Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2001 / Notices 27541

Commission (NRC) continue to review

and act on all requests before the NRC

which had been submitted by PASNY.

The Need for the Proposed Action

The proposed action is needed to

support continued operation with cable

wrap fire barriers in CT–1 that do not

have a rating of 1 hour.

No Significant Environmental Impacts

of the Proposed Action

The NRC has completed its evaluation

of the proposed action and concludes

that there would be no significant

environmental impact as a result of the

proposed action. While the installed fire

barrier in CT–1 has less than a 1-hour

fire endurance rating, it will provide

some resistance to fire. The area where

the fire barrier is located has no ignition

sources other than cables, has available

manual suppression capability, and is

equipped with automatic fire

suppression and fire detection. Under

these circumstances, there is an

adequate level of fire safety that there is

reasonable assurance that at least one

means of achieving and maintaining

safe shutdown conditions will remain

available during and after any

postulated fire, and, therefore, the

underlying purpose of the rule is met.

The proposed action will not

significantly increase the probability or

consequences of accidents, no changes

are being made in the types of any

effluents that may be released off site,

and there is no significant increase in

occupational or public radiation

exposure. Therefore, there are no

significant radiological environmental

impacts associated with the proposed

action.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts, the proposed

action does not involve any historic

sites. It does not affect nonradiological

plant effluents and has no other

environmental impact. Therefore, there

are no significant non-radiological

environmental impacts associated with

the proposed action.

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that

there are no significant environmental

impacts associated with the proposed

action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

As an alternative to the proposed

action, the staff considered denial of the

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’

alternative). Denial of the application

would result in no change in current

environmental impacts. The

environmental impacts of the proposed

action and the alternative action are

similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

This action does not involve the use

of any resources not previously

considered in the Final Environmental

Statement for the James A. FitzPatrick

Nuclear Power Plant.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

In accordance with its stated policy,

on March 22, 2001, the staff consulted

with the New York State State official,

Jay Dunkleberger, of the New York State

Research and Development Authority,

regarding the environmental impact of

the proposed action. The State official

had no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

On the basis of the environmental

assessment, the NRC concludes that the

proposed action will not have a

significant effect on the quality of the

human environment. Accordingly, the

NRC has determined not to prepare an

environmental impact statement for the

proposed action.

For further details with respect to the

proposed action, see PASNY’s letter

dated October 30, 2000, as

supplemented by Entergy Nuclear

Operations, Inc.’s letter dated February

7, 2001. Documents may be examined,

and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC’s

Public Document Room, located at One

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike

(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.

Publicly available records will be

accessible electronically from the

ADAMS Public Library component on

the NRC Web site, http:www.nrc.gov

(the Electronic Reading Room).

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day

of May 2001.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Guy S. Vissing,

Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project

Directorate I, Division of Licensing Project

Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 01–12413 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

requirement of section 3506 (c)(2)(A) of

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

which provides opportunity for public

comment on new or revised data

collections, the Railroad Retirement

Board (RRB) will publish periodic

summaries of proposed data collections.

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed information collection is

necessary for the proper performance of

the functions of the agency, including

whether the information has practical

utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s

estimate of the burden of the collection

of the information; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information to be collected; and (d)

ways to minimize the burden related to

the collection of information on

respondents, including the use of

automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

Title and purpose of information

collection:

Railroad Employers with No

Compensated Employees;

Under 20 CFR 209.2 of the RRB’s

regulations, the RRB may require any

employer or employee to furnish or

submit any information, records,

contracts, documents, reports or other

materials within their possession or

control, that, in the judgement of the

RRB, may have any bearing upon (a) the

employer status of any individual,

person or company (b) the employee or

pensions status of any individual, (c)

the amount and credibility of service

and compensation, and (d) any other

matter arising which involves the

administration of the Railroad

Retirement Act. The RRB proposes to

establish a monitoring program

designed to periodically contact covered

railroad employers who have either

reported no compensated employees for

the last 2 years, or who, after previously

reporting no compensated employees

are no longer reporting. The RRB will

contact the targeted railroad employers

and obtain information as to whether

they had compensated employees in the

past reporting year, if they expect to

have compensated employees in the

current reporting year, and provide

them the opportunity to request that

their status as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act be

reviewed. For program integrity

purposes, targeted employers who

operate a freight or passenger service

will be asked to provide additional

information as to whether they

conducted any freight or passenger

service during the previous reporting

year, if they expect to conduct any

during the current reporting year, or if

they have ceased all operations. If they

have conducted freight or passenger

service, they will be asked how the

service and compensation was

accounted for. If they have ceased

operations, they will be asked to

provide the Interstate Commerce

Commission/Surface Transportation

Board references to any abandonment

proceedings.

27542 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2001 / Notices

1 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).

2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d). 3 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).

The RRB proposes the establishment

of Form T–7, Request to Railroad

Employers to obtain the necessary

information from the targeted railroad

employers. Form T–7 will be

accompanied by an Employer Program

Letter which explains the purpose of the

initiative and provides instructions. The

completion time for Form T–7 is

estimated at 10 minutes. Completion is

mandatory.The RRB estimates that

approximately 175 T–7’s will be

completed annually.

Additional Information or Comments:

To request more information or to

obtain a copy of the information

collection justification, forms, and/or

supporting material, please call the RRB

Clearance Officer at (312) 751–3363.

Comments regarding the information

collection should be addressed to

Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement

Board, 844 N. Rush Street, Chicago,

Illinois 60611–2092. Written comments

should be received within 60 days of

this notice.

Chuck Mierzwa,

Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–12452 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application

To Withdraw From Listing and

Registration; (Home Security

International, Inc. Common Stock, par

value $0.001 per share) File No. 1–

14502

May 11, 2001.

Home Security International, Inc., a

Delaware corporation (‘‘Issuer’’), has

filed an application with the Securities

and Exchange Commission

(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section

12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)

thereunder,2 to withdraw its Common

Stock, $0.001 par value (‘‘Security’’),

from listing and registration on the

American Stock Exchange (‘‘Amex’’).

The Issuer started in its application

that it has met the requirements of

Amex Rule 18 by complying with all

applicable laws in effect in the State of

Delaware, in which it is incorporated,

and with the Amex’s rules governing an

issuer’s voluntary withdrawal of a

security from listing and registration.

In making the decision to withdraw

the Security from listing on the

Exchange, the Issuer considered:

(1) The Issuer’s non-compliance with

the Amex maintenance standards

concerning the price per share of the

Issuer’s Security ($0.12 as of May 1,

2001);

(2) The Issuer’s non-compliance with

the Amex maintenance standards

concerning the number of registered

shareholders of the Issuer’s Security (21

as of October 23, 2000);

(3) The volume of trading of the

Security is approximately nine percent

(9%) of the aggregate trading volume in

the Common Stock since 1997;

(4) The resignation of the Issuer’s

independent auditor;

(5) The percentage of the Issuer’s

Security owned by affiliates of the

Issuer; and

(6) The costs associated with

maintaining the Issuer’s listing on the

Amex in light of the Issuer’s current

financial position.

The Issuer represent that the Security

has been listed in the Pink Sheets since

late April 2001. The Issuer also

represents that it is investigating

whether or not to file a Form 15 with

the Commission.

Any interested person may, on or

before June 1, 2001, submit by letter to

the Secretary of the Securities and

Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street,

NW., Washington, DC 20549–0609, facts

bearing upon whether the application

has been made in accordance with the

rules of the Amex and what terms, if

any, should be imposed by the

Commission for the protection of

investors. The Commission, based on

the information submitted to it, will

issuer an order granting the application

after the date mentioned above, unless

the Commission determines to order a

hearing on the matter.

For the Commission, by the Division of

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated

authority.3

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–12437 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as

Amended by P.L. 104–13; Submission

for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review;

comment request.

SUMMARY: The proposed information

collection described below will be

submitted to the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) for review, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as

amended). The Tennessee Valley

Authority is soliciting public comments

on this proposed collection as provided

by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). Requests for

information, including copies of the

information collection proposed and

supporting documentation, should be

directed to the Agency Clearance

Officer: Wilma H. McCauley, Tennessee

Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street

(EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402–

2801; (423) 751–2523.

Comments should be sent to OMB

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for

Tennessee Valley Authority no later

than June 18, 2001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Type of Request: Regular submission,

new collection of information.

Title of Information Collection: TVA

Police Customer Satisfaction Survey.

Frequency of Use: On occasion.

Type of Affected Public: Individuals

or households and business or other forprofit.

Small Business or Organizations

Affected: Yes.

Estimated Number of Annual

Responses: 2,000.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 167.

Estimated Average Burden Hours Per

Response: 5 Minutes.

Need For and Use of Information:

This information collection will be

randomly distributed to individuals

who use TVA facilities and come in

contact with TVA Police Officers (i.e.,

campers, boaters, marina operators, etc.)

to provide feedback on the quality of the

security and safety provided by TVA

Police on TVA-managed public lands.

The information collection will be used

to evaluate current security and safety

policies and to identify new

opportunities for improvement.

Jacklyn J. Stephenson,

Senior Manager, Enterprise Operations,

Information Services.

[FR Doc. 01–12453 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8120–08–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To

Release Airport Property at the

University of Oklahoma Westheimer

Airport, Norman, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.