alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Spiegel, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
No. 33-69937, 33-19663, 33-32385, 33-38478, 33-44780, 33-56200 and 33-51755 
on Form S-8 of Spiegel, Inc. of our reports dated February 10, 1999, relating 
to the consolidated balance sheets of Spiegel, Inc. and subsidiaries as of 
January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, and the related consolidated statements 
of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in 
the three-year period ended January 2, 1999 and related financial statement 
schedule, which reports appear in the January 2, 1999 annual report on 
Form 10-K of Spiegel, Inc.




                                                    /S/ KPMG LLP
                                                    ---------------



Chicago, Illinois


March 25, 1999 
------------------




















                                       59
HEDGE
Street

February 3, 2006
VIA EMAIL: secretai cftc.gov

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification: HedgeStreet® will not list any new Nonfarm
Payrolls Binary Contracts, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) and Part
40.6(a)

Dear Secretary Webb:

HedgeStreet, Inc, (“HedgeStreet”) hereby notifies the Commission that as of the
close of business Friday, February 3, 2006, HedgeStreet will not list for trading any
new Nonfarm Payrolls Binary Hedgelet contracts until further notice to the
Commission. The Nonfarm Payrolls Binary contract specifications are contained in
HedgeStreet Rule 12.69. All of the current Nonfarm Payrolls contracts currently
trading on HedgeStreet had a Last Trading Date of yesterday, Thursday, February 2,
2006. Therefore, there will be no open interest in any Nonfarm Payrolls contracts
as the Settlement Date for such contracts is today, Friday, February 3, 2006.

No substantive opposing views were expressed to HedgeStreet with respect to these
additions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to
contact Stephanie Ford by telephone at (650) 638-3511 or by email at

sford@hedgestreet.com.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

ce: Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet , Inc.

1825 S. Grant Street

‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com Fax: 650.638.3501
Case 1:07-cr-00482-RPP     Document 18      Filed 02/15/2008     Page 1 of 1
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

CIRILO ENCALADA (AND WIFE, MELVA 

ENCALADA) 

NOTICE OP THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OP 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

100 WALL STREET COMPANY, LLC, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 4465 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., WFP Tower B Co. L.P., WFP Tower B Co. 

GP Corp., WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and WFP Tower D Co. GP Corp. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in 

the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Amended Answer to 

Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October "s~ 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

r Wigiam J1Smit~L ~2~S-q137) 

ttorne$s for the Brookfield Parties 

Re~tor Street, 20fh Floor 

Ne~SJPork, NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 24 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.
§1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    Teresa M. Nilsen                  
|Teresa M. Nilsen, Chief Financial Officer
|Hennessy Advisors, Inc.                  

Date: December 5, 2008
**Exhibit** **32.1**




**CEO
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350***





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Shaun A. Burke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




/s/
      Shaun A. Burke




Shaun
      A.
      Burke


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





November 14,
      2006





*
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
154 So. 118

#### LIBERTY NAT. LIFE INS. CO. v. COLLIER et al.

8 Div. 523.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 16, 1933.

Raymond Murphy, of Florence, for petitioner.

Bradshaw & Barnett and Robert M. Hill, all of Florence, opposed.

BROWN, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals applies the doctrine of error without injury to the case as presented by the record, without stating the facts. In such case, ordinarily, as has been uniformly ruled here, the decision of that court cannot be reviewed. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902.

But where this doctrine has been applied under a misapprehension of the law, and this appears on the face of the opinion, this court will reverse the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for further consideration.

It is stated in the opinion that “The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence — hence we assume such a condition of same as to justify each ruling— none of same being inherently and incurably erroneous — to which exception was reserved.”

As was observed in Bolton v. Cuthbert, 132 Ala. 403, 31 So. 358, 359, 90 Am. St. Rep. 914, “While this court has gone very far in indulging this presumption to sustain the judgment below, where charges are involved,' it has never extended it to a case where evidence was improperly admitted or excluded,” citing Torrey v. Burney, 113 Ala. 496, 21 So. 348; Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Hulsey, 115 Ala. 193, 22 So. 854; DeLoach v. Robbins, 102 Ala. 288, 14 So. 777, 48 Am. St. Rep. 46; McDonald v. Wood, 118 Ala. 589, 24 So. 86, section 6438, Code of 1923.

This rule has been reaffirmed. See John Dodd Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Burt, 225 Ala. 438, 143 So. 832; Southern Hardware & Supply Co. v. Standard Equipment Co., 165 *4Ala. *582, 51 So. 789;*Berow v. Brown, 208 Ala. 476, 94 So. 772.

The writ of certiorari must therefore he granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed, and the cause remanded to that court for further consideration.

Writ granted; reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur.
September 8, 2006

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

el

Reference File # 2720.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Zh ll Wy 8-

Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby submits the
following change in trading hours for Monday, September | 1, 2006. (Times noted are Central
Time.):

CBOT Agricultural contracts: Open auction and e-cbot® (electronic) openings (as
applicable) will be rescheduled from 9:30 a.m. to 9:31 a.m., except for South
American Soybean futures, which will open at their usual time (9:00 a.m.).

This scheduling change is in connection with observances of the anniversary of the events of
September 11, 2001.

There were no opposing views concerning these changes.

The CBOT certifies that these changes conform with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.
Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

gLas
REINER ES
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 31-3 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 11 of 11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-5: OTS Nos. H-3746 and 04232]

Notice is hereby given that on May 10, 2001, the Director, Examination Policy, Office of Thrift Supervision, or his designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of Globe Homestead Federal Savings Association, Metairie, Louisiana, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 225 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 500, Irving, Texas 75062-2326.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision,

Nadine Y. Washington,

Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12264  Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 14-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 5
# C_2019044EN.01003201.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2018 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Bee-Fee Group (LV POWER ENERGY DRINK)

(Case T-372/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark LV POWER ENERGY DRINK - Earlier EU figurative mark LV - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) - Earlier decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier trade mark))

(2019/C 44/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bee-Fee Group Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: L. Karpierz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2017 (Case R 906/2016-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Louis Vuitton Malletier and Bee-Fee Group.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 March 2017 (Case R 906/2016-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 March 2017 (Case R 906/2016-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Louis Vuitton Malletier; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Louis Vuitton Malletier;

| 3. | Orders Bee-Fee Group Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Louis Vuitton Malletier. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Bee-Fee Group Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Louis Vuitton Malletier.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-12 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### Peter S. COLLORAFI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

No. CV 83-1034.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

Dec. 2, 1983.

*507Adrienne L. Flipse, Williston Park, N.Y., for plaintiffs.

Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y., Thomas B. Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., James M. Shaker, Tax Div., Washington, D.C. (of counsel), for defendant.

*Memorandum of Decision and Order*

MISHLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that they are not subject to wage withholding by the Internal Revenue Service. The government moves to dismiss primarily on the ground that controversies over federal taxes are expressly excluded from the Declaratory Judgment Act. The Act provides:

> In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction, *except with respect to Federal Taxes*... any court of the United States ... may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party...

28 U.S.C. § 2201 (emphasis added)

Plaintiffs ignore the underlined phrase which exempts from the act controversies over federal taxes. In addition, the Supreme Court specifically addressed the exemption of federal taxes from the act in *Bob Jones University v. Simon,*416 U.S. 725, 732 n. 7, 94 S.Ct. 2038, 2045 n. 7, 40 L.Ed.2d 496 (1974). *See also*Wright, *Law of Federal Courts*672 (4th ed. 1983).

We find this action wholly without merit. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, for the reasons stated in CV 83-1033 which we also decide today, we award the government reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. We again question the competence of plaintiff’s attorney in bringing this action. In this case, however, we find that all the plaintiffs were parties to the action and they, and Ms. Flipse, are all jointly and severally liable for the government’s reasonable costs, expenses and attorney’s fees. We grant the motion by plaintiffs to allow Gerald R. Ladd, Vincent J. Cornell, Ross Tudisco, Palmer B. Rott, Christian Rampin, Robert V. McLaughlin, Roland DuBois, Joseph DeCecca, Joseph Hicks, Thomas Borland, Mark Shurdom, Harold Alleton, David Delaney, Gary Sneath to intervene as additional plaintiffs. These intervenors are also jointly and severally liable for the government’s reasonable costs and expenses including attorney’s fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The attorney for the government shall submit an affidavit calculating the costs and expenses including the hours and the hourly rate spent in preparation of this case.

SO ORDERED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs together with costs and attorney’s fees when determined by the court.
# C_2005212EN.01000701.xml

| 31.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/7

---

Communication in accordance with Article 12(5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

(2005/C 212/03)

Binding Tariff Information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Amendments to the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC0892 — report of the 34th Session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION

(34th SESSION OF THE HSC IN SEPTEMBER 2004) DOC. NC0892

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 42.02 Subheading Explanatory Notes | IJ/5 |
| --- | --- |
| 44.18 | IJ/4 |
| 66.01 | IJ/6 |
| 7102.21,-29 | IJ/6 |
| 72.13 | IJ/6 |
| Chapter 84 General | IJ/6 |
| 84.05 | IJ/6 |
| 84.14 | IJ/7 |
| 84.15 | IJ/7, IJ/9 |
| 84.18 | IJ/9 |
| 84.25 | IJ/6 |
| 84.31 | IJ/6 |
| 84.33 | IJ/6 |
| 84.48 | IJ/7 |
| 84.65 | IJ/6 |
| 85.31 | IJ/7 |
| 90.07 | IJ/7 |
| 91.03 | IJ/6 |
| 95.03 | IJ/6 |
| 97.04 | IJ/6 |

42.02 Subheading Explanatory Notes

IJ/5

44.18

IJ/4

66.01

IJ/6

7102.21,-29

IJ/6

72.13

IJ/6

Chapter 84 General

IJ/6

84.05

IJ/6

84.14

IJ/7

84.15

IJ/7, IJ/9

84.18

IJ/9

84.25

IJ/6

84.31

IJ/6

84.33

IJ/6

84.48

IJ/7

84.65

IJ/6

85.31

IJ/7

90.07

IJ/7

91.03

IJ/6

95.03

IJ/6

97.04

IJ/6

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

| 3824.90/12 | IJ/1 |
| --- | --- |
| 4202.21/1 | IJ/2 |
| 4202.91/1 | IJ/2 |
| 4418.30/2 | IJ/3 |

3824.90/12

IJ/1

4202.21/1

IJ/2

4202.91/1

IJ/2

4418.30/2

IJ/3

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm

---
Case 1:07-cv-05797-SHS     Document 7      Filed 08/17/2007     Page 1 of 1