alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
PeopleNet International Corporation

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of PeopleNet International Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and
cash flows for the two years period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of PeopleNet International Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the two years period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

The Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles
applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the
normal course of business. The Company has accumulated deficit of $18,912,157 and the Company's total liabilities
exceeded the total assets by $723,188 as of December 31, 2003. These factors as discussed in Note 14 to the financial
statements raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 14. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Fountain Valley, California
March 23, 2004
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1871 

To render certain military parents eligible for adjustment of status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2019 

Mr. CARBAJAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To render certain military parents eligible for adjustment 

of status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Patriot Par5 ents Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR CERTAIN MILITARY 

7 PARENTS. 

8 Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1255) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1871 IH

1 ‘‘(n)(1) In applying this section to an alien described 

2 in paragraph (2)— 

3 ‘‘(A) such alien shall be deemed, for purposes 

4 of subsection (a), to have been inspected and admit5 ted into the United States; and 

6 ‘‘(B) in determining the alien’s admissibility as 

7 an immigrant— 

8 ‘‘(i) paragraphs (6)(A), (7)(A), and (9)(B) 

9 of section 212(a) shall not apply; and 

10 ‘‘(ii) the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

11 in the discretion of the Secretary, may waive 

12 the application of paragraphs (6)(C), (9)(A), 

13 and (9)(C) of section 212(a) if the alien estab14 lishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary that 

15 the alien does not pose a threat to the public 

16 and has not committed any criminal offenses in 

17 violation of Federal or State law unrelated to 

18 the alien’s status. 

19 ‘‘(2) An alien is described in this paragraph if the 

20 alien— 

21 ‘‘(A) is a parent of a United States citizen 

22 who— 

23 ‘‘(i) is or was serving on active duty in the 

24 United States Armed Forces or in a reserve 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1871 IH

1 component of the United States Armed Forces; 

2 and 

3 ‘‘(ii) if discharged or released from service 

4 in the Armed Forces, was discharged or re5 leased under honorable conditions; and 

6 ‘‘(B) is the beneficiary of a petition for classi7 fication under section 204(a)(1)(A) as an immediate 

8 relative (as defined in section 201(b)) by reason of 

9 the parental relationship to such citizen.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Suzanne Rivera, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jose Rivera, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Max Goldstein, Defendant, and Flynn-Meye Kissena, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Norman L. Reiffman et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal from of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated January 4, 1988, which granted the respondents’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any third-party claims asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*557The instant action arises from an accident in which the defendant Max Goldstein lost control of his motor vehicle causing it to crash through a fence around an outdoor dining area of the McDonald Corporation killing Jose Rivera, a restaurant patron. It is the plaintiffs’ contention that the respondents were negligent in not erecting, designing, or maintaining a fence around the outdoor eating area which would have halted the impact from Goldstein’s automobile.

Where the evidence as to the cause of an accident is undisputed, the question as to whether any act or omission of the defendant was a proximate cause thereof is one for the court and not for the jury *(Rivera v City of New York,*11 NY2d 856). Unquestionably, a proximate cause of the accident was the fact that Goldstein lost control of his motor vehicle, causing it to crash through the fence of the restaurant and strike Rivera. There will ordinarily be no duty imposed on a defendant to prevent a third party from causing harm to another unless the intervening act which caused the plaintiff’s injuries was a normal or foreseeable consequence of the situation created by the defendant’s negligence *(Boltax v Joy Day Camp,*67 NY2d 617). The plaintiffs failed to set forth any evidentiary facts to demonstrate that this particular accident was not a unique occurrence. The fact that the outdoor dining and play area were near two major thoroughfares and the fact that the fence could not withstand the impact of a runaway automobile is insufficient to establish the respondents’ liability for the unforeseeable event of a driver losing control of his vehicle *(see, Grandy v Bavaro,*134 AD2d 957; *Marcroft v Carvel Corp.,*120 AD2d 651; *cf, Arena v Ostrin,*134 AD2d 306). The restaurant was merely the location of the accident, not the cause *(see, Benjamin v City of New York,*99 AD2d 995, *affd*64 NY2d 44). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-28 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 9 of 9
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1870 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand affordability of 

health insurance for working families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2019 

Ms. WILD (for herself, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

affordability of health insurance for working families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Health Care 

5 Affordability Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPAND AFFORDABILITY FOR WORKING FAMILIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 36B(c)(2)(C) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

9 as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1870 IH

1 ‘‘(i) COVERAGE MUST BE AFFORD2 ABLE.— 

3 ‘‘(I) EMPLOYEES.—An employee 

4 shall not be treated as eligible for 

5 minimum essential coverage if such 

6 coverage consists of an eligible em7 ployer-sponsored plan (as defined in 

8 section 5000A(f)(2)) and the employ9 ee’s required contribution (within the 

10 meaning of section 5000A(e)(1)(B)) 

11 with respect to the plan exceeds 9.5 

12 percent of the employee’s household 

13 income. 

14 ‘‘(II) FAMILY MEMBERS.—An in15 dividual who is eligible to enroll in an 

16 eligible employer-sponsored plan (as 

17 defined in section 5000A(f)(2)) by 

18 reason of a relationship the individual 

19 bears to the employee shall not be 

20 treated as eligible for minimum essen21 tial coverage by reason of such eligi22 bility to enroll if the employee’s re23 quired contribution (within the mean24 ing of section 5000A(e)(1)(B), deter25 mined by substituting ‘family’ for 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1870 IH

1 ‘self-only’) with respect to the plan ex2 ceeds 9.5 percent of the employee’s 

3 household income.’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

5 (1) Clause (ii) of section 36B(c)(2)(C) of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘Except as provided in clause (iii), an employee’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘An individual’’. 

9 (2) Clause (iii) of section 36B(c)(2)(C) of such 

10 Code is amended by striking ‘‘the last sentence of 

11 clause (i)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i)(II)’’. 

12 (3) Clause (iv) of section 36B(c)(2)(C) of such 

13 Code is amended by striking ‘‘the 9.5 percent under 

14 clause (i)(II)’’ and inserting ‘‘the 9.5 percent under 

15 clauses (i)(I) and (i)(II)’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exercise of Lease Renewal Option dated December 16, 2005



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

			
	 December 22, 2005
	 	 Brian Beattie
 Chief Financial Officer
 650.556.8914


  
 VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT COURIER

  
 Meg W. Davis 
 Director Finance / Land and Building 
 655 Serra Street, 2nd floor 
 Stanford CA 94305-6114 
  

	Re:	Exercise of Lease Renewal Option 

  
 575 Broadway, Redwood City, California 
 Lease
by and between Stanford University (as successor to MPTP Holding, LLC) 
 and SupportSoft, Inc. dated October , 2001 as amended in a First
Amendment 
 dated May 31, 2003 and Second Amendment dated May 6, 2005 
 (collectively the “Lease”) 
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter serves as SupportSoft, Inc.’s notice under the Lease that it is exercising the Renewal Option for the one year Renewal Term which shall commence on
June 1, 2006. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
  
 Brian Beattie

 CFO 
  
 cc: David Thede 
 Cornish & Carey Commercial 
 245 Lytton Avenue 
 Suite 150 
 Palo Alto, CA 94301 
  
 Robert Reidy

 Vice Provost - Land and Building 
 655 Serra Street, 2nd floor 
 Stanford CA 94305-6114 
  
 Ramsey Shuayto 
 Stanford Management Company 
 2770 Sand Hill Road 
 Menlo Park, CA 94025
Case 1:07-cr-00565-NRB Document 13 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 1 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 2 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 3 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 4 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 5 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 6 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 7 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 8 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 9 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 10 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 11 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 12 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 13 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 14 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 15 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 16 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 17 of 18Case 1:07-cv-05798-CM-HBP Document 56 Filed 01/13/09 Page 18 of 18
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quantum Materials Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chris Benjamin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ CHRIS BENJAMINChris Benjamin,Principal Financial OfficerNovember 16, 2012
Rule Self-Certification

June 27, 2006

Office of the Secretary r
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File SR-PBOT-2006-02
Rule Certification

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Commission Rule 40.6, the Philadelphia Board of Trade (“PBOT”) proposes
to amend Rule 208, Disclosure and Trading by Exchange Employees, Directors, and
Committee Members, Rule 324, Recording of Member Executions, and Rule 325,
Recording of Customer and Other Member Orders and Executions, as set forth below.

New language is underlined.

Rule 208.
Disclosure and Trading by Exchange Employees, Consultants, Directors and
Committee Members

(a) — (d) No Change.

(e) For purposes of this Rule 208 the term “‘employee”’ shall include any
consultant hired by the Exchange.

*** Commentary: No Change.

Rule 324,
Recording of Member Executions

Every floor member who executes purchases or sales of any commodity interest
(including straddles, spreads and combinations executed at a differential) for an
account in which he has an interest shall promptly prepare for each such
transaction a written record in ink showing the executing member, his clearing
member, transaction date, time of execution, commodity interest and the number
of contracts purchased or sold and, as applicable, price or premium, delivery



month or expiration date, put or call, strike price and such additional information
as the Exchange may from time to time require to be included thereon.

Rule 325.
Recording of Customer and Other Member Orders and Executions

(a) No Change.

(b) All records of such orders required to be in writing under paragraph (a) of
this Rule shall be written in ink and include:

(1) — (3) No Change.

(c) Every floor member who places an order for the purchase or sale of a
commodity interest (including spreads, straddles, and combinations executed at a
differential) with another floor member on the Floor must prepare and deliver to
such other member prior to the representation of such order in the trading crowd
a written record in ink of such order containing the commodity interest, number

of contracts, delivery month or expiration date and, as applicable, put or call and
strike price at the time he places the order with such other member.

The PBOT intends to implement these amendments no sooner than one business day
following the Commission’s receipt of this filing.

There were no opposing views among the PBOT’s Executive Committee concerning
these amendments.

The PBOT certifies that these amendments comply with the Commodity Exchange Act
and the rules thereunder.

Sincerely,

C. Robert Paul
Executive Vice President
and General Counsel

ec: Mr. Marvin Jackson
Ms. Jane Croessmann
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05556-AKH Document 34 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  News 

Breadcrumb-  News 

##   FORT Hydrologist Jonathan Friedman to co-present research on hydrology of the Green River

      By Fort Collins Science Center      January 24, 2024    

On January 30, Jonathan Friedman (FORT) and Dusty Perkins (NPS) will present research by NPS and FORT scientists (including Chris Holmquist-Johnson and Elizabeth Skaggs) at the 2024 Researchers Meeting for the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Endangered Fish Recovery Program in Grand Junction, CO. 

Learn more about the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program

View Media Details

 

Their presentation documents changes in channel and vegetation along the Green River, Utah in response to flow releases from Flaming Gorge Reservoir from 2020 to 2023. 

**Citation:** Perkins D., Friedman J., Holmquist-Johnson C., Skaggs E., Wondzell M., and Gommerman L. 2024. Study to evaluate the potential effects of experimental endangered fish flow releases from Flaming Gorge Dam on downstream resources. Presentation to the 2024 Researchers Meeting for the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Recovery Programs, Grand Junction, CO January 30-31, 2024.

 

 

 

 

### Get Our News

These items are in the RSS feed format (Really Simple Syndication) based on categories such as topics, locations, and more. You can install and RSS reader browser extension, software, or use a third-party service to receive immediate news updates depending on the feed that you have added. If you click the feed links below, they may look strange because they are simply XML code. An RSS reader can easily read this code and push out a notification to you when something new is posted to our site.

RSS Icon**

Ecosystems News

RSS Icon**

Fort Collins Science Center News

RSS Icon**

Water News

### Contacts

#### Jonathan Friedman, PhD

##### Research Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

friedmanj@usgs.gov

303-541-3017

#### Chris Holmquist-Johnson, PhD

##### Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

h-johnsonc@usgs.gov

970-226-9382

#### Elizabeth Skaggs

##### Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

eskaggs@usgs.gov

970-226-9309

### Partners and Cooperators

National Park Service (NPS)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTINaabe t.beseoa by the parson solemnfzin;; the rrrkgs aml

after tPe clerk rsaordr thr linsnso 85C 

### ratul'a.

APFRCIVEUJLJN

11, 1942 ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerard T. Whitehead, Appellant.

Mercure, J.

Appeal from *867a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Hanofee, J.), rendered March 24, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

The issues raised by defendant herein were previously determined in the appeal by the People from the order made on defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (135 AD2d 997). That decision, from which no appeal was taken, is the law of the case *(see, People v Talutis,*42 AD2d 918) and the issues therein decided adversely to defendant cannot be reconsidered *(see, People v Claudio,*130 AD2d 759, *Iv denied*70 NY2d 873).

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Brian J. Recatto, President and Chief Executive
Officer, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 7, 2009



/S/ BRIAN J. RECATTOBrian J. Recatto President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.



|                                 |  |                             
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC |  | Delaware                    
|Fieldcrest Resources LLC         |  | Delaware                    
|K Rail LLC                       |  | Delaware                    
|Loadout LLC                      |  | Delaware                    
|Suncrest Resources LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Toney Fork LLC                   |  | Delaware                    
|Wise LLC                         |  | Delaware                    
|PVR Midstream LLC                |  | Delaware                    
|PVR Gas Resources, LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Connect Energy Services, LLC     |  | Delaware