alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019406EN.01002001.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — BASF Grenzach v ECHA

(Case T-125/17) (1)

(REACH - Evaluation of substances - Triclosan - ECHA decision requesting further information - Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Action brought before the Board of Appeal - Task of the Board of Appeal - Adversarial nature of the procedure - Scope of the review - Intensity of the review - Powers of the Board of Appeal - Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 - First sentence of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Relevant information - Proportionality - Article 25 of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 - Data obtained under relevant circumstances - Persistence - Neurotoxicity - Reproductive toxicity - Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 - Delay in the submission of a scientific opinion)

(2019/C 406/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BASF Grenzach GmbH (Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) (represented: initially by K. Nordlander and M. Abenhaïm, lawyers, and subsequently by K. Nordlander and K. Le Croy, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented: initially by M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Röcke, and subsequently by M. Heikkilä, W Broere and C. Jacquet, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by C. Thorning and M. Wolff, and subsequently by M. Wolff, J. Nymann-Lindegren and P. Ngo, Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented: initially by T. Henze and D. Klebs, and subsequently by D. Klebs, Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and C. Schillemans, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Decision A-018-2014 of the Board of Appeal of the ECHA of 19 December 2016 in so far as it partially dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the ECHA decision of 19 September 2014 to request further information about the substance Triclosan (CAS 3380-34-5) and in which it fixed the deadline for presenting that information as 26 December 2018.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BASF Grenzach GmbH to bear its own costs, as well as the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BASF Grenzach GmbH to bear its own costs, as well as the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05561-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS     Document 13      Filed 06/19/2008     Page 1 of 1
June 9, 2006

Via E-Mail

Office of the Acting Secretary
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.68: Notification of
Amendments to NYMEX Rules 9.26, 9.27, and 9.34 for NYMEX
Financially-Settled Energy Contracts on Globex®.

Dear Ms. Eileen A. Donovan:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of amendments to
NYMEX Rules 9.26, All Month/Any One Month Position Accountability; 9.27, Expiration and
Current Delivery Month Position Limits or Position Accountability; and 9.34, Reporting Levels.

Effective on June 12, 2006, these amendments include the addition of position limits,
accountability levels, and reporting levels for NYMEX Financially-Settled Energy Contracts on
Globex®: Heating Oil Financial Futures Contract (BH), Henry Hub Financial Last Day Futures
Contract (HH), and Henry Hub Penultimate Financial Futures Contract (HP). Pursuant to
Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange
hereby certifies that the attached rule amendments comply with the Act, including regulations
under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Anthony V.
Densieski, Senior Director, Market Surveillance, at (212) 299-2881, or Bonnie H. Yurga,
Director, Market Surveillance, at (212) 299-2879.

Very truly yours,

Thomas LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management
ce: Brian Regan
Nancy Minett



(Underlining in bold indicates addition.)

All/Any One
Contract Name Rule _| Commodity Month Expiration Reporting
Chapter Code Accountability Month Level Aggregate | Aggregate
Level Limit Into (1) Into (2)
Rule 9.26 Rule 9.27 Rule 9.34

Petroleum
USA
New York
Harbor
Hei Oil
Financial Futures
Contract 825 BH 7,000 1,000 100 HO
Natural Gas
Henry Hub
Financial Last
Day Futures
Contract 823 HH 12,000 1,000 400 NG
Contract 824 HP 12,000 1,000 100 NG
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-68,543-03

EX P ARTE P AUL EUGENE DENLEY, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 417904-B IN THE 262ND DIST RICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Ap p licant was convicted of ag g rava ted sexual assault and sentenc ed to twenty -five y ea rs ’ imprisonment. The Four

teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Denley v. State , No. B14- 85-00532-CR (Tex. App. — [14t h Dist.] J une 25, 1987). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of convic tion, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that, due to a nunc pro tunc , his sentenc e discharg ed prior to the issuance of a pre- revoc ation war

rant that resulted in his parole revoc ation. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E § 508.283(b ) an d (c ); Ex parte Spann, 132 S.W .3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court2

is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fa ct. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice’s Offic e of the Gene ral Counsel to obtain

a response from a person with knowledg e of rele vant fac ts. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is i n d i gent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’ s name. The re sponse shall state the f ollowing: (1) Applica

nt’s sentenc e-be g in date, (2) the date and eff

ect of any nunc pro tunc judgme nts on Applicant’s discharg e date, (4) the da tes any revoc ation war

rants we re issued a

nd executed, and (5) whe ther Applica

nt rec eived c redit while re lease d on parole

. The trial court may make any other finding s an d conclusions that it deems appropr iate in response to Applicant’s cla im. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law within thirty day s from the date of this order

. The dist rict clerk s h al l t h en immediately forwa rd t o this Court the t rial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Aug ust 25, 2021 Do not publish
(82 South. 161)

#### Ex parte BRILLIANT COAL CO.

(6 Div. 909.)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 22, 1919.

Certiorari &wkey;>68 — Review oe Intermediate Court — Questions oe Fact.

The Supreme Court will not issue certiorari to review the Court of Appeals on questions of fact.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Action by Julius Sparks, by Ms next friend, against the Brilliant Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (16 Ala. App. 665, 81 South. 185), and defendant petitions for certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

A. F. Fite, of Jasper, for appellant.

Leith & Powell, of Jasper, for appellee.

SAYRE, J.

The court holds that there was no error in the rulings on the pleadings, and finds no occasion to add to what the Court of Appeals has said on that subject.

The writer thinks that reversible error is shown by the record, and that the judgment should have been reversed. But other members of the court, following the ruling of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91, will not review the Court of Appeals on the questions of fact involved and for that reason order the application for certiorari to be denied. The writer agrees that this is in accord with the rule upon which the court has settled in such cases. McNeil v. Munson S. S. Line, 184 Ala. 424, 63 South. 992.

Certiorari denied.

All the Justices concur.
Amendment  No. 4 to Cash Balance Plan



 Exhibit 10.1.3 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO THE 
 UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC. 
 CASH BALANCE PLAN 
  
 Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends the above-named plan (the “Plan”), effective as of March 28, 2005, as follows: 
  
 1. Section 6.2(g) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “$5,000” in the first sentence
thereof and replacing it with “$1,000.” 
  
 2.
Section 6.3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “$5,000” in the second sentence thereof and replacing it with “$1,000.” 
  
 * * * * * 
  
 The Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	“Company”
			
	 	 	 	 	 UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC.

				
	 Dated:    August 17, 2005
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	/s/    ROBERT M. LING,
JR.        
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Robert M. Ling, Jr.
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	Executive Vice President
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	General Counsel
Exhibit 11

# National Presto Industries, Inc.

The following presents the
computation of per share earnings reflecting the assumption that the granted shares under
the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

|                                                   | First Quarter
|-------------------------------------------------- | -------------
|
|Net Earnings (1)                                   |              
|                                                   |              
|Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)     |              
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options |              
|                                                   |              
|Adjusted common and common equivalent              |              
|shares for computation (3)                         |              
|                                                   |              
|Net earnings per share:                            |              
|Basic (1 divided by 2)                             |              
|                                                   |              
|Diluted (1 divided by 3)                           |              
|                                                   |              

---
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

October 19, 2022

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – Exhibit D - AEGIS SEF Broker Firm

Agreement and Exhibit G- AEGIS SEF Broker Firm Agreement Redline

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit D and Exhibit G

(“Exhibits”), which were submitted to the Commission as 40.6(a) Rule Certifications on this 

date. This request pertains to all material in the Exhibits. The Exhibits bear the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission

Regulations 40.8, as Exhibit contains information that would reveal the

trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information of AEGIS SEF and its

affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-hedging.com with any 

questions regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
EXHIBIT A 

(1 of 3) 

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 43 of 43
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27040-27041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1151; MM Docket No. 01-4; RM-10020]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Willow Creek, California

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots FM Channel 253A to Willow Creek,

[[Page 27041]]

California, as its first local aural transmission service. See 66 FR 
7607, (January 24, 2001). Coordinates used for Channel 253A at Willow 
Creek, are 40-56-50 NL and 123-37-10 WL. With this action, this 
docketed proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective June 18, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-4, adopted April 25, 2001, and 
released May 4, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under California, 
is amended by adding Willow Creek, Channel 253A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-12271 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 24.1

                                   CALBATECH, INC.

                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY

     I, the undersigned director of CalbaTech, Inc. (the "Company"),
do hereby constitute and appoint James DeOlden, Edward Deese or John
Gordon my true and lawful attorney and agent to sign an Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and to do any and all acts and things and to execute any
and all instruments for me and in my name in the capacity indicted
below, which said attorney and agent, may deem necessary or advisable
to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 as amended, and any rules, regulations, and requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with such Annual
Report, including specifically, but without limitation, power and
authority to sign for me in my name and in the capacity indicated
below, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)
hereto; and I do hereby ratify and confirm all that the said attorney
and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of
attorney.

     Executed below by the following person in the capacity and on
the date indicated:

Signature                      Title            Date

/s/ Marco Messina              Director          April 15, 2003
Marco Messina

/s/ Richard Bourke             Director          April 15, 2003
Richard Bourke
**EXHIBIT 21**

** **

**SUBSIDIARIES OF INVESTOOLS INC.**

 

**Direct subsidiaries of INVESTools Inc.:**

 

Telescan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (100% owned)

 

ZiaSun Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (100% owned)

 

**Direct subsidiaries of Telescan, Inc.:**

 

INVESTools, Inc., a California corporation (100% owned)

 

Entrepreneurs Online, a Delaware corporation (100% owned)

 

**Direct subsidiaries of ZiaSun Technologies, Inc.:**

 

Online Investors Advantage, Inc., a Utah corporation (100% owned)

 

**Direct subsidiaries of Online Investors Advantage, Inc.:**

 

Investor Education LLC, a Utah limited liability company (100% owned)

 

Memory Improvement Systems, Inc., a Utah corporation (100% owned)

 

Seminar Marketing Group, Inc., a Utah corporation (100% owned)

 

INVESTools Asia Pacific Pte., Limited, a Singapore company (100% owned)

 

INVESTools Hong Kong Ltd., a Hong Kong company (100% owned)
# C_2005107EN.01001301.xml

| 3.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/13

---

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block segment L16b of the Dutch continental shelf

(2005/C 107/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands serves notice that an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons has been received for the segment of block L16 indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Government Gazette 2002, 245), known as ‘block segment L16b’.

With reference to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons and the publication as described in Article 15 of the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons for block segment L16b.

Applications may be submitted for 13 weeks following the publication of this invitation in the Official Journal of the European Union and must be sent to the Minister for Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director of Energy Production, Prinses Beatrixlaan 5, The Hague, the Netherlands, and marked ‘personal’.

Official Journal of the European Union

Applications submitted following the expiry of this period will not be considered. A decision on applications will be taken not later than nine months after the expiry of the period.

Further information can be obtained by telephoning the following number: (31) 70 379 66 94.

---