alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1991 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1991

             For the relief of Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2019

  Mr. Neguse introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JEANETTE VIZGUERRA-RAMIREZ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Jeanette 
Vizguerra-Ramirez shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2


NEWS RELEASE FROM:
                                 DOTRONIX, INC.
                           (OTC Bulletin Board: DOTX)

FOR RELEASE: NOVEMBER 25, 2003


                 DOTRONIX REPORTS RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER
                            ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

ST. PAUL, MN, November 25, 2003 DOTRONIX, INC. (OTC BULLETIN BOARD: DOTX)
announced its first quarter results today.

Fiscal 2004 first quarter sales were $317,000 (quarter ended September 30,
2003) and $642,000 in the first quarter of 2003 (the quarter ended September
30, 2002).

The net loss in the first quarter of 2003 was $121,000, or $0.03 per share.
In the first quarter of the previous year the net loss was $270,000 or $0.06
per share.


Results Summary for the Quarters  Ended September  30

                         (In thousands except per share)


                                                      2003            2002
                                                      ----            ----

Net Sales                                            $  317          $  642

Net loss                                             $ (121)         $ (270)

Net loss per share                                   $(0.03)         $(0.06)


Contact information: Robert V. Kling
                     651-633-1742
Clear All

        26 January 2023    

                    Largest U.S.-Israeli Exercise in History Concludes                 
                Exercise Juniper Oak 23.2 involved roughly 6,400 U.S. service members alongside more than 1,500 Israeli troops.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
1-CH/200540.1

LAW OFFICES

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

101 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10178

(212) 309-6000

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------------x

EMILIO NOBLE, :

:

Plaintiff, : 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY

: Electronically Filed

-against- :

:

CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION, :

:

Defendant. :

------------------------------------------------------------------------x

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Amber Kagan, an attorney, hereby certify that on September 18, 2007, I electronically 

filed Defendant’s Notice of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Emilio Noble’s New York Correction 

Law Claim and Memorandum in Support with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system 

which sent notification of such filing to the following:

Stephen Bergstein at steve@tbulaw.com

s/ Amber Kagan

Amber Kagan (AK-7973)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

101 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10178

Telephone: 212.309.6000

Facsimile: 212.309.6001

Email: akagan@morganlewis.com

Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 10 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018436EN.01004802.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2018 — Mamas and Papas v EUIPO — Wall-Budden (Cot bumpers)

(Case T-672/17) (1)

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a cot bumper - Examination by the Board of Appeal of its own motion of the facts constituting disclosure - Principle of functional continuity - Insufficient evidence to establish disclosure))

(2018/C 436/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mamas and Papas Ltd (Huddersfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Reid, Barrister, and by B. Whitehead, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, D. Walicka and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jane Wall-Budden (Byfleet, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 July 2017 (Case R 208/2016-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mamas and Papas and Jane Wall-Budden.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mamas and Papas Ltd to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mamas and Papas Ltd to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 521 4609 nirup.ramalingam@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

October 16, 2020

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, October 16, 2020, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 20-454S) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6 to certify changes to

NEX SEF’s fee schedule (“Fee Schedule”). This supplemental filing includes an Appendix A (Fee 

Schedule, blacklined version) and an Appendix B (Fee Schedule, clean version).

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendix A and Appendix B (“Confidential Information”), on

the grounds that Appendix A and Appendix B contain confidential commercial information of the submitter 

(NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendix A and Appendix B

until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendix A or Appendix B or any other court order, 

subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission 

intends to disclose such Appendix A or Appendix B to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendix A or Appendix B.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

I,Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principalfinancial officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner ofGlobal Macro Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of theTrust on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Trust.

 

 
| Date:  | March  30, 2006                                                |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |
|   | /s/  Gregg Buckbinder                                          |   |
|   |     Gregg  Buckbinder                      |
|   |     Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |
|        |                                                                |        |  |  |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Gilchrist, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence imposed and as modified affirmed and defendant remanded to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and, in accordance with the plea bargain, was sentenced to an indeterminate term of *6V2*years’ to life imprisonment. On appeal, he contends that the court erred in imposing sentence because the People failed to file a second felony offender statement as mandated by CPL 400.21 and that the court abused its discretion in refusing to reduce the minimum term to six years.

The presentence investigation report, which was before the court at sentencing, indicates defendant had been subjected to a prior felony conviction in 1983. Under the circumstances, the filing of a second felony offender statement was mandatory (CPL 400.21 [1]) and the failure to comply with this requirement rendered the sentence invalid as a matter of law (CPL 440.40 [1]; *People v Scarbrough,*66 NY2d 673, *revg*105 AD2d 1107*on dissenting mem of Boomer, J.).*

We do not reach the issue of excessive sentence. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — crimi*924nal possession of controlled substance, second degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2022002EN.01002602.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2021 — Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking v Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu

(Case T-269/17) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research and technological development including demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Non-performance of the contract - Repayment of the amounts advanced - Default interest - Procedure by default)

(2022/C 2/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (represented by: B. Mastantuono, acting as Agent, and by M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu Sas (Rome, Italy)

Re:

Action brought under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order for Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu to repay the advanced payment paid under the Grant Agreement for partners No 325954, plus accrued late payment interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu Sas to pay Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking the amount of EUR 433 485,93, together with default interest calculated at 3,5 % per annum from 7 February 2017 and until the date of full payment of the amount due; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu Sas to pay Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking the amount of EUR 433 485,93, together with default interest calculated at 3,5 % per annum from 7 February 2017 and until the date of full payment of the amount due;

| 2. | Orders Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Revoind Industriale di Pindaru Gelu to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

---
Order filed November 25, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00591

- CR

____________ MOHAMMAD SAEED ALZAH RANI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 7

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1905659



### ORDER

The reporter’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The court reporter has informed the court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee to prepare the repor ter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(A). This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we enter the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).We ORDER the judge of County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 to

immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, and counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether appellant desire s to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record on appeal. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial cle rk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court’s findings and conclusions, and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording o f the video teleconference shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the

date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is t he responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall se t a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Russell Leslie James, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: October 13,  2010








RUSSELL LESLIE JAMES


Russell Leslie James


Chief Accounting Officer


Chief Financial Officer and Director











-1-
Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 1 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 2 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 3 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 4 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 5 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 6 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 7 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 8 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 9 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 10 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 11 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 12 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-05898-RJS-JCF   Document 77   Filed 04/20/10   Page 13 of 13
**EXHIBIT 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm underthe caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 Amendment No. 3and related Prospectus) of Orphan Medical, Inc. for the registration of 4,000,000 shares of itscommon stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 6,2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Orphan Medical, Inc.included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 4) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/   Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota**
C-1

EXHIBIT C

FITNESS STANDARDS & DIRECTOR COMPOSITION

The below is a description that sets forth the fitness standards for the RTX Fintech & Research LLC (the 

“Company” or “RTX SEF”) Board of Managers and its composition, including the number or percentage of 

public directors.

A. Fitness Standards

The directors of RTX SEF shall be of good reputation and possess skills and expertise to fulfill their 

responsibilities in overseeing the governance of the RTX SEF. They shall receive sufficient training so that

they have a clear understanding of their responsibilities, including their fiduciary duty to the RTX SEF as 

well as their responsibility to exercise sound judgment about the operations, management, growth, and 

compliance of the RTX SEF. The fitness standards also support the creation of a composition of the 

Company's Board of Managers that provides a diversified set of talents and perspectives.

Specifically, the directors must:

1. Have a high ethical standard and the desire to do the “right thing” at all times, at the core of their 

approach in business and life. The directors must exhibit independence, objectivity, and be 

capable of serving as a representative of not only the shareholders but also of other core 

constituencies.

2. Have the availability, commitment, and personal qualities to be able to make a substantial active 

contribution to Board deliberations. These qualities include intelligence, self-assuredness, a high 

moral standard, integrity, interpersonal and communication skills, independence, courage, and a 

willingness to ask the difficult questions.

3. Have no prior judgment or regulatory sanction issued against them or a company for which they 

controlled or had a controlling interest.

4. Have experience in financial services and/or technology, or other field of expertise useful to the 

RTX SEF.

5. Have a good overall reputation.

6. Have significant educational and either business or teaching experience.

7. Have an appreciation of, and experience with, a regulatory environment sufficient to foster a 

culture of compliance within the RTX SEF.

8. Have the ability to develop a good working relationship with other directors and contribute to the 

Board's working relationship with the senior management of the RTX SEF as well as with

regulators.

B. Composition of Company Board of Managers

The Company Board of Managers will have a total of five Board Managers, which shall be appointed by the 

parent, RTX Holdings, Inc. In compliance with the proposed rule 40.9 Governance (see 17 CFR Parts 1, 37, 

38, 39 and 40, RIN 3038-AD01, “Requirements for Derivative Clearing Organizations, Designated Contract 

Markets, and Swap Execution Facilities Regarding the Mitigation of Conflicts of Interest, hereafter 

“Proposed Conflicts of Interest Rules”), two Board Managers shall be independent Public Directors, as 

defined by Proposed Conflicts of Interest Rule 1.3 (ccc). The two Public Directors will comprise more than 

40% of the five member RTX SEF Board of Managers.
Case 1:07-cv-05796-SAS Document 5 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05796-SAS Document 5 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 2