alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. China Mining Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Xinyu Peng, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/Xinyu PengXinyu PengiChief Financial Officer





Dated: March 31, 2011
155 So. 95

#### CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. L. F. DAVIS.

6 Div. 577.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1934.

W. .7. Wynn and T. A. McFarland, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.

John T. Batten and James Esdale, both of Birmingham, for respondent.

GARDNER, Justice.

Petition of the city of Birmingham for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in City of Birmingham v. Davis, 155 So. 94.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1661 

To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility to 

increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Mr. ZELDIN (for himself and Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board 

flexibility to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLEXIBILITY FOR NCUA BOARD TO INCREASE 

4 FEDERAL CREDIT UNION LOAN MATURITIES. 

5 Section 107(5) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

6 U.S.C. 1757(5)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘shall not 

7 exceed 15 years,’’ the following: ‘‘or any longer maturity 

8 as the Board may allow, in regulations,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of InSight HealthServices Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”),I, Bret W. Jorgensen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          the report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Bret W. Jorgensen                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Bret W.  Jorgensen                     |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| September 27,  2006                    |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Living, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual period ending December 31, 2003(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I Marcus Feder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Marcus Feder               |   | Dated: May 17, 2004 |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|   | Marcus Feder                   |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

April 25, 2019

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2019

158274(97)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158274

v COA: 337113

Oakland CC: 2016-257776-FH

DONALD WAYNE BARNES, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to accept the late

reply that was submitted on October 23, 2018, is GRANTED.
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

## Identifying the Sources of Mercury in Water, Sediment, and Fish Downstream of a Historical Mining Site

      By Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center      March 2, 2023    

The aquatic ecosystems downstream of the former Black Butte Mine in Oregon are exposed to mercury contamination from historic mining activities, as well as mercury transported to the area through the atmosphere. 

Identifying the source of mercury (Hg) in contaminated sites is important for evaluating whether efforts aimed at reducing Hg contamination in the environment have been effective. Researchers measured Hg in soil, sediment, water, and fish from free-flowing segments of the Willamette River and a reservoir downstream from the former Black Butte Hg mine. The concentration of total Hg in fish collected from the reservoir was four times higher than in fish in free-flowing river further downstream. The researchers were able to distinguish between Hg from the mine and Hg from other sources and found that mine-sourced Hg had more of an influence on fish species that feed near the sediment compared to higher in the water column. Understanding the sources of Hg contamination, and how Hg moves through rivers and food webs, can help managers prioritize sites for clean-up efforts.  

Eckley, C.S., Eagles-Smith, C.A., Luxton, T., Hoffman, J., and Janssen, S.E., 2023, Using mercury stable isotope fractionation to identify the contribution of historical mercury mining sources present in downstream water, sediment and fish: Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry, v. 4, Online. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2023.1096199 

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

Biology News

RSS Icon**

Ecosystems Mission Area News

RSS Icon**

Ecosystems News

RSS Icon**

Environmental Health Program News

RSS Icon**

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Mercury Research Laboratory News

RSS Icon**

Upper Midwest Water Science Center News

### Contacts

#### Collin Eagles-Smith

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

ceagles-smith@usgs.gov

541-750-0949

#### Sarah E Janssen

##### Research Chemist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

##### Mercury Research Laboratory Team Lead

Mercury Research Laboratory

sjanssen@usgs.gov

608-663-5162

### Partners and Cooperators

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Region 10
#### In the Matter of Richard M. Tilker, for Reinstatement.

—Petition granted insofar as to refer this matter back to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department for a hearing, as indicated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Kassal, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1108

EDWARD RICHARDSON
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT; BARRY M. BARNARD, Chief of Police Prince William County Police Department; STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief (Retired); CHARLIE T. DEANE, Major (Retired); TIMOTHY RUDY, Major (Retired); SCOTT A. VAGO, Captain; JAY LANHAM, Major (Retired); MICHAEL A. FERNALD, First Sergeant
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

No. 18

- 1109

EDWARD RICHARDSON
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT; BARRY M. BARNARD, Chief of Police Prince William County Police Department; STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief (Retired); CHARLIE T. DEANE, Major (Retired); TIMOTHY RUDY, Major (Retired); SCOTT A. VAGO, Captain; JAY LANHAM, Major (Retired); MICHAEL A. FERNALD, First Sergeant
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.2 No. 18

- 1135

EDWARD RICHARDSON
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT; BARRY M. BARNARD, Chief of Police Prince William County Police Department; STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief (Retired); CHARLIE T. DEANE, Major (Retired); TIMOTHY RUDY, Major (Retired); SCOTT A. VAGO, Captain; JAY LANHAM, Major (Retired); MICHAEL A. FERNALD, First Sergeant
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

No

. 18

- 1174

EDWARD RICHARDSON
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY GOVERNMENT; BARRY M. BARNARD, Chief of Police Prince William County Police Department; STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief (Retired); CHARLIE T. DEANE, Major (Retired); TIMOTHY RUDY, Major (Retired); SCOTT A. VAGO, Captain; JAY LANHAM, Major (Retired); MICHAEL A. FERNALD, First Sergeant
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv

- 00761

- CMH

- TCB )3 Submitted : June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Edward Richardson , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.4 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Edward Richardson appeals the district court’s

order s denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint and related claims as
well as his motions to recuse, for a change of venue, for stay of the proceedings, and an
order granting the defendants ’ motion for a stay of discovery pending a ruling on their

motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Prince William Cty. Gov’t , No. 1:17

-

cv

- 00761

- CMH

- TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2018; Jan. 24, 2018; Jan. 31, 2018; Feb. 9,

2 018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Richard S. Mills, Esq. (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson, Esq. (JPC-9391)

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE 

LITIGATION

21 MC 102 (AKH)

JULIO HURTADO (and WIFE, ELDA 

MONICA MONTES),

 Plaintiffs, -against- 100 CHURCH, LLC, ET AL., 

 Defendants.

INDEX NO.: 07-CV-05295 (AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF AMBIENT 

GROUP, INC. S ANSWER

TO MASTER COMPLAINT

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., by its attorneys, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its Response to the allegations set forth 

in the Amended Complaint by Adoption (Amended Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master

Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, hereby adopts its Answer to Master Complaint

dated August 2, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In Re World Trade Center Lower

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, the defendant, AMBIENT GROUP, INC., demands judgment dismissing

the above-captioned action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 69 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: New York, New York

May 13, 2008 

Yours etc., 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc. 

By:_ s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483.9490

TO: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

(212) 267.3700

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

(212) 553.9206

James E. Tyrrell, Jr., Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 848.5600

Thomas A. Egan, Esq.

Fleming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006-1404

(212) 412.9500

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 69 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 13

th day of May 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER BY DEFENDANT AMBIENT GROUP, INC., 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which sends notification to 

appearing parties.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP

By: s/ John P. Cookson ____________ Richard S. Mills (RM-0206)

John P. Cookson (JPC-9391)

Attorneys for Defendant

Ambient Group, Inc.

Wall Street Plaza

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 483-9490

Case 1:07-cv-05295-AKH Document 69 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1742 

To make innovative technology loan guarantee support available for battery 

storage technologies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself and Mr. COLLINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make innovative technology loan guarantee support 

available for battery storage technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Battery Storage Inno5 vation Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1742 IH

1 SEC. 2. BATTERY STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES. 

2 Section 1703(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 

3 (42 U.S.C. 16513(b)) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(11) Battery storage technologies for residen6 tial, industrial, or transportation applications.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 5-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 5-5 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 10 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05294-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:           /s/Earl O. Bradley, III |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Earl O. Bradley, III                                                                         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                      |
|   | November 12, 2009                                                                            |
|   |                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                         |
|   | By:           /s/Patrick C. Greenwell |
|   | Patrick C. Greenwell                                                                         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                      |
|   | November 12, 2009                                                                            |
#### Charles PILGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.M. BOWMAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-1919.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 26, 2013.

Decided: May 31, 2013.

Thomas S. Gill, Thomas S. Gill, P.C., Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Stan*308ley J. Reed, Julie A. Reddig, Lerch, Early & Brewer, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Pilger appeals the district court’s orders: (1) entering summary judgment for Defendant on Pilger’s Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claim; and (2) entering judgment for Defendant in accordance with a jury’s verdict on Pilger’s claim that he was terminated from employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). We affirm.

With respect to Pilger’s claim of a violation of the FMLA, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Pilger v. D.M. Bowman, Inc.,*No. 1:10-cv-00597-WDQ (D.Md. July 3, 2011).

We reject Pilger’s claim that the district court erred in instructing the jury as to liability under the ADEA. A district court is “necessarily vested with a great deal of discretion in constructing the specific form and content of jury instructions.” *Hardin v. Ski Venture, Inc.,*50 F.3d 1291, 1293 (4th Cir.1995). “Instructions will be considered adequate if construed as a whole, and in light of the whole record, they adequately inform the jury of the controlling legal principles without misleading or confusing the jury to the prejudice of the objecting party.” *Rowland v. Am. Gen. Fin., Inc.,*340 F.3d 187, 191 (4th Cir.2003) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted). “We review challenges to jury instructions for abuse of discretion.” *Id.*Flawed jury instructions will not result in reversal absent a showing that the error seriously prejudiced the challenging party. *Id.*

Here, we discern no abuse of discretion in the court’s instructions, which, when considered in their entirety, fully and correctly informed the jury of the applicable law and were neither misleading nor confusing. In particular, there was no error in instructing the jury that Pilger had to prove that his age was “the reason” that he was fired. *See Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., Inc.,*557 U.S. 167, 176, 129 S.Ct. 2343, 174 L.Ed.2d 119 (2009) (stating that in ADEA cases, the plaintiff must show that “age was the ‘reason’ that the employer decided to act”).

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 23 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 23 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 37-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 37-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 37-2 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 3
HEDGE
Street

March 21, 2006

VIA EMAIL: secretary@eftc.gov

Ms. Jean A. Webb ‘
Secretary of the Commission ‘
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Fi
3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: Rule Certification: HedgeStreet filing amendment to Rule 2.3(a);
Submission pursuant to Commission Regulation §40.6(a)

Dear Secretary Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation §40.6(a)(2) and (3), HedgeStreet, Inc.
(“HedgeStreet”), a designated contract market (“DCM”) and derivatives clearing
organization (“DCO”), hereby files with the Commission an amendment to
HedgeStreet Rule 2.3(a) in order increase the number of members elected to
HedgeStreet’s Board of Directors from five to seven board members. The amendment
is defined in Exhibit A. The rule deletions are stricken out and the amendments are
underlined. HedgeStreet intends to implement this rule amendment immediately.

HedgeStreet is increasing the number of HedgeStreet Board of Directors pursuant to the
terms of the equity investment made by Norwest and CBOE II, LLC submitted
simultaneously with certification pursuant to Commission Regulation 38.5(c)).

No substantive opposing views were expressed to HedgeStreet with respect to this
amendment.

HedgeStreet certifies that the aforementioned rule amendment complies with the
Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the Commission’s regulations adopted
thereunder.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

cc: Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet, Inc. 1825 S. Grant Street

‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.688.3500
www.hedgestreet.com 1 Fax: 650.638.3601


HEDGE
Street

EXHIBIT A

Amendment to Rule 2.3(a) only
(The following Rule amendment is underlined and deletions are stricken out)

RULE 2.3 OFFICERS OF HEDGESTREET

(a) HedgeStreet has a f#¥e seven member board of directors elected by a
majority vote of all shareholders of HedgeStreet. Each director serves a one year
term. Each director, including a director elected to fill a vacancy, shall hold office
until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or
removal.

(b) — (f) [unchanged]

www.hedgestreet.com

1825 S. Grant Street

‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tet: 650.638.3500
Fax: 650.638.3501
Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05428-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2