# C_2018005EN.01004402.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/44

---

Action brought on 26 September 2017 — Relea Álvarez and Others v SRB

(Case T-653/17)

(2018/C 005/60)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: María Jesús Relea Álvarez (Madrid, Spain) and 20 other applicants (represented by: M. Gómez de Liaño Botella, V. Hernández-Talavera Martin, M. Gómez de Liaño Botella, F. Azpeitia Gamazo and L. Lopez Álvarez, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Declare that the EU has incurred financial liability for the damage caused and order the SRM fund to pay an amount corresponding to the value of the capital instruments before the implementation of the resolution mechanism, or in the alternative, the value of those instruments according to expert valuation carried out by an independent party, in accordance with Article 340, on the basis of which the applicants bring, in addition to the annulment proceedings, an action for damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the EU has incurred financial liability for the damage caused and order the SRM fund to pay an amount corresponding to the value of the capital instruments before the implementation of the resolution mechanism, or in the alternative, the value of those instruments according to expert valuation carried out by an independent party, in accordance with Article 340, on the basis of which the applicants bring, in addition to the annulment proceedings, an action for damages;

| — | Order SRB to pay the cost of these proceedings pursuant to Article 132 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order SRB to pay the cost of these proceedings pursuant to Article 132 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos

Single Resolution Board

Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL

Single Resolution Board

Comercial Vascongada Recalde

Commission and Single Resolution Board

García Suárez and Others

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Fidesban and Others

Single Resolution Board

Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015

Commission and Single Resolution Board

Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda

Commission and Single Resolution Board

---