alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Royal Union Holding Corporation for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010, Heidi Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Tammy Hardcastle, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Union Holding Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-KQ for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal Union Holding Corporation





Dated:  August 18, 2010





Royal Union Holding Corporation








By: /s/ Heidi Williams


Chief Executive Officer








By: /s/ Tammy Hardcastle


Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit 31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Thomas A. Janochoski, Vice
President & Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Great Northern Iron Ore
Properties, certify that: 1.      I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties; 2.      Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report; 4.      The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)      designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and b)      evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and c)       disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; 5.      The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors [or
persons performing the equivalent functions]: a)      all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and b)      any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date
     July 20, 2004
     By
     
     /s/   Thomas A. JanochoskiThomas A. Janochoski, Vice President & Secretary     and Chief Financial Officer


---
EXHIBIT 21.1

                       VillageEDOCS LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                       ---------------------------------


                                          State or Jurisdiction
     Name of Subsidiary                   of Incorporation          DBAs
     ------------------                   ----------------          ----

1.   Tailored Business Systems, Inc.      Georgia                   None.
2.   MessageVision, Inc.                  California                None.
3.   Phoenix Forms, Inc.                  Georgia                   Resolutions.
4.   Go Solutions, Inc.                   Florida                   None.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  27  LLC  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
March  31,  2009,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              May 12, 2009



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              May 12, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2246 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2246

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, as the ``Deputy 
   Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DEPUTY DONALD WILLIAM DURR, CORPORAL ZACH MOAK, AND 
PATROLMAN JAMES WHITE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Cherokee Street in Brookhaven, Mississippi, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Deputy Donald William Durr, Corporal 
Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Donald William Durr, Corporal Zach Moak, and Patrolman James White 
Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 19 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017283EN.01005102.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/51

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2017 — Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe v Parliament

(Case T-118/17 R)

((Interim proceedings - Institutional law - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation - Suspension of prefinancing - Obligation to provide a bank guarantee - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 283/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL (IDDE) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Plasschaert and É. Montens, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, seeking, first, the suspension of operation of Parliament Decision FINS-2017-28 of 15 December 2016 concerning the funding allocated to the applicant in so far as it suspends payment of prefinancing, second, exemption from the requirement to provide a bank guarantee as a condition for prefinancing and, third, an order that the Parliament pay to the applicant the prefinancing amount.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development 
(#1199).
    Date/Time: June 7-8, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
320 & 330, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Victor Santiago, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Foundation, 4210 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-4673.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 15, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12591 Filed 5-17-01 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our reportdated February 27, 2006 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Puget Energy, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Experts in such Registration Statement.



/s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Seattle, Washington

January 9, 2007

---
Case 7:07-cv-05802-KMK-GAY Document 5 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Pharmatech, Inc. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
their knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

Date: April 17, 2007

/s/ Lianqin Qu
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Lianqin Qu
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President


This Certification of the Chief Executive Officer is pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
145 So. 137

#### HARROD v. STATE.

4 Div. 642.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1932.

J. L. Giddens, of Troy, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

BOULDIN, J.

The appeal is from a decree in equity condemning an automobile, the property of respondent, J. G. Harrod, because of its use ip the transportation of prohibited liquors.

 The sole testimony in the record discloses that a police officer of the city of Troy found the car parked on the side of a street, between 8 and 9 o’clock at night, on the 18th of October, 1931; that Harrod was on the front seat of the ear asleep; that Mr. Spear was lying on the back seat asleep ; that a pint bottle about two-thirds full of whisky was found on the back seat behind Mr. Spear.

This evidence did not justify a condemnation of the car. There is no evidence that the car ever moved with the whisky, or that it was put in the car to be transported. Whose it was, when and where it was brought into the car, or how long the car had stood there, no .evidence discloses. That the parties were drinking in the car is easily inferable, but the whisky being there for such purpose was no cause for condemnation.

The ease is governed by Kelley v. State, 219 Ala. 415, 122 So. 638. See, also, Carter Guaranty Co. v. State, 214 Ala. 432, 108 So. 246.

We find in the record the following: “Note: By order of Respondent’s attorney, the Respondent’s testimony was not transcribed.”

If this were a case at law, this would indicate there was evidence before the trial court not presented to this court, and in such case the conclusion of the trial court on the evidence would not be reviewed. But this is. a proceeding in equity.

No evidence for respondent was noted on the submission. The only note of testimony appearing in the record is that of the state; and this notes only the testimony -of the state’s witnesses, which we have ■ reviewed above.

Proceedings of this character are governed by Equity Rule 75.

The trial court could consider only testimony .noted as required by this mandatory rule. Crews v. State ex rel. Patterson, Solicitor, 206 Ala. 101, 89 So. 205; Jones v. Moore, 215 Ala. 579, 112 So. 207.

It follows the decree must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
11-759-cv Heaphy v. Webster Central School District
**UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT** 
**SUMMARY ORDER**

**R ULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT**  **. C**  **ITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER J** **ANUARY 1,**  **2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY**  **F EDERAL**  **R ULE OF**  **A PPELLATE**  **P ROCEDURE**  **32.1 AND THIS COURT**  **’ S**  **L OCAL**  **R ULE**  **32.1.1. W** **HEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT ,**  **A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE F**  **EDERAL A**  **PPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE**  **( WITH THE NOTATION**  **“ SUMMARY ORDER**  **”). A**  **PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL**  **.** At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 1 for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan 2 United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of 3 New York, on the 14 thday of February, two thousand twelve. 4 5 PRESENT: BARRINGTON D. PARKER, 6 RICHARD C. WESLEY, 7 RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., 8 Circuit Judges

. 9 10 11 12 JENNIFER HEAPHY, 13 14 Plaintiff-Appellant , 15 16 -v.- 11-759-cv 17 18 WEBSTER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 19 20 Defendant-Appellee. 21 22 23 FOR APPELLANT: STEVEN E. LAPRADE (Christine A. Agola, on 24 the brief ), Christine A. Agola, PLLC, 25 Brighton, N.Y. 26 27 FOR APPELLEE: MICHAEL P. McCLAREN (Ryan G. Smith, on 28 the brief ), Webster Szanyi LLP, Buffalo, 29 N.Y. 30 31 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 32 Western District of New York (Larimer, J. ). 332 **UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED** 1
**AND DECREED**that the judgment of the United States District 2 Court for the Western District of New York be **AFFIRMED**
. 3 Appellant appeals from a judgment of the United States 4 District Court for the Western District of New York 5 (Larimer, J. ) that granted Defendant-Appellee Webster 6 Central School District’s (the “School District”) motion for 7 summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with 8 the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues 9 presented for review. 10 We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment 11 de novo and draw all factual inferences in favor of the non12 moving party. See Paneccasio v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc. , 13 532 F.3d 101, 107 (2d Cir. 2008). “Summary judgment is 14 appropriate only if there is no genuine dispute as to any 15 material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a 16 matter of law.” Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc. , 643 F.3d 17 352, 358 (2d Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). 18 For substantially the same reasons set forth in the 19 district court’s thorough and well-reasoned decision and 20 order, we conclude that the district court properly granted 21 summary judgment to the School District on Plaintiff- 223 Appellant Jennifer Heaphy’s claims of unlawful 1 discrimination and retaliation. 2 For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district 3 court is hereby **AFFIRMED**
. 4
5 FOR THE COURT: 6 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 7 8 9
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent 
Systems (1200).
    Date/Time: June 4-June 5, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1150, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ephriam Glinert, Deputy Division Director, 
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 292-8930.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review evaluate Computer and Social Systems proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 15, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12589 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 1 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 2 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 3 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 4 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 5 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 6 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 7 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 8 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 9 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 10 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 11 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 12 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 13 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 14 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 15 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 16 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 17 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 18 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 19 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 20 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 21 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE   Document 83    Filed 10/13/10   Page 22 of 22