alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

JULIA NARVAEZ, 07-CV-5304 (AKH)

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY

100 CHURCH LLC OF

-against- AMENDED ANSWER TO

MASTER COMPLAINT

100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter 100

Church), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action,

herein adopt 100 Churchs Amended Answer to Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which

was filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation,

21 MC 102 (AKH).

WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements.

Dated: New York, New York

September 7, 2007

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 687-0100

Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaint~ff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

All Other Defense Counsel

Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following

document to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of 100 Church LLCs Adoption of Amended Answer to Master

Complaint.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq. James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

115 Broadway, 12th Floor Patton Boggs LLP

New York, New York 10006 One Riverfront Plaza, ~ Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. Thomas Egan, Esq.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

New York, New York 10279 One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Gregory J. Carinata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plaintjffs

Dated: September 10, 2007

Is

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:07-cv-05304-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury Office of Thrift Supervision
 DATES: Submit written comments on or before June 15, 2001. *OMB Number:*
                         1550-0030. *Form Number:*
                         OTS Forms 1344 and 1561. *Type of Review:*
                         Renewal. *Title:*
                         Application for Issuance of Subordinated Debt Securities/Notice for Issuance of Subordinated Debt or Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock. *Description:*
                         The information provided to OTS issued to determine if the proposed issuance of securities will benefit the thrift institution or create an unreasonable risk to the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF). *Respondents:*
                         Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks. *Estimated Number of Responses:* Type of information collection
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses  
                             per  
                             respondent
Hours per 
                             response
Annual totalsApplication
1
1
60
60Notice
6
1
42
252
 
 
 *Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: See*
                     chart above. *Frequency of Response:*
                     1 per year. *Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*
                     312. *Acting Clearance Officer:*
                     Sally W. Watts, (202) 906-7380, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552. *OMB Reviewer:*
                     Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Deborah Dakin, Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations & Legislation Division.


[FR Doc. 01-12383 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
# C_2018190EN.01002701.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2018 –Alba Aguilera and Others v EEAS

(Case T-119/17) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Members of the temporary staff - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions - Decision reducing the allowance for living conditions in Ethiopia from 30 % to 25 % - Failure to adopt general implementing provisions giving effect to Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Liability - Non-material damage))

(2018/C 190/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ruben Alba Aguilera (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia) and the other EEAS officials and agents whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) the annulment of the EEAS decision of 19 April 2016 reducing, as of 1 January 2016, the allowance for living conditions paid to European Union staff posted to Ethiopia; and (ii), compensation in respect of the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 April 2016 reducing, as of 1 January 2016, the allowance for living conditions paid to European Union staff posted to Ethiopia from 30 % to 25 % of the reference amount; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 April 2016 reducing, as of 1 January 2016, the allowance for living conditions paid to European Union staff posted to Ethiopia from 30 % to 25 % of the reference amount;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herbert Speller, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered May 20, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Owens, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report, after a de novo suppression hearing, on that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.

We find that the defendant’s constitutional right to the assistance of counsel as well as his fundamental right to confront and cross-examine prosecution witnesses were necessarily violated when the hearing court ordered that the suppression hearing proceed despite the fact that the defendant’s counsel was not present in the courtroom and notwithstanding the consent of the Assistant District Attorney to adjourn the proceeding pending the appearance of counsel *(see, People v Spears,*64 NY2d 698).

We further find that the hearing court acted improvidently in denying the defense counsel’s request to reopen the suppression hearing so as to enable him to cross-examine the prosecution witness who had testified in his absence, in which request the prosecutor joined.

In order to insure that the fundamental rights of a defendant will be safeguarded, the law affords an accused an absolute right to be present, with counsel, during crucial stages in a criminal proceeding *(see, People v Ciaccio,*47 NY2d 431, 436). Error of a constitutional dimension, therefore, occurred when the hearing court refused to adjourn the suppression hearing and proceeded in the absence of defense counsel *(see, People v McGuinness,*9 NY2d 690; *People v Di Salvo,*19 AD2d 747; *People v McManus,*17 Misc 2d 247).

Accordingly, as the People concede, a de novo suppression hearing is warranted and the instant appeal is held in abeyance pending that hearing. Since we are not suppressing any evidence at this juncture, reversal of the judgment appealed from pursuant to the principle announced in *People v Coles*(62 NY2d 908) is not warranted at this time. Mollen, P. J., Eiber, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 19 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 19 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-22-000]

Take notice that on May 7, 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing and acceptance a Rate Schedule TF-2 non-conforming service agreement. Northwest also tendered the following tariff sheet as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective June 7, 2001: 

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 364 

Northwest states that the service agreement contains a scheduling priority provision imposing subordinate primary corridor rights. Northwest states that the tariff sheet is submitted to add such agreement to the list of non-conforming service agreements contained in Northwest's tariff and to update that list to reflect other minor changes.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-12297 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
99.2





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Portage
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended February 28, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Martine
Caron, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:  March
24, 2010





MARTINE
CARON


Martine
Caron


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director














-1-
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-04967-AKH Document 7 Filed 06/29/2008 Page 20 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-05559-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-05559-AKH Document 14 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
© 2021 KOR Financial, Inc.

Dispute Policy

2021-04-01
Dispute Policy 1

Table of Contents

Table of Contents........................................................................................................................ 1

History........................................................................................................................................ 2

1. Overview.............................................................................................................................. 3

Appendix A: Exhibits ................................................................................................................... 4
Dispute Policy 2

History

Date Description of change Sections Updated

2021-04-01 Original document

Last Review Date

2021-090-1
Dispute Policy 3

1. Overview

Reference applicable KOR SDR and SBSDR Rule: “Dispute Resolution” as referenced below.

2. Dispute Resolution

KOR has established procedures and provides facilities for effectively resolving disputes over the accuracy of 

the TR

1 Data and positions that are recorded in the Trade Repository.

When the Reporting Counterparty2does not agree with the accuracy of the reporting of a swap in KOR TR, but 

are prevented from amending the swap to what they believe to be accurate, the Client must follow the 

following steps:

a. Enter a ticket with KOR TR support with the details of the issue; and

b. Submit an allowed value per the applicable KOR TR Technical Specifications for the KOR TR field 

“Reporting Counterparty Dispute”. The allowed values are a high-level indication of the issue. Sample 

values may include but are not limited to: “No accurate UPI available” or “KOR TR Technical 

Specifications do not allow for accurate representation”. Clients may contact KOR TR to add additional 

values, but these values will be at the discretion of KOR TR. 

References: CFTC Rule(s) §49.10(f).

References SEC Rule(s) §240.13n-5(b)(6).

1 Trade Repository (TR) is an all-encompassing term that includes Swap Data Repository (SDR) and Security Based Swap 

Data Repository (SBSDR) for which KOR Reporting Inc. is registered.

2

Includes Reporting Side for SEC reporting.
Dispute Policy 4

3. Appendix A: Exhibits

Regulator Exhibit # Exhibit Description

CFTC JJ Attach as Exhibit JJ procedures and a description of facilities of the 

Applicant for effectively resolving disputes over the accuracy of the 

transaction data and positions that are recorded in the swap data 

repository. 

SEC CC Attach as Exhibit CC procedures and a description of facilities of the 

applicant for effectively resolving disputes over the accuracy of the 

transaction data and positions that are recorded in the securitybased swap data repository.
Case 1:07-cv-05563-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05563-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05563-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05563-AKH Document 4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 3 - National Land Cover Database      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we talk about the National Land Cover Database.

View Media Details

View

View Media Details

### **Episode 3 - National Land Cover Database**

**Download and Transcript Access**

**Summary**: Sorting Landsat data into an accurate and reliable record of land cover in the United States is one of the most important jobs at EROS. This episode explores the what, how, and why of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD).

**Guest**: Collin Homer, NLCD Program Director

**Host**: John Hult

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: Sept. 9, 2019

**More on NLCD**: 
                            - Multi-Resolution Land Use Consortium website
                            - NLCD Viewer
                            - New Land Cover Maps Depict 15 Years of Change Across America

## Related Content

                  -              Science           

Find every episode of Eyes on Earth on our show page.

link

####                 Eyes on Earth              

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. 

link

####   Eyes on Earth

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. 

Learn More

link

September 11, 2018

####                 National Land Cover Database              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Land Change Science Program, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

link

September 11, 2018

####   National Land Cover Database

Learn More

## Related Content

Find every episode of Eyes on Earth on our show page.

link

####                 Eyes on Earth              

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. 

link

####   Eyes on Earth

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. 

Learn More

link

September 11, 2018

####                 National Land Cover Database              

Ecosystems Mission Area, Land Change Science Program, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

link

September 11, 2018

####   National Land Cover Database

Learn More

### Contacts
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHRISTOPHER K. DAVIES


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Capital Holdings, Inc., Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  
   May 24, 2010





/s/ Christopher K. DaviesChristopher
      K. DaviesChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05353-AKH Document 40 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 24 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7