alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018301EN.01003601.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/36

---

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission

(Case T-757/17) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal - Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand - Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction - Claim for annulment - Act not adversely affecting an official - Claim for damages - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of two Commission memoranda of 27 March and 6 April 2017 and (ii) compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the outcome and duration of the disciplinary proceedings CMS 15/017 and CMS 12/063.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Petrus Kerstens is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Petrus Kerstens is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

---
DTCC Public (White)

June 29, 2018 

By Electronic Submission 

Mr. Chris Kirkpatrick 

Secretary 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

DDR Rule Filing: DDR13 

Re: Amendments to DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC Rulebook Pursuant to Section 5c(c) 

(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation § 40.6 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the “Commission” or “CFTC”) Regulation § 40.6, DTCC Data Repository 

(U.S.) LLC (“DDR”) submits, by written certification, amendments to DDR’s documentation in 

support of Section 2(h)(7)(A) of the CEA and CFTC Regulations 50.50 and 50.51, as well applicable CFTC 

Letters, which provide for a number of exceptions and exemptions from required clearing for swaps entered 

into by certain non-financial end users, financial cooperatives, treasury affiliates, bank holding companies and 

savings and loan holding companies, and community development financial institutions (collectively, the “EndUser Exception”). Changes to DDR’s End-User Exception documents (collectively, the “End-User Exception 

Documents”), include, but are not limited to, the high level changes enumerated below. 

I. DDR has updated the End-User Exception Documents to reflect all current end-user clearing 

exceptions and exemptions and applicable CFTC letters. 

II. DDR has amended certain defined terms to align with the regulations. 

III. DDR has amended the documentation to clarify what elections and representation must be 

made on a swap-by-swap basis and how those elections and representations are made on either 

an FpML or CSV message. 

In addition to the changes described above, additional edits have been made throughout the End-User 

Exception Documents for clarity and to correct typographical errors. 

55 WATER STREET 

NEW YORK, NY 10041-0099 
DDR Rule Filing: DDR12 

June 29, 2018 

2 

 2 

DTCC Public (White)

DDR certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and 

regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder. No substantive opposing views have been 

expressed by Users or others with respect to the amendments. DDR further certifies that, concurrent 

with this filing today, a copy of this submission was posted on its website and may be accessed at: 

http://www.dtcc.com/legal/important-notices. 

As noted above, enclosed with this letter are marked versions of each of the End-User Documents. If 

you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 212-855-3038. 

 Sincerely, 

 Adrienne During 

 Director, DDR Compliance 

Enclosures
# C_2017213EN.01003801.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/38

---

Action brought on 8 May 2017 — Swemac Innovation v EUIPO — Swemac Medical Appliances (SWEMAC)

(Case T-287/17)

(2017/C 213/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Swemac Innovation AB (Linköping, Sweden) (represented by: G. Nygren, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Swemac Medical Appliances AB (Linköping, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SWEMAC’ — EU trade mark No 6 326 177

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2017 in Case R 3000/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reinstate the EUTM number 006326177 to full validity, including goods and services in classes 10: ‘Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments’ and 42 ‘Research and development services relating to surgical and medical apparatus and instruments’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reinstate the EUTM number 006326177 to full validity, including goods and services in classes 10: ‘Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments’ and 42 ‘Research and development services relating to surgical and medical apparatus and instruments’;

| — | order the other party to pay the costs of the Applicant before EUIPO and the Boards of Appeal, EUR 1 000; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to pay the costs of the Applicant before EUIPO and the Boards of Appeal, EUR 1 000; and

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs of the Applicant before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs of the Applicant before the General Court.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27954-27955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-426-003]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Negotiated Rate

May 15, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 9, 2001, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation 
(Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
April 1, 2001:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 1
Sheet No. 19
Original Sheet No. 40
Sheet No. 41

    Texas Gas states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
first of a new negotiated rate/non-conforming contract in its tariff as 
required Section 154.112(b) of the Commission's regulations and as 
directed by Commission Letter Order dated April 27, 2001.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheet is being 
mailed to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections

[[Page 27955]]

385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such 
motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be 
filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12651 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2017178EN.01002402.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Kaimbi v Council

(Case T-142/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Delphin Kaimbi (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EX-13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned, Kelvin Fu Szeto, hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The annual report on Form 20-F of ChineseWorldNet.com Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 30, 2013



|/s/Kelvin Fu Szeto                                  | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|KELVIN FU SZETO                                     | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 GAIL WELLKNOWN, 2 Petitioner-Appellee, 3 v. NO. 33,184 4 WALTER HOBBS, 5 Respondent-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 7 Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge 8 Gail Wellknown 9 Fruitland, NM 10 Pro Se Appellee 11 John V. Nilan, LLC 12 John V. Nilan 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 KENNEDY, Chief Judge. 172 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No me morandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

____________________________________ 6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 10

___________________________ 11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 12
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Zion Nevada Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shawn
Wright, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





By:   /s/
Shawn Wright


Shawn
Wright


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Accounting Officer





Dated:  November
03, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

____________________________________

:

IN RE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. : 07 Civ. 5867 (PAC)

SECURITIES LITIGATION :

: FILED ELECTRONICALLY

:

:

:

:

____________________________________:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney at law in the state of New York, affirms under penalty of 

perjury, that on January 10, 2008, he caused the Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support 

of Defendant Andrew G. Bodnar s Motion to Dismiss to be served by Federal Express upon:

Richard A. Lockridge, Esq.

Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.

100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200

Minneapolis, MN 55401

 _________________/s/___________________

Jerrold L. Steigman (JS-9137)

Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 45 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Daquarious Tre’Ron Meadors, Appellant

No. 06-21-00056-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

21F0124-005). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice 

Stevens and Justice Carter* participating. 

*Jack Carter, Retired, Sitting by 

Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgments of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgments by (1) changing 

the titles to “Judgment of Conviction” instead of “Judgment of Conviction by Jury,”

(2) changing the “Plea to the Offense” sections to reflect that Appellant pled “Guilty” to both

offenses, and (3) replacing the language indicating that guilt was determined via a “Verdict by 

Jury” with language stating that the finding of guilt was made “By the Court.” We further 

modify the judgment convicting the Appellant of the second count of aggravated robbery by 

deleting the assessment of court costs. As modified, the judgments of the trial court are

affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Daquarious Tre’Ron Meadors, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 18, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Internal

Eurex Clearing AG

Weekly Summary of Rule Amendments

No. 002-24

January 19, 2024

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) submits this Weekly 

Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of January 15, 2024:

• Eurex Clearing Circular No. 002-24 (January 18, 2024): Amendments to the Clearing Conditions 

of Eurex Clearing AG - End of Consultation. This circular states that there were no comments 

received regarding Amendments A and B set forth in Eurex Clearing Circular 092-23, which was 

submitted previously as a 40.6 submission, and confirms the effective date of February 12, 2024

stated in that circular.

Copies of the above material is available at: https://www.eurex.com/ec-en/find/circulars. If you require 

any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (312) 544-1087.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Seinsheimer

By: Eric Seinsheimer

Title: US CCO, Eurex Clearing AG

Dated: January 19, 2024
tl 

FILED 

JUL 2 3 2012 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

Dale B. Adams, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission et a!., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

12 1201 

Before the Court are plaintiffs complaint brought pro se and application to proceed in 

forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint dismissed. Pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915~e)(2), the Court is required to dismiss a case "at any time [it] determines that ... 

the action ... fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) 

(2)(B)(ii). 

Plaintiff, a resident of Harrison, Arkansas, sues the Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission ("EEOC") and its Chairperson for the alleged wrongful processing of his grievances 

against Tysons Foods. "[N]o cause of action against the EEOC exists for challenges to its 

processing of a claim." Smith v. Casellas, 119 F.3d 33, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 

S.Ct. 386 (1997). Rather, "Congress intended the private right of action ... under which an 

aggrieved employee may bring a Title VII action directly against his or her employer [] to serve 

as the remedy for any improper handling of a discrimination charge by the EEOC." Id. 

Accordingly, the complaint must be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

3
# C_2017231EN.01004801.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/48

---

Action brought on 18 May 2017 — adidas v EUIPO — Shoe Branding Europe (Representation of three parallel stripes)

(Case T-307/17)

(2017/C 231/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and I. Junkar, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of three parallel stripes) — EU trade mark No 12 442 166

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2017 in Case R 1515/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it joins as intervener, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it joins as intervener, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 52(2) read in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(2) read in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 20-F of Oxford  Investments
Holdings Inc., a company  organized under the laws of under the laws of Ontario,
Canada (the  "Company"),  for the period ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects,  with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




By:            /S/ Michael Donaghy
               -------------------
                   Michael Donaghy
               Chief Financial Officer





Date:  June 29, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Orphan Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Timothy G. McGrath, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                                        |  |  | /s/   Timothy G. McGrath | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------ | 
| |                                                                       
| | Timothy G. McGrathVice President, Chief Financial OfficerJuly 20, 2004

---
Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1