alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2









Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Steele Recording Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pauline Schneider, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Pauline SchneiderPauline SchneiderPrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2228 

To offer persistent poverty counties and political subdivisions of such counties 

the opportunity to have their rural development loans restructured. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To offer persistent poverty counties and political subdivisions 

of such counties the opportunity to have their rural development loans restructured. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSISTENT POVERTY 

4 COUNTIES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS IN 

5 THOSE COUNTIES TO HAVE THEIR RURAL DE6 VELOPMENT LOANS RESTRUCTURED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—On request of a persistent poverty 

8 county or a political subdivision of such a county that has 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2228 IH

1 an outstanding loan described in subsection (c), the entity 

2 that made the loan shall restructure the loan so that the 

3 interest rate on the loan is 0 percent and the loan term 

4 is 40 years. 

5 (b) PERSISTENT POVERTY COUNTY DEFINED.—In 

6 subsection (a), the term ‘‘persistent poverty county’’ 

7 means a county that has had 20 percent or more of its 

8 population living in poverty over the past 30 years, as 

9 measured by the 1990, 2000, and 2010 decennial cen10 suses. 

11 (c) LOAN DESCRIBED.—A loan is described in this 

12 subsection if the loan is any of the following: 

13 (1) WATER AND WASTE DISPOSAL LOAN.—A 

14 loan made under section 306(a)(1) of the Consoli15 dated Farm and Rural Development Act for a water 

16 and waste disposal purpose. 

17 (2) ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY LOAN.— 

18 A loan made under section 306(a)(1) of the Consoli19 dated Farm and Rural Development Act for an es20 sential community facility. 

21 (3) TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE

22 LOAN.—A loan made under title III of the Rural 

23 Electrification Act of 1936. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2228 IH

1 (4) RURAL BROADBAND ACCESS LOAN.—A loan 

2 made under section 601 of the Rural Electrification 

3 Act of 1936. 

4 (5) DISTANCE LEARNING AND TELEMEDICINE

5 LOAN.—A loan made under section 2333 of the 

6 Food Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 

7 1990. 

8 (6) BROADBAND LOAN AND GRANT PILOT PRO9 GRAM LOAN.—A loan made under the program pro10 vided for in section 779 of Agriculture, Rural Devel11 opment, Food and Drug Administration, and Re12 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018. 

13 (7) RURAL ELECTRIFICATION LOAN.—A loan 

14 made under any provision of the Rural Electrifica15 tion Act of 1936 for a rural electrification purpose. 

16 (8) MULTIFAMILY RURAL RENTAL HOUSING

17 LOAN.—A loan made under section 515 of the Hous18 ing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1485). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12.2


ARCHSTONE-SMITH TRUST


COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES


AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS





(Dollar amounts in thousands)





(Unaudited)


Years Ended December 31,2001

2000

1999

1998

1997(1)Earnings from operations

$
175,397

$
176,466

$
169,339

$
134,571

$
24,686Add:Interest expense


141,907


145,173


121,494


83,350


61,153Earnings as adjusted

$
317,304

$
321,639

$
290,833

$
217,921

$
85,839Combined fixed charges and Preferred Share dividends:Interest expense

$
141,907

$
145,173

$
121,494

$
83,350

$
61,153Capitalized interest


20,294


24,317


31,912


29,942


17,606Total fixed charges


162,201


169,490


153,406


113,292


78,759Preferred Share dividends


22,277


25,340


23,733


20,938


19,384Combined fixed charges and Preferred Sharedividends

$
184,478

$
194,830

$
177,139

$
134,230

$
98,143Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and Preferred Share dividends


1.7


1.7


1.6


1.6


0.9





| | (1) |  | Earnings from operations for 1997 includes a one-time, non-cash charge of $71.7 million associated with costs incurred in acquiring Archstones REIT and property
management companies from Security Capital. Accordingly, earnings from operations were insufficient to cover combined fixed charges and Preferred Share dividends by $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. Excluding the charge, the ratio
of earnings to combined fixed charges and Preferred Share dividends for the year ended December, 31 1997 would be 1.6.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0396 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0396

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on creating the Youth in action programme for the period 2007-2013 (COM(2004)0471 - C6-0096/2004 - 2004/0152(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 272 E , 09/11/2006 P. 0213 - 0213 *

P6_TA(2005)0396

Youth in Action ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on creating the "Youth in action" programme for the period 2007-2013 (COM(2004)0471 — C6-0096/2004 — 2004/0152(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0471) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 149(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0096/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0263/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Makes clear that the appropriations indicated in the Commission proposal are purely indicative and will be determined by the decision on the next multiannual financial framework;

3. Calls on the Commission, once the next multiannual financial framework has been adopted, and if appropriate, to submit a proposal for an adjustment of the financial reference amounts;

4. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Refinitiv US SEF LLC

3 Times Square – 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

www.refinitiv.com

1

November 9, 2020

SUBMITTED VIA PORTAL

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment: Petition Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §§ 145.5 and 145.9 

Re: Submission 20-03: Refinitiv US SEF LLC – Amendments to Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), 

Refinitiv US SEF LLC (“RSEF”) hereby self-certifies the amendments to its Rulebook identified 

in Exhibit A. The Rulebook has been amended in order to reflect certain new requirements 

related to counterparty anonymity under Commission Regulation 37.9(d). The amended 

Rulebook will become effective on November 24, 2020.

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendments to the Rulebook and their compliance 

with applicable provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A, and the amendments showing changes against the version submitted to the 

Commission in Submission 19-01 on March 1, 2019, is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

RSEF hereby certifies that: (i) the amended Rulebook complies with the CEA and the 

Commission’s regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being 

concurrently posted on RSEF’s website. No substantive opposing views were expressed with 

respect to the amendments to the Rulebook.

Please contact me using the information below if you have any questions regarding these 

amendments to the Rulebook.

Michael W. Rooney

3 Times Square – 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

Phone: (646) 223-7397

Email: Michael.w.rooney@refinitiv.com
2 

Sincerely, 

Michael W. Rooney

Chief Compliance Officer

cc: Nancy Markowitz, Deputy Director, Division of Market Oversight, Exchange and Data

Repository Branch

Jasmine Lee, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight

(Commodity Futures Trading Commission) 
3

EXHIBIT A

Explanation and Analysis of Material Amendments

Summary: The Rulebook has been amended in order to reflect certain new 

requirements related to post-trade name give-up under Commission Regulation 37.9(d). The

amended Rulebook showing changes against the version submitted to the Commission in

Submission 19-01 on March 1, 2019, is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to

them in the Rulebook.

Amendment and Explanation Relevant Law, Regulation or

Guidance

Rule 702

Added a proviso stating that the identity of each Counterparty 

to a Permitted Transaction executed on the CLOB will only be 

disclosed if the transaction is not intended to be submitted for 

clearing contemporaneously with execution.

Core Principle 2

Rule 707

Added new Rule 707 explaining the prohibition of post-trade

name give-up for swaps executed anonymously and intended to 

be cleared.

Core Principle 2
4

EXHIBIT B

Rulebook Amendments
# C_2005020EN.01000201.xml

| 25.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/2

---

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

Imports from Israel into the Community

(2005/C 20/02)

By an earlier Notice to Importers published on 23 November 2001 in Official Journal of the European Communities C 328 (page 6), operators presenting documentary evidence of origin with a view to securing preferential treatment for products originating from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, were informed that putting the products in free circulation could give rise to a customs debt.

Official Journal of the European Communities

According to the Community, products coming from places brought under Israeli Administration since 1967 are not entitled to benefit from preferential tariff treatment under the EU-Israel Association Agreement (1).

1

Operators are informed that the EU and Israel have arrived to an arrangement for the implementation of Protocol 4 to the Agreement. As a result, all movement certificates EUR.1 and invoice declarations made out in Israel will bear, as from 1 February 2005 the name of the city, village or industrial zone where production conferring originating status has taken place.

Operators presenting preferential proofs of origin under the EU-Israel Association Agreement are informed that the preferential treatment will be refused to the goods for which the proof of origin indicates that the production conferring originating status has taken place in a city, village or industrial zone which is brought under Israeli Administration since 1967.

This notice replaces the November 2001 notice from 1 February 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 147 of 21.6. 2000, p. 3.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 23 (Dixon Hughes Logo) CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary
Elizabeth City, North Carolina We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-98027, 333-98025, and 333-98021)
on Forms S-8 of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary of
our report dated February 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31,
2004 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.
and Subsidiary. -s- Dixon Hughes PLLC Sanford, North Carolina
March 31, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Weldon BAKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6089.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Weldon Baker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Shawn Robert Evans, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Weldon Baker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines and the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372 (“FSA”). We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision on whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) and review de novo a court’s conclusion on the scope of its legal authority under that provision. *United States v. Munn,*595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In 2009, Baker pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). Baker was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum term of 120 months’ imprisonment. In 2012, Baker, through counsel, sought a sentence reduction, arguing that had he been sentenced under the FSA, he would not have been subject to the 120-month mandatory minimum.

Baker, however, originally was sentenced before the enactment of the FSA. We previously have held that the FSA does not apply retroactively to offenders who, like Baker, were sentenced before its enactment. *United States v. Bullard,*645 F.3d 237, 246-49 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 356, 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011). Moreover, because *187Amendment 750 did not lower the applicable Guidelines range, the district court properly denied Baker’s motion to reduce sentence. *See Munn,*595 F.3d at 187.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
View All Circulars / Subscribe / Contact Us / Media Inquiries

Registered name: ICE Clear Europe Limited, (Registered in England, No. 06219884) 

Registered office: Milton Gate, 60 Chiswell Street, London EC1Y 4SA, United Kingdom

ICE Clear Europe Ltd is recognised as a clearing house and central counterparty under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (which incorporates the European Market 

Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), as applicable), supervised by the Bank of England.

DD Month 2020

Circular C20/XXX

ICE Clear Europe: Designation of certain Permitted Co-mingled Contracts

Category

Regulations

Attachments

None

Following receipt of approval from the CFTC in relation to the treatment of customer funds held in connection with clearing 

by ICE Clear Europe Limited of contracts traded on ICE Futures Abu Dhabi (“IFAD”), Clearing Members are advised that 

ICE Clear Europe (“ICEU”) hereby designates the contracts admitted for trading on IFAD as “Permitted Co-mingled 

Contracts” within the meaning of Rules 101 and 1603 of the Clearing Rules.

This means that ICEU and FCM/BD Clearing Members may (i) hold in a DCM Customer Account subject to Section 4d(a) 

and (b) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the Act), customer money, securities and property used to margin, secure or 

guarantee both the futures and options on futures (“futures”) traded on ICE Futures US and foreign futures and options on 

futures as defined in Commission Regulation 30.1 (“foreign futures”), traded on IFAD, in addition to those traded on ICE 

Futures Europe and ICE Endex; and (ii) provide for portfolio margining of such futures and foreign futures in a manner 

consistent with applicable law, including CFTC Rule 39.13. Similarly, other FCMs that clear customer positions at ICE 

Clear Europe through an FCM/BD Clearing Member may hold customer money, securities and property used to margin, 

secure or guarantee such futures and foreign futures in the futures customer account and provide for portfolio margining 

of such futures and foreign futures in such manner.

ICEU expects that Clearing Members and their customers will benefit from the expanded commingling, through the 

enhanced protection for customer property that is provided under the Act for DCM Customer Account under Section 4d(a) 

and (b) of the Act, and the economic efficiencies that may be provided by making available appropriate portfolio margining 

among the relevant products.

Should you have any questions in relation to this Circular or require any further information, please contact Mark Woodward 

by phone on +44 (0)20 7065 7617 or by email mark.woodward@theice.com.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings specified in the Clearing Rules.

Please ensure that the appropriate members of staff within your organisation and customers are advised of the content of 

this Circular.

Signed:

Hester Serafini

President

For more information, please contact:

Mark Woodward

Vice President, Corporate Development

+44 (0)20 7065 7617

mark.woodward@theice.com
# C_2019044EN.01005801.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/58

---

Order of the General Court of 19 November 2018 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB

(Case T-14/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Setting of the 2016 ex-ante contribution - Period for bringing an action - Out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and K. Rübsamen, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, S. Raes, A. Kopp and T. Van Dyck, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and, second, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Landesbank Baden-Württemberg is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Landesbank Baden-Württemberg is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

---
Exhibit 99.2



INVESTOR INFORMATION



Annual Meeting



The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at the Sheraton Minneapolis West, 12201 Ridgedale Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota on April 25, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. local time. All shareholders are welcome to attend and take part in the discussion of Company affairs.



Board of Directors

Bradley D. Slye

Chairman of the Board

President, Electro-Sensors, Inc.



P. R. Petersen

President, P. R. Petersen Company

Secretary, Electro-Sensors, Inc.



Joseph A. Marino

President/CEO, Cardia, Inc.



Geoffrey W. Miller

Controller, Wilcox Paper



Director Nominee

Robert W. Heller

President, Heller Capital, Inc.



Officers

Bradley D. Slye

President; CEO and CFO



Peter R. Petersen

Secretary



Transfer Agent & Registrar

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

Corporate Trust Services

59 Maiden Lane

New York, NY 10038



Auditors

Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P.

7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Ste. 800

Minneapolis, MN 55344



Counsel

Fredrikson & Byron, PA

200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000

Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425



Exchange Listing

The Nasdaq Stock Market (Capital Market)

Common Stock

Stock Trading Symbol:ELSE



Form 10-KSB

The Form 10-KSB report included in this annual report to shareholders has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the SEC takes no action to approve or disapprove the report or to pass upon its accuracy or adequacy. This report is not intended to be used, nor may it be used, as a representation, prospectus or circular in respect to any security; it is published and furnished solely as information for the benefit of the Companys shareholders.

39

---
EXHIBIT 99

|             |  | 
|------------ |  | 
|NEWS RELEASE |  | 

|      |  | 
|----- |  | 
|FROM: |  | 
|      |  | 
|      |  | 
|      |  | 
|      |  | 

NEW ULM TELECOM, INC.
ANNOUNCES THE AGREEMENT OF ALLTEL TO PURCHASE MIDWEST WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC

NEW ULM, MN  On November 18,
2005, The President and CEO of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (OTCBB:NULM), Bill Otis,
announced that the Company has been informed by Midwest Wireless Holdings, LLC that it has
entered into a definitive agreement with Alltel Corporation for the purchase of the assets
of Midwest Wireless.

New Ulm Telecom, Inc. has a 9.88%
equity stake in Midwest Wireless Holdings, LLC.

Under the agreement, as announced today,
Alltel Corporation will pay $1.075 billion in cash to purchase Midwest Wirelesss
licenses, customers and network assets. Closing of the transaction, which expected to
occur in the first half of 2006, is contingent upon approval by the members of Midwest
Wireless, and regulatory approvals.