alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14


OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




I,
Jeffrey S. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of Sitesearch Corporation, certify
that:




(1)           I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
January 31, 2010 (the “Report”);




(2)           Based
on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this Report; and




(3)           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of the small business issuer as of, and for,
the periods represented in this Report.




(4)           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)           designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which the Report is being prepared;




(b)           evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           disclosed
in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and




(5)           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and to the audit committee of the board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):




(i)           all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(ii)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  March
9, 2010




/s/ Jeffrey S.
Peterson


Jeffrey
S. Peterson


Chief
Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-04518-AKH Document 15-2 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC103(AKH)

THOMAS MAHER, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

07CV5416(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

BLUE MILLENNIUM 

REALTY LLC OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC

(hereinafter “Blue Millennium”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new 

defendants not previously served filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopts Blue 

Millennium’s Answer to Master Complaint dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter 

of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

BLUE MILLENNIUM has filed a Master Disclosure of Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 

(AKH), and as such, is exempt from having to file such a disclosure in this specific matter, 

pursuant to the provisions of Case Management Order No. 4 (¶ J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, Blue Millennium reserves its 

right to assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated 

in Case Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Blue Millennium demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 January 16, 2008 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BLUE MILLENNIUM REALTY LLC 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on January 16, 2008, I caused to be filed and served 

the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of Blue Millennium’s Adoption of Answer to Master Complaint. 

Dated: January 16, 2008 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:07-cv-05416-AKH Document 15 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.





Exhibits 99.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section


906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oxford Investments Holdings Inc., a company organized under the laws ofunder the laws of Ontario, Canada (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





1.

the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.






By:    /S/    Michael Donaghy
 Michael Donaghy
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date: June 30, 2011
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn A. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7661.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2013.

Decided: May 23, 2013.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Devon L. Donahue, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn A. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See United States v. Harris,*No. 2:04-cr-00017-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2012); *cf. Lo v. Endicott,*506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir.2007); *E.J.R.E. v. United States,*453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir.2006); *Shannon v. Newland,*410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27084-27085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-413-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 7, 2001, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company 
(East Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in

[[Page 27085]]

Appendix A to the filing, to be effective June 7, 2001.
    East Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is to make 
the benefits and opportunities of e-commerce available to East 
Tennessee's existing and potential customers and to advance the 
Commission objectives as expressed in Order Nos. 637, et seq. of 
providing equality between the pipeline services and capacity release 
transactions.
    East Tennessee states that the proposed tariff modifications permit 
customers to request service agreements electronically and to execute 
such contracts on line via the LINKr System, which will facilitate 
nominations and increase the efficiency and convenience of the East 
Tennessee contracting process for all customers.
    East Tennessee states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12288 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 18 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 18 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 18 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### Frankie J. Shumway, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Gilbert C. Shumway, Deceased, Respondent, v Frank V. DeLaus, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Although the Second Department has held that a gap in treatment that exceeds the 21A-year period of limitations *(see,*CPLR 214-a) bars the application of the continuous course of treatment doctrine as a matter of law *(see, Curdo v Ippolito,*97 AD2d 497, *affd*63 NY2d 967; *Barrella v Richmond Mem. Hosp.,*88 AD2d 379; *Bennin v Ramapo Gen. Hosp.,*72 AD2d 736), the Court of Appeals found it unnecessary to adopt that holding *(see, Curdo v Ippolito,*63 NY2d 967, 969, *supra).*We decline to adopt such rule in this department. Instead, we adhere to the principle that "where the physician and patient reasonably intend the patient’s uninterrupted reliance upon the physician’s observation, directions, concern, and responsibility for overseeing the patient’s progress, the requirement for continuous care and treatment for the purpose of the Statute of Limitations is certainly satisfied” *(Richardson v Orentreich,*64 NY2d 896, 899). Upon application of that principle, plaintiff’s averments are sufficient to raise questions of fact. Thus, Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — partial summary judgment.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF,**

|         |                                                                        |                                     |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|         | SUBLANDLORD: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS                MACHINESCORPORATION |
|    |                                                                   |                                |
|              | By:                                                               | /s/ Charles              P. Assenza |
|         | Name:              Charles P. Assenza                                       |
|         | Title:              Senior Program Manager                                  |

|         |                               |                                |
|--------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|         | SUBTENANT: MRU HOLDINGS, INC. |
|    |                          |                           |
|              | By:                      | /s/ Vishal                Garg |
|         | Name:                Vishal Garg   |
|         | Title:                CFO          |
# FCM DATA MAY 2004
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the WaMu Mortgage
               Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-S8 dated as of March 22,
               2002


                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

         The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his own behalf for purposes of
the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-S8, as follows:

         1.    I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Vice President of
               the Company.

         2.    Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
               meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing
               Agreement related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.

         3.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
               Certificate on behalf of the Company.

         4.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
               preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has
               been made under my supervision.

         5.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
               Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
               throughout such year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 22, 2002.


                               By:  /s/ Richie Moore
                                    ---------------------
                                    Richie Moore
                                    Vice President
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Report of HERITAGE-CRYSTAL CLEAN, INC. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 6, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Chalhoub,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
      October 17, 2008
                By:
      /s/
      Joseph ChalhoubJoseph
      ChalhoubPresident,
      CEO and Director — Principal Executive
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 441 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
DeOrchis & Partners, LLP (212) 422-5299 1 2 

~e~rchis, Wiener CY Partners, LLP 

Ffona'a O~~CQ: A~.rneys at Law and Proctors in Admimky Narc /erney O&cC.: 

8251 W. Browud Bhd., Sk. 203 

~k. L~~.L. FL 333% 61 Broadway, 26" Floor 

(95%) 052-0100 New York, New ~ork 10006-2802 

ConnwtLut Office; MassacLusof~s 06~~: 

12) 422-5299 2355 Main, Street, k' 0. 186 

S. CLtharn, IYA 02659 

ww.marinelex.com (508) 432-2121 

January 10. 2008 

Via Fax:(l-212) 805-6717 I 

Judge Richard M. Berman 

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

40 Centre Street, Courtroom 706 

New York, NY 10007 I I 

Re: Zim Integrated Shipping ~ervic$r &g,v,, 

Dear Judge Berman: 

I 

We are attorneys representing plaintiff ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES, LTD., in 

the above captioned matter and we write you in connection to The number of pages of our 

memorandum of law in support of our opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss the second verified 

complaint and the motion to vacate the Rule B attachment due tomorrow. 

The defendants have filed two motions, a motion to dismjss plaintiff's second verified 

complaint and a motion to vacate the Rule B attachment. The two motions have been joined together 

and total 29 pages. The rules of this Court provide that the memoranduia of law should not exceed 25 

pages. In light of the complexity of the motions which engage in a choice of law analysis in the 

maritime context and a forum rwn convenienr analysis, and the fact that two motions have been joined 

in one, we request your permission to file a memorandum of law in support of plaintiffs opposition to 

defendants' joint motions which shall not exceed 40 pages. 

We thank Your Honor for his attention in this matter. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

DEORCHIS, WIENER & PARTNERS, LLP . 

DOCUrnhT 

i ELECTRONICAh,LY FILED 

; Doc #: 

I i DATE FILED: I \ \o\fl I. \ 01/10/08 THU 16:20 [TX/RX NO 80511 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 31 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANABELIA ALLEN,

Appellant,

v. 

GYPSY JASSO,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00169-CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

No. 16-12-21804-CVR

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant all costs of appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
No. 576.

#### In the Matter of William Buckley, Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. October 13, 1908. Docketed and dismissed on motion of *Mr. Frederick S. Tyler*for the appellee. *Mr. ■ Frederick S. Tyler,*and *Mr. U. S. Webb*for appellee. No one opposing.
#### Jimmy CLEMENTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-14587.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 2013.

Patrick Hannon, Peter Lampros, Cook Hall & Lampros, LLP, Atlanta, GA, David R. Jones, Law Offices of David R. Jones, Edwardsville, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James E. Gilson, Robert Sean McEvoy, Casey Gilson, PC, Atlanta, GA, Brian David Netter, Evan Mark Tager, Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant>-Appellee.

Before BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Anne C. Conway, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Clements appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) and alternatively for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) following a jury verdict and final judgment for defendant, CSX Transportation, Inc. on Clements’ negligence action brought under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, *et seq.*The jury verdict in this case forecloses each claim raised on appeal by Mr. Clements. Accordingly, the district court judgment is

AFFIRMED.
# FCM DATA APRIL 2007
Exhibit 32.1









Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Steele Recording Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mack Steele, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Mack SteeleMack SteelePrincipal Executive OfficerMay 17, 2010
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0190 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0190

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Chile on certain aspects of air services (COM(2004)0829 - C6-0011/2005 - 2004/0289(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 117 E , 18/05/2006 P. 0119 - 0119 *

P6_TA(2005)0190

EC-Chile Agreement on certain aspects of air services *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Chile on certain aspects of air services (COM(2004)0829 — C6-0011/2005 — 2004/0289(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0829) [1],

- having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0011/2005),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0100/2005),

1. Approves the conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Chile.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------