3612 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2001 / Notices

Use Power for the Pick-Sloan Missouri

Basin Program (P–SMBP), Eastern and

Western Division. The proposed rate for

Project Use Power is to recover all

annual operating, maintenance, and

replacement expenses. The analysis of

the proposed Project Use Rate is

included in a booklet available upon

request. The proposed rate for Project

Use Power will become effective April

1, 2001.

This notice provides the opportunity

for public comment. After review of

comments received, Reclamation will

consider them, revise the rates if

necessary, and recommend a proposed

rate for approval to the Commissioner of

the Bureau of Reclamation.

DATES: The comment period is being

extended with the publication of this

notice in the Federal Register. To be

assured consideration, please submit

comments on or before February 26,

2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be sent to Jim L. Wedeward, GP–2020,

Power O&M Administrator, Bureau of

Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Billings

MT 59107–6900.

Our practice is to make comments,

including names and home addresses of

respondents, available for public

review. Individual respondents may

request that we withhold their home

address from public disclosure, which

we will honor to the extent allowable by

law. There also may be circumstances in

which we would withhold a

respondent’s identity from public

disclosure, as allowable by law. If you

wish us to withhold your name and/or

address, you must state this

prominently at the beginning of your

comment. We will make all submissions

from organizations or businesses, and

from individuals identifying themselves

as representatives or officials of

organizations or businesses, available

for public disclosure in their entirety.

All booklets, studies, comments,

letters, memoranda, and other

documents made or kept by

Reclamation for the purpose of

developing the proposed rate for Project

Use Power will be made available for

inspection and copying at the Great

Plains Regional Office, located at 316

North 26th Street, Billings, Montana

59107–6900.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim

L. Wedeward (406) 247–7705, Internet:

jwedeward@gp.usbr.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Power

rates for the P–SMBP are established

pursuant to the Reclamation Act of 1902

(43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), as amended and

supplemented by subsequent

enactments, particularly section 9(c) of

the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43

U.S.C. 485h(c)) and the Flood Control

Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 887).

Beginning April 1, 2001, Reclamation

proposes to:

(a) increase the energy charge from 2.5

mills/kWh to 10.76 mills/kWh

(b) the monthly demand charge will

remain at zero.

The Project Use Power rate will be

reviewed each time Western Area Power

Administration (Western) adjusts the P–

SMBP Firm power rate. Western will

conduct the necessary studies and use

the methodology identified in this rate

proposal to determine a new rate.

The existing rate schedule MRB–P10

placed into effect on November 1, 1986,

will be replaced by rate schedule MRB–

P11.

In compliance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq; Council

on Environmental Quality Regulations

(40 CFR Parts 1500–1508); and

Reclamation’s Regulations (10 CFR Part

1021), Reclamation has determined that

this action is categorically excluded

from the preparation of an

Environmental Assessment or

Environmental Impact Statement.

Dated: January 9, 2001.

Gerald W. Kelso,

Assistant Regional Director, Great Plains

Region, Bureau of Reclamation.

[FR Doc. 01–1166 Filed 1–12–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–652 (Review)]

In the Matter of Aramid Fiber Formed

of Poly Para-Phenylene

Terephthalamide From The

Netherlands; Notice of Commission

Determination To Conduct a Portion of

The Hearing In Camera

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Closure of a portion of a

Commission hearing.

SUMMARY: Upon request of foreign

producer Twaron Products bv and

importer Twaron Products, Inc.

(‘‘Twaron’’), the Commission has

determined to conduct a portion of its

hearing in the above-captioned

investigation scheduled for January 9,

2001, in camera. See Commission rules

207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4)

(19 CFR 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and

201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the

hearing will be open to the public. The

Commission has determined that the

seven-day advance notice of the change

to a meeting was not possible. See

Commission rule 201.35(a), (c)(1) (19

CFR 201.35(a), (c)(1)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen V. Driscoll, Office of General

Counsel, U.S. International Trade

Commission, telephone 202–205–3092,

e-mail kdriscoll@usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that

information on this matter may be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–3105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission believes that Twaron has

justified the need for a closed session.

In this review, significant data for both

the foreign and domestic industries are

business proprietary. Twaron seeks a

closed session in order to fully address

the issues before the Commission

without referring to business proprietary

information. In making this decision,

the Commission nevertheless reaffirms

its belief that whenever possible its

business should be conducted in public.

The hearing will begin with public

presentations by E.I. DuPont de

Nemours & Company (‘‘DuPont’’),

domestic producer opposing revocation

of the antidumping duty order, followed

by foreign respondent Twaron in

support of revocation. During the public

session, the Commission may question

the parties following their respective

presentations. Next, the hearing will

include a 20-minute in camera session

for a confidential presentation by

Twaron and for questions from the

Commission relating to the BPI,

followed by a 20-minute in camera

rebuttal presentation by DuPont and

questions from the Commission relating

to the BPI. For any in camera session

the room will be cleared of all persons

except those who have been granted

access to BPI under a Commission

administrative protective order (APO)

and are included on the Commission’s

APO service list in these investigations.

See 19 CFR 201.35(b)(1), (2). The time

for the parties’ presentations and

rebuttals in the in camera session will

be taken from their respective overall

time allotments for the hearing. All

persons planning to attend the in

camera portions of the hearing should

be prepared to present proper

identification.

Authority: The Assistant General Counsel

for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

Investigations, acting for the General

Counsel, has certified, pursuant to

Commission Rule 201.39 (19 CFR 201.39)

that a portion of the Commission’s hearing in

Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene

Terephthalamide from the Netherlands, Inv.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2001 / Notices 3613

No. 731–TA–652 (Review), may be closed to

the public to prevent the disclosure of BPI.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 8, 2001.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–1221 Filed 1–12–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–444]

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor

Light Emitting Devices, Components

Thereof, and Products Containing

Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

December 15, 2000, under section 337 of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Rohm, Inc., of

Japan. A supplement to the Complaint

was filed on January 4, 2001. The

complaint, as supplemented, alleges

violations of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain semiconductor light emitting

devices, components thereof, and

products containing same by reason of

infringement of claims 1, 2, 4 and 6–45

of U.S. Letters Patent 6,084,899 and

claims 1–5 and 9–23 of U.S. Letters

Patent 6,115,399. The complaint further

alleges that an industry in the United

States exists and/or is in the process of

being established as required by

subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after the investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and a

permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and

supplement, except for any confidential

information contained therein, are

available for inspection during official

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC

20436, telephone 202–205–2000.

Hearing impaired individuals are

advised that information on this matter

can be obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may be obtained by

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anne M. Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2574.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.10

(2000).

Scope of Investigation: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

January 9, 2001, Ordered That—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain semiconductor

light emitting devices, components

thereof, or products containing same by

reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 4,

6–44 or 45 of U.S. Letters Patent

6,084,899 or claims 1–5, 9–22 or 23 of

U.S. Letters Patent 6,115,399, and

whether an industry in the United

States exists and/or is in the process of

being established as required by

subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—

Rohm Co., Ltd., 21, Saiin Mizosaki-cho,

Ukyo-ku, Kyoto, 615–8585, Japan

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Nichia Corporation, 491 Oka, KaminakaCho, Anan, Tokushima, 774–8601,

Japan

Nichia America Corporation, 3775

Hempland Road, Mountville, PA

17554

(c) Anne M. Goalwin, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Room 401–P, Washington,

DC 20436, who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Sidney Harris is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR §§ 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such

responses will be considered by the

Commission if received no later than 20

days after the date of service by the

Commission of the complaint and the

notice of investigation. Extensions of

time for submitting responses to the

complaint will not be granted unless

good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and to

authorize the administrative law judge

and the Commission, without further

notice to that respondent, to find the

facts to be as alleged in the complaint

and this notice and to enter both an

initial determination and a final

determination containing such findings,

and may result in the issuance of a

limited exclusion order or a cease and

desist order or both directed against that

respondent.

Issued: January 10, 2001.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–1222 Filed 1–12–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[A.G. Order No. 2353–2001]

Final Specification of Community

Programs Necessary for Protection of

Life or Safety Under Welfare Reform

Legislation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of final order.

SUMMARY: This publication contains the

final version of the Attorney General’s

Order that is issued pursuant to sections

401 and 411 of the Personal

Responsibility and Work Opportunity

Reconciliation Act of 1996. The Order

specifies the types of community

programs, services, or assistance for

which all aliens remain eligible. This

publication also responds to comments

submitted regarding the Order.

DATES: This Notice is effective January

16, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jessica Rosenbaum, Office of Policy