alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Coyote Hills Golf, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mitch Powers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephanie Erickson,
acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mitch S. Powers


Mitch Powers


Chief Executive Officer


August 7, 2009








/s/ Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Stephanie Lynn Erickson


Chief Financial Officer


August 7, 2009
Order entered December 31, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01217-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.G.G., B.N.G., AND R.T.G., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-03154

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated October 24, 2014, we 

notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue and directed the 

Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s 

record has not been filed and we have not received any correspondence from the Dallas County 

District Clerk’s office regarding the status of the clerk’s record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record or 

written verification that appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record 

within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification 

appellant is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will, without further notice, dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk and to all parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Trevor Phillips, Ph.D., in my capacity as principal executive officer of Critical Therapeutics,Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Critical Therapeutics,Inc.; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report.Dated: April 15, 2008       /s/ Trevor Phillips         Trevor Phillips, Ph.D.    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 15 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-32 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 21 of 21
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1833 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1833

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, as the ``Lieutenant 
              Michael R. Davidson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2019

  Miss Rice of New York (for herself, Mr. Brindisi, Ms. Clarke of New 
 York, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Delgado, Mr. Engel, Mr. Espaillat, 
 Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Katko, Mr. King of New York, Mrs. Lowey, 
 Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New 
 York, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Rose 
  of New York, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Tonko, Ms. 
Velazquez, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Reed, Ms. Meng, and Mr. Jeffries) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, as the ``Lieutenant 
              Michael R. Davidson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT MICHAEL R. DAVIDSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 35 Tulip Avenue in Floral Park, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lieutenant Michael R. Davidson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Michael R. Davidson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 4 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

Greer Bancshares
Incorporated and Subsidiary

Greer, South Carolina

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-128719, 333-128717, 333-128713 and 333-128712) on Form S-8 of Greer Bancshares Incorporated and Subsidiary of our
report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Greer Bancshares Incorporated and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2010, which report appears in Greer Bancshares Incorporateds 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

LOGO

Charlotte, North Carolina

March 31, 2011



91
Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-01524-AKH Document 16 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 3 of 3
EX-10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




NRG Energy, Inc.

CEO Compensation Table for 2006




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2006 Annual Incentive

Plan Design (1)	 	 	Grants Under the Long Term Incentive Plan	 
	 	Name and Title

	 	 	2006 Base

Salary
	 	 	Target
	 	 	Maximum
	 	 	Restricted

Stock Units

(2)
	 	 	Non-

Qualified

Stock

Options (3)
	 	 	Performance
Units (4)
	 
	 	Dave Crane,

President and

Chief Executive

Officer

	 	 	$	1,000,000	 	 	 	 	100	%	 	 	 	200	%	 	 	 	17,000	 	 	 	 	142,857	 	 	 	 	33,000	 	 
	 






	 	(1)	 	For fiscal 2006, Mr. Crane’s target incentive for annual incentive compensation will be
100% base salary with a maximum opportunity of 200% of base salary. Incentive components
for Mr. Crane include targets based on NRG’s free cash flow and EBITDA in 2006, as well as
operating performance, staff development and corporate compliance.
	 
	 	(2)	 	Each Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) is equivalent to one share of NRG Energy, Inc.’s
(“NRG”) Common Stock, par value $0.01. Mr. Crane will receive from NRG one such share of
Common Stock for each RSU on January 3, 2009.
	 
	 	(3)	 	Non-Qualified Stock Options will vest and become exercisable as follows: 33 1/3% on
January 3, 2007, 33 1/3% on January 3, 2008, and 33 1/3% on January 3, 2009. Stock options
will expire six years from the date of grant.
	 
	 	(4)	 	Mr. Crane was issued Performance Units (“PU’s”) by NRG under its Long Term Incentive
Plan on January 3, 2006. Each PU will be paid out on January 3, 2009 if the average
closing price of NRG’s Common Stock for the ten trading days prior to January 3, 2009 (the
“Measurement Price”) is equal to or greater than $67.37 (the “Target Price”). The payout
for each PU will be equal to: (i) one share of Common Stock, if the Measurement Price
equals the Target Price; (ii) a pro-rated amount in between one and two shares of Common
Stock, if the Measurement Price is greater than the Target Price but less than $ $79.49
(the “Maximum Price”); and (iii) two shares of Common Stock, if the Measurement Price is
equal to or greater than the Maximum Price.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7545

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TONY ALFORENZO WALKER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. ( 2:93

- cr - 00084

- AWA

- 1 )

Submitted : January 18, 201 8 Decided: January 23, 2018

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tony Alforenzo Walker , Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente , United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Tony Alforenzo Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Walker’s motion for a certificate of
appea lability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
No. 627.

#### Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, Petitioner, *v.*Erastus *W.*Willard, Administrator, *579etc.

December 7, 1908.

Petition for a writ of certiorari.to.the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted. *Mr. Albert J. Hopkins*for petitioner. *Mr. Arthur J. Eddy*and *Mr. E. C. Wetten*for respondent.
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 23 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 23 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.50

Mr. John J. Bonasia
1160 South River Landing
Edgewater, MD 21037

Dear John:

This letter will set forth our agreement regarding your employment and
management responsibilities as Senior Vice President, Manufacturing effective
October 3, 1994.

1.  Position: The position is that of Senior Vice President, Manufacturing
reporting to the President and Chief Operating Officer of UNC Incorporated.

You will be responsible for the profitability and growth of the units
comprising UNC's Manufacturing operations, including UNC Chemical Dynamics,
UNC Tri Manufacturing, UNC Johnson Technology, UNC Aerostructures, UNC Tri
Remanufacturing and Artex.

2.  Compensation:

    (a)  Base Salary: Your base annual salary will
be $195,000, payable biweekly and reviewed annually.

    (b)  Incentive Compensation Plan: You will be
designated a participant in UNC's Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan"),
under which you may receive incentive compensation of up to 50% of your base
annual salary depending on UNC's performance in achieving it's annual
business plan goals.  You will also be eligible to receive additional
discretionary compensation up to $100,000 for achieving all of the UNC
Manufacturing operations objectives and goals to be determined at a later
date between you and the President and Chief Operating Officer.

3.  Other Benefits:

    (a)  Perquisite:You will receive a $10,000 per
year allowance, paid in January and July in lieu of car expenses and other
perquisites.

    (b)  Retirement Income Savings Plan: You will
continue to be eligible to participate in the UNC Retirement Income Savings
Plan.

    (c)  Group Insurance: You will continue to be
eligible to participate in UNC's health, life insurance, disability and other
benefit plans.

    (d)  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan:
You will continue as an eligible participant in this plan.  Your future
benefit will be calculated using the average of your highest three years of
base salary.

    (e)  Change In Control: Will remain in effect.

    (f)  Vacation: You will be entitled to an
annual vacation of three weeks.

4.  Termination: In the event of the termination of your employment at the
initiative of UNC Incorporated, for any reason other than for cause or a
change in control, you will be entitled to receive up to twelve (12) months
of salary and group health benefits continuance from the date of termination
of your active employment to the time alternative employment is obtained.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign and return the enclosed
copy of this letter to me.

Sincerely,



/s/Dan Colussy



Accepted:



/s/ John J. Bonasia

9/29//94       
Date

DAC/aa
Case 1:07-cr-00481-PAC Document 2 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
HEDGE
Street
February 1, 2007

VIA EMAIL: secretary@cftc.gov

Sc
a
2
g

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary of the Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
3 Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

VRUIVLRYIR6

t

RE: Rule Certification: HedgeStreet® temporarily delists the Binary Nonfarm
Payrolls Contracts - Submission pursuant to Commission Regulation

§40.6(a)
Dear Secretary Donovan:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”), and
§40.6(a) of the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(the “Commission”) under the Act, HedgeStreet, Inc. (“HedgeStreet”) hereby submits to
the Commission that as of the close of business on Wednesday, January 31, 2007,
HedgeStreet will not list for trading any new Nonfarm Payrolls Binary contracts until
further notice to the Commission. The Nonfarm Payrolls contract specifications are
contained in HedgeStreet Rule 12.30.

The Nonfarm Payrolls contracts currently trading on HedgeStreet will have a Last Trading
Date of today, Thursday, February 1, 2007. Therefore, there will be no open interest in any
of the Nonfarm Payrolls contracts as the Settlement Date for such contracts is Friday,
February 2, 2007.

No substantive opposing views were expressed to HedgeStreet with respect to these
changes.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact
Stephanie Ford by telephone at (650) 638-3511 or by email at sfordG@hedgestrect.com.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ford
Vice President, Legal & Compliance

ce: Tom Leahy —- CFTC
Phil Colling - CFTC
Clarissa Manansala — HedgeStreet, Inc.

1825 S. Grant Street
Suite 500
‘San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: 650.638.3500
www.hedgestreet.com Fax: 650.638.3501
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-98203) of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. of our report dated December 3, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2010,
included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2010.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Marcum LLP           
|                         
|Marcum LLP               
|San Francisco, California
|December 3, 2010         

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-98203) of
Hennessy Advisors, Inc. of our report dated December 3, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2009, included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 30, 2010.

/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

San Francisco, California

December 3, 2010
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-05904-SHS Document 1 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 6 of 6
Filed: July 28, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2738

(CA-96-56-MJG)

Betty I. Roupe,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and

Human Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

ORDER

The Court amends its opinion filed June 19, 1997, as follows:

On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the appellee is corrected to

read "Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services."

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2738

BETTY I. ROUPE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-

56-MJG)

Submitted: June 3, 1997 Decided: June 19, 1997

Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty I. Roupe, Appellant Pro Se. Perry F. Sekus, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to the Defendant in a Title VII discrimination case. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Roupe v. Shalala, No. CA-96-56-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 24,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
152 So. 44

#### ZION STAR BAPTIST CHURCH v. HART.

6 Div. 434.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 11, 1934.

*25Fred G. Moore, of Birmingham, for appellant.

G. Ernest Jones, of Birmingham, for appellee.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

This is an action of unlawful detain-er under section S001 of the Code of 1923, and which, among other things, provides that a demand in writing must be made for the premises after a termination of the possessory interest. The making of this written demand is essential as a condition precedent to a recovery, and proof of same should be by the best evidence. Littleton v. Clayton, 77 Ala. 571; Bates v. Ridgeway, 48 Ala. 611; Dumas v. Hunter, 30 Ala. 75. The plaintiff attempted to prove the demand by stating he sent it by a colored boy in his office, but there was no proof that the same was delivered. Nor was any predicate laid for secondary evidence ; that is, no demand was made to produce the original. Again, while the plaintiff claimed to have kept a copy of the demand, it was never introduced, so the most that the plaintiff showed was his oral testimony that he made a demand in writing and sent it by hand by a colored boy. The trial court erred in not sustaining the defendant’s objection to the plaintiff’s testimony as to the demand.

As we understand, this was not a suit upon an instrument in writing so as to make the same admissible in evidence in the absence of a sworn plea denying the execution of same. It is an action for the recovery of the premises, and the trial court erred in admitting the rental contract in evidence without proper proof of the execution of same over the objection of the defendant.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.