alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 16 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40282

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO RAMIREZ-BELMARES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-960-1

Before JOLLY, GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario RamirezBelmares (Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 29, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40282 Document: 00511279702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2010
# FCM Data March 2004
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0159 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0159

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agremeent between the European Community and Serbia and Montenegro on the general principles for the participation of Serbia and Montenegro in Community programmes (5532/2005 - COM(2004)0809 - C6-0043/2005 - 2004/0280(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0059 - 0059 *

P6_TA(2005)0159

EC-Serbia and Montenegro Framework Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Framework Agremeent between the European Community and Serbia and Montenegro on the general principles for the participation of Serbia and Montenegro in Community programmes (5532/2005 — COM(2004)0809 — C6-0043/2005 — 2004/0280(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0809) [1],

- having regard to the text of the Council (5532/2005),

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 13 and 308 of the EC Treaty (C6-0043/2005),

- having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0122/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the conclusion of the Framework Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and Serbia and Montenegro.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 32-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 32-5 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH     Document 3      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 1 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 2 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 3 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 4 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 5 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 6 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 7 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 8 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 9 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 10 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 11 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 12 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 13 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 14 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 15 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 16 of 17

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22-2      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 17 of 17
712 F.2d 685

#### Roger L. WILLIAMS-EL, Appellant, v. Norman A. CARLSON, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

No. 83-1306.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 22, 1983.

As Amended July 22, 1983.

Roger L. Williams-El, was on the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, pro se.

Before MIKVA and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Roger L. Williams-El moves to proceed in forma pauperis to appeal the dismissal of his complaint by the district court. In his complaint, Williams-El states that while under federal “custody and control,” at the D.C. Community Treatment Center, he committed a Maryland state crime. He was convicted in Maryland state court and sentenced to 15 years. After he served only two months of his state sentence, Maryland returned Williams-El to federal custody and filed a detainer with the federal authorities.

Williams-El claims that the detainer is “illegal” because the Maryland prison officials had no authority to return him to federal custody to serve the remainder of his federal sentence before the completion of his state sentence. Appellant also claims that prisoners with detainers lodged against them have more restrictions placed upon them. Specifically, Williams-El claims that “there remains a tendency to consider [prisoners with detainers] escape risks and to assign them accordingly.” Complaint at 3.

*372Construing appellant’s complaint liberally, see *Haines v. Kerner,*404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), we agree with the district court that WilliamsE1 has averred no facts that would entitle him to relief. A prisoner has no cause of action “to contest the agreement between [two] sovereigns as to the order of prosecution and execution of sentences.” *Bullock v. State of Mississippi,*404 F.2d 75, 76 (5th Cir.1968); *see also Jacobs v. Crouse,*349 F.2d 857, 858 (10th Cir.1965). In addition, prison officials have the discretion reasonably to restrict the privileges of prisoners subject to detainers. *See*18 U.S.C. § 4081; *Moody v. Daggett,*429 U.S. 78, 88 n. 9, 97 S.Ct. 274, 279 n. 9, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). In any event, Williams-El would most likely be serving a sentence with a detainer filed against him for an unserved sentence whether he was imprisoned in Maryland upon his Maryland state conviction or in a federal institution upon his federal conviction.

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and the appeal is hereby dismissed as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

*So ordered.*
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K of Songzai International Holding Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Weiwei Li, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Weiwei LiWeiwei LiChief Financial Officer





Dated: April 15, 2010
Clear All

        09 April 2022    

#                     Groton Submarine Birthday Ball                 

                REMARKS AS PREPARED:Wow - Well, good evening! Thanks RDML Muckian for that kind introduction.Distinguished guests, industry partners, spouses, family, friends, and most importantly - the men and women of the finest Submarine Force the world has ever known - happy 122nd birthday!I just scorched            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1748 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for the minimum size 

of crews of freight trains, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for the 

minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Freight Act of 

5 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FREIGHT TRAIN CREW SIZE. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 201 of 

8 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following new section: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1748 IH

1 ‘‘§ 20169. Freight train crew size 

2 ‘‘Effective 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

3 Safe Freight Act of 2019, no freight train or light engine 

4 used in connection with the movement of freight may be 

5 operated unless it has a crew consisting of at least 2 indi6 viduals, one of whom is certified under regulations promul7 gated by the Federal Railroad Administration as a loco8 motive engineer pursuant to section 20135, and the other 

9 of whom is certified under regulations promulgated by the 

10 Federal Railroad Administration as a conductor pursuant 

11 to section 20163.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec13 tions for chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘20169. Freight train crew size.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
| (1)   | the                  Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Roughneck Supplies,                  Inc. for                  the quarter ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                  for                  the quarter ended August 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Roughneck                  Supplies, Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                  Travis McPhee                                                               |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Travis                  McPhee                                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal                  Executive Officer,Principal                  Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  October                  31, 2007                                                                      |
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R OM EO ELIAS HER

NANDEZR ODRIGUEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10166

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-01408-R C C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R ane r C . C ollins, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 * * B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. R om e o Elia s He rnande z -R odrigue z a ppe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha l le nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 30-m onth se nte nc e for



# FIL ED FEB 26 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 3 - 1 0 1 6 6re e ntry

a fte r de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernande z -R o drigue z ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f sta ting tha t the re are n o grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra wa s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d He rnande z -R odrigue zthe opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 1 6 6 2
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM S327 6 6

Appellee ) )

v. ) ) ORDER JQUAN T

. RUSSELL )

Staff Sergeant (E

- 5 ) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 3

On 2 7 September 2024

, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from

Appella te Review and a Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a DD Form 2330, Waive r /Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and
Special Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals

, signed by Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 17 September 2024

.
The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 8t h day of October

, 202 4

,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED

. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records
Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for Courts

Martial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (20 24
ed.).

FOR THE COURT

OLGA STANFORD , Capt, USAF

Commissioner
wuW. MGEX.Cor
WUU-MGEX. Con

wuu.MNGEX.com
wuu.MGEX. Con
wl. MGEX.Con
Wb. MGEX. Con
ull. MGEX. Con

MG

_AMINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE WUW.MGEX.COoMm eS <4

o

g

Electronic Mail July 28, 2006 z
Fi

m

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan 3
Acting Secretary of the Commission 2
Commodity Futures Trading Commission H D
Three Lafayette Centre H ze,

1155 21st Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20581

SUBJECT: Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commodity Exchange Act (“CEAct”) Section 5c(c)(1) and Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), the Minneapolis Grain
Exchange (“MGEX” or “Exchange”) hereby certifies that the attached amended
Resolution 2020.00. complies with the CEAct and the regulations thereunder. Additions
have been underlined while deletions have been marked through.

The purpose for amending the Resolution is to update Exchange service fees.

Pursuant to the authority of MGEX Rule 231.00. and Regulation 2020.00., the Board of
Directors overwhelmingly approved amending the Resolution. The MGEX plans to
implement the changes effective August 1, 2006.

If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (612) 321-
7190. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, .

Sue

Sandra S. Sullivan

Director, Market Regulation
Enclosure

cc: Anne Reuter

Department of Audits and Investigations 130 Grain Exchange Building 400 South 4th Street Minneapolis, MN 55415-1413
800.827.4746 612.321.7165 Fax: 612.321.7180 equal opportunity employer


RESOLUTION 2020.00,

The Minneapolis Grain Exchange Board of Directors has adopted the following schedule
of Exchange service fees to be paid to the Corporation for each contract of Minneapolis
Grain Exchange Futures bought, sold, exchanged for physical or risk, transferred,
delivered, accepted for delivery or cash settled, or for each contract of Minneapolis Grain
Exchange Options bought, sold, transferred, exercised or assigned.

Open Outcry

Type 1 rates $0.00
Member rate $0.30
Non-Member rate $0.45

MGEXpress

First 15,000 Contracts per month
Member rate ~ $4050.80
Non-Member rate $4351.60

Next 15,000 Contracts per month
Member rate $0.7560
Non-Member rate $4051.40

Each Additional Contract per month
Member rate $0.8545
Non-Member rate $0851.25

The maximum combined Exchange and Clearing service fees for Open Outcry Type 1
rates is five thousand dollars ($5,000) per year.

For purposes of computing fees, a “member” is the individual listed as the record holder
of a membership and trades Exchange contracts for their own account. Further,
member rates apply to a firm or corporation which is a record owner of a membership.
Member rates do not apply to employees, associated persons, affiliate companies,
subsidiary corporations or parent corporations of a member firm or corporation unless
they also are a record owner of a membership.

Approved by the Board May-8,2003July 13, 2006, effective May-9-2003August 1, 2006.
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
(105 So. 706)

#### Ex parte Will COLEMAN.

(3 Div. 729.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 15, 1925.)

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

W. R. Brassell and Thos. B. Hill, Jr., both of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Will Coleman for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Will (alias Hawk) Coleman v. State, 105 So. 706.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOB1AS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of TE Products Pipeline Company, LimitedPartnership (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I, Jerry E. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of TEPPCOGP, Inc., the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSON |   |
|-----------------------|--------|

Jerry E. Thompson

President and Chief Executive Officer

TEPPCOGP, Inc., General Partner

August 4,2006

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
.L,b. . ;- - 

~illiam 1. on& (WJH 1922) W@ WW 9: 

Michael J. Frevola (MJF 8359) - 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT L,LP 

195 Broadway 

New York, NY 10007-3189 

(212) 513-3200 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

M'ILHELhlSEN PREMIER MARTNE FUELS .As 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTEIERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

[USDS SDNY 1 I 

DOCUMENT 

~LECTRONICALLY FEED 

DOC #: 

W ILHELMSEN PREM I ER k1.W FLF LS AS, 

UBS PROVEDORES PTY LTD. aWa USB-USS 

INTERNATIONAL, 

ORDER APPOINTING 

PERSON TO 

SERVE PROCESS 

Defendant. J 

UPON application of Wilheln~sen Premier Marine Fuels AS for an Order appointing 

Elvin Ramos, Kudy D. Grecn, Jerome Wills, Willis Vargas, and Rapid and Reliable Attornuy 

Service, or any one of them, to serve the Writ 311d Order of Attachment and Gm~ishn~ent, 

Summons, Verified Complaint, Aftidavit in Suppart atld Interrogatories on the garnishees herein, 

and it appearing that Elvin Ramos, Kudy D. Green, Jerome Wills, Willis Vargas, and 

representatives of Rapid and Reliable Attorney Service are qualified persons over 18 years of 

age, and are 11ot a party to or an attorney in this action, and that substantial savings in travel fees 

will result froill such appointment. it is 

Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that Elvin Ramos, Rudy D. Green, Jerome Wills, Willis Vargas and Rapid 

and Reliable Attorney Senrice hereby are each appointed to serve the Writ and Order of 

Atlachment and Garnishment, Sununons, Verified Corl~pliiint, Affidavit in Support and 

Interrogatories on the garnishees herein. 

Dated: New 'r'ark, New York 

June,E, 2007 

SO ORDERED 

Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2