alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
151 So. 922

#### Solomon ROPER, alias Peropus, v. STATE.

2 Div. 33.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 14, 1933.

Wm. Craig and Alston Keith, both of Selma, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

BOULDIN, Justice.

Solomon Roper, alias Solomon Peropus, was indicted and tried in the circuit court of Dallas county for the murder of Page Brazier, “by striking him with an axe, or by striking him with some hard instrument a further description of which is to the Grand Jury unknown.” Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and his punishment fixed at death.

The appeal is on the record.

There is no bill of exceptions.

The record discloses an indictment by the grand jury in due form, returned into court, with indorsements required by law; the appointment of counsel who represented defendant throughout the proceedings; the arraignment of defendant, order setting a day for trial, and for special venire, drawing of special jurors; order for service upon defendant of list of jurors, regular and special, with copy of the indictment, and due return of such service; organization of jury for trial, submission of issue upon indictment and plea of not guilty, the return of verdict in due form, followed by judgment and sentence, and the presence of defendant in court during all such proceedings.

The record showing the due conviction and sentence of the appellant in all things as provided by law, and no error appearing therein, the cause is affirmed.

The day fixed by the trial court for the execution of the death sentence having passed, it is ordered that Friday, the 9th day of February, 1934, be and is hereby set as the day upon which such sentence will be .executed in the-manner provided by law.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
Date:
December 18. 2006

\Authorized by:
Matt Lisle

To:
|All USFE Members and ISVs
(Central Coordinators)

Related Circulars/Bulletins:
IUSFE Rule 901-910

Priority:
Medium

Contact:
Matt Lisle
+1-312-544-1076

Bulletin Attached [|

Binding Circular EL

Informational Circular 1]

|All Departments

‘Content may be most important for:

Attachments:
None

De-listing of U.S. Treasury Futures and Options

Effective December 19, 2006, U.S. Futures Exchange {USFE

scheduled for February 26, 2007.

If you have any questions, please contact Matt Lisle at +1-312-544-1076 or mlisie@usfe.com.

Deleted: 1

Deleted: December 18, 2006

“<> (Deleted: December 18, 2006

Deleted: December 18,
2006December 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             521
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,533,652
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          49,800
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,243
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,605,639
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,286,849
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,605,639
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              100,671
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               100,671
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          100,671
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 151
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 86,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,973
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,640
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.59
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

---

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Greer Bancshares Incorporated (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
               filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:  /s/ R. Dennis Hennett
R. Dennis HennettPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 25, 2004
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:  /s/ Richard Medlock, Jr.
Richard Medlock, Jr.Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 25, 2004
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 617.

#### H. V. Mercer et al., Trustees, etc., Appellants, *v.*Monitor Drill Company.

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. February 23, 1909. Dismissed per stipulation. *Mr. M. H. Boutelle*for appellants.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of Global MacroTrust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Trust on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theTrust.

Date:March 30, 2007
|        |   |   | /s/Harvey Beker                                    |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |     Harvey Beker               |   |
|   |   |   |     Co-Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### TEFFT v. DONNELLY.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

July 14, 1894.)

Ac ion by Otis A. Tefft against John Donnelly.

No opinion: Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# FCM DATA NOVEMBER 2004
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify that the foregoing Quarterly Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"):

         (1)      Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Don Crosbie
------------------------
Don Crosbie
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 1, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
152 So. 259

#### STATE SAVINGS & LOAN CO. v. STATE MORTGAGE CO.

6 Div. 491.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 18, 1934.

J. Chandler Burton, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Basil A. Wood, of Birmingham, opposed.

KNIGHT, Justice.

Petition of the State Mortgage Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the opinion and judgment of that court in State Savings & Loan Co. v. State Mortgage Co., 152 So. 257.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.
# C_2004254EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/2

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

(2004/C 254/02)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Synthetic fibres of polyester | Australia
  Indonesia | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 978/2000 (OJ L 113, 12.5.2000, p. 1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 902/2001 (OJ L 127, 9.5.2001, p. 20) | 13.5.2005 |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Synthetic fibres of polyester

Australia

Indonesia

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 978/2000 (OJ L 113, 12.5.2000, p. 1) as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 902/2001 (OJ L 127, 9.5.2001, p. 20)

13.5.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

1

(2)  Telex COMEU B 21877; Fax (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05400-AKH Document 22 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Amazon Goldsands Ltd. for the quarter      ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Amazon Goldsands      Ltd.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By:   |   |   /s/ Kenneth      Phillippe                           |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:       |   |  Kenneth      Phillippe                                                                                                                                                                       |
|  Title:      |   |  Principal      Executive Officer andPrincipal      Financial Officer                                                                                                                    |
|  Date:  |   |  May      21, 2010                                                                                                                                                                            |
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 28, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of The Seibels Bruce Group,
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999 into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements
(File S-8 Nos. 333-14135, 333-15457, 2-70057, 2-83595, 33-34973, 33-43618,
33-43601, and 2-48782).



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Columbia, South Carolina,
March 28, 2000.
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 36 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OFCHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

 

I,Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”), certify that(i) the Annual Report of the Trust on Form 10-K for the period ending December31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in suchAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

 
| Date:  March 26, 2004 |   |   |                       |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|                  |   | /s/    | Harvey  Beker              |   |
|                  |   |   | Harvey  Beker              |
|                  |   |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, George E. Crapple, certify that (i) the Annual Report of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





/s/George E. CrappleGeorge E. CrappleCo-Chief Executive OfficerMillburn Ridgefield CorporationManaging Owner, Global Macro TrustMarch 30, 2011
EXHIBIT 10.2


                             ANNUAL REVIEW AGREEMENT

THIS ANNUAL REVIEW  AGREEMENT (the  "Agreement") is entered into on December 19,
2005 by and between J. Gordon  Jennings,  III (the  "Employee") and 21st Century
Holding Company, a Florida corporation (the "Company").

The Company agrees to review the  Employee's  performance on an annual basis and
based on the conclusions of such review and the Company's  overall  performance,
the  Employee  may be entitled to a salary  increase of up to five  percent (5%)
over the previous year.

This  agreement  shall be binding  upon and inure to the benefit of the parties,
their successors,  assigns,  and personal  representatives.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly signed by the parties hereto on
the day and year first above written.


                                         21ST CENTURY HOLDING COMPANY


                                         By: /s/ Edward J. Lawson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Name: Edward J. Lawson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                         Title: President & CEO
                                                --------------------------------


                                             /s/ J. Gordon Jennings, III
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         J. Gordon Jennings, III, EMPLOYEE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bancinsurance Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Si
Sokol, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Si Sokol

Si Sokol
Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-05720-WHP Document 5 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 12 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-01513-AKH Document 12 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Abel GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-8166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 2013.

Decided: May 23, 2013.

Angel Abel Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angel Abel Guzman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Guzman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Allan Roof et al., Respondents, v Robert Bogdanski, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from that portion of an order which denied his motion for a protective order and granted plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery in accordance with their notice and supplemental notice for discovery and inspection. We conclude that the court properly denied a protective order. CPLR 3122 provides that a motion for a protective order must be made within 10 days of service of the challenged discovery notice. Defendant failed to make a timely motion and thus waived any objection to the propriety of the discovery demand. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — discovery.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

83