alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Symetra Financial Corporation (the
registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Margaret A. MeisterMargaret A. MeisterExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005052EN.01000401.xml

| 2.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/4

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2005/C 52/03)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was received, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Electronic weighing scales | Japan | Anti-dumping Duty | Regulation (EC) No 468/2001 (OJ L 67, 9.3.2001, p. 24) | 10.3.2005 |
| Electronic weighing scales | Singapore | Anti-dumping Duty | Regulation (EC) No 469/2001 (OJ L 67, 9.3.2001, p. 37) | 10.3.2005 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Electronic weighing scales

Japan

Anti-dumping Duty

Regulation (EC) No 468/2001 (OJ L 67, 9.3.2001, p. 24)

10.3.2005

Electronic weighing scales

Singapore

Anti-dumping Duty

Regulation (EC) No 469/2001 (OJ L 67, 9.3.2001, p. 37)

10.3.2005

---

(1)  OJ C 214, 26.8.2004, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

2

---
Clear All

        12 January 2022    

#                     Fleet Forces Delivers Remarks at SNA 2022                 

                Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Adm. Daryl Caudle, spoke at the Surface Navy Association’s 34th Annual National Symposium in Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2022.            

        30 April 2021    

#                     CNIC, USFFC to Conduct Hurricane/Disaster Response Exercise                 

                HURREX/CG 21 is conducted over a two-week period with this year's exercise running from May 3-14. The first week simulates a storm system along U.S. Atlantic coast and the second week shifts focus to procedures for recovery from severe weather events.The annual hurricane preparedness/disaster            

        18 September 2020    

#                     USFFC Commander Delivers Remarks at ASNE Virtual Fleet Maintenance, Modernization Symposium                 

                Adm. Christopher W. Grady, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) delivered the keynote address and answered questions Sept. 17, 2020, at the 2020 American Society of Naval Engineers’ (ASNE) Virtual Fleet Maintenance and Modernization Symposium.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1819 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1819

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to provide 
 for rewards for the arrest or conviction of certain foreign nationals 
   who have committed genocide or war crimes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``War Crimes Rewards Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    Paragraph (10) of section 36(b) of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)) is amended by striking 
``defined under the statute of such tribunal;'' and inserting the 
following: ``defined under--
                    ``(A) the statute of such country or tribunal, as 
                the case may be; or
                    ``(B) United States law;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ALLEN KOERSCHNER, Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 70283



# FILED JUL 2 8 2016

TRACIE K LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK 

### ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING APPEAL Appellant filed a document entitled "Appeal: Denial of Rule 60(b)(4) Motion by North Las Vegas Township Justice Court and Writ of Mandamus" in the district court. The district court clerk transmitted the document to this court and it was docketed as a criminal appeal.

Upon further review of the document, it appears that Mr. Koerschner intended to file the document in the district court. The document's caption identifies the Eighth Judicial District Court, and it appears that the document seeks relief from that court based on proceedings that occurred in the Justice Court. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to administratively close this appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Allen Koerschner Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

(0) 1947A
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

          - 32 CFR Part 989 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Air Force published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 28, 2001, a document concerning correcting amendments. This document corrects the inadvertent change to correcting amendment 17.                     

# DATES:

Effective on May 15, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Jack Bush (HQ USAF/ILEB), 1260 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1260, (703) 604-0553. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR Doc. 01-7671 published on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16868) make the following correction. On page 16868, correcting amendment 17, § 989.18, paragraph (a), third to last sentence correct “AF/ILEV” to read “USAF/ILEV.” 

Dated: May 10, 2001. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-12200 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7586
RICKY A. PIERCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JEFFERY S. HOLCOMB; HOWARD C. BROOKS, Plaintiffs, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN PHILLIPS; L. W. PARKER; D. WEAVER; E. MCCULLEN; T. OUTLAW; C. WYNN; V. JOHNSON; TAYLOR, Program Assistant, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-386-5-H) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ricky A. Pierce appeals the district court's order granting Defend ants' motion to strike as plaintiffs Jeffery Holcomb and Howard Brooks for failure to sign the complaint and denying Pierce's motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory and deny Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered May 11, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 36 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 36 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 36 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 36 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05861-RMB-GWG Document 36 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 5 of 5
154 So. 918

#### Malcom Sarah HOWARD et al. v. Aline F. BOURNE.

1 Div. 819.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 26, 1934.

J. G. Bowen, of Mobile, for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

Petition dismissed.
1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

 

In the Matter of the Application of 

RTX Fintech & Research LLC for 

Registration as a Swap Execution Facility 

 

ORDER OF REGISTRATION 

RTX Fintech & Research LLC (“RTX SEF”), a Delaware limited liability company 

headquartered in New York, New York has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”), pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange 

Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), an 

application for registration as a swap execution facility, including submissions dated April 21, 

2022 through March 20, 2023. 

WHEREAS RTX SEF represents it will offer electronic and voice order books and 

require and facilitate clearing of all swaps executed on or pursuant to the rules of its platform, 

including all permitted transactions as defined in Commission Regulation 37.9(c)(1), 17 C.F.R. 

§ 37.9(c)(1). 

WHEREAS RTX SEF represents it is responsible for conducting its own market 

surveillance, utilizing various in-house and external tools to monitor trading activity in real time 

and on a trade date plus one basis and to enforce its trading rules. 
2 

WHEREAS RTX SEF represents it will conduct its own regulatory reporting and 

recordkeeping, investigations and disciplinary actions, and arbitration hearings involving RTX 

SEF market participants; and it will monitor members’ compliance with RTX SEF’s minimum 

financial standards, as required under Commission Regulation 37.702, 17 C.F.R. § 37.702. 

WHEREAS RTX SEF represents it meets all the requirements for registration as a 

swap execution facility under Section 5h(a), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3(a) of the Act, and that it 

complies, and will remain subject to and compliant, with all provisions of the Act and the 

Commission’s Regulations applicable to swap execution facilities, including self-regulatory 

responsibilities applicable to swap execution facilities under the Act and the Commission’s 

Regulations. 

WHEREAS Commission staff reviewed and analyzed RTX SEF’s application for 

registration as a swap execution facility, including RTX SEF’s rules and all amendments 

thereto, and representations made by RTX SEF, to evaluate RTX SEF’s compliance with the 

Core Principles for swap execution facilities and corresponding Commission Regulations in 

accordance with Section 5h of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3. 

Based upon the foregoing, the Commission FINDS that, as required by Section 5h 

of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), 

RTX SEF’s application, subject to the conditions set forth below, has demonstrated its 

ability to comply with the Act and the Commission’s Regulations applicable to swap 

execution facilities. 

Therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Section 5h of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and
1 

Exhibit H 

AEGIS SEF, LLC 

Material Pending Legal Proceedings to which Applicant is a Party 

Attach as Exhibit H, a brief description of any material pending legal proceeding(s), other than 

ordinary and routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Applicant or any of its 

affiliates is a party or to which any of its or their property is the subject. Include the name of the 

court or agency where the proceeding(s) are pending, the date(s) instituted, the principal parties 

involved, a description of the factual basis alleged to underlie the proceeding(s), and the relief 

sought. Include similar information as to any proceeding(s) known to be contemplated by the 

governmental agencies. 

Response 

Neither AEGIS SEF, LLC nor any of its affiliates are subject to any pending legal proceedings 

described herein as of the date hereof.
300 Vesey Street New York, NY 10282 T 212 521 4609 nirup.ramalingam@cmegroup.com cmegroup.com

Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer

NEX SEF LIMITED

March 17, 2021

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Assistant Secretary of the Commission for

FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Acts Compliance

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20581

Re: FOIA Confidential Treatment Request 

To Whom It May Concern:

By electronic portal dated today, March 17, 2021, NEX SEF Limited (“NEX SEF”) submitted a 

supplemental rule certification filing (Submission No. 21-146S) to the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.6 to certify changes to

NEX SEF’s fee schedule (“Fee Schedule”). This supplemental filing includes an Appendix A (Fee 

Schedule, blacklined version) and an Appendix B (Fee Schedule, clean version).

NEX SEF requests confidential treatment of Appendix A and Appendix B (“Confidential Information”), on

the grounds that Appendix A and Appendix B contain confidential commercial information of the submitter

(NEX SEF). NEX SEF requests that confidential treatment be maintained for Appendix A and Appendix B

until further notice from NEX SEF. We also request that the Commission notify the undersigned 

immediately after receiving any FOIA request for said Appendix A or Appendix B or any other court order, 

subpoena, or summons for same. Finally, we request that we be notified in the event the Commission 

intends to disclose such Appendix A or Appendix B to Congress or to any other governmental agency or 

unit pursuant to Section 8 of the CEA. NEX SEF does not waive its notification rights under Section 8(f) of 

the CEA with respect to any subpoena or summons for such Appendix A or Appendix B.

Please contact the undersigned at (212) 521-4609 should you have any questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Nirup Ramalingam

Chief Operating Officer
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 6 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 6 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Royal Union Holding Corporation for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010, Heidi Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Tammy Hardcastle, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Union Holding Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal Union Holding Corporation





Dated:  November 5, 2010





Royal Union Holding Corporation








By: /s/ Heidi Williams


Chief Executive Officer








By: /s/ Tammy Hardcastle


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
YP.NET,INC.  THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     164,570
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,522,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,376,701
<PP&E>                                     675,977
<DEPRECIATION>                             150,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,645,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,005,364
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500
<COMMON>                                    40,051
<OTHER-SE>                               5,629,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,645,997
<SALES>                                  2,297,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,297,480
<CGS>                                    1,075,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,075,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,554,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         171,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (487,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (487,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (637,515)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.020)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-05301-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1