alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LETTER AGREEMENT


Exhibit 10.45







LETTER AGREEMENT




This LETTER AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made between Azco Mining Inc. (“AZCO”), a company registered in Delaware and Metallica Ventures, LLC (Metallica), a company registered in Wyoming (also a “Party” or the “Parties”).




THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the mutual promises and other valuable consideration herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:




1.

In return for consideration that AZCO shall pay or cause to be paid to Metallica, Metallica shall enter into the Assignment and Assumption of Planet Lease Agreement (“Assignment Agreement”) with AZCO.  The consideration paid to Metallica shall consist of:  A) ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and B) two million (2,000,000) shares of AZCO common stock which shall be issued to W. Pierce Carson and which shall carry “piggyback” registration rights.

 

2.

Metallica has made lease payments current to the payment due September 5, 2005.  AZCO shall make lease payments commencing with the payment due October 5, 2005.         




3.

AZCO shall pay all outstanding taxes due under the lease.




4.

Time is of the essence in this Agreement.




5.

If any litigation arises between the Parties relating to this Agreement, the losing Party shall pay the prevailing Party’s costs and expenses of litigation, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees.  




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and effective as of the 22nd day of September, 2005.




Azco Mining Inc.

Metallica Ventures, LLC







By:_________________________

By:_________________________




Its:_________________________

Its:_________________________
Exhibit 10.9
Accrued Compensation - Ken Assal

[Liska Biometry LOGO]

November 15, 2005

Ken Assal
1900 City Park Drive
Suite 510
Ottawa, ON
K1J 1A3

RE: Employee Equity Bonus

Dear Ken,

      Liska Biometry, Inc. is delighted to notify you that for services
previously rendered, in recognition of excellent work and dedication to Liska
Biometry, Inc., we are hereby granting you a bonus in the form of equity in the
amount of 30,000 shares of common stock. Please be advised that said shares will
be registered pursuant to Form S-8. We recognize and acknowledge that your
services were not, in any way, in connection with the sale of securities in a
capital-raising transaction, nor were they directly or indirectly in connection
with promoting or maintaining a market for Liska's securities. Thank you for
your recognized contributions to our company.

Sincerely,

Liska Biometry, Inc.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### February 4, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

ANGELA JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 07-6172 v. (W.D. Oklahoma) UNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; MICHAEL SPEARS, individually and in his capacity as Human Resource Director at Unity Health Center, Inc.; MELANIE McLAUGHLIN, individually and in her official capacity as Supervisor at Unity Health Center, Inc., Defendants - Appellees. (D.C. No. 05-CV-1022-T)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , ANDERSON , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination-2- of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff and appellant Angela Jones brought this action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and Oklahoma tort law. In an order dated June 27, 2007, the district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Jones’ ADA claim based upon the termination of her employment, awarded summary judgment to defendants on all other ADA and tort claims, and dismissed with prejudice Jones’ FMLA claims. Additionally, the district court awarded costs to defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). Jones appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendants on her ADA claims relating to the claimed failure to accommodate her disability and a hostile work environment, the dismissal of her ADA claim based upon the termination of her employment, and the district court’s refusal to reverse its award of costs. We AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the disability/hostile work environment ADA claims and the dismissal of her ADA termination claim, for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated June 27, 2007. We AFFIRM the district court’s award of costs, for substantially the reasons stated in its order dated October 12, 2007. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-12 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 16
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0158 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0158

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the general principles for the participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in Community programmes (5532/2005 - COM(2004)0809 - C6-0042/2005 - 2004/0279(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 092 E , 20/04/2006 P. 0058 - 0059 *

P6_TA(2005)0158

EC-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Framework Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the general principles for the participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in Community programmes (5532/2005 — COM(2004)0809 — C6-0042/2005 — 2004/0279(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2004)0809) [1],

- having regard to the text of the Council (5532/2005),

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 13 and 308 of the EC Treaty (C6-0042/2005),

- having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0122/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the conclusion of a Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement on a Framework Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
600335672 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

March 12, 2021 

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST 

Submitted via the Portal and via email 

CFTC FOIA Compliance Office 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

via email: FOIAsubmissions@cftc.gov 

Re: Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Confidential Treatment Request for 

Information Submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“Commission”) by Bloomberg SEF LLC, as operator of a swap execution facility 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 

40.6(a) of the regulations of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 

“CFTC”, or the “Commission”), Bloomberg SEF LLC (“BSEF”) as the operator of a 

swap execution facility, submitted to the Commission a rule amendment (the 

“Amendment”). 

Bloomberg SEF hereby requests that the Confidential Information (as defined below) be 

accorded confidential treatment on the grounds that it would reveal Bloomberg SEF’s 

trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. We request this 

confidential treatment for an indefinite period. 

Please promptly inform the following of any request for the Confidential Information or 

its contents made pursuant to FOIA or the Commission’s rules so that we may 

substantiate the foregoing request for confidential treatment in accordance with Part 

145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. 

David Levine 

General Counsel 

Bloomberg L.P. 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

The certification described above and attached as Annex A hereto is referred to herein as 

the “Confidential Information.” 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 2 

600365906 

Pursuant to Part 145.9(d)(4) of the Commission’s regulations, we have marked each page 

of the Confidential Information with the words “Confidential Treatment Requested by 

Bloomberg SEF LLC” and have numbered each page of the Confidential Information 

with an identifying number and code, beginning with “BSEF-0321-0075” and ending 

with “BSEF-0321-0734.” 

[signature page follows] 

 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 3 

600365906 

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 617-3918 with any questions regarding this matter. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

Devu Shanmugham 

Chief Compliance Officer 

Bloomberg SEF LLC 

731 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

cc: Jonathan Lave, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (Email: JLave@cftc.gov) 
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Page 4 

600365906 

Annex A 

Confidential Information 

Name of Confidential Information Identifying Number and Code 

Rule Amendment Self-Certification BSEF-0321-0075–BSEF-0321-

0734
Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 4 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05835-WHP Document 4 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Vincent M . DeOrchis (VMD-65 15) 

William E. Lakis (WL-9355) 

Olivier D. L. DuPont (OD-2817) 

DEORCHIS WIENER & PARTNERS, LLP 

61 Broadway, 26" Floor 

New York, New York 10006-2802 

(212) 344-4700 

USDC SDNY 11 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ............................................................ X 

ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES, 

LTD., 

- against - 

Case No. 07-civ-5861 (RMB) 

Plaintiff, 

BELCO RESOURCES, INC., SINOCHEM 

JIANGSU CORPORATION (FORMERLY 

KNOWN AS SINOCHEM JIANGSU IMPORT 

EXPORT CORPORATION), NANJING 

HUABIN FOREIGN TRADE & ECONOMICS 

CO . , LTD., DRAGONTRANS SHIPPING LTD . 

d/b/a HUABANG INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

SINOTRANS NINGBO INTERNATIONAL 

FORWARDING AGENCY CO., LTD., 

JOHN DOE 1-10, 

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

ORIGINAL SECOND AMENDED 

VERIFIED COMPLAINT 

- AND RULE B ATTACHMENT 

Defendants. ............................................................ X 

Whereas by Order dated October 18, 2007, Plaintiff was directed to file an 

amended complaint by October 25,2007; 

Whereas on October 25, 2007, Plaintiff served on all Defendants the Second 

Amended Verified Complaint and Rule B Attachment; 

Whereas on October 26, 2007, Plaintiff mailed electronically a copy of the above 

mentioned Second Amended Verified Complaint and Rule B Attachment to the Clerk of 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of 

filing its pleadings; 

Whereas on November 2, 2007, the clerk of the United States District Court for 

the Southern District of New York advised Plaintiff that it had not received an original of 

the Second Amended Verified Complaint and Rule B Attachment by regular mail and 

that the filing of same was subject to a Court order; 

For all of the above reasons, Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests leave of the 

Court to file an original of the Second Amended Verified Complaint and Rule B 

Attachment with the clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

New York. 

IT IS on this day of November 200'7: 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for leave to file an original Second Amended 

Verified Complaint and Rule B Attachment with the clerk of the United State District 

Court for the Southern District of New York is granted. 

U.S.D.J. 

Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATIONS

We, Benedict Van, Chief Executive Officer and Anthony K. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of PeopleNet
International Corporation, certify that:

1. We have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PeopleNet
International Corporation;

2. Based on our knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3. Based on our knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying Officers and we are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have;

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as pf the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and we have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and we have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 14, 2003

/s/ Benedict Van
Benedict Van
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Anthony K. Chan
Anthony K. Chan
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, George E. Crapple, the Co-ChiefExecutive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner ofGlobal Macro Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of theTrust on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Trust.

Date:  March 30, 2007                                                                           

                                                                                                           /s/George E. Crapple

                                                                                                                George E. Crapple

                                                                                                                Co-Chief Executive Officer

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 44 Filed 06/07/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 44 Filed 06/07/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 44 Filed 06/07/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 44 Filed 06/07/2008 Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0001 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0001

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds concerning the extension of the duration of the PEACE programme and the granting of new commitment appropriations (COM(2004)0631 — 16064/2004 — C6-0252/2004 — 2004/0224(AVC)) **

*
Official Journal 247 E , 06/10/2005 P. 0025 - 0025 *

P6_TA(2005)0001

PEACE Programme ***

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds concerning the extension of the duration of the PEACE programme and the granting of new commitment appropriations (COM(2004)0631 — 16064/2004 — C6-0252/2004 — 2004/0224(AVC))

(Assent procedure)

The European Parliament,

- — having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation (COM(2004)0631 — 16064/2004) [1],

- having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 161 of the EC Treaty (C6-0252/2004),

- having regard to Rule 75(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0001/2005),

1. Gives its assent to the proposal for a Council regulation;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Hayden, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered January 22, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts) and attempted burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the jurisdictional validity of the superior court information under which he was prosecuted is without merit *(see, People v Davis,*152 AD2d 634 [decided herewith]).

We further find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of David J. Clovsky, as Commissioner of Social Services of Chemung County, et al., Respondents, v Jeffrey SS., Appellant.

Casey, J.

Appeal from that part of an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), entered August 30, 1988, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, without prejudice.

Petitioner instituted this proceeding to adjudicate respondent the father of a child born out of wedlock to Pamela TT. Shortly before the scheduled hearing date, the mother admitted that she had had sexual relations with other men during the period of possible conception, contrary to the response which she had given in answer to respondent’s demand for a bill of particulars. Contending that he had prepared a defense based upon the original representation made by the mother, respondent moved to dismiss the proceeding. Family Court denied the motion and offered to adjourn the hearing to afford respondent additional time to prepare a defense in light of the mother’s admission. When respondent stated that he was willing to proceed with the hearing, petitioner indicated that he was not ready. Respondent again moved to dismiss and Family Court granted the motion, but without prejudice to renewal at a later date. Respondent appeals, contending that Family Court erred in failing to grant his request that the dismissal be with prejudice.

"The primary purpose of establishing paternity is to ensure that adequate provision will be made for the child’s needs, in accordance with the means of the parents” *(Matter of L. Pamela P. v Frank S.,*59 NY2d 1, 5). In addition, we have said that "since paternity statutes are intended, *inter alia,*to protect public funds, welfare officials are to be given the widest latitude to establish paternity of illegitimate children who are, or are likely to become, public charges” *(Matter of*
      *840
      *Van Alstyne v David Q.,*92 AD2d 971, 972). Since dismissal of this proceeding with prejudice would be inconsistent with the overriding concern for the child’s needs and the interest in preserving public funds, the order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.