alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 28, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2562.02
Non-Material Agricultural
Rule Change

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.4(b), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Amendments to Rulebook Appendix 4E, Section 1 as indicated in the attached text
(additions underlined; deletions bracketed).

This filing supersedes a previous version which the CBOT submitted by letter dated June 24,
2005 (CBOT Reference File #2562.01).

Appendix 4E sets forth Exchange financial requirements for firms to be regular for delivery
against CBOT agricultural contracts. Under the referenced revisions, the Financial Compliance
Committee could grant exemptions to the working capital requirement for regular firms having
adequate net worth levels and high ratings from a recognized credit rating agency.

The CBOT intends to implement these amendments no sooner than ten days after the
Commission’s receipt of this submission.

There were no opposing views concerning these amendments.

The CBOT certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

B062105


Additions are underlined.
Deletions are [bracketed].

Appendix 4E- MINIMUM FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AGRICULTURAL
REGULARITY

The minimum financial requirements for firms which are regular to deliver agricultural products
are:

1. Working Capital- (current assets excluding current receivables from affiliates/parent
company less current liabilities) must be greater than or equal to $2,000,000 or $1,000,000 for
firms regular for delivery in Denatured Fuel Ethanol futures. All current assets must be readily
marketable. Firms which do not have $2,000,000 ($1,000,000 for ethanol) in Working Capital
must deposit with the Exchange [$5,000 per contract which it is regular to deliver, up to a
maximum of $2,000,000 ($1,000,000 for ethanol), less SEC haircuts, as specified in SEC Rule
15c¢3-1(c )(2)(vi), (vii), (viii) plus 3% in the event of liquidation.] treasury securities or other
collateral deemed acceptable to the Exchange, in such sum and subject to such conditions as the
Exchange may require. Any such sums shall be reduced by SEC haircuts, as specified in SEC
Rule 15c3-1(c )(2)(vi), (vii), (viii). If the warehouseman/shipper deposits treasury securities, it
must execute a security agreement on a form prescribed by the Exchange. The Financial
Compliance Committee may grant an exemption from the working capital requirement described
above, in its sole discretion
Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2108 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A benefit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2019 

Mr. PALMER (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare 

part A benefit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retirement Freedom 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT OUT 

7 OF THE MEDICARE PART A BENEFIT. 

8 Any individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits 

9 under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may 

10 elect (in such form and manner as may be specified by 

11 the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to opt out 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2108 IH

1 of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other provision 

2 of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an 

3 election, such individual— 

4 (1) may (in such form and manner as may be 

5 specified by the Secretary) subsequently choose to 

6 end such election and opt back into such entitlement 

7 (in accordance with a process determined by the 

8 Secretary) without being subject to any penalty; 

9 (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits 

10 under title II of such Act as a condition for making 

11 such election; and 

12 (3) shall not be required to repay any amount 

13 paid under such part A for items and services fur14 nished prior to making such election. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Financial Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paula
J. Delaney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Paula J. Delaney
-------------------------
Paula J. Delaney
Chief Financial Officer



May 13, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Sunil Kumar, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of International Specialty Holdings Inc.;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;  4.The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  (b)Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.  Date:   March 30, 2005  /s/ Sunil KumarName:
  Sunil KumarTitle:
  President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2019103EN.01002301.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — RK v Council

(Case T-11/17) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Article 42c of the Staff Regulations - Placing official on leave in the interests of the service - Equal treatment - Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of age - Manifest error of assessment - Right to be heard - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Responsibility))

(2019/C 103/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RK (represented initially by: L. Levi and A. Tymen and subsequently by L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by A. Troupiotis and J. A. Steele, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the undated decision of the Council to place the applicant on leave in the interests of the service on the basis of Article 42c of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of 27 September 2016 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant and, secondly, compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders RK to bear 80 % of her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders RK to bear 80 % of her own costs.

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and 20 % of the costs incurred by RK. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and 20 % of the costs incurred by RK.

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.

---
#### Gerald Flynn et al., Respondents, v New York Life Insurance Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants appeal from that part of an order which denied their motion to dismiss portions of plaintiffs’ complaint on Statute of Limitations grounds. Insofar as appealed from, the order denied defendants’ motion to dismiss causes of action for breach of contract, negligence and fraud relating to six life insurance policies purchased by plaintiffs between 1957 and 1971. Some of these policies have lapsed, while the remainder were still in existence at the time this action was commenced. Plaintiff commenced this action against New York Life in January 1985 and against Charles White in June 1985.

We conclude that plaintiffs’ contract and negligence claims are time barred except as such claims relate to transactions that occurred within six years prior to commencement (CPLR 213 [2]; *see, Video Corp. v Flatto Assocs.,*58 NY2d 1026, 1028). Plaintiffs allege a series of wrongful acts that occurred over the lives of the policies and that, in some cases, continued up *923to and after the date of commencement. The wrongful acts allegedly perpetrated by defendants include their misapplication of "checkomatic” payments, and their payment of premiums on new policies by unauthorized loans against the cash values and accumulated dividends of policies in existence. We conclude that plaintiffs’ contract and negligence claims against defendants are timely insofar as they relate to premium and loan transactions that occurred after January or June 1979, respectively. On the other hand, those claims are time barred and must be dismissed insofar as they relate to premium and loan transactions and policy lapses that occurred prior to those dates.

With respect to plaintiffs’ fraud claim, triable questions of fact preclude a determination at this stage whether plaintiffs can be charged with discovery of the fraud more than two years prior to commencement (CPLR 203 [f]; 213 [8]). Thus, the court properly denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ fraud claim. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mastrella, J. — summary judgment.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
# C_2019238EN.01001502.xml

| 15.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Negru v EUIPO — Sky (SkyPrivate)

(Case T-837/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SkyPrivate - Earlier national word mark SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 238/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alexandru Negru (Iași, Romania) (represented by: initially I.-M. Iliescu, and subsequently by T. Protopopescu, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sky Ltd, formerly Sky plc, (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by K. Saliger, Solicitor, and P. Roberts QC)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 October 2017 (Case R 349/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Sky and Mr Negru.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Alexandru Negru to pay the costs, including those incurred by Sky Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Alexandru Negru to pay the costs, including those incurred by Sky Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.

---
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*HOWARD F.

*David V. DeRosa,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Christine Collyer,*special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 12, 2005

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 702 (AC 24281), is denied.
154 So. 917

#### Harold HARPER v. Wm. M. WALKER, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County.

6 Div. 416.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 19, 1934.

Wm. S. Pritchard, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.
# FCM DATA OCTOBER 2006
# C_2019399EN.01010301.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/103

---

Order of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Fastweb v Commission

(Case T-19/17) (1)

(2019/C 399/122)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26848-26849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1381-000]


Caledonia Generating, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 9, 2001.
    Caledonia Generating, L.L.C. (Caledonia) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Caledonia will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions at market-based rates. Caledonia also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Caledonia requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Caledonia.
    On April 27, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject of 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Caledonia should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).

[[Page 26849]]

    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Caledonia is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Caledonia's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 29, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12148 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal August 26, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending August 26, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for an Emerging Market risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12502]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3338]

State of Illinois

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on May 9, 
2001, I find that Carroll, Hancock, Henderson, Jo Daviess, Rock Island 
and Whiteside Counties in the State of Illinois constitute a disaster 
area due to damages caused by flooding occurring between April 18, 2001 
and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result 
of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on July 9, 
2001 and for economic injury until the close of business on February 
11, 2002 at the address listed below or other locally announced 
locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, 
One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties in Illinois may 
be filed until the specified date at the above location: Adams, Bureau, 
Henry, Lee, McDonough, Mercer, Ogle, Schuyler, Stephenson and Warren; 
Clark and Lewis Counties in the State of Missouri; and Grant and 
Lafayette Counties in the State of Wisconsin.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...............        6.625
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere............        3.312
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...............        8.000
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           4.000
   Available Elsewhere.....................................
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit          7.125
   Available Elsewhere.....................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           4.000
   Credit Available Elsewhere..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 333806. 
For economic injury the numbers assigned are 9L6600 for Illinois; 
9L6700 for Missouri; 9L6800 for Wisconsin. Iowa counties contiguous to 
the above named primary counties are not listed here because they have 
been previously declared.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 11, 2001.
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator For Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-12502 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```