alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ricardo Rosado, Principal Financial Officer of NS8 Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of NS8 Corporation;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made know to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures,  and  presented  in this  annual  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on our evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: January 23, 2007

                               /s/ Ricardo Rosado
                               ---------------------------
                               Principal Financial Officer
METHFESSEL & WERBEL, ESQS. 

450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1400 

New York, NY 10123 

(212) 947-1999 

Attorneys for BMS Catastrophe, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

NANCY CRIOLLO AND LAWRENCE 

ZENTEINO 

Plaintiff, 

-AGAINSTALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, 

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, LTD, 

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, 

AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL 

RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., 

ANN TAYLOR STORES, et.al. 

Defendants. 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

INDEX NO.: 07CV4462 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant, BMS Catastrophe, Inc. s/h/a 

Blackmon-Mooring-Steamatic Catastophe, Inc. d/b/a BMS Catastrophe, by 

their attorneys, Methfessel & Werbel, as and for their response to the 

allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) 

Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above referenced action, hereby 

adopts their Answer and defenses to the Master Complaint, dated July 26, 

2007, which was filed in the matter of: In Re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

 To the extent that Defendant’s Answer to the Master Complaint does not 

comprehensively address any of the specific allegations within the Check-Off 

Complaint in the above captioned matter, Defendant, Defendant, BMS 

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 28 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 3
Catastrophe, Inc., denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as 

to the truth of such specific allegations. 

 WHEREFORE, the defendant, Defendant, BMS Catastrophe, Inc., 

demands judgment dismissing the above captioned action as against them, 

together with costs, disbursements and such other and further relief as this 

Court deems just and proper. 

DATED: New York, New York 

 September 19, 2007 

METHFESSEL & WERBEL, ESQS. 

Attorneys for BMS Catastrophe 

 

By:________________________________ 

Frank J. Keenan (FK 8922) 

450 Seventh Avenue 

Suite 1400 

New York, New York 10123 

(212) 947-1999 

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 28 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 3
Our File No. 66200ddd 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies as follows: 

 l. I am employed by the law firm of Methfessel & Werbel. 

 2. On September 14, 2007 the undersigned prepared and 

forwarded copies of the within Notice of Adoption , via ECF, to the 

following parties: 

 Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP 

5 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, NY 10006 

Attorneys for: Plaintiff 

All Defense Counsel 

 3. I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am 

aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are wilfully false, I am 

subject to punishment. 

 

____________________________________ 

Frank J. Keenan 

Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 28 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Thomas G. Lehmann, a First Vice President of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in the year  covered  by this  annual  report,  of  WASHINGTON  MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-9;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:


Cendant Mortgage, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc, Citimortgage, Inc., GMAC Mortgage
Corp, National City Mortgage, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage


Dated: March 29, 2005
                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann,
                                     First Vice President
Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: CalbaTech, Inc.

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of CalbaTech, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002 of our report dated March 14, 2003 and
contained in the Registration Statement No. 333-104837 of CalbaTech,
Inc. (formerly Traffic Technologies, Inc.) Form S-8 under the
Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial
statements of CalbaTech, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                   /s/ Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
                       Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 15, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-05723-KMK Document 6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05723-KMK Document 6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 13-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 14 of 14
| Name of Subsidiaries                 |         | Percentage Owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| NAI Interactive Ltd.                 |         | 100% owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.                       |
| ChineseWorldNet.com (Hong Kong) Ltd. |         | 99% owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.                        |
| ChineseWorldNet.com (Shanghai) Ltd.  |         | 70% owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.                        |
| Weihai Consulting Investment Ltd.    |         | 70% owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc.                        |
| CWN Capital Inc.                     |    | 100% owned by ChineseWorldNet.com Inc. until October 1, 2010 |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7450

ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. 

Koon,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney General, in her official capacity 

as chief/judge/chief solicitor of SC; JEAN TOAL, Chief 

Justice, in their official capacity as chief/judge/chief 

solicitor of SC; ALAN WILSON, SC Attorney General, in his 

official capacity as chief/judge/chief solicitor of SC,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-7454

ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. 

Koon,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney General, in her official capacity 

as chief/judge/chief solicitor of SC; JEAN TOAL, Chief 

Justice, in their official capacity as chief/judge/chief 

solicitor of SC; ALAN WILSON, SC Attorney General, in his 

official capacity as chief/judge/chief solicitor of SC,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District 

Judge. (4:15-cv-02107-DCN; 4:15-cv-02349-DCN)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these duplicative and consolidated cases, Robert Holland 

Koon appeals the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing without 

prejudice Koon’s civil complaints. In No. 15-7450, Koon also 

appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to alter 

or set aside the judgment. We have reviewed the records and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm in both cases 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Koon v. Lynch, 

No. 4:15-cv-02107-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 12 & 27, 2015); Koon v. 

Lynch, No. 4:15-cv-02349-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0225 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0225

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (14843/1/2004 - C6-0038/2005 - 2002/0132(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 124 E , 15/05/2006 P. 0390 - 0395 *

P6_TA(2005)0225

Controls on cash movements ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (14843/1/2004 — C6-0038/2005 — 2002/0132(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (14843/1/2004 — C6-0038/2005),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2002)0328) [2],

- having regard to the amendments to the Commission proposal (COM(2003)0371) [3],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0167/2005),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 67 E, 17.3.2004, p. 259.

[2] OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002, p. 574.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 7:07-cv-05714-CS-MDF     Document 16      Filed 08/05/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 14 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 14 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 14 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-05867-PAC Document 14 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 4 of 4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2352

EL HADJI SALL; ANTA MBAYE DIAGNE,

Petitioners,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-226-098)

Submitted: August 6, 2004 Decided: August 23, 2004

Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland, Assistant

Director, Luis E. Perez, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

El Hadji Sall and his wife, Anta Mbaye Diagne, natives

and citizens of Senegal, petition for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals denying their motion to reconsider its

denial of their application for asylum. We dismiss the petition

for lack of jurisdiction.

Petitioners first challenge the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

finding that their asylum application is untimely. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) (2004). We conclude

we lack jurisdiction to review this claim. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(3) (2000). Petitioners next dispute the IJ’s finding

that they failed to qualify for withholding of removal and

protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed

the administrative record and conclude that petitioners did not

properly exhaust this claim because they failed to raise it in

their motion for reconsideration. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)

(2000); Asika v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004).

We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 22 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04356-AKH Document 22 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

Two Liberty Place

50 South 16th Street, 22nd Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19102

215) 851-8522 

RJacobsMeadway@eckertseamans.com

Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 10 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
February 6, 2006

Ms, Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2631.01
Rule Certification

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Establishment of an Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program for CBOT 100 oz.
Gold Options. (Summary of program’s salient features is attached).

There were no opposing views in connection with this program.

The CBOT intends to implement this program concurrently with the launch of trading in 100 oz.
Gold Options (presently targeted for March 3, 2006).

The CBOT certifies that this program complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b012406


CBOT® 100 oz. Gold Futures Options
Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program

EMM Obligations

Participants in this non-exclusive EMM program will provide two-sided markets in CBOT 100
oz. Gold Options on the CBOT’s electronic platform (e-cbot®), on a continuous basis and in
response to requests-for-quote (“RFQs”) during daytime U. S. market hours for such options,
unless prevented from doing so as a result of extraordinary circumstances beyond the EMM’s
reasonable control or due to position limits.

EMM participants agree that they will quote prices continuously, and respond to RFQs, for
CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options at agreed upon minimum size and maximum bid/offer spread levels
for specified options series.

EMM Incentives

In return for an EMM’s fulfillment of its obligations, such EMM will receive the following for
the period coinciding with EMM’s period of participation in this program:

Transaction fees: All CBOT electronic transaction fees will be rebated for EMM proprietary
transactions in CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options during the market hours of their assignment.

Entitlements: After the allocation of any priority order, EMMs will be entitled to a percentage of
each transaction in CBOT 100 oz. Gold Options, in a percentage to be determined, where EMMs
have matched the bid or offer prior to trade completion, during the hours of their assignment.
The CBOT reserves the right to periodically review and reallocate entitlement percentages
among the EMMs.

Term

The program will have an initial term through February 29, 2008, and may be extended if
mutually agreed.

Termination

EMM Agreements may be terminated for uncorrected material breach, upon specified advance
notice, or by mutual consent.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,482-03

EX PARTE MARK WILHELM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-37,085 IN THE 161 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child by contact and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he did not

present defensive evidence in opposition to the motion to adjudicate, and did not present evidence

to mitigate punishment. The habeas record contains no response from counsel and no findings from

the trial court. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
2

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,

it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant—either insofar as it caused his plea to be involuntary, or did not

mitigate Applicant’s punishment. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 13, 2016

Do not publish