alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Applications for TIFIA Credit Assistance

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability of funds inviting applications for 
credit assistance for major surface transportation projects.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, the Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA) published a notice announcing the availability of 
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) 
assistance and inviting applicants to submit applications for credit 
assistance for major surface transportation projects. The TIFIA 
authorizes the Department of Transportation (DOT) to provide credit 
assistance in the form of secured (direct) loans, lines of credit, and 
loan guarantees to public and private sponsors of eligible surface 
transportation projects. Highway, passenger rail, transit, and 
``intermodal'' projects (including intelligent transportation systems) 
may receive credit assistance under the TIFIA. Interested persons 
should review the FHWA Notice in today's Federal Register for further 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Joanne McGowan, Office of 
Passenger and Freight Services, Freight Program Division, (202) 493-
6390.

(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 181-189; 49 CFR 1.49)

    Issued on: May 8, 2001.
S. Mark Lindsey,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-12547 Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Effective Date: 3.29.1911.6.20

303940430 v2303940430 v3

DW SEF LLC

SWAP EXECUTION FACILITY

RULES
(e) Each Participant shall notify the Market Regulation Team promptly upon becoming aware

of:

(i) any unauthorized disclosure or use of any User ID assigned to such Participant

or any of its Authorized Users or Trading Customers and of any other reason for

deactivating a User ID assigned to such Participant or any of its Authorized

Users or Trading Customers;

(ii) any unauthorized disclosure or use of any User ID assigned to an Authorized

User of such Participant and of any other reason for deactivating a User ID

assigned to an Authorized User of such Participant;

(iii) any unauthorized access to the SEF by any Person using a User ID assigned to

such Participant or any of its Authorized Users; or

(iv) any unauthorized access to the SEF by any Person using a User ID assigned to

an Authorized User of such Participant. 416. Designated Contact

Each Participant shall (a) identify in writing to the Company one or more Designated Contacts as

the Company may determine, and (b) ensure that at least one of its Designated Contacts is

available by telephone at any time one of its Authorized Users is accessing the SEF. 417. Message Traffic

The Company may at any time restrict or establish utilization fees in respect of Message Traffic, either with respect to all or any Participants, Authorized Users and/or Trading Customers in

order to safeguard the security or operations of the SEF, or to preserve market integrity, fair and

orderly trading, or if otherwise in the public interest. 418. [Reserved]

419. Post-Trade Name Give-Ups

For all Required Transactions, no Participant shall directly or indirectly, including through a

third-party service provider, disclose the identity of a counterparty to a Swap that is executed

anonymously and intended to be cleared; provided that, if the Swap (or Swap component(s) of a

Package Transaction) is not intended to be cleared, disclosing the identity of a counterparty

shall not violate this Rule 419.

52

303940430 v2303940430 v3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat S.A. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such
officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Date: March 8, 2011 |  | /S/ DAVID
MCGLADE                    
|                    |  | David McGlade Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund VI, L.P., Series 9 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 3, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 1.4


                                     Quebec [LOGO]



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                             COMPANIES ACT, PART IA
                               (R.S.Q. CHAP. C-38)




                           I hereby attest that


                           QUEBECOR MEDIA INC.


                           has amended its articles on DECEMBER 5, 2003,
                           pursuant to Part IA of the Companies Act, as
                           indicated in the attached articles of amendment.







FILED IN THE REGISTER ON DECEMBER 5, 2003
UNDER REGISTRATION NO. 1149501992

                                                                        [signed]
                                     Inspector General of Financial Institutions

[stamp of the
Inspector General of
Financial Institutions
Quebec]

E530I12M9910DA


<PAGE>


Quebec [LOGO]
Inspector General of
Financial Institutions                             Form 5
                                                   ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                                   Companies Act, R.S.Q. c. c-38
                                                   Part 1A

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1   Company Name

         Quebecor Media Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2   |_|  Petition submitted under section 123.140 ff. of the Companies Act

3   The articles of the Company are amended as follows:

The Common Shares of the Company's share capital are hereby consolidated on the basis of seventy (70)
issued and outstanding Common Shares prior to the consolidation for one (1) issued and outstanding
Common Share after consolidation, so that the 8,652,196,704 issued and outstanding Common Shares of
the Company, as of the date hereof, are consolidated into 123,602,807 issued and outstanding Common
Shares of the Company.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.   Date of coming into force if different from date   5.  Name of company (or designation no.) prior to
     of filing (see instructions)                           the amendment if different from that appearing
                                                            in box 1:
                         N/A                                                    N/A

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

If more space is required, provide an attachment in 2 copies.


Signature of the authorized director:   [signed]




---------------------------------------
For official use only:

Gouvernement du Quebec
        filed on
           December 5, 2003
Inspector General of
Financial Institutions
---------------------------------------
142 So. 659

#### FERGUSON v. STATE.

7 Div. 114.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 10, 1932.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, J.

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to suffer death.

The deceased, Hensley Joshua Henderson, was a huckster engaged in peddling milk, butter, and vegetables, traveling a regular route.

The evidence is without dispute that the defendant and another lay in wait on the public highway for the purpose of robbing Henderson, the appellant being armed with a deadly weapon, and, if necessary to accomplish the robbery, to kill him. In carrying out this purpose, appellant shot and killed Henderson. The appellant not only made a confession to the sheriff and his deputies soon after his arrest, but testified fully on the trial, giving in detail the circumstances leading up to the killing, admitting the purpose and effort to rob, the commission of the robbery, and the intentional shooting of Henderson.

Mrs. Henderson, the wife of the deceased, testified as a witness in behalf of the state that the name of the deceased was Hensley Joshua Henderson; that he was commonly called “Josh”; that he was dead; that he died on the 30th day of June, 1931, about 6 o’clock in the evening. She was then asked by the solicitor: “How old was your husband?” The defendant objected to this question on the ground that it called for immaterial, illegal, and incompetent testimony. The objection was overruled and the defendant excepted. The witness answered: “Nearly 75.” The defendant moved to exclude the answer, and this motion was overruled. These rulings were free from error; the testimony went to the identity of the deceased. This is the only exception reserved on the record.

The jury, by their verdict, after hearing the evidence, fixed the degree of the crime at murder in the first degree, and the punishment at death. This was clearly justified by the evidence. Patterson v. State, 191 Ala. 16, 67 So. 997, Ann. Cas. 1916C, 968.

The judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except KNIGHT, J., not sitting.
Exhibit
31.2





Section
302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer




I,
Theresa Carlise, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Liberty Capital Asset
Management, Inc.





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances   under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;





4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly  report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)   presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and





b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.





6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material
weaknesses.





Date:
February 17, 2010





/s/
Theresa Carlise


Theresa
Carlise


Chief
Financial Officer






---
512 A.2d 693

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Richard TRADER, Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 12, 1986.

Filed July 14, 1986.

*584Joseph J. Mittleman, Assistant District Attorney, Media, for Com., appellant.

Carole Kafrissen, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before WICKERSHAM, WIEAND and POPOVICH, JJ.

WIEAND, Judge:

On December 19, 1984, at or about 8:10 p.m., a burglar alarm was activated at Saul Levy’s Furniture Warehouse in the City of Chester, Delaware County. Responding police found Richard Trader in a crouched position in an adjoining, vacant building. Trader had a flashlight in his possession but was not carrying burglary tools. Although a hole had been forced in the wall between the vacant building and the warehouse, neither plaster dust nor wooden splinters were found on Trader’s clothing. After the Commonwealth had proven these facts, the trial court sustained a defense demurrer to charges of criminal trespass and attempted burglary. Mere presence at the scene of a crime, the trial court held, was insufficient to prove guilt.

The sustaining of Trader’s demurrer was a determination that as a matter of law the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction. This was an acquittal. Because reversal would require a second trial in violation of the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution, an appeal by the Commonwealth can serve no proper purpose and, therefore, is barred. *Smalis v. Pennsylvania,*476 U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1745, 90 L.Ed.2d 116, (1986). *585See also: *United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.,*430 U.S. 564, 97 S.Ct. 1349, 51 L.Ed.2d 642 (1977). The Commonwealth’s appeal in the instant case, therefore, must be quashed.

Appeal quashed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7324
STANLEY SHANE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of Correction; LYNN PHILLIPS, Director of Prisons; MARCUS HUGHES, Unit Superintendent; WADE HATLEY, Assistant Unit Superintendent; TERRY GETMAN, Unit Sergeant; STEVE COOKE, Unit Mailroom Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-63-1-MU) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Shane Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Freeman , No. CA-96-63-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1996). We modify the order to reflect that the dismissal was without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# C_2018341EN.01001402.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Quadri di Cardano v Commission

(Case T-273/17) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the contract staff — Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Ten-year reference period - Nationality of the State of employment - Residence in the State of employment - Duties in an international organisation - Temporary employment contract))

(2018/C 341/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alessandro Quadri di Cardano (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, then N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and M. Mensi initially, then T. Bohr and L. Radu Bouyon, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision dated 19 July 2016 of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO), in so far as it refuses to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance on his entry into the service of INEA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Alessandro Quadri di Cardano to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Alessandro Quadri di Cardano to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

---
DOCSNY-271479v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

SONIA GARCIA AND CHRISTIAN CHAVEZ, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

90 CHURCH STREET 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05358-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05358-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Samuel Thompson, Petitioner, v General Motors Corporation et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The order of the Commissioner finding no discrimination with respect to the disciplinary actions taken against petitioner and his final discharge is supported by substantial evidence *(see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). The Administrative Law Judge did not err in declining to consider petitioner’s proffered evidence of respondent’s alleged disparate disciplinary action against its black employees. The statistics did not "rest on a sufficient data base” and they were not "adjusted to reflect various factors *945which may influence the reliability of the numbers” *(Matter of CUNY*— Hostos *Community Coll, v State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*59 NY2d 69, 78). Further, the Administrative Law Judge did not err in permitting proof with respect to the disciplinary action taken against petitioner in the five-year period preceding his discharge. (Original proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 and CPLR art 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.) Present-Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. RP01-314-001]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Tariff Filing

May 16, 2001
    Take notice that on May 11, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the compliance tariff 
sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to become effective May 1, 
2001.
    Williston Basin states that on April 27, 2001, the Commission 
issued its ``Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets, Subject to 
Refund and Conditions and Denying Request for Waiver, (Order)'' in the 
above referenced docket. That Order accepted Williston Basin's proposed 
park and loan service subject to Williston Basin making a compliance 
filing to address the conditions of the Order. The instant filing is 
being made in compliance with the provisions of that Order.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/
efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12779 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M