alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2003 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2003

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that during a lapse in 
   appropriations certain services relating to the Federal Employees 
Health Benefits Program are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2019

  Mr. Cummings (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Meadows, Ms. Clark of 
  Massachusetts, Mr. Young, and Mr. Taylor) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that during a lapse in 
   appropriations certain services relating to the Federal Employees 
Health Benefits Program are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring FEHBP Coverage During 
Shutdowns Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATING CERTAIN FEHBP-RELATED SERVICES AS EXCEPTED SERVICES 
              UNDER THE ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 8905 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Any services by an officer or employee under this chapter 
relating to enrolling individuals in a health benefits plan under this 
chapter, or changing the enrollment of an individual already so 
enrolled due to a qualifying life event, shall be deemed, for purposes 
of section 1342 of title 31, services for emergencies involving the 
safety of human life or the protection of property.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any lapse in appropriations beginning on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Alexander Chen, the
Chief Financial Officer of NIVS INTELLIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 4thday of
November, 2010.





/s/ Alexander ChenAlexander
      ChenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NIVS IntelliMedia Technology Group, Inc. and will be retained by NIVS
IntelliMedia Technology Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit  32.2
 CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF  2002*
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Winston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Bruce Winston
 Bruce Winston Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 August  10, 2004
 
 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1834 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations prohibiting the 

use of sunscreen containing oxybenzone or octinoxate in a National 

Marine Sanctuary in which coral is present, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2019 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself and Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations 

prohibiting the use of sunscreen containing oxybenzone 

or octinoxate in a National Marine Sanctuary in which 

coral is present, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Our Na5 tional Marine Sanctuaries from Damaging Chemicals Act 

6 of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1834 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF OXYBENZONE AND 

2 OCTINOXATE. 

3 The Secretary of Commerce shall issue regulations 

4 prohibiting use, including application to another indi5 vidual, of sunscreen containing oxybenzone or octinoxate 

6 in a National Marine Sanctuary in which coral is present. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2005224EN.01001501.xml

| 13.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/15

---

Corrigendum to the uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 168 of 8 July 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 168 of 8 July 2005

(2005/C 224/13)

On page 25, under Page 232, in the first list:

Page 232

for:

‘Swimming shorts must have all the following characteristics:

| | have inner briefs sewn to the garment or at least






  — | a lining in the front or the crotch |
| --- | --- | --- |

have inner briefs sewn to the garment or at least

—

a lining in the front or the crotch

| — | be tight at the waist (e.g. have a drawstring or a fully elasticated waist)’, |
| --- | --- |

—

be tight at the waist (e.g. have a drawstring or a fully elasticated waist)’,

read:

‘Swimming shorts must have all the following characteristics:

| — | have inner briefs sewn to the garment or at least a lining in the front or the crotch |
| --- | --- |

—

have inner briefs sewn to the garment or at least a lining in the front or the crotch

| — | be tight at the waist (e.g. have a drawstring or a fully elasticated waist)’. |
| --- | --- |

—

be tight at the waist (e.g. have a drawstring or a fully elasticated waist)’.

---
Exhibit G: Overview of Corporate Certification

Attach as Exhibit G, a copy of the constitution, articles of incorporation, formation, or association with all 

amendments thereto, partnership or limited liability agreements, and existing by-laws, operating agreement, rules 

or instruments corresponding thereto, of the Applicant. Include any additional governance fitness information not 

included in Exhibit C. Provide a certificate of good standing dated within one week of the date of this Form DCM

Exhibit G-1: Certificate of Incorporation of Small Exchange, Inc.

Exhibit G-2: Bylaws of Small Exchange, Inc.

Exhibit G-3: Common Stock Purchase Agreement of Small Exchange, Inc.

Exhibit G-4: Certificate of Good Standing 

Exhibit G-5: Voting Agreement of Small Exchange, Inc.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 | Company      Name |                                                                         |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |              |                                                                         |   |
| Date:  March      20, 2010 | By:               | /s/ Daryl      K. Gisser                                                |   |
|                                 |              | Daryl      K. Gisser                                                         |   |
|                                 |              | Chief      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Controller |   |

----
Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05564-AKH Document 30 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATESCODE

 

                I, Gregg Buckbinder, certifythat (i) the Annual Report of Global Macro Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust.

 
|   | /s/  Gregg Buckbinder                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Gregg  Buckbinder                      |
|   | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |
|   | Millburn  Ridgefield Corporation       |
|   | Managing  Owner, Global Macro Trust    |
|   | March 30,  2009                   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.40

                      TWELFTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

     TWELFTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT made this 14th day of September,
2005, by and between National City Bank of Pennsylvania (herein termed "Bank"),
and Steel City Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (herein termed
"Borrower").

                                    RECITALS:

     A. Borrower and Bank desire to modify a certain Credit Agreement executed
by Borrower and Bank on JULY 13, 2001 (as amended, supplemented, replaced or
otherwise modified, the "Agreement"); and

     B. The Borrower has requested the Bank to, extend the maturity date, and
the Bank is willing to do so upon the terms and conditions set forth in this
Amendment.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein
and subject to Borrower's satisfactory fulfillment of all conditions incident to
the borrowing, Bank and Borrower agree:

     1. This Amendment is and shall be construed and considered as a part of the
Agreement.

     2. The Agreement is and shall be amended as follows:

          THE FOLLOWING DEFINED TERM SET FORTH IN ANNEX A TO THE CREDIT
     AGREEMENT IS HEREBY AMENDED AND RESTATED IN ITS ENTIRETY AS FOLLOWS:

          "REVOLVING CREDIT MATURITY DATE" SHALL MEAN MAY 31, 2007.

     3. Except as hereinabove modified, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect.

     Executed this 14th day of September, 2005.

BANK:                                   BORROWER:
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA      STEEL CITY PRODUCTS, INC.


By: /s/ Dominic J. Pellicciotti         By: /s/ Terrance W. Allan
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Name: Dominic J. Pellicciotti           Name: Terrance W. Allan
Title: Assistant Vice President         Title: President, CEO

(SEAL)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Critical Therapeutics,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Paul D. Rubin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: March 16, 2005                      /s/ Paul D. Rubin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Paul D. Rubin, M.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to March 16, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-20-503 Jacinto v. Cruz

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR LOPEZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MANUEL A. RAMIREZ, Presiding Judge; 

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS 4TH 

DISTRICT DIVISION TWO, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-55224 

D.C. No. 5:18-cv-01835-VBFMRW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Arthur Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that a California court rule violated his due 

process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-55224 

a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Jachetta v. United States, 653 F.3d 

898, 903 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lopez’s action because defendants are 

entitled to immunity, and to the extent Lopez seeks injunctive relief, his action is 

barred by the Younger abstention doctrine. See Simmons v. Sacramento Cty.

Superior Court, 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 2003) (state courts, as an arm of 

state government, have Eleventh Amendment immunity); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 

F.2d 1072, 1075 (9th Cir. 1986) (en banc) (judges are absolutely immune from 

damage liability for acts performed in their official capacities); see also Younger v. 

Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43 (1971) (recognizing the longstanding public policy against 

federal court interference with state court proceedings).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend 

because amendment would have been futile. See Gordon v. City of Oakland, 627 

F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for

dismissing without leave to amend).

Lopez’s motion for extension of time to file a supplemental reply brief 

(Docket Entry No. 26) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
# fcmdata0308
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hague Corp.  (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Squires, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ STEPHEN
      SQUIRESStephen
      SquiresChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      23, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
 U.S. CONCRETE, INC.
 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


Effective as of December 16, 2005



          The Board of
Directors of U.S. Concrete, Inc. (the “Company”) by resolution has duly
adopted this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 2000 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.


          1.          The Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 9 and replacing, in lieu thereof, a new Section 9 reading in its entirety as follows:


     9.     PURCHASE PRICE. 



             9.1          Purchase
Price on or before December 31, 2005.  For any Offering Period ending
on or prior to December 31, 2005, the Purchase Price at which each share of
Stock may be acquired in such Offering Period upon the exercise of all or any
portion of a Purchase Right shall be established by the Board; provided,
however, that the Purchase Right shall not be less than eighty-five percent
(85%) of the lesser of (a) the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the
Offering Date of the Offering Period or (b) the Fair Market Value of a share of
Stock on the Purchase Date.  Unless otherwise provided by the Board prior
to the commencement of an Offering Period ending on or prior to December 31,
2005, the Purchase Price for that Offering Period shall be eighty-five percent
(85%) of the lesser of (a) the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the
Offering Date of the Offering Period or (b) the Fair Market Value of a share of
Stock on the Purchase Date. 



             9.2          Purchase
Price on or after January 1, 2006.  For any Offering Period beginning
on or after January 1, 2006, the Purchase Price at which each share of Stock may
be acquired in such Offering Period upon the exercise of all or any portion of a
Purchase Right shall be established by the Board; provided, however, that the
Purchase Right shall not be less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair
Market Value of a share of Stock on the Purchase Date of the Offering
Period.  Unless otherwise provided by the Board prior to the commencement
of an Offering Period beginning on or after to January 1, 2006, the Purchase
Price for that Offering Period shall be eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair
Market Value of a share of Stock on the Purchase Date of the Offering Period.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20343 Summary Calendar

DANIEL SERGIO HANSEN, Petitioner-Appellant

v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF C RIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CV-1056

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. In supplemental briefing filed by the p arties after our previous opinion on rehearing, it has c ome to our attention that the state courts are n ow moving forward with H ansen’s state habeas application. In the light of that activity, we U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D J uly 8, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the Court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-20343 Document: 00512299519 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2013No. 12-20343

cannot say that there is an absence of a vailable State corrective process or that circumstances e x i st t hat render such process ineffective t o pr o t e c t H ansen’s rights. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B). W e there f o r e withdraw our previous opinions in this case and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court dismissing Hansen’s federal habeas petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies.

2 Case: 12-20343 Document: 00512299519 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2013