27920 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Proposed Rules

including, but not limited to, parfleches,

tipis, horse trappings and tack, pouches,

bags, and hide paintings are Indian

products.

(b) Specific examples include, but are

not limited to: Narrative painted hides,

martingales, saddles, bonnet cases,

drapes, quirts, forelocks, rosettes, horse

masks, bridles, head stalls, cinches,

saddle bags, side drops, harnesses, arm

bands, belts, and other hand crafted

items with studs and tooling.

§ 309.19 What are examples of pottery and

ceramics that are Indian products?

(a) Pottery, ceramics, and related arts

and crafts items made or significantly

decorated by Indian labor, including,

but not limited to, a broad spectrum of

clays and ceramic material are Indian

products.

(b) Specific examples include, but are

not limited to: Ollas, pitch vessels,

pipes, raku bowls, pitchers, canteens,

effigy pots, wedding vases, micaceous

bean pots, seed pots, masks, incised

bowls, blackware plates, redware bowls,

polychrome vases, and storytellers and

other figures.

§ 309.20 What are examples of sculpture,

carving, and pipes that are Indian

products?

(a) Sculpture, carving, and pipes

made by Indian labor including, but not

limited to, wood, soapstone, alabaster,

pipestone, argillite, turquoise, ivory,

baleen, bone, antler, and shell are

Indian products.

(b) Specific examples include, but are

not limited to: Fetishes, animal

figurines, pipestone pipes, moose antler

combs, argillite bowls, ivory cribbage

boards, whalebone masks, elk horn

purses, and clamshell gorgets.

§ 309.21 What are examples of dolls and

toys that are Indian products?

Dolls, toys, and related items made by

Indian labor, including, but not limited

to, no face dolls, corn husk dolls,

kachina dolls, patchwork and palmetto

dolls, reindeer horn dolls, lacrosse

sticks, stick game articles, gambling

sticks, gaming dice, miniature cradle

boards, and yo-yos are Indian products.

§ 309.22 What are examples of painting

and other fine art forms that are Indian

products?

Painting and other fine art forms

made by Indian labor, and include but

are not limited to, works on canvas,

photography, sand painting, mural,

computer generated art, graphic art,

video artwork, printmaking, drawing,

bronze casting, glasswork, and art forms

to be developed in the future are Indian

products.

§ 309.23 Does this part apply to products

made before 1935?

The provisions of this part do not

apply to any art or craft products made

before 1935.

Dated: May 14, 2001.

Robert Lamb,

Acting Assistant Secretary—Policy,

Management, and Budget.

[FR Doc. 01–12666 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–84–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD08–99–007]

RIN 2115–AE47

Drawbridge Operation Regulation;

Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of

proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is

withdrawing a notice of proposed

rulemaking for the regulation governing

the operation of the L & N Railroad/Old

Gentilly Road bascule span drawbridge

across the Inner Harbor Navigation

Canal, mile 2.9 at New Orleans, Orleans

Parish, Louisiana. This proposed rule

was published, with request for

comments, to allow the bridge to have

remained closed to navigation for

temporary periods of time, during the

months of May, June, July, and

September, 1999, for replacement of the

damaged fender system. A final rule was

not published for the proposed

rulemaking. The fender system has been

replaced and the temporary rule is no

longer necessary.

DATES: The notice of proposed

rulemaking is withdrawn effective May

21, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Unless otherwise indicated,

documents referred to in this notice are

available for inspection or copying at

the office of the Eighth Coast Guard

District, Bridge Administration Branch,

Hale Boggs Federal Building, room

1313, 501 Magazine Street, New

Orleans, Louisiana 70130–3396 between

7 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday, except Federal holidays. The

Bridge Administration Branch of the

Eighth Coast Guard District maintains

the public docket for this notice of

proposed rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil

Johnson, Bridge Administration Branch,

at the address given above, telephone

(504) 589–2965.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory History

On March 15, 1999, the Coast Guard

published a notice of proposed

rulemaking in 64 FR 12795. The

proposed temporary rule would have

allowed the draw of the L & N bascule

span bridge to remain closed to

navigation daily from 8 a. m. until noon

and from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. from May

17 through May 28, 1999, June 1

through July 2, 1999, July 6 through

September 3, 1999 and from September

7 through September 22, 1999. The

comment period was limited to 45 days

because the rule needed to be effective

by May 17, 1999. At the end of the

comment period, no comments had

been received. However, there was not

time to publish a final temporary rule

prior to May 17, 1999. On July 19, 1999,

the Coast Guard received notification

that the fender system had been

replaced ahead of schedule and the

temporary rule was no longer necessary.

The Coast Guard is withdrawing this

notice of temporary rulemaking from

drawbridge operating regulations

(CGD08–99–007).

Dated: May 10, 2001.

Roy J. Casto,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,

Eighth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 01–12721 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–15–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[AZ 094–0027b; FRL–6916–3]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Arizona State

Implementation Plan Revision,

Coconino County, Mohave County, and

Yuma County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the Coconino County,

Mohave County, and Yuma County

portions of the Arizona State

Implementation Plan (SIP). These

revisions concern the recision of all of

the remaining defunct SIP rules from

these counties. We are approving the

recision of local rules that no longer

regulate permitting procedures and

various emission sources under the

Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA

or the Act).

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2001 / Proposed Rules 27921

DATES: Any comments on this proposal

must arrive by June 20, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andrew

Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR–

4), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

You may inspect copies of the

submitted rule and EPA’s technical

support documents (TSDs) at our Region

IX office during normal business hours.

You may also see copies of the

submitted rule at the following

locations:

Environmental Protection Agency, Air

Docket (6102), Ariel Rios Building,

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

Arizona Department of Environmental

Quality, 3033 North Central Avenue,

Phoenix, AZ 85012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al

Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR–4),

Air Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105, (415) 744–1135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

proposal addresses the recisions of

defunct SIP rules from Coconino

County, Mohave County, and Yuma

County. In the Rules and Regulations

section of this Federal Register, we are

approving the recision of these rules in

a direct final action without prior

proposal because we believe this SIP

revision is not controversial. If we

receive adverse comments, however, we

will publish a timely withdrawal of the

direct final rule and address the

comments in subsequent action based

on this proposed rule. We do not plan

to open a second comment period, so

anyone interested in commenting

should do so at this time. If we do not

receive adverse comments, no further

activity is planned. For further

information, please see the direct final

action.

Dated: September 13, 2000.

Keith A. Takata,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[Editorial note: This document was

received at the Office of the Federal Register

on May 15, 2001.]

[FR Doc. 01–12573 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA157–4112b; FRL–6981–6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;

Approval of Revisions to Stage II

Vapor Recovery Regulations for

Southwest Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revisions submitted by the Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental Protection

(PADEP). This action proposes to

approve PADEP’s revised rules for the

implementation of the control of volatile

organic compounds (VOCs) from

gasoline dispensing facilities (Stage II)

in the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley ozone

nonattainment area. In the Final Rules

section of this Federal Register, EPA is

approving the State’s SIP submittal as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial submittal and

anticipates no adverse comments. A

more detailed description of the state

submittal and EPA’s evaluation are

included in a Technical Support

Document (TSD) prepared in support of

this rulemaking action. A copy of the

TSD is available, upon request, from the

EPA Regional Office listed in the

ADDRESSES section of this document. If

no adverse comments are received in

response to this action, no further

activity is contemplated. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action

should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in

writing by June 20, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to David L. Arnold, Chief,

Air Quality Planning and Information

Services Branch, 3AP21, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

Copies of the documents relevant to this

action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the Air Protection Division,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; and

the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Resources Bureau of Air

Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400

Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814–2034, at the

EPA Region III address above, or by email at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

further information, please see the

information provided in the direct final

action, with the same title, that is

located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’

section of this Federal Register

publication.

Dated: May 1, 2001.

William C. Early,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. 01–12575 Filed 5–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

46 CFR Part 502

[Docket No. 01–05]

Alternative Dispute Resolution

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime

Commission proposes to issue new

regulations implementing the

Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.

The new regulations would expand the

Commission’s Alternative Dispute

Resolution (‘‘ADR’’) services, addressing

guidelines and procedures for

arbitration and providing for mediation

and other ADR services. This proposed

rule would replace current subpart U,

Conciliation Service, with a new

subpart U, Alternative Dispute

Resolution, that would contain a new

Commission ADR policy and provisions

for various means of ADR. The proposal

also would revise certain other

regulations to conform to the

Commission’s new ADR policy.

DATES: Submit an original and 15 copies

of comments (paper), or e-mail

comments as an attachment in

WordPerfect 8, Microsoft Word 97, or

earlier versions of these applications, no

later than June 20, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments

concerning this proposed rule to: Bryant

L. VanBrakle, Secretary, Federal

Maritime Commission 800 North

Capitol Street, NW., Room 1046,

Washington, DC 20573–0001, E-mail:

secretary@fmc.gov.