alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f1012ga2ex10i_europa5.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Description of Verbal Management Consulting Agreement Between Europa Acquisition V, Inc. and Peter Reichard












On June 30, 2010, Mr. Reichard, the President and sole director of the Company, verbally agreed to provide funding to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond, until the Company is engaged in business activities that provide cash flow sufficient to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations. We currently have no written contractual agreements in place with Mr. Reichard to provide such funding. During the next 12 months, Mr. Reichard has agreed to cover costs including, but not limited to, the filing of Exchange Act reports, and consummating an acquisition. At this time we do not have the funds to pay for these filings and do not have any written agreement to raise funds to cover these expenses. However, we believe we will be able to meet these costs with funds provided by Mr. Reichard. At such time that the Company has the ability to cover the costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations with cash flow from operations, Mr. Reichard will no longer be obligated to cover such costs.
Case 7:07-cv-05801-CLB Document 3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 7:07-cv-05801-CLB Document 3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 7:07-cv-05801-CLB Document 3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 7:07-cv-05801-CLB Document 3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 of 4
# C_2017195EN.01002901.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/29

---

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 10 April 2017 — Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte v ACER

(Case T-123/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Energy - Decision of ACER rejecting an application for leave to intervene in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated) - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 195/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Exaa Abwicklungsstelle für Energieprodukte AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: B. Rajal, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of the decision of ACER of 17 February 2017 rejecting the application for leave to intervene lodged by the applicant in Case A-001-2017 (consolidated).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32

# CERTIFICATION

| | The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
| | -----------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) |  | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the accompanying report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: | August 5, 2005                       | /s/   Bernard P. Aldrich
|----- | ------------------------------------ | ------------------------
|      |                                      |                         
|      | President and ChiefExecutive Officer
|     
|     
|Date: | August 5, 2005                       | /s/   Robert M. Wolf    
|      |                                      |                         
|      | Chief Financial Officer             

---
Case 7:07-cv-05802-KMK-GAY Document 9 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40180 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Carlos Alexis Perez-Lainez, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:22-CR-1075-1

______________________________ Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appo inted to represent Carlos Alexis Perez-Lainez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pere z-Lainez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 20, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40180 Document: 00516902640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2023No. 23-40180

2 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appe llate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-40180 Document: 00516902640 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2104

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 
  a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2019

 Mr. Latta (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 
  a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Star Program Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. NO WARRANTY.

    Section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6294a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) No Warranty.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any disclosure relating to participation 
        of a product in the Energy Star program shall not create an 
        express or implied warranty or give rise to any private claims 
        or rights of action under State or Federal law relating to the 
        disqualification of that product from Energy Star if--
                    ``(A) the product has been certified by a 
                certification body recognized by the Energy Star 
                program;
                    ``(B) the Administrator has approved corrective 
                measures, including a determination of whether or not 
                consumer compensation is appropriate; and
                    ``(C) the responsible party has fully complied with 
                all approved corrective measures.
            ``(2) Construal.--Nothing in this subsection shall be 
        construed to require the Administrator to modify any procedure 
        or take any other action.''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2057** 

BARTOLA J. PACETTI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; MARY HOLT , Defendants

– Appellees,
and MARK S. MILLARD, Judge; ALAN CARLSON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; KATHY RICCI,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01293

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : December 13, 2012 Decided: January 2, 2013

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees

.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court ’ s order s granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civ il
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Pacetti v. Millard , No. 1:11

- cv - 01293

- LO

- TCB (E.D.

Va. Ma r. 27, 2012 & filed Aug. 22, 2012, entered Aug. 23, 2012). We deny Pacetti’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Thomson Reuters (SEF) LLC

3 Times Square – 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

www.refinitiv.com

1

February 12, 2021

SUBMITTED VIA PORTAL

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: Submission 21-01: Refinitiv US SEF LLC – Amendments to Rulebook

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), 

Refinitiv US SEF LLC (“RSEF”) hereby self-certifies the amendments to its Rulebook identified 

in Exhibit A. The Rulebook has been amended in order to reflect certain new requirements 

related to error trades under Commission Regulation 37.9(e). The amended Rulebook will 

become effective on March 2, 2021.

A concise explanation and analysis of the amendments to the Rulebook and their compliance 

with applicable provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A, and the amendments showing changes against the version submitted to the 

Commission in Submission 20-03-A on November 20, 2020, is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

RSEF hereby certifies that: (i) the amended Rulebook complies with the CEA and the 

Commission’s regulations thereunder, and (ii) a notice and copy of this submission is being 

concurrently posted on RSEF’s website. No substantive opposing views were expressed with 

respect to the amendments to the Rulebook.

Please contact me using the information below if you have any questions regarding these 

amendments to the Rulebook.

Michael W. Rooney

3 Times Square – 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

Phone: (646) 223-7397

Email: Michael.w.rooney@refinitiv.com
2

Sincerely, 

Michael W. Rooney

Chief Compliance Officer

cc: Nancy Markowitz, Deputy Director, Division of Market Oversight, Exchange and Data

Repository Branch

Jasmine Lee, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight

(Commodity Futures Trading Commission)
3

EXHIBIT A

Explanation and Analysis of Material Amendments

Summary: The Rulebook has been amended in order to reflect certain new 

requirements related to post-trade name give-up under Commission Regulation 37.9(e). The

amended Rulebook showing changes against the version submitted to the Commission in

Submission 20-03-A on November 20, 2020, is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to

them in the Rulebook.

Amendment and Explanation Relevant Law, Regulation or

Guidance

Rule 513(a)

Added new subsection (1) to clarify the procedure for 

correcting Error Trades by executing a Correcting Trade (for 

Transactions that were rejected from clearing) or an offsetting 

trade (for Transactions that were accepted for clearing).

Core Principle 2

Rule 707(a)

Revise reference to former CFTC Regulation 37.9(d) to refer 

instead to new CFTC Regulation 37.9(f).

Core Principle 2
4

EXHIBIT B

Rulebook Amendments
Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05558-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 18 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 18 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 18 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 18 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 18 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 5 of 5
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 136182 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136182 COA: 272730 Oakland CC: 2006-207424-FH CHRISTOS ZOIS SCHIZAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
No. 79.

#### Bessie E. Stepp et al., Appellants, *v.*The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. January 4, 1909. Dismissed per stipulation. *Mr. William C. Scarritt*for appellants. *Mr. M. A. Low*for appellee.
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 21-5 Filed 05/05/2008 Page 12 of 12
# C_2018392EN.01002402.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Schoonjans v Commission

(Case T-79/17) (1)

((Civil service - Contract staff - Recruitment - Internal competition - Constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of assistants - Eligibility condition relating to the function group to which the candidate belongs on the date of expiry of the deadline for submitting applications - Non-admission to the tests in a competition))

(2018/C 392/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alain Schoonjans (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of the decision of the jury of internal competition COM/02/AST/16 (AST 2) rejecting the application of the applicant and, second, compensation for the damage he allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the jury of internal competition COM/02/AST/16 (AST 2) rejecting the application of Mr Alain Schoonjans; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the jury of internal competition COM/02/AST/16 (AST 2) rejecting the application of Mr Alain Schoonjans;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-01528-AKH Document 44-2 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 17 of 17
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF Document 12 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 5
Scot J. Halvorsen

 TRADITION SEF, Inc. General Counsel and Secretary

 Legal Department

 

Tradition SEF, Inc. 32 Old Slip, 28th floor, New York, NY 10005 F 212 791 4500 www.traditionsef.com

April 1, 2019

VIA ELECTRONIC PORTAL

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

RE: CFTC Regulation 40.6(a) Rule Certification. 

Notice of Change in the Volatility Swap Calculation Formula in Tradition SEF’s

Equity Asset Class.

Tradition SEF Submission No. 2019-02.

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”), and Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or the “Commission”) Regulation 40.6(a), Tradition SEF, Inc. 

(“Tradition SEF”) hereby submits for the Commission’s review a revised Equity Product Listing (the 

“Product Listing”). The effective listing date for the Product Listing is April 15, 2019.

Tradition SEF amended the Platform Supplement to conform the calculation of Volatility Swaps to 

industry protocol. The revised formula for calculating actual realized daily volatility is detailed in Section 

(II)(3) (Terms and Conditions) of the attached Product Listing. Pursuant to Commission Regulation 40.8, 

Tradition SEF hereby makes the Product Listing attached hereto as Exhibit A, publicly available. 

Tradition SEF continues to be in compliance with applicable provisions of the Act, including the Core 

Principles. Tradition SEF hereby certifies that the rule amendments comply with the Commodity 

Exchange Act and the Commission’s regulations thereunder. No substantive opposing views were 

expressed that were not incorporated into the rule amendments. Tradition SEF hereby certifies that it has 

posted a notice of pending certification with the Commission and a copy of the submission on its website 

(see http://www.traditionsef.com/regulatory/), concurrent with the filing of this submission with the 

Commission. 
2

Should you require additional information related to this submission, please contact the undersigned at 

(212) 337-2337 or scot.halvorsen@tradition.com. Please reference Tradition SEF Submission No. 2019-

02 in any related correspondence.

Sincerely,

/s/ Scot J. Halvorsen

General Counsel and Secretary

Attachment: Exhibit A
3

Exhibit A
# C_2019103EN.01003001.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Duym v Council

(Case T-549/17) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Appointment to a post of head of unit - Vacancy notice - Rejection of an application - Appointment of another candidate - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Interests of the service - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of non-discrimination))

(2019/C 103/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Frederik Duym (Oostende, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the decision of the advisory selection board, communicated to the applicant by email of 7 October 2016, rejecting his application in the context of the selection procedure for the Head of the Dutch Language Unit for the Council’s Translation Service, as well as the subsequent decision of the appointing authority of the Council of 20 December 2016 to appoint Ms A. to the post.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Frederik Duym to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Frederik Duym to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
Case 1:07-cr-00566-GBD     Document 17      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 1