alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Xethanol Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Ames,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to my knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 30, 2007
            
            /s/
                David R. AmesDate
            David
              R. Ames





Exhibit
      32 (cont.)




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Xethanol Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Flicker,
      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 30, 2007
            
            /s/
                Gary FlickerDate
            Gary
              Flicker
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12291]



[[Page 27089]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Docket No. RP01-335-001


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

May 10, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 4, 2001, TransColorado Gas Transmission 
Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing, of its FERC Gas Tariff 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective May 
1, 2001:

Substitute Eight Revised Sheet No. 203
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 203.01

    TransColorado states that this filing was tendered in compliance 
with the Commission's Order issued April 26, 2001, in Docket No. RP01-
335-000, which directed TransColorado to make two corrections to its 
Order No. 587-M compliance filing in Docket No. RM96-1-015 filed March 
30, 2001.
    TransColorado states that a copy of this filing has been served 
upon TransColorado's customers, the Colorado Public Utilities 
Commission and the New Mexico Public Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 10426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12291 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------------- x 

NOVELLA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff,

- against - 

CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., 

Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- x 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

07 Civ. 5805 (RJS) 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I am an Assistant Corporation Counsel in the 

Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, attorney for defendant, the City of 

New York in the above-captioned action. Please note that I am the Assistant Corporation 

Counsel assigned to this case and that all filings, or other information, related to this action can 

be directed to me at the below address. 

Dated: New York, New York 

November 2, 2007 

MICHAEL A. CARDOZO 

Corporation Counsel of the 

 City of New York 

Attorney for Defendant, the City of New 

York 

100 Church Street, Room 2-118 

New York, New York 10007-2601 

(212) 788-8703 

By: ECF: /s/ 

 JENNAYDRA D. CLUNIS (JC 1908) 

 Assistant Corporation Counsel 

TO: Reibman & Weiner 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

26 Court Street, Suite 1005 

Brooklyn, NY 10005 

Attn: Michael B. Lumer, Esq. 

Case 1:07-cv-05805-RJS-AJP Document 5 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
07 Civ. 5805 (RJS) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

NOVELLA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

- against - 

CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., 

Defendants. 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

MICHAEL A. CARDOZO 

Corporation Counsel of the City of New York 

Attorney for Defendant, the City of New York 

100 Church Street, Room 2-118 

New York, NY 10007-2601 

Of Counsel: Jennaydra D. Clunis 

 Tel: (212) 788-8703 

NYCLIS No. : 2007-031296

Due and timely service is hereby admitted. 

New York, N.Y. ...................................... , 200...... 

................................................................................. 

Attorney for................................................................

Case 1:07-cv-05805-RJS-AJP Document 5 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 838 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.838

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of land held by the Bureau of 
 Prisons of the Department of Justice in Miami Dade County, Florida, to 
facilitate the construction of a new educational facility that includes 
a secure parking area for the Bureau of Prisons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Miami Dade College Land Conveyance 
Act''.
SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF BUREAU OF PRISONS LAND TO MIAMI DADE COUNTY, 
FLORIDA.
    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Attorney General shall convey to 
Miami Dade College of Miami Dade County, Florida (in this section 
referred to as the ``College''), all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to a parcel of land held by the Bureau of Prisons 
of the Department of Justice in Miami Dade County, Florida, consisting 
of a parking lot approximately 47,500 square feet and located at 35 NE 
2 Street, for the purpose of permitting the College to use the parcel 
as a site for a new educational building that includes a parking area, 
of which not less than 118 secure parking spaces shall be designated 
for use by the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice.
    (b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Attorney General determines at 
any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not 
being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified 
in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
property shall revert, at the option of the Attorney General, to the 
United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate 
entry onto the property. Any determination of the Attorney General 
under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity 
for a hearing.
    (c) Survey.--If the Attorney General considers it necessary, the 
Attorney General may have the exact acreage or square footage and legal 
description of the land to be conveyed under subsection (a) determined 
by a survey satisfactory to the Attorney General. The College shall 
bear the cost of the survey.
    (d) Exemption.--Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) shall not apply to the 
conveyance of land under subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

h0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

145834

- 7

KARTER LANDON,

Petitioner

- Appellee, SC: 145834

- 7

COA: 301802, 301832,

v 301905, 301919

MTT: 00

- 339811, 00

- 339812,

00

- 339813, 00

- 339814

CITY OF FLINT,

Respondent

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Sparacino failed to object to do not rise to the level of plain error. Before 

imposing sentence, the district court disclaimed reliance upon all 

statements which fell outside the scope of NRS 176.015(3). See Buschauer, 

106 Nev. at 893, 804 P.2d at 1048. For these reasons, Sparacino fails to 

demonstrate that the district court violated his right to due process, see id. 

at 893-94, 804 P.2d at 1048, or abused its discretion at sentencing, see 

Randell, 109 Nev. at 8, 846 P.2d at 280; Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 

P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976) (a district court abuses its discretion if it bases its 

sentencing determination only upon impalpable or highly suspect 

evidence). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

kC)i J. 

Pickering 

J. 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

State Public Defender 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

kO) 1917A e
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF 10-Q REPORT OF




KL
Energy Corporation





FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009







The
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of KL Energy
Corporation (“KL”), that to his knowledge:





1.
            This
      Form 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      KL.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the 10-Q Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to KL and will be retained by KL and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is executed as of August 14, 2009.








/s/ STEVEN
CORCORAN


Steven
Corcoran


President
and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF MONTAN) ._ DA 22-0065 L. CRAIG SEMENZA,

Plaintiffand Appellant, v. HOLLISTER A. LARSON, et al, and HOLLYJEAN LARSON, both individually and collectively d/b/a FIRST & MAIN BUILDING,

Defendants and Appellees 

## JUL 18 2022 Bovvarl Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of rsAnntana ORDER

Appellant L. Craig Semenza has filed a motion for extension of time withi o fat opening brief. Upon consideration ofAppellant's motion for extension of time, IT ISHEREBY ORDERED that Appellant's motion for extension is GRA JED Appellant bas until August 15, 2022, or earlier within which to file his opening briet. DATED this ( 1 day ofJuly, 2022. For the Court, Chief Justice 07/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0065
DOCSNY-265920v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

CIRILO ENCALADA AND MELVA 

ENCALADA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

100 WALL STREET COMPANY LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

07-CV-04465-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-265920v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

 /s/ Judith R. Cohen 

______________________________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:07-cv-04465-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      10.1

    Allonge
      #6

    


    ALLONGE
      #6

     

    ($1,000,000
      NOTE)

     

    This
      Allonge #6 is hereby attached to and made a part of the Secured Promissory
      Note
      dated September 30, 2005, as amended by that certain Allonge dated October
      14,
      2005, that certain Allonge #2 dated October 21, 2005, that certain Allonge
      #3
      dated November 3, 2005, that certain Allonge #4 dated November 14, 2005, and
      that certain Allonge #5 dated December 1, 2005 (the “Note”), executed by
Winwin
      Gaming, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) in the original principal amount of $1,000,000
      in favor of Solidus
      Networks, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (“Lender”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
      herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.

     

    1.     Section
      1
      of the Note is hereby amended by deleting “December 31, 2005” in the second line
      thereof and substituting therefor “January 31, 2005.”

     

    2.     Borrower
      hereby ratifies and reaffirms the validity and enforceability of all of the
      liens and security interest heretofore granted pursuant to the Security
      Agreement, as collateral security for the Second Obligations (as defined in
      the
      Security Agreement), and acknowledges that all of such liens and security
      interests, and all Collateral heretofore pledged as security for the Secured
      Obligations, continues to be and remains Collateral for the Secured Obligations
      from and after the date hereof.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Allonge #6 to be executed
      and delivered by their duly authorized officers on December 21,
      2005.

     

     

    
      	 	 	 	Solidus Networks,
              Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	 	
               By:

            	 	/s/
              S.L. Zelinger 
	 	
               Name:

            	 	S.L.
              Zelinger
	 	
               Title:

            	 	General Counsel
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Winwin Gaming,
              Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	 	
               By:

            	 	/s/
              Patrick Rogers
	 	
               Name:

            	 	Patrick Rogers
	 	
               Title:

            	 	CEO/President
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of BuildingMaterials Holding Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•        the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•        the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Dated:  November 14, 2003

 

 
| /s/  Ellis C. Goebel       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| Senior Vice President - Finance |
| (Principal Financial Officer)   |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kirk Perlmutter, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, *570New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on August 21, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Fedora, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to suppress his inculpatory statement on the ground that it was obtained in violation of his right to counsel was properly denied. Defendant testified that he had retained counsel and had told Investigator Eisenhauer that he had retained counsel prior to making the inculpatory statement. Defendant’s self-serving testimony was inconsistent and contradictory and was not supported by the testimony of defendant’s father or attorney. The court refused to credit the testimony, as it was entitled to do, and that determination is supported by the record *(see, People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, 588, *cert denied*400 US 851). The statement of defendant’s father to defendant, "We’d better get in touch with a lawyer”, made in the noncustodial setting of their home, did not result in the "indelible attachment of the right to counsel” *(People v Hartley,*65 NY2d 703, 705; *People v Rowell,*59 NY2d 727, 730). (Appeal from judgment of Jeffer*976son County Court, Aylward, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 29 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 29 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,953,509
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,800,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 31,038,491
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,897,678
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,928,069
<LOANS>                                     56,022,576
<ALLOWANCE>                                    642,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,964,420
<DEPOSITS>                                  67,641,562
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,216,811
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,653,464
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,091,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,362,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              93,964,420
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,135,139
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              434,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                78,490 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,648,292
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             732,202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             797,891
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          850,401
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                683,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206,513
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     134,513
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76 
<LOANS-NON>                                          0 
<LOANS-PAST>                                   504,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               640,982
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,463
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              642,519
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           642,519
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
                  

</TABLE>