alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1389

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Kellie Jean Lovas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 25, 2008 Filed: February 28, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kellie Jean Lovas challenges the 36-month sentence that the district court 1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to conspiri ng to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. For reversal, she argues that the district court clearly erred by finding that she was a minor rather than a minimal participant in the conspiracy. Having carefully reviewed the record, we affirm.-2- We cannot say that the district court cl early erred in finding that Lovas was not a minimal participant in the conspiracy. See United States v. Bustos-Torres , 396 F.3d 935, 947-48 (8th Cir. 2005) (clear-error sta ndard of review). Lovas presented no evidence that she was unaware of the scope of the extensive drug conspiracy, which was responsible for the distribution of approximately 95 grams of crack cocaine; she facilitated the conspiracy by allowing the us e of her vehicle to deal drugs; she was present at times during such drug trans actions; and she benefitted from the drug proceeds, because she lived with one of he r co-conspirators, the father of her child. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.4) (minim al participant is plainly among least culpable of those involved in conduct of group; defendant’s lack of knowledge or understanding of scope of enterprise and ac tivities of others is indicative of role of minimal participant); United States v. Goodman , 509 F.3d 872, 876-77 (8th Cir. 2007) (reversing minimal-role reduction when de fendant, who admitted to participating in the conspiracy, presented no evidence thathe lacked knowledge or understanding of scope of conspiracy and possessed materials required to manufacture methamphetamine); United States v. Garvey , 905 F.2d 1144, 1146 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (reviewing court has upheld denial of mitigating-role reduction based solely on large amount of drugs involved).

Lovas’s reliance on United States v. Westerman , 973 F.2d 1422 (8th Cir. 1992), is misplaced. In that case, the districtcourt improperly focu sed on the defendant’s role in one part of the conspiracy, see id. at 1427, whereas the district court here considered Lovas’s role within the conspiracy as a whole.
The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12-7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12-7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12-7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12-7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
##### 



Exhibit 13.2
 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of
Quebecor Media Inc.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 8, 2008
    /s/ Louis MorinName:
    Louis MorinTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05903-SAS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00481-PAC     Document 25      Filed 03/04/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00481-PAC     Document 25      Filed 03/04/2008     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 26-2 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
# fcmdata0404
Translation of Loan Agreement dated in March 2009



 Exhibit 10.25 

Loan Agreement 

No.: MY20090304 
 Party A (the
Lender): Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd 
 Party B (the Borrower): Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd

 Party A and Party B have reached a consensus on the following matters and signed this agreement. 

I. Party A lends Party B RMB 30,000,000.00 (In words: RMB THIRTY MILLION ONLY). 

II. Term of Borrowing: From March 4, 2009 to September 3, 2009 

III. During the borrowing period, Party B shall pay to Party A fund use fees at the loan interest rate for the corresponding period. 

IV. Date and Method of Repayment: Before the loan is due, Party A shall repay to Party B a principal of RMB 30 million and loan interest rate
expenses of bank for corresponding period by means of bank transfer. 
 V. This agreement shall become effective on March 4, 2009. It shall
be made in duplicate, one for each party. 
 Lender (Seal): Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Technology Co., Ltd 

Legal Representative:



 
 Date: 

Borrower (Seal): Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd 

Legal Representative:



 
 Date:
# C_2005023EN.01000801.xml

| 28.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/8

---

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the twenty-sixth time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement) (1)

1

(2005/C 23/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of European harmonised standards under the Directive)

| European Standardisation Organisation (2) | Reference and title of the standard | Reference document | Reference of the superseded standard |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CEN | Methods of testing cement – Part 10: Determination of the water-soluble chromium (VI) content of cement | prEN 196-10:2004 (3) | NONE |

European Standardisation Organisation (2)

2

Reference and title of the standard

Reference document

Reference of the superseded standard

CEN

Methods of testing cement – Part 10: Determination of the water-soluble chromium (VI) content of cement

prEN 196-10:2004 (3)

3

NONE

---

(1)  OJ L 178, 17.7.2003, p. 24.

1

(2)  ESO: European Standardisation Organisations:

2

CEN: rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Bruxelles; tel. (32-2) 550 08 11, fax (32-2) 550 08 19 http://www.cenorm.be

CENELEC: rue de Stassart 35, B-1050 Bruxelles; tel. (32-2) 519 68 71, fax (32-2) 519 69 19 http://www.cenelec.org

ETSI: 650, route des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia Antipolis; tel. (33) 492 94 42 00, fax (33) 493 65 47 16 http://www.etsi.org

(3)  Awaiting for the final EN 196-10, this document is considered to provide with the relevant method for the determination of the water-soluble chromium (VI) content of cement

3

---
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2001-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

__/s/ James N. Ryan        

James N. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer

___July 23, 2003_________
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Trustees
Archstone-Smith Trust: We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
333-44639-01 (Form S-3), 333-72550 (Form S-8),
333-72506 (Form S-8), 333-60817-99 (Form S-8), 333-60815-99 (Form S-8),
333-31033-99 (Form S-8), 333-31031-99 (Form S-8), 333-43723-99 (Form S-8),
333-89160 (Form S-3),
333-86744 (Form S-3), of Archstone-Smith Trust and subsidiaries of our reports
dated February 9, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Archstone-Smith Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003, and the related schedule, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Archstone-Smith Trust. Our report refers to the adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (revised), effective July 1, 2003. KPMG LLP Denver, Colorado
March 5, 2004
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): ___________________________ 

Organization: ICE Swap Trade, LLC 

Filing as a: DCM X SEF DCO SDR Please note - only ONE choice allowed. 

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 11/3/2020 Filing Description: Rulebook Amendments 

SPECIFY FILING TYPE Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission. 

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: Definitions and Rule 514

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

 Official Product Name: 

 

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected:

Rule Numbers:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTTY ROACH, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-122, CA-98-432)

No. 99-6082
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTTY ROACH, Defendant - Appellant.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-205, CA-98-431) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scotty Roach, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In addition, Roach appealed the district court’ts orders denying his motion for an extension of the time in which to object to the magistrate judge’s report and for the production of documents. We have reviewed the district court’s orders and find no abuse of discretion. 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Scotty Roach seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). * In both cases, Roach’s motion was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Roach that failure to file timely objections to the recommendations could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendations. Despite this warning, Roach failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendations. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Roach has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and4 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017277EN.01006101.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/61

---

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2017 — Austrian Power Grid v ACER

(Case T-53/17) (1)

1

(2017/C 277/87)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-05425-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05425-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2003 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that during a lapse in 

appropriations certain services relating to the Federal Employees Health 

Benefits Program are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MEADOWS, Ms. CLARK of 

Massachusetts, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. TAYLOR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that during 

a lapse in appropriations certain services relating to the 

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring FEHBP 

5 Coverage During Shutdowns Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2003 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATING CERTAIN FEHBP-RELATED SERVICES 

2 AS EXCEPTED SERVICES UNDER THE ANTI3 DEFICIENCY ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8905 of title 5, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(i) Any services by an officer or employee under this 

8 chapter relating to enrolling individuals in a health bene9 fits plan under this chapter, or changing the enrollment 

10 of an individual already so enrolled due to a qualifying 

11 life event, shall be deemed, for purposes of section 1342 

12 of title 31, services for emergencies involving the safety 

13 of human life or the protection of property.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub15 section (a) shall apply to any lapse in appropriations be16 ginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 
Certifying Statement of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.



13



---





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence F. Curtin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and will be retained by Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                     |     |                                                    
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                    
|                     |    
|Date:  July 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Lawrence F. Curtin                             
|                     |     | Lawrence F. Curtin                                 
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer





14
# C_2019044EN.01002901.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2018 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-161/17) (1)

((Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid - Power of the Secretary-General - Rights of the defence - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Misuse of power - Error of fact - Proportionality))

(2019/C 44/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marion Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by: initially M. Ceccaldi and J.-P. Le Moigne, then M. Ceccaldi, and lastly R. Bosselut, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 6 January 2017 concerning the recovery from the applicant of a sum of EUR 41 554 unduly paid for parliamentary assistance, and of the debit note of 11 January 2017 relating thereto.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Ms Marion Le Pen to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Ms Marion Le Pen to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais  CEMIG (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report). Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a14(b) or 15d14(b) and to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as enacted pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Fabiano Maia Pereira, Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations, hereby certify that:

To the best of my knowledge:



| | (a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                        
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Fabiano Maia Pereira                               
|    |  | Name: Fabiano Maia Pereira                             
|    |  | Title: Chief Officer for Finance and Investor Relations

Dated: November 14, 2016

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1366-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1366-DR), dated April 27, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 1, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective May 1, 2001. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-12158 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P