alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ _____________________________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Rehearing No. 546 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 132042 Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 132042 v COA: 247391 Jackson CC: 02-002915-FC KATHERINE SUE DENDEL, Defendant-Appellee.

In this cause, the parties’ joint motion for rehearing is c onsidered and, in lieu of granting rehearing, IT IS ORDERED that th e opinion of the Cour t and the judgment order are amended to provide th at the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is REMANDED to the Court of Ap peals for consideration of the remaining issues raised on appeal.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 19, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28154-28155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the

[[Page 28155]]

following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Number: Request for Approval of Foreign Government 
Employment of Air Force Members; OMB Number 0701-0134.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 144.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 144.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 144.
    Needs and Uses: The purpose of this information collection is to 
obtain the information needed by the Secretary of the Air Force and the 
Secretary of State on which to base a decision to approve/disapprove a 
request to work for a foreign government. This approval is specified by 
37 U.S.C., section 908. Respondents are Air Force retired members and 
certain Reserve members who have gained jobs with a foreign government 
and who must obtain approval from the Secretary of the Air Force and 
the Secretary of State. Information, in the form of a letter, includes 
a detailed description of duty, name of employer, Social Security 
Number, and statements specifying whether or not the employee will be 
compensated; declaring if employee will be required or plans to obtain 
foreign citizenship; declaring that the member will not be required to 
execute an oath of allegiance to the foreign government; verifying that 
the member understands that retired pay equivalent to the amount 
received from the foreign government may be withheld if the member 
accepts employment with a foreign government before receiving approval. 
Reserve members must include a request to Inactive Status List Reserve 
Section (Reserve Section Code RB).
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households; Business or Other For-
Profit.
    Frequency On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-12828 Filed 5-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2119 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize grants for improving 

the energy efficiency of public buildings, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2019 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

grants for improving the energy efficiency of public buildings, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY EFFICIENT PUBLIC BUILDINGS. 

4 Section 125(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 15822(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘$30,000,000 

6 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 

8 2025’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee advises NARA on the full range of programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives in the Office of Records Services.

# DATES:

June 11, 2001, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Bill Emerson Hall, U.S. House of Representatives Page School, Library of Congress, Jefferson Building, Room LJ-A15.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael L. Gillette, Director, Center for Legislative Archives, 202-501-5350.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

Third Report to Congress: Follow-up

Historical Services Legislative Resource Center—Update

NARA Report on Electronic Records Project—Update

Center for Legislative Archives—Update

Other current issues and new business

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: May 10, 2001.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-12427 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
(309913748.1 )

TP ICAP Classification: Public
# C_2021310EN.01001801.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Italy and Spain v Commission

(Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17) (1)

(Rules on languages - Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of German-language translators, French-language translators, Italian-language translators and Dutch-language translators - Restriction of the choice of languages 2 and 3 in the competitions to German, English and French - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1) and (6), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Discrimination based on language - Interests of the service - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 310/20)

Languages of the cases: Italian and Spanish

Parties

Applicant in Case T-695/17: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant in Case T-704/17: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, D. Milanowska, N. Ruiz García and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the notice of open competitions to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment of German-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/343/17), French-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/344/17), Italian-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/345/17) and Dutch-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/346/17) (OJ 2017 C 224 A, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Annuls the notice of open competitions to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment German-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/343/17), French-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/344/17), Italian-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/345/17) and Dutch-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/346/17); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the notice of open competitions to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment German-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/343/17), French-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/344/17), Italian-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/345/17) and Dutch-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/346/17);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Italian Republic in Case T-695/17 and those incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in Case T-704/17. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Italian Republic in Case T-695/17 and those incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in Case T-704/17.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
# C_2018032EN.01003202.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/32

---

Action brought on 29 November 2017 — L v Parliament

(Case T-91/17)

(2018/C 032/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: L (represented by: I. Coutant Peyre, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of the European Parliament of 31/08/2016, refusing to accept two medical certificates produced by the applicant in order to justify certain absences from work and accordingly declaring the absence in question to be unauthorised. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of the European Parliament of 31/08/2016, refusing to accept two medical certificates produced by the applicant in order to justify certain absences from work and accordingly declaring the absence in question to be unauthorised.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging breach of the principles under European Union and Lithuanian law relating to the protection of whistleblowers. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging breach of the principles under European Union and Lithuanian law relating to the protection of whistleblowers.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach by the Parliament of its duty of care and of the principle of good administration. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach by the Parliament of its duty of care and of the principle of good administration.

---
# C_2021163EN.01002301.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — ViaSat v Commission

(Case T-245/17) (1)

(Action for failure to act and for annulment - Electronic communications networks and services - Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum - Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) - Decision 2007/98/EC - Harmonised operator selection procedure - Authorisations granted to the selected operators - Decision No 626/2008/EC - Request for action to be taken - No formal notice - Adoption of a position by the Commission - Inadmissibility - Refusal to take action - Measure not actionable - Inadmissibility - Powers of the Commission)

(2021/C 163/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ViaSat, Inc. (Carlsbad, California, United States) (represented by: E. Righini, J. Ruiz Calzado, P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun, L. Nicolae and V. Di Bucci, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman, acting as Agent), Eutelsat SA (Paris, France) (represented by: L. de la Brosse and C. Barraco-David, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: EchoStar Mobile Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. Robertson, QC), Inmarsat Ventures Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Spontoni, B. Amory, É. Barbier de La Serre, lawyers, and A. Howard, Barrister)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to take certain measures in the context of the harmonised application of rules concerning the provision of mobile satellite services (MSS) in the 2 GHz frequency band and, in the alternative, under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the Commission’s letters of 14 and 21 February 2017 by which it responded following the applicant’s request for action to be taken.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ViaSat, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ViaSat, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Eutelsat SA, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, EchoStar Mobile Ltd and Inmarsat Ventures Ltd to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Eutelsat SA, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, EchoStar Mobile Ltd and Inmarsat Ventures Ltd to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2019035EN.01002001.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — PepsiCo v EUIPO — Intersnack Group (Exxtra Deep)

(Case T-82/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Exxtra Deep - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 35/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PepsiCo, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Intersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Lampel and M. Pfaff, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2016 (Case R 482/2016-4), concerning invalidity proceedings between PepsiCo and Intersnack Group.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2016 (Case R 482/2016-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2016 (Case R 482/2016-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by PepsiCo, Inc.; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by PepsiCo, Inc.;

| 3. | Orders Intersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Intersnack Group GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

---
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-8, as follows:

     1. I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 15, 2004.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Michael L. Parker
                         Michael L. Parker,
                         President and Director
EX-10.1 2005 Management Incentive Plan



 






Exhibit 10.1




LNB Bancorp, Inc.

2005 Management Incentive Plan




     The purpose of the LNB Bancorp, Inc. 2005 Management Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) is
to provide members of the senior management team of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Bancorp”) with
incentives to achieve superior personal performance at the Bancorp during 2005 in order to benefit
the Bancorp and its shareholders. The Incentive Plan has been developed through communication and
reflection on subjective performance goals intended to challenge participants to excel as members
of the newly assembled senior management team of the Bancorp.



     The Compensation and Governance Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the
Bancorp will oversee the administration of the Incentive Plan. The Committee may delegate
ministerial duties to other persons and the Bancorp will furnish the Committee with clerical and
other assistance for administration of the Incentive Plan. The Committee will have the authority
to designate those members of the senior management team of the Bancorp eligible to participate in
the Incentive Plan (“Participants”). Bancorp management will make recommendations to the
Committee, for its consideration in its sole discretion, concerning Participants, Participants’
incentive opportunities and performance goals, and Participants’ achievement of performance goals.



     When the Committee designates a Participant, the Committee will have the authority to specify,
in its sole discretion, (i) the Participant’s target and/or maximum incentive opportunity for 2005,
in each case based on a percentage of the Participant’s 2005 base salary, and (ii) the specific
subjective performance goals (the “Performance Goals”) that apply to the Participant’s incentive
opportunity for 2005.



     The amount of an incentive payment to be paid under the Incentive Plan to a Participant, if
any, will be determined by the Committee after December 31, 2005 based upon the Committee’s
determination, in its sole discretion, of the Participant’s achievement during 2005 of the
Participant’s Performance Goals. If the Committee determines that a Participant has earned an
incentive payment, the Bancorp will notify the Participant of the amount, if any, and the incentive
payment will be made to the Participant in cash not later than March 15, 2006 as long as the
Participant is still employed by the Bancorp or one of its subsidiaries on the date the payment is
to be made. A Participant who is no longer employed by the Bancorp or one of its subsidiaries on
the date payment is to be made will forfeit any incentive payment otherwise payable under the
Incentive Plan. All payments under the Incentive Plan will be subject to applicable tax
withholding.



     The Committee will have the authority, in its sole discretion, to interpret the Incentive Plan
and to make any determinations it may deem to be necessary or advisable under the Incentive Plan.
Any such interpretation or determination of the Committee will be binding on each Participant to
whom it applies.
Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 4 of 4