Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 27453

as contained in the transmittal. Some

SIAP amendments may have been

previously issued by the FAA in a

National Flight Data Center (NFDC)

Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an

emergency action of immediate flight

safety relating directly to published

aeronautical charts. The circumstances

which created the need for some SIAP

amendments may require making them

effective in less than 30 days. For the

remaining SIAPs, an effective date at

least 30 days after publication is

provided.

Further, the SIAPs contained in this

amendment are based on the criteria

contained in the U.S. Standard for

Terminal Instrument Procedures

(TERPS). In developing these SIAPs, the

TERPS criteria were applied to the

conditions existing or anticipated at the

affected airports. Because of the close

and immediate relationship between

these SIAPs and safety in air commerce,

I find that notice and public procedure

before adopting these SIAPs are

impracticable and contrary to the public

interest and, where applicable, that

good cause exists for making some

SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. For the same

reason, the FAA certifies that this

amendment will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

Air traffic control, Airports,

Navigation (air).

Issued in Washington, DC on May 11,

2001.

L. Nicholas Lacey,

Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, part 97 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 97) is amended by establishing,

amending, suspending, or revoking

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on

the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT

APPROACH PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 97 is

revised to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120, 44701; and 14 CFR 11.49(b)(2).

§§ 97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33,

97.35 [Amended]

2. Part 97 is amended to read as

follows:

By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/

DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME

or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME,

LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME;

§ 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29 ILS,

ILS/DME, ISMLS, MLS, MLS/DME,

MLS/RNAV; § 97.31 RADAR SIAPs;

§ 97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and § 97.35

COPTER SIAPs, identified as follows:

* * * Effective July 12, 2001

Bethel, AK, Bethel, VOR RWY 36, Amdt 7A,

CANCELLED

St George, AK, St George, ILS RWY 11, Orig

St. Mary’s, AK, St. Mary’s, RNAV (GPS) RWY

16, Orig

St. Mary’s, AK, St. Mary’s GPS RWY 16,

Amdt 1, CANCELLED

Washington, DC, Ronald Regan Washington

National, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS–A,

Amdt 6A, CANCELLED

Fort Myers, FL, Southwest Florida Intl,

RADAR–1, Amdt 6

Fort Meyers, FL, Page Field, RADAR–1,

Amdt 3

Jasper, GA Pickens County, NDB RWY 34,

Orig

Belleville, IL, Scott AFB/Midamerica, ILS

RWY 14R, Orig

Salem, IL, Salem-Leckrone, NDB RWY 18,

Amdt 10

Salem, IL, Salem-Leckrone, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 18, Orig

Salem, IL, Salem-Leckrone, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 36, Orig

Salem, IL Salem-Leckrone, GPS RWY 18,

Orig, CANCELLED

Lexington, KY, Blue Grass, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 4, Orig

Lexington, KY, Blue Grass, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 8, Orig

Lexington, KY, Blue Grass, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 22, Orig

Lexington, KY, Blue Grass, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 26, Orig

Houma, LA, Houma-Terrebonne, VOR/DME

RNAV 36, Amdt 4, CANCELLED

Bedford, MA, Laurence G. Hanscom Field,

ILS RWY 29, Amdt 5

Baudette, MN, Baudette Intl, VOR RWY 30,

Amdt 10

Baudette, MN, Baudette Intl, VOR/DME RWY

12, Amdt 5

Baudette, MN, Baudette Intl, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 30, Orig

Olive Branch, MS, Olive Branch, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 18, Orig

Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, LOC RWY

22, Orig

Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, LOC RWY

22, Orig-B, CANCELLED

Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, NDB RWY

22, Amdt 5B, CANCELLED

Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, NDB RWY

22, Orig

Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, RADAR–

1, Amdt 17, CANCELLED

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, ILS

RWY 16L, Orig

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, ILS/

DME RWY 16L, Amdt 12A, CANCELLED

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, ILS

RWY 16R, Orig

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, ILS/

DME RWY 16R, Amdt 3A, CANCELLED

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, ILS

RWY 17, Amdt 12

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 16L, Orig

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 16R, Orig

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, GPS

RWY 16L, Orig-A, CANCELLED

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, GPS

RWY 17, Orig-B CANCELLED

Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 17 Orig

Green Bay, WI, Austin Straubel Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1

Green Bay, WI, Austin Straubel Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 18, Orig

Green Bay, WI, Austin Straubel Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 24, Orig

Green Bay, WI, Austin Straubel Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1

The FAA published an Amendment in

Docket No. 30245, Amdt No. 2048 to Part 97

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (Vol 66,

FR No. 87, Page 22438; dated May 4, 2001)

Under section 97.33 effective July 12, 2001,

which is hereby amended as follows:

Colby, KS, Shaltz Field, RNAV RWY 17,

ORIG

Colby, KS, Shaltz Field, RNAV RWY 35,

ORIG

Should read:

Colby, KS, Shaltz Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY

17, ORIG

Colby, KS, Shaltz Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY

35, ORIG

[FR Doc. 01–12486 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Parts 132 and 163

[T.D. 01–35]

RIN 1515–AC83

Licenses for Certain Worsted Wool

Fabrics Subject to Tariff-Rate Quota

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service,

Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Interim rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document contains a

correction to the interim regulations that

27454 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

were published in the Federal Register

on May 1, 2001, concerning the

implementation of a tariff-rate quota for

certain worsted wool fabric. The interim

regulations amended the Customs

Regulations to set forth the form and

manner by which an importer

establishes that a valid license, issued

under regulations of the U.S.

Department of Commerce, is in effect for

worsted wool fabric that is subject to the

tariff-rate quota. The importer must be

in possession of the license, or if the

importer is not the licensee, the

importer must possess a written

authorization from the licensee, in order

to be able to claim the in-quota rate of

duty on the worsted wool fabric.

DATES: Interim rule effective on May 1,

2001. The interim rule is applicable to

products that are entered, or withdrawn

from warehouse, for consumption on or

after January 1, 2001. Comments must

be received on or before July 2, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be

addressed to and inspected at the

Regulations Branch, U.S. Customs

Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,

NW., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom

Fitzpatrick, Office of Field Operations,

(202–927–5385).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

A document published in the Federal

Register (66 FR 21664) on May 1, 2001,

as T.D. 01–35, amended the Customs

Regulations on an interim basis

concerning the implementation of a

tariff-rate quota for certain worsted wool

fabric. Specifically, the interim

regulations amended the Customs

Regulations by adding a new § 132.18

that set forth the form and manner by

which an importer establishes that a

valid license, issued under regulations

of the U.S. Department of Commerce

(‘‘Commerce’’), is in effect for worsted

wool fabric that is the subject of the

tariff-rate quota. The importer must be

in possession of the license or, if not the

licensee, the importer must possess a

written authorization from the licensee,

in order to be able to claim the in-quota

rate of duty on the worsted wool fabric.

The interim rule stated that it would

be applicable to worsted wool products

that were entered or withdrawn from

warehouse for consumption on or after

May 1, 2001.

However, under section 501 of the

Trade and Development Act of

2000(Pub. L. 106–200, 114 Stat. 251;

May 18, 2000), the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)

was amended to establish a tariff-rate

quota covering designated worsted wool

fabrics that were entered or withdrawn

from warehouse for consumption, on or

after January 1, 2001.

In this regard, an import license

issued by Commerce that would entitle

an importer to claim the in-quota rate of

duty on worsted wool fabric is valid for

the entire calendar year for which the

license is issued (see 19 CFR

132.18(c)(2) at 66 FR 21667). Licenses

issued by Commerce for the year 2001

are therefore intended to cover worsted

wool fabrics subject to the tariff-rate

quota that are entered or withdrawn

from warehouse for consumption on or

after January 1, 2001.

Consequently, the interim rule is

applicable to worsted wool fabrics

covered under the tariff-rate quota that

are entered or withdrawn from

warehouse for consumption on or after

January 1, 2001, as indicated above

under the DATES caption, and as

corrected below.

Need for Correction

For the reasons noted, the interim

rule, as published, requires clarification.

Correction of Publication

The publication on May 1, 2001 of the

interim rule (T.D. 01–35), which was the

subject of FR Doc. 01–10717, is

corrected as follows:

On page 21664, in the third column,

under the DATES caption, the second

sentence is corrected to read: ‘‘The

interim rule is applicable to products

that are entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption, on or after

January 1, 2001.’’

Dated: May 11, 2001.

Stuart P. Seidel,

Assistant Commissioner, Office of

Regulations and Rulings.

[FR Doc. 01–12391 Filed 5–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4820–02–P

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

20 CFR Part 217

RIN 3220–AB45

Application for Annuity or Lump Sum

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement

Board amends its regulations to enable

a divorced spouse who remarries the

employee within six months of the

divorce to use the spouse application to

qualify for a divorced spouse annuity

for the period prior to the remarriage.

This amendment eliminates the

necessity for the spouse to file a

separate application for a short period of

benefits.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective

May 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General

Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board,

telephone (312) 751–4945, TTD (312)

751–4701.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

217.8 of the Board’s regulations

describes situations where the Board

will accept an application filed for one

type of annuity as an application for

another type of annuity. An application

may be effective for the period six

months prior to the date of filing. This

final rule adds a provision to enable a

divorced spouse who remarries the

employee within six months of the

divorce to use the spouse application to

qualify for a divorced spouse annuity

for the period after the divorce and prior

to the remarriage. In such cases the

requirement that a claimant be married

to the employee for a period of one year

prior to application for a spouse

annuity, as required by § 216.54 of this

part, is waived.

The Board published this rule as a

proposed rule on May 11, 2000 (65 FR

30366) and invited comments by July

10, 2000. No comments were received.

Accordingly, the proposed rule is

adopted as a final rule without change.

The Board, with the concurrence of

the Office of Management and Budget,

has determined that this is not a

significant regulatory action under

Executive Order 12866; therefore, no

regulatory impact analysis is required.

There are no information collections

associated with this rule.

List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 217

Railroad employees, Railroad

retirement.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, the Railroad Retirement

Board amends chapter II of title 20 of

the Code of Federal Regulations as

follows:

PART 217—APPLICATION FOR

ANNUITY OR LUMP SUM

1. The authority citation for part 217

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 45 U.S.C. 231d and 45 U.S.C.

231f.

2. In Subpart B, § 217.8, redesignate

paragraphs (m) through (u) as (n)

through (v), and add a new paragraph

(m) to read as follows:

§ 217.8 When one application satisfies the

filing requirement for other benefits.

* * * * *