alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6481

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LLOYD MACK ROYAL, III, a/k/a Blyss, a/k/a B, a/k/a Furious , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cr - 00048

- TDC

- 1; 8:19

- cv - 03359

- TDC )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lloyd Mack Royal, III, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Evans Chandler, Christopher Chen

Hsin Wang, Appellate Section, Civil Rights Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC E, Washington, D

. C

. , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lloyd Mack Royal, III , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims d ebatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ro y al has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Royal’s motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual
period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") by CapSource Financial, Inc.
("Registrant"), I, Fred C. Boethling, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Registrant.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CapSource
Financial, Inc. and will be retained by CapSource Financial, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


         DATE:  April 8, 2005                    By:  /s/ Fred C. Boethling
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                      Name: Fred C. Boethling
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment And Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice of designation of certifying officers.

# SUMMARY:

The trade adjustment assistance program operates under the Trade Act of 1974 to furnish program benefits to domestic workers adversely affected in their employment by imports of articles which are like or are directly competitive with articles produced by the firm employing the workers. The North American Free Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance amended the Trade Act of 1974 to provide assistance to workers impacted by a shift in production from the workers' firm to Mexico or Canada, or increased company or customer imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by the workers' firm. Workers become eligible for program benefits only if the worker group is certified under the Act as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. From time to time the agency issues an Order designating officials of the agency authorized to act as certifying officers. Employment and Training Order No. 1-01, was issued to revise the listing of officials designated as certifying officers, superseding the previous Order. Employment and Training Order No. 1-01, is published below.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of May 2001.

Raymond J. Uhalde,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-12820  Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1667

___________ Larry Kenneth Alexander, * * Appellant, * * v. * * John A. Hedback, Trustee of the * Bankruptcy Estate of Georgia * Yvonne Stephens, * * Appellee. * ___________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the No. 10-1855 District of Minnesota and ___________ the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. * In re: G. Yvonne Stephens * * [UNPUBLISHED] Debtor * * --------------------------------------- * * G. Yvonne Stephens * * Appellant, * * v. * * John A. Hedback, Trustee of the * Bankruptcy Estate of G. Yvonne * Stephens; Mary Jo A. *1 The Honorable Davis S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
2 The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Jensen-Carter, Trustee of the * Bankruptcy Estate of Larry * K. Alexander, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 4, 2010 Filed: October 6, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated app eals, Larry Alexander challe nges the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action for a declaratory judgment as to his ownership of real property (No. 10-1667); and G. Yvonne Ste phens challenges the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Pa nel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s 2 approval of a settlement between trustees regardi ng the same property (No. 10-1855). In No. 10-1667, we find that dismissal wa s proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Followell v. United States , 532 F.3d 707, 708 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review). In No. 10-1855, we agree with the BAP’s analysis in all respects. See In re Vote , 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8 thCir. 2002) (court of appeals applies same-3- standard of review as BAP, reviewing bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error, and its conclusions of law de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 14, 2019

No. 04-19-00406-CV

Richard A. CONTRERAS, the owner heir to Los Ojuelos Ranch, Abst. #1393-Sur. #592, Ind.;

Appellant

v.

Enrique BENAVIDES, et. al.; Leroy & Lavada Jones; Jean Shell, Trust; Huisache Land & 

Minerals, Ltd.; Guillermo Salinas & CAAMR Invest Janice Hinds-Ind.; Los Ojuelos Ranch 

Partnership; Diana Peacock, Mgr.; Killam Ranch Properties, Ltd.;

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV7002684-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c).

It is so ORDERED on August 14, 2019.

______________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of August, 2019.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
3. In addition, Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that additional Premises Components arescheduled to be incorporated into the Premises in accordance with the terms and provisions of theLease, including, without limitation, the terms and provisions of Section 3.1 and Article XVIIthereof.          After the delivery of each Premises Component, Landlord and Tenant shall enter into aDeclaration, in accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 17.2(B) of the Lease, asamended by Section 1 hereof.     4. Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, the leasing of the Must Take Premisesshall be upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Lease with regard to such space,including, without limitation, the delivery dates, condition upon delivery, construction allowance,payments for Annual Fixed Rent, operating expenses, taxes and electricity and parking privileges.     5. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all capitalized terms used herein withoutdefinition shall have the same meanings as are set forth in the Lease.     6. Except as herein amended the Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.All references to the “Lease” shall be deemed to be references to the Lease as amended hereby.[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]
2

 
     EXECUTED as a sealed instrument as of the date and year first above written.
Clear All

        30 March 2023    

                    USS Mesa Verde hosts Family Day for loved ones to learn about their Sailors                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, Va. –  On March 24, USS Mesa Verde (LPD 19) hosted an open house for its family members with ship tours, good eats, and a live band performing for the crew.Mesa Verde Executive Officer, Cmdr. William Bridges said Family Day was for spouses and children to better appreciate            

        10 February 2023    

                    Sisters on Deployment aboard USS George H.W. Bush                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA - On Nov. 13, 1942, during the Battle of Guadalcanal, the light cruiser USS Juneau (CL-52) was struck by a Japanese torpedo causing the ship to sink. Among the Sailors that lost their lives that day were the five Sullivan brothers. Since then, siblings are rarely assigned to            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 99.1



PRESTO*
National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire, WI  54703-3703
        Tel.  715-839-2121
Fax. 715-839-2148
715-839-2122
715-839-2242NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
        Contact:  Randy F. Lieble
(715)839-2164






NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. ANNOUNCES

NEW ACCOUNTING FIRM



Eau Claire, Wisconsin (November 28, 2006) -- National Presto Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NPK) announced today that Virchow Krause & Company has been engaged as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, effective immediately.



The selection of Virchow Krause as the Companys new audit firm was made after formal approval by National Prestos Audit Committee which is comprised of outside, independent members of the Board of Directors. In commenting on this action, Maryjo Cohen, President and CEO, stated, Because of Virchow Krauses reputation for high quality service and concentration of its offices in the Midwest where our headquarters are based and our domestic manufacturing activities are centered, Virchow Krause is particularly well suited for a public company of our size and needs. We look forward to working with Virchow Krause in all phases of their auditing activities.



Virchow Krause, founded 75 years ago, is the 15th largest accounting firm in the country. It employs more than 1,200 associates serving both public and private clients throughout its offices in Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.



National Presto Industries, Inc. operates in three business segments. The Housewares/Small Appliance segment, designs and sells small household appliances and pressure cookers under the PRESTO® brand name, and is widely recognized as an innovator of new products. The Defense segment manufactures a variety of products, including medium caliber training and tactical ammunition, energetic ordnance items, fuzes, and cartridge cases. The Absorbent Products segment is primarily engaged in the manufacture of private label adult incontinence products and baby diapers.



The information contained in this release is not intended as a solicitation to buy National Presto Industries, Inc. stock and is provided for general information. This release contains certain statements that may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements may include statements about the Companys beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates, and intentions, that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based upon various factors (some of which may be beyond the Companys control).



*Trademark of National Presto Industries, Inc.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12631]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 4, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Martin Tuchman, Princeton, New Jersey; to acquire voting shares 
of Yardville National Bancorp, Mercerville, New Jersey, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Yardville National Bank, Yardville, 
New Jersey.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 15, 2001.


Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-12631 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**Exhibit 10.20**

**APOLLO MANAGEMENT VI, L.P.**

9 West57th Street, 43RD Floor · New York, NewYork 10019 

 

 

March 17, 2009 

Momentive Performance Materials Inc. 

22 Corporate Woods Boulevard 

Albany, NY 12211 

Attention: Board of Directors 

 

Re: Market Purchases of Momentive Debt

 

Ladies & Gentlemen: 

As recently discussed with the Board of Directors of Momentive Performance Materials Inc.(“Momentive”), Apollo Management VI, L.P. (“Apollo”) has previously informed you that in the near future, funds affiliated with Apollo (“Apollo Funds”) may seek to purchase debt securities ofMomentive from third parties in the open market or privately negotiated transactions. The Apollo Funds are considering purchases from one or more of the outstanding tranches of Momentive notes, including the 9 3/4% Senior Notes due 2014, the 9% Senior Notes due 2014, the 10 1/8%/10 7/8% Senior Toggle Notes due 2014, and the 11 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the “Momentive Notes”). 

Momentive hereby acknowledges that Apollo may purchase Momentive Notes from time to time and consents to Apollo making such purchases. In the event thatMomentive decides in the future to purchase Momentive Notes from third parties in the open market or privately negotiated transactions and notifies Apollo of such decision, Apollo agrees that it will, at the request of Momentive, cease any furtherpurchases of the tranche or tranches of Momentive Notes covered by such request until Momentive notifies Apollo that it is no longer seeking to purchase such tranches of Momentive Notes. Apollo hereby agrees that it shall keep Momentive reasonablyapprised of any purchases of Momentive Notes by the Apollo Funds, including amounts purchased and the cost therefor. Apollo likewise agrees that, for a period 180 days following any such purchase, Apollo will give Momentive the option to purchasethe applicable Momentive Notes at a price equal to (1) the price paid by such Apollo Fund for such Momentive Notes, plus (2) accrued and unpaid interest on such Momentive Notes from the date of purchase through the date of sale toMomentive. This offer may be accepted by written notice delivered to Apollo, and shall be consummated as promptly as reasonably practicable thereafter. 

The foregoing option shall expire earlier than the specified 180-day period in the event that Apollo elects to sell or transfer such notes (other than to a controlled affiliate of Apollo, in which case the optionshall remain in effect for the original period). 

This letter is confidential and is intended solely for the benefit of Momentive. It is not transferableor assignable by either party. This letter shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed in such state. 

 
Sincerely,APOLLO MANAGEMENT VI, L.P.By: /s/ LAURIE MEDLEY Name: Laurie Medley Title: Vice President
**RECEIVED AND ACKNOWLEDGED**

**AS OF THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE:**

MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS INC. 

 
By: /s/ JONATHAN RICH Name: Jonathan Rich Title: President, CEO & Director
**Exhibit 7.1**

**Quebecor Media Inc.**

**Statement Regarding Calculation of Ratio ofEarnings to Fixed Charges as Disclosed in**

**Quebecor Media Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Year EndedDecember 31, 2016**

For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges disclosed in QuebecorMedia Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 under IFRS, (i) earnings consist of net income (loss), plus income taxes, fixed charges, amortized capitalized interest, less interest capitalized and(ii) fixed charges consist of interest expensed and capitalized, plus premiums and discounts amortization, financing fees amortization and an estimate of the interest within rental expense.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2094 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2094

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CHAMPVA Children's Care Protection 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Subsection (c) of section 1781 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of section 101(4)(A) 
of this title and except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of 
this section, a child is eligible for benefits under subsection (a) 
until the child's 26th birthday, regardless of the child's marital 
status.
    ``(2) This subsection shall not be construed to limit eligibility 
for benefits under subsection (a) of a child described in section 
101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Such subsection, as so amended, shall apply 
with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
By Electronic Mail

November 13, 2014

Ms. Melissa Jurgens

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Amendments to ICE Trade Vault, LLC Fee Schedule Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Jurgens:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6, ICE Trade Vault, LLC (“ICE Trade Vault”) submits, by

written certification, an amendment to the Fee Schedule to address repository fees for cleared swaps and options in 

the commodity asset class. This amendment complies with CFTC Regulation § 49.27(b)(1), “Fees,” which states 

that any fees or charges imposed by a registered SDR shall be equitable and established in a uniform and 

nondiscriminatory manner.

ICE Trade Vault certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules 

and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder. No substantive opposing views have been expressed 

by Participants or others with respect to the amendments. ICE Trade Vault further certifies that, concurrent with this 

filing today, a copy of this submission was posted on its website and may be accessed at: www.icetradevault.com. 

ICE Trade Vault intends to implement this amended Fee Schedule on November 28, 2014.

As noted above, enclosed with this letter is a marked version of the ICE Trade Vault Fee Schedule, which 

is being submitted in whole due to the number of amendments made thereto. If you have any questions or need 

further information, please contact me at Kara.Dutta@theice.com or (770) 916-7812.

Sincerely,

Kara Dutta

General Counsel

ICE Trade Vault, LLC

Enclosures