alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDLY PELITA SEPANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-75033

Agency No. A095-634-551

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Randly Pelita Sepang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

SEP 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-75033

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558

F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We review de novo the agency’s legal

determinations, id., and claims of due process violations, Colmenar v. INS, 210

F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Sepang filed his asylum

application within a reasonable period of time after any changed circumstances. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir.

2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, Sepang’s asylum claim fails. 

Sepang does not contend he suffered past persecution. He contends he is a

member of a disfavored group because he is Christian, but does not contend he has

been previously targeted as a member of this group. Even as a member of a

disfavored group, see Tampubolon v. Holder, 610 F.3d 1056, 1062 (9th Cir. 2010),

the record does not compel the conclusion that Sepang faces a clear probability of

future persecution, see Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1066 (a petitioner’s showing that he

is a member of a disfavored group must be “coupled with a showing that [he], in

particular, is likely to be targeted as a member of that group”) (internal citation and

quotation omitted). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Sepang’s withholding

of removal claim.
3 07-75033

To the extent Sepang contends the agency violated his due process rights by

failing to consider certain documentary evidence regarding the timeliness of his

asylum application, Sepang cannot demonstrate prejudice. See Colmenar, 210

F.3d at 971 (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal****Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 18, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              April
                24, 2008
#### SMITH et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN TURQUOISE CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

June 15, 1894.)

Action by Alfred H. Smith and another against the American Turquoise Company. F. Bien, for appellants. J. F. Horan, for respondent.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. See 28 N. Y. Supp. 329.
Exhibit 32.1



**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Steele Resources Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Landow



(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                    |                                             
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|Registrant          | *Steele Resources Corporation*              
|                    |                                             
|Dated: May 20, 2013 | /s/ Scott Landow                            
|                    | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer                
|                    |                                             
|                    |
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.28




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 4.28
 BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
      1




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
       2




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
       3




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
         4




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
      5




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
       6




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
          7




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
        8




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
          9




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
    10




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
   11




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
     12




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
         13




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
      14




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
              15




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
    16




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
       17




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
          18




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
   BONA FIDE
  19




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
         20




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
   21




---



##### 



Exhibit 4.28
  CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYBy:
    
    /s/ Karin A. LawrenceKarin A. LawrenceAuthorized RepresentativeTHE CRYSTAL WATER COMPANY OF
DANIELSONBy:
    
    /s/ David C. BenoitDavid C. Benoit, Vice President & CFOCONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ David C. BenoitDavid C. Benoit, Vice President & CFOA.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Craig A. HrinkevichCraig A. Hrinkevich, Vice President andManaging Director
 22
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1819 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to provide for rewards for the arrest or conviction 

of certain foreign nationals who have committed genocide 

or war crimes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1819 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Crimes Rewards 

3 Expansion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM. 

5 Paragraph (10) of section 36(b) of the State Depart6 ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘defined under the statute of such 

8 tribunal;’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘defined under— 

9 ‘‘(A) the statute of such country or tri10 bunal, as the case may be; or 

11 ‘‘(B) United States law;’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1819 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities 

other purposes. have committed genocide or war crimes, and for or conviction of certain foreign nationals who Act of 1956 to provide for rewards for the arrest
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

          - [Program Announcement No. ACYF/HS 2001-07A]

# AGENCY:

Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the Notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, May 3, 2001, Part II. On page 22294, first column (Item D), the August 1, 2001 closing date for the submission of applications is incorrect. The correct closing time and date for receipt of applications is 5 p.m. EDT on July 2, 2001.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The ACYF Operation Center at 1-800-351-2293 for referral to the appropriate contact person in ACYF for programmatic questions or send an e-mail to                         *hs@icgnet.com*

Dated: May 10, 2001.

James A. Harrell,

Acting Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.

[FR Doc. 01-12283 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Coyote Hills Golf, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mitch Powers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephanie Erickson, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mitch S. Powers


Mitch Powers


Chief Executive Officer


May 12, 2011








/s/ Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Chief Financial Officer


May 12, 2011
Exhibit 23.2  Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm  We
have issued our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Optelecom-NKF, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Optelecom-NKF, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-151486
effective June 6, 2008, File No. 333-130006 effective November 30,
2005 and File No. 333-48306 effective October 20, 2000).  /s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP Mclean,
Virginia March 30,
2010
IIe~rchis CY Partners, 11,P 

6 I 13roacIway, 26'" Floor . ..-~ .; . --yp$pZ:l,rn? -. , 

.. . .- --. . - . - . . . - ., .--... -:-yT y 1 ..dL; . . -,+ cur 7, New l'ork 10006-2802 

.. ,..,5q*r . L r. ' Clonneritcrrt Ofice: . 

'Ti;&. , s , ,, .; 

TeIepIlol,e: (212) 344-4700 

24 80, . . 

S~annlord.:C1' 06905 . - . "- Facsimile: (212) 422-5299 

~~w.Y.II1ar:Il~l~X.C"I11 

. . ... . . _ . . , . . . , . May 14,2008 

2355 i'lai-1 Street, IJ.O. 186 

5 Cl~atltat~~. blA 02659 

(508) 432.21 21 

BY HAND DELIVERY 

The Honorable R~chard W Renllan 

United 12. 3 States Dlstrict Court 

Southern District of New York 

40 Centre Street, Room 650 

New York, NY 10007 

Re: Zim Integrated Shipping Services, L.td. v. Belco Resources, Inc. et al. 

Southern District ofNew York, 07 Civ. 5861 (RMB)(GWa 

Dear Judge Berman: 

Wc represent plaintiff Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd., in the above captioned matter and 

we are writing to request a pre-motion conference to move for reconsideration of the Decision & Order 

entered on May 5, 2008, in the above captioned matter. 

Our client has now instructed us to ask the Court to reconsider its ruling dismissing plaintiffs 

second and third causes of action of its second amended complaint (See Order & Decision, pp. 7-8). We 

believe that the Court has overlooked the law of the Second Circuit on the notice of intent to plead a 

foreign law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1, and the fact that plaintiff did include a new "Third Cause of 

Action" (See Second Amended complaint, 1111 58-64) pleading alternative bodies of law by specifically 

invoking the provisions of 46 U.S.C. S 1304(6) of COGSA and "international conventions" or "sinlilar 

applicable irlternatioilal conventions" (See Second Amended Complaint, 711 54, 59 and 61) in accordance 

with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Rationis Enterprises Inc. of Panama v. Hylndai Mipo 

Dockyard Co., Ltd., 426 F.3d 580, 585 (2d Cir. 2005). 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 57 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Letter to Judge Bennan 

Ma-y 14, 2008 

Page 2 of 2 

We also would like to draw the attention of the Court on the expiration of the ten (10) days to file 

a motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 6.3 on May 15, 2008. 

R~ctfully submitted, 

0 incent M. DeOrchis 

CC: Via e-mail 

Lovells, LLP, Attorneysfor Sinochem Jiailgsu Corporation. 

Bennett, Giuliano, McDonnell & Perrone, LLP, Attorneys for Belco Resources, Inc. 

Tisdale Law Offices, LLC, Att0rne.v~ for Nanjing Huahin Foreign Trade & Economics Co., Ltd. 

W '1236-6XY\Cones.Lrl Judge I3crnun 051408 doc 

No wdk c ocbu i 

+ ?t Crrr # ~(*vd+.Mc t 

W wJl Gee ruCh 

Richard M. Berman, U.S.D.J. 

J 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 57 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Jay M. Meilstrup, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GameTech International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 14, 2005     /S/ Jay M. Meilstrup     Jay M. Meilstrup  Chief Executive Officer and President
24
1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 

In the Matter of the Notice of 

OneChicago LLC 

Requesting Vacation of Designation

as a Contract Market

 

ORDER OF VACATION

On September 21, 2020, OneChicago LLC (OneChicago) submitted a notice to the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the Commission) requesting the vacation of its 

contract market designation pursuant to Section 7 of the Commodity Exchange Act (the Act), 7 

U.S.C. § 11, and Commission Regulation 38.3(f), 17 C.F.R. § 38.3(f). 

WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Act provides that “[a]ny person that has been designated or 

registered [as] a registered entity in the manner [herein provided] may have such designation or 

registration vacated and set aside by giving notice in writing to the Commission requesting that 

its designation or registration as a registered entity be vacated, which notice shall be served at 

least ninety days prior to the date named therein as the date when the vacation of designation or

registration shall take effect;”

WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Act further provides that “[u]pon receipt of such notice the 

Commission shall forthwith order the vacation;” 
2 

WHEREAS, Commission Regulation 38.3(f) provides that “[a] designated contract 

market may vacate its designation under section 7 of the Act by filing a request electronically, in 

a format and manner specified by the Secretary of the Commission, with the Secretary of the 

Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters at submissions@cftc.gov and the Division of 

Market Oversight at DMOSubmissions@cftc.gov;”

WHEREAS, OneChicago was granted designation as a contract market by Commission 

Order on June 11, 2002; 

WHEREAS, OneChicago served notice to the Commission on September 21, 2020, 

requesting that the Commission vacate OneChicago’s designation, and such notice was provided 

at least ninety days prior to the requested effective date of December 21, 2020; and 

WHEREAS, OneChicago has represented that it will continue to maintain its regulatory

records (as defined in Commission Regulation 1.31) and make them available for inspection by 

any representative of the Commission or the United States Department of Justice after its 

registration has been vacated in accordance with Commission regulation 1.31. 
3 

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the designation of OneChicago as a contract market be 

vacated and set aside, effective December 21, 2020. 

Issued in Washington, D.C. on this 21st day of December, 2020. 

By the Commission 

Robert N. Sidman 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of December 20, 2005



 Exhibit 10.44.1 
  
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

  
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as
of December 20, 2005 (this “Amendment”), amending that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”), is made and entered into by and between Horizon Lines, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company, and John V. Keenan. 
  
 The
parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement as herein provided. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned
hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment of
Section 2(c). The first sentence of Section 2(c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 
  
 “The Executive shall serve as Senior Vice President and Chief Transportation Officer of the Company with such responsibilities,
duties and authority as may from time to time be assigned to the Executive by the Parent Board, the Company Board or the Company CEO.” 
  
 2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance
with its terms. 
  
 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be
executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Amendment. 
  
 4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed, construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of New
York, without reference to the principles of the conflicts of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction, and where applicable, the laws of the United States. 
  
 5. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective on February 1, 2006. 
  
 * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Employment Agreement to be
duly executed and delivered. 
  
  

			
	 HORIZON LINES, LLC

	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Charles G. Raymond        
	 	 	 Charles G. Raymond
 President and Chief Executive Officer

		
	 	 	 
	
	/s/ John V. Keenan
	 John V. Keenan