alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on June 5, 2001 in Medford, Oregon at the Medford Bureau of Land Management Office at 3040 Biddle Road.  The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 5 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Province Advisory Committee Operating Guidelines; (2) Public Comment; (3) Discussion of Land Management Issues; and (4) Current issues as perceived by Advisory Committee members.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Roger Evenson, Province Advisory Committee Coordinator, USDA, Forest Service, Umpqua National Forest, 2900 NW Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, Oregon 97470, phone (541) 957-3344.

Dated: May 11, 2001.

Michael D. Hupp,

Acting Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 01-12414  Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# C_2018123EN.01001801.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 February 2018 — Kwang Yang Motor v EUIPO — Schmidt (CK1)

(Case T-45/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CK1 - Earlier EU figurative mark CK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 123/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) (represented by: A. González Hähnlein and A. Kleinheyer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Udo Schmidt (Reken, Germany) (represented by: G. Rother and J. Vogtmeier, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 November 2016 (Case R 2193/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Schmidt and Kwang Yang Motor.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 011764
    Title: Zim/Norasia/CSAV Slot Exchange Agreement
    Parties: Compania Sud-Americana DeVapores S.A., Norasia Container 
Lines Limited, Zim Israel Navigation Co., Ltd.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Zim and CSAV/Norasia to exchange 
slots in the trade between the U.S. West Coast and countries bordering 
the Adriatic Sea, Israel, Egypt, Sri Lanka and the Far East in the 
Korea/Singapore/South East Asia range, allocations to be proportionate 
to their vessel allocation. Expedited review is requested.
    Agreement No.: 011765
    Title: Senator/OOCL-Slot Charter Agreement
    Parties: Senator Lines GmbH Orient Overseas Container Line Limited
    Synopsis: The proposed agreement would allow Senator Lines to sell 
100 TEU (1100 m/tons) per voyage westbound and 150 TEU (1650 m/tons) 
eastbound to OOCL in the trade between the U.S. East Coast and Korea, 
the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Senator may sell 
OOCL a maximum of 300 TEU (3300 m/tons) per voyage to both directions.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
    Dated: May 11, 2001.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12370 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05016-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 20 of 20
# C_2019072EN.01003001.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — Edison v EUIPO (EDISON)

(Case T-471/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - EU figurative mark EDISON - Partial surrender - Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 57 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Interpretation of terms contained in a class heading of the Nice Classification and the goods appearing on the accompanying alphabetic list))

(2019/C 72/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Edison SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Boscariol de Roberto, D. Martucci and I. Gatto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and L. Rampini, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2017 (Case R 1355/2016-5) concerning the EU figurative mark EDISON.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Edison SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Edison SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

---
Eurex Clearing AG 

ECAG Rule Certification 022-23 

April 6, 2023 

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Clearing Conditions (“Clearing Conditions”) of Eurex 

Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) and Price List (“Price List”) of Eurex Clearing is appended as Attachment 

A. Any additions are underlined and any deletions are struck through. 

2. The date of intended implementation is May 2, 2023. 

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange 

Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this 

submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ecen/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings. 

4. A concise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears 

below. 

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules. 

6. Confidential treatment is not requested. 

___________________________________________________________________________________ 

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF 

THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, 

INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER 

Eurex Clearing is amending the Clearing Conditions and Price List to reflect the decision of the 

Management Board of Eurex Deutschland to cancel the admission to trading for Interest Rate Swap Futures 

from May 2, 2023. Eurex Clearing will therefore discontinue clearing services for Interest Rate Swap 

Futures. 

For avoidance of doubt, Eurex Clearing has cleared Interest Rate Swap Futures outside the scope of its 

DCO license, which applies only to swaps. 

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed 

in Attachment A. 

Eurex Clearing has identified the following derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) Core Principle as 

potentially being relevant to the above amendments: 

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will 

comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendmentsreflect the delisting of listed contracts 

on Eurex Deutschland, which Eurex Clearing clears outside the scope of its DCO license, and all 

products cleared by Eurex Clearing under its DCO license will continue to be subject to appropriate 

standards in compliance with this Core Principle. 
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7 

U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6 

I hereby certify that: 

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder; and 

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of thisfiling 

to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-dco-filings. 

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer 

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG 

Dated: April 6, 2023
#### CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY *v.*UNITED STATES. FAITHORN *v.*SAME. WANN *v.*SAME.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE ¡SEVENTH CIRCUIT..

Nos. 238, 239, 240.

Argued October 21, 22, 1908.

Decided January 4, 1909.

This co.urt by a divided court and without opinion affirms the judgment of the lower court holding a common carrier guilty of violating § 1 of th'e Elkins act of February 19, 1903, c. .708, 32 Stat. 847. The contention of the carrier was that the amount paid to the shipper was for use of tracks owned by the shipper, although there was no reference thereto in the published rate.

*Mr. Blackburn Esterline*and *Mr. Ralph M. Shaw,*with whom *Mr. Frederick S. Winston, Mr. Robert Mather, Mr. John Barton Payne*and *Mr. Silas H. Straum*were on the .brief, for petitioners.

- *The Attorney General*and *The Solicitor General*for respondent. - -

*Per Curiam:*

Judgment affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District. Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
600335672 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

September 18, 2020 

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST 

Submitted via the Portal and via email 

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov 

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for 

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s 

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

David Levine 

General Counsel 

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as 

the “Confidential Information.” 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 2 

600365906 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0920-0018” and ending 

with “BSEF-0920-0292.” 

[signature page follows] 

 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 3 

600365906 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

Devu Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (Email: JLave@cftc.gov) 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4 

600365906 

Annex A 

Confidential Information 

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code 

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0920-0018–BSEF-0920-

0292
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of GeNOsys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), We, John W.
R. Miller, President and director and Christie Melanie Woodruff Jones,
Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: 3/15/2007                        /s/John W. R. Miller
       ---------                        ----------------------------------
                                         John W. R. Miller
                                         President and Director


Dated: 3/15/2007                        /s/Christie Melanie Woodruff Jones
       ---------                        ----------------------------------
                                         Christie Melanie Woodruff Jones
                                         Secretary/Treasurer and Director
[MOSS-ADAMS LLP LETTERHEAD]

# Exhibit 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-53308 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Spokane, Washington
February 25, 2005

|A member of                   |  | Offices in          | 
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------- | 
|Moores Rowland International  |  | Principal Cities of | 
|an association of independent |  | Washington, Oregon  | 
|accounting firms throughout   |  | and California      | 
|the world                     | 

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELANIE D. MANCE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 35697

D.C. No. 1:21

- cv

- 00028

- KLD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Kathleen Louise DeSoto, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2023 * *

Portland, Oregon

Before: BENNETT, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Melanie Mance appeals the district court’s order affirming an Administrative

Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of her claim for Social Security disability benefits. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 25 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

de novo and may only overturn the ALJ’s decision if it is not supported by

substantial evidence or is based on legal error. Luther v. Berryhill , 891 F.3d 872,

875 (9th Cir. 2018).

1. The ALJ did not err by not evaluating the frequency of Mance’s medical

appointments from June 2018 to August 2020 in assessing Mance’s residual

functional capacity. Mance was “ultimately responsible for providing the evidence

to be used in making the [residual functional capacity] finding.” Widmark v.

Barnhart , 454 F.3d 1063, 1068 (9th Cir. 2006); see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1512(a),

404.1545(a)(3). But she p rovided no evidence that the frequency, scheduling , or

duration of her medical appointments inhibited her ability to work on a regular and

continuing basis. The record does not show , for example, that her appointments

lasted entire workdays or her medical providers were concerned that she would

miss work. Cf. Brewes v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , 682 F.3d 1157, 1164 (9th

Cir. 2012) (considering medical providers’ opinion that claimant “would likely

miss multiple days [of work] each month”). On the record before us , t he ALJ had

no duty to help Mance develop such evidence. See Ford v. Saul , 950 F.3d 1141,

1156 (9th Cir. 2020) (explaining that an “ALJ’s duty to develop the record further

is triggered only when there is ambiguous evidence or when the record is

inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence” ( quoting Mayes v.

Massanari , 276 F.3d 453, 459

– 60 (9th Cir. 2001) ).3

2. Mance’s remaining arguments are forfeited, so we do not address them.

See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington , 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003)

( explaining that the “ bare assertion of an issue ” is insufficient to preserve it

(citation omitted) ).

AFFIRMED.
# Effective 3.15.21
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional) Date: July 14, 2017

I M P O R T A N T: CHECK BOX IF CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED. 

ORGANIZATION ICE Trade Vault, LLC

 FILING AS A: DCM SEF DCO X SDR ECM/SPDC 

TYPE OF FILING

 Rules and Rule Amendments 

 X Certification under § 40.6 (a) or § 41.24 (a)

 “Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” under § 40.4 (b)(5)

 Notification under § 40.6 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.4 (a) or § 40.5 (a)

 Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change under § 40.10 (a)

 Products

 Certification under § 39.5(b), § 40.2 (a), or § 41.23 (a)

 Swap Class Certification under § 40.2 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.3 (a)

 Novel Derivative Product Notification under § 40.12 (a)

RULE NUMBERS

ICE Trade Vault, LLC Rulebook and Participant Agreement 

DESCRIPTION

ICE Trade Vault, LLC has amended the ICE Trade Vault Participant Agreement as a result of 

a corporate reorganization. The ICE Trade Vault Participant Agreement has been updated to

remove provisions related to the eConfirm confirmation matching platform and its terms and 

conditions of use. In addition, the ICE Trade Vault Rulebook has been updated to make

conforming changes due to the corporate reorganization and to remove references to the 

eConfirm service being an ancillary service. This amended Rulebook and Participant 

Agreement are scheduled to be effective on July 31, 2017.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 8, 2013

NO. 03-11-00315-CV

Crystal Spurck, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the order of the trial court is 

in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that appellant has filed an affidavit 

of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of appeal be assessed against 

appellant; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of, Corporate Outfitters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Taigen, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February
13, 2008





By:  /s/ David Taigen


David Taigen, President, Chief Executive Officer,


Chief Financial Officer and Director