alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

News Release From:Dotronix, Inc.(OTC Bulletin Board: DOTX)
Contact information: Robert V. Kling
Phone: 651-633-1742

# FOR Release: October 19, 2004

# DOTRONIX ANNOUNCES ANNUAL
MEETING TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 2004

ST. PAUL, MN, October 19, 2004. DOTRONIX, INC. (OTC BULLETIN BOARD: DOTX) announced
          today that it would hold its Annual Meeting on December 8, 2004. The
          meeting will be held at the offices of Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., U.S. Bank
          Plaza, Suite 4000, 200 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Company
          expects to mail its proxy statement on or about November 5, 2004 to its
          shareholders of record on October 28, 2004.
Case 1:07-cv-05418-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05418-AKH Document 12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019172EN.01002902.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2019 — Fleig v EEAS

(Case T-492/17) (1)

(Civil Service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Termination with notice - Grounds for termination - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Interests of the service - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to have regard to the welfare of staff - Principle of sound administration - Articles 30 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Procedural issue - Publication on the Internet of documents included in the file relating to the proceedings before the General Court - Article 17 of the Staff Regulations)

(2019/C 172/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Stephan Fleig (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 19 September 2016 by which the director of the ‘Human Resources’ Directorate of the EEAS, acting in his capacity as the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment, terminated the applicant’s employment contract with effect from 19 June 2017 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered following that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Stephan Fleig to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Stephan Fleig to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14


OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




I,
Humberto Garcia Borbon, Chief Financial Officer of Sitesearch Corporation.,
certify that:




(1)           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 30, 2009 (the “Report”);




(2)           Based
on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this Report; and




(3)           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods represented in this Report.




(4)           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)           designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which the Report is being prepared;




(b)           evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           disclosed
in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




(5)           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or
persons fulfilling the equivalent function):




(i)           all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(ii)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:           June
9, 2009




/s/Humberto Garcia
Borbon


Humberto
Garcia Borbon


Chief
Financial Officer
#### Maria Socorro Gallegos MATIAS; Jose Jimenez Mendoza, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-70182.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Andrew Taylor, Attorney at Law San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Sabatino F. Leo, Trial, OIL, Joanna L. Watson, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Socorro Gallegos Matías and Jose Jimenez Mendoza, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen where they failed to establish prejudice arising from any alleged ineffective assistance by their former counsel. *See id.*at 793-94 (“[Prejudice results when the performance of counsel was so inadequate that it *may*have affected the outcome of the proceedings.” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Petitioners’ contention that the BIA employed an incorrect standard of review is belied by the record.

*537In light of our disposition, we need not address petitioners’ contention regarding their failure to depart within the voluntary departure period.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 272 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 272 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 272 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:02-cv-02255-SHS Document 272 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 4 of 4
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

NANCY CRIOLLO and LAWRENCE

ZENTENO,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4462-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 48 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 48 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05560-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05560-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
(84 South. 924)

#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF GADSDEN v. GOZA.

(7 Div. 30.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 14, 1920.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; W. J. Martin, Judge.

W. J. Boykin, of Gadsden, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018013EN.01001901.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/19

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 November 2017 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-391/17 R)

((Interim measures - Institutional law - European citizens’ initiative - Protection of national and linguistic minorities and enhancement of cultural and linguistic diversity in the Union - Principle of conferral - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2018/C 013/31)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: R.-H Radu, C.-M. Florescu, E. Gane and L. Liţu, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Decision (EU) No 2017/652 of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (OJ 2017 L 92, p. 100).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2018399EN.01005801.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/58

---

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2018 — Medora Therapeutics v EUIPO — Biohealth Italia (LITHOREN)

(Case T-776/17) (1)

(2018/C 399/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2180 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2180

To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability if a student 
  on whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes 
                               disabled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability if a student 
  on whose behalf a parent has received certain student loans becomes 
                               disabled.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Domenic and Ed's Law''.

SEC. 2. REPAYMENT OF LOANS TO PARENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 437(d) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1087(d)) is amended by inserting ``or becomes permanently 
and totally disabled (as determined in accordance with regulations of 
the Secretary), or if the student is unable to engage in any 
substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable 
physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death, 
has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60 months, or can 
be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 60 
months,'' after ``dies,''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to any outstanding loan received by a parent before, on, or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and without regard to the onset 
date of the disability or impairment.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32





BWI HOLDINGS, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce Milroy, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 23, 2010
By:
/s/ Bruce MilroyName:
Bruce MilroyTitle:
Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Appellate case name: In re Sanni

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case number: 01 - 1:t-00144-CV

Trial court case number: 2002-08930

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Relator has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. This court requests a response from

the real party in xnterest. See TEX. R. App. P. 52.4. The response, if any, is due March 7, 2013.

It 1s SO ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:/s/Rebeca Huddle

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2013
Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH     Document 6      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH     Document 6      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH     Document 6      Filed 02/06/2008     Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2177

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make members of health 
 care sharing ministries eligible to establish health savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2019

 Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Biggs, Mr. 
   Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Walker, Mr. 
  Palmer, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Babin, Mr. Smith of New 
  Jersey, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Allen, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
   Lamborn, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Kinzinger, Mr. Massie, Mr. Higgins of 
   Louisiana, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make members of health 
 care sharing ministries eligible to establish health savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Faith in Health Savings Accounts Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. MEMBERS OF HEALTH CARE SHARING MINISTRIES ELIGIBLE TO ESTABLISH 
              HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Application to Health Care Sharing Ministries.--For purposes 
of this section, membership in a health care sharing ministry (as 
defined in section 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii)) shall be treated as coverage 
under a high deductible health plan.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal September 9, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending September 9, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for a North American risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1947 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt transfers of funds from 

Federal agencies to the Department of Veterans Affairs for nonprofit 

corporations established under subchapter IV of chapter 73 of such 

title from certain provisions of the Economy Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. BRINDISI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt transfers 

of funds from Federal agencies to the Department of 

Veterans Affairs for nonprofit corporations established 

under subchapter IV of chapter 73 of such title from 

certain provisions of the Economy Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION. 

4 Section 7364(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following new sen6 tence: ‘‘Any amounts so transferred after September 30, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1947 IH

1 2016, shall be available without regard to fiscal year limi2 tations, notwithstanding section 1535(d) of title 31.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS