alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
By Electronic Mail

December 20, 2016

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Amendments to ICE Trade Vault, LLC Rulebook, Fee Schedule and Participant Agreement

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 

40.6

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6, ICE Trade Vault, LLC (“ICE Trade Vault”) submits, by

written certification, proposed amendments to the Rulebook updating Section 4.2.4.1, Exotic Trades, to clarify 

certain reporting procedures related to exotic transactions. In addition, Section 4.4 was updated to add the concept of 

errors and invalid trades and Section 4.5 was amended by adding the cleared novation definition as a Lifecycle 

Event status. The proposed amendments are blacklined in the text of the ICE Trade Vault Rulebook attached hereto.

In addition, ICE Trade Vault has amended the ICE Trade Vault Participant Agreement to add terms related 

to swap data reporting by investment managers and third party reporters. Lastly, ICE Trade Vault has amended the 

ICE Trade Vault Fee Schedule to incorporate fees for swap reporting by investment managers and third party 

reporters. The proposed amendments are blacklined in the text of the ICE Trade Vault Participant Agreement and 

ICE Trade Vault Fee Schedule attached hereto.

ICE Trade Vault certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules 

and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder. No substantive opposing views have been expressed 

by Participants or others with respect to the amendments. ICE Trade Vault further certifies that, concurrent with this 

filing today, a copy of this submission was posted on its website and may be accessed at: www.icetradevault.com. 

ICE Trade Vault intends to implement this amended Rulebook, Participant Agreement and Fee Schedule on January 

5th, 2017.

As noted above, enclosed with this letter is a marked version of the ICE Trade Vault Rulebook, which is 

being submitted in whole. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at

Kara.Dutta@theice.com or (770) 916-7812.

Sincerely,

Kara Dutta

General Counsel

ICE Trade Vault, LLC
Enclosures
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-23 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 16 of 16
# C_2019103EN.01002501.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2019 — EKETA v Commission

(Case T-198/17) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Actibio contract concluded within the context of the seventh framework programme - Eligible costs - Debit note issued by the defendant for the recovery of sums advanced - Reliability of the time records - Conflict of interests))

(2019/C 103/32)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou, A. Kyratsou and O. Verheecke, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration, first, that the request made to the applicant by the Commission in debit note no 3241615335 of 29 November 2016 to reimburse the sum of EUR 38 241 of the payment received for a study on the Actibio project is unfounded in the amount of EUR 9 353,56, and, second, that that sum corresponds to eligible costs which the applicant is not required to reimburse.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard B. CollinsRichard B. CollinsChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Mark A. RobertsMark A. RobertsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


November 8, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12784]



[[Page 28160]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1989-001]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 15, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 10, 2001, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) 
tendered for filing a supplement to the tariff changes submitted on May 
7, 2001, in Docket No. ER01-1989-000.
    Copies of this filing have been served on all affected state 
commission, SPP customers, and SPP members.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such considered by the 
Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12784 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Teresa M. Nilsen                     
|Teresa M. Nilsen, Chief Financial Officer
|Hennessy Advisors, Inc.                  
|                                         
|Date: December 4, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Innova Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Weisel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Walter Weisel
-----------------
Name:  Walter Weisel
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  April 15, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 9 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 9 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 9 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 9 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
# C_2019093EN.01005401.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/54

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Turbo-K International v EUIPO — Turbo-K (TURBO-K)

(Case T-671/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU work mark TURBO-K - Earlier non-registered marks TURBO-K - Relative ground for refusal - Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rules governing common-law actions for passing-off - Goodwill))

(2019/C 93/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Turbo-K International Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Norris and A. Muir Wood, Barristers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Turbo-K Ltd (Winchester, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. van Haperen, lawyer, T. St Quintin, Barrister, and E. Morris, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 July 2017 (Case R 2135/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Turbo-K and Turbo-K International.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible;

| 3. | Orders Turbo-K International Ltd and Turbo-K Ltd each to bear their own costs and each to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Turbo-K International Ltd and Turbo-K Ltd each to bear their own costs and each to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
Eurex Clearing AG
ECAG Rule Certification 059-22
August 18, 2022

1. The text of the proposed amendments to the Clearing Conditions (“Clearing Conditions”) of Eurex
Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) and Price List (“Price List”) of Eurex Clearing is appended as
Attachment A. Any additions are underlined and any deletions are struck through.

2. The date of intended implementation is October 10, 2022.

3. Attached please find a certification that: (1) these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange
Act (the “Act”), and the Commission’s regulations thereunder; and (2) concurrent with the filing of this
submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing to its website at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-
en/rules-regs/regulations/cftc-deo-filings.

4. Aconcise explanation and analysis of the operation, purpose, and effect of the amended rule appears
below.

5. There were no opposing views expressed regarding these amended rules.

6. Confidential treatment is not requested.

CONCISE EXPLANATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION, PURPOSE, AND EFFECT OF
THE PROPOSED RULE AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT,
INCLUDING CORE PRINCIPLES AND THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

Eurex Clearing is amending the Clearing Conditions and Price List to reflect the launch of five new FX
Futures on Emerging Markets currency pairs on Eurex Deutschland, as outlined in Eurex Clearing Circular
059/22, which is appended as Attachment A. Eurex Clearing will provide clearing services for these
contracts. For avoidance of doubt, Eurex Clearing will clear these contracts outside the scope of its DCO
license, which applies only to swaps.

Further information regarding the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed amendments is discussed
in Attachment A.

Eurex Clearing has identified the following derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) Core Principle as
potentially being relevant to the above amendments:

1. DCO Core Principle C (Participant and Product Eligibility): The proposed amendments will
comply with DCO Core Principle C because the amendments list new contracts, which Eurex
Clearing clears outside the scope of its DCO license, and all products cleared by Eurex Clearing
under its DCO license will continue to be subject to appropriate standards in compliance with this
Core Principle.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5c OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, 7
U.S.C. §7a-2 AND COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 40.6, 17 C.F.R. §40.6

I hereby certify that:

(1) the amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Commission’s
regulations thereunder; and

(2) concurrent with the filing of this submission, Eurex Clearing is posting a copy of this filing
to its website at: https://www.curex.com/ec-en/rules-regs/regulations/cfic-dco-filings.

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer
By: Eric Seinsheimer
Title: USCCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: August 18, 2022
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 15      Filed 08/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
141 So. 918

#### PURITY CREAMERY CO. v. A. W. BURT.

4 Div. 617.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 1932.

Cope & Cope, of Union Springs, for appellant.

Andrews & Andrews, of Union Springs, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB     Document 15      Filed 08/07/2007     Page 1 of 1
Tradition SEF, LLC

Tradition SEF, Inc. 32 Old Slip, 28th floor, New York, NY 10005 F 212 791 4500 www.traditionsef.com

Participant Notice 21-05 – Tradition SEF, LLC Adoption of Tradition SEF, Inc. Rulebook

March 31, 2021

To : Tradition SEF Authorized Representatives

From : Tradition SEF Operations and Compliance

As previously reflected in Participant Notice 21-04, Tradition SEF Inc. has converted from a Delaware

corporation to a Delaware limited liability company effective April 1, 2021, and from that date forward 

will be conducting business as Tradition SEF, LLC.

In accordance with this conversion, Tradition SEF, LLC hereby provides notice of its adoption of the 

Tradition SEF, Inc. Rulebook effective April 1, 2021. The revised Rulebook contains nonsubstantive 

changes to the Rules that reflect the revised name of the legal entity. Furthermore, none of these changes

will affect the rights and obligations of any Participant. 

Clean and redlined versions of the revised Rulebook are attached and a copy of this Notice will be filed 

with the CFTC.

___________________________________

For USD IRS and CDX INDEX questions please contact Trading Operations: (212) 238-5930 or 

trading.operations.us@tradition.com.

For SEF compliance or administrative questions, please contact: 

Eric Earnhardt, CCO: (212) 791-3497 or eric.earnhardt@tradition.com 

Jeff Mehan, CAO: (212) 943-4567 or jeff.mehan@tradition.com 

For Legal matters, please contact: 

Dan Glatter, General Counsel: (212) 377-2337 or daniel.glatter@tradition.com
# C_2019155EN.01003901.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)

(Case T-138/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PRIMED - Earlier national figurative marks PRIM S.A., PRiM, S.A. SUMINISTROS MEDICOS and GRUPO PRiM - Genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard - Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Classification as new or additional evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2019/C 155/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Prim, SA (Móstoles, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH (Halberstadt, Germany) (represented by: D. Donath, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2016 (Joined Cases R 2494/2015-4 and R 163/2016-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Prim and Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2016 (Joined Cases R 2494/2015-4 and R 163/2016-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2016 (Joined Cases R 2494/2015-4 and R 163/2016-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Prim, SA; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Prim, SA;

| 4. | Orders Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay half of those ińcurred by Prim. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay half of those ińcurred by Prim.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
# C_2022109EN.01002101.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/21

---

Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — Niemelä and Others v ECB

(Case T-321/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - Loss of interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 109/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Heikki Niemelä (Ohain, Belgium), Mika Lehto (Espoo, Finland), Nemea plc (St Julians, Malta), Nevestor SA (Ohain), Nemea Bank plc (St Julians) (represented by: A. Meriläinen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta and A. Witte, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 23 March 2017, ECB/SSM/2017 — 213800JENPXTUY75VSO/1 WHD-2017-0003, withdrawing Nemea Bank plc’s authorisation to operate as a credit institution and, second, under Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment.

| 2. | The claim for compensation is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The claim for compensation is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 3. | Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea plc, Nevestor SA and Nemea Bank plc and the European Central Bank (ECB) are ordered each to bear their own costs in relation to the application for annulment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea plc, Nevestor SA and Nemea Bank plc and the European Central Bank (ECB) are ordered each to bear their own costs in relation to the application for annulment.

| 4. | Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea, Nevestor and Nemea Bank are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the ECB in relation to the claim for compensation. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea, Nevestor and Nemea Bank are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the ECB in relation to the claim for compensation.

| 5. | The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 28.8.2017.

---