alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**asAdopted Pursuant Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

** **

**I,David H. Bateman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Evans &Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31,2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.**

** **
| **Date:  March 6, 2009** | **By:**    | **/s/  David H. Bateman**                      |
|--------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|
| ** **               | ** ** | **    David H. Bateman**        |
| ** **               | ** ** | **    Chief Executive Officer** |

** **

**I,Paul L. Dailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Evans &Sutherland Computer Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31,2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation.**

** **
| **Date:  March 6, 2009** | **By:**    | **/s/  Paul L. Dailey**                        |
|--------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|
| ** **               | ** ** | **    Paul L. Dailey**          |
| ** **               | ** ** | **    Chief Financial Officer** |

** **

** **

**Theforegoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.**

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re RAMS Aviation Company, Inc. and Jonathan L. Rankin

Appellate case number: 01-13-00885-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-23205

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas

On October 16, 2013, relator RAMS Aviation Company, Inc. and Jonathan L. Rankin 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court and an emergency motion to stay. Relators’ 

petition seeks relief from the trial court’s September 6, 2013 order denying relators’ traditional 

motion for summary judgment. Relators’ petition names the Honorable Ken Wise as the 

respondent in this original proceeding. The Honorable Ken Wise is no longer the presiding 

judge of the 334th District Court; the Honorable Grant Dorfman is now the presiding judge of 

that court.

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2, Judge Dorfman is substituted for the 

Judge Wise as the respondent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(a). Further, this original proceeding is 

abated and remanded to the trial court to allow Judge Dorfman to reconsider the ruling made the 

basis of relator’s petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b). 

Within 30 days of this order, a copy of Judge Dorfman’s order on reconsideration should

be filed with the Clerk of this Court. When a copy of the order on reconsideration is filed, the 

Clerk shall reinstate the case without further order of the Court.

The Court further orders all proceedings in the above-referenced underlying case stayed, 

with the exception that Judge Dorfman is permitted to reconsider the ruling made the basis of 

relator’s petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the case in this Court 

is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted.

Finally, relators are advised that their petition fails to include a certification as required 

by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(j). Accordingly, upon reinstatement, if relators 

desire to proceed with their original proceeding, relators must file a proper certification within 10 

days of reinstatement. If a proper certification is not filed, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus will be denied.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 21, 2013
Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-05552-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of thinkorswim Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ida K. Kane, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company, and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Dated: March 16, 2009

/s/ IDA K. KANE Ida K. Kane
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit G-4

RTX H: Certificate of Incorporation
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quantum Materials Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Squires, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ STEPHEN SQUIRESStephen SquiresPrincipal Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2013
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 19, 2010

s1118 

# Order

November 19, 2010

142024 & (28)

ADIA BLACKSHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, and

McLAREN MEDICAL CENTER, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142024 COA: 299611 Genesee CC: 08-089055-NF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
(106 So. 132)

#### MUSCLE SHOALS CONST. CO. v. LITTLE.

(8 Div. 767.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 5, 1925.)

Appeal and error <§^I13(3) — No appeal lies from judgment overruling motion to set aside judgment by confession.

No appeal lies from judgment overruling motion to set aside judgment by confession on account of accident or surprise under Code 1923, § 9518.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County ; Charles P. Almon, Judge.

Action by T. H. Little against D. M. Humphries, with garnishment in aid of suit.From a judgment overruling the motion of the garnishee, Muscle Shoals Construction Company, a partnership, to set aside a judgment by confession against it, the garnishee appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals, under Code 1923, § 7326.

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews, Peach & Almon, of ¡Sheffield, for appellant.

Bradshaw & Barnett, of Florence, for appellee.

In view of the decision, briefs of counsel on the merits need not be here set out.

SAYRE, J.

The Muscle Shoals Construction Company, a partnership, as garnishee, confessed judgment in the case of Little v. Humphries. At a later day of the term the garnishee moved the court to set aside the judgment and permit it to file an answer denying indebtedness to the defendant in the original suit. This motion, having been regularly continued, was overruled at the next term, and the garnishee now seeks to bring that action under review by appeal.

By its motion, garnishee invoked the common-law power of the court during the term to set aside its judgments on account of accident or surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. Code, § 9518. It would be a matter of no difficulty to demonstrate that appellant’s predicament is to be attributed to its own very obvious lack of ordinary diligence in making the agreement in pursuance of which judgment against it was rendered. But we cannot get to that, for no appeal lies from a judgment overruling a motion to set aside a judgment by confession. Baggett v. Alabama Chemical Co., 156 Ala. 637, 47 So. 102.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05403-AKH     Document 3      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Administrator User Form 

 

 

Administrator Users (aka “Admin User”) are given full privileged rights to the KOR system on behalf of the 

Client specific to assigned KOR Services. For such KOR Services, the Admin User has visibility to user 

lists and authority to add, edit and remove Client Users. Further, Admin Users may edit Client wide 

settings, submit data, and can view and download reports. There must be at least two Administrator Users

per KOR Service subscribed by Client.

Adminstrator User 1

First Name Last Name Email

Phone Number Title

 

 

Adminstrator User 2

First Name Last Name Email

Phone Number Title
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-05731-JGK-RLE Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 14
Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 1 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 2 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 3 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 4 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 5 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 6 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 7 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 8 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 9 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 10 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 11 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 12 of 13

Case 7:07-cr-00272-KMK   Document 1   Filed 03/18/10   Page 13 of 13
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


     In connection with the Annual Report of Zen Pottery Equipment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Walter Nathan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: SEPTEMBER 28, 2004


                                           By: /s/ Walter Nathan
                                           ------------------------
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ZST Digital Networks, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Zhong BoZhong
      BoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)August
      19, 2009/s/
      Zeng Yun SuZeng
      Yun SuChief
      Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)August
      19, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of ZST Digital
Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
. f 1 59 Gib} JEW YORK

BOARD OF TRADE*
World Financial Center
One North End Avenue

New York, New York 10282

BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

05-50
December 15, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary of the Commission

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21 Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Amendment to Rule 21.25 -
Submission Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act and Regulation 40.6

Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and
Commission Regulation 40.6, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (“Exchange”)
submits, by written certification, amendment to Rule 21.25, attached as Exhibit A.

In a letter dated November 21, 2005, the Exchange submitted an amendment to Rule
21.25 which would require all clerks to wear a trading jacket (see Submission No. 05-47). That
provision of Rule 21.25 has been further amended to require all members, as well as floor clerks,
to wear a trading jacket. Again, the purpose of this amendment is to give a more uniform and
professional appearance to the trading floor.

The Exchange certifies that the amendments comply with the requirements of the
Commodity Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The amendment was adopted by the Exchange’s Board of Governors on December 14,
2005. No substantive opposing views were expressed by members or others with respect to the
amendment. The amendment will go into effect on January 2, 2006.


-2-

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at

jfassler@nybot.com or 212-748-4084.

Sincerely,

Jill S. Fassler
Vice President
Associate General Counsel

ce: Riva Adriance
CFTC, Division of Market Oversight
Allen Cooper
CFTC, New York Regional Office


(In the text of the amendments below, additions are underlined and deletions are bracketed and
lined out.)

Rule 21.25. Floor Committee Summary Action
* * *
(b) Conduct Subject to Summary Action

It shall be a violation of the Rules regarding decorum, attire, or timely submission of accurate records
for a Member to engage in the following practices:

* * *

(ii) Attire: Failure to conform to the Exchange mandatory forms of dress and appearance.

A. For purposes of this Rule, the following forms of dress and appearance are mandatory.

* * *

5. All Clerks and Members must wear a trading jacket.
[REMAINDER OF RULE UNCHANGED]

EXHIBIT A
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1925 

To designate the Manhattan Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care 

System of the Department of Veterans Affairs as the ‘‘Margaret Cochran 

Corbin Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care System’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. 

NADLER, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Manhattan Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care System of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs as the ‘‘Margaret Cochran Corbin Campus of 

the New York Harbor Health Care System’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MANHATTAN CAMPUS OF 

4 THE NEW YORK HARBOR HEALTH CARE SYS5 TEM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF6 FAIRS, NEW YORK. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find8 ings: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1925 IH

1 (1) Margaret Cochran was born in Franklin 

2 County, Pennsylvania, on November 12, 1751, and 

3 married John Corbin in 1772. 

4 (2) Three years after the marriage, when John 

5 Corbin left to fight in the Revolutionary War as an 

6 artilleryman, Margaret Corbin accompanied him to 

7 war to support the Revolutionary Army. 

8 (3) Margaret Corbin supported the Revolu9 tionary Army by caring for injured and sick soldiers 

10 as well as by cooking and cleaning. During battle, 

11 she also helped her husband load the cannon he was 

12 responsible for manning. 

13 (4) On November 16, 1776, John Corbin was 

14 manning a cannon during the Battle of Fort Wash15 ington on Manhattan Island, New York, when he 

16 was killed. Margaret Corbin heroically took her hus17 band’s place, firing the cannon until she, too, was 

18 hit by enemy fire and seriously wounded. 

19 (5) Having lost the use of her left arm, Mar20 garet Corbin was assigned to the ‘‘Invalid Regi21 ment’’ at West Point, New York. 

22 (6) The Continental Congress awarded Mar23 garet Corbin a lifelong pension for her injuries, mak24 ing her the first woman to receive a pension from 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1925 IH

1 the United States by virtue of military service for 

2 the United States. 

3 (7) Margaret Corbin died in 1789 in Highland 

4 Falls, New York. She is honored nearby at West 

5 Point as a hero of the Revolutionary War. 

6 (b) DESIGNATION.—The Manhattan Campus of the 

7 New York Harbor Health Care System of the Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs in New York, New York, shall after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act be known and des10 ignated as the ‘‘Margaret Cochran Corbin Campus of the 

11 New York Harbor Health Care System’’. 

12 (c) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regula13 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

14 States to the Campus referred to in subsection (b) shall 

15 be deemed to be a reference to the Margaret Cochran 

16 Corbin Campus of the New York Harbor Health Care Sys17 tem. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH Document 12 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH Document 12 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05427-AKH Document 12 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.4
 
    Defined Terms.
 Extension of Non-Renewal Notice Period
  Miscellaneous
 Inverness Medical Innovations North America, Inc.
    
    
    
    Fisher HealthCareBy:
    
    /s/ Ron Zwanziger
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joseph BernandoName:
    
    Ron Zwanziger
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Joseph BernandoTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    PresidentDate:
    
    7/8/08
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    8 July 2008By:
    
    /s/ Ellen ChiniaraName:
    
    Ellen ChiniaraTitle:
    
    SecretaryDate:
    
    7/8/08
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

C.A., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1400

[ March 31, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kathleen J. Kroll , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2020

- CJ

001334

- XXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
fon

April 27, 2006 op Mp th

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21" Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2667.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Terminate trading authorization in August 2006 CBOT Dow Jones AIG Commodity
IndexTM futures, which has no open interest.

The foregoing action is being taken in connection with an Exchange review of the specifications
of this futures product.

The Exchange intends to implement this action as of the business day following the
Commission’s receipt of this filing.

There were no opposing views concerning this action.

The CBOT certifies that this action complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary

b042506

Dow Jones," AIG ®” Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index[SM]," and DJ-AIGCI[SM}" are service marks of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and
American International Group, Inc., as the case may be, and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by the CBOT. The CBOT Dow
Jones- AIG Commodity Index futures and futures options are not sponsored, endorsed or sold by Dow Jones, AIG, American International
Group, or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, and none of Dow Jones, AIG, American International Group, or any of their respective
subsidiaries or affiliates, makes any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s).”
Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 18-2 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 1