alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF FORM 10-Q/A REPORT OF




KL
ENERGY CORPORATION




FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010




The
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of KL Energy
Corporation (“KL”), that to his knowledge:




1.
              This Form 10-Q/A Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
              The information contained in such
      10-Q/A Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of
  KL.


This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the 10-Q/A Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to KL and will be retained by KL and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is executed as of September 28,
2010.


/s/  PETER
      GROSSPeter
      GrossPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                              |   |                           |   |
| Date:       January 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Harvey      Judkowitz |   |
|                              |   | Harvey      Judkowitz          |   |
|                              |   | Chief      Executive Officer   |   |
|                              |   | Chief      Financial Officer   |   |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dedric Louis JOHNSON, a/k/a Big Boy, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-4721.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Margaret A. Chamberlain, Chamberlain Law Firm, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dedric Louis Johnson was convicted by a jury in March 2011 of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of crack cocaine and marijuana and numerous associated substantive counts. He was sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment based on two prior felony drug convictions. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (2006). Johnson appealed. Prior to filing briefs, the parties filed a joint motion to remand for resentencing in accordance with the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010(FSA). We granted the motion and Johnson’s case was remanded to the district court. *See United States v. Johnson,*No. 11-4777 (4th Cir. Order entered October 20, 2011).

Johnson was resentenced in September 2012 to 120 months’ imprisonment. He timely appealed. Counsel has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but questioning whether the district court erred in denying Johnson’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Although advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Johnson has not done so.

Prior to trial, Johnson raised a pro se motion to dismiss the superseding indictment arguing that the statute referenced in it applied only to heroin, not to crack cocaine or marijuana, with which he was charged. The district court properly denied Johnson’s motion. Section 841 clearly includes cocaine base (crack) and marijuana within its penalty provisions. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841(b); *see also*21 U.S.C. § 812 (2006) (including cocaine (in all its forms) and marijuana in its list of “controlled substances”).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. *207We therefore affirm Johnson’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Johnson, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Johnson requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Johnson. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summit Brokerage Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Marshall T. Leeds, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                            /s/ Marshall T. Leeds
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Marshall T. Leeds
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. and will be retained by Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017086EN.01003002.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/30

---

Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)

(Case T-40/17)

(2017/C 086/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Habermaaß GmbH AG (Bad Rodach, Germany) (represented by: U. Blumenröder, H. Gauß and E. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Here Global BV (Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘h’ — Application for registration No 12 833 141

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2016 in Case R 53/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 41 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 41 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of the legal principles to be considered when applying and interpreting the Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the legal principles to be considered when applying and interpreting the Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 135(4) of the Rules of procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 135(4) of the Rules of procedure.

---
906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Royal Union Holding Corporation for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010, Heidi Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Tammy Hardcastle, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Union Holding Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-KQ for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal Union Holding Corporation





Dated:  May 21, 2010





Royal Union Holding Corporation








By: /s/ Heidi Williams


Chief Executive Officer








By: /s/ Tammy Hardcastle


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1



GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Dollar amounts in millions)



|                                                                                                         |  | Years Ended December 31,
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                                                                                                         |  | 2002                    
|Net earnings                                                                                             |  | $                       
|Provision for income taxes                                                                               |  |                         
|Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                                                      |  |                         
|                                                                                                         |  |                         
|                                                                                                        
|Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle                     |  |                         
|                                                                                                        
|Fixed charges:                                                                                           |  |                         
|Interest                                                                                                 |  |                         
|Interest portion of net rentals                                                                          |  |                         
|                                                                                                         |  |                         
|Total fixed charges                                                                                      |  |                         
|                                                                                                        
|Earnings, before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
plus fixed charges |  | $                       
|                                                                                                         |  |                         
|                                                                                                        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                       |  |                         
|                                                                                                         |  |                         



For purposes of
computing the ratios, fixed charges consist of interest on all indebtedness and one-third of rentals, which management believes is a reasonable approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 18, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              April
                24, 2008
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 521 4609 nirup.ramalingam@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

June 16, 2020

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, June 16, 2020, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 20-281S) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6 to certify changes to

NEX SEF’s fee schedule and certain incentive programs (“Fee Schedule”). This supplemental filing 

includes an Appendix A (Fee Schedule, blacklined version) and an Appendix B (Fee Schedule, clean

version).

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendix A and Appendix B (“Confidential Information”), on

the grounds that Appendix A and Appendix B contain confidential commercial information of the submitter 

(NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendix A and Appendix B

until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendix A or Appendix B or any other court order, 

subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission 

intends to disclose such Appendix A or Appendix B to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendix A or Appendix B.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

              Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          as adopted Pursuant to
               Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CalbaTech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Deese, CFO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and result of operations on the Company.


By: /s/ Edward Deese
------------------------
Edward Deese, CFO
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 33 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12252]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2001 / 
Notices

[[Page 27061]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Report of Requests for Restrictive Trade Practice or 
Boycott, Single or Multiple Transactions.
    Agency Form Number: 621P, 6051P, 6051P-A.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0012.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 1,298 hours.
    Average Hours Per Response: 121 to 151 minutes per response.
    Number of Respondents: 1,177 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: Used to carefully and accurately monitor requests 
for participation in foreign boycotts against countries friendly to the 
U.S. which are received by U.S. persons. Used to note trends in such 
boycott activity and to assist in carrying out U.S. policy of 
opposition to such boycotts.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, DOC Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-3129, Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: May 10, 2001.
Madeleine Clayton,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12252 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 27 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 27 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 27 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 27 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 4 of 4
Clear All

        11 March 2023    

                    USS Nitze (DDG 94) Arrives in Valletta, Malta                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) arrived in Valletta, Malta, for a scheduled port visit, March 11, 2023.             

        27 June 2022    

                    USS San Jacinto (CG 56) arrives in Valletta, Malta                 
                VALLETTA, Malta - The Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS San Jacinto (CG 56) arrived in Valletta, Malta for a scheduled port visit, June 26.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cr-00481-PAC     Document 34      Filed 09/05/2008     Page 1 of 1