alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.19**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TOWARRANT

 

Reference is made to that certain Warrant, issued toStuart Benson effective as of April l, 2002 and Amendment No. 1 thereto datedApril 3, 2003, which Warrant entitles Mr. Benson to purchase 1,340,000 sharesof Vital Living, Inc.’s (the “Company”) common stock subject to certainanti-dilution.

 

The Warrant shall be deemed amended in the followingrespects:

 

(i)                                     ThePreamble and Section 1 of the Warrant shall be deemed amended by changing thenumber of Shares covered to 6,130,000.

 

(ii)                                  Section8 of the Warrant shall be amended and restated as follows:

 

“This Warrant may be assigned, in whole or in part, atany time or from time to time, to any bona fide third party, provided that suchtransfer is in compliance with all applicable state and federal securitieslaws.”

 

(iii)                               Section 10 of the Warrant shall beamended and restated by eliminating Section 10(b), retaining onlySection 10(a) as follows:

 

10.                                 Effectof Stock Split, etc.

 

(a)                                            If the Company, by stock split, stockdividend, reverse split, reclassification of shares, or otherwise, changes as awhole the outstanding Common Stock into a different number or class of shares,then: (1) the number and/or class of shares as so changed shall, for thepurposes of this Warrant, replace the shares outstanding immediately prior tothe change; and (2) the Warrant purchase price in effect, and the number ofshares purchasable under this Warrant, immediately prior to the date upon whichthe change becomes effective, shall be proportionately adjusted (the price tothe nearest cent). Irrespective of any adjustment or change in the Warrantpurchase price or the number of shares purchasable under this or any otherWarrant of like tenor, the Warrants therefore and thereafter issued maycontinue to express the Warrant purchase price per share and the number ofshares purchasable as the Warrant purchase price per share and the number ofshare purchasable were expressed in the Warrant when initially issued.

 

ThisAmendment shall be effective as of the August 21, 2003.

 
|   | Vital Living, Inc. |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |
|   |               |
|   | By:                |   |   |
|   | Bradley Edson      |
|   |               |
|   |               |   |
|   | Stuart Benson      |

 

----
# C_2018445EN.01001801.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Deza v Commission

(Case T-400/17) (1)

((Environment and protection of human health - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 - Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances - Regulation (EU) 2017/776 - Classification of anthraquinone - Substance which is a presumed human carcinogen - Manifest error of assessment - Concept of substance - Legal certainty - Right to property))

(2018/C 445/23)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Deza, a.s. (Valašské Meziříčí, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Dejl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: Z. Malůšková, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, L. Zettergren and A. Alriksson, acting as Agents), European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and A. Hautamäki, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/776 of 4 May 2017 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (OJ 2017 L 116, p. 1), in so far as it classifies anthraquinone as a presumed human carcinogen.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deza, a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deza, a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05394-AKH Document 28-4 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52004PC0367 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 52004PC0367

**Amended proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty) /* COM/2004/0367 final - COD 2004/0025 */ **

*

*

Amended proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty)

2004/0025 (COD)

Amended proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable

1. Background

On 13 February 2004 the Commission submitted to Parliament, pursuant to Articles 251(2) and 157(3) of the EC Treaty, the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable (COM(2004) 96 - 2004/0025(COD)).

Opinion of the European Parliament - first reading: 22 April 2004.

2. Objective of the Commission proposal

eContentplus has the overall aim to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable, facilitating the creation and diffusion of information and knowledge - in areas of public interest - at the Union level.

It will create better conditions for accessing and managing digital content and services in multilingual and multicultural environments. It will broaden users' choice and support new ways of interacting with knowledge-enhanced digital content, a feature which is becoming essential to make content more dynamic and tailored to specific contexts.

3. Commission opinion on the amendments adopted by the Parliament

3.1. General assessment

All the changes made by the European Parliament are in line with the Commission's proposal and make useful clarifications for the implementation of the eContentplus programme. The Commission therefore accepts them all.

3.2. Examination of the amendments

Amendment 1 (recital 15a new), clarifying the reference to digital content stakeholders.

Amendments 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 clarifying the text related to the specific objectives.

Amendments 6, 8, 9, 10 proposing revised text to ensure the consistency of the annual appropriations with the financial perspective.

Amendment 7 proposing to forward the results of the quantitative and qualitative evaluations to the European Parliament and the Council together with any appropriate proposals for the amendment of the Decision before presentation of the draft general budget of the European Union for the year 2007 and 2009 respectively.

4. Conclusions

In accordance with Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty the Commission amends its proposal as set out above.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 27157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-950-1420-00-P]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The plats of the following described lands were officially filed in 
the Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 
effective 10 a.m., April 23, 2001.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, portions of Mineral Surveys 85, 92, 96, 157 and 
264, and Mineral Surveys 117, 146, 147, 150, 152, and 441, T. 16 N., R. 
80 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 493, was accepted 
April 23, 2001.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Fourteenth Guide Meridian West, through Township 30 North, between 
Ranges 112 and 113 West, and a portion of the subdivisional lines, and 
the subdivision of section 18, T. 30 N., R. 112 W., Sixth Principal 
Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 658, was accepted April 23, 2001.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
Twelfth Standard Parallel North, through Range 102 West, Tract 38, and 
portions of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of sections 4 
and 5, T. 48 N., R. 102 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group 
No. 666, was accepted April 23, 2001.

    Dated: April 23, 2001.
John P. Lee,
Chief, Cadastral Survey Group.
[FR Doc. 01-12273 Filed 5-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-05354-AKH Document 25 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 26853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 18-063]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

May 9, 2001.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47910), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed Idaho Power Company's application for 
license amendment to waive for 1 year the aesthetic flow requirements 
at the Twin Falls Hydroelectric Project, located on the Snake River in 
Twin Falls and Jerome Counties, Idaho, and has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA). The project includes about 93 acres of 
federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management.
    The EA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
impacts of the proposed amendment and concludes that approval of the 
proposed amendment with staff's modifications would not constitute a 
major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the 
human environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order issued on May 8, 2001 for 
the above application. Copies of the EA are available for review at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. the EA may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202) 
208-2222 for assistance).
    For further information, contact John Smith at (202) 219-2460.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-12150 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32



Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Furnished but not
filed)



In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Joseph S. Micallef, President of the Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:



1.   This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date | October 24, 2006 |  | By | /s/   Joseph S. Micallef                                                   
|---- | ---------------- |  | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                  |  |    | Joseph S. Micallef, President of the Trustees and   Chief Executive Officer





In connection with this quarterly report of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Thomas A. Janochoski, Vice President & Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, certify that:



1.   This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Northern Iron Ore Properties.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and will be retained by Great Northern Iron Ore Properties and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date | October 24, 2006 |  | By | /s/   Thomas A. Janochoski                                                  
|---- | ---------------- |  | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                  |  |    | Thomas A. Janochoski, Vice President &
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

 To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to the treatment 
   under section 351(k)(7) of such Act (relating to exclusivity for 
  reference products) of certain products deemed to have a biologics 
license pursuant to section 7002 of the Biologics Price Competition and 
                        Innovation Act of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2019

   Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Reed, Ms. Schrier, and Mr. Guthrie) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to the treatment 
   under section 351(k)(7) of such Act (relating to exclusivity for 
  reference products) of certain products deemed to have a biologics 
license pursuant to section 7002 of the Biologics Price Competition and 
                        Innovation Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to Biosimilars Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS DEEMED LICENSED.

    Section 351(k)(7) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
262(k)(7)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Deemed licenses.--
                            ``(i) No additional exclusivity through 
                        deeming.--An approved application that is 
                        deemed to be a license for a biological product 
                        under this section pursuant to section 
                        7002(e)(4) of the Biologics Price Competition 
                        and Innovation Act of 2009 shall not be treated 
                        as having been first licensed under subsection 
                        (a) for purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B).
                            ``(ii) Applicability of antievergreening 
                        provisions.--Subparagraph (C) shall apply to 
                        any reference product, without regard to 
                        whether--
                                    ``(I) such product was first 
                                licensed under subsection (a); or
                                    ``(II) the approved application for 
                                such product was deemed to be a license 
                                for a biological product as described 
                                in clause (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019148EN.01004701.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — L v Parliament

(Case T-59/17) (1)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistant - Termination of the contract - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Outside activity - Manifest error of assessment - Claim for damages)

(2019/C 148/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: L (represented by: I. Coutant Peyre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, Agents)

Re:

Concerning, first, an application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 24 June 2016 terminating the applicant’s contract of employment as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, an application for damages for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Parliament’s decision of 24 June 2016 to terminate L’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Parliament’s decision of 24 June 2016 to terminate L’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Baylake Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as amended and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Jennerjohn, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Steven D. JennerjohnSteven D. JennerjohnSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Baylake Corp. and will be retained by Baylake Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. 10
# C_2018190EN.01002502.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)

(Case T-15/17) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark YAMAS - Earlier EU word mark LLAMA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 190/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Mitrakos (Palaio Faliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Bakopanou, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Kusturovic and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Juan Ignacio Belasco Baquedano (Viana, Spain) (represented by P. Merino Baylos, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2016 (Case R 532/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Belasco Baquedano and Mr Mitrakos.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Dimitrios Mitrakos to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Dimitrios Mitrakos to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

1

---