alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


   Exhibit 32 - Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         -------------------------------------------------------------
                           (Furnished but not filed)
                           -------------------------

In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties
on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Joseph S.
Micallef, President of the Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Great
Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:

     1. This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties
and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date October 16, 2003       By /s/  Joseph S. Micallef
     ----------------          -------------------------------------------------
                               Joseph S. Micallef, President of the Trustees and
                                 Chief Executive Officer



In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties
on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Thomas A.
Janochoski, Vice President & Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Great
Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:

     1. This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties
and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date October 16, 2003         By /s/  Thomas A. Janochoski
    -----------------            -----------------------------------------------
                                 Thomas A. Janochoski, Vice President &
                                   Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019072EN.01002901.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Fifth Avenue Entertainment v EUIPO — Commodore Entertainment (THE COMMODORES)

(Case T-459/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark ‘THE COMMODORES’ - Unregistered earlier sign ‘Commodores’ - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Relative ground for refusal - Reference to the national law governing the earlier mark - Action for passing off))

(2019/C 72/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fifth Avenue Entertainment LLC (Orlando, Florida, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, and D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and S. Bonne, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Commodore Entertainment Corp. (Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: J. Mellor QC and J. Whelan, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2017 (Case R 851/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Commodore Entertainment and Fifth Avenue Entertainment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 May 2017 (Case R 851/2016-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 May 2017 (Case R 851/2016-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Fifth Avenue Entertainment LLC; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Fifth Avenue Entertainment LLC;

| 3. | Orders Commodore Entertainment Corp. to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Commodore Entertainment Corp. to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 37-6 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 37-6 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                                         109 North Post Oak Lane
                                                                 Suite 422
                                                           Houston, Texas 77024
                                                                713-621-4310
                                                            www.PWTCBATTERY.com
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.9




Power Technology Receives Funding for Production of New Batteries

HOUSTON, TEXAS - Power Technology Inc. (OTCBB: PWTC) announced today that it had
obtained  additional  funding to enable it to purchase  machinery  and equipment
required for the  manufacture  of its patent  pending  battery  technology.  CEO
Bernard J. Walter stated "Cornell Capital Partners,  LP has agreed to provide us
with an  additional  $1.1  million of funding  which will  enable us to purchase
machinery and equipment  necessary to build our pilot plant to  manufacture  our
unique  patent  pending  current  collectors  for our batteries and to bring our
batteries to market."

About Power  Technology:  Power  Technology,  Inc. is a research and development
Company engaged in activities  regarding  alternative  battery  technology using
patent  pending,   ultra  light  materials  with  up  to  50%  less  weight  and
significantly less lead content than conventional  batteries.  The Company is in
the early  stages of  commercializing  its battery  technology  and has designed
equipment and systems to manufacture its patent pending batteries.

Please visit our website at www.PWTCBATTERY.com for more information or call the
Company directly at 713-621-4310.

All  forward-looking  statements  are, by  necessity,  only  estimates of future
results and actual results achieved by Power Technology,  Inc. (PWTC) may differ
materially  from these  statements  due to a number of factors.  PWTC assumes no
obligations  to  update  these  forward-looking  statements  to  reflect  actual
results,  changes in  assumptions  or changes in other  factors  affecting  such
statements.  You should independently investigate and fully understand all risks
before making investment decisions.

SOURCE:   Power Technology, Inc.
CONTACT:  Power Technology, Inc.
          Bernard J. Walter, CEO
          713-621-4310
Case 7:07-cv-05800-KMK-LMS Document 10 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05800-KMK-LMS Document 10 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vital Living, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregg
A. Linn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge
and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ GREGG A. LINN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gregg A. Linn
                                        Chief Financial Officer


June 21, 2004
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of PDC 2001-A Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_____/s/ James N. Ryan______________

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: __March 26, 2003________
July 8, 2022

VIA CFTC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission 

FOIA, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Freedom of Information Act Confidential Treatment Request - Amendments to the 

ICE NGX Canada Inc. (“ICE NGX”) Risk Management Framework

Dear Sir or Madam:

ICE NGX Canada Inc. (“ICE NGX”) today submitted, via the CFTC Portal, the self-certification,

pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and Commission Regulation 

40.6(a), of certain amendments (the “Amendments”) to the ICE NGX Risk Management 

Framework (“RMF”), with the subject line Amendment to ICE NGX Canada Inc. Rules. ICE NGX

respectfully requests confidential treatment for the information attached to the submission as 

further described below until further notice.

Under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC Section 552, Section 809(g) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and pursuant to Commission Regulation 

145.9(d)(5) and any other applicable regulations under or implementing FOIA, ICE NGX hereby 

respectfully requests that confidential treatment be maintained until further notice for the 

documents titled “Confidential Description of Amendments to ICE NGX Canada Inc. Risk 

Management Framework”. As prescribed by 17 C.F.R. 145.9(d)(4), each page of the documents

included in this request bears the legend “Confidential Treatment Requested by ICE NGX Canada 

Inc.”

The basis for this request is that these documents contain sensitive commercial and proprietary 

information, public disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect on, and cause injury 

to, the operations and competitive position of ICE NGX and/or to its Contracting Parties. In 

addition, certain of this information could constitute material undisclosed information under 

Canadian securities laws. We request that you do not provide this information to anyone else or 

trade on this information until the information is no longer confidential. This request is not to be 

construed as a waiver of any other protection from disclosure or confidential treatment accorded 

by law, and ICE NGX will rely on and invoke any such confidentiality protection. 

ICE NGX requests that it be notified in the event the Commission intends to disclose such 

documents to any person, including to Congress or to any other governmental agency or unit 

pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA or other applicable law. ICE NGX does not waive its notification 

rights under Section 8(f) of the CEA or other applicable law with respect to any subpoena or 

summons for such documents.
In accordance with the foregoing regulations, kindly notify me (403-974-1740 or 

martin.mcgregor@ice.com) or Greg Abbott, ICE NGX President & COO (403-974-1701 or 

greg.abbott@ice.com) of any request under FOIA for access to such documents to enable ICE 

NGX to substantiate the grounds for confidential treatment, or if you have any questions regarding 

this document.

Yours truly,

Martin McGregor

General Counsel & CCO
February 5, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan

Acting Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

i
oe
ra
mm

Reference File # 2763.01

Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Donovan:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

Early listing of July and December 2010 Corn and mini-sized Corn futures.

These futures contracts ordinarily would be authorized for trading as of December 17, 2007.

Due to customer demand, the Exchange intends to list these contracts earlier than usual (i.c., as
of February 6, 2007).

This is a one-time change, rather than a permanent revision, in the Exchange’s listing cycle.

There were no opposing views with respect to this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

=)

90€ Bd S-
# C_2005156EN.01000201.xml

| 28.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/2

---

Communication from the Commission on the sugar sector

(2005/C 156/02)

The Commission draws the attention of interested parties to its legislative proposals for:

| — | the reform of the common market organisation (CMO) in the sugar sector, |
| --- | --- |

—

the reform of the common market organisation (CMO) in the sugar sector,

| — | the introduction of a temporary fund for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, and |
| --- | --- |

—

the introduction of a temporary fund for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, and

| — | the inclusion of direct income support to sugar beet growers in the Single Payment Scheme. |
| --- | --- |

—

the inclusion of direct income support to sugar beet growers in the Single Payment Scheme.

The proposals are contained in document COM(2005) 263 that is available on the Commission's website http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/index.htm.

According to the proposal the new sugar CMO and the Regulation on the temporary restructuring fund should be applicable as from the marketing year 2006/07 which is planned to start on 1 July 2006. Regarding direct income support it has been proposed to include the income support to sugar beet growers in the Single Payment Scheme as from the year 2006.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SPIEGEL, INC.

                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                 January 2, 1999

Name of Corporation                                       Incorporated In
-----------------------------------------------           -----------------

Distribution Fulfillment Services, Inc.                      Delaware

Eddie Bauer, Inc.                                            Delaware

Eddie Bauer of Canada, Inc. (1)                               Canada

Eddie Bauer International, Inc. (1)                          Delaware

Equity Cash Benefit Insurance Agency, Inc.                    Nevada

First Consumers National Bank                             Federal Charter

New Hampton Realty Corporation (2)                           Delaware

Newport News, Inc. (formerly New Hampton, Inc.)              Delaware

S.I. Reinsurance Limited                                 Turks & Caicos Islands

Spiegel Acceptance Corporation                                Delaware

Spiegel Catalog, Inc.                                         Delaware

Spiegel Credit Corporation III                                Delaware
 
Spiegel Management Group, Inc.                                Delaware

Spiegel of Philadelphia, Inc.                               Pennsylvania

Spiegel Publishing Company                                    Illinois

Spiegel Teleservice, Inc.                                     Illinois

Spiegel Teleservice, Inc.                                      Nevada

Together Retail U.S.A., Inc.                                  Delaware

Ultimate Outlet, Inc.                                         Delaware


(1)      Wholly owned subsidiary of Eddie Bauer, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
         of Spiegel, Inc.

(2)      Wholly owned subsidiary of Newport News, Inc., a wholly owned
         subsidiary of Spiegel, Inc.



                                       58
# C_2019103EN.01002601.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Pear Technologies v EUIPO — Apple (PEAR)

(Case T-215/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative trade mark PEAR - Earlier EU figurative trade mark depicting an apple - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 103/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pear Technologies Ltd (Macao, China) (represented by: J. Coldham, Solicitor, and E. Himsworth QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: J. Olsen and P. Andreottola, Solicitors, and G. Tritton, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2017 (Case R 860/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Apple and Pear Technologies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 January 2017 (Case R 860/2016-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 January 2017 (Case R 860/2016-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Pear Technologies Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Pear Technologies Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Apple Inc. to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Pear Technologies. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Apple Inc. to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Pear Technologies.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

---
#### Orr v. Orr.

1. Praotioe: *Time to answer supplemental bill.*Under the practice in Chancery, before the equity and common law jurisdiction were blended by the amendments of the Code of Civil Procedure, a defendant had until the fifth 'Monday after notice of the filing thereof, to answer a supplemental bill.

2. -: *J*decree, entered before that time had elapsed, without the defendant’s consent, and before he had plead to the supplemental hill, reversed.

This was an action for a divorce, brought in the District Court for Dacotah county, under the Chancery Code, prior to the late repeal of that Code and the amendments of the Code of Civil Procedure, conforming the common law and equity practice the one to the other. The bill was filed on the 18th of October, 1866 ; and proceedings were had thereon not material to be farther stated, than that the defendant appeared thereto and defended the same. On the 31st of Octobei*, 1867, the complainant filed her supplemental bill, alleging new matter and praying additional relief, and gave notice thereof to the defendant. By section 741 of the Chancery Code, he had until the fifth Monday following the service of the notice, to take proceedings against the supplemental bill. But on the 2d day of December following, the cause was brought on to be heard, as the decree expressed it, upon “the pleadings and proofs,” and “was submitted to the summary decision of the court.” The decree awarded a divorce with $15,000 alimony. The defendant appealed to this court.

*A. J. Pojpjpleton and O. O.*Tredway, for the appellant.

*J. M.*Woolworth, contra.

LIke, J.

*360It is unnecessary here to notice but one of the several questions argued at the bar.

The original petition was filed on the 18th of October, 1866, but issue had not been joined thereon, when on the 31st day of October, 1867, the complainant filed her supplemental petition, alleging new and material facts, and in addition to her former prayer, praying alimony in the sum of fifty thousand dollars.

On the 22d of November following, without the assent of the defendant, and before he had plead to the supplemental bill, the case was tried and a decree entered in favor of the complainant.

By the law regulating the practice in such cases, the defendant had until the fifth Monday after the service of notice upon him of the filing of the supplemental petition, to plead thereto. This right he was denied. Sec. 741, Code.

The record shows that on the 2d of December following, and within the time fixed by the statute therefor, the defendant did file exceptions to the supplemental petition, but they could not be heard, nor could they be of the least avail, were they ever so well taken, for the case had already passed to final judgment. The decree of the court below must be vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

                                                                   Exhibits 99.2

 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 20-F of Oxford  Investments
Holdings Inc., a company  organized under the laws of under the laws of Ontario,
Canada (the  "Company"),  for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects,  with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




By: /S/ Michael Donaghy
   -----------------------
   Michael Donaghy
   Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 12, 2005