alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of International Card Establishment, Inc
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Cecille Clayvielle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to International Card Establishment, Inc. and will be retained by
International Card Establishment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



DATE:  April 16, 2007



/s/ CECILLE CLAYVIELLE
___________________________
    Cecille Clayvielle
    Chief Financial Officer
CPL. GE TRE SECRETAR Is
January 30, 2006 “CRG TARIAL
Ms. Jean A. Webb
Secretary
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center
1155 21 Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581
Reference File #2627.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Establishment of an Market Maker Program for Soybean Board Crush Spread
Options (“Soybean Crush Options”). (Summary of program’s salient features is
attached).

This initiative has been established pursuant to CBOT Rule 225.00 “General Enabling Rule for
Market Maker Programs”, which authorizes the Chief Executive Officer of the Exchange to
approve the implementation of such programs.

There were no opposing views in connection with this program.

The CBOT intends to implement this program concurrently with the launch of CBOT Soybean
Crush Options (date to be determined).

The CBOT certifies that this program complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b012406


CBOT Soybean Crush Options Market Maker Program
Market Maker Obligations
Market Maker designation will be non-exclusive. Market Maker will provide two-sided open
auction markets in Soybean Crush Options, on a continuous basis during all open outcry trading
hours for such options, unless prevented from doing so as a result of extraordinary circumstances

beyond Market Maker’s reasonable control or due to position limits.

Each Market Maker will make markets in Soybean Crush Options, at a minimum depth, and
within a bid-offer spread, as mutually agreed.

Market Maker Incentives

In retum for Market Maker’s fulfillment of its obligations, Market Maker will receive the
following for the period coinciding with Market Maker’s period of participation in this program:

(a) CBOT transaction fee rebates for its proprietary transactions in Soybean Crush Options.

(b) | CBOT transaction fee rebates for Market Maker’s proprietary transactions in CBOT
Soybean, Soybean Meal and Soybean Oil futures and futures options which are entered
into for hedging purposes in connection with CBOT Soybean Crush Options.
Transaction fee rebates under this section (b) will not exceed $5,000 per calendar month.

Term

The program will have an initial term expiring December 31, 2006, and may be extended if
mutually agreed.

Termination

A Market Maker Agreement may be terminated for uncorrected material breach, upon 30 days’
advance notice by either party, or by mutual consent at any time.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-11 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 9 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05398-AKH Document 26 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 3 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 4 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 5 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 6 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 7 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 8 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 9 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 10 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 11 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 12 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 13 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 14 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 15 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 16 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 17 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 18 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 19 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 20 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 21 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 22 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 23 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 24 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 25 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 26 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 27 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 28 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 29 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 30 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 31 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-04463-AKH Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 32 of 32
#### O’Brien *vs.*Whitehead *et al.*

Complainant in an equity case obtained a decree that, upon paying the defendant two thousand dollars within six months, the latter should convey to him a certain tract of land, the defendant having contended in the litigation that the complainant should pay him $4,500. Complainant’s attorneys recorded their lien against the land. Complainant procured a third party to advance the money due under the decree; defendant conveyed the land to the plaint*752iff, who conveyed it to the third party as security for the money so advanced. The attorneys foreclosed their lien and caused the land to be levied on, and a claim was interposed:

*Held,*that the lien of the attorneys attached to the land when it was conveyed to the complainant, and followed it into the hands of the person to whom the complainant conveyed it.

February 9, 1886.

Attorney and Client. Liens. Before Judge Lumpkin. Hancock Superior Court. April Adjourned Term, 1885.

Reported in the decision.

James A. Harley, for plaintiff in error.

Reese & Little; Jordan & Lewis, for defendants.

Blandford, Justice.

Stephen Smith filed his bill against one Walker, and obtained a decree that Walker should convey to him a certain tract of land upon his paying Walker two thousand dollars within six months after the rendition of the decree. Walker contended in that litigation that Smith should pay forty-five hundred dollars, but the decree was for two thousand dollars, to be paid by Smith to Walker. Whitehead and W. M. & M. P. Reese represented Smith in that litigation, and recorded their lien, as attorneys, against the land decreed to be conveyed by Walker to Smith. Smith procured O’Brien to advance the money due by the decree to Walker, and Walker conveyed the land to Smith, and Smith conveyed the land to O’Brien as security for the money advanced by O’Brien to Walker for Smith. The attorneys foreclosed their lien against the land, and caused the land to be levied on, when O’Brien interposed a claim thereto. On the trial of the claim case, the court held and decided that the land was subject to the attorneys’ lien. This is the only error assigned and complained of.

It is manifest that the labor and services of the attor*753neys benefited Smith twenty-five hundred dollars, and when he complied with the decree and paid, or caused to be paid to Walker, the two thousand dollars therein provided, and Walker conveyed the land to Smith, that the lien of the attorneys attached to the land, and was not diverted by the conveyance from Smith to O’Brien. So we think that when O’Brien took the deed from Smith, he took the land subject to the encumbrance of the attorneys’ lien, whose services had recovered the land. This lien followed the land into whosesoever hands it might come, after the title had been put into Smith by the conyeyance from W alker.

So we think the court did not err in his ruling complained of.

Judgment affirmed.
November 14, 2006

Ms. Eileen Donovan

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: CME Clearing House Manual of Operations
Submission No. 06-100
Dear Ms. Donovan:
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“Exchange” or ““CME”) hereby notifies the Commission that
the Exchange has prepared and distributed the June 2006 version of the Clearing House Manual
of Operations (“Manual”). The Exchange certifies that the Manual neither violates nor is
inconsistent with any provision of the Commodity Exchange Act or of the rules and regulations
thereunder.
If you have any questions regarding this Manual, please contact Mr. Steve Szarmack in CME's
Legal Department at 312-648-5422, Thank you.
Sincerely,

Monica Chavarro-

Monica Chavarro
Assistant to Directors

Enclosure


November 14, 2006

Mr. Frank Zimmerle

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
525 West Monroe Street

Suite 1100

Chicago, Illinois 60661

Re: CME Clearing House Manual of Operations
Submission No. 06-100
Dear Mr. Zimmerle:
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (““Exchange” or “CME”) hereby notifies the Commission that
the Exchange has prepared and distributed the June 2006 version of the Clearing House Manual
of Operations (“Manual”). The Exchange certifies that the Manual neither violates nor is
inconsistent with any provision of the Commodity Exchange Act or of the rules and regulations
thereunder.
If you have any questions regarding this Manual, please contact Mr. Steve Szarmack in CME's
Legal Department at 312-648-5422. Thank you.
Sincerely,

Monica Chavarro-

Monica Chavarro
Assistant to Directors

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1661 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1661

 To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility 
    to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

   Mr. Zeldin (for himself and Mr. Gonzalez of Texas) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility 
    to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLEXIBILITY FOR NCUA BOARD TO INCREASE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 
              LOAN MATURITIES.

    Section 107(5) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757(5)) 
is amended by inserting after ``shall not exceed 15 years,'' the 
following: ``or any longer maturity as the Board may allow, in 
regulations,''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH Document 2 Filed 08/26/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-04898-AKH Document 2 Filed 08/26/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canusa Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Janet Janes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant tO ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of September, 2008.


/s/ Janet Janes
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
February 16, 2007

Ms. Eileen A. Donovan :
Acting Secretary o
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre -
1155 21" Street, N.W. ~
Washington, D.C. 20581 ° .
Reference File #2766.01 :
Rule Certification : _
Dear Ms. Donovan: :

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following, a portion of which is subject to the enclosed FOIA Confidential
Treatment Request:

- Establishment of an Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program for CBOT Dow
JonesTM US Real Estate Index futures. (Summary of program’s salient features is
attached).

There were no opposing views in connection with this program.

The CBOT intends to implement this program no sooner than one day after the Commission’s
receipt of this submission.

The CBOT certifies that this program complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b011607

*"Dow JonesTM, is a service mark of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and has been licensed for use for certain purposes by the Board
of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (“CBOT®). The CBOT’s futures contract based on the Dow Jones U.S, Real Estate Index
are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Dow JonesTM, and Dow JonesTM makes no representation regarding the
advisability of trading in such product.


CBOT® Dow JonesTM US Real Estate Index (“DJUSRE”) Futures
Electronic Market Maker (EMM) Program

EMM Obligations

Participants in this non-exclusive EMM program will provide two-sided markets in CBOT
DJUSRE futures on the CBOT’s electronic platform (e-cbot®), on a continuous basis and in
response to requests-for-quote (“RFQs”) during agreed upon periods between 8:30 a.m. and 3:15
p.m. (Chicago time), unless prevented from doing so as a result of extraordinary circumstances
beyond the EMM’s reasonable control or due to position limits.

EMM participants agree that they will quote prices continuously, and respond to RFQs, for
CBOT DJUSRE futures at agreed upon minimum size and maximum bid/offer spread levels for
specified contract months.

EMM Incentives

In return for an EMM’s fulfillment of its obligations, such EMM will receive the following for
the period coinciding with EMM’s period of participation in this program:

Transaction Fees: All CBOT electronic transaction fees (excluding clearing fees) will be rebated
for EMM proprietary transactions in CBOT DJUSRE futures.

Preferencing/Entitlements: After the allocation of any priority order, EMMs will be entitled to a
percentage of each transaction in CBOT DJUSRE futures, in a percentage to be determined,
where EMMs have matched the bid or offer prior to trade completion, during the hours of their
assignment. Total preferencing among all EMMs will be limited to 40%. The CBOT reserves
the right to periodically review and reallocate entitlement percentages among the EMMs.

Term

The program will have an initial term through December 31, 2008, and may be extended if
mutually agreed.

Termination

EMM Agreements may be terminated for uncorrected material breach, upon specified advance
notice, or by mutual consent.
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 33 – Global Land Change      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn about global land cover and land change mapping.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: Mapping land cover across the United States using Landsat satellite data is a difficult, time-intensive job, but there are jobs far larger. Matt Hansen, a Maryland-based professor and member of the Landsat Science Team focuses his efforts on mapping land cover and change on a global scale. In this episode of Eyes on Earth, we hear from Matt on how he and his team use the Landsat archive to map change at such a wide scale.

**Guest**: Matt Hansen, Department of Geographical Sciences at the University of Maryland, College Park

**Host**: Steve Young

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: September 8, 2020

**More on Global Land Change**: 
                            - Global Forest Watch
                            - Global Land Analysis and Discovery
                            -   High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
                            -  Landsat Science Team Member: Satellites Can Play Greater Role in Informing Global Policies 

### Contacts
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-15 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 10 of 10
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed Fe bruary 21, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22

- 2179

Lower Tribunal No. F 17

- 21512

________________



### John Allen Calaway

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Marisa Tinkler

Mendez , Judge.

John Allen Calaway , in proper person.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Gary Becton, Petitioner, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority made on or about December 4, 1985, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of certain charges and suspended him from his employment as a car maintainer. By order of this court, dated May 26, 1987, the matter was remitted to the respondent to make written findings setting forth the essential facts and evidence upon which it relied in its determination, and the proceeding was held in *756abeyance in the interim *(see, Matter of Becton v New York City Tr. Auth.,*130 AD2d 745). On July 7, 1987, the respondent made its findings.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

A review of the entire record reveals that there was substantial evidence to support the respondent’s determination as to the charges *(see, Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg,*47 NY2d 354).

As to the petitioner’s request for payment of "differential pay” pursuant to rule 157 of the respondent’s rules and regulations, this request is premature. We express no opinion as to whether or not he may be entitled to such pay, since he must first exhaust his administrative remedies as to this claim before seeking relief under CPLR article 78 *(see, Matter of Plummer v Klepak,*48 NY2d 486, *cert denied*445 US 952). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Solely
for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Hague
Corp., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the company’s financial condition and results of operations.


February
      17, 2009/s/
      Brian
    LukianBrian Lukian, Chief Financial
    Officer