alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 34 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 40 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 12 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 12 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-212680) and Amendment No. 727 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
      individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    December 20, 2019
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, George E. Crapple,Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the ManagingOwner of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Global Macro Trust;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;

 

4. The Trust’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Trust and have:

 

  (a)  designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Trust,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of theTrust’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  (c) presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Trust’s auditorsand the audit committee of the Trust’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Trust’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the Trust’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

  (b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Trust’s internal controls; and

 

6.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| By:                         | /s/ George E. Crapple |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                        |
|                        |
| George E. Crapple           |
| Co-Chief Executive  Officer |
| March 30, 2005         |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05712-MHD     Document 14      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### THORNTON *v.*CITY OF NATCHEZ.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.

No. 462.

Motion to dismiss or affirm.

Submitted November 16, 1908.

Decided November 30, 1908.

Writ of error to review judgment of state court, 88 Mississippi, 1, dismissed for want of jurisdiction under § 709, Rev. Stat., without opinion. . .

*Mr. Robert H. Thompson, Mr. Thomas A. McWittie*and *Mr. William C. Martin*for defendants in error in support of the motion.

*Mr. Wade R. Young*for plaintiffs in error in opposition to motion to dismiss.

*Per Curiam:*

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *Thornton*v. *Natchez,*88 Mississippi, 1; *S. C.,*129 Fed. Rep. 86, 87; *S. C.,*197 U. S. 620; *Harrison*v. *Myer,*92 U. S. *111; Moran*v. *Horsky,*178 U. S. 205; *New Orleans Water Works Co.*v. *Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.,*125 U. S. 18; *St. Paul Gas Light Co.*v. *St. Paul,*181 U. S. 142, 148; *Beals*v. *Cone,*188 U. S. 184; *Winona & St. Peter Railroad Company*v. *Plainview,*143 U. S. 371, 390; *Hammond*v. *Johnston,*142 U. S. 73.
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05794-MGC Document 20-5 Filed 09/10/2008 Page 13 of 13
142 So. 774

#### Oliver McNUTT v. STATE.

8 Div. 419.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 2, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 23, 1932.

Seybourn H. Lynne, of Decatur, for petitioner.

*283Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

On Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the original consideration of this cause, the writ was denied without an opinion. Counsel for the defendant, upon rehearing, stresses in support of same error upon the part of the trial court as to an exception to the oral charge as well as a refusal of his requested charge D. It is sufficient to say, in response to this insistence, that these questions were not so treated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals as to enable this court to review same upon certiorari.

As stated in the case of Whisenant v. State, 223 Ala. 550, 137 So. 457: “If, as counsel suggest, the question was argued and insisted upon in said court, it should have been so treated as to enable' the defendant to present the question to this court. But, as such was not done, the mere general statement by the Court of Appeals, ‘We see nowhere prejudicial error,’ is not sufficient to call upon this court to pass on a legal question not discussed or treated by the Court of Appeals.”

See, also, Simpson v. State, 214 Ala. 176, 106 So. 898; Folmar v. State, 217 Ala. 410, 116 So. 112.

Application overruled.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
SUBMISSION COVER SHEET

Registered Entity Identifier Code (optional) Date: April 10, 2019

I M P O R T A N T: CHECK BOX IF CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED. 

ORGANIZATION ICE Trade Vault, LLC

 FILING AS A: DCM SEF DCO X SDR ECM/SPDC 

TYPE OF FILING

 Rules and Rule Amendments 

 X Certification under § 40.6 (a) or § 41.24 (a)

 “Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change” under § 40.4 (b)(5)

 Notification under § 40.6 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.4 (a) or § 40.5 (a)

 Advance Notice of SIDCO Rule Change under § 40.10 (a)

 Products

 Certification under § 39.5(b), § 40.2 (a), or § 41.23 (a)

 Swap Class Certification under § 40.2 (d)

 Request for Approval under § 40.3 (a)

 Novel Derivative Product Notification under § 40.12 (a)

RULE NUMBERS

ICE Trade Vault, LLC Rulebook

DESCRIPTION

ICE Trade Vault, LLC has amended the ICE Trade Vault Rulebook to revise requirements 

related to exotic swaps. The amended ICE Trade Vault Fee Rulebook is scheduled to be 

effective on April 24, 2019.
EXHIBIT 4.1
                                                                     -----------





                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED TREY
                    RESOURCES, INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


The Board of Directors through unanimous written consent on December 13, 2005
amended the Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") by
deleting the reference to "6 million shares of the Company Class A, Common
Stock, par value $.00001" in Section 5 of the Plan and replacing it with "20
million shares of the Company Class A, Common Stock, par value $.00001".
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12195]



[[Page 24409]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

May 8, 2001.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Wednesday, May 16, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:
    1. Alan Good, Docket Nos. WEST 2000-44-M, etc. (Issues include 
whether the judge erred when he found that Alan Good violated (1) 30 
CFR 56.11002 for failure to provide handrails on elevated platforms, 
(2) 30 CFR 56.14101(a)(3) for an inoperative parking brake on a front-
end loader, and (3) 30 CFR 56.14107(a) for inadequate guards on moving 
machine parts).

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Thursday, May 17, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:
    1. Sec'y of Labor on behalf of Bernardyn v. Reading Anthracite Co., 
Docket Nos. PENN 99-129-D, etc. (Issues include whether substantial 
evidence supports the judge's finding that the operator's discharge of 
the complainant did not violate section 105(c) of the Mine Act).
    Any person attending an open meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sandra G. Farrow,
Acting Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 01-12195 Filed 5-10-01; 12:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7669

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CR-94-297, CA-98-2795-4-12) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Patrick Lamar Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United Stats v. Harris , Nos. CR-94-297; CA-98-2795-4-12 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23
 
 John T. Boyd Company
 Mining and Geological Consultants
 
 October 19, 2009
 
 We hereby consent to the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to our resource estimates as of December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2007, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Songzai International Holding Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
of the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, to our resource estimates as of December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2007, in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 Respectfully Submitted,
 
 JOHN T.  BOYD COMPANY
 
 /s/ John T. Boyd
 
 By:  John T. Boyd II
 President & Chief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1902 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow officers and employees 

of the Department of the Treasury to provide to taxpayers information 

regarding low-income taxpayer clinics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself and Mr. LEWIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow officers and employees of the Department of the Treasury 

to provide to taxpayers information regarding low-income 

taxpayer clinics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF INFORMATION REGARDING 

4 LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS. 

5 Section 7526(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 

7 paragraph: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1902 IH

1 ‘‘(6) PROVISION OF INFORMATION REGARDING

2 QUALIFIED LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS.—Not3 withstanding any other provision of law, officers and 

4 employees of the Department of the Treasury may— 

5 ‘‘(A) advise taxpayers of the availability of, 

6 and eligibility requirements for receiving, advice 

7 and assistance from qualified low-income tax8 payer clinics receiving funding under this sec9 tion, and 

10 ‘‘(B) provide information regarding the lo11 cation of, and contact information for, such 

12 clinics.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 22 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 23 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 24 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 25 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 26 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 27 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 28 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 29 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 30 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 31 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 32 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 33 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 34 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 35 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 36 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 37 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 38 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 39 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 40 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-05860-LTS Document 1-2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 41 of 41
#### Nicholas S. Vaccaro et al., Appellants, v Arthur Weber, Respondent.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered February 11, 1988, which is in favor of the defendant and against them, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

While we view with disapproval the trial court’s frequent intervention in the trial proceedings to question witnesses, upon our review of the record we find that the plaintiffs were not deprived of a fair trial.

The plaintiffs’ remaining claims of error with respect to the court’s charge are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 3592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 30, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Worth Bancorp, Spartanburg, Indiana; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Worth Bank (in 
organization), Spartanburg, Indiana, which will merge with Greensfork 
Township State Bank, Spartanburg, Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 10, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-1227 Filed 01-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S