alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5.2 Clearing Members 

5.2.1 All Participants must be an Individual Clearing Member or have an agreement with 

an FCM Clearing Member that establishes an account for the Participant for the 

purpose of clearing the Participant’s Transactions through the Clearing House. 

Individual Clearing Members have direct access to trade on the Exchange. All other 

Participants, which are not Individual Clearing Members, are granted direct access to 

trade authorization by the FCM Clearing Member.

5.2.2 A Clearing Member may at any time revoke any authorization granted and guarantee 

made by it to any Participant in accordance with Rule 5.2.1 above, by providing 

written notice of such revocation to the Exchange. The guarantee will remain in effect 

until the Participant has liquidated or transferred its positions and funds to another 

Clearing Member.

5.2.3 For clearing purposes, the Participant must specify Individual Trading Accounts that 

it wishes to be separately tracked and margined by its Clearing Member. The 

Exchange will give each of these accounts an ITM for use by the Clearing House and 

its Clearing Members.

5.2.4 The Clearing Member will set risk limits for each of the Participant’s ITMs, and has 

the right to suspend trading by a Participant on the Exchange.
Executive Agreement Addendum dated as of April 1, 2005



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 Executive Agreement Addendum 
  

					
	 Name: Nurez Khimji
	  	Title: Chief Financial Officer of VeriChip Corporation	  	Effective Date: April 1, 2005
	
	 Location: Richmond, BC Canada

	
	 Reports to: Kevin McLaughlin        Title: CEO – VeriChip
Corporation


  

					
	 Salary:
  
 $150,000 Canadian
	 	 Quarterly Bonus: - Section 1
  
 Special Quarterly bonuses may be initiated from time to time
	 	 Yearly Bonus: - Section 2.
  
 Up to 50% of base salary


  
 Except as modified
hereby, the terms and provisions of that certain Executive Agreement by and between VeriChip Inc. (f/k/a EXI Technologies Inc.) and Mr. Khimji shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 General Description of Duties: 
  

	 	•	 	Supervision of all financial aspects of the combined company 

  

	 	•	 	Continued personal involvement in Strategic Relationships 

  

	 	•	 	Assist in Strategic acquisitions for the Company 

  

	 	•	 	Develop significant Partnerships and Alliances in Gov’t and Commercial Accounts 

  

	 	•	 	Capital market activity for the new VeriChip Corporation 

  

	 	•	 	Other assigned tasks as necessary 

  
 SECTION 1. Quarterly Bonus 
  
 • 
  
 SECTION 2. Yearly Bonus Criteria (up to 50% of base salary) 
  

	 	•	 	30% Financial – EBITDA 

  

	 	•	 	15% Strategic / Revenue producing acquisitions 

  

	 	•	 	15% Capital market activity 

  

	 	•	 	10% Strategic Partnership – Major Distribution Agreement 

  

	 	•	 	30% Integration Goals 

  
 Financial (10%) 
  
 Personnel (10%) 
  
 Company (10%) 
  
 SECTION 3. Other Financial Consideration 
  

	 	•	 	Initial VeriChip Option Grant of 57,788 @ U.S. $1.54 

  

	 	•	 	Subsequent VeriChip Option Grant of 2,878 @ U.S. $1.54 on or prior to January 15, 2006 

  

			
	 /s/ Nurez Khimji

	  	 
	 Nurez Khimji
	  	Date:    12/28/05
		
	 /s/ Kevin McLaughlin

	  	 
	 Kevin McLaughlin
	  	Date:
<PAGE>   1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bancinsurance Corporation's 1984 Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Stock Option
Plan on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 1996, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
Bancinsurance Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                     Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.




Columbus, Ohio
February 28, 1997
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-01539-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05562-AKH     Document 6      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH Document 10 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05420-AKH Document 10 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[TN 241-1-2000103b; FRL-6974-5]


Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of the Redesignation of 
Shelby County, TN, to Attainment for Lead

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plan 
submitted on February 15, 2001, by the Memphis and Shelby County Health 
Department through the Tennessee Department of Environment and 
Conservation for the purpose of redesignating Shelby County from 
nonattainment to attainment for the lead national ambient air quality 
standard. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA 
is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without 
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial 
submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for 
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse 
comments are received in response to this action, no further activity 
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final 
rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The 
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this 
time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 4. 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Kimberly Bingham, at 
the EPA Regional Office listed below. The interested persons wanting to 
examine these documents should make an appointment with the appropriate 
office at least 24 hours before the visiting day. Copies of the 
documents relative to this action are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Atlanta Federal 
Center, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division, 61 Forsyth 
Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Bingham of the EPA Region 4, 
Air Planning Branch at (404) 562-9038 and at the above address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is published in the Final Rules section of this 
Federal Register.

    Dated: April 19, 2001.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 01-11091 Filed 5-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bancinsurance Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
l3a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:
March 1, 2006
    
    /s/ Matthew C. NolanMatthew C. NolanChief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
 71
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

GREGORY FISCO and NICOLE FISCO,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05289-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 16 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05289-AKH Document 16 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Via E-Mail

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 05.151: Notification of
the Delisting of NYMEX ClearPortTM Gasoline Swaps Contract Months
Beyond December 2006.

Dear Ms. Jean Webb:

The New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) of the-Exchange’s
immediate delisting of NYMEX ClearPortTM Gasoline Swaps Contract Months beyond December
2006. The delisting affects the following contracts:

New York Harbor Gasoline Calendar Swap (MS)

New York Harbor Gasoline Crack Spread Swap (UK)

New York Harbor Gasoline vs. Heating Oil Spread Swap (MR)
New York Harbor Gasoline Up-Down Swap (UU)

There is no open interest for any of the contracts in the delisted months.

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) and CFTC Rule 40.6,
the Exchange hereby certifies that this notification filing complies with the Act, including
regulations under the Act.

Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Dan Brusstar,
Director, Research, at (212) 299-2604.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. LaSala
Senior Vice President
Compliance and Risk Management
ce: Brian Regan
Dan Brusstar
Case 7:07-cv-05784-KMK-LMS Document 3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05784-KMK-LMS Document 3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Lewis RENDELMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6145.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2013.

Decided: April 30, 2013.

Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Stacy Dawson Belf, Assistant United States Attorney, Gregory P. Bailey, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Scott Lewis Rendelman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rendelman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.6



Report of Independent Accountants


Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank"),
Administrator of the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2001-4



We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over the Administration of the Chase Credit Card
Owner Trust Series 2001-4 (the "Owner Trust"), that Chase Manhattan Bank USA NA
(the "Bank") maintained effective internal control over its administration of
the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust
(the "Administration" of the Owner Trust) as of December 31, 2003, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over the
Administration of the Owner Trust, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained effective
internal control over Administration of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust
and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal
control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 29, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05388-AKH Document 6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 15-18 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 16 of 16
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

MARIA DE LA CRUZ,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-4464-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 32 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 11, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 32 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3