Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2001 / Notices 4011

NCPH requests waiver of the 60-day

prior notice requirement to permit

NCPH’s Rate Schedule and Code of

Conduct to be effective January 19,

2001.

NCPH intends to engage in electric

power and energy transactions as a

marketer. In transactions where NCPH

sells electric energy, it proposes to make

such sales on rates, terms and

conditions to be mutually agreed to with

the purchasing party. NCPH’s proposed

Rate Schedule also permits it to reassign

transmission capacity.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before January 18,

2001. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments and protests may

be filed electronically via the internet in

lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–1311 Filed 1–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–63–000]

Trunkline LNG Company; Notice of

Application

January 10, 2001.

Take notice that on January 5, 2001,

Trunkline LNG Company (Trunkline

LNG), P.O. Box 4967, Houston, Texas

77210–4967, filed an application with

the Commission in Docket No. CP01–

63–000 pursuant to section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for a certificate

of public convenience and necessity

requesting authorization to perform

minor modifications to its liquefied

natural gas (LNG) terminal near Lake

Charles, Louisiana, all as more fully set

forth in the application which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection. This filing may be

viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/htm (call 202–

208–2222 for assistance).

Specifically, Trunkline LNG requests

authorization to install approximately

80 feet of 16-inch insulated stainless

steel by-pass piping and valve actuator

around the existing recondenser to

increase the LNG throughput to the

second stage pumps; modify the seven

vaporizer air blowers and motors by

replacing the existing air blowers with

new air blowers and removing the

existing 359 HP motors, installing new

500 HP motors to increase the air

capabilities and, installing new burner

nozzles and NOX controls on vaporizers

to reduce emissions. Trunkline LNG

states that the proposed modifications

will eliminate operational bottlenecks in

the re-gasification process and permit

the terminal to increase the daily

sendout capability from 700 MMscf/d to

1 Bscf/d at an estimated cost of

approximately $1.25 million.

Any questions regarding this

application should be directed to

William W. Grygar, Vice President of

Rates and Regulatory Affairs, 5444

Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas

77056–5306 at (713) 989–7000.

There are two ways to become

involved in the Commission’s review of

this project. First, any person wishing to

obtain legal status by becoming a party

to the proceedings for this project

should, on or before January 31, 2001,

file with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC. 20426, a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations

under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A

person obtaining party status will be

placed on the service list maintained by

the Secretary of the Commission and

will receive copies of all documents

filed by the Trunkline LNG and by all

other parties. A party must submit 14

copies of filings made with the

Commission and must mail a copy to

the Trunkline LNG and to every other

party in the proceeding. Only parties to

the proceeding can ask for court review

of Commission orders in the proceeding.

However, a person does not have to

intervene in order to have comments

considered. The second way to

participate is by filing with the

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as

possible, an original and two copies of

comments in support of or in opposition

to this project. The Commission will

consider these comments in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but the filing of a comment alone

will not serve to make the filer a party

to the proceeding. The Commission’s

rules require that persons filing

comments in opposition to the project

provide copies of their protests only to

the party or parties directly involved in

the protest.

Persons who wish to comment only

on the environmental review of this

project should submit an original and

two copies of their comments to the

Secretary of the Commission.

Environmental commenters will be

placed on the Commission’s

environmental mailing list, will receive

copies of the environmental documents,

and will be notified of meetings

associated with the Commission’s

environmental review process.

Environmental commenters will not be

required to serve copies of filed

documents on all other parties.

However, the non-party commenters

will not receive copies of all documents

filed by other parties or issued by the

Commission (except for the mailing of

environmental documents issued by the

Commission) and will not have the right

to seek court review of the

Commission’s final order.

The Commission may issue a

preliminary determination on nonenvironmental issues prior to the

completion of its review of the

environmental aspects of the project.

This preliminary determination

typically considers such issues as the

need for the project and its economic

effect on existing customers of the

Trunkline LNG, on other pipelines in

the area, and on landowners and

communities. For example, the

Commission considers the extent to

which the Trunkline LNG may need to

exercise eminent domain to obtain

rights-of-way for the proposed project

and balances that against the nonenvironmental benefits to be provided

by the project. Therefore, if a person has

comments on community and

landowner impacts from this proposal,

it is important either to file comments

or to intervene as early in the process as

possible.

Comments and protests may be filed

electronically via the internet in lieu of

paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(ii)

and the instructions on the

Commission’s web site at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

If the Commission decides to set the

application for a formal hearing before

an Administrative Law Judge, the

Commission will issue another notice

describing that process. At the end of

4012 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2001 / Notices

the Commission’s review process, a

final Commission order approving or

denying a certificate will be issued.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–1255 Filed 1–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP99–381–007]

Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd,;

Notice of Compliance Filing

January 10, 2001.

Take notice that on January 5, 2001,

Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.

(WIC) tendered for filing as part if its

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 2, the sheets listed on

Appendix A and Appendix B to the

filing, to become effective on the dates

indicated on each sheet.

WIC asserts that the purpose of this

filing is to comply with the

Commission’s order issued September

27, 2000 in Docket No. RP99–381

approving settlement and granting

interlocutory appeal. Specifically, this

filing reflects the transportation rates

from January 1, 2000 forward for

consenting and contesting parties.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

be viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

Comments and protests may be filed

electronically via the internet in lieu of

paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)

and the instructions on the

Commission’s web site at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–1256 Filed 1–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC01–34–000, et al.]

Delmarva Power & Light Company, et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

January 9, 2001.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Delmarva Power & Light Company

and Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.

[Docket No. EC01–34–000]

Take notice that on January 5, 2001,

Delmarva Power & Light Company

(Delmarva) and Conectiv Energy

Supply, Inc. (CESI) (collectively

Applicant) submitted Exhibit H to

supplement their application under the

provisions of Section 203 of the Federal

Power Act involving the assignment of

Delmarva’s rights and obligations under

certain wholesale power sales

agreements (Agreements) to CESI.

Exhibit H includes the executed

assignment and assumption agreement

between Delmarva and CESI.

The Applicants state that copies of

this joint application have been served

upon Delmarva’s counterparties in the

Agreements and the pertinent state

regulatory commissions.

Comment date: January 19, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Calumet Energy Team, LLC

[Docket No. EG01–26–000]

Take notice that on December 15,

2000, Calumet Energy Team, LLC, c/o

Wisvest Corporation, N16 W23217

Stone Ridge Drive, Suite 100,

Waukesha, WI 53188, filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an amended application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to section

32(a)(1) of the Public Utility Holding

Company Act of 1935. The applicant is

a limited liability company organized

under the laws of the State of Delaware

that is engaged directly and exclusively

in developing, owning, and operating a

gas-fired, nominally 300 MW simplecycle peaking power plant in Chicago,

Illinois. The applicant’s power plant

will be an eligible facility.

Comment date: January 23, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. City of Kechikan, Alaska

[Docket No. EL01–26–000]

Take notice that on January 2, 2001,

the City of Ketchikan, Alaska, d/b/a

Ketchikan Public Utilities (Petitioner or

Ketchikan), submitted an Application

for Limited Waiver of Regulations

Implementing PURPA § 210, or in the

Alternative, Request for Confirmation of

Treatment of Avoided Cost, pursuant to

Section 402 of the Commission’s

Regulations under Sections 201 and 210

of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies

Act of 1978 (PURPA). Ketchikan is

seeking a limited waiver of any

obligation that it may have under

PURPA to displace purchases from the

Four Dam Pool Initial Project, with

purchases from a project certified under

PURPA as a qualifying facility.

Alternatively, Ketchikan requests that

the Commission confirm that a proper

calculation of ‘‘avoided costs’’ under

PURPA reflect the avoided costs of the

Four Dam Pool Initial Project Joint

Action Agency, and any waivers

necessary to permit the requested

confirmation of the avoided cost

calculation.

Comment date: February 8, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. EL00–62–016]

Take notice that on December 28,

2000, ISO New England Inc. submitted

an Interim Report of Compliance in

response to the Commission’s June 28,

2000 Order in this proceeding.

Copies of said filing have been served

upon all parties to this proceeding and

upon the utility regulatory agencies of

the six New England States.

Comment date: February 8, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket Nos. EL00–62–017 and EL00–62–

018]

Take notice that on January 2, 2001,

ISO New England Inc. made a

compliance filing as required in the

Commission’s December 15, 2000 Order

in these proceedings. Copies of said

filing have been served upon all parties

to this proceeding, upon NEPOOL

Participants, as well as upon the utility

regulatory agencies of the six New

England States.

Comment date: February 8, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.