alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 172 meeting to be held May 22-24, 2001, starting at 9 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: May 22: Plenary Session Convenes; (1) Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Disposition the Final Review and Comment (FRAC) Form comments for DO-224A, Change 1 (VHF Data Link MASPS); (5) Disposition the FRAC Form comments for VHF Data Link MOPS Mode 3. May 23 and 24: (6) Disposition of the FRAC Form comments continues; (7) Review ICAO Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel (AMCP) and EUROCAE WG-47 Activities; (a) Aeronautical Operational Control Over Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting Systems (AOA) in MOPS; (b) Ground Reference Station requirements; (c) ARINC 631 Specification vs. SARPs vs. MOPS/MASPS maintenance issues; (8) Report on Next Generation Communications (NEXCOM) Advisory Rulemaking Committee (NARC) and other FAA digital activities; (9) Report on Airline Electronic Engineering Committee Systems Architecture Interfaces Sub-committee (AEEC SAI) work on NEXCOM; (10) Other Business; (11) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (13) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 2, 2001.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 01-11720  Filed 5-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-05399-AKH Document 22 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF     Document 2      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 7:07-cv-05815-KMK-MDF     Document 2      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 17, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. RappaportPrincipal
                Executive OfficerJuly
                29, 2008
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-05804-GEL Document 19-15 Filed 05/03/2008 Page 15 of 15
Clear All

        07 March 2023    

                    USS George H.W. Bush Officer Earns Shiphandler of the Year Honor                 
                MEDITERRANEAN SEA- Lt. Cmdr. Andrew Whelan, assistant navigation officer aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), was recently named Shiphandler of the Year by Naval Air Force, Atlantic. The award recognizes the dedicated professionals skilled at maintaining position            

        19 December 2022    

                    Navy Releases Findings from Investigation into April 2022 Deaths of Three USS George Washington Sailors                 
                NORFOLK, Va. – Today, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic released the results of a command investigation into the deaths of three USS George Washington (CVN 73) Sailors that occurred in April, 2022. Besides being assigned to the same ship undergoing an extensive shipyard maintenance period, the            

        17 June 2022    

                    HSM-79 Establishes New Spain Detachment, CNAL Presides                 
                Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 79 established a new detachment stationed at Naval Station Rota, Spain, June 16, 2022.            

        27 April 2022    

                    Rear Adm. John Meier visits Naval Air Station Pensacola                 
                PENSACOLA, Fla. – Rear Adm. John Meier, commander of Naval Air Force Atlantic, visited Naval Air Station Pensacola April 25.            

        23 December 2020    

                    Naval Aviation and Aircraft Carrier Medical Staffs to Receive First Dosage of the COVID-19 Vaccination                 
                Medical personnel from a variety of Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (CNAL) commands will receive the first coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) Immunization Clinic, in Portsmouth, and at Navy Branch Health Clinic, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida            

        21 August 2020    

                    Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 11 Receives Safety Award                 
                The “Red Rippers” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 11 were presented the 2019 Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Aviation Safety Award by Rear Adm. John F. Meier, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic in a ceremony at Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, Aug. 19.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-05299-AKH Document 44 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Michael Cordani, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of GelTech Solutions, Inc.; and




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






Date: March 21, 2012
By:
/s/ Michael CordaniMichael CordaniChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-05386-AKH Document 22 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Clear All

        28 June 2022    

                    USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) arrives in Taranto, Italy                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) arrived in Taranto, Italy for a scheduled port visit, June 27, 2022.            

        27 June 2022    

                    USS San Jacinto (CG 56) arrives in Valletta, Malta                 
                VALLETTA, Malta - The Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS San Jacinto (CG 56) arrived in Valletta, Malta for a scheduled port visit, June 26.            

        24 June 2022    

                    USS Gravely Returns Home to Norfolk, Virginia                 
                The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Gravely (DDG 107) returned to Naval Station Norfolk after a regularly scheduled deployment, June 24.            

        17 June 2022    

                    BALTOPS 22, the premier Baltic Sea maritime exercise, concludes in Kiel                 
                KIEL, Germany - Sixteen NATO Allied and partner nations concluded the 51st iteration of Baltic Operations 2022 (BALTOPS22) in Kiel, Germany, June 17, 2022.            

        05 May 2022    

                    In a first, a littoral combat ship deploys to U.S. Sixth Fleet area of operations                 
                In a historic moment for the region, a Freedom-variant littoral combat ship, USS Sioux City (LCS 11), deployed to U.S. Sixth Fleet’s area of operations, supporting U.S. and NATO Ally and Partner interests in Europe and Africa.            

        25 April 2022    

                    USS Donald Cook Returns to Naval Station Mayport                 
                JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) returned to Naval Station Mayport following a three-month deployment, April 24.            

        16 April 2022    

                    USS Mitscher Returns to Norfolk After Surge Deployment                 
                NORFOLK, Va. — Nearly 300 Sailors arrived home to Naval Station Norfolk aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Mitscher (DDG 57) following a surge deployment to the European theater of operations, April 16.            

        13 April 2022    

                    USS Forrest Sherman Returns to Norfolk                 
                NAVAL STATION NORFOLK - The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98) returned home to Naval Station Norfolk following a surge deployment, April 13.            

#####  

##### Navy.mil  |  Navy.com  |  Navy FOIA  |  DoD Accessibility/Section 508  |  No Fear Act  |  Open Government  |  Plain Writing Act USA.gov  |  Veterans Crisis Line  |  VA Vet Center  |  FVAP  |   DoD Safe Helpline  |  Navy SAPR  |  NCIS Tips  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Contact US

###### Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command   |   1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 250   |   Norfolk, Virginia 23551-2487

###### Official U.S. Navy Website
(84 South. 750)

#### In re IGO. ONE FORD AUTOMOBILE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 958.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1919.)

1. Appeal and error &wkey;>1012(l)—Judgment NOT DISTURBED UNLESS PALPABLY AGAINST EVIDENCE HE ARID ORE TENUS.

Judgment or decree of court' in a case where the evidence was ore tenus will not be disturbed unless plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

2. Intoxicating liquors &wkey;>251—Evidence HELD TO SHOW THAT AUTOMOBILE OWNER WAS CONNECTED WITH UNLAWEUL TRANSPORTATION OE LIQUOR.

In proceedings by the state to condemn automobile found transporting liquor, in which claim was interposed by the owner, evidence *held*to warrant conclusion that owner of automobile not only knew that automobile was being used to transport liquor, but that he was connected with the unlawful act.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; C. W. Ferguson, Judge.

Action by the ¡State of Alabama to condemn one Ford automobile, motor No. 1459-798, license No. 40S01, found transporting whisky, with claim of same by I. B. Igo. From a decree condemning the automobile, claimant appeals.

Affirmed.

The car was captured by officers of the law on a public highway in Jefferson county and had in it 25 gallons of corn liquor, whisky. The man driving the car got away, but there (vas evidence tending to show that other men in a Dodge car were following close behind the car that was seized, and that the claimant was one of them. The evidence for the claimant tended to show that his car which was the Ford car here in question, was stolen on that particular night, and that he and one Porter spent the night in Paterson’s house in Shelby county. All the evidence was taken verbally before the court.

Leeper, Haynes & Wallace, of Columbiana, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the evidence and the issues, but cite no authorities.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Counsel discuss the evidence and the issues, but cite no authorities.

ANDERSON, C. J.

[1,2] The evidence in this case was ore tenus, and the trial court saw and heard the witnesses, and therefore had an advantage over this court in passing upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence, and its judgment or decree will not be disturbed unless the same was plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of evidence. Indeed, the judgment of the court was like unto the verdict of a jury. Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 South. 52; Finney v. Studebaker Co., 196 Ala. 422, 72 South. 54; Thompson v. Collier, 170 Ala. 469, 54 South. 493; York v. State, 154 Ala. 60, 45 South. 893. This rule also obtains as to decrees in equity as well as judgments at law when the evidence is ore tenus, or partly so. Fitzpatrick v. Stringer, 76 South. 932.1 There was evidence from which the trial court could have reasonably concluded that this claimant not only knew the auto was being used to transport liquor, but was connected with the unlawful act.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

1

200 Ala. 574.
Case 1:07-cv-05313-AKH     Document 5      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1927 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial 

review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mr. RATCLIFFE (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. PALMER, Mr. MEADOWS, 

Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, Mr. YOHO, Mr. 

BYRNE, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. WALKER, 

Mr. GAETZ, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. CHABOT, and 

Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature 

of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory 

and regulatory provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Separation of Powers 

5 Restoration Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1927 IH

1 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGU2 LATORY INTERPRETATIONS. 

3 Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘To the extent necessary’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘(a) To the extent necessary’’; 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘decide all relevant questions of 

8 law, interpret constitutional and statutory provi9 sions, and’’; 

10 (3) by inserting after ‘‘of the terms of an agen11 cy action’’ the following ‘‘and decide de novo all rel12 evant questions of law, including the interpretation 

13 of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules 

14 made by agencies. Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, this subsection shall apply in any action 

16 for judicial review of agency action authorized under 

17 any provision of law. No law may exempt any such 

18 civil action from the application of this section ex19 cept by specific reference to this section’’; and 

20 (4) by striking ‘‘The reviewing court shall—’’ 

21 and inserting the following: 

22 ‘‘(b) The reviewing court shall—’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Partners 

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74212 and 333-156732) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-106195 and 333-106239) of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) of our reports dated February 27,2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the yearsin the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of the Partnership.

/s/ KPMG, LLP 

Houston,Texas 

February 27, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05743-DC Document 1 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-05302-AKH Document 5 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Karen Lovely

Direct Dial: (713) 403-8394

klovely@thompsoncoe.com

Thompson

Coe

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.

Attorneys and Counselors

December 1,2015

<8fc

°/b/1/ ^>pPfi,

^

Austin

Dallas

Houston

Los Angeles

Saint Paul

Via Hand Delivery

First Court ofAppeals

Attn: Kim

301 Fannin Street, Room 208

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re: No. 01-14-00907-CV; Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v.

Creekstone Builders, Inc., et al.\ in the Court of Appeals for the First

District ofTexas at Houston

Dear Kim:

Per our conversation, enclosed please find our firm check in the amount of $15.00 to

cover the filing fee ofthe MOTION FOREN BANC RECONSIDERATION.

If you have any questions, please call.

/kl

Enclosure (as stated)

2325123v1

05060.795

Sincerely,

Karen Lovely

Assistant to Andrew L. Johnson

OneRiverway | Suite 1400 | Houston,TX 77056 | (713)403-8210 | Fax:(713)403-8299
# fcmdata0211
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Goodman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered August 5, 1987, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A defendant may offer evidence of his intoxication whenever it is relevant to negative an element of the crime charged *(see,*Penal Law § 15.25; *People v Lang,*143 AD2d 685). However, even an intoxicated person may be capable of forming the intent necessary to support a conviction *(see, People v Lang, supra; People v Morales,*125 AD2d 605; *People v Gonzalez,*119 AD2d 768; *People v Bell,*111 AD2d 926). Whether a defendant was so intoxicated as to be unable to form the requisite intent for a given crime presents a question of fact for the jury to resolve *(see, People v Danaher,*115 AD2d 905, 906; *see also, People v Lang, supra).*A jury may consider evidence of intoxication as negating specific intent, but it is not required to do *706so *(see, People v Jones,*27 NY2d 222, 228-229). In the case at bar, while the defendant submitted evidence that he consumed quantities of alcohol prior to the commission of the crimes charged, we find no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determination that the defendant had the requisite intent to murder his wife and to cause her serious physical injury *(see, People v Sanbolin,*133 AD2d 654; *People v Charles,*114 AD2d 466).

Further, we find that, reviewing the charge in its entirety, the jury was properly instructed that it could relieve the defendant of the criminal responsibility for his conduct "only where the intoxication is of such a degree, character and extent as to deprive a defendant of the power to form the particular criminal intent” (1 CJI[NY] 9.46; *see also, People v Lynch,*23 NY2d 262; *People v Leonardi,*143 NY 360).

Finally, we have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and have found them either to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey P. Devaney, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PASSUR Aerospace,
        Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
        statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
        to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
        such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
        covered by this Annual Report;

         Date: February 1, 2013
                                           By:  /s/ Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                ------------------------
                                                Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                Chief Financial Officer