alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Brandon  Stauber,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of INETEVENTS,  INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"),  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18  U.S.C.ss.1350,
that

     (1) the Company's Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
applicable; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: April 15, 2003                       /s/ BRANDON STAUBER
                                            __________________________
                                            Brandon Stauber
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            INETEVENTS, INC.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27538-27539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-12473]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


114th Full Meeting of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare 
and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
114th open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans will be held Tuesday, June 12, 2001, in 
Conference Room N-5437 A-C, U.S. Department of Labor Building, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will begin at 1 p.m. and end at 
approximately 3:30 p.m., is for members to be updated on activities of 
the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration and for chairs of this 
year's working groups to provide progress reports on their individual 
study topics.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topics the Council may be studying during 2001 by 
submitting 20 copies on before June 4, 2001 to Sharon Morrissey, 
Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, 
Suite N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue,

[[Page 27539]]

NW., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward 
their requests to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8921. 
Oral presentations will be limited to ten minutes, time permitting, but 
an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with 
disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon 
Morrissey by June 4 at the address indicated.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before June 4, 2001.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of May, 2001.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-12473 Filed 5-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
# C_2018445EN.01001701.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Bayer v EUIPO — UNI-Pharma (SALOSPIR)

(Case T-261/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark SALOSPIR - Earlier EU figurative marks representing coloured stripes and earlier national marks Aspirin - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Use of a sign of more than mere local significance in the course of trade - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 445/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, S. Pétrequin and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis, Farmakeutika Ergastiria AVEE (Kifisia, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.-V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2017 (Case R 2444/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bayer and Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis, Farmakeutika Ergastiria.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bayer AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis, Farmakeutika Ergastiria AVEE in the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bayer AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis, Farmakeutika Ergastiria AVEE in the proceedings before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

---
# C_2019082EN.01005201.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — France v Commission

(Case T-609/17) (1)

((EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by France - Export refunds on poultry meat - Flat-rate financial correction - Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EU) No 1306/2013 - Sound, fair and merchantable quality - Checks - Proportionality))

(2019/C 82/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas, B. Fodda and E. de Moustier, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and D. Bianchi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment in part of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 165, p. 37), in so far as it excludes payments made by the French Republic under the EAGF in the amount of EUR 120 901 216,61.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

---
No. 634.

#### The Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha *580Ry. Co. et al., Petitioners, *v.*The United States.

January 4, 1909.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. *Mr. Thomas Wilson*for petitioners. *The Attorney General, The Solicitor General*and *Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Ellis*for respondent;
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-05412-AKH Document 2-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In re Amr MOHSEN, Debtor, Amr Mohsen, Appellant, v. Carol Wu, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.

No. 11-60013.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2013.*

Filed May 22, 2013.

Amr Mohsen, Safford, AZ, pro se.

Dennis D. Davis, Esquire, Goldberg, Stinnett, Davis & Linehey, San Francisco, CA, for Appellee.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.

MEMORANDUM **

Amr Mohsen appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) *558judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Mohsen’s motion to set aside the default judgment against corporate entity defendants and his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. *Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian),*564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2009). We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion for reconsideration, *First Ave. W. Bldg. LLC v. James (In re OneCast Media, Inc.),*439 F.3d 558, 561 (9th Cir.2006), and a denial of a motion to set aside default judgment, *Jeff D. v. Kempthorne,*365 F.3d 844, 850 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mohsen’s motions because Mohsen is not an attorney and therefore cannot represent the named corporate entities. *See D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc.,*366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir.2004) (“It is a longstanding rule that corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.” (alteration, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Moreover, Mohsen lacks standing to defend against the complaint as a shareholder or as an alter ego of the named corporate entities. *See Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen),*31 F.3d 1447, 1451 n. 2 (9th Cir.1994) (“[T]he debtor’s assets and claims pass to the trustee, making the trustee the proper party in interest and the only party with standing to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); *Communist Party v. 522 Valencia, Inc.,*35 Cal.App.4th 980, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 618, 626 (1995) (alter ego liability “is not a doctrine that allows the persons who actually control the corporation to disregard the corporate form”); *see also Goodrich v. Briones (In re Schwarzkopf),*626 F.3d 1032, 1037 (9th Cir.2010) (state law determines whether alter ego liability applies).

Mohsen’s contention that Wu lacks standing is unpersuasive.

Mohsen’s motion to strike Wu’s answering brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2019399EN.01004201.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry v Commission

(Case T-228/17) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in China and Taiwan - Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties - Normal value - Adjustments - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 399/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co. Ltd (Wenzhou, China) (represented by: S. Hirsbrunner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, N. Kuplewatzky and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/141 of 26 January 2017 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan (OJ 2017 L 22, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co. Ltd to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co. Ltd to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

MARIA DE LA CRUZ, 07-CV-4464 (AKH)

Plaintiff, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, and 80 LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS TENANTS

IN COMMON (MAVORE ESTATES/80 LAFAYETTE) for the building located at 22

Cortlandt Street (Subcellar Floors 1, 2, 3 and Floors 1, 2, 3), New York, New York 10007,

in the above-captioned action and all future correspondence and papers filed or serviced in

connection with the above-captioned action are to be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 11,2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATES LLC,

MAYORE ESTATES LLC, and 80

LAFAYETTE ASSOCIATION LLC, AS

TENANTS IN COMMON

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants Mayore Estates LLC, 80 Lafayette

Associates LLC, Mayore Estates LLC, and 80 Lafayette Association LLC, As Tenants In

Common.

The undersigned further certifies that on September 11, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor Plain4ffs

Dated: September 11, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

Is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:07-cv-04464-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Rimage Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-34788, 333-53875, 33-71472, 333-69550,
333-106901 and 333-127244) on Form S-8 of Rimage Corporation of our reports
dated March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rimage
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31,
2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Rimage Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 15, 2006

50

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean Ryan, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court committed reversible error by submitting to the jury sheets containing elements of the crime, without defendant’s consent, relying on *People v Nimmons*(72 NY2d 830). Unlike the facts in *Nimmons,*however, this issue is unpreserved, and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6]).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J. — assault, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Gregory Walker, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s sole claim in this proceeding is that the Hearing Officer’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence. Whether petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility, refused to submit to a urinalysis test was a matter of credibility for the Hearing Officer *(Matter of Perez v Wilmot,*67 NY2d 615; *Matter of Summer v Kelly,*139 AD2d 972, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 804), and there was substantial evidence to support the Officer’s determination. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6772

G. ARTIS-BEY X,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. M. JADE, Chief Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-96-29)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

G. Artis-Bey X, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(104 So. 258)

#### McCORMACK BROS. MOTOR CAR CO. v. STATE.

(7 Div. 517.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1925.

Rehearing Granted May 7, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; S. W. Tate, Judge.

Lamkin & Watts, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Placed on rehearing docket by the court. Opinion of affirmance (102 So. 8943) set aside; the decree of the circuit court is reversed, and one is here rendered in favor of the claimant, upon the authority of Edwards v. State, post, p. 122, 104 So. 255.

3

 Ante, p. 6.
# BEAUCHAMP & COMPANY 
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS 
#205  788 BEATTY STREET
VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA V6B 2M1 
PHONE: (604) 688-2850   FAX: (604) 688-2777

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated October 8, 2003 relating to the financial statements,
which is exhibited in the Annual Report of Canplats Resources Corporation on Form 20-F for
the year ended July 31, 2003.

|December 15, 2003     | "BEAUCHAMP & COMPANY"
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|Vancouver, BC, Canada | Chartered Accountants
Case 7:07-cv-05832-KMK-GAY Document 4 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of International Broadcasting Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daryn P. Fleming, Chief Executive Officer and Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daryn P. Fleming
---------------------------------
    Daryn P. Fleming
    CEO, and Treasurer
    Principal Executive Financial
    and Accounting Officer