alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 104 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1986 

[Report No. 116–141] 

To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a scrivener’s 

error. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. RATCLIFFE (for himself, Miss RICE of New York, and Mr. HURD of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

JULY 9, 2019 

Additional sponsor: Mr. COLLINS of Georgia 

JULY 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1986 RH

A BILL 

To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, 

to correct a scrivener’s error. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1986 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Effective Prosecution 

5 of Possession of Biological Toxins and Agents Act of 

6 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE POSSESSION OF BIOLOGICAL 

8 TOXINS AND AGENTS. 

9 Section 175b of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) in subsection (a)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)(1) No restricted’’ and 

13 all that follows through the end of paragraph 

14 (1) and inserting the following: 

15 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for a 

17 restricted person to— 

18 ‘‘(A) ship, transport, or possess in or af19 fecting interstate or foreign commerce any bio20 logical agent or toxin described in paragraph 

21 (2); or 

22 ‘‘(B) receive any biological agent or toxin 

23 described in paragraph (2) that has been 

24 shipped or transported in interstate or foreign 

25 commerce. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1986 RH

1 ‘‘(2) AGENTS AND TOXINS COVERED.—A bio2 logical agent or toxin described in this paragraph is 

3 a biological agent or toxin that— 

4 ‘‘(A) is listed as a non-overlap or overlap 

5 select biological agent or toxin under part 73 of 

6 title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, pursuant 

7 to section 351A of the Public Health Service 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 262a); and 

9 ‘‘(B) is not excluded or exempted under 

10 part 73 of title 42, Code of Federal Regula11 tions.’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘(2) Whoever’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘(3) PENALTY.—Whoever’’ and adjusting 

14 the margin accordingly; and 

15 (2) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding 

16 paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘DEFINITIONS.—’’ be17 fore ‘‘In this section:’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 104 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1986 

[Report No. 116–141] 

A BILL 

To amend section 175b of title 18, United States 

Code, to correct a scrivener’s error. 

JULY 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Emily Bayer, Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Elmsford, Respondent, and Creighton M. English, Intervenor-Respondent.

In aproceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Elmsford, dated October 29, 1985, which granted a variance to the. intervenor-respondent, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), dated January 21, 1987, which dismissed the petition as time barred.

Ordered that the petitioner’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, said application is referred to Presiding Justice Mollen and leave to appeal is granted by Presiding Justice Mollen *(see,*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, and it is further,

Ordered that the intervenor-respondent is awarded costs, payable by the appellant.

The petition was properly dismissed as untimely since it was not commenced within 30 days after the filing of the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals in the office of the Village Clerk *(see,*Village Law § 7-712 [3]; *Matter of De Bellis v Luney,*128 AD2d 778; *Matter of Town of Clinton v Dumais,*69 AD2d 836).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ken Eickerman
  Ken Eickerman
  
  Chief Financial Officer 
Date: August 16, 2010

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
DOCSNY-265736v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

THOMAS COSTELLO AND TERRI 

COSTELLO, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN D/B/A KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05345-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-265736v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05345-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-10798-VM     Document 8      Filed 05/03/2007     Page 1 of 1
Clear All

        23 April 2023    

#                     Reassure and Deter: George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group Completes Historic Deployment                  

                NORFOLK - The George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group (CSG) - comprised of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 7, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 26, the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf (CG 55), and the Information Warfare            

        23 April 2023    

#                     USS George H.W. Bush Returns from Historic Deployment                  

                NORFOLK - The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) returned to Naval Station Norfolk, April 23, after being deployed for more than eight months.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
# C_2005220EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/2

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 25 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2005

Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1) and the Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3)

(2005/C 220/02)

| From | To | AT | BE | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9.2005 | ... | 4,08 | 4,08 | 7,53 | 3,40 | 4,08 | 3,54 | 5,50 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 8,59 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,49 | 4,08 | 6,64 | 7,00 | 4,08 | 6,24 | 4,08 | 3,96 | 5,10 | 7,55 | 5,81 |
| 1.7.2005 | 31.8.2005 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 7,53 | 4,05 | 4,08 | 4,23 | 5,50 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 8,59 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,49 | 4,08 | 6,64 | 7,00 | 4,08 | 6,24 | 4,08 | 3,96 | 5,10 | 7,55 | 5,81 |
| 1.6.2005 | 30.6.2005 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 7,53 | 4,05 | 4,08 | 4,23 | 5,50 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 8,59 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,49 | 4,08 | 6,64 | 7,00 | 4,08 | 6,24 | 4,08 | 4,69 | 5,10 | 7,55 | 5,81 |
| 1.4.2005 | 31.5.2005 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,33 | 4,05 | 4,08 | 4,23 | 5,50 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 8,59 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,49 | 4,08 | 6,64 | 7,00 | 4,08 | 7,62 | 4,08 | 4,69 | 5,10 | 7,55 | 5,81 |
| 1.1.2005 | 31.3.2005 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,33 | 4,86 | 4,08 | 4,23 | 5,50 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 8,59 | 4,08 | 4,08 | 6,49 | 4,08 | 6,64 | 7,00 | 4,08 | 7,62 | 4,08 | 4,69 | 5,10 | 7,55 | 5,81 |

From

To

AT

BE

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.9.2005

...

4,08

4,08

7,53

3,40

4,08

3,54

5,50

4,08

4,08

4,08

4,08

8,59

4,08

4,08

6,49

4,08

6,64

7,00

4,08

6,24

4,08

3,96

5,10

7,55

5,81

1.7.2005

31.8.2005

4,08

4,08

7,53

4,05

4,08

4,23

5,50

4,08

4,08

4,08

4,08

8,59

4,08

4,08

6,49

4,08

6,64

7,00

4,08

6,24

4,08

3,96

5,10

7,55

5,81

1.6.2005

30.6.2005

4,08

4,08

7,53

4,05

4,08

4,23

5,50

4,08

4,08

4,08

4,08

8,59

4,08

4,08

6,49

4,08

6,64

7,00

4,08

6,24

4,08

4,69

5,10

7,55

5,81

1.4.2005

31.5.2005

4,08

4,08

6,33

4,05

4,08

4,23

5,50

4,08

4,08

4,08

4,08

8,59

4,08

4,08

6,49

4,08

6,64

7,00

4,08

7,62

4,08

4,69

5,10

7,55

5,81

1.1.2005

31.3.2005

4,08

4,08

6,33

4,86

4,08

4,23

5,50

4,08

4,08

4,08

4,08

8,59

4,08

4,08

6,49

4,08

6,64

7,00

4,08

7,62

4,08

4,69

5,10

7,55

5,81

---
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-3 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-3 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-3 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 12 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

PANCRI DIEZ (and wife, ROSA DIEZ), 07-CV-5351 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

BLUE MILLENNIUM

-against- REALTY LLC OF ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

(hereinafter Blue Millennium), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the

above-referenced action, herein adopt Blue Millenniums Answer to Master Complaint, dated

August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, Blue Millennium demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plain4ffs

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Blue Millenniums Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, 1 caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq. James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

115 Broadway, 12th Floor Patton Boggs LLP

New York, New York 10006 One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. Thomas Egan, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

New York, New York 10279 One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata Liaison Counsellor the Defendants

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint?ff~

Dated: September 11, 2007

/5/

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SO 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05351-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
NO T F O R P UB LICATIO N IN W EST' S H AWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000459

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

S TATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID THOMAS MOLIAWA LEIALOHA, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

( CASE NO. 5CPC-19-0000018)

O RDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF THE APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of the Appeal ( Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal ), filed June 16, 2022, by Defendant-Appellant David Thomas Moliawa Leialoha ( Leialoha ), it appears that (1) the appeal was docketed on September 14, 2020; (2) pursuant to Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure ( HRAP ) Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate to voluntarily dismiss the appeal; (3) the stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; (4) the stipulation includes Leialoha's declaration showing he understands the consequences of voluntary dismissal, consistent Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000459 21-JUN-2022 07:59 AM Dkt. 45 OAWSTNO T F O R P UB LICATIO N IN W EST' S H AWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER

with HRAP Rule 42(c); and (5) dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b) and (c).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of the Appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 21, 2022. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

2
# FCM DATA SEPTEMBER 2005
Exhibit G-6

RTX SEF: Operating Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12534]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION AND PRIVACY COMPACT COUNCIL


Notice of Approval of Florida Proposal

AGENCY: National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Florida proposal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 28 CFR chapter IX, the Compact Council established 
by the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact has approved a 
proposal from the State of Florida authorizing access to the Interstate 
Identification Index (III) system on a delayed fingerprint submission 
basis for conducting criminal history record checks in connection with 
the placement of children with temporary custodians on an emergency 
basis. In approving the proposal, the Compact Council took note of the 
recommendation of the Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory 
Policy Board to allow governmental agencies authorized by an approved 
state statute to conduct ``preliminary III name checks'' for all 
persons occupying the residence at the time when children are placed in 
such residences on an emergency basis.
    The approved proposal authorizes III access on a delayed 
fingerprint submission basis by the Florida Department of Children and 
Family Services which is authorized to make emergency placements of 
children by a Florida statute which has been approved by the U.S. 
Attorney General pursuant to Pub. L. 92-544. Pursuant to the approved 
proposal, fingerprints are to be submitted as a follow-up to the III 
name-based check within five working days from such time the name 
checks are conducted. For the purposes of the proposal, working day is 
defined as a day when a governmental agency is open for business.
    Pursuant to Section 901.3 of 28 CFR, chapter IX, other States may 
apply to the FBI's Compact Officer for authority to grant delayed 
fingerprint submission access to governmental agencies authorized by 
approved state statutes to make emergency child placements. Such 
application must explain why the submission of fingerprints 
contemporaneously with search requests is not feasible and must justify 
the length of the requested delay in the submission of such 
fingerprints.
    Proposals should be sent to the FBI's Compact Officer at Criminal 
Justice Information Services, Attn: FBI Compact Officer, 1000 Custer 
Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 26306.

    Dated: May 3, 2001.
Wilbur Rehmann,
Chairman, Compact Council.
[FR Doc. 01-12534 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-U
# C_2018427EN.01004901.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Constantinescu v Parliament

(Case T-17/17) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Education - Admission to childcare facilities - Decision to enrol a child at childcare facilities different from those at which the child was previously enrolled - Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility - Liability)

(2018/C 427/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Radu Constantinescu (Kreuzweiler, Germany) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and L. Deneys, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Luxembourg (OIL) enrolling the applicant’s child at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg II — Bertrange/Mamer and, accordingly, refusing the child’s enrolment at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg I — Kirchberg, as well as the decision of the European Parliament of 7 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint, and, second, compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

---
# C_2019328EN.01004101.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Transdev and Others v Commission

(Case T-291/17) (1)

(State aid - State aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 - Investment subsidies granted by the Île-de-France Region - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ - Article 107 TFEU - Article 108 TFEU - Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Limitation period - Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589 - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 328/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Transdev (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France), Transdev Île de France (Issy-les-Moulineaux), Transports rapides automobiles (TRA) (Villepinte, France) (represented by: F. Salat-Baroux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470 of 2 February 2017, on State aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France Region (OJ 2017 L 209, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders Transdev, Transdev Île de France and Transports rapides automobiles (TRA) to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Transdev, Transdev Île de France and Transports rapides automobiles (TRA) to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05314-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1