alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3539-3540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will 
meet on Wednesday, January 31, 2001, at the Gifford Pinchot National 
Forest

[[Page 3540]]

Office, located at 10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, Washington. The 
meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 4:15 p.m. The purpose 
of the meeting is to: (1) Review Forest Monitoring for FY 2000, (2) 
Discuss the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act 
of 2000, (3) Discuss the mission of the committee, and (4) Provide for 
a Public Open Forum. All Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are 
encouraged to attend. The ``open forum'' provides opportunity for the 
public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory 
Committee. The ``open forum'' is scheduled as part of agenda item (4) 
for this meeting. Interested speakers will need to register prior to 
the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written 
comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Linda Turner, Public Affairs Specialist, at (360) 891-5191, 
or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 
10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: January 9, 2001.
Claire LaVendel,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-1228 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
NEX SEF LIMITED 

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London 

E1 6PW

United Kingdom

March 18, 2020

Via Email

Office of General Counsel

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request

Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEX SEF Limited (“Applicant”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) a rule certification in NEX SEF-2020-R-3 pursuant to CFTC Reg. 40.6 in order 

to issue a Market Regulation Advisory Notice (“Certification”). Attached as Exhibit B is MRAN 

2020-02 and attached as Exhibit C is a marked version of MRAN 2020-02. 

The Applicant hereby requests that MRAN 2020-02 as set forth in Exhibit B and Exhibit C to the 

Certification (“Confidential Information”) be treated as confidential in order to prevent 

disclosure of Applicant’s trade secrets and confidential commercial and financial information 

upon a request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). We request the Confidential 

Information be provided confidential treatment for an indefinite period.

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or its 

contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may substantiate the 

foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Section 145.9 of the 

Commission’s Regulations: Attention: General Counsel, NEX SEF LIMITED, London Fruit and 

Wool Exchange, 1 Duval Square, London E1 6PW, United Kingdom.

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page of the 

Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by NEX SEF

LIMITED” and have identified each portion of the Confidential Information with the following 

identifying numbers and codes, as applicable: NEX SEF-2020-R-2-Exhibit B and NEX SEF2020-R-2-Exhibit C.
2

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 with any questions regarding this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Nirup Ramalingam, Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

London Fruit and Wool Exchange

1 Duval Square

London

E1 6PW

United Kingdom

cc by email: Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission 

ACTIVE 255331735
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-05834-PKC Document 11 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 25 of 25
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION


Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, 
January 11, 2001, and Friday, January 12, 2001, at the Ronald Reagan 
Building, International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC. The meeting is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10 
a.m. on January 11, and at 9 a.m. on January 12.
    Topics for discussion include: issues in post-acute care; 
Medicare+Choice payment policies; hospital inpatient payment issues; 
updating payments and accounting for new technology in traditional 
Medicare; rural quality of care; input-price indexes for all health 
care settings; evaluating Medicare's payment policies; Medicare+Choice 
in rural areas; end-stage renal disease payment policies in traditional 
Medicare; beneficiary co-insurance under the new prospective payment 
system for hospital outpatient department services; access to care in 
rural areas; special payment provisions for inpatient care in rural 
hospitals; payments to rural health clinics; and treatment of the 
initial residency period for combined training programs in Medicare 
direct graduate medical education payments.
    Agendas will be mailed on January 4, 2000. The final agenda will be 
available on the Commission's website (www.MedPAC.gov)

ADDRESSES: MedPAC's address is: 1730 K Street, NW., Suite 800, 
Washington, DC 20006. The telephone number is (202) 653-7220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Ellison, Office Manager, (202) 
653-7220.

Murray N. Ross,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 01-124 Filed 1-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7305

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

GARFIELD ANTHONY ANDERSON, a/k/a James McDonald, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:02-cr-00070-F-1; 7:06-cv-00112-F) 

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: February 8, 2010 

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Garfield Anthony Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret 

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Garfield Anthony Anderson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Anderson has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 21 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 22 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 23 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 24 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 25 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 26 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 27 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 28 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 29 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 30 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 31 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 32 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 33 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-3 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 34 of 34
#### Vinnie Dunnell WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.A. PURDUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6100.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 2013.

Decided: May 23, 2013.

Vinnie Dunnell Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vinnie Dunnell Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Williams v.*
      *188
      *Purdue,*No. 3:12-cv00065-GMG-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# C_2019288EN.01004501.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-20/17) (1)

(State aid - Hungarian tax on the turnover from the broadcasting or publication of advertisements - Progressivity of tax rates - Deduction from the basis of assessment of the tax of 50 % of the losses carried forward for companies not generating a profit in 2013 - Decision characterising the measures as aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Condition relating to selectivity)

(2019/C 288/57)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M.-Z. Fehér, G. Koós and E.-Zs. Tóth, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and P.-J. Loewenthal, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz and A. Kramarczyk-Szaładzińska, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/329 of 4 November 2016 on the measure SA.39235 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Hungary on the taxation of advertisement turnover (OJ 2017 L 49, p. 36).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/329 of 4 November 2016 on the measure SA.39235 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Hungary on the taxation of advertisement turnover; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/329 of 4 November 2016 on the measure SA.39235 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Hungary on the taxation of advertisement turnover;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hungary, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hungary, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

In the matter of ICE Futures Canada, Inc.,
revocation of registration pursuant to
§ 48.9(b)(4) of the regulations of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

ORDER OF REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION

By Order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) dated August
25, 2015, ICE Futures Canada, Inc. (IFCA or Exchange), a foreign board of trade (FBOT)
designated by and subject to regulation in Manitoba, Canada by the Manitoba Securities
Commission (MSC), was granted registration pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (the Act), 7 U.S.C. § 6(b)(1), and Part 48 of the Commission’s regulations, 17
C.F.R. Part 48, to permit trading by direct access, as that term is defined in Section 4(b)(1)(A) of
the Act (FBOT registration).

As the result of an Exchange decision to cease operations in Manitoba, the MSC issued
Order No. 7459 dated August 21, 2018, revoking the designations of IFCA as a self-regulatory
organization and as a commodity futures exchange.

Commission regulation 48.8(a)(2)(i) specifies that, as a condition for maintaining FROT
registration, “(t]he foreign board of trade will continue to satisfy the criteria for a regulated
market or licensed exchange pursuant to the regulatory regime described in its application and

will continue to be subject to oversight by the regulatory authorities described in its application.”


Commission regulation 48.9(b)(4) provides that “[t]he Commission may revoke a foreign
board of trade’s registration in the event the foreign board of trade... is no longer authorized,
licensed or registered, as applicable, as a regulated market and/or exchange... or ceases to
operate as a foreign board of trade...”

In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 48.9(b)(4), that the
registration of IFCA pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C.

§ 6(b)(1), is hereby revoked, effective August 21, 2018.

Issued in Washington, D.C. this 18th day of September, 2018.

By the Commission

Christopher J¥ Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
1

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

February 16, 2021

VIA CFTC PORTAL

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Amendment to ICE NGX Canada Inc. Rules - Submission Pursuant to Section 

5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation § 40.6(a)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, (“Act”) and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), ICE NGX Canada 

Inc. (“ICE NGX”) is submitting this self-certification to amend the ICE NGX Risk Management 

Framework (“RMF”). The RMF is a “rule” as that term is defined under Commission Regulation 

40.1(i). ICE NGX intends to implement these amendments on March 3, 2021, or such later date 

as ICE NGX may designate.

1. Overview 

ICE NGX is making this submission to implement certain changes to the ICE NGX RMF. 

2. Details of Rule Changes

ICE NGX is making certain changes to its RMF to:

 introduce additional analyses on ICE NGX’s Initial Margin Rate model (IMR), including 

enhancing existing product level micro back-testing, conducting quarterly IMR materiality 

check, and performing an annual calibration study; and

 enhance documentation relating to ICE NGX’s Portfolio Margining Model (PMM) and IMR.

collectively, the “RMF Amendments”.

ICE NGX has respectfully requested confidential treatment for the RMF Amendments which were 

submitted concurrently with this submission.

3. Compliance with Core Principles

ICE NGX reviewed the RMF Amendments and determined that they comply with the rules and 

regulations of the Commission. In this regard, ICE NGX reviewed the derivatives clearing 

organization (“DCO”) core principles (each a “Core Principle”) and determined that the RMF 

Amendments are potentially relevant to the following core principles and applicable regulations of 

the Commission thereunder. 
2

Compliance (Core Principle A): The RMF Amendments are consistent with Core Principle A -

Compliance and Commission Regulation 39.10, as the RMF Amendments enhance ICE NGX’s 

policies and procedures relating PMM and IMR.

Risk Management (Core Principle D): The RMF Amendments are consistent with the 

requirements of Core Principle D and the following Commission Regulations: 

 §39.13(g)(2), as the RMF Amendments strengthen ICE NGX’s initial margin methodology 

and coverage; and

 §39.13(g)(7), as the RMF Amendments strengthen ICE NGX’s back-testing procedures.

4. Certifications

ICE NGX certifies that the proposed RMF Amendments discussed in this submission comply with 

the Commodity Exchange Act, including the Core Principles and the Regulations of the 

Commission thereunder. ICE NGX is not aware of opposing views expressed regarding these 

amendments. ICE NGX further certifies that, concurrent with this filing, a copy of this submission 

was posted to ICE NGX’s website.

Yours truly,

__________________________

By: Greg Abbott

Title: President & COO

Date: February 16, 2021

Greg Abbott (Feb 18, 2021 16:46 MST)
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000139

30-JAN-2015

02:08 PM
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Songzai International Holding Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Yvonne Zhang, Chief Financial Officer, certify, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my
knowledge:
 
 (1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 (2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /S/
      Yvonne ZhangYvonne
      ZhangChief
      Financial
Officer
 Dated:
March 30, 2009
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 10 (the “Partnership”) for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: May 27, 2011
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 72 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 72 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 72 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 3 of 3