alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Extension Agreement




Summary
of Terms of the Extension Agreement between Netword Publishing, Inc. and Waldrop
Enterprises d/b/a Vision Direct Marketing, a subsidiary of College Partnership,
Inc., dated as of November 4, 2005.




1. Netword
Publishing, Inc. (“Netword”) agreed
to extend the due date of payment obligations of Waldrop Enterprises
(“Waldrop”) under
an Exclusive License Agreement, a Stock Purchase Agreement and two Secured
Promissory Notes, all dated as of January 1, 2005 (the “Transaction
Documents”) to
December 20, 2005.




2. Netword
also agreed to temporarily halt any foreclosure actions and remedies for default
available to Netword under the Transaction Documents.




3. Waldrop
agreed to commence repayment of all outstanding payment obligations due to
Netword, Sandra and Phillip Bonnell (the “Bonnells”) and
Carlsmith Ball, LLP under the Transaction Documents on or before December 20,
2005.  




4. In the
event that Waldrop does not make such outstanding payments by December 20, 2005,
(i) all available default and foreclosure actions shall be re-instituted by
Netword or the Bonnells, as applicable, and (ii) Waldrop and Netword agreed to
negotiate a fair lease rate for the assets, office space and equipment necessary
for Netword to operate the business related to the “Verbal Advantage”
software.




5. The
Bonnells and College Partnership, Inc. agreed to provide advisory and consulting
services to Waldrop, as necessary for the period of time between November 4,
2005 and December 20, 2005.
# C_2017178EN.01002502.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/25

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Numbi v Council

(Case T-144/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: John Numbi (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
David L. Mazaroli (DM-3929) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

11 Park Place – Suite 1214 

New York, NY 10007-2801 

Tel. (212)267-8480 

Fax. (212)732-7352 

e-mail: dlm@mazarolilaw.com 

----------------------------------------------------------------x 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------------------x 

VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

M/V “CCNI CARTAGENA”, her engines, 

tackle, boilers, etc.; CCNI; et al.

 Defendants. 

: 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07 Civ. 5910 (NRB) 

ECF CASE 

RULE 7.1

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

-----------------------------------------------------------------x 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to enable judges and 

magistrate judges of the court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the 

undersigned counsel of record for a private nongovernmental corporate party discloses 

that the following are parent corporations of that party and the publicly held corporations 

that own 10% or more of the party’s stock: 

Vigilant Insurance Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Federal Insurance 

Company which, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Chubb 

Corporation, a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange. 

Date: New York, New York s/David L. Mazaroli 

 June 18, 2007 _____________________________ 

 David L. Mazaroli (DM 3929) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 11 Park Place - Suite 1214 

 New York, New York 10007 

 Tel.: (212)267-8480 

 Fax.: (212)732-7352 

 E-mail: dlm@mazarolilaw.com 

 File No.: 7C-1434 

Case 1:07-cv-05910-NRB Document 2 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 8 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 11 of 11
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168 

To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals incarcerated in 

Federal and State penal institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HILL of Arkansas, and Mr. RICHMOND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To reinstate Federal Pell Grant eligibility for individuals 

incarcerated in Federal and State penal institutions, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Education 

5 And Learning Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘REAL Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT ELIGI7 BILITY. 

8 Section 401(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2168 IH

1 (1) by striking paragraph (6); 

2 (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para3 graph (6); and 

4 (3) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking 

5 ‘‘(7)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘(6)(B)’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 The amendments made by section 2 shall be effective 

8 for academic year 2019–2020 and succeeding academic 

9 years. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Terwilliger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Houston American Energy Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Houston American Energy Corp.



By:

/S/    JOHN F.
TERWILLIGERName:

John F. TerwilligerTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

March 25, 2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2137 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7- 

year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. REED, and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the 7-year recovery period for motorsports 

entertainment complexes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2137 IH

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD FOR MOTORSPORTS EN2 TERTAINMENT COMPLEXES MADE PERMA3 NENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara6 graph (D). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

9 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12846]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation of Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  Vol. 66, No. 
93, at 24409, May 14, 2001.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, May 17, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commission meeting to consider and act upon 
Sec'y of Labor on behalf of Bernardyn v. Reading Anthracite Co., Docket 
Nos. PENN 99-129-D, etc., has been canceled. No earlier announcement of 
the cancellation was possible.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629 / (202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 01-12846 Filed 5-17-01; 12:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Fred G. Kowal, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)for the Registrant and have:

> 
a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (The Registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of the Company's annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> 
a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 9, 2004

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sandy WACHS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50201.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 9, 2013.*

Filed May 24, 2013.

Curtis A. Kin, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Nancy Spiegel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ira Salzman, Law Offices of Ira M. Salz-man, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*585Before: PREGERSON and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and DANIEL, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Sandy Wachs appeals the district court’s imposition of a supervised release condition requiring him to register as a convicted sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16913(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We affirm.

18 U.S.C. §§ 3551 and 3553 set forth, *inter alia,*the parameters a district court must adhere to in sentencing a defendant. Neither section precludes applicability of SORNA’s mandatory sex offender registration requirement as a condition of supervised release. Thus, the district court did not err in imposing the supervised release condition.

Wachs waived his substantive due process claim by failing to adequately present an argument in support of such claim in his opening brief. *See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington,*350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.2003). Assuming, *arguendo,*that Wachs did not waive his substantive due process claim, SORNA’s mandatory sex offender registration requirement is rationally related to the legitimate governmental purpose of public safety. The district court did not commit plain error in imposing the supervised release condition.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2019054EN.01003403.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/34

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-141/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/51)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
#### Lillie M. Hill, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Millard Fillmore Hospital et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Hill v Millard Fillmore Hosp.*([appeal No. 1] 152 AD2d 931). (Appeal from order *932and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J.— summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2005137EN.01000501.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 137/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Slovak Republic

Aid No: N 27/2005 and N 53/2005

Title: Social aid — Slovak coal

Objective: Inherited liabilities in the coal sector

Legal basis: Zakon št. 231/1999

Budget: SKK 8 935 671.00, EUR 234 804 (N 27/2005), SKK 4 277 250 (EUR 112 411) (N 53/2005)

Duration: Single payment

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption:

Member State: Sweden

Case number: N 156/04

Title: Energy tax on electricity used by the manufacturing sector

Objective: To introduce a business rate applicable for the electricity used in the production of the manufacturing sector

Legal basis: ‘Lag (2003:810) om ändring i lagen (1994:1776) om skatt på energi’ and ‘Lag (1994:1776) om skatt på energi’

Budget: In total, ca. SEK 17 840 million (approximately EUR 1 964 million)

Duration: 1 July 2004 — 31 December 2005

Other information: Annual report

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: France

Aid No: NN 25/2005

Title: Social aid scheme, known as the ‘mobility passport’ scheme, to assist certain categories of passengers on air services linking mainland France to the French overseas departments

Objective: To offset the disadvantages caused by remoteness — Air transport

Legal basis: Décret no 2004-163 du 18.2.2004 relatif à l'aide dénommée ‘passeport mobilité’ JO no 43 du 20.2.2004 p. 3468

o

o

Budget: EUR 7.4 million for 2003

Duration: indefinite

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
143 So. 557

#### ITALIAN ART EXHIBIT COMMITTEE et al. v. ROMEO.

6 Div. 183.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 6, 1932.

J. Reese Murray, of Birmingham, for ap. pellants.

Parsons & Cowherd, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BOULDIN, J.

The appellee sued the appellants, individually, and as members of the Italian Art Exhibit Committee, upon the common counts, and a special count on contract, for the recovery of a sum claimed to be due for services rendered. The Italian Art Exhibit Committee, of which defendants were members, were putting on a pageant in Birmingham in promotion of an Italian Art Exhibit. Plaintiff was employed to furnish band music for the pageant. Without dispute it was agreed that he should be paid $135 for furnishing music for the pageant and one dress rehearsal, which sum was paid. Plaintiff sues for an additional sum of $290, claimed to be due fox-furnishing music at several extra rehearsals at the rate of $27 per hour. The trial court gave judgment for $265. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain this judgment is the substantial question here presented.

The evidence fully sustains a finding that defendant Wheeler, a member of the committee, did agree to pay the sum claimed fox-extra rehearsals, that he authorized the director of the pageant to use the band in as many rehearsals as desired, and that music was furnished as claimed. There was no error in rendering judgment as to him. The chief argument is directed to Wheeler’s authority to bind the other members of the committee for this further obligation, and the question of ratification of his action by his associates. These questions are not presented for review. The appeal was taken jointly by all the defendants and there is a joint assignment of errors only.

By long-settled rules a joint assignment of errors "is unavailing unless the errors are injurious to all who join therein. Roberts v. Kemp, 218 Ala. 350, 352, 118 So. 656; Chavers v. Mayo, 202 Ala. 128, 130, 79 So. 594; Hall v.First Bank of Crossville, 196 Ala. 627, 72 So. 171; Mobile Temperance Hall Ass’n v. Holmes, 195 Ala. 437, 70 So. 640.

*397' The demand presented by the evidence was clearly recoverable under the common counts. Overruling the demurrer to the count on contract, questioning the sufficiency of the count for failure to allege whether the contract was verbal or in writing, if error, was without injury.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Letter


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 December 29, 2005 
  
 Mr. Byron D. Hewett 
 4 Mt. Holly Road East 
 Katonah, NY 10536 
  

	Re:	Your Employment with Immunicon Corporation 

  
 Dear Byron: 
  
 This will serve as an amendment and modification of the terms and conditions of your employment with Immunicon Corporation (“Immunicon”), including your employment letter and that letter agreement dated
October 8, 2004 and executed by you October 11, 2004, relating to terms and conditions taking effect in the event of certain circumstances involving termination of your employment (the latter being referred to hereinafter as the
“Severance Agreement”). You and Immunicon hereby agree to amend the Severance Agreement, effective January 1, 2006, as follows: 
  
 In Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Severance Agreement, each instance of “Chief Operating Officer and General Manager, Cancer Products” shall be replaced by
“President and Chief Executive Officer.” 
  
 It is understood and
agreed that all of the remaining terms and conditions of your employment and of the Severance Agreement which are not amended as set forth herein shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
  
 If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing both copies of this
letter where indicated below, and return one signed copy to me. 
  

					
	 Sincerely,
	 	 	 	 Accepted and Agreed:

	 IMMUNICON CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 Byron D. Hewett

			
	/s/    EDWARD L. ERICKSON        	 	 	 	/s/    BYRON D. HEWETT        
	Edward L. Erickson	 	 	 	 
	Chairman, Board of Directors	 	 	 	 Date of Signature: 12/29/2005
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of nCoat, Inc., on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul S. Clayson, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Paul S. ClaysonPaul
      S. ClaysonChief
      Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)Dated
      May 19, 2008