alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 23, 2006

1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581
Es}
Re: Rule Certification. NYMEX Submission 06.59: Notificatign of “
Listing 12 Contract Months in the RBOB Gasoline Financial Contract
and 18 Contract Months in the Heating Oil Financial Cotnract on

CME Globex on June 12, 2006.

o

ae3

BY EMAIL AND FACSIMILE o x

Office of the Secretariat 1 =
Commodity Futures Trading Commission m y P
Three Lafayette Centre Rg Ww a
3S Po

m
> +
w

Dear CFTC Commissioners:
The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("NYMEX" or the "Exchange") is notifying

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (““CFTC” or ““Commission”) that it will list 12
consecutive contract months in the RBOB Gasoline Financial futures contract (Symbol RT) and

18 consecutive months in the Heating Oil Financial futures contract (Symbol BH) on the CME
Globex trading platform. These contracts are also available for clearing on the NYMEX
ClearPortTM Clearing platform.

This listing schedule will become effective on Sunday evening, June 11, 2006 for trade
date Monday, June 12, 2006. Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)
and CFTC Rule 40.6, the Exchange hereby certifies that the listing of these additional months

complies with the Act, including regulations under the Act.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Daniel Brusstar,
Director, Research, at (212) 299-2604; or contact the undersigned at (212) 299-2390.

Very truly yours,

Robert A. Levin
Senior Vice President, Research

Q3A13934
March 13, 2019
VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Office of the Secretariat

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: FTSEF LLC — Regulation 40.6 Rule Certification: Rulebook, Version 1.2
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”) and Section 40.6(a) of the
regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), FTSEF LLC hereby
notifies the Commission that it has amended its Rulebook. The Rulebook has been amended to update
certain No Action Letters on which it relies. The amended rulebook will become effective March 28,
2019.

I have provided an explanation of the changes in exhibit A. A clean copy of the amended rulebook and a
copy of the amended Rulebook marked to show changes against the previous version is also submitted.

FTSEF hereby certifies that: (i) the amended Rulebook complies with the Act and the Commission’s
regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being concurrently posted on
FTSEF LLC’s website. Because the amendments to the Rulebook are non-substantive, the amended
Rulebook is being made effective without request for comment, subject to the Commission’s review
period of ten business days.

Please contact me with any questions regarding this matter.

Sincerel
[ o Ne
irl Schranz

Chief Compliance Officer

Carl.schranz@flextrade.com
212-232-8347 (phone)


Exhibit A

Rulebook Amendment

Explanation

Applicable Core
Principal/Commission
Regulation/SEF Policy

Rule 404 (1)(iii)

Rulebook referenced NAL 16-25
which has expired.

Updated

to reflect NAL 17-17.

§40.6

Rule 405(c)

Rulebook referenced NAL 15-68
which has expired. Updated to
reflect NAL 17-54.

§40.6

Rule 409 (e)

Rulebook references NAL 15-24
which has expired. Updated to
reflect NAL 17-27.

§40.6

Rule 602(a)

Rulebook references NAL 15-60
which has expired. Updated to
reflect NAL 17-60.

§40.6

Rule 409

Eliminated formatting error in
sections (c) though (h)
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 36 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 36 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 36 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of NIVS IntelliMedia Technology Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Tianfu LiTianfu
      LiChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)May
      19, 2009/s/
      Simon ZhangSimon
      ZhangInterim
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)May
      19, 2009




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of NIVS
IntelliMedia Technology Group, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canusa Capital Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Janet Janes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Janet Janes
-----------------------------
Janet Janes
Chief Financial Officer
December 11, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00982-CV

IN RE Reginald NELSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 9, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining the trial court has refused to rule 

on his “Conversion/Civil Theft” claim and issue a default judgment against the defendants. 

Because relator has not provided this court with a sufficient record, we deny the petition for writ 

of mandamus.

DISCUSSION

A trial court clearly abuses its discretion when it fails to rule within a reasonable time on a 

properly-presented motion. Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). However, a relator has the burden of providing this court with a 

record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1) (requiring 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CV06621, styled Reginald Nelson v. Rita Edwards, et al., pending in 

the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.
04-18-00982-CV

- 2 -

relator to file “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim 

for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). In a case such as this one, a relator 

has the burden to provide the court of appeals with a record showing the motion at issue was 

properly filed, the trial court was made aware of the motion, and the motion has not been ruled on 

by the trial court for an unreasonable period of time. See In re Mendoza, 131 S.W.3d 167, 167-68 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). 

Here, relator has not provided this court with a copy of any motion, a copy of the trial 

court’s docket, or any proof indicating the trial court is aware of his claims. Because relator did 

not provide this court with a sufficient record, relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus 

relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7540

JOHN H. BLACK, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-984-2)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Black, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Black, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Black’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Black v. Angelone, No. CA-97-984-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meetings: 

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates/Times:*                         May 29 and 30, 2001; 7:30 a.m.-9 p.m., May 31, 2001; 7:30 a.m.-3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 375, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Ulrich Strom, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-4938.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         Review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process to determine finalists for support for the FY Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers (NSEC) Competition.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 8, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-11923 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 7-2 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### *In re*DRESSLER, Peter Penn

(MR 20935)

West Chicago, IL

*688Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Peter Penn Dressier is suspended from the practice of law for three years. Suspension effective October 11, 2006. Respondent Peter Penn Dressier shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior the termination of the period of suspension.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00499-CR

Tyler Namon Payne

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1292644D)

August 8, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed September 14, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0843

Lower Tribunal No. 21-3438

________________

Yachtbrasil Motor Boat and Charters, LLC, etc., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

CNP XII Ventures LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles 

Johnson, Judge.

McCarthy & Yersel, PLLC, and Martin G. McCarthy and Emre Yersel, 

for appellants.

CRL Law Group, and Frank P. Cuneo and Jessica B. Reyes, for 

appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS
2

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration, we grant the motion to dismiss as the appeal 

impermissibly seeks review of a non-final order. Libman v. Fla. Wellness & 

Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“It is wellestablished that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims 

are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties 

remain in the suit.’”) (quoting S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 

97, 99 (Fla. 1974)).

Motion granted; appeal dismissed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 16, 2022

NO. 03-20-00567-CV

CMST Development, LLC, Appellant

v.

City of Austin, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying CMST Development’s motion for partial summary 

judgment and the order granting the City of Austin’s motion for summary judgment, both

signed by the trial court on November 10, 2020. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ 

arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the orders. Therefore, the Court 

affirms the trial court’s orders. CMST Development shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24165-24166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-11921]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (1171) Subcommittee for Human Subjects.
    Date/Time: June 12, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and June 13, 2001; 
8:30 a.m.-1 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 970, 4021 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Stuart Plattner, Division of Behavioral and 
Cognitive Sciences, NSF, Suite 995; 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8740.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation on issues related to the use of human 
subjects in social and behavioral research.
    Type of Meeting: Open (Members of the public who wish to attend 
should arrange access ahead of time with the contact person listed 
below).
    Agenda: Discussions addressing the following topics:

Foreign Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
Training (for principal investigators, research personnel, IRBs)
Consent (forms, signing, group/individual, students as research 
subjects)
Ethnography/oral history; ``ethical proofreading''
Confidential/privacy
Secondary subjects/secondary data; linking data
Expanding the ``exempt'' category
Deception
Subpart ``D'' of the Common Rule
Research on the World Wide Web
Data archiving


[[Page 24166]]


    Dated: May 8, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-11921 Filed 5-10-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-05371-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05371-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05371-AKH Document 10-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-10 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-05926-CS Document 16-10 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05357-AKH Document 16 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center  

#           Eyes on Earth Episode 44 – Landsat Water Atlas      

      By Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Eyes on Earth

Get every episode

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Eyes on Earth is a podcast on remote sensing, Earth observation, land change and science, brought to you by the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. In this episode, we learn how Landsat is used to study surface water.

View Media Details

View

Download and Transcript Access

View Media Details

**Summary**: Dr. Alan Belward has spent a lot of time thinking about the planet’s surface water. The former Landsat Science Team member uses satellite data to track changes to lakes, rivers, and streams, and recently published a book that uses Landsat data to tell some of those stories. In this episode of Eyes on Earth, we hear about some of the surprising things Belward and his team learned about how surface water has changed since the early 1980s and about the value and importance of remote sensing to the study of this critical resource.

**Guest**:  Dr. Alan Belward, European Commission Joint Research Centre

**Host**: Jane Lawson

**Producer**: John Hult

**Release date**: February 22, 2021

**More on the Landsat Water Atlas**: 
                            - Atlas displays beauty, variety, and value of Landsat water images
                            - Global Surface Water Explorer
                            - Atlas of Global Surface Water Dynamics (pdf download)

 

### Contacts
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-05715-CLB Document 1 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 52005AP0403 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52005AP0403

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council determining the general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport networks and energy and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 (COM(2004)0475 - C6-0086/2004 - 2004/0154(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 272 E , 09/11/2006 P. 0404 - 0416 *

P6_TA(2005)0403

Trans-European transport networks and energy ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council determining the general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport networks and energy and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 (COM(2004)0475 — C6-0086/2004 — 2004/0154(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0475) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 156 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0086/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0283/2005),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Points out that the appropriations indicated in the legislative proposal beyond 2006 are subject to the decision on the next multiannual financial framework;

4. Calls on the Commission, once the next multiannual financial framework is adopted, to present, if appropriate, a proposal to adjust the financial reference amount for the implementation of the proposed regulation;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------