alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION Certification of Chief Financial Officer  I, Eileen Casey as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dialpoint Communications Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 19, 2008 By:/s/ Eileen Casey Eileen Casey, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
NEX SEF-2019-R-1

January 17, 2019

Submitted via CFTC Portal

Division of Market Oversight

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: NEX SEF Limited – Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification – Amended Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the 

regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), NEX SEF Limited (“NEX 

SEF” or the “Facility”) hereby notifies the Commission that it has amended its Rulebook, specifically 

Rules 801 and 802. 

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendments to the Rulebook and their compliance with 

applicable provisions of the Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A. 

A clean copy of the amended Rulebook exclusive of confidential Chapter 9 is attached hereto as Exhibit B

and a copy of the Rulebook exclusive of confidential Chapter 9 marked to show changes against the 

version most recently submitted to the Commission is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 

The amendments will become effective on February 1, 2019. NEX SEF certifies that the amendments 

comply with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. NEX SEF

has reviewed the swap execution facility core principles (“Core Principles”) as set forth in the Act and has 

determined that the amendments impact the Core Principles identified in Exhibit A.

NEX SEF is not aware of any substantive opposing views expressed with respect to this filing and 

certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission was posted on the NEX SEF website 

and may be accessed at: http://www.nexsef.com. 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

2 Broadgate

London EC2M 7UR

United Kingdom
2

Exhibit A

Explanation and Analysis

NEX SEF has amended its Rulebook as provided below. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein 

have the meanings assigned to them in the Rulebook.

Section/Rule Description of Revision

Reason and/or

Supporting Rule or Core

Principle

Cover Page  Updated effective date. Conforming change

Rule 801  Rule 801 has been amended to reflect the new 

trading hours applicable to Non Deliverable 

Forward transactions.

 Core Principle 2

 Core Principle 4

Rule 802  Rule 802 has been amended to reflect the new 

trading hours applicable to Interest Rate Swap 

transactions.

 Rule 802(5) has been amended to reflect the 

current names of certain benchmark indices 

underlying Inflation Swaps that were sold from 

Telerate to Reuters.

 Core Principle 2

 Core Principle 4

ACTIVE 239128893
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-950-1420-00-P] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The plat of survey of the following described land is scheduled to be officially filed in the Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication. 

## Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming 

T. 44 N., R. 118 W., Metes and Bounds Survey of Tract 39, accepted April 23, 2001 

This plat will be placed in the open files of the Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and will be available to the public as a matter of information only. Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the reproduction fee of $1.10 per copy. 

A person or party who wishes to protest this survey must file with the State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, a notice of protest within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication. If the protest notice did not include a statement of reasons for the protest, the protestant shall file such a statement with the State Director within thirty (30) calendar days after the notice of protest was filed. 

If protests against this survey are received prior to the official filing, the filing will be stayed pending consideration of the protest(s) and or appeal(s). A plat will not be officially filed until after disposition of protest(s) and or appeal(s). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John P. Lee, (307) 775-6216, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 1828, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003. 

Dated: April 23, 2001. 

John P. Lee, 

Chief, Cadastral Survey Group. 

[FR Doc. 01-12274 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1918 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1918

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
    Veterans Affairs in Bozeman, Montana, as the ``Travis W. Atkins 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2019

Mr. Gianforte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
    Veterans Affairs in Bozeman, Montana, as the ``Travis W. Atkins 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRAVIS W. ATKINS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS CLINIC IN BOZEMAN, MONTANA.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 300 North Willson Avenue, 
Bozeman, Montana, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 
known and designated as the ``Travis W. Atkins Department of Veterans 
Affairs Clinic'' or the ``Travis W. Atkins VA Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community-
based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Travis W. Atkins Department of 
Veterans Affairs Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
December 14, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2610.01
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Revised Regulation 450.04 per the attached texts.
The referenced revisions will reduce the specified adjustment periods for member firm
‘overpayments and underpayments of Exchange fees. Under these revisions, the adjustment
period for overpayments will change from six months to two months, and the adjustment period
for underpayments will change from two years to one year.
The Exchange intends to implement these revisions as of April 1, 2006.

There were no opposing views in connection with these revisions.

The CBOT certifies that these revisions comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b121305


Remove current Regulation 450.04 in its entirety:

[450.04 Exchange Service Fees — Adjustments — Exchange Service Fee adjustments may be
granted to or required of member firms which have made overpayments to or underpaid the
Exchange for any reason. The Exchange will only grant adjustments to member firms for the
overpayment of exchange service fees for a period of up to six months back from the month-end
preceding the date when a rebate request is made by the firm. The Exchange will only require
member firms to make adjustments for the underpayment of exchange service fees for a period
of up to two years back from the end of the audit period selected by the Exchange. Interest
and/or costs may be assessed in accordance with policies established by the Exchange.]}

Add new Regulation 450.04 as follows:

450.04 Exchange Transaction Fees - Adjustments — Exchange Transaction Fee
adjustments resulting from the overpayment of transaction fees must be made through the
Exchange Fee Billing System’s (““EFB”) on-line correction facility. The Exchange will only
grant adjustments to member firms for the overpayment of exchange transaction fees for the
prior two months from the month the adjustment is made to the EFB on-line correction facility.

The Exchange will only require member firms to make adjustments for the underpayment of
exchange transaction fees for a period up to one year back from the end of the audit period
selected by the Exchange. Exchange findings of underpayments may not be offset with an
adjustment for any overpayments, except as provided above. Interest and/or costs may be
assessed in accordance with policies established by the Exchange.
(September 28, 1989)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard L. Smith, Sr., Appellant.

Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Siedlecki, J.), rendered June 17, 1988, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Seeking reversal of his conviction, defendant contends that (1) County Court erred when it permitted a psychotherapist to testify on behalf of the prosecution with regard to the behavior of sexually abused children without ever interviewing the victim of the alleged abuse, (2) it was improper to permit the People to amend the indictment to conform to the proof as to the date of the alleged crime, and (3) the evidence was, as a matter of law, insufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In our view, the conviction should be affirmed.

The expert opinion evidence offered by the psychotherapist was to assist the jury in an area beyond the ordinary knowledge of the average juror, i.e., the psychological reactions of a child who is the victim of sexual abuse by a family member. Accordingly, there being a proper foundation for this testimony, the action of County Court was in the sound exercise of its discretion *(see, People v Keindl,*68 NY2d 410, 422). We also find.no error in permitting the amendment of the indictment to conform to the proof of a two-day difference between the date alleged in the indictment and the date proven at trial *(see,*CPL 200.70 [1]). We note that defendant failed to seek an adjournment and was not prejudiced by the amendment *(see, People v Johnson,*115 AD2d 794).

Finally, in our view the evidence in this record establishes defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*CPL 60.20 [2] ; Penal Law § 130.16; *People v Sinatra,*134 AD2d 738, *lv denied*70 NY2d 1011).

*996Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 6-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
23.2
  JIMMY
      C.H. CHEUNG & CO.
              Certified
      Public Accountants
              Members
      of Kreston International
            Registered
      with the Public Company
              Accounting
      Oversight Board
  
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
 SONGZAI
INTERNATIONAL HOLDING GROUP, INC.
 
  We hereby
consent to the re-issue of our opinion on the audited financial statements of
Songzai International Holding Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for use in a Form 10-K /A that it expects to file with
the SEC on or about April 22 , 2008.
  
 
 
 
 /s/
JIMMY C.H. CHEUNG & CO.
 
 JIMMY
C.H. CHEUNG & CO.
 Certified
Public Accountants
  Hong
Kong
  Date:
April 22 , 2008
Exhibit 10.35
 Rules of the Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.  2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan  For the Grant of Options To Participants in France
 I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
 1. Introduction
     2. Definitions
  1




---



##### 



(a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (i)
    
    purchase stock options (rights to acquire Shares repurchased
by the Company prior to the date on which the Option becomes exercisable); and(ii)
    
    subscription stock options (rights to subscribe for newly
issued Shares).
 3. Eligibility
 (a) contrat de travail
 (b) Président du Conseil
 2




---



##### 



dAdministration, Directeur Général, Directeur Général Délégué, Membre du Directoire, Gérant
de Sociétés par actions contrat de travail
 (c)
 4. Non-Transferability
  5. Disqualification of French-qualified Options
   6. Employment Rights
  7. Amendments
  3




---



##### 



II. OPTIONS
 1. Closed Period
  2. Conditions of French-qualified Options
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (i)
    
    with respect to purchase stock options: the higher of either
80% of the average of the quotation price of the Shares during the 20 trading
days immediately preceding the Grant Date or 80% of the average of the
purchase price paid for such Shares by the Company;(ii)
    
    with respect to subscription stock options: 80% of the
average of the quotation price of such Shares during the 20 trading days
immediately preceding the Grant Date; and(iii)
    
    the minimum exercise price permitted under the U.S. Plan.
 3. Exercise of French-qualified Options
 (a)
 4




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 (g)
 (h)
 5




---



##### 



mandataires sociaux
 4. Death
  5. Adjustments and Change in Control
    6




---



##### 



6. Term of French-qualified Options
  7. Interpretation
   III. ADOPTION
  7




---



##### 



Appendix 1
 INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.
2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 8
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 20 Filed 07/29/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Glenn GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6025.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

*222David Glenn Green, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Glenn Green seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of his conviction and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. The district court correctly ruled that the relief that Green sought was only available by way of a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. Finding that Green had already filed a § 2255 motion, the district court denied his motion as successive. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 10.30




---



##### 



Name of Optionee:Number of Option Shares:Option Exercise Price Per Share:Grant Date:Expiration Date:
  Exercisability Schedule
 Number of
    
    Total Number ofExercisability
    
    Option Shares First
    
    Option SharesDate
    
    Becoming Exercisable
    
    Exercisable(
    %)
    
    
    (
    %)(
    %)
    
    
    (
    %)(
    %)
    
    
    (100
    %)




---



##### 



Manner of Exercise




---



##### 



Termination of Service to the Company
 Termination For Cause
 Termination by Reason of Death
 Other Termination provided that
 Incorporation of Plan
 Transferability




---



##### 



Miscellaneous




---



##### 



For:
    
    INVERNESS MEDICAL 
INNOVATIONS, INC.By:Title: Treasurer
  Dated:Optionees SignatureOptionees name and address:
Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05553-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 2 of 2