alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 114th open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held Tuesday, June 12, 2001, in Conference Room N-5437 A-C, U.S. Department of Labor Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.

The purpose of the meeting, which will begin at 1 p.m. and end at approximately 3:30 p.m., is for members to be updated on activities of the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration and for chairs of this year's working groups to provide progress reports on their individual study topics.

                    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement pertaining to any topics the Council may be studying during 2001 by submitting 20 copies on before June 4, 2001 to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue,                           ( print page 27539)                        NW., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward their requests to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8921. Oral presentations will be limited to ten minutes, time permitting, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by June 4 at the address indicated.                

Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the meeting if received on or before June 4, 2001.

Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of May, 2001.

Ann L. Combs,

Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-12473  Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
# C_2018427EN.01006402.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/64

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2018 — Carbon System Verwaltungs v EUIPO (LIGHTBOUNCE)

(Case T-825/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark LIGHTBOUNCE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2018/C 427/85)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Carbon System Verwaltungs GmbH (Marktheidenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Gilch and L. Petri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2017 (Case R 2301/2016-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign LIGHTBOUNCE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Carbon System Verwaltungs GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Carbon System Verwaltungs GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
# C_2018427EN.01006901.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/69

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret v EUIPO (gratis)

(Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Applications for EU figurative marks gratis - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2018/C 427/92)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AȘ (Istanbul, Turkey) authorised to replace Sedes Holding AȘ (represented by: K. Ongena and C. Du Jardin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Vuijst and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2017 (Cases R 506/2017-2 and R 507/2017-2) concerning the applications for registration of the figurative signs gratis as EU trade marks.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The actions are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The actions are dismissed.

| 2. | Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AȘ shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AȘ shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

ANTHONY JOSEPH DECARLO,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 217 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
NEX SEF-2020-R-4

April 21, 2020

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Division of Market Oversight

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: NEX SEF Limited – Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification – Amended Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), NEX SEF Limited (“NEX 

SEF”) hereby notifies the Commission that it has amended its Rulebook, specifically Rule 315. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendment to the Rulebook and its compliance with applicable 

provisions of the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

A clean copy of the amended Rulebook is attached hereto as Exhibit B and a copy of the Rulebook 

marked to show changes against the version most recently submitted to the Commission is attached 

hereto as Exhibit C. 

The amendment will become effective on May 5, 2020. NEX SEF certifies that the amendment complies

with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. NEX SEF has 

reviewed the swap execution facility core principles (“Core Principles”) as set forth in the Act and has 

determined that the amendment impacts the Core Principles identified in Exhibit A.

NEX SEF is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and 

certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the NEX SEF website 

and may be accessed at: http://www.nexsef.com. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London E1 6PW

United Kingdom
2

Exhibit A

Explanation and Analysis

NEX SEF has amended its Rulebook as provided below. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein 

have the meanings assigned to them in the Rulebook.

Section/Rule Description of Revision

Reason and/or

Supporting Rule or Core

Principle

Rule 315 • Rule 315(b) has been amended to reduce the

amount of time a Participant has to request

review of a transaction’s price (other than the 

price of an uncleared Pre-Arranged Cross) 

following the execution of such transaction on the 

Facility from 15 minutes to 8 minutes.

• Core Principle 2

ACTIVE 252196219
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
  
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Revett Minerals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Ken Eickerman       | 
|----------------------- | 
|Ken Eickerman           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: November 13, 2009 | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Revett Minerals Inc. and
will be retained by Revett Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): 22-461

Organization: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. ("CME")

Filing as a: DCM SEF DCO SDR 

Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 10/18/22 Filing Description: Weekly Notification of Rule 

Amendments - Week of October 10, 2022

SPECIFY FILING TYPE 

Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

Rule Numbers: N/A

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

Official Product Name:

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected: 

Rule Numbers: 
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 299 2200 F 212 301 4645 christopher.bowen@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

1

Christopher Bowen 

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel

Legal Department

October 18, 2022

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments

CME Clearing Submission No. 22-461

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(d), the clearing house division of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME 

Clearing”) submits this Weekly Notification of the following rule amendments issued during the week of October 10, 

2022: 

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 22-394 (October 13, 2022), Performance Bond Requirements - Agriculture, 

Energy Margin - Effective October 14, 2022

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 22-395 (October 13, 2022), Performance Bond Requirements - Energy, 

Metal Margin - Effective October 14, 2022

• Clearing House Advisory Notice 22-396 (October 14, 2022), “LS” Spread Type on Pit Trades - Effective 

November 21, 2022

Copies of the above-referenced materials are available at www.cmegroup.com. If you require any additional 

information, please e-mail CMEGSubmissionInquiry@cmegroup.com or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2200.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Bowen

Managing Director and Chief Regulatory Counsel
NEX SEF LIMITED 

2 Broadgate

London 

EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

August 3, 2018

Via Email

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts

Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) (Applicant) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (Commission) a rule certification amendment in NEX SEF-2018-R-8 pursuant to 

CFTC Reg. 40.6 in order to certify its revised fee program (the Certification). Attached as 

Exhibit A to the Certification is the Fee Program, and attached as Exhibit B to the Certification is 

a copy of the Fee Program marked to show changes to the version last submitted to the 

Commission. 

The Applicant hereby requests that Exhibit A and Exhibit B to the Certification (Confidential 

Information) be treated as confidential in order to prevent disclosure of Applicant’s trade 

secrets and confidential commercial and financial information upon a request under the 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). We request the Confidential Information be provided 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, 2 Broadgate, 

London EC2M 7UR, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY NEX 

SEF LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying number and code: NEX SEF-2018-R-8-Exhibit A and NEX SEF-2018-R-8-Exhibit B.
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

2 Broadgate

London EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 234532781v.1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130191-2 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. FRED W. BRZOZOWSKI and Stephen J. Markman, LA VERNE S. BRZOZOWSKI, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130191-2 COA: 256701; 259098 Berrien CC: 01-003847-CH ARTHUR W. WO NDRASEK and MARY WONDRASEK, Defendants-Appellants,

and

SHEILA FINK, Intervening Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0920 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2006

Clerk
Case 1:07-cv-05862-RJH     Document 11      Filed 08/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Caraballo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), rendered November 24, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, under indictment No. 551/87, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered November 24, 1987, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated under indictment No. 2247/86.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of murder in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Any rational trier of fact could have concluded that the objective circumstances surrounding the defendant’s reckless conduct so elevated the gravity of the risk created as to evince the depraved indifference to human life necessary to sustain the murder conviction *(see, People v Roe,*74 NY2d 20; *People v Register,*60 NY2d 270).

Moreover, we find that the trial court’s curtailment of inquiry into acts of violence committed by the defendant’s family members on prior occasions was a proper exercise of its *703discretion to limit the admission of collateral evidence *(see, People v Williams,*142 AD2d 310). Significantly, we note that the trial court’s ruling did not exclude testimony as to the commission of the acts, but rather precluded excursion into the underlying details. Accordingly, the defendant suffered no prejudice from the court’s ruling and the efficiency of the trial was not compromised. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Rachel Lakaye Guillory, * From the 358th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D-44,283.

Vs. No. 11-20-00207-CR * September 25, 2020

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
# C_2021242EN.01001801.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 –Primart v EUIPO — Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)

(Case T-584/17 RENV) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz - Earlier national word marks PRIMA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Referral)

(2021/C 242/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe ‘Primart’ Marek Łukasiewicz (Wołomin, Poland) (represented by: J. Skołuda, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bolton Cile España, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 June 2017 (Case R 1933/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bolton Cile España and Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe ‘Primart’ Marek Łukasiewicz.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe ‘Primart’ Marek Łukasiewicz to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe ‘Primart’ Marek Łukasiewicz to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADDED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Refining Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John A. Catsimatidis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To my knowledge:



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                     |  |                            
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                      |  |    
|Dated: April 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy
|                      |  |     |  |                     |  | James E. Murphy            
|                      |  |     |  |                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Lee GORE, a/k/a Manager, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 30, 2013.

*278Johnny Lee Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse or disqualify. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*387 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*