alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019044EN.01003101.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2018 — Campbell v Commission

(Case T-312/17) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning an infringement procedure brought by the Commission against the Republic of Lithuania - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of inspections, investigations and audits - General presumption - Overriding public interest))

(2019/C 44/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Liam Campbell (Dundalk, Ireland) (represented by: J. MacGuill and E. Martin-Vignerte, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 2448 final of 7 April 2017 refusing access to documents relating to infringement procedure 2013/0406 against the Republic of Lithuania regarding the application of Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings (OJ 2010 L 280, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Liam Campbell and the European Commission each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Liam Campbell and the European Commission each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services
Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 13, 2009



/S/ RONALD D. MOGELRonald D. Mogel Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018341EN.01001501.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Curto v Parliament

(Case T-275/17) (1)

((Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace - Decision rejecting the request for assistance - Error of assessment - Scope of the duty to provide assistance - Duration of the administrative procedure - Reasonable period - Refusal to disclose reports drawn up by the Advisory Committee))

(2018/C 341/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Michela Curto (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: L. Levi and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau, E. Taneva and M. Rantala, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU for (i) annulment of the decision of the European Parliament, of 30 June 2016, by which the Authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance submitted by the applicant on 14 April 2014 and (ii) compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that authority’s disregard of the duty to provide assistance laid down in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, inter alia on account of the excessive duration of the procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 30 June 2016 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance submitted by Ms Michela Curto on 14 April 2014; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 30 June 2016 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance submitted by Ms Michela Curto on 14 April 2014;

| 2. | Orders the Parliament to pay Ms Curto, in respect of the non-material harm suffered, the sum of EUR 10 000, together with default interest from the date of delivery of the present judgment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Parliament to pay Ms Curto, in respect of the non-material harm suffered, the sum of EUR 10 000, together with default interest from the date of delivery of the present judgment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32(i)


CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Sonnen Corporation for the quarterly period endedMarch
 31, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert
 Miller, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
 that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 May 19, 2010



/s/
 Robert Miller

Robert
 Miller

Chief
 Executive Officer



This
 certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
 required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
 as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective
 of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written statement required by
 §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.
#### *In re*WELZIEN, Michael S.

(MR 21730)

Lombard, IL

Order of the Court:

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Michael S. Welzien is suspended from the practice of law for four months. Suspension effective October 9, 2007. Respondent Michael S. Welzien shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Cordani, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GelTech Solutions, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 14, 2008



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | /s/ MICHAELCORDANI           
| | Michael Cordani,             
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| |
#### Sam Flanel, Appellant, v Darrell Flanel, Respondent.

—In an action, *inter alia,*to enforce an alleged loan agreement, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated March 7, 1988, as granted the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant, his son, the amounts expended by him for the defendant’s college education. It is the plaintiff’s position that the defendant had agreed to repay him. This alleged agreement was not in writing, and the plaintiff relied primarily on letters *537in which the defendant had acknowledged an obligation to repay him. However, it is apparent from the plaintiffs deposition testimony that, if such an oral promise was made, it was no more than an agreement to agree since the terms of repayment were to be "worked out in the future depending upon circumstances”. Where an essential element of a contract is left for future negotiations, there is no enforceable contract *(see, Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher,*52 NY2d 105; *Willmott v Giarraputo,*5 NY2d 250; *see also, Azoulay v Cassin,*128 AD2d 660; *Cosomolite Mfg. Co. v Theodus,*122 AD2d 246). The court properly granted the defendant partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was based on the alleged loan agreement. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
152 So. 246

#### Ex parte Hugh WALKER.

7 Div. 153.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 9, 1933.

Hugh Walker, of Anniston, pro se.

THOMAS, Justice.

The due procedure in like cases was recently considered by this court in Re Yon L. Thompson, ante, p. 113, 152 So. 229, and Ex Parte Robert G. Messer (Ala. App.) 152 So. 244.

The questions assigned for error and urged in argument by this petitioner-appellant go to the right of trial by jury, and were decided adversely to this petitioner in the recent case of In re Von L. Thompson, supra, sustaining the constitutionality of the Acts of 1923 and 1031. Acts 1923, p. 100; Acts 1931, p. 683.

The evidence offered at the trial sustained the judgment and conclusion announced by the bar commission. No error is found in that proceeding; however, exercising our supervisory powers, we think the punishment should be reduced to six months from this date; and it is so ordered.

The finding of the bar commission is so modified, and, as modified, is affirmed.

Modified and affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development (#1199).                    

*Date/Time:*                         May 24 and 25, 2001 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Stafford Place I—4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 830, and Stafford Place II—Conference Center, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 517, 565, 575, 585, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Marilyn Suiter, Program Director, Human Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 292-5121.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning nominations submitted to  NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate the Presidential Awards for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Mentoring nominations as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The nominations being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the nominations. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11925 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Order entered December 31, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01217
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF P.G.G., B.N.G., AND R.T.G., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. DF
- 05
- 03154



### O RDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue

. By postcard dated October 24, 2014, we notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue and directed the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and we have not received any correspondence from the Dallas County District Clerk’s office regarding the status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County Distric t Clerk to file the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification appellant is not indigent a nd has not paid for the record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk and to all pa rties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 202 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 202

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2019

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 
              the Department of Justice Inspector General.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inspector General Access Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL.

    Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and paragraph 
                (3)'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
                    (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by striking 
                ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``, except with respect 
        to allegations described in subsection (b)(3),''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 5 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 20 of 20
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2022

No. 04-22-00093-CV

Donald W. TAYLOR,

Appellant

v.

THE RENEGADE RANCH SUBDIVISION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS and Treasure: Brian and Dixon Schultz, Kevin and Cynthia 

Gallagher, Secondary Committee Member, Co-Treasure Jeffrey C. and Vada Michelle Pitts,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16772

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 25, 2022. Appellant’s first motion for extension 

of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to August 24, 2022. On August 

23, 2022, appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until 

September 23, 2022, for a total extension of 60 days, and we granted appellant’s motion. 

On September 21, 2022, appellant filed a third motion for extension of time requesting an 

additional 90 days to file the brief. After consideration, we GRANT the motion IN PART and 

ORDER appellant to file his brief by OCTOBER 23, 2022. Appellant is advised that no 

further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2022.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court