alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

mable P. L. Hu’quess fJ@lnty Auditor -ton county Wharton, Texas De&l- Sir:

long as he relnlns toe of the peaoo.
en reaelved

8nd amequote froP pour request

unty oontinue

to psy ation of his Corm? ahto pow 8nsve~ 4t JOUP lrollawse the pqaheeks uemado thismonth Sor the month of April:

om Oprnion

Ho. O-4457OS thls department as

*In OpiniOA no. o-3448, addressed

to the Honorable Fred liorrls,

CountyAuditor, Polk County, Uv- &n&cm, Toxas,this Department, following

AHAalo~0mble P. 1. M8Pweas, page 2

5, Seatlon24, of the Constltutlon of Toxas, and ?ollowing

lI.ao the o? 3ismllton

v. KIna "p lnlon oftihoaomt lathe QUO Texas CivilAppeals, X918), 204 S. Y. 953, held tMt the lnductlca o? l oounty attorney

into the ulry did not orootea vaoanayin such offloo. SinaeArtiale5, 8oatlan24, of tho f.xmstltutlon o? the 3tato of Texas,also lnoludea justioos or the pea00 in its terms, vo .be~love that the oplnicn

above referred to au??iolontly aasvers pur puestlon

rogerdIng

the vaaanay,

and that ?ollouln g t h i s 0 p l p i0n a n din lOaOPdanae

vlth the holding of the aourt,hour firit quaatlon should bo ansvorod in the negative, that is, that ths induatian 3.&o the army of the just100 of the poaao,referrod to gfgr lettop, doer not aro8to a vaaano~ in such

A aopy of this opinion is attaahed hereto for yoir ln?orstbtlon~ * opinion lo. o-4465 of this department hous that the oounty

attornay of Llbortl Countqwho jolnodthe UnltodStatea Aakqvas ontltlod

to hla l

al8rj ?ram tho o??laer*a solmy fund as laxi& os lm remained suah aountyl ttcmep. Tbia opinion points out however

that I? the aountyoS?iaial &coopted and euraised on c?- fla8 in the U. S. Army he vould vbaGe his ooantyo??loo, under so&ion 12 of Article XVI of our Caatltutlon, ls held in opinion Xqp, O-4343 of this departaunt.

Uo onclose

herewith

3 Y? es; of opfnlo~ nos. O-2333: O&Yf!u&oO~343, o-4457, and o-44 5, of~thla department

for your

. We assume fronn

rour lotterthat the justioe of tho pooaehold& and exerairos no O??laein tho U. 5. Army. Under the faota stated unl l a s uud ,

it.18 our opl&n tht tho justice

a? the poses now sorvingin the m ts logolly eS&itled

to drav his salory?rca~ tho o??laer~a

solor~?und of Y'WP countyas lang as he holds l uah offlao, provldod of avurao that tho prealnat

offiaeca

o? your acuntyoontlnw to be amponrated on a salary buls.

Of course, I? the justiao be005808 an army offiaor he till then vacate

his offloeof jwtiae o? tho peace and his SU&ry as justfoe

vould then atop.&aozablo P. L. Harqwaa, page 3

Trusting

thatva have aetlsfaotorll~ ansvered

yaw inquiry,

vo are Very trulyyours ATTWIFX OEXBAL OF TXlU3
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William M. Smartt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Building Materials Holding Corporation (Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors:

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: August 5, 2004 | */s/ William M. Smartt*                                                                         |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | William M. SmarttSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

**1**
# C_2019035EN.01002301.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — Bopp v EUIPO (Representation of an equilateral octagon)

(Case T-460/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a blue octagonal frame - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 35/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Carsten Bopp (Glashütten, Germany) (represented by: F. Pröckl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 May 2017 (Case R 1954/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a blue octagonal frame as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Carsten Bopp to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carsten Bopp to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         124,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  675,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                   358,172
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,863
<PP&E>                                      37,783,582
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,158,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,142,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          753,213
<BONDS>                                     10,803,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,585,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,142,979
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,825,055
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,652,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               358,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,062,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,359,921
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,359,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,359,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    58.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    58.41
        

</TABLE>
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
cmeé

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.cme.com

October 26, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, NW

Washington DC 20581

RE: Section Sc(c)1 and Regulation 40.6 Submission. Exchange Certification of Revisions to
the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index Composition and Weights for 2006. CME
Submission #05-110.

Dear Ms. Webb:

On October 11, 2005 the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (“GSCI” or “Index”) Policy
Committee approved the commodities and their respective weights to be included in the
Goldman Sachs Commodity Index for 2006. Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or
“Exchange”) hereby notifies the Commission of these changes, effective with the listing of the
February 2006 contract month on November 16, 2005.

The GSCI for 2006 will consist of the same 24 commodities as in 2005. A list of the
commodities and their corresponding weights (calculated using the Average Contract Reference
Prices for 2006, and rounded to the nearest .01 percent) in the GSCI for the February 2006
through January 2007 contract months is attached. These changes and all other rules pertaining
to the calculation of the GSCI weights for 2006 will be published by Goldman Sachs in The
GSCI Manual: A Guide to the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index.

The Exchange certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and rules
thereunder.


Ms. Jean A. Webb

Revisions to GSCI Weights and Composition for 2006
October 26, 2005

Page 2

If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact Mr. Paul Peterson at (312)
930-4587 or via e-mail at ppeterso@cme.com. Please refer to CME Submission #05-110 in all
correspondence regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

o 2

j LEE
ED. a

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development


Ticker

Exchange

CBT
KBT
CBT
CBT
csc
csc
csc
NYC
CME
CME
CME
NYM
IPE

NYM
NYM
IPE

NYM
LME
LME
LME
LME
LME
CMX
CMxX

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Revisions to GSCI Weights and Composition for 2006

Commodity

Wheat (Chicago Wheat)
Wheat (Kansas Wheat)
Com

Soybeans

Coffee "C"

Sugar #11

Cocoa

Cotton #2

Lean Hogs

Cattle (Live Cattle)

Cattle (Feeder Cattle)

Oil (No 2 Heating Oil, NY)
Oil (Gasoil)

Oil (Unleaded Reg Gas, NY)
Cit (WTI Crude Oil)

Oil (Brent Crude Oil)
Natural Gas

High Grade Primary Aluminum
Copper - Grade A
Standard Lead

Primary Nickel

Special High Grade Zinc
Gold

Silver

Group
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Livestock
Livestock
Livestock
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Metals
Metals
Metals
Metals
Metals
Metals
Metals

October 26, 2005
Page 3

Percentage Dollar Weights

2006 2005
247% 2.51%
0.90% 0.94%
2.46% 2.47%
1.77% 1.71%
0.80% 0.77%
1.30% 1.28%
0.23% 0.23%
0.99% 1.01%
2.00% 1.98%
2.88% 2.88%
0.78% 0.74%
8.16% 8.58%
441% 4.72%
7.84% 8.38%

30.05% 28.90%
13.81% 14.00%
10.30% 10.24%
2.88% 2.81%
2.37% 2.33%
0.29% 0.29%
0.82% 0.80%
0.54% 0.53%
1.73% 1.72%
0.20% 0.20%
100.00%  100.02%
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Yvonne
Zhang, certify that:
 
 1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Songzai International Holding
Group, Inc.;
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:  March
      30, 2009
                  By:
                  /S/
      Yvonne ZhangYvonne
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Annual Report of Geraco,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for
the period  ending June 30,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Gerald D.  Curtis,  Chief
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /S/ Gerald D. Curtis
Gerald D. Curtis
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)


November 3, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NS8 Corporation  (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ricardo Rosado,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Ricardo Rosado
------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
January 23, 2007
# C_2018301EN.01003001.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Pegasus v Parliament

(Case T-57/17) (1)

((Institutional law - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation - Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded - Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee - Financial Regulation - Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding - Proportionality - Equal treatment))

(2018/C 301/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Decision FINS-2017-31 of the European Parliament of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant, in so far as that decision restricts the pre-financing to 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant and makes its payment subject to the provision of a bank guarantee.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pegasus to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pegasus to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RENWICK WELLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1188

[July 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Sarah Willis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502021CF005768A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2021242EN.01001701.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — RQ v Commission

(Case T-29/17 RENV) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Director-General of OLAF - Decision waiving the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings - Obligation to state reasons - Duty of assistance and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials - Legitimate expectations - Presumption of innocence - Principle of sound administration)

(2021/C 242/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RQ (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks, J.-P. Keppenne and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 1449 final of 2 March 2016 concerning a request to waive the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders RQ to pay the entirety of the costs, including those relating to Case T-29/17 and Case C-831/18 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders RQ to pay the entirety of the costs, including those relating to Case T-29/17 and Case C-831/18 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.

---