alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



NEITHER THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY NOR THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE HEREOF HAVE
BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT), OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED, ASSIGNED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS
(1) A REGISTRATION STATEMENT WITH RESPECT THERETO IS EFFECTIVE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND ANY
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR (2) THE COMPANY RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE HOLDER
OF THIS WARRANT OR SUCH SECURITIES, WHICH COUNSEL AND OPINION ARE REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE
COMPANY, THAT THIS WARRANT OR SUCH SECURITIES, AS APPLICABLE, MAY BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED,
ASSIGNED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN THE MANNER CONTEMPLATED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
 THE TRANSFER OF THIS WARRANT IS RESTRICTED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN.
 CLAIMSNET.COM INC.
 Warrants for the Purchase
of
1,000,000 Shares of Common Stock, Par Value $.001 per share
 No. W- 2006-EE01
    
    May 30, 2006
 THIS CERTIFIES Kent McRee CLAIMSNET.COM, INC.,




---



##### 



Section 1 Exercise of Warrant and Payment for Shares .
  Period of Warrant Holders ContinuousRelationship With the Company orAffiliate From the Date the Warrant is
    
    Portion of Total Warrant Which isGranted
    
    Exercisable1 year
    
    
    33.3
    %2 years
    
    
    66.6
    %3 years
    
    
    100
    %
        Section 2 Rights Upon Exercise; Delivery of Securities .




---



##### 



Section 3 Transferability .
  Section 4 Reservation of Shares .
  Section 5 Antidilution .




---



##### 



Section 6 Reclassification; Reorganization; Merger; Change of Control .
 Cash, Stock, or Other Property for Stock
 Conversion of Options on Stock for Exchange Stock




---



##### 








---



##### 



Section 7 Notice of Certain Events .
        Section 8 Charges and Taxes .
  Section 9 Periodic Reports .
  Section 10 Legend .




---



##### 



THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT), OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED,
ASSIGNED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS (1) A REGISTRATION STATEMENT WITH RESPECT THERETO IS
EFFECTIVE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR (2) THE COMPANY
RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE HOLDER OF THE SECURITIES, WHICH COUNSEL AND OPINION ARE
REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY, THAT SUCH SECURITIES MAY BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED,
ASSIGNED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN THE MANNER CONTEMPLATED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
 Section 11 Loss; Theft; Destruction; Mutilation .
  Section 12 Stockholder Rights .
  Section 13 Governing Law .
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 CLAIMSNET.COM INC.By:Name:            Don Crosbie
 1.
    
    Title: Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



FORM OF ASSIGNMENT
  
 
 Signature
 NOTICE




---



##### 



ELECTION TO EXERCISE
     Dated:
    
    
    
    
    
    Name(Print)Address:
 (Signature)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2073 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

7.5 percent adjusted gross income floor for the medical expense deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Ms. PORTER (for herself and Mr. MARCHANT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the 7.5 percent adjusted gross income floor for 

the medical expense deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF REDUCTION IN 

4 MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION FLOOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 213(a) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘10 per7 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘7.5 percent’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 (1) Section 213 of such Code is amended by 

10 striking subsection (f). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2073 IH

1 (2) Section 56(b)(1) of such Code is amended 

2 by striking subparagraph (B) and by redesignating 

3 subparagraphs (C), (D), (E), and (F), as subpara4 graphs (B), (C), (D), and (E), respectively. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De7 cember 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Agreement between Gain Star International Limited and Registrant



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 [Letterhead of Gain Star International Limited] 
  

			
	TO:	  	American Telecom Services Inc.
		
	ATTN:	  	Mr. Bruce
		
	DATE:	  	June 22, 2005

  
 Further to our previous discussions,
we would like to put forward the proposal as below to accommodate your request to start business before you get PO from the customers or chain stores: 
  
 Gain Star International Limited will grant ATS an LC facility up to US$500K on a 20% cash deposit books or standby LC. That is, ATS shall put 20% of the LC amount into
Gain Star’s bank account as deposit or issue a standby LC to Gain Star and then Gain Star will open 100% LC to the manufacturer when it receives ATS’ deposit. As preconditions, ATS shall sign the sales contract with Gain Star before the LC
is opened and a sample LC form shall be provided for Gain Star’s approval. 
  
 The afore-said deposit shall only be released and/or the standby LC shall be allowed to expire in the event that any of the following occurs: 1) ATS shall get CIT-approved PO and the Sales Contract along with the Assignment Agreement
between ATS and Gain Star covers the goods under relative LC; 2) ATS pays in full the LC amount plus the initial charges as stated in the Sales Contract to Gain Star. In such case, Gain Star agrees to return the deposit within 3 working days after
ATS written notification of the above mentioned occurrences and/or to allow the standby LC to expire. 
  
 Before the manufacturer effects delivery of the goods, ATS should receive approved PO from its customers and/or chain stores; the manufacturer shall never make delivery before ATS gets CIT-approved PO. 
  
 If the manufacture fails to make delivery or ATS fails to get CIT-approved PO within 90 days
after the LC issuing date, Gain Star shall still be entitled to the initial charges as stated in the Sales Contract. 
  
 As this is an accommodation for ATS before Pos are received, Gain Star can stop issuing the LC when it, by its own discretion, thinks appropriate. All these transactions
under this letter should be subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Contract as well. 
  
 For and On Behalf of 
  

	
	 GAIN STAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

	
	/S/ SUN KUONG WEI
	Authorized Signature(s)
**Exhibit
31.1 & 31.2**
 
 **RULE
13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e) CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Li,
Hong Jun, President and Acting Principal Accounting Officer, certify
that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Songzai International Holding
Group, Inc. (the “Company”).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  ****Date: April 21, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Li,
      Hong JunLi,
      Hong JunPresident,Acting
      Principal Accounting
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27151-27152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C.,

[[Page 27152]]

as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: May 10, 2001.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jeanne N. Ketley, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4130, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1789.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 8, 2001.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-12260 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - Docket No. RP01-335-001

      ( print page 27089)    
Take notice that on May 4, 2001, TransColorado Gas Transmission Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing, of its FERC Gas Tariff Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective May 1, 2001:

Substitute Eight Revised Sheet No. 203

Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 203.01

TransColorado states that this filing was tendered in compliance with the Commission's Order issued April 26, 2001, in Docket No. RP01-335-000, which directed TransColorado to make two corrections to its Order No. 587-M compliance filing in Docket No. RM96-1-015 filed March 30, 2001.

TransColorado states that a copy of this filing has been served upon TransColorado's customers, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission and the New Mexico Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 10426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

                    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12291  Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report of Heckmann Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2010



|       |  |                                                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Richard J. Heckmann                               |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brian R. Anderson                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Richard J. Heckmann                                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Brian R. Anderson                                                                     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Secretary of the Company and will be retained by the Office of General Counsel of the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
cone BINEWYORK

World Financial Center
OB ee Soe One North End Avenue, 13 Floor
New York, New York 10282

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

07-36
June 6, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary of the Commission
Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21% Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Request for Commission Rule Approval: Amendment to Rule 6.19 -
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(2) of the Act and Regulation 40.4(a)

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Section Sc(c)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.4(a), the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (“Exchange”)
is requesting approval of an amendment to Rule 6.19, attached as Exhibit A.

The Exchange has amended Rule 6.19 to raise the Any One Month speculative position
limit for Cotton No. 2 futures and options contracts to 3,500 futures equivalent contracts from
the previous 2,500 contract level. The increase brings the Exchange limit for this category to the
same level provided for in Commission Regulation 150.2. This amendment will bring all of the
Exchange’s Cotton No. 2 position limit levels to the same levels contained in the Regulation.

The Exchange certifies that the amendment complies with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The amendment to Rule 6.19 was adopted by the Exchange’s Board of Directors by
written unanimous consent in accordance with By-Law Section 4.7 on May 31, 2007 and will go
into effect on a date set by the President for all delivery months currently listed whether or not
there is open interest and all subsequently listed delivery months. No substantive opposing
views were expressed by members or others with respect to the amendment.


-2-

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 212-748-4084
or at jill.fassler@nybot.com.

Sincerely,

Jill S. Fassler
Vice President
Associate General Counsel

ce: Riva Adriance
Thomas Leahy
Martin Murray
CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper
CFTC, New York Regional Office


(In the text of the amendments below, additions are underlined and deletions are bracketed and
lined out.)

Rule 6.19. Position Limits for Cotton No. 2 Contracts

(a) Subject to the exceptions contained in this Chapter, the maximum net long or net short position
which any one (1) Person may hold or control in the Cotton No. 2 Contract is five thousand (5,000)
Futures Contracts and Futures Equivalent Contracts in all months combined and [#ve] three thousand five
hundred ((2]3,500) Futures Contracts and Futures Equivalent Contracts in any one (1) month.

(b) Subject to the exceptions contained in this Chapter, the maximum net long or net short position
which any one (1) Person may hold or control in the Cotton No. 2 Contract is three hundred (300) Futures
Contracts for any month for which delivery notices have been or may be, issued.

(c) The establishment of position limits for Cotton No. 2 Contracts shall be deemed to affect the terms
and conditions of the Cotton No. 2 Contract for purposes of By-Law Section 601(b)(i).

EXHIBIT A
A92A0942.

#### BROWNE v. TRUST COMPANY BANK.

(422 SE2d 669)

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Trust Company Bank brought suit in the State Court of DeKalb County on a note against Cecil Pharr, as principal, and Robert Browne, as guarantor. Pharr did not file an answer and judgment was entered against him by default. The court heard the case against Browne without a jury and awarded judgment in favor of the bank. Browne appeals.

In his sole enumeration of error, appellant contends that the trial court should have dismissed the complaint against him for “lack of jurisdiction over the person” of appellant. He cites OCGA § 15-7-4 as authority for the proposition that the trial court could not obtain jurisdiction over him because he was a resident of Fulton County and was not a joint obligor with Pharr, a DeKalb County resident. OCGA § 15-7-4, however, sets forth the subject matter jurisdiction of state courts and is not applicable to appellant’s claim of lack of personal *500jurisdiction. See *Williams v. Fuller,*244 Ga. 846, 849 (262 SE2d 135) (1979) for a discussion of the distinction between subject matter and personal jurisdiction. Having been served with process and having objected to personal jurisdiction solely on the basis that he was not a resident of the forum county, appellant presented only a question of venue. *Weddington v. Kumar,*149 Ga. App. 857, 858 (256 SE2d 141) (1979).

Decided September 17, 1992.

*J. Caleb Clarke III,*for appellant.

*Stokes, Lazarus & Carmichael, Richard J. Joseph,*for appellee.

Venue is established by the Georgia Constitution, which provides in pertinent part that “[s]uits against joint obligors . . . residing in different counties may be tried in either county.” Ga. Const., Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (1983). See OCGA § 9-10-31. Principals and guarantors, which under Georgia law are considered equivalent to principals and sureties, OCGA § 10-7-1, are “joint obligors” within the meaning of these vénue provisions and accordingly may be sued in the county of residence of either defendant. E.g., *National Bank of Ga. v. Moore,*159 Ga. App. 729-730, 733 (2) (285 SE2d 78) (1981); see *Concrete Coring Contractors v. Mechanical Contractors & Engineers,*220 Ga. 714, 719 (3) (141 SE2d 439) (1965). The “test of whether a verdict may be obtained against a nonresident is whether the verdict against the resident is authorized.” *Woods v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.,*110 Ga. App. 394, 397 (8) (138 SE2d 593) (1964). Since Pharr, appellant’s principal, resided in the county in which this action was filed and failed to file an answer, default judgment against Pharr was authorized. Thus, venue against appellant was proper in the forum, see id., and the trial court did not err by declining to dismiss the action.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 03, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 03, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0253. ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY, INC. d/b/a BLUE RIDGE

MOUNTAIN RECOVERY CENTER v. CHEROKEE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ITS

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV1843