Inc.


IN LIEU OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

cMoney, Inc.


(Company Name)


 




Pursuant to the Authority granted to directors to take action by unamous consent without a meeting pursuant to the articles of organization of cMoney, inc. the Board of Directors ("Directors") of cMoney. Inc. a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby consent to, adopt, ratify, confirm and approve, as of the date indicated below, the following recitals and resolutions, as evidenced by their signatures hereunder:


 


WHEREAS, the Directors believe it is in the best interest of the corporation that effective immediately, William Watson and Dave Johnson are hereby terminated for cause and cause is defined as improper notification to the Board of Directors as as to their actual intent as it relates to communications as to factual statements regarding the operations of the company and conspiring defraud the directors of the company.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board is notifying William Watson, CEO, and Dave Johnson and the SEC that this action was confirmed by the Board of Directors of cMoney, Inc., effective immediately this September 2, 2010.


 


GENERAL RESOLUTION 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The undersigned have set forth their hands in his capacity as of this 2nd day of September, 2010.


 


/s/ Larry Wilson, Chairman


 


/s/ Melvin Tekell, Director
Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6819
DWAYNE DION BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. THORNE; MR. COULBURNE; KATHLEEN GREEN; MR. KING; TRACEY WARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-02454-AW) Submitted: September 28, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne Dion Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dwayne Dion Bacon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bacon v. Thorne , No. 8:06-cv-02454-AW (D. Md. May 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2018427EN.01005201.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2018 — M & T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v EUIPO (fluo.)

(Case T-120/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark fluo. - Partial rejection of the application for registration - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2018/C 427/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: M & T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Spyridonos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M.d.M. Baldares and J. Ivanauskas, Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2016 (Case R 863/2016-2), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign fluo. as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2016 (Case R 863/2016-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls paragraph 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2016 (Case R 863/2016-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by M & T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE, including the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by M & T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE, including the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

---
# C_2017063EN.01003901.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/39

---

Action brought on 5 January 2017 — Golden Balls v EUIPO — Intra-Presse (GOLDEN BALLS)

(Case T-8/17)

(2017/C 063/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Golden Balls Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC, M. Hawkins, Solicitor and T. Dolde, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intra-Presse (Boulogne Billancourt, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘GOLDEN BALLS’ — Application for registration No 6 036 503

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2016 in Case R 1962/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 6 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: May 11, 2001. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-12316 Filed 5-11-01; 12:27 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2017256EN.01003701.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/37

---

Action brought on 9 June 2017 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Fulia Trading (LV BET ZAKŁADY BUKMACHERSKIE)

(Case T-373/17)

(2017/C 256/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fulia Trading Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LV BET ZAKŁADY BUKMACHERSKIE’ — Application for registration No 13 514 534

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2017 in Case R 1567/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and thus refuse registration to the contested mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and thus refuse registration to the contested mark;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings;

| — | order Fulia to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Fulia to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of legal certainty. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of legal certainty.

---
#### In the Matter of Richard Stevens, Respondent, v James R. Hewson et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hastings, Appellants.

Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred in upholding the December 1987 determination made by respondents (ZBA). A decision, upon reconsideration or rehearing, to reverse or modify a prior determination by the ZBA must be approved unanimously (Town Law § 267 [6]; *Matter of Panella v Budney,*59 Mise 2d 542; 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 25.35 [3d ed]). The December resolution, which effectively reversed an earlier interpretation of the zoning ordinance made in September of 1987, was approved by a 4 to 2 vote and thus, was not properly adopted. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Donovan, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
#### Donald E. Swartzman et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Chad Swartzman and Another, Infants, Respondents, v County of Chautauqua, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed as against defendant county. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying the county’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs’ failure to plead compliance with the requirement of prior written notice of the existence of snow and ice upon the highway requires dismissal of the complaint *(see,*Highway Law § 139 [2]; Local Laws, 1985, No. 3 of County of Chautauqua; *Banta v County of Erie,*134 AD2d *971839, 840; *Powell v Gates-Chili Cent. School Dist.,*50 AD2d 1079, 1080). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 3249

_____________________________
D EVIN D AENARD G ARMON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

April 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OWE , T ANENBAUM , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Devin Daenard Garmon
, pro se, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

Appendix A

REDACTED
UTTLETON JOYCE

UGHETTA PARK & K€LLY LLP

I MannanaNille Roa4 sùre 302

PùEùasq NéwYork 10577

Tel: (914)417-3400

At!t: Bryon L, lriedne, E8q- (8!,5?52)

EDaiì B4rr.Fdednù@Littl€iorjore,com

UNITED STATES DISTfuCT COIJRT

SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

cos no. 0? Civ, 5898 (RJS)

Plairtin

-agoins!

CNOSIS S,P,A. and ONoSIS BIORESEARCH S-A.,

D.fadúts.

RENZO BERNA, beirg dùly swoú, depos drd syrl

l. I m îlE mmagi.e.liÈtor of tn ddeúdaDt Cnosis s.p-A., and I e tuIy fditiù

itù the focts set fonl b ùis amdavir b*€d @ my pdo.l tnowtedse.

2. I $bnil tbs aiîdùi in turln sùppor of úe dctftdùG moù@ b dims úe

@rlaid Ior l(k ofjù.didion,

lDo8lr S.p,{-

3. GGis S.p.A. C$nGis") is ar Ilalie corpoútion, viù ns principaÌ plac€ ofbùsines

4, Gnosis his no offrc6, lelephoe llMbe6, flployeq ú bút accoùls in Ns yo* __"*._'.""'__J) 

I

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 9-3 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 4
5 cnosh sctis no pruducr in New yo* Cnosis onÌy sels producr

disr buro6, notrcof*hichaE tocalcd inNcsyork.

t Cnuns cof,Llrcr no Jd\eda,ng rn Nra \ ort.

6. Cnosis sc s ro onty r*o disriburo^ in rhc uni.cd srrrs: HD in Arlank, Georyi.j

ard WellùHerlú in Los Ansetes. Catifonria.

3. (Ìnosis naiÍains an inre,ler websire

viewcd by ary inreùìer ùser, bur n docs ror accL,pr

inlbmarion, bur n is nor ìnhc!ìvc.

9 Whcn oncofcrosÀ sdirnburorssctk

label for rhe pllducr. cnosis docs Dor preparc

l0.cnosis has nor nade any sates in New yórk. Upon i.tomarion and bctief, AHD

Nld one shipnenl ol cnosis pridùct - consìeins ofone kitocra,È for whìch AHD charsed

ts.000 b a Ns Yolk buye.

I L Gnosh has no aijliation wùtì AHD. t.lìcy re roraÌ ty sepaúre conprD ìes. They have

$parareownc h'p_nanasemcm. dnecb.s, andconlrt.

Ctrosis Biorrsearch S.A.

12. Gnosis BioEea(h S.A. (,,8ìorese!r!h,) is a swiss corponrìon, wiù ns principal

Dlacc Òl busincss nr Swiùe and.

ll. Ajorcsedch is a *hoity oNnd subsidiary of Cnosk.

(ww.snosis-biÒ.coml The wósie c.n be

o^iers orinqùnes. tr àttows. viewúb e..l

Crosis s producl. ùc dÈù jhùbr Drpares any

rny labols for irs prcdud foi saìes b, ùs

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 9-3 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 2 of 4
seus all Òf its prcduct ìo Cnosis. BioMh sls

h6 no ottc6, rclephone nunb6, ehploy€6, or h6nt ecoùnk in Ns

16. Bioeemh.onduck no adverueng jn NN y.rt.

l7- BioEs@h has no alÌliaIón wilh AHD.

ve sep.nt€ ownenhlp, mmoeenà! diEdoÌs, dd

lley ft roElly Éepure compaj6. Ttèy

d.y of .2003

l -

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 9-3 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 3 of 4
vèla e aurentica

{,n

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 9-3 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-19 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 8 of 8