alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 23, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21 Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2758.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT”) hereby
submits the following:

- Amendment to Rule 252.00 per the attached text (deletions struck through).

The amendment will remove an obsolete reference to Class A-2 (restricted) shares of CROT
Holdings, Inc. The transfer restrictions on Series A-2 shares were lifted in October 2006.

The CBOT intends to implement this amendment one day after the Commission’s receipt of this
submission.

There were no opposing views concerning this amendment.

The CBOT certifies that this amendment complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b011607


Deletions struck through:

252.00 Proceeds of Membership and Class A Common Stock

(a) GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST. Each member of the Exchange grants to
the Exchange for the benefit of the Exchange, the Clearing Services Provider, such
member’s Primary Clearing Member, all other Clearing Members and all other members of
the Exchange, a security interest in the shares of Class A common stock of CBOT
Holdings associated with each of such member’s memberships in the Exchange, which, for
purposes of this Rule 252.00, includes (1) all shares of Class A common stock, Series A2
and Class-A commen-steck, Series A-3 of CBOT Holdings associated with each of such
member’s memberships (regardless of holder); and (2) all restricted and unrestricted shares
of Class A common stock of CBOT Holdings registered on behalf of, or which qualify,
CBOT Clearing Members, member firms, Qualified Affiliates and pools, hedge funds or
other collective investment vehicles under Rule 230.00 or Regulation 230.02 or 230.03,
and the proceeds thereof for the purpose of securing such member’s, member firm’s,
Qualified Affiliates’ or pools’, hedge funds’ or other collective investment vehicles’
obligations, whether direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, under the Certificate of
Incorporation, Bylaws and Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, including, without
limitation, this Rule 252.00.

kK Ok OK
# C_2019172EN.01002901.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2019 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-480/17) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Greece - One-off and flat-rate financial corrections - Cross compliance - Monitoring of statutory management requirements - Risk analysis - Assessment of the financial loss - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality)

(2019/C 172/40)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos and Α. Vassilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 165, p. 37), in so far as it imposes on the Hellenic Republic, following the investigation under reference XC/2014/002/GR, one-off and flat-rate financial corrections amounting in total to EUR 1182 054.17 because of weaknesses in the application of cross compliance (EAGF and EAFRD).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.

---
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

IMPORTANT: Check box if Confidential Treatment is requested

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional): ___________________________ 

Organization: ICE Swap Trade, LLC

 

Filing as a: DCM X SEF DCO SDR Please note - only ONE choice allowed.

 

Filing Date (mm/dd/yy): 05/22/2018 Filing Description: ICE Swap Trade, LLC (“IST”) is amending its 2018 

Trading and Holiday Schedule in order to clarify the reserved maintenance window in Commodity Contracts. 

SPECIFY FILING TYPE Please note only ONE choice allowed per Submission.

 

Organization Rules and Rule Amendments

Certification § 40.6(a)

Approval § 40.5(a)

Notification § 40.6(d)

Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change § 40.10(a)

SIDCO Emergency Rule Change § 40.10(h)

 Rule Numbers: 214, 1384-1385, 1388-1393, 13110 and 13147

New Product Please note only ONE product per Submission.

Certification § 40.2(a) 

Certification Security Futures § 41.23(a)

Certification Swap Class § 40.2(d)

Approval § 40.3(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.23(b)

Novel Derivative Product Notification § 40.12(a)

Swap Submission § 39.5

 Official Product Name: 

 

Product Terms and Conditions (product related Rules and Rule Amendments)

Certification § 40.6(a) 

Certification Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.6(a)

Certification Security Futures § 41.24(a)

Delisting (No Open Interest) § 40.6(a) 

Approval § 40.5(a)

Approval Made Available to Trade Determination § 40.5(a)

Approval Security Futures § 41.24(c)

Approval Amendments to enumerated agricultural products § 40.4(a), § 40.5(a)

“Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” § 40.4(b)(5)

Notification § 40.6(d)

 Official Name(s) of Product(s) Affected:

Rule Numbers: 

X
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. (“ Company ”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, (the “ Report ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 2, 2010





/s/ Donald W. Rowley


Name: Donald W. Rowley


Title: Chief Financial and Accounting Officer








THIS CERTIFICATION “ACCOMPANIES” THE REPORT, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SECAND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE REPORT), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher Foley, as Chief Financial Officer of NBO SYSTEMS, INC.,
certify that:

> 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
> 	the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of NBO SYSTEMS, INC.;
> 	
> 	2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
> 	any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
> 	necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
> 	which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
> 	covered by this report;
> 	
> 	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
> 	other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
> 	in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
> 	cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
> 	report;
> 	
> 	4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
> 	responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
> 	procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
> 	the registrant and have:
> 	
> 	(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
> 		or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
> 		our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 		registrant is made known to us by others within the company,
> 		particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
> 		
> 		(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos.
> 		33-8238 and 34-47986]
> 		
> 		(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
> 		disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
> 		conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
> 		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
> 		such evaluation; and
> 		
> 		(c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the
> 		registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 		during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
> 		fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
> 		materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
> 		registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
> 	5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
> 	disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
> 	financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
> 	the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
> 	functions):
> 	
> 	a) all significant deficiencies and material
> 		weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over
> 		financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
> 		registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
> 		information; and
> 		
> 		b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
> 		management or other employees who have a significant role in the
> 		registrant's internal controls and over financial reporting.

Date: June 13, 2005

/s/ Christopher FoleyChristopher Foley
Director and Chief Financial Officer
✎AO 85 (Rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference — Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE —

EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES

Plaintiff MAGISTRATE JUDGE

V.

Case Number:

Defendant

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that a United States

magistrate judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial,

and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all

parties voluntarily consent.

You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court’s jurisdiction

from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding

consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for

this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent to have a United

States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and

conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

Party Represented Signatures Date

ORDER OF REFERENCE

IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to

United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.

Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED 

ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 7:07-cv-05784-KMK-LMS Document 4-3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
DOCSNY-271449v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

CIRILO ENCALADA AND MELVA 

ENCALADA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

100 WALL STREET COMPANY LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-04465-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 13 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### GREG S. SCHUB *v.*DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

*Greg S. Schub,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided March 31, 2005

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 748 (AC 25080), is denied.
DOCSNY-288327 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

CARLOS PINELA (AND WIFE, CIOTELDE 

PINELA), 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN D/B/A KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05377-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-288327 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 January 18, 2008 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 19 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 10 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, William Lopshire, the Chief Executive Officer of INTERNATIONAL CARD
ESTABLISHMENT, INC. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to International Card Establishment, Inc. and will be retained by
International Card Establishment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  October 25, 2005


/s/ WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
______________________________________
    William Lopshire
    Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05300-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 5 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05791-CM Document 5 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saint GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6134.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Saint Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saint Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and its subsequent order denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 128 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Corning Debenture-Backed Series
          2001-28 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing
          distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in respect of
          periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.



Date: March 27, 2006


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
Order entered November 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01519-CV

BEVER PROPERTIES, LLC AND JESSE M. TAYLOR, D.D.S., P.A., Appellants

V.

JERRY HUFFMAN CUSTOM BUILDER, L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-2512-04

ORDER

Based on the record before us, we GRANT appellants’ November 5, 2013 motion to 

extend time to file notice of appeal. Appellants’ joint notice of appeal, filed November 1, 2013, 

is considered timely for jurisdictional purposes.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE