alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11335 Conference Calendar

DAVE LELAND MATHONICAN, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF TEXAS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-1671

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion of Texas prisoner Dave Mathonican, Sr., #594269, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is hereby GRANTED. The Prison Reform Act (PLRA) requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. As Mathonican does not have funds for immediate payment of this fee, he is assessed an initial partialNo. 96-11335 - 2 - filing fee of $2, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the remainder will be deducted from Mathonican’s prison trust-fund account until the entire filing fee is paid. § 1915(b)(2). IT IS ORDERED that Mathonican pay the appropriate filing fee to the clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of Mathonican’s inmate account shall collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee and forward for payment, in accordance with § 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas each time the amount in Mathonican’s account exceeds $10, until the appellate filing fee is paid. Mathonican raises numerous appellate contentions, all of which implicate the validity of his state-court conviction. He may not pursue his claims in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 until his conviction has been invalidated or called into question by a grant of a writ of habeas corpus. Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 489 (1994). Mathonican’s appeal is frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit
32.0




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS




I,
Benedict Van, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of hereUare,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




1. the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
April 15, 2009





/s/ Benedict
      VanBenedict
      VanChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer




The
material contained in Exhibit 32.0 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 19, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-01218-CR

ERICH KIRCHMANN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX15-90031-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang and Brown

Opinion by Justice Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the 

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and 

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

151218F.U05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

EX PARTE ERICH KIRCHMANN

No. 05-15-01218-CR

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX15-90031-J.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Lang 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 19th day of October, 2015.
Case 1:07-cv-05773-LAK-GWG     Document 5      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-05673-KMK-LMS Document 17 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05673-KMK-LMS Document 17 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01538-AKH Document 26-3 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 21 of 21
#                                                                         USS Frank E. Petersen, Jr. (DDG 121) set for Charleston commissioning ceremony                                                                    

##### by Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

09 May 2022CHARLESTON, S.C. -- 
                Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, the future USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121), will be commissioned, Saturday, May 14, 2022, in Charleston, South Carolina. (U.S. Navy graphic illustration by Ted Townsend)                            220303-N-N0831-1001                            Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, the future USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121), will be commissioned, Saturday, May 14, 2022, in Charleston, South Carolina. (U.S. Navy graphic illustration by Ted Townsend)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Ted TownsendVIRIN: 220303-N-N0831-1001The commissioning will be a private event with a limited audience due to public health and safety concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The event will be livestreamed for public viewing.

Those interested in viewing the ceremony live may do so here. Media are encouraged to use this public domain, livestream footage in their coverage.

A **media availability and static display** will be held **Thursday, May 12, at**** ****10:30 a.m.**** ****EDT.**** **Those available to interview include Commanding Officer Cmdr. Daniel Hancock.

Media interested in participating in either or both events, please RSVP no later than **Wednesday, May 11, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. (EST**) to Julie Ann Ripley, at julie.a.ripley1@.navy.mil, 619-940-8247. Please provide the media member’s name, name of the organization, which event they plan to attend, and confirmation of vaccination. All media in attendance must be fully vaccinated, having received their final dose no later than April 29, 2022. Registered media will receive a confirmation email with participation instructions, and will need to present proof of vaccination during check-in.

Built by Huntington Ingalls Industries in Pascagoula, Mississippi, Frank E. Petersen, Jr. was launched July 13, 2018, and delivered to the U.S. Navy Nov. 30, 2021. The ship will be commissioned in Charleston, S.C. on May 14, 2022, and then transit to her homeport at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are the backbone of the U.S. Navy’s surface fleet. These highly capable, multi-mission ships conduct a variety of operations, from peacetime presence to national security providing a wide range of warfighting capabilities in multi-threat air, surface and subsurface.

Tags:
**Commissioning**USS Frank E. Petersen Jr.**DDG 121**Charleston**Destroyer

Terms:
**All Navy Categories
exv10w23



 











Exhibit 10.23




November 21, 2005




Adam Kablanian




RE: Base Salary Reduction for Fiscal Year 2006




Dear Adam:



This letter constitutes the agreement (the “Agreement”) between yourself and Virage Logic Corp.
(the “Company”) regarding the reduction of your base salary for fiscal year 2006 (“Salary Reduction
Period”).




     1. Base Salary. Effective October 1, 2005, your base salary will be $20,032.54 per
month (equivalent to $240,378.48 per annum). This represents a reduction of 10%. This new salary
will be in effect through September 30, 2006 or at such time as you and the Company agree to
reinstatement of your previous base salary. If no other action is taken, your base salary will
automatically revert to it pre-reduction level of $22,257.26 per month (equivalent to $267,087.12
per annum) on October 1, 2006. All base salary payments are subject to standard payroll deductions
and withholdings.



     2. Repayment. Since the effective date of this action was prior to the approval of
the Operation Plan, you agree to the recovery of prior payments of base salary for the three pay
periods ending October 15, October 31 and November 15. The total amount to be repaid is $3,338.59.
This repayment will be made through a single withholding transaction against your base salary for
the pay period ending November 30.



     3. Benefits. During the Salary Reduction Period, you will be eligible to continue
your current Company benefits subject to the terms and limitations of the applicable plans with the
exception of your life insurance/AD&D benefits which will remain at the maximum life insurance
benefit of $500,000.


If this Agreement is acceptable to you, please sign below and return the original to me.



Sincerely,



Virage Logic Corp.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Richard C. Butts	 	 
	 

	 	 

Richard C. Butts
	 	 
	 

	 	Vice President, Human Resources	 	 






Agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

/s/ Adam Kablanian
	 	 	 	 

11-22-05
	 	 
	 

	 	 

Adam Kablanian
	 	 	 	 

Date
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2030 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2030

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to execute and carry out 
agreements concerning Colorado River Drought Contingency Management and 
                  Operations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado River Drought Contingency 
Plan Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. COLORADO RIVER BASIN DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
expressly addressing the operation of the applicable Colorado River 
System reservoirs, immediately upon execution of the March 19, 2019, 
versions of the Agreement Concerning Colorado River Drought Contingency 
Management and Operations and the agreements attached thereto as 
Attachments A1, A2, and B, by all of the non-Federal parties thereto, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall, without delay, execute such 
agreements, and is directed and authorized to carry out the provisions 
of such agreements and operate applicable Colorado River System 
reservoirs accordingly.
    (b) Effect.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) be construed or interpreted as precedent for the 
        litigation of, or as altering, affecting, or being deemed as a 
        congressional determination regarding, the water rights of the 
        United States, any Indian Tribe, band, or community, any State 
        or political subdivision or district of a State, or any person; 
        or
            (2) exempt the implementation of such agreements and the 
        operation of applicable Colorado River System reservoirs from 
        any requirements of applicable Federal environmental laws.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2030

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to execute and carry out 
agreements concerning Colorado River Drought Contingency Management and 
                  Operations, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of PDC 2001-C Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_____/s/ James N. Ryan______________

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: __March 26, 2003________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00548-CV

Rufina Reyes YANEZ,

Appellant

v.

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVF000504-D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 16, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss arguing appellant’s notice of 

appeal was filed impermissibly late pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(a)(1), and 

appellant failed to file a timely motion for extension of time. 

Appellant failed to file a reply to appellee’s motion to dismiss, but did file a motion to 

abate the appeal. This Court may not abate an appeal if the notice of appeal was filed late. 

Further, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee. 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 3, 2015 and a motion for extension of 

time on the same date. The trial court’s judgment was signed on July 20, 2015. It thus appears 

that neither document was filed within the time allowed for filing a motion for extension of time 

to file the notice of appeal. 
A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, 

once the period for granting a motion for extension of time has passed, a party can no longer 

invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Id. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from 

the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is 

further ORDERED that appellant to show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this 

order that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying 

the filing fee. 

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for 

want of prosecution or for failure to pay the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c). The briefing 

schedule is suspended pending determination whether this Court holds jurisdiction over this appeal. 

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
September 29, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Center

1155 21* Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Reference File # 2586.01
Rule Certification
Dear Ms. Webb:

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6(a), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) hereby
submits the following:

- Revised e-cbot® (electronic) trading hours for CBOT Financial, Stock Index,
Ethanol and Metals contracts. Under the revised schedule, electronic trading
sessions in the referenced products will begin one hour earlier than is presently the
case. (The ending times for these electronic trading sessions will not change.)

The CBOT intends to implement this revised schedule as of October 9, 2005 (trade date October
10, 2005).

There were no opposing views concerning this revision.

The CBOT certifies that this revision complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules
thereunder.

Sincerely,

Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Elliot
Krasnow, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Netfran Development Corp.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/ Elliot Krasnow
----------------------
Elliot Krasnow

March 28, 2003
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 19 , 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00684

- CV

IN RE DR. NILESH KOT ECHA , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 245th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 45379



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 4, 2019, relator Dr. Nilesh Kotecha filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable
Tristan Longino
, presiding judge of the 245th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate his July 9, 2019 order appointing Warren Cole as a discovery master.2

On S eptember 12 , 2019, relator filed a n unopposed motion asking this court

to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus.

We GRANT the motion and DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

I, Stuart A. Benson, ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), certify that this annualreport on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained hereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Vital Living, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periodspresented.

 

 
| Date:  March 30, 2004 |                           | /s/ Stuart A. Benson |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|                       | Stuart A. Benson               |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                       | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-01670-AKH Document 26 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH     Document 17      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1988 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced mortgage loans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. LEVIN of California, and Mr. BARR) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced 

mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Affordable 

5 Mortgages for Veterans Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1988 IH

1 SEC. 2. SEASONING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN REFI2 NANCED MORTGAGE LOANS. 

3 (a) GINNIE MAE.—Paragraph (1) of section 306(g) 

4 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)(1)) is 

5 amended by striking the second sentence (as added by sec6 tion 309(b) of Public Law 115–174). 

7 (b) VETERANS LOANS.—Section 3709 of title 38, 

8 United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c) 

9 and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(c) LOAN SEASONING.—Except as provided in sub11 section (d) and notwithstanding section 3703 of this title 

12 or any other provision of law, a loan to a veteran for a 

13 purpose specified in section 3710 of this title that is a 

14 refinance may not be guaranteed or insured under this 

15 chapter until the date that is the later of— 

16 ‘‘(1) the date on which the borrower has made 

17 at least six consecutive monthly payments on the 

18 loan being refinanced; and 

19 ‘‘(2) the date that is 210 days after the first 

20 payment due date of the loan being refinanced.’’. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

22 may be construed to restrict or otherwise modify the au23 thorities of the Government National Mortgage Associa24 tion. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS