alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 30 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 30 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
exv10w30









    Exhibit 10.30



 




    SUMMARY
    OF 2011 CASH BONUS PROGRAM



 



    The Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the
    “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the
    “Board”) of Dollar Financial Corp. (the
    “Company”) approved a cash bonus program for the
    Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2011
    (“Fiscal 2011”) pursuant to which certain management
    personnel of the Company will participate (the “2011 Cash
    Bonus Program”), including each of the Company’s named
    executive officers: Jeffrey Weiss, Chairman and Chief Executive
    Officer; Randy Underwood, Executive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer; Norman Miller, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Operating Officer; Syd Franchuk, Executive Vice President
    and Chairman — National Money Mart Company; and Silvio
    Piccini, Senior Vice President and Managing Director —
    United Kingdom Operations (collectively, the “NEOs”).
    The 2011 Cash Bonus Program provides for target and maximum
    bonus opportunities as a percentage of each participant’s
    annual base compensation for Fiscal 2011, with that percentage
    determined based upon the Company’s achievement of certain
    earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
    (“EBITDA”) goals, the performance of the business unit
    in which the participant operates,
    and/or the
    Company’s achievement of strategic objectives established
    by the Board.



 



    The following table sets forth the target and maximum bonus
    opportunities for each of the NEOs under the 2011 Cash Bonus
    Program, expressed as a percentage of each NEO’s annual
    base compensation for Fiscal 2011:



 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

    Named Executive Officer


	
 
	
    Target Bonus Opportunity
	
 
	
    Maximum Bonus Opportunity

	 

	

    Jeffrey Weiss


	
 
	
 
	
    125
	
    %
	
 
	
 
	
    175
	
    %

	

    Randy Underwood


	
 
	
 
	
    90
	
    %
	
 
	
 
	
    180
	
    %

	

    Norman Miller


	
 
	
 
	
    90
	
    %
	
 
	
 
	
    180
	
    %

	

    Sydney Franchuk


	
 
	
 
	
    60
	
    %
	
 
	
 
	
    120
	
    %

	

    Silvio Piccini


	
 
	
 
	
    50
	
    %
	
 
	
 
	
    100
	
    %









 



    Under the 2011 Cash Bonus Program, the bonuses of
    Messrs. Weiss, Underwood and Miller will be based on the
    Company’s consolidated EBITDA for Fiscal 2011, the bonus of
    Mr. Franchuk will be based on the performance of the
    Company’s Canadian business unit during Fiscal 2011 and the
    bonus of Mr. Piccini will be based primarily on the
    performance of the Company’s U.K. business unit during
    Fiscal 2011.



 



    The Committee
    and/or the
    Board will determine the EBITDA operating targets and
    methodology on which bonuses are paid pursuant to the 2011 Cash
    Bonus Program based upon methods historically used by the
    Company. The Committee and the Board retain the right to amend,
    alter or terminate the 2011 Cash Bonus Program at any time.
    Bonuses under the 2011 Cash Bonus Program will be calculated and
    paid after finalizing the Company’s annual financial
    results for Fiscal 2011.
Clear All

        29 September 2023    

#                     NSA Hampton Roads Chief Petty Officer Pinning Ceremony                 

                  Alright, well good afternoon everyone. What a wonderful day. I know M-C-C Brooks said we are going to do this uncovered but I only get to wear this like 30 minutes every year, and I will not be denied my 30 minutes. This is all about getting this cover, and I’m proud of it too, so anyway, you’re            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# FCM Data October 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

CAMILLA MAZARESE, as Proposed Administratrix 07-CV-5561 (AKH)

of JOHN MAZARESE,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Plaintiff,

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an~ appearance as counsel

for Defendants CENTURY 21, INC and BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC in the abovecaptioned action and all future correspondence and papers filed or serviced in cormection with

the above-captioned action are to be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

CENTURY 21, INC., BLUE

MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC,

Is/

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

Realty).

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants Century 21, Inc and Blue Millennium

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint~fs

Dated: September 11, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

I Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05947-CLB Document 4 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05947-CLB Document 4 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05947-CLB Document 4 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Pici, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Penn
Virginia Resource GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 27, 2009



/s/ FRANK A. PICIFrank A. Pici Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meetings:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates/Times:*                         June 6 and 7, 2001, 7:30 a.m.-9 p.m.; June 8, 2001, 7:30 a.m.-3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Ulrich Strom, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4938.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         Review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552      ( print page 27704)                            b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 15, 2001.

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-12592  Filed 5-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# C_2019122EN.01001701.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Mouldpro v EUIPO — Wenz Kunststoff (MOULDPRO)

(Case T-796/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MOULDPRO - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relative grounds for invalidity - Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2019/C 122/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: W Rebernik, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 October 2017 (Case R 2153/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mouldpro and Wenz Kunststoff.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mouldpro ApS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mouldpro ApS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 187 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park 

to include the Wallis House and Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. LOUDERMILK (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. HICE of Georgia, 

and Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of the Kennesaw Mountain National 

Battlefield Park to include the Wallis House and 

Harriston Hill, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain 

5 National Battlefield Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this section: 

8 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en9 titled ‘‘Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 187 IH

1 Park, Proposed Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 

2 325/80,020, and dated February 2010. 

3 (2) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Ken4 nesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park. 

5 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

6 the Secretary of the Interior. 

7 SEC. 3. KENNESAW MOUNTAIN NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD 

8 PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

9 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the 

10 Park is modified to include the approximately 8 acres of 

11 land or interests in land identified as ‘‘Wallis House and 

12 Harriston Hill’’, as generally depicted on the map. 

13 (b) MAP.—The map shall be on file and available for 

14 inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 

15 Service. 

16 (c) LAND ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may acquire 

17 land or interests in land described in subsection (a) by 

18 donation, purchase from willing sellers, or exchange. 

19 (d) ADMINISTRATION OF ACQUIRED LAND.—The 

20 Secretary shall administer land and interests in land ac21 quired under this Act as part of the Park in accordance 

22 with applicable laws (including regulations). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit
32


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF JAMES DEOLDEN AND EDWARD DEESE





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the quarterly report of CalbaTech, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to their
knowledge:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 25, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/  James
      DeOldenJames
      DeOlden,Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 25, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/  Edward
      DeeseEdward
      Deese,Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ John R. Hawkins                                 
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|John R. HawkinsChief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2006

---
# C_2019082EN.01005101.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — De Loecker v EEAS

(Case T-537/17) (1)

((Civil service - EEAS - Temporary agents - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Right to be heard - Liability))

(2019/C 82/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Stéphane De Loecker (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially J. N. Louis and N. de Montigny, then J. N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of 270 TFEU and seeking, firstly, the annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 10 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance made under Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 10 October 2016 rejecting Mr Stéphane De Loecker request for assistance made under Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 10 October 2016 rejecting Mr Stéphane De Loecker request for assistance made under Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
**Exhibit L**

**ForecastEx LLC**

**Core Principles Chart**

**March 2022**

**Error! Unknown document property name.**

9

**A narrative and any other form of documentation that may be provided under other Exhibits herein that describe the manner in which the Applicant is able to comply with each core principle. Such documentation must include a regulatory compliance chart setting forth each core principle and providing citations to the Applicant’s relevant rules, policies, and procedures that address each core principle. To the extent that the application raises issues that are novel, or for which compliance with a core principle is not self-evident, include an explanation of how that item and the application satisfy the core principles. Applicant must include a description of how it meets the definition of “Board of Trade” as defined in §1a(2) of the CEA.**

The below chart details how ForecastEx LLC (“ForecastEx” or the “Exchange”) meets each core principle.

1
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM S32766

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

JQUAN T. RUSSELL )

Staff Sergeant (E-5) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 3

On 27 September 2024, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from 

Appellate Review and a Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and 

Special Courts-Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals, 

signed by Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 17 September 2024.

The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 8th day of October, 2024,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records 

Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for CourtsMartial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024

ed.). 

FOR THE COURT

OLGA STANFORD, Capt, USAF

Commissioner