alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1



SECTION
302

CERTIFICATION



I,
James Schoonover, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Houston American Energy Corp.;                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|Date:
    April 13, 2020 | /s/
    James Schoonover       
|------------------------ | -------------------------------
|                         | James
    Schoonover,          
|                         | Chief
    Executive Officer and
|                         | Principal
    Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2012 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that Federal law shall 

not preempt State law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Ms. DEGETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide that 

Federal law shall not preempt State law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect States’ and 

5 Citizens’ Rights Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

7 Section 708 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

8 U.S.C. 903) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2012 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘No provision’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in sub3 section (b), no provision’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(b) SPECIAL RULE REGARDING STATE MARIHUANA

6 LAWS.—In the case of any State law that pertains to mar7 ihuana, no provision of this title shall be construed as indi8 cating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy 

9 the field in which that provision operates, including crimi10 nal penalties, to the exclusion of State law on the same 

11 subject matter, nor shall any provision of this title be con12 strued as preempting any such State law.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2020175EN.01001001.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — UG v Commission

(Case T-571/17) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Termination with notice - Grounds for termination - Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service - Manifest error of assessment - Review of the accuracy of the facts - Lack of evidence - Liability - Material harm - Payment of salaries owed)

(2020/C 175/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UG (represented by: M. Richard and P. Junqueira de Oliveira, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, L. Radu Bouyon and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 17 October 2016 by which the Commission’s Office for ‘Infrastructure and Logistics in Luxembourg’ (OIL) terminated the applicant’s employment contract pursuant to Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union as from 20 August 2017 and, second, compensation for the material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following that decision and the non-material harm she allegedly suffered as a result of the degrading treatment she claims to have been subject to because of her trade union activity and her period of parental leave.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 17 October 2016 terminating the contract of indefinite duration of Ms UG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 17 October 2016 terminating the contract of indefinite duration of Ms UG;

| 2. | Orders the parties to forward to the Court, within three months of the delivery of this interim judgment, either the jointly agreed amount of financial compensation resulting from the illegality of the decision of 17 October 2016 or, failing agreement, their submissions on that amount; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to forward to the Court, within three months of the delivery of this interim judgment, either the jointly agreed amount of financial compensation resulting from the illegality of the decision of 17 October 2016 or, failing agreement, their submissions on that amount;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.

---
141 So. 917

#### John H. ADAMS v. ALABAMA LIME & STONE CORP.

6 Div. 928.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 19, 1932.

Seje,; also, 222 Ala. 538,133 So.'580.

"■¡PER,‘CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 45 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ............................................................ X 

ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES, 

LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

ECF FILED 

- against - 

Case No. 07-civ-5861 (RMB) 

BELCO RESOURCES, INC., SINOCHEM 

JIANGSU CORPORATION (FORMERLY 

KNOWN AS SINOCHEM JIANGSU IMPORT & 

EXPORT CORPORATION). NANJING 

HUABIN FOREIGN TRADE'& ECONOMICS 

CO., LTD., DRAGONTRANS SHIPPING LTD. 

d/b/a HUABANG INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

NOTICE OF 

VOLUNTARY -- DISMISSAL 

SINOTRANS NINGBO INTERNATIONAL 

FORWARDING AGENCY CO., LTD., 

JOHN DOE 1 - 10, 

Defendants. ............................................................ X 

Plaintiffs ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES, LTD., through its attorneys, 

DeOrchis & Partners, LLP, therefore and hereby file a notice of dismissal without prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as against defendant 

Dragontrans Shipping Ltd. d/b/a Huabang International, Inc., no answer or motion for 

summary judgment having been filed by said defendant at the time of this filing. 

Dated: New York, New York 

March 6, 2008 

DEORCHIS & PARTNERS, LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

By: s/Olivier D. L. DuPont 

Vincent M. DeOrchis (VMD-65 15) 

William E. Lakis (WL-9355) 

Olivier D. L. DuPont (OD-2817) 

6 1 Broadway, 261h Floor 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 49 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Elliot
Krasnow, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Netfran Development Corp.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/ Elliot Krasnow
--------------------------------
Elliot Krasnow

March 23, 2004
# C_2019399EN.01004301.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Arysta LifeScience Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-476/17) (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance diflubenzuron - Review of approval - Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Rights of the defence - Ultra vires - Manifest error of assessment - Procedure for renewal of approval - Article 14 of Regulation No 1107/2009 - Imposition, in the context of the review procedure, of additional restrictions limiting the use of the active substance at issue without waiting for the outcome of the renewal procedure - Proportionality)

(2019/C 399/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Arysta LifeScience Netherlands BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, I. Naglis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/855 of 18 May 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance diflubenzuron (OJ 2017 L 128, p. 10).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Arysta LifeScience Netherlands BV is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action and in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Arysta LifeScience Netherlands BV is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action and in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

The following applicant has applied for approval to conduct certain activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to Section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 15.26(c). 

                    Applicant: Mr. Jerry Jennings, Fallbrook, California, on behalf of the Toucan Preservation Center (CB006). The applicant wishes to amend approved cooperative breeding program CB006 to include Green aracari (                    *Pteroglossus viridis*), Black-necked aracari (                    *Pteroglossus aracari*), and Blue-headed macaw (                    *Ara couloni*). The Toucan Preservation Center maintains responsibility for oversight of this program.                 

Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication. 

                    Documents and other information submitted with this application are available for review,                     *subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act,*                     by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-2281).                 

Dated: January 10, 2001. 

Andrea Gaski, 

Chief, Branch of CITES Operations, Division of Management Authority. 

[FR Doc. 01-1246 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|(1) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six month
          periods ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: August 4, 2003 |  | By: /s/ James D. Hartman
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sitesearch Corporation (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
Jeffrey S. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:           /s/ Jeffrey S.
Peterson


Jeffrey
S. Peterson


Chief
Executive Officer


March 9,
2010
#### In the Matter of Channa Tauber, Respondent, v Elkan Tauber, Appellant.

In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 in which the wife was granted permanent custody of the parties’ minor children upon the default of the husband, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated December 23, 1987, which denied, without a hearing, his motion to vacate the custody order.

Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Rockland County, for an evidentiary hearing on the husband’s motion to vacate his default.

On the husband’s default, permanent custody of the parties’ six minor children was awarded to the wife. The husband’s subsequent motion to vacate the order entered upon his default was denied without a hearing, despite his contention that his failure to appear was attributable to his former attorney. In view of this court’s liberal policy in favor of vacating defaults in matrimonial and custody matters *(see, D’Alleva v D'Alleva,*127 AD2d 732; *Ray v Ray,*108 AD2d 905; *675
      *Antonovich v Antonovich,*84 AD2d 799), the Family Court should not have denied the motion without a hearing on the issues of whether the default is excusable and whether the husband has a meritorious defense to the award of custody *(see, Pisano v Pisano,*71 AD2d 670).

There is no merit to the husband’s contention that the court failed to acquire in personam jurisdiction over him since the jurisdictional predicates of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (Domestic Relations Law art 5-A) were fully complied with, and, in particular, he received notice and an opportunity to be heard *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 75-e). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
DOCSNY-287432 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

FREDDY CONFORME, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

160 WATER ST., INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05552-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 January 18, 2008 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 18 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF TYLER, TEXAS.

WRIT OP ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP TEXAS.

No. 159.

Motion to dismiss or affirm. —

Submitted October 19, 1908.

Decided October 26, 1908.

Writ of error to review 99 Texas, 491, dismissed for want of jurisdiction, there being a non-Federal ground on which the judgment rested sufficient to sustain it without regard to the Federal question, if any, involved.

*Mr. Cone Johnson, Mr. Horace Chilton, Mr. Ben B. Cain*and *Mr. Jamas M. Edwards,*for defendants in error in support of the motion.

*Mr. E. B. Perkins*and *Mr. Hiram, Glass*for plaintiffs in error. ,

*Per Curiam:*

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Eustis*v. *Bolles,*150 U. S. 361; *Railway Company*v. *Fitzgerald,*160 U. S. 556; *Moran*v. *Horsky,*178 U. S. 205; *Johnson*v. *Risk,*137 U. S. 300-307; *Chicago & Alton Railroad*v. *Wiggins Ferry Company,*119 U. S. 615; *Eagan*v. *Hart,*165 U. S. 188.
# C_2021338EN.01001702.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Bateni v Council

(Case T-455/17) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Limitation period - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

(2021/C 338/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Naser Bateni (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Schlingmann, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: .-P. Hix and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hödlmayr, J. Roberti di Sarsina and M. Kellerbauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Articles 268 and 340 TFEU and seeking compensation for the losses which the applicant allegedly suffered following the listing of his name in the lists set out, first, in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39), by means of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), and in Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), by means of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), secondly, in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), and, thirdly, in the Annex to Council Decision 2013/661/CFSP of 15 November 2013 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2013 L 306, p. 18), and in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1154/2013 of 15 November 2013 implementing Regulation No 267/2012 (OJ 2013 L 306, p. 3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as in part inadmissible and in part unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as in part inadmissible and in part unfounded;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bateni to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bateni to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 13 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 13 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 13 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 13 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 4 of 4