alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT
No. 1


 


to
the


 


FRAMEWORK
AGREEMENT FOR CREDIT PRODUCTS


 


(hereinafter referred to as
“Framework Agreement”)


 


between


 


L. Kellenberger & Co. AG


Heiligkreuzstrasse 28, 9009 St. Gallen


(hereinafter referred to as
“the Borrower”; date of the Borrower’s signature on the Framework Agreement:
17. June 2010)


 


and


 


CREDIT
SUISSE AG


Mailing address:  P.O. Box 358, 9001 St. Gallen


Contact address:  St. Leonhardstrasse 3, 9000 St. Gallen


(the lender, hereinafter
referred to as the “Bank”; date of the Bank’s signature on the Framework
Agreement: 7. June 2010)


 


The Framework Agreement is
herewith amended and / or modified as follows:


 


1.
Negative Pledge Clause


 


The Negative Pledge Clause under Borrower’s Negative Obligations is fully
deleted and replaced by the following clause


 


	
  Borrower’s Negative Obligations

  	
   

  	
  ·      Negative Pledge Clause 

  The Borrower undertakes, to the extent permitted by law, to refrain
  from providing new or additional collateral in favour of a third party to
  secure existing or future liabilities or the Borrower or a third party except
  cash credits up to an amount of CHF 5’000’000.00 secured by mortgage notes
  (“Namenschuldbriefe”) on Land Register Biel, no. 9443, Mohnweg 5, 2500
  Biel/Bienne.

  



 


	
  2. Applicable Law and Place of Jurisdiction

  	
   

  	
  This Amendment No. 1 is subject to and shall be construed in
  accordance with Swiss law.  

   

  The Borrower recognizes the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of

  



 


1

















 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Zurich or of the location of the
  branch of the Bank with which the contractual relationship exists. The Bank
  also has the right to bring legal action against the Borrower before any
  other competent court.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  7. Issuance / Signing of this Agreement

  	
   

  	
  This Amendment No. 1
  is drawn up in two copies. The Borrower and the Bank shall each receive one
  copy.

  



 


 


	
  CREDIT
  SUISSE AG  

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  L.
  Kellenberger & Co. AG

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /S/
  ARMIN SIGNER

  	
   

  	
  /S/
  CHRISTIAN KUNZ  

  	
   

  	
  /S/ JURG KELLENBERGER

  	
   

  	
  /S/ PETER HUERSCH

  
	
  Armin
  Signer

  	
   

  	
  Christian
  Kunz

  	
   

  	
  Jurg Kellenberger

  	
   

  	
  Peter Heursch

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  St. Gallen, 19. August 2010

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  St. Gallen, 31. August 2010

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


2
# Effective 2.9.24

# Effective COB 5.7.24
LCH | 10 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

RESTRICTED - EXTERNAL

VIA CFTC Portal

Mr Christoper Kirkpatrick

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street NW

Three Lafayette Centre

Washington DC 20581

15 January 2024

Weekly Notification of Rule Amendment for the Week of 15 

January 2024

Dear Mr Kirkpatrick,

Please accept this notification pursuant to CFTC regulation § 40.6(d) of the below-described 

changes to LCH Limited’s (“LCH”) London Deposit Rate (“LDR”), Client Deposit Rate (“CDR”), 

FCM London Deposit Rate (“FCM LDR”) and RepoClear Deposit Rate (“RDR”).

The RDR is applicable to cash balances held on RepoClear service accounts. The FCM LDR 

is applicable to cash balances held on SwapClear client FCM accounts. The CDR is applicable 

to cash balances held on SwapClear and ForexClear client accounts. The LDR is applicable 

to all other cash balances (excluding the default fund).

The changes recommended by the LCH Spread and Accommodation Review Group were 

approved by the LCH CEO and are as follows:

RDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 44.0bp Change from (49.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

GBP SONIA 28.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

LDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 44.0bp Change from (49.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

GBP SONIA 28.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

USD FedFunds 33.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

CHF SARON 47.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards
 

LCH | 10 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7LS | T: +44 (0)20 7426 7000 | F: +44 (0)20 7426 7001 | lch.com

RESTRICTED - EXTERNAL

FCM LDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 39.0bp Change from (44.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

GBP SONIA 18.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

USD FedFunds 16.0bp Change from (15.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

CDR changes

CCY Benchmark Spread Change / No Change Period

EUR €STR 39.0bp Change from (44.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

GBP SONIA 18.0bp No Change 22 January 2024 onwards

USD FedFunds 16.0bp Change from (15.0bp) 22 January 2024 onwards

These changes will be notified via circular to clearing members in advance of the effective 

date.

No change is required to the LCH Rulebook.

Should you have any questions regarding this submission please contact me at 

james.woolley@lseg.com. 

Yours sincerely,

James Woolley

Regulatory Compliance Analyst

LCH Limited
Case 1:07-cv-05432-AKH     Document 3      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
# C_2018427EN.01007201.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/72

---

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2018 — M-Sansz v Commission

(Case T-709/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers - Preliminary examination procedure - Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘party concerned’ - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/96)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) (Pécs, Hungary) (represented by: L. Szabó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions that the Commission allegedly adopted concerning the complaints SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers alleged to be unlawful due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation and SA. 45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint made by OPS Újpest-lift Kft. concerning the State aid granted between 2006 and 2012 to companies employing disabled workers.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.

---
Exhibit 31.2

In connection with the Report of CalbaTech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward Deese, Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material aspects, the financial condition and result of
operations on the Company.


By: /s/  Edward Deese
Edward Deese, Treasurer
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2109 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in awarding a contract 

for the procurement of goods or services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2109 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boosting Rates of 

3 American Veteran Employment Act’’ or the ‘‘BRAVE 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE FOR OFFERORS EMPLOYING VET6 ERANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 81 of 

8 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding after 

9 section 8128 the following new section: 

10 ‘‘§ 8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans 

11 ‘‘(a) PREFERENCE.—In awarding a contract for the 

12 procurement of goods or services, the Secretary may give 

13 a preference to offerors that employ veterans on a full14 time basis. The Secretary shall determine such preference 

15 based on the percentage of the full-time employees of the 

16 offeror who are veterans. 

17 ‘‘(b) ENFORCEMENT PENALTIES FOR MISREPRESEN18 TATION.—(1) Any offeror that is determined by the Sec19 retary to have willfully and intentionally misrepresented 

20 the veteran status of the employees of the offeror for pur21 poses of subsection (a) may be debarred from contracting 

22 with the Department for a period of not less than 5 years. 

23 ‘‘(2) If the Secretary carries out a debarment under 

24 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall commence debarment 

25 action against the offeror by not later than 30 days after 

26 determining that the offeror willfully and intentionally 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2109 RFS

1 misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the 

2 offeror as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete 

3 debarment actions against such offeror by not later than 

4 90 days after such determination. 

5 ‘‘(3) The debarment of an offeror under paragraph 

6 (1) includes the debarment of all principals in the offeror 

7 for a period of not less than 5 years.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

10 after the item relating to section 8128 the following new 

11 item: 

‘‘8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# THE ATIYORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Aus-rm. TIEXAS 78711

August 28, 1974
The Honorable Cue D. Boykin Chairman, Texas Industrial Accident Board P. 0. Box 12757, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Dear Mr. Boykin: Opinion No. H- 385 Re: Deposit ofthe Second Injury Fund in interest bearing accounts.

You have asked whether the Second Injury Fund should be deposited by the State Treasurer in aninterest bearing account. The Second Injury Fund is a part oftheworkmen’s compensation system and is governed by Article 8306, Sec. 12c-2, V. T. C.S., which provides: The special fund known as the ‘Second Injury

Fund’ shall be created in the following manner: (a) In every case ofthe death ofan employee under this Act where there is noperson entitled to compensation surviving said employee, the association shall pay to the Industrial Accident Board the full death benefits, but not to exceed 360 weeks ofcompensation, as provided inSection 8, ofArticle 8306, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925. as amended, tobe deposited with the Treasurer ofthe State for the benefit of said Fund and the Board shall direct the distribution thereof. (b) When the total amount ofall such payments into the Fund, together with the accumulated interest thereon, equals or exceeds Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) in excess ofexisting liabilities. nofurther payments shall be required tobe paid to said Fund; butwhenever thereafter the amount of such Fund shall be reduced below One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000) by reason p. 1813The Honorable Cue D. Boykin. page 2 (H-385)

ofpayments from such Fund, thepayments to such Fund shall be resumed forthwith, andshall continue until such Fund again amounts to Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) including accumulated interest thereon. (Emphasis added) There is ample statutory authority permitting the deposit ofsome State funds in interest bearing accounts. Articles 2525, 2534, V. T.C.S. ; Lawson V. Baker, 220 S.W. 260 (Tex. Civ.App., Austin~ 1920. writ ref’d. ); Attorney General Opinions M-468 (1969), M-203 (1968). As the statute creating the Second Injury Fund specifically refers tothe accumulated interest onthe payments into the fund, we believe deposit ofall or part ofthe fund ininterest bearing accounts is clearly contemplated. Therefore, we answer your question in the affirmative. SUMMARY The Workmen’s Compensation Second Injury Fund may be deposited in an interest bearing account. Very truly yours,

JOHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 1814
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 72 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC-RLE Document 72 Filed 11/20/2009 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05032-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05032-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05032-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-05032-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/15/2008     Page 4 of 4
CASE 1:21-MC-00102-AKH Filed 9/17/07 Page 1 of 2

ESCHEN, FRENKEL, WEISMAN & GORDON, LLP

20 West Main Street

Bay Shore, New York 11706

(631) 969-7777

Attorneys for Defendants

LIONSHEAD 110 DEVELOPMENT, LLC 

formerly known as and sued herein as 

LIONSHEAD DEVELOPMENT, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: Case No.: 1:21 MC 102(AKH)

 LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION (21 MC 102)

---------------------------------------------------------X

EDWARD MOORE & NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF 

WIFE RUTH MOORE, ANSWER TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, ELECTRONICALLY FILED

-against1 WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER, et. al.,

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------X

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendants LIONSHEAD 110

DEVELOPMENT, LLC formerly known as and sued herein as LIONSHEAD

DEVELOPMENT, LLC by their attorney, ESCHEN, FRENKEL, WEISMAN &

GORDON, LLP as and for a their Response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint

by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the abovereferenced action, hereby adopt their Answer to Master Complaint dated July 31, 2007,

which was filed in the matter of In Re: World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster

Case 1:07-cv-05562-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendants LIONSHEAD 110 DEVELOPMENT,

LLC formerly known as and sued herein as LIONSHEAD DEVELOPMENT, LLC

demand judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as against them, together with

their costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief as this Court deems

just and proper.

Dated: Bay Shore, New York

September 14, 2007 Yours, etc.,

By:__________________________

Todd E. Weisman (TEW-0963)

ESCHEN, FRENKEL, WEISMAN

& GORDON, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

LIONSHEAD 110 DEVELOPMENT, LLC 

formerly known as and sued herein as 

LIONSHEAD DEVELOPMENT, LLC 

20 West Main Street

Bay Shore, New York 11706

(631) 969-7777

File #: 9091-07

Case 1:07-cv-05562-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017202EN.01002701.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/27

---

Action brought on 9 May 2017 — Kwizda Holding v EUIPO — Dermapharm (UROAKUT)

(Case T-266/17)

(2017/C 202/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kwizda Holding GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Wiltschek, D. Plasser and K. Majchrzak, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dermapharm GmbH (Vienna, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Party applying for the mark at issue: Applicant

Party applying for the mark at issue:

Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘UROAKUT’ — application No 13 854 146

Mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2017 in Case R 1221/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the action and amend the contested decision in such a way that the opposition to the EU trade mark application No 13 854 146 UROAKUT is rejected; in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action and amend the contested decision in such a way that the opposition to the EU trade mark application No 13 854 146 UROAKUT is rejected; in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report of Heckmann Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 14, 2011



|       |  |                                                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Richard J. Heckmann                               |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brian R. Anderson                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Richard J. Heckmann                                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Brian R. Anderson                                                                     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Secretary of the Company and will be retained by the Office of General Counsel of the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019423EN.01005101.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/51

---

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — CX v Commission

(Case T-605/17) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Decision of the Commission to recover salaries paid to the applicant - Debit note ordering recovery of the sums at issue - Replacement of the contested measures in the course of the proceedings - Abandonment of any measure seeking the recovery of the sums at issue - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 423/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the measures seeking recovery of the salaries paid for the months of November 2013 to October 2016.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.2





Certification





I, Hui Liu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June 27, 2011





/s/ Hui LiuName: Hui LiuTitle: Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.