Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices 27987

are (1) written disclosure to patients

about Federal laws and regulations that

protect the confidentiality of each

patient, and (2) documenting ‘‘medical

personnel’’ status of recipients of a

disclosure to meet a medical emergency.

The annual burden estimates for these

requirements are summarized in the

table below.

Annual

responses

Responses

per

respondents

Burden per

response Annual burden

Disclosure 42 CFR 2.22 ................................................................................ 11,250 130.175 .......................... 255,938

Recordkeeping 42 CFR 2.51 ......................................................................... 11,250 2 .17 3,938

Total .................................................................................................... 11,250 ........................ .......................... 259,876

Written comments and

recommendations concerning the

proposed information collection should

be sent within 30 days of this notice to:

Stuart Shapiro, Human Resources and

Housing Branch, Office of Management

and Budget, New Executive Office

Building, Room 10235, Washington,

D.C. 20503.

Dated: May 14, 2001.

Richard Kopanda,

Executive Officer, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 01–12673 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162–20–U

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR–4630–C–02]

FY 2001 Super Notice of Funding

Availability (SuperNOFA) for HUD’s

Housing, Community Development and

Empowerment Programs and Section 8

Housing Voucher Assistance;

Technical Corrections; Notification of

E.O. 13202

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.

ACTION: Super Notice of Funding

Availability (SuperNOFA) for HUD

Grant Programs; Technical Correction.

SUMMARY: On February 26, 2001, HUD

published its Fiscal Year (FY) 2001

Super Notice of Funding Availability

(SuperNOFA) for HUD’s Housing,

Community Development, and

Empowerment Programs and Section 8

Housing Voucher Assistance. This

document makes certain technical

corrections to the general section of the

SuperNOFA and to the following

programs: Housing Counseling, HOPE

VI, Economic Development Initiative

(EDI); Brownfields Economic

Development Initiative (BEDI);

Continuum of Care; Housing

Opportunities for Persons With AIDS

(HOPWA); Youthbuild; Resident

Opportunities and Self Sufficiency

(ROSS) Program, Section 202

Supportive Housing for the Elderly

Program, Section 811 Supportive

Housing for Persons with Disabilities

Program, and Assisted Living

Conversion Program. This document

also extends the application due date for

Tribes and Tribally Designated Housing

Entities (TDHEs) applying for funding

under the ROSS Capacity Building and

Conflict Resolution initiative.

DATES: Except for the extension of the

application due date for Tribes and

Tribally Designated Housing Entities

(TDHEs) applying for funding under the

ROSS Capacity Building and Conflict

Resolution initiative, all application due

dates remain as published in the

Federal Register on February 26, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

the Programs listed in this notice, please

contact the office or individual listed in

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION heading in

the individual program section of the

SuperNOFA, published on February 26,

2001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

February 26, 2001 (66 FR 11638), HUD

published its Fiscal Year (FY) 2001

Super Notice of Funding Availability

(SuperNOFA) for HUD’s Housing,

Community Development, and

Empowerment Programs and Section 8

Housing Voucher Assistance. The FY

2001 SuperNOFA announced the

availability of approximately $2.75

billion in HUD program funds covering

45 grant categories within programs

operated and administered by HUD

offices and Section 8 housing voucher

assistance.

This notice published in today’s

Federal Register makes certain

corrections and clarifications to the

General Section of the SuperNOFA and

to the funding availability

announcements of the following

programs: Economic Development

Initiative (EDI); Brownfields Economic

Development Initiative (BEDI); HOPE

VI; Housing Counseling; Youthbuild;

Resident Opportunities and Self

Sufficiency (ROSS) Program, Assisted

Living Conversion Program, Housing

Opportunities for Persons With AIDS

(HOPWA), Section 202 Supportive

Housing for the Elderly Program and

Section 811 Supportive Housing for

Persons with Disabilities Program.

Summary of Technical Corrections

A summary of the technical

corrections that will be made by this

document are as follows: The page

numbering shown in bracket identifies

where the individual funding

availability announcement that is being

corrected can be found in the February

26, 2001 SuperNOFA, and the page

numbering in parentheses identifies

where the specific language that is being

corrected can be found in the February

26, 2001 SuperNOFA.

General Section of SuperNOFA [Page

11636]

HUD corrects the Catalog of Federal

Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)

for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control

Program on the chart at page 11643 and

the Healthy Homes Demonstration and

Education Program at page 11644. The

CFDA for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard

Control Program should be 14.900. The

CFDA for the Healthy Homes

Demonstration and Education Program

should be 14.901.

HUD also amends Section II

(Requirements and Procedures

Applicable to All Programs) by adding

paragraph (L) to make the SuperNOFA

consistent with Executive Order 13202

entitled, ‘‘Preservation of Open

Competition and Government Neutrality

Towards Government Contractors’ Labor

Relation on Federal and Federally

Funded Construction Projects’’ (page

11652).

HUD also corrects Appendix A–2, List

of EZs, ECs, Urban Enhanced Enterprise

Communities, Strategic Planning

Communities, (page 11658) to

accurately reflect an Empowerment

Zone in Upper Manhattan/Bronx (the

Empowerment Zone was included, and

the address was correct but was not

identified as ‘‘Upper Manhattan/

Bronx’’) and to add the Strategic

Planning Community in Brooklyn (page

11661). A certification that should have

been filed with an application for this

strategic planning community may still

be filed and will be treated as a

technical deficiency.

27988 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices

Housing Counseling [Page 11841]

HUD amends paragraph (A)(2) of

Section VIII (Application Submission

Requirements) to correct the fiscal year

referenced in the section. More

specifically, HUD is requesting

information for the fiscal year beginning

October 1, 1999 and ending September

30, 2000. (See page 11849). This section

is also being corrected to note that

applicants that did not participate in the

Housing Counseling program during FY

2000 should report their counseling

workload during this period. (See page

11849). HUD is also correcting

paragraph (A)(3) of Section VIII

(Application Submission Requirements)

to inform applicants that they do not

need to use the budget worksheet that

HUD has provided in the past to submit

their proposed budgets. (See page

11849).

HOPE VI [Page 11913]

HUD corrects the cross reference in

paragraph (B)(2)(b)(ii) of Section II

(Amount Allocated). (See page 11917).

HUD amends Rating Factor 2, paragraph

(2)(a) of Section VI (Revitalization

Application Selection Process) in which

the maximum number of points under

the Impact on Neighborhoods was

correctly listed as totaling 7 points, but

the discussion of the factor indicates

that the maximum number of points

‘‘you will receive is 4 to 6 points.’’ (See

page 11931). HUD also amends Rating

Factor 3, paragraph (7) of Section VI

(Revitalization Application Selection

Process) to make it consistent with

Executive Order 13202 entitled,

‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and

Government Neutrality Towards

Government Contractors’ Labor Relation

on Federal and Federally Funded

Construction Projects.’’ Specifically,

HUD is eliminating the current

reference to union sponsored

apprenticeship programs and

substituting ‘‘registered apprenticeship

programs.’’ The correction also defines

registered apprenticeship programs as

programs that have been ‘‘registered

with either a State Apprenticeship

Agency recognized by the Department of

Labor’s Bureau of Apprenticeship and

Training (BAT) or, if there is no

recognized State agency, by the BAT.’’

(See page 11934).

Economic Development Initiative (EDI)

[Page 12015]

HUD corrects Rating Factor 2,

paragraph (2)(b)of Section V

(Application Selection Process) in

which the maximum number of points

under the Unemployment sub-factor

were correctly listed as totaling 15

under ‘‘Rating Factor 2: Distress/Extent

of the Problem’’, but the examples that

followed incorrectly totaled a maximum

of 10 points. (See page 12023).

Brownfields Economic Development

Initiative (BEDI) [Page 12033]

HUD corrects section identifier errors

in Rating Factor 2, Section V (The

Application Selection Process) at page

12040. HUD also corrects Rating Factor

2, paragraph (2)(b) of Section V

(Application Selection Process) in

which the maximum number of points

under the Unemployment sub-factor

were correctly listed as totaling 15

under ‘‘Rating Factor 2: Distress/Extent

of the Problem’’, but the examples that

followed incorrectly totaled a maximum

of 10 points. (See page 12040).

Youthbuild [Page 12055]

HUD corrects the asterisked footnote

to line 12 of exhibit 4A, Total

Youthbuild Grant Budget, (page 12071)

to note that administrative costs,

consistent with Section III (A)(7) of the

Youthbuild NOFA (page 12058), may

not exceed 10 percent of the grant

award. HUD also corrects Form 2C 13a:

Housing Project Certification for

Residential Rental Units, cited in

Section IV(E) (Application Selection

Process), to publish both pages of this

required form. (See page 12075).

Resident Opportunities and Self

Sufficiency (ROSS) Program [Page

12081]

HUD extends the due date for Tribes

and Tribally Designated Housing

Entities (TDHEs) applying for funding

under the ROSS Capacity Building and

Conflict Resolution initiative to June 20,

2001. HUD also clarifies the eligibility

requirements for Tribes and Tribally

Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs)

applying for funding under the ROSS

Capacity Building and Conflict

Resolution initiative at page 12082.

Continuum of Care Homeless

Assistance [Page 12207]

HUD corrects the chart in Appendix

A that addresses ‘‘Eligible Populations’’

under the Section 8 SRO program. (See,

page 12218). The chart should delete the

second bullet providing ‘‘Section 8

eligible current occupants.’’ This

correction conforms the program to the

McKinney-Vento Act, which limits

eligibility to homeless individuals, and

Section IV (A)(1) (Program

Requirements) of the Continuum of Care

Homeless Assistance NOFA at page

12212.

Housing Opportunities for Persons With

AIDS (HOPWA) [Page 12223]

HUD amends Section VI(A)

(Application Submission Requirements)

to correct a typographical error. Item 10

should read ‘‘Enter 14–241’’ and not

‘‘Enter 14–21.’’ (See page 12235). HUD

also corrects Appendix D, the HOPWA

Project Information Form, to reflect the

2001 Continuum of Care competition

and not the 2000 competition. (See page

12255). Specifically, Part B of the

HOPWA Project Information Form

requires an applicant or project sponsor

to indicate whether it is seeking funding

under this HOPWA competition for an

activity that is duplicated in an

application under the HUD Continuum

of Care Homeless Assistance 2001

competition. Additionally, HUD

corrects paragraph 3 of Appendix D,

HOPWA Applicant Certifications to

provide that ‘‘It will not acquire,

rehabilitate, convert, lease, repair or

construct property to provide housing or

commit HUD, State, local or other funds

to program activities with respect to any

eligible property until it has obtained

HUD approval of form HUD–7015.15,

‘‘Request for Release of Funds and

Certification’’ of compliance with the

National Environmental Policy Act and

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part

58 (Environmental Review Procedures

for Entities Assuming HUD

Environmental Responsibilities) or, in

cases where HUD has performed the

environmental review, the Applicant

has obtained HUD approval of the site

following HUD’s completion of form

HUD–4128.’’ (See page 12265).

Section 202 Supportive Housing for the

Elderly Program [Page 12267]

HUD adds to the list of deficiencies

that will be considered curable in a

Section 202 application, the Exhibit 7(j),

Certification of Consistency with the

EZ/EC Strategic Plan (Form HUD 2990),

but only in connection with

applications involving sites in Brooklyn,

New York, in the jurisdiction of the

New York Multifamily Hub (see

‘‘Exhibits’’ under Section V on page

12276.) This change is necessary since

Brooklyn was not included in the list of

EZs, Ecs, Urban Enhanced Enterprise

Communities, and Strategic Planning

Communities for New York, New York

in Appendix A–2 to the General Section

of the SuperNOFA. As a result,

applicants, proposing sites in this

location will not otherwise have had

sufficient time to obtain the necessary

signature on Exhibit 7(j) in advance of

the application deadline date. (See

‘‘Exhibits’’ under Section V on page

12276.)

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices 27989

Section 811 Supportive Housing for

Persons With Disabilities [Page 12301]

HUD adds to the list of deficiencies

that will be considered curable in a

Section 811 application, the Exhibit 7(j),

Certification of Consistency with the

EZ/EC Strategic Plan (Form HUD 2990),

but only in connection with

applications involving sites in Brooklyn,

New York, in the jurisdiction of the

New York Multifamily Hub (see

‘‘Exhibits’’ under Section V on page

12310.) This change is necessary since

Brooklyn was not included in the list of

EZs, Ecs, Urban Enhanced Enterprise

Communities, and Strategic Planning

Communities for New York, New York

in Appendix A–2 to the General Section

of the SuperNOFA. As a result,

applicants, proposing sites in this

location will not otherwise have had

sufficient time to obtain the necessary

signature on Exhibit 7(j) in advance of

the application deadline date.

Assisted Living Conversion Program

(ALCP) for Eligible Multifamily Projects

[Page 12339]

HUD corrects the e-mail address for a

contact persons on page 12341, second

column, under the fifth full paragraph.

HUD also amends paragraph (B)(11) of

Section III (Program Description:

Eligible and Ineligible Applicants,

Developments and Activities) for clarity.

(See page 12343). HUD also corrects

paragraph (D) of Section III (Program

Description: Eligible and Ineligible

Applicants, Developments and

Activities) to clarify the eligibility of

Section 236 developments. (See page

12343).

Accordingly, in the Super Notice of

Funding Availability for Housing,

Community Development, and

Empowerment Programs and Section 8

Housing Voucher Assistance for Fiscal

Year 2001, FR Doc. 01–4439, beginning

at 66 FR 11638, in the issue of Friday,

February 26, 2001, the following

corrections are made:

1. General Section of SuperNOFA,

Beginning at 66 FR 11638

• On page 11643, the CFDA Number

in the box labeled Lead-Based Paint

Hazard Control Program should be

14.900.

• On page 11644, the CFDA Number

in the box labeled Healthy Homes

Demonstration and Education Program

should be 14.901.

• On page 11652, paragraph (L)

should be added to read as follows:

(L) Consistent with Executive Order

13202, neither you nor any subrecipient

or program beneficiary receiving funds

under an award granted pursuant to this

SuperNOFA, nor any construction

manager acting on behalf of you or any

such subrecipient or program

beneficiary, may require bidders,

offerors, contractors, or subcontractors

to enter into or adhere to any agreement

with any labor organization on any

construction project funded in whole or

in part by such award or on any related

construction project; or prohibit

bidders, offerors, contractors, or

subcontractors from entering into or

adhering to any such agreement on any

such construction project; or otherwise

discriminate against bidders, offerors,

contractors, or subcontractors on any

such construction project because they

become or refuse to become or remain

signatories or otherwise to adhere to any

such agreements. Contractors and

subcontractors are not prohibited from

voluntarily entering into such

agreements.

• On page 11661, second column, the

list of EZs, ECs, Urban Enhanced

Enterprise Communities, Strategic

Planning Communities for New York,

New York, should read as follows:

NY, New York

Empowerment Zone (Upper Manhattan/

Bronx)

Mr. Marion Phillips, III, New York

Empowerment Zone Corp., 633

Third Avenue, 32nd Floor, New

York, NY 10017, 212–803–3240

(Phone), 212–803–3294 (Fax)

Strategic Planning Community

(Brooklyn)

Ms. June Van Brackle, Mayor’s Office

of the New York City EZ, 100 Gold

St., 2nd Floor, New York, NY

10038, 212–788–6777 (Phone), 212–

788–2718 (Fax)

2. Housing Counseling Program,

Beginning at 66 FR 11841

• On page 11849, second column,

HUD amends paragraph (A)(2) of

Section VIII to read as follows:

(2) Form HUD–9902, Housing

Counseling Agency Fiscal Year Activity

Report for fiscal year October 1, 1999

through September 30, 2000.

If you did not participate in HUD’s

Housing Counseling program during FY

2000, this report should be completed to

reflect your counseling workload during

that period.

• On page 11849, second column,

HUD amends paragraph (A)(3) of

Section VIII to read as follows:

(3) Budget Work Sheet. A proposed

budget for use of the requested HUD

funds. Applicants need not, however,

use the budget worksheet that HUD has

provided in the past to submit their

proposed budgets.

3. HOPE VI Program, Beginning at 66 FR

11913

• On page 11917, second column,

HUD corrects paragraph (B)(2)(b)(ii) of

Section II (Amount Allocated) to read as

follows:

(ii) At least half of the funds requested

for relocation must be used to provide

mobility counseling and other services

to promote the self-sufficiency of

displaced residents and must be

matched by non-HOPE VI funds in

accordance with Section IV(F)(2) of this

HOPE VI section of the SuperNOFA

below.

• On page 11931, second column,

HUD amends Rating Factor 2, paragraph

(2)(a) of Section VI (Revitalization

Application Selection Process) to read

as follows:

(a) you will receive 4 to 7 points if

you demonstrate that revitalization of

the severely distressed project if you

demonstrate that revitalization of the

severely distressed project with HOPE

VI funds will significantly improve the

overall health of the neighborhood and

spur outside investment into the

surrounding community.

• On page 11934, first column, HUD

amends Rating Factor 3, paragraph (7) of

Section VI (Revitalization Application

Selection Process) to read as follows:

(7) Apprenticeship Program: 2 Points.

As described in Section VI(1) of the

General Section, Bridging the Gap is a

program in which HUD encourages you

to assist public housing residents in

obtaining construction apprenticeships.

This will involve working with

registered apprenticeship sources to

provide entry level apprenticeships in

construction, construction-related, and

maintenance activities. A registered

apprenticeship program is a program

which has been registered with either a

State Apprenticeship Agency

recognized by the Department of Labor’s

Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training

(BAT) or, if there is no recognized State

agency, by the BAT. See also DOL

regulations at 29 CFR Part 29.

(a) You will receive 2 points if you

propose to implement a program that

offers apprenticeships to residents or

relocated residents of the targeted

development. You must identify the

registered apprenticeship source(s) you

will work with and the number and

types of jobs for which apprenticeships

can be obtained.

(b) You will receive 0 points if:

(i) your program does not propose to

assist residents in obtaining

construction, construction-related, or

maintenance-related apprenticeships, or

(ii) there is not enough information in

your application to enable HUD to rate

this factor.

27990 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices

4. Economic Development Initiative

(EDI) Program, Beginning at 66 FR

12015

• On page 12023, first column, Factor

2, paragraph (2)(b) of Section V

(Application Selection Process) to read

as follows:

(b) Unemployment (15 points)—for

both the project area and jurisdiction; an

application that compares the local

unemployment rate in the following

manner to the national average at the

time of submission will receive points

under this Section as follows:

(i) Equal to but less than twice the

national average—3 points;

(ii) Twice but less than three times the

national average—6 points;

(iii) Three but less than four times the

national average—9 points;

(iv) Four but less than five times the

national average—12 points;

(v) Five or more times the national

average—15 points.

5. Brownfields Economic Development

Initiative (BEDI) Program, Beginning at

66 FR 12035

• On page 12040, first column, the

formerly undesignated second, third,

and fourth paragraphs under Rating

Factor (2): Distress/Extent of the

Problem (40 points), should read as

follows: (1) In applying this factor, HUD

will consider current levels of distress

for the following areas affected by the

project: first, in the area (i.e., Census

Tract(s) or Block Groups) immediately

surrounding the project site or the target

area to be served by the proposed

project; second, in the jurisdiction in

which the project is to be located; third,

relative to the similar measures of

distress in the nation. Applicants may

also provide data for the overall

jurisdiction alongside comparable

jurisdictions in the county and state, as

appropriate to the activity, in order to

demonstrate the various levels of

distress in context. This means that an

application that provides data that show

levels of distress in the project area and

the jurisdiction expressed as a percent

greater than the national average will be

rated higher under this Factor.

Notwithstanding the above, an

applicant proposing a project to be

located outside the target area could still

receive points under the Distress factor

if a clear rationale is provided linking

the proposed project location and the

benefits to be derived by persons living

in more distressed area(s) of the

applicant’s jurisdiction.

(2) Applicants should provide data

that address all indicators of distress, if

applicable, as follows: (a) Poverty rate

(20 points)—data should be provided in

both absolute and percentage form (i.e.,

whole numbers and percents) for both

the target area(s) and the jurisdiction as

a whole; an application that compares

the local poverty rate in the following

manner to the national average at the

time of submission will receive points

under this section as follows:

Equal to but less than twice the national

average—5 points;

Twice but less than three times the

national average—10 points;

Three or more times the national

average—20 points.

• On page 12040, second column,

Rating Factor 2, paragraph (2)(b) of

Section V (Application Selection

Process) to read as follows:

(b) Unemployment (15 points)—for

both the project area and jurisdiction; an

application that compares the local

unemployment rate in the following

manner to the national average at the

time of submission will receive points

under this Section as follows:

(i) Equal to but less than twice the

national average—3 points;

(ii) Twice but less than three times the

national average—6 points;

(iii) Three but less than four times the

national average—9 points;

(iv) Four but less than five times the

national average—12 points;

(v) Five or more times the national

average —15 points.

6. Youthbuild Program, Beginning at 66

FR 12055

• On page 12071, the asterisked

footnote to line 12 of Exhibit 4A to read

that ‘‘Request may not exceed 10% of

Youthbuild subtotal (line 11).’’

• On page 12075, the Form 2C 13a:

Housing Project Certification for

Residential Rental Units, is corrected to

read as follows:

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices 27991

27992 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices 27993

7. Resident Opportunities and Self

Sufficiency (ROSS) Program, Beginning

at 66 FR 12081

• On page 12081, first column, fourth

paragraph under Program Overview,

should read as follows:

Application Deadline. May 24, 2001,

for Resident Management and Business

Development; May 24, 2001, for

Capacity Building or Conflict Resolution

for all applicants except that Tribes and

Tribally Designated Housing Entities

(TDHEs). For Tribes/TDHEs

applications will be due June 20, 2001.

June 26, 2001, for Resident Service

Delivery Models; and

After publication of this SuperNOFA,

Service Coordinator grant renewals

under the Service Coordinator category

will be accepted until all funds are

awarded or June 28, 2001, whichever

occurs first.

• On page 12081, first column, first

paragraph under Section I (Application

Due Date, Application Kits, Further

Information and Technical Assistance)

should read as follows:

Application Due Date: Your

completed application (one original and

two copies) is due on or before 12:00

midnight, Eastern time, on the following

application due dates to HUD

Headquarters at the address shown

below.

May 24, 2001, for Resident Management

and Business Development;

May 24, 2001, for Capacity Building or

Conflict Resolution for all applicants

except that Tribes and Tribally

Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs).

For Tribes/TDHEs applications will

be due June 20, 2001.

June 26, 2001, for Resident Service

Delivery Models; and

After publication of this SuperNOFA,

Service Coordinator grant renewals

under the Service Coordinator category

will be accepted until all funds are

awarded or June 28, 2001, whichever

occurs first.

• On page 12082, first column,

paragraph (C)(b)(iii) under Section II

(Amount Allocated) should read as

follows:

(iii) The maximum amounts for CB/

CR are as follows: $100,000 for CityWide Resident Organizations (CWROs)

per applicant, and $240,000 per

applicant for all other eligible

applicants in these funding categories.

Applicants are required to allocate at

least two-thirds of the total grant to

direct funding of CB or CR activities for

Site-Based Resident Associations (RAs)

and/or Tribal ROs. Tribes/TDHEs may

serve a single tribal RO. CWROs are

required to serve a minimum of three

RAs. All other applicants are required to

serve a minimum of 10 RAs.

8. Continuum of Care Homeless

Assistance Program, Beginning at 66 FR

12207

On page 12218, the field of the chart

in Appendix A that addresses ‘‘Eligible

Populations’’ under the Section 8 SRO

program is corrected to eliminate the

second bullet providing ‘‘Section 8

eligible current occupants.’’ (The first

bullet providing ‘‘Homeless

individuals’’ is correct.)

9. Housing Opportunities for Persons

With AIDS (HOPWA) Program,

Beginning at 66 FR 12225

• On page 12235, second column,

HUD corrects Section VI(A)

(Application Submission Requirements)

to read as follows:

Item 10—Enter 14–241 and the title

‘‘Housing Opportunities for Persons

with AIDS’’ or ‘‘HOPWA’’ for the

Catalogue of Federal Domestic

Assistance.

• On page 12255, HUD corrects

paragraph B of Appendix D, the

HOPWA Project Information Form, to

read as follows:

B. Duplication of Assistance

Requested. Please indicate if your

applicant or a project sponsor is seeking

funding under this HOPWA competition

for an activity that is duplicated in an

application under the HUD Continuum

of Care Homeless Assistance 2001

competition as follows:

• On page 12265, HUD corrects

paragraph 3 of Appendix D, HOPWA

Applicant Certifications to read as

follows:

3. It will not acquire, rehabilitate,

convert, lease, repair or construct

property to provide housing or commit

HUD, State, local or other funds to

program activities with respect to any

eligible property until it has obtained

HUD approval of form HUD–7015.15,

‘‘Request for Release of Funds and

Certification’’ of compliance with the

National Environmental Policy Act and

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part

58 (Environmental Review Procedures

for Entities Assuming HUD

Environmental Responsibilities) or, in

cases where HUD has performed the

environmental review, the Applicant

has obtained HUD approval of the site

following HUD’s completion of form

HUD–4128.

10. Section 202 Supportive Housing for

the Elderly Program, Beginning at 66 FR

12267

On page 12276, second column, the

list of Exhibits under Section V

(Application Selection Process) is

amended by adding the following new

item (j):

(j) Certification of Consistency with

the EZ/EC Strategic Plan (Form HUD

2990) (Only for applications with sites

to be located in Upper Manhattan/Bronx

and Brooklyn).

11. Section 811 Supportive Housing for

Persons With Disabilities Program,

Beginning at 66 FR 12301

On page 12310, second and third

columns, the list of Exhibits under

Section V (Application Selection

Process) is amended by adding the

following new item (j):

(j) Certification of Consistency with

the EZ/EC Strategic Plan (Form HUD

2990) (Only for applications with sites

to be located in Upper Manhattan/Bronx

and Brooklyn).

12. Assisted Living Conversion Program

(ALCP) for Eligible Multifamily Projects,

Beginning at 66 FR 12341

• On page 12341, second column,

under the fifth paragraph under ‘‘For

Further Information and Technical

Assistance’’ the third sentence is

corrected to read as follows:

For Further Information and

Technical Assistance. You should

contact the Multifamily Hub where you

will be mailing your ALCP Application.

(Please refer to Hub telephone numbers

in Appendix A.)

You also may contact Aretha

Williams, Director, Grant Policy and

Management Division, Room 6138, at

(202)–708–3000 x2480 or Faye Norman,

Housing Project Manager at (202) 708–

3000 x2482 for questions regarding the

ALF process. This is not a toll free

number. Ms. Williams can be reached,

by e-mail at

aretha_m._williams@hud.gov and Ms.

Norman at faye_l._norman@hud.gov.

Both Ms. Williams and Ms. Norman are

located at the Department of Housing

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410.

If you have a hearing or speech

impairment, you may access the

telephone number via TTY by calling

the Federal Information Relay Service at

1 800–877–8339.

• On page 12343, first column, HUD

corrects paragraph (B)(11) of Section III

(Program Description: Eligible and

Ineligible Applicants, Developments

and Activities) to read as follows:

(11) Upon receipt of a grant under this

program, all project owners

participating in the ALCP must provide

a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants

(DRC), which will be recorded with the

land, to retain the low income character

of the housing, and to maintain the

project (including the ALF), as a

27994 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Notices

moderate, low, or very low income

facility (as appropriate) for at least 20

years beyond the current 40-to-50 year

term of the mortgage loan or capital

advance. If you are going to use grant

funds to convert unused or

underutilized commercial property you

must provide a DRC for at least a 20-

year period or for the term of the

mortgage on the property whichever is

longer.

• On page 12343, third column, HUD

also corrects paragraph (D) of Section III

(Program Description: Eligible and

Ineligible Applicants, Developments

and Activities) to read as follows:

(D) Eligible Developments. (1) Section

202 projects, Section 202 projects

receiving rental assistance under

Section 8, and Section 202 projects

receiving project rental assistance under

Section 202(C)(2). Rural housing

projects assisted under Section 515 of

the Housing Act of 1949 receiving

Section 8 rental assistance are also

included. Projects receiving projectbased rental assistance under Section 8,

among others, include housing

constructed, substantially rehabilitated

or receiving moderate rehabilitation

assistance under Section 8. Housing

financed by a below-market interest rate

loan or mortgage insured under Section

221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act;

and housing insured, assisted or held by

HUD, or a State or State Agency under

Section 221(d)(3) of the National

Housing Act; and housing insured,

assisted or held by HUD, or a State or

State Agency under Section 236 of the

National Housing Act are also included.

These housing projects must have been

designated primarily for occupancy by

elderly persons, been in occupancy for

at least five years from the date the

HUD–92485 Form entitled ‘‘Permission

to Occupy Project Mortgages’’ was

issued and Final Closing must have

been completed. Your project must:

Dated: May 16, 2001.

Sean G. Cassidy,

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for

Housing.

Donna M.Abbenante,

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for

Community Planning and Development.

Gloria J. Cousar,

Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary

for Public and Indian Housing.

[FR Doc. 01–12794 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–32–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership

Council

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: As provided in Section

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, the Fish and Wildlife

Service announces a meeting designed

to foster partnerships to enhance public

awareness of the importance of aquatic

resources and the social and economic

benefits of recreational fishing and

boating in the United States. This

meeting, sponsored by the Sport Fishing

and Boating Partnership Council

(Council), is open to the public, and

interested persons may make oral

statements to the Council or may file

written statements for consideration.

DATES: Wednesday, June 6, 2001, 10

a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Holiday Inn Hotel and Suites, 625

First St., Alexandria, VA; (703) 548–

6300.

Summary minutes of the conference

will be maintained by the Council

Coordinator at 4040 N. Fairfax Dr.,

Room 132A, Arlington, VA 22203, and

will be available for public inspection

during regular business hours within 30

days following the meeting. Personal

copies may be purchased for the cost of

duplication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laury Parramore, Council Coordinator,

at (703) 358–1711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sport

Fishing and Boating Partnership

Council was formed in January 1993 to

advise the Secretary of the Interior

through the Director, U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, about sport fishing and

boating issues. The Council represents

the interests of the public and private

sectors of the sport fishing and boating

communities and is organized to

enhance partnerships among industry,

constituency groups, and government.

The 18-member Council includes the

director of the Service and the president

of the International Association of Fish

and Wildlife Agencies, who both serve

in ex officio capacities. Other Council

members are directors from state

agencies responsible for managing

recreational fish and wildlife resources

and individuals who represent the

interests of saltwater and freshwater

recreational fishing, recreational

boating, the recreational fishing and

boating industries, recreational fisheries

resource conservation, aquatic resource

outreach and education, and tourism.

The Sport Fishing and Boating

Partnership Council (Council) will

convene to discuss: (1) The Council’s

continuing role in providing input to

the Fish and Wildlife Service on the

Service’s strategic planning for its

Fisheries Program and the National Fish

Hatchery System. (2) The Council’s

work in its role as a facilitator of

discussions with Federal and State

agencies and other sportfishing and

boating interests concerning a variety of

national boating and fisheries

management issues. (3) The Council’s

role in providing the Interior Secretary

with information about the

implementation of the Strategic Plan for

the National Outreach and

Communications Program. The

Secretary approved the plan in February

1999, and the five-year, $36-million

federally funded outreach campaign

authorized by the 1998 Sportfishing and

Boating Safety Act is now being

implemented by the Recreational

Boating and Fishing Foundation, a

private, nonprofit organization.

Dated: May 12, 2001.

Marshall P. Jones, Jr.,

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 01–12668 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Liquor

Regulation and Licensing Ordinance

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the

Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Liquor

Regulation and Licensing Ordinance.

The Ordinance regulates the control,

possession, and sale of liquor on the

Hopland Band of Pomo Indians trust

lands, in conformity with the laws of

the State of California, where applicable

and necessary. Although the Ordinance

was adopted on March 2, 2001, it does

not become effective until published in

the Federal Register because the failure

to comply with the Ordinance may

result in criminal charges.

DATES: This Ordinance is effective on

May 21, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kaye Armstrong, Branch of Tribal

Relations, Division of Tribal

Government Services, 1849 C Street

NW., MS 4631–MIB, Washington, DC

20240–4001; telephone (202) 208–4400.