alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1249 

CAF 10-01243 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF MARY P. KELLEY, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

KATRINA LAZORE-CAMELO, NICHOLAS J. CAMELO, JR., 

AND DIANE M. KELLEY, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

JOHN T. NASCI, ROME, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

SCOTT T. GODKIN, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT KATRINA LAZORECAMELO. 

JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA, FOR ARIAH C.

ABBIE GOLDBAS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA, FOR SANTINO C. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Brian M.

Miga, J.H.O.), entered April 12, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition against

respondents. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1965-000]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Notice of Filing

May 9, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 3, 2001, Commonwealth Edison Company 
(ComEd), filed a request, consistent with last year's authorization 
(Notice of Interim Procedures to Support Industry Reliability Efforts, 
91 FERC para.61,189 (2000)), to purchase power using a streamlined 
regulatory process from entities with small amounts of electric 
wholesale sales. ComEd requests authorization for the use of the 
streamlined regulatory procedures for the period from June 1, 2001 to 
September 30, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 22, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12183 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William Lopshire, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of INTERNATIONAL CARD ESTABLISHMENT, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2005                       /S/ WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 WILLIAM LOPSHIRE
                                                 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 6 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 7 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 8 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 9 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 10 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 11 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 12 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 13 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 14 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 15 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 16 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 17 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 18 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 19 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 20 of 21Case 1:07-cv-05847-DAB Document 33 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 21 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 3-2 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1844

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, as the ``Corporal Alex Martinez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL ALEX MARTINEZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 66 Grove Court in Elgin, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Corporal Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Alex Martinez Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Clear All

        09 January 2023    

                    Naval Enterprise can Expect Risk Management Assessments                 
                NORFOLK, Va. - Naval enterprise commands can now expect assessments of their risk management and self-improvement practices by Naval Safety Command (NAVSAFECOM) assurance teams.            

        11 June 2022    

                    Navy aviation units hold safety pause                 
                As a result of recent crashes involving U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft, Commander, Naval Air Forces has directed all non-deployed Navy aviation units to conduct a safety pause on June 13 in order to review risk-management practices and conduct training on threat and error-management processes.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Exhibit 3.3
                      ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

               TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                     THE AUTOLINE GROUP, INC.


          Pursuant to the provisions of Section 16-10a-1006 of the Utah
Revised Business Corporation Act (the "Act"), the undersigned corporation
hereby adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation.

          FIRST:    The name of the corporation is The Autoline Group, Inc.

          SECOND:   The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
of The Autoline Group, Inc. was duly adopted by the written consent of the
holders of a majority of the corporation's issued and outstanding shares in
accordance with Section 16-10a-704 on September 12, 2005, in the manner
prescribed by the Act, to-wit:

                            ARTICLE I
                          CORPORATE NAME

          The name of the corporation shall be "GeNOsys, Inc."

          THIRD:    This amendment does not provide for any exchange,
reclassification or cancellation of issued shares.

          FOURTH:   The effective date of this amendment shall be October 10,
2005.

          FIFTH:    This amendment was not adopted by the incorporators or the
Board of Directors without stockholder action.

          SIXTH:    (a)  The designation and number of outstanding shares of
each class entitled to vote thereon as a class were as follows:

               CLASS                    NUMBER OF SHARES

               Common                            41,254,000

                    (b)  The number of shares voted for such amendment was
33,646,456, with none opposing and none abstaining.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned President and Secretary, having
been thereunto duly authorized, have executed the foregoing Articles of
Amendment for the corporation under the penalties of perjury this 30th day of
September, 2005.

                                   THE AUTOLINE GROUP, INC.


                                   By/s/John W. R. Miller
                                        John W. R. Miller, President
Attest:


Christy M. Woodruff Jones
Christy M. Woodruff Jones, Secretary
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 7-6 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 21 of 21
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 15, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. RappaportPrincipal
                Executive OfficerOctober
                14, 2008
Delaware

The First State

Page 1

 

7182620 8300 Authentication: 205204118

SR# 20224393708 Date: 12-28-22

You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "RAILBIRD EXCHANGE, LLC" IS DULY FORMED

UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD STANDING AND

HAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE SHOW, AS

OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER, A.D. 2022. 

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE BEEN

ASSESSED TO DATE.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2057 

To direct the Attorney General to enter into an agreement with the National 

Academies to conduct a study to develop guidelines, best practices, and 

examples for congressional redistricting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Mr. MCNERNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to enter into an agreement 

with the National Academies to conduct a study to develop guidelines, best practices, and examples for congressional redistricting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair And Inclusive 

5 Redistricting Map Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Map Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MAP STUDY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2057 IH

1 shall enter into an agreement with the National Academies 

2 under which the National Academies shall conduct a study 

3 to— 

4 (1) develop guidelines, best practices, and ex5 amples consistent with the criteria in subsection (b) 

6 to aid States in drawing congressional district maps; 

7 and 

8 (2) define metrics, limitations to such metrics, 

9 and other factors for the criteria in subsection (b). 

10 (b) MAP CRITERIA.— 

11 (1) REQUIREMENTS.—The guidelines, best 

12 practices, and examples developed under subsection 

13 (a) shall— 

14 (A) comply with the Constitution of the 

15 United States, including the requirement of 

16 equal population; and 

17 (B) comply with the Voting Rights Act of 

18 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10301 et seq.). 

19 (2) CONSIDERATIONS.—The guidelines, best 

20 practices, and examples developed under subsection 

21 (a) shall consider factors related to— 

22 (A) maintaining geographic contiguity and 

23 compactness; 

24 (B) respecting natural and existing polit25 ical boundaries; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2057 IH

1 (C) respecting communities of interest; and 

2 (D) maintaining partisan fairness. 

3 (c) COMPLETION OF STUDY.—The Study required 

4 under subsection (a) shall be completed at the later of— 

5 (1) January 1, 2021; or 

6 (2) the date that is 1 year after the date of the 

7 agreement in subsection (a). 

8 (d) REPORT.—After the completion of the study, the 

9 Attorney General shall submit to Congress and make pub10 licly available the results of the study described in sub11 section (a). 

12 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

13 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

14 as may be necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
cme ¢@

Chicago Mercantile Exchange
20 South Wacker Drive 312/930.1000 tel
Chicago, IL 60606-7499 312/466.4410 fax

www.cme.com

July 8, 2005

Ms. Jean A. Webb

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

faa

1
©
6

Re: Section Se(c)(1), Regulation 40.6(a) Submission. Self-Certification for
Composition of CME X-Fund Index Futures contracts.
CME Submission #05-69

IVIGVL3

Dear Ms. Webb:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. hereby informs the Commission regarding the composition for
the July 8, 2005 — July 22, 2005 CME X-Fund Index Futures contracts.

The Exchange certifies that the CME X-Funds product complies with the Act & regulations
thereunder.

There will be no CME X-Funds available for the July 2nd trading cycle.

If you require any additional information regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Charles Piszczor at 312-930-4536 or via e-mail at cpiszczo@cme.com. We would be
appreciative if you could reference our CME Submission #05-69 in any related correspondence.

Sincerely,

John W. Labuszewski, Managing Director
Research & Product Development

QGAMS0gu
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander James HARDNETT, a/k/a Alex, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 12, 2013.

Decided: May 3, 2013.

Alexander James Hardnett, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander James Hardnett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hardnett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05352-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2