alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Songzai International Holding Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Yvonne Zhang, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
  /s/
      Yvonne ZhangYvonne
      Zhang
              Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
              April
      10, 2008
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Chesapeake Bay Activities 

#           Partners        

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

USGS Chesapeake studies collaborate with multiple science partners including Federal, State, and local governments; non-governmental agencies; and academic partners. The USGS coordinates science activities through the Chesapeake Bay Program and works with stakeholders in the CBP to apply findings to inform restoration and conservation decisions.

Listing of Chesapeake Activities Partners 

#### Air Resources Laboratory (NOAA)

#### Chesapeake Bay Program

#### District of Columbia (DC) - Department of Energy & Environment

#### Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA)

#### Maryland Sea Grant Program

#### National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)

#### National Park Service (NPS)

#### Old Dominion University (ODU)

#### Old Dominion University (ODU) - Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography

#### Old Dominion University (ODU) - Department of Biological Sciences

#### Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR)

#### Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP)

#### Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission

#### Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)

#### State Fish and Wildlife Agencies

#### Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC)

#### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program

#### U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

#### U.S. Forest Service (USFS)

#### University of Maryland

#### University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC)

#### University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES)

#### Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VADCR)

#### Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ)

#### Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://derivs.ftx.us/

1

August 4, 2022

VIA COMMISSION PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Commission Regulation 40.6(a) – Rule Certification

LedgerX LLC Submission No. 22-12

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC (d/b/a FTX US Derivatives) (the “Company”) hereby notifies the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 5c(c) of 

the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and Commission Regulation 40.6(a), that it is 

certifying the attached amendments to its Participant Agreement, which incorporates 

contractual acceptance of the newly separated standalone Rulebooks for the Company’s 

Designated Contract Market (“DCM”), Swap Execution Facility (“SEF”), and Derivatives 

Clearing Organization (“DCO”). The attached amendments will become effective on 

August 18, 2022. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the changes and amendments, and their 

compliance with applicable provisions of the CEA, including the Core Principles and the 

Commission’s Regulations, is as follows. For exchange related activities, these changes clarify 

Participants’ contractual acceptance of the newly divided DCM Rulebook and SEF Rulebook, 

as applicable to the Participant’s activities. This is consistent with DCM Core Principle 2 and 

SEF Core Principle 2, which require the Company to establish, monitor, and enforce 

compliance with the Company’s rules. For clearing related activities of Participants, including 

Kalshi Participants, these changes clarify the contractual acceptance of the newly divided DCO 

Rulebook, consistent with DCO Core Principle H which requires the Company to maintain 

adequate arrangements for the effective monitoring and enforcement of compliance with the 

rules of the DCO.

The above-referenced changes are identical to the July 28, 2022 revisions which have 

been withdrawn. These changes are being re-certified to coordinate with the related Rulebook 

filings.

The changes and amendments to the Participant Agreement are reflected in a redlined 

copy designated as Appendix A. The final version of the revised Participant Agreement is 

attached at Appendix B. 

The Company certifies that the above changes and amendments comply with the CEA 

and Commission Regulations thereunder. The Company additionally certifies that it has 

concurrently posted a copy of this submission letter and the attachments hereto on the Company 
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

https://derivs.ftx.us/

2

website at https://derivs.ftx.us. The Company is not aware of any or substantive opposing 

views to the changes and amendments.

Please contact the undersigned at brian@ftx.us if you have any questions or you would 

otherwise like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Brian G. Mulherin

General Counsel, FTX US Derivatives
UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O
. 97-786
P A T RI CK F. D'A M I CO , A PP EL L ANT ,

V
. ANTHONY J. P RI NCI PI , S EC RE T A RY O F V ET ER A N S A FF A I RS , A PPEL L EE
.

Be fore HOL DAWAY, I VERS, and GREENE, Judges

.

O R D E R
I n an opinion dated Marc h 23, 1999, the Court aff irmed the F ebrua

ry 27, 1997, decision of the B o ar d o f V e te r an s ' A p p e a ls ( B V A ) th a t c o n c lu d e d th a t t h e a p p e ll an t h a d

f a il e d to s u b mi t n ew and materia l e vidence to r eopen a previously disallowed claim for VA benef its. D'A mi c o v . W

est , 12 Vet.App. 264 ( 1999). The appellant subsequently perf ecte d an appe al to the United States Court of Appe als for the Fe dera l Circuit (Fe dera l Circuit). On April 7, 2000, the Fe dera l Circ uit remande d this appeal in order for the Court to addre ss c erta in que stions re g arding the application of the " new and mater ial" sta

ndard of 38 U.S.C. § 5108 and the duty to assist. D'A mi c o v . W

est , 209 F.3d 1322 (F ed. Cir. 2000). On April 16, 2001, the C ourt vacated t he BVA de cision and re manded the matter in light of the e nactment of the Vete rans Claims Assistance A ct of 2000 (VCAA), Pub. L . No. 106- 475, 114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000). D'Amico v. Principi , 14 Ve t.A pp . 3 21 (2 00 1) . T he a

pp e lla nt, throug h counsel, subseque ntly filed an application for attorney fee s and expenses under the Equal Acc ess to J ustice Ac t (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B ).
I n th is c a se , th e a

pp e lla nt' s cla im was re mand e d s ole ly in l ig ht o f t

he VC AA ' s e na c tme nt. B e c a us e the re mand

thu s w a s n ot p re dic a te d u po n a dmi nis tr a tiv e e rr or , th e a ppell ant is n ot a preva iling party under the merits theory

. See V aughn v. Principi , 15 Vet.App. 277, 279 (2001) ( per curiam order) , appeal dock eted, No

. 02 -7 01 9 (F e d. Cir

. No v. 29 , 2 001) ; Sumner v . Principi , 15 Vet.App. 256, 264-65 (2001) (en ba nc), appeal dock

eted , No. 02-7082 (F ed. Cir. Dec . 27, 2001). Mo re ov e r, the c ata ly st and ine vit a ble -v ic tor y te sts are no t via

ble me ans to attai n p re va ili ng -p a rt y status. See V

aughn, supra; Thayer v. Principi , 15 Vet.App. 204, 211 (2001), appeal dock eted , No. 02-7012 (F ed. Cir. Nov. 29, 2001). A ccor dingly , the appe llant cannot be c onsidered a preva il ing party for EA J A purposes. Up on c on sid e ratio n o f t

he fo re g oin g , it

is ORDERED the appe llant's EA J A application is DENI ED.
DA TE D: July

9, 20 02 PER CU RI AM

.
# C_2017178EN.01002701.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/27

---

Action brought on 27 March 2017 — Boehringer Ingelheim International v Commission

(Case T-191/17)

(2017/C 178/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission Implementing Decision of 19 January 2017 C(2017)379(final); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Implementing Decision of 19 January 2017 C(2017)379(final);

| — | state that the effects of this Commission Implementing Decision remain in force until the European Commission has adopted a new decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

state that the effects of this Commission Implementing Decision remain in force until the European Commission has adopted a new decision; and

| — | order the European Commission to pay its own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2017 constitutes a violation of Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, read in conjunction with Article 11 of Directive 2001/83/EC and the Notice to Applicants. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2017 constitutes a violation of Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, read in conjunction with Article 11 of Directive 2001/83/EC and the Notice to Applicants.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2017 is not consistent with the application of the relevant provisions and guidelines and regulatory practice in other cases and thus constitutes a violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination and results in a distortion of the level playing field. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2017 is not consistent with the application of the relevant provisions and guidelines and regulatory practice in other cases and thus constitutes a violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination and results in a distortion of the level playing field.

---
# C_2018427EN.01006701.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/67

---

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — SC v Eulex Kosovo

(Case T-242/17) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Arbitration clause - Common foreign and security policy - Staff of EU international missions - Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts - Internal competition - Impartiality of the selection board - Non-renewal of a fixed term contract - Partial reclassification of the action - Contractual liability - Non-contractual liability - Material and non-material harm - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2018/C 427/89)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SC (represented by: L. Moro and A. Kunst, lawyers)

Defendant: Eulex Kosovo (represented by: E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application for the internal competition organised by Eulex Kosovo in 2016 for the position of prosecutor (EK 30077) and of the decision of that mission not to renew her fixed-term contract, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the material and non-material harm that the applicant allegedly sustained as a result of the infringement by Eulex Kosovo of its non-contractual obligations and, thirdly, under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that Eulex Kosovo be ordered to pay compensation for breach of its contractual obligations

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | SC is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

SC is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27495-27496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12438]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy


National Petroleum Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Petroleum 
Council. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463,86 Stat. 
770) requires notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Wednesday, June 6, 2001, 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The Ritz Carlton,Ballroom Salon I, 1150 22nd Street, 
NW.,Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margie D. Biggerstaff, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 202/
586-3867.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Purpose of the Committee: To provide advice, 
information, and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters 
relating to oil and gas or the oil and gas industry.

Tentative Agenda

--Call to order and introductory remarks by Archie W. Dunham, Chair 
of the NPC.
--Remarks by the Honorable Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy 
(invited).
--Consideration of the proposed final report of the NPC Committee on 
Critical Infrastructure Protection.
--Administrative matters.
--Discussion of any other business properly brought before the NPC.
--Public comment (10-minute rule).
--Adjournment.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
chairperson of the Council is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any 
member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the 
Council will be permitted to do so, either before or after the meeting. 
Members of the public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Margie D. Biggerstaff at the address or 
telephone

[[Page 27496]]

number listed above. Requests must be received at least five days prior 
to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation on the agenda. This notice is being published less than 15 
days before the date of the meeting due to the late resolution of 
programmatic issues.
    Transcripts: Available for public review and copying at the Public 
Reading Room, Room IE-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 am and 4 pm, Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on May 11, 2001.
Belinda Hood,
Acting Deputy Committee Advisory Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12438 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT

55 WATER STREET, 19th FLOOR

NEW YORK, NY 10041-0099

December 21, 2017

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for FOIA Matters

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

1155 21st Street, NW Room 2205 

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Dear Staff:

Pursuant to Section 145.9 of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“Commission”) Regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, DTCC Data 

Repository (U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) requests that the following DDR policies and procedures being 

submitted to the Commission and the information contained therein (together, the “Documents”), 

be afforded confidential treatment until further notice under the Freedom of Information Act and 

the Commission's Regulations:

Documents:

 DDR Compliance Manual

 DDR Financial Resources Procedures

 DDR Access and Onboarding Procedures

 DDR Compliance Department Procedures

 DTCC Global Privacy Policy

 DDR Systems Development and Monitoring Procedures

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact the undersigned at (212) 855-

3038.

Very truly yours,

Adrienne Z. During

DDR Compliance Director
Bloomberg SEF LLC 731 Lexington Avenue Tel +1 212 318 2000

New York, NY 10022 bloombergsef.com 

May 12, 2023 

Submitted via Portal

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: Bloomberg SEF LLC – Certification 2023-R-03 (Notice to Participants) 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”), 

Bloomberg SEF LLC (“Bloomberg SEF”) hereby notifies the Commission that Bloomberg SEF 

released the Notice to Participants attached hereto as Exhibit A on May 12, 2023. 

This Notice informs Participants that the Notice to Participants listed on Exhibit A have been

withdrawn for the reasons identified in Exhibit A. The supporting Core Principle or Commission 

regulation for this Notice is Core Principle 2 and CFTC Regulation 37.9(e). 

Bloomberg SEF certifies that: (i) the Notice to Participants complies with the Act and the 

Commissions regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission has been 

concurrently posted on Bloomberg SEF’s website. There were no substantive opposing view to 

the Notice to Participants.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-7331 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Brian Robinson, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

 Commission

Enclosures
Bloomberg SEF LLC Exhibit A

Notice to Participants 2023-1

The following Notice to Participants have been withdrawn. The supporting Core Principle or 

Commission regulation for this Notice is Core Principle 2 and CFTC Regulation 37.9(e). 

• Notice to Participants 2015-1 was withdrawn because the CFTC No-Action Letter 15-24

is no longer effective.

• Notice to Participants 2016-1 was withdrawn because the functionalities described in the

Notice are no longer supported by BSEF.

• Notice to Participants 2016-8 was withdrawn because the CFTC No-Action Letter 16-58

is no longer effective.

• Notice to Participants 2020-1 was withdrawn because the CFTC No-Action Letter 20-01

is no longer effective. The Rulebook was updated to incorporate the currently effective

CFTC Regulation 37.9 (e).

Effective Date: May 12, 2023
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 25 of 25
# C_2017277EN.01005302.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/53

---

Action brought on 03 July 2017 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino)

(Case T-416/17)

(2017/C 277/77)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Papouis Dairies LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colour containing the word element ‘fino’ — Application for registration No 11 180 791

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 in Case R 2759/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---