alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 23882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-835]


Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 
Administrative Antidumping Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods from Japan

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Campau, Holly Hawkins or Maureen 
Flannery, AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1395, (202) 482-0414 or (202) 482-3020, respectively.

The Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, 
all citations to the Department's regulations are to the current 
regulations, codified at 19 CFR part 351 (2000).

Background

    In accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 351.213(b)(2), the Department 
received a timely request from petitioner U.S. Steel Group that we 
conduct an administrative review of the sales of Sumitomo Metal 
Industries. On September 29, 2000, the Department initiated an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on oil country 
tubular goods (OCTG) for the period of review (POR) of August 1, 1999 
to July 31, 2000, in order to determine whether merchandise imported 
into the United States is being sold at dumped prices.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    Because of the complexity and timing of certain issues in this 
case, it is not practicable to complete this review within the time 
limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 
351.213(h) of the Department's regulations. See Memorandum from Barbara 
E. Tillman to Joseph A. Spetrini, dated April 27, 2001 (on file in the 
public file of the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the Department 
of Commerce).
    Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 
Department is extending the time limits for the preliminary results to 
no later than August 31, 2001.

    Dated: May 2, 2001.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement III.
[FR Doc. 01-11843 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05355-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Russell Leslie James, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Date:  January 12, 2011
 
 
 RUSSELL LESLIE JAMES
 Russell Leslie James
 Chief Accounting Officer
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
##### 



2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    25.4
    
    
    $
    25.5
    
    
    $
    22.8
    
    
    $
    35.7
    
    
    $
    54.2Amortization of debt issuance costs
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    1.4Interest capitalized during period
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    0.8Portion of rent expense representative of
interest
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.7Fixed Charges
    
    $
    29.8
    
    
    $
    29.0
    
    
    $
    25.6
    
    
    $
    38.9
    
    
    $
    58.1Earnings:Pretax income from continuing operations
and before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
    
    $
    48.6
    
    
    $
    47.7
    
    
    $
    10.5
    
    
    $
    19.9
    
    
    $
    38.6Add: Loss from unconsolidated joint venture
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    0.4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    Less: Income from unconsolidated joint venture
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.1
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1.9
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    29.8
    
    
    
    29.0
    
    
    
    25.6
    
    
    
    38.9
    
    
    
    58.1Interest capitalized during period
    
    
    (0.5
    )
    
    
    (0.3
    )
    
    
    (0.3
    )
    
    
    (0.5
    )
    
    
    (0.8
    )Amortization of interest capitalized
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    0.7
    
    
    
    0.7
    
    
    
    0.7Earnings
    
    $
    79.1
    
    
    $
    77.7
    
    
    $
    36.4
    
    
    $
    60.0
    
    
    $
    94.7Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    2.65
    
    
    
    2.68
    
    
    
    1.42
    
    
    
    1.54
    
    
    
    1.63
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended November 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Russell
Leslie James, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Date:
December 29, 2008








RUSSELL LESLIE
JAMES


Russell
Leslie James


Chief
Accounting Officer


Chief
Financial Officer and Director








-1-
Case 1:07-cv-05423-AKH Document 4 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05423-AKH Document 4 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH Document 14 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 58 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 58 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 58 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Robert Steinberg,
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Netfran Development Corp. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual report on
Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert Steinberg
-------------------------
Robert Steinberg

March 28, 2003
# FCM DATA JANUARY 2005
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.4 
  

AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 ALICO, INC. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Articles of Incorporation of Alico, Inc. (the “Corporation”), were originally filed with and approved by the Secretary of
State of Florida on the 1st day of February, 1960; 
  
 WHEREAS, said Articles were subsequently restated on February 25, 1972, amended on January 14, 1974, and amended on January 20, 1987; 
  

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the directors and the stockholders of the Corporation that the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation be
amended in accordance with the proposed amendment hereinafter set forth; 
  
 WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation hereinafter set forth was approved by the directors and the shareholders of the Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of
Florida Statutes 607.181; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the approval of
the Secretary of State of Florida of the proposed amendment hereinafter set forth is hereby requested. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation are hereby amended by adding thereto an additional article, to be known as ARTICLE
9; such article is to read as follows: 
  

			
	 “ARTICLE 9.
	 	Affiliated Transactions. The corporation expressly elects, pursuant to §607.108(5)(b) of the Florida Statutes, not to be governed by the rules pertaining to affiliated
transactions contained in §607.108, Florida Statutes.”

  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this Amendment to Articles of Incorporation is hereby executed on behalf of Alico, Inc. by its President and Secretary this 27th day of December, 1988. Date adopted by the shareholders was December 27, 1988. 
  

			
	 ALICO, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/    BEN HILL GRIFFIN,
III        
	 	 	Ben Hill Griffin, III,
	 	 	President
		
	By:	 	/s/    BEATRICE W. BOYLE        
	 	 	Beatrice W. Boyle,
	 	 	Secretary


  

			
	STATE OF FLORIDA	 	)
	 	 	)
	COUNTY OF HENDRY	 	)

  
 The foregoing
instrument was acknowledged before me this 27th day of December, 1988, by BEN HILL GRIFFIN, III and BEATRICE W. BOYLE, President and Secretary, respectively, of ALICO, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. 
  

	
	
	/s/    BETTY L. DUNHAM        
	Notary Public
	State of Florida at Large


  

			
	 My Commission Expires:
	  	Notary Public, State of Florida
	 	  	My commission Expires Oct. 15, 1992
	 	  	Bonded thru troy XXX-Insurance Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1913 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1913

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay educational assistance or subsistence 
   allowances to certain individuals during school term, quarter, or 
                            semester breaks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2019

 Mr. Cisneros introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay educational assistance or subsistence 
   allowances to certain individuals during school term, quarter, or 
                            semester breaks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Break Relief for Every Academic Kind 
of Period in an Academic Year for Veterans Act'' or the ``BREAK PAY for 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE OR SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES TO 
              CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DURING SEMESTER BREAKS.

    Section 3680(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and inserting 
        a semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``disapproval.'' 
        and inserting ``disapproval; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(C) during periods between school terms, quarters, or 
        semesters where the educational institution certifies the 
        enrollment of the eligible veteran or eligible person on an 
        individual term basis if--
                    ``(i) the period between those terms, quarters, or 
                semesters does not exceed eight weeks; and
                    ``(ii) both terms, quarters, or semesters 
                immediately preceding and immediately following the 
                period are not shorter in length than the period.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1200]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 5.875 (5\7/8\) percent for the January-March quarter 
of FY 2001.

LeAnn M. Oliver,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-1200 Filed 1-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 9 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 9 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05809-AKH Document 9 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginal Marcellius BOYD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6406.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 29, 2013.

Reginal Marcellius Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Mikell Johnson, James Chris Leventis, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginal Marcellius Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, denying his Rule 59(e) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive *250procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Order entered October 25, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01066-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S., A CHILD, Appellant

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-01775-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is the October 20, 2017 request of court reporter Tanner Joy Feast for an 

extension of time to file court reporter’s record. We GRANT the request. The reporter’s record

shall be filed by November 8, 2017.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34-4 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 24 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG     Document 23      Filed 10/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG     Document 23      Filed 10/19/2007     Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | /s/              GREGG A.              LINN                                         |
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                 | Gregg              A.              Linn*Chief Financial Officer*                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Date: March 31, 2006 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

ROSA DIEZ (and husband, PANCRI DIEZ), 07-CV-5352 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, and 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS TENANTS

IN COMMON (MAYORE ESTATES/80 LAFAYETTE) for the building located at 22

Cortlandt Street (Subcellar Floors 1, 2, 3 and Floors 1, 2, 3), New York, New York 10007,

in the above-captioned action and all future correspondence and papers filed or serviced in

connection with the above-captioned action are to be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, and 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS

TENANTS IN COMMON

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants Mayore Estates LLC, 80 Lafayette

Associates LLC, Mayore Estates LLC, and 80 Lafayette Association LLC, As Tenants In

Common.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counsellor Plaint~ffs

Dated: September 11, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

I Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3