alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.3

**AMENDMENT NO. 2TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 2 (this  “Amendment’) dated as of January 1, 2004, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), andW. Lawrence Hough (the “Executive”).

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment  Agreement  dated as of June 1, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of May 31, 2001 ( as so amended,the “EA”),  to secure the services of the Executive as its President  and Chief Operating Officer; and

**            WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $605,000, effective as of January 1, 2004.

**            NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.**        **Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced withthe following new Section 6(a):

                        “(a).  *Base Salary.*  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from July 1, 2001 to December 31,2003, shall be $550,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. Effective  January 1, 2004, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $605,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustmentfrom time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

----

**- 2 -**

****

**            IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first setforth above.

**                                                                                   Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                                   By:       /s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                                                                                                                    Charles N. Martin, Jr.                                                                                               Chairman of the Board and                                                                                               Chief Executive Officer

**                                                                                   Executive**:

**                                                                                   **/s/ W. Lawrence Hough                                   **                                                                                   **W. Lawrence Hough
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1925 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the Manhattan Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care System of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs as the ‘‘Margaret Cochran Corbin Campus of 

the New York Harbor Health Care System’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1925 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MANHATTAN CAMPUS OF 

2 THE NEW YORK HARBOR HEALTH CARE SYS3 TEM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS, NEW YORK. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find6 ings: 

7 (1) Margaret Cochran was born in Franklin 

8 County, Pennsylvania, on November 12, 1751, and 

9 married John Corbin in 1772. 

10 (2) Three years after the marriage, when John 

11 Corbin left to fight in the Revolutionary War as an 

12 artilleryman, Margaret Corbin accompanied him to 

13 war to support the Revolutionary Army. 

14 (3) Margaret Corbin supported the Revolu15 tionary Army by caring for injured and sick soldiers 

16 as well as by cooking and cleaning. During battle, 

17 she also helped her husband load the cannon he was 

18 responsible for manning. 

19 (4) On November 16, 1776, John Corbin was 

20 manning a cannon during the Battle of Fort Wash21 ington on Manhattan Island, New York, when he 

22 was killed. Margaret Corbin heroically took her hus23 band’s place, firing the cannon until she, too, was 

24 hit by enemy fire and seriously wounded. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1925 RDS

1 (5) Having lost the use of her left arm, Mar2 garet Corbin was assigned to the ‘‘Invalid Regi3 ment’’ at West Point, New York. 

4 (6) The Continental Congress awarded Mar5 garet Corbin a lifelong pension for her injuries, mak6 ing her the first woman to receive a pension from 

7 the United States by virtue of military service for 

8 the United States. 

9 (7) Margaret Corbin died in 1789 in Highland 

10 Falls, New York. She is honored nearby at West 

11 Point as a hero of the Revolutionary War. 

12 (b) DESIGNATION.—The Manhattan Campus of the 

13 New York Harbor Health Care System of the Department 

14 of Veterans Affairs in New York, New York, shall after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act be known and des16 ignated as the ‘‘Margaret Cochran Corbin Campus of the 

17 New York Harbor Health Care System’’. 

18 (c) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regula19 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

20 States to the Campus referred to in subsection (b) shall 

21 be deemed to be a reference to the Margaret Cochran 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 1925 RDS

1 Corbin Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care Sys2 tem. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 7 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
142 So. 917

#### Ex parte M. K. FRANK.

6 Div. 160.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1932.

Chas. H. Brown, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Petition dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Hypercom Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I certify to the best of
my knowledge that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of
Hypercom Corporation (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hypercom
Corporation. By:

/s/ G. Grant LyonG. Grant LyonInterim Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005
# C_2018094EN.01002401.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2018 — Weber-Stephen Products v EUIPO (iGrill)

(Case T-35/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark iGrill - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 094/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Weber-Stephen Products LLC (Palatine, Illinois, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel and A. Jauch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 November 2016 (Case R 538/2016–2), relating to the international registration designating the European Union of the word mark iGrill.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Weber-Stephen Products LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Weber-Stephen Products LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  MRU  Holdings,  Inc.  a  Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  Edwin J. McGuinn,  Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Vishal Garg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best of
their  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to MRU Holdings,  Inc., and will be retained by MRU Holdings,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: April 29, 2005                    MRU HOLDINGS, INC.


                                        /s/ Edwin J. McGuinn, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        By: Edwin J. McGuinn, Jr.
                                        Its: Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 29, 2005                    MRU HOLDINGS, INC.


                                        /s/ Vishal Garg
                                        ------------------------
                                        By: Vishal Garg
                                        Its: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 298
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 7, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ``Corporal Alex Martinez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL ALEX MARTINEZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 298

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1844

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ``Corporal Alex Martinez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 33-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 33-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gary Trent Ringo Sr.

, * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR39444

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 092

- CR * September 17 , 2015

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
September 9, 1975 

The Honorable Bevington Reed 

Commissioner of Higher Education 

Coordinating Board 

Texas College and University System 

P. 0. Box 12788, Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Dear Dr. Reed: 

Opinion No. H- 685 

Re: Whether Senate Bill 360 applies 

to students from Mexico who are 

attending Texas Junior Colleges 

adjacent to the Mexican border. 

You have requested our opinion concerning the scope of Senate Bill 360 

of the 64th Legislature found at Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 122, p. 280. Senate 

Bill 360 amends section 54.060 of the Education Code and provides an exemption 

from normal non-resident tuition rates for a student: 

v,ho is a resident of a state situated adjacent to 

Texas and who registers in any Texas public 

junior college situated in a county immediately 

adjacent to the state in which the nonresident 

student resides. 

You have asked whether a student who is a resident of Mexico would be entitled 

to the reduced tuition rat,es provided in section 54. 060. 

The meariing of the word “&ate” in a particular statute depends upon its 

context. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co.“. Inman, Akers & Inman, 

134 S. W. 275 (Tex. Civ. App. 1911, no writ). Thus in some cases “state” 

has been construed to mean-one of the United States. Eidman Y. Martinez, 184 

U.S. 578 (1901); Employers’ Liability Assurance Co. V. Commissioner of Insurance 

31 N.W. 542 (Mich. 1887); Houston East & West Texas Railwav Co. v. Inman. 

Akers, & Inman, supra. In other c :ases “state” h; 2s been held to include foreign 

countries. Mlsslssippi Beneficial Association v. Majure, 29 So. 2d 110 (Miss. 

1947): Fessenden V. Radio Corporat.ion of America, 10 F. Supp. 394 (D. Del. 1935); 

tioissevainv, Boissevain, 231 N. Y. S. 529 (Sup. Ct. App. Div. N. Y. 1928). 

Section 54. 060 applies to “nonresident” students. The Legislature has treated 

nonresident students and students of foreign countries as constituting different 

classes for purposes of tuition in a related statute. Education Code $ 54. 051 (c).(h). 

See Attorney General Opinion H-61A (1973); H-103 (1973). 

- 

p. 2983 
. 

1 . 

The Honorable Bevington Reed - Page 2 (H-685) 

Additionally, in other statutes the Legislature has used the words “any county 

bordering on the International Boundary of the United States” to denote an 

application to counties adjacent to the Mexican border. V. T. C. S. arts. 3737d-1, 

331f, 331f-1. 

We have discovered no indication of any legislative intent to make section 

54. 060 applicable to counties adjacent to the Mexican border. Since the 

Legislature has expressly included these counties in other statutes, in our view 

the absence of any similar language in section 54. 060 indicates that this section 

is not applicable to those counties. Accordingly, in our opinion, the word “state” 

as contained in section 54.060 of the Education Code does not include Mexico. 

SUMMARY 

The word “state” as contained in section 

54.060 of the Education Code does not include Mexico. 

c/ JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General of Texas 

PPROVED: 

Opinion Committee 

jad: 

p. 2984
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2019

No. 04-19-00229-CV

TEXAS P.M.R., INC. and John Ripley,

Appellant

v.

Robert RIPLEY and Mary Guzman,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-23830

The Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from an order denying an application for temporary 

injunction. Appellants’ brief was originally due to be filed on June 3, 2019. 

On June 3, 2019, appellants filed an opposed motion for extension of time to file their 

brief. By order dated June 5, 2019, the motion was granted, extending the deadline for 

appellants to file their brief to June 17, 2019.

The brief was not filed by the June 17, 2019 deadline. It is therefore ORDERED that 

appellants show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of June, 2019.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
eenX

European Energy Exchange AG
Augustusplatz 9 | 04109 Leipzig | Germany

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Dr. Wolfgang v. Rintelen
525 W Monroe St # 1100 Director Legal & Compliance
60661 Chicago, IL Phone: +49 341 2156-250
Fax: +49 341 2156-109

United States of America Wolfgang.Rintelen@eex.com
2016-09-27

Update of EEX FBOT Application

Dear Mr. Andresen,

Enclosed please find the European Energy Exchange’s updated application for the Foreign
Board of Trade registration with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. As agreed we
will forward Supplement S-1 of the application regarding the clearing organization of the Euro-
pean Energy Exchange until the end of October 2016.

The enclosed files contain:

A table of contents

A terminology index

Exhibits A-I for the Form FBOT
Supporting documentation

eocee

The European Energy Exchange has taken it upon itself to answer all questions as thoroughly
and clearly as possible. It is of utmost priority for the European Energy Exchange to be able to
ensure its good standing with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and status as a
foreign board of trade by means of the submission of this application.

We look forward to hearing back from you regarding our application for registration. Please do
not hesitate to contact us or either of our regulators should any questions or concerns arise
during the review process.

Yours sincerely,

Nit li}

Peter Reitz . Wol fgang v. Rintelen
Chief Executive Officer Director Legal & Compliance

European Energy Exchange AG HRB 18 4 09 Leipzig Executive Board: Peter Reitz (Chairm.)
Augustusplatz 9 VAT ID: DE 222 118 427 Jean-Frangois Conil-Lacoste, Steffen Kohler,
04109 Leipzig, Germany Dr. Egbert Laege, Dr. Dr. Tobias Paulun,
info@eex.com, www.eex.com Baden-Wiirttembergische Bank: Dr. Thomas Siegl, Iris Weidinger

P: +49 341 2156-0 IBAN: DE77600501017461503383 Supervisory Board:

F: +49 341 2156 - 109 S.W.1.F.T: SOLADEST Dr. Jurgen Kroneberg (Chairm.)
Exhibit
32.0B





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Benedict Van, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of hereUare,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





1. the
Second Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 30, 2010





/s/ Benedict VanBenedict
      VanChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





The
material contained in Exhibit 32.0 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
Case 1:07-cv-05436-AKH Document 10 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05436-AKH Document 10 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
DOCSNY-271450v01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

LUIS K. ENCALADA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-05354-AKH 

APPEARANCE 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for: 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: New York, New York 

 October 3, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 18 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05807-TPG Document 9-47 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 13 of 13