alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The
  accompanying Rimage Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
  ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.                                                

|                 |  |                          
|---------------- |  | -------------------------
|March 15,
  2006 |  | /s/
  Bernard P. Aldrich 
|                 |  | Chief
  Executive Officer
|                 |  |                          
|                 |  | /s/
  Robert M. Wolf     
|                 |  | Chief
  Financial Officer

53

---
January 13, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2621.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of May 2006 Ten Year U.S. Treasury Note Options.
This option contract ordinarily would be authorized for trading later in January 2006. Due to
customer demand, the Exchange intends to list this contract earlier than usual (i-e., the business
day after the Commission’s receipt of this filing).
This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 32





Certification of Principal and Financial Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Vineyard, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert DeMate, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to International Vineyard, Inc., and will be retained by International Vineyard, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Robert DeMateRobert DeMate

President, Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2010
#### The Platte Valley Bank v. Harding.

1. Niel tiel corporation. The maker of a note which is in terms payable to a bank, cannot, in an action brought by it thereon,'raise the question of its incorporation. He is estopped to deny it.

The Platte Valley Bank sued Harding in the District Court for Otoe county, upon a promissory note made by him, whereby he promised to pay to “The Platte Valley Bank or order, $400, etc.” The plaintiff claimed to be incorporated by an act of the legislature of the Territory of Nebraska. The defendant denied that it was incorporated, because, he insisted, that the alleged act of incorporation conflicted with an act of Congress entitled “An act to disapprove and annul certain acts of the Territorial Legislature of Florida, and for other purposes.”

*Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled :*

That no act of the Territorial Legislature of any of the Territories of the United ¡States incorporating any bank or any institution with banking powers or privileges, here-after to be passed, shall have any force or effect whatever until approved and confirmed by Congress.

Judgment was given for the plaintiff, and the defendants brought the case here by petition in error.

*J. M.*Woolworth, for plaintiff in error.

*J. F. Kinney,*contra.

The Court,

by Hall Ch. J.,

held that the question of the incorporation of the bank could not be raised in this cause, because the defendants were estopped to deny the same.

Judgment affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center (CFWSC) 
-  Science 

# Evapotranspiration and Carbon Flux

-  Home 
-    Science    -  Coastal Hydrology 
  -  Droughts, Floods, and Hurricanes 
  -  Evapotranspiration and Carbon Flux 
  -  Hydrogeology and Geophysics 
  -  Hydrologic Mapping and Tools 
  -  Hydrologic Modeling and Analysis 
  -  Science Topics 
  -  Water Quality 
  -  Water Use 
-  Data 
-  Maps 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  Software 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Evapotranspiration is the rate of transport of water vapor from the earth’s surface into the atmosphere. Evapotranspiration can be computed as reference, potential, or actual evapotranspiration.   Reference evapotranspiration is that from a grass surface that is well-watered.  Potential evapotranspiration is that from a surface that has unlimited water (such as a lake). 

### Actual Evapotranspiration

Actual evapotranspiration is that which occurs under field conditions, such as a crop-covered field.

Learn more

### Reference and Potential ET

Reference evapotranspiration is that from a grass surface that is well-watered.  Potential evapotranspiration is that from a surface that has unlimited water (such as a lake). 

Download Data

### Evapotranspiration Network

USGS Florida Evapotranspiration Network is a network of 15 data collection sites representing various land cover types.

Learn more

## Browse Topics

Actual Evapotranspiration for Florida

Evapotranspiration and Carbon-Flux Network

Reference and Potential Evapotranspiration

link

February 14, 2019

####                 Actual Evapotranspiration for Florida              

Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center (CFWSC)

link

February 14, 2019

####   Actual Evapotranspiration for Florida

Learn More

link

February 12, 2019

####                 Reference and Potential Evapotranspiration              

Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center (CFWSC)

link

February 12, 2019

####   Reference and Potential Evapotranspiration

Learn More

link

February 5, 2019

####                 Evapotranspiration and Carbon-Flux Network              

Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center (CFWSC)

link

February 5, 2019

####   Evapotranspiration and Carbon-Flux Network

Learn More
# C_2019025EN.01004102.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — DRH Licensing & Managing v EUIPO — Merck (Flexagil)

(Case T-831/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Flexagil - Genuine use of the mark - Article 18(1), second subparagraph,(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character))

(2019/C 25/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DRH Licensing & Managing AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 October 2017 (Case R 2043/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between DRH Licensing & Managing and Merck.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DRH Licensing & Managing AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DRH Licensing & Managing AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
© 2021 KOR Financial, Inc.

Position Calculation Policy

2021-04-01
Position Calculation Policy 1

Table of Contents

Table of Contents........................................................................................................................ 1

History........................................................................................................................................ 2

1. Overview.............................................................................................................................. 3

Appendix A: Exhibits ................................................................................................................... 4
Position Calculation Policy 2

History

Date Description of change Sections Updated

2021-04-01 Original document

Last Review Date

2021-09-01
Position Calculation Policy 3

1. Overview

Reference applicable KOR SDR or SBSDR Rulebook section: "Positions”.

KOR TR

1

shall calculate aggregated views of data in KOR TR. These views will include the gross and net notional 

amount, by leg, in the reported currency, for all open swaps. KOR TR shall not convert currencies or aggregate 

across currencies. These aggregated views are available by reporting counterparty LEI(s) by one or more of the 

following attributes:

a. Asset class

b. UPI

c. Underlying instrument

d. Counterparty

References CFTC Rule §49.12 and 49.2(a).

References SEC Rule §240.13n-5(b)(2).

1 Trade Repository (TR) is an all-encompassing term that includes Swap Data Repository (SDR) and Security Based Swap 

Data Repository (SBSDR) for which KOR Reporting Inc. is registered.
Position Calculation Policy 4

2. Appendix A: Exhibits

Regulator Exhibit # Exhibit Description

CFTC KK Attach as Exhibit KK policies and procedures relating to the Applicant's 

calculation of positions.

SEC DD Attach as Exhibit DD policies and procedures relating to the applicant's 

calculation of positions.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Roger A. Parker, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Amber Resources
Company of Colorado;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

         (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:  October 13, 2005


/s/ Roger A. Parker
Roger A. Parker
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ZST Digital Networks, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Zhong BoZhong
      BoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)May
      14, 2010/s/ John ChenJohn
      ChenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)May
      14, 2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of ZST Digital
Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy N. INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 8, 2013.

Decided: May 22, 2013.

Leroy N. Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy N. Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated *184by the district court. *See United States v. Ingram,*No. 3:05-cr-00500-HEH-l (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT      21**

| Name                of Subsidiary                        |   | Jurisdiction |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
|                                                     |   |         |
| Education                Empowerment Funding, LLC        |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| Embark                Corp.                              |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| Embark                Online, Inc                        |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| Goto                College Holdings Inc.                |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| Iempower,                Inc. (d/b/a MyRichUncleTM) |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                ABS LLC                               |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                Funding SPV, Inc.                     |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                Lending, Inc.                         |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                Lending Holdco, LLC                   |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                Originations, Inc.                    |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| MRU                Universal Guaranty Agency, Inc.       |   | Delaware     |
|                                                     |   |         |
| Student                Services SPV, Inc.                |   | Delaware     |

----
Ledger Holdings Inc

December 9, 2020

VIA COMMISSION PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington,	D.C.		20581

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments [Reg. 40.6(d))]

LedgerX LLC Submission No. 20-14

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC (“LedgerX”) hereby submits to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and 

Commission Regulation 40.6(d), this weekly notification following rule amendments made 

effective during the week of November 30, 2020. The attached Amendment became effective on

December 2, 2020. 

LedgerX’s trading fees have been revised. The new fee schedule is attached hereto as Appendix A. 

A redline of the changes to the fee schedule are reflected in Appendix B attached hereto. 

This Amendment is consistent with CFTC Core Principles because this fee schedule sets forth fees 

that are equitable, reasonable, and do not unfairly discriminate in the manner in which LedgerX 

will assess its fees in a clear and transparent way.

LedgerX certifies that the changes comply with the CEA and Commission Regulations thereunder. 

LedgerX additionally certifies that it has concurrently posted a copy of this submission letter and 

the attachment hereto on LedgerX’s website at https://ledgerx.com/. LedgerX is not aware of any

substantive opposing views to the Amendment.

Please contact the undersigned at glenn@ledgerx.com if you have any questions or you would 

otherwise like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Glenn Chaleff

Chief Compliance Officer

LedgerX LLC
Ledger Holdings Inc

Appendix A

LedgerX Fee Schedule

Trading Fees

Day-Ahead Bitcoin Minis Swap

Fees: $0.05/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Bitcoin Mini Futures

Fees: $0.05/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Bitcoin Mini Options

Fees: $0.15/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Please note, the fee can never be higher than 20% of the option premium per contract. If $0.15 is 

more than 20% of the option premium per contract, the fee will be 20% of the option premium 

per contract.

Withdrawal Fees

A USD withdrawal fee of .001 BTC will be charged to the Participant per BTC withdrawal
Ledger Holdings Inc

Appendix B

LedgerX Fee Schedule

Trading Fees

Day-Ahead Bitcoin Minis Swap

Fees: $0.05/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Bitcoin Mini Futures

Fees: $0.05/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Bitcoin Mini Options

Fees: $0.150/contract. 1 contract = 0.01 BTC

Please note, the fee can never be higher than 20% of the option premium per contract. If $0.10 is 

more than 20% of the option premium per contract, the fee will be 20% of the option premium 

per contract.

Liquidity Maker Fee Model

Liquidity Makers (Providers) Executing in the Customer Limit Order Book

• A Liquidity Provider shall not be charged trading fees for trades executed in the Customer Limit 

Order Book

• Liquidity Takers will pay fees in accordance with the LedgerX Fee Schedule (above)

Withdrawal Fees

A USD withdrawal fee of .001 BTC will be charged to the Participant per BTC withdrawal