alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Vineyard, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Keith Bootow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Vineyard, Inc., and will be retained by International Vineyard,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  /s/
      Keith BootowKeith
      Bootow
                  Chief Executive Officer
                  May
      13, 2008
## Breadcrumb

-  Astrogeology Science Center 
-  Science 

#           MRCTR GIS Lab      

  Active

      By Astrogeology Science Center      September 24, 2018    

            -              Overview           

**The USGS Astrogeology Mapping, Remote-sensing, Cartography, Technology, and Research (MRCTR, pronounced "Mercator") GIS Lab provides** web-based resources aimed at the planetary research community. The lab supports Geographic Information Systems (GIS) graphical, statistical, and spatial tools for analyses of planetary data, including the distribution of planetary GIS tutorials, tools, programs, and information. We maintain planetary GIS databases consisting of peer-reviewed digital geologic maps, feature maps, topography, and remote-sensing data under the scientific oversight of the NASA Geologic Mapping Subcommittee (GEMS). In addition, the lab supports and encourages geospatial open standards.

 

MRCTR Products

**Pages: **

GIS Tools

GIS Tutorials

GIS Forum

GIS-ready Mosaics

 

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                      - Mapping
                      - Labs and Facilities
                      - Research
                      - Planetary Science

View All **

**The USGS Astrogeology Mapping, Remote-sensing, Cartography, Technology, and Research (MRCTR, pronounced "Mercator") GIS Lab provides** web-based resources aimed at the planetary research community. The lab supports Geographic Information Systems (GIS) graphical, statistical, and spatial tools for analyses of planetary data, including the distribution of planetary GIS tutorials, tools, programs, and information. We maintain planetary GIS databases consisting of peer-reviewed digital geologic maps, feature maps, topography, and remote-sensing data under the scientific oversight of the NASA Geologic Mapping Subcommittee (GEMS). In addition, the lab supports and encourages geospatial open standards.

 

MRCTR Products

**Pages: **

GIS Tools

GIS Tutorials

GIS Forum

GIS-ready Mosaics

 

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                      - Mapping
                      - Labs and Facilities
                      - Research
                      - Planetary Science

View All **
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50722

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTHUR HOSEA SALAZAR, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-87-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Arthur Hosea Salazar, Jr., has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Salazar has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50722 Document: 00511640470 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
# C_2019122EN.01001501.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission

(Case T-134/17) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid - Refusal of access - Lis alibi pendens - Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Obligation to conduct a specific and individual examination - Overriding public interest)

(2019/C 122/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: S. Rating and Y. Martínez Mata, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 736 final of 2 February 2017, refusing Hércules Club de Fútbol access to documents relating to the procedure for reviewing State aid SA.363872.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD to pay the costs, including those relating to the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD to pay the costs, including those relating to the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    OF AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY OF COLORADO
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Amber Resources Company of Colorado for the period ending June 30,
2005:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Amber
Resources Company of Colorado.






/s/ Kevin K. Nanke
Kevin K. Nanke
Chief Financial Officer

October 13, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Amber Resources Company of
Colorado and will be retained by Amber Resources Company of Colorado and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
# UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

# FORM 8-K

---

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

# Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 2, 2006

# Commission File Number 0-23903

---

# eAUTOCLAIMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 95-4583945                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.)
|                                                              
|
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       | (Zip Code)                      

# (813) 749-1020
(Registrants telephone number)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.
below):

|o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under
the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---

---

|Item 8.01. |  | Other Events
|---------- |  | ------------

Please refer to Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 attached hereto.

|Item 9.01. |  | Financial Statements and Exhibits
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------

|99.1 |  | Correspondence dated April 5, 2006 from Automatic Data Processing,
Inc. to eAutoclaims, Inc.
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|99.2 |  | Correspondence dated May 1, 2006 from eAutoclaims, Inc. to
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

|      | eAUTOCLAIMS, INC.         
|----- | --------------------------
|     
|Date: | May 2, 2006               
|      | Print Name:   Eric Seidel 
|      | Title:   CEO and President

---

---
# C_2018436EN.01003801.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2018 — John Mills v EUIPO — Jerome Alexander Consulting (MINERAL MAGIC)

(Case T-7/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MINERAL MAGIC - Earlier national word mark MAGIC MINERALS BY JEROME ALEXANDER - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 436/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: John Mills Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. (Surfside, Florida, United States) (represented by: T. Bamford and C. Rani, Solicitors)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 2087/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Jerome Alexander Consulting and John Mills.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Chamber of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 October 2016 (Case R 2087/2015-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Chamber of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 October 2016 (Case R 2087/2015-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by John Mills Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by John Mills Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by John Mills. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Jerome Alexander Consulting Corp. to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by John Mills.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

---
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7722 South Main Street in Pine Plains, New 

York, as the ‘‘Senior Chief Petty Officer Shannon M. 

Kent Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2151 EH

1 SECTION 1. SENIOR CHIEF PETTY OFFICER SHANNON M. 

2 KENT POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 7722 South Main Street in Pine 

5 Plains, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Senior Chief Petty Officer Shannon M. Kent Post Of7 fice’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Senior Chief Petty 

12 Officer Shannon M. Kent Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPetty Officer Shannon M. Kent Post Office’’. Pine Plains, New York, as the ‘‘Senior Chief al Service located at 7722 South Main Street in
# C_2018408EN.01004901.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2018 — Mondi v ACER

(Case T-146/17) (1)

((Energy - Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER - Rejection of the application to intervene - Direct and existing interest at the end of the procedure - Right to be heard))

(2018/C 408/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mondi AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: B. Rajal, lawyer)

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER of 17 February 2017 rejecting the applicant’s application to intervene in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mondi AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mondi AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER);

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 7 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Gregg Buckbinder, ChiefOperating Officer and principal financial officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”), do herebycertify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global MacroTrust;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The Trust’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the Trust and have:

 

  (a)  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the Trust, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the Trust’s auditors and the audit committeeof the Trust’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the Trust’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theTrust’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Trust’s internalcontrols; and

 

6.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| By:  /s/ Gregg Buckbinder |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Gregg  Buckbinder              |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |
| March 26,  2004                |

 

1

----
# C_2017392EN.01003201.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/32

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — António Conde & Companhia v Commission

(Case T-443/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Fishing vessels - Regional fisheries management organisation for the North-East Atlantic - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 392/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: António Conde & Companhia, SA (Gafanha de Nazaré, Portugal) (represented by J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by A. Bouquet, A. Lewis and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking an order that the Commission submit to the secretary of the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) the amended list for 2017, sent to the Commission by the Portuguese Republic, containing the Portuguese-flagged vessels Santa Isabel and Calvão.

Santa Isabel

Calvão

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
#### Fisher and others *v.*Consolidated Amador Mine, Etc.

*(Circuit Court, D. California.*

September 7, 1885.)

Patents fob Invention—Aotton at Law for Infringement—Prior Suit in Equity.

An answer in an action at law by a patentee to recover damages for the use of a patented article that sets up that, the article used was purchased by the defendant from a manufacturer, against whom plain till had obtained a decree in equity for an accounting, does not state a defense unless it also avers that the accounting included the article in question, and that the decree has been satisfied by payment or otherwise.

Demurrer to Special Answer.

*Langhorue é Miller*and *W. H. II. Hart,*for plaintiff.

*J. A. McKenna,*for defendant.

Sawyer, J.

This is a demurrer to a special answer.. The action is brought to recover damages for the unlawful use of certain hydraulic machines, which are alleged to infringe upon reissued letters patent No. 8,876, owned by plaintiffs. 'The answer sets up that the same plaintiffs had previously brought suit in equity against one Hos-kins, to recover the profits resulting from an infringement of the patent by Hoskins in manufacturing and selling machines constructed *202according to the specifications of the patent; that a decree had been rendered in that case in favor of plaintiffs, and against Hoskins, and, upon an accounting 'had, the sum of $16,465.33 had been awarded to plaintiffs as the profits realized by Hoskins from manufacturing and selling said machines. The answer further alleges that the particular machines used by the defendant, and for the use of which the present action is brought, were purchased by defendant from Hos-kins, and that the profits of their manufacture and sale had been included in the decree against Hoskins, and' that, therefore, the plaintiffs had received satisfaction for the said machines, and defendant was not liable to plaintiffs for using the same. But the answer nowhere alleges that the Hoskins decree has ever been satisfied by payment or otherwise. In order to be a defense it must allege that said decree has been paid, or. otherwise satisfied, as well as that .the accounting against Hoskins included the machines in question. In the absence of such allegation the answer does not state a defense. *Gilbert & B. Manuf’g Co.*v. *Bussing,*1 Ban. & A. 621; *Birdsell*v. *Shaliol,*112 U. S. 485; S. C. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 244; *Steam Stone-cutter Co.*v. *Sheldons,*21 Fed. Rep. 875; Walk. Pat. § 314. It follows, therefore, that the demurrer must be sustained; and it is so ordered.

If the defendant desires, it can have time to amend, though I cannot see that it can properly amend unless it can truthfully state that the decree has been satisfied, and I have good reason to know that it has not been satisfied.
# DDR User Guide

mailto:john.smith@Corp123mailto:billing@corp123.com

# DDR Account Input

# DDR MQ Input

# Sheet1

# DDR Third Party Submitter

# DDR Canada - Local Counterpart

# DDR Electronic Signature