alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23965-23966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11821]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3659]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations; ``Mies in Berlin''

DEPARTMENT: United States Department of State.

[[Page 23966]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
[79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459], the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681 et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit ``Mies 
in Berlin,'' imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without 
profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These 
objects will be imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign 
lenders. I also determine that the temporary exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, in New York, NY, from 
on or about June 21, 2001, to on or about September 11, 2001, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6529). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: May 2, 2001.
Helena Kane Finn,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-11821 Filed 5-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 10 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 10 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05785-PAC Document 10 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
# FCM DATA June 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending November 30, 2001 (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Michael R. Quinn



Michael R. Quinn,

 Principal Financial Officer and Director

May 28, 2004
Exhibit 10.18

FORM OFthinkorswim Group Inc.  2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN  Notice and Agreement of Grant of Stock Option

TO:FROM:

Compensation Committee of the Board of DirectorsDATE:

XXXX


At
the direction of the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors of thinkorswim Group Inc. (the "Company"), you are hereby notified that on XXXX, 20XX (the "Date of
Grant") the Committee has granted to you an option to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company (the "Option"), pursuant to the thinkorswim Group Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2001
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), as amended from time to time, which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this agreement. This agreement evidences the Option that was granted to you.
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as in the Plan.



---









thinkorswim Group Inc. Compensation Committee



[Officer]

I
hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and the Plan Prospectus, copies of which are annexed hereto, and represent that I am familiar with the terms and provisions thereof and hereby accept
the Option, subject to all the terms and provisions of the Plan and this agreement. I hereby

2

---



agree
to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Compensation Committee with respect to any question arising under the Plan.

Employee:Date:


3

---



QuickLinks
#### Paulruth Trading Co., Appellant, v Pauline Hoffman et al., Respondents.

In an action for a judgment declaring the plaintiff to be the owner of certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (LeVine, J.), dated March 11, 1988, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination dismissing the complaint as time barred, vacating the notice of pendency, and denying the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the respondent Estate of Mae Marcus.

In June 1962, Paulruth Trading Company transferred the real property at issue herein to the defendants Pauline Hoffman and Phyllis Schact, and the defendant estate’s decedent, Mae Marcus. Hoffman, Schact, and Marcus contemporaneously entered into a partnership agreement creating Paulruth Trading Company for the purpose of "operating and managing real estate”. More than 20 years later, and after the death of Marcus, a dispute arose as to the ownership of the subject property. Thus in 1987 the partnership commenced this action, by which it sought, *inter alia,*a judgment declaring it to be the owner of the property, alleging that "the Partners neglected to execute a deed transferring the record ownership from their individual names to the name of the Partnership”. Shortly thereafter, the defendant estate moved *689to dismiss the complaint, *inter alia,*as time barred and because it failed to state a cause of action. The motion was joined in by the defendant Schact. Upon a finding that "the gravaman of the plaintiff’s cause of action is mistake”, the court applied a six-year Statute of Limitations and dismissed the action as time barred. We hereby affirm, but do so on the basis that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

The documents appended to the complaint, i.e., the 1962 deed and partnership agreement, conclusively refute the allegation, contained in the complaint, that "the Partnership was organized for the purpose of owning and thereafter operating, *inter alia,*the Property”, an allegation vital to the plaintiff’s cause of action. It cannot seriously be disputed, and in fact is not disputed by the parties herein, that these evidentiary submissions, provided by the plaintiff, may be considered on this motion to dismiss the complaint *(see, Rovello v Orofino Realty Co.,*40 NY2d 633, 635-636). Upon consideration of these evidentiary submissions and review of the complaint, we find that the plaintiff has not stated a cause of action upon which declaratory relief may be based. Thus, the complaint was properly dismissed.

We further find that the court properly denied the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint *(see, Sharapata v Town of Islip,*82 AD2d 350, 362, *affd*56 NY2d 332).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the issue of whether the Supreme Court properly determined that the cause of action was time barred. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-6 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### Sarah H. Feness, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Craig P. Feness, Deceased, Appellant, v St. Joseph Intercommunity Hospital et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, plaintiff’s motion granted, and defendants’ motion denied. Memorandum: In this medical malpractice action for the wrongful death of her husband, plaintiff moved to compel disclosure of statements made by a party defendant at defendant hospital’s review committee meeting investigating decedent’s death. Defendants hospital and Dr. Das cross-moved for a protective order, contending that disclosure of handwritten minutes of medical review committee proceedings is prohibited by Education Law §6527 (3). Special Term erred in denying plaintiff’s motion, and in granting the motion for a protective order. An in camera inspection of notes taken at the review committee is required to determine whether statements by Dr. Bergmann, a defendant, are included, and, if so, such statements are subject to disclosure under the statute and should be furnished to plaintiff *(see, De Paolo v Wisoff,*94 AD2d 694; *Carroll v St. Luke’s Hosp.,*91 AD2d 674; *see also, Lilly v Turecki,*112 AD2d 788). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Per Högård, certify that: 1.             I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Preem Holdings AB (publ); 2.             Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.             Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report; 4.             The
companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a)Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and (c)Disclosed in this report any change in
the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and 5.             The
companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:
  April 29, 2004By:
  /s/ Per HöjgårdName:
  Per HöjgårdTitle:
  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 24177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11950]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From Requirements

    Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads have petitioned the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance 
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of 
49 CFR part 236 as detailed below.
Docket No. FRA-2001-9022
    Applicant: Canadian National/Illinois Central, Mr. L.W. Winn, 
Manager-Signal & Communications, 2921 Horn Lake Road, Memphis, 
Tennessee 38109.
    The Illinois Central Railroad seeks approval of the discontinuance 
and removal of the existing signal arrangement, consisting of two 
signals, at milepost 148.6, on the Gulf Division, Central Subdivision, 
near Natchez, Mississippi.
    The reason given for the proposed changes is that the signal 
arrangement is no longer necessary, because it is within yard limits 
where all movements must be coordinated with the person in charge of 
the yard at Natchez, Mississippi.
    Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be 
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
    All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified 
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice 
will be considered by the FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401 (Plaza Level), 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. All documents in the 
public docket are also available for inspection and copying on the 
internet at the docket facility's Web site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.
    FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral 
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
for public hearing.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 7, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator forSafety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-11950 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
```
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martine Caron, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   January 12, 2011
 
 MARTINE CARON
 Martine Caron
 Chief Executive Officer,
 President and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision 

# DATES:

Submit written comments on or before February 2, 2001. 

*OMB Number:*                         1550-0059.                     

*Form Number:*                         OTS Form 1583.                     

*Type of Review:*                         Regular.                     

*Title:*                         Capital Distribution.                     

*Description:*                         Provides uniform treatment for capital distributions made by savings associations held by holding companies. Ensures adequate supervision of distribution of capital by those savings associations, thereby fostering safety and soundness of the thrift industry.                     

*Respondents:*                         Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.                     

*Estimated Number of Responses:*                         687.                     

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Response:*                         4 hours.                     

*Frequency of Response:*                         Once per occurrence.                     

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                         2,748 hours.                     

*Clearance Officer:*                         Ralph E. Maxwell, (202) 906-7740, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.                     

*OMB Reviewer:*                         Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                     

John E. Werner, 

Director, Information & Management Services.

[FR Doc. 01-123 Filed 1-2-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quantum Materials Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Squires, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRESStephen SquiresPrincipal Executive OfficerNovember 16, 2012
Clear All

        26 December 2022    

                    USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) spends Christmas in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania                 
                The Lewis B. Puller-class expeditionary sea base USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) spent the Christmas season in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania after arriving in the Tanzanian port for a scheduled visit, Dec. 22, 2022.            

        13 August 2022    

                    USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) Arrives in Tanzania                 
                DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania - The Lewis B. Puller-class expeditionary sea base USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB 4) arrived in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania for a scheduled port visit, Aug. 13, 2022.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
November 28, 2006

2
=
2S
©
i

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21 Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C, 20581

ZI OAV 60 AGH Fee

LWISVLAUITS 2!

Reference File # 2746.01

Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Early listing of August and September 2008 Soybean, mini-sized Soybean,
Soybean Meal and Soybean Oil futures.

These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading as of March 15 and May 15,
2007, respectively. Due to customer demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier
than usual (i.e., as of November 29, 2006).

This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.
There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

TM

‘OLS
CSAS