alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-409-000]


Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 8, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 4, 2001, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline 
L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be 
effective June 4, 2001:

First Revised Sheet No. 201
Original Sheet No. 309
Sheet Nos. 310-399

    Maritimes states that the purpose of this filing is to amend its 
tariff, as suggested by the Commission in its April 12, 2001, Order 
Denying Clarification and Rehearing in Docket No. CP95-218-004, to 
include a generic waiver of the ``shipper must have title'' rule and a 
general statement that it will only transport for others on off-system 
capacity pursuant to its existing tariff and rates.
    Maritimes states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-11985 Filed 5-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,482-03

EX P ARTE MARK

WILHE LM, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. B-37,085 IN THE 161 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisio n s o f Ar t i cle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indece ncy with

a child by contac t a

nd sentenc ed to f

ifteen year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he did not prese nt de fensive evidenc e in opposition to the motion to adjudicate , and did not prese nt e vidence to mitigate punishment. The habea s rec ord contains no response from counsel and no finding s from the trial cour

t. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these2

circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to r espond to A pplicant’s claims of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. It appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it shall deter

mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indi gen t and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make fin d i n gs o f fac t and conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so, whether counsel’s d ef i cient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant—either insofar as it cause d his plea to be involuntary , or did not mitigat e Ap p l i ca n t ’s punishment. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The i s s ues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcript conta i n i n g al l aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

13, 2016 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of GelTech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Cordani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Cordani                                                  
|Michael Cordani
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 16, 2009





In connection with the quarterly report of GelTech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Hull, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Hull                                                  
|Michael Hull
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: November 16, 2009
ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN SAMUEL LEIGH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-WCB; 3:04-cv-00022-WCB) Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Henry Nave, CHARLES H. NAVE, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Samuel Leigh seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We previously dismissed the appeal, but subsequently granted rehearing. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). Although the district court erroneously concluded that Leigh failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Leigh has not made the requisite showing for issuance of a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.- 3 - DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cr-00560-DFE Document 2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00560-DFE Document 2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00560-DFE Document 2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00560-DFE Document 2 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-01699-AKH Document 20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05317-AKH Document 3 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 5 of 5
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: October 2, 2014 518362

________________________________ In the Matter of MIGUEL CASTRO, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 4, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Miguel Castro, Elmira, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Fitzgerald, J.), entered March 27, 2013 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.-2- 518362

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
William J. Honan (WJH 1922)

Michael J. Frevola (MJF 8359)

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

195 Broadway

New York, NY 10007-3189

(212)513-3200

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

WILHELMSEN PREMIER MARINE FUELS AS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

WILHELMSEN PREMIER MARINE FUELS AS,

Plaintiff,

-againstUBS PROVEDORES PTY LTD. a/k/a USB-USS

INTERNATIONAL,

Defendant.

I/

t ?

07 Civ.

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

OF REQUEST FOR AN

ORDER APPOINTING

PERSONS TO

SERVE PROCESS

STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK )

Michael J. Frevola, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am a member of the firm of Holland & Knight LLP, attorneys for plaintiff

Wilhelmsen Premier Marine Fuels ("Plaintiff), and I am duly admitted to practice before the

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. I am fully familiar with all

the facts in the above case.

Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
2. This affidavit is made in support of Plaintiffs application for an Order to appoint

Elvin Ramos and/or Rudy D. Green and/or Jerome Wills and/or Willis Vargas and/or Rapid and

Reliable Attorney Service, individuals or representatives of whom are all over 18 years of age

and are not a party to or an attorney in this action, to serve the Writ and Order of Attachment and

Garnishment, Summons, Verified Complaint, Affidavit in Support and Interrogatories on the

Gamishees.

3. The granting of this request will result in a material savings in process and travel

expenses.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Order be granted appointing Elvin

Ramos, Rudy D. Green, Jerome Wills, Willis Vargas, a person from Rapid and Reliable Attorney

Service, or any one of them to serve process in this matter upon the above named defendant and

the garnishees.

Sworn to before me this

19th day of June, 2007

Notary Public

j-. ctato of New York

# 4609640 vl Notary £U""°kf i|te

"

Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
May 11, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21 Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2671.01

Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:
Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following revised trading hours for CBOT South American Soybean futures (all
times shown are Chicago time):

- e-cbot® electronic trading from 6:31 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. and from 9:00 a.m. to
1:15 p.m. (The 9:00 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. trading period is new.)

- open auction trading from 9:00 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. (Previous open auction hours
were 9:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.)

The CBOT intends to implement these trading hour changes beginning May 15, 2006.
There were no opposing views concerning these changes.

The CBOT certifies that these changes comply with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

6042506
EXHIBIT
      13.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of ChineseWorldNet.com, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe Kin Foon
      Tai,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that , to the
      best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  July
      17,
      2006


/s/ *Joe
      Kin Foon Tai*


Joe
      Kin
      Foon Tai


Chief
      Executive Officer
502 166% 9% WOL-4851g 2 NOC 112463 PMIO4TIZ-', CHE AD! ATTY N2D1GRB4,TT, $76 20000300 COZS'L, $02 11

: . 190 South LaSalle Sreet, Suite 800 312.5543
Chicago Climate Exchange” Chicago, tinois 60603 F 312.5583

September 14, 2006

Ms. Jean A. Webb z=
Secretary ares!
o

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21% Street, N.W.

Washington, C.C. 20581

Re: Chicago Climate Futures Exchange, LLC
Submission No. 06-08

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”) and Parts 40.6 of
the regulations promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) under the Act,
Chicago Climate Futures Exchange, LLC (“CCFE”) hereby submits amended Rule 615 “Simultaneous
Buying and Selling Orders” and new Rule 616 “Prohibited Same Account Buying and Selling” to clarify
procedures for accepting and entering Orders.

CCFE intends to make these amendments effective as of September 15, 2006. The Exchange certifies
that these amendments neither violate nor are inconsistent with any portion of the Act or of the rules
thereunder.

Amarked copy of the amended Rule 615 and new Rule 616 is attached hereto.

Should you require additional information regarding this submission, please contact me at 312.554.0812.
Please reference our submission number 06-08 in any related correspondence.

Very ti urs,

Ann M. Cresce
Senior Vice President & General Counsel

bal

enc.

cc: Riva Adriance
Martin Murray
Gregory Price

www.chicagoclimateexchange.cr

gy NOK BGLZ VOCLI2613"y PIO AZZ, CM IDBGrTT!, 870.1099 077,
ss “ °



615. Simultaneous Buying and Selling Orders

()+(a) No Trading Privilege Holder (including its Authorized
Traders) may accept or cnter simultaneous buy and sell Orders from
the same Customer for the same delivery month of a particular Future.

4+(b)_A Trading Privilege Holder (including its Authorized
Traders) holding Orders to buy and sell at the same time from different
Customers for the same month of a particular Future may enter both
Orders into the CCFE Trading Platform.

616. Prohibited Same Account Buying and Selling

Authorized Traders) shall_not

A Trading Privilege Holder (including its
a fount with

sunt with the same benelicial owner,
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05830-CM Document 19-9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 4
cmesé

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax
www.cme.com
December 1, 2006
Ms. Eileen Donovan 2°
o 4

Office of the Secretariat > 5
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20581

Re: Section Sc(c)(1), Regulation 40.6(a) Submission. Exchange Certification for =
Amendments to CME Frost Days Index and Seasonal Frost Index Futures and Options
contracts.

CME Submission #06-112

Dear Ms. Donovan:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. hereby informs the Commission regarding the
amendments to CME Frost Days and Seasonal Frost Days Index Futures and Options
contracts. There is no open interest in any of the contract months, therefore the
amendments can take effect on Monday, December 11, 2006.

The Exchange certifies that CME Frost Day and Seasonal Frost Index Futures and
Options complies with the Act and rules thereunder.

CME FROST DAYS INDEX FUTURES
41602. FUTURES CALL

41602.B. Size of Trading Unit
The size of the unit of trading shall be [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€) times the
respective CME Frost Days Index.

41602.C. Price Increments
The minimum price fluctuation on the respective CME Frost Days Index futures
shall be 1 index point and have a value of [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€).



416A01.

41702.

417A01,.

Ms. Eileen Donovan

CME Frost Days and Seasonal Index Futures and Options
December I, 2006

Page 3 of 4

OPTIONS ON CME FROST DAYS INDEX FUTURES
OPTION CHARACTERISTICS
416A01.C. Minimum Fluctuations
The price of an option shall be quoted in terms of the respective CME Frost
Days Index. Each index point represents [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€). For
example, a quote of 2 index points represents [20,000] 2,000 Euros (€). The
minimum fluctuation shall be 1.0 index point (also known as one tick), equal to
[48,009] 1,000 Euros (€).

CME SEASONAL FROST DAYS INDEX FUTURES

FUTURES CALL
41702.B. Size of Trading Unit

The size of the unit of trading shall be [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€) times the
respective CME Seasonal Frost Days Index.

41702.C. Price Increments
The minimum price fluctuation on the respective CME Seasonal Frost Days
Index futures shall be | index point and have a value of [40,000] 1,000 Euros
(€).

OPTIONS ON CME SEASONAL FROST DAYS INDEX FUTURES
OPTION CHARACTERISTICS

417A01.C. Minimum Fluctuations

The price of an option shall be quoted in terms of the respective CME Seasonal Frost
Days Index. Each index point represents [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€). For example, a quote
of 2 index points represents [20,000] 2,000 Euros (€). The minimum fluctuation shall be
1.0 index point (also known as one tick), equal to [40,000] 1,000 Euros (€).


Ms. Eileen Donovan

CME Frost Days and Seasonal Index Futures and Options
December |, 2006

Page 4 of 4

If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Charles Piszezor at 312-930-4536 or via e-mail at cpiszcezo@cme.com. We
would be appreciative if you could reference our CME Submission #06-112 in any related
correspondence.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development
RECEIVED

CRTC.

2 .

79S JUL 28 PH Hips, 2006
BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE Ure. Gr THE SECRETARIAT
Office of the Secretariat 3
Commodity Futures Trading Commission mmc
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: NYMEX Submission 06.90 (Replaces Submission 06.88):

Clarification on the Listing of the Heating Oil Financial Contract
(code BH) on NYMEX ClearPortTM Clearing system on July 23, 2006.

Dear CFTC Commissioners:

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is replacing its
previous submission 06.88 to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or
“Commission”) to clarify the listing of the Heating Oil Financial futures contract (Symbol BH)
on the NYMEX ClearPortTM Clearing platform.

The Heating Oil Financial futures contract was listed for clearing on the NYMEX
ClearPortTM Clearing system on Sunday evening, July 23, 2006 for trade date Monday, July 24,
2006. This Contract will continue to be listed for trading on the CME Globex system, which
became effective on June 11, 2006. This Contract is listed under NYMEX Rule chapter 825.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“‘Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6,
the Exchange hereby certifies that this listing complies with the Act, including regulations under
the Act. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Daniel Brusstar,
Director, Research, at (212) 299-2604; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research