alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.7


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment to
Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into and effective as
of the 8th of July 2005 (the “Effective Date”), by and
among Neff Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Neff Rental LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Neff
Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Neff Rental LLC, Neff Rental, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct,
wholly-owned subsidiary of Neff Rental LLC, and Mark H. Irion, an individual
(the “Executive” and collectively with the Company, Neff Rental LLC, Neff
Finance Corp. and Neff Rental, Inc., the “Parties”).


 


Recitals


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement, effective as of March 1,
2000 (the “Original Agreement”), where the Company and the Executive
agreed to employ the Executive as Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
and the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Original Agreement,
effective as of January 31, 2005 (the “First Amendment”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
and the Company desire to add Neff Rental LLC, Neff Finance Corp. and Neff
Rental, Inc. as parties to the Original Agreement and the First Amendment.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this
Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


Terms and
Conditions


 


As of the Effective Date,
the Original Agreement and the First Amendment are hereby amended to add Neff
Rental LLC, Neff Finance Corp. and Neff Rental, Inc. as “Parties” (as the
term is defined in each of the Original Agreement and First Amendment).


 


[signature page follows]


 





















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, Neff Rental LLC, Neff Finance Corp.
and Neff Rental, Inc. have caused this Agreement to be executed by its
duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  NEFF CORP.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  NEFF RENTAL LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  NEFF FINANCE CORP.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  NEFF RENTAL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Mark Irion

  



 


 


Second Amendment to Mark
Irion Employment Agreement
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
# C_2019230EN.01003001.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Steinhoff and Others v ECB

(Case T-107/17) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - ECB - National central banks - Restructuring of the Greek public debt - Involvement of the private sector - Collective action clauses - Mandatory exchange of Greek bonds - Private creditors - Opinion of the ECB - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Principle of pacta sunt servanda - Article 17(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Article 63(1) TFEU - Article 124 TFUE)

(2019/C 230/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Frank Steinhoff (Hamburg, Germany), Ewald Filbry, (Dortmund, Germany), Vereinigte Raiffeisenbanken Gräfenberg-Forchheim-Eschenau-Heroldsberg eG (Gräfenberg, Germany), Werner Bäcker (Rodgau, Germany), EMB Consulting SE (Mühltal, Germany) (represented by: O. Hoepner and D. Unrau, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: O. Heinz and G. Várhelyi, acting as Agents, and H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking restitution of the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants due to the fact that the ECB failed, in its Opinion of 17 February 2012 (CON/2012/12), to draw the attention of the Republic of Greece to the unlawful nature of the proposed restructuring of the Greek public debt by a mandatory exchange of bonds.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Frank Steinhoff, Mr Ewald Filbry, Vereinigte Raiffeisenbanken Gräfenberg-Forchheim-Eschenau-Heroldsberg eG, Mr Werner Bäcker and EMB Consulting SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Frank Steinhoff, Mr Ewald Filbry, Vereinigte Raiffeisenbanken Gräfenberg-Forchheim-Eschenau-Heroldsberg eG, Mr Werner Bäcker and EMB Consulting SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05766-GBD Document 2 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Energética de Minas GeraisCEMIG
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fabiano Maia Pereira, Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Fabiano Maia PereiraName:

Fabiano Maia PereiraTitle:

Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations


Date: April 29, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Iowa Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 1 p.m. on May 30, 2001, at the Des Moines Marriott Hotel, 700 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future activities.

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, May 7, 2001.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-12443 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. S. T. AND R. 

F. T., MINOR CHILDREN, 

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00028-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCM7816)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court, filed on April 19, 2021, is Celia A. Villasenor’s, attorney for 

M.T., motion to withdraw and appoint new counsel. The clerk’s record reflects that M.T. was 

represented by appointed counsel, Celia A. Villasenor, in the trial court and M.T. is presumed 

indigent for purposes of appeal. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 20.1. Celia A. Villasenor was appointed by the 

trial court on December 10, 2019. 

The Court has authority to rule on a motion to withdraw as counsel, but we do not have 

authority to appoint counsel to represent M.T. on appeal. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial 

court hold a hearing within three days of the issuance of the order to consider the appointment of 

new counsel on this appeal. 

Appellant’s brief was initially due on March 9, 2021. An extension was received from Celia 
2

A. Villasenor and granted. Appellant’s brief was then due March 29, 2021. A second extension 

request by Celia A. Villasenor was made and granted. Appellant’s brief was then due April 18, 

2021. On April 19, 2021, the motion to withdraw was filed. 

On the Court’s own motion, Appellant’s brief is now due May 8, 2021. Further extensions 

are strongly discouraged. 

The order of appointment shall be filed with trial court clerk no later than April 26, 2021. 

Further the order of appointment shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and forwarded 

to the Court no later than April 28, 2021. The Court will address the motion to withdraw after the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of April 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., not participating
Case 7:07-cv-05802-KMK-GAY Document 10 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### James Connor, Jr., Appellant-Respondent, v Ghiath Y. Aga, Also Known as Ghias Y. Aga, Doing Business as Lemoyne Supermarket, Respondent-Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm Special Term’s order that denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment conditioned upon plaintiff’s payment of $2,026.50 to defendant for attorney’s fees and disbursements. Defendant’s cross appeal must be dismissed. Subsequent to the entry of Special Term’s order on January 28, 1988, defendant’s counsel accepted and retained checks tendered by plaintiff’s attorney in the total sum of $2,026.50. Defendant’s acceptance and retention of the monetary sanction operated as a waiver of his right to appeal *(see, Dolin v Passero-Scardetta Assocs.,*110 AD2d 1051). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — vacate note of issue.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Russell Leslie James, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Date:   September 28, 2009
 
 
 RUSSELL LESLIE JAMES
 Russell Leslie James
 Chief Accounting Officer
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 -1-
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 266 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
# C_2018328EN.01005001.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/50

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — GE Healthcare v Commission

(Case T-783/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Suspension of the marketing authorisation for contrast agents containing gadolinium for human use - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 328/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GE Healthcare A/S (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: D. Scannell, Barrister, G. Castle and S. Oryszczuk, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 7941 final of 23 November 2017, concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for gadolinimum-containing contrast agents for human use which contain one or more of the active substances ‘gadobenic acid, gadobutrol, gadodiamide, gadopentetic acid, gadoteric acid, gadoteridol, gadoversetamide and gadoxetic acid’.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2019305EN.01004001.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Keolis CIF and Others v Commission

(Case T-289/17) (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 - Investment subsidies granted by the Île-de-France region - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and of ‘new aid’ - Article 107 TFEU - Article 108 TFEU - Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Limitation period - Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

(2019/C 305/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Keolis CIF (Le Mesnil-Amelot, France) and the seven other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: R. Sermier and D. Epaud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470 of 2 February 2017 on aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France for bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France region (OJ 2017 L 209, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Keolis CIF and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Keolis CIF and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00006-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 97th District Court

Clay County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-0156C-CV

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MARY BOWMAN, Appellant

V.

CARLA CRUMP SAULS, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss.” We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 9, 2023
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 15-4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 15-4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 15-4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 15-4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB     Document 7      Filed 07/27/2007     Page 1 of 1
H. R. 2196 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour requirement 

for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CREDIT HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR EDITH 

NOURSE ROGERS STEM SCHOLARSHIP. 

Section 3320(b)(4)(A)(i) of title 38, United States Code, is 

amended by striking ‘‘more than the standard 128 semester (or 

192 quarter) credit hours’’ and inserting ‘‘at least the standard 

120 semester (or 180 quarter) credit hours’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTIN MENDES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-97-235, CA-01-9-V)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Mendes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Martin Mendes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude

on the reasoning of the district court that Mendes has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

United States v. Mendes, Nos. CR-97-235; CA-01-9-V (W.D.N.C. filed

May 20, 2002, entered May 21, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the report), we, Pamela S. Schutz and Kelly L. Groh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Pamela S. Schutz   
|Pamela S. Schutz       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Kelly L. Groh      
|Kelly L. Groh          
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 16, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      22, 2010