alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH Document 5 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 6 of 6
2006 Annual Incentive Plan


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 2006 GLOBALSANTAFE ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the “Company”)
approved the 2006 GlobalSantaFe Annual Incentive Plan (the “2006 AIP”) on December 19, 2005. The payment of bonuses, if any, under the 2006 AIP will be based on performance for the period January 1 through December 31, 2006,
at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee will determine bonus amounts, if any, during the first calendar quarter of 2007. 
  
 The purpose of the 2006 AIP is to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing eligible management employees with financial rewards based upon
the achievement of targeted performance. The 2006 AIP is also intended to help the Company attract and retain management employees. 
  
 Executive officers as well as other officers and managers are eligible to participate in the 2006 AIP. The target bonus as a percent of each individual participant’s
annual base salary ranges from 5% to 100%. The 2006 AIP bonus is capped at 200% of an individual’s annual base salary. 
  
 The 2006 AIP performance measures for participants in the parent company and the Company’s contract drilling services subsidiaries consist of both financial and
operational targets. The weighting is 50% for the financial measures, which are net income relative to peer companies and cost. The weighting is also 50% for the operational performance measures, which are safety, downtime, well performance, and
specified corporate objectives. 
  
 The 2006 AIP performance measures for
participants in the Company’s drilling management services consist of both financial and operational targets. The weighting is 80% for the financial measures which are based on domestic and international operating incomes and 20% for the
operational measure which is safety. 
  
 Bonuses payable under the 2006 AIP are
determined by the Committee, subject to ratification by the independent members of the Board of Directors with respect to the Chief Executive Officer’s bonus.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12387]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2001 / 
Notices

[[Page 26830]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Board of Directors Meeting

TIME: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.

PLACE: ADF Headquarters.

DATE: Friday, May 18, 2001.

STATUS: Closed.

Agenda

9 a.m.--Executive Session (Closed)
1 p.m.--Adjournment

    If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Doris 
Mason Martin, General Counsel, who can be reached at (202) 673-3916.

Nathaniel Fields,
President.
[FR Doc. 01-12387 Filed 5-11-01; 3:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

GUADALUPE GARCIA CORTEZ , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 1 8

- 0 459 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2016

- 000251

- 001 The Honorable Lauren R. Guyton , Commissioner
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent Guadalupe Garcia Cortez , Kingman Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell , Judge Paul J. McMurdie , and Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 9-20-2018STATE v. CORTEZ Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Guadalupe Garcia Cortez seeks review of the superior court ’ s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- convic tion relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not est ablished an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit 32





Certification of Principal and Financial Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Vineyard, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert DeMate, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to International Vineyard, Inc., and will be retained by International Vineyard, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Robert DeMateRobert DeMate
President, Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2009
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


Exhibit 10.59









Schedule A




Stock Options 2006




Stephanie Schissler - Consultant







Stock Options – 

Consultant will receive stock options for achieving these 2006 targets:




1.

Grow Cord Partners’ 1099 group to 100 field reps by end of  2006 (25,000 cap)

2.

50 options per new Cord Partners customer enrollment in calendar year 2006 (50,000 cap)

3.

Completing all marketing campaigns by deadline to include (15,000 cap)

a.

Print Campaigns

b.

Postcard campaigns

4.

Successful transition of day-to-day management of preservation counselors, lead follow-up, and customer service to Consumer Sales Manager. (35,000 cap)




    

Rules:

1.

Plan caps at 125,000 options to be issued.

2.

Options will have a 1 year vesting schedule

3.

Strike price will be the closing price for Dec 31, 2006

4.

Company must not be insolvent.

5.

Consultant must have not violated Code of Ethics during this time period.

6.

Even if all other criteria are met, Board of Directors has ultimate final approval on the issuance.

7.

If the consultant accomplishes the above targets by December 31, 2006, then the consultant will be awarded with stock options for the value of their goal on December 31, 2006.













________________________

____________________________

Matthew Schissler, CEO

Stephanie Schissler, Consultant







________________________

Sandra Smith, CFO






9000 W. Sunset Boulevard, Suite 400

Los Angeles, CA 90069

Ph: 310.432.4090; Fax: 310.432.4098
# C_2005066EN.01000301.xml

| 18.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/3

---

Infringement 2003/4497 — multiple complaint

(2005/C 66/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Following the decision on infringement No 2003/4497 (multiple complaint) taken at the A1/2004 meeting on infringements, the Commission sent Italy a reasoned opinion regarding its incorrect application of Directives 96/62/EC on ambient air quality assessment and management and 99/30/EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. In particular, the Commission considered that, by not correctly measuring ambient concentrations of PM10 particles in Civitavecchia, Rome, and consequently failing to inform the public of these concentrations regularly, Italy had failed to fulfil its obligations under Directives 96/62/EC and 99/30/EC.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2088 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to reauthorize 

the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2019 

Mr. STANTON (for himself and Mr. VEASEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 

2007 to reauthorize the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION 

4 BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. 

5 (a) PURPOSE.—Section 542(b)(1) of the Energy 

6 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

7 17152(b)(1)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

9 and inserting a semicolon; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2088 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the semi2 colon and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) diversifies energy supplies, including 

5 by facilitating and promoting the use of alter6 native fuels;’’. 

7 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 544(9) of the Energy 

8 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

9 17154(9)) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(9) deployment of energy distribution tech11 nologies that significantly increase energy efficiency 

12 or expand access to alternative fuels, including— 

13 ‘‘(A) distributed resources; 

14 ‘‘(B) district heating and cooling systems; 

15 and 

16 ‘‘(C) infrastructure for delivering alter17 native fuels;’’. 

18 (c) COMPETITIVE GRANTS.—Section 546(c)(2) of the 

19 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 

20 U.S.C. 17156(c)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including 

21 projects to expand the use of alternative fuels’’ before the 

22 period at the end. 

23 (d) FUNDING.—Section 548(a) of the Energy Inde24 pendence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17158(a)) 

25 is amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2088 IH

1 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

2 ‘‘(1) GRANTS.—There is authorized to be ap3 propriated to the Secretary for the provision of 

4 grants under the program $3,500,000,000 for each 

5 of fiscal years 2020 through 2025. 

6 ‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—There is au7 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for ad8 ministrative expenses of the program $35,000,000 

9 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2025.’’. 

10 (e) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 543 of the 

11 Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 

12 U.S.C. 17153) is amended— 

13 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘subsection 

14 (a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(3)’’; and 

15 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘subsection 

16 (a)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(4)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 4 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal July 1, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending July 1, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for Emerging Market risk factors

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Lake Area Corn Processors, LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Douglas Van Duyn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Douglas  Van Duyn      |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Douglas Van Duyn           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    |
|   | Dated: March 29, 2006 |

 

----
# C_2021062EN.01002401.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — RN v Commission

(Case T-442/17 RENV) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Surviving spouse - Survivor’s pension - Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Conditions for eligibility - Duration of the marriage - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age - Proportionality - Concept of ‘spouse’)

(2021/C 62/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RN (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 24 September 2014 rejecting the applicant’s request for a survivor's pension.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 September 2014 rejecting RN’s request for a survivor’s pension; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 September 2014 rejecting RN’s request for a survivor’s pension;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by RN relating to Case F-104/15 and in the present proceedings on referral; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by RN relating to Case F-104/15 and in the present proceedings on referral;

| 3. | Orders the Commission and RN each to bear their own costs relating to the proceedings in Case T-695/16 P; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission and RN each to bear their own costs relating to the proceedings in Case T-695/16 P;

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs relating to Case F-104/15 and the present proceedings on referral. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs relating to Case F-104/15 and the present proceedings on referral.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  about 
-  Doing Business 

#           Partners and Cooperators      

## We monitor, assess, map, and conduct targeted scientific research

### so that policy makers and the public have the understanding they need to address complex environmental, natural resource, and public safety issues.

Connect with Us

-  About 
-  About Us 
-  Survey Manual 
-  Key Officials 
-  Organization 
-  Congressional 
-  Budget 
-  Careers and Employees 
-  Doing Business     -  Acquisitions and Financial Assistance 
  -  Partners and Cooperators 
  -  Building Partnerships 
-  Emergency Management 
-  Documents 
-  Emergency Management Resources 

Given the increasingly global nature of the world’s natural science problems, we use international partnerships to conduct a variety of science worldwide. Both foreign and domestic organizations help with our global outreach.

#### Alaska Wildlife Alliance

#### Albany Engineering Corporation, New York

#### Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission

#### Alberta Environment and Parks

#### Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority

#### Albuquerque BioPark

#### Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority

#### Alcoa Corporation

#### Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute

#### Alfred Wegener Institute

#### Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley

#### Allstate Consultants LLC

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹ Previous 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Current page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast »
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-11 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
# C_2018063EN.01001301.xml

| 19.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/13

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO (Национальный Продукт)

(Case T-246/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Национальный Продукт - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Article 177(1)(d) and (e) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 063/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH (Bühl, Germany) (represented by: A. Lingenfelser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 February 2017 (Case R 1017/2016–1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Национальный Продукт as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

1

---