alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

d0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148871

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148871

COA: 311129

Wayne CC: 12-000746-FH

CURTIS DIONTE COPELAND,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

APPENDIX A

REDACTED
1110 Brickell Avenue

Suite 430k-200

Miami, FL 33131

www.ledgerx.com

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC

APPENDIX B

REDACTED
` 
 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Steele Recording Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mack Steele, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

By:   */s/ Mack Steele*

       Mack Steele

       Chief Executive Officer

       Chief Accounting Officer

 

Dated:  July 18, 2008

  

 

 

 
`
# C_2004320EN.01002901.xml

| 24.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/29

---

Communication in accordance with Article 12 § 5 a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992, on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

(2004/C 320/18)

Binding Tariff Information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Amendments to the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC0730 — report of the 31st Session of the HS Committee, NC0796 — report of the 32nd Session of the HS Committee, NC0845 — report of the 33rd Session of the HS Committee):

st

nd

rd

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION

31st SESSION OF THE HSC IN MAY 2003 DOC. NC0730

st

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes to the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| Chapter 29. Sub-Chapter X. General | M/3 |
| --- | --- |

Chapter 29. Sub-Chapter X. General

M/3

32nd SESSION OF THE HSC IN NOVEMBER 2003 DOC. NC0796

nd

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes to the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 85.12 | L/18 |
| --- | --- |
| 85.24 | L/20 |

85.12

L/18

85.24

L/20

33rd SESSION OF THE HSC IN MAY 2004 DOC. NC0845

rd

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes to the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 25.20 | M/17 |
| --- | --- |
| 26.21 | M/14 |
| 29.29 | M/3 |
| 29.35 | M/9 |
| 34.07 | M/17 |
| Chapter 39 General | M/19 |
| 39.09 | M/3 |
| 39.11 | M/3 |
| 40.08 | M/19 |
| Chapter 44 | M/10 |
| 71.02 | M/12 |
| 71.03 | M/12 |
| 71.04 | M/12 |
| Chapter 84. General | M/11 |
| 84.30 Subheading Explanatory Notes | M/11 |
| 84.42 | M/13 |
| Chapter 85. General. Item (B) | M/15 |
| 85.16 | M/11 |
| 85.17 | M/11 |
| 85.19 | M/11 |

25.20

M/17

26.21

M/14

29.29

M/3

29.35

M/9

34.07

M/17

Chapter 39 General

M/19

39.09

M/3

39.11

M/3

40.08

M/19

Chapter 44

M/10

71.02

M/12

71.03

M/12

71.04

M/12

Chapter 84. General

M/11

84.30 Subheading Explanatory Notes

M/11

84.42

M/13

Chapter 85. General. Item (B)

M/15

85.16

M/11

85.17

M/11

85.19

M/11

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

| 0402.99/1 | M/4 |
| --- | --- |
| 1701.91/1 | M/5 |
| 1901.90/2 | M/6 |
| 8471.30/1 | M/7 |
| 9504.10/1 | M/8 |

0402.99/1

M/4

1701.91/1

M/5

1901.90/2

M/6

8471.30/1

M/7

9504.10/1

M/8

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/taxation_customs/index_en.htm

---
Exchange and Clearing Transaction Fee Schedule for Nodal Exchange Futures

Fee Per Lot1 Fee Per Mile

Trucking Freight Futures

Exchange 

Transaction

Clearing 

Registration2

Clearing 

Settlement2

Exchange 

Transaction

Clearing 

Registration2

Clearing 

Settlement2

Van Freight Rate Futures -

Monthly $8.5 $1.5 $1.5 $0.0085 $0.0015 $0.0015

Rev. March 29, 2019

Notes:

1 The lot size for trucking freight contract is 1,000 miles. 

2 Nodal Clear charges the registration fee for all trades and the cash settlement fee for positions held through expiration.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: May 23, 2001.
    Time of Meeting: 0830-1545, May 23, 2001.
    Place: Battle Lab, Ft. Gordon GA
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) panel will conduct an Ad 
Hoc Study on ``Adapting Future Wireless Communication'' to examine 
potential future commercial wireless capabilities and recommend 
which capabilities may have applicability for the Objective Force. 
The meetings will be open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the 
time and in the manner permitted by the committee. For further 
information, please contact Mr. Jeff Ozimek, Army Science Board 
Staff Assistant, 732-532-5496 or Ms. Lisa Calabrese, Army Science 
Board Staff Assistant, 732-427-4646.

Wayne Joyner,
Executive Assistant, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 01-12202 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Javier FLORES-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 12-41241, 12-41248

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 6, 2013.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Javier Flores-Jimenez, Oklahoma City, OK, pro se.

Margaret Christina Ling, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier Flores-Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Flores-Jimenez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the records reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the consolidated appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of International Card Establishment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Lopshire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2010
            By:
            /s/  William
      LopshireWilliam
      Lopshire
              President
      (Chief Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 and 41 CFR 101-6.1013, the Office of National Drug Control Policy renewed the Charter of the Drug Free Communities Advisory Commission on May 3, 2001.  The renewed charter is available for viewing through the Library of Congress and the United States General Services Administration.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda V. Priebe, (202) 395-6622, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: May 9, 2001.

Linda V. Priebe,

Assistant General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-12343  Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING  CODE 3180-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NS8 Corporation  (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Anthony J. Alda,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that;

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                     /s/  Anthony J. Alda
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
                                                     December 4, 2006
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LESLIE R. HOWARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

RJF FINANCIAL LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-15392

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01213-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Leslie R. Howard appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his action alleging that defendant’s debt collection efforts violated the Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act and an Arizona statute of limitations. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a dismissal under

FILED

AUG 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-15392

the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and a summary judgment. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d

1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment under the

Rooker-Feldman doctrine because Howard’s action amounted to a forbidden “de

facto appeal” of a state court judgment. Id. at 1163-65 (discussing RookerFeldman doctrine); see also Henrichs v. Valley View Dev., 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th

Cir. 2007) (Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff’s claim because alleged legal

injuries arose from the “state court’s purportedly erroneous judgment” and the

relief he sought “would require the district court to determine that the state court’s

decision was wrong and thus void”).

We treat the judgment as a dismissal without prejudice. See Kougasian v.

TMSL, Inc., 359 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissals under

Rooker-Feldman are for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Kelly v. Fleetwood

Enters., Inc., 377 F.3d 1034, 1036 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissals for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction should be without prejudice). 

Howard’s contentions concerning the district court’s denial of his motion to

strike Jennifer Ache’s declaration are unpersuasive. See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v.

Lozen Int’l, LLC, 285 F.3d 808, 813 (9th Cir. 2002) (“We review for abuse of
3 12-15392

discretion evidentiary rulings made in the context of summary judgment.”). 

AFFIRMED.
#### In re Tyrone HURT; William E. Turner, Petitioners.

No. 13-1056.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 2013.

Decided: May 23, 2013.

*187Tyrone Hurt, William E. Turner, Petitioners Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt and William Turner petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a ruling by the district court in two actions. Although unreasonable delay in the district court may be a reason to grant mandamus relief, *see Johnson v. Rogers,*917 F.2d 1283, 1285 (10th Cir.1990), the district court’s docket sheets reflect that final orders have been entered in each case and there are no outstanding matters requiring attention by the district court. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
EX-10.2 Instrument of Termination



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




INSTRUMENT OF TERMINATION OF THE

LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2002), AS AMENDED




          WHEREAS, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Lincoln Electric
Holdings, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, originally effective as of November 15, 1994, as amended
and restated as of January 1, 2002, as amended (the “Plan”); and




          WHEREAS, Section 7.3 of the Plan reserves to the Company the right to terminate and amend the
Plan.





	 	 	NOW, THEREFORE,
	 
	1.	 	Subject to the following provisions of this Instrument of Termination, the Company hereby
terminates the Plan effective December 23, 2005 (the “Termination Date”), or, if termination
cannot be completed, hereby amends the Plan as of December 30, 2005 (the “Amendment Date”).
	 
	2.	 	The Account (as defined in the Plan) as of the Termination Date of any person who does not
consent to such termination, as required by Section 7.3 of the Plan, will be administered in
accordance with the terms of the Plan prior to such termination; provided, however, that the
Company intends that any such Account shall comply and shall be administered in a manner that
is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”) and the Plan shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent.
	 
	3.	 	To the extent that a payment and/or benefit from any Account described in paragraph 2 above
is subject to Section 409A of the Code, it shall be administered and paid in a manner that
will comply with Section 409A of the Code, including proposed, temporary or final regulations
or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service
with respect thereto (the “Guidance”). Any provision of the Plan that would cause a payment
and/or benefit to fail to satisfy Section 409A of the Code shall have no force and effect
until amended to comply with such Section (which amendment may be retroactive to the extent
permitted by the Guidance).
	 
	4.	 	The Account as of the Termination Date of each person who consents on a form provided by the
Company to the distribution of such Account shall be distributed on or prior to December 29,
2005, to such person in a lump sum, subject to any withholding of taxes as provided in Section
8.5 of the Plan.
	 
	5.	 	Section 7.3 of the Plan is amended as of the Amendment Date by deleting the parenthetical
therein added by Amendment No. 1 to the Plan effective as of
December 1, 2004.





 









 




EXECUTED as of this 23rd day of December, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	Frederick G. Stueber
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Woodhead Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Philippe Lemaitre, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

BY: /s/ Philippe
LemaitrePhilippe LemaitreChief
Executive OfficerMay 12, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

27

---
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      OF JAMES WATSON**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Micro Mammoth Solutions, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
            October
                28, 2008





/s/
                James WatsonJames
                WatsonChief
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal August 12, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending August 12, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for an Emerging Market risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal