alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27144-27145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than May 30, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

[[Page 27145]]

    1. Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole; Paris, France, to retain, 
indirectly through Banco Espirito Santo, S.A., Lisbon, Portugal, an 
existing investment in and acquire additional shares of Clarity 
Incentive Systems, New York, New York, and thereby continue engaging in 
data processing and management consulting activities pursuant to Secs.  
225.28(b)(9) and (b)(14) of Regulation Y.
    2. Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole; Paris, France, to retain, 
indirectly through Banco Espirito Banco Espirito Santo, S.A., Lisbon, 
Portugal, shares of FiNet.com, Inc., San Ramon, California, and thereby 
continue engaging in extending credit and activities related to 
extending credit pursuant to Secs.  225.28(b)(1) and (b)(2) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 10, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-12263 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
cmeé

FC.GF TS Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

October 10, 2006

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21 Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: Section Sc(c)(1) and Regulation Section 40.6. Certification of Normalizing Constant for
November 2006 Goldman Sachs Commodity Index. CME Submission #06-86.

Dear Ms. Donovan:
On October 5, 2006 Goldman Sachs set the Normalizing Constant to be used for settlement of
the November 2006 through January 2007 GSCI Futures and Options contracts. CME hereby

notifies the Commission that the Normalizing Constant is 5650.874

The Exchange certifies that these actions comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the
tules thereunder.

If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact Mr. Paul Peterson at (312)
930-4587 or via e-mail at ppeterso@cme.com. Please refer to CME Submission #06-86 in all
correspondence regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04507-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05377-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH     Document 2      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TE XAS

N O . P D 0 9 2 7 - 0 9
R I C H A R D C I S N E R O S , J R . , A p p e l l a n t

v . T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W F R O M T H E F O U R T E E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

H A R R I S C O U N T Y
P E R C U R IA M . M E Y E R S , J . d i s s e n t e d . We have deter

mined that ou r decision to g rant the appellant’ s petition was improvident. There fore , the petition is dism issed.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 12, 2011 Publis h
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 1 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 2 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 3 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 4 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 5 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 6 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 7 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 8 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 9 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 10 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 11 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 12 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 13 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 14 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 15 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 16 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 17 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 18 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 19 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 22      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 20 of 20
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. James T. DOYLE, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant.

No. 31,665.

CM 433690.

U. S. Court of Military Appeals.

Jan. 2, 1979.

Appearances: For *Appellant*— Captain *Burén R. Shields, III*(on brief); *Captain Jay Sacks Cohen*(on brief); *Captain Larry C. Schafer*(on brief).

For *Appellee*— Colonel *Thomas H. Davis*(on brief); *Lieutenant Colonel R. R.*Boiler; *Major Steven M. Werner*(on brief); *Captain Douglas P. Franklin*(on brief).

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The appellant and others provided funds to purchase marihuana off base. The marihuana was to be delivered to the off-base residence of the appellant. At a subsequent time while appellant was on base he was informed that the marihuana would not be delivered to his residence, but rather, he would have to accept personal delivery off base. The appellant borrowed a van from on the base and proceeded off base where he obtained possession of the marihuana — his share and the quantity purchased by another person. After accepting delivery, appellant was arrested by civilian police. Appellant was charged by the military with possession of marihuana, the charge to which he entered a plea of guilty.

As we apply the jurisdictional criteria of *Relford v. Commandant,*401 U.S. 355, 91 S.Ct. 649, 28 L.Ed.2d 102 (1971), to these pertinent facts, we do not observe “service connection” support for court-martial jurisdiction. *O’Callahan v. Parker,*395 U.S. 258, 272, 89 S.Ct. 1683, 23 L.Ed.2d 291 (1969); *United States v. Alef,*3 M.J. 414 (C.M.A. 1977); *United States v. Sims,*2 M.J. 109 (C.M.A.1977); *United States v. Williams,*2 M.J. 81 (C.M.A.1976); *United States v. McCarthy,*2 M.J. 26 (C.M.A.1976); *United States v. Hedlund,*2 M.J. 11 (C.M.A.1976); *cf. United States v. Moore,*1 M.J. 448 (C.M., A.1976).

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings and sentence are set aside and the charge is ordered dismissed.

COOK, Judge

Judge”(dissenting):

In my opinion, the events that transpired on base establish the service connection of the off-base transaction. *See*my opinions in *United States v. Johnson,*4 M.J. 92 (C.M.A.1977), *United States v. Cherry,*4 M.J. 83 (C.M.A.1977), and *United States v. Burston,*4 M.J. 82, 83 (C.M.A.1977).
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal****Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 17, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
                Financial OfficerJuly
                29, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report of Heckmann Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 14, 2011



|       |  |                                                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Richard J. Heckmann                               |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brian R. Anderson                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Richard J. Heckmann                                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Brian R. Anderson                                                                     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Secretary of the Company and will be retained by the Office of General Counsel of the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 18-9 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 43 of 43
# C_2009131EN.01001201.xml

| 10.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/12

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 131/06

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Brive–Paris (Orly) and return |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 5 January 2010 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté of 5 May 2009 modifying PSO between Brive and Paris (Orly)
  NOR: DEVA0909086A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 0158094321 |
| osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Concerned route

Brive–Paris (Orly) and return

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

5 January 2010

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté of 5 May 2009 modifying PSO between Brive and Paris (Orly)

NOR: DEVA0909086A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 0158094321

osp-compagnies@dta.aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
SCWC-15-0000381

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STEPHEN L. PAULMIER, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000381; FC-CR No. 14-1-0101)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stephen L. Paulmier’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on October 15, 2018, is 

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 23, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000381

23-NOV-2018

11:18 AM
# C_2005191EN.01000401.xml

| 5.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 191/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Cyprus

Aid No: N69/2005

Title: Cyprus Airways (Rescue Aid)

Objective: Air transport

Legal basis: Απόφαση του Υπουργικού Συμβουλίου της Δημοκρατίας της Κύπρου της 3ης Φεβρουαρίου 2005 για τη χορήγηση ενίσχυσης διάσωσης στην Cyprus Airways Ltd

ης

Budget: State guarantee for a loan of CY£30 million, (€51 million)

Duration: The loan will be prepaid with 12 months

Other information: The Cypriot authorities have undertaken to notify a restructuring plan in respect of Cyprus Airways Ltd. within 6 months of the authorisation by the Commission of the rescue aid.

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption:

Member State: Estonia

Aid number: N 601/2004

Title: Promotion of research and development

Objective: R&D aid for large enterprises (all sectors)

Legal basis: Majandus- ja kommunikatsiooniministri määrus ‘Eesti riikliku arengukava Euroopa Liidu struktuurifondide kasutuselevõtuks — ühtne programmdokument aastateks 2004-2006’ meetme nr 2.3 ‘Teadus- ja arendustegevuse ning innovatsiooni edendamine’ osa ‘Teadus- ja arendustegevuse projektide toetamine’ tingimused

Budget: Total budget 2,56 Mi€

Intensity or amount: Up to 50 % for industrial research projects.

Up to 25 % for pre-competitive development activities.

Up to 75 % for feasibility studies preparatory to industrial research activities.

Up to 50 % for feasibility studies preparatory to pre-competitive development activities.

The bonuses can be applied.

Duration: 1.1.2005-31.12.2006

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
Exhibit 10.5


 


Schedule


 


Following
is the Amendment to the Employment Agreement of Christopher J. Kearney
Regarding Vacation Accrual.


 


Amendments
were also executed by each of the following executives.  Each Amendment is identical to the following
Amendment in all respects other than the parties thereto.  Pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K, only the Agreement with Mr. Kearney is being filed, together
with the following schedule setting forth the names of the parties to the other
Agreements.


 




	
  Name

  
	
   

  
	
  Robert
  B. Foreman

  
	
  Thomas
  J. Riordan

  
	
  Patrick
  O’Leary

  






 


 


Amendment to Employment Agreement


Regarding Vacation Accrual


 


 


This shall constitute an amendment to the Employment agreement dated February 23,
2005 (the “Agreement”) between Christopher J. Kearney (the “Executive”) and SPX
Corporation (“SPX”) pursuant to Section 9 of the Agreement, and shall be
effective as of October 26, 2005.


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement specifies a minimum annual vacation entitlement
and permits the Executive to carry over unused vacation for up to twelve (12)
months; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to cap the maximum permitted accrual at the
amount of the Executive’s annual vacation entitlement on a prospective basis
and without forfeiture of any previously earned and accrued entitlement;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


Section 4(f) states as follows:


 


Vacation.  The Executive will be entitled to vacation in
accordance with the Company’s vacation policy for senior executive officers,
but in no event less than 5


 





















 


weeks per calendar year.  Unused vacation shall be carried over for a
period not in excess of twelve (12) months.


 


Section 4(f) shall be superseded and replaced in its entirety
by the following provision:


 


Vacation.  The Executive will be entitled to vacation in
accordance with the Company’s vacation policy for officers, but in no event
less than 5 weeks per calendar year.  The
maximum vacation accrual allowed from year to year and at any given time will
equal Executive’s annual entitlement. 
Once the maximum accrual is reached, Executive will no longer accrue
vacation until the unused amount accrued is below the maximum level allowed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above
written.


 


	
  EXECUTIVE ACCEPTANCE

  	
   

  	
          SPX CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Christopher J. Kearney

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
  :     /s/ Ross B.
  Bricker

  
	
  Christopher J. Kearney

  	
   

  	
          Ross
  B. Bricker

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
          Its:

  	
  Senior Vice President, Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  and General Counsel

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
          Date:

  	
  December 21, 2005