alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      13.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ChineseWorldNet.com, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelvin Fu Szeto,
      Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
June
              29, 2007/*s/
              Kelvin Fu Szeto*Kelvin
              Fu SzetoChief Operating Officer & Chief Financial
              Officer
No. 652.

#### James Hamilton Lewis et al., Petitioners, *v.*The Alton Water Company.

January 11, 1909.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. *Mr. E. N. Z.oline*and *Mr. James Hamilton Lewis*for petitioners. *Mr. William Burry*and *Mr. Levi Davis*for respondent.
EXHIBIT 32.1 EXHIBIT 99 Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dialpoint Communications Corporation ("Dialpoint") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Billy Radford, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dialpoint, and I, Eileen Casey, Principal Financial Officer of Dialpoint, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meltdown. Date: May 22, 2008  /s/ Billy Radford Billy Radford President and Chief Executive Officer Date: May 22, 2008  /s/ Eileen Casey Eileen Casey Principal Financial Officer
# CE2011236EN.01018501.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 236/185 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 236/185

---

Wednesday 16 June 2010Rights to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings ***I

P7_TA(2010)0220

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 June 2010 on the draft directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the rights to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings (00001/2010 – C7-0005/2010 – 2010/0801(COD))

2011/C 236 E/45

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the initiative of a group of Member States (00001/2010),

having regard to point (b) of Article 76 and point (b) of the second subparagraph of Article 82(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the initiative was submitted to Parliament (C7-0005/2010),

having regard to Article 294(3) and (15) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to the Commission proposal (COM(2010)0082), which has the same legislative objective,

having regard to the reasoned opinions sent to its President by national parliaments on whether the initiative complies with the principle of subsidiarity,

having regard to Rules 44 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0198/2010),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

Wednesday 16 June 2010P7_TC1-COD(2010)0801

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 16 June 2010 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2010/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2010/64/EU)

---
No. 4.

#### The United States, Appellant, *v.*The Mountain Copper Company, Limited.

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. November 9, 1908. Dismissed per stipulation, on motion of *.Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt*for the appellant. *The Attorney General, The Solicitor General,*and *Mr. Ligoh Johnson*for appellant. *Mr. W. S. Goodfellow*and *Mr. Charles P. Eells*for appellee.
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 56 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1 :07-cv-05911 -RMB Document 6 Filed 1211 912007 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ............................................................................. x GT-9127 

JENNIFER YANNI, 

07 Civ. 591 1 (RMB)(JCF) 

Plaintiff, 

STIPULATION AND 

against - : ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Individually and 

d/b/a STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, 

Defendant(s). 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by their 

respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice and without costs to 

Dated: New York, New York 

December 4,2007 

Respectfully yours, 

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ 

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 

By: , 

J/~eorge N. Tompkins, II! (GT-9127) .".~.--.- .. . .-. . . . . . L. 

! -.__ --.._._ . . -. ... .. . 

, . 

j USDC SDNY i nscuhrmrr 1 j ELECfI<ONICAZLY FILED . > 

?i COC #: 

I, DATE FHLEI): Id(#)I=? i i 

150 East 42nd Street - 

New York, New York 10017 

(212) 490-3000, Ext. 2562 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a 

STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 

Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 7 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case I :07-cv-05911-RMB Document 6 Filed 1211 912007 Page 2 of 2 

.I 

Dated: New York, New York 

December5-2007 

STEVEN R. HARRTS & ASSOCVES 

NKW York, New York 10022 

(212) 593-7600 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JENNIFER YmI 

Dated: December 5,2007 SO ORDERED: 

+@/o 7 , U.S.D.J. 

Case 1:07-cv-05911-RMB Document 7 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Wayne EDDINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-7989.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: May 2, 2013.

Timothy Wayne Eddington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Wayne Eddington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Eddington has not made the requisite showing. Accord*215ingly, although we grant Eddington’s motion to amend his informal brief, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability, deny his motion for permission to file a successive § 2255 motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05796-SAS Document 8 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Cash Bonus Awards




On December 28, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Herbalife Ltd.
unanimously approved a one-time cash bonus award to the following individuals:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	Bonus
	Gregory L. Probert
	 	President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	$	50,000	 
	Richard P. Goudis
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	50,000	 
	Brett R. Chapman
	 	General Counsel
	 	$	50,000
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-5 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD Document 45-5 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MAURO RAMIREZ, DOC #S04945, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2039

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Brian A. Iten, 

Judge.

Mauro Ramirez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# C_2018436EN.01004602.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — VF International v EUIPO — Virmani (ANOKHI)

(Case T-548/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative trade mark ANOKHI - Earlier EU figurative mark kipling - Earlier EU figurative mark representing the silhouette of a monkey - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 EU) - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 436/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ken Virmani (Munich, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2017 (Case R 2307/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between VF International and Mr Virmani.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 May 2017 (Case R 2307/2015-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 May 2017 (Case R 2307/2015-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by VF International Sagl. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by VF International Sagl.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
# C_2019103EN.01003301.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials)

(Case T-656/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials - Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL - Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 103/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA (Carnaxide, Portugal) (represented by: A. de Sampaio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ludwig Manfred Jacob (Heidesheim, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2017 (Case R 2067/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Sumol + Compal Marcas and Mr Jacob.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 July 2017 (Case R 2067/2016-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 July 2017 (Case R 2067/2016-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA;

| 3. | Orders Mr Ludwig Manfred Jacob to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Ludwig Manfred Jacob to bear his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00649-CR

MARKUS A. GREEN

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 1989-12-3983-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its 

opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 30, 2014
================================================================================

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT


                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                        DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 2004
                        (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED)



                               PARK BANCORP, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                        Commission File Number: 000-20867
                        ---------------------------------


        DELAWARE                                           36-4082530
(State of Incorporation)                       (IRS Employer Identification No.)

                               5400 S. PULASKI RD.
                                CHICAGO, IL 60632
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                 (773) 582-8616
              (Registrant's telephone number, including are code)

================================================================================


<PAGE>


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS

        (c)     The following exhibit is being furnished herewith:

                99.1     Press Release, dated April 30, 2004, of
                         Park Bancorp, Inc.

ITEM 12. DISCLOSURE OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

     The following information is being provided under Item 12, Results of
Operations and Financial Condition. Such information, including the Exhibit
attached hereto, shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

     On April 30, 2004, Park Bancorp, Inc. issued a press release to report
     the company's 2004 first quarter and quarterly dividend. The release is
     furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.


                                    SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                            PARK BANCORP, INC.


Date: April 30, 2004                        By: /s/ David A. Remijas
                                                -------------------------------
                                                  David A. Remijas
                                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


99.1     Press Release, dated April 30, 2004, of Park Bancorp, Inc.
Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION

1998 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(As Amended and Restated effective as of May 31, 2006, 

and further amended effective November 28, 2006)




This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Dollar General Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated effective as of May 31, 2006, and further amended effective November 28, 2006) (the “Plan”) is effective as of August 26, 2010.  Except as otherwise defined in this Agreement, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.




1.

The second sentence of Section 5(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such sentence in its entirety and replacing it with the following language:




“As determined by the Board or the Committee, in its sole discretion, at or (except in the case of an Incentive Stock Option) after grant, payment for the award or of the exercise price of a Non-Qualified Stock Option may be made in full or in part in the form of shares of Common Stock already owned by the optionee, shares of Restricted Stock or shares subject to such Option or another award hereunder (in each case valued at the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date the Option is exercised).” 




2.

Section 12(j) of the 1998 Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph:




“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if at the time of an award holder’s termination of employment with the Corporation, the award holder is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code and the deferral of the commencement of any payments or benefits otherwise payable hereunder as a result of such termination of employment is necessary in order to prevent any accelerated or additional tax under Section 409A of the Code, then the Corporation will defer the commencement of the payment of any such payments or benefits hereunder (without any reduction in such payments or benefits ultimately paid or provided to such award holder) until the date that is six months following the award holder’s termination of employment with the Corporation (or the earliest date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code).”




3.

This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Tennessee applicable therein. 




4.

References to the “Plan” contained in the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended by this Amendment. Except as so modified pursuant to this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 




This Amendment was duly authorized by the Board on August 26, 2010.
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-44 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 20 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 20 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
94807.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

LAWRENCE OBSTFELD, ) 

individually and derivatively ) 

on behalf of TOEV MEDICAL ) Civ. No. 07-5847 (DAB) 

CORPORATION, and ) 

IGNITION VENTURES, INC., ) ECF Case 

 ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) NOTICE OF MOTION

 ) 

ARTHUR SCHWARTZ, ) 

RONALD SOLAR, ) 

RENAISSANCE BIOMEDICAL, INC., ) 

GLEN LIEBER, and ) 

THERMOPEUTIX, INC., ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law in 

Support of Defendants Ronald Solar, Renaissance Biomedical, Inc., Glen Lieber, and 

ThermopeutiX, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, and the accompanying Declaration of Glen 

Lieber in support thereof, Defendants Ronald Solar, Renaissance Biomedical, Inc., Glen 

Lieber, and ThermopeutiX, Inc. (the “Moving Defendants”), by their undersigned 

counsel, hereby move this Court, located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, for 

an Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6) and 23.1 dismissing 

Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 21 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 94807.1 

Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint with prejudice and in its entirety. 

 The Moving Defendants respectfully request oral argument on this motion. 

Dated: August 24, 2007 

 New York, New York 

CONSTANTINE CANNON LLP 

 By: s/ Kerin E. Coughlin___ 

 Kerin E. Coughlin 

 Stacey Anne Mahoney 

 450 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor 

 New York, New York 10017 

 Phone: (212) 350-2700 

 Fax: (212) 350-2701 

 kcoughlin@constantinecannon.com 

 FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A. 

Laurie J. Miller (pro hac vice pending) 

 200 Sixth Street, Suite 4000

 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

Phone: (612) 492-7000 

 Fax: (612) 492-7077 

 lmiller@fredlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Ronald Solar, 

Renaissance Biomedical, Inc., Glen Lieber 

and ThermopeutiX, Inc.

Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 21 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 2