alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

# Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 15, 2004

MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

|North Dakota                                   |  | 33-94644                 |  | 23-7222188                           | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |  | (Commission File Number) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | 

|7525 Red River Road                      |  |            | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | 
|Wahpeton, North Dakota                   |  | 58075      | 
|(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code) | 

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (701) 642-8411

Check the appropriate box below if
the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the
registrant under any of the following provisions:

|[  ] |  | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|[  ] |  | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-2 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-2)
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|[  ] |  | Pre-commencement communications pursurant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|[  ] |  | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# Item 8.01    OTHER EVENTS.

Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative has
announced that the board of directors, following the completion of the 2004 fiscal year
audit, has approved the final payment for the 2003 crop of $45.08 per ton of beets
harvested (13.918882 cents per pound of sugar).  The Board of Directors has also declared
and allocated to shareholders of record, for the 2003 crop, non-qualified allocated
patronage totaling $5,128,308 or $2.26 per ton of beets harvested.

---

# SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|                        | MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE
|----------------------- | ----------------------------
|                       
|                       
|Dated: October 15, 2004 |                             
|                        |                             
|                        |                             
|                        |                             

---
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1852 JESUS MIRANDA-GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. J. L. GARCIA, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Juan M. Pérez-Giménez, U.S. District Judge ] Before Selya, Circuit Judge , Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges .

Jesus Miranda-Gonzalez on brief pro se. Guillermo Gil , United States Attorney, Jorge E. VegaPache co , Assistant United States Attorney, and Nelson PerezSosa , Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
June 27, 2001Per Curiam . The district court dismissed the

habeas petition filed by Jesus Miranda-Gonzalez under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and petitioner has appealed. After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirmthe judgment of the district court for essentially the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and in the district judge's Opinion and Order. Specifically, petitioner's double jeopardy argument is meritless because the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in prison disciplinaryproceedings. Any due process argument also lacks merit because, even assuming, without deciding, that petitioner possessed some kind of liberty interest, he received all the process he was due under Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539 (1974).

Affirmed . See Local Rule 27(c).
# C_2019295EN.01002401.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2019 — Vialto Consulting v Commission

(Case T-617/17) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Instrument for pre-accession assistance - Third country - National public procurement - Devolved management - Decision of a national authority - Investigations by OLAF - Nonmaterial damage - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 - Principle of sound administration - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Right to be heard)

(2019/C 295/30)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Vialto Consulting Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, J. Baquero Cruz and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant due to unlawful acts allegedly committed, first, by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in the course of an inspection carried out in the applicant’s premises and, second, by the European Commission following that inspection.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vialto Consulting Kft. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vialto Consulting Kft. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of CoroWare, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lloyd T. Spencer, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
CoroWare, Inc. and will be retained by CoroWare, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May 10,,
2010







/s/ Lloyd T.
      SpencerLloyd T.
    SpencerChief Executive Officer and
      the Interim Chief Financial Officer

              (Principal
      Executive Officer,  Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer )
December 30, 2005

°
a 3
S

VIA E-MAIL

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certifications. New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. Submission
#05.228: Amendments to NYMEX Rule 0.09(C)

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“Exchange”) is notifying the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (“Commission”) of amendments to NYMEX Rule 9.09 (C). Pursuant to Section 5c(c)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the
attached amendments comply with the Act, including regulations under the Act; these changes will be
made effective on January 2, 2006.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned at (212)
299-2207.

Very truly yours,
Brian J. Regan

Vice President and Counsel

Att.


NOTIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 9.09 (“Clearing Fees”)

Rule 9.09 Clearing Fees

(A) Charges for clearing trades shall be fixed by the Board upon the recommendation of
the Clearing House Committee and shall be payable by Clearing Members as billed. All
Clearing Fees shail be charged per contract bought, sold, delivered or accepted.

(B) A minimum fee of $200.00 per month shall be charged to Clearing Members.

(C) Claims by Clearing Members for adjustments to clearing charges or fees shall be
made to the Exchange within 90 days of the invoicing of such charges by the Exchange.
The failure to claim adjustments within this period shall constitute a waiver of such claim
by the Clearing Member; provided, however, that the Board of Directors, for good cause
shown and following review by the Clearing House Committee, may authorize payment
by the Exchange of a late claim for adjustment filed within a period of 6 three months
plus the balance of the month that the credit has been requested of the invoicing of
charges by the Exchange in excess of $1,000. Any late claim for adjustment paid by the
Exchange shall be subject to a 10% administrative fee that shall be deducted from such
payment. No claim for adjustment will be considered that is filed later than the period
referenced above 6m after the inveicing changes-_by the Exchange.
# C_2017239EN.01007001.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/70

---

Action brought on 2 June 2017 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)

(Case T-355/17)

(2017/C 239/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Daico International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Kassner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: American Franchise Marketing Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘RoB’ — EU trade mark No 5 284 104

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2017 in Case R 1405/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

---
(104 So. 918)

#### STATE of Alabama et al. v. S. P. DUNN, Judge of Probate of Conecuh County.

(3 Div. 706.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1925.)

Original impeachment proceeding.

PER CURIAM.

Not guilty.

All the Justices concur.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12752]



[[Page 28015]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 3660]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Annual Meeting on Friday, June 15, 2001, at 9:30 a.m. in 
Conference Room 1105, Department of State Building, 2201 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas, which are assisted by the Department of State and which are 
attended by dependents of U.S. Government families and children of 
employees of U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools. The agenda includes a review of 
the recent activities of American-sponsored overseas schools and the 
overseas schools regional associations, a presentation on the status of 
education in the United States and its impact on American-sponsored 
overseas schools, a progress report on projects selected for the annual 
Program of Educational Assistance, and selection of a new Vice Chair of 
the Council.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting and join in 
the discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of 
public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to the 
State Department is controlled, and individual building passes are 
required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should so advise 
the office of Dr. Keith D. Miller, Department of State, Office of 
Overseas Schools, Room H328, SA-1, Washington, DC 20522-0132, telephone 
202-261-8200, prior to June 5, 2001. Each visitor will be asked to 
provide a date of birth and Social Security number at the time of 
registration and attendance and must carry a valid photo ID to the 
meeting. All attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council, U.S. Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 01-12752 Filed 5-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
`
 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Zion Nevada Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shawn Wright, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

By:   */s/ Shawn Wright*

       Shawn Wright

       Chief Executive Officer

       Chief Accounting Officer

 

Dated:  October 23, 2008

  

 

 

 

 
`
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Hague
Corp., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the company’s financial condition and results of operations.








November
14, 2008








/s/ Brian
Lukian


Brian
Lukian, Chief Financial Officer
Plaza 5, 185 Hudson St #2200 

Jersey City, NJ 07311

308883717 v2

February 2, 2021

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: DW SEF LLC – Rulebook Amendments Related to SEF Rule

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), DW SEF LLC 

(“DW SEF”) hereby submits amendments to its Rulebook related to the recently adopted Swap 

Execution Facility Requirements (85 FR 82313 (November 18, 2020)) (the “SEF Rule”). The 

Rulebook has been amended to reflect updates to the CFTC’s Parts 36 and 37 regulations relating 

to the execution of “package transactions” on swap execution facilities (SEFs) and the resolution 

of error trades on SEFs as directed by the SEF Rule. The amendment will become effective on 

February 16, 2021, no fewer than ten business days from the date hereof. In connection with this 

submission, DW SEF hereby notifies the Commission that:

1. DW SEF certifies that it has posted a notice of this pending certification with the 

Commission and a copy of this submission on DW SEF’s website, including a redline 

of the updates to the Rulebook, which is attached here to as Attachment A;

2. DW SEF certifies that the Rules comply with the Act and the Commission’s regulations 

thereunder; and

3. No substantive opposing views with respect to the Rules were expressed to DW SEF 

by its governing board or committee members, members of DW SEF or market 

participants.
2

Should you have questions regarding this submission, please contact the undersigned at (646) 

560-7223 or at Gregory.compa@tradeweb.com.

Very truly yours,

Gregory Compa

Chief Compliance Officer

cc: Dorothy D. DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight
3

ATTACHMENT A

Redline Version of Rule 419
4

ATTACHMENT B

Newly Adopted Rule 419
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Hy-Tech Technology Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Martin Nielson
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer

June 12, 2003
# C_2017178EN.01002401.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-141/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kasa-Vubu, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of West Metro Financial Services, Inc.



This 26th day of March,
2005.



/s/ J. Michael WombleJ. Michael WombleChief Executive Officer
Presidential Documents

27443

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 96

Thursday, May 17, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Notice of May 15, 2001

Continuation of Emergency With Respect to Burma

On May 20, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 13047, certifying

to the Congress under section 570(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export

Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–

208), that the Government of Burma has committed large-scale repression

of the democratic opposition in Burma after September 30, 1996, thereby

invoking the prohibition on new investment in Burma by United States

persons, contained in that section. The President also declared a national

emergency to deal with the threat posed to the national security and foreign

policy of the United States by the actions and policies of the Government

of Burma, invoking the authority, inter alia, of the International Emergency

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

The national emergency declared on May 20, 1997, must continue beyond

May 20, 2001, because the Government of Burma continues its policies

of committing large-scale repression of the democratic opposition in Burma,

threatening the national security and foreign policy of the United States.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect

to Burma. This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

[FR Doc. 01–12598

Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 15, 2001.

W
No. 684.

#### Timothy McCarthy et al., Petitioners, *v.*The Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Company et al.

February 1,1909.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. *W. T. Stoll*and Mr. *W. C. Jones*for petitioners. Mr. *C. W. Beale*for respondents.