alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward Kenneth WERDELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Attorney General of the State of Florida, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-14050.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 30, 2013.

Edward Kenneth Werdell, Raiford, FL, pro se.

Patricia Ann McCarthy, Bill McCollum, Office of the Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment in this case is vacated and the case is remanded so that the district court can do what it offered to do in its February 25, 2011 order: allow the petition to proceed in that court without dismissal on the ground that it violated Rule 2(e) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. *See Walker v. Crosby,*341 F.3d 1240, 1246 (11th Cir.2003), *overruled on other grounds by Zack v. Tucker,*704 F.3d 917 (11th Cir.2013) (en banc). In doing so, the district court may consider any affirmative defenses the respondent raises, including the statute of limitations set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), which applies on a claim-by-claim basis, not on a petition-wide basis. *Zack,*704 F.3d at 918.

We also note that the district court can take reasonable steps to have the petitioner clarify his petition, or any claims in his petition, that are difficult to parse or understand. *See*Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Advisory Committee Notes on 1976 Adoption (“[T]he judge may want to consider a motion from respondent to make the petition more certain.”); *see also Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol.,*516 F.3d 955, 983-84 (11th Cir.2008); *Wagner v. First Horizon Pharm. Corp.,*464 F.3d 1273, 1280 (11th Cir.2006); *Burden v. Yates,*644 F.2d 503, 505 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981).

VACATED AND REMANDED.1

1

. This appeal was originally scheduled for oral argument but was removed from the oral argument calendar by unanimous consent of the panel under 11th Circuit Rule 34 — 3(f)-
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24412-24413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of May 14, 21, 28, June 4, 11, 18, 2001.

PLACE: Commissioner's Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Week of May 14, 2001

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of May 14, 2001.

Week of May 21, 2001--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of May 21, 2001.

Week of May 28, 2001--Tentative

Wednesday, May 30, 2001

10:25 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)

Week of June 4, 2001--Tentative

Tuesday, June 5, 2001

9:25 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)
2 p.m.  Discussion of Management Issues (Closed-Ex. 2)

Wednesday, June 6, 2001

10:30 a.m.  All Employees Meeting (Public Meeting)
1:30 p.m.  All Employees Meeting (Public Meeting)

[[Page 24413]]

Week of June 11, 2001--Tentative

Thursday, June 14, 2001

9:25 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (If needed)
9:30 a.m.  Meeting with Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Public 
Meeting)
1:30 p.m.  Briefing on License Renewal Program (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: David Solorio, 301-415-1973)

Week of June 18, 2001--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of June 18, 2001.

    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: David Louis Gamberoni (301) 
415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6828d91a6889485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="57333c201739253479303821">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 9, 2001.
David Louis Gamberoni,
Technical Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12190 Filed 5-10-01; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


Benjamin Moore & Co.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement No. 33-2694 and in Registration Statement Nos.
33-39750 and 33-69480 of Benjamin Moore & Co. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of
our report dated February 27, 1998 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of
computing depreciation) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Benjamin
Moore & Co. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
February 27, 1998
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-04462-AKH Document 11 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
COMPENSATION POLICY FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS







NUTRISYSTEM, INC.







Compensation Policy For Non-Employee Directors







Effective December 19, 2005







EQUITY COMPENSATION
New Director Equity Grant









	Upon first appointment or election to the Company's Board of Directors, a new non-employee director will receive shares of restricted stock with a value of $100,000.  Vesting will be one-third each year for three years on the anniversary of the date of grant.  The number of restricted shares shall be determined by dividing $100,000 by the closing price per common share on the date of grant.




Annual Equity Retainer Grant









	Each non-employee director will receive shares of restricted stock with a value of $25,000.  Grants will be made at the end of each fiscal year.  Shares will be fully vested on the date of grant, but may not be sold until the first anniversary of the date of grant.  The number of restricted shares shall be determined by dividing $25,000 by the closing price per common share on the date of grant.  







CASH COMPENSATION:




Annual Cash Retainer Fee









	$20,000 annual cash retainer for each director, payable in the amount of $5,000 per quarter in arrears.




Annual Cash Retainers for Committee Service









	$10,000 annual cash retainer for the chair of the Audit Committee, payable in the amount of $2,500 quarterly in arrears.
	$2,000 annual cash retainer for the chair of each standing board committee other than the Audit Committee, payable in the amount of $500 quarterly in arrears.
	$5,000 annual cash retainer for the non-chair members of the Audit Committee, payable in the amount of $1,250 quarterly in arrears.
	Non-chair members of committees other than the Audit Committee shall receive no additional compensation.
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal September 16, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending September 16, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• bid/offer widths for CDX and iTraxx credit indices

• concentration charge thresholds for North American (“NA”), European (“EU”), Asia/Pacific (“AP”), 

and Emerging Market (“EM”) risk factors

• Kendall Tau rank-order correlations for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• MAD estimates (inclusive of EWMA) for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• left and right tail parameters for NA, EU, AP, and EM risk factors

• recovery rates for NA risk factors

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Haydee Soto, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), imposed April 21, 1987, upon her conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 5 to 15 years’ imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to an indeterminate term of *2Vs*to 7 years’ imprisonment; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

Upon a review of the record we conclude that the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. We note that upon their postjudgment investigation of the facts and circumstances of this case, the People have reached the same conclusion, and consent to the reduction. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.
# Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of United Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Paula J. Delaney, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Paula J. Delaney                     |  | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                         |  | 
|Paula J. Delaney
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|                                        
|                                        
|May 12, 2004                            

---
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-1521 

LT Case No. 2021-CF-1122-A 

_____________________________ 

AARON DAVID BROOKS, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. 

Joel Fritton, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Officed of the Public Defender, Daytona Beach, 

for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. 

Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 10, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal September 23, 2022

Re: Weekly Notification of Rule Amendments 

– Updates to Risk Parameters Established by 

ICC Pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the 

Commodity Exchange Act and Commission 

Regulation 40.6(d)

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit (“ICC”) hereby submits, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) Regulation 40.6(d), a notification of changes to 

risk parameters established by ICC in consultation with the ICC Risk Committee, Trading Advisory Group 

and/or Risk Working Group. ICC is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

The purpose of this notification is to report any changes to the risk parameters established by ICC. During 

the week ending September 23, 2022, changes were made to the following parameters: 

• recovery rates for a North American risk factor

ICC has posted a copy of this submission on its website concurrent with this filling. 

ICC would be pleased to respond to any questions the Commission or the staff may have regarding this 

submission. Please direct any questions or requests for information to the attention of the undersigned at 

maria.alarcon@ice.com or (312) 836-6854.

Sincerely,

Maria Alarcon

Manager, Legal
Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 13 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 13 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 13 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 20 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
# C_2017369EN.01000201.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/2

---

Request for an opinion submitted by the Kingdom of Belgium pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU

(Opinion 1/17)

(2017/C 369/02)

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

Applicant

Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, L. Van den Broeck and M. Jacobs, agents, Agents)

Question submitted to the Court

Question submitted to the Court

Is Chapter Eight (‘Investments’), Section F (‘Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states’) of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 30 October 2016, compatible with the Treaties, including with fundamental rights?

---
# C_2019004EN.01002501.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — RQ v Commission

(Case T-29/17) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Director-General of OLAF - Decision waiving the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings - Lis pendens - Act adversely affecting a person - Obligation to state reasons - Duty of assistance and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials - Legitimate expectations - Rights of the defence)

(2019/C 4/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RQ (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks, J.-P. Keppenne and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 1449 final of 2 March 2016 concerning a request to waive the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings and, so far as necessary, of Commission Decision Ares(2016) 5814495 of 5 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 1449 final of 2 March 2016 concerning a request to waive RQ’s immunity from legal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 1449 final of 2 March 2016 concerning a request to waive RQ’s immunity from legal proceedings;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05024-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 20 of 20
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Innova Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eugene Gartlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respect,  the financial  condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Eugene Gartlan
----------------------------
Name:  Eugene Gartlan
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  July 27, 2005
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30461

Conference Calendar

__________________

DAVID BOUDREAUX, SR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE, Individually and in his

official capacity as Chief Executive Officer,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-1221-J

- - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Boudreaux, Sr., in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action, appeals from the district court's denial of a motion for

an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate judge's

report recommending the dismissal of his complaint. The district

court has discretion in enforcing scheduling orders and time

deadlines. See Geiserman v. MacDonald, 893 F.2d 787, 790-91 (5th

Cir. 1990). The district court's denial of Boudreaux's second
No. 95-30461

-2-

motion for an extension of time to file objections to the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation is reviewed for

abuse of discretion. See id. at 793 (court did not abuse its

discretion by refusing to grant additional time to file late

responses to interrogatories); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). 

As the district court reasoned in its order denying the

motion, the court, in effect, had already granted Boudreaux two

extensions of time in which to file objections to the report when

the court received Boudreaux's second motion for an extension of

time. At no time, in the district court or on appeal, has

Boudreaux indicated or offered his objections. Under these

circumstances, the district court's denial of the motion did not

constitute an abuse of discretion. 

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, June 6, 2001, 7 p.m. to June 7, 2001, 4 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 2, 2001, 66 FR 21993.                

The times for the open and closed sessions on June 7, 2001, have changed. The open session has been changed to 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 12 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The closed session has been changed to 11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting is partially Closed to the public.

Dated: May 10, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-12461  Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M