alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2178 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the waiting periods 

for disability insurance benefits and Medicare coverage for individuals 

with metastatic breast cancer, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself and Ms. CASTOR of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the waiting periods for disability insurance benefits and 

Medicare coverage for individuals with metastatic breast 

cancer, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Metastatic Breast Can5 cer Access to Care Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2178 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WAITING PERIOD FOR INDIVID2 UALS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223 of the Social Security 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 423) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter fol7 lowing subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘or (ii)’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘(ii) in the case of an individual 

9 who has been medically determined to have 

10 metastatic breast cancer, for each month begin11 ning with the first month during all of which 

12 the individual is under a disability and in which 

13 the individual becomes entitled to such insur14 ance benefits, or (iii)’’; and 

15 (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘or 

16 (iii)’’ after ‘‘clause (ii)’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply with respect to applications for dis19 ability insurance benefits filed after the date of the enact20 ment of this Act. 

21 SEC. 3. WAIVER OF 24-MONTH WAITING PERIOD FOR MEDI22 CARE COVERAGE OF INDIVIDUALS WITH 

23 METASTATIC BREAST CANCER. 

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 226(h) of the Social Secu25 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 426(h)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2178 IH

1 metastatic breast cancer’’ after ‘‘amyotrophic lateral scle2 rosis (ALS)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to benefits for months beginning 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0285 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0285

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (COM(2004)0635 - C6-0062/2005 - 2004/0232(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 157 E , 06/07/2006 P. 0382 - 0382 *

P6_TA(2005)0285

UN-ECE Protocol on pollutant release and transfer registers *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (COM(2004)0635 — C6-0062/2005 — 2004/0232(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0635) [1],

- having regard to the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,

- having regard to Article 175(1), Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0062/2005),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0170/2005),

1. Approves the conclusion of the Protocol;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretary General of the United Nations.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service 

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a Federally owned invention, U.S. Patent Application No. 09/304,352 filed May 4, 1999, entitled “Chemical Compositions That Attract Arthropods,” is available for licensing and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to the University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc., of Gainesville, Florida, an exclusive license to this invention. 

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before April 17, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5257. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Richard M. Parry, Jr., 

Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 01-1264 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
Exhibit 99.2
                                 ------------



                                      13
<PAGE>



                                                                        [LOGO]

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 4500
700 Fifth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 08104-5044

Tel: (206) 292-1800
Fax: (206) 343-7809
www.us.deloitte.com



INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON
COMPLIANCE WITH UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Washington Mutual, Inc.
Seattle, Washington

We have examined management's assertion about Washington Mutual, Inc.'s (the
Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001,
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
    --------------------------------
March 6, 2002



                                      14

<PAGE>

                                                                        [LOGO]

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, Washington Mutual, Inc. (the
Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy in the amounts of $110 million and $25 million, respectively.

/s/ Craig S. Davis
Craig S. Davis
President
Home Loans & Insurance Services Group

/s/ Anthony T. Meola
Anthony T. Meola
Executive Vice President
Home Loans & Insurance Services Group

March 6, 2002



                                      15
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





I, Gregg Buckbinder, certify that (i) the Annual Report of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





/s/ Gregg BuckbinderGregg BuckbinderChief Financial and Operating OfficerMillburn Ridgefield CorporationManaging Owner, Global Macro TrustMarch 30, 2011
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

# Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest
event reported): March 9, 2004

MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

|North Dakota                                   |  | 33-94644                 |  | 23-7222188                           | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |  | (Commission File Number) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | 

|7525 Red River Road                      |  |            | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | 
|Wahpeton, North Dakota                   |  | 58075      | 
|(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code) | 

Registrant's telephone number,
including area code: (701) 642-8411

---

ITEM 5.      OTHER EVENTS.

On March 5th, 2004, Minn-Dak Farmers
Cooperatives Board of Directors modified the planting level for the 2004 crop to 143% of
base acres plus a 2% measuring tolerance for a total planting of 145% of base acres. The
Board had first established plantings for the 2004 crop at 155% of base acres plus 2%
measuring tolerance in November 2003, the same planting level as the prior two crop years.

There was no one single reason for
this 7.6% reduction in plantings, but rather a number of factors which the Board
considered. The principle reasons for the reduction in acreage include reduced demand for
sugar due to changing dietary habits of Americans and increased levels of imported sugar
containing products, the real prospect of reduced marketing allocations for Minn-Dak
Farmers Cooperative for the 2004 crop and the grower payment risk associated with
producing quantities of sugar far in excess of a marketing allocation.

---

SIGNATURE

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

|                     |  | MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE                                              |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                    
|Dated: March 9, 2004 |  | By /S/ David H. RocheDavid H. Roche President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2196

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN CREDIT HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR EDITH NOURSE ROGERS 
              STEM SCHOLARSHIP.

    Section 3320(b)(4)(A)(i) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``more than the standard 128 semester (or 192 
quarter) credit hours'' and inserting ``at least the standard 120 
semester (or 180 quarter) credit hours''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2196

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
                    Department of Veterans Affairs.
```
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orphan Medical, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy G. McGrath, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/   Timothy G. McGrath
| |                         
| | Timothy G. McGrath      
| | Vice President and      
| | Chief Financial Officer 
| | August 9, 2004          

33

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129683 & (44) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 129683 

 COA: 254928 
 Wayne CC: 03-000955

EMMITT GLOVER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Defendant’s 

motion to remand is also DENIED. 

t1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
#### Castle *v.*Hutchinson.

*Circuit Court, D. Indiana.*

November 10, 1885.

1. Cross-Complaint—Action at Law.

A cross-complaint is not permissible in a common-law action.

8. Constitutional Law—Statute Begulating Form of Note Given for Patent-Bight.

A state statute providing that any person wbo may take any obligation in writing for which any patent-right, or right claimed to be a patent-right, shall form the whole or any part of the consideration, shall, before it is signed by the maker, insert in the body thereof, above his signature, the words “given for a patent-right," is unconstitutional.

At Law. Motion to strike out cross-complaint and parts of answer.

*Byfield & Howland*and *Ward d Davis,*for plaintiff.

*T. H. Nelson,*for defendant.

Woods, J.

A cross-complaint is not permissible in a common-law action. The second paragraph of answer contains a clause to the effect that the notes in suit were made in Indiana, were given for a patent-right, and do not contain in their body the words ‘‘given for a patent-right,” as required by law. The statute referred to is section 6055, Eev. St. Ind., 1881, which reads as follows:

> “Any person who may take any obligation in writing for which any patent-right, or right claimed by him or her to be a patent-right, shall form the whole or any part of the consideration, shall, before it is signed by the maker or makers,- insert in the body of said written obligation, above the signature of said maker or makers, in legible writing or print, the words * given for a patent-right.’ ”

This law is, I think, clearly unconstitutional. It was so held, in respect to similar laws, in *Helm*v. *First Nat. Bank,*43 Ind. 167, following the decision in *Ex parte Robinson, 2*Biss. 309. See, also, *Grover & Baker S. M. Co.*v. *Butler,*53 Ind. 454; *Fry*v. *State,*63 Ind. 552; *Toledo Agr. Works*v. *Work,*70 Ind. 253.

It is claimed that these cases are inconsistent with the opinion of the supreme court of the United States in *Patterson*v. *Kentucky,*97 U. S. 501. But that case has reference to local restrictions upon the sale or use of tangible property; and, notwithstanding the property was manufactured or produced under letters patent, it was held that the enforcement of the statute of the state interfered with no right conferred by the letters patent. The case manifestly has no application here; the notes in suit having been given, not for tangible property, but *for d*right in letters patent, in respect to which the states can impose no restrictions.- Motion sustained.
# SRW Wheat & Oats (Chi & BH)

# SRW Wheat (St. Louis-Alton) 

# Oats

# SRW Wheat (Toledo)

# SRW Wheat (Ohio River)

# SRW Wheat (Mississippi River)

# SRW Wheat (Northwest Ohio)

# KC HRW Wheat

# Corn & Soybean

# Rough Rice

# Soybean Oil 

# Soybean Meal

# Ethanol
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11149 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONY ISRAEL AMBROSIO, also known as Ronnie Ismael Lambrosio, also known as Ronnie Anbrosio, also known as Rodney Lambrosio, also known as Ronny Ishmael Lambrosio, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-162-ALL-D

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rony Israel Ambrosio argues that the district court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence based on his alleged prior aggravated felony convictions, which were not alleged in the indictment. He argues that his prior convictions were an element of the offense and not merely a sentence enhancement factor.No. 00-11149 -2- Ambrosio concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 120 S.Ct. at 2361-62 & n.15; see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). As Ambrosio’s arguments for appeal are foreclosed, he has failed to show that the district court committed error in imposing sentence. Ambrosio’s judgment of conviction is
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canusa Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Janet Janes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Janet Janes
-------------------------------
Janet Janes
Chief Financial Officer
March 5, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.