alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Songzai
International Holding Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Yang Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §§. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Hongjun LiHongjun LiChief Financial OfficerJanuary 31, 2007
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theannual report on Form 10-K of InSight Health Services Holdings Corp. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian G. Drazba, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Brian G. Drazba                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian G. Drazba                                      |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| September 25, 2003                                   |

 

----

*A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to InSight Health Services Holdings Corp. and will beretained by InSight Health Services Holdings Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 16, 2018

No. 04-17-00318-CV

Lisa Bueno MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

FURMANITE AMERICA, INC., Furmanite Corporation, Furmanite Louisiana, LLC f/k/a 

Furmanite US GSG LLC, Galbraith Contracting, Inc., Southcross Energy Partners GP, LLC, 

Southcross Energy Partners, LP, Southcross NGL Pipeline, Ltd., Estate of Dennis Henneke,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-16-139-C

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 22, 2018, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of 

time to file a consolidated reply brief. At the time appellant filed her motion, appellees 

Furmanite America, Inc., Furmanite Corporation, and Furmanite Louisiana, LLC f/k/a Furmanite 

US GSG LLC (collectively, “Furmanite”); Galbraith Contracting, Inc.; Southcross Energy 

Partners, GP, LLC and Southcross NGL Pipeline Ltd. (collectively, “Southcross”); and Estate of 

Dennis Hennecke had each filed separate briefs. However, appellee Rene Elizondo had not yet 

filed a brief. On February 6, 2018, this court notified appellee Rene Elizondo by letter that an 

appellee’s brief had not been filed on his behalf and was past due. Our notice required appellee 

Rene Elizondo to file a response within ten days of the date of the letter. On February 8, 2018, 

appellee Rene Elizondo filed a response, stating he will not be filing an appellee’s brief. 

Under Rule 38.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, an appellant may file a reply 

brief addressing any matters in the briefs filed by appellees. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(c). The 

appellate rules further provide that “[a] reply brief, if any, must be filed within 20 days after the 

date the appellee’s brief filed.” Id. R. 38.6(c). Accordingly, based on the foregoing, a reply brief 

would be due February 28, 2018. 

We therefore GRANT appellant’s request to file a consolidated reply brief and ORDER

appellant to file her reply brief on or before February 28, 2018. 
We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of February, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 19, 2015.

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 01218

- CR

ERICH KIRCHMANN, A ppellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX15

- 90031

- J



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang and Brown

Opinion by Justice Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the

motion. Th e Court GRANTS the mo tion and ORDERS th at th e appeal be DISMISSED and

this decision be certified below for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47

151218F.U05 /Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Te xas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

EX PARTE ERICH KIRCH MANN

No. 05

- 15

- 01218

- CR On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX15

- 90031

- J.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Chief

Justice Wright and Justice Lang

part icipating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 19th day of October, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The Urban Targets Panel Meeting will meet in Washington, DC on May 
29-31, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings and discuss the 
direction of the study. The meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with section 552b(c) of Title 5, United States Code, 
specifically subparagraphs (1) and (4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-12446 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
#### CLEVENGER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, *v.*CHANEY. SAME *v.*LYLE. SAME *v.*NICHOLS.

APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND APPLICATIONS POR WRITS OP CERTIORARI.

Nos. 221, 222, 223.

Motions to dismiss or affirm and applications for certiorari submitted December 7, 1908.

Decided December 14, 1908.

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Appeals affirming orders and decrees of the bankruptcy court dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion on authority of *Chapman*v. *Bowen,*207 U. S. 89.1

*Mr. E. E. Clevenger*and *Mr. Cook Danford,*for appellants.

*Mr. A. H. Mitchell*for appellees.

1

[ The headnote in *Chapman*v. *Bowen,*207 U. S. 89, is as follows;

*563“Clause 3 of general order in bankruptcy XXXVI applies to-appeal-able cases and must be complied with. .

“This appeal cannot be maintained because it does not com*within either paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of § *25b oí*the bankruptcy act.

“Where the decision below proceeds on principles of general law broad enough to sustain it without reference to provisions of the bankruptcy act, the question involved is not one which would justify a writ of error from the highest court of a State to this court.”]

*Per Curiam:*

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Applications for certiorari denied. *Chapman, Trustee, &c.,*v. *Bowen,*207 U. S. 89.
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Exhibit 99.2

                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

           Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that:

       1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
           September 30,2002, (the "Report") fully complies with the require-
           ments of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


/s/ Teresa M. Nilsen
---------------------------
Teresa M. Nilsen

Date:  December 26, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 7, 2009



/S/ RONALD D. MOGELRonald D. Mogel Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019072EN.01002701.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — La Zaragozana v EUIPO — Heineken Italia (CERVISIA)

(Case T-378/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CERVISIA - Earlier national word mark CERVISIA AMBAR - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 72/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: La Zaragozana, SA (Saragossa, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García and A.M. Santos Pribañez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Heineken Italia SpA (Pollein, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2017 (Case R 1241/2016-5) concerning opposition proceedings between La Zaragozana and Heineken Italia.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 March 2017 (Case R 1241/2016-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 March 2017 (Case R 1241/2016-5);

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05370-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05346-AKH Document 16 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05346-AKH Document 16 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05346-AKH Document 16 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2019082EN.01005301.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/53

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Bischoff v EUIPO — Miroglio Fashion (CARACTÈRE)

(Case T-743/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark CARACTÈRE - Absolute grounds for refusal - No descriptive character - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 82/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bischoff GmbH (Muggensturm, Germany) (represented by: D. Régnier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Pétrequin and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miroglio Fashion Srl (Alba, Italy) (represented by: O. Vanner, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2017 (Case R 328/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bischoff and Miroglio Fashion.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bischoff GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bischoff GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.

---
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

We hereby consent to the use of the nameLonquist & Co., LLC and to incorporation by reference of our report, which appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Houston American Energy Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2009, in the Registration Statements of HoustonAmerican Energy Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-127656), relating to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Houston American Energy Corp., on Form S-3 (File No. 333-134756), on Form S-8 (File No. 333-151824), relating to the 2008 EquityIncentive Plan, of our report dated March 16, 2009, and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-161319), and to any amendments to those Registration Statements. 

/s/ Don E. Charbula, P.E. 

Vice President 

LONQUIST & CO., LLC 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

March 22, 2010
1

GEMINI TITAN, LLC 

EXHIBIT G 

Attach as Exhibit G, a copy of the constitution, articles of incorporation, formation or association 

with all amendments thereto, partnership or limited liability agreements, and existing bylaws, 

operating agreement, rules or instrument corresponding thereto, of the Applicant. Include any 

additional governance fitness information not included in Exhibit C. Provide a certificate of good 

standing dated within one week of the date of this Form DCM.
# C_2018381EN.01002301.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Pelikan v EUIPO — NBA Properties (NEW ORLEANS PELICANS)

(Case T-112/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark NEW ORLEANS PELICANS - Earlier EU word marks and earlier national figurative mark Pelikan - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2018/C 381/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: NBA Properties, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented initially by: M. Chapple, and subsequently by T. Elias, Barristers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 December 2016 (Case R 408/2016-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft and NBA Properties.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

---
L;NII'LD STA'TES DIS~I'RIC'T UOIJR'T 

SOU'l-I IEKN DISTRICT OF NEW YOKK 

X 

Millennium Pipeline Company. I,.L.C., 

PlaintifS(s), 

-api nst07 C'iv. 581 5 (CMj(MDI.'I 

ORDER OF REFERENCE 

A MAGISTRA'TE JUDGE 

Certain l emporary Easements in 322 

Sleepy Vallcq Road, Town oL' Warn ick, zt id., DOCUMENT 

ELECTRONICALLY FLED 

Dcfendant(s). 

X DOC #: - - .

'I he above entitled action is rcfcrred to the Honorable Tllark U, CIS, rllted Stafcs 

Magistrate Judgc tbr the folla\\-ing purpose(s): 

-- General 1'1-elrial (ir~cludcs scheduling, Consen1 undcr 28 G.S.C. 

discovery, non-dispositive prctrial motions, $636(c) for all purposes 

and se tt lcmenl (including trial) 

-- - Specific Nun-Dispositive Motion/Dispute:* - C'cjnscnt under 28 U.S.C. 

$636~~) Sur limited purpose 

(e.g., dispositive motion, 

.-. , - prcliminary injuncrivil 

Ii'rcf'erral is for discovcy disputes when Flnhcas Corpus 

thc llistricr .Judge is unavailablel the time 

period ot'the reirral: - - Social Security 

Scttlcmetlt* \ ," -- .- Dispositi\ e Motion (i.e., motion 

requiring 3 Kcport and 

- Ir~cluest Afier 13cfiultiDamagcs Hearing Reco~nmcnda~ion 

All such :tiotions: - P.. , . - 

* Do not check if alread) assigned Lur gencral ptelrial. 

13atrd: July 1 1, 2007 

Neu York, York 

Hurl. Collccn McMal~on 

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 27 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
3056877.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------X

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE

LITIGATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No.:

21 MC 102 (AKH)

ANTWI SAMUEL,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC., et al,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.:

07-CV-05399-AKH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

BY DEFENDANT

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------X

To the Clerk of this Court and All Parties of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Weston”), by

and through its attorneys, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP,

hereby appears in the above-entitled action, and that all pleadings and papers in this action be

served upon the undersigned at the office and address stated below. The undersigned certifies

that he is admitted to practice before this Court.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Weston has previously appeared and served

its notice of adoption of answer in the Master Docket 21 MC 102, and files this notice merely for

the purposes of receiving CM/ECF notifications.

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 19 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3056877.1

Dated: New York, New York

December 17, 2007

Yours etc.,

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

By: _/s/ Jason Harrington_____

Jason Harrington (JH7273)

Attorneys for Defendant

Weston Solutions, Inc.

150 E 42

nd

Street

New York, NY 10017

(212) 490-3000 (p)

(212) 490-3038 (f)

To: All parties via ECF

Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 19 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Order entered January 11, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00550-CR

RICKY LEE STEVENSON, II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81736-2022

ORDER

Appellant’s brief is overdue. Appellant’s brief was due December 16, 2022. 

On December 21, 2022, we notified appellant’s counsel by postcard that the brief 

was overdue and directed that appellant’s brief and a motion for extension be filed 

by December 31, 2022. The brief and motion have not yet been filed. We 

ORDER appellant’s brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief be 

filed no later than FEBRUARY 10, 2023.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE