alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for OMB review and approval of the information collection system 
described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Extensions of Credit to Executive Officers, Unsafe and 
Unsound Practices.
    OMB Number: 3064-0108.
    Annual Burden:

Estimated annual number of respondents: 4,000
Estimated number of responses: 8,000
Estimated time per response: 1 hour
Total annual burden hours: 8,000 hours

    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: June 30, 2001.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before June 11, 2001 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collection and recordkeeping 
requirements are mandated by statute and take the form of (1) a report 
by executive officers of insured nonmember banks to their boards of 
directors within 10 days of incurring any indebtedness to any other 
bank in an amount in excess of the amount the insured nonmember bank 
could lend to the officer, and (2) a report from insured nonmember 
banks, included with their reports of condition filed with the FDIC, on 
any extensions of credit made by the bank to its executive officers 
since the bank filed its last report of condition.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11862 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**Exhibit 4.38**

 

**Share purchase agreement between Cemig GT and Vale**

 

On December 19, 2013 Cemig GT and Vale S.A. signed commercial and stockholding documents for creation of the company Aliança Geração de Energia S.A. (Aliança), to be a platform for consolidation of generation assets held by the parties in generation consortia, and investments in future electricity generation projects.

 

The two parties will subscribe their shares in Aliança in the form of their holdings in the following generation assets:*Porto Estrela, Igarapava, Funil, Capim Branco I* and *II, Aimorés*, and *Candonga*. With these assets the new company will have installed hydroelectric generating capacity in operation of 1,158 MW (652 average MW), among other generation projects. Vale will hold 55%, and Cemig GT 45%, of the total capital of this new company.

 

The interest of Cemig GT has been valued at R$ 2.030 billion. The association increases Cemig GT’s potential to generate new business and maximize profit, due to the combination of the two companies’ experiences in operational, financial and project management.

 

Cemig GT will also acquire, for approximately R$ 206 million, 49% of the future company Aliança Norte Energia Participações S.A., which will own the 9% interest owned by Vale in Norte Energia S.A. (the Belo Monte hydroelectric plant).

 

The acquisition price, corresponding to the capital injections made by Vale up to December 31, 2013, will be paid at sight on the closing date, adjusted by the IPCA inflation index. With the acquisition Cemig GT becomes the indirect holder of a further 4.41% of Norte Energia, representing an installed generation capacity of 495.39 MW (201 average MW).

 

** **

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Q. MOSES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6281.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 3013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Samuel Q. Moses, Appellant pro se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Q. Moses seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moses has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# C_2017249EN.01004601.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/46

---

Action brought on 13 June 2017 — Winkler v Commission

(Case T-369/17)

(2017/C 249/63)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bernd Winkler (Grange, Ireland) (represented by: A. Kässens, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 13 March 2017 on the applicant’s complaint and order the defendant to adopt a decision on the calculation of the capital value at the time of the registration of the applicant’s claim on 14 September 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 13 March 2017 on the applicant’s complaint and order the defendant to adopt a decision on the calculation of the capital value at the time of the registration of the applicant’s claim on 14 September 2011;

| — | in the alternative, order the defendant to pay compensation amounting to EUR 19 920,39, payable to the applicant’s pension account. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order the defendant to pay compensation amounting to EUR 19 920,39, payable to the applicant’s pension account.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law:

| 1. | First plea in law: infringement of the principle that action must be taken within a reasonable period, infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of fair procedure, and infringement of the obligations relating to information and consultation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law: infringement of the principle that action must be taken within a reasonable period, infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of fair procedure, and infringement of the obligations relating to information and consultation.

| 2. | Second plea in law: infringement of the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law: infringement of the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality.

| 3. | Third plea in law: failure to respect legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law: failure to respect legitimate expectations.

---
Exhibit 31.1
  Section 302 Certification of Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 I,Michael Barron, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Corporate Outfitters, Inc.
 2.   Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances   under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.   Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
  b)   evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly  report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c)   presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and
  b)   any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls.
 
 6.   The registrant's
other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether
or not there were significant changes in  internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.
  Date:August 14, 2009
 
 /s/Michael A. Barron
 Michael A. Barron
 Chief
Executive Officer
  19
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 17 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 18 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 19 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 20 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 21 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 22 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 23 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 24 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 25 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 26 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 27 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 28 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 29 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-10 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 30 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, John Terwilliger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Houston American Energy Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Houston American Energy Corp.


                                   By:    /s/ John Terwilliger
                                   Name:  John Terwilliger
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                   Dated: March 24, 2004




<PAGE>
# C_2019155EN.01004102.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a shape)

(Case T-762/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark representing a shape - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 155/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Grammer AG (Amberg, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2017 (Case R 2250/2016-4), concerning an application for registration of a shape as an EU figurative mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2017 (Case R-2250/2016). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2017 (Case R-2250/2016).

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Grammer AG for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Grammer AG for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---
EXHIBIT
32


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF JOHN M. PECK AND SYLVIA QUINTERO




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the quarterly report of International Aerospace Enterprises,
Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to their
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
      March 30, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      John M. PeckJohn
      M. Peck,Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Sylvia QuinteroSylvia
      Quintero,Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I,Ian B. Carter, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A ofCommonwealth Energy Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely
 

 

   affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 16, 2004 /s/ IAN B. CARTER     Ian B. Carter
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 35 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under
the caption Experts in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 Amendment No. 2
and related Prospectus) of Orphan Medical, Inc. for the registration of 4,000,000 shares of its
common stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 6,
2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Orphan Medical, Inc.
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 3) for the year ended
December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| | /s/
Ernst & Young LLP
| | ---------------------

Minneapolis, Minnesota
July 19, 2004



---