alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
John Terwilliger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
No. 2 to the Annual Report of Houston American Energy Corp. on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Houston American Energy
Corp.








By:  /s/
      John F. TerwilligerName:
      John F. TerwilligerTitle:   Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      October 2, 2008
# C_2019305EN.01004301.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Café del Mar and Others v EUIPO — Guiral Broto (Café del Mar)

(Case T-773/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Café del Mar - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 305/51)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Café del Mar, SC (Sant Antoni de Portmany, Spain), José Les Viamonte (Sant Antoni de Portmany) and Carlos Andrea González (Sant Josep de sa Talaia, Spain) (represented by: F. Miazzetto and J. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain) (represented by: J. de Castro Hermida, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1542/2015-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González and, on the other, Mr Guiral Broto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1542/2015-5). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2017 (Case R 1542/2015-5).

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar SC, Mr José Les Viamonte and Mr Carlos Andrea González in the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar SC, Mr José Les Viamonte and Mr Carlos Andrea González in the proceedings before the General Court.

| 3. | Orders Mr Ramón Guiral Broto to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Ramón Guiral Broto to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by Café del Mar, Mr Les Viamonte and Mr Andrea González in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---
July 27, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2570.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Extension, through October 1, 2005, of the Exchange’s existing Electronic Permit
Program (summary of salient features attached).

This program was established to facilitate access to the Exchange’s electronic trading platform
by offering qualified participants a temporary waiver of seat registration requirements and a
temporary reduction of applicable Exchange transaction fees. The referenced extension will
continue the program beyond its previously scheduled expiration date (July 31, 2005).

The CBOT intends to implement this program extension as of August 1, 2005.

There were no opposing views concerning this program extension.

The CBOT certifies that this program extension complies with the Commodity Exchange Act
and the rules thereunder.

Sincerely,
Paul J. Draths

Vice President and Secretary
B062105



CBOT® Electronic Permit Program

Salient Features

This temporary permit program will facilitate access to the e-cbot electronic trading platform by
providing a waiver of seat lease or seat ownership requirements for qualified e-cbot member
firms. The key features of the permit program are as follows:

- Entity must have a clearing relationship with a CBOT clearing member.
- Entity must have registered for the permit program with the CBOT by June 30, 2004.

- Available only to legally recognized non-clearing, non-FCM entities with a European
presence.

- Entities will pay CBOT Level 2 transaction rates plus the delegate surcharge for all
electronically traded contracts.

- Entities that qualify for the permit program as described above can also qualify for a
temporary waiver of the delegate surcharge by:

- Purchasing/registering an Associate Membership, or leasing a Full or Associate
Membership during the enrollment period and maintaining the registered
Associate Membership or a Full or Associate Membership lease thereafter.

- The permit program will be in effect until October 1, 2005.
## Breadcrumb

-  about 

#           Documents      

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

This is a collection of supporting documents to include instructions, training materials, technical memos, flowcharts, analytical references, and more. 

Official USGS Publications

**File icon

March 28, 2023

####   Request Prioritization Criteria (Appendix B)

**File icon

March 28, 2023

####   ECS Data, Publications, and Physical Samples Policy and Procedures

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Fire Impacts Photo Documentation Activity – Student Instructions

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Fire Impacts Photo Documentation Activity – Teacher Instructions

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Two-Column Research Notes: Explore Fire in Your Region

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Teacher Instructions and Key for the Introduction to Landsat Activity

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Introduction to Landsat Activity

**File icon

March 23, 2023

####   Will it Burn - Ecosystem Cards

**File icon

March 22, 2023

####   Wildland Fire - One Pager

**File icon

March 22, 2023

####   Wildfire Behavior Lab - Student Instructions

**File icon

March 22, 2023

####   Wildfire Behavior Lab - Teacher Information

**File icon

March 22, 2023

####   What Does Fire Require - Directed Fire Lab

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
- ...
-                Page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Current page            9 
-                Page            10 
-                Page            11 
-                Page            12 
-                Page            13 
- ...
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
EXHIBIT 32





BWI HOLDINGS, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim Can, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 21, 2010
By:
/s/ Jim CanName:
Jim CanTitle:
Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

BEV ERL Y COL E, I

NDI VI DUAL L Y AND AS NEX T FRI END OF REGI NAL D L UKE, A MI

NOR, Appellant,

v.

MARI A MCGI

NNI S, R.N., TONYA PEREZ, L .V.N., MARGARI TA CORDOVA, L .V.N., SHERITAL L EY, M.D., EDWI

N FRAN KS, M.D., MI CHAEL

GRI MMETT, PH.D., TEXAS YOUTH COMMI SSI ON, TEXA S TECH UNI VERSI TY SYSTEM, Appellee s. § § § § § § § § § § No. 08-10-00333- CV

Appea l from the 83rd Judi cial District Court of Pecos County , Texas (TC# P-6554-83-CV-B )

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending be fore the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion for voluntar y dismiss al of this
appea l. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a)( 1). The motion is g rante d, and this appea l is dism issed. Costs of appe al ar e asse ssed ag ainst Appellant. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d).

Marc h 23, 2011 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| Date:  | May      6, 2009                                                                                                                                                    |

| /s/ James Watson                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| James      WatsonChief      Executive Officer andPrincipal      Accounting Officer |

----
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 17 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 17 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 17 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 17 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05417-AKH Document 17 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. EL00-95-034 and EL00-98-033] 

Take notice that on May 11, 2001, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered a filing in compliance with the Commission's April 26, 2001, Order in the above-captioned dockets.

                    The ISO states that this filing has been served on the California Public Utilities Commission, on all parties on the official service lists maintained by the Secretary for Docket Nos. EL00-95-000,                     *et al.,*                     and on all entities that have entered into Participating Generator Agreements with the ISO.                

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protest should be filed on or before May 22, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file  a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12683 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 47

Joe Ramon Saucedo, Petitioner and Appellant

 v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20200265

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central

Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for

respondent and appellee.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

MARCH 24, 2021 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Saucedo v. State

No. 20200265

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joe Saucedo appealed from an order denying his second application for 

post-conviction relief. Saucedo’s first application for post-conviction relief 

alleged his trial counsel was ineffective. The district court denied his

application, and we summarily affirmed. Saucedo v. State, 2018 ND 2, 905 

N.W.2d 562.

[¶2] In his second application, Saucedo argued his post-conviction counsel 

provided ineffective assistance. He also argued his trial attorney provided 

ineffective assistance because the attorney did not participate in or prepare for 

a presentence investigation interview.

[¶3] On appeal, Saucedo argues the district court erred when it denied his 

second application. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). 

Kalmio v. State, 2018 ND 182, ¶ 18, 915 N.W.2d 655 (“[D]istrict courts are 

required to dismiss an applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of postconviction relief counsel in a Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act 

proceeding.”); Jensen v. State, 2004 ND 200, ¶ 9, 688 N.W.2d 374 (“Postconviction proceedings are not intended to allow defendants multiple 

opportunities to raise the same or similar issues, and defendants who 

inexcusably fail to raise all of their claims in a single post-conviction 

proceeding misuse the post-conviction process by initiating a subsequent 

application raising issues that could have been raised in the earlier 

proceeding.”).

[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KERVINS BONHUER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D 1 9

- 790

[ May 2, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Thomas J. Coleman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 005400CF10A

.

Kervins Bonhuer, Live Oak, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G R OSS

, C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS Document 6-3 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 16 of 16
Singapore Exchange Derivatives Trading Limited 

Company Reg No. 197802854W 

(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore Exchange Limited) 

2 Shenton Way, #02-02 SGX Centre 1, Singapore 068804 

main: +65 6236 8888 fax: +65 6535 7282 

sgx.com 

Circular

29 May 2018

Circular No. DC/AM – 30 of 2018

Update on SGX India Derivatives 

We refer to the Circular No. DT/AM – 40 of 2018 and Circular No. GEN –22 of 2018. 

The Exchange wishes to inform market participants that it will continue to list the following SGX Nifty 

contracts for trading and clearing on SGX Titan until August 2018: 

(a) SGX Nifty 50 Index Futures (“Nifty Futures”); 

(b) SGX Nifty 50 Index Options (“Nifty Options”); and 

(c) SGX Nifty Bank Index Futures (“Nifty Bank”), 

 (collectively, the “Nifty Contracts”). 

The Exchange will reschedule the launch of the new SGX India contracts (namely, SGX India Futures, 

SGX Options on SGX India Futures, and SGX India Bank Futures), pending the outcome of arbitration 

proceedings. 

A. Listing of Contract Months 

New contract months for the Nifty Contracts will be listed for trading as per the schedule enclosed 

here: 

Date New Contract Months Listed Existing Contract Months Listed

1 June 2018 August 2018 contract June 2018, July 2018, September 2018, 

December 2018, March 2019 contracts 

29 June 2018 June 2019 contract July 2018, August 2018, September 2018, 

December 2018, March 2019 contracts 

27 July 2018 October 2018 contract August 2018, September 2018, December 

2018, March 2019, June 2019 contracts 

B. Trading Session on 1 June 2018 

The T and T+1 sessions for Nifty Contracts on 1 June 2018 will be open for trading as per usual. 

C. Migration of Open Positions 

Accordingly, there will be no migration of open positions in the Nifty Contracts. 
Singapore Exchange Derivatives Trading Limited 

Company Reg No. 197802854W 

(A wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore Exchange Limited) 

2 Shenton Way, #02-02 SGX Centre 1, Singapore 068804 

main: +65 6236 8888 fax: +65 6535 7282 

sgx.com 

D. Amendments to the Futures Trading Rules and SGX-DC Clearing Rules 

Amendments to the Futures Trading Rules and SGX-DC Clearing Rules associated with the delisting of 

the Nifty Contracts will not be implemented. Members are not required to undertake any changes at 

this time and are hereby advised that it will be business as usual. 

E. Removal of Nifty Futures as Designated Futures Contracts for Mutual Offset System with Chicago 

Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) 

Notwithstanding the above, the Nifty Futures will continue to be removed as a Designated Futures 

Contract pursuant to the Mutual Offset System with Chicago Mercantile Exchange in accordance with 

the earlier Circular No. DT/AM – 27 of 2018. The consequential rule amendments to Appendix 2 of the 

SGX-DC Clearing Rules where the Nifty Futures will be removed as a Designated Futures contract will 

also still be effected as planned. 

Please contact SGX Derivatives Clearing and Collateral at (65) 6236 5319 if you need any clarification. 

Alternatively, you may email your query to dcc@sgx.com. 

Shanmugam Sakthivel 

Head, Derivatives 

Operations
Case 1:07-cv-05422-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05422-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2022095EN.01002201.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission

(Case T-177/17) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme - Eligible costs - Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced - Reliability of the time records - Conflict of interests - Subcontracting)

(2022/C 95/28)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou, T. Adamopoulos and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration, first, that the request made to the applicant by the Commission in debit note No 3241615292 of 29 November 2016 to reimburse to it the sum of EUR 211 185,95 of the payment received for a study on a research project called Ask-it is, in the amount of EUR 89 126,11, unfounded, and, second, that the sum in dispute corresponds to eligible costs which the applicant is not required to reimburse.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5