alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gerald D. Curtis, Principal Executive Officer of Geraco, Inc. certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Geraco, Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

           a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared.

           b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

           c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

           a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

           b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: September 29, 2004


/s/ Gerald D. Curtis
______________________________________
Gerald D. Curtis
Principal Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH     Document 32      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1808 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1808

            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2019

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALEMSEGHED MUSSIE TESFAMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Alemseghed Mussie 
Tesfamical shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Alemseghed 
Mussie Tesfamical shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Approval

    The following applicant has applied for approval to conduct certain 
activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the Wild 
Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 
15.26(c).
    Applicant: Mr. Jerry Jennings, Fallbrook, California, on behalf of 
the Toucan Preservation Center (CB006). The applicant wishes to amend 
approved cooperative breeding program CB006 to include Green aracari 
(Pteroglossus viridis), Black-necked aracari (Pteroglossus aracari), 
and Blue-headed macaw (Ara couloni). The Toucan Preservation Center 
maintains responsibility for oversight of this program.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, 
Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/
358-2281).

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
Andrea Gaski,
Chief, Branch of CITES Operations, Division of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 01-1246 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
----

|        |   | Global                Private Client Group **Merrill                Lynch Business****Financial                Services Inc.**222                North LaSalle Street17th                FloorChicago,                Illinois 60601(312)                499-3284FAX:                (312) 499-3254 |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   |   | May                19,                2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

**RE:      WCMA LINE OF CREDIT NO. 412-02104 ("Line of Credit")**

| By:    | /s/                Jack Gongaware |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Jack                Gongaware     |
|   | Credit                Manager     |

| cc: | Nick                Zappia |
|-----|----------------------------|

----
# C_2019093EN.01005601.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/56

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — Dermatest v EUIPO (ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 5-star-guarantee.de CLINICALLY TESTED)

(Case T-802/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 5-star-guarantee.de CLINICALLY TESTED - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 93/71)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 (Case R 525/2017-4), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 5-star-guarantee.de CLINICALLY TESTED as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.

---
# FCM DATA JUNE 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05868-DC Document 7 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05868-DC Document 7 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05868-DC Document 7 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
# C_2019399EN.01004401.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-629/17) (1)

(ERDF - ESF - Reduction in financial assistance - Public procurement - Article 99(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Article 16(b) of Directive 2004/18/EC - Specific exclusion - Public service contracts for the acquisition, development, production or co-production of programme material intended for broadcasting by broadcasters)

(2019/C 399/52)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil and T. Müller, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and K. Rudzińska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 4682 final of 6 July 2017 cancelling part of the European Social Fund assistance for the operational programme Education for Competitiveness under the ‘Convergence’ and ‘Regional Competitiveness and Employment’ objectives in the Czech Republic and part of the European Regional Development Fund assistance for the operational programmes Research and Development for Innovations under the ‘Convergence’ objective in the Czech Republic and Technical Assistance under the ‘Convergence’ and ‘Regional Competitiveness and Employment’ objectives in the Czech Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of thinkorswim Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lee K. Barba, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company, and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Dated: March 16, 2009

/s/ LEE K. BARBA Lee K. Barba
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



INTRICON ADDS PHILIP N. SEAMON TO BOARD

New Independent Director Brings More than 30 Years of

Corporate Finance Experience

ST. PAUL, Minn.  Sept. 1, 2006  IntriCon Corporation (AMEX: IIN), a designer, developer,
manufacturer and distributor of miniature and micro-miniature medical and electronic products, has added Philip N. Seamon, to its
board of directors. Seamon brings more than 30 years of corporate finance and operational consulting experience. With his addition
to the companys board, IntriCon now has five board members, of whom four are independent under applicable SEC and American
Stock Exchange guidelines.

Most recently, Seamon was a senior managing director in the corporate finance practice of FTI Consulting, Inc. FTI is a premier provider of problem-solving consulting and technology services to major corporations, financial institutions and law firms. Previously, Seamon was the partner and service line leader of PricewaterhouseCoopers business recovery services practice in Philadelphia. FTI acquired this practice in September 2002.

Were eager to have Phil join IntriCons board of directors, said Mark S. Gorder, IntriCons president and chief executive officer. He is a proven financial leader who brings valuable experience in strategic business planning and improving companies operational efficiencies. His counsel and guidance will be crucial as we continue to grow IntriCon.

Prior to joining PricewaterhouseCoopers, Seamon held senior management and partnership positions in various commercial and investment banking organizations. Among others, his industry experience includes banking, distribution, environmental services, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing, oil and gas, telecommunications and transportation.

Seamon holds a BA degree from Villanova University and an MBA degree from Drexel University. He is a member of: the Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Advisors (AIRA), the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) and the Turnaround Management Association (TMA).

About IntriCon Corporation

Headquartered in Arden Hills, Minn., IntriCon Corporation designs, develops and manufactures miniature and micro-miniature medical
and electronic products. The company is focused on four key markets: medical, hearing health, professional audio and
communications, and electronics. IntriCon has facilities in the United States, Asia and Europe. The companys common stock
trades under the symbol IIN on the American Stock Exchange. For more information about IntriCon, visitwww.intricon.com.



ContactsAt IntriCon:
Scott Longval, CFO
651-604-9526
slongval@intricon.com
        At Padilla Speer Beardsley:
Marian Briggs/Matt Sullivan
612-455-1700
mbriggs@psbpr.com/msullivan@psbpr.com




###

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIAM JAMAL DEMPS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2316

[ October 17, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 574CF10A

.

William Jamal Demps, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
152 So. 57

#### Armnis CRUMBLEY v. STATE.

6 Div. 497.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 11, 1934.

Griffith & Griffith and St. John & St. John, all of Cullman, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

FOSTER, Justice.

Petition of Armnis Crumbley for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Crumbley v. State, 152 So. 55.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION

I, Steven R. Williams, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  March   , 2004               
 /s/ Steven R. Williams                           

Steven R. Williams

Chief Executive Officer

of the Managing General Partner of the Registrant
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT MCCLAIN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

VERNONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-35609

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00756-HA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2013** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN, District

Judge.*** 

Appellant Brent McClain appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of

appellees Vernonia School District and Kenneth Cox. McClain argues that he had

FILED

NOV 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as

provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable James C. Mahan, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the

District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
a constitutionally protected property interest in his employment with the school

district, including: (1) the right to be transferred into the teacher on special

assignment (“TOSA”) position; and (2) the right to be recalled to the newly created

part-time administrator position. McClain further argues that the school district

deprived him of his property interest in continued employment without due process

of law. 

The Oregon Court of Appeals addressed the statutory rights of probationary

employees in Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, 511 P.2d

854 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). In discussing school district employees covered by

sections 342.805 to 342.955 of the Oregon Revised Statutes, the court determined

that “[i]t is clear that at the end of the term of the contract[] during the probationary

period a teacher has no job security.” Id. at 868. The court concluded that

“[e]mployees who are in a probationary status, either temporarily or permanently,

have no property interest within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id.

at 871. 

As a probationary employee whose contract expired, McClain had no

protected property interest in continued employment, including any right to be

transferred into the TOSA position or to be recalled to the part-time administrator

position. Because McClain did not have a constitutionally protected property

2
interest in his continued employment, the court need not decide whether he was

given sufficient process.

AFFIRMED.

3
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 21      Filed 08/13/2007     Page 1 of 1